WEBVTT - Paradigm’s Matt Huang on the Biggest Crypto Fund Ever Raised

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the Odd Lots podcast.

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joe Wisenthal and I'm Tracy Halloway. We haven't talked

0:00:18.960 --> 0:00:22.439
<v Speaker 1>about it in a few weeks, but crypto crisis side,

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>there's always volatility. It's clearly not slowing down at all.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:28.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like we have been talking about crypto over

0:00:28.800 --> 0:00:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the past few weeks, but I guess I guess we

0:00:30.600 --> 0:00:33.599
<v Speaker 1>haven't on the podcast, We've written about it on the

0:00:33.640 --> 0:00:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Odd Lots site. There's still a lot going on. I mean,

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:40.559
<v Speaker 1>like every day it seems there's a new investment in

0:00:40.600 --> 0:00:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the space. People are getting more and more excited about defy. Uh.

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:48.720
<v Speaker 1>These random tokens keep taking off at the same time, Um,

0:00:48.720 --> 0:00:52.919
<v Speaker 1>everyone's talking about n f t s. The list goes on, right.

0:00:53.200 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>You know what I feel like with crypto, and it's funny,

0:00:55.560 --> 0:00:57.760
<v Speaker 1>like a joke, you know, it's kind of half true.

0:00:57.800 --> 0:01:00.320
<v Speaker 1>We haven't been talking about it lately. I think guess

0:01:00.360 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the issue is if you I feel like, if you

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>go three weeks without having a crypto episode of the podcast,

0:01:07.080 --> 0:01:08.840
<v Speaker 1>or if I sort of tune out of crypto for

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a few weeks because say I'm interested in supply chains

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>or lumber or inflation or something. Then when I try

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:17.600
<v Speaker 1>to tune back in, I'm like, what the heck just happened?

0:01:17.640 --> 0:01:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Because everything the stand has changed so fast, and the

0:01:21.280 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>news story of the new coin that people are to

0:01:23.080 --> 0:01:26.760
<v Speaker 1>exchange so fast that I feel like I'm totally behind.

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:29.120
<v Speaker 1>So three weeks of the crypto space feels like three

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.760
<v Speaker 1>months or a year. Yeah, it's sort of like a

0:01:31.840 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>dog years type phenomenon, right, Like crypto just seems to

0:01:35.160 --> 0:01:38.960
<v Speaker 1>be moving faster than everyone else. Yeah, So anyway, let's

0:01:39.080 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I want to just get right into it. I'm very excited. Um.

0:01:41.680 --> 0:01:45.800
<v Speaker 1>There's a long time by crypto standards VC firm or

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:49.720
<v Speaker 1>investment firm called Paradigm. If you say the name Paradigm

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to people like in crypto circles, it's like this like

0:01:52.760 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>hushed tone, because like there's such reverence for this firm.

0:01:57.280 --> 0:02:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Everyone respects this firm, and they've recently raised the biggest

0:02:02.200 --> 0:02:05.640
<v Speaker 1>crypto I think VC is the right word term, but

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the biggest crypto investment fund as of now and today

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:12.919
<v Speaker 1>we're recording this November. Who knows, the record is probably

0:02:12.919 --> 0:02:15.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna be broken in about three days, but they have

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.560
<v Speaker 1>raised the biggest fund ever to invest in in the

0:02:18.639 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>space of two point five billion dollars and we are

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>going to uh talk to one of their co founders

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>about what they planned to do. Great, can't wait. I'm

0:02:28.080 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 1>very excited. I want to bring in Matt Wong. He

0:02:30.200 --> 0:02:33.919
<v Speaker 1>is the co founder and managing partner at Paradigm. Matt,

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:36.679
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much for coming on odd lots, Hi Joe,

0:02:36.720 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Hi Tracy, thanks for having me. Absolutely so. Like I

0:02:40.600 --> 0:02:43.399
<v Speaker 1>said in the intro, I feel like when I've been

0:02:43.440 --> 0:02:46.079
<v Speaker 1>in crypto circles, are hanging out with crypto people, and

0:02:46.120 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like you bring up Paradigm, people are like, oh, yeah,

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>they're legit. Like there's a lot of like kind of

0:02:50.840 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 1>fakers in the space. We all sort of know that,

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of people that just arrived on

0:02:55.120 --> 0:02:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the scene five minutes ago. But before we talk about

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>this new fund, what do you talk about, Uh, where

0:03:00.639 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 1>did Paradigm come from? What is its background and history

0:03:04.280 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 1>and what's its sort of basic story. Yeah? Sure, well

0:03:07.960 --> 0:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you very grateful that that's what people are saying about us. Look,

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I think Paradigm started from a pretty simple place. My

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>co founder, whose name is Fred Arison, who had previously

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 1>co founded coin Base, and I were longtime acquaintances and friends.

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Back in two thousand seventeen, when I was I like

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 1>to say, a boring venture capitalist at Sequoia focused on

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:36.320
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of different technology investing and started to spend

0:03:36.360 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot more time in the crypto space. We would

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, meet up often and consider new investments. And

0:03:42.800 --> 0:03:46.560
<v Speaker 1>one of our observations at the time, actually there were two.

0:03:46.720 --> 0:03:51.080
<v Speaker 1>The first was, and you know, Fred gained this early

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>but a very very deep conviction that what was enabled

0:03:57.080 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>by crypto was likely to be one of the most

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>impactful sort of spaces to be spending time and over

0:04:05.000 --> 0:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>the next ten years. And we had already seen bitcoin

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>as a digital monetary asset grow from effectively zero two

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:19.119
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions. We started to see the early days

0:04:19.160 --> 0:04:21.320
<v Speaker 1>of defied take off on top of the theory um

0:04:22.240 --> 0:04:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and so it was just very clear to us that

0:04:24.160 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this was the future. And yet when you looked at

0:04:27.200 --> 0:04:32.480
<v Speaker 1>the traditional tech investing establishment, I think it was very underrated.

0:04:32.960 --> 0:04:37.799
<v Speaker 1>In fact, most very smart and well meaning people often

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 1>when they take a first look at crypto, especially back then,

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they couldn't help but come away with a

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:47.640
<v Speaker 1>sense that maybe there wasn't so much substance, it was

0:04:48.680 --> 0:04:51.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, there were dog coins and cat coins, and

0:04:51.080 --> 0:04:52.599
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of what what is the point of

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:55.960
<v Speaker 1>all this? And and yet when we spent time on

0:04:56.000 --> 0:04:58.840
<v Speaker 1>the front lines with some of the protocol developers and

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the team's building real you know, hard technology in the space,

0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:06.719
<v Speaker 1>we just haven't had a totally different view. So so

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>sort of born out of that conviction in crypto. And then,

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, somewhat separately, we looked around and you know,

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.640
<v Speaker 1>I would talk to Fred he had co founded coin

0:05:17.680 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>based in two thousand and twelve. So if you were

0:05:20.600 --> 0:05:25.039
<v Speaker 1>starting another crypto project today, is there another investor that

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.520
<v Speaker 1>you would be really excited to work with? And I

0:05:28.560 --> 0:05:30.600
<v Speaker 1>think the answer for both of us at that point

0:05:30.640 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>in time was no. And so Paradigm really came from

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>us kind of building the investment firm that we would

0:05:39.320 --> 0:05:44.840
<v Speaker 1>have wanted as entrepreneurs. And to us, one of the

0:05:44.880 --> 0:05:51.200
<v Speaker 1>biggest parts of that is how native we are and

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 1>our team is to the technology. And I think this

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:58.039
<v Speaker 1>is a general pattern you see across technology waves where

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>some new platform exists, whether it's mobile phones or the

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Internet or crypto, and it's very easy to apply kind

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:11.720
<v Speaker 1>of old analogies to the new medium, and yet it

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 1>turns out that some of the most important companies are

0:06:14.600 --> 0:06:17.920
<v Speaker 1>innovations that come out of a particular wave end up

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:21.479
<v Speaker 1>being deeply native to it. And so that was kind

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:25.880
<v Speaker 1>of our aspiration around paradigm is sort of getting very

0:06:25.880 --> 0:06:29.720
<v Speaker 1>close to the metal technically and being able to help

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:35.040
<v Speaker 1>support and guide the people building this future. So I

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>want to go back to something you said, what exactly

0:06:38.600 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>in your opinion does crypto enable And this kind of

0:06:42.480 --> 0:06:45.480
<v Speaker 1>gets to the tension that you were describing with some

0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>other vcs they don't see that much value in it.

0:06:48.560 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, critics have described blockchain at various points in

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:55.400
<v Speaker 1>time as a solution in search of a problem. We've

0:06:55.440 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 1>talked on the show about how a lot of DeFi

0:06:58.400 --> 0:07:03.280
<v Speaker 1>technology seems to be focused on more defied So it's

0:07:03.320 --> 0:07:06.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of, you know, trading coins or tokens all the

0:07:06.480 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 1>way down, But what is it that you see give

0:07:09.120 --> 0:07:13.320
<v Speaker 1>us the elevator pitch? Sure. I think at the very

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>highest level we're seeing crypto disrupt in several stages. The

0:07:20.920 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>first was this idea of bitcoin as digital money, and

0:07:26.680 --> 0:07:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, looking into the history of bitcoin, I think

0:07:30.440 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a similar dynamic was always present, which was is bitcoin

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 1>distinguishable from two lips? Is it tulips or is it

0:07:40.800 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, the next digital monetary standard. And one observation

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>would be like when you talk to people in developed countries,

0:07:51.640 --> 0:07:54.880
<v Speaker 1>they often don't see the point of bitcoin, and when

0:07:54.920 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>you talk to people in developing countries, it almost clicks immediately,

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:03.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it's countries in Latin or countries like China and

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Russia where perhaps the rule of law or currency stability

0:08:10.080 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is less taken for granted, and so there's a form

0:08:12.600 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of dollar privilege in a lot of ways around bitcoin.

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think that is the first category and not

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:23.720
<v Speaker 1>to be underrated. I think that could be tremendously powerful

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>for the world as it progresses. The second is, which

0:08:27.960 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>is quite a natural extension of digital money, is this

0:08:31.080 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>idea of to centralized finance. Now that you have digitally

0:08:34.559 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>native assets, beyond just sending them back and forth or

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>holding them, you can now do much more complex things

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.559
<v Speaker 1>with them and program them. And I think one thing

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>that's unique about defies the protocol can encode certain rules

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>that you can trust will continue to be the case

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>several years from now. In a lot of ways, It's

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:03.080
<v Speaker 1>much like you know in the in the country governance context.

0:09:03.640 --> 0:09:07.960
<v Speaker 1>The idea of strong property rights. Strong property rights enables

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>an economy to form in a way that's truly long term.

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>People can build businesses and make decisions knowing that there

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>will be stability over many years or decades. And similarly,

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:24.040
<v Speaker 1>around DEFY, the idea that say a decentralized exchange protocol

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:28.160
<v Speaker 1>like unit swap might continue operating exactly the way it's

0:09:28.160 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>operating today ten years from now or twenty years from now,

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:35.120
<v Speaker 1>really enables other people who might want to plug into

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that protocol are build on top of it to do so.

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think that digital commitment is sort of a

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>key part of what these blockchains enable. And then finally,

0:09:45.000 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I think now that defy has really scaled. I think

0:09:50.040 --> 0:09:54.679
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing, especially over the past year, cryptocurrencies and crypto

0:09:54.720 --> 0:09:59.720
<v Speaker 1>protocols broaden in the sort of types of industries that

0:09:59.760 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>they a can touch. And you know, this year we've

0:10:02.800 --> 0:10:05.480
<v Speaker 1>seen the rise of n f t s and the

0:10:05.520 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 1>notions of digital art. Crypto gaming has been become really popular,

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and so I think we'll see crypto brought into touch many,

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.280
<v Speaker 1>many different parts of the modern Internet. So let's talk

0:10:17.320 --> 0:10:20.080
<v Speaker 1>about this fund As I mentioned, I think it was

0:10:20.160 --> 0:10:22.280
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of weeks ago you announced it a

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>two and a half billion dollar fund, which as of

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:28.760
<v Speaker 1>now is the biggest crypto fund that's been raised. What

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:30.720
<v Speaker 1>do you see as the big opportunities I mean you

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 1>talked to sort of broad categories defy that's very broad now.

0:10:34.960 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>It means a lot of things, n f T, the

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:39.599
<v Speaker 1>sort of n f T S, gaming, sort of like

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.240
<v Speaker 1>certain culture of things. What specifically do you see as

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 1>the big opportunities that they're going to go after with

0:10:47.400 --> 0:10:50.320
<v Speaker 1>this fund, with this money. You know, back to when

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:52.959
<v Speaker 1>we started Paradigm in two thousand and eighteen, we had

0:10:52.960 --> 0:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conviction about the progression of crypto over

0:10:56.400 --> 0:11:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the coming decade, and we spent a lot of the

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:06.439
<v Speaker 1>early years investing across defy, UM, you know, various other areas.

0:11:06.480 --> 0:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I think one thing that's become very notable over the

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>past year is this the rise of what I think

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the industry is terming Web three. This notion of blockchains

0:11:18.200 --> 0:11:22.359
<v Speaker 1>is a way to build for many different other categories

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:26.559
<v Speaker 1>of the Internet, you know, stepping back from the specific opportunities,

0:11:27.600 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's particularly notable to us, and we pay

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention to is kind of the talent

0:11:32.320 --> 0:11:35.960
<v Speaker 1>flows into the industry. When we started in two thousand eighteen,

0:11:37.480 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it was Crypto was mostly a ghost town. It was

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>people who were present in two thousand six, two thousand

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:48.000
<v Speaker 1>seventeen who despite the bear market, we're continuing to build.

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:55.199
<v Speaker 1>Today it's become much more consensus almost that Web three

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and Crypto might present part of the future for the Internet.

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So we're seeing a lot of interesting engineering and entrepreneurial

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.480
<v Speaker 1>talent come into the space. And you know, I'm not

0:12:05.520 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>trying to avoid the question. I do think what we're

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:12.160
<v Speaker 1>focused on is sort of the long term potential that's possible,

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>and also kind of the short term signs of quality

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and innovation and following that because I think ultimately, for

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>any new innovation that's you know, happening at such a

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:30.160
<v Speaker 1>primitive level, I think it's always hard to fully predict

0:12:30.200 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>exactly what's going to happen, whether it's like the Internet itself,

0:12:34.679 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for you know, the advent of electricity or something. I

0:12:37.600 --> 0:12:43.200
<v Speaker 1>think the applications eventually surprise us, and so we're more

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.800
<v Speaker 1>focused on keeping our ear to the ground, understanding the

0:12:46.800 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>tech deeply, and spending time where the builders are spending.

0:13:06.280 --> 0:13:10.040
<v Speaker 1>So how do you actually go about investing in a

0:13:10.080 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>crypto business if you find one that you like, Because

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are multiple ways to do this, but

0:13:15.840 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I guess the two big ones would be, you know,

0:13:19.600 --> 0:13:23.280
<v Speaker 1>you just buy a stake in a crypto business sort

0:13:23.320 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 1>of the old fashioned venture capitalist way, or you could

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>buy the project's token and maybe that comes with some

0:13:31.920 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of governance, say via a dow or something like that.

0:13:35.360 --> 0:13:38.640
<v Speaker 1>How do how do you sort of weigh those options? Yes,

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's a very fascinating question, and I think it's you know,

0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:47.640
<v Speaker 1>as a whole somewhat an open one for the industry,

0:13:47.960 --> 0:13:51.760
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, for hundreds of years even we've

0:13:51.760 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 1>had this very well established and evolved form of kind

0:13:56.720 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of coordinating human activity around corporations or elcs and having

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:07.360
<v Speaker 1>sort of investors and outside folks participate in that. And

0:14:07.480 --> 0:14:09.840
<v Speaker 1>now all of a sudden, we have the ability to

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:14.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of store the cap table or the you know,

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>record of value on the blockchain in a sort of trustless,

0:14:19.720 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>immutable way that is equivalently good in various ways. And

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:27.520
<v Speaker 1>so there's sort of a question which is a better

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:31.280
<v Speaker 1>fit for the crypto startup of today, And I think

0:14:31.720 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>depending on the startup, the answer could be different. Sort

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.640
<v Speaker 1>of In practice, we're often investing at the earliest stages

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>before any digital token might exist, and we do that

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>through corporate entities as a way to kind of preserve

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:53.840
<v Speaker 1>optionality for the way that the project might ultimately want

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>to distribute the record of participation. You sort of anticipated

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>a question that I was go to ask, but I

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about there's something interesting And I think

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:06.080
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons that people do have this reverence

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.640
<v Speaker 1>for Paradigm specifically is because it's clear that you have

0:15:09.880 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of like technical talent, and I think like

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>vcs always like they love to blog and they love

0:15:16.160 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>to opine. They do these like big tweet threads about

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>how like you know, the future of work is going

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to change and stuff like that, and you know, they

0:15:22.800 --> 0:15:25.000
<v Speaker 1>all sort of like I want to be writers or something.

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like Paradigm is unique. Like if you

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:29.560
<v Speaker 1>look on your blog, like there's a lot of like

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:33.720
<v Speaker 1>technical stuff and you have colleagues who are literally inventing

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>new financial products all the time, Like I'm looking at

0:15:35.720 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>your blog and one of your colleagues, Dave White, like

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.120
<v Speaker 1>introduced a new type of like futures idea that could

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>be connected to n f T S. And you have

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>another like another colleague who I think is Tudonymous, who

0:15:47.480 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 1>like frequently like writes about like finding hacks and stuff

0:15:50.520 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>like that, or like sort of finding exploits in a

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>token before they're discovered. And so I'm curious, Like it

0:15:57.800 --> 0:16:02.560
<v Speaker 1>sounds like the strategy is having your ears close to

0:16:02.600 --> 0:16:05.640
<v Speaker 1>the ground, knowing the tech deeply because you don't necessarily

0:16:05.680 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>know where it's going, like nobody really does, but you

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.040
<v Speaker 1>know where the talent is going. Talk about this, like

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.840
<v Speaker 1>how much of a mote you see that for paradigm,

0:16:13.880 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the idea of like having like deep technical people working

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:19.760
<v Speaker 1>for the fund itself as opposed to just being like

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.960
<v Speaker 1>money people. So first of all, I would sort of

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that I don't think this is what most investment

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:31.160
<v Speaker 1>firms look like. And certainly when we were starting out,

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>there's always this temptation you know, what have other people done?

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know what have successful investment firms throughout history done.

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.480
<v Speaker 1>There's always wisdom and lessons to be gleaned there, but

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>we were very focused on just trying to think from

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>first principles, like if we were an entrepreneur building a

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 1>new crypto startup, who would we want around the table?

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible for an investment firms such as ours

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>to be able to add value in a way that

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:03.320
<v Speaker 1>was really meaningful? You know, investors can always write tweet threads,

0:17:03.360 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>but we thought we should go further and you know,

0:17:06.840 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to code alongside the companies and you know,

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>audit their code, etcetera. I think, you know, that's clearly

0:17:15.119 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>very valuable and our practical level, and we're continuing to

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 1>explore other ways to lean into that. I think also

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:26.680
<v Speaker 1>at an abstract level, you know, one of the potential

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>promises of cryptos this notion of digitizing more and more

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>of our institutions and our companies and our infrastructure into

0:17:37.680 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>these sort of protocolized forms. And if you envision sort

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 1>of a future state in which more and more of

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:48.880
<v Speaker 1>our economy is running on crypto rails, then it seems

0:17:49.800 --> 0:17:54.840
<v Speaker 1>almost inevitable that you know, having deeply technical people is

0:17:54.880 --> 0:17:57.960
<v Speaker 1>a really important part of participating in that. And so

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>just generally in philosoph ethically, we feel like technical expertise

0:18:02.560 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>must be one of the core parts of what we

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 1>do at PARA. So in addition to technical expertise, there

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>was something that you tweeted recently where you asked people, Um,

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:16.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, if if they're good at memes and they

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.040
<v Speaker 1>want to work at Paradigm, could they get in touch? Like,

0:18:20.520 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 1>is that is that Tracy is good at memes, so

0:18:25.320 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 1>she's sort of she's thinking about going from the media

0:18:30.040 --> 0:18:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the media the crypto pipeline here is this a job

0:18:33.200 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 1>requirement for the crypto space now? Like you have to

0:18:36.240 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>be able to deal in memes and ideas given that,

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, Joe kind of touched on this in the intro,

0:18:42.520 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>but like, given that a lot of what's happening in

0:18:44.560 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the space seems to be driven by different narratives and

0:18:47.680 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>those are shifting all the time. Yeah, there's again both

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:56.240
<v Speaker 1>this practical element of I think a lot of modern marketing,

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:01.720
<v Speaker 1>whether it is for investment firms or come Benese, occurs

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.800
<v Speaker 1>through sort of the medium of Twitter and memes and

0:19:05.480 --> 0:19:08.479
<v Speaker 1>memes drive culture in a lot of ways, and so

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that skill is is very useful. I think

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:13.800
<v Speaker 1>it you know, there's a whole world that operates on

0:19:13.880 --> 0:19:16.720
<v Speaker 1>crypto twitter is because you both know from following it,

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.439
<v Speaker 1>it's almost a parallel universe to what's happening in the

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>real world, and if you aren't on crypto Twitter and

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 1>aren't sort of one of these very online people who

0:19:26.440 --> 0:19:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is following what's happening, you're sort of not up to

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 1>date on the latest in the culture or the substance

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>of what's happening in crypto. So I think there's another

0:19:38.680 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>element there that's really important. And then finally, I think

0:19:42.280 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>if you think about, you know, the hardest problem for

0:19:45.840 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 1>every upstart, whether it's us at Paradigm or one of

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the companies or projects we're backing, it's sort of assembling

0:19:53.440 --> 0:19:55.439
<v Speaker 1>a really talented group of people to work on a

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>single problem for a long period of time. And I

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.600
<v Speaker 1>think that's ultimately what it teks to build something really

0:20:01.640 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>great and special. And in a lot of ways, someone

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:08.880
<v Speaker 1>like Elon Musk is a huge part of his success

0:20:08.960 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is his ability to attract sort of all the best

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:15.640
<v Speaker 1>people who want to work on rockets at at this

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.359
<v Speaker 1>one rocket company. If you think about the role of

0:20:20.200 --> 0:20:24.000
<v Speaker 1>memes and marketing in that effort, I think, you know,

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>memes are sort of the new way in which one

0:20:27.560 --> 0:20:32.639
<v Speaker 1>can build a narrative around division. It could be something silly,

0:20:32.800 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>like you know, a dog coin, or it could be

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>something you know, serious and important like rockets and everything

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>in between. And so I think, you know, memes are

0:20:42.400 --> 0:20:44.199
<v Speaker 1>all good and fun, and we have you know, a

0:20:44.240 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>great internal channel where everyone's sharing memes. But I think

0:20:47.600 --> 0:20:52.960
<v Speaker 1>there's also something deeply powerful about, you know, their role

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>in the way they're sort of shaping attention and directing

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 1>energy towards certain projects that people get about. So I

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>want to ask you. You mentioned that sort of like

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 1>one of the interesting properties of crypto is this sort

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.760
<v Speaker 1>of predictability. And you mentioned that there's you know, unit swap,

0:21:11.920 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a paradigm investment. You're an investor

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:17.719
<v Speaker 1>in unit swap. You know that code may live on

0:21:17.840 --> 0:21:20.680
<v Speaker 1>in its current form for ten or maybe a hundred years,

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>and so someone could build on top of that code

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and build something new and have some expectation that that

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is not going to change. When you think about investing,

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>to what extent do you think about different portfolio investments

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 1>or different tokens or different taos that you invest in

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 1>as somewhat being like like, uh, the network effects within

0:21:40.280 --> 0:21:44.439
<v Speaker 1>your own companies, within paradigm companies, or within paradigm investments.

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.119
<v Speaker 1>I mean people in traditional tech. But I always talk

0:21:47.160 --> 0:21:50.440
<v Speaker 1>about network effects, but it's sort of uh confined. There's

0:21:50.480 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>like Facebook's network effect or Twitter, etcetera. To what extent

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.239
<v Speaker 1>do you think about sort of compounding network effects of

0:21:57.320 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>different tokens you invest in that in some way old

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>or enhance another company or token within your family. It's

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a great question, and I think it's present in the

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.959
<v Speaker 1>dynamics of the portfolio, which is, if we invest in

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:15.880
<v Speaker 1>protocols that are providing a great value to the ecosystem

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.159
<v Speaker 1>and its users, then it often makes a lot of

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.560
<v Speaker 1>sense for those protocols to start interoperating or building on

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 1>top of each other. And so that's definitely a dynamic

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:29.280
<v Speaker 1>that we'd love to encourage and do think about. I

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>think there is actually a nice sort of pre existing

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.160
<v Speaker 1>analogy to that effect, where if you look at a

0:22:36.240 --> 0:22:40.280
<v Speaker 1>incubator like y Combinator, it's sort of a very common

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:45.800
<v Speaker 1>element that new hy Combinator startups often their first customers

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 1>or first hundred customers are actually like other y combinator startups,

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:53.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's been a powerful flywheel for that

0:22:53.840 --> 0:22:58.280
<v Speaker 1>community overall. And certainly we do hope that if we're

0:22:58.320 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>doing our jobs right, which is, you know, finding and

0:23:02.119 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>supporting some of the most ambitious and special crypto entrepreneurs

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>around the world, that there will be a lot of

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>benefits to them being in that same community and being

0:23:11.680 --> 0:23:16.920
<v Speaker 1>able to work together. I have a slightly theoretical question,

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:20.439
<v Speaker 1>but you know, one of the benefits, or one of

0:23:20.480 --> 0:23:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the sort of selling points for crypto has at various

0:23:24.800 --> 0:23:29.639
<v Speaker 1>times been described as the manufacturing of artificial scarcity. So

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:33.800
<v Speaker 1>something like bitcoin, there is a limited amount, only a

0:23:33.800 --> 0:23:36.159
<v Speaker 1>certain number of coins are ever going to be mined,

0:23:36.680 --> 0:23:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and so there's something valuable about them. The same thing

0:23:39.800 --> 0:23:42.439
<v Speaker 1>sort of for and f t s. You know, if

0:23:42.480 --> 0:23:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you collect a certain type of arts or pieces from

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>one artist in particular, there's a limited amount. But one

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of the things I sometimes wonder about is, with all

0:23:54.119 --> 0:23:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the attention on crypto at the moment, and all the

0:23:57.119 --> 0:24:03.760
<v Speaker 1>money flooding into the space, does the artificial scarcity benefit

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.880
<v Speaker 1>or case get sort of eroded because you just see

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:12.320
<v Speaker 1>more and more projects, you know, more tokens, more coins,

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.840
<v Speaker 1>more n f t s, and people are just sort

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of flitting from one thing to the next, such that

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>a market, never actually an individual market might get scarce,

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:31.000
<v Speaker 1>but crypto as a total is just multiplying perhaps the

0:24:31.000 --> 0:24:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the core underlying question is this one of with an

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 1>oversupply of capital, is that kind of efficient in terms

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of driving towards the innovation that you know, crypto has

0:24:44.640 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the potential to achieve, and at least we think about

0:24:47.640 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 1>it in these terms in which you know, I think

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>when markets get overheated, you think of investing as a

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>sort of a capital allocation and function for sort of

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:02.359
<v Speaker 1>which experiment mints are worthy of running and once they

0:25:02.359 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>start working, which ones are worth supporting more. And in

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:10.680
<v Speaker 1>this environment in which capital is abundant, I think that

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>sort of selection function is probably a bit weaker, and

0:25:14.440 --> 0:25:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that does make it very hard as an investor, or

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 1>an engineer or an entrepreneur to kind of know what

0:25:20.680 --> 0:25:24.840
<v Speaker 1>to pay attention to. And there's certainly this this dynamic

0:25:24.920 --> 0:25:27.280
<v Speaker 1>of the flavor of the week, you know, we we

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:31.840
<v Speaker 1>often remark internally in some ways there were elements to

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 1>miss about the bear market of two thousand eighteen, because

0:25:35.359 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>with nobody paying attention and not that much capital around,

0:25:39.040 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>it was actually easier to get work done. People made

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>more progress, and the people who were building were really

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:47.520
<v Speaker 1>committed because they were doing it even though it was

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 1>really not cool and you know, people made fun of

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>them for doing it. So I think we are at

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the spectrum now and the pendulum

0:25:57.720 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>has swung. It's a great time to be a crypto investor, entrepreneur,

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's a lot of opportunity, but I also think

0:26:05.880 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>there's there's a lot of signal to noise to to

0:26:09.080 --> 0:26:13.280
<v Speaker 1>work through. Speaking of, um, the other end of the pendulum,

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 1>and I want to get your take on something. One

0:26:15.800 --> 0:26:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of the things that gets discussed I don't think particularly

0:26:19.040 --> 0:26:22.800
<v Speaker 1>loudly in crypto Twitter or crypto generally, but it's definitely

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:27.280
<v Speaker 1>discussed is the huge gap that people sometimes site between

0:26:27.680 --> 0:26:31.600
<v Speaker 1>how coins are valued when they're offered up privately versus

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>when those same token projects become ultimately listed. So there

0:26:35.800 --> 0:26:38.439
<v Speaker 1>may be some sort of crypto thing but it's pre token,

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and then the token becomes available on the decentralized exchanges

0:26:42.400 --> 0:26:44.840
<v Speaker 1>or on f t X or binance, and people like

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>oh ten exits A. Is that the case that they're

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.359
<v Speaker 1>in your view right now, that there is still this

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>huge gap between private valuations and then what how coins

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:59.280
<v Speaker 1>are valued once they're sort of listed and be you know,

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>you talk about at the very beginning or early on.

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:06.080
<v Speaker 1>You want Paradigm to be a place that if I were,

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 1>say raising money for a you know, some new token offering,

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I would want to go to you. And so how

0:27:12.640 --> 0:27:15.440
<v Speaker 1>much is it is? Just sort of like that access

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:17.960
<v Speaker 1>to deal flow you want the first look. You want

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>people to say, I want Paradigm money as opposed to

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:23.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, I want to name another one, but as

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 1>opposed to some other fun money. How important is that

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of like early stage investment in sort of like

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 1>where you see delivering returns. Yeah, I think crypto markets

0:27:35.320 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>have always been sometimes a puzzle on the valuation side.

0:27:40.760 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, relative to other markets, and I

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:49.200
<v Speaker 1>won't name specific names, but I think there are really substantive,

0:27:50.119 --> 0:27:55.200
<v Speaker 1>credible projects that are maybe worthy of what they're worth,

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:57.439
<v Speaker 1>and there are others that may be less so. And

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I think there's maybe not as much of a forcing

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:05.399
<v Speaker 1>function in crypto markets around that. But I think to

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.320
<v Speaker 1>your point on you know, the stage of getting involved,

0:28:10.040 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>we do aspire to get involved as early as possible.

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>That's in part because we believe that we've built a

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 1>team that can help from the earliest days, and especially

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>when you're building a protocol related project, so much of

0:28:28.400 --> 0:28:32.800
<v Speaker 1>getting a protocol right is sort of the initial protocol

0:28:32.840 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you launch with. In contrast to say a website or

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.640
<v Speaker 1>a mobile app that you're updating every day or every week,

0:28:39.840 --> 0:28:44.120
<v Speaker 1>protocols are much less frequent in terms of upgrade cycle,

0:28:44.240 --> 0:28:47.720
<v Speaker 1>and so there's a lot of importance We believe in

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in getting things right up front, and so we aspire

0:28:50.480 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to to get involved from the earliest days. That being said,

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>we're humble about the fact that there's going to be

0:28:56.400 --> 0:29:00.120
<v Speaker 1>plenty of great projects that will miss and we we

0:29:00.240 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>love participating down the line too, if that's when it

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:07.920
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. So at the other end of getting in

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:12.000
<v Speaker 1>early is um, you know, actually getting out and the

0:29:12.040 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 1>exit process um for companies, and I'm curious what that

0:29:16.520 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>looks like for crypto businesses. So, you know, coin Base

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 1>went public, but I don't think we've seen many other

0:29:24.000 --> 0:29:27.000
<v Speaker 1>crypto entities that have done the same, and part of

0:29:27.040 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>me gets the sense that a lot of them wouldn't

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:34.000
<v Speaker 1>want to. There's sort of attention between disrupting the existing

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 1>world of finance, you know, the traditional listening process, and

0:29:38.200 --> 0:29:41.520
<v Speaker 1>what they're trying to do in various ways with crypto

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>and blockchain. It seems like listing might be sort of contradictory.

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>So how do you see the exits for your investments? Sure, so,

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>for first we we tend not to think too much

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>about that because we do you know, we're only three

0:29:57.600 --> 0:30:00.960
<v Speaker 1>years into the life of Paradigm, and we believe a

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of the best companies or projects will be ten

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:09.560
<v Speaker 1>year or more journeys. But in terms of your structural question,

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it sort of gets back to the question

0:30:12.640 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>earlier about tokens versus equity. There are certain types of

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>crypto businesses that are, at least today a much better

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>fit for the traditional you know, see court model, coin

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.880
<v Speaker 1>based being an example, or you know, exchanges globally around

0:30:28.920 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the world, software as a service businesses that might be

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, building software for crypto companies as two examples,

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 1>And so I think a lot of those businesses will

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:45.560
<v Speaker 1>probably take a more traditional I P O path, And

0:30:45.600 --> 0:30:50.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe the distinction is that their regular businesses and generate

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.920
<v Speaker 1>revenue in a normal way, they just happened to serve

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the crypto market. And then on the other end of

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the spectrum, there's sort of the crypto protocols that you know,

0:31:00.640 --> 0:31:04.120
<v Speaker 1>have tokens from early on, and I would guess You're

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>probably right that you know, a lot of those protocols

0:31:08.360 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>probably don't take the traditional I P O path in

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the long run. So I just want to sort of

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>crystallize these different options with an actual example. So, if

0:31:21.000 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>if you had the option of investing in so Lana

0:31:25.080 --> 0:31:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the token or the coin versus investing in so Lana

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 1>as like a business, which would be the better long

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:36.840
<v Speaker 1>term investment in your view? Well, so maybe apologies for

0:31:36.960 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>resisting this particular example, but maybe let me share, Maybe

0:31:41.920 --> 0:31:44.760
<v Speaker 1>let me share sort of protocols like Salona, which I

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:47.680
<v Speaker 1>would categorize as sort of layer one protocols that are

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of building a full blockchain have sort of a

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>core monetary unit at their center. I think those types

0:31:55.600 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>of investments we believe ultimately the monetary unit or the

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 1>unit of account in Salona's case, sol or an Ethereum's

0:32:04.600 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>case ether, those are the sort of most natural place

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>for value to accrue in the long run, relative to

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a corporate structure that might exist. And in a lot

0:32:17.160 --> 0:32:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of ways, the corporate structure maybe there's sort of somewhat orthogonal,

0:32:21.800 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and that it's maybe a labs entity or something else

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that's responsible for the development of the core protocol, but

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:32.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe other things around the ecosystem, but not necessarily um

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.000
<v Speaker 1>a core revenue driver. Right. A lot of these are

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:39.080
<v Speaker 1>non not for profit foundations, right, that's right, that's right,

0:32:39.120 --> 0:32:42.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think that the ecosystem is sort of still

0:32:42.520 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>exploring best practices on exactly how to structure all this stuff.

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's right. And then on the flip side, you know,

0:32:48.080 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we're investors in a company that provides accounting software or

0:32:53.960 --> 0:32:56.720
<v Speaker 1>tax software called tax Bit, and that's an example where

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>besides the fact that it serves the crypto industry, it

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:15.760
<v Speaker 1>looks very much like a traditional software as a service company.

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:24.160
<v Speaker 1>So you've mentioned that right now kind of feels like

0:33:24.200 --> 0:33:28.080
<v Speaker 1>the other end of the pendulum from and that was

0:33:28.160 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>like the sort of the crypto winter, as was called,

0:33:31.000 --> 0:33:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and we're definitely not we're you know, long crypto summer.

0:33:34.680 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you ever look at things that are going on

0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>right now, whether it's like the million fork of Home,

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:46.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, some sort of crazy, uh you know, projects

0:33:46.440 --> 0:33:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that even the adherents joke about, like they blatantly call

0:33:50.000 --> 0:33:53.560
<v Speaker 1>them ponzis in many cases, or say, you know, the

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:56.760
<v Speaker 1>twentie version of a coin that has a puppy and

0:33:56.800 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk's name, do you ever like worry about like

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a sort of hot money, or maybe better term that

0:34:02.960 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>I think about it, like cynical money, which is like

0:34:05.680 --> 0:34:08.800
<v Speaker 1>projects that are clearly I don't know, do not seem

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:10.919
<v Speaker 1>to be built with some sort of longer vision other

0:34:10.960 --> 0:34:13.560
<v Speaker 1>than like capitalizing and trying to make money right now.

0:34:13.960 --> 0:34:16.480
<v Speaker 1>Do you worry that that has corrosive effects on the

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.480
<v Speaker 1>space or is that just like or do you not

0:34:18.560 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>see it that way? And that's just like some people

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 1>are having fun and throwing things against the wall and

0:34:23.480 --> 0:34:26.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no reason to view it cynically. Yeah, it's a

0:34:26.200 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>great question. I mean, on one level, it just is

0:34:30.320 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's neither good or bad. It's it's all part

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of a whole. And I think, you know, would it

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:44.680
<v Speaker 1>be better if more labor and capital and attention was

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:52.440
<v Speaker 1>focused on really great, long term innovative projects. I think yes.

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And then sort of any market that attracts, any market

0:34:56.960 --> 0:35:00.360
<v Speaker 1>that starts to do well and attracts other participants, I

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:04.239
<v Speaker 1>think ends up with these sorts of you know, speculative dynamics,

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think there's somewhat inseparable and so you know,

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:10.560
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to to sort of critique one part of

0:35:10.560 --> 0:35:14.439
<v Speaker 1>it without thinking about the broader hole. I do think

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:18.640
<v Speaker 1>we'll see cyclical effects over time as a result, because

0:35:19.120 --> 0:35:21.359
<v Speaker 1>to your point, and you know, I love that you're

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:24.960
<v Speaker 1>following the twentie ome fork, but you know, eventually people

0:35:25.000 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 1>probably tire of the ome forks, and so there's sort

0:35:28.000 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 1>of attention and interest that can exhaust. But you know, ultimately,

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.320
<v Speaker 1>I think Crypto as a whole feels very robust relative

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>to you to three years ago. There's a guy in

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>my d MS every week who I really like personally.

0:35:41.600 --> 0:35:43.080
<v Speaker 1>Actually I don't know who he is. I don't even

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:44.480
<v Speaker 1>know if it's a guy. And he's like, what are

0:35:44.520 --> 0:35:46.040
<v Speaker 1>you doing an OME episode? What are you doing an

0:35:46.239 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>episode of? Like, we're not doing an OLM episode. We're

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:52.680
<v Speaker 1>not doing an episode on something that you blatantly joke

0:35:52.760 --> 0:35:55.920
<v Speaker 1>of as a Ponzi. But anyway, sorry, keep going anyway.

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:57.520
<v Speaker 1>I just get a kick out of that hole. So

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>that's actually the fascinating because I think the you know,

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>to your point, there's sort of like a decentralized signal filter, right,

0:36:07.280 --> 0:36:09.439
<v Speaker 1>so you know, Bloomberg is not going to cover home,

0:36:09.480 --> 0:36:12.040
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg is going to focus on you know, more

0:36:12.160 --> 0:36:15.360
<v Speaker 1>substantive long term projects, and I think that's generally speaking

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:18.880
<v Speaker 1>a decent place to go, although maybe I'm like, you know,

0:36:19.120 --> 0:36:21.600
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna really come back to haunt me. And when

0:36:21.640 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>Home is truly the sort of like the unbacked stable

0:36:24.719 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 1>coin of the Internet, I'll feel like that person who

0:36:27.080 --> 0:36:31.640
<v Speaker 1>dismissed all the Bitcoin pitches in my inbox from that's right,

0:36:31.680 --> 0:36:36.839
<v Speaker 1>you should do an Home episode as insurance then, just

0:36:36.920 --> 0:36:38.880
<v Speaker 1>as ensure. Do you think case it's the currency of

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the future, right? I guess this is kind of a

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 1>related question, but just in terms of evaluating use cases

0:36:45.560 --> 0:36:49.319
<v Speaker 1>for different um coins or technologies, like so much of

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it right now depends on their ability to scale up

0:36:53.480 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 1>um and I know this is something that you've been

0:36:55.600 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>watching quite closely when it comes to ethereum, but like,

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.920
<v Speaker 1>how how are those efforts going in your view, and

0:37:04.000 --> 0:37:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what are the challenges of scaling up or making the

0:37:07.880 --> 0:37:10.560
<v Speaker 1>networks more efficient for a lot of those coins, Because

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:12.840
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be the thing that you know

0:37:13.120 --> 0:37:17.160
<v Speaker 1>drives defy expansion, So if the underlying tech isn't working

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:21.799
<v Speaker 1>that smooth, that would seem to be a problem. I

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>think it maybe it's worth elucidating sort of why there

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 1>is this core issue, which is part of what blockchains

0:37:30.719 --> 0:37:36.440
<v Speaker 1>do is to ensure that there's sort of this immutable

0:37:36.520 --> 0:37:41.400
<v Speaker 1>record of what happened. You know, transactions are basically repeated

0:37:41.560 --> 0:37:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on a lot of different machines in a consensus process,

0:37:44.960 --> 0:37:48.359
<v Speaker 1>and that's inherently going to be more costly and less

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 1>efficient than sort of traditional Internet services. And I think

0:37:53.200 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>when you think about that process, there's a couple of

0:37:56.200 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 1>different ways of solving it. One way is to sort

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of batch transactions together and either make proofs about them

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:08.880
<v Speaker 1>or you know, optimistically accept them and accept fraud proofs

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:13.640
<v Speaker 1>about them. And that's a type of scaling solution that's

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:18.520
<v Speaker 1>emerging around ethereum called roll ups. Another approach is to

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:21.879
<v Speaker 1>think about the hardware that you're using to run these

0:38:21.920 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 1>and be able to run them in larger and better hardware.

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say right now we're at a phase in

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem where basically every potential solution is being explored,

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's great for the ecosystem overall, and

0:38:38.200 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>relative to two or three years ago, we're a lot

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:44.720
<v Speaker 1>further along. There's optimistic roll ups and zero knowledge roll ups,

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 1>both in production around Ethereum. There's other layer, ones like Salana,

0:38:50.200 --> 0:38:55.240
<v Speaker 1>which are more scalable, and so we're sort of seeing

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:58.240
<v Speaker 1>this play out in real time, and I would guess

0:38:58.440 --> 0:39:01.920
<v Speaker 1>another couple of years from now, scaling will still be

0:39:01.960 --> 0:39:05.000
<v Speaker 1>an issue, but it will no longer feel as existential

0:39:05.400 --> 0:39:08.320
<v Speaker 1>or uncertain. The sort of fog of war will have lifted,

0:39:08.360 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have much more clarity on sort of the

0:39:10.760 --> 0:39:14.359
<v Speaker 1>specific paths and directions that are going to work. So

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you a question about this sort

0:39:16.120 --> 0:39:18.759
<v Speaker 1>of you know, we've been talking about crypto, the term

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:22.920
<v Speaker 1>web three point oh has sort of become synonymous, and

0:39:22.960 --> 0:39:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, like you know, people like here web three

0:39:25.560 --> 0:39:28.520
<v Speaker 1>point oh, there's this debate and this was This is

0:39:28.560 --> 0:39:32.240
<v Speaker 1>actually another thing that got discussed recently on crypto Twitter recently,

0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.640
<v Speaker 1>which is will the services that we've come to associate with,

0:39:35.680 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like the last iteration of the web web two point oh,

0:39:38.080 --> 0:39:40.719
<v Speaker 1>will they all become sort of like on blockchain? And

0:39:40.800 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 1>so the classic examples like will there be an uber

0:39:43.360 --> 0:39:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on the blockchain where instead of an uber inc, like

0:39:45.880 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 1>a company that there is like some sort of like

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:52.759
<v Speaker 1>decentralized protocol that routed drivers and they collected token and

0:39:53.040 --> 0:39:56.080
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of and the every passenger and driver get

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:58.920
<v Speaker 1>some sort of reputation score. We no longer need like

0:39:58.960 --> 0:40:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a sort of like corporate o man or something like that,

0:40:01.640 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>or Twitter or could could that entirely exist on a

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.480
<v Speaker 1>blockchain without an LLC as we know it? And I'm curious,

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've kind of been a little bit reluctant

0:40:10.280 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 1>to sort of elucidate specifically the investment idea. But what

0:40:14.320 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think about that? Like, are all these sort

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.359
<v Speaker 1>of Web two point oh things in your view going

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:24.000
<v Speaker 1>to get recreated on chain or do you think all

0:40:24.040 --> 0:40:26.279
<v Speaker 1>those are sort of more or less exist in their

0:40:26.280 --> 0:40:28.360
<v Speaker 1>current form, And what happens on web three point I

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.919
<v Speaker 1>would just be something novel that we can't really anticipate yet.

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's sort of two thoughts on this. The

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:42.360
<v Speaker 1>first is that we tend to think that it's much

0:40:42.880 --> 0:40:46.040
<v Speaker 1>easier for the blockchain to kind of reason about things

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that are on the blockchain or at least digital and

0:40:49.960 --> 0:40:53.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of accessible via oracle or some other mechanism. And

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:56.840
<v Speaker 1>so the example of Uber on the blockchain, you know,

0:40:56.920 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I would guess that that's really far off if it

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>ever happens. In contrast, I think gaming is a great

0:41:04.600 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>example where you know, most games aren't fully on chain,

0:41:09.120 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but the idea of putting game items or gain currency

0:41:12.960 --> 0:41:16.320
<v Speaker 1>on chain is a very natural one, and we're likely

0:41:16.360 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>to see that happen much sooner. So that would be

0:41:19.120 --> 0:41:22.360
<v Speaker 1>one general principle we think about is sort of how

0:41:22.719 --> 0:41:27.920
<v Speaker 1>blockchain or crypto native is the application or how digitally

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:30.640
<v Speaker 1>native is it. I think the second thing we think

0:41:30.640 --> 0:41:35.680
<v Speaker 1>about is it's always easy to think in analogies like

0:41:35.760 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>Facebook on the block chain, Uber on the blockchain. I

0:41:38.000 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>think we tend to have the view that the most

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:47.480
<v Speaker 1>compelling applications will be kind of uniquely enabled by the

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:50.880
<v Speaker 1>new technology. You wouldn't have been able to build it

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:54.799
<v Speaker 1>without it, and so you know the example, but the

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Internet might be something like you could put the New

0:41:57.680 --> 0:42:02.279
<v Speaker 1>York Times or Bloomberg on line, but you couldn't have

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:05.080
<v Speaker 1>done Wikipedia before the Internet, and I think that was

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, ultimately much more interesting, although not a huge business.

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:13.560
<v Speaker 1>In the crypto world, I think there's sort of this

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:16.839
<v Speaker 1>example of unit swap, of the idea of like this

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:20.720
<v Speaker 1>on chain always available sort of permission this market maker

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>was not possible before and now it's it's suddenly possible.

0:42:24.880 --> 0:42:27.879
<v Speaker 1>Because sort of ethereum is is kind of live all

0:42:27.880 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the time, and so that's what we're really looking for

0:42:31.120 --> 0:42:34.560
<v Speaker 1>at Paradigm is sort of these uniquely enabled applications that

0:42:34.560 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been possible before. Can you give us an example,

0:42:38.920 --> 0:42:44.400
<v Speaker 1>like a really concrete example of something that's exciting you

0:42:44.800 --> 0:42:47.879
<v Speaker 1>in the space right now, Like, what is it that

0:42:48.160 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>that you're most like optimistic about or enthusiastic about. I

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>think the the idea of and I've already sort of

0:42:57.680 --> 0:43:04.280
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned it, but the idea of digital games adopting blockchains.

0:43:04.600 --> 0:43:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's just a really compelling area, both because

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a behavior that's already sort of decades old,

0:43:13.680 --> 0:43:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the idea of placing value and digital items potentially trading them,

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:22.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's a really natural fit for what you know,

0:43:22.640 --> 0:43:27.360
<v Speaker 1>crypto and blockchain enables, which is true digital property rights.

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And so you know, imagine the person who's maybe playing

0:43:32.560 --> 0:43:35.040
<v Speaker 1>World of Warcraft for ten hours a day and really

0:43:35.080 --> 0:43:41.040
<v Speaker 1>investing time, energy, money into their digital life effectively in

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:45.440
<v Speaker 1>this game, and yet most of the value is purely

0:43:45.560 --> 0:43:50.319
<v Speaker 1>subject to the platform. One analogy we think about is,

0:43:50.920 --> 0:43:53.560
<v Speaker 1>you know a lot of these digital worlds, whether it's games,

0:43:53.680 --> 0:43:58.960
<v Speaker 1>or you know, Facebook's metaverse or your digital cryptosystems. You're

0:43:59.000 --> 0:44:03.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of moving to a new country in a lot

0:44:03.160 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of ways and sort of adopting the rules of this

0:44:07.080 --> 0:44:09.719
<v Speaker 1>new country. And it turns out that today most of

0:44:09.760 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 1>those digital systems are you know, effectively autocratic in contrast

0:44:16.000 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 1>to you know, what we think of as good governance

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:22.759
<v Speaker 1>today more broadly, So I think that's a tremendous intersection.

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:27.920
<v Speaker 1>And then just very practically, we're seeing the gaming industry

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:34.919
<v Speaker 1>really adopt this seriously. All the major large studios, small studios,

0:44:34.960 --> 0:44:39.600
<v Speaker 1>gaming entrepreneurs from past waves are really sort of rushing

0:44:39.840 --> 0:44:43.640
<v Speaker 1>head first because Crypto has all all of a sudden,

0:44:43.680 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 1>cracked open, this you know, creative canvas that I think

0:44:47.440 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>people are really excited to explore. So I just have

0:44:51.280 --> 0:44:54.120
<v Speaker 1>one last question, and it's sort of pragmatic, but you know,

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:56.840
<v Speaker 1>two and a half billion dollar raised for this new fund,

0:44:57.360 --> 0:44:59.560
<v Speaker 1>what is do you have like a sort of estimated

0:45:00.160 --> 0:45:03.720
<v Speaker 1>internal guesses to the length of time that you expect

0:45:04.160 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>to deploy that over and sort of the cycle of

0:45:07.840 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 1>it's so you know, we sort of, you know, we

0:45:09.320 --> 0:45:11.800
<v Speaker 1>joked at the beginning three weeks or three months in crypto,

0:45:11.840 --> 0:45:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it feels like years. What is the cycle of which

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:17.960
<v Speaker 1>you expect to deploy two and a half billion dollars?

0:45:18.160 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know how many different projects give some

0:45:20.960 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>guests of how far that will how far that will go?

0:45:23.640 --> 0:45:26.879
<v Speaker 1>Like what's your what's your goal here? So the top

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:31.840
<v Speaker 1>level answers that were very focus bottoms up and you know,

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:34.640
<v Speaker 1>not not trying to adadge the question, but just very

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:39.279
<v Speaker 1>genuinely we're always just trying to find interesting people and

0:45:39.360 --> 0:45:42.959
<v Speaker 1>projects and back the ones that we get very excited about.

0:45:43.000 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>And that could be at the really early stage with

0:45:45.640 --> 0:45:47.799
<v Speaker 1>small checks, it could be at the growth stage with

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:52.440
<v Speaker 1>larger checks. I would guess that it's not dissimilar to

0:45:53.080 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 1>any other venture capital fund, which might you know, have

0:45:57.480 --> 0:46:02.279
<v Speaker 1>a deployment period of a couple of years. Well, Matt,

0:46:02.360 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 1>it was a it was a real pleasure to have

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>you on odd lots. Really appreciate it, really fascinating conversation

0:46:08.280 --> 0:46:11.400
<v Speaker 1>and looking forward to uh seeing what you do. Cool.

0:46:11.440 --> 0:46:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for the time, Yeah, take care of Matt. Thanks

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 1>so much, Matt. Truth so trazy. I found that conversation

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to be really interesting, and I think the thing that

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>struck me the most, I mean, at the end, what

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:37.719
<v Speaker 1>he said to you about you know, his interest in

0:46:37.760 --> 0:46:41.400
<v Speaker 1>blockchain gaming is clearly but I think like one of

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:43.160
<v Speaker 1>the things that struck me most was sort of like

0:46:43.520 --> 0:46:46.840
<v Speaker 1>how open ended they seem to be, or mad seems

0:46:46.880 --> 0:46:48.600
<v Speaker 1>to be about where this might go, which is like,

0:46:48.960 --> 0:46:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know, it might look totally different. No

0:46:51.440 --> 0:46:55.040
<v Speaker 1>one could have anticipated Wikipedia prior to the Internet, and

0:46:55.120 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 1>just the sort of idea of let's just see what

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:01.239
<v Speaker 1>the talented people are building. Yeah, I think the thing

0:47:01.280 --> 0:47:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that stood out to me um was that bit towards

0:47:04.120 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the end of the conversation where he was talking about

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:08.880
<v Speaker 1>what you put all this stuff on the chain and

0:47:08.960 --> 0:47:12.400
<v Speaker 1>you're building Web three point oh or Web three or whatever.

0:47:12.880 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>But what you're essentially doing is sort of move moving

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:20.880
<v Speaker 1>from those vertical models of trust where everything you know,

0:47:21.239 --> 0:47:25.840
<v Speaker 1>was controlled by a single entity, like I mean, Facebook's

0:47:25.840 --> 0:47:28.320
<v Speaker 1>about example, because it's going to be starting the metaverse,

0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:31.640
<v Speaker 1>but like everything is controlled by Facebook, the social network,

0:47:31.680 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>and now you're moving to sort of more horizontal structure

0:47:37.120 --> 0:47:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of trust that's enabled by the protocols that might be

0:47:40.960 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>embedded in a particular crypto project like Needless to Stay

0:47:46.160 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>and probably I think both of us, you know, still

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>have some I don't know crypto. Neither of us are

0:47:51.680 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 1>like totally drinking the kool aid crypto converts, And I

0:47:54.960 --> 0:47:57.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of see myself as somewhere in the middle these days.

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think a lot of the problem that people

0:47:59.480 --> 0:48:01.839
<v Speaker 1>have what they is they sort of like, oh, like

0:48:02.280 --> 0:48:05.239
<v Speaker 1>Uber already works fine, um as it is, it doesn't

0:48:05.239 --> 0:48:07.359
<v Speaker 1>need to be on the blockchain, or Facebook already works fine,

0:48:07.440 --> 0:48:10.360
<v Speaker 1>or Twitter works fine, or banking works fine, or Robin

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:14.120
<v Speaker 1>hood works fine. And it kind of feels like, as

0:48:14.160 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>he put it, or the way he's thinking about it,

0:48:16.920 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 1>it's like, yeah, maybe it's not about solving some obvious

0:48:21.360 --> 0:48:24.440
<v Speaker 1>problem that already exists, and maybe that's the wrong question

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:28.839
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to what organically emerges out of these new

0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:33.520
<v Speaker 1>governance structures or property right structures that we sort of

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:35.680
<v Speaker 1>came conceive of. And so it's like the yeah, but

0:48:35.760 --> 0:48:39.520
<v Speaker 1>what is crypto four question? Maybe in a sense, maybe

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it's the wrong question to be asking at some level. Yeah,

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:46.080
<v Speaker 1>although I kind of feel like, with the amount of

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:48.879
<v Speaker 1>money that is pouring into the space, you would want

0:48:49.480 --> 0:48:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you would want to be asking that question. And again,

0:48:52.120 --> 0:48:54.040
<v Speaker 1>like part of me is very interested to see what

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:56.279
<v Speaker 1>comes out of all of this. But the other part

0:48:56.320 --> 0:48:59.600
<v Speaker 1>of me is thinking, why can't all this money go

0:48:59.840 --> 0:49:03.880
<v Speaker 1>into I don't know, some sort of environmental technology or

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:08.719
<v Speaker 1>something like that, rather than who's making like the most

0:49:08.719 --> 0:49:11.399
<v Speaker 1>efficient way to move n f T s from one

0:49:11.560 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 1>owner to the other. But who knows, like maybe maybe

0:49:15.640 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>the metaverse or web three or whatever is going to

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 1>be absolutely amazing and you know we'll take it all back. Yeah.

0:49:23.239 --> 0:49:25.279
<v Speaker 1>Well no, I mean I remember, like you sort of

0:49:25.280 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>made fun of me, like, you know, when so we

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:30.520
<v Speaker 1>did some of our defy me make fun of you?

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, that would never happened when we did some

0:49:33.600 --> 0:49:37.719
<v Speaker 1>of our like first Defy like episodes, like early in one,

0:49:37.760 --> 0:49:39.759
<v Speaker 1>because I was like, yeah, well, what is the thing

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that's like getting funded? It's great to invent invent finance,

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:47.080
<v Speaker 1>but like finance has a reason. It's like to fund

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:51.000
<v Speaker 1>whaling expeditions and to distribute the risk of that, and

0:49:51.040 --> 0:49:52.840
<v Speaker 1>so it's like, yeah, well what other things? And I

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:55.640
<v Speaker 1>guess like that is still where I stand. On some level,

0:49:57.280 --> 0:50:00.840
<v Speaker 1>defy or crypto finance will seems like it has to

0:50:00.880 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 1>like finance something of some use rather than just and

0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:06.879
<v Speaker 1>I saw and also I wonder, like, you know, looking

0:50:06.880 --> 0:50:10.239
<v Speaker 1>at this in December or November. At this point was

0:50:10.320 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 1>like all of these own forks, many of which like

0:50:12.600 --> 0:50:16.480
<v Speaker 1>are like you know, they like called themselves Ponzi schemes.

0:50:16.600 --> 0:50:18.680
<v Speaker 1>It's like, is this really going in the other direction

0:50:18.719 --> 0:50:21.800
<v Speaker 1>where it's like these are just blatant the games. First

0:50:21.800 --> 0:50:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of all, I can tell already that we are going

0:50:23.400 --> 0:50:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to end up doing an episode on on and then secondly,

0:50:26.160 --> 0:50:28.759
<v Speaker 1>I love that all our de fi episodes always come

0:50:28.760 --> 0:50:32.560
<v Speaker 1>back to the whaling industry. That's the whole point of finance.

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Distribute risk from something that has, you know, very unpredictable return.

0:50:37.960 --> 0:50:41.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, shall we leave it there, Let's leave it there. Okay,

0:50:41.640 --> 0:50:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this has been another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:50:47.000 --> 0:50:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway and I'm Joey Isn't All. You can follow

0:50:50.000 --> 0:50:53.240
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at the Stalwart. Follow our guests on Twitter.

0:50:53.360 --> 0:50:57.000
<v Speaker 1>Matt Wong, He's Matt Long. Follow our producer Laura Carlson,

0:50:57.120 --> 0:51:00.600
<v Speaker 1>She's at Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg Head podcast

0:51:00.640 --> 0:51:04.279
<v Speaker 1>Francesco Levi at Francesca Today, and check out all of

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:07.920
<v Speaker 1>our podcast at Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts thanks

0:51:07.920 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 1>for listening,