WEBVTT - 031624 Israel’s Response in Gaza with Ami Horowitz (Part 2)

0:00:00.720 --> 0:00:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Keep on riding with us as we continue to broadcast

0:00:02.960 --> 0:00:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the balance and defend the discourse from these hip hop

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>weekly studios. Welcome back to Civic Cipher. I am your host,

0:00:08.200 --> 0:00:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Ramsey's job. Big shout out to my man c Ward,

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>who is somewhere in South America trying to change the world,

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and I think we're all going to be a little

0:00:17.000 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>bit better for it. Unfortunately, you couldn't be here with

0:00:19.720 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>a dear friend of ours and a dear friend of

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the show of Amy Horwitz, who is come back today

0:00:25.000 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to help us with an update on the conflict going

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>on in Palestine Israel Hamas war. And for those just

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>joining us, Amy Horwitz is a fellow journalist. He is

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:43.159
<v Speaker 1>a man who has gone underground with Hamas and just

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a gorilla journalist who's on the ground, you know, getting

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.800
<v Speaker 1>people's opinions. A conservative journalist. It's important to point that

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:55.320
<v Speaker 1>out and over here we're decidedly not conservative folks in

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the same way, and we're going to continue a conversation

0:00:58.520 --> 0:01:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that we've been having, so stick around for them. In

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, it's time to discuss Baba becoming a better ally.

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>Baba and today's Baba sponsored by Friends of the movement.

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:07.880
<v Speaker 1>You can sign up for the free voter wallet from

0:01:07.959 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 1>fotmglobal dot com just for black businesses and allied businesses

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>as well as make an impact whether your spending. Again,

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.360
<v Speaker 1>that's fotmglobal dot com. Today we are going to shout

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:25.200
<v Speaker 1>out my jinf dot org, the most trusted name in

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Israeli donations. I want to disclose to you that I

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>have done some research on this org and they do

0:01:35.560 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>have a facet where they fund the IDF in terms

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>of soldiers and protecting the soldiers and so forth. I

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.000
<v Speaker 1>need you to be aware of that this was given

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>to me by a dear friend of mine, Michael Malice,

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>who is a supporter of this cause. He is a

0:01:50.240 --> 0:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Jewish man and a decades long friend of mine, and

0:01:53.920 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>so I'm going to read this with you on his behalf.

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 1>This is not an endorsement. This is just what we do.

0:01:59.360 --> 0:02:02.280
<v Speaker 1>And today we're giving the microphone to our Jewish brothers

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:04.520
<v Speaker 1>and sisters. So since they're founding in nineteen oh one,

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Jewish National Fund USA USA's passion commitment envision for the

0:02:10.040 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 1>future of Israel and the Jewish people has remained clear

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>and unwavering. Charity Navigator and Better Business Bureau consistently at

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.600
<v Speaker 1>wore Jewish National Fund USA with their highest ratings indicating

0:02:19.600 --> 0:02:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the organization's trustworthiness and fiscal responsibility. You can read more

0:02:22.960 --> 0:02:25.520
<v Speaker 1>about their vision work and what makes them the leading

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:30.240
<v Speaker 1>organization supporting the land and the people of Israel. Excuse

0:02:30.280 --> 0:02:35.800
<v Speaker 1>me at my dot JNF dot org. So again, this

0:02:35.880 --> 0:02:41.080
<v Speaker 1>is not a personal endorsement, and I would not personally

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:46.000
<v Speaker 1>ever recommend anyone donate money to fund war. That's just

0:02:46.080 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>not my way, It's not in my heart. But I

0:02:48.000 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>was I asked a person that had more insight than me.

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>This was what I was given, and I gave my

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>word that I would share it. And so if this

0:02:55.880 --> 0:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>moves you, you have my dot JNF dot org to visit. Next.

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Now back to Ami, I left us off in the

0:03:03.639 --> 0:03:08.440
<v Speaker 1>middle of some some sort of debunk or now heavily questioned,

0:03:10.520 --> 0:03:15.160
<v Speaker 1>uh talking points that I want to get just kind

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:16.880
<v Speaker 1>of a response on. So I'll finish reading them the

0:03:16.880 --> 0:03:19.080
<v Speaker 1>ones that you can speak to please, the ones that

0:03:19.120 --> 0:03:21.000
<v Speaker 1>you don't feel are important. We'll just move on cause

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>we still have a ton to cover. I suspect we

0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:27.160
<v Speaker 1>won't get to all of it. Okay, so the forty

0:03:27.160 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>beheaded babies. Obviously, that was something that everyone had to

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.160
<v Speaker 1>reel in. After the fact Hamas's main base being under

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the Al Shifa Hospital, the Associated Press UH found ultimately

0:03:39.680 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>one room with a couple of metal cots in it

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:43.720
<v Speaker 1>that looked like it was out of use. The Washington

0:03:43.760 --> 0:03:47.160
<v Speaker 1>posts that they found no evidence of a base. The

0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Israeli Minish military sorry, found the Gaza Ministry of Health

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>to be a reliable source of info. And you mentioned

0:03:56.440 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 1>we spoke before today's meeting that this this information was

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not reliable. But when I researched the sources that you

0:04:04.880 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>gave me and the resources that I was researching prior

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>to that, it turned out that one source was slightly

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:18.159
<v Speaker 1>more credible left leaning than the source that you gave me,

0:04:18.200 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>which was like I believe it was like the tablet

0:04:19.800 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 1>or something like that. But the other source was science based,

0:04:23.720 --> 0:04:26.080
<v Speaker 1>so it doesn't have a bias one way or the other,

0:04:26.360 --> 0:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>and it was green lit all the way down. And

0:04:28.360 --> 0:04:31.560
<v Speaker 1>that source is the I have it right here, give

0:04:31.600 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>me one second. The oh sorry, I have it in

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>my email. I'm gonna grab it for you in one second.

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But so in terms of the numbers, of the people

0:04:44.320 --> 0:04:46.560
<v Speaker 1>that have been killed, the twenty five thousand women and children,

0:04:46.600 --> 0:04:48.799
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, the four out of the five hundreds.

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 2>No, no, no, not twenty five thousands of the twenty

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:55.240
<v Speaker 2>one thousand dead. It is not twenty one thousand women

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 2>and children were killed.

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.600
<v Speaker 1>What we have here thousand women and children. The number

0:04:59.680 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is much higher than that. So this is the number

0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 1>of women and people under the age of eighteen makes

0:05:05.160 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>up twenty five thousand. The difference of adult men would

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:11.159
<v Speaker 1>make up the difference in the number of the dead total,

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 1>which is above thirty thousand. This is based on the

0:05:13.360 --> 0:05:15.760
<v Speaker 1>numbers from the most credible source that I've found just

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:17.920
<v Speaker 1>yet and against science based and in fact, I'll find

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:19.839
<v Speaker 1>it to find it for you and share it with you,

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:26.240
<v Speaker 1>just so that you have it here. It is the

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the lancet. The lancet is kind of a medical It's a.

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 2>L I know the left of the lancet is which

0:05:32.920 --> 0:05:35.440
<v Speaker 2>is highly bia sources.

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>That's not what I found based on the media, and

0:05:37.560 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I use the same media. How can I point it good?

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Doesn't make any sense. How can the lancet know anything

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 2>about how many people were killed in Gaza? This doesn't

0:05:45.200 --> 0:05:47.960
<v Speaker 2>make any sense. They have to get their number from somewhere.

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:51.040
<v Speaker 2>There's only there are only two people who have any

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.120
<v Speaker 2>sense of what people are being killed, people on the

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:54.839
<v Speaker 2>ground in Gaza and these early military.

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.680
<v Speaker 1>So let me make sense. Yeah, yeah, yeah, so that's

0:05:57.920 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a great point. I'm glad you brought it up.

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:02.440
<v Speaker 1>So let me make sure that stated correctly. The Lancet

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.440
<v Speaker 1>is not saying that the numbers are accurate. They're saying

0:06:06.480 --> 0:06:10.039
<v Speaker 1>they have found no evidence that the numbers have been inflated.

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>So that is those are two different things, but it's

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 1>not unlike that what you sent over from the Tablet,

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:23.239
<v Speaker 1>which again based on the same the same fact checking

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>source that I use to determine media bias, and I

0:06:26.200 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>use it for all of them. I use it for CNN,

0:06:28.120 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>Fox News, I use it for the Lancet, I used

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:31.840
<v Speaker 1>it for the Tablet, I use it for everything that

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.839
<v Speaker 1>we used for today. So I use that as they

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>define what center is, they define what credible is, and

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>relative to every other source, I can use them as

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:42.760
<v Speaker 1>a guidepost. And so what I found based on what

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>was sent over from you the Tablet thing is that, uh,

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.840
<v Speaker 1>that article that was suggesting that these numbers have somehow

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>been inflated. What a lot of that article is also speculative.

0:06:55.880 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't based on data. It was just based on

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.840
<v Speaker 1>these numbers don't quite look right. Wasn't based on these

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 1>numbers are factually wrong.

0:07:02.600 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Good statistical variability. And the math behind that.

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Is data is not necessarily data is data. Data is data.

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:12.680
<v Speaker 1>This is how many people died, this is how many

0:07:12.680 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>people are We don't know. That's data, statistical variability. It

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>could be an anomaly, it could be uh again, just

0:07:20.640 --> 0:07:22.840
<v Speaker 1>something that people didn't expect to see. But it is

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>not in any way a confirmation. And I suspect that

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.720
<v Speaker 1>coming from a source that is so questionable, so far

0:07:29.800 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>right leaning, and so questionable with respect to the tablet,

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely is so So this is this is something

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that I looked up last night. But that's that's neither

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>here nor there. Because we need right we do need

0:07:44.680 --> 0:07:48.080
<v Speaker 1>right leaning media sources as well, because between the two

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>somewhere we'll find the truth. So I'm not knocking them

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>for that. Is there's pro Israel right leaning news source. However,

0:07:55.000 --> 0:08:00.200
<v Speaker 1>they do have questionable uh they publish questionable are to

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>articles and their data is not considered to be reliable

0:08:04.400 --> 0:08:06.679
<v Speaker 1>across the board, not to the degree that the lance

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:10.600
<v Speaker 1>it is not to the agree. I'm sorry, please your response.

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.480
<v Speaker 2>No, no, I'm okay. I disagree. First of all, TABLET.

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:14.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't see it as a right wing right wing

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:15.280
<v Speaker 2>at all.

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>The admitted you can. You could look it up on

0:08:18.120 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>their Wikipedia page. You can look it up on their website.

0:08:20.600 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 2>So I'd say, and the Lancet is absolutely not not

0:08:24.760 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 2>UnBias source plans and at no point going, no point

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 2>going in who's right, who's wrong, who's who's But let me,

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 2>let me let let's put a let's let's put aside. Yeah,

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 2>the numbers themselves. No, sorry, we'll deal the numbers. But

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:40.760
<v Speaker 2>let's assume that AMASS numbers. As dubious as that sounds,

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the belief coms number, let's assume their numbers are correct.

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:49.320
<v Speaker 2>Just assume it right, thirty thousand people roughly killed. Again,

0:08:49.440 --> 0:08:51.640
<v Speaker 2>we have to devoid and both you and I have

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:53.520
<v Speaker 2>been emotional about this is an emotional thing, and it's

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:57.120
<v Speaker 2>totally normal to the emotional. But but I think ultimately

0:08:57.120 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 2>you have to look at the data in context, and

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 2>the context is actually kind of simple. Is if you

0:09:04.880 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 2>look at the situation that Israel findslf in and you

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 2>compare it to let's say, where what most people would

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:14.880
<v Speaker 2>argue was the most moral, ethical army on Earth today,

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:18.880
<v Speaker 2>which is NATO, and you compare them to how many

0:09:18.920 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 2>civilians are killed versus militants in Afghanistan, which is a far,

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 2>far easier place to conduct war in in terms of

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 2>avoiding civilian casualties. And I think most people argue NATO

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 2>tries to avoid civilian casualties. Their average is one militant

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:41.000
<v Speaker 2>or three civilians. It's almost static number that they've had

0:09:41.080 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 2>for decades when they engage in war. And if you

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 2>assuming you take Hamas's numbers, right, think both numbers as fact.

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.439
<v Speaker 2>The amount of how many Hamas militants have been killed,

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.880
<v Speaker 2>terrorists have been killed that Israel has calculated, and how

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:59.080
<v Speaker 2>many civilians have been killed. You're talking twelve ten to

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:04.840
<v Speaker 2>fourteen thousand and Hamas soldiers out of that thirty thousand civilians.

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>So are suggesting that the Hamas soldiers are including people

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>who are under the age of eighteen. Oh of course, okay,

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that's that's okay. I see that. That's not something that

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I delineated in myself. So I wanted to marry no.

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 2>Fair enough, and and and normally when you're dealing with

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:24.199
<v Speaker 2>a military, you wouldn't because most kids don't fight wars, right,

0:10:24.360 --> 0:10:26.840
<v Speaker 2>so you would assume that because you don't have fifteen

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:31.000
<v Speaker 2>year olds going and trying to kill people. But unfortunately,

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 2>let me in this situation, you do so, right. But

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 2>the point is is that you're talking roughly one point

0:10:38.240 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 2>and one point five, so you have for every terrorist

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 2>who's killed one point five, civilians are killed less than

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 2>two one to two, which is an again to put

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 2>in context, in the most difficult possible fighting environment that

0:10:56.280 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 2>exists on planet Earth, densely urban warfare is specifically putting

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 2>its own civilians as shields, which is not botherly not

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 2>argued by anybody in that environment. Israel is roughly killing

0:11:10.760 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 2>fifty percent less civilians than NATO.

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:18.280
<v Speaker 1>So let me so your point as well made. Let

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>me let me make sure that I push back just

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:22.959
<v Speaker 1>a bit right here. So when we talk about the

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 1>human shields, I think that that you're right when you

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:32.320
<v Speaker 1>say that. There's a lot of people who don't question that, right.

0:11:32.920 --> 0:11:35.120
<v Speaker 1>But what I think that a lot of people who

0:11:35.160 --> 0:11:39.160
<v Speaker 1>are talking about outside of the very decidedly pro Israel circles,

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:42.640
<v Speaker 1>which in my estimation is very insulated from criticism, very

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>insulated from you know, there's there's laws on the books

0:11:45.040 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 1>in Arizona that I've seen with these eyes. You cannot

0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>protest the nation state of Israel and enter into a

0:11:50.440 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>government contract. Otherwise your contract will be dismantled or voided

0:11:54.800 --> 0:11:59.679
<v Speaker 1>or whatever. I forget seen it myself, see it myself.

0:12:00.080 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Want Okay, the words were, you can't criticize it as well,

0:12:03.320 --> 0:12:08.720
<v Speaker 2>or you can't can't protest, you can't engage in BDS protest, Okay,

0:12:08.760 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 2>I don't. I'm okay, I'm clarified.

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:12.760
<v Speaker 1>But in any of it. The point I'm making here

0:12:12.960 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 1>is that again with with pro Israeli folks, they're very

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:20.080
<v Speaker 1>insulated from these types of criticisms. But what I would

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>argue is that there are folks who look at this

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, that's just the justification that Israel would

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:35.920
<v Speaker 1>need to finally get this off right. The human shields thing, right, Oh, well,

0:12:35.960 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>they're using the human shields. We mentioned the I believe

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the au It's in my notes, but it's the hospital,

0:12:42.640 --> 0:12:45.200
<v Speaker 1>right that everyone was thinking, Okay, there's a military base,

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>remember seeing the diagrams one room. This is from the

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a P. This isn't from Ramses, this isn't from Homy.

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:53.800
<v Speaker 1>This is there was one room they found with two

0:12:53.800 --> 0:12:55.040
<v Speaker 1>cots in it.

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 2>CNN, CNN had an entire crew go down there. This

0:12:59.720 --> 0:13:00.480
<v Speaker 2>is just not true.

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So so the AP is lying because the a P.

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. I don't know. I don't know if

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:07.520
<v Speaker 2>AP more credible.

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, trust me, I know this, Okay, I can incredible

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:12.880
<v Speaker 1>then seeing.

0:13:13.240 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you that when the AP interviewed me

0:13:15.800 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 2>for a video that I did, and I crushed them

0:13:18.520 --> 0:13:20.319
<v Speaker 2>in the interview. You know what the AP did, but

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 2>totally biased interview. They didn't play. They didn't play the interview.

0:13:23.240 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 2>CN ended with CEN interviewed and I crushed them interview,

0:13:25.800 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 2>they still played it. I don't know. Look, I'm not

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 2>saying I'm not saying AP is a completely corrupt source

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 2>of information. I'm not saying that they are a relatively

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 2>credible source information. But so, but okay, I have to

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:38.960
<v Speaker 2>see the article. I can only tell you that I

0:13:39.000 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 2>saw Fox News, CNN go down into the tunnels under

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>Al Shifa, and it wasn't one room. Now, it may

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:49.160
<v Speaker 2>not have been, it may not have been the main

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Hamas military base, but it was an incredibly, incredibly sophisticated

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.680
<v Speaker 2>system out of there where there are plenty of weapons. List.

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's that's that's not in. The Washington Post has

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:04.120
<v Speaker 1>another article kind of explaining the whole thing, to which

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.920
<v Speaker 1>again has a left bias to it, so less credible

0:14:07.920 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>than the AP in my estimation, I like the news

0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:14.880
<v Speaker 1>center and I like it to be very credible, right right,

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:17.680
<v Speaker 1>But you know, we take both sides around here because

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>we need to. But the fact is is that you

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:24.359
<v Speaker 1>can imagine by saying, Okay, well they have this military

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:28.400
<v Speaker 1>base underneath this hospital, and they're using the hospital effectively,

0:14:28.480 --> 0:14:30.840
<v Speaker 1>using the humans in the hospital as human shields, so

0:14:30.880 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>we can bomb that hospital. Ops, they're not there. Well,

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're under the next hospital. Let's bomb that one. Oh,

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe they're under the next hospital. Let's bomb that one.

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:40.560
<v Speaker 1>And as far as I know, I think it's all

0:14:40.600 --> 0:14:44.640
<v Speaker 1>but three or four hospitals have been blown up. And

0:14:44.720 --> 0:14:51.600
<v Speaker 1>so this starts to shift away from Wow, Hamas has

0:14:51.640 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>this really sophisticated terrorism network to Wow, this really looked

0:14:56.760 --> 0:14:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like a convenient excuse to just bomb all the infrastructure

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Gaza strip and then now we're back to

0:15:02.600 --> 0:15:06.520
<v Speaker 1>talking about how folks outside of that insulated bubble are

0:15:06.640 --> 0:15:10.120
<v Speaker 1>becoming more and more critical of Israel's response, hence the

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:15.200
<v Speaker 1>shift in attitudes global support of Israel more in favor

0:15:15.240 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>of Palestine. So all of these things work together where

0:15:19.360 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>folks are now looking at this like, okay, so this

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:26.000
<v Speaker 1>is not fair, this is not humanitarian, this does not

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:31.280
<v Speaker 1>look like defense at all. There's no hostages recovered that.

0:15:31.320 --> 0:15:35.000
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the IDF is killing hostages now at this point,

0:15:35.400 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>that's something that they admitted, you know, And this response

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:42.280
<v Speaker 1>and to everyone that says, okay, well, Israel has a

0:15:42.360 --> 0:15:44.080
<v Speaker 1>right to defend itself, We're not going to call for

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a ceasefire, it just starts to look as calloused as

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>it looks. It's just starts to look as self serving

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:55.000
<v Speaker 1>as it looks. If in fact, Israel is going after

0:15:55.360 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>something other than Hamas, could it be land to be

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever you know you said with skinseriocy theory. I cannot

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>prove or disprove that, and I won't try to. But

0:16:05.520 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>you start to question things, and then people have that,

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, emotional response like wait a minute, what's

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.200
<v Speaker 1>going on here? What's going on?

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Are you saying there's no terrace infrastructure. I don't understand.

0:16:16.880 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 1>No, there absolutely is, and there are tunnels. There are

0:16:19.480 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>tunnels there, Okay, But where they're identifying the tunnels and

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>where we're supposed to find all of this stuff? Remember Israel,

0:16:28.320 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 1>the Israeli militaries, I believe, the third most powerful military

0:16:32.360 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 1>on earth. The intelligence that Israel has is about about

0:16:37.200 --> 0:16:40.920
<v Speaker 1>there in terms of how sophisticated their intelligence is, their weapons,

0:16:40.960 --> 0:16:42.240
<v Speaker 1>their training, et cetera.

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Indis militaries more powerful than Russia's.

0:16:46.600 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I forgive me if the numbers are wrong, but I

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.880
<v Speaker 1>know that it's a very powerful military. I believe it's

0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 1>in the top five military. Absolutely. This is something that

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I've read and maybe that's misinformation. Maybe the Israeli military

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:01.480
<v Speaker 1>not going to matter, okay, But I do know what it's.

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>It's a sophisticated operation. It is not.

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 2>It is not anything aistic is itst is no joke.

0:17:08.720 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>It is Okay. So with the military that powerful, making

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:13.679
<v Speaker 1>a mistake like that, you.

0:17:13.560 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 2>Have almost making mistakes, no matter how sophisticated you are,

0:17:19.640 --> 0:17:20.360
<v Speaker 2>is part of war.

0:17:21.800 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Leaning into them is not. Leaning into them is not.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:27.359
<v Speaker 1>And if it is, if leaning into your mistakes is

0:17:27.440 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 1>a part of war. Then discuss again the the response

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of the world. See my thinking is, Amy, I love

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:45.879
<v Speaker 1>Jewish people, man. I've hugged when they when they lost

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:48.399
<v Speaker 1>loved ones. I've eaten at their tail, I've been in

0:17:48.440 --> 0:17:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the houses these people took me in. Okay, this happened.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:55.199
<v Speaker 1>I know. Hang on, hang on, hang on, hang on,

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 1>hang on. I have to hear what you have to say.

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>But let me say this, Okay. These people I love

0:17:59.080 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 1>with my whole heart.

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I know it.

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:05.760
<v Speaker 1>And then I see this response from Israel in the

0:18:05.880 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>name of those Jewish people, in the name of defending

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>those Jewish people, okay, and then I have to be

0:18:12.200 --> 0:18:16.159
<v Speaker 1>critical of that response because those Palestinian folks, even though

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:18.439
<v Speaker 1>I haven't met any Palestinian folks until this time in

0:18:18.480 --> 0:18:22.080
<v Speaker 1>my life, my default setting is to love them the same, okay,

0:18:22.680 --> 0:18:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And when I do, I run the risk of being

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>anti Semitic. Huh me me. I run the risk of

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:33.760
<v Speaker 1>being called this, and so does everyone else, right, and

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.800
<v Speaker 1>so you become fearful of these criticisms, and so when

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.960
<v Speaker 1>you ask these questions like listen, is this just justification

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>to do this? Because you can say that, and then

0:18:42.400 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 1>we can have that conversation, which I don't suspect it

0:18:44.800 --> 0:18:46.639
<v Speaker 1>will ever happen, and I don't know that it is,

0:18:46.880 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>but you start to see that global support shift away,

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:51.879
<v Speaker 1>and then you start questioning, Listen, is this guy, this

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:54.399
<v Speaker 1>met and Yahoo guy, is he really acting in the

0:18:54.400 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 1>best interest of Jewish populations globally? Because you've been on

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the ground at universities and you've seen a change in

0:19:01.320 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>temperature for Jewish people. You've seen that, and that's something

0:19:06.400 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>that breaks my heart. And I suspect it's because of

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>his response murdering all these people who have nothing to

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>do with it. He did not vote in that election

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>there and and the people that join Hamas, I Hamas

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>call it a terrorist organization. I'll agree with you, okay.

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.320
<v Speaker 1>But the people that join that, I question what alternative

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.080
<v Speaker 1>do they have? Do I sit here and get bombed

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>or do I fight back? And if I fight back,

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:31.159
<v Speaker 1>how does it look? Are these are people fighting? Do

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>I join them? Okay?

0:19:32.680 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 2>Ras? First of all, you know you know that I

0:19:35.840 --> 0:19:38.919
<v Speaker 2>would defend you to the death for something. Call you

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and semitic, right, you know that?

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>Thank you? Hammy?

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 2>Okay, you know I don't you don't have an en

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 2>Semitic bone in your body. But what my my point

0:19:47.720 --> 0:19:52.440
<v Speaker 2>is is that I think sometimes we get lost in

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:58.960
<v Speaker 2>the anecdote and we're losing. We're losing the what I

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.399
<v Speaker 2>was the data I was breaking up before. Like, look,

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.600
<v Speaker 2>we could argue back and forth again, can mistakes be made,

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 2>States can be made, Mistakes have been made, But ultimately

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:13.960
<v Speaker 2>you're not and cannot impeach an overall statistic of the

0:20:14.000 --> 0:20:17.680
<v Speaker 2>amount of civilians who were killed relative to the amount

0:20:18.160 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 2>of terrorists who were killed. Now to go back to

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 2>for a moment to what you said about what choice

0:20:24.640 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 2>they have again, I can't stress enough before October seventh,

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 2>they had their own essentially nation state. What do you

0:20:31.840 --> 0:20:34.239
<v Speaker 2>mean what choice they had? They were making all their

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 2>own political choices, their own economic choices. They were essentially

0:20:38.760 --> 0:20:41.440
<v Speaker 2>what it almost was was a dry run for a

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza. Okay, which

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 2>by the way, I think ultimately that's where we have

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 2>to be. But it makes that argument very hard when

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 2>people on the right say to me, well, look what

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:58.160
<v Speaker 2>happened with Gaza. We gave them essentially a state they

0:20:58.200 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 2>made to a terrorist state. You cannot find a single

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 2>example of Israel attacking or bombing Gaza when it wasn't

0:21:07.040 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 2>responding from attacks from Gaza. Not one. There always a

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.800
<v Speaker 2>response now when one says, well, how do you compare

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:19.280
<v Speaker 2>you know, fifteen hundred people being killed to thirty thousand,

0:21:19.359 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 2>because that's not proportional, right, that doesn't seem proportional. That's

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 2>not what proportionality is. That's not in the law. And

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:27.760
<v Speaker 2>we can only go by the laws of war, right,

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 2>which have been set up for years over the court

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.240
<v Speaker 2>actually with the course of centuries, and there is or

0:21:35.280 --> 0:21:37.879
<v Speaker 2>will not be prosecuted for war crimes. And I'm sorry

0:21:37.920 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 2>they will not be found guilty of war crimes because

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 2>they're not committee war crimes. They are following the rules

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:47.080
<v Speaker 2>of war, how ugly they may seem to be, including proportionality,

0:21:47.080 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 2>and we can get to that later. But that's I

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>want to stress that.

0:21:50.880 --> 0:21:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Well, this show is way too short and it's heartbreaking

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 1>because there's so much more that we need to talk about.

0:22:01.160 --> 0:22:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I appreciate you talking to me because it allows me

0:22:03.800 --> 0:22:07.880
<v Speaker 1>some understanding and hopefully it allows our listeners some understanding. Naturally,

0:22:07.880 --> 0:22:11.879
<v Speaker 1>there are people who would would push back, and I

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>suspect that I need to have less talking points in

0:22:15.240 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>an episode when it comes to something like this, because

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these we cannot simply just gloss over,

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's what we've done, and still we haven't gotten

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 1>to the videos that are on your social media that

0:22:27.560 --> 0:22:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I would naturally be very critical of your methods of

0:22:31.720 --> 0:22:34.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, context blind spots, all these sorts of things,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure you would welcome that, but we're going

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>to have to table that for another discussion. Discussion. Please

0:22:40.280 --> 0:22:42.400
<v Speaker 1>real quick before we go, please drop your social media

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>so folks can tap in with you, just.

0:22:44.680 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 2>At Ammi Horowitz and all the major socials.

0:22:47.440 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, and of course you can follow me at Ramsey's job.

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 1>You can follow the show at Civic Cipher. Ammy. We're

0:22:53.520 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>gonna have to have you back on again to finish

0:22:55.400 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>this conversation. I hope you'll come back, but until then, peace,