WEBVTT - Loser Democrats Endlessly Investigate

0:00:10.840 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>You are entering the freedom hunt. The border crisis continues

0:00:15.800 --> 0:00:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and Democrats are showing that they want to decriminalize, at

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:23.840
<v Speaker 1>least some of them want to decriminalize illegal entry into

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.760
<v Speaker 1>this country. This is a leap toward open borders. We've

0:00:27.760 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>got a lot for you on that and also the

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>latest in the scandals that the Democrats are covering up.

0:00:35.440 --> 0:00:37.280
<v Speaker 1>That are more coming up on The Buck Sexton Show.

0:00:37.760 --> 0:00:41.479
<v Speaker 1>This is the Buck Sexton Show where the mission where

0:00:41.520 --> 0:00:45.640
<v Speaker 1>mission is to decode what really matters with actionable intelligence.

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Make no mistake America, You're a great American. Again, the

0:00:51.560 --> 0:01:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Buck Sexton Show begins. He's a great guy. Now Mexico

0:01:01.080 --> 0:01:03.800
<v Speaker 1>is now stopping people coming very easy for them to do,

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:06.800
<v Speaker 1>stopping people coming in through Mexico. Let's see if they

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>keep it done. If they keep doing that now, if

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>they don't, or if we don't make a deal with Congress,

0:01:15.959 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>the border is going to be closed, or we're going

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>to close large sections of the border, maybe not all

0:01:21.880 --> 0:01:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of it, but it's the only way we're getting a response.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And I'm totally ready to do it, and I will

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:31.040
<v Speaker 1>say this many people want me to do it. Welcome

0:01:31.080 --> 0:01:33.800
<v Speaker 1>to the Buck Sexton Show. President Trump still pushing the

0:01:33.840 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 1>idea that he may shut down the border. I don't

0:01:38.880 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>think that this is the way he's going to go,

0:01:42.560 --> 0:01:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think it will solve or even necessarily

0:01:45.440 --> 0:01:48.440
<v Speaker 1>help on the problem all that much. But the man's

0:01:48.480 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>trying to do something. There are no good options available

0:01:52.920 --> 0:01:55.520
<v Speaker 1>right now because of the laws that exist on the books,

0:01:55.560 --> 0:01:58.760
<v Speaker 1>because of the situation on the ground at the border,

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and because one political party no longer believes that we

0:02:03.080 --> 0:02:09.239
<v Speaker 1>should have immigration laws. One political party no longer believes

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's anything wrong with illegal immigration. Really, I mean,

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 1>they won't say this out loud, but there's plenty of data.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I can point you to, plenty of evidence that this

0:02:19.040 --> 0:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>is in fact how they feel. Let me bring you

0:02:24.760 --> 0:02:32.960
<v Speaker 1>up to speed on what is going on with Joaquin Castro. Now, well,

0:02:33.040 --> 0:02:36.359
<v Speaker 1>Keene Castro is someone who and this just came out today,

0:02:36.840 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he's running for president. He's not one of the top contenders,

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:45.639
<v Speaker 1>but he's a congressman from Texas I believe, who is

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:48.520
<v Speaker 1>running for president and has put out and is one

0:02:48.520 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 1>of the first Democrats to put out what his plan

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>is on immigration. And here's the very shortened version of

0:02:59.240 --> 0:03:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what could be a longer conversation and will be. But

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:10.000
<v Speaker 1>he wants to decriminalize illegal entry into the United States,

0:03:10.160 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, Julian Castro wants to make sure that if

0:03:15.600 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>somebody comes into America illegally, they are no longer to

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 1>be arrested and treated as No, it's a misdemeanor, it's

0:03:22.960 --> 0:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>a federal misdemeanor to enter, but it is still a crime.

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>This would now be the equivalent, legally speaking of a

0:03:30.639 --> 0:03:35.400
<v Speaker 1>civil offense a parking ticket. At the moment when the

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:41.240
<v Speaker 1>country is in the grips of the biggest immigration, illegal

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:45.520
<v Speaker 1>immigration crisis, perhaps in its history, because remember, it's not

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:49.320
<v Speaker 1>just the people crossing now, it's they say, eleven more

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>like twenty million illegals already in the country. And what

0:03:54.240 --> 0:03:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that does to the political parties and to our our

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:01.440
<v Speaker 1>cultural and political and social fabric in this country and

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>rule of law, and you know that's always looming in

0:04:04.560 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>the background. You already have an enormous population of legal

0:04:08.080 --> 0:04:11.080
<v Speaker 1>aliens living in the country, enormous and now you have

0:04:11.080 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge surge that'll be a million more for the

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:17.320
<v Speaker 1>year if it continues at the current rate. And what

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.600
<v Speaker 1>do what do the Democrats do? Oh, that's right, they

0:04:19.600 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>start to talk about how we should make it even easier,

0:04:24.200 --> 0:04:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we should make the penalties even less, and right now

0:04:28.200 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>there's basically no penalty. It would be in the Dallas

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.640
<v Speaker 1>News was supporting on this today that that Castro's plan

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>would be turning this into a civil, non criminal violation

0:04:39.200 --> 0:04:42.240
<v Speaker 1>illegal entry. So it's like it'd be like a like

0:04:42.279 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a parking ticket situation. Now, and this is where I'm

0:04:48.400 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>telling you I see it right now, this is where

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:53.320
<v Speaker 1>the Democratic Party is going. They're they're going to do

0:04:53.400 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>everything they can to further weaken immigration enforcement. They're going

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to try to eliminate any real hope of interior enforcement

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>against illegal alien illegal aliens, and then illegal entry at

0:05:05.480 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the border will be deprioritized as any kind of law

0:05:09.640 --> 0:05:12.320
<v Speaker 1>enforcement issue, and they're just going to say, let's just

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>process people as fast as we can bring more of

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 1>them into the country and completely leave law enforcement I

0:05:21.400 --> 0:05:23.799
<v Speaker 1>mean in the lurch. I mean, if all of a sudden,

0:05:23.839 --> 0:05:25.479
<v Speaker 1>a legal entry is not really a crime, you have

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to ask the question, why does border patrol even exist?

0:05:27.720 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Then border patrol shouldn't be out there. You know, does

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>border patrol's mission matter? If they're not policing crimes? What

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 1>are they doing down there. Oh, they're just there to

0:05:39.480 --> 0:05:43.680
<v Speaker 1>prevent drugs from flowing into the country. There's more than that,

0:05:43.800 --> 0:05:47.720
<v Speaker 1>isn't there. You know, we are being forced to address

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>a fundamental question about the future of this country, which

0:05:51.400 --> 0:05:54.919
<v Speaker 1>is should we have borders at all? The Democrats want

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>to say no, but they're not ready to say no.

0:05:59.040 --> 0:06:02.080
<v Speaker 1>They do not believe that we should be excluding people

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>from the country. They do not think that there's anything

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:09.159
<v Speaker 1>wrong with illegal entry into the United States. And they

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:12.080
<v Speaker 1>have gone so far left and so out of the

0:06:12.120 --> 0:06:16.800
<v Speaker 1>mainstream on this issue that I can't see how twenty

0:06:16.839 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>twenty turns into on immigration anything more than a fight

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>over It's just going to be a fight over amnesty.

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 1>They're going to offer amnesty to everybody who's here. That's

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>what they're gonna want to do. They're gonna call it

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a pathway to citizenship, but they know that they're a

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Lynsky I'd approach here of overwhelming The system is going

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:35.360
<v Speaker 1>to be true not just that our southern border, it's

0:06:35.360 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>going to be true of the supposed pathway. The pathway

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>is going to be a conveyor belt. All you have

0:06:40.640 --> 0:06:42.159
<v Speaker 1>to do is be on it and you'll get to

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>the end, which means citizenship here to tell me that

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.560
<v Speaker 1>people that are in the country that you don't have

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 1>English proficiency, proven to the government, that don't pay back

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:53.400
<v Speaker 1>taxes when most of them would actually get money from

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>the government because they'll make enough money to pay taxes,

0:06:56.880 --> 0:06:58.680
<v Speaker 1>so they're not gonna pay into the system. They're not

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna pay any fine, They're not all this is all nonsense.

0:07:02.960 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 1>We went through this before we Reagan signed an amnesty

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>back in the eighties, and they were still here in

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>cases twenty years later, or people who said that they

0:07:11.720 --> 0:07:14.400
<v Speaker 1>were they should have been covered by the amnesty, or

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.240
<v Speaker 1>there was some aspect of it, and we were promised

0:07:17.240 --> 0:07:19.280
<v Speaker 1>that it would be it would stop after that. You know,

0:07:19.320 --> 0:07:21.920
<v Speaker 1>it was for a few million people the amnesty. I

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>forgot three or four million. I think it would stop

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>after that. Edn't think out words. It only got bigger.

0:07:28.240 --> 0:07:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Democrats want to want the incentives to come into this country,

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>even even stronger than they had been in the past,

0:07:41.880 --> 0:07:45.680
<v Speaker 1>even stronger than they have been before this. So we

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>do not have partners in addressing the crisis. We have

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>actually one side that wants to figure this out, the Republicans,

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that they're particularly adept or skilled

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>at it. But then on the other side, you've got

0:07:57.120 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>people that just want to perpetuate exactly what's going on.

0:08:00.760 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>And that's why you're going to just see the continuation

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of all this dysfunction. We're going to see a real

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:11.920
<v Speaker 1>lack I think of well, there'll be a lack of

0:08:11.920 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 1>honesty and the way the Democrats talk about this, but

0:08:14.600 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 1>this is we're focusing on the issue. And the last

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:18.840
<v Speaker 1>week I was saying, we need more focus, we need

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>more focus. Now here we are and you know, Trump's

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:25.840
<v Speaker 1>last car to play seems to be shutting down the border.

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Here's Sarah Howkaby Sanders saying just that play fourteen. The

0:08:28.600 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>President's not threatening. The President's taking his job as the

0:08:31.760 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>commander in chief very seriously in terms of protecting the

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>American people. Everyone wants to talk about the cost of

0:08:39.960 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>doing that. That is certainly, again not something we want

0:08:43.040 --> 0:08:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to happen. The President's the one that is responsible for

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the last two years of economic growth, economic boom, and

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:50.880
<v Speaker 1>the number of jobs that we have in this country.

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:53.120
<v Speaker 1>We don't want to see that hurt. But at the

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>same time, the president's number one responsibility is to protect

0:08:56.920 --> 0:09:00.360
<v Speaker 1>American life. Democrats may not care about that. They may

0:09:00.400 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>be perfectly fine watching women and children exploited as they

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>make the treacherous journey up from the up from the

0:09:07.240 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>South across the southern border. They may be perfectly fine

0:09:10.679 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>seeing babies frankly killed right up until the moment of birth.

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 1>But this president isn't. He takes his job of protecting

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>American life very seriously, and he's gonna do what it

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 1>takes to make sure that happens right. Shutting down the

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:27.679
<v Speaker 1>border would at least be a demonstration of resolve from

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:30.559
<v Speaker 1>the president and focus on the issue. But I'm telling you,

0:09:30.600 --> 0:09:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the pressure would be too great and he'd have to

0:09:32.240 --> 0:09:34.839
<v Speaker 1>relent very quickly. It would not last long, and it

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't solve the problem. It just gets people to focus

0:09:37.080 --> 0:09:41.280
<v Speaker 1>on the problem. This is the biggest challenge the country,

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 1>imminent challenge the country faces right now what to do

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>about the southern border. Who is showing leadership on this

0:09:48.040 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 1>other than President Trump? I can think of very few people,

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and that is really unsettling. We have more on this

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:55.559
<v Speaker 1>border issue, and a whole lot more coming up in

0:09:55.600 --> 0:09:57.560
<v Speaker 1>the show. Team stay with Me, give us any money

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to fix it. They won't change the law to fix it.

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So we're gonna do the best with what we have,

0:10:01.240 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and if that means pulling people off the ports of

0:10:03.400 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 1>entry to put them out on the border where there's

0:10:06.320 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>no wall, we will absolutely do that. There's a lot

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>of good ways to help solve this problem. Congress could

0:10:11.400 --> 0:10:13.920
<v Speaker 1>do it, but they're not going to. Mexico could help

0:10:14.000 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 1>us do it. They need to do a little bit more.

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Honduras could do more, Nicaragua could do more. El Salvador

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:20.199
<v Speaker 1>could do more. And if we're going to give these

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:22.679
<v Speaker 1>countries hundreds of millions of dollars, we would like them

0:10:22.720 --> 0:10:26.720
<v Speaker 1>to do more. They're not going to do more, though, folks,

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I wish we're not the case. I'd like to tell

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>you that things are looking good and there's going to

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:38.520
<v Speaker 1>be some real change on the horizon. That the the

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 1>other partners that we should have here in Mexico, Honduras,

0:10:41.880 --> 0:10:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Nicaragua or Salvador, Guatemala, the Democrat Party in our own country,

0:10:47.440 --> 0:10:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that they would seek to in some way, in some

0:10:51.600 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>way that is meaningful, stem the flow of migrants. I

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:59.520
<v Speaker 1>mean this mass movement of people which is what we

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>are in the mid stuff This is not a normal

0:11:01.960 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>immigration issue. We are at the beginning of an immigration,

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:09.960
<v Speaker 1>an illegal alien tsunami in this country. That's what is happening.

0:11:10.000 --> 0:11:12.280
<v Speaker 1>People have called it an invasion, that's all. It's not

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:17.719
<v Speaker 1>a military invasion. It's an illegal alien invasion. That is

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.120
<v Speaker 1>what's going on here. And if you don't think that,

0:11:21.200 --> 0:11:23.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm giving it to you Stradium though I was down

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:25.400
<v Speaker 1>in our passa last week, is you know, reporting on

0:11:25.440 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 1>this issue and talking to Border Patrol about this. Here's

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:34.360
<v Speaker 1>the Border Patrol Council VP telling us just how serious

0:11:34.400 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>it is. Plate twelve. They're definitely at a crisis and

0:11:37.520 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>it's an emergency. You know, we welcome more agents coming

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>down here to the southern border and assisting. But in

0:11:44.280 --> 0:11:46.920
<v Speaker 1>the end, you know, something needs to be done about

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:50.240
<v Speaker 1>the overflow of these individuals that are coming into the country.

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:55.239
<v Speaker 1>And if there's other countries that are facilitating this invasion,

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>they obviously need to step up to the plate and

0:11:58.800 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>start doing something about it. You notice what he says,

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:08.440
<v Speaker 1>an invasion facilitating an invasion. That is the Border Patrol

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Council Vice President who is just calling it like he

0:12:12.480 --> 0:12:17.640
<v Speaker 1>sees it and not mincing words. Now you get into

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>this back and forth, and I've mentioned Julian Castro before here,

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you know he Castro is saying that everything

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 1>that the Trump administration is trying to do is a

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>bad idea. I play thirteen. The idea that you would

0:12:34.320 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>close the border or that you would cut off aid

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>to these very countries where people are fleeing and coming

0:12:39.880 --> 0:12:43.680
<v Speaker 1>to the United States is downright stupid. It's the wrong

0:12:43.720 --> 0:12:46.400
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. If you close off the border, you're

0:12:46.480 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 1>just going to hurt jobs in the United States. Okay,

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:54.120
<v Speaker 1>but what does mister what does Representative Castro think we

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>should do? Oh, we know what he thinks we should do,

0:12:57.120 --> 0:13:02.199
<v Speaker 1>which is just not enforced immigration law anymore, no longer illegal.

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Let people just come into the country. It's a it's

0:13:04.840 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>a parking ticket. It's no big deal. This guy's running

0:13:08.800 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 1>for president, folks. Okay, this is not I'm not picking

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:13.600
<v Speaker 1>some in a random Internet troll and saying, so this

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 1>is what the left believes this guy is. If not

0:13:16.480 --> 0:13:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a serious presidential contender, I think a lot of people

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of him as a very serious VP contender. I mean,

0:13:22.280 --> 0:13:25.520
<v Speaker 1>he's young, and you know, the optics of Castro on

0:13:25.559 --> 0:13:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the ticket to the Democrats look good. But while he's

0:13:29.600 --> 0:13:34.640
<v Speaker 1>just trashing the Trump administration's desire to do something here,

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Border agent Raoul or Tez is just reminding everybody that

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:44.040
<v Speaker 1>this thing, this situation going on at the border is

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>out of control. Play fifteen at double our capacity right now.

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't have to have enough medics. I don't know,

0:13:52.640 --> 0:13:55.360
<v Speaker 1>have enough border troll agents to ensure that these folks

0:13:55.360 --> 0:13:58.360
<v Speaker 1>are getting processed within the forty eight hours that we

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>should be processing them. We're going to keep people in

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.839
<v Speaker 1>custody longer, our agents are getting assaulted. Potentially could be

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a liability where even one of the individuals that are

0:14:07.440 --> 0:14:11.239
<v Speaker 1>in custody could be assaulted in detension facilities that are overcrowded.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know who else we have to hear it

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:16.400
<v Speaker 1>from that this is a crisis, that this is something

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that cannot be handled, that cannot be dealt with right

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 1>now now. I just wonder who who it is that

0:14:25.400 --> 0:14:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that the Democrats would believe, what authority could be point

0:14:29.280 --> 0:14:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to here if that's not enough. J Johnson, Obama's DHS secretary,

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.360
<v Speaker 1>is like, oh no, no, this is definitely a crisis.

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Place sixteen. As Kevin McLean and the Commissioner of CVP

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>pointed out on Tuesday, there were four thousand apprehensions one

0:14:46.200 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>day alone, four thousand run pace this month for one

0:14:49.880 --> 0:14:54.280
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand apprehensions. The highest we saw on my watch

0:14:54.520 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 1>was May twenty fourteen, sixty five thousand. So this is

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:03.960
<v Speaker 1>a crisis. It's very diff only a crisis, yep, it

0:15:04.200 --> 0:15:11.440
<v Speaker 1>is very definitely a crisis. Now, you will remember the

0:15:11.520 --> 0:15:14.280
<v Speaker 1>media lied about this for the two months or so

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>leading up to our current discussion. It's not a crisis.

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:20.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not a crisis. Oh no, it is a crisis.

0:15:21.000 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 1>The numbers don't lie, the people working the issue don't lie.

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 1>And now that we're trying to trying to come up

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>with some way of dealing with this, some way of

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>stopping this invasion as it was called, this tsunami as

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I like to call him, in just this, this enormous

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>tidal wave of illegal entry and illegal activity. What the

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrats do? They undermine and criticize Trumpet at every juncture.

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.440
<v Speaker 1>They have no constructive solutions whatsoever. In fact, they're solutions.

0:15:52.040 --> 0:15:54.240
<v Speaker 1>The things that they want to do and propose would

0:15:54.320 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>only make it worse because the Democrats have shifted so

0:15:59.120 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>far left on him ration I mean they are now

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a party that is a day facto open borders party.

0:16:07.040 --> 0:16:08.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, the law can be whatever it is. I mean,

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you can tell me as much as you want that

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the law right now says, if you're an illegal alien

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>in the United States and you are to be deported,

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 1>that is what the law states. Okay, but illegal aliens

0:16:21.680 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>get invited to Democrats by Democrats for the State of

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the Union, address illegal aliens, march proudly in the streets

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>and say, we demand rights, we demand this, we demand

0:16:32.160 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>that they're not They're not being deported. It's not happening.

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So the law on that issue doesn't really matter. So

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 1>while you could say, back, but look at all the

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:42.320
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure and all the stuff, when all the laws we

0:16:42.360 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 1>have at the border right now, I say to you, yeah,

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>but they're not it's not working. People are getting into

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>the country who are not supposed to be in the country,

0:16:49.760 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 1>who are abusing the system. They're doing it in huge numbers.

0:16:52.280 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>They know they're doing it. It's not working. We have

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a near open border situation, and you know, Trump is

0:17:01.360 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>trying some pretty radical stuff here, don't I don't think

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>that shutting down the boarder will work because there will

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 1>be tremendous economic pressure. If he does that, there will

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>be people saying, my business is getting crushed. Now, dude,

0:17:11.160 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>you can't do this, or mister President, not dude. But

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Congress won't act. I'm sitting

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Are we going to just keep looking at this problem

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>get worse and worse, the swell of the you know,

0:17:23.680 --> 0:17:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the surge of people get larger and larger the southern border.

0:17:27.240 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer is probably yes. I think that

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.639
<v Speaker 1>what you end up having here is maybe some bipartisan

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>bill come out of the Congress to just increase the resources.

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:42.239
<v Speaker 1>But if you increase the resources, all you're doing is

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:46.399
<v Speaker 1>making people more comfortable and adding to the speed with

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:49.520
<v Speaker 1>which they will be under the current asylum law introduced

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:51.439
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, never to be seen again by

0:17:51.440 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the authorities. So you know, I wish I could. I mean,

0:17:56.680 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>I know what the answers are. I just also know

0:17:58.640 --> 0:18:02.520
<v Speaker 1>that the people in charge aren't going to do anything

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>for that. They're not going to do anything to solve

0:18:07.080 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 1>the situation, which is very disheartening. Let's talk about red

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:17.160
<v Speaker 1>flag laws and Second Amendment sanctuaries. This has now come

0:18:17.240 --> 0:18:20.920
<v Speaker 1>up because of what's happening in Colorado, but it does

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 1>have ramifications for the Second Amendment and for folks across

0:18:26.520 --> 0:18:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the country because of well the one. There's the gun

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:35.920
<v Speaker 1>rights aspect, but then there's just also what happens when

0:18:37.040 --> 0:18:42.320
<v Speaker 1>nullification of law occurs in response to what is a

0:18:42.440 --> 0:18:47.080
<v Speaker 1>perceived unconstitutional overreach. What happens when people no longer have

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:52.760
<v Speaker 1>respect that the other side is acting on or has

0:18:52.800 --> 0:18:56.320
<v Speaker 1>the expectation the other side is acting on good faith

0:18:56.920 --> 0:19:00.400
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the way that they're right laws

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and then trying to enforce laws. So you got a

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:05.720
<v Speaker 1>sheriff in Colorado who has said that he would rather

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>go to jail. It's got a lot of attention to

0:19:07.680 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>rather go to jail than enforce a new gun controlled

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>bill that has been passed by the legislature in the

0:19:14.720 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>state of Colorado, which as we know, is a purple states.

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>You get some very very democrats stuff gone to Denver,

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, very democrat, and yet there's also some red

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>areas of Colorado too. And you have these red flag

0:19:27.359 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 1>laws now a red flag law. I think they exist

0:19:29.560 --> 0:19:33.840
<v Speaker 1>in fifteen different states right now. Guess what, mostly blue

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Democrats states from what I understand, But you have these

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.320
<v Speaker 1>red flag laws where a law enforcement officer or an

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>individual I believe, I think you have to be a

0:19:45.600 --> 0:19:47.600
<v Speaker 1>you might have to be a family member. But there's

0:19:48.800 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 1>individuals can go forward and say to a judge that

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:57.800
<v Speaker 1>someone is a threat, that their firearms, firearms that they

0:19:57.840 --> 0:19:59.679
<v Speaker 1>have in their possession, or a threat, and they can

0:19:59.720 --> 0:20:08.359
<v Speaker 1>be taken away. Now, this is on many levels, both

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, reasonable and unreasonable, or reasonable and concerning. You know,

0:20:14.200 --> 0:20:16.080
<v Speaker 1>it's reasonable because you'd say yourself, Hold on a second,

0:20:16.119 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean a temporary it's effectively a temporary restraining order,

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:21.520
<v Speaker 1>which I've talked about in the past, and I can

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>see some wisdom to this as long as it's very

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:30.399
<v Speaker 1>clearly spelled out. But and and and is respectful of

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the rights of law biding gun owners. But it is either.

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Problem here is that what you really have is an

0:20:39.200 --> 0:20:43.199
<v Speaker 1>open door for abuse. I mean, the problem that you

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:46.760
<v Speaker 1>run into is that one this is going to be

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>almost an entirely ineffective I mean, you know, this is

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 1>you're hoping that the one person that you're trying to

0:20:52.920 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 1>stop from doing something bad with a gun, that they're

0:20:55.520 --> 0:20:57.600
<v Speaker 1>going to go to the court in time to stop him.

0:20:57.640 --> 0:20:59.880
<v Speaker 1>And you know, they'll tell you all of this might stopt.

0:21:00.040 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>Shootings are listening, very very unlikely. So from an effectiveness standpoint,

0:21:05.800 --> 0:21:08.879
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it's very it's dubious. But from a rights,

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:13.160
<v Speaker 1>from a Second Amendment standpoint, you are on just the

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>order of a judge losing your Second Amendment rights without

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:21.639
<v Speaker 1>the ability to defend yourself. I don't mean defend yourself

0:21:21.720 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 1>with the Second Amendment, I mean without the if they

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:27.640
<v Speaker 1>convince the judge in your absence that you are a danger,

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:30.760
<v Speaker 1>they can take Now, the laws are a little different

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>state to state twos, and this Colorado one is what

0:21:33.000 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm focused on right now. But they can take your

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>guns away or your gun away, and I think we

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>all know that, whether we're talking about a contentious personal

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:47.760
<v Speaker 1>relationship or you know, there's just any number of ways

0:21:47.760 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>that this could be abused. And so I understand, I

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:56.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally understand why you would have someone who's a sheriff,

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>for example in Colorado, just says, look, I'm not going

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>to do this. I'm not going to take I'm not

0:22:00.600 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>going to go into someone's home who has not been

0:22:03.280 --> 0:22:05.480
<v Speaker 1>accused of a crime. We gotta remember this is not

0:22:05.520 --> 0:22:07.280
<v Speaker 1>about being a crime This is about somebody who's just

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a danger to themselves or others. This is an entirely

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:15.159
<v Speaker 1>mental health oriented diagnosis that people who don't have a

0:22:15.160 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>background of that are going to be making decisions on.

0:22:18.359 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's essentially a PreCrime removal of or you know,

0:22:24.440 --> 0:22:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you call it pre crime, but

0:22:25.920 --> 0:22:28.280
<v Speaker 1>you know it's a pre crime removal of a second

0:22:28.280 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Amendment right from somebody. Now it is temporary. You can

0:22:31.800 --> 0:22:36.960
<v Speaker 1>challenge it. You know there's a fourth what does it now?

0:22:38.240 --> 0:22:41.119
<v Speaker 1>The comtat of version quote would allow family members or others.

0:22:41.160 --> 0:22:43.240
<v Speaker 1>See it is open to others to petition a judge

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 1>to remove people's guns that they're deemed an extreme risk

0:22:45.680 --> 0:22:48.800
<v Speaker 1>to themselves or others. If the judge agrees, each person

0:22:48.800 --> 0:22:51.199
<v Speaker 1>would lose the right to purchase or possess firearms for

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:54.720
<v Speaker 1>three hundred and sixty four days. They would be able

0:22:54.760 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 1>to file a protest for request to order to have

0:22:57.800 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the order reversed. You know, this is what I mean.

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're this is like what people say, Oh,

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 1>if you're on the no fly list, you shouldn't be

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:06.880
<v Speaker 1>able to have a gun. Well, the no fly list

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 1>is not an adjudicated list it's just a bureaucratic list.

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:13.240
<v Speaker 1>And this is a judge who would be able to say,

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you know what, you you are no longer able to

0:23:17.520 --> 0:23:20.000
<v Speaker 1>own a gun because these people, and it's not clear

0:23:20.080 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>necessarily who the people are in this instance, these people

0:23:22.840 --> 0:23:25.600
<v Speaker 1>say you should not have one, that you are a

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.639
<v Speaker 1>danger to yourself or to others. So if somebody's just

0:23:28.680 --> 0:23:30.680
<v Speaker 1>really sad and you know, maybe having a little too much,

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a little too much of Grandpa's old cough medicine, little

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>too much scotch late at night, you know, and they

0:23:35.800 --> 0:23:38.560
<v Speaker 1>own a firearm, is someone going to be able to say, well,

0:23:38.560 --> 0:23:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they shouldn't own that firearm. They could do something bad

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>with it. I think that this opens up problems, and

0:23:46.359 --> 0:23:50.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it really solves many problems. I unlike

0:23:50.320 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other gun control measures, though, I at least,

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>and this is kind of how I started off this discussion,

0:23:55.440 --> 0:23:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I at least think that this one, by proponents of it,

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:02.960
<v Speaker 1>some proponents of it, at least is intended in good faith.

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>This isn't a completely this isn't a worthless idea. This

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:12.159
<v Speaker 1>isn't in a band bump stocks which okay do nothing,

0:24:12.240 --> 0:24:15.199
<v Speaker 1>but you know, bum stocks and I know some of

0:24:15.200 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>you don't even like the band of the bump stocks,

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and you've written I've gotten I've read your emails. I

0:24:19.359 --> 0:24:21.240
<v Speaker 1>am very aware that you think the bump stock band

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.439
<v Speaker 1>because it's really banning a style of firing a weapon.

0:24:24.800 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 1>It's like banning eating with your left hand with a

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.520
<v Speaker 1>fork instead of your right. I mean, you can't, you know,

0:24:29.720 --> 0:24:33.439
<v Speaker 1>a bump stock is not really something that changes the

0:24:33.480 --> 0:24:36.480
<v Speaker 1>internal mechanism at all of the rifle, as you know anyway.

0:24:37.480 --> 0:24:39.320
<v Speaker 1>But then you also that so that's at the at

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the gun control level of this, there's some some nuance

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and some different layers. Um. But then you get to, though,

0:24:46.359 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you start having sheriffs you say, I'm

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>just not gonna I'm not going to comply with that.

0:24:52.280 --> 0:24:54.720
<v Speaker 1>You get a sense of the gun the real gun

0:24:54.760 --> 0:24:58.400
<v Speaker 1>grabbers in this country who want to just find a way.

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.680
<v Speaker 1>And we saw what happened from the anti gun left

0:25:01.720 --> 0:25:05.080
<v Speaker 1>after the New Zealand massacre, the Mosque massacre that happened.

0:25:05.720 --> 0:25:07.640
<v Speaker 1>The left is always looking for a way, always looking

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for an opening to try and eliminate, you know, guns

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:15.119
<v Speaker 1>from private hands in this country. I mean, and yet

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:20.440
<v Speaker 1>it's such a far fetched idea logistically, never mind constitutionally

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and legally that it's it's hard to take it seriously

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.560
<v Speaker 1>other than we know they have the desire. But you

0:25:27.640 --> 0:25:30.360
<v Speaker 1>all know this, and a lot of you are from

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 1>parts of the country where this is much more true

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:34.480
<v Speaker 1>than certainly where I live in DC, were very, very

0:25:34.560 --> 0:25:37.680
<v Speaker 1>very few people owned guns. The federal government going door

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to door to take people's guns would be disastrous in

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:43.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways, and in ways that I don't

0:25:43.680 --> 0:25:46.879
<v Speaker 1>have to spell out to you, But in a local

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:52.120
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement sheriffs and local police departments deciding that they

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 1>won't go along with this just goes to show you

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>how meaning they won't go along in this case with

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:02.919
<v Speaker 1>this red flag law, that there's not a sense of

0:26:02.960 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>good faith from the other side on this issue, and

0:26:05.400 --> 0:26:09.359
<v Speaker 1>that there's now the debate over guns has become so

0:26:09.440 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>toxic and so politicized, people just would prefer to non

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement, would prefer to non comply in some in

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 1>some instances, you know, and this is why when I

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 1>talk about the erosion of legal standards that are rooted

0:26:25.840 --> 0:26:29.040
<v Speaker 1>in principle and rooting in playing understanding of the law,

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, there there are ramifications to this stuff, you know,

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 1>the same way. And Democrats like to play this game

0:26:35.560 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot where they'll just, I mean, DACA is effectively

0:26:40.080 --> 0:26:43.040
<v Speaker 1>executive branch nullification of immigration law. That's what it is.

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.520
<v Speaker 1>That's what President Obama did. And when you start to

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>see one side do this just in order to keep

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:55.920
<v Speaker 1>pace with the overreach that you're seeing from your political opponents,

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:58.520
<v Speaker 1>it becomes then more likely that you, as a Republican,

0:26:58.560 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 1>as a conservat you'll say, you know what, well, we're

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:03.360
<v Speaker 1>just not going to enforce this law. It's like when

0:27:03.400 --> 0:27:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I say, okay, we're not going to enforce immigration law,

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe we should enforce the income tax either, and see

0:27:08.480 --> 0:27:10.560
<v Speaker 1>how long that works for us. Oh buck, you can't

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:14.640
<v Speaker 1>do that. You know, well, the same the same thinking

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>that tells people that you can have deferred action for

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:23.280
<v Speaker 1>childhood arrivals, because Obama says so that that same thinking

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 1>could be, well, we just think that the irs should prioritize,

0:27:25.960 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, only people who have stolen more than ten

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 1>million dollars from the government should be prosecuted. Everybody else

0:27:30.800 --> 0:27:33.640
<v Speaker 1>you get a warning and a request for payment. Everybody else.

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:35.800
<v Speaker 1>That actually probably sounds like a pretty good system to me.

0:27:36.320 --> 0:27:38.679
<v Speaker 1>You know the first time around, you okay, send us

0:27:38.680 --> 0:27:41.040
<v Speaker 1>our money. Right. No one goes to prison the first

0:27:41.080 --> 0:27:43.040
<v Speaker 1>time unless you've stolen, you know, more than a million

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 1>or more than ten million from the government. And even

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.080
<v Speaker 1>then the prison sentence shouldn't be very long, because you

0:27:47.080 --> 0:27:48.879
<v Speaker 1>can tell. Is where I start to turn it a

0:27:48.880 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a radical anarchist because I hate paying

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:53.639
<v Speaker 1>taxes and it's about to be tax season here. It

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 1>is tax season, Oh gosh day when everyone Americans should

0:27:57.800 --> 0:27:59.320
<v Speaker 1>be forced to send a check to the government. Just

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:03.040
<v Speaker 1>for your purpose. We'll be right back. Say we're at

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>Florida International University talking to students about their opinions of

0:28:06.200 --> 0:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>socialism and if they support a socialist GPA policy, would

0:28:09.760 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>they be willing to share their high GPA with people

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:15.000
<v Speaker 1>that have a low GPA? After all, it's all about equality.

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:17.679
<v Speaker 1>Which would you rather have in America? Socialism or capitalism?

0:28:18.040 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 1>I would say socialism. How do you view the word

0:28:20.080 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>socialism favorably or unfavorably? I guess I would go with favorably.

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:26.680
<v Speaker 1>I'd rather people have that. See opportunity. It's a lot

0:28:26.680 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of excess in America. The main idea of socialism being

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.880
<v Speaker 1>that people at the top are doing their fair share

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 1>to help people at the bottom, trying to prevent disparity

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:36.760
<v Speaker 1>of income and trying to prevent excess as you called it,

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>and so on campus, if there's a GPA disparity where

0:28:39.280 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>there's people to bottom with the poor GPA, would you

0:28:41.360 --> 0:28:43.840
<v Speaker 1>support a policy or people at the top spread the

0:28:43.840 --> 0:28:46.959
<v Speaker 1>wealth and give that GPA to people to bottom, give like,

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>help them get a better GPA. I'm all for helping.

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't give like, oh, let me just give you

0:28:53.320 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>so much point. But it's about being fair, right, we

0:28:55.320 --> 0:28:57.760
<v Speaker 1>got to help people to bottom. I've fought a lot

0:28:57.800 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>of sleep, so I don't know if I will be fair.

0:29:02.360 --> 0:29:06.920
<v Speaker 1>It's hard. If I guess, it would be kind of

0:29:07.080 --> 0:29:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like hypocritical for me to say no, yea that those

0:29:12.920 --> 0:29:17.000
<v Speaker 1>are our friends from from campus Reform asking on a

0:29:17.040 --> 0:29:19.760
<v Speaker 1>campus because it's campus reform. You know, do you do

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you support socialism? And a lot of kids say yes

0:29:23.280 --> 0:29:24.719
<v Speaker 1>these days. I mean when I say kids, these are

0:29:24.760 --> 0:29:27.920
<v Speaker 1>young adults. These are people who, generally speaking on a

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:32.120
<v Speaker 1>campus can vote. And I just saw some polling data.

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>It was from an old poll, but you know, something

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 1>like forty of the people in this poll who are millennials,

0:29:38.720 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 1>if memory serves, think that socialism is a better Socialism

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is better than capitalism. This is a theory that is growing.

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it wasn't long ago that I think it

0:29:51.320 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 1>would have been considered completely bizarre to hear anybody on

0:29:56.520 --> 0:30:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a college campus walking around saying that socialism is better

0:30:01.080 --> 0:30:05.400
<v Speaker 1>than capitalism for students, for professors a little different. There

0:30:05.400 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>are these Marxist professors walking around. But you know, we've

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>gotten a bit far from the fall of the Soviet

0:30:12.520 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Union and the lesson that the world and unfortunately many,

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.360
<v Speaker 1>many hundreds of millions of people had to learn the

0:30:18.400 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>hard way, the lesson of what comes from from socialism.

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's interesting to watch how the Democrats

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>have to grapple with whether they're just going to be

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.520
<v Speaker 1>honest about what they wanted for twenty twenty, whether where

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>they're going to run as open democratic socialists because that's

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>what the platform is. You know, Medicare for all and

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:46.360
<v Speaker 1>these other Green New Deal program and you know, you

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.080
<v Speaker 1>look at free college and this is this is all

0:30:49.160 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>what you would expect in a European welfare state. I'll

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:57.640
<v Speaker 1>note that the president did and I you heard a

0:30:57.640 --> 0:30:59.680
<v Speaker 1>bit of the skepticism in my voice about this for

0:30:59.760 --> 0:31:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the last week or so, when all of a sudden

0:31:02.680 --> 0:31:05.600
<v Speaker 1>healthcare has come up, presidents now said that a healthcare

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.080
<v Speaker 1>repeal and replace or reform or whatever it is they're

0:31:09.080 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it is not going to happen till after

0:31:10.440 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the twenty twenty election. It's probably the right move because

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:19.320
<v Speaker 1>they didn't seem like they were ready for this public debate. Again,

0:31:19.320 --> 0:31:22.200
<v Speaker 1>they didn't seem like they're ready for this fight, and

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why they're backing off it, which which is smart.

0:31:26.200 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>I think let's focus on the economy, focus on immigration,

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.480
<v Speaker 1>on problems where the Democrats don't really have a leg

0:31:32.520 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 1>to stand on, so to speak. Trump, they got rid

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>of the Congress, got rid of the individual mandate penalty.

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:40.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there have been some things done. They have

0:31:40.240 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>worked to try and lower the price of prescription drugs,

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 1>very very important problem to tackle, and yet they don't

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.440
<v Speaker 1>really seem to understand that if all people here about

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a healthcare reform is that you can stand your parents'

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>insurance until you're twenty six, and that people with prexisting

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:00.560
<v Speaker 1>conditions will be covered. Oh and a lot of people

0:32:00.760 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>that have insurance now would lose it under their plan,

0:32:03.440 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>even though most of them would go back to having

0:32:06.480 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>other plans, and you know, the ones that have any

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:12.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of a private plan and the ones that are

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:17.160
<v Speaker 1>on Medicaid expansion. I mean, Medicaid is a very ineffective

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:20.400
<v Speaker 1>healthcare program and a very expensive one in addition to that.

0:32:20.440 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So there should be better ways, and states experimenting to

0:32:24.120 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>cover people who would need Medicaid would be a better move,

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 1>giving states greater control. But this is they're not The

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:34.760
<v Speaker 1>Republicans were not ready for this one, and I could

0:32:34.840 --> 0:32:36.920
<v Speaker 1>sense it, and I think that they're making the right

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>move by at least for now, shelving this debate. Because

0:32:39.600 --> 0:32:43.400
<v Speaker 1>if you're going to come out, don't let the Democrats replay,

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:48.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty twelve. Don't let the Democrats come out

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.600
<v Speaker 1>with the same talking points and win on this one.

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And let's focus on socialism. I mean, let's really have

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that debate. Let's really have a discussion about whether this

0:32:57.960 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 1>country should increasingly brace the idea that there is a

0:33:04.040 --> 0:33:08.000
<v Speaker 1>basic need that the government has to fulfill to take

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:13.000
<v Speaker 1>from some to give to others because it's the right

0:33:13.120 --> 0:33:15.840
<v Speaker 1>thing to do according to the people doing the taking,

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>that the government should be and if we're going to

0:33:18.720 --> 0:33:21.720
<v Speaker 1>have a more classical definition of socialism, the government is

0:33:21.720 --> 0:33:24.920
<v Speaker 1>in control of the means of production. We're a ways

0:33:24.960 --> 0:33:29.480
<v Speaker 1>away from that, but we're increasingly in a place where

0:33:29.480 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the government certainly is in control of the distribution of

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.560
<v Speaker 1>what is produced, or the government has greater control over

0:33:35.600 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that than it has in the past. And I do

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>want twenty twenty to be something of a referendum on socialism.

0:33:42.720 --> 0:33:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to be because then it's also referendum on

0:33:45.440 --> 0:33:50.360
<v Speaker 1>statism and on big government and on unconstitutional overreach by

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.600
<v Speaker 1>federal authority. You know, that's that all gets tied into

0:33:53.600 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>this debate over socialism. Let's make it, you know, a

0:33:57.240 --> 0:34:03.200
<v Speaker 1>contest between MAGA and the Sanders AOC vision of the future.

0:34:03.240 --> 0:34:05.680
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm hoping happens. So we'll continue to focus

0:34:05.720 --> 0:34:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on that big hour two coming up. My friend Andy

0:34:09.800 --> 0:34:11.719
<v Speaker 1>McCarthy from National Review is going to join us to

0:34:11.719 --> 0:34:15.840
<v Speaker 1>tell us what happens now. Mullaprobe is over. But there's

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>this fight over the full report. Oh, they have to

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:21.680
<v Speaker 1>see the full report. What will that mean? Will the

0:34:21.800 --> 0:34:25.640
<v Speaker 1>grand jury information get released? Will there'll be fights over this?

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:30.080
<v Speaker 1>How does executive privilege way in on what information we

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.799
<v Speaker 1>can see, and that's you know, And also I just

0:34:33.840 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>want to want to ask him about whether the president

0:34:36.200 --> 0:34:41.120
<v Speaker 1>should really be concerned about any possible legal jeopardy going forward.

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, is that something that we really also need

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be aware of. You know, could could Trump find

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 1>himself indicted by someone by some other federal authority or

0:34:50.239 --> 0:34:53.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe some state authority. Even Andy, who was at the

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Southern District of New York for decades, can tell us

0:34:56.400 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 1>all about that. And we have oh so much more

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to team coming your way, So we'll be back in

0:35:03.040 --> 0:35:05.239
<v Speaker 1>just a moment. You know, when you put on a

0:35:05.239 --> 0:35:06.719
<v Speaker 1>pair of jeans you haven't worn a long time, you

0:35:06.800 --> 0:35:08.480
<v Speaker 1>find a twenty in the back pocket, you go, oh,

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it's my day. Well, think about the money that you

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.759
<v Speaker 1>currently have sitting around doing nothing in that four oh

0:35:13.800 --> 0:35:15.960
<v Speaker 1>one K account from you know, the job before last

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:18.520
<v Speaker 1>one that you're not really paying attention to. That money

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.920
<v Speaker 1>is just sitting there gathering financial dust. It could be

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>working a lot harder for you in a precious metals IRA.

0:35:26.320 --> 0:35:28.280
<v Speaker 1>My friends at Noble Goold can see if you qualified,

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll do all the hard work for you on this,

0:35:30.600 --> 0:35:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and this could make you a lot and cost you nothing.

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Give noble Goold to call at eight seven seven six

0:35:35.400 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>four six five three four seven, or this is really easy,

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Just text my name buc K. That's text Buck to

0:35:42.600 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>five eleven, five eleven and received their free investors Guide

0:35:46.640 --> 0:35:49.520
<v Speaker 1>plus for all qualified iras about twenty thousand dollars. They'll

0:35:49.520 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>include a complimentary rare graded Morgan silver dollar valued at

0:35:53.200 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty dollars. Just go to Noblegold Investments

0:35:57.120 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>dot com or text buck to five eleven five eleven.

0:36:00.400 --> 0:36:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Individual results may vary invest wise, standard text rates may apply.

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:07.120
<v Speaker 1>There's no reason why the Attorney General can't seek permission

0:36:07.160 --> 0:36:09.320
<v Speaker 1>to disclose all the grand jury material, which could be

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:12.239
<v Speaker 1>a sizable portion of that report that has been the

0:36:12.239 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>president in Watergate. And at the end of the day, Abe,

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.319
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to allow this Attorney general him by

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the President, to oppose the obstruction case to bury Mueller's

0:36:23.760 --> 0:36:25.480
<v Speaker 1>report and finding. So we're going to insist that it

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:29.760
<v Speaker 1>comes out there. You have Adam Schiff, who has learned

0:36:29.760 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>nothing apparently the last two years, isn't isn't budging much

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:37.080
<v Speaker 1>at all from his collusion delusions. Well, now it's I

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>guess the obstruction construction. But we got somebody who can

0:36:41.680 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 1>tell us what's coming next in all this and what

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 1>our expectations should be. And the fun part is he's

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:50.399
<v Speaker 1>been right all along, unlike Schiff, who's been wrong all along.

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>We've got Andy McCartney with us now of National Review,

0:36:53.120 --> 0:36:56.279
<v Speaker 1>also a Fox News contributor. Andy, great to have you back.

0:36:57.480 --> 0:36:59.399
<v Speaker 1>What do you mean to be with you? Thanks so much? Man?

0:36:59.520 --> 0:37:03.239
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of shift here? Trying to say that,

0:37:03.320 --> 0:37:06.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, the first of all, the handpicked I mean

0:37:06.320 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the little kind of you know, the little kidney punches

0:37:09.400 --> 0:37:11.919
<v Speaker 1>he's throwing. No one's looking at the handpicked ag Well,

0:37:11.960 --> 0:37:13.840
<v Speaker 1>every president hand picks it. I mean, like, well, what

0:37:13.880 --> 0:37:16.920
<v Speaker 1>does that even mean? But saying that that he's not

0:37:16.960 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>going to him interfere in the obstruction case, is he

0:37:19.480 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 1>really trying to say that they may try to bring

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a political obstruction case against the president or does he

0:37:24.719 --> 0:37:29.040
<v Speaker 1>still think there's some prayer of a of a criminal proceeding. Well,

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 1>I think they've always thought, Buck that they could bring

0:37:34.239 --> 0:37:40.040
<v Speaker 1>political charges of some kind. After all, impeachment, which has

0:37:40.080 --> 0:37:43.600
<v Speaker 1>hovered over this thing from the beginning. I think it's

0:37:43.719 --> 0:37:47.480
<v Speaker 1>less likely now, although it's not off the table. It's

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:51.359
<v Speaker 1>less likely now that we know that Muller has not,

0:37:51.960 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, come out with any smoking gun, and it

0:37:55.120 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>looks like most of his report exonerates the president, at

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 1>least at least on legal issues. You know, political issues

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.439
<v Speaker 1>are a different story. But you know, Congress doesn't need

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a penal offense, you know, an actual felony like I

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>used to prosecute in federal court in order to impeach

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>a president back in I think it was nineteen seventy

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:25.319
<v Speaker 1>or seventy one. Ironically, Jerry Ford, who was then the

0:38:25.440 --> 0:38:31.440
<v Speaker 1>minority leader in Congress, trying to impeach Justice William O. Douglas.

0:38:31.480 --> 0:38:34.719
<v Speaker 1>I think at the time it's ironic because Ford ends

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>up becoming president because of an impeachment effort against Nixon,

0:38:39.760 --> 0:38:44.600
<v Speaker 1>who resigns rather than be impeached. But Ford, back in

0:38:44.840 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy or seventy one said that an impeachable offense

0:38:49.239 --> 0:38:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is anything at the House of Representatives decides that it

0:38:53.680 --> 0:38:57.279
<v Speaker 1>is at a certain point in history. So yes, they can,

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, they can do this politically. But as the

0:39:01.000 --> 0:39:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the smarter Democrats have said, or at least

0:39:06.320 --> 0:39:10.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, grudgingly conceded um. You know, unless you have

0:39:10.400 --> 0:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a consensus. Unless you have such egregious misconduct that cuts

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:17.640
<v Speaker 1>across the you know, the the outrage over it cuts

0:39:17.680 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>across partisan and ideological lines, You're not going to have

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>an impeachable offense. So you might as well forget about.

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.320
<v Speaker 1>So where does this go though? In terms of the

0:39:29.320 --> 0:39:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the grand jury information that may be

0:39:32.239 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 1>contained in the Muller Report. I mean, you know there's

0:39:36.560 --> 0:39:40.160
<v Speaker 1>now where are we in finding out? You know, what's

0:39:40.160 --> 0:39:41.719
<v Speaker 1>in it? How much do we get to see? And

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:43.360
<v Speaker 1>what do you think the play is going to be

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>for Democrats? I mean, I know they're going to find

0:39:45.080 --> 0:39:48.080
<v Speaker 1>something in there to say, see, this proves something, But

0:39:48.160 --> 0:39:51.200
<v Speaker 1>what do you see happening? Well, I think the grand

0:39:51.280 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>jury issue is largely an empty bag that they're fighting over.

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Buck In this sense, you know, there's no doubt that

0:40:03.000 --> 0:40:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Barr in his letter talks about the need to scrub

0:40:08.719 --> 0:40:13.120
<v Speaker 1>grand jury information from the report because of legal requirements.

0:40:12.760 --> 0:40:16.880
<v Speaker 1>There's there's a requirement by federal law of grand jury secrecy.

0:40:17.880 --> 0:40:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Not to get too deep in the weeds on this.

0:40:19.719 --> 0:40:23.960
<v Speaker 1>But when I was a prosecutor, especially where I practice,

0:40:24.000 --> 0:40:27.200
<v Speaker 1>the law is different from from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. But

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:32.040
<v Speaker 1>in the Second Circuit it was pretty common to if

0:40:32.080 --> 0:40:34.680
<v Speaker 1>you needed to get a disclosure of grand jury information,

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you just go to a judge and get a disclosure order.

0:40:38.400 --> 0:40:42.239
<v Speaker 1>But the interesting thing, if you read Rules sixty, which

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 1>controls all this federal rules of criminal procedure, there's nothing

0:40:46.800 --> 0:40:53.399
<v Speaker 1>in Rules sixty that expressly makes dissemination to Congress a

0:40:53.520 --> 0:40:59.840
<v Speaker 1>rationale for for unsealing grand jury information. And the reason

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>that matters is there's a big appellate case in the

0:41:03.880 --> 0:41:06.640
<v Speaker 1>DC Circuit right now, which is where, of course, all

0:41:06.680 --> 0:41:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this action is taking place in Washington right The case

0:41:11.600 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 1>of the DC Circuit, which is called McKeever versus Sessions,

0:41:15.760 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 1>concerns whether a judge has authority outside the strict provisions

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:26.239
<v Speaker 1>of Rule six C, just like a generalized authority to

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:30.839
<v Speaker 1>unseal grand jury minutes. And what the Justice Department has

0:41:30.920 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 1>argued in that case is that the judge is stuck

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:39.160
<v Speaker 1>with the rationales that are laid out in Rule six C.

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You can't just like make up, you know, I think

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.040
<v Speaker 1>it would be fair to disseminate this to Congress, so

0:41:44.120 --> 0:41:47.440
<v Speaker 1>therefore I can disseminate it to Congress. So that precise

0:41:47.520 --> 0:41:49.560
<v Speaker 1>issue is in front of the court now, and the

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department has taken a position on it. So it

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:55.959
<v Speaker 1>would be impossible for Bar, with the Justice Department having

0:41:56.760 --> 0:42:00.080
<v Speaker 1>argued in the DC Circuit that a judge doesn't have

0:42:00.200 --> 0:42:04.239
<v Speaker 1>authority outside the rule, to suddenly say that a judge does.

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason I say all this may be

0:42:08.160 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>an empty bag. But as I understand it, most of

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:18.360
<v Speaker 1>the important witnesses that the Democrats would care about cooperated

0:42:18.400 --> 0:42:21.759
<v Speaker 1>with Muller's investigation without the need of going into the

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:24.359
<v Speaker 1>grand jury. He didn't need to subpoena them. They sat

0:42:24.400 --> 0:42:29.919
<v Speaker 1>for interviews. Those interviews and whatever Muller made of them

0:42:30.600 --> 0:42:33.560
<v Speaker 1>are not grand jury material. They're not covered by grand

0:42:33.640 --> 0:42:37.520
<v Speaker 1>jury secrecy. So in the end, the grand jury, I think,

0:42:37.560 --> 0:42:40.319
<v Speaker 1>may turn out to be less of an issue than

0:42:40.440 --> 0:42:47.239
<v Speaker 1>executive privilege, which becomes an important issue because it's one

0:42:47.320 --> 0:42:53.920
<v Speaker 1>thing for White House officials to speak to a federal prosecutor,

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>which is what Bar, but which is what Muller was

0:42:57.600 --> 0:43:02.360
<v Speaker 1>because that's within the executive brand and it doesn't wave privilege.

0:43:02.680 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 1>It's quite another thing to disclose it to Congress in

0:43:06.040 --> 0:43:09.440
<v Speaker 1>the public, which would require a waiver of privilege. So

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 1>I think while we're having all this hullabaloo about the

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:15.360
<v Speaker 1>grand jury, now when against it gets down to brass

0:43:15.360 --> 0:43:19.439
<v Speaker 1>tax executive privilege. Yeah, it's the executive privilege argument of it. Yeah,

0:43:19.480 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>that that makes that makes sense to me. Andy, Um

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, I also just wanted to get your senses

0:43:25.000 --> 0:43:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to how how do you how do you assess now

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:32.319
<v Speaker 1>that it's it's done, Muller's actions here? You know, you

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:34.800
<v Speaker 1>know what what do you think was fair? What was unfair?

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:36.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, now that we can actually look back on

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>a on a game that has been played and you

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:41.200
<v Speaker 1>know the whistle has been blown, what do you think

0:43:41.239 --> 0:43:44.800
<v Speaker 1>about how the way Muller conducted this whole thing? Well,

0:43:44.880 --> 0:43:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I mostly um am not very favorable toward it. I

0:43:52.239 --> 0:43:55.959
<v Speaker 1>will say one thing. I think the silver lining of

0:43:56.960 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Muller's appointment is that it rested control of a counter

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:11.279
<v Speaker 1>intelligence investigation from the FBI two Muller and I think

0:44:11.440 --> 0:44:14.839
<v Speaker 1>Buck that turns out to be very interesting. As we've

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:19.040
<v Speaker 1>talked about a number of times, counterintelligence investigations in the

0:44:19.080 --> 0:44:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department don't get a prosecutor because it's not prosecutor work.

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>You're not trying to build a criminal case. So it

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 1>was unusual to take it away from the bureau which

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:33.879
<v Speaker 1>runs counter intelligence and give it to a federal prosecutor.

0:44:34.200 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think a lot of that was to allow

0:44:36.719 --> 0:44:40.759
<v Speaker 1>him to conduct a criminal investigation under the guise of

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:44.400
<v Speaker 1>counter intelligence. But on the other hand, what I thought, Buck,

0:44:44.520 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 1>is a very interesting fact that hasn't gotten a lot

0:44:46.760 --> 0:44:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of attention is that the last carter page FISA warrant

0:44:53.000 --> 0:44:57.640
<v Speaker 1>was issued in June round mid to late June of

0:44:57.920 --> 0:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen, probably a couple of weeks, maybe a month

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 1>after Muller was appointed, while he was still kind of

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:09.680
<v Speaker 1>getting his bearings, and they did go back to court

0:45:09.840 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>in June and get another one. The interesting thing, Buck,

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:16.719
<v Speaker 1>is that's a ninety day warrant, which means it would

0:45:16.760 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 1>have been due to be reauthorized in September of twenty seventeen,

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:27.040
<v Speaker 1>by which point Mueller would have been really up and running.

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.480
<v Speaker 1>He'd have been running the investigation for four months. He'd

0:45:29.719 --> 0:45:33.719
<v Speaker 1>he'd have been on top of everything. In September, they

0:45:33.760 --> 0:45:37.040
<v Speaker 1>don't go back to reauthorize the warrant, and by then

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:41.760
<v Speaker 1>everybody who's been involved in the warrant is gone. Comey

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>has been removed, McCabe's been sidelined. Baker's gone, Strack and

0:45:46.280 --> 0:45:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Page or gone. Everybody who was the the key group

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of agents and the key group of Justice Department officials

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>who were behind using the card, using the Steel dossier

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:02.959
<v Speaker 1>to get surveyed allance warrants from the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court,

0:46:03.000 --> 0:46:06.439
<v Speaker 1>they're all gone. And Muller, when it's his call to make,

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>decides we're not going to do that. And I believe

0:46:10.520 --> 0:46:14.640
<v Speaker 1>that that's why we can conclude that's a big reason

0:46:14.719 --> 0:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>why we conclude that there was probably by the end

0:46:18.040 --> 0:46:21.720
<v Speaker 1>of twenty seventeen, probably by the by the mid autumn

0:46:21.760 --> 0:46:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of twenty seventeen, I think they knew there was no

0:46:25.600 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>collusion case. And do you think that is there any

0:46:29.480 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 1>doubt in your mind that the dossier, based on what

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:34.279
<v Speaker 1>we've been told, on what's been out there so far,

0:46:34.560 --> 0:46:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that the dossier was a substantial and the kind of

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the the sine qua non of getting the FISA applications

0:46:44.239 --> 0:46:48.120
<v Speaker 1>or getting the FISA warrants buck without you and me

0:46:48.320 --> 0:46:51.280
<v Speaker 1>having to speculate about this, because you know, we haven't

0:46:51.280 --> 0:46:57.480
<v Speaker 1>seen the unredacted warrants. Senator Grant Grassley and Senator Graham,

0:46:57.719 --> 0:47:01.719
<v Speaker 1>who have seen them, say that with out the dossier,

0:47:01.760 --> 0:47:04.680
<v Speaker 1>there's no way they had enough to seek a warrant.

0:47:05.080 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>And Andy McCabe and his testimony when he was deputy

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:11.920
<v Speaker 1>director of the FBI and his testimony in Congress has

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:15.880
<v Speaker 1>conceded as much. So I think we can safely say,

0:47:16.960 --> 0:47:19.319
<v Speaker 1>especially now that Mueller's gotten to the end of the

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 1>rainbow and told us emphatically that there was no criminal collusion,

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I think we can safely say that if they didn't

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:28.719
<v Speaker 1>have you know, if they had other information, we'd have

0:47:28.800 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>heard about it. Is the president out of any realistic

0:47:32.200 --> 0:47:35.400
<v Speaker 1>possibility of criminal jeopardy here any not just in them,

0:47:35.440 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean just in general. From Mueller's investigation. Yes, you know,

0:47:42.200 --> 0:47:45.879
<v Speaker 1>we don't. The Southern District of New York investigation is continuing,

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:49.720
<v Speaker 1>so and that's on a different it's in a different

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:53.280
<v Speaker 1>place and on a different rhythm, being run by different

0:47:53.280 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 1>people and looking at different stuff than Mueller looked at.

0:47:57.040 --> 0:48:02.720
<v Speaker 1>But I think, you know, the major, the major alleged misconduct,

0:48:02.840 --> 0:48:05.560
<v Speaker 1>even though it's hard for me to say allege because

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:07.640
<v Speaker 1>it it looks like it was on the basis of

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:12.720
<v Speaker 1>virtually nothing, but the major allegation of misconduct against Trump

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:16.920
<v Speaker 1>was an espionage conspiracy with Russia, and I think he's

0:48:17.200 --> 0:48:20.160
<v Speaker 1>past that hurdle. And then, of course there was the obstruction,

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:24.080
<v Speaker 1>which I never thought was much of anything. But you know,

0:48:24.120 --> 0:48:25.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you asked me before where I think of

0:48:26.000 --> 0:48:30.200
<v Speaker 1>the way Muller handled this, I think it's really does

0:48:30.280 --> 0:48:33.719
<v Speaker 1>not speak well of him that he abdicated on the

0:48:33.800 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>one question that there really that he was arguably needed

0:48:38.120 --> 0:48:41.359
<v Speaker 1>to answer. I mean, I think there was no collusion case,

0:48:41.440 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and he probably knew that very early on, and this

0:48:44.400 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>basically came to him buck as a as an obstruction investigation.

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 1>He was retained or he was appointed right on the

0:48:52.520 --> 0:48:57.920
<v Speaker 1>heels of Komi's firing, and right after McCabe opened an

0:48:57.920 --> 0:49:02.360
<v Speaker 1>obstruction case against the president at the FBI, and he

0:49:02.440 --> 0:49:06.279
<v Speaker 1>spent twenty two months that as Muller did, looking at obstruction,

0:49:06.680 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and in the end he said, well, you know, look,

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:12.240
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you the facts on both sides of the question,

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and then, you know, do you agree with Professor Dershowitz

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:17.720
<v Speaker 1>and others who say that not only was that weird,

0:49:17.800 --> 0:49:21.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's really unethical and unfair that the that Muller

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:23.080
<v Speaker 1>needed to make a call one or the other and

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:26.120
<v Speaker 1>not do this. Well, I could have, but I didn't. Yeah,

0:49:26.200 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I don't know that I would say

0:49:27.719 --> 0:49:29.839
<v Speaker 1>it was unethical, But I do think it does have

0:49:29.880 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 1>ethical implications, and that is this book there. You're not

0:49:33.239 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>supposed to have a special counsel unless there's two things.

0:49:36.560 --> 0:49:39.960
<v Speaker 1>There's got to be concrete grounds for criminal investigation, which

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:44.840
<v Speaker 1>means a crime to investigate, and secondly, a conflict of

0:49:44.880 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 1>interest that is so profound the Justice Department can't, within

0:49:48.160 --> 0:49:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the ethical rules, run the case itself. So what do

0:49:52.560 --> 0:49:56.120
<v Speaker 1>we see Mueller doing here? Muller comes because there's supposedly

0:49:56.440 --> 0:50:02.600
<v Speaker 1>a conflict for justice, yet he recruits his staff from

0:50:02.640 --> 0:50:07.000
<v Speaker 1>the upper rechelance of the supposedly conflicted Justice Department. When

0:50:07.040 --> 0:50:11.439
<v Speaker 1>he returns indictments or files indictments, he transfers a boast

0:50:11.480 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 1>of a bunch of them to the component parts of

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the supposedly conflicted Justice Department. And in the end, the

0:50:19.800 --> 0:50:24.120
<v Speaker 1>only decision that he had to make, he basically delegated

0:50:24.160 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>it to the Attorney General, who runs the supposedly conflicted

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 1>Justice Department. So you have to ask, why did we

0:50:31.440 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 1>need a special counsel If the Justice Department was capable

0:50:34.760 --> 0:50:37.640
<v Speaker 1>of doing all this, what did we need a special

0:50:37.680 --> 0:50:41.800
<v Speaker 1>counsel for very good question. Annie McCarthy. Everybody, you should

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:45.680
<v Speaker 1>follow his work on a National review. And and you've

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:48.799
<v Speaker 1>got a podcast over there, right I do. It's called

0:50:48.840 --> 0:50:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the McCarthy Report, so it should be easy enough to remember,

0:50:52.200 --> 0:50:55.640
<v Speaker 1>all right, McCarthy report. Remember me there we go and

0:50:55.680 --> 0:50:57.640
<v Speaker 1>look for any on Fox News, everybody. Andy, thanks so

0:50:57.680 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 1>much for your time, my friend. We'll talk to you soon. See,

0:51:01.400 --> 0:51:03.760
<v Speaker 1>we'll be back in just a moment. Mac. In February,

0:51:03.920 --> 0:51:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Leadership Institute field organizer Hayden Williams was peacefully helping conservative

0:51:08.000 --> 0:51:11.120
<v Speaker 1>students recruit for their group at UC Berkeley when he

0:51:11.200 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 1>was viciously attacked by a radical leftist thug. Since then,

0:51:14.640 --> 0:51:17.640
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has taken action, signing an executive order to

0:51:17.640 --> 0:51:21.959
<v Speaker 1>protect students free speech, including conservatives. My friends, but more

0:51:22.040 --> 0:51:25.760
<v Speaker 1>action is needed. You can take that action now. Support

0:51:25.840 --> 0:51:29.960
<v Speaker 1>the Leadership Institute and defend conservative students. Just go to

0:51:30.120 --> 0:51:33.600
<v Speaker 1>take back the Campus dot org. The Leadership Institute is

0:51:33.640 --> 0:51:37.200
<v Speaker 1>the premier organization for educating and training conservative college students.

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:39.799
<v Speaker 1>With your gift of as little as five dollars a month,

0:51:40.000 --> 0:51:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you can help conservative college students stand up to the

0:51:42.640 --> 0:51:46.680
<v Speaker 1>intimidation and physical attacks of radical leftist campus bullies. The

0:51:46.760 --> 0:51:49.560
<v Speaker 1>left's effort to silence conservative voices on college campuses in

0:51:49.600 --> 0:51:52.160
<v Speaker 1>America has been going on for too long, So please

0:51:52.560 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>visit take back the Campus dot org to make your

0:51:55.120 --> 0:51:59.040
<v Speaker 1>urgent gift to the leadership Institute today. That's take back

0:51:59.160 --> 0:52:04.040
<v Speaker 1>the Campus or take back the campus dot org. Nothing

0:52:04.120 --> 0:52:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you give them, whether a Shifty SHIFT or Jerry Nadler.

0:52:08.680 --> 0:52:11.359
<v Speaker 1>It's a four hundred page report, right. We could give

0:52:11.400 --> 0:52:14.440
<v Speaker 1>them eight hundred pages and it wouldn't be enough. They

0:52:14.440 --> 0:52:18.000
<v Speaker 1>spent over thirty million dollars on an investigation. They found

0:52:18.080 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 1>no collusion, which by the way, was the most ridiculous

0:52:20.640 --> 0:52:23.680
<v Speaker 1>premise I've ever heard of anyway, and you understand exactly

0:52:23.680 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>what I mean, no collusion. There was no collusion. There

0:52:27.000 --> 0:52:30.319
<v Speaker 1>never was. After thirty million dollars, we're going to start

0:52:30.360 --> 0:52:33.080
<v Speaker 1>this process again because Jerry Magner wants to start it,

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:36.880
<v Speaker 1>or because SHIFT wants to start it. I'll rely on

0:52:36.960 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 1>the Attorney General to make decisions, but I will tell

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you anything that's given to them will never be good enough.

0:52:44.320 --> 0:52:46.319
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's somewhat of a waste that time.

0:52:46.360 --> 0:52:48.880
<v Speaker 1>This is just politics at a very low level and

0:52:49.040 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 1>President's absolutely right, and we know he's right. Denial ain't

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:59.759
<v Speaker 1>just a river in Egypt, my friends. Democrats are pretending

0:52:59.800 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 1>like they have not watched, at least many of them

0:53:02.640 --> 0:53:06.040
<v Speaker 1>are pretending like they have not watched the complete deflation

0:53:06.200 --> 0:53:09.680
<v Speaker 1>and eradication of their favorite conspiracy theory, the one that

0:53:09.760 --> 0:53:15.800
<v Speaker 1>says that President Trump somehow, for some reason, and without

0:53:15.800 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it being you know, able to without being able to

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:24.279
<v Speaker 1>prove any evidence of, but he colluded with the Russians

0:53:24.719 --> 0:53:27.480
<v Speaker 1>to cheat in the election. And this is why I

0:53:27.520 --> 0:53:29.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know. We just talked to Andy about this, but

0:53:29.120 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 1>you can already hear Democrats saying, oh, well, now now

0:53:31.560 --> 0:53:34.719
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna try to get him on obstruction. What they

0:53:34.760 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 1>what they really need to figure out? And I think

0:53:36.840 --> 0:53:38.919
<v Speaker 1>that they haven't made up their minds on this because

0:53:38.960 --> 0:53:43.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a purely political calculation. It's not based in law,

0:53:43.800 --> 0:53:46.319
<v Speaker 1>it's not based in what's ethical or right. It's just

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 1>what will help the Democrats take back power in twenty twenty.

0:53:50.640 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 1>Are they going to impeach him? Can they find some justification?

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:56.839
<v Speaker 1>They know it's not going to be collusion, but now

0:53:56.880 --> 0:53:58.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe there's some way that they can get him on

0:53:59.400 --> 0:54:01.800
<v Speaker 1>obstruct I mean the fact that the Southern District of

0:54:01.840 --> 0:54:04.680
<v Speaker 1>New York still has ongoing investigations and there's all these

0:54:04.760 --> 0:54:08.919
<v Speaker 1>investigations of the president. Can you imagine if there were

0:54:09.040 --> 0:54:12.840
<v Speaker 1>ongoing federal investigations of Obama that were just fishing expeditions,

0:54:12.840 --> 0:54:15.719
<v Speaker 1>just just looking for something. You get a bunch of

0:54:15.719 --> 0:54:20.799
<v Speaker 1>Ausa's assistant, US attorneys and FBI agents just going through

0:54:20.840 --> 0:54:22.880
<v Speaker 1>all the you know, all of Obama's You need to

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 1>go back to what was that that guy Tony Rezko

0:54:26.480 --> 0:54:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and go back to domestic terrorists, Bill Ayres, and you know,

0:54:32.520 --> 0:54:34.839
<v Speaker 1>you look, look at all these figures from Obama's past.

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Imagine the FBI just started investigating all that, you know,

0:54:37.600 --> 0:54:41.440
<v Speaker 1>all these different people, at all the different connections. The

0:54:41.480 --> 0:54:44.120
<v Speaker 1>media would have completely lost their minds. And at least

0:54:44.200 --> 0:54:46.160
<v Speaker 1>some of that stuff sounds like it could have happened

0:54:46.239 --> 0:54:49.719
<v Speaker 1>or did happen, Whether there was criminal activity or not,

0:54:49.760 --> 0:54:51.920
<v Speaker 1>you'd have to figure it out. But what we have

0:54:52.000 --> 0:54:56.560
<v Speaker 1>here is just the endless investigation of endless investigations. I mean,

0:54:56.560 --> 0:54:59.040
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to stop there. They're never going to

0:54:59.080 --> 0:55:01.320
<v Speaker 1>stop because they can not accept that they were wrong

0:55:01.719 --> 0:55:06.719
<v Speaker 1>and they cannot accept that they lost He walked up

0:55:06.719 --> 0:55:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to me and wrapped his hands around my face like

0:55:11.040 --> 0:55:15.440
<v Speaker 1>that and pulled me in and started rubbing noses with me.

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And it wasn't, you know, like an eskimo kiss or

0:55:20.680 --> 0:55:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and then stop. It was for like a good fifteen seconds,

0:55:24.960 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>and I remember thinking, is he going to kiss me?

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:30.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not rape, but it doesn't need to be rape

0:55:31.120 --> 0:55:37.319
<v Speaker 1>to not be right. That's Amy Lapos, second accuser of

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:41.320
<v Speaker 1>inappropriate conduct. Let's be very clear, not sexual assault or

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:46.200
<v Speaker 1>but inappropriate conduct. And as she said, it's not it's

0:55:46.239 --> 0:55:49.520
<v Speaker 1>not rape, but that doesn't mean that it's okay. Even

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:56.200
<v Speaker 1>weirder the conduct in this instance, allegedly even weirder then

0:55:56.239 --> 0:55:59.799
<v Speaker 1>what was initially said. It wasn't like a quick eskimo kiss.

0:55:59.840 --> 0:56:03.400
<v Speaker 1>It kept going as apparently where he rubbed noses briefly,

0:56:03.800 --> 0:56:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he kept rubbing his nose against her nose.

0:56:06.440 --> 0:56:10.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. It's super weird, folks, I know you know that.

0:56:11.160 --> 0:56:15.480
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they can try to contort reality as

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:18.000
<v Speaker 1>much as they want. They can do all this different stuff.

0:56:18.000 --> 0:56:21.240
<v Speaker 1>They do everything in their power to make it seem

0:56:21.280 --> 0:56:23.879
<v Speaker 1>like this isn't a super creepy weirdo thing to do.

0:56:24.040 --> 0:56:29.799
<v Speaker 1>It is a super creepy, weirdo thing to do. I

0:56:29.840 --> 0:56:33.200
<v Speaker 1>don't care how much they you know, they try to

0:56:33.239 --> 0:56:38.520
<v Speaker 1>explain this away. There's something very very strange about Joe

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:42.879
<v Speaker 1>Biden's behavior. I mean, you've got Jillibrand and Pelosi Wang

0:56:42.920 --> 0:56:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and now Pelosi said earlier today that it's not disqualifying.

0:56:48.000 --> 0:56:50.600
<v Speaker 1>But Democrats, you see, they want to give Biden to pass.

0:56:50.680 --> 0:56:53.480
<v Speaker 1>But they can't say that. So what they'll say is

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:56.280
<v Speaker 1>there shouldn't be consequences, but there should be a conversation.

0:56:56.880 --> 0:57:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Republicans get consequences, Democrats get a conversation. Let's talk about this.

0:57:02.080 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Republicans should lose their jobs, never never be in public

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:09.320
<v Speaker 1>life again, be you know, right. And in some cases,

0:57:09.360 --> 0:57:12.960
<v Speaker 1>as we know, like with Kavanaugh, based on lies, based

0:57:12.960 --> 0:57:16.680
<v Speaker 1>on lies, Democrats based on truth. No, no, no consequences.

0:57:16.720 --> 0:57:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Let's just have a conversation. Here's what Jillibrand and Pelosi

0:57:20.240 --> 0:57:23.640
<v Speaker 1>said played nineteen. These women feel to means and that's

0:57:23.680 --> 0:57:26.640
<v Speaker 1>not okay. So if Vice President Biden does choose to

0:57:26.720 --> 0:57:29.040
<v Speaker 1>run for president of the United States, I imagine this

0:57:29.120 --> 0:57:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is a conversation he will be having to have with

0:57:31.200 --> 0:57:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the American people. I know, Jimli Biden a long time,

0:57:33.920 --> 0:57:36.840
<v Speaker 1>My grandchildren loved Joe Biden. I mean, he's an affectionate

0:57:36.960 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 1>person to children, to senior citizens, to everyone. That's just

0:57:41.480 --> 0:57:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the way he is. He has to understand in the

0:57:43.560 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 1>world that we're in now that people's face is important

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:52.240
<v Speaker 1>to them, and what's important is how they receive it,

0:57:52.400 --> 0:57:57.640
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily how you've intended it. He's an affectionate person.

0:57:58.680 --> 0:58:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Have you seen all the all the photos and all

0:58:00.920 --> 0:58:04.000
<v Speaker 1>the video and everything that's out there of how Biden acts.

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that if Biden had an R next

0:58:07.280 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 1>to his name, if he were a member of the

0:58:08.920 --> 0:58:13.680
<v Speaker 1>g O P, would these women in the Democratic parties,

0:58:13.720 --> 0:58:16.720
<v Speaker 1>prominent women Nancy Pelosi, third in line for the presidency,

0:58:16.720 --> 0:58:23.800
<v Speaker 1>folks that'll help you sleep at night. These women coming

0:58:23.800 --> 0:58:27.160
<v Speaker 1>out to defend Biden would not do it if this

0:58:27.200 --> 0:58:29.720
<v Speaker 1>were a Republican So this is not about principle, This

0:58:29.840 --> 0:58:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is about power. But Biden's stuff is really weird. I

0:58:33.760 --> 0:58:36.880
<v Speaker 1>understand it's not a huge it's not a huge deal,

0:58:36.920 --> 0:58:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not trying to make it a huge deal.

0:58:38.920 --> 0:58:41.600
<v Speaker 1>It's really more than anything else. Another instance where we

0:58:41.640 --> 0:58:44.400
<v Speaker 1>see how dishonest the media is and how the double

0:58:44.440 --> 0:58:51.680
<v Speaker 1>standards are absolutely everywhere. I think that Biden's gonna flame

0:58:51.680 --> 0:58:55.080
<v Speaker 1>out very quickly once he gets in. There'll be this

0:58:55.160 --> 0:58:58.400
<v Speaker 1>recognition that this guy that they're so desperate for a

0:58:58.480 --> 0:59:03.120
<v Speaker 1>return to It seemed like the political inevitability of obama

0:59:03.240 --> 0:59:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Ism to the left, and yes, Obama did win two

0:59:05.640 --> 0:59:09.040
<v Speaker 1>elections and was in office for eight years, that they

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:13.160
<v Speaker 1>think that Biden can be a kind of restorative figure

0:59:13.240 --> 0:59:17.080
<v Speaker 1>back to that glorious time for the Democrat Party. Although

0:59:17.360 --> 0:59:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, when Obama was an Democrat party was decimated

0:59:20.760 --> 0:59:24.880
<v Speaker 1>as a party. It lost a tremendous amount of seats

0:59:24.880 --> 0:59:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and state legislatures, a lot of House and Senate seats, laws.

0:59:28.600 --> 0:59:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was a lot that did not go

0:59:30.360 --> 0:59:32.800
<v Speaker 1>well if the Democrats. Well, Obama was an office. Obama

0:59:32.920 --> 0:59:38.440
<v Speaker 1>was not somebody who's political popularity translated to other members

0:59:38.560 --> 0:59:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of his party. That just didn't happen. In fact, I

0:59:41.680 --> 0:59:44.560
<v Speaker 1>think that the party had to bear a lot of

0:59:44.600 --> 0:59:52.560
<v Speaker 1>consequences because of who Obama, because of Obama's policies. But

0:59:52.640 --> 0:59:54.560
<v Speaker 1>there is an obvious double standard here and we're going

0:59:54.600 --> 0:59:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to see that continue with Biden. Some of the old

0:59:57.200 --> 1:00:00.040
<v Speaker 1>statements that he made that people in the media I

1:00:00.040 --> 1:00:02.960
<v Speaker 1>had to say we're funny or lighthearted when they when

1:00:03.000 --> 1:00:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you see them again, now you'll say, hold on the

1:00:06.120 --> 1:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>same media that will dredge up audio tape if somebody

1:00:09.360 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>from ten years ago or that will completely lose their

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:15.480
<v Speaker 1>minds over a photo or something that someone did thirty

1:00:15.560 --> 1:00:19.640
<v Speaker 1>years ago. In terms of inappropriate I'm not talking about crimes,

1:00:19.640 --> 1:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, inappropriate conduct or insensitive conduct. They're gonna

1:00:23.600 --> 1:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>try to make it sound like, oh, uncle Joe Biden,

1:00:26.600 --> 1:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>he's not creepy, he's just oh he is, he's he's

1:00:29.520 --> 1:00:32.479
<v Speaker 1>he's a creepster, saying that he's really affectionate. These women

1:00:32.480 --> 1:00:35.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't think it was normal. These women didn't think that.

1:00:35.280 --> 1:00:38.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I can tell you this. I have never

1:00:38.080 --> 1:00:41.560
<v Speaker 1>tried to eskimo kiss a fellow employee, male or female.

1:00:42.680 --> 1:00:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Never gone for the eskimo kiss um, no matter what

1:00:45.840 --> 1:00:47.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of mood I was in, no matter how it

1:00:47.800 --> 1:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>was feeling, never leading anything. We just just reb noses

1:00:50.360 --> 1:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>for seconds, a little nose reb Nope, that did not happen. Oh,

1:00:56.040 --> 1:01:02.000
<v Speaker 1>but speaking of double standards, there's a second accuser against

1:01:02.080 --> 1:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fairfax, Lieutenant Governor of Virginia, And there was a

1:01:05.880 --> 1:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>story today in the New York Times. You can't make

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>this up about how that just that that whole political

1:01:13.960 --> 1:01:19.080
<v Speaker 1>scandal in Virginia, Well it just went, you know, poof,

1:01:19.080 --> 1:01:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it just disappeared. Oh this is so surprising. Guys, How

1:01:24.000 --> 1:01:26.640
<v Speaker 1>did these scandals in Virginia? You know, I love the media.

1:01:26.640 --> 1:01:28.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean the media is like the guy who lights

1:01:28.280 --> 1:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the house on fire and then whatever arrives goes. Isn't

1:01:30.800 --> 1:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it the craziest thing? This house is on fire. I

1:01:32.920 --> 1:01:36.760
<v Speaker 1>don't know how this happened. You know, they're like the

1:01:36.880 --> 1:01:39.439
<v Speaker 1>arsonist and firefighter at the same time. Hey, hey, let's

1:01:39.440 --> 1:01:41.720
<v Speaker 1>get some buckets of water to throw out to put

1:01:41.720 --> 1:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>out this fire. I just started. Yeah, the media covered

1:01:45.560 --> 1:01:48.480
<v Speaker 1>up the whole Fairfax I should well. They covered it

1:01:48.520 --> 1:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>up initially by not reporting on it. Now they're letting

1:01:50.680 --> 1:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>it whither away and they're just gonna move on from it.

1:01:53.960 --> 1:01:56.960
<v Speaker 1>But Meredith Watson, who's the second accuser for Fairfax, she's

1:01:56.960 --> 1:01:59.720
<v Speaker 1>saying she wished she came out sooner. And you know,

1:01:59.760 --> 1:02:02.880
<v Speaker 1>this is still a story play twenty. I feel guilty.

1:02:04.000 --> 1:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Why do you feel guilty? It happened to her after

1:02:08.040 --> 1:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>it happened to me, and had I had the strength?

1:02:17.280 --> 1:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>Are the courage to say something in two thousand, maybe

1:02:24.840 --> 1:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>it never would have happened to her. It was a

1:02:28.440 --> 1:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>huge betrayal. He was my friend. I don't understand how

1:02:37.720 --> 1:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>need do that to somebody that you've been a friend too,

1:02:42.560 --> 1:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>and who's confided in you about things. I just don't

1:02:45.280 --> 1:02:49.520
<v Speaker 1>understand how you need do that. Does anyone think that

1:02:49.520 --> 1:02:52.400
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't sound like a credible retelling of events and

1:02:52.400 --> 1:02:56.640
<v Speaker 1>that woman is sharing anything other than real pain and real,

1:02:57.480 --> 1:03:00.880
<v Speaker 1>real angst resulting from an alt against her. I mean,

1:03:01.680 --> 1:03:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think a woman can sound I mean, compare

1:03:04.120 --> 1:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that that story that she's telling, the way she's telling it,

1:03:08.720 --> 1:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>how she sounds she's telling it to say Julie Sweatnik,

1:03:11.240 --> 1:03:14.160
<v Speaker 1>the third accuser of Kavanaugh, who Democrats were willing to

1:03:14.160 --> 1:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>initially believe, just because I find Meredith Watson entirely credible, unbelievable.

1:03:20.560 --> 1:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing about her story that does not add up.

1:03:23.200 --> 1:03:27.920
<v Speaker 1>Where are the me to mobs? Where where are the

1:03:28.000 --> 1:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>people that you know storm Capitol Hill that get all

1:03:31.520 --> 1:03:34.720
<v Speaker 1>angry at Republicans that you know did everything to stop Kavanaugh?

1:03:34.760 --> 1:03:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And I don't know, I don't I don't see them.

1:03:37.520 --> 1:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>All of a sudden, there they've just disappeared. They're almost

1:03:39.640 --> 1:03:44.000
<v Speaker 1>like the anti war left that just evaporated under the

1:03:44.040 --> 1:03:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Obama administration. When Obama increased the troops in Afghanistan, who

1:03:48.640 --> 1:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>over one hundred thousand? Where were all the Code Pink protesters? Then?

1:03:52.640 --> 1:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Where were all the anti war leftists? Oh, it's just

1:03:55.800 --> 1:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>more important things, apparently than stopping the massive escalation of

1:03:59.760 --> 1:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>a war that, by the way, resulted in more US casualties.

1:04:03.680 --> 1:04:07.959
<v Speaker 1>The Obama administration racked up more US casualties in Afghanistan

1:04:08.720 --> 1:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>than the eight years of Bush or so far the

1:04:12.240 --> 1:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>two years of Trump put together. So not a lot

1:04:17.920 --> 1:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>of interest there obviously from the left, and same thing here.

1:04:21.720 --> 1:04:25.240
<v Speaker 1>It's just all all about the jockeying and jostling for

1:04:25.280 --> 1:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>power for the leftist that there's not they I have

1:04:28.920 --> 1:04:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a hard time taking them seriously on these matters because

1:04:32.760 --> 1:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>they pretend to be advocates for a certain principle, but

1:04:36.680 --> 1:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>really they are just pushing to be in greater control

1:04:39.800 --> 1:04:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and they want to just trash the other side. That's

1:04:42.560 --> 1:04:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the primary motivation that they have for so much of this.

1:04:46.440 --> 1:04:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Meredith Watson sounds like a woman in a lot of

1:04:48.680 --> 1:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>pain with a lot of who you know, who needs

1:04:52.480 --> 1:04:56.480
<v Speaker 1>and deserves a lot of sympathy for what happened to her.

1:04:56.560 --> 1:04:58.880
<v Speaker 1>And yes, you could say Buck, that was in an interview.

1:04:58.880 --> 1:05:01.800
<v Speaker 1>The media's obviously talking to or okay, but it's how

1:05:01.880 --> 1:05:03.840
<v Speaker 1>they talk to her, how often they talk to her.

1:05:03.960 --> 1:05:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Is this a front page news story or is this

1:05:05.560 --> 1:05:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on the back pages? Is this something to talk about

1:05:09.240 --> 1:05:10.920
<v Speaker 1>once in a while, or is this something that they

1:05:10.960 --> 1:05:15.360
<v Speaker 1>make a repeat story so that the heat gets turned

1:05:15.400 --> 1:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>up on Fairfax to resign. You know the answers to this.

1:05:17.720 --> 1:05:22.040
<v Speaker 1>They don't want Fairfax to resign for the optics and

1:05:22.160 --> 1:05:24.440
<v Speaker 1>for the fact that you'd have a major Democrat that

1:05:24.480 --> 1:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>would be going down in the state of Virginia, a

1:05:26.560 --> 1:05:30.160
<v Speaker 1>very important state in the twenty twenty election. So that's

1:05:30.200 --> 1:05:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what's happening here. The stories just went poof about Northam,

1:05:32.920 --> 1:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>about Fairfax, about herring oh on the media is like,

1:05:38.400 --> 1:05:40.480
<v Speaker 1>how did that happen? We all know how it happened.

1:05:41.320 --> 1:05:43.160
<v Speaker 1>There's a lot of things I know about Joe Biden.

1:05:43.240 --> 1:05:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm don him for a long time. He is extremely affectionate.

1:05:48.440 --> 1:05:52.320
<v Speaker 1>He's very affectionate, I find oddly affectionate. He gives people

1:05:52.320 --> 1:05:55.280
<v Speaker 1>on the mouth. I've seen him rub the shoulders of

1:05:55.360 --> 1:05:59.920
<v Speaker 1>women and men. Joe Biden calls them expressions of affect

1:06:00.320 --> 1:06:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Uncle Joe, as we affectionally call him, very very affectionate.

1:06:04.280 --> 1:06:07.520
<v Speaker 1>He's touchy feely. He's been doing it his entire life

1:06:07.920 --> 1:06:13.560
<v Speaker 1>in an affectionate way. He suffers from being overtly affectionate.

1:06:13.640 --> 1:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>To say that, you know, Biden should change the way

1:06:15.920 --> 1:06:18.840
<v Speaker 1>he is, or that he needs to be less affectionate,

1:06:18.960 --> 1:06:20.440
<v Speaker 1>I think is a problem. I think the next time

1:06:20.480 --> 1:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I see Joe Biden, if he doesn't hug me and

1:06:23.040 --> 1:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>give me a kiss and hold my hand, that's not

1:06:25.120 --> 1:06:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the Joe Biden. I knew he's a nice guy. He's

1:06:27.640 --> 1:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>not a predator. And this is ridiculous. Let me just

1:06:30.600 --> 1:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>say it. This is ridiculous. I just want to know

1:06:35.320 --> 1:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>what's ridiculous. I mean, you know, Mika there is in

1:06:38.840 --> 1:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>high dudgeon. It is ridiculous, sir, you know. I mean

1:06:43.720 --> 1:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>it's like she was at the spa and they didn't

1:06:45.880 --> 1:06:50.440
<v Speaker 1>have the proper organic lemon peel slices to put in

1:06:50.520 --> 1:06:56.360
<v Speaker 1>her deionized water. I mean, she's very upset, But I

1:06:56.480 --> 1:07:01.320
<v Speaker 1>just want to know what's ridiculous is there's no let's

1:07:01.320 --> 1:07:04.480
<v Speaker 1>be clear about this There's no allegation out there about

1:07:04.600 --> 1:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Biden doing any of this stuff that anyone really disputes.

1:07:07.920 --> 1:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>It's just a question of how creepy and how big

1:07:09.800 --> 1:07:12.320
<v Speaker 1>a deal it is. It's definitely creepy, So on the

1:07:12.360 --> 1:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>one to ten creepiness scale, you know, where does it

1:07:14.520 --> 1:07:18.280
<v Speaker 1>fall and how much should people care about it? Those

1:07:18.320 --> 1:07:21.320
<v Speaker 1>are all fine things, But to be so outraged about it,

1:07:21.360 --> 1:07:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they accuse Republicans of stuff that didn't even happen,

1:07:24.160 --> 1:07:26.600
<v Speaker 1>and we're supposed to take action against them, right, they

1:07:26.600 --> 1:07:30.400
<v Speaker 1>accuse Republicans, they lie about Republicans like Havanaugh to take

1:07:30.440 --> 1:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>them down, and you know, they seem to think that

1:07:34.720 --> 1:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>we are just going to like let this go. That

1:07:36.720 --> 1:07:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Biden is a weird he's a weirdo. Nuzzling somebody's nose,

1:07:40.280 --> 1:07:42.760
<v Speaker 1>you don't know, in a professional environment or in a

1:07:42.800 --> 1:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>professional setting where you have power, where you are in control,

1:07:46.840 --> 1:07:50.080
<v Speaker 1>is weird? Okay. No one's saying that Biden should go

1:07:50.080 --> 1:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to prison or is a terrible person or anything that

1:07:51.800 --> 1:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>We're just saying that guy's a weirdo, all right, the

1:07:54.000 --> 1:07:58.880
<v Speaker 1>same you know, does it matter that Elizabeth Warren is

1:07:59.240 --> 1:08:01.600
<v Speaker 1>not actually Cherokee and that she lied up being a

1:08:01.680 --> 1:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>Cherokee to advance herself professionally for many, many years. I mean,

1:08:04.840 --> 1:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter in the grand scheme of things in life,

1:08:06.880 --> 1:08:09.000
<v Speaker 1>but does it should it matter in terms of her

1:08:09.040 --> 1:08:11.439
<v Speaker 1>judgment to the American people that she thought, Oh, I'm

1:08:11.480 --> 1:08:14.400
<v Speaker 1>gonna say I'm one, one thou and twenty fourth Cherokee,

1:08:14.520 --> 1:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>So that proves me right? Is that weird? Yeah, that's

1:08:18.160 --> 1:08:23.559
<v Speaker 1>very weird. Okay, that's also very very weird. And you know,

1:08:23.760 --> 1:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>satire and mockery or things that these that these democrats,

1:08:27.000 --> 1:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>they can't handle it because the so much of the

1:08:30.800 --> 1:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>of the pitch for them is the construct around whatever

1:08:33.920 --> 1:08:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the media is telling people. But if people are snickering

1:08:36.680 --> 1:08:39.720
<v Speaker 1>behind your back because they know that you're actually kind

1:08:39.760 --> 1:08:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of a strange a strange bird, you know, a strange

1:08:43.400 --> 1:08:46.679
<v Speaker 1>duck is a strange duck stranger than a strange bird,

1:08:46.720 --> 1:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, quack quack. That's very hard then to

1:08:51.960 --> 1:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>keep the mythology around people going. But speaking of being

1:08:56.200 --> 1:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a bit strange, a little transition here into the latest

1:08:59.200 --> 1:09:04.559
<v Speaker 1>from to O Rourke, who is really a combination of

1:09:05.400 --> 1:09:09.679
<v Speaker 1>the guy from What's the What's the movie? Oh yeah,

1:09:09.880 --> 1:09:12.559
<v Speaker 1>it is really a combination of Napoleon Dynamite and Keanu

1:09:12.600 --> 1:09:16.800
<v Speaker 1>Reeves the nineties. Yeah, like, I just totally I just

1:09:16.840 --> 1:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>want to run for president and have you put all

1:09:19.040 --> 1:09:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of your hopes and dreams like in this basket that

1:09:21.920 --> 1:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to carry around. Does anyone else care? Again,

1:09:25.240 --> 1:09:28.880
<v Speaker 1>not a big deal, but a little weird that Beto

1:09:29.280 --> 1:09:32.880
<v Speaker 1>only seems to wear a blue button down shirts. Is

1:09:32.880 --> 1:09:34.599
<v Speaker 1>it the same shirt? Does he just have a closet

1:09:34.600 --> 1:09:37.599
<v Speaker 1>full of you'll see this. I've never seen him not

1:09:37.720 --> 1:09:40.320
<v Speaker 1>wearing a blue button down shirt with rolled up sleeves.

1:09:40.320 --> 1:09:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Is this the Beto uniform? Um? Not a big deal.

1:09:45.320 --> 1:09:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Not going to solve world piece, not gonna cure cancer,

1:09:48.000 --> 1:09:50.479
<v Speaker 1>whether Beto changes a shirt or not. But it's a

1:09:50.520 --> 1:09:52.840
<v Speaker 1>little weird. You know what. Else, it's weird that he

1:09:52.960 --> 1:09:55.840
<v Speaker 1>thinks that, you know what, people really want more town

1:09:55.960 --> 1:10:02.799
<v Speaker 1>halls with oh Man, with elected or with appointed officials,

1:10:02.840 --> 1:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>not even like the officials play clip nine. That's why

1:10:05.400 --> 1:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>as president, I'll sign an executive order on the first

1:10:09.400 --> 1:10:13.639
<v Speaker 1>day in office requiring every single cabinet secretary to hold

1:10:13.680 --> 1:10:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a town hall meeting like this every single month, to

1:10:17.360 --> 1:10:19.599
<v Speaker 1>listen to you and to be accountable to you. So

1:10:19.640 --> 1:10:24.360
<v Speaker 1>that we deliver for you. Democracy is what we need

1:10:24.400 --> 1:10:27.280
<v Speaker 1>if this country is gonna make it. I mean that

1:10:27.360 --> 1:10:30.759
<v Speaker 1>just sounds so horrible. Yeah, every month, every you're gonna

1:10:30.800 --> 1:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>have to like have the department like that. The Secretary

1:10:34.560 --> 1:10:37.960
<v Speaker 1>of Health and Human Services is gonna have to sit

1:10:38.080 --> 1:10:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on a bunch of like random people who don't know

1:10:41.000 --> 1:10:44.640
<v Speaker 1>anything about the issue per se, are gonna ask questions,

1:10:44.680 --> 1:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>are gonna televise it. It's a great idea of betto Ah.

1:10:50.240 --> 1:10:53.720
<v Speaker 1>You're an amazing You're an amazing fella, mister betto He

1:10:53.880 --> 1:10:56.400
<v Speaker 1>also just says other things that are that are demonstrably

1:10:56.960 --> 1:11:01.960
<v Speaker 1>bizarre and untrue. Play play eight D. These kinds of

1:11:02.080 --> 1:11:06.800
<v Speaker 1>challenges in the lifetimes of anyone in this auditorium, regardless

1:11:06.800 --> 1:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of how young or how old you are. This economy,

1:11:10.160 --> 1:11:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this this unprecedented concentration of wealth and power and privilege

1:11:16.200 --> 1:11:20.559
<v Speaker 1>we haven't seen since the last true progressive era, that

1:11:20.680 --> 1:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>center of clobature referred to that produced Teddy Roosevelt in

1:11:24.120 --> 1:11:29.479
<v Speaker 1>some extraordinary progressive reforms healthcare system where people are dying

1:11:29.720 --> 1:11:34.800
<v Speaker 1>of diabetes and the flu and curable cancers in the

1:11:34.880 --> 1:11:38.879
<v Speaker 1>year two nineteen, in the wealthiest of the most powerful

1:11:38.960 --> 1:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>copy second, does Beto not realize that people die from

1:11:41.960 --> 1:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the flu because they die from the flu because it's

1:11:44.200 --> 1:11:47.599
<v Speaker 1>a virus that we have no cure for or vaccine

1:11:48.080 --> 1:11:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that is proven effective against. To see, people still die

1:11:54.200 --> 1:11:56.600
<v Speaker 1>from the flu. Yes, yes, many tens of thousands of

1:11:56.600 --> 1:12:02.519
<v Speaker 1>people do because it's the flu. That's not you who

1:12:02.560 --> 1:12:05.280
<v Speaker 1>needs facts. Betto has his blue shirt and he has

1:12:05.280 --> 1:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>a vision for America. Our three coming up. Global Verification

1:12:10.240 --> 1:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>Network is the only dual certified and veteran owned background

1:12:13.680 --> 1:12:17.160
<v Speaker 1>investigation and vetting company. Now, background checks are critical for

1:12:17.360 --> 1:12:20.280
<v Speaker 1>your business, and you may already have some company, some

1:12:20.400 --> 1:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>vendor that does them for you. I want you to

1:12:22.880 --> 1:12:26.160
<v Speaker 1>give my friends at Global Verification Network a call. They

1:12:26.400 --> 1:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>not only are veteran owned and operated, so you can

1:12:28.400 --> 1:12:32.920
<v Speaker 1>support veteran business by using them. They also don't outsource

1:12:33.200 --> 1:12:35.720
<v Speaker 1>their data or any of the work. It's all done

1:12:35.840 --> 1:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>here in the States, so they are separating themselves from

1:12:39.720 --> 1:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the competition, and they are the people that you should

1:12:42.360 --> 1:12:45.759
<v Speaker 1>be calling to do your background checks. They're headquartered in Chicago,

1:12:45.800 --> 1:12:49.480
<v Speaker 1>but they have offices throughout the nation and all employees

1:12:49.479 --> 1:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>are located here in the United States. So give them

1:12:53.160 --> 1:12:54.720
<v Speaker 1>a call and tell them that you're part of team

1:12:54.760 --> 1:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>buck all right eight seven seven six nine five one

1:12:58.360 --> 1:13:01.360
<v Speaker 1>one seven nine. That's eight seven and seven six nine

1:13:01.400 --> 1:13:04.680
<v Speaker 1>five one one seven nine. Or go to my GVN

1:13:05.040 --> 1:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>dot com Global Verification Network leave no stone unturned. That's

1:13:09.240 --> 1:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>what I hear these things. Let's make America great again.

1:13:12.120 --> 1:13:14.000
<v Speaker 1>I think to myself, well, exactly when did you think

1:13:14.000 --> 1:13:17.720
<v Speaker 1>America was great? It certainly wasn't when people were in

1:13:17.800 --> 1:13:21.559
<v Speaker 1>slave It certainly wasn't when women didn't have the right

1:13:21.600 --> 1:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>to vote. It certainly wasn't when the LGBT community and

1:13:24.520 --> 1:13:26.320
<v Speaker 1>was denied the rights to which it was in times.

1:13:26.360 --> 1:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>That phrase echo as discrimination in your ears. It takes

1:13:30.080 --> 1:13:33.639
<v Speaker 1>us back to I think an American past and never

1:13:33.680 --> 1:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in fact really existed in this notion of greatness. Let's

1:13:37.360 --> 1:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>unpack former Obama administration Attorney General Eric Holder there from him,

1:13:42.800 --> 1:13:45.479
<v Speaker 1>and let's let's do this. Shall we unpack what he says?

1:13:46.920 --> 1:13:54.639
<v Speaker 1>He rejects this notion of in America that was ever great.

1:13:55.800 --> 1:13:57.519
<v Speaker 1>How else can you explain? He says, Well, we had

1:13:57.520 --> 1:13:59.439
<v Speaker 1>slaves before me could vote. I mean that takes you

1:13:59.479 --> 1:14:02.799
<v Speaker 1>all the way up into the into the twentieth century.

1:14:03.720 --> 1:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>The LGBT community didn't have rights, So that takes you

1:14:06.080 --> 1:14:09.599
<v Speaker 1>up into the Obama administration. So if America wasn't great

1:14:09.640 --> 1:14:12.440
<v Speaker 1>all the way up until the Obama administration, then America,

1:14:12.520 --> 1:14:16.720
<v Speaker 1>according to Derek Holder, has never been great unless the

1:14:16.760 --> 1:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>only time it has been great is the Trump presidency,

1:14:19.160 --> 1:14:22.000
<v Speaker 1>which you and I might think is kind of funny.

1:14:22.000 --> 1:14:23.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think it was great before then too,

1:14:24.080 --> 1:14:26.639
<v Speaker 1>but I'm sure Eric Holder does not take that position.

1:14:28.520 --> 1:14:32.240
<v Speaker 1>But this for me is a reminder of a common place,

1:14:34.160 --> 1:14:37.519
<v Speaker 1>a commonplace way that democrats think of this country. You know,

1:14:37.520 --> 1:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of people who take pride in

1:14:40.360 --> 1:14:44.200
<v Speaker 1>being American, but leftists generally take pride in thinking they're

1:14:44.320 --> 1:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>better than America. That's where that's where they get a

1:14:48.360 --> 1:14:50.479
<v Speaker 1>sense of self worth. You know. This is why you

1:14:50.520 --> 1:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>know Obama's message was very much a promise of a

1:14:54.040 --> 1:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>fundamental transformation, that he was a near Messianic figure who

1:14:58.680 --> 1:15:02.479
<v Speaker 1>would wipe away this ms of the American past and

1:15:02.600 --> 1:15:04.600
<v Speaker 1>bring us into some new promise language. As we know.

1:15:04.640 --> 1:15:07.919
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is all just this was all just crap,

1:15:09.000 --> 1:15:11.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't It wasn't true, It wasn't the case. But there

1:15:11.840 --> 1:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>there is a blame America first, and blame America as

1:15:16.880 --> 1:15:19.640
<v Speaker 1>quickly as you can, attitude that is prevalent on the

1:15:19.720 --> 1:15:22.360
<v Speaker 1>left and Eric Holder, whom I've heard people say, I

1:15:22.360 --> 1:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know if this is to be taken seriously or not,

1:15:27.000 --> 1:15:29.599
<v Speaker 1>but I've heard people say that Eric Holders considering running

1:15:29.600 --> 1:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>for president too, and the Democrats are soon going to

1:15:32.800 --> 1:15:37.280
<v Speaker 1>get to the the you know, the the dance hall

1:15:37.360 --> 1:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have room for any more people part of this equation.

1:15:40.120 --> 1:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, I really don't think you can

1:15:41.720 --> 1:15:44.320
<v Speaker 1>have a primary with thirty candidates in it, but this

1:15:44.320 --> 1:15:49.000
<v Speaker 1>seems to be where we're heading. Holder, though, understood his

1:15:49.160 --> 1:15:51.639
<v Speaker 1>role in the Obama administration, which was very much to

1:15:52.000 --> 1:15:55.040
<v Speaker 1>protect President Obama and to protect the Democratic Party. I mean,

1:15:55.040 --> 1:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>he was a political infighter. You look at what Holder

1:15:58.320 --> 1:16:00.559
<v Speaker 1>did in his approach to his job, not just fast

1:16:00.640 --> 1:16:03.559
<v Speaker 1>and furious and some of the other debacles that now

1:16:03.600 --> 1:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>are all swept under the rug and people pretend like

1:16:05.960 --> 1:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>they never happened. But you look at what someone like

1:16:09.720 --> 1:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Sessions or even Attorney General Barr, how he is

1:16:12.400 --> 1:16:15.519
<v Speaker 1>supposed to approach the role. He's expected to be not

1:16:15.640 --> 1:16:21.439
<v Speaker 1>just neutral, but a kind of paragon of non partisan

1:16:21.520 --> 1:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>perfection in the role. Meanwhile, when Holder was in the job.

1:16:24.200 --> 1:16:27.040
<v Speaker 1>They all knew that he was, as Holder said, Obama's wingman.

1:16:28.080 --> 1:16:31.719
<v Speaker 1>That was the claim that he was Obama's right hand guy,

1:16:31.760 --> 1:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and he was, I mean, to Holder's credit or infamy,

1:16:35.120 --> 1:16:36.880
<v Speaker 1>depending on how you want to view it, he was

1:16:36.920 --> 1:16:39.679
<v Speaker 1>in fact right hand man to President Obama all along.

1:16:40.240 --> 1:16:45.640
<v Speaker 1>But Holder also holds views that are very commonplace among Democrats,

1:16:45.840 --> 1:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and he's somebody who has said I believe it was

1:16:49.040 --> 1:16:50.639
<v Speaker 1>it was Holder who said that America is a nation

1:16:50.640 --> 1:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of cowards because we never talk about race. Reality is

1:16:53.400 --> 1:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>that we talk about race in this country all the time.

1:16:56.880 --> 1:16:59.200
<v Speaker 1>The reality is that we talk about race and have

1:16:59.320 --> 1:17:01.720
<v Speaker 1>to be very, very very cautious because there are only

1:17:01.760 --> 1:17:04.840
<v Speaker 1>certain ways you are allowed to talk about race. You know,

1:17:04.920 --> 1:17:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it is now expected that, at least among Democrats and

1:17:10.120 --> 1:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the left and the media and the academy, that white privilege,

1:17:13.560 --> 1:17:15.479
<v Speaker 1>which I think is one of these stupidest and most

1:17:15.520 --> 1:17:20.839
<v Speaker 1>offensive phrases in common usage these days, that white privilege

1:17:20.920 --> 1:17:24.000
<v Speaker 1>is just taken as a thing. You know, I'm still

1:17:24.040 --> 1:17:27.320
<v Speaker 1>waiting for my white privilege check. I'm waiting for someone

1:17:27.320 --> 1:17:28.800
<v Speaker 1>to say, oh, I'm going to hire you because you've

1:17:28.800 --> 1:17:31.880
<v Speaker 1>your white privilege over the other fifty white guys who

1:17:31.960 --> 1:17:33.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of look like you, kind of sound like you,

1:17:33.800 --> 1:17:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and want the same job. Where's the white privilege? I

1:17:37.960 --> 1:17:41.040
<v Speaker 1>just I need someone to explain to me how there's

1:17:41.479 --> 1:17:43.719
<v Speaker 1>how this is even worthy of being set out loud,

1:17:43.720 --> 1:17:46.160
<v Speaker 1>that people have something called white privilege. I deny that

1:17:46.160 --> 1:17:48.360
<v Speaker 1>there is such a thing, and I would also deny

1:17:48.439 --> 1:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>that it is in any way a useful thing to

1:17:52.240 --> 1:17:54.439
<v Speaker 1>talk about, not only because it does not exist. But

1:17:54.479 --> 1:17:57.040
<v Speaker 1>even if you theoretically believe that there is such a

1:17:57.040 --> 1:17:59.280
<v Speaker 1>thing as white white privilege, how do you quantify it,

1:18:00.160 --> 1:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>how do you offset it? What are you supposed to

1:18:03.040 --> 1:18:05.720
<v Speaker 1>do about it as a white person? There are no

1:18:05.760 --> 1:18:09.639
<v Speaker 1>answers here, But you know, holder knows that it's just

1:18:09.720 --> 1:18:14.439
<v Speaker 1>it's among Democrats the cheapest and easiest applause line to

1:18:15.200 --> 1:18:18.719
<v Speaker 1>speak of in these these sweeping terms about our racist

1:18:18.720 --> 1:18:21.479
<v Speaker 1>past and how how bad we have been as a country.

1:18:22.000 --> 1:18:24.920
<v Speaker 1>That's why I says, you know, America was really never great,

1:18:25.320 --> 1:18:30.200
<v Speaker 1>which this is mainstream thinking among many Democrats, that America

1:18:30.240 --> 1:18:32.880
<v Speaker 1>has sinned around the world and at home, and that

1:18:32.960 --> 1:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are a bunch of jingoistic maniacs who just want

1:18:37.040 --> 1:18:39.599
<v Speaker 1>to wave their American flags while they drink bud light

1:18:39.680 --> 1:18:42.639
<v Speaker 1>and you know, go race their four by fours out

1:18:42.680 --> 1:18:45.000
<v Speaker 1>in the yard, and you know all that, you know something,

1:18:45.040 --> 1:18:47.720
<v Speaker 1>You're like, Buck, that sounds great, I know, but that's

1:18:47.720 --> 1:18:51.639
<v Speaker 1>a caricature. We all recognize that as a caricature, but

1:18:52.000 --> 1:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>holder things that we are not aware enough of the

1:18:54.400 --> 1:18:57.679
<v Speaker 1>racism of our past. I think that many Democrats agree

1:18:57.680 --> 1:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with them play five that judges, like everybody, all other

1:19:02.240 --> 1:19:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Americans carry with them implicit biases, and especially in the

1:19:06.280 --> 1:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>criminal justice spheres. How do you fix it? Well, you

1:19:09.280 --> 1:19:11.639
<v Speaker 1>certainly have to have training. You have to make people

1:19:11.640 --> 1:19:14.520
<v Speaker 1>aware of the fact that they do carry these biases

1:19:15.000 --> 1:19:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and make them understand that. You know, if you see

1:19:17.439 --> 1:19:19.840
<v Speaker 1>an African American defendant in front of you, that's going

1:19:19.880 --> 1:19:24.559
<v Speaker 1>to probably trigger things in your mind unconsciously, subconsciously, and

1:19:24.640 --> 1:19:27.639
<v Speaker 1>you're perhaps going to treat that person differently than somebody

1:19:27.640 --> 1:19:30.040
<v Speaker 1>who shows up in a tie and has you know,

1:19:30.080 --> 1:19:32.559
<v Speaker 1>a great lawyer that they have paid for. You're going

1:19:32.640 --> 1:19:34.559
<v Speaker 1>to maybe cut that person a break that you wouldn't

1:19:34.560 --> 1:19:38.679
<v Speaker 1>otherwise give to a Hispanic or African American defendant. People

1:19:38.720 --> 1:19:40.880
<v Speaker 1>have to be just aware of that, and then that

1:19:41.000 --> 1:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>training has to continue So here's a fun fact. There's

1:19:46.080 --> 1:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>no evidence whatsoever that anyone can point to that implicit

1:19:50.439 --> 1:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>bias training has any impact on implicit bias. I mean,

1:19:55.680 --> 1:20:00.439
<v Speaker 1>this is a kind of social science voodoo that there

1:20:00.520 --> 1:20:02.599
<v Speaker 1>is no they people talk about this, Oh we need

1:20:02.640 --> 1:20:06.519
<v Speaker 1>implicit bias training if somebody has an implicit or subconscious bias,

1:20:06.560 --> 1:20:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I assure you having an hour of classroom time telling

1:20:10.439 --> 1:20:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you not to be subconsciously biased will do nothing. So

1:20:14.439 --> 1:20:18.160
<v Speaker 1>start with that. I mean, this is just this is meaningless.

1:20:18.200 --> 1:20:21.439
<v Speaker 1>This is meaningless pablum from holder on this issue. And

1:20:21.479 --> 1:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>remember this guy who's Attorney General, folks, the senior most

1:20:24.000 --> 1:20:26.759
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement official in the United States government for years

1:20:27.320 --> 1:20:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and is still a Democrat and very high, very high standing.

1:20:31.840 --> 1:20:33.599
<v Speaker 1>But another question I have if we're going to talk

1:20:33.600 --> 1:20:37.120
<v Speaker 1>about implicit bias and racist baggage and racism in this country.

1:20:38.160 --> 1:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I just pose this as a question and won't follow

1:20:40.360 --> 1:20:42.839
<v Speaker 1>up with an answer, but it would be it's interesting

1:20:42.880 --> 1:20:44.840
<v Speaker 1>if you try to get the left to weigh in

1:20:44.920 --> 1:20:48.120
<v Speaker 1>on is it possible to have implicit bias against white people?

1:20:49.479 --> 1:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>Think about that one a little more. Let that one

1:20:52.320 --> 1:20:54.439
<v Speaker 1>just bounce around for a moment. Is it possible for

1:20:54.479 --> 1:20:56.439
<v Speaker 1>people to have an implicit We're being told all the

1:20:56.439 --> 1:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>time that there's white privilege. So there are people who

1:20:58.920 --> 1:21:00.960
<v Speaker 1>are white who are getting all kinds of benefits and

1:21:00.960 --> 1:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>advancing themselves because of their whiteness. Meanwhile, I don't think

1:21:04.360 --> 1:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>whiteness is in short supply. I don't know anybody who's

1:21:07.120 --> 1:21:11.400
<v Speaker 1>benefiting professionally or otherwise merely from the fact of being white.

1:21:12.720 --> 1:21:14.879
<v Speaker 1>But is it possible for them to be implicit bias

1:21:14.920 --> 1:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>from people of any non white background against white people.

1:21:20.880 --> 1:21:22.439
<v Speaker 1>You will hear most people on the left say the

1:21:22.479 --> 1:21:26.320
<v Speaker 1>answer is no, which is a fascinating discussion in and

1:21:26.439 --> 1:21:29.599
<v Speaker 1>of itself. That essentially, anti white racism is not possible

1:21:29.600 --> 1:21:34.559
<v Speaker 1>because they view race entirely as through the lens of

1:21:34.760 --> 1:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>being a social construct. So in a society like ours

1:21:40.560 --> 1:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>where the majority is white, although it's not going to

1:21:42.920 --> 1:21:44.679
<v Speaker 1>be the case that much longer in this country based

1:21:44.680 --> 1:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>on the demographic trends, but insided like like ours, it's

1:21:48.040 --> 1:21:50.599
<v Speaker 1>impossible for there to be anti white racism because racism

1:21:50.600 --> 1:21:56.360
<v Speaker 1>requires power. That's what they say. They redefine what it

1:21:56.439 --> 1:21:59.559
<v Speaker 1>is to be racist, They redefine the very concept of

1:21:59.680 --> 1:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>race is such that it's not about treating people thinking

1:22:04.360 --> 1:22:08.120
<v Speaker 1>about people acting toward people differently because of their skin color,

1:22:08.920 --> 1:22:15.839
<v Speaker 1>making moral and character and other assumptions about someone because

1:22:15.840 --> 1:22:20.719
<v Speaker 1>of their pigmentation and some of their genetically dictated features.

1:22:21.160 --> 1:22:23.439
<v Speaker 1>That's what I think of as racism. The left thinks

1:22:23.439 --> 1:22:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of racism entirely through the lens of a power construct.

1:22:30.600 --> 1:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>And so this is how you get all this talk

1:22:32.160 --> 1:22:37.040
<v Speaker 1>about white privilege and even now white supremacy, which you've

1:22:37.040 --> 1:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>noticed has been expanded well beyond what it had previously

1:22:40.880 --> 1:22:44.120
<v Speaker 1>been thought of. Right, white supremacy used to be people

1:22:44.160 --> 1:22:49.200
<v Speaker 1>that would march around with swastika's tattooed on their foreheads

1:22:49.360 --> 1:22:52.200
<v Speaker 1>and you know, yelling about white power. And they've always

1:22:52.240 --> 1:22:56.840
<v Speaker 1>been this noisy fringe of idiots and losers. But now

1:22:56.880 --> 1:23:02.160
<v Speaker 1>white supremacy is things like, you know, the the feeling

1:23:02.200 --> 1:23:06.160
<v Speaker 1>that people have based upon someone's dress code or someone's

1:23:06.200 --> 1:23:09.920
<v Speaker 1>choice of what they wear when they walk into a courtroom. No,

1:23:10.160 --> 1:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>it's white supremacy to expect that somebody wear a jacket

1:23:12.880 --> 1:23:16.799
<v Speaker 1>and tie. You know what you heard Joe Biden recently

1:23:16.800 --> 1:23:20.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about how you know that this is a speaking

1:23:20.320 --> 1:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>about about the problem we have is white culture. I mean,

1:23:23.960 --> 1:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>first of all, Joe Biden to say that, I mean,

1:23:26.520 --> 1:23:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the guy is not exactly got a lot of street cred.

1:23:32.680 --> 1:23:34.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what else to say. I mean, Joe,

1:23:34.200 --> 1:23:38.040
<v Speaker 1>Joe Biden is not uptricularly is not a guy that

1:23:38.080 --> 1:23:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you would think of as understanding anybody, at least inherently

1:23:41.880 --> 1:23:46.800
<v Speaker 1>understanding anybody outside of his own immediate circles. But this

1:23:46.920 --> 1:23:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is the way that you need that, this is the

1:23:48.320 --> 1:23:50.519
<v Speaker 1>way that you're told to talk about these things from

1:23:50.520 --> 1:23:52.200
<v Speaker 1>a level. So I just think it's interesting because you know,

1:23:52.280 --> 1:23:56.439
<v Speaker 1>Holder wants to lecture us about racist baggage, but he

1:23:56.479 --> 1:23:58.799
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any solutions, and he doesn't even have answers

1:23:58.800 --> 1:24:01.880
<v Speaker 1>to straightforward questions. And in fact, the left doesn't have

1:24:02.040 --> 1:24:04.080
<v Speaker 1>answers to these questions. And when they do try to

1:24:04.120 --> 1:24:11.240
<v Speaker 1>give answers, they're entirely unsatisfying because they're intellectually untenable. I mean,

1:24:11.280 --> 1:24:15.599
<v Speaker 1>they're self contradictory. You can't adjust your definition of what

1:24:15.720 --> 1:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>racism is based upon the race of an individual, because

1:24:19.680 --> 1:24:23.080
<v Speaker 1>then you're redefining what it is to be racist. But

1:24:23.200 --> 1:24:25.519
<v Speaker 1>that is in fact what happens all the time among

1:24:25.560 --> 1:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Democrats and the left. If we look for consistency, we're

1:24:28.280 --> 1:24:32.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be looking for a very very long time,

1:24:32.439 --> 1:24:35.599
<v Speaker 1>my friends, but that is where we are. I've got

1:24:36.720 --> 1:24:40.240
<v Speaker 1>more coming up. Stay with me. Conservatives are under siege

1:24:40.240 --> 1:24:43.680
<v Speaker 1>on campuses. You know this, my friends. And back in February,

1:24:43.680 --> 1:24:45.639
<v Speaker 1>there was an incident that really showed us just how

1:24:45.680 --> 1:24:49.919
<v Speaker 1>bad it's gotten. The Leadership Institute's field organizer, Hayden Williams,

1:24:49.960 --> 1:24:52.920
<v Speaker 1>was peacefully helping conservative students recruit for their group when

1:24:53.000 --> 1:24:57.240
<v Speaker 1>he was attacked by a vicious radical leftist thug. You now,

1:24:57.479 --> 1:24:59.960
<v Speaker 1>President Trump has taken action. He signed an executive order

1:25:00.080 --> 1:25:03.759
<v Speaker 1>to protect conservative students free speech, but more action is needed.

1:25:04.120 --> 1:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>You can help. Go to take back the Campus dot

1:25:08.280 --> 1:25:12.000
<v Speaker 1>org to support the Leadership Institute and defend conservative students.

1:25:12.280 --> 1:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>The Leadership Institute is the premier organization for educating and

1:25:15.880 --> 1:25:19.960
<v Speaker 1>training conservative college students now. The left effort to silence

1:25:20.000 --> 1:25:22.920
<v Speaker 1>conservative voices on campuses has gone on for far too long.

1:25:23.000 --> 1:25:25.519
<v Speaker 1>My friends, Hayden Williams took a punch for all of us.

1:25:25.640 --> 1:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Now it's time to fight back and protect conservative students

1:25:28.320 --> 1:25:32.080
<v Speaker 1>on campus everywhere. Visit take back the Campus dot org

1:25:32.120 --> 1:25:34.559
<v Speaker 1>to make your urgent gift to the Leadership Institute today.

1:25:34.920 --> 1:25:39.439
<v Speaker 1>That's take back the campus dot org. So I don't

1:25:39.479 --> 1:25:41.760
<v Speaker 1>know if you saw my announcement speech, but I did

1:25:41.760 --> 1:25:47.479
<v Speaker 1>it right outside of Trump International. Did you see it? Well?

1:25:47.520 --> 1:25:50.360
<v Speaker 1>The reason why I took the fight to him is

1:25:50.400 --> 1:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>because President Trump is creating so much division and hate

1:25:54.280 --> 1:25:58.639
<v Speaker 1>in this country. But he is very small. He is weak,

1:25:58.760 --> 1:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>He is a coward. He is a leader who actually

1:26:01.479 --> 1:26:05.840
<v Speaker 1>punches down. He demonizes those who need our help, those

1:26:05.880 --> 1:26:09.800
<v Speaker 1>who need our support. Jill Brand just like wants to

1:26:09.880 --> 1:26:12.800
<v Speaker 1>y'all and it's equal pay day. I'm like, she wants

1:26:12.840 --> 1:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>equal pay for people because, oh my gosh, Democrats, can

1:26:17.320 --> 1:26:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you do better than this police? I mean, at least

1:26:19.840 --> 1:26:22.160
<v Speaker 1>give at least give us some candidates to talk about

1:26:22.240 --> 1:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that are are interesting, you know, and not just worthy

1:26:26.439 --> 1:26:28.759
<v Speaker 1>of mocker. I mean, Jilla Brand doesn't even she doesn't

1:26:28.760 --> 1:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>know what her ideas are. People just tell her what

1:26:31.800 --> 1:26:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the idea should be, whatever she thinks will work at

1:26:33.840 --> 1:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>any given moment. But I thought that was a really

1:26:38.080 --> 1:26:40.639
<v Speaker 1>a really funny little little moment there where she comes

1:26:40.640 --> 1:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>out and she's saying Trump is creating division and hate.

1:26:44.280 --> 1:26:46.680
<v Speaker 1>He's terrible and I hate his stupid face, that he's

1:26:46.720 --> 1:26:50.800
<v Speaker 1>so mean and awful. It's like I'm pretty sure, miss

1:26:50.880 --> 1:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Jilla brand, that you are in fact creating division and hate.

1:26:54.800 --> 1:26:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm I'm gonna go out on a limb here

1:26:57.040 --> 1:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>and say that Kirsten Jill, Kristen or Kirstin I don't

1:27:01.880 --> 1:27:03.759
<v Speaker 1>make I don't mix them up on purpose, I swear,

1:27:03.840 --> 1:27:07.720
<v Speaker 1>but it's just impossible. I think it's Kirston Jilbren that

1:27:07.920 --> 1:27:11.599
<v Speaker 1>she she thinks that the Democrats are are the are

1:27:11.640 --> 1:27:13.840
<v Speaker 1>the great healers in this nation. I mean the same

1:27:13.880 --> 1:27:17.440
<v Speaker 1>Democrats who for the last two years have been pretending

1:27:18.720 --> 1:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that President Trump is a traitor, that the President of

1:27:22.200 --> 1:27:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the United States is a sexual predator, um, a trader,

1:27:28.080 --> 1:27:33.759
<v Speaker 1>um crazy as in mentally unfit to hold any office,

1:27:33.840 --> 1:27:40.840
<v Speaker 1>probably a racist, a xenophobe, an anti Muslim bigot. I mean,

1:27:40.880 --> 1:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>you got on the line. All these things that they've

1:27:43.680 --> 1:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>said about the president that are are are deeply destructive

1:27:47.880 --> 1:27:51.720
<v Speaker 1>and unfair and untrue. I do not believe any of

1:27:51.760 --> 1:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>those things are true about President Trump. They certainly the

1:27:55.080 --> 1:27:59.360
<v Speaker 1>whole you know, grab the woman by the area line

1:27:59.400 --> 1:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>that everyone's very familiar from the Billy Bush tape. I

1:28:02.240 --> 1:28:05.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know what it's going to take for the media

1:28:05.120 --> 1:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to stop misconstruing what he said. I'm not saying it

1:28:07.320 --> 1:28:09.920
<v Speaker 1>was okay, I mean it was. It was an ungentlemanly

1:28:09.960 --> 1:28:14.479
<v Speaker 1>thing to say. But he wasn't bragging about assaulting women.

1:28:14.520 --> 1:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>He was bragging about his access to attractive women who

1:28:19.000 --> 1:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>let him. That was what he said, let him do

1:28:21.240 --> 1:28:26.519
<v Speaker 1>things because he's a famous, powerful, important guy. But they

1:28:26.560 --> 1:28:28.559
<v Speaker 1>always make it sound like he was claiming that he

1:28:28.960 --> 1:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>was drugging and then taking advantage of people or something.

1:28:32.200 --> 1:28:34.640
<v Speaker 1>You know that he's almost a Cosby esque situations, not

1:28:34.720 --> 1:28:37.360
<v Speaker 1>that at all. It's not. And they're not so stupid.

1:28:37.360 --> 1:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>The media is not so stupid that they don't understand that.

1:28:40.200 --> 1:28:43.439
<v Speaker 1>But a major and you're going to see this now

1:28:43.600 --> 1:28:47.799
<v Speaker 1>gearing up for the twenty twenty election, a major point

1:28:47.840 --> 1:28:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of opposition against Trump that comes from the left has

1:28:51.360 --> 1:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to do with making support of Trump socially unpalatable. You know,

1:28:58.200 --> 1:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>supporting Trump makes you somebody who's a bad person that

1:29:02.000 --> 1:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>people shouldn't be friends with. And you know, nobody should

1:29:05.080 --> 1:29:07.640
<v Speaker 1>like let let their kids stay over at you know,

1:29:07.760 --> 1:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>your house to hang out with your kids because you're

1:29:09.720 --> 1:29:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a Trump supporter and you're a bad person, right, That's

1:29:12.920 --> 1:29:17.280
<v Speaker 1>that's part of the effort here. And and it was

1:29:17.320 --> 1:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>just yesterday that I said to you, it's not just

1:29:19.840 --> 1:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>about Trump. They really do feel this way about Trump

1:29:25.600 --> 1:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>supporters too. You know, the things they're saying about Trump,

1:29:30.520 --> 1:29:32.880
<v Speaker 1>they feel about the people who voted for him. And

1:29:33.120 --> 1:29:37.200
<v Speaker 1>if that sounds at all like it's a it's a leap. Well,

1:29:37.240 --> 1:29:42.599
<v Speaker 1>here's the chairman of the DNC, Tom Perez, talking about

1:29:42.680 --> 1:29:49.120
<v Speaker 1>people who support Trump, who support Mitch McConnell and Paul

1:29:49.200 --> 1:29:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Ryan and all these different people, or rather who he

1:29:52.680 --> 1:29:55.120
<v Speaker 1>named some of these people who have supported Trump. Here's

1:29:55.120 --> 1:29:57.439
<v Speaker 1>what he thinks of those who support President Trump. Play three.

1:29:57.960 --> 1:30:00.559
<v Speaker 1>But the thing is they they are cowardly. I mean,

1:30:00.680 --> 1:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>history will not only judge Donald Trump harshly, It will

1:30:05.960 --> 1:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>judge Mits McConnell and Paul Ryan and all the other

1:30:11.040 --> 1:30:15.559
<v Speaker 1>cowards who refuse to stand up to this president and

1:30:15.680 --> 1:30:18.519
<v Speaker 1>allowed the Party of Lincoln to die. They will be

1:30:18.600 --> 1:30:24.599
<v Speaker 1>judge harshly because whatever he says goes right. Cowards. He

1:30:24.680 --> 1:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>says cowards about Republicans who won't stand up. And I

1:30:27.920 --> 1:30:32.639
<v Speaker 1>can assure you cowards and idiots and buffoons is how

1:30:32.640 --> 1:30:37.559
<v Speaker 1>they would describe, at least privately, those who vote for Trump.

1:30:37.760 --> 1:30:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It is not just about the president himself. It is

1:30:40.360 --> 1:30:43.760
<v Speaker 1>about those who believe in what he is trying to accomplish.

1:30:43.840 --> 1:30:46.320
<v Speaker 1>You see, for me, it's always been it's always been

1:30:46.360 --> 1:30:50.320
<v Speaker 1>the agenda. It has not been the case that, you know,

1:30:50.360 --> 1:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's individual character or you know, even individual accomplishments

1:30:55.680 --> 1:30:59.800
<v Speaker 1>before becoming president, were the motivating factor in support. Although

1:30:59.840 --> 1:31:03.160
<v Speaker 1>I do find most of his tweets and certainly his

1:31:03.200 --> 1:31:06.560
<v Speaker 1>battles with the media to be very entertaining, amusing and

1:31:07.600 --> 1:31:12.439
<v Speaker 1>worthwhile too. The media has changed. They don't realize it

1:31:12.520 --> 1:31:14.760
<v Speaker 1>quite yet, but they have changed, and it will never

1:31:14.800 --> 1:31:17.559
<v Speaker 1>be the same because of this president. And I think

1:31:17.600 --> 1:31:20.920
<v Speaker 1>that's all to the good. I think it's something that

1:31:20.920 --> 1:31:23.920
<v Speaker 1>we should all be very happy about. But they're gonna

1:31:23.960 --> 1:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>try this through the media, through through not just and

1:31:27.680 --> 1:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I don't just mean the news media. They're going to

1:31:29.280 --> 1:31:31.960
<v Speaker 1>try it through TV shows and through Hollywood, and they

1:31:32.040 --> 1:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>want to make it socially unacceptable to support Trump. And

1:31:36.479 --> 1:31:39.439
<v Speaker 1>so even if you personally are going to vote for him,

1:31:40.680 --> 1:31:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Jilla Brand and Tom Perez and all these others out

1:31:43.200 --> 1:31:46.160
<v Speaker 1>there are going to make people feel a little sheepish

1:31:46.200 --> 1:31:49.639
<v Speaker 1>about speaking openly going into this election about their support

1:31:49.680 --> 1:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>for Trump, They're gonna make people feel like, you know,

1:31:51.760 --> 1:31:53.559
<v Speaker 1>I sit down in the boardroom at work, or I

1:31:53.560 --> 1:31:56.560
<v Speaker 1>sit down and you know in the office environment, I

1:31:56.920 --> 1:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>better not be wearing my MAGA hat. I better keep

1:31:59.320 --> 1:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>this to myself. And that's an advantage for Democrats and

1:32:04.160 --> 1:32:07.000
<v Speaker 1>they know it. You know, a chilling effect on your

1:32:07.000 --> 1:32:09.439
<v Speaker 1>support of MAGA is what they're trying to achieve, and

1:32:09.479 --> 1:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of ways of trying to do it. Hi,

1:32:12.560 --> 1:32:18.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to gap. Binary sex typically refers to your

1:32:18.080 --> 1:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>biological traits as your gonads, your genitalia, your internal sex characteristics,

1:32:22.960 --> 1:32:27.679
<v Speaker 1>your hormone production, hormone response, and secondary sex characteristics. Gender

1:32:27.800 --> 1:32:30.960
<v Speaker 1>is about your identity, your expression, and it's often based

1:32:31.000 --> 1:32:33.800
<v Speaker 1>on ideas about sex. It's important that we really break

1:32:33.800 --> 1:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>down what are we talking about when we talk about

1:32:35.920 --> 1:32:39.120
<v Speaker 1>sex and gender and is there something called biological sex

1:32:39.120 --> 1:32:41.320
<v Speaker 1>and what does that mean. This idea that the body

1:32:41.400 --> 1:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>is either male or female is totally wrong and I

1:32:45.880 --> 1:32:48.639
<v Speaker 1>am living proof of that. We know intersex people exist

1:32:48.680 --> 1:32:52.439
<v Speaker 1>and break down this binary We all have characteristics that

1:32:52.479 --> 1:32:55.200
<v Speaker 1>are typically male and typically female, and it is really

1:32:55.240 --> 1:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>about political choices, social factors, ideological choices that we assign

1:33:00.160 --> 1:33:03.840
<v Speaker 1>meeting to different parts of our body. All of that

1:33:03.960 --> 1:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is wrong. Everything that you just heard there is factually, scientifically,

1:33:12.200 --> 1:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>rationally incorrect. For those of you who are wondering what

1:33:17.200 --> 1:33:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the heck was that nonsense, it was a video ad

1:33:21.080 --> 1:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>that is running in teen Vogue. Now hold on, before

1:33:24.240 --> 1:33:26.720
<v Speaker 1>you say, puck, come on teen Vogue, Who cares? I

1:33:26.760 --> 1:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>guess I better cancel my subscription before we look at

1:33:31.240 --> 1:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that part. Let's understand that, you know, teen Vogue is

1:33:34.200 --> 1:33:36.439
<v Speaker 1>owned by one of these big media conglomerates, just like

1:33:36.479 --> 1:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>all these other magazines, and they're propagandizing to young people

1:33:41.160 --> 1:33:46.960
<v Speaker 1>who don't have the knowledge and philosophical background necessarily to

1:33:47.040 --> 1:33:51.360
<v Speaker 1>understand that what they're being told is complete garbage. There's

1:33:51.439 --> 1:33:55.519
<v Speaker 1>no binary, coherent thing called biological sex. That is as

1:33:56.080 --> 1:34:00.479
<v Speaker 1>false as any statement can be. There is abs resolutely

1:34:01.160 --> 1:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>a coherent thing. It's It's one of the clearest and

1:34:05.240 --> 1:34:08.760
<v Speaker 1>most well understood things in existence is that there is

1:34:08.800 --> 1:34:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a difference between xx chromosome and x y chromosome. Now,

1:34:12.720 --> 1:34:14.720
<v Speaker 1>people who want to play the game, and sometimes I

1:34:14.760 --> 1:34:17.720
<v Speaker 1>get emails from people that think they're very smart and say, well, buck,

1:34:17.760 --> 1:34:24.320
<v Speaker 1>there can be chromosomal abnormalities, and they're you know, sometimes okay, well,

1:34:24.439 --> 1:34:27.400
<v Speaker 1>is that then the standard for being intersex? See? See,

1:34:27.400 --> 1:34:31.880
<v Speaker 1>they they want they want there to be a scientific

1:34:31.920 --> 1:34:36.559
<v Speaker 1>explanation for what is a purely psychological phenomenon, and a

1:34:36.600 --> 1:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon based entirely of emotion and will and choice, not

1:34:41.600 --> 1:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>of a physical manifestation or a physical reality. And you know,

1:34:48.960 --> 1:34:54.679
<v Speaker 1>this is a kind of extension, this desire to First

1:34:54.680 --> 1:34:56.840
<v Speaker 1>of all, there's a Marxist underpinning to all this, because

1:34:56.880 --> 1:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>destroying the family, destroying sex is necessary to destroy the family.

1:35:00.080 --> 1:35:03.400
<v Speaker 1>Destroying family is a necessary component of replacing the family

1:35:03.479 --> 1:35:06.360
<v Speaker 1>unit with the state. The state then becomes your family,

1:35:06.520 --> 1:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the collectivist identity that we all are handed by. The

1:35:10.240 --> 1:35:12.800
<v Speaker 1>state becomes the only identity that has meaning, because of

1:35:12.800 --> 1:35:16.280
<v Speaker 1>course the state also wants to be in place of God.

1:35:16.800 --> 1:35:18.880
<v Speaker 1>So get rid of the family, get rid of God,

1:35:18.920 --> 1:35:21.599
<v Speaker 1>replace it with the state. This is some people will

1:35:21.640 --> 1:35:27.599
<v Speaker 1>talk about cultural Marxism, but has long standing roots in

1:35:27.920 --> 1:35:31.920
<v Speaker 1>secularist Marxist philosophy. So it's not out of nowhere that

1:35:31.960 --> 1:35:33.599
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden we're being told there's no such

1:35:33.640 --> 1:35:38.800
<v Speaker 1>thing as biological sex. This is a very very fashionable,

1:35:38.880 --> 1:35:41.920
<v Speaker 1>not just because it's in teen vogue, a very fashionable

1:35:42.520 --> 1:35:45.160
<v Speaker 1>position on the left now. And people say this and

1:35:45.240 --> 1:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>think that they don't sound stupid when they sound very stupid,

1:35:49.200 --> 1:35:55.880
<v Speaker 1>saying there is no scientific basis for these claims whatsoever.

1:35:56.360 --> 1:36:00.000
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, every cell of your body is different,

1:36:00.520 --> 1:36:04.559
<v Speaker 1>male or female, and you know this goes to the

1:36:04.800 --> 1:36:10.400
<v Speaker 1>very earliest stages of development inside the womb and what occurs.

1:36:10.560 --> 1:36:13.400
<v Speaker 1>But you know, it's also this desire to fight against

1:36:13.960 --> 1:36:20.320
<v Speaker 1>nature and this presumption that leftist philosophy can somehow overcome

1:36:20.840 --> 1:36:24.439
<v Speaker 1>reality just by wishing it to be. So, you know,

1:36:24.560 --> 1:36:29.760
<v Speaker 1>it's it's almost like, uh, you know. Deconstructionism is a

1:36:29.880 --> 1:36:35.080
<v Speaker 1>garbage philosophy of Derita from the nineteen sixties, and it's

1:36:36.000 --> 1:36:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a theory about that that criticizes traditional assumptions about things

1:36:40.040 --> 1:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>like what is true and what is identity? Right, so

1:36:42.640 --> 1:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you just pull apart everything nothing matters really anymore, nothing

1:36:46.240 --> 1:36:49.720
<v Speaker 1>is true or real anymore. That's deconstructionism. And this is

1:36:49.760 --> 1:36:54.839
<v Speaker 1>how you get you know, high school sophomores or particularly

1:36:54.840 --> 1:36:57.320
<v Speaker 1>it happens in college. We're being told, well, let's you know,

1:36:57.720 --> 1:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>what's wrong with Hamlet? You know, what what do you think?

1:37:00.720 --> 1:37:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Hamlet says, forget what Shakespeare meant. What do you think

1:37:03.840 --> 1:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Shakespeare was saying here? Not what do you think he

1:37:07.000 --> 1:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>meant to say? But what should he be saying here?

1:37:09.080 --> 1:37:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is what deconstruction is. It just turns

1:37:11.200 --> 1:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>into a form of mental auto erotica. And that's a

1:37:19.520 --> 1:37:22.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a fun word, by the way, That's what you

1:37:22.320 --> 1:37:25.880
<v Speaker 1>see here. Though this is not rooted in truth, it's

1:37:25.920 --> 1:37:29.320
<v Speaker 1>not rooted in science. But there is a very real

1:37:29.360 --> 1:37:31.960
<v Speaker 1>movement to propagandize to your kids that there's no such

1:37:32.000 --> 1:37:35.160
<v Speaker 1>thing as biological sex. Meanwhile, we're all supposed to sit

1:37:35.160 --> 1:37:38.240
<v Speaker 1>around and be worried about the pay gap. The pay

1:37:38.320 --> 1:37:41.439
<v Speaker 1>gap is a thing only if you don't understand how

1:37:41.439 --> 1:37:45.800
<v Speaker 1>basic economics works, which the left also doesn't understand. I

1:37:46.200 --> 1:37:48.800
<v Speaker 1>know that they have powerful emotions, and that people who

1:37:48.800 --> 1:37:52.479
<v Speaker 1>are leftists, if they have these feelings that are very

1:37:52.600 --> 1:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>very strong, but they really need to bend to the

1:37:56.120 --> 1:37:59.160
<v Speaker 1>reality around them and at least make coherent arguments. And

1:37:59.280 --> 1:38:02.599
<v Speaker 1>saying there's no coherent thing called biological sex is one

1:38:02.640 --> 1:38:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of the dumbest things I have ever heard. There absolutely is.

1:38:06.400 --> 1:38:09.040
<v Speaker 1>We all know what it is, and just because they

1:38:09.120 --> 1:38:15.160
<v Speaker 1>say so doesn't mean it is roll calls up next.

1:38:16.000 --> 1:38:18.800
<v Speaker 1>Ain't no party, look a Team Buck party, because a

1:38:18.960 --> 1:38:28.519
<v Speaker 1>Team Buck party. Don't stop. Yeah, we got Buck turned

1:38:28.560 --> 1:38:44.559
<v Speaker 1>up to eleven. It's time for roll call. Indeed, it

1:38:44.720 --> 1:38:48.920
<v Speaker 1>is from Savannah, Georgia. I'm gonna tell you guys something

1:38:48.920 --> 1:38:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that's very exciting for me. And those of you who

1:38:51.400 --> 1:38:55.479
<v Speaker 1>are from Georgia or Florida or some of the other

1:38:55.520 --> 1:38:58.639
<v Speaker 1>states in the vicinity are going to think that I'm

1:38:58.680 --> 1:39:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a big dork for saying this, but I was very

1:39:01.360 --> 1:39:05.800
<v Speaker 1>excited today. I saw an alligator, which for somebody from DC,

1:39:06.040 --> 1:39:08.680
<v Speaker 1>perhaps because I am a swamp creature, for me to

1:39:08.720 --> 1:39:11.680
<v Speaker 1>see a real swamp creature was very exciting. But it

1:39:11.720 --> 1:39:14.800
<v Speaker 1>was basking in the sun. Looked to be about a

1:39:14.880 --> 1:39:18.439
<v Speaker 1>six foot or i'd say, just hanging out, just hanging out.

1:39:18.439 --> 1:39:20.800
<v Speaker 1>It's exciting for me, you know. It's this is like

1:39:20.800 --> 1:39:22.639
<v Speaker 1>when I've been in some parts of the world where

1:39:22.960 --> 1:39:25.880
<v Speaker 1>where there are monkeys just running around, like monkeys are

1:39:25.960 --> 1:39:28.439
<v Speaker 1>kind of like squirrels, and you know, you know, you're

1:39:28.439 --> 1:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>a tourist, You're like, look at the monkeys, and all

1:39:30.400 --> 1:39:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the people that are actually from the country are like, yeah,

1:39:32.439 --> 1:39:34.799
<v Speaker 1>they're annoying and loud and steal my and steal food

1:39:34.840 --> 1:39:37.439
<v Speaker 1>from like the window sill. I'm sure people down here

1:39:37.439 --> 1:39:40.000
<v Speaker 1>aren't as excited about gators as I am, but I

1:39:40.040 --> 1:39:43.439
<v Speaker 1>was like, whoa the gator. Very touristy moment for me.

1:39:43.520 --> 1:39:46.200
<v Speaker 1>But unfortunately, Savannah, I have to tell you. I love

1:39:46.400 --> 1:39:49.679
<v Speaker 1>your city and your food, and Georgia is a great state.

1:39:50.000 --> 1:39:53.519
<v Speaker 1>But I could have used higher than like forty five

1:39:53.600 --> 1:39:55.519
<v Speaker 1>degree weather while I was down here. I'm just saying

1:39:55.680 --> 1:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I came all the way from New York, I mean

1:39:57.080 --> 1:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>from not New York, from DC, and it was a

1:39:59.640 --> 1:40:01.720
<v Speaker 1>little b on the chili side. But no, Savannah is great.

1:40:01.760 --> 1:40:03.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean the food here is amazing, which I will

1:40:03.720 --> 1:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>say is that pretty much sells me on a place.

1:40:06.080 --> 1:40:08.519
<v Speaker 1>If I like the food, I can handle everything else.

1:40:08.560 --> 1:40:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh and people down here actually have good politics, unlike NDC,

1:40:12.080 --> 1:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>so that's nice. Johann said, heard you were in Atlanta

1:40:17.200 --> 1:40:20.680
<v Speaker 1>for a conference, and believe you said the name Stansbury.

1:40:22.760 --> 1:40:26.360
<v Speaker 1>So the recently I saw a TV ad for a

1:40:26.400 --> 1:40:29.519
<v Speaker 1>book titled The American Jubilee. An online search took me

1:40:29.560 --> 1:40:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the website for the publishers also Stansbury scary stuff. Will

1:40:32.760 --> 1:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you be sharing your views on it? Johann. Yeah, they've

1:40:35.040 --> 1:40:39.000
<v Speaker 1>published Jubilee is essentially a book that dives into where

1:40:39.040 --> 1:40:41.439
<v Speaker 1>the economy is going to crash out and how things

1:40:41.479 --> 1:40:43.960
<v Speaker 1>are going to get really bad. And yes, that is

1:40:44.000 --> 1:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>Stansbury Research. I work with Stansbury Research. I know the

1:40:47.920 --> 1:40:50.240
<v Speaker 1>folks who are running very well, and I'm down here

1:40:50.280 --> 1:40:54.080
<v Speaker 1>for a Stansbury conference. But I am in Savannah, Georgia.

1:40:54.120 --> 1:40:58.920
<v Speaker 1>I am not in Atlanta, Jesse. Right, if you were

1:40:58.920 --> 1:41:01.160
<v Speaker 1>in Savannah, I hope you style by nine Line Apparel

1:41:01.200 --> 1:41:04.160
<v Speaker 1>and Black Rifle Coffee Company, Jesse. I have had it's

1:41:04.160 --> 1:41:07.280
<v Speaker 1>a fair point. I have reached out to my friend

1:41:07.400 --> 1:41:10.519
<v Speaker 1>at nine Line Apparel, the CEO of there, Tyler Merritt.

1:41:10.800 --> 1:41:13.519
<v Speaker 1>Unfortunately he has been out of town over the weekend

1:41:13.680 --> 1:41:16.360
<v Speaker 1>and into the week so we've not been able to

1:41:16.360 --> 1:41:19.400
<v Speaker 1>meet up yet. But otherwise I absolutely would have gone

1:41:19.400 --> 1:41:21.720
<v Speaker 1>over there and if I just had a little bit

1:41:21.760 --> 1:41:24.599
<v Speaker 1>more time. But it's it's a bit, it's a bit

1:41:24.600 --> 1:41:28.599
<v Speaker 1>on the busy side. So I'm hoping that, you know,

1:41:28.640 --> 1:41:32.200
<v Speaker 1>things will more or less come together on all that.

1:41:34.120 --> 1:41:38.000
<v Speaker 1>What else do we have here? And I just started mumbling,

1:41:38.000 --> 1:41:42.280
<v Speaker 1>there the end, they'll come together with the thing. Paul Rites, Hello, Buck,

1:41:42.320 --> 1:41:48.679
<v Speaker 1>any chance your truffled egg recipe is available online, Paul,

1:41:48.760 --> 1:41:51.759
<v Speaker 1>I didn't know that I had a truffled egg recipe.

1:41:52.120 --> 1:41:56.519
<v Speaker 1>Are you referring to scrambled egg with truffle flavoring? Because

1:41:56.600 --> 1:41:58.880
<v Speaker 1>that would just be scrambled eggs. You add some either

1:41:58.920 --> 1:42:01.880
<v Speaker 1>truffle shavings if you want to be very bougie, will

1:42:01.960 --> 1:42:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi electrafor shavings in my scrambled eggs? Yes, I do,

1:42:07.040 --> 1:42:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and I wear a top hat and a monocle while

1:42:09.080 --> 1:42:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I eat them and nothing else. That's one way to go.

1:42:15.800 --> 1:42:20.599
<v Speaker 1>But the secret for me for scrambled eggs is and

1:42:20.760 --> 1:42:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the game changer things that I learned from doing. And

1:42:23.600 --> 1:42:25.400
<v Speaker 1>I'll just tell you I watch a lot of YouTube videos.

1:42:25.439 --> 1:42:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I learned to cook by watching YouTube videos. But you

1:42:27.720 --> 1:42:31.280
<v Speaker 1>have to watch multiple videos of making the same dish

1:42:31.320 --> 1:42:34.320
<v Speaker 1>because everybody has different techniques and certain ones you will

1:42:34.720 --> 1:42:37.439
<v Speaker 1>pick up yourself and you'll you'll like, and others you'll

1:42:37.479 --> 1:42:38.920
<v Speaker 1>be like, I don't want to do it that way.

1:42:39.040 --> 1:42:41.479
<v Speaker 1>So if you watch multiple videos, it's kind of like

1:42:41.560 --> 1:42:46.679
<v Speaker 1>reading various news sources on the same topic. It's important

1:42:46.720 --> 1:42:49.520
<v Speaker 1>to do that in my business because there are nuances

1:42:49.600 --> 1:42:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and little details that are different from write up to

1:42:52.920 --> 1:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>write up. So to go deep on a story, you

1:42:55.040 --> 1:42:57.599
<v Speaker 1>want to read more than one source on it. In fact,

1:42:57.600 --> 1:42:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you want to read many sources on it most of

1:42:59.080 --> 1:43:02.799
<v Speaker 1>the time. I feel the same way about being an

1:43:02.880 --> 1:43:05.800
<v Speaker 1>autodidact chef. I don't know if that's a thing, but

1:43:05.880 --> 1:43:08.000
<v Speaker 1>let's say that's a thing. Somebody who's self taught as

1:43:08.000 --> 1:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a chef, which I am, and chef is way too

1:43:11.920 --> 1:43:14.240
<v Speaker 1>grandiose a term for it. Somebody who can make some

1:43:14.360 --> 1:43:20.639
<v Speaker 1>decent proteins and breakfast food and occasionally, no, that's really it. Actually,

1:43:20.640 --> 1:43:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that's where I go. That's that's the full the full

1:43:23.200 --> 1:43:25.960
<v Speaker 1>length of my culinary skills. But my scrambled eggs are amazing.

1:43:26.000 --> 1:43:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're amazing. I cannot lie to you. Know.

1:43:27.760 --> 1:43:31.679
<v Speaker 1>It's a very good thing to be able to make carroy.

1:43:31.720 --> 1:43:33.719
<v Speaker 1>Oh wait, I was telling you. I see a Karen.

1:43:33.760 --> 1:43:35.519
<v Speaker 1>I'll get to you in one second. I skip right

1:43:35.560 --> 1:43:37.160
<v Speaker 1>over the secret for those you want to know, you're

1:43:37.240 --> 1:43:39.880
<v Speaker 1>learning one thing today you can really use. Make sure

1:43:39.960 --> 1:43:43.479
<v Speaker 1>that you know that you can take the eggs. And

1:43:43.479 --> 1:43:45.599
<v Speaker 1>this seems so simple, but I never thought of it before.

1:43:45.640 --> 1:43:48.719
<v Speaker 1>I always tried to adjust the heat. Eggs are so

1:43:50.520 --> 1:43:54.639
<v Speaker 1>heat sensitive and cook so quickly that as you're going

1:43:54.720 --> 1:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>the moment you think that it's there, they're going too fast.

1:43:57.040 --> 1:43:59.439
<v Speaker 1>Because overcooking eggs is what everybody does. This is why

1:43:59.439 --> 1:44:02.120
<v Speaker 1>when you go to a diner and they say, hey,

1:44:02.160 --> 1:44:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna make you an omelet, and the omelet comes

1:44:05.200 --> 1:44:08.479
<v Speaker 1>out and has those sort of brown scorched marks on

1:44:08.520 --> 1:44:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the outside. I mean, eggs should never have brown scorch

1:44:11.360 --> 1:44:13.240
<v Speaker 1>marks on it. That's not a good sign. That means

1:44:13.240 --> 1:44:16.920
<v Speaker 1>they cook the you know what out of it. Be

1:44:18.400 --> 1:44:22.720
<v Speaker 1>comfortable taking your eggs off the burner entirely, So just

1:44:22.840 --> 1:44:24.760
<v Speaker 1>move it off the burner, move it somewhere else on

1:44:24.800 --> 1:44:26.920
<v Speaker 1>your stove, Move it somewhere where it's not overdirect heat,

1:44:26.920 --> 1:44:28.559
<v Speaker 1>because there's still going to be heat in that pan,

1:44:29.160 --> 1:44:31.439
<v Speaker 1>so it's gonna stay very warm, in fact, will continue

1:44:31.439 --> 1:44:34.760
<v Speaker 1>to cook. But that's just a way more effective I

1:44:34.880 --> 1:44:38.000
<v Speaker 1>find than you know, trying to get to like low

1:44:38.120 --> 1:44:40.320
<v Speaker 1>medium or simmer or you know whatever. It's just just

1:44:40.360 --> 1:44:43.320
<v Speaker 1>take it off that heat and then know that in

1:44:43.360 --> 1:44:48.200
<v Speaker 1>the process is a necessary step. Karen, it's buck great

1:44:48.200 --> 1:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>that you talked about the starvation in China under Mao.

1:44:51.160 --> 1:44:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Helen Raleigh, who grew up in China might be an

1:44:53.280 --> 1:44:56.240
<v Speaker 1>interesting guest for your show. She is now a businesswoman

1:44:56.240 --> 1:44:59.040
<v Speaker 1>who occasionally writes for The Federalist. I recently finished reading

1:44:59.040 --> 1:45:02.040
<v Speaker 1>her book Can You Just Never Said, which is about

1:45:02.040 --> 1:45:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the hardships her family endured under MAO and how difficult

1:45:05.280 --> 1:45:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it was to get American citizenship. Look, China is a fascinating,

1:45:13.240 --> 1:45:20.160
<v Speaker 1>fascinating everything country, economic competitor, national security challenge, and we

1:45:20.200 --> 1:45:22.720
<v Speaker 1>are about to enter a new phase now. I mean

1:45:22.720 --> 1:45:27.400
<v Speaker 1>the last almost twenty years, you would say at this point,

1:45:27.439 --> 1:45:32.800
<v Speaker 1>we've had a twenty year cycle now of interventions abroad,

1:45:33.040 --> 1:45:37.439
<v Speaker 1>predominantly but not entirely, but predominantly in the Muslim world,

1:45:38.439 --> 1:45:43.000
<v Speaker 1>and they have been counterinsurgency operations for the most bar

1:45:43.080 --> 1:45:47.400
<v Speaker 1>counter terrorism that turns into counterinsurgency, and that's just been

1:45:47.439 --> 1:45:52.400
<v Speaker 1>our focus. Radical Islam has been the primary enemy of

1:45:52.439 --> 1:45:56.200
<v Speaker 1>America and the West for the last twenty years. We

1:45:56.240 --> 1:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are shifting out of that now, not that radical Islam

1:45:59.280 --> 1:46:01.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't still are and it's going to go away, but

1:46:02.040 --> 1:46:05.400
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to be a primary or the primary threat.

1:46:05.800 --> 1:46:10.400
<v Speaker 1>It's going to first it'll feel like China, China and

1:46:10.400 --> 1:46:13.799
<v Speaker 1>the US are butting heads more and more over economic matters,

1:46:14.040 --> 1:46:18.000
<v Speaker 1>and then the national security challenges will become more apparent.

1:46:18.680 --> 1:46:20.880
<v Speaker 1>So we are heading into that. I mean, I think

1:46:20.880 --> 1:46:23.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be in a twenty year cycle and

1:46:23.320 --> 1:46:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it's really starting now of US China struggle for dominance,

1:46:27.640 --> 1:46:29.400
<v Speaker 1>and by the end of those twenty years, we're going

1:46:29.439 --> 1:46:33.400
<v Speaker 1>to know who's the top dog. And that's what I

1:46:33.439 --> 1:46:36.840
<v Speaker 1>see happening now. So I'm really trying to gear myself

1:46:37.560 --> 1:46:41.040
<v Speaker 1>toward understanding that as much as possible. I'm going to

1:46:41.200 --> 1:46:45.439
<v Speaker 1>China in May, at least that's the plan as of now,

1:46:46.120 --> 1:46:50.920
<v Speaker 1>for all kinds of just basic ground truth tourism stuff

1:46:50.920 --> 1:46:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and also some high level meetings with some business folks there.

1:46:54.320 --> 1:46:56.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to get some ground truth to be

1:46:56.640 --> 1:46:58.240
<v Speaker 1>able to bring back to you here on the show.

1:46:59.160 --> 1:47:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But is going to be at folks, I mean all

1:47:01.840 --> 1:47:05.679
<v Speaker 1>it's amazing too. Notice how Russia, the Russia scaremongering since

1:47:05.720 --> 1:47:08.799
<v Speaker 1>the Mulla report came out, has dropped off already so much.

1:47:09.439 --> 1:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And Russia is not a realistic challenger to US. Yes,

1:47:14.240 --> 1:47:16.599
<v Speaker 1>it has a very large nuclear arsenal, it's a very

1:47:16.600 --> 1:47:19.280
<v Speaker 1>big country with a lot of natural resources, but it's

1:47:19.400 --> 1:47:22.640
<v Speaker 1>it's little You know, it's a little weak sauce economy,

1:47:23.439 --> 1:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>just it's not a serious national security and economic competitor

1:47:28.439 --> 1:47:31.000
<v Speaker 1>threat China is China is going to have a bigger

1:47:31.040 --> 1:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>economy than us and then a bigger military. Then well

1:47:35.160 --> 1:47:38.240
<v Speaker 1>already has more manpower, but a more powerful military than

1:47:38.280 --> 1:47:41.920
<v Speaker 1>ours under current with a current trajectory in a pretty

1:47:41.920 --> 1:47:46.280
<v Speaker 1>short period of time. And we have no leadership really

1:47:46.280 --> 1:47:48.160
<v Speaker 1>that thinks about this problem. I mean, the fact that

1:47:48.200 --> 1:47:52.280
<v Speaker 1>matters that Trump is the first president in my lifetime

1:47:52.720 --> 1:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>who has at least been ringing the alarm bell about

1:47:56.120 --> 1:47:58.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, China, we want with them on some things,

1:47:58.760 --> 1:48:01.519
<v Speaker 1>but we want to try to be cooperative where we can.

1:48:01.720 --> 1:48:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But China is a competitor. China is trying to become

1:48:05.360 --> 1:48:07.880
<v Speaker 1>the global hegemon. It does not want to be in

1:48:07.960 --> 1:48:13.559
<v Speaker 1>second place. Trump understands that, you know, his zero sum view,

1:48:13.760 --> 1:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>his hyper competitive view of all things interpersonal, inter business

1:48:17.240 --> 1:48:21.080
<v Speaker 1>relationships has meant that Trump understands the threat that China

1:48:21.320 --> 1:48:25.400
<v Speaker 1>poses to not just the US but the liberal Western

1:48:25.439 --> 1:48:28.760
<v Speaker 1>world order over the long term. I mean, let me

1:48:28.800 --> 1:48:33.080
<v Speaker 1>put it to you in these terms, the US China

1:48:33.439 --> 1:48:36.160
<v Speaker 1>showdown that I think we're in the early stages of

1:48:36.280 --> 1:48:40.000
<v Speaker 1>right now is going to be something akin to what

1:48:40.439 --> 1:48:44.559
<v Speaker 1>you know ancient Greece and Persia were locked in. I mean,

1:48:44.680 --> 1:48:46.760
<v Speaker 1>this is going to be the two great powers of

1:48:46.800 --> 1:48:49.080
<v Speaker 1>the day, or people would say a new Cold War

1:48:49.200 --> 1:48:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and that's you know, sure, that's that's another more recent

1:48:53.520 --> 1:48:55.360
<v Speaker 1>version of it. But I like to get to the ancient,

1:48:55.840 --> 1:48:58.479
<v Speaker 1>ancient Greek and ancient Roman stuff whenever I can. So

1:48:58.640 --> 1:49:01.719
<v Speaker 1>that's what I see happening here. And so you're gonna

1:49:01.760 --> 1:49:06.360
<v Speaker 1>hear more from me about China going forward. Tim, That's

1:49:06.360 --> 1:49:09.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna be it for Live from Savannah today here in

1:49:09.920 --> 1:49:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the Freedom Hunt. I'll be back in the swamp in

1:49:12.120 --> 1:49:14.400
<v Speaker 1>DC tomorrow. I'm not going to bring any alligators with me,

1:49:14.880 --> 1:49:19.240
<v Speaker 1>but I will talk to you then. As always, shields high.

1:49:19.400 --> 1:49:23.599
<v Speaker 1>We have a fantastic contingent of seniors who are patriots

1:49:23.600 --> 1:49:26.160
<v Speaker 1>in love this country, who listen to this show and

1:49:26.160 --> 1:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to all the seniors out there. You know, you may

1:49:28.080 --> 1:49:30.800
<v Speaker 1>have heard of the AARP, but I want you to

1:49:30.840 --> 1:49:34.679
<v Speaker 1>know AARP doesn't share your values. They're pretty left wing,

1:49:34.880 --> 1:49:38.439
<v Speaker 1>fought for progressive causes, including Obamacare. That's why I want

1:49:38.479 --> 1:49:41.640
<v Speaker 1>you to check out my friends at amak amac was

1:49:41.680 --> 1:49:45.599
<v Speaker 1>founded by an air veteran, and they have working for

1:49:45.800 --> 1:49:50.080
<v Speaker 1>over a decade to support conservative views and policy here

1:49:50.160 --> 1:49:53.320
<v Speaker 1>in America. So AMAK agrees with you on what the

1:49:53.320 --> 1:49:55.840
<v Speaker 1>future of this country should look like, but also gets

1:49:55.840 --> 1:49:59.839
<v Speaker 1>you great value discounts on car insurance, hotels, roadside assistance,

1:50:00.080 --> 1:50:03.719
<v Speaker 1>ental plans, even sell service options. So check out AMACS

1:50:03.800 --> 1:50:05.920
<v Speaker 1>stand with them as they fight the good fight by

1:50:05.960 --> 1:50:08.439
<v Speaker 1>becoming a member today. The benefits are great, but the

1:50:08.560 --> 1:50:12.479
<v Speaker 1>cause is even greater. Join right now at AMAC dot

1:50:12.600 --> 1:50:18.439
<v Speaker 1>us slash buck. That's AMAC dot us slash buck. AMAC

1:50:18.520 --> 1:50:20.880
<v Speaker 1>is better, better for you, Better for America.