1
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:07,400
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news.

2
00:00:08,000 --> 00:00:10,680
Speaker 2: Making the case for a rake cut. FED Governor Chris

3
00:00:10,680 --> 00:00:13,360
Speaker 2: Waller sounding an audience here in New York, looking across

4
00:00:13,360 --> 00:00:15,520
Speaker 2: the selfton hot data, I get a picture of a

5
00:00:15,600 --> 00:00:18,200
Speaker 2: labor market on the edge joining us now here in

6
00:00:18,239 --> 00:00:21,000
Speaker 2: New York City, the Federals f Governor Chris Waller.

7
00:00:21,040 --> 00:00:23,919
Speaker 1: Governor Walla, good morning, Oh, good morning from Jonathan Lisa Henry.

8
00:00:24,079 --> 00:00:24,720
Speaker 1: Nice to be here.

9
00:00:24,720 --> 00:00:26,880
Speaker 2: It's good to see you, sir. Let's talk about why

10
00:00:26,880 --> 00:00:28,560
Speaker 2: we're losing the luxury of white sink.

11
00:00:28,880 --> 00:00:31,560
Speaker 1: Have we lost that already? No? I think we have.

12
00:00:31,760 --> 00:00:34,760
Speaker 3: Like I said last night, the headline numbers for the

13
00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:38,000
Speaker 3: lay remark what we're seeing are okay, but it's like

14
00:00:38,040 --> 00:00:40,280
Speaker 3: when you get underneath and start looking at the data,

15
00:00:40,479 --> 00:00:43,480
Speaker 3: the private sector is not doing as well as everybody thinks.

16
00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:46,479
Speaker 3: It is like most of the half of the employment

17
00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:49,000
Speaker 3: growth we saw last month was in the public sector,

18
00:00:49,560 --> 00:00:50,720
Speaker 3: and that means the private.

19
00:00:50,479 --> 00:00:52,240
Speaker 1: Sector is not doing particularly well.

20
00:00:52,360 --> 00:00:56,639
Speaker 3: So I was just joking that, you know, if you're

21
00:00:56,680 --> 00:00:59,040
Speaker 3: walking on a lake and the ice is frozen and

22
00:00:59,240 --> 00:01:02,280
Speaker 3: sound safe, but when you start hearing cracks, and that's

23
00:01:02,280 --> 00:01:04,720
Speaker 3: what I feel like, it's too late once you go

24
00:01:04,760 --> 00:01:07,000
Speaker 3: through the ice, so you've got to start prepping in

25
00:01:07,040 --> 00:01:09,200
Speaker 3: advance before you have that happen.

26
00:01:09,360 --> 00:01:11,000
Speaker 2: How do you scan that with what we've had from

27
00:01:11,040 --> 00:01:14,800
Speaker 2: Coporate America so far? What Coporate America has tolled Lisa

28
00:01:14,959 --> 00:01:17,680
Speaker 2: sitting down with Skull cub if United aadlines talking about

29
00:01:17,680 --> 00:01:20,360
Speaker 2: a rebound in the second half, what we've had from

30
00:01:20,360 --> 00:01:22,080
Speaker 2: the big banks so far this week? How do you

31
00:01:22,080 --> 00:01:24,640
Speaker 2: sclam what you're seeing the data with what way hearing

32
00:01:24,959 --> 00:01:25,680
Speaker 2: from CEOs?

33
00:01:26,000 --> 00:01:27,759
Speaker 3: Yeah, I mean when I talk to CEOs, I get

34
00:01:27,760 --> 00:01:30,959
Speaker 3: the same thing, wearing just hole pattern in terms of

35
00:01:30,959 --> 00:01:34,679
Speaker 3: certainly the labor market. They're not hiring, they're not firing,

36
00:01:34,720 --> 00:01:36,640
Speaker 3: they're just watching. And that's kind of what you see

37
00:01:36,640 --> 00:01:37,880
Speaker 3: in this underlying.

38
00:01:37,480 --> 00:01:38,360
Speaker 1: Private sector data.

39
00:01:38,440 --> 00:01:41,760
Speaker 3: There's not much happening, So it wouldn't take much sort

40
00:01:41,800 --> 00:01:42,199
Speaker 3: of tippet.

41
00:01:42,720 --> 00:01:44,480
Speaker 1: Now, could I be wrong? Absolutely?

42
00:01:44,640 --> 00:01:46,800
Speaker 3: I mean last year we got a couple of week

43
00:01:47,200 --> 00:01:49,600
Speaker 3: labor market reports allowed us to cut in September and

44
00:01:49,640 --> 00:01:52,160
Speaker 3: then everything kind of reversed went back up.

45
00:01:52,680 --> 00:01:55,919
Speaker 1: So I'm not saying that couldn't happen again.

46
00:01:56,400 --> 00:01:59,160
Speaker 3: But it's just we've constantly seen little bits of day

47
00:01:59,280 --> 00:02:03,000
Speaker 3: continually coming down the page book yesterday came out some

48
00:02:03,080 --> 00:02:03,600
Speaker 3: other stuff.

49
00:02:03,680 --> 00:02:05,760
Speaker 1: When you get out of the Joels quits rates.

50
00:02:05,560 --> 00:02:08,320
Speaker 3: Hiring rates, these things are not indicating our super healthy

51
00:02:08,360 --> 00:02:09,600
Speaker 3: private sector of labor market.

52
00:02:09,680 --> 00:02:12,640
Speaker 2: As you know, you're facing potentially and I stress, potentially

53
00:02:12,720 --> 00:02:15,720
Speaker 2: negative supply shelks on both sides of the mandate. I

54
00:02:15,760 --> 00:02:17,639
Speaker 2: want to say on the labor market, just for one

55
00:02:17,639 --> 00:02:21,040
Speaker 2: further note, immigration, how are you thinking about that when

56
00:02:21,080 --> 00:02:22,639
Speaker 2: you look at a labor market at the moment when

57
00:02:22,639 --> 00:02:25,000
Speaker 2: we have people coming on the program on Blimbeck Savanans

58
00:02:25,040 --> 00:02:27,920
Speaker 2: on Bloomback TV every single morning six till nine, coming

59
00:02:27,960 --> 00:02:30,919
Speaker 2: on here and saying, look at the data, unemployment could

60
00:02:30,919 --> 00:02:33,320
Speaker 2: stand these levels even with job gains of fifty to

61
00:02:33,360 --> 00:02:36,320
Speaker 2: one hundred thousand because of tighter immigration. How does that

62
00:02:36,360 --> 00:02:38,520
Speaker 2: factor into your thinking as you look at the US

63
00:02:38,600 --> 00:02:39,200
Speaker 2: labor market.

64
00:02:39,400 --> 00:02:41,760
Speaker 3: Well, yeah, the labor market doesn't necessarily have to be

65
00:02:41,960 --> 00:02:45,200
Speaker 3: affected by it because if workers flow in and they

66
00:02:45,240 --> 00:02:48,239
Speaker 3: get jobs at roughly the same rate as the existing workers,

67
00:02:48,240 --> 00:02:50,600
Speaker 3: the unmployment rate doesn't change even though the labor force

68
00:02:50,680 --> 00:02:52,800
Speaker 3: is higher. And when they go back out, the same

69
00:02:52,800 --> 00:02:55,560
Speaker 3: thing happens. If they leave the employment and leave the

70
00:02:55,600 --> 00:02:59,080
Speaker 3: labor force, you don't see a big change. The inflationing

71
00:02:59,280 --> 00:03:02,400
Speaker 3: now ken potentially affect the break even rate that you

72
00:03:02,400 --> 00:03:05,639
Speaker 3: would need to have the market going well. And that's

73
00:03:05,680 --> 00:03:07,560
Speaker 3: what we're still trying to kind of get a sense

74
00:03:07,600 --> 00:03:10,920
Speaker 3: of because you basically brought five years of immigration forward,

75
00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:14,320
Speaker 3: and you know, of that eight or nine million, most

76
00:03:14,360 --> 00:03:17,640
Speaker 3: of them haven't disappeared. So they're still here somewhere, whether

77
00:03:17,639 --> 00:03:19,440
Speaker 3: they're going to work, they're not going to work, but

78
00:03:19,160 --> 00:03:23,239
Speaker 3: they're still here. I don't where I think the immigration stuff.

79
00:03:23,240 --> 00:03:25,799
Speaker 3: If immigration was a big factory, you'd be seeing shortages,

80
00:03:25,880 --> 00:03:29,280
Speaker 3: and you might see some in you know, some industries.

81
00:03:29,880 --> 00:03:32,160
Speaker 3: But like I pointed out that if you look at

82
00:03:32,240 --> 00:03:37,400
Speaker 3: the new college graduate unemployment rate, it's seven percent. It's

83
00:03:37,640 --> 00:03:40,320
Speaker 3: much higher than it has These are not jobs are

84
00:03:40,320 --> 00:03:44,280
Speaker 3: being opened up because immigrants are not coming in.

85
00:03:45,360 --> 00:03:46,520
Speaker 1: It should be just the opposite.

86
00:03:46,520 --> 00:03:48,560
Speaker 3: If immigrants are leaving and these jobs are open and

87
00:03:48,640 --> 00:03:50,600
Speaker 3: then the unemployment right should go the other way. So

88
00:03:50,760 --> 00:03:53,680
Speaker 3: that unemployment rate, to me, is telling me immigration.

89
00:03:53,320 --> 00:03:54,640
Speaker 1: Is not the source of the problem.

90
00:03:54,920 --> 00:03:58,640
Speaker 3: Firms are just holding off on hiring decisions even if

91
00:03:58,680 --> 00:03:59,800
Speaker 3: their earnings are doing well.

92
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:02,080
Speaker 1: That's that's just what I'm saying. They're doing on the

93
00:04:02,120 --> 00:04:02,560
Speaker 1: labor side.

94
00:04:02,560 --> 00:04:04,040
Speaker 2: I wanted to sign as a mutual friend of us.

95
00:04:04,040 --> 00:04:05,560
Speaker 2: That feels like he's missing out this morning, so I

96
00:04:05,600 --> 00:04:06,760
Speaker 2: wanted to cat show with you as well.

97
00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:09,520
Speaker 3: He's outing Victor idoh, always having a good time, isn't it.

98
00:04:09,640 --> 00:04:14,360
Speaker 1: My McKay joined us now. Good morning Mike, Good.

99
00:04:14,120 --> 00:04:16,280
Speaker 4: Morning John, and good morning Governor. While I would say

100
00:04:16,360 --> 00:04:18,200
Speaker 4: I'm sorry I'm not there with you, but I bet

101
00:04:18,240 --> 00:04:20,040
Speaker 4: you're sorry you're not here with me, I know.

102
00:04:20,000 --> 00:04:22,640
Speaker 1: You got it. I've been there before. It's a nice place.

103
00:04:25,440 --> 00:04:27,520
Speaker 4: You've made the case now a couple of times for

104
00:04:27,800 --> 00:04:29,120
Speaker 4: a July rate cut.

105
00:04:29,120 --> 00:04:31,000
Speaker 1: But how committed are you?

106
00:04:31,279 --> 00:04:33,840
Speaker 4: Are you willing to dissent at this meeting if the

107
00:04:33,880 --> 00:04:35,080
Speaker 4: majority votes the other way?

108
00:04:35,720 --> 00:04:38,279
Speaker 3: Well, I never want to commit to an action before

109
00:04:38,360 --> 00:04:41,080
Speaker 3: the meeting. That's otherwise. If everybody committed before, you don't

110
00:04:41,120 --> 00:04:43,440
Speaker 3: even need to have the meeting have a discussion. So

111
00:04:44,279 --> 00:04:46,680
Speaker 3: the goal is to always go to the meeting, sit down,

112
00:04:46,800 --> 00:04:47,839
Speaker 3: listen to all sides.

113
00:04:48,520 --> 00:04:50,200
Speaker 1: People will try to convince me of their view.

114
00:04:50,240 --> 00:04:52,720
Speaker 3: I'll try to convince some of my views, and then

115
00:04:52,760 --> 00:04:54,840
Speaker 3: the end of the day you make decisions on what

116
00:04:54,880 --> 00:04:58,320
Speaker 3: you think is the right outcome and the right data,

117
00:04:59,200 --> 00:05:01,560
Speaker 3: how the data is coming and right now. I laid

118
00:05:01,560 --> 00:05:03,320
Speaker 3: out my case last I don't think I could be

119
00:05:03,360 --> 00:05:06,520
Speaker 3: any more clear, I hope, as to what my position

120
00:05:06,680 --> 00:05:07,680
Speaker 3: is and why.

121
00:05:07,520 --> 00:05:08,640
Speaker 1: I think we need to do this.

122
00:05:08,839 --> 00:05:11,080
Speaker 3: It's just how I read the data and how I

123
00:05:11,120 --> 00:05:13,720
Speaker 3: think about going forward. How you respond to anything that

124
00:05:13,839 --> 00:05:14,760
Speaker 3: involves tariffs.

125
00:05:17,760 --> 00:05:20,560
Speaker 4: There's a lot of politics in this decision coming up,

126
00:05:21,880 --> 00:05:25,760
Speaker 4: more than usual, and I'm wondering. Governor Bowman has also

127
00:05:25,960 --> 00:05:29,360
Speaker 4: suggested she would prefer a rate cut in July. If

128
00:05:29,360 --> 00:05:32,280
Speaker 4: two of you vote for a rate cut, if two

129
00:05:32,360 --> 00:05:34,719
Speaker 4: of you were to descend, would you worry about the

130
00:05:34,760 --> 00:05:35,920
Speaker 4: market reaction to that?

131
00:05:37,080 --> 00:05:37,320
Speaker 1: You know.

132
00:05:37,400 --> 00:05:39,240
Speaker 3: One of the things that has always bothered me since

133
00:05:39,279 --> 00:05:41,599
Speaker 3: I took this job is the criticism.

134
00:05:41,040 --> 00:05:42,800
Speaker 1: That we are nothing but group think.

135
00:05:43,000 --> 00:05:46,360
Speaker 3: All the meanings are the same, nobody does sense, nobody

136
00:05:46,400 --> 00:05:47,440
Speaker 3: does anything.

137
00:05:47,839 --> 00:05:49,640
Speaker 1: And I think this is healthy.

138
00:05:49,760 --> 00:05:51,520
Speaker 3: I think this is a turning point in the way

139
00:05:51,520 --> 00:05:54,400
Speaker 3: we want to think about policy. Some people don't want

140
00:05:54,440 --> 00:05:57,080
Speaker 3: to cut, some do want to cut, but coming out

141
00:05:57,160 --> 00:06:01,520
Speaker 3: and making the case either side's good healthy debate. Otherwise,

142
00:06:01,560 --> 00:06:03,279
Speaker 3: if we're always going to do the same, the joke is,

143
00:06:03,279 --> 00:06:05,440
Speaker 3: why don't you just have one person set policy and

144
00:06:05,440 --> 00:06:07,600
Speaker 3: some of the other eighteen FMC members home.

145
00:06:08,160 --> 00:06:09,880
Speaker 1: So this is healthy. I think this is what you

146
00:06:09,920 --> 00:06:11,920
Speaker 1: want to see in a democracy. You want to see.

147
00:06:11,720 --> 00:06:15,800
Speaker 3: Policymakers have serious, open discussion about where policies should go.

148
00:06:15,960 --> 00:06:18,320
Speaker 3: It doesn't mean anything about politics or anything else. It's

149
00:06:18,640 --> 00:06:21,360
Speaker 3: make the economic argument and then see if you can

150
00:06:21,360 --> 00:06:22,760
Speaker 3: convince others to go along with you.

151
00:06:22,839 --> 00:06:23,920
Speaker 1: And that's all I'm trying to do.

152
00:06:24,200 --> 00:06:26,640
Speaker 2: We totally agree with you. For the record, we would

153
00:06:26,640 --> 00:06:28,279
Speaker 2: sack of the great thinking. It's good to have dissent,

154
00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:30,600
Speaker 2: you know, Mike essentially is asking if you will dissent

155
00:06:30,880 --> 00:06:32,480
Speaker 2: at the end of this month. Is the value and

156
00:06:32,520 --> 00:06:34,360
Speaker 2: dissentic on the f web site.

157
00:06:34,960 --> 00:06:39,000
Speaker 3: Well, I mean it's often the case that you dissent

158
00:06:39,160 --> 00:06:41,520
Speaker 3: if you make it very clear you think at this

159
00:06:41,600 --> 00:06:43,599
Speaker 3: moment in time, this is an important thing to do.

160
00:06:44,360 --> 00:06:46,240
Speaker 3: If you were to go in and do kind of

161
00:06:46,240 --> 00:06:49,000
Speaker 3: a jihadist I'm going to dissent at every single meeting

162
00:06:49,000 --> 00:06:51,320
Speaker 3: no matter what happens. Then you don't even have to

163
00:06:51,360 --> 00:06:53,880
Speaker 3: show up. Everybody knows what you're going to do. So

164
00:06:54,080 --> 00:06:58,080
Speaker 3: it is important to make sure that if you dissent,

165
00:06:58,240 --> 00:07:01,920
Speaker 3: you do it carefully and you have the right reasons,

166
00:07:02,200 --> 00:07:04,440
Speaker 3: and it's not going to turn into a serial dissenting

167
00:07:04,600 --> 00:07:07,280
Speaker 3: potential case. I mean, that's how I take my job

168
00:07:07,480 --> 00:07:10,880
Speaker 3: seriously and responsibly, so I only would think about doing this.

169
00:07:10,960 --> 00:07:13,360
Speaker 3: I dissented on the balance sheet slowed down earlier this

170
00:07:13,440 --> 00:07:17,520
Speaker 3: year because I felt like that was not needed. And

171
00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:18,920
Speaker 3: that's kind of the situation we're.

172
00:07:18,840 --> 00:07:23,800
Speaker 1: In now, Chris.

173
00:07:23,960 --> 00:07:27,800
Speaker 4: If you do cut, the markets will go one way.

174
00:07:27,840 --> 00:07:32,800
Speaker 4: If you don't, they'll go another. Perhaps, are how critical

175
00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:36,160
Speaker 4: is it to get to a rate cut fairly quickly?

176
00:07:36,200 --> 00:07:38,640
Speaker 4: You've mentioned the danger to the labor market, But if

177
00:07:38,680 --> 00:07:41,280
Speaker 4: you do wait till September, is that going to be

178
00:07:41,360 --> 00:07:41,800
Speaker 4: too late?

179
00:07:42,440 --> 00:07:45,560
Speaker 3: Well that's kind of the debate. What does it mean

180
00:07:45,680 --> 00:07:49,640
Speaker 3: to wait six weeks? Is it that critical? And the

181
00:07:49,760 --> 00:07:52,200
Speaker 3: answer is probably not. It could be, but it's also

182
00:07:52,240 --> 00:07:55,760
Speaker 3: the reverse. Why wait till September? If it's just six weeks,

183
00:07:56,400 --> 00:07:59,520
Speaker 3: that's exactly the thing. It doesn't kind of matter. Just

184
00:07:59,560 --> 00:08:01,520
Speaker 3: start the thinking about do I want to wait and

185
00:08:01,600 --> 00:08:02,600
Speaker 3: risk something happening.

186
00:08:02,600 --> 00:08:05,320
Speaker 1: This is what we saw last summer. By the way we.

187
00:08:05,240 --> 00:08:08,360
Speaker 3: Left July, we left rates and then boom, we got

188
00:08:08,360 --> 00:08:13,040
Speaker 3: a very weak, bad labor market reports and unemployment rate

189
00:08:13,160 --> 00:08:16,480
Speaker 3: jumped two tens, payrolls went way down from where they were,

190
00:08:16,680 --> 00:08:18,960
Speaker 3: and people were screaming at us last August, you guys

191
00:08:18,960 --> 00:08:22,280
Speaker 3: should have cut in July. So one month? Can it

192
00:08:22,720 --> 00:08:25,600
Speaker 3: always is one month? Just remember that it's just one month.

193
00:08:26,000 --> 00:08:27,520
Speaker 3: But we live in a world in which we have

194
00:08:27,560 --> 00:08:29,760
Speaker 3: to respond to real time data to kind of sense

195
00:08:29,760 --> 00:08:32,640
Speaker 3: of where the economy is going. And I've always said

196
00:08:32,679 --> 00:08:35,439
Speaker 3: if you worry about long and variable lags, which everybody

197
00:08:35,440 --> 00:08:37,600
Speaker 3: always talks about, the whole point of.

198
00:08:37,520 --> 00:08:39,440
Speaker 1: That is to get ahead of it, not wait for

199
00:08:39,520 --> 00:08:40,359
Speaker 1: it to happen.

200
00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:43,480
Speaker 3: And then hike a policy action that takes quarters or

201
00:08:43,559 --> 00:08:45,119
Speaker 3: months down the road to actually.

202
00:08:44,880 --> 00:08:45,640
Speaker 1: Have any impact.

203
00:08:45,800 --> 00:08:48,120
Speaker 2: The new Wiries tariffs, We've just had a six minute

204
00:08:48,120 --> 00:08:50,000
Speaker 2: conversation with you at that month, at your policy You've

205
00:08:50,000 --> 00:08:51,400
Speaker 2: built a case for a lot of interest rights, and

206
00:08:51,440 --> 00:08:54,400
Speaker 2: no one's talked about trite or inflation. Two assumptions in

207
00:08:54,440 --> 00:08:57,400
Speaker 2: your speech yesterday, and I think they're important assumptions. A

208
00:08:57,480 --> 00:09:00,200
Speaker 2: large share of tariff increases one bepostreets can see us

209
00:09:01,160 --> 00:09:03,720
Speaker 2: any increase would fight over the next YEARO cybe what

210
00:09:03,880 --> 00:09:05,839
Speaker 2: data underpins that conclusion?

211
00:09:06,400 --> 00:09:10,000
Speaker 3: Well, one, it's just first, it's just economic theory. So

212
00:09:10,280 --> 00:09:12,080
Speaker 3: you put on a tear cari iff as long as

213
00:09:12,160 --> 00:09:15,480
Speaker 3: it's a one time tariff, and that's it. That's a

214
00:09:15,520 --> 00:09:17,600
Speaker 3: one time price effect. I mean, this is economic theory.

215
00:09:17,600 --> 00:09:21,760
Speaker 3: You could not get in any serious economic model persistent

216
00:09:21,800 --> 00:09:24,480
Speaker 3: inflation from that. You would have to cook up some

217
00:09:24,720 --> 00:09:26,640
Speaker 3: other amplification mechanisms.

218
00:09:26,640 --> 00:09:28,640
Speaker 1: And that's what people talk about wages. They'll start going

219
00:09:28,720 --> 00:09:31,160
Speaker 1: up and everything will get out of control. You're not

220
00:09:31,200 --> 00:09:32,040
Speaker 1: seeing that at all.

221
00:09:32,160 --> 00:09:35,080
Speaker 3: This is just not those kind of amplification mechanism or

222
00:09:35,160 --> 00:09:41,160
Speaker 3: wage price spirals aren't happening. Tariffs are attacks, and in

223
00:09:41,240 --> 00:09:44,520
Speaker 3: public finance you learn that you may levy attacks on

224
00:09:44,559 --> 00:09:47,240
Speaker 3: a firm, but who bears the incidents of the burden

225
00:09:47,280 --> 00:09:49,760
Speaker 3: of that tax can be a group of people or

226
00:09:50,720 --> 00:09:52,600
Speaker 3: one person not of the firm.

227
00:09:52,720 --> 00:09:55,120
Speaker 1: So this is what I've heard from a lot of firms.

228
00:09:55,120 --> 00:09:59,200
Speaker 3: If there's a ten percent tax, they'll force their suppliers.

229
00:09:58,600 --> 00:09:59,760
Speaker 1: To eat some of that cost.

230
00:10:00,040 --> 00:10:02,520
Speaker 3: Workers meet some of that costs in terms of less

231
00:10:02,600 --> 00:10:03,840
Speaker 3: hiring and things like that.

232
00:10:04,320 --> 00:10:05,240
Speaker 1: The firm will take it.

233
00:10:05,200 --> 00:10:08,360
Speaker 3: Out of their profit margins, and then lastly some of

234
00:10:08,360 --> 00:10:11,000
Speaker 3: it will get passed on. And as I mentioned last night,

235
00:10:11,000 --> 00:10:13,440
Speaker 3: I've heard this for months now, like the rule is

236
00:10:13,480 --> 00:10:16,000
Speaker 3: ten percent, it's sorefully rule. If I'm as a third

237
00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:19,480
Speaker 3: to third a third suppliers of later to third firms

238
00:10:19,559 --> 00:10:21,280
Speaker 3: lead to third consumer is going to eat a third

239
00:10:21,280 --> 00:10:23,480
Speaker 3: of that tariff. So if you eat a third of

240
00:10:23,480 --> 00:10:25,880
Speaker 3: it and it's ten percent, like I've been arguing, this

241
00:10:25,960 --> 00:10:30,160
Speaker 3: is like three tenths of a three basic three tenths

242
00:10:30,160 --> 00:10:33,680
Speaker 3: on the inflation rate for a few months, and that's it,

243
00:10:34,520 --> 00:10:36,960
Speaker 3: and it'll persist. If you do twelve month over twelve month,

244
00:10:37,000 --> 00:10:39,280
Speaker 3: that base effect will not go away for a while

245
00:10:39,320 --> 00:10:41,640
Speaker 3: and then it'll just drop off a cliff. So that's

246
00:10:41,640 --> 00:10:43,040
Speaker 3: why I've been arguing, you want to look at like

247
00:10:43,120 --> 00:10:45,400
Speaker 3: three months and six months to see if these tariff

248
00:10:45,400 --> 00:10:48,880
Speaker 3: effects pop up and then go away. And so that's

249
00:10:48,880 --> 00:10:50,440
Speaker 3: more critical looking at twelve month.

250
00:10:51,480 --> 00:10:54,040
Speaker 4: Yes, but the way the President is putting these tariffs

251
00:10:54,080 --> 00:10:57,800
Speaker 4: on might not match up with theory. Chris, the smooth

252
00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:00,440
Speaker 4: hol attacks was passed and came into it on a

253
00:11:00,480 --> 00:11:04,640
Speaker 4: certain date. The President is not yet put on most

254
00:11:04,679 --> 00:11:07,000
Speaker 4: of these tafts they're in. Theory is still coming and

255
00:11:07,040 --> 00:11:08,720
Speaker 4: we still haven't seen the Section two.

256
00:11:08,559 --> 00:11:09,440
Speaker 1: Thirty two tariffs.

257
00:11:09,480 --> 00:11:11,800
Speaker 4: For the most part, the National Defense tariffs that he

258
00:11:11,840 --> 00:11:15,120
Speaker 4: wants to put on semiconductors and pharmaceuticals, et cetera. So

259
00:11:15,160 --> 00:11:18,520
Speaker 4: if the process is stretched out, consumers could be hit

260
00:11:18,679 --> 00:11:22,320
Speaker 4: by a series an ongoing series of tariff increases. And

261
00:11:22,360 --> 00:11:25,160
Speaker 4: given what they've just been through, isn't there danger that

262
00:11:25,280 --> 00:11:27,520
Speaker 4: inflation psychology starts to seep in?

263
00:11:28,120 --> 00:11:29,520
Speaker 1: Well, that's exactly the point.

264
00:11:30,120 --> 00:11:32,080
Speaker 3: All my example has been is if you put the

265
00:11:32,080 --> 00:11:34,680
Speaker 3: ten percent uniform tariff on and keep it roughly in

266
00:11:34,720 --> 00:11:38,319
Speaker 3: that range, than what I've described as will happen. If

267
00:11:38,320 --> 00:11:42,000
Speaker 3: there's constantly a sequence of higher and higher and higher tariffs,

268
00:11:42,040 --> 00:11:46,959
Speaker 3: then you are going at this rolling potential impact on prices.

269
00:11:46,240 --> 00:11:47,720
Speaker 1: That's true.

270
00:11:48,520 --> 00:11:51,640
Speaker 3: If it's still just a question of delaying it, that

271
00:11:51,679 --> 00:11:54,400
Speaker 3: doesn't change my argument. Whether you see the spike in

272
00:11:54,480 --> 00:11:58,199
Speaker 3: July or it happens in June, or Army, August or September.

273
00:11:58,760 --> 00:12:03,440
Speaker 3: When it happens, is there for the economics that's.

274
00:12:02,480 --> 00:12:04,080
Speaker 1: A non starter an argument.

275
00:12:04,880 --> 00:12:07,800
Speaker 3: Firms could also just spread it out in smaller increments

276
00:12:07,840 --> 00:12:10,880
Speaker 3: over several months. The total effects stillins of being the same.

277
00:12:10,920 --> 00:12:13,400
Speaker 3: They just get there in a later fashion and it'll

278
00:12:13,440 --> 00:12:16,160
Speaker 3: be smaller amounts. So the bigger thing is if we

279
00:12:16,280 --> 00:12:19,280
Speaker 3: just continually get another wave of tariffs, another wave of tariffs,

280
00:12:19,280 --> 00:12:22,440
Speaker 3: and another waves of tariffs. That's when things become more

281
00:12:22,520 --> 00:12:25,040
Speaker 3: problematic thinking about what's going to happen with inflation.

282
00:12:25,280 --> 00:12:27,200
Speaker 2: You don't think the feder was a should Wait, I

283
00:12:27,280 --> 00:12:29,040
Speaker 2: just want to talk about the experience of last year.

284
00:12:29,200 --> 00:12:31,280
Speaker 2: I think Lisa's done a fantastic job of covering this

285
00:12:31,360 --> 00:12:33,880
Speaker 2: over the last six seven eight months. The move we

286
00:12:33,880 --> 00:12:36,520
Speaker 2: saw last year one hundred basis point reduction in interest

287
00:12:36,600 --> 00:12:39,200
Speaker 2: rates on Fed funds, and then we saw a corresponding

288
00:12:39,200 --> 00:12:42,080
Speaker 2: move one hundred basis points higher at the long end

289
00:12:42,080 --> 00:12:45,600
Speaker 2: of the yield curve. Yields down did not happen. It

290
00:12:45,640 --> 00:12:48,040
Speaker 2: was yields up and mortgage costs up as well. How

291
00:12:48,040 --> 00:12:50,840
Speaker 2: do you think one informed the other and how might

292
00:12:50,880 --> 00:12:52,760
Speaker 2: that shape your approach to kind of interest rates this

293
00:12:52,800 --> 00:12:53,640
Speaker 2: time around?

294
00:12:53,840 --> 00:12:55,760
Speaker 3: Well, I think last September there was a lot of

295
00:12:55,840 --> 00:12:59,480
Speaker 3: rumor the long term rates were going down through Artist

296
00:12:59,559 --> 00:13:03,680
Speaker 3: and early September, and this was not any contradiction of

297
00:13:03,720 --> 00:13:06,720
Speaker 3: what we were doing. It's just after the September meeting

298
00:13:06,800 --> 00:13:09,320
Speaker 3: that data just came back and the opposite way growth

299
00:13:09,480 --> 00:13:13,240
Speaker 3: was productivity was employment suddenly took back off. And then

300
00:13:13,280 --> 00:13:17,040
Speaker 3: you have real growth expectations being much higher. We were

301
00:13:17,040 --> 00:13:19,760
Speaker 3: seeing productivity growth in GDP growth are close to three percent,

302
00:13:20,400 --> 00:13:22,960
Speaker 3: So in that case, long rates go up anyway, So

303
00:13:23,000 --> 00:13:25,840
Speaker 3: it's not necessarily there was some counter reaction to what

304
00:13:25,880 --> 00:13:29,240
Speaker 3: we were doing. I never saw inflation expectations adjust.

305
00:13:29,280 --> 00:13:29,959
Speaker 1: It caused all that.

306
00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:32,000
Speaker 2: You didn't think it was a market questioning. Youal commitments

307
00:13:32,000 --> 00:13:32,920
Speaker 2: to the inflation mandate.

308
00:13:33,200 --> 00:13:35,760
Speaker 3: If it would have been, you've seen it inflation expectations

309
00:13:35,800 --> 00:13:39,320
Speaker 3: in the market, not the Michigan thing, But we didn't

310
00:13:39,360 --> 00:13:42,880
Speaker 3: see it. I mean, inflation expectations stayed fairly anchored all

311
00:13:42,920 --> 00:13:45,520
Speaker 3: through this rise. So I think the increase of long

312
00:13:45,600 --> 00:13:47,440
Speaker 3: rate was just all the data was coming in for

313
00:13:47,480 --> 00:13:50,040
Speaker 3: a better, stronger economy. Then we thought it was going

314
00:13:50,080 --> 00:13:52,559
Speaker 3: to be in September. That's fine with me, you know.

315
00:13:52,760 --> 00:13:54,880
Speaker 3: I sometimes you're going to do these things taking a

316
00:13:54,920 --> 00:13:56,960
Speaker 3: shot that I want to make sure we don't have

317
00:13:57,000 --> 00:14:00,800
Speaker 3: a hard landing. And as I said, with any kind

318
00:14:00,800 --> 00:14:03,480
Speaker 3: of an insurance cut, sometimes you don't need the insurance.

319
00:14:03,800 --> 00:14:04,800
Speaker 1: It didn't work.

320
00:14:04,640 --> 00:14:06,360
Speaker 3: Out, but that doesn't mean you go back and say, oh,

321
00:14:06,400 --> 00:14:07,880
Speaker 3: that was a stupid decision.

322
00:14:07,480 --> 00:14:10,679
Speaker 2: To make market based expectations of inflation. Let's sit on this.

323
00:14:11,280 --> 00:14:13,559
Speaker 2: There are clear and obvious threats to the central banks

324
00:14:13,559 --> 00:14:17,120
Speaker 2: independence right now. Every single down this program, we're quoting

325
00:14:17,120 --> 00:14:19,840
Speaker 2: the President, quoting the chairman too late, and going after

326
00:14:19,920 --> 00:14:22,040
Speaker 2: lower interest rates. And I think a way that you

327
00:14:22,040 --> 00:14:25,120
Speaker 2: and I can have this conversation without addressing those those

328
00:14:25,160 --> 00:14:28,680
Speaker 2: cools directly is to think about what's happening with inflation expectations.

329
00:14:29,240 --> 00:14:33,880
Speaker 2: Did these threats threats into d anchor market based inflation expectations?

330
00:14:34,320 --> 00:14:36,320
Speaker 2: And it's not something you and the Committee might become

331
00:14:36,680 --> 00:14:38,560
Speaker 2: increasingly sensitive too in the months to come.

332
00:14:39,560 --> 00:14:40,280
Speaker 1: Well, Like I.

333
00:14:40,240 --> 00:14:42,920
Speaker 3: Said, I look at the after the tariffs coming on,

334
00:14:43,040 --> 00:14:46,360
Speaker 3: everybody was worried about the anchoring expectations, particularly after some

335
00:14:46,360 --> 00:14:49,320
Speaker 3: of these Michigan surveys came out. When I always look

336
00:14:49,360 --> 00:14:52,480
Speaker 3: at the market based expectation because money, people have money

337
00:14:52,480 --> 00:14:52,960
Speaker 3: in the game.

338
00:14:53,440 --> 00:14:54,400
Speaker 1: Firms are making.

339
00:14:54,200 --> 00:14:57,160
Speaker 3: Decisions or what they're cheap economists are saying, and if

340
00:14:57,200 --> 00:14:59,240
Speaker 3: those things are wrong, they're gonna lose a lot of money.

341
00:15:00,080 --> 00:15:01,040
Speaker 1: Always paid more attention.

342
00:15:01,320 --> 00:15:04,640
Speaker 3: I haven't seen much in the way of market expectations

343
00:15:04,640 --> 00:15:07,320
Speaker 3: being unanchored in any ways you want to measure them

344
00:15:07,400 --> 00:15:09,120
Speaker 3: any forwarder now in the near term.

345
00:15:09,160 --> 00:15:10,920
Speaker 1: Of course they might go on because you would.

346
00:15:10,800 --> 00:15:13,600
Speaker 3: See inflation in the short term, but in the longer

347
00:15:13,720 --> 00:15:17,400
Speaker 3: term ones I'm not seeing it. So either the market

348
00:15:17,480 --> 00:15:21,120
Speaker 3: is just dismissing all of this as chattering noise, or

349
00:15:21,160 --> 00:15:23,520
Speaker 3: at some point if something happens such that it becomes

350
00:15:23,600 --> 00:15:27,320
Speaker 3: much more serious than you might see a discrete jump, and.

351
00:15:27,240 --> 00:15:30,000
Speaker 1: Then you know that's that's gonna be a problem for everybody.

352
00:15:32,080 --> 00:15:35,040
Speaker 4: One of the questions that we get all the time, Chris,

353
00:15:35,280 --> 00:15:37,920
Speaker 4: from people on Wall Street is or one of the

354
00:15:38,440 --> 00:15:41,360
Speaker 4: posits they make is that all this criticism of the

355
00:15:41,400 --> 00:15:45,200
Speaker 4: FED is hurting FED credibility and that the next chairman

356
00:15:45,320 --> 00:15:47,080
Speaker 4: is going to have a tough job because there are

357
00:15:47,080 --> 00:15:51,160
Speaker 4: going to be expectations for the next chairman set by

358
00:15:51,200 --> 00:15:54,720
Speaker 4: the White House rather than by the economy. Do you

359
00:15:54,960 --> 00:15:57,240
Speaker 4: feel that inside the building.

360
00:15:58,040 --> 00:16:00,520
Speaker 1: Now, To be absolutely honest, we just do our job.

361
00:16:00,600 --> 00:16:04,320
Speaker 3: Every day I go in, I just focus on my

362
00:16:04,760 --> 00:16:07,400
Speaker 3: work on monetary policy, payments.

363
00:16:06,960 --> 00:16:09,560
Speaker 1: And oversight of the reserve banks. That's what I do.

364
00:16:09,800 --> 00:16:12,200
Speaker 3: I let this stuff go and then just try to

365
00:16:12,240 --> 00:16:15,040
Speaker 3: focus on my job. And I think that's how all

366
00:16:15,080 --> 00:16:17,800
Speaker 3: of us are proceeding with this. I mean, at the

367
00:16:17,880 --> 00:16:20,000
Speaker 3: end of the day, the president, when whoever they choose,

368
00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:21,920
Speaker 3: you're going to have to have somebody has credibility with

369
00:16:21,920 --> 00:16:24,720
Speaker 3: the markets, or you will see, as Jonathan is talking about,

370
00:16:24,800 --> 00:16:27,000
Speaker 3: you're going to see inflation expectations bike.

371
00:16:27,080 --> 00:16:29,240
Speaker 1: You will not get lower interest rates, you will get

372
00:16:29,320 --> 00:16:31,360
Speaker 1: higher interest rates. This is well known.

373
00:16:31,480 --> 00:16:34,280
Speaker 3: We've seen this everywhere around the world when this happens.

374
00:16:34,760 --> 00:16:38,080
Speaker 3: And I know Scott Deson knows this, So this is

375
00:16:38,200 --> 00:16:41,280
Speaker 3: not something that is lost on anybody.

376
00:16:41,600 --> 00:16:43,720
Speaker 2: You've been nominated by this president for the seat on

377
00:16:43,760 --> 00:16:46,400
Speaker 2: the board. Yes, you were a previously director of research

378
00:16:46,400 --> 00:16:49,000
Speaker 2: for Jim Pillot White back then is it a position

379
00:16:49,080 --> 00:16:51,560
Speaker 2: you would like? Is it something you would like to

380
00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:52,760
Speaker 2: do or in the future.

381
00:16:53,200 --> 00:16:55,800
Speaker 1: Look in twenty nineteen, the President contact me and say

382
00:16:55,840 --> 00:16:57,880
Speaker 1: would you serve? And I said yes. If the President

383
00:16:57,920 --> 00:16:59,560
Speaker 1: contacted me and so I want you to serve, I

384
00:16:59,600 --> 00:17:00,000
Speaker 1: would do it.

385
00:17:01,240 --> 00:17:06,160
Speaker 3: But he's not contact What say if he does, If

386
00:17:06,160 --> 00:17:07,880
Speaker 3: he says, Chris, I want you to do the job,

387
00:17:07,920 --> 00:17:08,760
Speaker 3: I'll say yes.

388
00:17:09,800 --> 00:17:10,879
Speaker 1: But he's not talking to me.

389
00:17:11,000 --> 00:17:16,600
Speaker 3: So that's it that much hypothetical that.

390
00:17:15,119 --> 00:17:17,320
Speaker 2: That might change. So it's good to see you. We

391
00:17:17,359 --> 00:17:19,840
Speaker 2: appreciate your time, all right, been very generous with it.

392
00:17:19,880 --> 00:17:23,080
Speaker 2: Thank you very much. The Federal Reserve governor there, Christopher Waller,

393
00:17:23,119 --> 00:17:24,880
Speaker 2: Mike McKay, thanks as well to you, sir,