Speaker 1: You're listening to the Buck Sexton Show podcast, make sure
Speaker 1: you subscribe to the podcast on the iHeartRadio app or
Speaker 1: wherever you get your podcasts. Shoulder to Shoulder Shield Time.
Speaker 1: Welcome to the Buck Sexton Show team. Welcome to the
Speaker 1: Freedom Hut. Monday, December fifth edition of the program. We
Speaker 1: have the Twittergate bombshells dropping all over the place about
Speaker 1: how it turns out the Libs were in fact colluding
Speaker 1: with Twitter to make sure the Hunter Botton laptop story
Speaker 1: was suppressed right before the twenty twenty election. But that's
Speaker 1: just the beginning. There is going to be so much
Speaker 1: more of this. We're also finding out who are these
Speaker 1: people who were running Twitter and using some of these
Speaker 1: social media sites like Twitter as propaganda arms of the DNC,
Speaker 1: Who actually made the determinations about what was acceptable. Here's
Speaker 1: the answer. It's like the Libs created a emotionally unstable
Speaker 1: cry babies in a lab and then said, you get
Speaker 1: to determine what people are allowed to say. This was
Speaker 1: not a good idea, that's for sure. Plus we have
Speaker 1: Fox News reporting more than seventy three thousand illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: evaded border patrol just in the month of November. The
Speaker 1: border is the widest open it has ever been. Where
Speaker 1: is all of this going? And then the progressive Philadelphia
Speaker 1: District Attorney Larry Krasner is asking a court to halt
Speaker 1: impeachment proceedings against him. Let's hope another sorrow's back, DA
Speaker 1: is going to get pulled from his job. We'll get
Speaker 1: into all of this in just a second here. But first,
Speaker 1: my friends, if you've never thought about being a real
Speaker 1: estate investor, listen up. You've got to check out my
Speaker 1: friends at Done for You real Estate. Done for Your
Speaker 1: Real Estate is a company that will work with you
Speaker 1: from scratch, from no background in investing in real estate whatsoever.
Speaker 1: In fact, I didn't even have a background and buying
Speaker 1: a house before I met the folks have Done for
Speaker 1: Your Real Estate. The first house I ever purchase was
Speaker 1: through DFY and well, they help me purchase that house,
Speaker 1: I should say they help me pick it out. It
Speaker 1: was an investment property. And now I'm building out a
Speaker 1: portfolio of homes. You can do this too. You get
Speaker 1: some free cash flow coming to you every month, and
Speaker 1: you're building up financial stability for yourself over the long term.
Speaker 1: All you have to do to see how this process
Speaker 1: works is good have done for you, Buck dot Com.
Speaker 1: That's done for you. Buck dot Com will take you
Speaker 1: through every step of the process, from figuring out where
Speaker 1: you should be investing geographically, helping you pick just the
Speaker 1: right house at a good price, get a management company
Speaker 1: there so they can get a tenant in place, and
Speaker 1: you start seeing that free cashflow, the mortgage is getting
Speaker 1: paid down, You're building up equity. It's a great system.
Speaker 1: Good to done for you, Buck dot Com. One more time,
Speaker 1: that's done for you, Buck dot Com. Look, there's a
Speaker 1: lot more that's going to come out about Twitter in
Speaker 1: the days ahead. Here Elon Musk's purchase of this for
Speaker 1: forty four billion dollars. You know, as one does. It's
Speaker 1: a big deal. Matters a lot. We're getting a window
Speaker 1: here into how the propaganda is done behind the scenes.
Speaker 1: How do the Democrats with their dominance of these social
Speaker 1: media platforms? And I understand this. People often say why
Speaker 1: is it the Democrats? And when I say democrats, I
Speaker 1: mean woke leftists. Really who are democrats? But it's a
Speaker 1: particular subtype of Democrats. Why is it that woke leftists
Speaker 1: become in charge of all these really powerful corporations? You
Speaker 1: realize well, they usually aren't the ones who built them
Speaker 1: start with that. It's usually not the ones who are
Speaker 1: there at the beginning and had the idea. Sometimes it is,
Speaker 1: but generally they come later, and they usually come through
Speaker 1: the HR Diversity and Inclusion and and these these very
Speaker 1: amorphous components, you know, the pr wing, if you will,
Speaker 1: of these companies. But they're a bit like an invasive species.
Speaker 1: You know, an invasive species will come in to an
Speaker 1: area and kick out every every other species. They'll outcompete
Speaker 1: and kick out every other species until they're the perhaps
Speaker 1: you know, the only species of fish, are the only
Speaker 1: kind of bird or whatever that is left in the area.
Speaker 1: That's what woke leftists are like, because they can't coexist
Speaker 1: with other people in these companies. They can only have
Speaker 1: people who are like them or who comply with all
Speaker 1: their demands. So over time, this is this also goes
Speaker 1: back to the old phrase I think it's is it
Speaker 1: Irving Berlin who said that any institution that is not
Speaker 1: explicitly right wing will become left wing, And that is
Speaker 1: what we see happening in American society all the time.
Speaker 1: Every company that does not have core stated principles of
Speaker 1: free speech becomes powerful enough and eventually you have to
Speaker 1: say men can get pregnant or else you're going to
Speaker 1: get fired. And that's really where we are as a country,
Speaker 1: and that's certainly where Twitter was. Yourle Wroth was the
Speaker 1: head of trust and safety for a while at Twitter,
Speaker 1: which is it's remarkable, that's really even what they call
Speaker 1: this role, that they call it trust in safety. It
Speaker 1: is Orwellian in the truest sense. But y'all, Roth is
Speaker 1: somebody who is no longer on Twitter, but he was
Speaker 1: involved in making the determinations about what can people like
Speaker 1: me say about masking, what can I say about a
Speaker 1: whole range of issues. And here is mister Roth explaining,
Speaker 1: for example, we have two clips of them. Well, let's
Speaker 1: first just play how January sixth was trauma for the
Speaker 1: Twitter executives who had to think about what to do
Speaker 1: in the aftermath of it. There was a trauma like
Speaker 1: a trauma. It's so sad from January six Play that
Speaker 1: clip January sixth. If you talk to content moderators who
Speaker 1: worked on January sixth, myself included the word that nearly
Speaker 1: everybody uses as trauma. We experienced those events, not some
Speaker 1: of us as Americans, but not just as Americans or
Speaker 1: as citizens, but as people working on sort of how
Speaker 1: to prevent harm on the Internet. We saw the clearest
Speaker 1: possible example of what it looked like for things to
Speaker 1: move from online to off. We saw what was We
Speaker 1: saw the way that rhetoric about a stolen election was
Speaker 1: being mobilized on sites like the Donald dot win. We
Speaker 1: saw the trafficking of this content in the fringe parts
Speaker 1: of the Internet. And we saw people dead in the Capitol.
Speaker 1: First of all, the only person who was dead in
Speaker 1: the Capitol was an unarmed female protester shop by police
Speaker 1: from a distance through a door in the neck. That
Speaker 1: is it. So the only person who died that day
Speaker 1: at the Capitol was an unarmed protester. But beyond that
Speaker 1: this handwringing in ski, these are the people who were
Speaker 1: in charge of the biggest media platforms effectively, because that's
Speaker 1: what the social media platforms are, the biggest media platforms
Speaker 1: in the world. These emotionally unstable cry babies clearly picked
Speaker 1: last for dodgeball all throughout their lives, and now they've
Speaker 1: bought into this. They have some power and they want
Speaker 1: to abuse it. They have power and they think that
Speaker 1: This is always the problem you see with individuals like this.
Speaker 1: They think they're the good guys, they think they're on
Speaker 1: the side of the good people. Now you can see
Speaker 1: with the January sixth thing just what a little winer
Speaker 1: this guy is and how he's no respect at all
Speaker 1: for the First Amendment. He also makes no mention of
Speaker 1: the trauma that you could argue people suffered from months
Speaker 1: and months of rioting as a result of BLM. Remember that, Yeah,
Speaker 1: BLM was rioting, burning down buildings, doing crazy things, calling
Speaker 1: cops racist, attacking people all over the country. This was happening,
Speaker 1: and yet Twitter never shut any of that down. Antifa BLM,
Speaker 1: they can reliably use Twitter not only to get their
Speaker 1: message out, but as an organizing platform. Hey here we are,
Speaker 1: let's go right in this neighborhood. They don't get shut down,
Speaker 1: antifoot doesn't get blocked by of course not. They're leftists.
Speaker 1: Leftists get free rein. That's the whole game. That's what
Speaker 1: the Twitter gate files have shown us. Only the Hunter
Speaker 1: Biden laptop get suppressed. For example, right before an election,
Speaker 1: if the New York Times had a Trump family member
Speaker 1: laptop with all that kind of stuff on it, you
Speaker 1: think they would have sat on it. If the Washington
Speaker 1: Post had that information, you think they would have been like, well,
Speaker 1: maybe this was hacked by Russhaw. Nobody believes that. Not
Speaker 1: even the Washington Post believes that, and not even Twitter.
Speaker 1: Twitter didn't believe it either. They just went along with
Speaker 1: a pretext, which is just a way of saying they
Speaker 1: went along with a lie because they didn't like the
Speaker 1: implications for their preferred side. This is what we're seeing here.
Speaker 1: By the way, it gets even worse. They've really tried
Speaker 1: to destroy comedy. You've noticed this. You're not allowed to
Speaker 1: make jokes anymore. You're not allowed to use there are
Speaker 1: very few words you can use. What do you call
Speaker 1: somebody who's a coward? Think about this for a second.
Speaker 1: What are you allowed to call a person who is
Speaker 1: a coward a weakling? What words are available to you?
Speaker 1: There are very few words you can use. They've really
Speaker 1: changed the language. A lot of words. People would say, oh,
Speaker 1: that's misogynistic, You can't say that. Say okay, well, you know,
Speaker 1: referring to somebody being let's say a little a man
Speaker 1: being a bit weak, you know, you'd say perhaps he's
Speaker 1: a whoos would be a word that some people may use,
Speaker 1: but there are other things people might call him. They've
Speaker 1: eliminated our ability to use words to call out the
Speaker 1: cowardice and the lack of honorable manliness that the left
Speaker 1: so often displays. But beyond that, you're not allowed to
Speaker 1: make jokes on to make fun of them. And that's all.
Speaker 1: This is all tied together. The reason that Twitter was purchased,
Speaker 1: and it's so much credit deserved by the Babylon Be
Speaker 1: for this, was because the Babylon be made a joke
Speaker 1: about Rachel Levine. Rachel Levine is a man with long
Speaker 1: hair who now claims to be a woman. See. I
Speaker 1: can say that because I know it can go on Twitter.
Speaker 1: It's not going to get me suspended, and I know
Speaker 1: who cares about YouTube. I can say that, but you
Speaker 1: weren't allowed to say it then on Twitter, and the
Speaker 1: Babylon Bee, which is a satire site which makes jokes,
Speaker 1: was shut down and refused to bend the knee over this.
Speaker 1: Here is how you'll wroth. In a sitdown over the weekend,
Speaker 1: explains that yes, that's right, they made a joke, but
Speaker 1: they still needed to be booted off of Twitter because
Speaker 1: the transagenda is more important. Listen to it play Babylon Bee,
Speaker 1: which is what got him to buy the thing. I
Speaker 1: think the Babylon Bee's Man of the Year is Rachel Levine.
Speaker 1: Let's start from a premise that it's fucked up, But
Speaker 1: then again, let's look at what Twitter's written policies are.
Speaker 1: Twitter's written policies prohibit misgendering, full stop. And the Babylon Bee,
Speaker 1: in the name of satire misgendered Admiral Rachel Levine Twitter
Speaker 1: rare nominally, but it's still misgendering, okay, And there can
Speaker 1: be a very long and academic discussion of satire and
Speaker 1: sort of the lines there, you know, we landed on
Speaker 1: the side of enforcing our rules has written. Yeah, no
Speaker 1: sense of humor, obviously, but also note that this whole
Speaker 1: concept that there's something called misgendering, No, there's no such
Speaker 1: thing as miss gender. This is a made up turn
Speaker 1: by the left. There are men, there are women, and
Speaker 1: we know what the difference is between them. The differences
Speaker 1: are between them, so what exactly even this is a
Speaker 1: made up concept. Dead naming was also, just to be clear,
Speaker 1: dead naming, which is when you use someone's name who's
Speaker 1: transgender when they were the other gender, and now they're
Speaker 1: pretending they are a different gender. You can change your name,
Speaker 1: you can't change your gender. They even were suspending people
Speaker 1: from making fun of journalists. What's that all about? She
Speaker 1: should have asked them that, why is it that if
Speaker 1: you said learn to code to journalists after there are
Speaker 1: a number of major layoffs in the journalism industry, you
Speaker 1: weren't allowed to do that because they're friends Twitter. The
Speaker 1: people running Twitter, they're friends were those live journals who
Speaker 1: were all in the propaganda mill together, and the expectation
Speaker 1: was that they would defend their feelings. That's all that is.
Speaker 1: This is just what table are you sitting at in
Speaker 1: the cafeteria at high school kind of stuff. This has
Speaker 1: nothing to do with actually defending people from a harm
Speaker 1: and oh so sad and it's all crap. They just
Speaker 1: use that terminology because they won't actually stand up and
Speaker 1: just say we do it because we can, and we
Speaker 1: do it to who we like, and we protect whom
Speaker 1: we like or who we don't like, rather than we
Speaker 1: protect whom we like. And that's it, full stop, full stop.
Speaker 1: Talking about the border here in a second, I'll tell
Speaker 1: you what I think is coming there, and then also
Speaker 1: crime situation across the country, so we've got a lot
Speaker 1: to cover here in a few minutes. You want to
Speaker 1: do something really nice for yourself. Look at me right now.
Speaker 1: I'm in a next chair. It's super comfortable. I love it.
Speaker 1: I'm in it for hours at a time. Thank God,
Speaker 1: I've got a great chair because i got to do
Speaker 1: a lot of work every day, a lot of radio
Speaker 1: writing research. So I'm in an office chair. I'm one
Speaker 1: of the best chair possible. That's what I've got with
Speaker 1: X chair. In fact, I love my X chair so much.
Speaker 1: I got my sister one, my dad's got one, probably
Speaker 1: gonna get one for another family member for Christmas because
Speaker 1: that's how great they are. It's a great investment for
Speaker 1: you and your body, your comfort and your productivity. An
Speaker 1: X chair Also, if you finance it, what you can
Speaker 1: easily do cost you about twenty bucks a month, So
Speaker 1: for less than a dollar a day, X chair is
Speaker 1: going to make the hours spend at your desk a
Speaker 1: thousand times more comfortable and more productive. Just go to
Speaker 1: x chairbuck dot com now you'll save an extra ten
Speaker 1: Percently do you get a great discount here x chairbuck
Speaker 1: dot com. They have all kinds of colors and styles
Speaker 1: and sizes. In additions, you can make your chair, headrest, armrest, footrest,
Speaker 1: gel packs, all kinds of stuff x chairbuck dot com.
Speaker 1: Pick out the chair of your dreams and get it
Speaker 1: for yourself x chair buck dot com. So the numbers
Speaker 1: tell a pretty clear story here. The southern border is
Speaker 1: wide open, and I know the Biden administration they're they're
Speaker 1: not actually going to the border. They're not going to
Speaker 1: Fox report at seventy three thousand illegal immigrants evaded the
Speaker 1: border patrol in November, which marks the highest number ever
Speaker 1: recorded at the southern border. The numbers of goataways are
Speaker 1: fiscal year twenty twenty two, six hundred thousand. I mean,
Speaker 1: the border is a total joke. People coming in and
Speaker 1: the Biden administration is making no real effort to do
Speaker 1: any enforcement at the southern border, which makes you sit
Speaker 1: there and wonder, well, what is it going to take?
Speaker 1: At what point? At what point do you think they
Speaker 1: will have to do something? And I'm telling you they're
Speaker 1: going to try to push for not only a legislative amnesty.
Speaker 1: That's definitely going to happen now in the second part
Speaker 1: of Biden's first term or Biden's term. But they're going
Speaker 1: to try an executive amnesty of some kind, which is
Speaker 1: already underway. In some ways, they're not doing any enforcement.
Speaker 1: They're just refusing to enforce the law about immigration. Refusing
Speaker 1: to enforce when things like shall detain are written in statute.
Speaker 1: You know what the Biden administration does. Man, we're not
Speaker 1: going to detain, you say, We'll hold on a second.
Speaker 1: The law says you shall detain, and you're supposed to
Speaker 1: execute as the executive branch of the lawn not doing it.
Speaker 1: They use an expansive definition of prosecutorial discretion, which is
Speaker 1: effectively just nullification of the law to do whatever they want.
Speaker 1: And what they want is to let as many illegal
Speaker 1: immigrants into the country as possible. And they hope that
Speaker 1: eventually they will get an amnesty, and not far off.
Speaker 1: They think that the amnesty will come sooner than later.
Speaker 1: In fact, I believe that their hope is that in
Speaker 1: twenty twenty four, the first of all, they get rid
Speaker 1: of the filibuster. We'll see what happens with the Herschel
Speaker 1: Walker Herschel Walker race in Georgia this week, but they
Speaker 1: are possibly going to have fifty one seats They certainly
Speaker 1: will have fifty that's already decided in the Senate, and
Speaker 1: they may decide, you know, we're just gonna get rid
Speaker 1: of the filibuster. We've got fifty one. We're going to
Speaker 1: change the rules. No more filibuster, no more sixty that
Speaker 1: you need. And then the twenty twenty four election turns
Speaker 1: into all we have to do as Democrats, all they
Speaker 1: have to do is get one more term for Biden.
Speaker 1: He'll do whatever. At that point, doesn't care. And if
Speaker 1: they just have a bare minimum majority in the Senate
Speaker 1: and a bare minimum majority in the House, Amnesty, that's
Speaker 1: the game plan here, that's the only game plan for them.
Speaker 1: They and it's going to be twenty million people plus
Speaker 1: let's be massive. People say, oh, but they won't have
Speaker 1: the right to vote. Of course, they'll have the right
Speaker 1: to vote, maybe not officially right away once they're amnesty
Speaker 1: officially and they can stay in the country illegally. You
Speaker 1: know what happens after that, they push to get them
Speaker 1: voting rights. First, it'll be local and state and that
Speaker 1: eventually federal. That is what will happen, and then it's
Speaker 1: all over, folks for the Republican Party. As we know, it.
Speaker 1: At that point, we're looking at elections now at the
Speaker 1: national level that are determined by one hundred thousand votes maybe,
Speaker 1: So does anybody really think does any do you really
Speaker 1: think that if you add twenty million illegals. Now I
Speaker 1: know some of them are not of age to vote yet,
Speaker 1: but but the point is, if you add even a
Speaker 1: few million, even a few hundred thousand motivated Democrat voters
Speaker 1: to the roles nationally and it depending on what states
Speaker 1: they're that's going to be it. It's all over. Republicans
Speaker 1: will never win another presidential election in my lifetime. So
Speaker 1: those are the kind of stakes that they're playing for.
Speaker 1: On our side, it's all, Hey, who's gonna who's gonna
Speaker 1: run the RNC? I don't know. I mean, maybe we
Speaker 1: should have the same person runner, maybe we should have
Speaker 1: a different person running. I don't know. And look, I
Speaker 1: understand people get excited about all these investigations that are
Speaker 1: supposed to happen. As well. All Republicans have the House,
Speaker 1: they'll be the investigations. It's interesting. I think it's worthwhile
Speaker 1: for the public to know the truth. You know, what
Speaker 1: will happen as a result of these investigations, Whether it's
Speaker 1: of the origins of COVID or any number of nothing.
Speaker 1: Nothing will actually happen. So anyone who's telling you, oh,
Speaker 1: the people might get you know, marched off to in
Speaker 1: as a result, there's finally going to be accountability. It's
Speaker 1: not true. It's not true. Accountability in our system comes
Speaker 1: really from the ballot box, and that's it. Once the
Speaker 1: other side wins, it's all over. And then I want
Speaker 1: to talk to you, just for a second year about
Speaker 1: the Krasner Larry Krasner. He is. The Pennsylvania Senate just
Speaker 1: approved by the way two procedural measures to stage an
Speaker 1: impeachment trial for Philadelphia DA Larry Krasner. They're trying to
Speaker 1: remove this prosecutor from office. The trial's going to begin
Speaker 1: in January, and they've set up the rules. Of course
Speaker 1: they should remove this guy. Philadelphia has the highest murder
Speaker 1: rate it has ever had in the history of the city.
Speaker 1: And here's a guy who all he does is trying
Speaker 1: to find ways to not prosecute criminals. And the progressive
Speaker 1: Sauros back das take the approach that there are too
Speaker 1: many minority men who are going to prison, so they're
Speaker 1: just going to prosecute fewer people across the board. That
Speaker 1: is their belief. That is what they think criminal justice
Speaker 1: reform means, Well, what happens when there's somebody who's been
Speaker 1: arrested a hundred times, when somebody's been arrested for a
Speaker 1: whole range of serious felonies, Well they just downgraded to
Speaker 1: non serious crimes to misdemeanors, or they just dismiss it
Speaker 1: all together. And they think that we're going to be
Speaker 1: safer as a society. Well we've seen the results. The
Speaker 1: results make us markedly less safe. It is obvious that
Speaker 1: this is where we are, and it's true about everybody
Speaker 1: at every major city across the country, or just really
Speaker 1: in cities across the country. You already had the DA
Speaker 1: in San Francisco. Chess at Boudan, he was recalled Larry
Speaker 1: Krasner has got to go. I mean, the people of
Speaker 1: Philadelphia don't push for this. At what point do you
Speaker 1: say they just want to live in a crime filled
Speaker 1: hell hole? At what point is it clear that they
Speaker 1: think that they're suffering is part of some progressive purification,
Speaker 1: that the crime on the streets is necessary to get
Speaker 1: to the utopia that will never come if it's not
Speaker 1: now when is it. I mean, they've got to get
Speaker 1: rid of this guy Krasner. He's the absolute worst and
Speaker 1: as a district attorney. And it's looking like, even though
Speaker 1: we just had a pretty disappointing mid term on this front,
Speaker 1: people realize the crime situations out of control. The Left
Speaker 1: is wrong on crime. A lot of people suffer, a
Speaker 1: lot of people suffer because of these bad ideas. You know,
Speaker 1: I saw that the word of the year according to
Speaker 1: the Oxford Oxford English Dictionary is goblin mode. And I
Speaker 1: had never even seen that. Do you guys know about that.
Speaker 1: I've never even seen this before, goblin mode. And I
Speaker 1: actually asked my sister about him, my little sister. She said, oh, yeah,
Speaker 1: goblin mode is when you just kind of wear your
Speaker 1: frontiest sweats and just stay inside and stay in the
Speaker 1: dark and watch Netflix and just eat like really bad
Speaker 1: for you food. So I didn't realize I've at different
Speaker 1: times become kind of a goblin mode expert. I don't
Speaker 1: even know what it was, but yeah, that was That
Speaker 1: was the word of the year. And it comes from
Speaker 1: similar origins according to the Oxford English Dictionary as beast mode,
Speaker 1: which goes back to altered beast if Sega video game
Speaker 1: from nineteen eighty eight that I remember playing as a
Speaker 1: kid and thinking this game is awesome. Yeah, Goblin Mode
Speaker 1: a different thing apparently. Thanks for hanging with me today, team,
Speaker 1: More coming soon. Shields High