WEBVTT - Wait, Did Zuckerberg Get Off Easy?

0:00:00.140 --> 0:00:02.440
<v Speaker 1>A few weeks ago, Meta looked like it was in

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:03.120
<v Speaker 1>deep trouble.

0:00:03.760 --> 0:00:06.300
<v Speaker 2>Meta is back on trial in what could be the

0:00:06.340 --> 0:00:10.480
<v Speaker 2>most consequential moment in social media history. This trial could

0:00:10.619 --> 0:00:14.010
<v Speaker 2>change how teenagers and kids use the platform in the future.

0:00:15.190 --> 0:00:16.489
<v Speaker 1>As a lot of you will know from listening to

0:00:16.530 --> 0:00:18.989
<v Speaker 1>our show, I'm very interested in the recent wave of

0:00:19.070 --> 0:00:22.930
<v Speaker 1>court cases against social media companies for hurting kids. There

0:00:22.950 --> 0:00:24.930
<v Speaker 1>was the woman who won against Meta and YouTube in

0:00:24.950 --> 0:00:28.610
<v Speaker 1>California earlier this year for millions of dollars for addicting

0:00:28.630 --> 0:00:30.470
<v Speaker 1>her to their apps as a teen. And there was

0:00:30.510 --> 0:00:33.190
<v Speaker 1>a trial we sent reporters to in New Mexico where

0:00:33.250 --> 0:00:35.890
<v Speaker 1>Meta was ordered to pay nearly a billion dollars and

0:00:35.930 --> 0:00:39.870
<v Speaker 1>make certain changes to its apps. These were important wins,

0:00:40.270 --> 0:00:43.070
<v Speaker 1>but they were also kind of patchwork. The changes Meta

0:00:43.110 --> 0:00:45.229
<v Speaker 1>was forced to make to Instagram and Facebook in the

0:00:45.270 --> 0:00:48.140
<v Speaker 1>New Mexico case, for instance, they only apply in that state.

0:00:48.780 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>And Meta's appealing in any way, so they could be

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.779
<v Speaker 1>delayed for years. The evidence that's come out in these

0:00:53.820 --> 0:00:57.610
<v Speaker 1>cases is so damning. showing that Meta studied the teen

0:00:57.650 --> 0:01:01.500
<v Speaker 1>brain to build features that would purposefully hook kids, and

0:01:01.520 --> 0:01:05.339
<v Speaker 1>that Mark Zuckerberg himself made decisions to keep features despite

0:01:05.440 --> 0:01:09.020
<v Speaker 1>knowing how dangerous they could be. What I was craving

0:01:09.380 --> 0:01:12.199
<v Speaker 1>as a parent and as someone who covers this is

0:01:12.220 --> 0:01:15.140
<v Speaker 1>a more comprehensive punishment for the company, and really an

0:01:15.380 --> 0:01:18.350
<v Speaker 1>overhaul to their apps and their business that will stop

0:01:18.370 --> 0:01:20.890
<v Speaker 1>them from doing it again. And it seemed like we

0:01:20.910 --> 0:01:23.570
<v Speaker 1>could actually get that with a new trial that began

0:01:23.610 --> 0:01:26.110
<v Speaker 1>in Oakland a few weeks ago. This was part of

0:01:26.150 --> 0:01:29.150
<v Speaker 1>a giant series of lawsuits brought by nearly all of

0:01:29.190 --> 0:01:32.510
<v Speaker 1>the U.S. states and territories. If the states won this case,

0:01:32.890 --> 0:01:34.910
<v Speaker 1>the first of these child harm cases to be tried

0:01:34.950 --> 0:01:38.080
<v Speaker 1>in federal court, Instagram and Facebook could have been forced

0:01:38.100 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>to make big changes to their apps nationwide, such as

0:01:41.540 --> 0:01:45.819
<v Speaker 1>removing the recommendation algorithm for all teens. And the numbers

0:01:45.900 --> 0:01:48.419
<v Speaker 1>being floated for how much Meta would need to pay

0:01:48.900 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>in this case ranged from $ 200 billion to to $ 1. 4 trillion,

0:01:54.540 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>close to the company's entire market cap.

0:01:56.700 --> 0:02:00.900
<v Speaker 3>The financial implications could be massive, billions of dollars hanging

0:02:01.000 --> 0:02:01.620
<v Speaker 3>in the balance.

0:02:03.340 --> 0:02:06.340
<v Speaker 1>Meta had tried a last-ditch effort to get this trial

0:02:06.420 --> 0:02:09.870
<v Speaker 1>blocked by using Section 230, the law, of course, that

0:02:09.910 --> 0:02:13.450
<v Speaker 1>has long shielded social media companies from trials over content

0:02:13.470 --> 0:02:16.150
<v Speaker 1>on their platforms. But the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals

0:02:16.230 --> 0:02:19.570
<v Speaker 1>ruled against Meta. So the trial got going, and eight

0:02:19.610 --> 0:02:22.490
<v Speaker 1>days in, Meta was on the back foot. Its executives

0:02:22.510 --> 0:02:25.109
<v Speaker 1>were getting grilled publicly on the stand. There was a

0:02:25.169 --> 0:02:29.410
<v Speaker 1>real possibility Mark Zuckerberg could be called. And then, right

0:02:29.450 --> 0:02:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the trial, as the head of Instagram,

0:02:32.660 --> 0:02:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Adam Masseri, was testifying, came an announcement. Meta has reached

0:02:37.060 --> 0:02:40.460
<v Speaker 1>a settlement in a landmark social media trial. The state

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:44.060
<v Speaker 1>settled with Meta, 47 of them, along with Puerto Rico, D.C.,

0:02:44.090 --> 0:02:44.649
<v Speaker 1>and other U.S.

0:02:44.690 --> 0:02:45.230
<v Speaker 2>Territories.

0:02:46.169 --> 0:02:48.690
<v Speaker 1>They won some of what they asked for. Meta agreed

0:02:48.710 --> 0:02:51.790
<v Speaker 1>to make certain changes. like limiting teens to two hours

0:02:51.830 --> 0:02:54.730
<v Speaker 1>a day on Instagram and Facebook, turning off access at night,

0:02:55.250 --> 0:02:58.430
<v Speaker 1>investing in better checks for users' ages, and allowing parents

0:02:58.450 --> 0:03:01.750
<v Speaker 1>the choice to make their kids' feeds chronological instead of

0:03:01.790 --> 0:03:05.029
<v Speaker 1>driven by the recommendation algorithm. Meta also agreed to pay

0:03:05.030 --> 0:03:09.860
<v Speaker 1>$ 17 billion. Attorneys general across the country are selling this

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:13.120
<v Speaker 1>as a huge win for them and for kids. But

0:03:13.240 --> 0:03:16.459
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't help but feel disappointed. It still feels piecemeal.

0:03:16.780 --> 0:03:20.370
<v Speaker 1>A small modification here, another one there. rather than the big,

0:03:20.590 --> 0:03:24.310
<v Speaker 1>drastic reimagining that seemed warranted. And it's not just me.

0:03:24.830 --> 0:03:27.590
<v Speaker 1>Others have weighed in. This is still chump change. I mean,

0:03:27.630 --> 0:03:30.690
<v Speaker 1>this is a company that makes a huge amount of money.

0:03:30.889 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 2>It's like they just paid people to just keep on

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:34.940
<v Speaker 2>making death machines.

0:03:35.460 --> 0:03:38.220
<v Speaker 1>The Florida attorney general, who is also suing Meta but

0:03:38.340 --> 0:03:42.260
<v Speaker 1>held out from settling, called the payouts peanuts. Meta's stock

0:03:42.540 --> 0:03:45.470
<v Speaker 1>rallied after the settlement, enough to pay for the $ 17 billion.

0:03:46.450 --> 0:03:50.720
<v Speaker 1>What's more, Arturo Behar... a whistleblower from Facebook who testified

0:03:50.840 --> 0:03:54.110
<v Speaker 1>for the states in this case, said after they settled

0:03:54.410 --> 0:03:57.650
<v Speaker 1>that the changes the AGs got wouldn't have prevented many

0:03:57.670 --> 0:03:59.970
<v Speaker 1>of the teen deaths that have been blamed on social media.

0:03:59.990 --> 0:04:02.730
<v Speaker 1>The good way to think about what happened is we're

0:04:02.750 --> 0:04:05.710
<v Speaker 1>telling teens that it's OK to smoke cigarettes for two

0:04:05.730 --> 0:04:06.170
<v Speaker 1>hours a.

0:04:06.150 --> 0:04:08.970
<v Speaker 2>Day rather than as much as they could. And that's

0:04:09.070 --> 0:04:09.810
<v Speaker 2>just not enough.

0:04:11.180 --> 0:04:12.900
<v Speaker 1>It seemed like the states were in a position to

0:04:13.020 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>finally take meta to task. for building products they knew

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:18.779
<v Speaker 1>were dangerous and getting millions of kids hooked on them

0:04:19.000 --> 0:04:22.419
<v Speaker 1>for massive profits. The states had two jury victories at

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.029
<v Speaker 1>their backs. Meta was feeling the pressure. Why did they

0:04:26.070 --> 0:04:29.529
<v Speaker 1>give in? Do the attorneys general really see this settlement

0:04:29.570 --> 0:04:31.650
<v Speaker 1>as a win? Or are they spinning it as one

0:04:31.910 --> 0:04:34.930
<v Speaker 1>when really they wanted a lot more? So I called

0:04:34.970 --> 0:04:37.710
<v Speaker 1>up the AG who led the settlement negotiations with Meta.

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to ask him.

0:04:39.260 --> 0:04:42.220
<v Speaker 2>Some big companies have armies of lawyers. Meta has armies

0:04:42.260 --> 0:04:44.890
<v Speaker 2>of law firms. I mean, their resources are basically those

0:04:44.910 --> 0:04:45.969
<v Speaker 2>of like a nation state.

0:04:46.410 --> 0:04:49.330
<v Speaker 1>From Placement Theory and KCRW, this is Question Everything. We

0:04:49.350 --> 0:04:52.830
<v Speaker 1>investigate how the truth gets buried, distorted, and denied, and

0:04:52.850 --> 0:04:54.740
<v Speaker 1>the ways people are fighting to make it matter again.

0:04:55.300 --> 0:04:58.700
<v Speaker 1>I'm Brian Reed. Today, my interview with the Attorney General

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:08.620
<v Speaker 1>of Tennessee. Stick around. Hi, Attorney General Scarametti. How are you?

0:05:08.860 --> 0:05:10.039
<v Speaker 2>Good. Good to meet you.

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:13.919
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Scarametti is the Attorney General of Tennessee. He was

0:05:13.980 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the 40-some-odd state attorneys general suing Metta for

0:05:17.370 --> 0:05:20.050
<v Speaker 1>harming teens in his state. His legal team had actually

0:05:20.250 --> 0:05:23.070
<v Speaker 1>just concluded their own trial against the company in state

0:05:23.110 --> 0:05:25.930
<v Speaker 1>court and were waiting for a verdict on that as

0:05:25.990 --> 0:05:28.990
<v Speaker 1>the federal trial began in Oakland. And as all this

0:05:29.010 --> 0:05:32.000
<v Speaker 1>was happening, Scarametti had also been chosen by his fellow

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>attorneys general to represent them in settlement negotiations with Metta.

0:05:36.120 --> 0:05:40.380
<v Speaker 1>Scramendi's a Republican. He led the negotiations alongside Colorado's attorney general,

0:05:40.620 --> 0:05:44.140
<v Speaker 1>a Democrat. They both have experience dealing with tech. Scramendi's

0:05:44.180 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>led lawsuits against Google and Roblox. He also used to

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.420
<v Speaker 1>teach cyber law at the University of Memphis. So he

0:05:50.460 --> 0:05:52.460
<v Speaker 1>and the Colorado AG were the ones who'd get on

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:55.020
<v Speaker 1>the phone with Mehta's lawyers, then report back to the

0:05:55.100 --> 0:05:57.790
<v Speaker 1>larger group of AGs trying to hammer out a deal.

0:05:58.620 --> 0:06:01.390
<v Speaker 1>But nothing had come of it all year until this

0:06:01.470 --> 0:06:04.940
<v Speaker 1>sudden settlement was announced mid-trial. I read that at one point,

0:06:05.200 --> 0:06:07.409
<v Speaker 1>as you were discussing the settlement and whether to take it,

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.940
<v Speaker 1>you turned to your fellow attorneys general from different states

0:06:10.980 --> 0:06:13.900
<v Speaker 1>around the country and said, there's a saying here in Tennessee,

0:06:13.960 --> 0:06:17.250
<v Speaker 1>pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered. Is that true?

0:06:17.290 --> 0:06:17.930
<v Speaker 1>Did you say that?

0:06:18.990 --> 0:06:19.230
<v Speaker 2>I did.

0:06:19.250 --> 0:06:19.950
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:20.570 --> 0:06:24.310
<v Speaker 2>Why did you think you were going to get slaughtered? Well, politically,

0:06:24.390 --> 0:06:26.450
<v Speaker 2>maybe it is better to go through to the end

0:06:26.490 --> 0:06:29.409
<v Speaker 2>of trial and just sock it to them. But when

0:06:29.450 --> 0:06:32.930
<v Speaker 2>we started this years ago, the goal was always to

0:06:32.990 --> 0:06:35.830
<v Speaker 2>solve the problem. We want to do whatever we can

0:06:36.010 --> 0:06:39.570
<v Speaker 2>collectively as the attorneys general of the states that we

0:06:39.610 --> 0:06:44.310
<v Speaker 2>represent to protect our kids. I mean, if the goal

0:06:44.330 --> 0:06:47.299
<v Speaker 2>was to just whack the money pinata that is meta

0:06:47.420 --> 0:06:51.739
<v Speaker 2>until as many dollars as possible were extracted, that doesn't

0:06:51.779 --> 0:06:54.339
<v Speaker 2>necessarily do the kids any good. It drags the cases

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:58.170
<v Speaker 2>out and it creates a lot of risk. And Getting

0:06:58.190 --> 0:07:01.430
<v Speaker 2>a framework in place that actually limits the harm that

0:07:01.450 --> 0:07:04.929
<v Speaker 2>the platform can do is better for us than having,

0:07:05.450 --> 0:07:08.550
<v Speaker 2>you know, five to 10 years of appeals against an

0:07:08.650 --> 0:07:15.170
<v Speaker 2>extremely well-resourced, extremely sophisticated opponent who could potentially invalidate everything

0:07:15.190 --> 0:07:16.090
<v Speaker 2>that we've been doing.

0:07:16.980 --> 0:07:19.510
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General Scarametti told me he was particularly worried that

0:07:19.560 --> 0:07:23.340
<v Speaker 1>Metta could keep wielding Section 230 in appeal courts, potentially

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:25.500
<v Speaker 1>all the way up to the Supreme Court, and ultimately

0:07:25.540 --> 0:07:28.140
<v Speaker 1>get the whole case thrown out. Still, I told him

0:07:28.260 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>from where I was watching, it seemed like he and

0:07:30.660 --> 0:07:33.220
<v Speaker 1>the other attorneys general had the upper hand here. You know,

0:07:33.260 --> 0:07:36.780
<v Speaker 1>you'd had two juries in other states who had landed

0:07:36.880 --> 0:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>major defeats to Meta. Meta was being forced to disclose

0:07:40.300 --> 0:07:43.430
<v Speaker 1>lots of damaging info publicly at trial. There was talk

0:07:43.470 --> 0:07:46.290
<v Speaker 1>of Mark Zuckerberg possibly having to testify. You're in the

0:07:46.310 --> 0:07:49.850
<v Speaker 1>middle of trial, mid-testimony of the head of Instagram. Why

0:07:49.870 --> 0:07:51.250
<v Speaker 1>did you give in?

0:07:51.290 --> 0:07:55.140
<v Speaker 2>It felt disappointing. There's never been... settlement like this in

0:07:55.160 --> 0:07:58.080
<v Speaker 2>the tech industry. You know, we banged our head against

0:07:58.100 --> 0:08:00.740
<v Speaker 2>the wall with the antitrust suits against these big companies.

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:05.190
<v Speaker 2>We outright lost the Facebook monopoly case. So we've had

0:08:05.230 --> 0:08:09.190
<v Speaker 2>some frustrations where everything looks like it's going our way,

0:08:09.310 --> 0:08:11.330
<v Speaker 2>or at least we feel pretty good about our cases.

0:08:12.130 --> 0:08:14.890
<v Speaker 2>You know, we gave up on some glory and we

0:08:14.930 --> 0:08:19.060
<v Speaker 2>gave up on the catharsis of getting the jury verdict returned.

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:22.560
<v Speaker 2>But All of that was in furtherance of the long-term

0:08:22.600 --> 0:08:26.280
<v Speaker 2>strategy of finding the most effective way to protect kids

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:30.670
<v Speaker 2>in our states. And so, you know, it's the nerdier outcome.

0:08:30.790 --> 0:08:34.069
<v Speaker 2>It's the blander outcome. I think it's the more lasting outcome.

0:08:34.710 --> 0:08:37.810
<v Speaker 2>This is injunctive relief beyond what a lot of us

0:08:37.850 --> 0:08:39.470
<v Speaker 2>thought we would be able to get out of this,

0:08:39.950 --> 0:08:41.390
<v Speaker 2>or at least than I thought we would get.

0:08:41.670 --> 0:08:44.850
<v Speaker 1>Injunctive relief is the changes that META agreed to make

0:08:44.929 --> 0:08:47.090
<v Speaker 1>to its products, basically, and its practices.

0:08:47.190 --> 0:08:51.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, right. Changing the platform was always the number one priority.

0:08:51.300 --> 0:08:54.900
<v Speaker 1>AG Scrimetti says the big win here is not the

0:08:54.980 --> 0:08:57.990
<v Speaker 1>money Meta agreed to pay. It's the redesigns the company

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.810
<v Speaker 1>committed to make to Instagram and Facebook. After this settlement,

0:09:02.309 --> 0:09:04.309
<v Speaker 1>kids will have a pretty different experience on these apps.

0:09:05.090 --> 0:09:06.550
<v Speaker 1>Teens will only be able to use them up to

0:09:06.650 --> 0:09:09.290
<v Speaker 1>two hours a day, and they'll get an alert after

0:09:09.410 --> 0:09:13.030
<v Speaker 1>every 15 minutes of continuous screen use. They'll no longer

0:09:13.090 --> 0:09:17.829
<v Speaker 1>get those unsolicited push notifications during school hours. and teens'

0:09:17.910 --> 0:09:20.620
<v Speaker 1>feeds will be shut off between midnight and 6 a.m.

0:09:21.600 --> 0:09:24.540
<v Speaker 1>Parents will also get new controls over their kids' accounts.

0:09:25.140 --> 0:09:27.380
<v Speaker 1>For instance, parents will now be able to choose whether

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:31.420
<v Speaker 1>their kids are exposed to Facebook and Instagram's recommendation algorithm,

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.359
<v Speaker 1>which was modeled after a slot machine and shown to

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.230
<v Speaker 1>be addictive. They'll also get to choose whether to turn

0:09:37.280 --> 0:09:39.950
<v Speaker 1>on features such as light counts and beauty filters for

0:09:39.970 --> 0:09:43.150
<v Speaker 1>their kids that have been shown to lead to depression, anxiety,

0:09:43.450 --> 0:09:47.740
<v Speaker 1>and body dysmorphia. To implement all this, Meta has agreed

0:09:47.770 --> 0:09:50.679
<v Speaker 1>to specific improvements in the way it checks users' ages.

0:09:51.200 --> 0:09:53.180
<v Speaker 1>Meta will also have to give access to an auditor

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.870
<v Speaker 1>that the states will appoint to make sure the company

0:09:55.890 --> 0:09:58.449
<v Speaker 1>is doing everything it said it would. The closest thing

0:09:58.470 --> 0:10:01.479
<v Speaker 1>to a regulator this industry has seen. Scrimendi told me

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:04.320
<v Speaker 1>he's very skeptical they would have gotten changes this strong

0:10:04.660 --> 0:10:06.240
<v Speaker 1>if they'd left it to the whim of a jury

0:10:06.559 --> 0:10:06.939
<v Speaker 1>or judge.

0:10:07.660 --> 0:10:09.980
<v Speaker 2>I think we would have had some time restrictions. I

0:10:10.020 --> 0:10:13.540
<v Speaker 2>think we would have had some, you know, some limitations

0:10:13.620 --> 0:10:16.220
<v Speaker 2>on notifications. I don't think we would have had the

0:10:16.380 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 2>option for parents to turn off the algorithmic feed altogether.

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:21.660
<v Speaker 2>I think that's the best outcome here, right, is just

0:10:22.179 --> 0:10:27.080
<v Speaker 2>switching to a chronological feed. Giving parents that option takes

0:10:27.140 --> 0:10:30.940
<v Speaker 2>away so many of the problems and lets kids enjoy

0:10:30.960 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 2>the benefit of connecting with their friends without subjecting them

0:10:34.110 --> 0:10:37.510
<v Speaker 2>to all of the algorithmic chicanery that warped their brains.

0:10:38.350 --> 0:10:40.010
<v Speaker 2>I think there would have been a lot of reluctance

0:10:40.070 --> 0:10:41.830
<v Speaker 2>on the part of a court to dig into the

0:10:41.870 --> 0:10:48.590
<v Speaker 2>machinery of addiction inside the platform as thoroughly and effectively

0:10:48.630 --> 0:10:50.030
<v Speaker 2>as I think we're able to do with the deal.

0:10:50.110 --> 0:10:53.370
<v Speaker 2>And it's really using a hatchet where the settlement lets

0:10:53.429 --> 0:10:54.290
<v Speaker 2>us take a scalpel.

0:10:54.650 --> 0:10:56.130
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have an example to look at in

0:10:56.170 --> 0:10:58.720
<v Speaker 1>New Mexico, which we've reported on here that did go

0:10:58.750 --> 0:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>through a trial where eventually a judge issued a court

0:11:02.010 --> 0:11:04.540
<v Speaker 1>order doing what you're saying. He did go through a

0:11:04.700 --> 0:11:09.059
<v Speaker 1>lot of very detailed or relatively detailed, I think, features

0:11:09.100 --> 0:11:12.010
<v Speaker 1>on the platform. And some he said, I don't I

0:11:12.030 --> 0:11:13.890
<v Speaker 1>think I'm restricted in weighing in on these others. He

0:11:13.929 --> 0:11:17.929
<v Speaker 1>did weigh in on sometimes as granular as hours when

0:11:18.510 --> 0:11:22.050
<v Speaker 1>a platform can send notifications, you know, to kids. So

0:11:22.950 --> 0:11:24.630
<v Speaker 1>did you look at that? Cause it came out kind

0:11:24.650 --> 0:11:26.350
<v Speaker 1>of as you were in the midst of your trial

0:11:26.670 --> 0:11:28.229
<v Speaker 1>and did it play a role in your decision to

0:11:28.290 --> 0:11:30.929
<v Speaker 1>settle seeing how the judge had, you know, kind of

0:11:30.970 --> 0:11:32.550
<v Speaker 1>dealt with those issues in New Mexico?

0:11:34.450 --> 0:11:36.290
<v Speaker 2>We did look at it and in some ways we

0:11:36.309 --> 0:11:37.910
<v Speaker 2>were able to do better. I mean, in terms of

0:11:37.929 --> 0:11:40.069
<v Speaker 2>the time limits over the course of a month, um,

0:11:41.100 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 2>you know, the New Mexico judge allowed more hours than

0:11:43.870 --> 0:11:45.150
<v Speaker 2>our settlement agreement allows.

0:11:45.730 --> 0:11:47.750
<v Speaker 1>So it's like New Mexico got three hours per day

0:11:47.910 --> 0:11:50.610
<v Speaker 1>of a limit, roughly, and you all got two hours

0:11:50.650 --> 0:11:50.970
<v Speaker 1>per day.

0:11:51.270 --> 0:11:51.670
<v Speaker 2>Correct.

0:11:52.490 --> 0:11:54.610
<v Speaker 1>It is also true that the judge in New Mexico,

0:11:54.910 --> 0:11:58.100
<v Speaker 1>in his ruling against Meta, declined to force the company

0:11:58.150 --> 0:12:01.020
<v Speaker 1>to change its algorithm at all, even though he acknowledged

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:04.300
<v Speaker 1>that it seriously addicted and harmed kids. The judge said

0:12:04.380 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>Section 230 and the First Amendment tied his hands there.

0:12:07.660 --> 0:12:10.650
<v Speaker 1>By negotiating with Meta in a settlement, Scermetti and the

0:12:10.730 --> 0:12:13.860
<v Speaker 1>other attorneys general were able to circumvent that legal hurdle.

0:12:14.410 --> 0:12:16.500
<v Speaker 1>And he told me it was hard won. They tried

0:12:16.510 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to get Meta to remove the recommendation algorithm altogether for kids.

0:12:20.340 --> 0:12:24.620
<v Speaker 2>Which, in an ideal world, would be how this was implemented.

0:12:24.700 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 2>To say, hey, for kids, we're not going to use

0:12:28.500 --> 0:12:31.440
<v Speaker 2>the addictive content delivery system that we've worked so hard

0:12:31.460 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 2>to develop.

0:12:32.540 --> 0:12:34.959
<v Speaker 1>But Meta refused to go that far. I guess that's

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.860
<v Speaker 1>how valuable the algorithm is to them. In keeping users,

0:12:38.040 --> 0:12:42.490
<v Speaker 1>even kids under 18, scrolling, scrolling, scrolling. And what did

0:12:42.570 --> 0:12:44.790
<v Speaker 1>you got? So is it the default that the algorithm

0:12:44.850 --> 0:12:47.370
<v Speaker 1>is on for kids or the default that it's off?

0:12:48.130 --> 0:12:51.340
<v Speaker 2>The default is that it's on. Parents can turn it off. Okay.

0:12:51.510 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 2>So we weren't able to completely eliminate the algorithm. But,

0:12:56.179 --> 0:12:58.660
<v Speaker 2>you know, I think the New Mexico experience shows that

0:12:58.820 --> 0:13:02.620
<v Speaker 2>is not something likely if we want to trial. I mean,

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:05.340
<v Speaker 2>that's a huge move for a court to make to

0:13:05.380 --> 0:13:09.050
<v Speaker 2>say we're going to completely rewrite how your business interacts

0:13:09.070 --> 0:13:11.620
<v Speaker 2>with with children at the most fundamental level.

0:13:12.380 --> 0:13:15.820
<v Speaker 1>It struck me, talking to Attorney General Scarametti, how fearful

0:13:15.900 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 1>he was, not only of Metta's legal prowess, but of

0:13:19.760 --> 0:13:22.350
<v Speaker 1>the laws he has to operate within in general when

0:13:22.450 --> 0:13:25.270
<v Speaker 1>suing a social media company like Metta. I could hear

0:13:25.330 --> 0:13:28.270
<v Speaker 1>him navigating all these legal tripwires as he gamed out

0:13:28.330 --> 0:13:31.209
<v Speaker 1>his different paths. Section 230 could trip me up if

0:13:31.250 --> 0:13:33.410
<v Speaker 1>I try to go for this. The First Amendment could

0:13:33.429 --> 0:13:34.720
<v Speaker 1>get in the way if I try to get that.

0:13:35.550 --> 0:13:38.530
<v Speaker 1>Those laws are huge protections Meta and other social media

0:13:38.570 --> 0:13:43.620
<v Speaker 1>companies have from liability. Meanwhile, Congress and state legislatures have

0:13:43.740 --> 0:13:46.860
<v Speaker 1>not passed strong regulations for social media, which leaves the

0:13:46.900 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>attorneys general without much to draw on. They have to

0:13:49.820 --> 0:13:52.059
<v Speaker 1>come up with inventive ways to use laws that were

0:13:52.140 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>not written for tech to go after these companies, like

0:13:55.760 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>old consumer protection laws that have traditionally been used to

0:13:58.540 --> 0:14:01.949
<v Speaker 1>go after companies selling defective toys or cars, or public

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.170
<v Speaker 1>nuisance laws that that previously applied to factories that are

0:14:05.190 --> 0:14:08.030
<v Speaker 1>polluting the air. They've had to wield those against Meta,

0:14:08.610 --> 0:14:11.010
<v Speaker 1>all the while worrying if they make one wrong move,

0:14:11.570 --> 0:14:14.460
<v Speaker 1>will it bring their whole case crashing down? I want

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.180
<v Speaker 1>to ask you quickly about age verification, even though it's

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:18.000
<v Speaker 1>not a quick subject.

0:14:18.420 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, cool.

0:14:20.220 --> 0:14:22.320
<v Speaker 1>As we've gone into in other episodes, one of the

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.340
<v Speaker 1>questions that shoots through all these cases with social media

0:14:25.920 --> 0:14:29.000
<v Speaker 1>is how are these companies verifying the ages of their users?

0:14:29.020 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to have specific restrictions for teens... you

0:14:32.740 --> 0:14:35.360
<v Speaker 1>need to know that they are, in fact, teens. When

0:14:35.380 --> 0:14:37.800
<v Speaker 1>people sign up for Instagram or Facebook, they just have

0:14:37.840 --> 0:14:40.300
<v Speaker 1>to give their age on the honor system. And the

0:14:40.340 --> 0:14:43.420
<v Speaker 1>company knows that, for instance, kids under the age of 13,

0:14:43.420 --> 0:14:45.580
<v Speaker 1>which is Meta's own cutoff for being old enough to

0:14:45.660 --> 0:14:48.860
<v Speaker 1>use its apps, routinely lie to get on them. The

0:14:48.900 --> 0:14:52.250
<v Speaker 1>company doesn't require IDs, and the new settlement doesn't require

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.990
<v Speaker 1>them either. That would be called age verification. What Meta

0:14:56.010 --> 0:14:58.290
<v Speaker 1>has agreed to with Tennessee and the other states is

0:14:58.330 --> 0:15:01.370
<v Speaker 1>to get better at what's known in industry jargon as

0:15:01.650 --> 0:15:05.770
<v Speaker 1>age assurance. which is using various other tactics like having

0:15:05.790 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>their AI monitor users' posts or see the ages of

0:15:09.120 --> 0:15:12.080
<v Speaker 1>their friends, things like that, to ferret out which accounts

0:15:12.400 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>might be underage. What did you get that's key that

0:15:15.160 --> 0:15:17.740
<v Speaker 1>you feel like this is going to be better, like

0:15:17.760 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 1>we're actually going to know who are kids and who aren't?

0:15:20.660 --> 0:15:23.470
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the best thing about it is it exists, right?

0:15:23.490 --> 0:15:26.610
<v Speaker 2>We have a state statute that attempts to impose age verification.

0:15:26.650 --> 0:15:29.720
<v Speaker 2>We are getting whooped in court. trying to implement that.

0:15:30.060 --> 0:15:32.740
<v Speaker 2>So it's either nothing or something. They were willing to

0:15:32.800 --> 0:15:34.820
<v Speaker 2>concede to something that I don't know that we could

0:15:34.840 --> 0:15:35.900
<v Speaker 2>have otherwise obtained.

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:38.660
<v Speaker 1>And what did they agree to? Like, what's the highlight?

0:15:39.420 --> 0:15:40.860
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the highlight is they're going to use the

0:15:40.900 --> 0:15:43.980
<v Speaker 2>data that they have to have a very good idea

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.740
<v Speaker 2>of whether an individual user is a particular age. And

0:15:48.040 --> 0:15:51.340
<v Speaker 2>this is a very technical discussion. I'm not super in

0:15:51.380 --> 0:15:54.850
<v Speaker 2>the weeds. There were some staff members that just lived

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:56.300
<v Speaker 2>nothing but age assurance.

0:15:56.950 --> 0:15:57.290
<v Speaker 1>Bless them.

0:15:57.390 --> 0:15:59.170
<v Speaker 2>Getting to an agreement that they felt good about.

0:15:59.230 --> 0:15:59.390
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:15:59.550 --> 0:15:59.990
<v Speaker 2>Bless them.

0:16:00.850 --> 0:16:03.190
<v Speaker 1>I asked our producer, Zach St. Louis, who was part

0:16:03.210 --> 0:16:05.150
<v Speaker 1>of our coverage of the New Mexico trial, became our

0:16:05.170 --> 0:16:09.250
<v Speaker 1>show's resident reporter on age verification. Bless him. To take

0:16:09.270 --> 0:16:11.550
<v Speaker 1>a look at the concessions Scermetti and co. got here.

0:16:12.130 --> 0:16:14.730
<v Speaker 1>And he said what Meta agreed to does go further

0:16:14.770 --> 0:16:17.810
<v Speaker 1>than they have before. In New Mexico, even though the

0:16:17.850 --> 0:16:20.810
<v Speaker 1>state won the case at trial, the judge forced Meta

0:16:20.830 --> 0:16:23.220
<v Speaker 1>to do less on age checks than the company agreed

0:16:23.250 --> 0:16:26.180
<v Speaker 1>to in this settlement. The New Mexico judge said Meta

0:16:26.220 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>had to, quote, improve on age assurance. Attorney General Scrimetti

0:16:30.280 --> 0:16:33.820
<v Speaker 1>and his colleagues got Meta to commit to specific accuracy

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:37.400
<v Speaker 1>targets in identifying underage accounts and getting them off the app.

0:16:38.000 --> 0:16:40.340
<v Speaker 1>And Meta agreed to have an auditor who will hold

0:16:40.380 --> 0:16:43.610
<v Speaker 1>them to those targets. Scrimetti doesn't know if they would

0:16:43.630 --> 0:16:45.810
<v Speaker 1>have been able to accomplish that if they'd stayed in court.

0:16:46.650 --> 0:16:48.770
<v Speaker 2>We are going to have a lot more age assurance

0:16:48.810 --> 0:16:52.050
<v Speaker 2>than we currently have. And so that's another win where

0:16:52.070 --> 0:16:53.770
<v Speaker 2>you look at what the alternative would be if we

0:16:53.810 --> 0:16:55.750
<v Speaker 2>hadn't been able to reach an agreement. And the alternative

0:16:55.790 --> 0:16:56.960
<v Speaker 2>might have been we get nothing.

0:17:03.000 --> 0:17:06.139
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, the biggest demand Meta had in order to

0:17:06.200 --> 0:17:16.510
<v Speaker 1>settle that came right from the top. I'll report it.

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:21.430
<v Speaker 1>At the beginning of this year, Mehta hired a new

0:17:21.470 --> 0:17:24.790
<v Speaker 1>chief legal officer named C.J. Mahoney. He used to be

0:17:24.850 --> 0:17:27.970
<v Speaker 1>Microsoft's general counsel and worked in the first Trump administration.

0:17:28.970 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>Days into his new job at Mehta, back in January,

0:17:31.940 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>he called up Attorney General Scrimetti, saying he wanted to

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.160
<v Speaker 1>start discussing a deal. Over the course of the next

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.169
<v Speaker 1>eight months, while Mehta suffered one loss after another in

0:17:40.190 --> 0:17:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the other child safety trials... Mahoney would put up a

0:17:43.000 --> 0:17:46.359
<v Speaker 1>good front publicly in interviews, insisting Mehta was going to

0:17:46.420 --> 0:17:47.020
<v Speaker 1>fight to the end.

0:17:47.340 --> 0:17:49.530
<v Speaker 2>We disagree with these verdicts, respectfully.

0:17:49.970 --> 0:17:51.810
<v Speaker 3>We think that they're vulnerable on appeal, and we're going

0:17:51.830 --> 0:17:53.330
<v Speaker 3>to pursue those appeals aggressively.

0:17:53.990 --> 0:17:56.530
<v Speaker 1>But behind the scenes, he was very eager to strike

0:17:56.570 --> 0:17:59.649
<v Speaker 1>a deal to make the suits go away. Just days

0:17:59.710 --> 0:18:03.300
<v Speaker 1>before the multi-state trial started in Oakland, Mahoney flew to

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:05.859
<v Speaker 1>Nashville to meet with Attorney General Scarametti and some of

0:18:05.900 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the other AG's offices. Mehta was prepared to offer a

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:12.399
<v Speaker 1>significant settlement. Mark Zuckerberg had approved it. But there was

0:18:12.590 --> 0:18:14.690
<v Speaker 1>one condition that was non-negotiable.

0:18:15.369 --> 0:18:16.270
<v Speaker 2>The contingency.

0:18:17.130 --> 0:18:19.850
<v Speaker 1>Mahoney insisted on a structure where Meta would agree to

0:18:19.869 --> 0:18:23.189
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of baseline things. A minimum payment, certain changes

0:18:23.230 --> 0:18:25.780
<v Speaker 1>to its platforms. But the company would agree to do

0:18:25.900 --> 0:18:31.659
<v Speaker 1>more contingent on its competitors also changing their platforms. TikTok, Snapchat,

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.949
<v Speaker 1>and YouTube. Meta didn't want to go down alone. So

0:18:35.990 --> 0:18:39.170
<v Speaker 1>for instance, sure the settlement was for $ 17 billion dollars.

0:18:39.770 --> 0:18:42.300
<v Speaker 1>But Meta only has to pay the full $ 17 billion

0:18:42.690 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>if the other companies settle with the states on similar

0:18:45.340 --> 0:18:48.960
<v Speaker 1>terms as well. Otherwise, Meta only has to pay $ 12 billion.

0:18:49.980 --> 0:18:52.500
<v Speaker 1>Same with some of the app modifications. As of now,

0:18:52.619 --> 0:18:55.020
<v Speaker 1>Meta is limiting Teams to two hours per day on

0:18:55.060 --> 0:18:57.540
<v Speaker 1>its apps. But if all the other companies sign on,

0:18:57.720 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>it's agreed to drop the limit down to one hour.

0:19:00.180 --> 0:19:03.260
<v Speaker 1>Throughout all its negotiations with Scrimeti and the other AGs,

0:19:03.740 --> 0:19:06.790
<v Speaker 1>Meta was dead set on this. Which I found interesting

0:19:06.810 --> 0:19:08.990
<v Speaker 1>to hear, because I'd seen the company focus on the

0:19:09.030 --> 0:19:12.220
<v Speaker 1>same thing in the other trials this year, like in

0:19:12.260 --> 0:19:15.840
<v Speaker 1>New Mexico. In court, Meta's lawyers kept saying, hey, the

0:19:15.880 --> 0:19:18.459
<v Speaker 1>other social media apps are doing the same things. Why

0:19:18.480 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>are you picking on us? They seemed fixated on this.

0:19:21.760 --> 0:19:25.640
<v Speaker 1>What does that tell you about Meta, about the industry?

0:19:26.050 --> 0:19:28.369
<v Speaker 2>So I think there are two things driving that. The

0:19:28.390 --> 0:19:33.170
<v Speaker 2>first is pure capitalism. Other industry participants are doing the

0:19:33.230 --> 0:19:36.790
<v Speaker 2>same bad thing. And by moving first, Meta is going

0:19:36.830 --> 0:19:39.389
<v Speaker 2>to lose ground to them competitively. Now they're trying to

0:19:39.490 --> 0:19:42.500
<v Speaker 2>pivot and say, hey, we're the responsible ones who took

0:19:42.540 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 2>the deal first. And that's the smart thing for them

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:46.909
<v Speaker 2>to do. We expected they would do that. We get

0:19:46.950 --> 0:19:47.590
<v Speaker 2>that they do that.

0:19:47.830 --> 0:19:50.060
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, they're running an ad campaign now to try and

0:19:50.080 --> 0:19:54.520
<v Speaker 1>like shame TikTok and YouTube and Snapchat into settling with

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:57.900
<v Speaker 1>you guys as well. There's a big newspaper print campaign

0:19:57.940 --> 0:20:00.200
<v Speaker 1>Meta's doing, calling on those other companies to strike their

0:20:00.240 --> 0:20:03.690
<v Speaker 1>own deal with the states. Also, Chief Legal Officer C.J.

0:20:03.730 --> 0:20:06.850
<v Speaker 1>Mahoney released this video after the deal was finalized.

0:20:07.890 --> 0:20:09.050
<v Speaker 2>Our new time limit commitments.

0:20:09.540 --> 0:20:12.680
<v Speaker 3>Night mode features, and usage limits during school hours set

0:20:12.720 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 3>the right path forward for our whole industry. But this

0:20:15.290 --> 0:20:17.800
<v Speaker 3>framework will only work if all our peers join us.

0:20:18.290 --> 0:20:21.449
<v Speaker 3>We therefore call on our industry peers, TikTok and YouTube,

0:20:22.070 --> 0:20:25.590
<v Speaker 3>to implement this new framework right away. As a parent,

0:20:26.170 --> 0:20:27.990
<v Speaker 3>I'm proud both of the work Meta has done to

0:20:28.030 --> 0:20:31.260
<v Speaker 3>protect kids historically and of this new groundbreaking agreement.

0:20:32.940 --> 0:20:35.689
<v Speaker 1>Scrimetti says this moral high ground tour doesn't bother him.

0:20:36.450 --> 0:20:38.909
<v Speaker 2>I'm not opposed to this. I would love the entire

0:20:38.950 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 2>industry to do what they are supposed to do. And

0:20:42.300 --> 0:20:45.460
<v Speaker 2>we sued Meta. They were the first ones we went after.

0:20:45.600 --> 0:20:48.600
<v Speaker 2>So I think that shows it was a priority for

0:20:48.660 --> 0:20:51.369
<v Speaker 2>us to get them in line. But they got in line.

0:20:52.170 --> 0:20:54.310
<v Speaker 2>So I don't mind them bragging about it a little

0:20:54.330 --> 0:20:57.270
<v Speaker 2>bit now that they're on board. I think there's another

0:20:57.369 --> 0:21:00.229
<v Speaker 2>dynamic here too, though. And that is Mark Zuckerberg has

0:21:00.270 --> 0:21:03.100
<v Speaker 2>been singled out as kind of the face of evil

0:21:03.119 --> 0:21:05.719
<v Speaker 2>big tech. when there are a lot of other companies

0:21:05.770 --> 0:21:08.909
<v Speaker 2>that are engaged in the same conduct and making similar

0:21:08.970 --> 0:21:12.470
<v Speaker 2>amounts of money that are under the radar. And I

0:21:12.510 --> 0:21:15.689
<v Speaker 2>don't know this for sure. This is pure speculation. But

0:21:15.710 --> 0:21:19.950
<v Speaker 2>my guess is Mark Zuckerberg does not love being vilified

0:21:20.530 --> 0:21:22.790
<v Speaker 2>when he feels like he is just one of the

0:21:22.850 --> 0:21:27.929
<v Speaker 2>participants here. And so by taking the deal, maybe he

0:21:27.970 --> 0:21:31.350
<v Speaker 2>viewed that as an opportunity to show that he is

0:21:31.450 --> 0:21:35.110
<v Speaker 2>not the tech bad guy, that it is an industry thing,

0:21:35.150 --> 0:21:37.070
<v Speaker 2>that they wanted to make sure the focus was spread

0:21:37.090 --> 0:21:37.850
<v Speaker 2>across companies.

0:21:37.970 --> 0:21:40.830
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you think this maybe came from Mark Zuckerberg himself

0:21:41.590 --> 0:21:43.690
<v Speaker 1>and had kind of almost a personal motivation?

0:21:44.090 --> 0:21:46.350
<v Speaker 2>I mean, it's pure speculation, but I got to think

0:21:46.470 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 2>it's really hard to be the punching bag for an industry.

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 2>Being hated to the point of, you know, solidifying a

0:21:56.320 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 2>place in history as the villain, no matter how much

0:21:59.160 --> 0:22:02.580
<v Speaker 2>money there is, like, I think it probably gets old

0:22:02.619 --> 0:22:05.699
<v Speaker 2>being vilified like that. He probably worries about his kids seeing,

0:22:05.980 --> 0:22:07.980
<v Speaker 2>you know, memes about him or reading about all the

0:22:08.070 --> 0:22:12.030
<v Speaker 2>horrible things that he's responsible for. And maybe he was

0:22:12.090 --> 0:22:14.630
<v Speaker 2>looking to find a basis for saying, hey, I'm not

0:22:14.690 --> 0:22:18.450
<v Speaker 2>the bad guy, making it very clear that other industry

0:22:18.470 --> 0:22:20.669
<v Speaker 2>players were doing the same bad stuff. And he is

0:22:20.730 --> 0:22:22.410
<v Speaker 2>not some uniquely evil person.

0:22:23.020 --> 0:22:27.959
<v Speaker 1>Hence the contingency, a shrewd Zuckerbergian move. I think it's

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:30.760
<v Speaker 1>rubbing some people the wrong way as I read about

0:22:30.900 --> 0:22:34.609
<v Speaker 1>reactions to the case, because it looks as if Meta

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:38.250
<v Speaker 1>is using you all to dictate terms to its competitors,

0:22:38.330 --> 0:22:41.890
<v Speaker 1>basically to get a dig in on its competitors. And

0:22:42.609 --> 0:22:44.629
<v Speaker 1>like this is supposed to be a case about holding

0:22:44.750 --> 0:22:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Meta accountable for the wrongs it did to kids. Why

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:51.619
<v Speaker 1>do they get to, you know, get this dig in

0:22:51.680 --> 0:22:53.220
<v Speaker 1>on their competitors through it?

0:22:54.119 --> 0:22:56.540
<v Speaker 2>The goal all along was to make this industry wide.

0:22:57.590 --> 0:23:00.190
<v Speaker 2>We sued Meta because we viewed that as the industry leader.

0:23:00.950 --> 0:23:03.370
<v Speaker 2>We also have litigation going on with TikTok right now.

0:23:03.590 --> 0:23:08.490
<v Speaker 2>Other people are deep in litigation with Snapchat. Less so,

0:23:08.530 --> 0:23:13.310
<v Speaker 2>but some are litigating against YouTube. So this was never

0:23:13.510 --> 0:23:17.429
<v Speaker 2>just about Meta. Meta obviously did bad things. There had

0:23:17.450 --> 0:23:21.350
<v Speaker 2>to be accountability. There had to be changes. But if

0:23:21.390 --> 0:23:25.550
<v Speaker 2>this just becomes about Meta, then we're not actually protecting

0:23:25.570 --> 0:23:29.070
<v Speaker 2>the kids in our states. because the entire industry has

0:23:29.190 --> 0:23:32.450
<v Speaker 2>been engaged in the same conduct. One of the things

0:23:32.470 --> 0:23:35.790
<v Speaker 2>that I've always been struck by is the fact that

0:23:35.990 --> 0:23:38.750
<v Speaker 2>a lot of the people involved in these companies are parents,

0:23:39.630 --> 0:23:41.670
<v Speaker 2>and they have kids, and they worry about their kids'

0:23:41.710 --> 0:23:44.730
<v Speaker 2>exposure to technology. And I'm sure they feel a deep

0:23:44.750 --> 0:23:48.130
<v Speaker 2>sense of hypocrisy about the worries they have about their

0:23:48.170 --> 0:23:50.510
<v Speaker 2>kids versus what they know they're doing to other kids

0:23:50.630 --> 0:23:56.699
<v Speaker 2>out there. And I don't think most of them are

0:23:56.780 --> 0:23:59.869
<v Speaker 2>sociopathic monsters. I think there's a lot of money involved

0:24:00.609 --> 0:24:04.210
<v Speaker 2>and they probably let themselves be convinced by the money

0:24:04.810 --> 0:24:06.830
<v Speaker 2>that they weren't doing anything that was that bad.

0:24:11.710 --> 0:24:13.369
<v Speaker 1>How do you feel about the money side of it,

0:24:13.570 --> 0:24:17.330
<v Speaker 1>where you landed? That was another reaction I had. It

0:24:17.410 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>is true that this is the biggest settlement for the

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:23.220
<v Speaker 1>big tech industry and But I think it says something

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:27.060
<v Speaker 1>about the size and power of that industry that relative

0:24:27.140 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 1>to Meta's revenue, it's still a pretty small number. You know,

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>$ 17 billion. This is a company that had $ 200 billion

0:24:35.220 --> 0:24:37.790
<v Speaker 1>in revenue in one year alone in 2025. And this

0:24:38.030 --> 0:24:40.950
<v Speaker 1>is going to be paid out over a decade. There's

0:24:40.970 --> 0:24:42.970
<v Speaker 1>contingencies on whether all of it will be paid out.

0:24:43.750 --> 0:24:45.429
<v Speaker 1>I do just want to understand, why are these the

0:24:45.470 --> 0:24:48.410
<v Speaker 1>numbers you landed on? And do you believe that financial

0:24:48.570 --> 0:24:49.450
<v Speaker 1>penalty is sufficient?

0:24:50.690 --> 0:24:56.210
<v Speaker 2>The money here, from a Tennessee perspective, is phenomenal. We

0:24:56.260 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 2>got $ 752 million if the contingency kicks in. It's a

0:25:00.540 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 2>floor of, I think, $ 530 million, which is still one

0:25:04.260 --> 0:25:07.340
<v Speaker 2>of the biggest financial outcomes in a case in Tennessee history.

0:25:07.359 --> 0:25:09.919
<v Speaker 2>I think it is the record. This is the biggest

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.399
<v Speaker 2>penalty against a tech company in global history. So it's

0:25:13.420 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 2>not nothing.

0:25:14.580 --> 0:25:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the initial demand was something like $ 200 billion.

0:25:16.859 --> 0:25:19.050
<v Speaker 1>And I know there were reports of, you know, Meta's

0:25:19.090 --> 0:25:20.750
<v Speaker 1>entire market share over a trillion.

0:25:21.470 --> 0:25:23.909
<v Speaker 2>You know, what you ask for in negotiations of what

0:25:23.950 --> 0:25:27.060
<v Speaker 2>you expect to get can be different. Often you will

0:25:27.100 --> 0:25:30.960
<v Speaker 2>have the maximalist approach and the other side will offer

0:25:31.040 --> 0:25:34.140
<v Speaker 2>some ridiculously small number. That's the way all of these

0:25:34.180 --> 0:25:35.220
<v Speaker 2>negotiations go.

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:38.520
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of the Florida attorney general's response,

0:25:38.540 --> 0:25:40.540
<v Speaker 1>which I'm sure you're familiar with? I have a quote

0:25:40.560 --> 0:25:42.689
<v Speaker 1>from him here because Florida held out. They did not

0:25:42.730 --> 0:25:44.670
<v Speaker 1>take part in the settlement. They're taking Meta to trial.

0:25:45.530 --> 0:25:48.450
<v Speaker 1>The Attorney General James Altemeier said the payouts are, quote,

0:25:48.550 --> 0:25:52.720
<v Speaker 1>peanuts compared to the profound harms met as profit-driven addictive

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.540
<v Speaker 1>features inflicted on kids and a slap on the wrist

0:25:55.740 --> 0:25:59.139
<v Speaker 1>for a trillion-dollar corporation that'll pay more to lawyers than

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.060
<v Speaker 1>to the states. We'll see them at trial.

0:26:02.260 --> 0:26:05.060
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I think once he's collected a larger amount

0:26:05.100 --> 0:26:09.139
<v Speaker 2>of money, then, you know, he'll be vindicated. But if

0:26:09.180 --> 0:26:12.200
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't or if he's not getting there until a

0:26:12.250 --> 0:26:16.700
<v Speaker 2>decade from now, You know, better to have peanuts than nothing.

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:21.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't think this is peanuts. This is a record-setting

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.820
<v Speaker 2>amount of money. The EU, which has been going after

0:26:25.420 --> 0:26:28.260
<v Speaker 2>Meta and other companies for ages, has never come close

0:26:28.300 --> 0:26:31.340
<v Speaker 2>to getting this much. Part of me really wanted to

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:35.240
<v Speaker 2>get that verdict. But I think by an objective measure,

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:38.480
<v Speaker 2>this is the most anybody has ever gotten out of

0:26:38.520 --> 0:26:41.609
<v Speaker 2>a tech company. You can compare it against a blank

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 2>slate of your imagination. But look at what people have

0:26:45.020 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 2>actually been able to do to regulate the excesses and

0:26:49.720 --> 0:26:53.580
<v Speaker 2>misconduct of the tech industry. I would say this settlement

0:26:53.660 --> 0:26:56.180
<v Speaker 2>is probably the landmark.

0:27:05.130 --> 0:27:08.210
<v Speaker 1>I came away from talking to Attorney General Scarametti, certainly

0:27:08.270 --> 0:27:11.890
<v Speaker 1>understanding better his decision to settle. He's a pragmatic guy.

0:27:12.570 --> 0:27:14.650
<v Speaker 1>And he and the other AGs probably did get Meta

0:27:14.690 --> 0:27:17.510
<v Speaker 1>to do more to protect kids more quickly than they

0:27:17.530 --> 0:27:19.409
<v Speaker 1>would have by fighting the company in courts around the

0:27:19.450 --> 0:27:23.670
<v Speaker 1>country for years on end. That said, I still wish

0:27:23.730 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>they had seen their trials through. In a pure way,

0:27:27.280 --> 0:27:30.300
<v Speaker 1>I wanted Meta to face its day in court. One

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:33.139
<v Speaker 1>of the most frustrating things about this settlement is that

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.980
<v Speaker 1>Meta does not have to admit any wrongdoing. I worry

0:27:37.140 --> 0:27:39.010
<v Speaker 1>that's going to allow them to try and gaslight the

0:27:39.070 --> 0:27:42.500
<v Speaker 1>public into thinking the company didn't do anything bad. even

0:27:42.540 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>as they keep hawking new, potentially dangerous or creepy products

0:27:46.840 --> 0:27:50.400
<v Speaker 1>like their Metaglasses or the new AI companion agent thingy

0:27:50.619 --> 0:27:54.270
<v Speaker 1>they just rolled out this month called Muse. Not admitting

0:27:54.410 --> 0:27:58.010
<v Speaker 1>any wrongdoing. That does not give me confidence that the

0:27:58.050 --> 0:28:07.070
<v Speaker 1>company's learned its lesson. Today's show was produced by Sam

0:28:07.130 --> 0:28:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Egan and edited by Jen Kinney. Please follow Question Everything

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:13.100
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts, rate and review our show,

0:28:13.540 --> 0:28:17.439
<v Speaker 1>sign up for our sub stack, questioneverything.substack.com, and find our

0:28:17.460 --> 0:28:22.260
<v Speaker 1>reporting about Meta on Instagram at questioneverything.podcast. Robin Semyon and

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:25.020
<v Speaker 1>I are the executive producers of the show. Kevin Sullivan

0:28:25.060 --> 0:28:27.919
<v Speaker 1>is our executive editor. Our team also includes producers Tracy

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.119
<v Speaker 1>Hunt and Zach St. Louis, associate producer Kevin Shepard, and

0:28:31.160 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>contributing editor Neil Drumming. This episode was fact-checked by Annika

0:28:34.530 --> 0:28:38.270
<v Speaker 1>Robbins and Marisa Robertson-Textor. Mixing and sound design by Brendan Baker.

0:28:38.490 --> 0:28:40.910
<v Speaker 1>Our music is by Matt McGinley. Evie Kwong runs our

0:28:40.950 --> 0:28:43.800
<v Speaker 1>social media. Thanks to our partners at KCRW, who include

0:28:43.820 --> 0:28:47.660
<v Speaker 1>Arnie Seipel, Tejla Jamera, Natalie Hill, and Jennifer Farrow. We'll

0:28:47.680 --> 0:28:48.300
<v Speaker 1>be back next week.