WEBVTT - Streaming Trends, Market Forecast, Ford Mach-E Price Cut

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.439
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Let's bring in Mark Douglas.

0:00:22.480 --> 0:00:26.080
<v Speaker 1>He is the CEO of Mountain m n T n UH,

0:00:26.079 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and we bring him in to talk about all things

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>tech really on the on the com side, on the

0:00:30.080 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>streaming side, and Adam all lined up to talk about

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Netflix and what I feel like is a turnaround and

0:00:34.680 --> 0:00:37.640
<v Speaker 1>sentiment there as well as Google. They're getting sued by

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice and it's going to be a

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>jury trial. Holy Comoley could be the first breakup since

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:46.279
<v Speaker 1>mob El. Remember that that can't happen. I don't think

0:00:46.320 --> 0:00:48.920
<v Speaker 1>so either. But um, let's talk to Mark first about

0:00:49.040 --> 0:00:52.040
<v Speaker 1>the tech sector in general. Mark, we have these big

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:57.600
<v Speaker 1>earnings coming out this week, Amazon, Alphabet and Apple, UM

0:00:57.640 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>and everyone is expecting this earning sea to be horrendous,

0:01:01.760 --> 0:01:04.880
<v Speaker 1>So executives might even take advantage. We thought of this

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.160
<v Speaker 1>earning season to throw in the kitchen sink and get

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:09.360
<v Speaker 1>everything out of the way. You know, are all their

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:13.160
<v Speaker 1>dirty laundry. It hasn't been that bad, has it. It hasn't.

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, this is an interesting place win right

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>now because normally, if you look back at all the

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>previous downturns, it's like this is herd mentality where everyone

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:27.440
<v Speaker 1>like when rushes to the next thing, Like when if

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>you go back to two thousand when the tech sector crash,

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 1>then everyone ran that by houses and then you know,

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like this herd. But right now the herd is

0:01:36.880 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just kind of grazing, just all kind of standing around,

0:01:41.760 --> 0:01:44.600
<v Speaker 1>not knowing where to go or what to do. So

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>things are neither like going up nor they like crashing

0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that hard. Everyone's waiting for you know, what am I

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.480
<v Speaker 1>supposed to do now? And nobody seems to know. I

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>think what I'm hearing from some tech analysts is tech

0:01:59.000 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>spending is still gonna go row intercessionary environment. It's just

0:02:02.080 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna grow at a lower rate than we've been used to.

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of how you see? It was on

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>fire over the last It's very hard to forecast revenue

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:15.440
<v Speaker 1>in a tech company right now, because your customers don't

0:02:15.440 --> 0:02:18.000
<v Speaker 1>even know what they want, what they're going to spend.

0:02:18.040 --> 0:02:21.320
<v Speaker 1>So I know from my company, like our customers normally

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>tell us that by in December what their plans are

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for Q one. Most of them didn't even know until

0:02:28.040 --> 0:02:30.720
<v Speaker 1>like third week of January. That is still trying to

0:02:30.760 --> 0:02:33.560
<v Speaker 1>figure it out. So it's really hard to forecast. So

0:02:33.600 --> 0:02:36.880
<v Speaker 1>I think you're gonna see forecasts be pretty soft, but

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>it's an opportunity for overachievement. Everyone's going to be kind

0:02:40.360 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>of kind of the other um, you know, the other

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.040
<v Speaker 1>thread that we can pull from tech has been labor.

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:49.840
<v Speaker 1>They've been firing all the excess workers that they rushed

0:02:50.000 --> 0:02:52.519
<v Speaker 1>higher over the last year and a half two years.

0:02:53.360 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think we are there? I mean, the

0:02:55.440 --> 0:02:58.000
<v Speaker 1>question is a lot of people think they're gonna fire

0:02:58.040 --> 0:03:01.760
<v Speaker 1>too many people. UM obviously hired too many people. But

0:03:01.840 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>can't they run with a surplus of employees? Well, I

0:03:04.720 --> 0:03:08.520
<v Speaker 1>think some people would say Ellen, Elon Musk obviously, if

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>you say Elon Musk, other Elons, Yeah, whoever that is.

0:03:13.960 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>I think a lot of people would say Ellen proved

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:18.799
<v Speaker 1>that maybe a lot of tech companies have over hired

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:22.880
<v Speaker 1>since you know, but nothing has changed since he essentially

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.000
<v Speaker 1>cut eighty percent of the staff or our parts of

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>eighty percent of staff. I talked to people, and some

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:30.000
<v Speaker 1>of these big Twitter you mean yea Twitter. I talked

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.360
<v Speaker 1>to some people, you know, people at some of the

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>big companies I do, big tech companies do wonder what

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>do you do for a living at this time at

0:03:38.520 --> 0:03:41.360
<v Speaker 1>this company? So there's there's definitely fat. If you guys

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.760
<v Speaker 1>see some of the videos that post away, people say

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the day in the life of working at Google and

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>and I saw one the other day and the person

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>got laid off a weekly. So there's there's fat to

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.800
<v Speaker 1>cut on in allge So there's still more pink slift

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>to come. I don't know. And we haven't seen that

0:03:58.880 --> 0:04:02.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of firing. No, no, this is definitely I mean

0:04:02.720 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>what you know, everyone knows we're kind of in a

0:04:06.640 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>in a downward you know, the market crash. Everything's going down,

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.680
<v Speaker 1>but um, it's going to go back up. Also, I

0:04:13.680 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>I talked to some like people who manage um trillions

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, like some of the biggest equity firms in

0:04:21.160 --> 0:04:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the world, and they seem like they're really anxious to

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 1>put money back in the stock market, and and if

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 1>they do, the market is going to go up. So

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I think they're people are ready to get back in.

0:04:32.320 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>They just want stability before they mark. What are you

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:36.920
<v Speaker 1>hearing from some of the digital advertising players out there?

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're gonna hear from Facebook and Google and

0:04:39.760 --> 0:04:42.559
<v Speaker 1>uh and some of the other's Amazon of course this week.

0:04:43.400 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>How tough is it out there in the digital ad

0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:50.159
<v Speaker 1>space if if you're not in the growth sectors? Pretty tough. So, um,

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>my company were in performance television with returning TV into

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:59.159
<v Speaker 1>this direct response at channel and so if we look

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 1>at our customer as we already have, they're they're covering,

0:05:02.680 --> 0:05:06.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're not really increasing or decreasing. So but

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>we have all this growth from new customers coming into

0:05:09.080 --> 0:05:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the market. If you don't have that trend of a

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of new customers, it's it's are you guys playing

0:05:14.680 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in the in the streaming the ad supported streaming business? Exactly? Yeah,

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:22.120
<v Speaker 1>we're turning streaming television into essentially add words for for

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>TV and that's where the incremental AD dollars are going.

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to Peacock versus NBC? Are they're going

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>to Paramount Plus versus the cps, Well, they're just going

0:05:30.839 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>into I think streaming in general. I think I think

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:38.440
<v Speaker 1>it's television after you know, it's kind of almost one

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:43.080
<v Speaker 1>of the first like traditional ad channels. And now for

0:05:43.120 --> 0:05:45.919
<v Speaker 1>the first time in what is it seven eight decades,

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's now like this full digital marketing channels. So it's

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:54.400
<v Speaker 1>become a growth set. It's it's become a growth sector again.

0:05:54.440 --> 0:05:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think all the TV networks, but especially like

0:05:57.720 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 1>NBC at Comcast, um Disney Plus and Hulu. You know

0:06:02.320 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>those companies that are really obviously Netflix now with their

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:09.600
<v Speaker 1>ad business, they're you know, they're those companies that really

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:11.640
<v Speaker 1>have the dollars to investment. They are going to benefit

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the most. Does Google own the marketplace for ads, for

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.680
<v Speaker 1>digital ads, no matter where you're going to advertise, no

0:06:17.720 --> 0:06:20.520
<v Speaker 1>matter who's buying the ads. Do they own that? Is

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that the problem with the well they own? They own search.

0:06:23.400 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm glad you brought that up. But just

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in general, a little known fact is that for the

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>first time, Google and Meta like don't have less than

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:36.200
<v Speaker 1>half the march, so the rest of the market is

0:06:36.240 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>actually growing. I mean, on the whole Google lawsuit thing,

0:06:40.040 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that it's UM not directed with the real

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.200
<v Speaker 1>action is the analogy I would use is what they're

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>suing them over the tools, like the software that serves

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>an AD. So that's like going after a company because

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:57.479
<v Speaker 1>they have a dominant position in hammers where the real

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.160
<v Speaker 1>action is, well, they have all the data and where

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>people are going to move to. That's where the real access.

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>Google has just a massive amount of data. Know, Google

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>knows I'm here right now, right because I have Google

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Maps in my pocket. But we're gonna sue him over

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the hammers, like it makes no sense. And I think

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>this one after al Capone for Taxia, Yeah, exactly, that works.

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:23.120
<v Speaker 1>So I think this um the government going after them

0:07:23.320 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>is not actually going to have much of an impact

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because where the real action is is the data privacy

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 1>legislation around the data. All privacy legislation makes Google, Meta,

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:40.679
<v Speaker 1>Apple and Amazon essentially even stronger because it goes after

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>anonymous data while they have like your personal identity, and

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>so they get to continue to use the personal data

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>while everyone else's market. That's a big player on TikTok,

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>he's all over that platform. Talks about TikTok, What do

0:07:56.160 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 1>you tell us what's the future of TikTok. Uh, Well,

0:08:01.040 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it's i there's so many people using it, it's not

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>going to be banned in the United States that I

0:08:06.240 --> 0:08:08.760
<v Speaker 1>was thinking, Yeah, that ships sail. I mean Trump years

0:08:08.760 --> 0:08:12.000
<v Speaker 1>ago tried to bring up this issue and everyone was like,

0:08:12.040 --> 0:08:14.480
<v Speaker 1>well if Donald Trump spring it up, we're not gonna

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.080
<v Speaker 1>listen that. You know, they have all of the status

0:08:18.080 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 1>an open mic in every living room. But um TikTok

0:08:21.520 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>is doing extremely well. I don't see it diminishing in

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>any way in the near future. So they are crushing it.

0:08:27.480 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>And what about Netflix. I mean, this was last year

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the market beat it down like a redheaded step child.

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.760
<v Speaker 1>And I nothing against Gingers. I am a step child myself.

0:08:36.760 --> 0:08:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So but now it seems like sentiment is really shifted,

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:42.000
<v Speaker 1>especially after the last Earns report they added seven and

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:44.280
<v Speaker 1>a half million subscribers. Yeah, I mean the market is

0:08:44.320 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>just up and down on in general, but on Netflix

0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in particular. Thing about Netflix, just through the math. Let's

0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>say they're average subscriptions like twelve dollars. They have two

0:08:54.400 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and forty million subscribes. It's like three billion dollars

0:08:57.520 --> 0:09:00.439
<v Speaker 1>a month coming in and people like, yeah, but they

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:04.320
<v Speaker 1>missed you know, subscriber numbers by hundred thousands. Yeah, but

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>they got three a billion dollars in three billion dollars

0:09:08.440 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a month. It's just overreactions, possibly in both directions. Overreacted

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>in terms of downward sentiment and possibly a little bit

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and upward sentiment. And we got some new management there,

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:20.319
<v Speaker 1>so we'll see how that plays out. YEA, so good stuff.

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Mark Douglas, President and CEO of Mountain, joining us in

0:09:23.679 --> 0:09:27.080
<v Speaker 1>our Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studio giving us the latest on

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 1>all things tech and all things digital advertising. Quincy Crosby

0:09:32.880 --> 0:09:35.600
<v Speaker 1>joints us here. She's a chief Global strategist for lp

0:09:36.080 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>L Financial. That's a nastact treated firm lp L. A

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>is it took her load into your Bloomberg terminal, Quincy,

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:46.800
<v Speaker 1>A lot to digest here this week. What's most important

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:48.560
<v Speaker 1>to you? What's your gonna what's gonna be your focus

0:09:48.559 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>this week? Simply because we had a strong rally. Volume

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.960
<v Speaker 1>was good on the rally, and the rally was cyclically

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>oriented for the most are. Now granted you we can

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>dismiss the rally. We can say it was you know,

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 1>short covering UH traders going in and taking advantage of

0:10:08.920 --> 0:10:13.720
<v Speaker 1>the tax claws only in in you know. Uh. But

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:19.199
<v Speaker 1>nonetheless you started to see volume pickup in rally, and

0:10:19.240 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a rally that suggested that the market is

0:10:23.040 --> 0:10:26.199
<v Speaker 1>looking ahead of everything. You know, we always would say

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>the market gets news worked. Anyway, February tends to be

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a month where the market is tends to actually say,

0:10:34.200 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>have these rallies, um dissipate. It's probably the worst month

0:10:38.640 --> 0:10:41.880
<v Speaker 1>for the market next to September. So we're gonna watch

0:10:42.040 --> 0:10:45.199
<v Speaker 1>very closely how these big tech names do because the

0:10:45.400 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>waiting in the indextions, it's just them that these are

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the big tech guys. We're gonna see if they can

0:10:51.440 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>if they can garner any interest from traders at least

0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>and certainly investors. All Right, so, um, what are you

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to see to prove that this rally really

0:11:02.200 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>has legs? Quincy? I mean, what are some signs? I

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.440
<v Speaker 1>was just looking at the break down of um, the

0:11:08.480 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>industrial groups that have won and lost this year, and

0:11:11.240 --> 0:11:14.559
<v Speaker 1>you've got all the you know, consumer discretionary and tech

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>companies that have done well. Meanwhile, consumer staples and um,

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, utilities have done poorly. So it looks like

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:26.280
<v Speaker 1>the defensive are getting sold off. And the um You know,

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the growth companies are are putting up some gains, but

0:11:29.520 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I guess that could be explained by the short covering narrative.

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 1>So what do we need to see UM two ensure

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.559
<v Speaker 1>us that this rally is solid. Well, what one thing

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:43.560
<v Speaker 1>would be I look at the semiconductors. They are the

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 1>they are the consummate dull weather for global growth, and

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 1>they've been they've actually the days that they've been outperforming

0:11:50.880 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>even the the growth growth nas the gross the growth residence,

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 1>so to speak. We'll say if they can hold, obviously

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>then they sell off, but we'll see if they can hold.

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:05.960
<v Speaker 1>It's very important that they participate, uh in a rally

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and stay strong. You know. The other thing that we're

0:12:09.600 --> 0:12:11.960
<v Speaker 1>going to look at is on a technical basis, is

0:12:12.000 --> 0:12:15.520
<v Speaker 1>whether or not going through the obstacle course of this

0:12:15.559 --> 0:12:20.599
<v Speaker 1>week their earnings obstacle course the said statement his press conference,

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:25.360
<v Speaker 1>then you know Friday's payroll report and see where wages are,

0:12:25.360 --> 0:12:28.320
<v Speaker 1>how they're moving. Is whether or not this market an

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.520
<v Speaker 1>a rally. If it does rally, can actually cross forty

0:12:34.800 --> 0:12:37.920
<v Speaker 1>that is, you know, one of the most important levels

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>for the market, and it's been difficult obviously for this

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:48.079
<v Speaker 1>market to launch an absolute attack on quincy. Tough, tough

0:12:49.000 --> 0:12:51.040
<v Speaker 1>for everybody out there and the equity biz in the

0:12:51.080 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>fixed income markets as you start oute, what are you

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.079
<v Speaker 1>telling your clients in terms of positioning here after such

0:12:58.120 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a tough year. Well, you know, we're trying to figure

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:05.720
<v Speaker 1>out obviously, whether or not the market has discounted a recession.

0:13:06.040 --> 0:13:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Is it an earnings recession? Is that a rolling recession

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a shallow recession. Our view at

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>LPL researches that will be fairly shallow. That's with all

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.199
<v Speaker 1>the information we have now. However, one thing that we

0:13:19.280 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>have now it's not just about equities. We've got the

0:13:22.200 --> 0:13:25.800
<v Speaker 1>sixth income market and we're looking at it and investing

0:13:25.840 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 1>in it. The treasury market is offering very attractive return,

0:13:31.000 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>guaranteed return, and investment grade corporates as well. We also

0:13:35.760 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>sawt we're not advocating this, but we've seen money going

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.719
<v Speaker 1>into high yield. Who whatever thought, you know, if all

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.319
<v Speaker 1>of these dire headlines, money would go into high yield.

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>But those are the ones who think we're not going

0:13:46.640 --> 0:13:49.280
<v Speaker 1>to have a recession, will be a soft or soft

0:13:49.320 --> 0:13:53.520
<v Speaker 1>just landing. But the point is that companies when out

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>and borrowed during the period when money was so easy

0:13:57.880 --> 0:14:01.160
<v Speaker 1>and rates were so low, so that their balances, their

0:14:01.200 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>cash balances are strong. And right now these companies are

0:14:06.480 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>still you know, making certain that they cut costs when

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>they have to and that you know, they're going to

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>manage costs going into three, especially if there is a recession.

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>So we're saying investment grade corporate, we're saying the treasury

0:14:22.120 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 1>that can help the portfolio. And also on the equity side,

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:29.960
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at dividends. This is crucial, we think for

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>this market. And you know, some of the sectors are

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>doing well. Take a look at the industrials today, they're up. Granted,

0:14:37.640 --> 0:14:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the the defense names are helping to underpin the the

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:47.600
<v Speaker 1>industrials along with machinery. So there are pockets in the

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>market that are still attractive, attractively valued, especially after sell

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>off such as we had in the defense names, but

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 1>they're coming back today. So again, until there is more

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>certain in terms of where we are headed and whether

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:07.600
<v Speaker 1>or not the market is actually discounted even a percentage

0:15:07.720 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>of a possibility of that you know, final final deep

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:15.280
<v Speaker 1>sell off, we want the clients to be uh certain, careful,

0:15:15.360 --> 0:15:19.000
<v Speaker 1>conservative Quincy. Just want to ask before you came to

0:15:19.000 --> 0:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street, you spent a lot of time at diplomatic

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:26.080
<v Speaker 1>postings around the world. Uh. You served as Assistant Secretary

0:15:26.120 --> 0:15:30.560
<v Speaker 1>of Commerce and also UM as Energy attached at the

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:33.560
<v Speaker 1>US Embassy in London. UM, what do you think about

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the reopening of China and the kind of I guess,

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:41.080
<v Speaker 1>the the spat that seems to be, you know, mellowing

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>out between the US and China right now. How is

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>that going to drive the market this year? You know

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously that this is you know, a major event. Is

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the world's second largest economy. And it was interesting that

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 1>when they announced the final lift of the zero COVID policy,

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>we the countries that country indexes that've got a booth

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>were none other than Germany, France, Italy. These are that

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>these are the strongest trading partners in the West with China,

0:16:12.000 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the US. So the question becomes whether or

0:16:16.640 --> 0:16:20.960
<v Speaker 1>not this um, you know, multilateral approach that let received

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>from China around the world trying to shore up uh,

0:16:25.160 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, positive on the bilateral front, good feelings and

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>so on, even with the United States, But whether or

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>not it masks UM. You know, the issue on Taiwan.

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:41.320
<v Speaker 1>And the other issue is regarding selling of any kind

0:16:41.400 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of technology that helps the military. Their military has grown,

0:16:46.520 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is grown faster than our military. Take a look at

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:55.080
<v Speaker 1>the naval components. It's it's larger than than the the

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>US and even today, I mean speaking of you know, Europe,

0:16:59.320 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the US is been pushing the Netherlands with a SML

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:06.479
<v Speaker 1>but you know it's it is a chip mak, right,

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:11.359
<v Speaker 1>it's a manufacturer ships. Uh. Finally they have come out

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and said they're going to be more cheerful with their

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:16.800
<v Speaker 1>sales to China. They're going to you know, trying to

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:20.679
<v Speaker 1>break off some of the parts that would go right

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:25.080
<v Speaker 1>into laws. Um. Yeah, so that is not going away.

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.560
<v Speaker 1>And you know, and by the way, it is in

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the US across the aisles, Democrats and Republicans, this is

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:38.719
<v Speaker 1>an area where they agree they do to be sot

0:17:38.760 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on China. One of the very few. Quincy, thanks so

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:43.720
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Quincy Crosby there. She is chief

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:48.160
<v Speaker 1>global strategist at LPL Financial. Joining us to talk about

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>what to expect in the markets after this rally that

0:17:50.640 --> 0:17:55.160
<v Speaker 1>we've seen and throughout the rest of the year. Let's

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:57.800
<v Speaker 1>talk stocks right now. Ted Oakley founder managing partner of

0:17:57.880 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 1>ox Bow Advisors, joins us Ted. I mean brutal year

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>for equities, also for fixed income as well. What do

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.199
<v Speaker 1>you what's the message you went out to your clients

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:11.200
<v Speaker 1>with when you were kind of saying, all right, let's

0:18:11.200 --> 0:18:14.399
<v Speaker 1>get ready for well, I think you know what we

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:17.639
<v Speaker 1>did in twenty two was we were extremely defensive. You know,

0:18:17.720 --> 0:18:23.159
<v Speaker 1>we were fifty uh cash or short term treasuries primarily.

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:28.160
<v Speaker 1>So while but your your clients don't your clients don't

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.119
<v Speaker 1>mind you being in that much cash. Well, we were

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>getting you gotta remember now, it's not that it's not

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Tina anymore. You can get you can get four and

0:18:36.960 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>a half percent or four sixty five right now and

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>even a three months and so we do a lot

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 1>with the floating right treasuries, but that's just a holding

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:48.000
<v Speaker 1>spot for us UM. And then this year coming into it,

0:18:48.119 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>we just don't have I mean, we have a lot

0:18:49.840 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>of stocks on the two D probably a two hundred

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:56.280
<v Speaker 1>stock screen we have, but none of those are they're

0:18:56.359 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>just not in evaluation areas where we want to come

0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:02.720
<v Speaker 1>by can we own stocks? But the stocks we've alreadyo owned,

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.760
<v Speaker 1>but we're not buying too many things. You know, right

0:19:05.800 --> 0:19:07.840
<v Speaker 1>at this point other than some income oinants, we are

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>buying another portfolio. What are the levels that you're watching for,

0:19:11.800 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>and um, what do you think it's gonna take for

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>us to get down back down there again? Because we've

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:19.879
<v Speaker 1>had pretty a pretty enthusiastic rally we have and I

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.159
<v Speaker 1>will tell you it reminds me of the January of

0:19:23.240 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 1>oh one, two thousand one, you know, in the matter

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:30.000
<v Speaker 1>markets seld Off hard nasdac uh you know, during two

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 1>thousand and came back at the end of the year,

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>had a good month in January, and then the rest

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.760
<v Speaker 1>of the year of NAZAC getting a lower by far

0:19:37.840 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>of a lot of that. And so we're sort of

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:44.439
<v Speaker 1>and people they talked about, you know, two thousand nine eleven,

0:19:44.520 --> 0:19:46.880
<v Speaker 1>but acts of the market was lower before and ended

0:19:46.920 --> 0:19:48.600
<v Speaker 1>up the year like that. So anyway, go to back

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to your question what we're looking for. If you say

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna do two hundred dollars on the SMP, I

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.159
<v Speaker 1>know everybody's at two twenty five and all that, but

0:19:56.200 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we think two hundred would be the best might be.

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>And so if you put yeah, put you know, if

0:20:05.359 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at two hundred, it's only twelve or cent

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>below estimates. It's not that far. So if you do

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:14.600
<v Speaker 1>two hundred and you take you know, you're take an

0:20:14.720 --> 0:20:18.400
<v Speaker 1>SMP at calling four thousand sixty, you're almost at twenty

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.399
<v Speaker 1>multiple right now. And that's not where you get your

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.480
<v Speaker 1>best buys ever, And so that's kind of where we're

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.520
<v Speaker 1>looking at it. I think that's I think that's yet

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>to come. And and I said, well, we'll see. I

0:20:30.520 --> 0:20:33.000
<v Speaker 1>guess that's that's what makes a horse race. But that's

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>where we are right now. So you know, this is

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:37.439
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a busy week TED four earnings. We've got

0:20:37.480 --> 0:20:41.159
<v Speaker 1>a hundred nine SPI companies reporting here. Um, do you

0:20:41.240 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>think we're gonna start seeing some big revisions downward in

0:20:43.680 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>earnings guidance from a lot of these companies. Well, you should.

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things that we've noticed so much

0:20:49.640 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the last five years really is they've been allowed to

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.920
<v Speaker 1>get away with so much in the way of accruals

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>and all these adjustments to gap earnings that you have

0:20:57.560 --> 0:20:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to look through a lot of it. But I think

0:21:00.080 --> 0:21:02.679
<v Speaker 1>if you looked at an acremement the real cash earnings, yes,

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I think those are some of those are gonna have

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:08.040
<v Speaker 1>to be revised down for sure. So what are some

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>of the sectors here? I mean, I mean, as you

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.399
<v Speaker 1>sit here with the high levels of cash, when you

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:15.440
<v Speaker 1>do get ready to deploy, where do you think you'll

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>you'll put it? Will it be in some of the

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.720
<v Speaker 1>defensive names where you try to get back into growth.

0:21:20.240 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Where do you think the play is going to be? Well,

0:21:22.520 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a mix. We have a mixed now. But

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.920
<v Speaker 1>if you look at our favorite companies, you know they're

0:21:26.960 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>gonna be companies that can go through a tough procession period.

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:33.639
<v Speaker 1>If you take Visa and MasterCard, you know they have

0:21:33.800 --> 0:21:35.800
<v Speaker 1>enough cash in a quarter almost to pay off all

0:21:35.840 --> 0:21:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the debt um and and if you inflate people use cards,

0:21:39.600 --> 0:21:41.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, the prices go up, people use cards more.

0:21:41.960 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>We think two other things like that. You know, obviously

0:21:46.080 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you know we like uh, some defensive names O'Riley, you know,

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:52.320
<v Speaker 1>a health And then we you know, we on the

0:21:52.520 --> 0:21:55.399
<v Speaker 1>we on the oils, we on gas pipelines, um. And

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:58.159
<v Speaker 1>we particularly like the oil wyalties because you don't have

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the capital investment. And so we think we mix all

0:22:02.359 --> 0:22:04.879
<v Speaker 1>those together and come up with a pretty good, you know,

0:22:05.040 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>pretty good mix overall. So we get some cash for

0:22:07.200 --> 0:22:11.680
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. And I'm getting on the treasury yep. Absolutely,

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:14.080
<v Speaker 1>And I know you're based in Texas there. I'm just

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 1>envisioning you sitting around with your buddies talking oil NonStop. Um,

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>what is kind of the feeling down there about energy

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>because it's had such a really two great years for investors. Yeah, well,

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>you know I mentioned this to you before. A lot

0:22:30.200 --> 0:22:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of the oil people are not uh they're not great

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.000
<v Speaker 1>for a sentiment here. You know, they get really excited

0:22:36.040 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 1>about when the prices up. For us, we felt we've

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 1>actually cut back on the majors and added to the

0:22:42.320 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>royalties because the royalties pay a lot more cash and

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>if we missing the oil goes higher, we'll participate in

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.959
<v Speaker 1>the way. But I think what they forget is that, uh,

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've had a big run and if you

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>do slow the economy down, it's not a guarantee. But

0:22:56.760 --> 0:23:00.480
<v Speaker 1>if you do slow it down, no matter what happened, Um,

0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the price of oil will dri up a

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And I know they never look at this,

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but if you look at miles driven by people in

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the last year, it's down. And so I think, you know, gasling,

0:23:11.320 --> 0:23:14.280
<v Speaker 1>which is a big piece of that will probably be

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:17.320
<v Speaker 1>a news. Consumption will go lower, but there, you know,

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 1>but that's what they think. What we think is it

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>will drift with the economy and then you know, if

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you want to pick it up the lower level, you

0:23:23.880 --> 0:23:26.760
<v Speaker 1>probably can. So you don't think we're gonna see Remember

0:23:26.840 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>in um two thousand and eight, when we knew that

0:23:30.800 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the whole world was going to hell in a handbasket.

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.359
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, um, the Chinese were still driving more and

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.479
<v Speaker 1>more and more cars, and things weren't quite as bad

0:23:39.520 --> 0:23:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in Europe as they were here. Yet the housing crisis

0:23:41.840 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>hadn't rolled around the world and oil went to a

0:23:44.600 --> 0:23:47.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred forty six dollars a barrel. They don't think that's

0:23:47.440 --> 0:23:52.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna happen again. Oh yeah, eventually, Yeah, I do. I

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.239
<v Speaker 1>think I think this is just a short term swoon. Uh.

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>But long term, if you look at if you look

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:02.400
<v Speaker 1>at the numbers and supply the men, it's almost impossible

0:24:02.920 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>not to go back up. I mean, it's just once

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you come out of it into a newer, a better economy.

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>And you gotta remember, China's just coming out to now.

0:24:12.440 --> 0:24:15.359
<v Speaker 1>So once you come out and that's and everybody else,

0:24:15.680 --> 0:24:17.240
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to be in a situation where the

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:19.800
<v Speaker 1>price the price will go, It'll go it had almost

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:22.920
<v Speaker 1>has to go up right now. Not not short term,

0:24:22.960 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>but I'm talking about it in the long term and

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:28.120
<v Speaker 1>has to go up because there's not enough of it. Ted,

0:24:28.320 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>how to folks down in Texas really think about uh

0:24:31.800 --> 0:24:35.879
<v Speaker 1>kind of this move towards a more greener energy, uh

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:38.680
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure if if you will, maybe in terms of time

0:24:39.000 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>or just kind of has an investment opportunity. I mean,

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>are you taking advantage of it even though you're surrounded

0:24:43.680 --> 0:24:47.879
<v Speaker 1>by wildcatters? Oh? Yeah? If you look across Texas and

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:52.240
<v Speaker 1>we have a tremendous amount of wind power now and

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.439
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous amount of solar power, all of those are

0:24:56.600 --> 0:24:57.920
<v Speaker 1>you know there? If you you go out in the

0:24:58.080 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>ranches and uh in Sexes and look around it, they

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:04.479
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of them have windmills now, I mean

0:25:04.560 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot and you know, so they're using wind, they're

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>using solar. It's not they're not um not using it.

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>They just they blended in with the other things they

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 1>had all right, Ted, good stuff appreciated. Always checking in

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:19.200
<v Speaker 1>with you. Ted Oakley. He's a founder and managing partner

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Oxbow Advisors. Let's check out what some of the pros

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 1>are doing in the marketplace here, because again a busy

0:25:27.400 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>busy week, lots of earnings, lots of eco data. Lyle

0:25:30.560 --> 0:25:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Himbau Uh joins us. He's a partner Granted Group Advisors. Lyle,

0:25:36.040 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks for joining us here at Brutal two. We've got

0:25:39.080 --> 0:25:42.240
<v Speaker 1>a busy, busy week here. The markets have rebounded off

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.359
<v Speaker 1>of those October lows. What are you telling your clients?

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 1>Great question right now? You know, you know if everything

0:25:50.200 --> 0:25:53.840
<v Speaker 1>for us is really about you know, valuation, valuation, valuation, right,

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:56.840
<v Speaker 1>So when you look at the market today, and this

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:58.760
<v Speaker 1>is part of the things that we put in our

0:25:58.840 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>quarly commentary to our clients, UH, is that we're treating

0:26:02.320 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 1>at eighteen point two times this year's earnings. In itself,

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:08.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not so bad, but when you look at historical

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>norms of being between fifteen and sixteen, um, it's a

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>little high, right, So we could have a little bit

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of retrenchment here coming down, but it's not so bad

0:26:19.119 --> 0:26:21.200
<v Speaker 1>if we have the growth. But if we don't have

0:26:21.320 --> 0:26:25.320
<v Speaker 1>the growth, there would be really no reason to really

0:26:25.359 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>go chase the market up here at this particular moment,

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and by the way, that's across all companies, even those

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:33.919
<v Speaker 1>that don't have an E. Right, if you look at

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>all the companies, only the ones that have an E,

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 1>we're trading at almost twenty times. Yeah, the ones that

0:26:39.960 --> 0:26:43.080
<v Speaker 1>have an E are like really really the small cap guys.

0:26:43.400 --> 0:26:47.120
<v Speaker 1>There are a bunch of small companies that I tell

0:26:47.160 --> 0:26:49.480
<v Speaker 1>the v C guys that call us a cold cause

0:26:49.560 --> 0:26:51.600
<v Speaker 1>he said, there's no reason for me to place money

0:26:51.600 --> 0:26:54.240
<v Speaker 1>with your privately when I can get public valuation of

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>private value equity valuations in the public market at this point, right,

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:00.119
<v Speaker 1>So some of them are you know, the E is

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.680
<v Speaker 1>essential going forward here in a sort of a flat market.

0:27:03.880 --> 0:27:07.440
<v Speaker 1>How much, by the way, um, how much of this

0:27:07.600 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>could change? We we've been talking about earnings performance on

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:14.919
<v Speaker 1>the SMP on the nasdack, but we're only into it, right.

0:27:15.320 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>What kind of swings do you see in an earning

0:27:17.680 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>season like this, um, when there seems to be so

0:27:21.200 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>much uncertainty in the markets. Is there uncertainty in the

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the remaining of the company's coming out earnings or do

0:27:27.119 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>we have a pretty good indicator? Might be the indications

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.080
<v Speaker 1>are pretty good for those of people that put out

0:27:33.080 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>the earnings in advance. But you know right now, you know,

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:37.640
<v Speaker 1>I think earn the cost of good soul is increasing.

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>So like we don't think there's gonna be a really

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:43.080
<v Speaker 1>hard landing or economic recession, but in the short term here,

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:46.399
<v Speaker 1>I think there's going to be a margin recession. Right,

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>So Poplin is okay, but the bottom line might be

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>affected because it's just so much costs so much more

0:27:55.119 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 1>to you know, you know, to establish that output for

0:27:58.520 --> 0:28:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, to deliver our product, how much of it? Also,

0:28:01.880 --> 0:28:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's being measured against an unfair, unfair time.

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, um, you know, because Paul is so focused

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:12.880
<v Speaker 1>on the media and streaming and everything. Um, they've gone

0:28:12.920 --> 0:28:17.640
<v Speaker 1>through an exceptional and extraordinary period, the likes of which

0:28:18.160 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>is unlikely to be repeated for decades, right, I mean

0:28:20.920 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>once the next time, we're all gonna be locked in

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 1>our homes forced to watch every single program on Netflix. Yeah,

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:31.159
<v Speaker 1>well I'm guilty of that. I went through. Uh, I

0:28:31.240 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>did some binge watching for a while, so the but

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the I can't foresee, you know, you can't predict the unpredictable,

0:28:39.400 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 1>right when stuff like that happens, uh, is it is

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:45.840
<v Speaker 1>really it's it's a once in a lifetime of that,

0:28:45.960 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's why the valuations in tech got so crazy

0:28:48.520 --> 0:28:51.239
<v Speaker 1>back in twenty one. Right at the end of twenty one,

0:28:51.360 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>we were really three standard deviations over valid back in November. Uh,

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in December of twenty one, it was really expensive. And

0:28:59.080 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 1>now then that's why seeing this, you know, you know

0:29:01.640 --> 0:29:05.280
<v Speaker 1>uh pullback in Nastac. The Naszak is still over I

0:29:05.320 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 1>would say that the Nazak is still slightly overvalued. I

0:29:08.040 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>still think we're we have some downside, really interested in general,

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the SMP and the NAZAC. But I think there's going

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 1>to be um another I think a milder leg down

0:29:18.880 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 1>won't be as uh big as twenty two. But three's

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>so far is uh based on what I see in

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the earnings, we should have some short term volatility going

0:29:31.400 --> 0:29:34.080
<v Speaker 1>on to the downside. Lie on. One of the concerns

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:36.960
<v Speaker 1>that I think some some strategists call out, some fund

0:29:37.000 --> 0:29:39.160
<v Speaker 1>managers call out, is earnings risk. And if I look

0:29:39.200 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>at the SMP five hundred on the Bloomberg terminal, looking

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:44.680
<v Speaker 1>like about dollars per share earnings this year, some folks

0:29:44.680 --> 0:29:48.200
<v Speaker 1>are even suggesting the downside to be two hundred two earnings.

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Here are you in that camp? Do you think earnings

0:29:50.120 --> 0:29:53.000
<v Speaker 1>risk is is material in this market? It? You know,

0:29:53.040 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>from when you look at it, that's a great question.

0:29:54.720 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 1>When you look at it from a historical perspective, you know,

0:29:57.640 --> 0:29:59.719
<v Speaker 1>there's I don't want scary audience. But if you look

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>at off Ford p s, you get a much lower

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>SMP number. But let's assume we're not going to have

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this hard landing. And then when you look at the

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>valuations here, you know, assume it's sixteen you know multiple,

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least for the short term, if we

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have you know, a fall off in the economy.

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.880
<v Speaker 1>But at the end of the day, if if the

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:24.280
<v Speaker 1>guys are right there, some people are looking at hundred.

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh my friends over at Cratt Swifts they're saying, uh

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen as the best case scenario, and imply a

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>sixteen multiple, you're getting thirty four hundred, right at least

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.920
<v Speaker 1>on the short term. Right, So but you have to

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, for long term investors, I think

0:30:40.440 --> 0:30:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you really got to look out to twenty four right now.

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:45.920
<v Speaker 1>You see earnings coming down. I saw in Bloomberg. I think, um,

0:30:46.520 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 1>I think earnings for this year down to two twenty

0:30:48.760 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>four to twenty three. But for next year, the earnings

0:30:52.200 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 1>are starting to come down for four and they were

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>at two fifty five. I think that down to two

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.560
<v Speaker 1>seven and that's just starting. UM. So when you look

0:31:01.600 --> 0:31:05.720
<v Speaker 1>at normal metrics, you know, you know you and since

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the market looks forward not backwards, uh, you've really got

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:11.800
<v Speaker 1>to look at you know, sixteen multiple I think would

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>be normal and based it on around two forty or so.

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>And you're gonna get around, Lyle, what do you expect

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to hear from j Powell and co On or really

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>just from UM Chairman Powell on Wednesday? Can you deliver

0:31:27.040 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a very hawkish basis points? Is that what we're looking

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>for now? Yeah? I think I think, I think you

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>know the market is predicting basis points. That's that's that's

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>a done deal. Uh. If he goes fifty basis points,

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.240
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sort of hoping he will, just to rip

0:31:41.320 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the band aid off and get this over with because

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>you remember, his mandate is to really control inflation, and

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>inflation is controlled by wage inflation. Uh. Core inflation is

0:31:51.080 --> 0:31:55.680
<v Speaker 1>controlled by wage inflation. And uh, he's really got to

0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 1>get that on control. If he does fifty, Uh, this

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:01.400
<v Speaker 1>market will go down all right, good stuff appreciated as

0:32:01.480 --> 0:32:04.200
<v Speaker 1>always Lyle Himball. He is a partner at granted A

0:32:04.280 --> 0:32:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Group Advisors. It's interesting Ford hits back at Tesla's price

0:32:10.880 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>cut by lopping nearly six dollars off the Mustang. Mocke

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>I want to see what's going on there. What are

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the folks in Detroit really think about this stuff? Keith not,

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and he covers the autos industry for Bloomberg. He is

0:32:23.600 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>based in our Detroit bureau. Keith, You know Ford here,

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 1>what do you think they're doing? Are they following Tesla?

0:32:30.400 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Are they trying to be a price leader? Is there

0:32:32.400 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>a demand part problem out there? What's going on with

0:32:34.960 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this price cut? They're absolutely following Tesla. That's what they

0:32:38.640 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 1>told me when I asked him that direct question. Is

0:32:40.960 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>this a response to Tesla? The answer was yes. So

0:32:44.440 --> 0:32:46.920
<v Speaker 1>they're trying to, you know, build a beach head in

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the electric vehicle market. Tesla controls two thirds of the

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 1>US market and Ford is the number two seller of

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:58.360
<v Speaker 1>electric vehicles thanks to the Mustang MAKEE. So they're cutting

0:32:58.400 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>prices by an average of forty five hundred dollars a car.

0:33:02.760 --> 0:33:06.600
<v Speaker 1>That's as much as a nine cut um. But Tesla's cuts,

0:33:06.640 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>you might recall, were as much as so Tesla has

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:15.400
<v Speaker 1>a much wider profit margin that it can mind as

0:33:15.480 --> 0:33:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it cuts places. Ford already has admitted that it's losing

0:33:19.120 --> 0:33:22.880
<v Speaker 1>money on the Mackie. But the Machi looks way cooler

0:33:22.920 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>than a Tesla. I mean, the Tesla design hasn't changed

0:33:26.120 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>since I first drove one in two thousand ten, you know. Um,

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and for some cars that works, like the Dodge Challenger

0:33:33.360 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I think has been around in its current form since

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.360
<v Speaker 1>before that. But the Mackie is like the new new thing,

0:33:39.600 --> 0:33:43.760
<v Speaker 1>right or um to my eye at least, it's certainly

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>more interesting and more pleasing. Yeah, I mean, the Mackie

0:33:48.880 --> 0:33:51.960
<v Speaker 1>came out a couple of years ago. It is newer.

0:33:52.320 --> 0:33:57.160
<v Speaker 1>But obviously, you know, American buyers vote with their pocketbooks, right,

0:33:57.400 --> 0:34:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and Tesla controls two thirds of the elect vehicle market

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. So what do the sales look

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:07.240
<v Speaker 1>like for the Maki then, Keith, I mean, um, I'm

0:34:07.280 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 1>seeing more and more than my test drop one last year. Uh,

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 1>and maybe that's what sort of opened my eyes to it. Um.

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Is it is it selling? Well? Oh yeah, man, it's

0:34:20.160 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>selling fantastic for GV sales more than double last year.

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And part of what's going on here in a way

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that Sport is hoping to improve the margin picture on

0:34:30.960 --> 0:34:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this vehicle is they are boosting capacity at their Mexican

0:34:35.600 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>plant by sixty so they planned to build a hundred

0:34:39.360 --> 0:34:42.959
<v Speaker 1>and thirty thousand makis this year, up from sixty seven

0:34:43.000 --> 0:34:45.000
<v Speaker 1>thousand last year. The exciting thing to me is that

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you can get into such a cool looking vehicle, um

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 1>with you know, the obvious torque benefits of an e

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>V for so cheap. I mean, every other vehicle I

0:34:55.800 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>look at is costing eye popping amounts, and this one

0:34:59.719 --> 0:35:06.239
<v Speaker 1>still hovers around you know, forty grand even with options. Yep. Yeah,

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:09.200
<v Speaker 1>the lowest price Mackie. Uh. They cut the price on

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 1>that one by nine hundred dollars, so that now starts

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:17.799
<v Speaker 1>at that's the real old drive one. Uh. The high

0:35:18.000 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 1>end Markie, which is the the GT Uh. They cut

0:35:21.880 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>that price byred so that now starts at six. There's

0:35:27.280 --> 0:35:31.240
<v Speaker 1>another California Route one Extended Range edition that starts around

0:35:31.280 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty seven nine, So you know, it's right starting below

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 1>fifty grand and then climbing well. But Keith, when I

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:41.720
<v Speaker 1>do the math as a consumer, who looks to save

0:35:42.440 --> 0:35:44.719
<v Speaker 1>UH taxes in any way I can. I'm adding the

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:46.840
<v Speaker 1>credit back in. Is that is that right for me

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to add theredit back in? Is that a lock with

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the Ford Mustang Maki or are we still not sure

0:35:53.040 --> 0:35:56.879
<v Speaker 1>exactly who's going to get these credits? Um, you can

0:35:57.160 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>get the credit um currently if you're below fifty K

0:36:01.640 --> 0:36:04.640
<v Speaker 1>on this type of vehicle. So some of the makis

0:36:05.120 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>will call it qualify certainly the the base model at

0:36:10.800 --> 0:36:13.000
<v Speaker 1>but there's also an all wheel drive model that also

0:36:13.160 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 1>is below the bogey. So um you can qualify it

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:20.759
<v Speaker 1>for it on some of the make models. But so

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:24.680
<v Speaker 1>that's the cutoff, not no e V, you know, totally

0:36:25.880 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>b EV if it costs more than fifty five thousand

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:36.319
<v Speaker 1>gets tax credit anymore for this particular model configuration. There's

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:40.600
<v Speaker 1>different levels. It's a very complex formula, so you know

0:36:40.800 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>math and and it's a formula that's still in flux

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:48.239
<v Speaker 1>and will change more in the coming months. Hey, Keith,

0:36:48.239 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>you know Kevin Tynan at Bloomberg Intelligence has been really

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>consistent on his EV analysis over the last several years.

0:36:54.040 --> 0:36:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Were basically saying when Detroit can make money on evs,

0:36:57.880 --> 0:37:00.920
<v Speaker 1>they'll make evs but if they're getting the price here,

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:04.960
<v Speaker 1>what's Ford saying about the profitability the unprofitability of these things.

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Ford has said since June that the profits have been

0:37:09.040 --> 0:37:12.800
<v Speaker 1>wiped out on the make because of rising commodity costs.

0:37:13.320 --> 0:37:15.960
<v Speaker 1>They are working continually to try and cut costs out

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>of this thing. They feel like boosting production as much

0:37:18.760 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 1>as they're doing is going to help the profit picture.

0:37:21.400 --> 0:37:23.240
<v Speaker 1>You know, they're trying to make up for in volume,

0:37:23.280 --> 0:37:25.840
<v Speaker 1>if you will, but they are not making money on

0:37:25.920 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>this car. The choice they're making right now is trying

0:37:29.719 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 1>to gain market share. Established that beach head. They liked

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:36.840
<v Speaker 1>being the number two seller of electric vehicles, way ahead

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.400
<v Speaker 1>of general motors. So they want to stay in that

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.239
<v Speaker 1>position and grow from there. And sometimes you have to

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 1>take some short term pain to make the long term gain. Keith,

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:50.080
<v Speaker 1>you're in Detroit. What are the real car people in Detroit?

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:52.239
<v Speaker 1>What are they saying about the e V business? Are

0:37:52.280 --> 0:38:01.040
<v Speaker 1>they grudgingly moving towards evs? Are rushing get ahead? I

0:38:01.120 --> 0:38:04.280
<v Speaker 1>see these everywhere. There's Tesla's in my neighborhood. There's ribbans

0:38:04.320 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in my neighborhood. They are not knuckle drivers here in Detroit.

0:38:08.000 --> 0:38:12.640
<v Speaker 1>They are driving evs so and everybody likes the instant torque,

0:38:13.360 --> 0:38:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Like Matt, I've driven the Marquee several times. It's a

0:38:16.160 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 1>it's a blast as our all the evs out there

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:24.440
<v Speaker 1>because of that instant torque. I've drove the F one

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty Lightning. You know. You you touch the accelerator pedal

0:38:28.600 --> 0:38:31.040
<v Speaker 1>on that thing and it's like warp speed. So how

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:33.919
<v Speaker 1>can you not enjoy this? So? Yeah, this car town

0:38:34.680 --> 0:38:38.040
<v Speaker 1>loves electric vehicles? Do we do we know whether there's

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:41.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be more needed more laborers to build these

0:38:41.040 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 1>things are less fewer, right, it takes fewer to fewer

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>people put together. Yep. There are fewer moving parts in

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:51.760
<v Speaker 1>an electric vehicle and it'll take I think the estimates

0:38:51.800 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>have been about one third fewer workers to assemble them.

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, you have an electric motor um or multiple

0:38:58.680 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 1>electric motors, there's there's it's not a lot. It's not

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:03.320
<v Speaker 1>as much as you get from an internal combustion engine.

0:39:04.040 --> 0:39:05.759
<v Speaker 1>That's what I thought. That's what I thought. All right,

0:39:05.800 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 1>good stuff. Keith Notton, he's our autist reporter based in Detroit,

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 1>which is a good thing. That's where you want him

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:13.400
<v Speaker 1>to be. Uh, talking about the V business, Forward cutting

0:39:13.480 --> 0:39:17.120
<v Speaker 1>the price on their mocke pretty significant, and I mean

0:39:17.200 --> 0:39:19.840
<v Speaker 1>they're pretty clear. I mean, as Keith was reporting in

0:39:20.040 --> 0:39:23.200
<v Speaker 1>response to Tesla, they want to take market share, and um,

0:39:23.680 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a cool little vehicle to do so. I just

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 1>think they need more. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg

0:39:27.920 --> 0:39:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews with

0:39:31.360 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:39:36.480 --> 0:39:40.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller V three. Pet On

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Ball Sweeney I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney. Before the podcast,

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>you can always catch us worldwide at Bloomberg Radio