WEBVTT - It's Hard To Fight On Ice

0:00:01.840 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.200 --> 0:00:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong and Shoe Getty arm Strong

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>and get Ki and he Armstrong and Getty.

0:00:23.720 --> 0:00:25.439
<v Speaker 2>But he should have taken it serious in allowed the

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 2>United States to engage. President Trump is the only one

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 2>that could have prevented this war from taking place. And

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:32.320
<v Speaker 2>President Trump now is cleaning out the mess of Biden

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 2>left behind and and President Trump will get it done.

0:00:35.400 --> 0:00:38.000
<v Speaker 2>He will negotiate an end to this war. He wants

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:41.400
<v Speaker 2>to see the war ended, regardless of how that takes place.

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:44.040
<v Speaker 2>He wants to see a win for Ukraine and a

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 2>win for Russia at the same time, because there's a

0:00:46.960 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 2>lose lose going on for both growth countries.

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Right now.

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 2>People are dying, and the President said he wants people

0:00:52.960 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 2>to stop dying.

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 1>As Senator Mark Wayne Mullen, friend of the Armstrong and

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Getty Show, we're in the stage of Trump communication where

0:01:02.960 --> 0:01:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Trump says something outrageous and sometimes ridiculous, and then his

0:01:06.760 --> 0:01:10.040
<v Speaker 1>allies reinterpret it for us in a more sane way.

0:01:10.120 --> 0:01:12.200
<v Speaker 1>And I want to talk about, you know, some of

0:01:12.200 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>the things Trump said and done lately is they try

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:19.360
<v Speaker 1>to move toward a solution of the Ukraine Russian conflict specifically,

0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>but first a general discussion with Mike Lyons, military analyst

0:01:23.959 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 1>to Mike served with various military organizations in both the

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:29.280
<v Speaker 1>US and Europe throughout his career and joints US. Now, Mike,

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:29.800
<v Speaker 1>how are you.

0:01:31.240 --> 0:01:31.600
<v Speaker 3>Good? Good?

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:32.400
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me back.

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh, it's always a pleasure, thank you. So before we

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:37.959
<v Speaker 1>get into some of the specifics of the Ukraine Russia

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>thing right now, you're a student of history as we

0:01:41.280 --> 0:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>know it is, I think beyond question that there is

0:01:44.760 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a serious change in the chemistry the magnetic fields. However

0:01:50.840 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you want to describe it post World War Two, NATO

0:01:56.040 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Western Powers. Where would you start in you know,

0:02:00.360 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>telling a class about that.

0:02:02.760 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 5>I'd start at nineteen eighty nine, nineteen ninety when the

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:10.880
<v Speaker 5>Soviet Union falls as the West completely screws up what

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:14.400
<v Speaker 5>happened of the Russian Empire back then? And you go

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.080
<v Speaker 5>back at that point, had you know, NATO wins the

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 5>Cold War and Russian's bankrupt. Ronald Reagan a lot of

0:02:21.919 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 5>it has to do with what he wanted to do

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 5>with Russia and decides and the Soviet Union breaks up,

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 5>and instead of managing that properly and making sure that

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:34.160
<v Speaker 5>the Russian Empire had zero chance of ever coming back again.

0:02:35.120 --> 0:02:39.240
<v Speaker 5>The West decided to bring countries into NATO one at

0:02:39.280 --> 0:02:41.880
<v Speaker 5>a time or so over the course of the next

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 5>thirty years since then, and thinking that that was going

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 5>to be a stable way to go, as opposed to

0:02:47.840 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 5>recognize not recognizing that you can't have every member of

0:02:51.000 --> 0:02:53.000
<v Speaker 5>NATO to be everybody except Russia, because that's how the

0:02:53.000 --> 0:02:55.800
<v Speaker 5>First World War started. So we're seeing now the effects

0:02:55.840 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 5>of lack of NATO doing anything in six when Georgia

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 5>gets invaded. We're definitely seeing the effects of fourteen when

0:03:02.840 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 5>Obama and Merkele does do nothing when Crimea is taken.

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 5>And then very clearly Joe Biden when he was president,

0:03:11.720 --> 0:03:14.320
<v Speaker 5>was the reason why Vladimir Putin decides to go after Ukraine.

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.640
<v Speaker 5>And now we're faced with a NATO that's disarmed on

0:03:17.720 --> 0:03:19.560
<v Speaker 5>the continent that if not but for the United States

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.840
<v Speaker 5>nuclear umbrella, that the defenses don't happen.

0:03:22.600 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 4>The last twelve years.

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 5>Historians are going to look back at the European countries

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 5>and say they had multiple warnings to rearm and remobilize

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:33.639
<v Speaker 5>their forces to put some kind of leverage behind any

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 5>kind of military operations, and they didn't. And I think

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 5>that's where we're at right now, and that's why the

0:03:38.000 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 5>messag is being cleaned up.

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Which leads me beautifully to the next topic I'm on

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>to address, and that is I've been reading a lot

0:03:44.760 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 1>about the domestic politics and economics a lot of the

0:03:48.120 --> 0:03:51.160
<v Speaker 1>European countries now, particularly because several of them are having

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:55.800
<v Speaker 1>important elections. Virtually all of the biggies are. And it

0:03:55.880 --> 0:03:58.800
<v Speaker 1>strikes me, whether you're talking about technology or the economy

0:03:58.840 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 1>in general, the politics, the freedom of speech policies in Germany,

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:12.080
<v Speaker 1>which has been much discussed lately, it all feels like shrinking,

0:04:12.240 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>not growth. Europe just feels like a diminished force that's

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>continuing to be diminished with few signs of life.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And the thing is, we needed each of those

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 5>individual countries to have their own individual leaders that had

0:04:30.160 --> 0:04:32.320
<v Speaker 5>that same vision with regard to where they were going,

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.279
<v Speaker 5>but instead each of them have been more aligned with

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:41.480
<v Speaker 5>i'll just say, more liberal tendencies of unlimited immigration. The

0:04:41.480 --> 0:04:44.320
<v Speaker 5>free speech conversation that's taking place in Germany right now

0:04:44.440 --> 0:04:48.640
<v Speaker 5>is appalling. I mean, what happened over with the sixty

0:04:48.640 --> 0:04:53.440
<v Speaker 5>minutes interview and they're arresting people for putting memes on

0:04:53.480 --> 0:04:56.599
<v Speaker 5>the Internet and then trying to equate that summer reason

0:04:56.720 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 5>like because of free speech, that's why we had the Holocaust.

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.400
<v Speaker 5>I can't even connect these dots, or whoever thought they

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:04.480
<v Speaker 5>were going to get connected is just virtually insane at

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:05.120
<v Speaker 5>this point.

0:05:04.880 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 4>But what's happened is and then go back to Germany.

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 5>You know, they've they've gotten rid of all their nuclear

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 5>energy power plants.

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 4>The world runs on energy.

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 5>You have to you can't have a country unless you

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:18.160
<v Speaker 5>have that, so they rely on Russia.

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 4>So you kind of bring all this together.

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:21.560
<v Speaker 5>I saw a good quote the other day that talked about,

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 5>you know, when the Roman Empire fell, it's not because

0:05:24.440 --> 0:05:27.360
<v Speaker 5>of the elites, you know, didn't improve their their their

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.880
<v Speaker 5>cost of living, or didn't improve their their lifestyles. It

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.520
<v Speaker 5>fell because the barbarians had hatchets. And that's still the

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 5>same for today. You've got to have a military presence

0:05:36.000 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 5>and show leverage and show capability of doing things.

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 4>And all of those countries, to include England.

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 5>England is no less guilty in any of these countries

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 5>right now, and they really risk Europe in particular England, France, Germany.

0:05:48.760 --> 0:05:51.080
<v Speaker 5>Some of these countries really risk losing their cultures, losing

0:05:51.080 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 5>everything that's about.

0:05:51.800 --> 0:05:55.279
<v Speaker 1>Them well, and every sign is that they have no

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:58.560
<v Speaker 1>inclination whatsoever to do the things that need to be

0:05:58.600 --> 0:06:01.480
<v Speaker 1>done to fix it. In fact, the minute somebody suggests,

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>for instance, hey, our welfare state is draining our coffers

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and we don't have the money to defend themselves, they

0:06:06.839 --> 0:06:09.880
<v Speaker 1>get voted out of office. So I don't have a

0:06:09.920 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of hope. So let's get a little more specific

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.120
<v Speaker 1>about Ukraine and Russia. You can either address some of

0:06:16.160 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the incendiary things Trump has said lately or not. It's

0:06:18.720 --> 0:06:22.720
<v Speaker 1>up to you. But as the folks gather for various

0:06:22.760 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>peace talks, how does the whole thing strike you overall?

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 5>Well, yeah, he said some outrageous things. Obviously, you know,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 5>the dictator here is Prutin, and Russia did invade Ukraine.

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 5>It's unjustifiable, and the Russian aggression is something that has

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 5>to be dealt with. The question is how what's the

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:43.960
<v Speaker 5>leverage that we can apply back in order to have

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 5>them not do it again? And Trump's transactional view of

0:06:48.920 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 5>this whole thing is it has to stop. Once it

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 5>does stop, we create an armacist, but he's afraid of

0:06:54.480 --> 0:06:57.520
<v Speaker 5>the same thing over and over again. We land European

0:06:57.520 --> 0:06:59.720
<v Speaker 5>troops there, we put American troops there. American troops will

0:06:59.760 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 5>before this and they became really what will be a

0:07:02.440 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 5>trip wire. I mean, again, I appreciate what the British

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.840
<v Speaker 5>Prime Minister was talking about sending troops to Ukraine.

0:07:08.880 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 4>I'd like to know exactly which troops.

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 5>There's less than one hundred thousand active duty troops that

0:07:12.960 --> 0:07:16.120
<v Speaker 5>are in the UK Army right now, which is ridiculous

0:07:16.160 --> 0:07:18.160
<v Speaker 5>for a country of that size for once was once

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:18.840
<v Speaker 5>a great power.

0:07:18.880 --> 0:07:20.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, they might as well be Portugal, they might

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 4>as well be you.

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 5>Know, some some mid Atlantic uh, you know, the Middle

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.440
<v Speaker 5>Eastern country right now. So so again, none of these

0:07:28.440 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 5>countries have got really any capability to do this. But

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 5>I think I think the question is I think we're

0:07:34.400 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 5>going to get to the spot that everybody is you know,

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 5>Pete Heiks that said the quiet part out loud. Russia

0:07:38.800 --> 0:07:41.520
<v Speaker 5>will contain, will have the twenty percent of that they've kept,

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:45.120
<v Speaker 5>they'll likely keep CRIMEA, they will put up a border.

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:49.520
<v Speaker 5>Lato won't be won't be bringing in Ukraine anytime soon,

0:07:50.000 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 5>and they'll be lucky to get some some EU you know,

0:07:52.960 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 5>kind of money they're going forward and to try to

0:07:54.840 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 5>get the fighting to stop. I think that's where it's

0:07:56.520 --> 0:07:58.360
<v Speaker 5>going to go, and that's that's where it should have

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.960
<v Speaker 5>went back when the first thing started four years ago,

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 5>three years ago at this point.

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:04.440
<v Speaker 1>And honestly, whatever's next is not going to play out

0:08:04.440 --> 0:08:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in the next year. It's going to play out in

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the next thirty years. So we'll all find out together.

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Military analyst Mike Lyons online, Mike, we're really putting you

0:08:10.920 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>through the paces today, and we appreciated another topic speaking

0:08:15.080 --> 0:08:18.120
<v Speaker 1>of Pete Hegzeth and in Trump's order to take a

0:08:18.160 --> 0:08:21.600
<v Speaker 1>serious look at the Pentagon, cut budgets, cut the fat.

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:24.440
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of that in general? And you,

0:08:24.560 --> 0:08:30.440
<v Speaker 1>as an experienced Pentagon hand, tell us about the efficiencies

0:08:30.480 --> 0:08:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and inefficiency of the Pentagon.

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.959
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they go through this every once in a while.

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 4>They've tried a couple of different administrations.

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 5>What you're seeing though, is Pete Heggsuff being very overly transparent.

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 4>He put about an eight minute video out.

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:45.959
<v Speaker 5>Last night with regard to what that was going to

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.800
<v Speaker 5>be about, specifically left certain things out of its certain

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 5>domains that won't be cut. But like anything else, there

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 5>are things that are redundant within the Pentagon that it's

0:08:56.880 --> 0:09:00.120
<v Speaker 5>an easy place for fivictoms to be built and for

0:09:00.120 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 5>for kingdoms to kind of move forward as people try

0:09:03.120 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 5>to stay in one location and don't change their jobs.

0:09:06.080 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 4>So I think he's looking to knock down some of

0:09:07.679 --> 0:09:08.160
<v Speaker 4>those stilos.

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:10.200
<v Speaker 5>Some of those stilos are calcified, I'll put it that way,

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 5>in terms of where they don't talk and now eleven

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:15.679
<v Speaker 5>did actually a pretty good job of knocking those silos

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.640
<v Speaker 5>down when it came to information and communication, but they

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 5>still get rebuilt and they still get re established, and

0:09:21.000 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 5>I think that's what Pete wants to do. Up He's

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.040
<v Speaker 5>up against a very strong momentum on the other side

0:09:27.040 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 5>because there's people that are going to dig in pretty

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.680
<v Speaker 5>deeply and they're going to want to keep their victems

0:09:31.760 --> 0:09:32.800
<v Speaker 5>and keep their dollars.

0:09:32.800 --> 0:09:34.400
<v Speaker 4>But when you think about if the Pentagon is the.

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 5>Most the largest discretionary budget that we have right now,

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 5>and so if we can get some savings out of

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 5>their ten percent, then I think that'll be a win, right.

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:43.959
<v Speaker 1>And we have always said around here at the A

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:46.839
<v Speaker 1>and G Show that the kindest, best thing we can

0:09:46.880 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>do for our actual fighting men and women is to

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>ensure there's efficiency at the Pentagon. And the idea that

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:57.959
<v Speaker 1>scrutinizing the Pentagon or re ordering budgets to somehow weakening defense,

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:01.719
<v Speaker 1>I think is foolish. Final question, speaking of our military

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:04.199
<v Speaker 1>in these turbulent times, what do you see as our

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>greatest strength right now as our forces exist? And what's

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>your greatest concern or our greatest weakness.

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:15.600
<v Speaker 5>I think our greatest strength remains this intangible of being

0:10:15.600 --> 0:10:16.160
<v Speaker 5>an American.

0:10:16.320 --> 0:10:18.240
<v Speaker 4>I think anytime you see.

0:10:18.080 --> 0:10:21.400
<v Speaker 5>Americans in a situation where they have to rally and

0:10:21.559 --> 0:10:24.000
<v Speaker 5>put themselves together, not just in the military, you see

0:10:24.000 --> 0:10:26.560
<v Speaker 5>it in corporate America sometimes. But but there's this thing

0:10:26.720 --> 0:10:28.599
<v Speaker 5>about being an American, which is why everybody wants to

0:10:28.600 --> 0:10:29.760
<v Speaker 5>come here, why everybody.

0:10:29.480 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 4>Wants to be part of this thing.

0:10:31.640 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 5>When when when push comes to shove, when a mission

0:10:34.120 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 5>has to get done, I remember, you know, my time

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 5>in active duty, that that people would say, you know,

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:40.320
<v Speaker 5>this is we're going to get this done.

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 4>We're going to you know, look left and look right

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:42.720
<v Speaker 4>and take care of each other.

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 5>So I think our greatest strength is this tangible that

0:10:45.760 --> 0:10:49.000
<v Speaker 5>runs in our DNA of of being an American and

0:10:49.000 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 5>what that means and being on the high on the

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:55.760
<v Speaker 5>high ground and doing whatever it takes. I often think about,

0:10:56.280 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 5>you know, I look at these videos and I watch

0:10:57.760 --> 0:10:59.920
<v Speaker 5>the Russians leave their soldiers behind and things like that.

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.559
<v Speaker 5>I remember being in when I was at combat, thinking that,

0:11:03.920 --> 0:11:06.280
<v Speaker 5>you know, you never see Americans surrender and things like that.

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 5>So we have this intangible that's there, But then that

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 5>greatest strength is a weakness. If we still don't have

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 5>the technology and don't have the equipment, and if we

0:11:13.920 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 5>come up with somebody that has better, better kind of things,

0:11:18.840 --> 0:11:21.320
<v Speaker 5>we're not going to no matter no matter how great

0:11:21.360 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 5>that intangible is, it's not going to overcome that. So

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:24.959
<v Speaker 5>we still have to have military might, we have to

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.480
<v Speaker 5>have material might, and be able to put our money

0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 5>where our mouth is.

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:30.320
<v Speaker 4>I think those are the two biggest things.

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Right, And that's so perfect. I was just going to

0:11:32.520 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>interject it. In reading about Germany and the elections and

0:11:35.520 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>that sort of thing, a German analyst was saying, what

0:11:37.920 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>really weakens us and strengthens the Americans is that we

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.640
<v Speaker 1>have a culture of we'd better be careful, we'd better

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.400
<v Speaker 1>not Here are the things that can be wrong, that

0:11:47.440 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>could go wrong. Rather, whereas the Americans have a spirit

0:11:50.679 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>of let's try it and see what happens, learn from

0:11:53.760 --> 0:11:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it and go from there. And yeah, if we ever

0:11:57.440 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>lose that including technologic as you're saying, and you know,

0:12:01.440 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we're screwed. Uh. Military analyst Mike Clons Mike, great to

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>talk to you. Thanks so much for the time.

0:12:07.040 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, thank you, thanks for having me.

0:12:08.880 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely. Coming up in just a moment or two, a

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>couple of interesting perspective studies I've come across in the

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 1>last few days about the technical world, what it's doing

0:12:19.679 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>to our brains, and how to unplug from it. I

0:12:22.440 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 1>think you'll find it interesting.

0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:30.439
<v Speaker 3>Stay with us, very stars.

0:12:33.280 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 6>What's that for?

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 7>Call future done it again inside the Tady garden.

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, look back on that moment and understand that's what

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 1>started the Great Canadian American War Canada viciously and unprovokedly

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is that a word, Uh, scoring against our poor goalie

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:05.040
<v Speaker 1>in overtime and brutally winning the hockey game, which did

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:06.800
<v Speaker 1>not start with a bunch of fights. By the way,

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>I was hanging out with my buddy Gordy, who is

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a former elite hockey player, not quite NHL, but very

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:16.959
<v Speaker 1>very good hockey player and still as part of the

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:19.319
<v Speaker 1>world of sports. And I said, hey, they're going to

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.160
<v Speaker 1>be a bunch of fights to the night. And he said, no, no, no, no,

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.200
<v Speaker 1>too important a game. It'll come out just win. Scores

0:13:24.240 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>have been settled. Now let's play hockey. And he was

0:13:26.200 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>absolutely right. He also pointed out that hockey is the

0:13:28.960 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>only sport where there are absolutely rock solid rules unwritten

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:40.679
<v Speaker 1>but you cannot violate. About fighting. You watch an NBA fight,

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>guys are are sucker punching each other and punching each

0:13:44.320 --> 0:13:50.319
<v Speaker 1>other from behind and swinging wildly like lunatics. In hockey,

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:56.240
<v Speaker 1>you tell the guy we're fighting, he says, yes, you

0:13:56.360 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>drop your gloves, you slug each other in the head.

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:01.920
<v Speaker 1>If you can, you can't. It's very hard to fight

0:14:02.000 --> 0:14:05.160
<v Speaker 1>on ice. If you've never tried it, don't, but trust

0:14:05.240 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>me when I tell you it's very difficult, especially when

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:09.839
<v Speaker 1>somebody's grabbing your jersey and pulling it up and the

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:14.679
<v Speaker 1>rest of it. The minute anybody's getting hurt, the referees

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>dive in and break it up. And the minute anybody

0:14:18.240 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>goes to the ice, the other guy says, oh, it's over,

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 1>and they back off. You'll never see an NHL player

0:14:25.960 --> 0:14:28.920
<v Speaker 1>like pounding another guy who's down. They just don't. It's

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>very honorable. It's like the dueling culture thing we were

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about yesterday. You don't have to be in favor

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:38.400
<v Speaker 1>of it. But it's not like straight thugs beating each

0:14:38.400 --> 0:14:40.440
<v Speaker 1>other to death on the pavement or anything like this.

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Very very different than that. It's a gentlemanly punching another

0:14:45.320 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>man in the face. Anyway, I thought this was good, interesting,

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>thought provoking because I worry about this all the time,

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>not just for the younger generation, although I certainly do,

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:58.200
<v Speaker 1>but also about myself, and that is our addiction to

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>the endorphin bursts of in put after input after input

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.040
<v Speaker 1>from smartphones in particular, technology in general. Here's a story

0:15:05.240 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>about how popular these unplugged nights are among young Brits.

0:15:14.760 --> 0:15:19.400
<v Speaker 1>Offcom is the name of the organization. They unplug and

0:15:19.440 --> 0:15:24.640
<v Speaker 1>they get together for offline nights, they call them, and

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:29.920
<v Speaker 1>they do whatever, whether it's drinking or dancing or even

0:15:29.960 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>playing games or whatever, just talking to each other, no

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:42.680
<v Speaker 1>tech allowed. Katie joins us, Yeah, I love this idea. Yeah, yeah,

0:15:42.720 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>me too. And they you know, anybody old enough to

0:15:45.480 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 1>remember this doesn't need a description, but they mentioned one

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>group that was playing games and scattered around the room

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>table stacked with board games is an excited hum echoed

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>around the walls. Here's this twenty five year old engineer

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 1>that he found leaving his phone at the door, freeing.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I didn't realize the addiction. Then too often I feel

0:16:04.680 --> 0:16:07.280
<v Speaker 1>the urge to look at my phone and scroll. He

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about fomo, but this is growing in popularity. I

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it will achieve any sort of critical mass,

0:16:15.520 --> 0:16:18.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's definitely a response to what we're all feeling.

0:16:18.720 --> 0:16:23.359
<v Speaker 1>I think. And then this, which is of similar content obviously,

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:28.240
<v Speaker 1>but a big study out multiple universities across the USA

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and Canada worked with hundreds and hundreds of iPhone users,

0:16:31.160 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>average age thirty two to test how we're moving Constant

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:38.040
<v Speaker 1>internet access would affect their daily lives. And I'll squeeze

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>in the analysis real quickly as we look forward to

0:16:40.400 --> 0:16:42.200
<v Speaker 1>a chat with Lanhi Chen in just a moment or

0:16:42.240 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>two about domestic policy. Blocking mobile internet for two weeks

0:16:46.960 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>led to mental health improvements with an effect size larger

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:54.920
<v Speaker 1>than typically seen in antidepressant studies. Improved sustained attention comparable

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to reversing ten years of age related decline and increased

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.080
<v Speaker 1>well being in ninety one percent under participants in at

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 1>least one key area. There's more to it, and we'll

0:17:03.840 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 1>dip back into it. But it's like better for depression

0:17:06.600 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 1>than drugs and better for memory than being ten years younger.

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 1>Holy cow, stay with us, Lanhi chennext, Armstrong and Getty.

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 8>Cut jobs, save the government money, sant Americans a check

0:17:22.119 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 8>for the difference. That's the Trump plan being floated at least,

0:17:25.960 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 8>But is it realistic? Is it feasible? And might it

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 8>hurt your wallet more than it would help?

0:17:31.520 --> 0:17:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Where He's gone too far?

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:36.000
<v Speaker 3>A slim majority using presidential power fifty two percent say

0:17:36.000 --> 0:17:38.640
<v Speaker 3>he's gone too far There cutting federal programs.

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Fifty one percent of Americans say gone too far. This

0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:43.840
<v Speaker 1>is the.

0:17:43.960 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 6>Chainsaw for bureaucracy, turns off change saw a variety of

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 6>opinions and thoughts there having to do with domestic policy,

0:17:56.600 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 6>budget cutting, bureaucracy taming, et cetera, which is one of

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:02.920
<v Speaker 6>the major initiatives going on in the Trump administration right now.

0:18:03.080 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Who better to discuss this with than Lanhi Chen, David

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and Diane Steffi fellow in American Public Policy Studies at

0:18:08.600 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the Hoover Institution and the Director of Domestic Policy Studies

0:18:11.920 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>at Stanford University Lanai.

0:18:13.520 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 3>How are you great to be with you?

0:18:15.280 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>How are you just terrific? Thank you. Earlier in the show,

0:18:19.119 --> 0:18:24.439
<v Speaker 1>we were comparing and contrasting the democratic reaction to a

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of the cutting and restructuring and examining the giant bureaucracy,

0:18:28.040 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>which has been essentially any cuts are a horror in

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a constitutional crisis, with Lincoln's statement that we absolutely have

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.399
<v Speaker 1>the right to amend to reconstruct and you know he

0:18:41.400 --> 0:18:44.359
<v Speaker 1>didn't say this supposedly, but cut or grow government in

0:18:44.400 --> 0:18:46.120
<v Speaker 1>the way we the people see fit.

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:50.879
<v Speaker 3>It's quite a contrast, it is, And I would just

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.359
<v Speaker 3>say this, I mean, I think there is a fair

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:58.359
<v Speaker 3>amount of hysteria over some of the activity that we're seeing,

0:18:58.560 --> 0:19:01.920
<v Speaker 3>and the effort I think that's underway by some in

0:19:01.960 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 3>the media is to try and define some of these

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 3>cuts as existential. We're deeply problematic. So let's just step

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.320
<v Speaker 3>back and take a look at one of them that

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:12.520
<v Speaker 3>they talk about. For example, the IRS. This is one

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 3>of my favorite ones. The IRS has reached record levels

0:19:16.840 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 3>of staffing in the last couple of years, and they

0:19:19.680 --> 0:19:23.400
<v Speaker 3>have significantly expanded their workforce. So they went from about

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 3>seventy thousand employees to one hundred thousand employees over the

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 3>course of a couple of years. Now, the cuts that

0:19:30.640 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 3>DOZE is talking about sixty eight hundred employees, we're talking

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:39.359
<v Speaker 3>about sixty eight hundred probationary recent hires that they're looking

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.440
<v Speaker 3>to essentially trim from the IRS bureaucracy. We're talking about

0:19:43.720 --> 0:19:47.919
<v Speaker 3>between six to seven percent of the workforce. And it

0:19:48.000 --> 0:19:51.399
<v Speaker 3>doesn't even account for this significant, as I said, increase

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 3>in the workforce we've seen recently. So people just need

0:19:54.080 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 3>to look at the facts and try to figure out

0:19:56.440 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 3>exeguly what's going on here, because fundamentally there is this

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.240
<v Speaker 3>notion and that well, no, we can't cut anything. This

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 3>is going to cause a degradation of service. Look, the

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.119
<v Speaker 3>service of the IRS wasn't all that great before. So

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 3>the notion that we have this challenge that's being created

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:12.600
<v Speaker 3>because of the things that government is doing, the things

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 3>that DOGE is doing in particular, it's just not true.

0:20:17.000 --> 0:20:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Well, and the idea that to even autit something is

0:20:22.720 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>improper or threatening is just it's it's obscenely backward. One

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of the things Kim Strassel's writing about is how the

0:20:31.640 --> 0:20:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Trump administration is taking a serious look at the agencies

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:42.399
<v Speaker 1>that Congress created to perform executive functions, Like, well, they

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>administer laws, but they're free from the executive branches control.

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like Congress created its own executive branch. And any

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.159
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on where we are as a country with that,

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:54.919
<v Speaker 1>and what are the chances of doing something about it.

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's another great question, because you've got a whole

0:20:57.760 --> 0:21:01.000
<v Speaker 3>host of agencies that are they're called into pendent agencies, right,

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 3>they're created Usually they end in a B or a

0:21:03.600 --> 0:21:07.840
<v Speaker 3>C so commission or board, and these are the organizations

0:21:07.840 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 3>that essentially are part of the executive branch, but they

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 3>have some independent authority. So they've got, for example, board

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:18.400
<v Speaker 3>members or commission members who are appointed by a president

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 3>for a set amount of time, confirmed by the Senate,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:23.400
<v Speaker 3>and they're supposed to sit for that set amount of time.

0:21:23.480 --> 0:21:25.840
<v Speaker 3>And the idea was, well, you've got some of these

0:21:25.840 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 3>institutions that are supposed to create some separation from the

0:21:30.800 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 3>rest of the executive branch. And this doesn't make a

0:21:32.440 --> 0:21:34.119
<v Speaker 3>whole lot of sense though at some level, And so

0:21:34.200 --> 0:21:36.680
<v Speaker 3>what this administration, what the Trump administration is now trying

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 3>to do, is to say, for example, hey, if you,

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 3>as a commission, a supposedly independent commission, issue a new

0:21:42.960 --> 0:21:46.720
<v Speaker 3>regulation something that you're saying people can or cannot do,

0:21:47.560 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 3>you need to take that regulation and you've got to

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:51.960
<v Speaker 3>run it through the White House. We've got to know

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 3>what it is that you're doing, even as a quote

0:21:54.600 --> 0:21:57.919
<v Speaker 3>independent agency. I don't think that's unreasonable, right, because the

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 3>independent agency has elements of independence. We understand that because

0:22:01.760 --> 0:22:04.680
<v Speaker 3>they're regulating, let's say, for example, whether a merger can

0:22:04.680 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 3>go through or not. But at core, what the White

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 3>House is saying is, if you're going to regulate, we

0:22:10.080 --> 0:22:12.840
<v Speaker 3>have to know about it. And again, this is one

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 3>of those things where there's been a lot of writing

0:22:14.800 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 3>in the media, a lot of misunderstanding, this notion of

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 3>Trump's trying to take over the entire bureaucracy, when the

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 3>reality is there's certain things here that independent agencies, for example,

0:22:25.600 --> 0:22:28.159
<v Speaker 3>been doing for a long time where we probably do

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:30.520
<v Speaker 3>need a little more political oversight. And so, you know,

0:22:30.560 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 3>people again just got to understand what the real story

0:22:32.560 --> 0:22:33.960
<v Speaker 3>is versus what the media is reporting.

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:39.080
<v Speaker 1>Sure, and we've been plenty harsh about the unchecked growth

0:22:39.080 --> 0:22:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of executive power and how the gigantic executive branches come

0:22:43.000 --> 0:22:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to be. In many ways, it mimics all three branches.

0:22:48.119 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>It writes rules and laws like Congress, then it enforces

0:22:52.400 --> 0:22:56.879
<v Speaker 1>them like the executive branch, I guess, and then decides

0:22:56.920 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 1>on your fines. And here's the appeals and everything, like

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.560
<v Speaker 1>the judicial branch. And so obviously it needs to be

0:23:03.640 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 1>looked at. And the other aspect of this that has

0:23:06.200 --> 0:23:08.960
<v Speaker 1>never talked about in the media is that the president,

0:23:09.840 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>as for instance, they're howling that Elon Musk is unelected,

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, like the president's virtually the only person in

0:23:16.560 --> 0:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch who is elected. But the idea that

0:23:20.359 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>a huge chunk of the executive branch wouldn't be answerable

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>to the voters at all, except, like, you know, three

0:23:28.320 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>steps down the line. While I fear unchecked executive power.

0:23:33.880 --> 0:23:38.160
<v Speaker 1>If the executive is in charge, they can do good

0:23:38.240 --> 0:23:42.200
<v Speaker 1>things and be rewarded with reelection or their party or reelection.

0:23:42.560 --> 0:23:44.640
<v Speaker 1>But if they do bad things, they can be voted out.

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Right now, if the giant, sprawling executive branch does bad things,

0:23:49.000 --> 0:23:50.239
<v Speaker 1>what the hell do I do about it?

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:55.240
<v Speaker 3>Well, This is the most important thing that people don't realize,

0:23:55.280 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 3>which is that there is actually check on what the

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:00.840
<v Speaker 3>executive branch can do. And that's Congress.

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Right.

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 3>If Congress actually did its job and was functional as

0:24:04.520 --> 0:24:06.680
<v Speaker 3>opposed to just being a bunch of people running around

0:24:06.760 --> 0:24:10.680
<v Speaker 3>yelling all the time. If Congress actually yeah, if Congress

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:13.800
<v Speaker 3>actually functioned the way Congress is supposed to function, that's

0:24:13.840 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 3>your check on the executive branch, right, that's your check

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 3>on what the executive is doing. They have the oversight power.

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:22.959
<v Speaker 3>They can have hearings, they can run legislation, they can

0:24:23.040 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 3>do all sorts of stuff to constrain if they're really

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 3>worried about if Chuck Schumer and Democrats and the have

0:24:29.560 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 3>Hakeem Jeffreyes and all the rest, if they're really worried

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 3>about what the executive branch is doing, if they're worried

0:24:35.600 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 3>about what those is doing, they have the ability in

0:24:38.800 --> 0:24:42.000
<v Speaker 3>Congress to try and work together with Republicans there to

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 3>figure out a way to conduct oversite. They can conduct

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:46.360
<v Speaker 3>oversite on their own, by the way, they don't need

0:24:46.400 --> 0:24:50.639
<v Speaker 3>Republicans to do it necessarily. So the idea that there's

0:24:50.680 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 3>no check on the executive first of all, you're right,

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.760
<v Speaker 3>the voters can set a check. But more importantly, Congress

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 3>needs to do its job, and Congress completely seated the

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 3>playing field in a lot of waste the executive. This

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:05.879
<v Speaker 3>is not a Trump problem. This happened during the Biden administration,

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 3>has happened during Obama. That the Congress has just gotten

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.960
<v Speaker 3>less and less willing to do its job. And that's problem.

0:25:12.000 --> 0:25:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it just that if they're not on the record

0:25:15.040 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>having done anything, they can't be blamed for anything going wrong.

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Where does this cowardice, laziness, whatever it is come from.

0:25:22.080 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 3>Well, part of it is that the incentives for members

0:25:24.440 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 3>of Congress are really different now than they work for

0:25:26.520 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 3>you know.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:28.119
<v Speaker 4>Now it's all about.

0:25:27.960 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 3>How many likes can I get on social media, how

0:25:30.480 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 3>can I generate a following on social media? How can

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 3>I do all of that, as opposed to you know,

0:25:35.560 --> 0:25:37.960
<v Speaker 3>where I think there were members of Congress that did

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.720
<v Speaker 3>the hard work of actually trying to get things done.

0:25:41.320 --> 0:25:43.360
<v Speaker 3>You know, I think it's been a few decades since

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 3>we've really seen a lot of that activity. But I

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 3>think part of it is the incentive structure has changed.

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:50.639
<v Speaker 3>And then part of it is, you know, unfortunately I

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 3>do think we're electing in a lot of places more

0:25:52.920 --> 0:25:56.399
<v Speaker 3>extreme members of Congress who are really more interested in

0:25:56.440 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 3>advancing ideology than actually passing legislation and getting the done. Now,

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:03.879
<v Speaker 3>some of that's the reflection of us as the American people,

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 3>becoming more more polarized and more ideological in some ways.

0:26:08.200 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 3>But overall, I do think that the composition of Congress,

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:14.160
<v Speaker 3>the nature of Congress who were sending to Congress, all

0:26:14.200 --> 0:26:18.440
<v Speaker 3>of these things have impacted quite frankly, Congress's ability to

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 3>do its job and congress members of Congress's willingness to

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:22.320
<v Speaker 3>do their job.

0:26:24.200 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Wow, that's a big and that's a big and we

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>don't really have time to talk about how to reform

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>our entire primary process. Yeah, and the rest of it. Actually,

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you know what I was going to ask, and I'm debating,

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:38.639
<v Speaker 1>can you hang on for a few minutes through a break?

0:26:38.880 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah?

0:26:39.320 --> 0:26:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, Okay, because what I was going to ask, because

0:26:42.080 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 1>folks like me and perhaps you are more than willing

0:26:46.680 --> 0:26:52.120
<v Speaker 1>to geek out on the you know, the inside baseball

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:56.560
<v Speaker 1>structural stuff a government and then forget to explain what

0:26:56.800 --> 0:26:59.959
<v Speaker 1>a success reigning in the giant bureaucratic state would look

0:27:00.200 --> 0:27:02.959
<v Speaker 1>like to real human beings in their lives. So why

0:27:03.000 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>don't we take a break, catch our breath, and let's

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:07.359
<v Speaker 1>talk about what it would look on look like on

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>main Street. If that sounds good to you, be here,

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.120
<v Speaker 1>beautiful Lanhi Chen of the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, more

0:27:14.160 --> 0:27:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to come. Thank you for tuning in, Armstrong and Getty here.

0:27:21.800 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Jack is off for today, but we're pleased to have

0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:30.080
<v Speaker 1>terrific guests like Lanhi Chen of the Hoover Institution, Stanford University. Alanhi,

0:27:30.200 --> 0:27:34.239
<v Speaker 1>thanks for hanging around. We really appreciate it. And so

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>for folks just tuning in especially, we've been talking about

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of this has gone on unnoticed or

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>untalked about by many people in the media in the

0:27:43.359 --> 0:27:46.879
<v Speaker 1>midst of Trump cutting, you know, transgender polo matches for

0:27:47.000 --> 0:27:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Dubai or whatever the heck. A lot of the serious

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>looking at and rejiggering the administrative state, all these commissions

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 1>and boards and making everybody go through all the rules

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>and see if any of the rules violate the Constitution,

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:07.159
<v Speaker 1>exceed legislative power, go beyond the clear words of the

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:11.439
<v Speaker 1>Congressional Statute, harm the national interest, a stripping down of

0:28:11.480 --> 0:28:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the gigantic administrative state, and those of us who've been

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.000
<v Speaker 1>praying for that sort of thing are super excited. But

0:28:17.040 --> 0:28:19.119
<v Speaker 1>as I said before the break lawn, he can we

0:28:19.240 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 1>help understand, help people understand rather how that helps their lives,

0:28:26.640 --> 0:28:28.720
<v Speaker 1>you know in everywhere America.

0:28:30.440 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 3>Well, look, we want an effective and efficient government, right

0:28:34.400 --> 0:28:37.479
<v Speaker 3>and obviously everyone wants government to do things that's supposed

0:28:37.480 --> 0:28:40.640
<v Speaker 3>to do. But when you have I think there's a

0:28:40.640 --> 0:28:43.960
<v Speaker 3>couple of issues. One is when you have government that's

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:48.680
<v Speaker 3>grown so big and particularly has so many people that

0:28:48.760 --> 0:28:51.760
<v Speaker 3>it becomes kind of a constituency in and of itself, right,

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 3>that it becomes about defending the institution, which really means

0:28:56.400 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 3>making sure that nothing ever changes. What you end up with, fortunately,

0:29:00.360 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 3>is a situation where government doesn't have to improve. I mean,

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 3>let's just compare that to a minute to let's just

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 3>think about a business.

0:29:06.240 --> 0:29:06.400
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:09.880
<v Speaker 3>If you think about a business, the reason why businesses improve,

0:29:09.960 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 3>really the only reason why they improve is because of competition.

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.719
<v Speaker 3>And you've got a marketplace where you've got different businesses

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:20.360
<v Speaker 3>competing for people's support and for people's business, and that

0:29:20.520 --> 0:29:23.160
<v Speaker 3>ends up forcing them to improve and to change and

0:29:23.200 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 3>to evolve. Think about government for a minute. What forces

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.520
<v Speaker 3>government to change and evolve and get better. The answer

0:29:29.560 --> 0:29:33.320
<v Speaker 3>is nothing on a regular basis unless you apply some

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 3>sort of pressure. There is no competition. There's no other

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:40.760
<v Speaker 3>government out there that's going to do national security, that's

0:29:40.800 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 3>going to do processing to make sure that we have

0:29:43.640 --> 0:29:46.600
<v Speaker 3>clean air and clean water. That you don't have that

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:50.800
<v Speaker 3>unless you apply some political pressure on government to do better.

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.320
<v Speaker 3>And that is fundamentally why we need to think about

0:29:54.600 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 3>some of these changes that are going on. You know,

0:29:56.640 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 3>are some of them unorthodox, Are some of them going

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 3>to raise eyebrows? Sure, but fundamentally, the only way government

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 3>gets better is if you apply some pressure on it

0:30:04.040 --> 0:30:06.560
<v Speaker 3>to be more efficient and more effective. And by the way,

0:30:06.600 --> 0:30:09.840
<v Speaker 3>here's another thing, Joe, that really drives me nuts is transparency.

0:30:10.720 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 3>If you look at, for example, in California where I'm sitting,

0:30:13.480 --> 0:30:16.760
<v Speaker 3>the lack of transparency we have into what government is

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 3>doing and spending money on is remarkable. And at the

0:30:20.800 --> 0:30:23.480
<v Speaker 3>federal level we've got some similar issues. It's not as

0:30:23.480 --> 0:30:26.600
<v Speaker 3>bad as it is in California, But why can't we,

0:30:26.640 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 3>as the people who fund government, have a better idea

0:30:30.160 --> 0:30:33.400
<v Speaker 3>of what government's spending our money on. This is something

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 3>that's always drove me. Thats is why I ran for

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 3>controller several years ago. It's why I continue to believe

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.880
<v Speaker 3>we've got to push this transparency message because if we

0:30:40.920 --> 0:30:43.480
<v Speaker 3>don't know what government is doing, it can ever get better.

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 3>We can't ever make it do the things that's supposed

0:30:46.440 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 3>to do, and instead it ends up doing things that

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:51.080
<v Speaker 3>after the fact we read about it, we're like, what

0:30:51.160 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 3>our money's been going to?

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:52.280
<v Speaker 4>What?

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.320
<v Speaker 3>Because no one was able to see along the way

0:30:55.360 --> 0:30:57.239
<v Speaker 3>where all that money was going. So anyway, I'll get

0:30:57.240 --> 0:30:59.640
<v Speaker 3>off my soapbox now, but I really think transparency is

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:00.720
<v Speaker 3>hugely important.

0:31:01.120 --> 0:31:04.800
<v Speaker 1>Well so, and how that lands on main street though

0:31:04.920 --> 0:31:07.880
<v Speaker 1>is number one. We're not being stolen from and our

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>tax money merely distributed to cronies. That is what I

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:15.680
<v Speaker 1>would like very much. But secondly, wouldn't we see less

0:31:15.800 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 1>regulation therefore more efficient economic growth and change and that

0:31:21.080 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>sort of thing and rising wages? I just think I

0:31:23.760 --> 0:31:26.720
<v Speaker 1>think scaling back the administrative state would have a specific

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>material benefit to average Americans wherever they are.

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Well, yeah, I mean, look aside from people getting better

0:31:33.840 --> 0:31:36.880
<v Speaker 3>service and having a government that's more responsive. You're right,

0:31:36.920 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean, not to get too wonky about this, but

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 3>there is always this worry about government crowding out the

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 3>private sector, and what that means is that the government

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.960
<v Speaker 3>becomes so big that it starts to make it difficult

0:31:49.080 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 3>for you know, private entrepreneurs and small business owners to

0:31:52.520 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 3>do what they're doing. And the more debt we take on,

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:58.440
<v Speaker 3>the more people are going to have to pay in

0:31:58.480 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 3>taxes to pay off debt. And why we why do

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 3>we carry debt? We carry debt to have a bigger government.

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:07.120
<v Speaker 3>And so yeah, there is a real impact for people

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 3>on main street, and that is that if government gets bigger,

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:13.600
<v Speaker 3>taxes go up and people pay more because we have

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:16.920
<v Speaker 3>to pay more to support the mechanism of government that's

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.239
<v Speaker 3>been created. So there is a direct effect on our

0:32:19.280 --> 0:32:21.360
<v Speaker 3>pocketbooks and something that that people.

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Need to be aware of. And just you know, a

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>personal example. I've been very fortunate, Jack and I have

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:30.800
<v Speaker 1>done well in this business. I'm reasonably financially comfortable, but

0:32:31.120 --> 0:32:35.719
<v Speaker 1>my taxes are breathtaking. And if I were not paying

0:32:35.760 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 1>those taxes like that, It's not like I would go

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 1>out and buy a yacht. I would love to invest

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:46.120
<v Speaker 1>in smart people with great ideas. That's what I would

0:32:46.160 --> 0:32:48.680
<v Speaker 1>do if I was not spending X amount of money

0:32:48.720 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>on taxes and help them grow their businesses and hire

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of people and to get start an insurance

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.440
<v Speaker 1>plan and the rest of it. So yeah, the idea

0:32:56.480 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>that government crowds out free enterprise and private enterprise is

0:33:00.840 --> 0:33:05.400
<v Speaker 1>absolutely true. So Alanie, we appreciate the time and thoughts

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>anything else on what the Trump administration is doing domestically

0:33:10.200 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that's got you excited or you're feeling really good about.

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.680
<v Speaker 3>Well, Joe, I mean, look, I think the some of

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:18.840
<v Speaker 3>the stuff that the doge is doing in terms of

0:33:19.000 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 3>right sizing government, I think that's long overdue, quite frankly.

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:25.400
<v Speaker 3>But what I would also say is we've got a president.

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, whether you like what he's doing or not,

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:29.959
<v Speaker 3>he's doing something okay, And I think that that is

0:33:30.120 --> 0:33:34.040
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally what in many ways in our in our country,

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:36.480
<v Speaker 3>we feel like we've been lacking this. We've been lacking

0:33:36.520 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 3>this kind of leadership and direction. And we can have

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 3>a real debate about whether all of these things are

0:33:41.240 --> 0:33:43.440
<v Speaker 3>right or wrong, whether we like everything that's happening, whether

0:33:43.480 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 3>we think the direction that's that the US is taking

0:33:45.520 --> 0:33:48.720
<v Speaker 3>around the world is the right one. But fundamentally, we

0:33:48.800 --> 0:33:52.880
<v Speaker 3>have an action oriented executive branch and an action oriented government,

0:33:53.280 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 3>and maybe we can kind of wake everyone up and

0:33:56.080 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 3>sort of say, listen, there's some things that have to

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.239
<v Speaker 3>get done here, and there's some ways in which we

0:34:00.280 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 3>need to push forward to improve our country. And I

0:34:03.760 --> 0:34:06.040
<v Speaker 3>just think that we can have a real debate over

0:34:06.080 --> 0:34:08.319
<v Speaker 3>these things and this level of activity and action that

0:34:08.480 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 3>is truly exciting to be and you know, let's see

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:12.279
<v Speaker 3>where it goes.

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Lanhi Chen of the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Lonie is

0:34:16.760 --> 0:34:19.040
<v Speaker 1>always a pleasure. Thanks so much for the time.

0:34:19.320 --> 0:34:20.480
<v Speaker 3>Yep, great to be with you. Thank you.

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Likewise, thanks and to Chuck Schumer and those who have

0:34:24.360 --> 0:34:27.000
<v Speaker 1>been denigrating the Supreme Court and talking about how it's

0:34:27.040 --> 0:34:31.080
<v Speaker 1>illegitimate and the rest of it. The plan is all

0:34:31.080 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>the stuff we've been talking about to really look at

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>the foundations of the giant, obese Washington Colossus and dragged

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Supreme Court. Questions like these commissions and boards

0:34:48.120 --> 0:34:52.240
<v Speaker 1>and departments of since they're no longer doing what Congress

0:34:52.280 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>told them to do and they're not accountable to the

0:34:54.080 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>executive agent, the executive branch, can we end them or

0:34:57.719 --> 0:35:02.920
<v Speaker 1>how can we trim them and restructure them? And if

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>it runs a foul of any constitutional principles we have,

0:35:07.800 --> 0:35:11.880
<v Speaker 1>thank God and Trump. Frankly, we have a lot of

0:35:12.920 --> 0:35:18.400
<v Speaker 1>constitutionalist judges who are very, very protective of the bones

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Constitution, the original intents of the Constitution. So

0:35:21.239 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the perfect circumstance. We've got an agent

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of change and agents of stability that are going to

0:35:26.880 --> 0:35:29.080
<v Speaker 1>work together to make the government better for all of us.

0:35:29.120 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Hey la hey, law I love it. Stay with us,

0:35:33.400 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Armstrong and Getty