WEBVTT - Colin Cowherd’s Fantasy Football Over/Under Picks and Predictions + The 11 Biggest Questions for Week 7 (Ep. 1405) 0:00:00.920 --> 0:00:04.000 Hello everybody. Welcome into the Fantasy Pros Football Podcast. I'm 0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.800 Ryan Warmley, joining this Friday morning by Derek Brown and 0:00:06.840 --> 0:00:10.840 by Pat Fitzmorris. We're having some fun already, fellas. We 0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.040 are talking our key questions for Week seven. Here quick 0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:16.799 reminder for everyone, All of our weekly consensus rankings and 0:00:16.920 --> 0:00:21.200 tiers can be found at fantasypros dot com slash rankings. 0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.800 Also a quick reminder that if you're juggling multiple fantasy 0:00:23.800 --> 0:00:27.000 football teams and feeling overwhelmed, Fantasy Pros will help you 0:00:27.040 --> 0:00:30.360 simplify things. With Fantasy Pros Multi League Assistant, you can 0:00:30.400 --> 0:00:33.160 see the latest news, notes, and rankings for every single 0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.800 player across all your teams. It's all in one spot, 0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:39.000 making your path to victory clearer and easier. Dive in 0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:40.960 and let us help you dominate all your leagues with 0:00:41.000 --> 0:00:44.040 a multi league assistant at fantasypros dot com, slash my 0:00:44.080 --> 0:00:47.640 playbook or on the Fantasy Football My Playbook app. Fellas, 0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.440 Before we jump in to the questions this week, I 0:00:50.440 --> 0:00:51.959 do want to head a little bit on Thursday Night 0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:54.880 football and my real question that I wanted to discuss here. 0:00:55.120 --> 0:00:57.680 It was thirty three to ten Broncos victory over the 0:00:57.720 --> 0:01:02.080 Saints in New Orleans. Was this Javant Williams being good 0:01:02.600 --> 0:01:05.680 or was this the Saints run defense being bad? Williams 0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:08.840 obviously fourteen carries eighty eight yards, two touchdowns. He also 0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:11.039 had three catches for twenty three yards, a breakout game 0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.280 for him within the twenty twenty fourth season. Was this 0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:15.360 Givante good or Saints bad? 0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:18.240 Fits a little bit of both. 0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:24.720 He ran hard, broke some tackles the Saints. The Saints 0:01:24.760 --> 0:01:27.160 defense was not good. I mean it looked like they 0:01:27.400 --> 0:01:30.000 were quitting almost on that side of the ball on 0:01:30.160 --> 0:01:31.840 national television last night. 0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:34.759 So yeah, I mean, like. 0:01:34.720 --> 0:01:39.280 What we were worried about, if we uh the Javante investors, 0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:43.040 which I certainly am, the rumors that maybe Odrick Estime 0:01:43.280 --> 0:01:45.920 would have more of a role this week, and we 0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:48.600 heard Sean Payton sort of talk about wanting to get 0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:51.040 Estime more involved. I think est May wound up playing 0:01:51.160 --> 0:01:53.400 five snaps, so that kind of wound up not being 0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:57.680 a thing. And I believe next week the Broncos get 0:01:57.680 --> 0:02:00.920 the Panthers, so we can feel pretty good rolling with 0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:03.840 Javante another week, but then the week after that warm 0:02:04.000 --> 0:02:06.280 I think it's your Ravens, who, as you pointed out 0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:08.960 on a different show this week, haven't given up fifty 0:02:09.040 --> 0:02:11.840 rushing yards to any running back this week. So, uh, 0:02:12.160 --> 0:02:13.760 you know, it might be a pretty good two week 0:02:13.840 --> 0:02:18.320 run for Javante before we get the hangover in week nine. 0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.000 What was your takeaway debro it. 0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:24.720 I mean, look, Javante looked good, but also this was 0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:26.840 a function of the Saints defense. I wrote it up 0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:29.600 in the primer. I said he's probably headed towards his 0:02:29.760 --> 0:02:32.440 best output of the season, and that's exactly what we saw. 0:02:32.720 --> 0:02:35.200 This Saints team is just a dumpster fire man Like, 0:02:35.639 --> 0:02:38.760 doesn't it feel so far in the rear view of 0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:41.480 the first two weeks of the season, how the Saints looked. 0:02:41.560 --> 0:02:44.000 And I'm not going to just pile on top of 0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.320 it and say like and I'll get to it. But 0:02:47.200 --> 0:02:50.360 I mean, Rashid Shaheed is out, Chris Olave is out, 0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:52.920 Paulson the debo, but you know, shout out to him. 0:02:52.960 --> 0:02:55.560 Thoughts are with him and the recovery. He goes out 0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.640 there hurt, battered, beaten. The offensive line is a shell 0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:00.840 of itself. But the other part of this is that 0:03:00.919 --> 0:03:03.240 this team has quit on Dennis Allen and he needs 0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.040 to go. He should have never come back this season. 0:03:06.720 --> 0:03:08.600 I hate that he did, but he needs to go. 0:03:08.840 --> 0:03:12.600 By gone. Clint Kubiak, run the team, pick somebody be 0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:15.480 the interim head coach. Burn it all down to the 0:03:15.560 --> 0:03:19.040 freaking studs. I'm ready for Saints to rebuild and just 0:03:19.320 --> 0:03:19.920 start over. 0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:24.800 I think that's completely justified. I don't disagree with with 0:03:24.880 --> 0:03:28.079 anything you just said on the Saint side of things. 0:03:28.560 --> 0:03:31.400 Is the quarterback situation so bad that outside of Camara, 0:03:31.400 --> 0:03:33.880 we're just not starting any Saints until Derek Carr is back? 0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.280 Debra, No, I mean I think with Shahi going out, 0:03:37.440 --> 0:03:40.920 can we also say, like Chris a labe and because 0:03:40.960 --> 0:03:43.680 he didn't play in this game, he's a player that 0:03:43.680 --> 0:03:45.800 people need to be training for, Like he is going 0:03:45.840 --> 0:03:49.920 to hoover targets? Like, what's he gonna get weekly, guys, 0:03:50.280 --> 0:03:53.680 twenty seven thirty percent targets here? Yeah, it's gonna be 0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:54.000 a lot. 0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.360 Yeah. I thought when you started that set is I 0:03:57.360 --> 0:03:59.560 thought when you said twenty seven, you were gonna say targets, 0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:04.520 not target share. That's how many can expect him to get. Yeah, fits, 0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:06.560 I mean, I guess you know a lave. Are you 0:04:07.080 --> 0:04:08.240 interested in trading for him. 0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:08.800 Yeah. 0:04:08.920 --> 0:04:11.240 I mean, uh, well not really because I've already got 0:04:11.280 --> 0:04:13.960 him on pretty much all my roster. Yeah, so you know, 0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.480 it's it's probably gonna work out if Karr comes back. 0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:19.960 Yeah, I think we're looking at big weekly target chairs. 0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:23.039 Before we jump into this week's questions, let's check in 0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.640 with Colin Coward and his over under picks for the 0:04:25.680 --> 0:04:31.640 Fantasy Over Under Challenge. It's time for the Week seven 0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:34.680 Over Under Challenge. As always, this segment is presented by 0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.320 DraftKings and I'm joined by Colin Coward to talk through 0:04:37.320 --> 0:04:40.400 some of our favorite player picks for this week's slate. 0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:42.800 Before we jump in, I want to remind everyone listening 0:04:42.800 --> 0:04:45.240 that you can play along with our over Under challenge 0:04:45.279 --> 0:04:47.320 and try to not only beat Colin, but win some 0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:51.560 cool prizes as well by heaving Fantasypros dot Com Slash Challenge. 0:04:51.720 --> 0:04:54.120 All right, Colin, let's start with the quarterbacks. We'll start 0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.600 with Josh Allen. He's QB five on DraftKings. On the season, 0:04:57.880 --> 0:05:00.000 in terms of scoring, it's been kind of up and down, 0:05:00.240 --> 0:05:03.159 though he's finished at QB one twice. He's also had 0:05:03.160 --> 0:05:05.560 some games where he wasn't even worth starting at all. 0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:08.080 In fantasy going up against the Titans. Do you think 0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:09.840 this is going to be another one of those either 0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:11.919 you know, all or nothing games or maybe somewhere in 0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:12.279 the middle. 0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:18.400 Well, you know, they really should have lost to the 0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.160 Jets if the Jets could kick field goals. Taylor rat 0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:24.080 made a couple of great plays. I think Buffalo tends 0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:26.760 to be a tad over valued because Josh Allen is 0:05:26.839 --> 0:05:29.920 so great and we love him so much, He's our 0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:34.080 superman that we just they're a roller coaster team. But 0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.400 I do think Amari Cooper is a really sound investment, 0:05:38.839 --> 0:05:43.440 no cost, high production, high character, so I and I 0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:46.520 think James Cook has a chance to return. I love 0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:50.600 their tight end play this point forward, I like Buffalo, 0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.919 and I like Josh Allen. There is no more excuses 0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:58.159 Amari Cooper and their slot receiver and their tight ends 0:05:58.160 --> 0:06:00.320 and James Cook. This is going to be a highly 0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:03.880 productive offense. Cooper solves one of their issues is a 0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:08.279 is a productive veteran wide receiver. I like Josh this week. 0:06:08.640 --> 0:06:10.600 I totally agree with you on Cooper. Do you think 0:06:10.640 --> 0:06:13.000 we're going to see that benefit pan out in Week 0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:14.800 one or do you think there might be a transition 0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.080 period here as he just gets accustomed to the offense. 0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.120 Well, I think there's so much change in New York. 0:06:21.240 --> 0:06:24.200 Devantae Adams may take time to be productive, but Amari 0:06:24.360 --> 0:06:27.200 Cooper is coming into an offense with Josh Allen and 0:06:27.320 --> 0:06:32.520 Joe Brady that I mean, their only issue is, you know, 0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:35.520 it's these big moments, it's third down, it's red zone, 0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:38.240 it's a productive offense. So and again, I think he's 0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:42.359 a I think, you know AFC player coming into a 0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:45.479 sound AFC organization. I don't think Amari Cooper is going 0:06:45.560 --> 0:06:47.600 to take very long. He's one of the better route runners, 0:06:47.600 --> 0:06:49.520 one of the smarter receivers in the league. I think 0:06:49.520 --> 0:06:50.520 it works pretty quickly. 0:06:51.200 --> 0:06:53.520 Another quarterback. I want to hit on Brock Perty going 0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:56.440 up against the Chiefs Super Bowl and rematch. Obviously, Perty's 0:06:56.480 --> 0:06:59.960 QB eight on DraftKings this season, seventeen point six fantasy 0:07:00.040 --> 0:07:02.320 points per game. He's been QB seven since Week three, 0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:05.920 over twenty fantasy points per game on DraftKings. The Kansas 0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:08.880 City defense has been good overall, you know, really just 0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.760 an impressive job, you know, under Steve Spagnolo. But what 0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:13.520 do you expect that of Purdy going up you know again, 0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:15.400 in this Super Bowl rematch that we've seen a few 0:07:15.400 --> 0:07:16.160 times now. 0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:20.080 Well, Shanahan's zero to four. I my gut feeling is 0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.840 nobody likes to bet against Andy Reid and a bye. 0:07:23.280 --> 0:07:25.480 But I do think the Chiefs are a little vulnerable 0:07:25.520 --> 0:07:27.840 on the road. I was talking to Greg Cosell this 0:07:27.880 --> 0:07:30.520 week and he pointed out that Mahomes, you can tell 0:07:30.560 --> 0:07:33.360 he's letting go of the ball early and moving early. 0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.520 He doesn't trust his offensive line. When I watch Brock 0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.360 Purdy in his arsenal, he has great trust in Shanahan 0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.360 and his O line in this spot, I think Purty 0:07:42.400 --> 0:07:45.280 old play well. I mean, I think there's certain things 0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:48.120 that feel inevitable, the Bills winning a Super Bowl with 0:07:48.200 --> 0:07:51.320 Josh Allen and the Niners eventually at some point, beating 0:07:51.440 --> 0:07:53.920 Kansas City in a game. I think this is the 0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:55.560 spot Brock Purty play as well. 0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.120 Let's look at our running back here at Saquon Barklay 0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.280 going up against the Giants game narrative. He's been one 0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:03.960 of the best fantasy running backs on DraftKings all season 0:08:04.040 --> 0:08:06.440 over eighteen points per game, that's good for RB three 0:08:06.880 --> 0:08:09.800 on the season, and facing the second worst rush defense 0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.560 in the NFL by yards per carry in the Giants 0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:14.440 rush defense. What do you expect out of Saquan in 0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:14.960 this one? 0:08:15.560 --> 0:08:18.240 Well, Andrew Thomas, the left tackle, the very good left 0:08:18.240 --> 0:08:20.440 tackle for the Giants, is out for the season. What 0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:24.440 does that mean? Daniel Jones probably has more three and 0:08:24.480 --> 0:08:28.880 outs and quick drives. Translation, Saquon Barkley gets the ball 0:08:29.120 --> 0:08:32.400 at our field position. I think they're a little concerned 0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:37.320 about Jalen Hurts and his turnover reality Again week to week, 0:08:37.400 --> 0:08:41.120 it feels like Nick Siriani's coaching for his job in 0:08:41.160 --> 0:08:46.080 a very progressive, smart and aggressive organization. I think Saquon eats. 0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:50.679 I think they play well. I Malik Neighbors is one thing, 0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:52.800 but when they lose Andrew Thomas, this is not a 0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.719 highly functional offense. I think Philadelphia gets lots of possessions 0:08:57.200 --> 0:08:59.040 and whether they get into the end zone or not, 0:08:59.320 --> 0:09:00.559 saqu is productive. 0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.200 Do you think that the Eagles as an organization and 0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.600 I guess really Nick Sirianni, as kind of a guy 0:09:05.600 --> 0:09:08.439 who coaches by emotion a lot of the time, is 0:09:08.480 --> 0:09:09.959 going to go into this game saying we want to 0:09:09.960 --> 0:09:12.439 see Saquon have a huge day against the Giants, specifically 0:09:12.440 --> 0:09:13.959 because of that remaining narrative. 0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:17.439 Yeah, I think that's how Nick Sirianni rolls. I think 0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:20.079 he's I think he is. And also, when you're losing 0:09:21.080 --> 0:09:23.920 a potential job, you want to gain favor in the 0:09:23.960 --> 0:09:27.800 locker room, right as management maybe behind the scenes, asks 0:09:27.840 --> 0:09:31.120 players about the vibe in the locker room. So the position, 0:09:31.200 --> 0:09:33.079 it's a good question the position this week. If you 0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.840 were going to lose your job, you'd look for life preservers. 0:09:37.040 --> 0:09:40.480 Sirianni's life preserver is I'm a Saquon guy. I'm a 0:09:40.520 --> 0:09:42.560 team guy. I'm gonna get my player of the ball. 0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:44.599 That's what the Eagle players want. They want Saquan to 0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.040 go off, So I think he'll That's I think that's 0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:48.160 one of the better bets of the week. 0:09:48.760 --> 0:09:51.439 Let's look at some pass catchers here, Justin Jefferson going 0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:54.480 up against the Lions. Awesome matchup here in the NFC North, 0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.120 clearly the best division of football so far this season. 0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.360 Really excited for this one. Jeffson's been wide receiver on 0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:04.040 DraftKings this season. He's facing a Detroit pass defense allowing 0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:06.200 over ten yards per catch this season, tied for six 0:10:06.240 --> 0:10:08.959 bests in the NFL last year. In two games against 0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.000 the Lions, Justin Jefferson eighteen catches, three hundred and thirty 0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:14.800 three yards and two touchdowns. One of the best receivers 0:10:14.800 --> 0:10:16.080 in football. What do you think we're going to see 0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:16.520 this weekend? 0:10:17.080 --> 0:10:20.360 Well, Vikings off a bye, more time to be creative, 0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:24.800 love that for Justin Jefferson. Aiden Hodgson's injury, they haven't 0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:27.640 replaced him yet, less of a pass rush, more time 0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.200 for Sam Darnold. I think Justin Jefferson has a big, 0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:32.280 big game. 0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.160 We're loving the players so far. I think that's pretty 0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.480 much all over so far. We've got a couple more 0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.199 thank you if we're expecting more offense here. Cooper Cup 0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.200 not one hundred percent determined to be making his return, 0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.160 It seems to be trending in that direction. We've got 0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:47.760 a are they playing tool on fantasypros dot Com that 0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:50.560 gives him something like an eighty to ninety percent chance 0:10:50.760 --> 0:10:52.720 as of right now based on the early practice reports. 0:10:52.760 --> 0:10:54.720 We'll see if that pans out. But assuming he's back 0:10:54.760 --> 0:10:57.160 on the field, he obviously was pretty productive in the 0:10:57.200 --> 0:10:59.720 games that he didn't miss, you know, across the season. 0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:02.800 Receiver seventy seven, but he's wide receiver twenty three, Week two, 0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:05.160 then of course missed the last three games. Going up 0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.160 against this Raiders defense. If he's on the field, do 0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:08.640 you think we'll see a big Cooper Cup Day. 0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:09.840 I know. 0:11:09.960 --> 0:11:13.040 I think it's a low scoring game reasonably. I think 0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.840 off of bye however, Sean McVay is going to try 0:11:16.840 --> 0:11:19.320 to get Cooper a Cup looks, but because he's not 0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:22.079 certain to play and this is a must win for 0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:25.679 the Rams, I don't think Shawn's building the game plan 0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.400 around him, so I don't I don't think John. I 0:11:29.400 --> 0:11:32.160 don't think Sean in a must win position would do that. 0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:35.360 But my takeaway, he'll eat. They're going to have extra 0:11:35.400 --> 0:11:38.360 time to be creative, but there'll be limitations. I think 0:11:38.360 --> 0:11:41.840 the Raiders play really hard. I think they're anemic offensively, 0:11:41.880 --> 0:11:44.600 but I think Max Crosby they get a pass rush. 0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.880 I like the spirit the Raiders play. I just think 0:11:47.880 --> 0:11:48.880 they need a quarterback. 0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.000 We'll wrap up with a tight end here, Sam Laporta 0:11:52.040 --> 0:11:53.920 going up against the Vikings. We already touched on this 0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.240 game from the other perspective, or see me from the 0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.679 wide receiver position on the other side of this one 0:11:58.760 --> 0:12:01.960 tight end twelve five fantasy points per game on DraftKings. 0:12:01.960 --> 0:12:04.800 This season, he's been a huge disappointment relative to where 0:12:04.800 --> 0:12:07.560 he was going in drafts last season. In two games 0:12:07.600 --> 0:12:10.280 against the Vikings, just eight catches for forty seven yards 0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:12.400 and a touchdown. What do you expect out of Laporta 0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:12.960 this weekend? 0:12:13.880 --> 0:12:17.120 Low numbers and under I think the way to take 0:12:17.160 --> 0:12:20.960 the crowd out of Minnesota is to run the football 0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:29.160 and have long, slow, boring drives. Running the football with Montgomery, 0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:34.800 Jamiir Gibbs, and I think what Detroit's trying to do 0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.120 off that big win over the Cowboys, knowing Minnesota is 0:12:38.160 --> 0:12:40.640 going to be cute and clever offensively off a bye 0:12:40.679 --> 0:12:44.240 with a smart offensive coach, get the ball, run the ball, 0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:47.240 eat the clock. Laporta does more blocking than catching. 0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:50.079 We'll wrap up there. Awesome slate this weekend. Best of 0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.640 luck to everybody in all their bets and their fantasy players. 0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:55.800 Remember ahead to fantasypros dot Com slash challenge to play 0:12:55.840 --> 0:12:59.120 along all season long. Thanks for joining us, Colin, Thanks man. 0:13:02.440 --> 0:13:04.520 All right, let's shop into our questions for the slate. 0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:06.640 As always, are going through our ten biggest questions for 0:13:07.080 --> 0:13:09.040 this is now week seven. We are into that second 0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:12.120 trimester of the twenty twenty four season. Let's start with 0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:16.640 Bengals Browns with Amari Cooper gone and Nick Chubb returning. 0:13:16.880 --> 0:13:19.080 Who are the Browns worth starting in this one? Fits? 0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:23.720 It's not a long list worm In fact, I don't 0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.200 know if there's a list at all. The Browns haven't 0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.720 scored twenty points in a game this year. They're averaging 0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:33.720 two hundred and forty yards of offense per game. Obviously, 0:13:33.760 --> 0:13:37.000 I don't want to start Deshaun Watson. I don't want 0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.040 to start Nick Chubb because I don't know what his 0:13:39.160 --> 0:13:40.920 role is going to be if they've got him on 0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.760 a snap count or a carry limit this week. So 0:13:44.200 --> 0:13:46.480 I want to show me game out of Nick Chubb 0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.000 before I roll him into a lineup. 0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:49.640 Don't want to start Deontin Foreman. 0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.920 Don't really want to start David Nijoku because he's never 0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.600 just never had good chemistry with Deshaun Watson. I mean, 0:13:56.640 --> 0:13:58.480 I guess he's playable if you're sort of in the 0:13:58.600 --> 0:14:03.800 land of tight end too sadness. Don't really want to 0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.840 start Jerry Judy because I don't think he's good, Like 0:14:07.320 --> 0:14:10.199 I don't know how I know it stands to reason 0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.920 that he should benefit from the departure of Amari Cooper. 0:14:13.280 --> 0:14:15.560 I just don't know if Judy is good enough to capitalize. 0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:18.120 Do Youira, what do you think? Do you have a 0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.440 maybe a little more optimism here than Fitz does. 0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:24.360 I have a little more optimism, but it's not much. 0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.880 There's only one Cleveland brown that's worth starting this week, 0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:29.320 and it's David and Joku. That's it. I mean, it's 0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:33.200 I and my update of the primer will reflect this too. 0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:35.480 You do not need to play anybody from the Cleveland 0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:37.840 Browns backfield. I get you can run on the Bengals. 0:14:38.680 --> 0:14:40.960 This could be three to four running backs this week 0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.520 getting carries if Jerome Fod plays. If not, it could 0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:45.920 be three running backs. It could be Pierre Strong, Nick Chubb, 0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:49.000 Deonta Foreman, all of them getting between five and eight carries, 0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.240 and nobody is worth playing. But back to David and Joku, 0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:57.040 I mean he should be a PPR machine. Look at 0:14:57.080 --> 0:14:59.520 it as bad as Deshaun Watson is. David and Joku 0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.880 has like a of five A dots. So I'm only 0:15:01.920 --> 0:15:09.160 asking for Deshaun Watson to just basically handle elongated handoffs 0:15:09.200 --> 0:15:12.200 to David and Joku, and in that sense, then Joku 0:15:12.240 --> 0:15:13.720 can be good this week. I mean last week he 0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.680 had a thirty percent target share, so if he can 0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.040 replicate that this week in a good matchup, since he 0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.560 has been allowing a good amount of production two tight 0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.000 ends tenth most receiving yards and fifth most Fantasy points 0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:27.760 per game. So in Djoku, I think is very worth 0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.040 starting this week. But the rest of the Cleveland count 0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:32.720 me out. Nope, not worth you. 0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.040 No. No, if there is a receiver, is it Judy 0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.120 or I mean. 0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:41.440 When if we felt good about starting Amarti Cooper at 0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:44.080 any time this season? So do we feel you need 0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.200 better about a lesser talent and Jerry Judy? 0:15:46.400 --> 0:15:47.160 I don't. 0:15:47.240 --> 0:15:48.720 I'm the no. No. 0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:53.480 Let's go to a much more fun game Seahawks at Falcons. 0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:56.160 Lots of players in this one are ranked very close 0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:57.960 to each other. So I want to play a little 0:15:57.960 --> 0:15:59.960 head to head with you guys and ask you for 0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.800 at a couple of different positions, kind of similar to 0:16:02.800 --> 0:16:04.880 what we do on the Thursday show. Actually Deep Ros 0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.080 Star with you. Who do you prefer at quarterback? Gino 0:16:07.120 --> 0:16:08.960 Smith or Kirk Cousins, Kirk. 0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:11.760 O James Baby, running the top five pay and passing 0:16:11.840 --> 0:16:17.680 right clip. Seattle has been a bottom three pass defense 0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:20.480 over the last few weeks, basically their last three games. 0:16:21.080 --> 0:16:23.720 They're They're horrible, They're wretched. It's Kirk Cousins. 0:16:23.760 --> 0:16:26.720 Easy for me, fits quarterback Gino or Kirk. 0:16:27.040 --> 0:16:30.280 I've got Gino ranked one spot higher. He is leading 0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:32.880 the NFL in passing yardage right now, and I think 0:16:32.880 --> 0:16:36.240 he's gonna feast in this one. Falcons rank thirtieth in 0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.920 pressure rate right now, so he's gonna have time to 0:16:39.000 --> 0:16:42.400 find dk Metcalf, Jackson Smith and jakeban Tyler Lockett. 0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:46.240 Those are QB ten and QB twelve in ECR for 0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:49.600 the record, at running back, these guys are both obviously starts, 0:16:49.600 --> 0:16:50.880 but just because they're very close to each other, I 0:16:50.920 --> 0:16:53.480 wanted to ask Jean Robinson or Kenneth Walker who's gonna 0:16:53.480 --> 0:16:54.320 have the bigger week Debro. 0:16:55.040 --> 0:16:57.600 I think it's gonna be massive Kenneth Walker game. And 0:16:57.640 --> 0:16:59.920 that's kind of why I'm a little bit lower on Geno, 0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.880 only because I think Kenneth Walker is going off in 0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:07.080 this game. Atlanta cannot stop the run eighth most rushing 0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:10.399 yards per game, tenth highest miss tackle rate, their top 0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:14.199 six in success rates to both gap and zone runs, 0:17:14.280 --> 0:17:16.640 Like you want to see the monster blow up game 0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:18.720 for Kenneth Walker where he gets like one hundred rushing 0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:21.040 yards and two scores. This is it. 0:17:22.040 --> 0:17:24.680 This is RB four and RB five fits. Do you prefer? 0:17:24.920 --> 0:17:27.000 I also have them RB four and RB five, and 0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:30.440 I have bijon ranks higher. I mean, Debro's talking about 0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:33.479 how bad the Atlanta run defense has been and how 0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.000 bad the Seattle pass defense has been. Lately, the Seahawks 0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:39.440 have been getting smoked by running backs. The last couple 0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:43.520 of weeks, the Giants rookie Tyrone Tracy eighteen carries for 0:17:43.520 --> 0:17:46.680 one hundred and twenty nine yards in that Giants upset 0:17:46.800 --> 0:17:49.919 in Seattle, and then last week we saw the forty 0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:54.199 nine Ers trio of backups Jordan Mason, Isaac Grendo and 0:17:54.200 --> 0:17:57.080 Patrick Taylor twenty four carries for one hundred and eighty 0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.400 eight yards combined against the Seahawks last week, Seattle giving 0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.240 up one hundred and twenty four point five rushing yards 0:18:03.240 --> 0:18:05.560 per game to running backs and five point two yards 0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.240 per carry. Bijohn's can have a big day, and maybe 0:18:08.320 --> 0:18:10.360 Tyler Algier might be flexworthy too. 0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:12.160 Yeah, that's a good call. 0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:16.040 Ranks close together, at wide receiver Drake London and DK Metcalf, 0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:17.520 do you, bro, who do you prefer here? And I'm 0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:19.439 pretty sure based on your history, I know the answer is. 0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.080 Going to be It's London time, baby all the time. 0:18:22.200 --> 0:18:25.200 I mean, we got stuff out on the old social 0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.360 medias that London is playing the Puka Nakua role which 0:18:28.400 --> 0:18:31.639 we've all seen come to fruition and it's been beautiful. 0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:33.640 There's no way I'm not taking Drake London here. He's 0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:35.480 gonna get so many freaking targets this week. It's gonna 0:18:35.480 --> 0:18:35.920 be awesome. 0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.000 Fits Drake London as wide receiver seven. DK Metcalf is 0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:40.560 wide receiver eight. Who do you prefer? 0:18:41.320 --> 0:18:41.679 Again? 0:18:42.760 --> 0:18:45.760 With all of these one spot of separation in my rankings, 0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:47.159 but London calling? 0:18:47.960 --> 0:18:49.080 H Yeah. 0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.400 London has double digit targets in three straight games. He's 0:18:52.400 --> 0:18:56.199 had at least six catches in five straight games and 0:18:56.320 --> 0:18:59.719 four touchdowns in his last five games. The trends are 0:18:59.800 --> 0:19:01.040 very pro London here. 0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:03.520 It's so beautiful here. 0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.560 Last aleden for this game, Dardel Mooney. He's wide receiver 0:19:07.600 --> 0:19:11.040 twenty three, JSN Jackson Smith and Jigba wide receiver twenty six. 0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.359 So finally a bit of separation was still really close 0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.159 in ECR deverra. Who do you prefer this week? Mooney 0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:17.159 or JSN. 0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.320 I'm gonna go Mooney looking at his role in the 0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:24.280 Atlanta passing attack. He owns the deep role, and while 0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:28.440 the coverage show matchup isn't really in his favor, I've 0:19:28.440 --> 0:19:30.680 got him one spot ahead at JSN a wide receiver 0:19:30.720 --> 0:19:33.240 twenty seven and JASN water receiver twenty eight. I think 0:19:33.280 --> 0:19:35.000 that he could pop off a big play this week. 0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:36.040 Who do you like? 0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:39.600 Fits yet again one spot of separation in my rankings 0:19:39.600 --> 0:19:43.119 with all four of these worms, I've got Mooney over JSN. 0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:46.600 It's just JSN had one hundred and seventeen yards against 0:19:46.600 --> 0:19:48.760 the Patriots back in Week two. He hasn't had more 0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:51.040 than fifty three yards in any other game, and he 0:19:51.080 --> 0:19:52.439 has one touchdown this season. 0:19:52.440 --> 0:19:53.840 He's just been disappointing. 0:19:54.920 --> 0:19:56.760 Who do you guys like to win this game? Because obviously, 0:19:56.760 --> 0:19:59.679 as we laid out, like the play the respective players 0:19:59.680 --> 0:20:02.399 at each respected position, our ranks so closely, so these 0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:05.880 teams are fairly similar. Atlanta is laying a field goal 0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:07.679 at home. Fits do you have like a lean on 0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:08.040 that game? 0:20:09.320 --> 0:20:11.640 I am probably not going to put my own money 0:20:11.640 --> 0:20:13.760 on it, because I think this is like, it does 0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:16.119 look like it's going to come down to the final possession. 0:20:16.280 --> 0:20:19.120 In pools where I am required to make a pick 0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.119 against the spread, I took Seattle and the points the 0:20:22.160 --> 0:20:23.879 two and a half or three or whatever it is. 0:20:25.000 --> 0:20:27.280 Deebro, what do you think I'm taking Atlanta? 0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:29.920 But for me, if I wanted to play this anyway 0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:31.840 in the betting market, I would just hit the over. 0:20:32.840 --> 0:20:36.080 And Fitzy's brought this up before, like, betting totals over 0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.760 fifty is not really something we like to do. There's 0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:42.600 just too many outs to failure. But both of these 0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:47.560 defenses are struggling. Both of these offenses have top five 0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:52.159 neutral pace, the play volume, the scoring potential. That's the 0:20:52.160 --> 0:20:54.000 way that I would bet this. I would bet the over. 0:20:54.080 --> 0:20:55.760 And there's not many totals that are this high that 0:20:55.760 --> 0:20:57.280 I'm looking to bet the over on, but this is 0:20:57.320 --> 0:20:57.720 one of them. 0:20:57.880 --> 0:20:58.880 Yeah, I think it's good. 0:20:59.000 --> 0:20:59.520 Yeah, go ahead. 0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:01.560 Oh sorry, I was just going to say, I believe 0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:03.760 they are number I can't remember who's number two and 0:21:03.760 --> 0:21:05.800 who's number three, but they're number two and three and 0:21:05.920 --> 0:21:09.399 seconds between snaps, So yeah, like they play at a 0:21:09.480 --> 0:21:11.640 break neck pace. It's going to be a really fun game. 0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.879 Fun Week seven slate overall, we're kind of getting the 0:21:14.920 --> 0:21:17.280 bad games out of the way early on Thursday night 0:21:17.359 --> 0:21:20.679 and the London game on Sunday morning. But then after that, 0:21:20.840 --> 0:21:26.600 I mean, Packers, Texans, Lions, Vikings, Falcons, Seattle, even Jets 0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:28.800 Seattle is going to be kind of fun with DeVante 0:21:28.840 --> 0:21:31.680 Adams returning to the Jets, and see what Russell Wilson 0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:34.520 brings to the Steelers. So like, I'm excited about Week 0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:35.600 seven Fits. 0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:37.639 That is exactly what I was going to say, and 0:21:37.680 --> 0:21:39.960 then I you know, let you go first, and you 0:21:40.119 --> 0:21:42.240 took my point exactly, which is that this game is 0:21:42.320 --> 0:21:45.480 really fun Falcon Seahawks, and yet it's like fourth on 0:21:45.520 --> 0:21:47.800 the list of games I'm looking forward to this weekend 0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:51.399 because the Sunday slate is so awesome. So I totally agree. 0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:54.960 There are some really high level matchups here. We're about 0:21:55.000 --> 0:21:57.840 to jump into another high level matchup here, arguably the 0:21:58.080 --> 0:21:59.800 best on the on the slate. This is what I'm 0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.959 looking forward to, actually, just because of the quarterbacks Texans 0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:05.280 at Packers, I mean CJ. Stradverord Jordan Love. There's a 0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:07.560 lot of talk over the offseason about how similar these 0:22:07.560 --> 0:22:09.760 guys were obviously a couple of years apart in the draft, 0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:12.359 but just last year was the year that like, okay, 0:22:12.440 --> 0:22:15.320 these guys are two of the future superstar quarterbacks in 0:22:15.359 --> 0:22:18.080 the league. You know, I heard some podcasts in the 0:22:18.080 --> 0:22:20.280 offseason say that, like the Packers were kind of the 0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:23.199 NFC Texans and vice versa. So it's really intriguing to 0:22:23.200 --> 0:22:25.879 see them go go head to head. You know, the 0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.040 box score numbers haven't always been there for Strad this year, 0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:29.840 but he just if you watch the games, it's like 0:22:30.080 --> 0:22:32.080 so clear he's one of the five best quarterbacks in 0:22:32.080 --> 0:22:34.520 football at Jordan Love obviously missed some time. It's just 0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:37.320 a super fun matchup of two current and future stars 0:22:37.520 --> 0:22:39.960 at quarterback. You know, Love has been better for fantasy 0:22:40.000 --> 0:22:43.159 purposes in twenty twenty four. You know, the Texans defense 0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.199 is really good though, you know, particularly getting pressure. So 0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:47.879 who is the better game this week? Stroud and the 0:22:47.880 --> 0:22:51.440 Texans offense or Love and the Packers offense? Fits I'll 0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:51.840 start with you. 0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:54.080 I have to be a shameless homer and go with 0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:57.600 Jordan Love. It might be closer if Nico Collins weren't 0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:00.280 on IR for the Texans. But for what it's worth, 0:23:01.119 --> 0:23:05.520 I went on DraftKings to see what the statistical expectations 0:23:05.640 --> 0:23:08.080 sort of are for these two quarterbacks. Stroud actually has 0:23:08.119 --> 0:23:11.600 the higher yardage prop number as of Thursday night, two 0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:14.800 hundred and fifty seven point five yards Love's number two 0:23:14.920 --> 0:23:18.520 hundred and forty nine point five, butts for touchdowns. The 0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:20.880 over under for both guys was one and a half 0:23:21.200 --> 0:23:24.120 TD passes, but for Stroud it's minus one oh five 0:23:24.200 --> 0:23:26.280 to play the over and for Love it's minus one 0:23:26.400 --> 0:23:27.680 seventy five to play the over. 0:23:27.760 --> 0:23:29.200 So the odds will. 0:23:29.000 --> 0:23:33.040 Suggest that multiple touchdowns are expected for Jordan Love, but 0:23:33.119 --> 0:23:35.680 not really for CJ. Stroud, more of a fifty to 0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:36.280 fifty there. 0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:39.680 It's kind of hilarious fits that one of these teams 0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:41.200 is five and one and one of them is four 0:23:41.240 --> 0:23:43.240 and two, and their two of the most fun and 0:23:43.280 --> 0:23:45.600 offenses to watch, you the best quarterbacks, and yet one 0:23:45.600 --> 0:23:47.359 of these teams is in first place in their division 0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:49.119 and the other ones in the last place in their division. 0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.439 It is remarkable how deep and strong the NFC North is. 0:23:52.520 --> 0:23:55.760 Oh my well, they are one, two, three and four 0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.760 in point differential all the teams in the NFC North. 0:23:58.840 --> 0:23:59.320 That's wild. 0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.879 It's I can't remember ever seeing that. I'm sure somebody 0:24:02.880 --> 0:24:05.120 out there has the stat on if we've actually seen 0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.280 it before, I certainly can't think of it. It's it's 0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:10.719 really impressive. If you look at on the NFL's kind 0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.199 of stats page, you could look at net touchdowns on 0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:16.840 the season, every other division has at least one team 0:24:16.960 --> 0:24:20.320 in the negatives, obviously, whereas the worst in the NFC North, again, 0:24:20.359 --> 0:24:23.080 the Packers, is still a net three touchdowns up on 0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.760 the season. It's just it's insane. Deebro, what are you 0:24:26.760 --> 0:24:28.080 expecting out of this one? Do you think this is 0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:30.520 a matchup that lines up better for Strout and the 0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:31.920 Texans or loving the Packers. 0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:35.000 I'm taking Jordan Love here. I mean he has been 0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.600 lights out man top three QB and two of the 0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:41.480 last three games. I mean it just he's basically automatic. 0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:43.399 I mean he does not have it. He doesn't have 0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:46.000 a game on his twenty twenty four ledger where he's 0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.160 thrown less than two passing touchdowns. 0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:51.000 So that's kind of what he did last season too, 0:24:51.040 --> 0:24:53.359 Like on once he also got going, he was just 0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:54.920 throwing touchdowns all the time. 0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.399 He is freaking awesome. He's QB three right now, so 0:24:58.600 --> 0:25:03.080 I don't as much I love CJ. Stroud. The out 0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.600 for Stroud to come away with a lesser fantasy day here, 0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:09.359 still play incredibly well, but come away with a lesser 0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.320 fantasy day. When Houston has been able to run the 0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.080 ball this year, they are going to run the ball. 0:25:15.240 --> 0:25:18.280 And this is again it's I mean, it's tried and true. 0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:20.600 It's every single year. The Packers are an awesome team, 0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:24.080 but they can't stop the run. So if Houston's able 0:25:24.080 --> 0:25:26.840 to feed Joe Mixon and he can get going, that's 0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:31.720 the differentiating factor for me with these two different quarterbacks. 0:25:31.720 --> 0:25:33.520 Green Bay gets in the red zone, it's Love time. 0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:37.159 He's throwing passing touchdowns. Josh Jacobs good luck. But Houston 0:25:37.200 --> 0:25:39.479 when they get there, man, it's feed Joe Mixon. So 0:25:39.600 --> 0:25:40.760 I'm gonna go Jordan Love here. 0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:45.639 Last year betweens week three and Week nine, Jordan Love 0:25:45.720 --> 0:25:48.680 only threw multiple touchdowns once between Week three and Week nine. 0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:50.840 The rest of the season, so weeks one and two 0:25:51.000 --> 0:25:54.359 and then weeks ten on, he only didn't throw multiple 0:25:54.359 --> 0:25:57.120 touchdowns once. He had two or three touchdowns in all 0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.760 but one game the entire rest of the season outside 0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:01.520 of that month and a half stretch in the middle. 0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.399 So that is what he was doing last year, and 0:26:04.800 --> 0:26:07.240 to your point, it's what he's doing again this year. 0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:09.960 This roller coaster of an NFL season is moving right 0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:12.840 along and it promises to be a month full of tricks, treats, 0:26:12.880 --> 0:26:15.919 and of course, touchdowns. And DraftKings sports Book and official 0:26:15.920 --> 0:26:18.640 sports betting partner of the NFL is the number one 0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:21.120 place to bet touchdowns, running it in from the one 0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:23.679 or an eighty yard bomb. We don't care how they 0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.360 score touchdowns. We just want to bet on them. DraftKings 0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.359 hurt us and is delivering Ready to place your first bet. 0:26:29.480 --> 0:26:31.720 Try betting on something simple like a player to score 0:26:31.760 --> 0:26:34.040 a touchdown. Go to the Draft Kings sports Book app 0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:36.399 and make your pick. The Sunday slate, as we mentioned 0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.880 already in Week seven, looks awesome. We got Chiefs Niners 0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.160 in the late window. Of course, Super Bowl rematch San 0:26:42.160 --> 0:26:44.119 Francisco's laying a point and a half at home. The 0:26:44.160 --> 0:26:47.280 early window looks even better. Epic NFC North battle between 0:26:47.280 --> 0:26:49.520 Detroit and Minnesota. The Vikings are laying a point and 0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.160 a half. Also Texans Packers, Like we just talked about 0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:54.960 Jordan love Is laying a field goal against Stroud. Those 0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:57.640 lines and odds are subject change, but wherever they land, 0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.639 this slate looks incredible. Here's a reason for customers to 0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:03.119 do a touchdown dance of their own. Bet five dollars 0:27:03.160 --> 0:27:05.920 to get two hundred dollars in bonus bets. Instantly score 0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:08.280 big with DraftKings Sports Book, the number one place to 0:27:08.280 --> 0:27:11.360 bet touchdowns. Download the DraftKings Sportsbook app and use Code 0:27:11.359 --> 0:27:13.920 Fantasy Pros. That's Code Fantasy Pros for new customers to 0:27:13.920 --> 0:27:16.520 get two hundred dollars in bonus bets when you betes 0:27:16.560 --> 0:27:20.120 five bucks only on DraftKings. The Crown is yours. 0:27:20.760 --> 0:27:23.440 Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New York 0:27:23.520 --> 0:27:25.800 called eight seven seven eight hope and WI or text 0:27:25.800 --> 0:27:28.600 hope and Y four six seven three six nine In Connecticut. 0:27:28.600 --> 0:27:30.960 Help is available for problem gambling called eight eight eight 0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.840 seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit CCPG 0:27:34.040 --> 0:27:37.040 dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of Boothill Casino 0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:40.200 when resorting Kansas twenty one and over. Agent eligibility varies 0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.399 by jurisdiction, Void and Ontario. Bonus bets expire one hundred 0:27:43.440 --> 0:27:45.800 and sixty eight hours after issue INCE four. Additional terms 0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:50.240 and responsible gaming resources see DKNNG, dot co slash ft ball. 0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.080 All right, guys, let's get into one of those awesome 0:27:54.160 --> 0:27:58.399 matchups Lions Vikings. Detroit's offense is rolling, but so is 0:27:58.440 --> 0:28:01.440 Minnesota's defense prior to their bye week. Who comes out 0:28:01.440 --> 0:28:04.159 on top in this matchup the very fun Lines offense 0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.399 or the chaotic Vikings defense, Deebra start with you. 0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:09.480 I think it's gonna be the Lions, and I think 0:28:09.480 --> 0:28:12.840 this all comes down to one particular point, and we 0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:15.680 know that Brian Flores is going to blitz the ever 0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:19.720 love and heck out of Jared Goff. Quietly, Jared Goff 0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:22.399 has been the best quarterback in the NFL, or at 0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:25.359 least top three versus the Blitz. Like he's thirteenth in 0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:27.960 passing grade sixth and big time throw rate. He leads 0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:33.040 the NFL in yards per attempt versus the Blitz. If 0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:35.160 so fact, though, this is gonna be a huge Jamison 0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:38.920 Williams game. If Jared Goff can perform well versus the Blitz, 0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.080 JMO's numbers, I'll put this out on social media last night, 0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:45.080 like he has a twenty five percent target chair. He 0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:49.280 has four point seven yards per route run. When Jared 0:28:49.280 --> 0:28:51.680 Goff is blitz he's the number one option. When golf 0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:55.040 is blitzed, He's gonna get blitzed. If golf can perform 0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.960 well versus the blitz, Detroit's winning this game. 0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:00.080 Do you see it the same way? 0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:05.800 Yeah, I mean, I'll say the Lions. This game does 0:29:05.840 --> 0:29:08.120 profile as a shootout. I think we're gonna see points. 0:29:08.160 --> 0:29:11.880 It's such a fun matchup. The Vikings gave up four 0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.720 hundred and sixty five yards of offense to the Packers 0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:17.560 three hundred and ninety six yards of offense to the 0:29:17.600 --> 0:29:19.960 forty nine Ers. Now, granted, both the Packers and forty 0:29:20.040 --> 0:29:22.680 nine ers fell into holes against the Vikings, so kind 0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.480 of had to stomp the accelerator a little bit and 0:29:25.840 --> 0:29:29.400 juice up the game script. But good offenses can move 0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:31.520 the ball on Minnesota. The key for the Vikings has 0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:35.680 been forcing turnovers. They forced thirteen turnovers in five games, 0:29:35.720 --> 0:29:39.160 in at least two in every game. And it seems 0:29:39.160 --> 0:29:42.280 like Andrew Van Ginkel, my favorite defensive player in the NFL, 0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:43.240 forces all of them. 0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:44.680 He is just a maniac. 0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:49.760 But yeah, like, if the Lions can limit the mistakes 0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:54.440 and Flora's to Debro's point, like Flora's forces those mistakes 0:29:54.920 --> 0:29:58.320 by dialing up pressure and bringing it in unexpected ways, 0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:01.560 like you never know who's coming for the Vikings on 0:30:01.600 --> 0:30:03.720 the pass rush, which makes it really hard to be 0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.960 a quarterback against them. Like that, this is the team 0:30:06.000 --> 0:30:07.880 I would least want to face in the NFL if 0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.280 I was an opposing quarterback. But yeah, I think the 0:30:11.320 --> 0:30:13.920 Lions are going to move the ball. And to Deebro's point, 0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:18.280 like if the Lions can neutralize the Blitz and they 0:30:18.280 --> 0:30:21.200 do have a really good offensive line, I think GoF 0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:22.320 is going to do some business. 0:30:22.400 --> 0:30:24.840 I know this question was built around Lions offense verus 0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:27.400 Vikings defense, but you did mention a shootout fits. Do 0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:29.400 you think that we're going to see? You know, Sam 0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.000 Darnold and company do pretty well against the Lions defense 0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:33.240 now missing Aiden Hutchinson. 0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:37.480 Yeah, I mean that's that's the thing, Like the Lions 0:30:37.480 --> 0:30:40.480 have I'm going to be interested to see the residual 0:30:40.520 --> 0:30:44.240 effect of the Hutchinson injury, not only like does that 0:30:44.280 --> 0:30:47.880 make the Lions a less daunting defensive matchup when you're 0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.400 considering start sit in fantasy? But I think it's going 0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.280 to change the outlook for some of the Lions themselves, 0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:56.080 like GoF has averaged twenty three and a half pass 0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.920 attempts in the Lions four wins. Like they've been they've 0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.880 had some squash jobs so far this season. I don't 0:31:02.880 --> 0:31:04.760 think that's gonna happen as much. I think we're gonna 0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:07.719 see more shootouts, which is probably good for goth Amen, 0:31:07.800 --> 0:31:12.160 Ra Laporta, Jamiir Gibbs, maybe not as good for David Montgomery, 0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.120 who's been getting a steady like fifteen carries a game, 0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:18.400 as Ben Johnson just keeps dialing up running plays and 0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:23.200 grinding it out in these close or not close games. Now, 0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:25.040 when we get close games like I think that might 0:31:25.120 --> 0:31:27.239 hurt Manty a little bit, but help everyone in the 0:31:27.280 --> 0:31:27.920 Detroit I. 0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:30.160 Really want to see one particular move. We saw the 0:31:30.400 --> 0:31:32.240 flurry of trades here. I just want to sneak this 0:31:32.320 --> 0:31:35.520 in here. Dude, tell me there is not a more 0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:39.320 Detroit Dan Campbell player than freaking Max Crosby. I want 0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.160 him to become a Detroit Lions so bad I could 0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.760 taste it like he would be awesome in Detroit. 0:31:46.240 --> 0:31:49.000 What about what about Hassan Reddick? Why is he not? 0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:53.040 I mean, I mean, Hassan Reddick just seems like, I mean, 0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:55.000 does he want to play football at this point? Like 0:31:55.720 --> 0:31:58.400 your agent fires you because you can't come to terms 0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:01.800 with any type of contract. Like at some point, man, 0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:03.600 like you just got to like look like you. I mean, 0:32:03.640 --> 0:32:05.760 even Jamar Chase all these wide receivers said like like 0:32:05.840 --> 0:32:08.440 at some point, let's go play ball and then figure 0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:09.160 out the money later. 0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:12.000 Yeah, I'm not sure if a guy who's intentionally not 0:32:12.080 --> 0:32:14.880 playing football right now is somebody that is in you know, 0:32:15.000 --> 0:32:16.760 Dan Campbell's good graces. 0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:18.240 But yeah, good point. 0:32:18.400 --> 0:32:20.560 But yeah the Max Crosby, Like, well, on the field, 0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.400 both of them wouldn't fit. But like yeah, off the 0:32:22.400 --> 0:32:24.360 field too, like Max Crosby just so class. 0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:28.200 Crosby just supreams Dan Campbell player, Like Dan Campbell would 0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:29.840 like walk in there and be like, Okay, we're building 0:32:29.880 --> 0:32:31.200 a monument to you. Day two. 0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:36.160 Next game here, Dolphins Colts. You know, maybe not the 0:32:36.200 --> 0:32:39.320 most like exhilarating game in a vacuum, But I just 0:32:39.400 --> 0:32:41.000 wanted to bring it up because I wanted to ask, like, 0:32:41.080 --> 0:32:43.840 coming out of the buy, did the Dolphins figure anything 0:32:43.840 --> 0:32:45.840 out with their week off or are we still like 0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.480 somewhat afraid of of starting their players in fantasy. As 0:32:48.520 --> 0:32:50.600 long as this quarterback situation remains what it. 0:32:50.600 --> 0:32:54.360 Is, fits Man, you would hope the bye week helps 0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:58.000 get Tyler Huntley acclimated to the Mike McDaniel offense, and 0:32:58.320 --> 0:33:01.560 now the Dolphins do get this soft matchup against a 0:33:01.600 --> 0:33:05.280 pretty flawed Colts defense. I want to say that this 0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:07.160 is the week where we finally get the big play 0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.560 or two we've been waiting for from Tyreek Hill. We 0:33:10.680 --> 0:33:15.480 know the Colts cornerbacks not a very good group, So 0:33:15.520 --> 0:33:18.040 I've got Tyreek Hill ranked inside my top twenty at 0:33:18.040 --> 0:33:22.400 wide receiver just kind of. I've over ranked him for 0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:24.600 weeks and weeks and weeks. I'm not gonna stop now. 0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.959 I'm just going to keep playing him and ranking him highly. 0:33:28.760 --> 0:33:31.600 And I'm optimistic Devon Achan can get it going. I 0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:34.600 don't know about Jalen Waddle. It seems like he's the 0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:37.760 guy who really most needs to to come back. He 0:33:37.760 --> 0:33:40.280 hasn't scored a touchdown this year, and he has not 0:33:40.320 --> 0:33:44.120 reached fifty yards in a game since Week one. You know, 0:33:44.160 --> 0:33:46.320 it's been really bad for Waddle ever since two I 0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:46.800 got hurt. 0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:48.120 What do you think do you brow, where are these 0:33:48.120 --> 0:33:50.240 guys ranked for you? Roughly this week. 0:33:50.760 --> 0:33:53.520 I've got a big disparity between Tyreek Hill and Jalen Waddle, 0:33:53.560 --> 0:33:55.000 Like I've got Jalen Wattle all the way down at 0:33:55.000 --> 0:33:57.360 wide receiver forty one, I've got Tyreek Hill with wide 0:33:57.360 --> 0:34:00.720 receiver twenty two. I think this is a get matchup 0:34:00.880 --> 0:34:06.600 for specifically the Dolphins ground game. Tyler Huntley is Tyler Huntley, 0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.880 but can he just feed a few decent catchuple targets 0:34:10.920 --> 0:34:12.680 to Tyreek Hill and he takes one or two to 0:34:12.719 --> 0:34:15.279 the house. I think this is the get right game 0:34:15.320 --> 0:34:18.000 for their ground game. Though devon a chan this offensive 0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:21.120 line has been playing pretty bad. But this is the 0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:25.760 get right matchup for basically any running game in the NFL. 0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:29.200 If you got a problem running the ball, hi meet 0:34:29.200 --> 0:34:31.680 the Indianapolis Colts. They don't like to stop the run. 0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:38.120 Let's look at another maybe not most exciting matchup on paper, 0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.880 but that has an interesting question surrounding at Raiders rams. 0:34:41.239 --> 0:34:43.120 Who steps up for the Raiders offense the rest of 0:34:43.120 --> 0:34:46.280 the season without DeVante Adams? I mean, the most common 0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.600 kind of answer you see on social media throughout the 0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:51.440 week is brock Bauers. Is there a receiver that we 0:34:51.480 --> 0:34:54.239 think steps up as well? Does this elevate Bowers into 0:34:54.320 --> 0:34:57.520 like borderline like Titan one overall status. I mean, you 0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:00.719 might already have been there anyway. It's what do you 0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.680 make of the Raiders offense Sands Davante Adams. 0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.560 Well, obviously we're in the all you can eat target 0:35:07.680 --> 0:35:08.400 buffet for. 0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:10.600 Rock Bowers. 0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.600 I mean it's just three targets at the omelet station, 0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:16.800 two targets at the salad bar. You get the idea 0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:19.280 like there are going to be targets galore for Boers, 0:35:19.320 --> 0:35:23.040 But maybe there's some residual benefit for Jacoby my Like. 0:35:23.080 --> 0:35:25.279 I just don't know if Jacoby Myers is the kind 0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:28.520 of guy who's going to turn into you know, like 0:35:28.680 --> 0:35:30.880 a'm and Ros Saint Brown. As far as usage, I 0:35:31.120 --> 0:35:33.719 don't know if we get like a consistent diet of 0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.839 double digit targets, but probably eight or nine a game 0:35:36.960 --> 0:35:40.160 for Jacoby, So I think it at least makes him 0:35:40.200 --> 0:35:44.440 like a solid wide receiver three type the rest of 0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:48.360 the season. And maybe it makes Trey Tucker at least 0:35:48.400 --> 0:35:51.719 like worthy of flex consideration depending on matchup, and the 0:35:51.719 --> 0:35:54.040 matchups pretty good this week against the Rams, who are 0:35:54.080 --> 0:35:57.319 giving up a league high nine point zero yards per pass. 0:35:57.400 --> 0:35:59.719 Yeah, I'm glad you mentioned like the particular matchup this week, 0:35:59.760 --> 0:36:01.800 because I guess there's sort of two parts of the question. 0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:04.360 One is who steps up in this matchup in particular, 0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.080 and the other is kind of rest of season Debra, 0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.200 how do you see that plan out. 0:36:09.040 --> 0:36:12.120 In this matchup? I don't think Jacoby Myers plays, so 0:36:12.200 --> 0:36:14.000 I think it's gonna have to be all brought hours 0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.319 and that's basically it. I don't have a lot of 0:36:16.320 --> 0:36:18.360 faith in Trey Tucker, but I've got a lot of 0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:21.000 faith in Jacoby Myers if he can come back healthy. 0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:25.160 I mean the two games before he missed last week 0:36:25.239 --> 0:36:28.439 due to injury, nine targets, ten targets, and these were 0:36:28.480 --> 0:36:30.880 tough matchups, I mean against going against the Cleveland Browns, 0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:34.480 going against the different Broncos. Since Week four, he has 0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:39.360 had a thirty one percent target share, thirty four percent 0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:42.960 first read chare, so he is getting all the volume 0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:45.880 he can freaking handle. Yeah, I think fits he hit 0:36:45.960 --> 0:36:48.880 this perfectly. I think Jacoby Myers rest of the season 0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:51.840 should be valued as a wide receiver three if you 0:36:51.880 --> 0:36:54.960 can get him tossed into a trade specifically, because he 0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.759 missed last week, he probably misses this week. I would 0:36:57.800 --> 0:36:59.680 be trying to get him added on to any kind 0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:01.000 of deal. And if he's out on the word freaking 0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:03.799 waiver wire fifteen percent minimum. 0:37:05.000 --> 0:37:07.680 Do you guys remember in our rookie draft this year 0:37:07.680 --> 0:37:09.560 and our work Dynasty League, when I got Bowers at 0:37:09.560 --> 0:37:13.439 the one TENN I do. 0:37:14.760 --> 0:37:17.680 I'm still waiting on trade offers for Trey Benson. My 0:37:17.680 --> 0:37:19.200 my inbox is gathering those. 0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:22.160 Those will those will not be coming. But yeah, you 0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:24.960 guys both you guys both had chances to take Bowers 0:37:24.960 --> 0:37:27.200 and you both passed, and I got them at the one. 0:37:27.080 --> 0:37:27.680 Whoa whoa, whoa? 0:37:27.800 --> 0:37:30.480 Hold on I was. I was not sitting down there 0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.400 one all way. But you had picks before that. 0:37:33.680 --> 0:37:34.399 It's my point. 0:37:34.520 --> 0:37:36.840 Yeah, well one oh one. I wasn't taking Brockbi. 0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:39.160 I remember in that rookie draft if I had a 0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:41.600 first this year, he did and here and here's how 0:37:41.640 --> 0:37:43.799 I remember it is so I had a bunch of 0:37:43.800 --> 0:37:44.359 picks in that trap. 0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:46.040 I know nobody cares about this, but I had. I 0:37:46.040 --> 0:37:47.399 had a bunch of picks. I had like the one 0:37:47.400 --> 0:37:49.600 of four and then I had the seven, eight and ten, 0:37:50.320 --> 0:37:53.640 and so at eight I was, and you you had 0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.440 nine Debro. So at eight I was like, well, Debro 0:37:56.520 --> 0:37:59.920 has good tight ends already, and he loves Jonathan Brooks. 0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:01.759 So if I take Bowers here, which is what I 0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.120 would have done, then Dero is going to take Brooks. 0:38:04.200 --> 0:38:06.200 But if I take Brooks here, Dero is not going 0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:07.680 to take Bowers, then he'll slide to me to the. 0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:11.280 One because here's in that league I have Dalton Kincaid 0:38:11.320 --> 0:38:13.520 and Sam Laporta. So why the hell was I going 0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:16.000 to draft block Powers? 0:38:16.000 --> 0:38:18.719 Because Bowers is maybe now tight end one in the 0:38:18.800 --> 0:38:22.920 Dynasty arguably fair, but still where where is? But by 0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:25.200 the way, something that people actually care about? Where would 0:38:25.200 --> 0:38:27.000 you guys like Bowers the rest of season now amongst 0:38:27.040 --> 0:38:27.560 tight ends? 0:38:27.600 --> 0:38:31.480 Like I know, okay, only Travis Kelcey for me. 0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:34.600 Fits You've been like higher than anybody on Bauers, Like 0:38:34.640 --> 0:38:37.040 in terms of redrafting, everybody was hiring him in Dynasty, 0:38:37.040 --> 0:38:38.680 but you were all in on him even in redraft 0:38:38.760 --> 0:38:41.640 this year relative to consensus. Where do you see him now? 0:38:41.719 --> 0:38:42.320 Rest of season? 0:38:44.040 --> 0:38:47.960 I have him, I have him three behind Kittle and Kelsey, 0:38:48.000 --> 0:38:49.959 But man, it is hard to parse those three. 0:38:50.040 --> 0:38:52.320 I think they're all really close. 0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:55.400 When I think about my favorite Fall activities, there are 0:38:55.440 --> 0:38:57.680 plenty of fun adventures on the list. Right at the 0:38:57.680 --> 0:39:00.239 top every fall is going to football games live. Some 0:39:00.280 --> 0:39:02.480 of my all time favorite memories watching the Ravens have 0:39:02.520 --> 0:39:05.120 come right inside M and T. Banks Stadium in Baltimore, 0:39:05.320 --> 0:39:08.160 cheering along with thousands of fellow Ravens fans in primetime. 0:39:08.200 --> 0:39:11.279 And I'll be checking off another NFL stadium from my 0:39:11.360 --> 0:39:14.200 list later this month, actually, in just like a week 0:39:14.239 --> 0:39:16.279 and a half, when the Ravens head to Cleveland, I'll 0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:17.680 be going to that game along with a handful of 0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:20.880 our fantasy pros colleagues. Can't wait to see everybody in person, 0:39:21.200 --> 0:39:23.719 and when we order our tickets, you know we used 0:39:23.760 --> 0:39:26.919 game Time. They've got a great new feature called game 0:39:26.960 --> 0:39:29.279 Time Picks, which filters out the fluff to show you 0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:32.240 only incredible deals on great seats the mikes Getting tickets 0:39:32.280 --> 0:39:35.120 to see your favorite teams play live even easier. The 0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:37.239 list of my favorite features on the Game Time app 0:39:37.440 --> 0:39:39.000 is too long to eat everything, but there are some 0:39:39.080 --> 0:39:43.000 standouts for me personally, I love the game Time Picks curation, obviously, 0:39:43.200 --> 0:39:45.120 especially since I can use it for not just sports, 0:39:45.280 --> 0:39:48.520 but concerts, comedy, theater and more. I also love the 0:39:48.560 --> 0:39:50.719 all in pricing so there are no surprise fees that 0:39:50.880 --> 0:39:53.239 check out. There's nothing in the world that is more 0:39:53.239 --> 0:39:55.719 infuriating to me than thinking I know what I'm about 0:39:55.760 --> 0:39:57.400 to spend on a purchase, then getting hit with a 0:39:57.440 --> 0:40:00.160 surprise fee at the last second. That doesn't happen with 0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:03.000 Game Time. Plus, I also appreciate the seat views to 0:40:03.040 --> 0:40:05.160 get a panoramic view from your seat in the app 0:40:05.200 --> 0:40:08.080 before you commit to buying. The customer service is excellent 0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:09.920 as well. Their support team has helped me out on 0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:13.120 more than one occasion buying last minute tickets, So take 0:40:13.120 --> 0:40:15.800 the guesswork out of buying tickets with Game Time. Download 0:40:15.800 --> 0:40:17.919 the Game Time app, Create an account and use code 0:40:17.960 --> 0:40:20.840 Fantasy Pros for twenty dollars off your first purchase terms 0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:24.239 apply again. Create an account and redeem code fan tas 0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:27.800 y p Ros for twenty dollars off. Download Game Time today. 0:40:28.000 --> 0:40:31.120 What time is it? Game time? All right, guys, let's 0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.280 get into that Super Bowl rematch. You know, a matchup 0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:35.640 we've seen a couple of times now in recent years. 0:40:35.719 --> 0:40:38.359 Chiefs at forty nine ers, you know, a little less 0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:39.920 juice to this one than maybe in some of the 0:40:40.000 --> 0:40:42.080 last couple of years. But it still just feels like 0:40:42.080 --> 0:40:44.680 a cool matchup seeing these two teams go against each other. 0:40:44.800 --> 0:40:48.200 You know, Kyle Shanahan, Patrick Mahomes, just all the stars 0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:50.120 in this game. Still looking forward to this one a 0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.359 lot in the late window. Brandon Nyuk has just one 0:40:53.400 --> 0:40:56.040 game this season with at least fifty receiving yards. He's 0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:59.600 only finished inside the top forty receivers in one week 0:40:59.680 --> 0:41:02.399 on the entire year, Yet he's still ranked as wide 0:41:02.400 --> 0:41:06.040 receiver seventeen in our half PPR Expert Consensus Rankings four 0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:08.720 Week seven. So is this the week that he gets 0:41:08.719 --> 0:41:09.400 going fits? 0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:11.319 Yeah. 0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.799 The issue with Ayuk is that he is just not 0:41:13.840 --> 0:41:16.520 a target hog. He's a really good player, but even 0:41:16.600 --> 0:41:18.640 last year, when he was a thirteen hundred yard receiver, 0:41:18.719 --> 0:41:21.840 he only averaged six point six targets a game. Ayuk 0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:24.760 has had two games with double digit targets this season, 0:41:24.880 --> 0:41:27.839 four games with five or fewer targets, and the two 0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:30.120 games where he had double digit targets came against the 0:41:30.160 --> 0:41:33.000 Cardinals and the Rams, two of the worst pass defenses 0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:35.880 in the league. The Chiefs pass defense not among the 0:41:35.880 --> 0:41:39.200 worst pass defenses in the league. So I'm below consensus 0:41:39.239 --> 0:41:40.799 on him at wide receiver twenty one. 0:41:41.040 --> 0:41:43.080 Do you hear? What do you think? Again? He hasn't 0:41:43.120 --> 0:41:45.399 been inside the top forty much of this season, yet 0:41:45.440 --> 0:41:47.440 he's ranked inside the top twenty in ECR. 0:41:47.800 --> 0:41:50.040 He shouldn't be ranked that high. I'm pulling on my ranking. 0:41:50.120 --> 0:41:52.160 I'm low on Ayuk this week. I've got him at 0:41:52.280 --> 0:41:55.759 wide receiver twenty five, and honestly, I feel like I 0:41:55.760 --> 0:41:58.760 need to drop him. Yeah, I'm gonna drop him more, by. 0:41:58.640 --> 0:42:00.839 The way, by the way I say, and that he 0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:03.440 is actually wide receiver eighteen. Looks like he dropped between 0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:05.399 what I put together the outline. Still in the side 0:42:05.440 --> 0:42:07.560 the top twenty, but he is one spot lower. 0:42:07.400 --> 0:42:09.920 Than before wide receiver twenty nine, and I think he 0:42:10.040 --> 0:42:13.320 should be looked at as a mid to low range 0:42:13.320 --> 0:42:16.239 wide receiver three. This week, the cover shell matchup is 0:42:16.320 --> 0:42:19.000 terrible for him. I mean, Kansas City's running the second 0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:21.640 highest rate of too high right now on sixty seven 0:42:21.640 --> 0:42:25.040 percent of the defensive snaps. I Yuke's numbers against two high. 0:42:25.480 --> 0:42:29.080 He's always been San Francisco's single high beater. That's the 0:42:29.120 --> 0:42:30.960 games you see I you go off in and I 0:42:30.960 --> 0:42:33.799 write about this in the primer constantly, is that their 0:42:33.880 --> 0:42:36.960 splits between two high and single high are massive, so 0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:40.640 debos should be their go to this week. I Yuke's 0:42:40.719 --> 0:42:44.480 numbers against two high this year fifteen percent target chair 0:42:44.960 --> 0:42:48.279 one point one yards per route run, so not good. 0:42:48.320 --> 0:42:49.600 You need to sit Ayuk this week. 0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:54.560 It's where did you say you have Iu cranked twenty one? Okay, 0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.680 so lower than consentus, but not quite as low as 0:42:57.880 --> 0:42:59.880 as deep bro. I did want to sneak in a 0:42:59.880 --> 0:43:02.400 second question on this matchup with a different wide receiver. 0:43:02.480 --> 0:43:04.040 I just feel like we have to talk about Juju 0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:07.160 Smith Schuster seven catches for one hundred and thirty thirty 0:43:07.200 --> 0:43:09.000 yards to the last time we saw the Chiefs play. Obviously, 0:43:09.000 --> 0:43:11.279 they're coming off of bye so are we kind of 0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:15.439 treating Juju for the time being as Casey's wide receiver one? 0:43:15.520 --> 0:43:16.839 Or coming out of the bye week, do we think 0:43:16.840 --> 0:43:19.399 we're going to see rookie wide receiver Savior Worthy take 0:43:19.400 --> 0:43:21.359 a larger role in the offense. We do often see 0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:23.759 that with talented rookies coming off a bye. I've been 0:43:23.760 --> 0:43:25.680 talking about it all week. That's one of my favorite 0:43:25.760 --> 0:43:28.120 kind of profiles of players. To go after in trades 0:43:28.160 --> 0:43:31.000 is is you know, highly drafted rookies coming out of 0:43:31.040 --> 0:43:32.759 their bye week. So Deebra, how do you see that 0:43:32.800 --> 0:43:34.040 plan out? Do you think that this is kind of 0:43:34.320 --> 0:43:36.920 Juju's receiving room right now or do you expect to 0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:37.760 see more out of Worthy? 0:43:38.280 --> 0:43:41.160 I expect to see more out of Worthy and Juju 0:43:41.200 --> 0:43:44.719 also popping up with a late week hammy issue he 0:43:44.840 --> 0:43:47.600 was limited in practice on Thursday, doesn't look great for 0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:50.160 his outlook. I still think as of right now that 0:43:50.200 --> 0:43:53.279 he plays, but we do still have to take note 0:43:53.320 --> 0:43:56.920 of that the difference between Juju he walked away last 0:43:56.920 --> 0:44:00.239 week with a huge box score, but looking at the 0:44:00.520 --> 0:44:03.520 minute show of the numbers an eighteen percent first read 0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:07.239 chare he wasn't the go to. It was Kelsey and 0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:11.319 actually Exavier Worthy at a twenty seven percent first read here. 0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:13.560 So while the box score don't didn't look great for 0:44:13.600 --> 0:44:16.880 Examer Worthy, when Patrick Mahomes was dropping back, he was 0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:19.760 actually looking in Worthies direction more than he was looking 0:44:19.760 --> 0:44:22.799 for Juju Jujuju just happened to be open more last week. 0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:25.880 So I am higher, probably maybe a little bit than 0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:29.520 consensus about Xavier Worthy and his outlook. Rest of the season, 0:44:30.360 --> 0:44:32.840 and maybe a little bit more tepping on Juju considering 0:44:32.840 --> 0:44:35.000 the hamstring issue and some of the deeper numbers from 0:44:35.040 --> 0:44:35.439 last week. 0:44:35.480 --> 0:44:38.920 It's a good point on Juju week together this outline 0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.560 before that late week injury popped up? Are are they playing? 0:44:42.600 --> 0:44:45.520 Tool on fantasypros dot Com gives him a forty seven 0:44:45.560 --> 0:44:48.600 percent chance to play right now. That's one of our 0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.560 new tools. So it is slightly on the pessimistic side 0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:54.160 of Juju playing this week given that late week you 0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:56.640 know pop up of the injury fits what what do 0:44:56.640 --> 0:44:58.719 you think about this one? And maybe you can take 0:44:58.760 --> 0:45:01.080 a longer term view if we don't expect Juju to 0:45:01.120 --> 0:45:02.759 play this week, but kind of how do you see 0:45:02.800 --> 0:45:05.719 this this receiver room panning out for as long as 0:45:05.840 --> 0:45:08.520 you know this is these are the guys they have healthy. 0:45:09.880 --> 0:45:12.759 Yeah, the late week injury designation is bad because I'm 0:45:12.800 --> 0:45:13.960 gonna have to pull him out of a lot of 0:45:13.960 --> 0:45:16.960 lineups because I picked him up pretty much everywhere, Like 0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:19.200 I think he's their wide receiver one going forward. 0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:21.080 I'd rather have him than Savi. You're worthy. 0:45:21.880 --> 0:45:25.560 So Juju is now in the Rashi Rice role as 0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:28.920 the short area receiver for Kansas City and this has 0:45:28.920 --> 0:45:34.040 been a valuable role, and Juju actually had it before 0:45:34.120 --> 0:45:36.520 Rashi Rice came in in twenty twenty three and proved 0:45:36.520 --> 0:45:38.839 to be a big upgrade over Juju. But in twenty 0:45:38.920 --> 0:45:41.480 twenty two, Juju had seventy eight catches for nine hundred 0:45:41.480 --> 0:45:45.520 and thirty three yards. So I think like seventy eight 0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:47.400 for nine to thirty three is the sort of pace 0:45:47.440 --> 0:45:49.439 we're going to see for Juju the rest of the way. 0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:52.799 And that's about seventy five percent of what Rashi Rice 0:45:52.840 --> 0:45:55.399 can give you. But seventy five percent of Rashi Rice 0:45:55.480 --> 0:45:57.080 is still a guy you're starting every week. 0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:00.680 Let's go to our next matchup here, Sunday eight Football 0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:04.080 Jets at Steelers. This one's pretty obvious. Fits will start 0:46:04.160 --> 0:46:07.160 with you, what are expectations for the startable Jets players 0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:09.200 in week one now that DeVante Adams is going to 0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:10.080 be joining them? 0:46:11.000 --> 0:46:11.200 Oh? 0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:13.920 Man, Well, Adams is the most interesting case here. And 0:46:13.960 --> 0:46:16.760 I know in our start shit show earlier this week, 0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:20.520 worm Ericson was telling us how he thinks Adams is 0:46:20.520 --> 0:46:23.279 going to get peppered with targets right from the get go. 0:46:23.360 --> 0:46:26.200 I'm not as sure about that, Like, I don't know 0:46:26.360 --> 0:46:28.439 what the usage is going to be. I do tend 0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:30.719 to think Garrett Wilson is still going to lead the 0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:34.880 Jets and targets this week, but we'll see. I mean, obviously, 0:46:34.960 --> 0:46:38.840 Adams and Aaron Rodgers have a long and successful history together. 0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.080 I don't know, like, do we think the DeVante Adams 0:46:43.160 --> 0:46:45.719 hamstring injury was complete fiction? Because that's kind of the 0:46:45.800 --> 0:46:48.719 key of it. Actually, if there was something to it, 0:46:48.800 --> 0:46:51.680 maybe Adams doesn't play a full compliment of snaps. But 0:46:51.760 --> 0:46:56.279 if that was, you know, just a non injury meant 0:46:56.280 --> 0:46:59.479 to force a trade, then maybe we see Adams get 0:46:59.520 --> 0:47:03.560 like in a snapshare north of eighty percent. So that's 0:47:03.640 --> 0:47:05.919 kind of the key. And you know, hopefully the good 0:47:05.920 --> 0:47:08.480 game against the Bills on Monday night gets breeze Hall going. 0:47:10.480 --> 0:47:12.560 Let me ask you guys about this, what do we 0:47:12.680 --> 0:47:16.840 think DeVante Adams tells for Aaron Rodgers in fantasy? Like, 0:47:16.920 --> 0:47:19.200 is there any chance that with Garrett Wilson and DeVante 0:47:19.200 --> 0:47:22.440 Adams is his top two receivers like Rogers could flirt 0:47:22.520 --> 0:47:25.680 with low end QB one value the rest of the way. 0:47:26.680 --> 0:47:28.359 I would say yes, I don't know that I would 0:47:28.400 --> 0:47:31.399 rank him as a lower QB one, but I think 0:47:31.440 --> 0:47:33.440 the way you phrase it as flirting with that kind 0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:36.200 of value, I do think that. I mean, and I 0:47:36.239 --> 0:47:37.799 know that he's we kind of make fun of it 0:47:37.840 --> 0:47:39.480 a lot, but like Alan Lazard is not a bad 0:47:39.480 --> 0:47:42.920 wide receiver three, especially given his chemistry with Rogers, and 0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:45.759 so if he's behind now two guys that can play 0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:49.520 at a superstar level theoretically, you know, plus you know, 0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:52.479 passing the hall and just all of it, Like, yeah, 0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:55.360 I think I think he's in that range of could 0:47:55.800 --> 0:47:58.200 very conceivably in any given week finish in the as 0:47:58.200 --> 0:47:59.920 a back half QB one. 0:48:00.040 --> 0:48:01.919 What do you think to you, bro, Yeah, I think 0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:05.440 he's He's in that that long tier of guys like 0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:10.160 the Jared Golfs, the Kirk Cousins of the world guys 0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:14.800 were Caleb Williams lately guys were were ranking somewhere between 0:48:14.960 --> 0:48:19.160 QB ten and QB fifteen ish. So yeah, I think 0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:20.640 he's gonna be on the fringe of that in a 0:48:20.640 --> 0:48:22.440 lot of different weeks. And probably it's going to pretend 0:48:22.520 --> 0:48:25.880 like the the matchup is it better for the ground 0:48:25.920 --> 0:48:29.239 game versus the passing game, and kind of like where 0:48:29.280 --> 0:48:31.960 we're we divving up touchdowns this week? If it's more 0:48:32.000 --> 0:48:34.400 towards the passing game, then yeah, I could see Rogers 0:48:35.040 --> 0:48:39.200 weeks moving forward, or we're ranking him as a top 0:48:39.239 --> 0:48:42.120 twelve quarterback. I think that Adams just it's it's the 0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:44.400 tide that raises all ships, man like it. 0:48:47.360 --> 0:48:49.600 Yeah, let me like one thing to add one of 0:48:49.640 --> 0:48:52.280 the reasons I was not really interested in Aaron Rodgers 0:48:52.360 --> 0:48:54.440 coming into this season. I thought the Jets defense was 0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:56.719 going to be so good that, like Rogers just wasn't 0:48:56.760 --> 0:49:00.040 going to play in many shootouts, you know, like the 0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:02.520 Jets would put them in a lot of favorable scripts 0:49:02.560 --> 0:49:05.160 with their defense. But the Jets defense has not been 0:49:05.200 --> 0:49:07.080 as good as I thought, which means maybe there's a 0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:10.200 little more yardage upside for Aaron Rodgers than I thought. 0:49:10.280 --> 0:49:12.200 Yeah. I think that's definitely. Because the thing about the 0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:16.759 Jets is you don't want to attack their secondary, but 0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:20.399 that's fine. You can run on this defense. Their run 0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:25.080 defense is not great, so depending on how teams attack 0:49:25.200 --> 0:49:27.680 them and saying like look like, okay, find your secondary 0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:30.560 is really stinking good. Okay, let's avoid the corners. It's 0:49:30.680 --> 0:49:33.360 user tight ends, so let's run the dang ball. People 0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:35.720 can have success if you have a good enough offensive 0:49:35.760 --> 0:49:38.640 line against the Jets defense right now, staying away from 0:49:38.640 --> 0:49:42.360 their secondary. So I don't disagree fit's a and just 0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:47.640 for the laughs, I do have DeVante Adams ranked over 0:49:47.680 --> 0:49:50.359 Garrett Wilson. I'm kind of in the ericson bucket here. 0:49:50.440 --> 0:49:54.200 I think that there's too much rapport here and basically, 0:49:54.760 --> 0:49:56.959 if they were walking into a situation, I mean, let's 0:49:57.000 --> 0:50:00.560 be real here, other people are calling the plays right now. 0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:04.920 For the Jets. They're still using the Nathaniel Hackett Aaron Rodgers' playbook, 0:50:04.960 --> 0:50:08.200 which is basically DeVante Adams knows for years, years and years. 0:50:08.719 --> 0:50:10.880 So I think this is much more of a seamless 0:50:10.960 --> 0:50:14.080 kind of transition for Adams and more of a you know, 0:50:14.640 --> 0:50:18.840 updated nomenclature for the playbook this year, but still the 0:50:18.960 --> 0:50:21.200 same old, tried and true plays like let's just play 0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:25.560 the hits this week and go out there and ball DeVante. 0:50:24.360 --> 0:50:29.200 Garrett Wilson's wide receiver nineteen and half PPR ECR and 0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:31.880 DeVante Adams wide receiver twenty seven. So there's a bit 0:50:31.880 --> 0:50:35.520 of a gap there across the industry. Deeber I talked 0:50:35.520 --> 0:50:37.799 about this a little bit in a show earlier the week, 0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.120 but what I really love is the idea of them 0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:43.360 using DeVante Adams in this week, particularly in the red zone. 0:50:43.400 --> 0:50:45.440 Like I don't know that he's going to get a 0:50:45.520 --> 0:50:49.160 huge workload overall, but I think if when he's on 0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:51.040 the field, it will be in kind of those high 0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:53.320 leverage moments. I think when they're near the end zone, 0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:56.279 and I would not be surprised to see him catch 0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:59.000 a touchdown. Like I think that's where if he's going 0:50:59.040 --> 0:51:02.279 to make an immediate impact, like maybe he was a 0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:04.279 little banked up with the hamstring working his way back in. 0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:07.759 I think that's where they use him his anytime touchdowns. 0:51:07.800 --> 0:51:10.280 Plus one fifty five I like quite a bit on Drafted. 0:51:10.440 --> 0:51:13.760 It's plus funny, right, I thought, you're right now because 0:51:13.840 --> 0:51:16.719 minus so I'm looking right now. Plus one fifty five 0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:19.759 on DraftKings first touchdown score, which I love too. You 0:51:19.760 --> 0:51:21.279 know Rogers is gonna want to go to him right away. 0:51:21.520 --> 0:51:22.480 Plus eight hundred. 0:51:22.840 --> 0:51:23.319 I love that. 0:51:24.200 --> 0:51:26.560 Oh, I'm betting right now. I'm betting right now. 0:51:26.960 --> 0:51:30.840 I'm I'm already looking forward to seeing an Aaron Rodgers 0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:33.600 back shoulder throat to Devonte Adams again I've missed. 0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:36.319 I mean, it is an absolutely the only reason they 0:51:36.360 --> 0:51:39.080 wouldn't go to him, Like the absolute first play that 0:51:39.120 --> 0:51:43.520 they can in the red zone is if the Steelers 0:51:43.560 --> 0:51:45.480 like triple team him because they know it's coming to 0:51:45.719 --> 0:51:49.080 like you know that Rogers wants to force feed the 0:51:49.120 --> 0:51:51.520 ball to Adams to get him a touchdown. 0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:53.560 Especially like you know, I mean they're making the move 0:51:53.640 --> 0:51:55.839 to justify the move and to get you know, all 0:51:55.880 --> 0:52:00.120 the good feels rolling like immediately. Yes, I agree with everything. 0:52:00.160 --> 0:52:02.560 So I'm running to bet this right now. And I 0:52:02.600 --> 0:52:06.439 do have just two notes, Davante Adams. I have at 0:52:06.440 --> 0:52:09.760 wide receiver, where are you at, Davonte wide receiver eighteen? 0:52:09.800 --> 0:52:13.080 And I've got Garrett Wilson at wide receiver twenty as 0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:16.640 well as Davante is practicing in full all week right now, 0:52:16.640 --> 0:52:17.600 so I think he's gonna be a full go. 0:52:18.320 --> 0:52:22.200 Yeah, I expect that as well. Let's go to there's 0:52:22.280 --> 0:52:24.880 another doubleheader for Monday night football. They are doing a 0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:28.279 ton of these this year. Ravens Bucks is one of 0:52:28.320 --> 0:52:32.600 these games. Two very explosive offenses playing you know, really well, 0:52:33.080 --> 0:52:36.160 tons of fantasy starters in this game. So rather than 0:52:36.239 --> 0:52:37.839 kind of break down all the matchups, because I think 0:52:37.880 --> 0:52:40.160 the matchups are pretty much good across the board. Given 0:52:40.320 --> 0:52:42.920 the offenses and the defenses they're going against. Outside of 0:52:42.960 --> 0:52:45.160 the running backs facing the Ravens run defense, pretty much 0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:47.480 everything else in this game, I expect to favor the 0:52:47.520 --> 0:52:49.600 offensive side of the things. So let's just have some fun. 0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:51.600 I want you guys to predict one player each who 0:52:51.640 --> 0:52:55.760 will score multiple touchdowns in this one, not including quarterbacks. Obviously, 0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:58.360 fifty can go first. Who is one player in Ravens 0:52:58.360 --> 0:53:00.799 Bucks who will score multiple times this week? 0:53:02.040 --> 0:53:04.919 How about the guy who scored multiple touchdowns last week? 0:53:05.200 --> 0:53:08.359 Chris Godwin eleven catches for one hundred and twenty five 0:53:08.400 --> 0:53:11.600 in a pair of tids against the Saints last Sunday. 0:53:11.880 --> 0:53:14.719 Godwin has turned into this red zone machine, which is 0:53:14.800 --> 0:53:17.120 kind of funny. He's already got five tds on the season, 0:53:17.480 --> 0:53:19.840 which is as many as he had in twenty twenty 0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:24.000 two and twenty twenty three combined. So let's let's give 0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:25.719 Chris Godwin two more this week. 0:53:25.760 --> 0:53:27.520 Deebro, I saw you nodding. Was that your pick or 0:53:27.560 --> 0:53:28.320 did you disagree? 0:53:28.760 --> 0:53:31.200 Oh? That was that was the pick that I was 0:53:31.200 --> 0:53:34.080 going to go with. Also adding in here Baltimore versus 0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:37.320 slot wide receivers, they have allowed the fifth most receiving 0:53:37.360 --> 0:53:41.120 touchdowns to the slot. But I was going to go 0:53:41.120 --> 0:53:43.839 with Godwin here, But also I do want to mention, 0:53:44.160 --> 0:53:46.040 if you want to go further down the page, I 0:53:46.040 --> 0:53:49.640 think the really fun pick here is Kate Auton Baltimore 0:53:49.719 --> 0:53:52.520 has been having a tough time guarding titands this year, 0:53:52.560 --> 0:53:54.879 giving out the most receiving yards and the tenth most 0:53:54.920 --> 0:53:57.480 fantasy points. If we were going to go off the 0:53:57.480 --> 0:53:59.839 page here a little bit, and it's not Godwin at 0:54:00.280 --> 0:54:01.839 really like Kate Otten this week. 0:54:03.120 --> 0:54:05.279 Look at the hurt on Worm's face that we didn't 0:54:05.320 --> 0:54:05.800 pick Derek. 0:54:06.320 --> 0:54:08.359 No, I think I think it's reasonable to not pick. 0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:11.080 Yeah, what's his touchdown onds this week? 0:54:11.160 --> 0:54:15.239 I'm sure betting he gets one, you know two. I 0:54:15.239 --> 0:54:16.960 don't know they like to get him as one. I 0:54:16.960 --> 0:54:20.440 mean he could easy, Yeah, you get to I almost 0:54:20.520 --> 0:54:23.360 kind of wanted to pick somebody like like Mark Andrews, 0:54:23.400 --> 0:54:25.880 just to like go completely like you know, you know 0:54:26.080 --> 0:54:27.399 it's has been. 0:54:27.280 --> 0:54:29.960 Bad to see is not weird enough for your worm? Well? 0:54:30.080 --> 0:54:32.120 No not. I was gonna say, if we're picking Kate 0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:34.040 Mark and I thought. 0:54:33.840 --> 0:54:35.719 You guys are gonna pick Mike Evans, which is what 0:54:35.800 --> 0:54:37.719 would have been my pick, but I thought he was 0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:39.480 really I do think it was fascinating. I'm not hurt 0:54:39.520 --> 0:54:41.239 by it. I think it's interesting that all three of 0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:44.319 us are first instinct were Bucks players, not the team 0:54:44.360 --> 0:54:46.239 that's favored. So the Ravens I think are length three 0:54:46.280 --> 0:54:47.880 and a half. Do you guys think that the Bucks 0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:49.960 cover that? Then, if we're all kind of leaning towards 0:54:50.000 --> 0:54:52.760 Tampa Bay players to score multiple touchdowns. 0:54:52.360 --> 0:54:55.759 Yeah, I mean, I've got Baker a lot. I don't 0:54:55.800 --> 0:54:57.400 know if they cover it, but it's it's gonna be 0:54:57.440 --> 0:54:58.160 a hell of a game. 0:54:59.480 --> 0:55:01.319 No, I bet the Ravens well. 0:55:01.360 --> 0:55:03.840 Then, then which Ravens is gonna get two touchdowns? Fits 0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:10.279 probably Flowers Flowers, the answer could be, the answer is 0:55:10.480 --> 0:55:14.440 probably Lamar Jackson if anybody other than Derrick Henry. 0:55:14.480 --> 0:55:16.520 We spent way too much time talking about the Ravens. 0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:20.440 Now we did half the segment of the bus. I 0:55:20.480 --> 0:55:22.439 do think that's an awesome game. Like, I think both 0:55:22.440 --> 0:55:24.719 the offenses are going to score a ton. That's gonna 0:55:24.719 --> 0:55:25.439 be a really fun one. 0:55:25.880 --> 0:55:27.920 So definitely, any any of the Ravens players you want 0:55:27.960 --> 0:55:29.520 to mention here, worm, I think we've kind of covered 0:55:29.520 --> 0:55:31.120 the entire skill position roster. 0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:32.200 Charlie Cole. 0:55:32.360 --> 0:55:35.600 I used to say all Mark Andrews as a joke 0:55:35.960 --> 0:55:39.360 and Lamar Jackson as he wasn't eligible, but as serious 0:55:39.360 --> 0:55:40.040 Ala Wallace. 0:55:40.239 --> 0:55:42.400 No, okay, sorry, moving. 0:55:42.200 --> 0:55:44.239 On, None of the none of the receivers would be 0:55:44.360 --> 0:55:45.879 actually actually you know you know who the real pick. 0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:47.560 Oh, here we go, see. 0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:52.120 The real pick is. Here's the thing about the Ravens. 0:55:52.120 --> 0:55:54.200 They don't typically do like the one guy outside of 0:55:54.239 --> 0:55:56.560 Derrick Henry like gets all the touchdowns. They spread it 0:55:56.560 --> 0:55:58.520 around when they get in close. If it is one guy, 0:55:58.520 --> 0:56:01.520 it's Isaiah Likely who I don't think that'll happen, but 0:56:01.560 --> 0:56:03.840 he's probably the guy if we're being real. All right, 0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:07.000 let's go to Chargers at Cardinals. Before we get into 0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:09.080 the key question for Monday Night's matchup, I want to 0:56:09.120 --> 0:56:12.240 ask you guys about your Uber Eats Monday Night Meals 0:56:12.360 --> 0:56:15.400 of the Week debro. What must order food gets you 0:56:15.440 --> 0:56:18.120 reaching for your Uber Eats app for great game day 0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:21.120 deals when you think of Arizona where this game's taking place. 0:56:21.520 --> 0:56:23.759 Dude, I'm gonna channel my best Ryan Reynolds in my 0:56:23.800 --> 0:56:26.200 best Deadpool here. It's Jimmy Chonga's baby. That's the one 0:56:26.200 --> 0:56:26.960 I won Come. 0:56:26.840 --> 0:56:30.399 On, it's zzy. You were very excited when we were 0:56:30.400 --> 0:56:32.920 discussing this to say, oh, Jimmy Jangas, I. 0:56:32.920 --> 0:56:36.240 Almost wore my Deadpool onesie on this show just because 0:56:36.280 --> 0:56:37.280 of that almost. 0:56:40.160 --> 0:56:42.960 What do you think of? What do you think of Arizona? 0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:46.319 I keep hearing about how good Pizzeria Bianco is in 0:56:46.400 --> 0:56:48.799 the Phoenix Scottsdale area, and I've never had it, but 0:56:48.800 --> 0:56:51.200 I've heard a lot of people say it is the 0:56:51.560 --> 0:56:55.240 you know, just an A plus pizzeria, so I would 0:56:55.239 --> 0:56:55.920 love to try that. 0:56:56.120 --> 0:56:59.920 I don't have a ton of knowledge about Arizona cuisine, 0:57:00.000 --> 0:57:02.480 and the first thing I think of immediately is just 0:57:02.520 --> 0:57:05.000 I'm sure there's really excellent Mexican food there that I 0:57:05.000 --> 0:57:07.239 would be happy to to. 0:57:06.920 --> 0:57:09.360 The way always. 0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:13.000 But when I googled it, the first thing that popped 0:57:13.040 --> 0:57:15.880 up of top foods you must eat in Arizona is 0:57:16.120 --> 0:57:19.480 fry bread, which I don't know what that is, but 0:57:20.160 --> 0:57:22.640 it's two of my favorite things are fried food and bread, 0:57:22.760 --> 0:57:26.400 So I am all in trying out fry bet bread 0:57:26.800 --> 0:57:29.120 the next time i'm there. But yeah, there's the big 0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:31.840 two that releasted when I googled it, Arizona Zone for 0:57:31.880 --> 0:57:34.560 fried bread and the invention of Chimney Changa's. So Debro 0:57:34.640 --> 0:57:36.800 already took the other one. But yeah, very if anybody 0:57:36.800 --> 0:57:38.880 knows what fried bread is, drop it in the comments. 0:57:38.880 --> 0:57:40.840 I mean, I'm sure I could google it, but it 0:57:41.000 --> 0:57:43.040 sounds very good to me. There, you guys have it. 0:57:43.560 --> 0:57:46.280 Our Uber Eats Monday Night Meals of the week. We 0:57:46.320 --> 0:57:48.400 got fried red, we got Chimney Changka's, we got the 0:57:48.440 --> 0:57:51.320 pizza place. Uber Eats has the best game day deals 0:57:51.360 --> 0:57:55.720 all season long. Order now for game day Chargers at Cardinals. Guys, 0:57:55.800 --> 0:57:59.640 last game on the slate. Kind of a you know, 0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:03.040 pessimistic question to end on what's wrong with Kyler Murray? 0:58:03.400 --> 0:58:05.760 I know Kyler is somebody that you've talked about Debro 0:58:06.240 --> 0:58:08.880 a couple of times on the show this season. QB 0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:11.920 fifteen or worse in four out of his six games 0:58:11.960 --> 0:58:14.840 played so far in twenty twenty four. Is Kyler a 0:58:14.920 --> 0:58:17.400 starting option in fantasy against what has been a good 0:58:17.520 --> 0:58:19.840 Chargers defense? Where are we getting kind of further and 0:58:19.880 --> 0:58:21.560 further away of believing in Kyler. 0:58:22.240 --> 0:58:26.520 Kyler is a mid range QB two, and I might 0:58:26.560 --> 0:58:30.520 actually bump him to a low range QB two. It's 0:58:31.080 --> 0:58:34.440 the rushing is saving him, and two really good games 0:58:34.520 --> 0:58:39.080 are saving when people look at his season long stuff. 0:58:39.160 --> 0:58:42.000 It really lies to you. If you have Kyler Murray 0:58:42.000 --> 0:58:44.360 on any fantasy teams, you already know the pain that 0:58:44.360 --> 0:58:48.080 I'm about to discuss. He's been arguably and this honestly 0:58:48.120 --> 0:58:51.200 was last year too. I talked about this, and I 0:58:51.280 --> 0:58:53.640 was hoping for better returns this year, but he was 0:58:53.760 --> 0:58:57.560 arguably terrible as a passer last year and we've seen 0:58:57.760 --> 0:59:00.800 much of the same this year. Thirty seven qualif find quarterbacks. 0:59:00.840 --> 0:59:05.080 Kyler Murray thirty second in yards per attempt nineteenth. In 0:59:05.240 --> 0:59:10.680 CPOE he is thirty six. There is only one quarterback 0:59:11.040 --> 0:59:15.200 worse than Kyler Murray as far as highly accurate throw rate. 0:59:15.720 --> 0:59:18.840 So all I can say, if you're starting Kyler Murray 0:59:18.920 --> 0:59:21.400 this week, you better hope he runs because the passing 0:59:21.720 --> 0:59:23.720 has been wolf this year. 0:59:24.800 --> 0:59:26.919 So let me ask you this de row before throwing 0:59:26.960 --> 0:59:29.720 into fits. So I'm in a guillotine league with a 0:59:29.960 --> 0:59:31.840 couple of our coworkers at work, and I have Kyler 0:59:31.920 --> 0:59:33.880 Murray as my quarterback. So in a format like that, 0:59:34.280 --> 0:59:37.600 would you view that situation as I need to prioritize 0:59:37.640 --> 0:59:41.000 spending my fab dollars on a different quarterback. Okay, you 0:59:41.000 --> 0:59:42.880 don't believe that he's going to kind of come together 0:59:42.960 --> 0:59:43.680 later in the season. 0:59:43.760 --> 0:59:45.640 Okay, Nope, you need to get it. You need to 0:59:45.640 --> 0:59:48.880 get a quarterback that's that's actually hashtag good because it 0:59:48.920 --> 0:59:50.840 ain't Kyler fits. 0:59:50.880 --> 0:59:52.240 What do you what do you make of Kyler? Is 0:59:52.280 --> 0:59:54.560 there kind of anything you can identify that's been going 0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:56.440 wrong from this year? What do you expect rests of season? 0:59:56.440 --> 0:59:58.680 How are you evaluating the situation? And also, you know, 0:59:58.760 --> 1:00:00.080 in terms of the matchup against the charg. 1:00:02.320 --> 1:00:05.080 Guillotine is probably the worst format for Kyler because he 1:00:05.160 --> 1:00:08.760 is wildly inconsistent, and that is just a hallmark of Kyler. 1:00:08.760 --> 1:00:11.640 And it always has been, like I've had Kyler in 1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:15.480 a couple of dynasty leagues and if you like follow him, 1:00:15.480 --> 1:00:17.919 and maybe you're not watching the game, you'll you'll see 1:00:17.960 --> 1:00:20.840 at halftime he's got like four Fantasy points and you're like, 1:00:20.840 --> 1:00:23.000 what's going on with Kyler? And then all of a sudden, 1:00:23.040 --> 1:00:24.440 by the end of the day, I'll have like twenty 1:00:24.440 --> 1:00:29.280 four Fantasy points. He is just game to game, half 1:00:29.320 --> 1:00:30.880 to half, wildly inconsistent. 1:00:30.960 --> 1:00:31.720 Debro is right. 1:00:31.840 --> 1:00:34.200 He is not a very good pure passer and he's 1:00:34.240 --> 1:00:37.640 not really a consistent runner. He's not the sort of 1:00:37.640 --> 1:00:40.280 guy who just delivers the goods with rushing week in 1:00:40.400 --> 1:00:41.760 week out, like Lamar Jackson. 1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:45.440 Just not that kind of guy. So yeah, I mean it. 1:00:45.400 --> 1:00:48.520 Feels like the numbers should be better because by most metrics, 1:00:48.560 --> 1:00:51.320 the protection has been okay for Kyler and he's got 1:00:51.520 --> 1:00:55.040 pretty decent weaponry now with Marvin Harrison Junior. Granted, you know, 1:00:55.120 --> 1:00:57.840 missed most of the Packers game last week with the 1:00:57.880 --> 1:01:03.480 concussion Trey McBride, but yeah, that Debro mentioned it. Like 1:01:03.560 --> 1:01:07.760 Kyler has averaged six point seven yards or fewer per 1:01:07.840 --> 1:01:11.520 pass attempt against every team he's played this season, against 1:01:11.560 --> 1:01:13.960 the Rams, who have one of the worst pass defenses 1:01:13.960 --> 1:01:18.200 in the league, even against the Commanders he didn't play 1:01:18.200 --> 1:01:22.280 all that well, So it hasn't been catastrophic though, Like 1:01:22.320 --> 1:01:24.320 he's had a couple of bangers, a couple of games 1:01:24.320 --> 1:01:27.720 with twenty plus points and everyone was ready to dump 1:01:27.760 --> 1:01:30.080 on him two weeks ago, and he played the forty 1:01:30.160 --> 1:01:31.800 nine Ers and wound up having a really good day. 1:01:32.320 --> 1:01:36.240 So man, in some ways, you almost have to just 1:01:36.360 --> 1:01:37.720 leave him in there and know they're going to be 1:01:37.800 --> 1:01:40.680 some bad weeks and good weeks and it's not even 1:01:40.720 --> 1:01:42.640 predictable based on opponents sometimes. 1:01:43.320 --> 1:01:45.360 Yeah, deeb R, I saw you mentioned in the chat 1:01:45.400 --> 1:01:48.520 here two games under fifteen rushing yards. Yeah, it's just 1:01:48.720 --> 1:01:49.880 not what you think of with Kyler. 1:01:50.080 --> 1:01:52.080 No, by the way, I've got him, I've got him 1:01:52.120 --> 1:01:54.520 ranked as a low end QB one. I'm just kind 1:01:54.560 --> 1:01:56.800 of like, that's my assessment of him. He is a 1:01:56.840 --> 1:01:59.600 low ENQB one and I'm just sticking him there every week, 1:01:59.640 --> 1:02:02.120 and I know I'm gonna be like, way too low 1:02:02.240 --> 1:02:03.320 some weeks and way too high. 1:02:03.520 --> 1:02:06.400 I'll throw this out there for people. This week, I 1:02:06.400 --> 1:02:09.560 would play Trevor Lawrence over Kyler Murray. This week I 1:02:09.560 --> 1:02:12.760 would play Anthony Richardson over Kyler Murray. I have no 1:02:12.800 --> 1:02:14.160 faith in Kyler Murray at all. 1:02:14.200 --> 1:02:16.200 I can get on with a rich but I cannot 1:02:16.240 --> 1:02:17.040 get down with Trevor. 1:02:17.160 --> 1:02:19.200 I just the New England Patriots are a pass funnal 1:02:19.240 --> 1:02:20.280 That's what I'm leaning into. 1:02:21.120 --> 1:02:23.280 Do you guys like that We're still having these doubleheaders 1:02:23.280 --> 1:02:25.800 on Monday Night like this deep into the season. Now. 1:02:26.000 --> 1:02:28.720 I love it for DFS purposes. It's it's wonderful. I 1:02:28.760 --> 1:02:30.240 love two gamers. 1:02:30.760 --> 1:02:32.880 As long as one's kind of a lousy game that 1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:34.960 I can just sort of like check in on during 1:02:34.960 --> 1:02:37.320 commercials and not feel like I'm missing anything on the line. 1:02:37.320 --> 1:02:39.800 I feel like these these could be two good games. 1:02:39.680 --> 1:02:42.640 It's it's the there's a world where it's not doesn't 1:02:42.680 --> 1:02:44.919 play out that way. But like again, I think Ravens 1:02:44.960 --> 1:02:48.080 Bucks is gonna be really explosive like Chargers Cardinals. If 1:02:48.240 --> 1:02:50.800 Kyler is playing well and you know JK. Dobbins is 1:02:50.840 --> 1:02:52.360 running all over the field like that could be a 1:02:52.360 --> 1:02:53.000 fun one too. 1:02:53.080 --> 1:02:55.560 So I think it's gonna be a fun week if 1:02:55.600 --> 1:02:57.640 you're a Chargers fan. I'll put it that way. 1:02:57.840 --> 1:02:59.600 Yeah, I mean yeah, I do think the Charger is 1:02:59.600 --> 1:03:01.400 gonna win, but we'll see how play is that. We 1:03:01.400 --> 1:03:04.040 will wrap up there. Thanks everybody for tuning in. Best 1:03:04.080 --> 1:03:06.480 of luck in week seven with all of your lineup decisions. 1:03:06.480 --> 1:03:09.120 You can head to Discord and ask us plenty more 1:03:09.160 --> 1:03:11.880 questions if you want. Debro and fits around there pretty 1:03:11.920 --> 1:03:14.160 much all weekend long, so be sure to check that 1:03:14.280 --> 1:03:17.080 out for fits and Debro. I'm Ryan Warmy. Thank you 1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:19.720 everybody for tuning in. We'll see again next week. Thanks 1:03:19.720 --> 1:03:22.880 for listening to the Fantasy Pros. Fantasy Football podcast. If 1:03:22.880 --> 1:03:25.520 you love the show, the best freeway to support us 1:03:25.640 --> 1:03:28.640 is by leaving a positive review on Apple Podcasts at 1:03:28.640 --> 1:03:32.640 fantasypros dot com slash review or on Spotify. Follow us 1:03:32.640 --> 1:03:36.440 on x, Instagram, and TikTok at fantasy Pros, and subscribe 1:03:36.440 --> 1:03:39.120 to our YouTube channel at YouTube dot com slash fantasy 1:03:39.160 --> 1:03:39.440 Pros