1 00:00:00,600 --> 00:00:07,800 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. 2 00:00:09,760 --> 00:00:12,719 Speaker 2: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. 3 00:00:13,039 --> 00:00:16,960 Speaker 1: Catch us live weekdays at noon Eastern on epocarplaying Thenrouno 4 00:00:17,040 --> 00:00:20,120 Speaker 1: with the Bloomberg Business app. Listen on demand wherever you 5 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:23,600 Speaker 1: get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube. 6 00:00:25,680 --> 00:00:27,880 Speaker 3: So you're the richest man of the world, you get 7 00:00:27,920 --> 00:00:30,320 Speaker 3: on your jet, you come to Washington to save the day. 8 00:00:30,360 --> 00:00:34,480 Speaker 4: You're gonna cut two trillion dollars. That's part of the DOGE. 9 00:00:35,040 --> 00:00:38,279 Speaker 4: Elon Musk. If you're Elon Musk, do you bring your 10 00:00:38,320 --> 00:00:39,320 Speaker 4: son to the party. 11 00:00:39,520 --> 00:00:41,960 Speaker 3: He brought his son to the meeting. He walked in 12 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:45,320 Speaker 3: the meeting with Senator John Thunne with his young boy 13 00:00:45,440 --> 00:00:47,680 Speaker 3: sitting on his shoulders. And what a story he's going 14 00:00:47,760 --> 00:00:48,800 Speaker 3: to have to tell someday. 15 00:00:48,880 --> 00:00:56,160 Speaker 4: Huh, this is not really a department. Has anyone mentioned that? 16 00:00:56,280 --> 00:00:56,520 Speaker 1: Yet? 17 00:00:56,720 --> 00:01:04,039 Speaker 3: DOGE stands for not only the coin but the Department 18 00:01:04,120 --> 00:01:06,720 Speaker 3: of Government Efficiency, and there is no department. 19 00:01:06,760 --> 00:01:09,639 Speaker 4: It's kind of a well, it's a panel, I guess. 20 00:01:11,240 --> 00:01:16,200 Speaker 3: So connecting the dots between the DOGE and actual legislation 21 00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:21,400 Speaker 3: might be a longer walk than some are thinking. Then again, 22 00:01:23,160 --> 00:01:28,600 Speaker 3: this is Trump's town Trump's Congress and a lot of 23 00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:31,720 Speaker 3: lawmakers looking to make him happy. So what Elon Muskin 24 00:01:31,760 --> 00:01:34,920 Speaker 3: Vivek Ramaswami have to say must carry some weight, right, 25 00:01:35,000 --> 00:01:38,559 Speaker 3: let's find out from our panel. I mentioned Jeanie Shanzay No, yeah, 26 00:01:38,560 --> 00:01:42,560 Speaker 3: she's here today, Bloomberg Politics contributor, Democratic analyst, senior democracy 27 00:01:42,560 --> 00:01:44,880 Speaker 3: fellow with the Center for the Study of the Presidency 28 00:01:44,920 --> 00:01:47,600 Speaker 3: in Congress, and Shape and Fay is back, Republican strategist, 29 00:01:47,600 --> 00:01:51,480 Speaker 3: founder of Lighthouse Public Affairs. Great to see you both here. 30 00:01:51,600 --> 00:01:53,640 Speaker 3: I'm just gonna bet both of you would bring your 31 00:01:53,720 --> 00:01:56,240 Speaker 3: young child to Washington if you were the richest person 32 00:01:56,280 --> 00:01:56,840 Speaker 3: in the world. 33 00:01:57,280 --> 00:01:57,960 Speaker 4: Shape in Fay. 34 00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:01,440 Speaker 3: Does anyone listen to what comes out of this not 35 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:02,760 Speaker 3: department but panel? 36 00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:05,640 Speaker 1: I think so. 37 00:02:06,080 --> 00:02:08,720 Speaker 5: Listen. Donald Trump is about to do what conservatives have 38 00:02:08,760 --> 00:02:11,960 Speaker 5: been trying and talking about doing for decades. Right, He's 39 00:02:11,960 --> 00:02:14,000 Speaker 5: going to disrupt the government, and I think a lot 40 00:02:14,040 --> 00:02:16,160 Speaker 5: of the ideas and a lot of the ways to 41 00:02:16,240 --> 00:02:19,000 Speaker 5: implement these policies are going to come out of the 42 00:02:19,000 --> 00:02:22,560 Speaker 5: Department of Government Efficiency. Like you said, However that looks right, 43 00:02:23,360 --> 00:02:25,120 Speaker 5: whether it has teeth or not, is really going to 44 00:02:25,120 --> 00:02:29,000 Speaker 5: be up to the legislature. But again Republicans won. I 45 00:02:29,000 --> 00:02:31,400 Speaker 5: think Donald Trump is heading into the White House in 46 00:02:31,480 --> 00:02:34,000 Speaker 5: January what they mandate to do the thing that he 47 00:02:34,000 --> 00:02:36,200 Speaker 5: said he was going to do and disrupt some of 48 00:02:36,240 --> 00:02:38,840 Speaker 5: these government institutions that are no longer serving Americans. And 49 00:02:38,880 --> 00:02:40,359 Speaker 5: I think that's exactly what they're going to do. And 50 00:02:40,440 --> 00:02:42,680 Speaker 5: Elon and Vivic are going to be sort of tip 51 00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:43,280 Speaker 5: of the spear of that. 52 00:02:44,560 --> 00:02:47,480 Speaker 3: Well, it's a tall order, Genie, when you start getting 53 00:02:47,520 --> 00:02:49,360 Speaker 3: down of the math here, I mean two trillion dollars. 54 00:02:49,360 --> 00:02:52,480 Speaker 3: My god, it would be impossible to do that without 55 00:02:53,040 --> 00:02:56,280 Speaker 3: starting to eat into entitlements, and so far there's been 56 00:02:56,280 --> 00:02:58,600 Speaker 3: no appetite to do that, not just on Capitol Hill, 57 00:02:58,639 --> 00:03:02,359 Speaker 3: but in Washington through the presidential campaigns would go near 58 00:03:02,480 --> 00:03:05,000 Speaker 3: Social Security and Medicare. In fact, the president was going 59 00:03:05,080 --> 00:03:08,360 Speaker 3: to lift taxes on some of these benefits. Right, So 60 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:11,480 Speaker 3: how does this come together in the form of law. 61 00:03:12,880 --> 00:03:15,119 Speaker 6: Yeah, First of all, Joe I would take that. Very 62 00:03:15,160 --> 00:03:17,440 Speaker 6: cute kid, and it's going to soften the blow when 63 00:03:17,480 --> 00:03:19,960 Speaker 6: they have to make these tough decisions. I think Alon 64 00:03:20,080 --> 00:03:24,360 Speaker 6: Musk is onto something as usual. Very cute kid, but 65 00:03:24,560 --> 00:03:27,440 Speaker 6: you know the reality is I said before I will 66 00:03:27,480 --> 00:03:30,800 Speaker 6: repeat again. They need somebody like Maya McGuinness to hold 67 00:03:30,840 --> 00:03:34,680 Speaker 6: their feet to the fire. You know. The fact is 68 00:03:34,680 --> 00:03:37,560 Speaker 6: is that when you look at the federal budget, sixty 69 00:03:37,640 --> 00:03:42,120 Speaker 6: two percent of it is mandatory spending. And you're absolutely right, both, 70 00:03:42,880 --> 00:03:46,840 Speaker 6: you know, the Democrats and then President the Trump they 71 00:03:47,240 --> 00:03:50,280 Speaker 6: ran through this campaign saying things like they won't touch 72 00:03:50,280 --> 00:03:53,840 Speaker 6: social Security, won't touch Medicare, won't touch all of these things. 73 00:03:53,880 --> 00:03:58,920 Speaker 6: And so substantial cups, particularly in the two trillion dollar range, 74 00:03:59,120 --> 00:04:02,840 Speaker 6: would be in possible if you don't start to have 75 00:04:02,920 --> 00:04:08,080 Speaker 6: a serious conversation about that. That said, I think Democrats 76 00:04:08,120 --> 00:04:12,920 Speaker 6: have to be very very careful here. The idea is right, 77 00:04:13,680 --> 00:04:18,119 Speaker 6: and the notion that you need to cut, the notion 78 00:04:18,320 --> 00:04:22,960 Speaker 6: that you need to streamline the federal government is exactly right. 79 00:04:23,440 --> 00:04:26,440 Speaker 6: And so Democrats can't get caught in this trap of 80 00:04:26,920 --> 00:04:29,120 Speaker 6: you know, looking the other way and saying all of 81 00:04:29,160 --> 00:04:33,200 Speaker 6: these ideas are wrong. They have to be reformers as well, 82 00:04:33,360 --> 00:04:36,400 Speaker 6: and they have to hold these people's feet to the 83 00:04:36,440 --> 00:04:38,679 Speaker 6: fire when they talk about these cuts. 84 00:04:38,720 --> 00:04:39,760 Speaker 7: But they should. 85 00:04:39,440 --> 00:04:44,560 Speaker 6: Support smart streamlining and cuts as well. They just obviously 86 00:04:44,600 --> 00:04:47,000 Speaker 6: are not going to talk about, you know, destroying the 87 00:04:47,000 --> 00:04:48,480 Speaker 6: Department of Education overall. 88 00:04:49,760 --> 00:04:50,640 Speaker 4: You know, bringing the kid. 89 00:04:50,680 --> 00:04:53,880 Speaker 3: We call that pulling a shirley around here at balance 90 00:04:53,920 --> 00:04:56,040 Speaker 3: of power. You both know it's a long story. Would 91 00:04:56,040 --> 00:04:59,039 Speaker 3: you show them the picture of the cute child before 92 00:04:59,080 --> 00:05:00,400 Speaker 3: you deliver the bad news? 93 00:05:01,000 --> 00:05:04,359 Speaker 4: Shape and faith. Senator Marsha Blackburn. 94 00:05:04,680 --> 00:05:07,120 Speaker 3: Thinks that she's got this worked out. I will be 95 00:05:07,240 --> 00:05:10,880 Speaker 3: introducing legislations you just put this on Twitter that coincides 96 00:05:10,880 --> 00:05:15,400 Speaker 3: with Doge's plan. My Doge Act will freeze federal hiring, 97 00:05:15,920 --> 00:05:19,320 Speaker 3: begin the process to relocate agencies out of the DC swamp, 98 00:05:19,400 --> 00:05:22,919 Speaker 3: she says, and establish a merit based salary system for 99 00:05:22,960 --> 00:05:24,000 Speaker 3: the federal workforce. 100 00:05:24,160 --> 00:05:25,320 Speaker 4: Did something like that pass? 101 00:05:27,600 --> 00:05:30,160 Speaker 5: Listen? I think those are all great ideas, and I 102 00:05:30,200 --> 00:05:32,520 Speaker 5: think it will bring this federal government closer to the 103 00:05:32,560 --> 00:05:35,719 Speaker 5: people that it's supposedly serving. And you know, those of 104 00:05:35,760 --> 00:05:37,600 Speaker 5: us on the right believe that it has stopped serving 105 00:05:38,040 --> 00:05:41,200 Speaker 5: Americans for a long time. Are they achievable? They are 106 00:05:41,279 --> 00:05:44,760 Speaker 5: very ambitious goals, and Democrats have in the past, you know, 107 00:05:44,839 --> 00:05:49,039 Speaker 5: been really entrenched on behalf of government employees and benefits 108 00:05:49,120 --> 00:05:52,600 Speaker 5: and sort of the DC culture in our nation's capital. 109 00:05:52,680 --> 00:05:54,520 Speaker 5: So I do think there's going to be a fight 110 00:05:54,640 --> 00:05:59,479 Speaker 5: right in the Senate. Democrats can certainly hold up legislation 111 00:05:59,560 --> 00:06:01,960 Speaker 5: and work to get compromises and shape the bills and 112 00:06:02,000 --> 00:06:05,039 Speaker 5: the House. Of course, it's majority rules pretty much, so 113 00:06:05,080 --> 00:06:06,680 Speaker 5: there shouldn't be too much of an issue there as 114 00:06:06,720 --> 00:06:10,440 Speaker 5: long as the Republicans hold on to their slim majority. 115 00:06:11,040 --> 00:06:12,839 Speaker 5: But I do think those are ambitious gold like you said, 116 00:06:12,839 --> 00:06:14,640 Speaker 5: and I do think there will be some fights. There 117 00:06:14,640 --> 00:06:18,200 Speaker 5: will be definitely some public affairs battles over I think 118 00:06:18,279 --> 00:06:20,120 Speaker 5: probably a lot of these ideas and a lot of 119 00:06:20,120 --> 00:06:23,719 Speaker 5: other things, particularly coming out of DOGE, just because you know, 120 00:06:23,880 --> 00:06:25,920 Speaker 5: change is scary for a lot of people, and changes 121 00:06:26,000 --> 00:06:30,320 Speaker 5: certainly scary for the establishment and incumbents, so it's gonna 122 00:06:30,560 --> 00:06:32,120 Speaker 5: I do think there are gonna be some battles. I 123 00:06:32,120 --> 00:06:34,640 Speaker 5: do think some of that stuff does have a chance 124 00:06:34,680 --> 00:06:37,080 Speaker 5: and a shot. I mean, moving moving an agency out 125 00:06:37,120 --> 00:06:40,320 Speaker 5: of d C. Right, that's probably a lot easier than 126 00:06:40,920 --> 00:06:44,599 Speaker 5: you know, a hiring freeze or changing civil service rules 127 00:06:44,600 --> 00:06:47,039 Speaker 5: and regulations. But I think they're all the right ideas, 128 00:06:47,040 --> 00:06:48,520 Speaker 5: and I think I think there's gonna be a fight, 129 00:06:48,520 --> 00:06:50,800 Speaker 5: and I think it's a worthy discussion to have regardless. 130 00:06:51,720 --> 00:06:54,160 Speaker 3: How about bringing people back to work in the office 131 00:06:54,200 --> 00:06:56,320 Speaker 3: five days a week, Genie, This is actually one of 132 00:06:56,360 --> 00:07:00,000 Speaker 3: the few specific suggestions that we've heard from Musk and Ramaswami, 133 00:07:00,760 --> 00:07:04,320 Speaker 3: not only out of fairness, they say, in the spirit 134 00:07:04,360 --> 00:07:06,000 Speaker 3: of productivity. 135 00:07:05,600 --> 00:07:08,040 Speaker 4: But also might thin the herd a little bit. 136 00:07:08,080 --> 00:07:09,480 Speaker 3: A lot of people don't want to come back to 137 00:07:09,520 --> 00:07:11,680 Speaker 3: work five days a week, and that might result in 138 00:07:11,880 --> 00:07:12,720 Speaker 3: a lower head count. 139 00:07:12,720 --> 00:07:16,360 Speaker 6: What do you think it can Absolutely and we've seen that, 140 00:07:17,440 --> 00:07:20,680 Speaker 6: you know, throughout the country and in other organizations. We've 141 00:07:20,720 --> 00:07:25,000 Speaker 6: also seen and they've talked about enticing people to retire early, 142 00:07:25,080 --> 00:07:29,160 Speaker 6: so retirement packages that also can work. The problem is 143 00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:32,680 Speaker 6: they have to curb their enthusiasm when they talk two 144 00:07:32,920 --> 00:07:36,400 Speaker 6: trillion dollars in cuts. You know, you could cut out 145 00:07:36,400 --> 00:07:40,680 Speaker 6: the entire workforce almost and it wouldn't approach that. And 146 00:07:40,760 --> 00:07:43,760 Speaker 6: so it is the you know, scope of what they're 147 00:07:43,800 --> 00:07:46,520 Speaker 6: talking about that they may not be able to reach. 148 00:07:46,520 --> 00:07:47,840 Speaker 7: I wouldn't count against them. 149 00:07:48,080 --> 00:07:51,040 Speaker 6: These are two guys who have been insanely successful in 150 00:07:51,080 --> 00:07:54,280 Speaker 6: their other aspects of their professional lives. But the reality 151 00:07:54,400 --> 00:07:59,400 Speaker 6: is this process is still very unclear. They are not, 152 00:07:59,600 --> 00:08:02,120 Speaker 6: as you said, part of the government. You know, I 153 00:08:02,160 --> 00:08:06,000 Speaker 6: loved when Donald Trump said this was like the Manhattan Project. Okay, 154 00:08:06,840 --> 00:08:09,840 Speaker 6: you know, that's that is a lofty goal. But you 155 00:08:09,880 --> 00:08:13,720 Speaker 6: know what is the process? These cuts, for the most part, 156 00:08:13,800 --> 00:08:16,840 Speaker 6: would have to go through Congress. You're talking about a 157 00:08:16,840 --> 00:08:20,560 Speaker 6: House with maybe even just a one seat majority at 158 00:08:20,600 --> 00:08:22,920 Speaker 6: some points, you're talking about a Senate and a House 159 00:08:23,240 --> 00:08:26,040 Speaker 6: that already the GOP is disagreeing. Do we start with 160 00:08:26,120 --> 00:08:29,080 Speaker 6: tax cuts? Do we start with Donald Trump's non tax cuts? 161 00:08:29,080 --> 00:08:31,800 Speaker 6: So the priorities, So, how do you do this? And 162 00:08:31,880 --> 00:08:34,160 Speaker 6: do this in a two year period, because of course 163 00:08:34,200 --> 00:08:37,560 Speaker 6: Donald Trump said they will shut down DOGE by July. 164 00:08:37,720 --> 00:08:40,160 Speaker 6: I think it's twenty twenty six, So a lot to 165 00:08:40,200 --> 00:08:43,080 Speaker 6: do in a short period of time. Worthy goal, but 166 00:08:43,400 --> 00:08:45,240 Speaker 6: you know, the devil is in the details here, and 167 00:08:45,280 --> 00:08:47,240 Speaker 6: we haven't heard any of these details yet. 168 00:08:47,280 --> 00:08:50,680 Speaker 3: Yeah, as always, Okay, So the other specific idea that 169 00:08:50,720 --> 00:08:53,800 Speaker 3: we had, beyond the broadcut two trillion, we had bring 170 00:08:53,840 --> 00:08:55,760 Speaker 3: people back in the office five days a week, the 171 00:08:55,800 --> 00:09:02,320 Speaker 3: federal workforce, and then do away with daylight savings. Now, 172 00:09:02,760 --> 00:09:05,720 Speaker 3: this is something that's come up before. Ask ed Marky 173 00:09:06,559 --> 00:09:09,160 Speaker 3: about it his pet issue. I think Marco Rubio signed 174 00:09:09,160 --> 00:09:11,599 Speaker 3: on to that bill as well. Look, I don't know 175 00:09:11,600 --> 00:09:14,480 Speaker 3: if we're going to favor Sun in the Morning or 176 00:09:14,559 --> 00:09:17,680 Speaker 3: sun later in the day here Chhape and Faye. But 177 00:09:18,080 --> 00:09:19,640 Speaker 3: would that actually make a difference. 178 00:09:22,600 --> 00:09:25,880 Speaker 5: I do think it would make a difference. What that 179 00:09:25,920 --> 00:09:29,559 Speaker 5: difference is, I think is anybody's guess. If if it 180 00:09:29,640 --> 00:09:32,880 Speaker 5: stays sunnier or a lighter out during the day for us, 181 00:09:32,920 --> 00:09:36,000 Speaker 5: I think that's I would I would support it. And 182 00:09:36,080 --> 00:09:42,800 Speaker 5: of course time zones, you know, can cause difficulty. But 183 00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:44,680 Speaker 5: you know, I don't know that this is the fight 184 00:09:45,080 --> 00:09:48,200 Speaker 5: that they really want to get into. Considering some of 185 00:09:48,200 --> 00:09:49,880 Speaker 5: the earlier things that we talked about that are going 186 00:09:49,920 --> 00:09:52,440 Speaker 5: to be fights that I think are real will have 187 00:09:52,520 --> 00:09:55,360 Speaker 5: an immediate and real substantial impact on making the government 188 00:09:55,400 --> 00:09:57,640 Speaker 5: more efficient. I don't know if this one will do that, 189 00:09:58,720 --> 00:10:01,000 Speaker 5: but again I think people could support it if it 190 00:10:01,040 --> 00:10:01,840 Speaker 5: will help that personally. 191 00:10:02,920 --> 00:10:04,640 Speaker 4: Yeah, I look, this has come up before. 192 00:10:04,640 --> 00:10:08,560 Speaker 3: As I mentioned, Genie ed Markey made a cause around 193 00:10:08,559 --> 00:10:09,400 Speaker 3: this whole idea. 194 00:10:09,640 --> 00:10:10,520 Speaker 4: You're an educator. 195 00:10:10,559 --> 00:10:12,600 Speaker 3: This actually was a big part of the reason why 196 00:10:12,600 --> 00:10:14,280 Speaker 3: we do this, so kids weren't going to school in 197 00:10:14,280 --> 00:10:16,800 Speaker 3: the dark in the morning. I feel like I'm setting 198 00:10:16,840 --> 00:10:18,880 Speaker 3: up some kind of online poll here. 199 00:10:18,920 --> 00:10:22,199 Speaker 4: If you like it. 200 00:10:20,960 --> 00:10:22,960 Speaker 3: Late in the morning or in the afternoon, we can 201 00:10:23,000 --> 00:10:24,000 Speaker 3: all weigh in on that later. 202 00:10:24,080 --> 00:10:26,360 Speaker 4: But is this something we should be spending time talking about. 203 00:10:27,920 --> 00:10:29,320 Speaker 7: Uh, probably not. 204 00:10:29,559 --> 00:10:32,840 Speaker 6: You know, I do recall like in high school, Joe Matthew, 205 00:10:32,840 --> 00:10:34,920 Speaker 6: I'd have to you and I growing up in Connecticut, 206 00:10:35,160 --> 00:10:36,040 Speaker 6: I had to get. 207 00:10:35,840 --> 00:10:37,439 Speaker 7: On that bus. It was pitch black. 208 00:10:37,520 --> 00:10:38,600 Speaker 5: It was very pitch black. 209 00:10:38,640 --> 00:10:41,520 Speaker 6: Yeah, yeah, so you know there is you know, but 210 00:10:41,600 --> 00:10:43,920 Speaker 6: I think am I correct Joe that some of our 211 00:10:44,000 --> 00:10:47,320 Speaker 6: colleagues in the more vacation spots, they're not keen. 212 00:10:47,120 --> 00:10:48,079 Speaker 7: On this idea. 213 00:10:48,480 --> 00:10:51,720 Speaker 6: So there's a plus minds here. But to Japin's point, 214 00:10:51,720 --> 00:10:54,960 Speaker 6: the reality is this probably isn't going to get you 215 00:10:55,320 --> 00:10:57,760 Speaker 6: near where you need to be to addrust the serious 216 00:10:57,800 --> 00:11:01,480 Speaker 6: problems in our budget deficits. So yes, you know, for 217 00:11:02,000 --> 00:11:04,080 Speaker 6: the kids, we can think about it, but you know, 218 00:11:04,160 --> 00:11:05,560 Speaker 6: I think we need to look elsewhere. 219 00:11:05,880 --> 00:11:08,600 Speaker 7: Entitlements and titlements and titlements. 220 00:11:08,640 --> 00:11:12,320 Speaker 3: In a series of posts on X, both entrepreneurs Musk 221 00:11:12,640 --> 00:11:17,360 Speaker 3: and Ramaswami went there must declaring Americans want the United 222 00:11:17,360 --> 00:11:22,319 Speaker 3: States to quote abolish the annoying time changes unquote. Ramaswami 223 00:11:22,920 --> 00:11:26,280 Speaker 3: described the practice as inefficient and easy to change. 224 00:11:26,360 --> 00:11:26,920 Speaker 4: Unquote. 225 00:11:27,000 --> 00:11:29,319 Speaker 3: Here's my question for you, Chapin, and you guys can 226 00:11:29,320 --> 00:11:31,440 Speaker 3: you imagine being Chapin and Genie and have to answer 227 00:11:31,480 --> 00:11:33,520 Speaker 3: the questions that Joe has every day about. 228 00:11:33,240 --> 00:11:36,600 Speaker 4: This wacky stuff. Does Elon Musk get bored? 229 00:11:36,679 --> 00:11:38,920 Speaker 3: I mean, really, where's Elon Musk six months down the 230 00:11:38,960 --> 00:11:41,120 Speaker 3: road here when he's got a rocket company, He's got X, 231 00:11:41,160 --> 00:11:42,280 Speaker 3: He's got a lot of stuff going on. 232 00:11:42,360 --> 00:11:46,760 Speaker 5: Japin, listen, maybe his son can carry this argument and 233 00:11:46,800 --> 00:11:49,520 Speaker 5: that could be his pet issue, the daylight issue. Well, 234 00:11:49,720 --> 00:11:51,640 Speaker 5: that that might be the way to get it done. 235 00:11:53,000 --> 00:11:55,360 Speaker 5: I do not think he gets bored. I think these 236 00:11:55,360 --> 00:11:59,720 Speaker 5: are very talented, smart, thoughtful men, and they care right 237 00:11:59,760 --> 00:12:02,760 Speaker 5: now about government efficiency and I think that they're going 238 00:12:02,840 --> 00:12:05,440 Speaker 5: to do their best at trying to do, you know, 239 00:12:05,679 --> 00:12:09,480 Speaker 5: U execute Trump's vision of this, and I think they 240 00:12:09,480 --> 00:12:11,200 Speaker 5: are the two people that can do it. I mean 241 00:12:11,240 --> 00:12:14,520 Speaker 5: Elon Musk is literally a rocket scientist, right, and it 242 00:12:14,559 --> 00:12:17,040 Speaker 5: is doing things that we, you know, didn't think possible 243 00:12:17,440 --> 00:12:19,839 Speaker 5: a year ago. So I think he had I think 244 00:12:19,840 --> 00:12:22,600 Speaker 5: these are the exact right people to be looking at 245 00:12:22,600 --> 00:12:24,599 Speaker 5: government right. One of the problems in government is that 246 00:12:24,720 --> 00:12:28,400 Speaker 5: is not innovative most of it. Right, There's there's no innovation. 247 00:12:28,440 --> 00:12:30,640 Speaker 5: The Department of Education, it's one of the one. You know, 248 00:12:30,679 --> 00:12:33,640 Speaker 5: agencies where there's just an innovation is frowned upon, right, 249 00:12:33,920 --> 00:12:37,200 Speaker 5: So continuity of government is good. Innovation and change every 250 00:12:37,240 --> 00:12:38,160 Speaker 5: now and then is better. 251 00:12:39,480 --> 00:12:42,320 Speaker 3: Doad's Day with gd Shanzano and Chape and Fay. Our 252 00:12:42,360 --> 00:12:44,600 Speaker 3: great panel will have a lot more to talk about 253 00:12:44,600 --> 00:12:45,040 Speaker 3: coming up. 254 00:12:48,200 --> 00:12:51,480 Speaker 2: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast Ken 255 00:12:51,679 --> 00:12:54,440 Speaker 2: Just Live weekdays at noon Eastern on Apple car Play 256 00:12:54,520 --> 00:12:56,680 Speaker 2: and then roud Oto with the Bloomberg Business Ad. 257 00:12:56,840 --> 00:12:59,640 Speaker 1: You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our 258 00:12:59,679 --> 00:13:03,680 Speaker 1: Flag New York station Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven. 259 00:13:06,240 --> 00:13:07,280 Speaker 4: It's Doge Day. 260 00:13:07,679 --> 00:13:10,920 Speaker 3: The Big Buzz today inside the Beltway Elon Musk the 261 00:13:11,000 --> 00:13:14,840 Speaker 3: viik Ramaswami meeting with lawmakers today to walk through their 262 00:13:14,920 --> 00:13:18,520 Speaker 3: plan that is bringing more questions than answers at the moment. 263 00:13:19,200 --> 00:13:21,839 Speaker 3: Where the cuts will come from, how it will become law. 264 00:13:22,120 --> 00:13:25,240 Speaker 3: It's something that Speaker Mike Johnson was asked about earlier today. 265 00:13:25,240 --> 00:13:27,600 Speaker 8: Here he is, we do have to scale back the 266 00:13:27,640 --> 00:13:29,400 Speaker 8: size and scope, but government it serves the people. It 267 00:13:29,440 --> 00:13:32,400 Speaker 8: unleashes the free market again. Our policy changes will be 268 00:13:32,400 --> 00:13:34,640 Speaker 8: a part of that. But I think that if we 269 00:13:34,679 --> 00:13:37,680 Speaker 8: can make some dramatic changes in downsizing the scale and 270 00:13:37,679 --> 00:13:39,400 Speaker 8: scope of these things will go a long way. 271 00:13:39,480 --> 00:13:42,760 Speaker 9: And two specific examples, planned parenthood and PBS are in 272 00:13:43,480 --> 00:13:44,480 Speaker 9: congressional control. 273 00:13:44,720 --> 00:13:46,360 Speaker 10: Are you planning to act both of those? 274 00:13:46,640 --> 00:13:48,800 Speaker 8: I would like to, that's for sure for both of those. Yeah, 275 00:13:48,800 --> 00:13:50,600 Speaker 8: we got to build consensus to have the votes to 276 00:13:50,600 --> 00:13:50,840 Speaker 8: do that. 277 00:13:52,280 --> 00:13:54,800 Speaker 4: And just like that, we're right back to cutting big bird. 278 00:13:54,880 --> 00:13:58,200 Speaker 3: Let's get into it with Jack Fitzpatrick, our appropriations expert 279 00:13:58,480 --> 00:14:01,440 Speaker 3: at Bloomberg Government. He's on Capitol Hill today as well 280 00:14:01,760 --> 00:14:05,600 Speaker 3: for an important series of meetings with these two individuals. 281 00:14:05,640 --> 00:14:07,120 Speaker 4: Jacket's great to have you back. 282 00:14:07,240 --> 00:14:10,679 Speaker 3: I see Senator Marshall Blackburn has raised her hand to 283 00:14:10,720 --> 00:14:15,200 Speaker 3: begin potentially drafting some legislation that would include the findings 284 00:14:15,240 --> 00:14:19,000 Speaker 3: or recommendations of this panel. But that's the point here, right, 285 00:14:19,040 --> 00:14:21,480 Speaker 3: It's not a department, it is a panel, and there's 286 00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:24,760 Speaker 3: no clear path for any of these ideas to become law. 287 00:14:25,920 --> 00:14:29,040 Speaker 11: Yeah, there's a lot of interest you mentioned, Senator Blackburn. 288 00:14:29,200 --> 00:14:33,520 Speaker 11: Senator Joni Ernst started the Senate caucus, the Doge Caucus, 289 00:14:34,080 --> 00:14:36,680 Speaker 11: Aaron Bean, Republican from Florida, and the House started a 290 00:14:36,720 --> 00:14:39,360 Speaker 11: House caucus. A lot of people want to be involved. 291 00:14:39,480 --> 00:14:42,000 Speaker 11: There's a lot of enthusiasm and there were big promises 292 00:14:42,000 --> 00:14:45,400 Speaker 11: made regarding two trillion dollars in cuts, but this is 293 00:14:45,440 --> 00:14:49,920 Speaker 11: basically a think tank or an advisory board, and Republicans 294 00:14:49,960 --> 00:14:52,680 Speaker 11: are happy to hear their ideas, but there are a 295 00:14:52,720 --> 00:14:56,480 Speaker 11: lot of limitations on how you put those ideas into law. 296 00:14:56,840 --> 00:14:59,560 Speaker 11: If you want to cut huge dollars from the federal budget, 297 00:15:00,040 --> 00:15:04,160 Speaker 11: you're probably looking at Social Security or Medicaid. Medicare or 298 00:15:04,240 --> 00:15:07,680 Speaker 11: Medicaid not easy things to legislate. You can't just pull 299 00:15:07,720 --> 00:15:08,840 Speaker 11: it from the annual budget. 300 00:15:09,200 --> 00:15:10,000 Speaker 10: So there have been some. 301 00:15:10,040 --> 00:15:13,920 Speaker 11: Warnings from key members. Susan Collins, who's the incoming Appropriations chair, 302 00:15:13,960 --> 00:15:16,360 Speaker 11: said she wants to hear their ideas. She respects them, 303 00:15:16,840 --> 00:15:19,400 Speaker 11: but this is not business. This is government and it 304 00:15:19,440 --> 00:15:21,400 Speaker 11: works differently than private enterprise. 305 00:15:22,480 --> 00:15:27,040 Speaker 3: Well, Jack, this is your wheelhouse. You specialize in appropriations. 306 00:15:27,320 --> 00:15:30,640 Speaker 3: If one were to cut two trillion dollars out of 307 00:15:30,680 --> 00:15:32,800 Speaker 3: government spending, what would it mean for our budget? 308 00:15:32,840 --> 00:15:34,080 Speaker 4: What would it mean for the economy? 309 00:15:35,440 --> 00:15:38,560 Speaker 11: It would be huge, you know. The two trillion dollar 310 00:15:38,680 --> 00:15:41,520 Speaker 11: number comes from Elon Musk. At that Madison Square Garden event, 311 00:15:41,560 --> 00:15:43,360 Speaker 11: he was asked, how much can you cut from the 312 00:15:43,760 --> 00:15:47,520 Speaker 11: annual budget, which was six point seventy five trillion dollars 313 00:15:47,600 --> 00:15:51,320 Speaker 11: last year, So cutting almost a third of federal spending 314 00:15:51,360 --> 00:15:57,040 Speaker 11: would be wild. It would require massive overhauls of popular 315 00:15:57,240 --> 00:15:58,400 Speaker 11: entitlement programs. 316 00:15:59,440 --> 00:15:59,800 Speaker 4: You know this. 317 00:16:00,240 --> 00:16:05,600 Speaker 11: They've talked about finding efficiencies in Department of Defense contracting. 318 00:16:05,640 --> 00:16:08,520 Speaker 11: That doesn't do it. So we should acknowledge upfront some 319 00:16:08,600 --> 00:16:12,840 Speaker 11: of the campaign promises and rhetoric were not realistic. But 320 00:16:12,880 --> 00:16:14,480 Speaker 11: if we do take them at their word that they're 321 00:16:14,520 --> 00:16:17,800 Speaker 11: being very ambitious. The things you'd have to look at 322 00:16:17,880 --> 00:16:23,160 Speaker 11: are popular entitlement programs like Social Security, Medicare. Social Security 323 00:16:23,200 --> 00:16:25,720 Speaker 11: has to be bipartisan. You can't do that through reconciliation. 324 00:16:26,400 --> 00:16:30,080 Speaker 11: So there are some huge stumbling blocks, and the reality 325 00:16:30,160 --> 00:16:32,880 Speaker 11: check is probably going to be difficult when they actually 326 00:16:32,920 --> 00:16:34,920 Speaker 11: start talking about legislating any of. 327 00:16:34,880 --> 00:16:38,640 Speaker 3: This, which brings us to your column earlier today, the 328 00:16:38,720 --> 00:16:44,160 Speaker 3: headlines schoolhouse doge mus get Ramaswami talk cuts on Capitol Hill. 329 00:16:44,200 --> 00:16:48,000 Speaker 3: Your point here not only is talk cheap jack, but 330 00:16:48,080 --> 00:16:50,640 Speaker 3: maybe everybody needs to go back to school here on 331 00:16:50,680 --> 00:16:51,680 Speaker 3: how a bill is written. 332 00:16:52,920 --> 00:16:55,400 Speaker 11: Yeah, well, look, they can rewrite some of the things 333 00:16:55,400 --> 00:16:58,160 Speaker 11: on how a bill is written. The expanding use of 334 00:16:58,480 --> 00:17:02,800 Speaker 11: budget reconciliation to get around the Senate filibuster is as 335 00:17:02,880 --> 00:17:06,920 Speaker 11: significant as it has ever been. Republicans are talking about 336 00:17:06,960 --> 00:17:10,359 Speaker 11: how many spending cuts can we find to offset the 337 00:17:10,440 --> 00:17:14,679 Speaker 11: impact of extending tax cuts. So there's some reality to 338 00:17:14,800 --> 00:17:17,720 Speaker 11: Republicans saying we're going to do something significant. We're going 339 00:17:17,800 --> 00:17:19,639 Speaker 11: to cut a lout of spending. They're not going to 340 00:17:19,720 --> 00:17:23,399 Speaker 11: do it with Democrats, but two trillion dollars and the 341 00:17:23,480 --> 00:17:27,480 Speaker 11: idea of waiting into major entitlement reform does not seem 342 00:17:27,520 --> 00:17:30,119 Speaker 11: realistic because they've talked so much about it already and 343 00:17:30,160 --> 00:17:31,879 Speaker 11: no one has taken action lately. 344 00:17:32,880 --> 00:17:34,879 Speaker 4: Well, so what of the old timers say here? 345 00:17:34,920 --> 00:17:37,080 Speaker 3: And I say that with all due respect, you talk 346 00:17:37,160 --> 00:17:43,080 Speaker 3: to the appropriations experts, including the chairman, Tom Cole. Does 347 00:17:43,240 --> 00:17:45,640 Speaker 3: you want to see everybody go back to schoolhouse Rock? 348 00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:47,240 Speaker 4: What does he think of these ideas? 349 00:17:48,080 --> 00:17:51,919 Speaker 11: They've offered some reminders that Congress controls the power of 350 00:17:51,960 --> 00:17:53,960 Speaker 11: the purse. You don't set up a think tank or 351 00:17:53,960 --> 00:17:57,240 Speaker 11: an advisory board and then just put Elon Musk and 352 00:17:57,320 --> 00:18:00,600 Speaker 11: vivik Ramaswami in charge of the federal budget. So there's 353 00:18:00,640 --> 00:18:04,760 Speaker 11: a warning there. Cole also said earmarks don't add up 354 00:18:04,800 --> 00:18:07,000 Speaker 11: to that much money anyway, So we're not touching those, 355 00:18:07,000 --> 00:18:10,720 Speaker 11: We're not getting rid of that. Susan Collins said she 356 00:18:10,880 --> 00:18:14,439 Speaker 11: is very interested in looking at telework and getting federal 357 00:18:14,440 --> 00:18:18,360 Speaker 11: employees back in person or saving money on federal leases. 358 00:18:18,920 --> 00:18:21,280 Speaker 11: So there are some ideas, there's some enthusiasm, but a 359 00:18:21,280 --> 00:18:24,320 Speaker 11: lot of warnings that ideas are one thing, but it's 360 00:18:24,359 --> 00:18:28,000 Speaker 11: still Congress that makes the decisions regarding federal spending. 361 00:18:28,960 --> 00:18:32,080 Speaker 3: Well, the two most specific ideas that we've heard would 362 00:18:32,080 --> 00:18:35,720 Speaker 3: include one you just mentioned, bringing workers back into the 363 00:18:35,800 --> 00:18:38,280 Speaker 3: office five days a week, knowing that a lot of 364 00:18:38,680 --> 00:18:41,400 Speaker 3: federal workers are still doing the work from home. Bit 365 00:18:41,440 --> 00:18:44,320 Speaker 3: also eliminating daylight savings time. That seemed to be a 366 00:18:44,359 --> 00:18:49,240 Speaker 3: cause that both Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswami wanted to endorse. 367 00:18:49,480 --> 00:18:51,760 Speaker 3: In terms of the first one, though, you seem to 368 00:18:51,800 --> 00:18:55,200 Speaker 3: think that's something that actually has enough support in Washington. 369 00:18:55,200 --> 00:18:57,840 Speaker 3: Would it result in a lower head count because many 370 00:18:57,840 --> 00:19:00,439 Speaker 3: federal workers do not want to return to the office. 371 00:19:01,240 --> 00:19:03,480 Speaker 11: You know, that's something that Republicans have brought up, but 372 00:19:03,520 --> 00:19:06,239 Speaker 11: they've gone back and forth because on one hand, it 373 00:19:06,280 --> 00:19:10,159 Speaker 11: may result in people leaving and not being replaced and 374 00:19:10,200 --> 00:19:14,720 Speaker 11: you have a smaller workforce through attrition, but also Republicans themselves, 375 00:19:14,960 --> 00:19:18,400 Speaker 11: including relevant appropriators. Steve Walmack has brought this up, has said, 376 00:19:18,600 --> 00:19:20,560 Speaker 11: you know, we could save a lot of money by 377 00:19:20,680 --> 00:19:24,399 Speaker 11: embracing some telework not paying as much through the General 378 00:19:24,440 --> 00:19:28,760 Speaker 11: Services Administration on federal leases, telework can be used as 379 00:19:28,840 --> 00:19:32,960 Speaker 11: an efficiency, and Republicans, though they're interested in cracking down 380 00:19:32,960 --> 00:19:36,440 Speaker 11: on inappropriate telework and excessive locality pay for people who 381 00:19:36,680 --> 00:19:37,800 Speaker 11: don't actually live in DC. 382 00:19:38,520 --> 00:19:39,639 Speaker 10: They have to choose a direction. 383 00:19:39,680 --> 00:19:41,720 Speaker 11: Are you bringing back everybody full time or are you 384 00:19:41,760 --> 00:19:46,399 Speaker 11: looking for savings through efficient telework Sometimes so that's another 385 00:19:46,440 --> 00:19:49,639 Speaker 11: area where they have to make some more specific decisions 386 00:19:49,720 --> 00:19:52,040 Speaker 11: rather than just identifying this issue. 387 00:19:53,200 --> 00:19:55,280 Speaker 3: Got it, Jack, It's great to have you back. Good 388 00:19:55,280 --> 00:19:58,480 Speaker 3: to see Jack Fitzpatrick. With a busy day on Capitol Hill. 389 00:19:58,720 --> 00:20:01,359 Speaker 3: We didn't even get to the fun deadline that is looming. 390 00:20:01,480 --> 00:20:05,000 Speaker 3: By the way, December twentieth, we're fifteen days out and 391 00:20:05,040 --> 00:20:08,000 Speaker 3: there is still no deal on top lines on how 392 00:20:08,000 --> 00:20:10,680 Speaker 3: to avoid a shutdown. So the logic at this point 393 00:20:10,760 --> 00:20:12,679 Speaker 3: is we kick the can into early next year, so 394 00:20:12,760 --> 00:20:15,760 Speaker 3: we could kick the can again presumably until March. That 395 00:20:15,920 --> 00:20:19,879 Speaker 3: is the buzz at the moment here on Capitol Hill, 396 00:20:20,520 --> 00:20:24,320 Speaker 3: as Elon Musk continues his stride across the Capital with 397 00:20:24,400 --> 00:20:27,760 Speaker 3: the vik Ramaswami, I'm drawn to a quote in this 398 00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:31,879 Speaker 3: morning's punch Bowl tip sheet, a senior Republican talking with 399 00:20:32,000 --> 00:20:35,320 Speaker 3: punch Bowl about this idea. Two people, they say, who 400 00:20:35,359 --> 00:20:38,000 Speaker 3: know nothing about how the government works, pretending they can 401 00:20:38,040 --> 00:20:41,600 Speaker 3: cut a trillion dollars, both with decent pulpits to preach 402 00:20:41,640 --> 00:20:48,520 Speaker 3: from and the ear of an unpredictable president disaster. The 403 00:20:48,560 --> 00:20:50,560 Speaker 3: only good thing is at some point the'll over promise 404 00:20:50,600 --> 00:20:54,080 Speaker 3: and get bounced by Trump. But until then, disaster, said 405 00:20:54,080 --> 00:20:58,159 Speaker 3: this senior Republican aid gives you a sense of what 406 00:20:58,160 --> 00:21:00,159 Speaker 3: we're heading for in the new year. As we had 407 00:21:00,200 --> 00:21:03,119 Speaker 3: the voice of Rosemary Becky, a conversation we've been looking 408 00:21:03,119 --> 00:21:06,280 Speaker 3: forward to as we try to bring you voices of experts, 409 00:21:06,320 --> 00:21:09,919 Speaker 3: people with experience that might have seen these movies before. 410 00:21:10,160 --> 00:21:13,520 Speaker 3: Tax Attorney with Brownstein, former Tax Council to the Senate 411 00:21:13,560 --> 00:21:14,320 Speaker 3: Finance Committee. 412 00:21:14,359 --> 00:21:15,480 Speaker 4: Rosemary is great to have you. 413 00:21:15,520 --> 00:21:19,679 Speaker 3: Welcome to Bloomberg TV and Radio. Will doge results in 414 00:21:19,720 --> 00:21:21,040 Speaker 3: a smaller government. 415 00:21:22,320 --> 00:21:26,000 Speaker 9: So it quite possibly could there could be some great 416 00:21:26,080 --> 00:21:29,760 Speaker 9: recommendations that come out of it to make our government 417 00:21:29,800 --> 00:21:30,800 Speaker 9: a little bit smaller. 418 00:21:33,320 --> 00:21:36,080 Speaker 3: Well, two trillion dollars, of course is a lot smaller. 419 00:21:36,119 --> 00:21:39,840 Speaker 3: And I wonder if this falls into the category of 420 00:21:39,960 --> 00:21:42,320 Speaker 3: a lot of things involving Donald Trump, that the opening 421 00:21:42,440 --> 00:21:46,040 Speaker 3: salvo is just that, and that at some point there 422 00:21:46,080 --> 00:21:48,320 Speaker 3: will be maybe some spending cuts that they can take 423 00:21:48,359 --> 00:21:48,800 Speaker 3: credit for. 424 00:21:48,880 --> 00:21:49,640 Speaker 4: Is that how this goes? 425 00:21:50,960 --> 00:21:51,480 Speaker 7: Yeah? 426 00:21:51,560 --> 00:21:54,800 Speaker 9: And so how this process is all going to play 427 00:21:54,840 --> 00:21:58,760 Speaker 9: out is initially the DOGE is going to be set 428 00:21:58,840 --> 00:22:01,520 Speaker 9: up as an advisory committee, and I think your prior 429 00:22:01,560 --> 00:22:04,760 Speaker 9: guest talked a little bit about this and show it 430 00:22:04,920 --> 00:22:07,879 Speaker 9: will be set up as an advisory committee to OMB 431 00:22:08,359 --> 00:22:12,199 Speaker 9: and it will provide recommendations as the President puts forward 432 00:22:12,320 --> 00:22:14,400 Speaker 9: his budget for twenty twenty six. 433 00:22:16,720 --> 00:22:19,240 Speaker 3: So how does it play out then when it comes 434 00:22:19,280 --> 00:22:22,040 Speaker 3: time to actually crafting a budget. I mentioned the stopgap. 435 00:22:22,040 --> 00:22:24,119 Speaker 3: We're going to go through this kicking the can. But 436 00:22:24,160 --> 00:22:26,840 Speaker 3: at some point, likely by March, I think is the 437 00:22:26,840 --> 00:22:29,439 Speaker 3: conventional wisdom on Capitol Hill, there will. 438 00:22:29,320 --> 00:22:30,480 Speaker 4: Be a budget crafted. 439 00:22:31,359 --> 00:22:34,280 Speaker 3: Dare I say using regular order? But I don't want 440 00:22:34,280 --> 00:22:36,919 Speaker 3: to get too crazy here, but we'll actually have Donald 441 00:22:36,960 --> 00:22:40,960 Speaker 3: Trump's fingerprints on them. Is that how he implements what 442 00:22:41,000 --> 00:22:42,720 Speaker 3: we hear from Musk and Ramaswami. 443 00:22:43,840 --> 00:22:49,400 Speaker 9: Yeah, no, absolutely, and show this advisory committee will make 444 00:22:49,520 --> 00:22:53,800 Speaker 9: recommendations to OMB and ultimately it'll be up to the 445 00:22:53,840 --> 00:22:58,560 Speaker 9: President and OMB to put together a budget proposal that 446 00:22:58,640 --> 00:23:00,600 Speaker 9: they'll send up to Capital Hill. 447 00:23:00,840 --> 00:23:04,040 Speaker 7: And then it's up to wallmakers right to. 448 00:23:04,359 --> 00:23:08,400 Speaker 9: Craft a budget and to go through the appropriations process 449 00:23:08,920 --> 00:23:11,879 Speaker 9: and show, you know, hard to say at this point 450 00:23:12,000 --> 00:23:16,320 Speaker 9: you know which recommendations will be taken into account, and 451 00:23:16,359 --> 00:23:19,520 Speaker 9: it may be some recommendations are held back or further 452 00:23:19,640 --> 00:23:25,399 Speaker 9: developed as they look at other budgets spending proposals like 453 00:23:25,440 --> 00:23:28,760 Speaker 9: a tax bill. Maybe you saved some of the proposals 454 00:23:28,800 --> 00:23:30,200 Speaker 9: for that exercise. 455 00:23:31,280 --> 00:23:33,320 Speaker 4: Sure, that was really the genesis of this. 456 00:23:33,440 --> 00:23:33,600 Speaker 1: Right. 457 00:23:33,640 --> 00:23:36,080 Speaker 3: When the idea of extending or making permanent the Trump 458 00:23:36,119 --> 00:23:41,320 Speaker 3: tax cuts came about, everyone cried deficit spending, bigger deficits, 459 00:23:41,400 --> 00:23:44,760 Speaker 3: maybe higher inflation. And then we heard this idea about 460 00:23:44,760 --> 00:23:48,080 Speaker 3: the doge. Is it the answer to higher deficiles. 461 00:23:49,320 --> 00:23:53,800 Speaker 9: It's it's certainly part of a process to pay for 462 00:23:53,880 --> 00:23:58,199 Speaker 9: the tax bill, right is looking for ways to cut 463 00:23:58,240 --> 00:24:04,000 Speaker 9: spending as an offset to cutting those taxes. It will 464 00:24:04,240 --> 00:24:08,320 Speaker 9: cost in order to extend all of the twenty seventeen 465 00:24:08,640 --> 00:24:12,639 Speaker 9: expiring provisions. It's going to cost a net number of 466 00:24:12,760 --> 00:24:17,240 Speaker 9: four point six trillion dollars, and so hopefully you can 467 00:24:17,359 --> 00:24:21,440 Speaker 9: use some government savings to pay for that process and 468 00:24:21,560 --> 00:24:23,560 Speaker 9: the extension of those tax cuts. 469 00:24:24,800 --> 00:24:28,480 Speaker 3: You believe Donald Trump actually wants to cut spending. Did 470 00:24:28,520 --> 00:24:31,720 Speaker 3: his first administration show us a pattern there? 471 00:24:33,040 --> 00:24:33,200 Speaker 9: Oh? 472 00:24:33,280 --> 00:24:34,040 Speaker 7: Absolutely. 473 00:24:34,359 --> 00:24:40,120 Speaker 9: I look, I think that people are looking for real change, 474 00:24:40,640 --> 00:24:46,280 Speaker 9: They're looking to see our economy expand to create jobs, 475 00:24:46,400 --> 00:24:48,480 Speaker 9: and so I do think that they are going to 476 00:24:48,480 --> 00:24:52,760 Speaker 9: be looking at cutting government spending. And as I said before, 477 00:24:52,880 --> 00:24:55,840 Speaker 9: I think that you know, it'll be part of just 478 00:24:56,040 --> 00:24:59,240 Speaker 9: the general budget process, and we could see some of 479 00:24:59,280 --> 00:25:03,520 Speaker 9: those additional cuts appear as part of a tax bill 480 00:25:03,800 --> 00:25:06,640 Speaker 9: or other budget processes. 481 00:25:09,000 --> 00:25:13,040 Speaker 3: Rosemary, you started your government career at the IRS, which 482 00:25:13,080 --> 00:25:17,960 Speaker 3: gives you unique perspective on everything we're talking about here, including, 483 00:25:18,000 --> 00:25:20,159 Speaker 3: by the way, Donald Trump's new pick to run the IRS, 484 00:25:20,200 --> 00:25:22,160 Speaker 3: which I want to ask you about. But this agency 485 00:25:22,240 --> 00:25:24,800 Speaker 3: is at the center of so much strife in Washington. 486 00:25:25,560 --> 00:25:28,720 Speaker 3: Many Republicans wanted to pull back the funding that the 487 00:25:28,720 --> 00:25:31,840 Speaker 3: Biden administration had given, saying that you'd have armed agents 488 00:25:31,960 --> 00:25:36,280 Speaker 3: knocking on your doors. Are you concerned about the image 489 00:25:37,080 --> 00:25:40,840 Speaker 3: the way that IRS has been framed by people. What is, 490 00:25:40,840 --> 00:25:43,280 Speaker 3: in fact an agency that's willfully underfunded. 491 00:25:45,400 --> 00:25:48,840 Speaker 9: I'm not concerned about it because I think that it's 492 00:25:48,880 --> 00:25:53,960 Speaker 9: a perfect example of where there's inefficiencies and an agency 493 00:25:54,080 --> 00:25:59,000 Speaker 9: that hasn't run well and hasn't served the taxpayers well. 494 00:25:59,200 --> 00:26:03,000 Speaker 9: And so I think what President Trump is looking to 495 00:26:03,080 --> 00:26:05,560 Speaker 9: do is to bring in a fresh set of eyes 496 00:26:06,200 --> 00:26:09,639 Speaker 9: and to take another look at ways to make that 497 00:26:09,800 --> 00:26:11,960 Speaker 9: agency more efficient. 498 00:26:12,119 --> 00:26:13,560 Speaker 6: And again, you. 499 00:26:13,440 --> 00:26:19,320 Speaker 9: Know, just automating that agency isn't the answer. We really, 500 00:26:19,680 --> 00:26:25,520 Speaker 9: you know, need taxpayer services and people to help taxpayers. 501 00:26:25,680 --> 00:26:30,000 Speaker 9: I think that's where the real frustration is at with Americans. 502 00:26:31,200 --> 00:26:33,840 Speaker 3: Well, we do have a name, Billy Long, former congressman 503 00:26:33,840 --> 00:26:37,800 Speaker 3: from Missouri, named yesterday by Donald Trump to lead the 504 00:26:37,840 --> 00:26:41,840 Speaker 3: Internal Revenue Service. I'm a little bit confused to here, Rosemary. 505 00:26:41,880 --> 00:26:43,440 Speaker 3: You might think this is a great pick or not, 506 00:26:43,560 --> 00:26:47,119 Speaker 3: But don't we have an IRS commissioner already? 507 00:26:47,800 --> 00:26:52,880 Speaker 9: We do, and he has a five year term and 508 00:26:52,960 --> 00:26:56,960 Speaker 9: he is confirmed by the Senate. I suspect there will 509 00:26:57,000 --> 00:27:00,960 Speaker 9: be a lot of pressure for him to lead his position, 510 00:27:01,320 --> 00:27:05,639 Speaker 9: and which case, then you know, this nomination could move forward. 511 00:27:07,680 --> 00:27:10,879 Speaker 3: What can mister Long, assuming he gets this job, do 512 00:27:11,000 --> 00:27:14,600 Speaker 3: then to make the IRSM or efficient agency, one that 513 00:27:14,680 --> 00:27:18,480 Speaker 3: works better, one that Republicans will not be allergic to. 514 00:27:20,400 --> 00:27:24,879 Speaker 9: I think it's about making sure that agents are trained properly, 515 00:27:26,040 --> 00:27:29,800 Speaker 9: that automation isn't actually running the agency. 516 00:27:30,359 --> 00:27:33,159 Speaker 7: I think that there is so much that can be 517 00:27:33,240 --> 00:27:33,880 Speaker 7: done in. 518 00:27:33,920 --> 00:27:39,320 Speaker 9: Terms of again providing real service to taxpayers and helping 519 00:27:39,480 --> 00:27:44,560 Speaker 9: people get their questions answered. I feel like at time 520 00:27:44,640 --> 00:27:48,239 Speaker 9: and time again you're hearing about people getting notices and 521 00:27:48,280 --> 00:27:52,520 Speaker 9: being frustrated with the process because there's no one that 522 00:27:52,640 --> 00:27:56,920 Speaker 9: can answer their questions and help them with notices that 523 00:27:56,960 --> 00:28:00,640 Speaker 9: they receive it in the mail. So I do think 524 00:28:00,680 --> 00:28:04,360 Speaker 9: there's a real opportunity to take a hard look at 525 00:28:04,400 --> 00:28:06,640 Speaker 9: this agency and make some change. 526 00:28:08,080 --> 00:28:11,920 Speaker 3: What do you expect in terms of the tax debate here? 527 00:28:12,040 --> 00:28:13,920 Speaker 3: And it's you know, it's funny. We've been talking about 528 00:28:13,960 --> 00:28:17,240 Speaker 3: tax reform and reforming the tax code, Rosemary for a 529 00:28:17,320 --> 00:28:19,040 Speaker 3: lot of years. Remember when it was going to fit 530 00:28:19,119 --> 00:28:23,560 Speaker 3: on a postcard. What will this debate look like when 531 00:28:23,600 --> 00:28:26,320 Speaker 3: it comes to extending the Trump tax cuts and will 532 00:28:26,320 --> 00:28:29,120 Speaker 3: it include all of the exemptions that he rolled out 533 00:28:29,320 --> 00:28:32,440 Speaker 3: on the campaign trail? No taxes on tips, no taxes 534 00:28:32,480 --> 00:28:35,399 Speaker 3: on overtime. I could keep going. I haven't even mentioned 535 00:28:35,440 --> 00:28:37,520 Speaker 3: salt yet. What will the final product look like? 536 00:28:39,080 --> 00:28:42,400 Speaker 9: You know, the final product is probably going to be 537 00:28:42,520 --> 00:28:48,240 Speaker 9: a combination of extending the twenty seventeen tax cuts as 538 00:28:48,280 --> 00:28:52,240 Speaker 9: well as making good on a lot of the campaign promises. 539 00:28:53,520 --> 00:28:56,640 Speaker 9: And I think what we're also going to see is 540 00:28:56,760 --> 00:29:01,840 Speaker 9: maybe looking again at different ways to pay for that again, 541 00:29:01,960 --> 00:29:08,760 Speaker 9: whether it's through tariffs or through cutting further cutting government spending. 542 00:29:09,960 --> 00:29:12,480 Speaker 9: But there's going to be some trade offs and it's 543 00:29:12,520 --> 00:29:17,280 Speaker 9: going to be a really hard process. I mean, you're 544 00:29:17,600 --> 00:29:22,960 Speaker 9: talking about members who are definitely concerned about deficits and debt, 545 00:29:23,640 --> 00:29:26,640 Speaker 9: and so that's all got to be taken into account 546 00:29:26,720 --> 00:29:27,800 Speaker 9: during this process. 547 00:29:29,080 --> 00:29:32,520 Speaker 3: Just quickly, one more as we get ready for the 548 00:29:32,560 --> 00:29:35,760 Speaker 3: confirmation process or whatever we're going to call this for 549 00:29:35,880 --> 00:29:38,640 Speaker 3: Billy Long, assuming there is a change here at the 550 00:29:38,640 --> 00:29:42,320 Speaker 3: top of the irs, because it can't result in a firing. 551 00:29:42,360 --> 00:29:46,960 Speaker 3: As you've pointed out, this former congressman spent a long 552 00:29:47,040 --> 00:29:54,400 Speaker 3: time dealing with the pandemic era tax credit. I want 553 00:29:54,440 --> 00:29:58,680 Speaker 3: to be exact about this, the employee retention tax credit, 554 00:29:58,680 --> 00:30:01,600 Speaker 3: which has been very controversial. A lot of lawmakers tried 555 00:30:01,640 --> 00:30:06,120 Speaker 3: to shut down. Will that make it problematic for him 556 00:30:06,160 --> 00:30:06,960 Speaker 3: to get this job. 557 00:30:09,440 --> 00:30:11,920 Speaker 7: I don't think it'll make them problematic. 558 00:30:12,160 --> 00:30:15,800 Speaker 9: I think it's certainly he'll have to answer questions about it. 559 00:30:16,280 --> 00:30:20,040 Speaker 9: You know, it is certainly a program that needs to 560 00:30:20,120 --> 00:30:26,800 Speaker 9: be taken looked at and reevaluate it and frankly probably 561 00:30:27,760 --> 00:30:34,240 Speaker 9: they need to learn from from that experience. So so 562 00:30:34,360 --> 00:30:37,480 Speaker 9: that'll all be his affirmation process. 563 00:30:38,760 --> 00:30:41,479 Speaker 3: I'm glad you could join us. Rosemary Becky, tax attorney 564 00:30:41,520 --> 00:30:44,600 Speaker 3: with Brownstein. We thank you for the insights. As always 565 00:30:44,640 --> 00:30:46,880 Speaker 3: here on Balance of Power. We'll follow the beat on 566 00:30:46,960 --> 00:30:49,400 Speaker 3: Billy Long for you in the future of the irs. 567 00:30:53,120 --> 00:30:56,080 Speaker 2: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. 568 00:30:56,400 --> 00:30:59,520 Speaker 1: Catch Just Live weekdays at noon Eastern onmo car Play 569 00:30:59,560 --> 00:31:02,360 Speaker 1: and then Oh where the Bloomberg Business at Listen on 570 00:31:02,440 --> 00:31:05,640 Speaker 1: demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us live 571 00:31:05,760 --> 00:31:08,680 Speaker 1: on YouTube. 572 00:31:09,040 --> 00:31:11,360 Speaker 3: Thanks for joining us on the Fastest Show in Politics. 573 00:31:11,440 --> 00:31:14,200 Speaker 3: Thursday edition of Balance of Power. We're live in Washington, 574 00:31:14,200 --> 00:31:16,520 Speaker 3: where it's been a pretty busy day around Here is 575 00:31:16,560 --> 00:31:19,920 Speaker 3: Doge Day on the Fastest Show in Politics. That means 576 00:31:19,960 --> 00:31:23,600 Speaker 3: the Departments of Government efficiency. Yes, we're following the coin 577 00:31:23,640 --> 00:31:25,800 Speaker 3: as well. It's actually doing pretty well. As Elon Musk 578 00:31:26,120 --> 00:31:28,960 Speaker 3: and the vek Ramaswami meet with lawmakers today, we're told 579 00:31:29,000 --> 00:31:30,600 Speaker 3: they're going to be holding a news conference or at 580 00:31:30,640 --> 00:31:33,640 Speaker 3: least making a statement a bit later on following their meetings, 581 00:31:34,120 --> 00:31:36,440 Speaker 3: and we'll hear what they have to say, knowing that 582 00:31:36,480 --> 00:31:38,840 Speaker 3: Elon Musk has promised to find a way to cut 583 00:31:38,880 --> 00:31:42,240 Speaker 3: some two trillion dollars out of the federal budget while 584 00:31:42,240 --> 00:31:44,680 Speaker 3: we're at it. By the way, fifteen days from now, 585 00:31:44,960 --> 00:31:47,320 Speaker 3: we will not have a federal budget. The government will 586 00:31:47,400 --> 00:31:49,560 Speaker 3: run out of money. So there's also an effort underway 587 00:31:49,760 --> 00:31:51,840 Speaker 3: to try to craft the stopgap to get us through 588 00:31:52,320 --> 00:31:54,920 Speaker 3: the new year here without a government shut down. One 589 00:31:54,960 --> 00:31:56,959 Speaker 3: of the big stories that we've been talking about with 590 00:31:57,000 --> 00:32:00,000 Speaker 3: regard to geopolitics are eyes on China and the intersection 591 00:32:00,360 --> 00:32:04,760 Speaker 3: with politics, policy and technology is the tip for tat 592 00:32:04,800 --> 00:32:08,400 Speaker 3: that we have been seeing when it comes to access 593 00:32:09,120 --> 00:32:11,400 Speaker 3: to some of the most advanced technology and in this 594 00:32:11,520 --> 00:32:14,840 Speaker 3: case many cases at least chips from companies like in 595 00:32:14,880 --> 00:32:19,080 Speaker 3: Nvidia that are helping to create this new age of 596 00:32:19,240 --> 00:32:22,920 Speaker 3: artificial intelligence. China ratcheting up trade tensions with the ban 597 00:32:23,080 --> 00:32:25,880 Speaker 3: on rare earths this tip for tat that not a 598 00:32:25,880 --> 00:32:29,080 Speaker 3: lot of people saw bringing equity to the situation. But 599 00:32:29,160 --> 00:32:33,800 Speaker 3: Gregory Allen, who runs the wadwani Ai Center at the 600 00:32:33,800 --> 00:32:37,240 Speaker 3: Center for Strategic and International Studies, embarked on a great 601 00:32:37,280 --> 00:32:40,440 Speaker 3: project because we talk a lot here on Bloomberg about 602 00:32:40,480 --> 00:32:43,400 Speaker 3: the impact of these export controls and what they will 603 00:32:43,440 --> 00:32:47,640 Speaker 3: mean for our relationships and our economies, but nowhere do 604 00:32:47,720 --> 00:32:50,640 Speaker 3: we really get answers on what that impact will be. 605 00:32:50,680 --> 00:32:53,320 Speaker 3: And that's what Gregory Allen set out to find. It's 606 00:32:53,320 --> 00:32:54,840 Speaker 3: great to see you, welcome back. Nice to see you 607 00:32:54,880 --> 00:32:55,960 Speaker 3: at the table here at Bloomberg. 608 00:32:55,960 --> 00:32:57,000 Speaker 10: It's wonderful to be back. 609 00:32:57,320 --> 00:32:59,360 Speaker 3: This is a big, squishy story, so we can go 610 00:32:59,400 --> 00:33:01,200 Speaker 3: on a lot of different directions here, and you're a 611 00:33:01,200 --> 00:33:03,640 Speaker 3: real expert. So I want to start with the most 612 00:33:03,680 --> 00:33:07,360 Speaker 3: recent turn in this Tit for tat With China, we're 613 00:33:07,400 --> 00:33:09,600 Speaker 3: trying to keep technology out of their hands and they're 614 00:33:09,600 --> 00:33:11,320 Speaker 3: trying to keep rare earth's out of ours. 615 00:33:11,360 --> 00:33:13,120 Speaker 4: But we don't buy all of that from China. 616 00:33:13,200 --> 00:33:17,200 Speaker 10: To me, no, So China is a really strong supplier 617 00:33:17,320 --> 00:33:20,800 Speaker 10: in the world's rare earth market. Most of their strength 618 00:33:20,880 --> 00:33:23,959 Speaker 10: is actually as a refiner, not as a miner So 619 00:33:24,080 --> 00:33:27,120 Speaker 10: while they have really strong market share in most of 620 00:33:27,160 --> 00:33:29,040 Speaker 10: the mining in terms of owning the mines around the 621 00:33:29,080 --> 00:33:31,959 Speaker 10: world that produce rare earths, where they really dominate is 622 00:33:32,000 --> 00:33:35,000 Speaker 10: in refining capacity. And what we've seen with the most 623 00:33:35,040 --> 00:33:37,800 Speaker 10: recent round of export controls coming out of China, so 624 00:33:37,880 --> 00:33:41,360 Speaker 10: this is their restricting sales to America is on gallium 625 00:33:41,360 --> 00:33:44,200 Speaker 10: and germanium. But I would say it's actually not nearly 626 00:33:44,240 --> 00:33:46,560 Speaker 10: as strong as what the United States has done to China. 627 00:33:46,600 --> 00:33:49,160 Speaker 10: And there's two reasons for that. The first of which 628 00:33:49,200 --> 00:33:53,280 Speaker 10: is gallium and germanium are natural byproducts of aluminum and 629 00:33:53,400 --> 00:33:56,480 Speaker 10: zinc mining, which means just about anybody who right now 630 00:33:56,520 --> 00:33:59,440 Speaker 10: today is mining aluminum or zinc could get into the 631 00:33:59,480 --> 00:34:02,720 Speaker 10: business of alium or germanium if they wanted to. Fascinating 632 00:34:02,760 --> 00:34:04,920 Speaker 10: now once they have all that or they're going to 633 00:34:04,920 --> 00:34:06,680 Speaker 10: have to find a refinery to ship it to. And 634 00:34:06,760 --> 00:34:09,640 Speaker 10: right now, China dominates the world of refining. So the 635 00:34:09,719 --> 00:34:13,359 Speaker 10: question is, are these export controls that China has put 636 00:34:13,400 --> 00:34:16,560 Speaker 10: in place scary enough that somebody in the West is 637 00:34:16,560 --> 00:34:19,440 Speaker 10: actually going to start putting the money into building local 638 00:34:19,480 --> 00:34:22,120 Speaker 10: refining capacity for these metals, and that could take a 639 00:34:22,160 --> 00:34:24,239 Speaker 10: year or two to set up, and then China might 640 00:34:24,280 --> 00:34:27,040 Speaker 10: flood the market later to sort of destroy that investment. 641 00:34:27,200 --> 00:34:28,880 Speaker 4: Is that a nimby story, is it? 642 00:34:29,080 --> 00:34:31,520 Speaker 3: I mean, we're actually hearing Democrats warm up to the 643 00:34:31,600 --> 00:34:34,880 Speaker 3: idea of opening new nuclear power plants to help to 644 00:34:34,960 --> 00:34:37,880 Speaker 3: provide power for AI data centers, for instance. It sounds 645 00:34:37,920 --> 00:34:39,240 Speaker 3: like everything is being considered. 646 00:34:39,239 --> 00:34:41,560 Speaker 10: Again, well, I think in the United States' this case, 647 00:34:41,600 --> 00:34:44,680 Speaker 10: we don't necessarily need it to happen in the United States. 648 00:34:44,719 --> 00:34:46,480 Speaker 10: Of course, there's folks who would love for that to 649 00:34:46,480 --> 00:34:50,040 Speaker 10: be the case for the jobs or for the strategic positioning, 650 00:34:50,080 --> 00:34:52,360 Speaker 10: et cetera. But what we really need more than we 651 00:34:52,440 --> 00:34:56,799 Speaker 10: need American sources are just non Chinese? Are those or Africa? 652 00:34:56,920 --> 00:34:59,280 Speaker 10: In terms of where the medals are, that's actually almost 653 00:34:59,320 --> 00:35:02,839 Speaker 10: everywhere here. I'm talking specifically about gallium and germanium again 654 00:35:03,280 --> 00:35:05,239 Speaker 10: anywhere processing facilities. 655 00:35:05,320 --> 00:35:08,479 Speaker 3: Right, we're paying for this trans continental railroad. Maybe that's 656 00:35:08,600 --> 00:35:09,680 Speaker 3: the next source for these. 657 00:35:10,040 --> 00:35:12,680 Speaker 10: So that's the point is you could put these refining 658 00:35:12,719 --> 00:35:16,480 Speaker 10: sources anywhere, and some developing countries such as Indonesia, which 659 00:35:16,480 --> 00:35:19,320 Speaker 10: are strong in mining certain metals, have expressed an interest 660 00:35:19,400 --> 00:35:22,040 Speaker 10: in getting into the refining market. The problem is on 661 00:35:22,080 --> 00:35:25,040 Speaker 10: the investor side, because they're asking themselves, if we put 662 00:35:25,120 --> 00:35:27,799 Speaker 10: up the money for a refinery, is China just going 663 00:35:27,840 --> 00:35:30,120 Speaker 10: to flood the market to press prices so that our 664 00:35:30,160 --> 00:35:32,319 Speaker 10: refinery goes out of business. So they're going to be 665 00:35:32,320 --> 00:35:35,920 Speaker 10: looking for long term purchase agreements with US customers that 666 00:35:35,960 --> 00:35:38,280 Speaker 10: are going to ensure that they're still going to have access. 667 00:35:38,320 --> 00:35:38,840 Speaker 4: Fascinating. 668 00:35:39,000 --> 00:35:40,839 Speaker 10: There's one other thing here that I think is really 669 00:35:40,880 --> 00:35:43,680 Speaker 10: worth pointing out, and this is a research done by 670 00:35:43,760 --> 00:35:47,600 Speaker 10: your colleague in Bloomberg, Gerard de Pippo, who has pointed 671 00:35:47,640 --> 00:35:50,440 Speaker 10: out that there's really a lot of circumvention of Chinese 672 00:35:50,480 --> 00:35:54,080 Speaker 10: export controls going on right now because US purchases from 673 00:35:54,160 --> 00:35:57,160 Speaker 10: China have obviously plummeted in the wake of these export controls, 674 00:35:57,560 --> 00:36:01,400 Speaker 10: but Chinese exports to Europe have surged, and Chinese exports 675 00:36:01,400 --> 00:36:04,200 Speaker 10: from Europe to the United States have also served. And 676 00:36:04,280 --> 00:36:06,040 Speaker 10: so China is getting a little bit of a taste 677 00:36:06,080 --> 00:36:08,000 Speaker 10: of its own medicine when it comes to working to 678 00:36:08,000 --> 00:36:08,920 Speaker 10: evade export control. 679 00:36:09,080 --> 00:36:11,000 Speaker 3: Nice had tip to Gerard his team is doing amazing 680 00:36:11,080 --> 00:36:13,920 Speaker 3: work over there. China wants to have its own industry. 681 00:36:14,760 --> 00:36:17,000 Speaker 3: It wants to get the chip making equipment that we 682 00:36:17,120 --> 00:36:20,680 Speaker 3: don't want it to have. What's so, when you put 683 00:36:20,680 --> 00:36:26,399 Speaker 3: the walls around China's chip manufacturing capacity, how far behind 684 00:36:26,760 --> 00:36:29,000 Speaker 3: the US is it and how could it catch up? 685 00:36:29,400 --> 00:36:31,520 Speaker 10: So there's multiple ways you can think about this. The 686 00:36:31,560 --> 00:36:34,239 Speaker 10: first is in the types of equipment. What do you 687 00:36:34,280 --> 00:36:37,759 Speaker 10: need to actually put in the chip fabrication facility to 688 00:36:37,800 --> 00:36:40,480 Speaker 10: operate that facility. The one that's best known is the 689 00:36:40,520 --> 00:36:43,840 Speaker 10: lithography equipment. This is sort of using light to print 690 00:36:44,040 --> 00:36:47,800 Speaker 10: the design on the chip. But there's also advanced deposition equipment, 691 00:36:47,920 --> 00:36:52,440 Speaker 10: advanced etching equipment, and China's positioning differs in these different 692 00:36:52,520 --> 00:36:57,680 Speaker 10: categories of equipment. They're dramatically behind in lithography equipment. In 693 00:36:57,719 --> 00:37:01,400 Speaker 10: some sub niches of deposition and etching equipment, they're still good, 694 00:37:01,480 --> 00:37:03,759 Speaker 10: although they're quite a bit behind the global state of 695 00:37:03,760 --> 00:37:06,760 Speaker 10: the art, as represented by what the United States companies 696 00:37:06,760 --> 00:37:08,680 Speaker 10: can do, what the Japanese companies can do, what the 697 00:37:08,760 --> 00:37:09,680 Speaker 10: Dutch companies can do. 698 00:37:09,800 --> 00:37:14,320 Speaker 3: How can China get that equipment American made equipment potentially 699 00:37:14,320 --> 00:37:16,120 Speaker 3: through other countries. There's a lot of ways to backdoor 700 00:37:16,200 --> 00:37:17,600 Speaker 3: this stuff, as we have seen. 701 00:37:17,640 --> 00:37:20,680 Speaker 10: Yes exactly, and of course the American equipment companies. The 702 00:37:20,719 --> 00:37:23,239 Speaker 10: point that they're making is Hey, if other countries are 703 00:37:23,280 --> 00:37:25,520 Speaker 10: going to sell this, we want to be able to 704 00:37:25,520 --> 00:37:28,319 Speaker 10: sell it too. So that's why they're really concerned about 705 00:37:28,320 --> 00:37:31,759 Speaker 10: the export controls occurring in a unilateral basis, because then 706 00:37:31,800 --> 00:37:34,959 Speaker 10: there's no strategic impact on China and there's a loss 707 00:37:34,960 --> 00:37:38,520 Speaker 10: of sale by US companies. And so in earlier tranches 708 00:37:38,520 --> 00:37:42,280 Speaker 10: of export controls, what you've seen is US firms actually 709 00:37:42,320 --> 00:37:46,040 Speaker 10: increasing their shipments of semiconductor manufacturing equipment coming out of 710 00:37:46,320 --> 00:37:49,080 Speaker 10: the countries to which they have outsourced some of their manufacturing. 711 00:37:49,360 --> 00:37:51,600 Speaker 10: So it's no longer a US export. It is now 712 00:37:51,640 --> 00:37:54,920 Speaker 10: a Malaysian export, even though it's coming from a US company. 713 00:37:55,080 --> 00:37:57,640 Speaker 10: The most recent tranch of export controls, designed by the 714 00:37:57,640 --> 00:38:01,439 Speaker 10: Bide Administration expands the usage of the foreign Direct Product rule, 715 00:38:01,440 --> 00:38:05,000 Speaker 10: which is a little bit esoteric category of export control law, 716 00:38:05,200 --> 00:38:07,239 Speaker 10: but it should put a real stop to all of 717 00:38:07,239 --> 00:38:10,440 Speaker 10: that category of stuff there now, wherever it's made in 718 00:38:10,480 --> 00:38:13,880 Speaker 10: the world, if it includes US content, export controls are 719 00:38:13,880 --> 00:38:16,840 Speaker 10: going to apply, or Dutch or Japanese local export controls 720 00:38:16,880 --> 00:38:17,440 Speaker 10: are going to apply. 721 00:38:17,480 --> 00:38:20,279 Speaker 3: You're so good at this that when you consider some 722 00:38:20,360 --> 00:38:24,480 Speaker 3: of the impacts more broadly speaking, here, you're actually trying 723 00:38:24,520 --> 00:38:27,560 Speaker 3: to find the impact this has economically financially. How about 724 00:38:27,560 --> 00:38:31,279 Speaker 3: for the companies themselves, whether you're an Nvidia or an 725 00:38:31,320 --> 00:38:32,560 Speaker 3: Applied Materials. 726 00:38:32,880 --> 00:38:34,359 Speaker 4: Every time there's a quarterly. 727 00:38:34,040 --> 00:38:37,320 Speaker 3: Conference call, we hear that demand is off the scale 728 00:38:37,360 --> 00:38:40,000 Speaker 3: and we can't even can't keep up with the backlog. 729 00:38:40,480 --> 00:38:42,640 Speaker 4: So what does it matter to them if China's not buying? 730 00:38:43,000 --> 00:38:45,400 Speaker 10: So it's worth saying here, you know that it's a 731 00:38:45,400 --> 00:38:48,680 Speaker 10: little bit different for different markets. Now. In the case 732 00:38:48,719 --> 00:38:53,000 Speaker 10: of semiconductor manufacturing equipment, it's often described in the press 733 00:38:53,040 --> 00:38:55,000 Speaker 10: as a ban, but what it really is is a 734 00:38:55,000 --> 00:38:59,200 Speaker 10: ban on advanced semiconductor manufacturing equipment. You can still sell 735 00:38:59,200 --> 00:39:02,240 Speaker 10: the old stuff, and it's also a ban of selling 736 00:39:02,320 --> 00:39:04,840 Speaker 10: all types of equipment to those chip fabs in China 737 00:39:05,120 --> 00:39:07,719 Speaker 10: that are producing advanced chips, the types of chips that 738 00:39:07,719 --> 00:39:11,439 Speaker 10: would compete with an Nvidia, for example. So what we've 739 00:39:11,440 --> 00:39:14,640 Speaker 10: seen is not a reduction in demand from China. In fact, 740 00:39:14,680 --> 00:39:17,560 Speaker 10: demand from China is exploding right now. But what you 741 00:39:17,640 --> 00:39:20,960 Speaker 10: have seen is a major change in the composition of demand, 742 00:39:21,280 --> 00:39:24,319 Speaker 10: buying more of the older types of machines that they're 743 00:39:24,360 --> 00:39:26,800 Speaker 10: still allowed exactly. 744 00:39:26,440 --> 00:39:29,440 Speaker 3: So does that help the intels or the AMDs, or 745 00:39:29,480 --> 00:39:31,520 Speaker 3: those who are not quite at the point of an 746 00:39:31,600 --> 00:39:34,920 Speaker 3: Nvidia with prohibitively advanced technology. 747 00:39:35,320 --> 00:39:38,280 Speaker 10: Yes, indeed, So what it really does is it changes 748 00:39:38,480 --> 00:39:41,200 Speaker 10: what China is setting its sights on in terms of 749 00:39:41,400 --> 00:39:44,640 Speaker 10: chip manufacturing. You know, if you think about a most 750 00:39:44,640 --> 00:39:48,239 Speaker 10: advanced in Nvidia chip, that's you know, being manufactured at 751 00:39:48,280 --> 00:39:52,680 Speaker 10: five nanometers, soon at three nanometers, those really really small, 752 00:39:52,760 --> 00:39:56,720 Speaker 10: really precise components at the bleeding edge. Now what China 753 00:39:56,760 --> 00:39:59,560 Speaker 10: can't buy is the equipment you use to manufacture five 754 00:39:59,640 --> 00:40:02,480 Speaker 10: nanime or three and animeters. So what you've seen is 755 00:40:02,480 --> 00:40:05,560 Speaker 10: a surge of increasing chip production capacity at what we 756 00:40:05,640 --> 00:40:10,319 Speaker 10: call legacy nodes nineteen animeters, forty eight animeters, twenty four 757 00:40:10,320 --> 00:40:13,399 Speaker 10: and animeters or twenty eight animeters. These are the types 758 00:40:13,440 --> 00:40:16,040 Speaker 10: of chips that go into your washing machine, into your 759 00:40:16,080 --> 00:40:18,960 Speaker 10: hair dryer, to a certain extent, into your car, and 760 00:40:19,080 --> 00:40:22,640 Speaker 10: China is looking to become the new juggernaut of legacy chips. Now, 761 00:40:22,680 --> 00:40:26,040 Speaker 10: for the US equipment suppliers, it's been a bonanza because 762 00:40:26,040 --> 00:40:28,600 Speaker 10: they're continuing to get all the dollars, but what they're 763 00:40:28,640 --> 00:40:31,160 Speaker 10: selling is the older equipment. That's at least what we've 764 00:40:31,160 --> 00:40:34,600 Speaker 10: seen so far but the expert controls that came out 765 00:40:34,600 --> 00:40:37,080 Speaker 10: this Monday really are designed to sort of change the story. 766 00:40:37,120 --> 00:40:39,640 Speaker 4: Those old fashioned chips go into weapons too, don't they. 767 00:40:39,640 --> 00:40:41,000 Speaker 10: Oh yes, absolutely, which has. 768 00:40:40,920 --> 00:40:43,800 Speaker 4: Been quite a bit of demand for Russia. 769 00:40:43,840 --> 00:40:46,120 Speaker 3: Gregory Allen, It's a great conversation and great to see 770 00:40:46,160 --> 00:40:47,920 Speaker 3: you again. I appreciate the work so much, Director of 771 00:40:47,960 --> 00:40:50,799 Speaker 3: the juadwani Ai Center at the Center for Strategic and 772 00:40:50,840 --> 00:40:52,920 Speaker 3: International Studies CSIS. 773 00:40:53,000 --> 00:40:55,040 Speaker 4: You're always welcome here. I appreciate your research and sharing 774 00:40:55,040 --> 00:40:55,840 Speaker 4: your work with a scriptory. 775 00:40:55,880 --> 00:40:57,360 Speaker 7: It's good to see you. 776 00:40:59,480 --> 00:41:01,960 Speaker 4: Thanks for listening to the Balance of Power podcast. 777 00:41:02,600 --> 00:41:05,719 Speaker 3: Make sure to subscribe if you haven't already, at Apple, Spotify, 778 00:41:05,800 --> 00:41:08,399 Speaker 3: or wherever you get your podcasts, and you can find 779 00:41:08,440 --> 00:41:12,160 Speaker 3: us live every weekday from Washington, DC at Noontimeeastern at 780 00:41:12,160 --> 00:41:13,440 Speaker 3: Bloomberg dot com.