WEBVTT - Part One: The Online & Real Life Harassment of Marginalized Elected Officials

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to another episode of Internet Hate Machine. I am

0:00:03.600 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>your host, Bridget Todd. I am enjoined with my lovely producer, Sophie. Hey, Sophie,

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>what's up, Hey, Bridget. How's it going? It is going well,

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and I'm so, so so excited to be joined by Francesco.

0:00:13.840 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're in TV correspondent, funny Lady, host of the

0:00:17.800 --> 0:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>Situation Pod, the Twitteration Room on the Young Turk's News

0:00:21.680 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>broke on a J Plus, and New Mama Francesco. Thank

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:27.920
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being here. I'm so excited. Anytime,

0:00:27.920 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, talk to me about something else other

0:00:31.080 --> 0:00:37.680
<v Speaker 1>than nursing and sleep habits, just get me out of

0:00:37.680 --> 0:00:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that headspace. And I realized we might delve into something

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.479
<v Speaker 1>far worse, and I'll be rushing back to want to

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>talk about nursing and all and spit up habits and

0:00:47.640 --> 0:00:50.720
<v Speaker 1>all that crap, all the all the things that babies

0:00:50.760 --> 0:00:54.360
<v Speaker 1>do exactly. We might be talking maybe about babies I

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't know, or big babies. Yeah there there are,

0:00:57.520 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 1>so there are some grown man babies and the story. Yeah,

0:01:01.240 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's what the show is about, right, just

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>people being massive babies on the Internet and speaking of

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 1>people being massive babies on the Internet. I have to

0:01:10.240 --> 0:01:12.959
<v Speaker 1>call out this tweet that you had that had me rolling,

0:01:13.560 --> 0:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>uh elon must tweeted Twitter feels increasingly alive and you've

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>replied increasingly alive now that death threats are back. Absolutely.

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean the real joke, I think is that it's

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.680
<v Speaker 1>alive because we're all dunking on him just endlessly and

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>he's just trying to tweet through his entire failure. But yeah,

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 1>it's like, you know, the actual truth of it, and

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:37.039
<v Speaker 1>this is something you speak to is that we're just

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's alive. He's the equivalent of alive is because now

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>no one is censored when they're trying to docks people

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>or harass them. Yeah, now an open season for hate

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>speech docs saying death threats, all the stuff that you

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>want to see you when you log into Twitter dot com.

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>That actually was something that I was surprised at. You know,

0:01:58.240 --> 0:01:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I know we're not going to necessarily go into the

0:01:59.840 --> 0:02:03.520
<v Speaker 1>whole old debacle, but that in order to get people

0:02:03.560 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 1>to get on stay on your platform, you it has

0:02:05.280 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a place people want to be. And I

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:09.639
<v Speaker 1>was reading some analysis and I was like, oh, yeah,

0:02:10.160 --> 0:02:13.080
<v Speaker 1>as much as I think something like Instagram makes me

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously like it's a perpetual fomo and I feel terrible

0:02:15.919 --> 0:02:18.360
<v Speaker 1>about myself in different ways. It is also still a

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>place I want to be, And Ellen's got to make

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter a place people want to be who aren't just

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>white nationalists. Yeah, and I was reading about how only

0:02:30.120 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>a small percentage of power users on the platform, like

0:02:33.560 --> 0:02:36.799
<v Speaker 1>people who tweet regularly, like those are the folks who

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>really drive engagement, and so it does seem kind of

0:02:40.520 --> 0:02:43.840
<v Speaker 1>like Ellen is kind of his his first order of

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>business is kind of attacking those people and making sure

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>that they feel like Twitter is not a hospitable platform

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 1>for them to show up and like it's not like

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.640
<v Speaker 1>any of us are getting paid to tweet. So after

0:02:52.680 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>a while, it's like, why am I going to continue

0:02:54.440 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to show up here? Right? It's it's basically just too

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>again make fun of now the new owner. But that's it.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:04.959
<v Speaker 1>He needs to sweeten the pot for them and getting

0:03:05.160 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 1>folks to pay eight dollars a month for that, Like

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that's not that's not it. It should be. Ah God,

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:14.640
<v Speaker 1>my friend of mine suggested something, and I just have

0:03:14.680 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>to put this out there. But monetize Twitter by paying

0:03:19.880 --> 0:03:26.080
<v Speaker 1>to d m women paying Elan would be he would

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:30.960
<v Speaker 1>be making so much money off Twitter overnight, right or

0:03:31.120 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 1>or even like lower lower the bar, not even, but

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:36.280
<v Speaker 1>like to get so that you can see if they

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>read it or not sure exactly these different tiers, I

0:03:39.960 --> 0:03:42.839
<v Speaker 1>mean even replying to anybody, you know, the whole thing.

0:03:42.880 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>But it's like, oh God, if you want to troll

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>this person in their d M, you gotta pay fifty

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:52.360
<v Speaker 1>dollars if there's gonna be like, you know, if you're

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna say something about the way they look, you know,

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:56.960
<v Speaker 1>a hundred dollars if you're gonna throw in like a

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>toots or a nobody says toots anymore. You know how

0:04:02.120 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the Internet and trolls are all just like you know,

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>men in their eighties. Yeah, I love you, I love

0:04:09.320 --> 0:04:13.240
<v Speaker 1>the tweet. That's the voice that I that I read

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:21.200
<v Speaker 1>all m Andrew Dice, Clay voice, Hickory Dickory Duck. Yeah

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you look better without anyone under the age of thirty

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:28.479
<v Speaker 1>is like, what are they saying, Andrew Dice? Who I

0:04:28.520 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>don't These are not current, These are not topical references.

0:04:32.720 --> 0:04:36.360
<v Speaker 1>But you know your point about you know, paying to harass,

0:04:36.360 --> 0:04:40.040
<v Speaker 1>paying to bother people actually does fit really clearly into

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.560
<v Speaker 1>what I want to talk about today, And so far

0:04:42.640 --> 0:04:45.400
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast, we've talked about some examples of black

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.679
<v Speaker 1>women and women of color who have been the target

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>of not so fun things on social media platforms. We've

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:53.839
<v Speaker 1>talked about dongle Gate with a fear Richards, the end

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>Father's Day campaign on Twitter, and then coordinated attacks on

0:04:58.120 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 1>SNL actor Leslie Jones, And as horrific as these things are,

0:05:02.440 --> 0:05:04.440
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of easy to think of them as sort

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>of isolated incidents or things just happening on Twitter with

0:05:08.600 --> 0:05:11.200
<v Speaker 1>no real context playing out in the you know, the

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 1>real the I r L world, like the real world,

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And so I wanted to spend a little bit of

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 1>time kind of connecting those dots on why all this

0:05:18.040 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>matters and why it matters beyond the folks who are

0:05:21.520 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>being targeted. And since we just had mid term elections,

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 1>I think taking a look at some of recent elections

0:05:26.320 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and the experiences of elected officials will provide a really

0:05:29.560 --> 0:05:32.400
<v Speaker 1>good example for the real world consequences of having a

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:36.480
<v Speaker 1>social media landscape ready and willing to amplify racist, sexist

0:05:36.520 --> 0:05:39.040
<v Speaker 1>attacks on black women and women of color. Is this

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:43.279
<v Speaker 1>something that you've experienced as like a visible person on Twitter. Yes,

0:05:43.360 --> 0:05:46.760
<v Speaker 1>and no, I will say that. Um I what I

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>think that the online hate has done for me is

0:05:51.000 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>make me, um invisibilize myself deliberately, So say less, be

0:05:56.920 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>very very careful. And again, I'm a comic, you know,

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and I and I am a pundit. I like to speak.

0:06:01.880 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>I love doing podcasts, I love doing you know, my

0:06:04.720 --> 0:06:07.720
<v Speaker 1>live show, the Bituation Room, all that. But it's when

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:10.279
<v Speaker 1>it comes to just the world of Twitter, I am

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:12.440
<v Speaker 1>much more on my p's and q's, and not in

0:06:12.480 --> 0:06:15.040
<v Speaker 1>a good way. So it's so ironic. We are being

0:06:15.160 --> 0:06:18.920
<v Speaker 1>trolled by you know, generally dudes and white dudes and

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever cis het you keep adding to it, who are

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>constantly saying that they are being silenced, when in fact,

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>what they the ecosystem they create, actually just silences women,

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>people of color, marginalized folks, anyone who feels like they

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.760
<v Speaker 1>are already targeted by systemic oppression. That's just it's sort

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of a self imposed censorship. So and I hate that

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>about so. So No, I have not been deliberately targeted.

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>But also I don't stick at my neck out that much.

0:06:51.279 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's a that's not good, you know,

0:06:54.880 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>but but yeah, I've been, you know, in multiple I

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>think it's also because I'm not like I'm next and

0:07:00.440 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>people are like, I don't know how to troll you.

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:09.360
<v Speaker 1>What epithode do I use? Are exactly? Are you Chinese?

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>Are you Italian? Are you Latina? I don't know, damn it,

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna google it. Uh my Wikipedia pages all fucked

0:07:15.680 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 1>up to It's like I don't know if we can swear,

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:20.880
<v Speaker 1>but I am my bad um. So it's just like

0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they I think my Wikipedia page says that I'm like

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.360
<v Speaker 1>from Argentina, but I'm not. The point is it's funny

0:07:26.400 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>when you're not discernibly something. So people don't know how

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>to troll. I will say this to Year and I

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:35.560
<v Speaker 1>know you did a whole episode on Leslie Jones thing.

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 1>I was at the r n C in t St. Milo, Napolis,

0:07:40.320 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>was going live for Bright Bart and my producers. The

0:07:44.040 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>people at a J Plus were like, yo, this is

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the day after that Leslie Leslie Jones was I think

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 1>left Twitter was being trolled. Milow started it. They go, yo,

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:56.760
<v Speaker 1>you should like say something to him, do something. So

0:07:57.040 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>on air we did our own little like rolling of him,

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, you know, does it does all

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>this make you feel better that your mom never hugged

0:08:05.960 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you as a child, you know, just like being raised

0:08:08.880 --> 0:08:11.800
<v Speaker 1>by the legends of Zelda like and I was something

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:13.720
<v Speaker 1>about like I said, I think the first thing I

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:15.360
<v Speaker 1>said to him was like, it's funny that you hate

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>black people because your heart is black, is what I said.

0:08:18.600 --> 0:08:22.200
<v Speaker 1>That's that's good. So yeah, so that was the man

0:08:22.760 --> 0:08:26.320
<v Speaker 1>stunned to speak. No he called me. He turns around, goes,

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't mean nasty, you know, he goes, what a mean nasty,

0:08:30.120 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 1>skinny lesbian you are? And I was like, me's guinea things?

0:08:35.120 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Oh my god. So I was also at that same

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:41.160
<v Speaker 1>r n C. And I remember I was this is

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a whole long story, but I was there as part

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of a group who was meant to be getting like

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:50.280
<v Speaker 1>like writing a piece about Milo. And I remember him

0:08:50.320 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>walking around like the press area and what a like

0:08:54.679 --> 0:08:56.559
<v Speaker 1>you could just you ever see somebody who you can

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 1>tell wants to have their presence be something that everybody

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>is talking about. And everybody was working, so nobody was like,

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, there's Milo. Everybody was like, oh, what

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:09.160
<v Speaker 1>is like this person just came in they clearly want

0:09:09.200 --> 0:09:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a scene, and everybody just went back to their their

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>laptops and it was kind of this, like I remember

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:17.560
<v Speaker 1>just feeling like this is pathetic, Like this this is

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.560
<v Speaker 1>like reminds me of when I was like when I

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>first got my driver's license and I would like get

0:09:22.000 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>in my car and drive by the school playing music

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:26.520
<v Speaker 1>loud with sunglasses on and be like, I hope they

0:09:26.559 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 1>see me. I just felt I just felt very sad. Yeah, exactly. No, Yeah,

0:09:31.679 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>he definitely like plays. He has a little boom box

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.040
<v Speaker 1>next to him and like plays. You know, I have

0:09:38.200 --> 0:09:40.720
<v Speaker 1>some kind of trumpet entrance, like has a little smoke

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:44.319
<v Speaker 1>machine he wants that's in his mind, Like it goes

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.240
<v Speaker 1>off when he walks in a room. You know what

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying. My brain is on new Mom. I'm sorry, um,

0:09:51.120 --> 0:09:53.600
<v Speaker 1>but yeah, yeah, I know that he's a sad, sad

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>man and uh, I think got what he deserved. But

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>that's I know you went into that. Yeah, I mean

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.199
<v Speaker 1>he talking about him is actually a great segue into

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the idea that I think in so many of the

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>incidents that we have discussed, particularly around like Milo and

0:10:08.320 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Leslie Jones, it's this idea that It really shows, in

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>my opinion, the way that a sort of disregard and

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>distrust of women, particularly women of color and black women,

0:10:19.880 --> 0:10:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of baked into our experience of being on

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.680
<v Speaker 1>social media platforms. And if you've ever seen a right

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 1>wing figure attack of black woman who was basically just

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 1>minding her business like Leslie Jones was, and thought what's

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>going on? You know, when you see a right wing

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.800
<v Speaker 1>figure randomly attack Lizzo or how like Trump would randomly

0:10:35.840 --> 0:10:39.600
<v Speaker 1>attack uh yeah, Signore April Ryan like right like women

0:10:39.600 --> 0:10:41.959
<v Speaker 1>of color, always you'd be thinking, like, why are they

0:10:41.960 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>doing this? Well, I would argue it's because it is

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a tried and true engagement strategy. And when you apply

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 1>that to social media people who run platforms, they're not

0:10:51.640 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>really interested in sort of de incentivizing that because it's

0:10:54.800 --> 0:10:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a successful way to generate engagement, which means, you know,

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 1>more profit for them. And so basically I think that

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.080
<v Speaker 1>attacking women of color is always going to be a

0:11:04.120 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>way to get to like fire up your base and

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.600
<v Speaker 1>get engagement, and platforms are not interested in stopping this

0:11:09.760 --> 0:11:13.559
<v Speaker 1>or de incentivizing it because they are in on the grift. Yeah,

0:11:13.640 --> 0:11:17.680
<v Speaker 1>well that's sure. I mean it's amazing. Once again, this

0:11:17.679 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>this is the right. It loves to accuse the Left

0:11:20.120 --> 0:11:24.280
<v Speaker 1>of being triggered by something, and they the people you're naming,

0:11:25.720 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the reason they triggered. They are the ones triggering the

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:33.840
<v Speaker 1>right merely by their existence, the idea that black women

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:39.520
<v Speaker 1>are excelling in journalism, in music, in something that otherwise

0:11:39.600 --> 0:11:41.640
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't give a shit about. They don't know who

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Lizzo is. Ben Shapiro doesn't know Lizzo is. But then

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>suddenly she's playing you know whoever the fox flute Jefferson?

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Was it Jefferson? It was Jefferson. Yeah, just like so

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Jefferson's flute um, which of course we all know she

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>should have smashed into a million pieces. Uh, and that's what. No,

0:12:00.480 --> 0:12:03.480
<v Speaker 1>she played it amazingly, And you're just like, this is

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:05.920
<v Speaker 1>what I mean by identity politics still matter. I mean,

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:07.160
<v Speaker 1>this is why I think a lot of us still

0:12:07.160 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 1>say it, because they's like, literally by their identity, by fote,

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>by black women just doing them. Suddenly this entire yeah,

0:12:14.920 --> 0:12:19.480
<v Speaker 1>machinery of algorithms and grift and money making is actually

0:12:19.480 --> 0:12:22.480
<v Speaker 1>just triggered and is set off, you know, and just

0:12:22.559 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 1>keeps on spinning and spinning and spinning and victimizing, I

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.080
<v Speaker 1>would say, but honestly, like, these are also badass people

0:12:29.480 --> 0:12:31.120
<v Speaker 1>who I think it takes a lot more to bring

0:12:31.120 --> 0:12:33.679
<v Speaker 1>them down. But yeah, victimizing usually women of color and

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:37.160
<v Speaker 1>black women specifically. Absolutely. My favorite tweet that I saw

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>about the Lizzo situation was when everybody was like, oh,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 1>she played that flute. Lizzo should dig up the bones

0:12:43.760 --> 0:12:49.760
<v Speaker 1>of Jefferson and play his ribs like a xylophone. So

0:12:49.920 --> 0:12:52.439
<v Speaker 1>you're you're exactly right, And I've seen the exact same thing.

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Disinformation researcher and the author of the great new book

0:12:55.600 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Black Skinheads, and person who is a lot smarter than

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.760
<v Speaker 1>me on these issues, Brandy dex Raclar. She explained it

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>very well in an interview with Janet Burns. She says,

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:06.680
<v Speaker 1>social media as a sphere, because of its theatrical nature,

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>is where you will see the most profound attacks, and

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter some of the most vicious attacks that are

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:13.680
<v Speaker 1>being directed at black women, black leaders, and black activists.

0:13:14.000 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It ends up getting laughed about on the now defunctor

0:13:17.040 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Riley Factor and other shows. There's this freedom to attacked

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 1>and repeated validation of it, and everywhere we go we

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>see corporate or government gatekeepers who declined to intervene. So

0:13:26.440 --> 0:13:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I completely agree with her point. We have a media

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.720
<v Speaker 1>landscape where attacking women of color and black women isn't

0:13:32.760 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>just okay, it's incentivized, and I think this is key.

0:13:35.920 --> 0:13:39.680
<v Speaker 1>When platforms allow racist, sexist attacks on black women and

0:13:39.679 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>women of color and do nothing, it normalizes this behavior

0:13:43.360 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and it doesn't just say that it's okay, but it

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>says like this is just the cost of being a

0:13:47.880 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>visible black woman online. And even if it starts on

0:13:50.760 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>platforms like Twitter, I think it creates the conditions that

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.280
<v Speaker 1>normalize the same kind of abuse to happen more broadly

0:13:56.320 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>out into the world, and also create a pathway for escalation,

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 1>Like if people don't do anything when you harass a

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.520
<v Speaker 1>black woman or a woman of color online, you know,

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.400
<v Speaker 1>bad actors will watch that response and be like, Okay, well,

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:10.360
<v Speaker 1>I will reasonably conclude that I could take that behavior

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:14.320
<v Speaker 1>offline too, And that's kind of really sad, because you know,

0:14:14.360 --> 0:14:16.520
<v Speaker 1>when we're talking about women and black women and women

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>of color who don't always get the support that we should,

0:14:20.800 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>people are not totally incorrect and assuming that they can

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:27.920
<v Speaker 1>harass these women and escalate that harassment from the Internet

0:14:27.920 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>to the real world, and that people aren't going to

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>do anything because they're kind of right, and a lot

0:14:32.440 --> 0:14:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of instances, not a lot is done. Yeah, I mean

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>it's it's seen as like I think black women specifically

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.480
<v Speaker 1>because of white supremacy, um, and the ways that like

0:14:47.160 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 1>your your identities are immediately politicized not by your not

0:14:53.720 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>by you, but by the by white supremacy and the

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:59.360
<v Speaker 1>function of it and how it works. And so it's

0:14:59.400 --> 0:15:02.120
<v Speaker 1>like like I'm saying, folks mining their own business, women

0:15:02.200 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>just doing themselves is suddenly seen as like how dare

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 1>you attack me? And you're like, what are you talking about?

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>No one's attacking you. But it's and again this is

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>like some folks can go through the world and their

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:17.280
<v Speaker 1>identities are not automatically politicized. They're not automatically seen as

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:20.120
<v Speaker 1>like oh, it's like, um, I can't remember her name,

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>but there was this Asian American reporter who got a

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.560
<v Speaker 1>phone call after she like talked about you know, what

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>she eats at Thanksgiving, right, and I think she's Korean,

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 1>and she was like someone called her and was like

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:37.480
<v Speaker 1>your reporter was very Asian, you know, like I was

0:15:37.560 --> 0:15:41.440
<v Speaker 1>offended by how Asian your reporter was even just because

0:15:41.480 --> 0:15:44.720
<v Speaker 1>they mentioned that they don't eat turkey on things. Remember

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:50.200
<v Speaker 1>that it would just the existence of her specific cultural thing. Yeah,

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:54.120
<v Speaker 1>the mere existence your mirror. I am victimized by your

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 1>mere existence. Like God, white fragility is so so brittle

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:04.040
<v Speaker 1>and exactly what it is, Michelle Lee. I believe, yes,

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>now selling very Asian merch and I love it. Um

0:16:08.840 --> 0:16:11.960
<v Speaker 1>but but so yeah, and and of course anything that

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>makes folks money is gonna That's why, I mean, I

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 1>know that your whole show just is going to end

0:16:19.280 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in we need to nationalize and break up big tech.

0:16:23.080 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean I think it's that's a whole yeah, yes, yes, um.

0:16:29.320 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>But you know, when you're talking about sort of this

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:34.800
<v Speaker 1>idea of women and people of color and black folks

0:16:35.000 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 1>just sort of being inherently politicized, this is something that

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I really want to pull out because I talk a

0:16:40.240 --> 0:16:44.320
<v Speaker 1>lot about things like misinformation, disinformation, malinformation, all of that.

0:16:44.640 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like my day job is like researching that. And

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that what often gets lost are the ways

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>that these kinds of things are so often identity based, right,

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.960
<v Speaker 1>and so ideas about you know, someone who is Chinese

0:16:58.000 --> 0:17:01.880
<v Speaker 1>American being foreign or you know not, you know not

0:17:02.000 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't belong here, or ideas about you know, black women

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>being angry or incompetent. I think that we so often

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>see identity based inaccurate information, and it's so much harder

0:17:13.240 --> 0:17:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to pull out and talk about, as opposed to disinformation

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:20.159
<v Speaker 1>and misinformation around things like COVID or vaccines, where it's like, yeah,

0:17:20.359 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 1>most reasonable people are like, like, there's a baseline understanding

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of you know, oh, this is inaccurate information. But when

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes to identity, I think it's a little bit

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.600
<v Speaker 1>harder to actually pull out and identify and talk about

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 1>because I don't know, talking about race and culture and

0:17:35.640 --> 0:17:39.960
<v Speaker 1>identity can be so fraught and difficult for our society.

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>I guess yeah, And you don't want to be overly

0:17:42.440 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>reductive in when you when you combat this, when you

0:17:46.320 --> 0:17:48.600
<v Speaker 1>combat hate as well, it's the same thing, I think,

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>and where we don't have to get into it all

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.360
<v Speaker 1>but around our conversations about Kanye's anti semitism and how

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.919
<v Speaker 1>to like properly and how to adequately combat it in

0:17:57.000 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>order to shut it down, But how much do you engage?

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:03.320
<v Speaker 1>And that it's sticky because again, I think it's super

0:18:03.320 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>reductive to be like all black people are this, all

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>Jews are that, all Chinese Americans like just like it.

0:18:10.560 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>You how do we push back against stereotypes while also

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:19.120
<v Speaker 1>understanding the like the heterogene when what's the word? Like

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:27.000
<v Speaker 1>just how um not homogeneous? Heterogeneous? I don't have words anymore. Um,

0:18:27.600 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm just gonna a SMR every time I don't know

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 1>my vote? Yeah, just how how like how much difference

0:18:32.840 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>there is in all of these communities exactly? And I

0:18:36.160 --> 0:18:39.200
<v Speaker 1>think it's one of the reasons why talking about it

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is so difficult, because it's like, how do you make

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>room for the fact that no no group as a monolith.

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we there are nuances and like like we're

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:53.439
<v Speaker 1>a gradient, like there's nuances in our communities, but we

0:18:53.480 --> 0:18:55.960
<v Speaker 1>still need to I believe it's still like very important

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to have a clear united front against things like anti Semitism.

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:01.760
<v Speaker 1>And I mean this is like a tangent, but like

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>with Kanye West, it troubles me that he can't see

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:08.359
<v Speaker 1>that like when someone is being and this is my opinion,

0:19:08.359 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 1>when someone is being anti Semitic or you know, anti Asian, whatever,

0:19:13.560 --> 0:19:15.920
<v Speaker 1>it is a hot skipping away from anti blackness. That

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:18.120
<v Speaker 1>ship is all linked and that train is never late.

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>And so like, if you, as a black person, are

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:23.320
<v Speaker 1>engaging explicitly an anti semitism, do you not realize that

0:19:23.320 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 1>you're creating the conditions for that ship to come back

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>around on us. And like, all of our oppression is linked.

0:19:28.200 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe firmly that our liberation is linked. And you

0:19:31.320 --> 0:19:33.720
<v Speaker 1>just got like when I see him doing that, I'm like,

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.879
<v Speaker 1>can you not see the way that you are setting

0:19:35.880 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 1>yourself up to later be knocked down? People are gonna

0:19:38.960 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>be like, oh, we love that he's being anti Semitic. Good,

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>good good, And you know that's just giving folks more

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.080
<v Speaker 1>thought or to slip in anti blackness. So like, what

0:19:47.119 --> 0:19:49.639
<v Speaker 1>the funk are you doing? Yes, oh my god, go

0:19:49.680 --> 0:19:52.399
<v Speaker 1>off and and like final, just like last thing on this,

0:19:53.280 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>they're super linked. The whole Sorrows myth right Sorrows is

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>a billionaire who is fill in the blank um helping

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:08.600
<v Speaker 1>BLM defund the police, creating thugs out of inner city

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:12.280
<v Speaker 1>black children. Like literally it's always linked. It's it's Jews

0:20:12.480 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>run stuff. And the running stuff inherently means they're flooding

0:20:18.200 --> 0:20:22.120
<v Speaker 1>our country with immigrants and they basically um help black

0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>people vote and or like flooding our like voters electoral

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:28.040
<v Speaker 1>system with like black votes, like Google straight up that

0:20:28.160 --> 0:20:31.320
<v Speaker 1>they're the orchestrators of the people of color. So it's

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>like so layered. Yeah, but it's again, I feel like

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>we have this, particularly on social media, we have this

0:20:41.040 --> 0:20:44.560
<v Speaker 1>climate that loves to flatten things out and strip things

0:20:44.600 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of nuance and context. And I don't think that we

0:20:47.680 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>have I don't think that our platforms have the range

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 1>to allow for discussing things in the way they actually

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>need to be discussed, right Like social media platforms are

0:20:57.520 --> 0:21:05.359
<v Speaker 1>incentivize to amplify the most insidiary inflammatory nuance, lacking bs,

0:21:05.359 --> 0:21:08.600
<v Speaker 1>extremist stuff, and so I don't think our platforms are

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:11.479
<v Speaker 1>largest communication platforms are really equipped for the level of

0:21:11.480 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>like conversation that we need to be having right now,

0:21:14.840 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>and not at all. It is like, say something reductive,

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>say it unapologetically and take out any kind of maybe

0:21:24.400 --> 0:21:29.479
<v Speaker 1>could be leading to perhaps you know, and just end

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.760
<v Speaker 1>it with the period and you're done, and then you'll

0:21:32.760 --> 0:21:36.679
<v Speaker 1>get a million retweets and that's yeah, that's what wins.

0:21:36.800 --> 0:21:40.639
<v Speaker 1>People make money off of that, People get deals, and

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I don't care which side of the spectrum you're on.

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Just no room for nuanced, forgive no one, take no prisoners,

0:21:46.880 --> 0:21:51.320
<v Speaker 1>cancel everybody, and or troll everybody, and you will win

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 1>as social media. It's so funny that you put it

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 1>this way. I miss, I might going off the rails here.

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. We can yeah, but you know we have

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 1>to talk about women in elections, female candidates. Correct, But

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I just gonna say one thing like this is like

0:22:05.080 --> 0:22:07.159
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons why I find myself showing up

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.359
<v Speaker 1>less and less on social media platforms because I think

0:22:10.400 --> 0:22:14.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're exactly right. It's not even definitely extremists. Right

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>wing extremists are like the worst, are like the biggest

0:22:17.240 --> 0:22:19.360
<v Speaker 1>bad actors, but it certainly they are not the only

0:22:19.400 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>ones doing it. And I think even when it's not

0:22:21.600 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>something that is like politically charged, like I don't know

0:22:24.520 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 1>if you saw that woman who was tweeting about like,

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>oh I sure love sitting in my garden and everybody

0:22:28.560 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>was like boo, we hate who usedupid bitch? Like we

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.600
<v Speaker 1>are incentivized to be our worst selves, and our worst

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 1>selves are what these algorithms amplify, and that has been

0:22:37.760 --> 0:22:39.879
<v Speaker 1>determined by study after a study like, it's not your

0:22:39.920 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>imagination when you bring hatefulness extremism. You know, two platforms,

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 1>platforms a boost that when you show up with nuance

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 1>or thoughtfulness, they do not. And so it's a real

0:22:53.119 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>word tremity, like, hey, I really love my garden. Now

0:22:57.600 --> 0:22:59.680
<v Speaker 1>funk your garden? Oh my god, how much do you

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:02.679
<v Speaker 1>want to it? How much water are you wasting in

0:23:02.760 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>that beautiful garden of yours? You know that's it's always

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:12.639
<v Speaker 1>you cannot be positive, sable, it's insufferable. And if you

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:15.120
<v Speaker 1>are positive on like you know you do you take

0:23:15.119 --> 0:23:19.800
<v Speaker 1>a cute selfie on Instagram, haters be on following you.

0:23:19.880 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 1>Let me just be real, when you post out, you

0:23:22.880 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>post something you look cute unfollowed. Yeah, it's funny because

0:23:27.359 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 1>like I I think we're all just like really miserable

0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.280
<v Speaker 1>and we're showing up with a lot of misery on

0:23:36.359 --> 0:23:39.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly exactly. And I've actually even heard people be like, yeah,

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:41.399
<v Speaker 1>don't bring your joy to social media. People will just

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.480
<v Speaker 1>find a way to shoot on it. Agreed to take

0:23:44.520 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>that somewhere else, like your family. So let's talk about

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about what we've been seeing in terms

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of attacks on women of color and black women and

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:02.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to elections and hold collected office. So

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into a little bit of research first.

0:24:04.800 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll breathe through this, but there's actually quite a big

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.800
<v Speaker 1>body of work as of late around some of what

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.200
<v Speaker 1>we'll be talking about today. So in this the Internationals

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:14.880
<v Speaker 1>did a study that looked at abusive messages hurled at

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a multi racial group of members of parliament, and they

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>found that Black Asian and minority ethnic women members of

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.840
<v Speaker 1>parliament are impacted far more than their white colleagues. The

0:24:23.880 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty black Asian and minority ethnic members of Parliament that

0:24:26.960 --> 0:24:30.199
<v Speaker 1>they that they looked at received almost half of the

0:24:30.240 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>abusive tweets, despite being almost eight times as many white

0:24:33.560 --> 0:24:36.280
<v Speaker 1>members of parliament. In the study, uh they also examined

0:24:36.320 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>abusive tweets targeted women journalists and politicians in both the

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:41.640
<v Speaker 1>United States and the United Kingdom and found that black

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>women were eighty four percent more likely than white women

0:24:44.440 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>to be mentioned in abusive tweets. Over in the United States,

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.399
<v Speaker 1>a report from the Institute for Strategic Dialogue found that

0:24:51.440 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>women of color candidates are targeted by the right on

0:24:54.320 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>social media at alarming rates. Abusive messages counted for more

0:24:57.480 --> 0:25:00.119
<v Speaker 1>than fifteen percent of those directed at every female all

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 1>maker analyze, compared to around five to ten of male candidates.

0:25:04.000 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Women of color are particularly likely to be targeted. Rep

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:11.120
<v Speaker 1>il Han Omar received the highest proportion of abusive messages

0:25:11.160 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of all candidates, and AOC received the highest ratio of

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>abusive comments on Facebook. And this is like a specific

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:21.320
<v Speaker 1>thing to women when they looked at male UH elected

0:25:21.359 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>officials who are people of colors, So like Corey Booker

0:25:23.600 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>or Tim Scott, who are both black, they received similar

0:25:26.920 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 1>levels of abuse to their white male candidates. However, the

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>attacks against them were more likely to be about race.

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:34.960
<v Speaker 1>When you look at the way that men are targeted

0:25:35.080 --> 0:25:38.680
<v Speaker 1>for you know, problematic or you know negative tweets and

0:25:38.720 --> 0:25:42.640
<v Speaker 1>negative content, those tweets are much more likely to focus

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 1>on policy, right, So, like, I don't like your position

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>on this, I don't like your position on that. When

0:25:47.440 --> 0:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>it comes to women, it's much more exactly to be

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:54.199
<v Speaker 1>about their appearance or their general incompetence. Female Democrats received

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>ten times more abusive comments and their male counterparts on Facebook,

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and Republican women got more than twice as many abusive

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.919
<v Speaker 1>comments and Republican men and then lastly, the Center for

0:26:04.080 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Democracy and Technology looked at congressional candidates in the US

0:26:08.640 --> 0:26:10.560
<v Speaker 1>and found that women of color candidates were the most

0:26:10.560 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 1>ectly to be targeted with the posts that combined miss

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:15.840
<v Speaker 1>and disinformation and abuse. Women of color were at least

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>five times more likely than other candidates to be targeted

0:26:18.520 --> 0:26:21.760
<v Speaker 1>with tweets related to their identity and focus specifically on

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:24.639
<v Speaker 1>their gender and their race. UM, I have to ask you,

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:28.960
<v Speaker 1>does any of this surprise you? No, not at all,

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 1>not not in the slightest. And this is why I

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:39.000
<v Speaker 1>always say I think it's important to harass Republican men

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.240
<v Speaker 1>based on their looks. I just you know, I I

0:26:41.320 --> 0:26:43.159
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I don't. I can't solve any of this.

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I can't solve sexism, patriarchy, white supremacy overnight. But I

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>can troll Matt Gates for his five head or troll

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Mitch McConnell for looking like an uncircumcised chode, you know,

0:26:55.920 --> 0:26:58.119
<v Speaker 1>like I can. That's what I think we need to

0:26:58.160 --> 0:27:00.960
<v Speaker 1>do more of, and that's how I want to level

0:27:01.000 --> 0:27:05.119
<v Speaker 1>the playing field. I completely agree. The proudest moment I

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:06.919
<v Speaker 1>had in the last couple of months was that video

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>of Ted Cruise at a Yankees game and then the

0:27:11.080 --> 0:27:13.920
<v Speaker 1>crowd just screaming at him. Remember when Trump called your

0:27:13.960 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>wife ugly fuck it? I was like, Oh, that's the

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:23.359
<v Speaker 1>America that I'm proud of, and she no, But I think,

0:27:24.400 --> 0:27:26.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, like, yeah, Ted Cruise, I mean this is

0:27:26.440 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I used to get in trouble for when I had

0:27:29.440 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 1>like a news comedy show on a J Plus. They

0:27:31.200 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>were like, you should criticize Ted Cruise more on his look,

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, sorry, more in his substance, And I was like, yeah,

0:27:36.160 --> 0:27:39.879
<v Speaker 1>but he does look like he's holding a bunch of

0:27:39.920 --> 0:27:44.080
<v Speaker 1>like little hatchlings of like baby salamanders in his mouth

0:27:44.119 --> 0:27:45.439
<v Speaker 1>at all times, you know what I mean. He's just

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.840
<v Speaker 1>he looks like you know, and he himself looks like

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a bat. Like He's just I need to be able

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>to say that in the same breath that I'm like yes,

0:27:54.040 --> 0:27:56.960
<v Speaker 1>And he also demonizes immigrants and wants to you know,

0:27:57.000 --> 0:28:00.200
<v Speaker 1>privatize medicare all those kinds of things. Two things can

0:28:00.200 --> 0:28:02.920
<v Speaker 1>be true at once, But I always catch myself because

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>of course I like to make fun of Marjorie Tayler Green,

0:28:05.720 --> 0:28:11.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, but am I equally applying that critique

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to these other hateful bastards as well. I mean, it's

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>a great question. I feel like if the research has

0:28:18.359 --> 0:28:21.440
<v Speaker 1>anything to be to be looked at like most people are.

0:28:21.480 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>When they see a woman, it's like you're an ugly skank,

0:28:24.680 --> 0:28:26.800
<v Speaker 1>blah blah blah, and when you see a man it's

0:28:26.840 --> 0:28:30.000
<v Speaker 1>like it's I would like to see a world where,

0:28:30.760 --> 0:28:32.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't know that we're ever gonna get

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to a place where women are not insulted for their

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>looks and things they can't control. Why why why can't

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Ted Cruz be take take one for his looks, you know,

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>more than one preferably. And then I think there's always

0:28:46.560 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>like Republican generally written large. If a woman is like

0:28:53.120 --> 0:28:56.000
<v Speaker 1>made fun of, like Sarah how Colbe Sanders um at

0:28:56.000 --> 0:28:59.400
<v Speaker 1>the White House Press Correspondence Dinner by Michelle Wolf, suddenly

0:28:59.400 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>they're like, you mean, do that, but AOC is a

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>Latino with a big gass, and we all know that

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>she's having anchor babies, you know, like whatever in the

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>same breath, and they'll be like, how dare you make

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:17.520
<v Speaker 1>fun of Sarah copy Sanders his eyeshadow. She's just a woman.

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>But they do not apply that at all. Obviously the

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>other side. I mean, come on, and this is why,

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 1>like AOC when she openly speaks about how she gets

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:28.360
<v Speaker 1>these death threats that are very sexual in nature and

0:29:28.400 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>also like really charged with that that disgusting like amalgamation

0:29:34.680 --> 0:29:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of both being attracted to and then also hating hatefulness

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:41.320
<v Speaker 1>towards her, the vin Tucker Carlson will straight up a

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:43.240
<v Speaker 1>dedicated half an hour segment to be like, Oh, do

0:29:43.320 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you think people want to poke you? I mean, we

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:47.160
<v Speaker 1>do want to poke you, but we don't what we do.

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:50.480
<v Speaker 1>But whatever you're growsing you we girl that grows like

0:29:50.720 --> 0:29:54.120
<v Speaker 1>he it's and you're like, you're proving our point, homie.

0:29:54.760 --> 0:30:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you suggesting that these people are disingenuous? Yeah, Tucker Carlson.

0:30:01.760 --> 0:30:04.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I could do a whole episode on the

0:30:04.200 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>way that he coordinates these attacks on women. And then

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.120
<v Speaker 1>when the women are like actually, like when they just

0:30:11.200 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>are honest about them, he's like, oh, like, it's exactly

0:30:13.880 --> 0:30:17.040
<v Speaker 1>what you said. And it's so clear that everyone knows

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:19.480
<v Speaker 1>what's going on. But the only reason that he's able

0:30:19.560 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 1>to get away with minimizing what we can all see

0:30:23.080 --> 0:30:27.120
<v Speaker 1>is these like super weird, sexually charged attacks is because

0:30:27.160 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>he's not we're not we're not talking honestly about them

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>as a society, Like like the women who are targeted

0:30:32.600 --> 0:30:34.760
<v Speaker 1>aren't really able to speak about them openly, and when

0:30:34.800 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 1>they do, their attacked, and so it's allows for this

0:30:37.560 --> 0:30:41.200
<v Speaker 1>vibe or like it's happening, we all see it happening,

0:30:41.360 --> 0:30:43.880
<v Speaker 1>we're not talking about it happening. People like Tucker Carlson

0:30:43.960 --> 0:30:46.960
<v Speaker 1>can be actively engaged in it happening and like do

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.840
<v Speaker 1>make it happen and then go on TV and be

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>like what are you talking about? And you know exactly, Yeah,

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Santa Claus doesn't exist, but like make sure to put

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the cookies out every single Christmas. Like it's just like

0:31:01.720 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you're straight up talking, you're make You're willing it into existence.

0:31:05.840 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>And AOC to her credit and Ilhano mar to a

0:31:09.160 --> 0:31:11.840
<v Speaker 1>lesser extent, I think obviously being a Muslim American woman

0:31:11.880 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 1>like she is targeted because of that as well wearing

0:31:14.920 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>a job, but AOC is actually able to talk about

0:31:18.160 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>it and be like, yo, there, it is sexual in

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>nature and that doesn't mean that I'm thirsty for that

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>attention at all. And then Republicans are like, oh, she's

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 1>like no, and I think that's because we are definitely

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:33.840
<v Speaker 1>taught to like when there is a tinge of like,

0:31:34.160 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and especially if someone is attractive, he's attractive, you know,

0:31:38.280 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we're taught to like not um or as women online

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:46.600
<v Speaker 1>like m hmm. Don't don't discuss or bring up the

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>fact that someone is targeting you in a sexual manner,

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>because it will almost feel like you're bringing it on

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.400
<v Speaker 1>yourself because you're left, do you know what I mean?

0:31:55.480 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And the are you wearing type of way? I know

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 1>exactly what you mean, where it's this weird trap of

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:05.680
<v Speaker 1>like if you even acknowledge the fact that it's happening,

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the idea, the impression is that you're playing into it,

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:11.200
<v Speaker 1>or that maybe you want it, or it's a two

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:14.040
<v Speaker 1>way street, or like you're you're you're enticing it in

0:32:14.080 --> 0:32:16.080
<v Speaker 1>some way, and so that it's one of the reasons

0:32:16.160 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>why talking about harassment, especially when it's kind of sexually

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>charged or sexually tinged, is so difficult because nobody wants

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 1>this insinuation that you're that you're getting off on it

0:32:26.320 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 1>or inviting it or wanting it. But I think, I mean,

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to talk about, but I think it's especially

0:32:31.280 --> 0:32:36.000
<v Speaker 1>true when you're talking about like young conventionally attractive women.

0:32:36.600 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 1>I think that like men does don't know what to do.

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:41.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like they look like they get can they like

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:44.800
<v Speaker 1>they hate them, but they're aroused. It's like, I think

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:48.320
<v Speaker 1>something happens where they don't know how to handle it.

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>It comes out as this like incredibly weird, sexually tinged harassment,

0:32:52.600 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>And if she even acknowledges the reality of it, then

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:57.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like, oh, well, she must want it, she likes

0:32:57.400 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the attention. Like and I think it really goes back

0:32:59.880 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>to this idea that I want to combat in this

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:04.840
<v Speaker 1>episode that like women who run for public office or

0:33:04.880 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 1>women who choose to be visible. So even if you're

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.480
<v Speaker 1>not running for public office, if you are an activist,

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:12.040
<v Speaker 1>or if you are a pundit, or you're somebody who

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.480
<v Speaker 1>you know builds a platform on Twitter, because you are

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 1>building up this profile, Like I feel like that comes

0:33:19.520 --> 0:33:22.080
<v Speaker 1>along with a kind of suspicion that you are a

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.800
<v Speaker 1>woman who wants power. You're a woman who wants visibility.

0:33:24.840 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>You're a woman who wants eyes on her. Therefore you

0:33:27.800 --> 0:33:30.400
<v Speaker 1>deserve whatever you get. It comes with it comes with

0:33:30.440 --> 0:33:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the territory of showing up in that way and if

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:35.720
<v Speaker 1>you did, if you didn't really want that kind of sexualized,

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>charred harassment and attention, you would be in the shadows.

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>You would not be a public figure, you would not

0:33:40.760 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 1>be running for office, you would be completely offline. If

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it's no one, no one applies that. No one applies

0:33:46.720 --> 0:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>that to men. Although we all know Ted Cruz very

0:33:51.440 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>much gets off on being trolled, so she actually is

0:33:56.920 --> 0:34:01.360
<v Speaker 1>aroused and is inviting it and wants you to dunk

0:34:01.440 --> 0:34:06.600
<v Speaker 1>on him. It gets him whoa things that I don't

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.799
<v Speaker 1>want to imagine. So everyone just know that every time

0:34:09.840 --> 0:34:13.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna tweet, bagoted Cruise or make fun of him,

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>that it only makes him stronger, you know where. So yeah, yes,

0:34:16.840 --> 0:34:26.480
<v Speaker 1>it is. Yeah. So one of the important things to

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>remember is that the point of all of this, all

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.600
<v Speaker 1>of these like racist, sexist attacks on women and women

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of color in the public eye. It's it's particularly for

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:36.640
<v Speaker 1>who are running for office or holding an elected office.

0:34:36.960 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 1>It's meant to take all of the oxygen out of

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the room and have the thing that takes up the

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>most base, be the racism or the sexism or the

0:34:45.160 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>sexualization or whatever. And a great example is Kamala Harris.

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Now I should say, I am no big fan of

0:34:51.239 --> 0:34:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Harris when she was running for president. I had major

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:56.080
<v Speaker 1>issues with her record, you know. But when she was

0:34:56.280 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>named as Biden's vice presidential pick, she based a way

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 1>aave of like, racist, misogynistic, sexually charged attacks, including these

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 1>like explicit and unplicit suggestions that she is untrustworthy, too emotional,

0:35:09.080 --> 0:35:11.920
<v Speaker 1>or unqualified, according to The New York Times false. And

0:35:11.920 --> 0:35:14.480
<v Speaker 1>then this leading information about Harris spiked online on on

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:16.799
<v Speaker 1>TV as soon as she was named as the vice

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 1>presidential pick. The activity jumped from two dozen mentions per

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.719
<v Speaker 1>hour during the recent week to over three thousand, two

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred per hour when she was named. This is according

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to a company called Signal And so there's something very

0:35:28.120 --> 0:35:31.200
<v Speaker 1>specific about the attacks on her. I'm gonna put a

0:35:31.239 --> 0:35:33.680
<v Speaker 1>link in the chat to an image or actually, Sophie's

0:35:33.719 --> 0:35:39.040
<v Speaker 1>got it, super producer, So what tell me? Tell me

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:42.480
<v Speaker 1>what your reaction to this image here? It's pretty upsetting,

0:35:42.960 --> 0:35:51.160
<v Speaker 1>h is those the legs? Those are those are white

0:35:51.200 --> 0:35:54.720
<v Speaker 1>women legs. Oh, it's a very sloppy photo, I should

0:35:54.719 --> 0:35:59.000
<v Speaker 1>probably describe it's a very spy photoshop job of Harris

0:35:59.040 --> 0:36:01.839
<v Speaker 1>on her back with a pair of obviously like white

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:07.719
<v Speaker 1>women's legs in heels up. It says, get her done, Kamala,

0:36:07.840 --> 0:36:10.680
<v Speaker 1>heals up Harris for the people. She's got a little

0:36:10.680 --> 0:36:13.879
<v Speaker 1>speech bubble where she is saying to be VP. Sure

0:36:13.960 --> 0:36:16.279
<v Speaker 1>I will. And so the insinuation is that she is

0:36:16.560 --> 0:36:19.319
<v Speaker 1>having sex with someone in order to become the vice

0:36:19.360 --> 0:36:24.320
<v Speaker 1>presidential pick. Yeah, it's a terrible photoshop job. It's clearly

0:36:24.320 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 1>the legs of a white woman. It's like not she

0:36:26.200 --> 0:36:29.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't even wear shoes like that. Um, but yeah, I mean,

0:36:29.239 --> 0:36:31.399
<v Speaker 1>but I think more than that. I mean, obviously those

0:36:31.400 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>shoes look really painful number one to walk in. But

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:37.800
<v Speaker 1>more than that, it is very jarring to see someone,

0:36:38.239 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a public figure who is deserving of a minimal amount

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:48.600
<v Speaker 1>of respect, to be portrayed in this way. Um, so disgustingly.

0:36:49.280 --> 0:36:51.680
<v Speaker 1>And um it's the same when like, you know, I

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:53.839
<v Speaker 1>was no big fan of Hillary Clinton, but watching seeing

0:36:53.840 --> 0:36:57.720
<v Speaker 1>all those shirts that are like you know, Hillary swallows,

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 1>like that shirt people are selling, Like what the fuck

0:37:00.920 --> 0:37:03.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, like Hillary, why why are you selling this?

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Like I understand, like go back to lock her up?

0:37:06.800 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>And this is it's that same thing, like no matter

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>how far you get, we can always photos like we're

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:16.800
<v Speaker 1>always imagining you like fucking your way to the top,

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Like we're all be your only reduced to the fact

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:23.920
<v Speaker 1>that you are a woman. Exact criticize her record, this

0:37:23.960 --> 0:37:28.480
<v Speaker 1>is like so juvenile and disgusting, right, and so like,

0:37:29.160 --> 0:37:30.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's it's one of those things. So, so

0:37:30.600 --> 0:37:32.960
<v Speaker 1>this is the common trope with Harris, Like if you

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:35.520
<v Speaker 1>google the phrase heels up Harris, that was like a

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:39.440
<v Speaker 1>common attack on her, is that this idea that she

0:37:39.520 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>slept quote slipt her way to the top. And it's

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:44.680
<v Speaker 1>a bit like the attacks on Ghostbusters that we talked

0:37:44.680 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>about last episode, where the whole conversation gets flattened out

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:51.640
<v Speaker 1>and becomes people taking sides and nobody is just like

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>talking about the merit of the movie, right, And so

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to Harris, you know, people are lobbying

0:37:57.960 --> 0:38:02.200
<v Speaker 1>these incredible, incredibly like set realized attacks on her because

0:38:02.239 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>she is a woman of color, and then people watching

0:38:05.440 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 1>they I kind of understandably feel like they have to

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:12.480
<v Speaker 1>support her. And so Harris has an incredibly like robust

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>online network of supporters who will like pervently pushed back

0:38:16.120 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>against any and all criticisms of her online. And so

0:38:19.040 --> 0:38:21.959
<v Speaker 1>the ability to just have an honest, accurate conversation about

0:38:21.960 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>her record, her merit, her acts, her actual actions gets

0:38:25.960 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>totally lost in the noise intention. And then it's I

0:38:29.200 --> 0:38:32.640
<v Speaker 1>think precisely the point nobody can talk about her actual record,

0:38:33.080 --> 0:38:35.960
<v Speaker 1>whether or not she's fit for office whatever, when you

0:38:36.040 --> 0:38:41.319
<v Speaker 1>introduce these kinds of like sexist, racist, gross attacks. And

0:38:41.360 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 1>so I would say, like, even if you're somebody who

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know doesn't like Harris, doesn't think that she is,

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:49.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, should have didn't think she made it a president,

0:38:49.440 --> 0:38:52.040
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make she makes a good vice presidential candidate, I

0:38:52.120 --> 0:38:54.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like you should be invested in making sure the

0:38:54.440 --> 0:38:58.960
<v Speaker 1>conversation does not rely and traffic in these sexist smears

0:38:59.000 --> 0:39:02.320
<v Speaker 1>and tropes, because you should want to be having space

0:39:02.360 --> 0:39:04.759
<v Speaker 1>to talk about her actual record. But when these are

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:08.160
<v Speaker 1>introduced into the conversation, we don't really get that. I mean,

0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>look at how effectively it worked in twenty six seen

0:39:10.120 --> 0:39:12.399
<v Speaker 1>against Hillary Clinton. As I was mentioning before, I mean,

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:17.040
<v Speaker 1>it is again absent of like put the record aside.

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.319
<v Speaker 1>We've seen the way women in public spaces have been

0:39:21.800 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>completely torn down. And this is why I mean, I

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:28.479
<v Speaker 1>will say we can't have nice things, and by nice things,

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean a first female president a um, you know,

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:35.200
<v Speaker 1>vice president of color, like I mean, which we do have,

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>but like by you know, it's a thin we're we're

0:39:40.520 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>we're treading very lightly here. And if Kamala Harris does

0:39:43.880 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>run for president one day again, this will only get

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.640
<v Speaker 1>worse and worse and worse and focus on all side

0:39:49.680 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>of the political spectrum. And I'm a huge Bernie bro

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 1>Like I do not like Hillary Clinton or Kamala Harris

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:59.000
<v Speaker 1>for that matter, but my god, I understand how these

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.759
<v Speaker 1>things are weaponized against them to tear them down. And

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 1>what's fucked is that it is conflated with their record

0:40:06.760 --> 0:40:11.600
<v Speaker 1>rather than separated. It is automatically conflated so that people

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>who whose politics I disagree with, you know, maybe someone

0:40:15.280 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>from the k hive who's like, you know, yeah, I

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:21.239
<v Speaker 1>think we need more cops like kamally like like that

0:40:21.239 --> 0:40:24.839
<v Speaker 1>that I will get accused of racism or sexism when

0:40:24.880 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm bringing up a substantive point um. And that is

0:40:28.040 --> 0:40:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the way that I think identity politics can be weaponized

0:40:30.440 --> 0:40:35.360
<v Speaker 1>in a cynical and way by liberals. You know, Yeah,

0:40:35.440 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I find myself, it's I find myself having to defend women,

0:40:40.440 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly women of color whose politics I don't align with

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Time and time again where I'm like, how can we

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>just talk about but they're so well, some of these people,

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:51.000
<v Speaker 1>there's so much to dislike, there's so much to pull apart.

0:40:51.400 --> 0:40:53.920
<v Speaker 1>We really don't have to talk about the way she looks.

0:40:53.920 --> 0:40:57.000
<v Speaker 1>We really don't have to rely on like sexist tropes

0:40:57.080 --> 0:40:59.239
<v Speaker 1>about any of this. Like there's for a lot of

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 1>these people, they're so much substance there to talk about.

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Why are you cheapening the conversation by introducing this stuff?

0:41:06.080 --> 0:41:10.239
<v Speaker 1>And we it's like, if you if you're someone who

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:12.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't like these figures, you should be investing and having

0:41:12.640 --> 0:41:15.799
<v Speaker 1>a real conversation about their actual records so that like

0:41:16.160 --> 0:41:18.759
<v Speaker 1>we can actually air it out when you introduce these

0:41:18.840 --> 0:41:21.960
<v Speaker 1>kinds of like this garbage. People aren't doing that because

0:41:22.280 --> 0:41:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that is like the point of these attacks. They just

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 1>take up so much room and then you're defending it,

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:28.839
<v Speaker 1>and then and then people are defending them, and like

0:41:29.360 --> 0:41:31.239
<v Speaker 1>you lose, you lose the thread of like well what

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:33.800
<v Speaker 1>do we act like what is this person's actual record?

0:41:33.800 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>What is our actual merit? Completely so I obviously had

0:41:38.160 --> 0:41:40.759
<v Speaker 1>a ton to say about this topic, so much that

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we actually needed to do an additional episode. So this

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>is just part one of Francesca, Sophie and My exploration

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:49.480
<v Speaker 1>into the ways that online abuse and harassment can keep

0:41:49.480 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>women out of elected office, create barriers to their success

0:41:52.719 --> 0:41:56.640
<v Speaker 1>once they get there, and overall crtail speech and civic participation.

0:41:57.360 --> 0:42:00.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll be talking more in depth about specific women of

0:42:00.080 --> 0:42:03.120
<v Speaker 1>their political candidates and the campaigns of harassment that they

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>had to endure once they got into public office. In

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, here's Baltimore States Attorney Marylyn Moseby talking about

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 1>her experience as a black woman and left official. You know,

0:42:12.680 --> 0:42:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it can be overwhelming, and I think my kids more recently,

0:42:15.760 --> 0:42:17.279
<v Speaker 1>I would say, in the past year or so, I

0:42:17.360 --> 0:42:20.239
<v Speaker 1>have seen me understress. And so for the first time,

0:42:20.280 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>my baby said, Mommy, I don't want to be a

0:42:22.640 --> 0:42:25.319
<v Speaker 1>politician anymore. And I'm like, why, why don't you want

0:42:25.320 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 1>to be a politician? Like what? What? Now? She's like,

0:42:28.760 --> 0:42:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't want them to treat me the way he

0:42:30.280 --> 0:42:32.480
<v Speaker 1>treat you. So that brought it tear to my eye.

0:42:32.520 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, I'm like, baby, they will only

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:37.359
<v Speaker 1>treat you like that when you stand for what's right,

0:42:38.080 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and that's what comes with trying to change systems and

0:42:42.640 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 1>if mommy is gonna be fine. But this this comes

0:42:44.920 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 1>with the territory. You have to have courage enough to

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:49.279
<v Speaker 1>know that you're doing the right thing. As long as

0:42:49.280 --> 0:42:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you're doing the right thing, people are always going to

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.840
<v Speaker 1>come for you. Not only are these stories heartbreaking, but

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they also demonstrate how online harassment and abuse keeps us

0:42:59.000 --> 0:43:02.520
<v Speaker 1>from having the healthy democracy that we deserve. There is

0:43:02.600 --> 0:43:05.080
<v Speaker 1>so much to say about this, so please, please please

0:43:05.080 --> 0:43:07.479
<v Speaker 1>tune in to part two of our exploration of black

0:43:07.480 --> 0:43:10.759
<v Speaker 1>women political candidates, online harassment and abuse and why it's

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the problem for all of us. Internet Hate Machine is

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:18.919
<v Speaker 1>a production of cool Zone Media. More podcasts from cool

0:43:18.960 --> 0:43:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Zone Media, check out our website cool zone media dot com,

0:43:22.040 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>or find us on the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:26.319
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you get your podcasts.