WEBVTT - Decoding the Fed's Next Move, Inflation Secrets, Skyrocketing Home Prices, China's Semiconductor Standoff, & Latest in Bitcoin

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello, Welcome to another episode of the Mark Mass Show,

0:00:02.480 --> 0:00:05.520
<v Speaker 1>where we're always talking about the decentralized revolution, how the

0:00:05.559 --> 0:00:09.120
<v Speaker 1>world is changing through the lens of politics, finance, and technology.

0:00:09.520 --> 0:00:12.440
<v Speaker 1>And that technology that we're talking about is bitcoin, which

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is a decentralized technology. And there was a lot going

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:18.759
<v Speaker 1>on in the bitcoin world today and I have a

0:00:18.760 --> 0:00:21.600
<v Speaker 1>lot to cover we're going to talk about in this segment.

0:00:21.760 --> 0:00:24.079
<v Speaker 1>We're going to talk about what happened in the bitcoin space,

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>something crazy, weren't talk about the economy, what the Fed

0:00:27.880 --> 0:00:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is doing, and even more news coming out of China.

0:00:31.200 --> 0:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>So lots to talk about in this segment. But jumping

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>into bitcoin for a minute, the big news is that

0:00:37.320 --> 0:00:42.360
<v Speaker 1>the price of bitcoin shot up, jumped up on fake news,

0:00:42.400 --> 0:00:44.920
<v Speaker 1>on fake rumors. And what happened is we've been talking

0:00:44.920 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>about on this show for a long time, is that

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>there is an ETF coming out that would well hopefully

0:00:50.680 --> 0:00:53.559
<v Speaker 1>there's an ETF coming out for bitcoins. We have ETFs

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:58.040
<v Speaker 1>for all types of things, and we've been trying to

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:00.520
<v Speaker 1>get one through for bitcoin for a long time, and

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I believe there's eight ETF applications that are stuck at

0:01:05.000 --> 0:01:08.039
<v Speaker 1>the SEC trying to get through. Now one of the

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>larger sort of cryptocurrency bitcoin related news sites, a site

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:18.160
<v Speaker 1>called coin Telegraph, put out a tweet on Twitter fake news,

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>saying that breaking Sec approves a bitcoin spot etf And

0:01:24.319 --> 0:01:27.880
<v Speaker 1>when that happened, within about thirty minutes, we saw the

0:01:27.880 --> 0:01:32.040
<v Speaker 1>price of bitcoin shoot up before coin telegraph could come

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>out and say reportedly, and then they went ahead and

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>they deleted that tweet altogether. Now, during that time, we

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>saw the price job dump about seven to eight percent

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:48.240
<v Speaker 1>during that time before it was disproven. Now, what's in this?

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>There's something in this. There's a couple of things. First

0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:55.120
<v Speaker 1>of all, when that happened, we saw the price shoot up.

0:01:55.200 --> 0:01:57.080
<v Speaker 1>Why did it shoot up so much? I think there's

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>two reasons why. So, first of all, the frenzy triggered

0:02:03.240 --> 0:02:06.520
<v Speaker 1>a short squeeze. There were seventy eight million dollars in

0:02:06.560 --> 0:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>short positions and there was thirty four million in longs,

0:02:10.000 --> 0:02:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and they got liquidated faster than.

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:14.040
<v Speaker 2>You can say fake news.

0:02:15.000 --> 0:02:17.359
<v Speaker 1>They took off really really fast, and so there were

0:02:17.440 --> 0:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>so many shorts. As soon as it started moving, they

0:02:19.360 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 1>started getting liquidated, which caused the price to move up faster, faster, faster, faster, faster.

0:02:23.080 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Bester fa faster, all right.

0:02:25.080 --> 0:02:26.960
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that I think is interesting in the

0:02:27.040 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>story is isn't just on the price action. It's really

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>about what will happen. I guess if I think it's

0:02:35.680 --> 0:02:38.800
<v Speaker 1>more when and the ETF actually does get approved. And

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>so even though the news was fake, the reaction from

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the market wasn't. And so what we saw is that

0:02:45.680 --> 0:02:50.120
<v Speaker 1>the market responded positively. We saw that the market moved up.

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:53.160
<v Speaker 1>We saw the price jump up almost ten percent in

0:02:53.400 --> 0:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>just a thirty minute time frame. Now could it have

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>jumped out more or less, I don't know, but I

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>think what it means is that happened within thirty minutes.

0:03:02.960 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>And so I guess the question that most of us

0:03:05.720 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>want to understand is do we think this news is

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>already priced in? Do we think that the bitcoin ETF

0:03:14.080 --> 0:03:17.400
<v Speaker 1>getting approved is already priced in? I believe Bloomberg has

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.480
<v Speaker 1>it at like a ninety percent chance of it becoming approved.

0:03:20.880 --> 0:03:24.079
<v Speaker 1>We've seen Gary Ginsler's language around this starting to change,

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>and so is it already priced in? And based off

0:03:26.639 --> 0:03:28.440
<v Speaker 1>of this price action, it looks.

0:03:28.200 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Like maybe it wasn't.

0:03:30.040 --> 0:03:32.320
<v Speaker 1>If this wasn't taken down within thirty minutes, if it

0:03:32.360 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>was allowed to stay up for long or for hours,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:37.080
<v Speaker 1>for days, for weeks. What could happen? How much could

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the price move up? Now? It's a little bit priced

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 1>in in my opinion, because it didn't jump up that much.

0:03:43.040 --> 0:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, sure, seven, eight, nine, ten percent sounds like

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot.

0:03:46.440 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 2>It would be a lot for this.

0:03:47.320 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 1>S in P. Five hundred, it's not a lot for bitcoin.

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.640
<v Speaker 1>We've seen bitcoin move way more than that in a

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>single day, in a single candle. And so while that

0:03:56.400 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly is positive price action, it's not as big as

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you might think it would be. And so to me,

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I think that most of it has been priced in,

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 1>not one hundred percent of it, but most of it

0:04:07.400 --> 0:04:09.720
<v Speaker 1>has been priced in. Of course, this doesn't account for

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>the amount of funds that will flow into bitcoin at

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>some point.

0:04:13.440 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:04:14.080 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the biggest ETFs that's trying to get through

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:21.640
<v Speaker 1>right now is from the largest asset manager in the world, Blackrock.

0:04:22.320 --> 0:04:24.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm no fan of Blackrock. I've been very vocal about that,

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>but Blackrock is one of the I believe eight ETFs

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>trying to get through. And if anybody's going to get

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.479
<v Speaker 1>an ETF through, it's probably going to be Blackrock. There's

0:04:33.520 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a quasi semi arm of the government.

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:38.760
<v Speaker 1>They work on the Fed's behalf, they work with the

0:04:38.839 --> 0:04:42.080
<v Speaker 1>FDIC bank bailouts, all of those things. So if anybody

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>could get one through, it would be them. And it's

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty interesting this week to see the CEO of Blackrock,

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fink, come out and say that he's seeing client

0:04:50.320 --> 0:04:54.320
<v Speaker 1>demand for bitcoin all around the world. He said that

0:04:54.320 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>clients across the globe are talking about the need for crypto.

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:01.960
<v Speaker 1>He said that I think the rally today is about

0:05:02.000 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>a flight to quality. With all the issues around the

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Israeli war now global terrorism, etc. People want to flight

0:05:10.279 --> 0:05:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to quality, and he thinks that's why people are going

0:05:12.839 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>to bigcoin, which is very interesting. You have arguably the

0:05:17.920 --> 0:05:23.360
<v Speaker 1>most powerful man in the financial world, which makes him

0:05:23.440 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>arguably one of the most powerful men in the entire world,

0:05:27.240 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>who you wouldn't think would want something like bitcoin to

0:05:32.040 --> 0:05:35.320
<v Speaker 1>be approved, and also would always be trying to talk

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:39.560
<v Speaker 1>down fears of financial problems in the markets, financial markets,

0:05:40.640 --> 0:05:43.640
<v Speaker 1>and here he is talking about bitcoin being used as

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:45.080
<v Speaker 1>a flight to safety.

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:47.279
<v Speaker 2>So think about that for a minute.

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Bitcoin went from being a scam to being a Ponzi scheme.

0:05:53.040 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 2>To being ridiculous.

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:57.039
<v Speaker 1>Jamie Diamond of JP Morgan said that if anybody even

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:58.880
<v Speaker 1>used it, he would fire them, and if anybody at

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:00.920
<v Speaker 1>JP Morgan used it trade that he would fire them.

0:06:01.240 --> 0:06:03.960
<v Speaker 1>To now we have arguably one of the most powerful

0:06:04.080 --> 0:06:07.359
<v Speaker 1>men in the world think saying that they're using it

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>as a flight to quality.

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Boy, how far we've come.

0:06:11.080 --> 0:06:13.160
<v Speaker 1>It reminds me of the quote that I think it's

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.599
<v Speaker 1>first they laugh at you, then they fight you, and

0:06:15.640 --> 0:06:17.960
<v Speaker 1>then they finally accept you. And so that's sort of

0:06:17.960 --> 0:06:20.680
<v Speaker 1>where we're at now. I wouldn't say that it's a

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:24.360
<v Speaker 1>flight to quality necessarily. I think it's something a little

0:06:24.400 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>bit different. So typically we have a flight to quality.

0:06:27.279 --> 0:06:30.040
<v Speaker 1>And you think about treasury. The treasury market like the

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:34.359
<v Speaker 1>bond market, and bonds are what's considered a risk free asset.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 1>It's a risk free asset because the government's always going

0:06:36.880 --> 0:06:39.120
<v Speaker 1>to pay. Now, it's not totally risk free.

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>It's only risk.

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Free if you hold it to maturation. However, even that's

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 1>not risk free because they're going to pay you back,

0:06:45.120 --> 0:06:46.359
<v Speaker 1>but they're going to pay you back.

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 2>With heavily devalued dollars.

0:06:48.680 --> 0:06:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So you may get one hundred dollars put one hundred

0:06:51.320 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars in you get a hundred dollars back, but the one

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars may only buy you twenty or thirty dollars

0:06:55.240 --> 0:06:59.400
<v Speaker 1>worth of stuff. So there is risk there, inflation risk. However,

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>what I'm seeing isn't a flight to safety, because it's

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 1>no one's flut rushing into the treasury or bond market.

0:07:07.600 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>What they're doing is they're buying assets instead. So we're

0:07:10.600 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 1>seeing gold at one of the largest deviations from the

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:18.240
<v Speaker 1>treasury market that we've seen in recent history. Bitcoins holding up,

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>even stocks are holding up, which is against everybody on

0:07:22.760 --> 0:07:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street. They're telling you that no, once rates go up,

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the stocks have to come down because when the risk

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>free rate moves up, stock the evaluations, the pe ratios

0:07:32.560 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>have to come down. Really do they have to, because

0:07:36.600 --> 0:07:41.000
<v Speaker 1>they haven't. Rates have been going up for a year.

0:07:41.840 --> 0:07:46.320
<v Speaker 1>How come the ratios haven't come down? And I think

0:07:46.360 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the reason why is the same reason why Larry thinks

0:07:49.840 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>that people are rushing to safety. What they're rushing to

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>safety in isn't the safety asset of the bond. What

0:07:55.760 --> 0:08:00.040
<v Speaker 1>they're rushing to is anything other than fiat currency. But

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.720
<v Speaker 1>they're rushing to is anything other than government inside paper

0:08:03.720 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 1>money bond market money. What they're rushing to is real assets.

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 1>That's why gold is going up, That's why real estate

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:13.920
<v Speaker 1>is holding up, that's why equities are holding up, and

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that's why bitcoin is holding up. Now do I think

0:08:16.640 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>something could change? Of course, something can always change. There

0:08:19.280 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>is so so much danger sitting out in this world

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>right now that something could certainly change. But it's sort

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>of like this crackup boom right level. Go On Misis,

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the godfather of the Austrian school of economics, called it

0:08:31.720 --> 0:08:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the crackup boom, he said. And then suddenly people realize

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that inflation is both intentional and ongoing, and they will

0:08:40.760 --> 0:08:43.000
<v Speaker 1>no longer want to hold the currency and they'll quickly

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.360
<v Speaker 1>trade it for anything else that they can get their

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>hands on. And so you see this happening in other

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:51.520
<v Speaker 1>countries all around the world, where Venezuela, Lebanon, Turkey, et cetera,

0:08:51.679 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 1>where the currency is dropping so fast they'll literally take

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>anything other than hanging onto the currency. Now, we may

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>not be at that point saying the United States is

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:05.839
<v Speaker 1>at the Lebanon, Turkey, Argentina, Venezuela level yet, but we're

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly on that path. And I think this is why

0:09:08.080 --> 0:09:10.920
<v Speaker 1>people aren't rushing to the safety of the treasuries in

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:15.239
<v Speaker 1>the bonds, but rather holding onto assets such as equities

0:09:15.280 --> 0:09:18.319
<v Speaker 1>which aren't super safe in my opinion, but gold, real

0:09:18.440 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>estate and bitcoin.

0:09:20.920 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 2>But we'll see. If you're just tuning in listening.

0:09:23.080 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>To the markmas Show, we're talking through some of the

0:09:25.280 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>latest breaking news headlines this week. We just went through

0:09:27.679 --> 0:09:29.960
<v Speaker 1>what happened in the bitcoin crypto markets and with the

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>largest asset manager in the world. But I have a

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>whole lot more to cover when I come back after

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>this very short break. Don't go away, I'll be here

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:37.199
<v Speaker 1>back all right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in

0:09:37.240 --> 0:09:39.160
<v Speaker 1>your listening to the Mark Maas Show, we're talking through

0:09:39.160 --> 0:09:41.960
<v Speaker 1>some of the latest breaking news headlines this week. Of course,

0:09:41.960 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>always looking through the lens of politics, finance and technologies,

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 1>you can have a better understanding, better context to what's

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:49.560
<v Speaker 1>going on in the world now. Right before the break,

0:09:49.600 --> 0:09:54.680
<v Speaker 1>I was talking about this Ludwig von Misus's theory called

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 1>the crackup boom and how people don't want to hold

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>on to the money anymore, they'd rather buy assets. And

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>so we've seen these assets going higher and higher and higher,

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:08.640
<v Speaker 1>partly because of this inflation where the currency's being destroyed

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>and partly because of this rush to own those types

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:11.800
<v Speaker 1>of assets.

0:10:12.280 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 2>And I've been very vocal.

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>I've been on record many times on my main YouTube channel,

0:10:16.760 --> 0:10:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Mark Moss, which, by the way, if you're not watching

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.960
<v Speaker 1>on YouTube, you should just search Mark Moss on YouTube

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:24.400
<v Speaker 1>and you can watch and listen to all these shows

0:10:24.440 --> 0:10:26.920
<v Speaker 1>on the podcast just search the Mark Moss Show, or

0:10:26.960 --> 0:10:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you can watch these episodes also on the Market Disruptors

0:10:30.440 --> 0:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>YouTube channel. But I've been very vocal, even back when

0:10:34.760 --> 0:10:38.080
<v Speaker 1>inflation was at seven eight nine percent, saying that this

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I think this would still even be some of the

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:42.760
<v Speaker 1>lowest inflation that we'll see for the rest of the decade.

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:44.800
<v Speaker 1>And so while a lot of people think that inflation

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.880
<v Speaker 1>is over the FED has won, I don't think they're

0:10:47.920 --> 0:10:50.760
<v Speaker 1>even close. And what do I mean by that, I

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:54.600
<v Speaker 1>mean inflation has come down reportedly from this nine percent

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:57.560
<v Speaker 1>down to this three percent range, right, Mark, So they

0:10:57.559 --> 0:11:00.000
<v Speaker 1>did win. They got it down, right, well, not really.

0:11:01.160 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>First of all, that number is so heavily.

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 2>Manipulated you can't believe that number.

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Second of all, inflation comes in waves, all right, So yes,

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>they got it down temporarily get ready for the next

0:11:11.600 --> 0:11:14.240
<v Speaker 1>move up. Now, we can see this in any number

0:11:14.280 --> 0:11:16.679
<v Speaker 1>of ways. For example, I saw this report come out

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.720
<v Speaker 1>this week that home buyers in the United States now

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:24.400
<v Speaker 1>home buyers must earn one hundred and fifteen thousand dollars

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to afford the typical US home. The median home price

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, you now have to earn one

0:11:31.400 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifteen thousand dollars to afford that meeting home.

0:11:35.080 --> 0:11:39.760
<v Speaker 1>The problem is that's about forty thousand more than the

0:11:40.240 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>median US income, So the median income can't afford the

0:11:46.240 --> 0:11:47.160
<v Speaker 1>median house.

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:49.800
<v Speaker 2>That's a problem.

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:53.480
<v Speaker 1>The bigger problem is that this has gone up by

0:11:53.679 --> 0:11:56.800
<v Speaker 1>more than fifty percent since the start of the pandemic.

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>So now you need fifty percent more income today then

0:12:02.160 --> 0:12:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you needed a few years ago to buy the median

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>home price. The problem is your pay didn't go up

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>by fifty percent, which is why we're continue to see

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:13.439
<v Speaker 1>it being harder and harder and harder and harder for

0:12:13.480 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 1>people to live, which is why in the United States

0:12:15.280 --> 0:12:18.319
<v Speaker 1>we continue to see strikes.

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Right, we have strikes happening all over the place.

0:12:20.280 --> 0:12:23.439
<v Speaker 1>The auto workers in Hollywood, I saw the railways today,

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>everywhere we're having strikes because people can't afford to live anymore.

0:12:27.760 --> 0:12:31.280
<v Speaker 1>It's gotten way too expensive. Home prices went up fifty percent,

0:12:31.320 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>but your pay didn't. And so while the FED wants

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to tell you they've got inflation under control, they haven't. Also,

0:12:39.440 --> 0:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>as I've mentioned many times, even if they did get

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:45.079
<v Speaker 1>inflation from their nine percent down to three percent, it

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:49.160
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that prices came back down. What it means

0:12:49.200 --> 0:12:51.520
<v Speaker 1>is that prices continue to go up, just at a

0:12:51.559 --> 0:12:55.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a slower rate. But that's compounding because

0:12:55.440 --> 0:12:59.880
<v Speaker 1>we're still adding on to the already high rate. And

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>like I said, I've been very vocal saying that I

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>think inflation is still going higher. And I think the

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.319
<v Speaker 1>market is actually telling us the same thing, not the FED.

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:09.320
<v Speaker 1>The Fed's patting themselves on the back saying they got

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.760
<v Speaker 1>a job well done, but the market is telling us

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:16.160
<v Speaker 1>something different. Now, the market is us. The market is

0:13:16.280 --> 0:13:18.480
<v Speaker 1>me and you. The market is the people, the businesses,

0:13:18.559 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>it's Wall Street, it's the bankers, the people we make

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.920
<v Speaker 1>up the market. And the markets are what it's called

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:30.719
<v Speaker 1>discounting mechanisms. They're really the betting markets. Every day, if

0:13:30.760 --> 0:13:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you put money into the market, whether into the economy,

0:13:33.720 --> 0:13:36.800
<v Speaker 1>or more specifically, into the Wall Street kind of investment market.

0:13:37.360 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>You are betting.

0:13:38.440 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>You're placing your bet as to what you think that

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>could happen. So if you go to Las Vegas, for example,

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna go into the sportsbook.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 2>You're gonna bet on a football game.

0:13:46.800 --> 0:13:48.599
<v Speaker 1>So you're gonna say, I'm going to put down this

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:51.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars that I think the Dallas Cowboys are going

0:13:51.200 --> 0:13:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to win this game, and they either do or they don't,

0:13:54.800 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 1>and I win money I don't. Now I'm sort of

0:13:57.160 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing. If I'm buying Tesla or Apple

0:13:59.320 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 1>or Facebook or or whatever stock i'm buying, I'm betting

0:14:02.920 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that the price of that stock will go up, or

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm short and I'm betting the price we will down.

0:14:07.760 --> 0:14:10.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're all betting at the same time. The market

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is is billions of pieces of data all aggregating together

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to tell us what people think is going to happen,

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>what the future will hold. And so we can see

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.160
<v Speaker 1>this I've talked a lot about if you look at

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market, the bond market, we have the inversion

0:14:25.600 --> 0:14:29.520
<v Speaker 1>of the yield curve. You've heard about this extensively, so

0:14:30.040 --> 0:14:32.480
<v Speaker 1>what this means the yield curve is supposed to go

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:35.520
<v Speaker 1>from lower rates in the short term, so three months,

0:14:35.560 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 1>six months, et cetera should be very should be low rates,

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and the long term, the thirty year bond should be

0:14:41.800 --> 0:14:44.240
<v Speaker 1>a higher rate because I want to get paid a

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:47.640
<v Speaker 1>higher amount to loan to you for a longer period

0:14:47.680 --> 0:14:50.680
<v Speaker 1>of time. Makes sense, right, So we should have this

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:53.000
<v Speaker 1>yield curve where the long rates are higher than the

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:56.120
<v Speaker 1>short term rates. The problem is it's been inverted, meaning

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>that the short term rates are higher than long term rates.

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>Whenever that happens, spens, it's guaranteed it. It's told us

0:15:03.240 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>that there's a recession coming. I believe it's one hundred

0:15:05.840 --> 0:15:09.080
<v Speaker 1>percent accurate, and it's told us that typically that recession

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>comes in about twelve to eighteen months. And now we're

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that yield curve the inverted. Your career

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is starting to reinvert or what we call resteeping. But

0:15:20.240 --> 0:15:23.880
<v Speaker 1>what's happening is it's happening the wrong way. So typically,

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the way it's supposed to work is that the front end,

0:15:26.000 --> 0:15:28.080
<v Speaker 1>which is higher than it should be, should come down.

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>But what we're seeing is the back end that's higher

0:15:32.160 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, is lower is actually starting to go up.

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 1>So what this means is that the market is actually

0:15:38.760 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>calling the fed's bluff on maintaining a long term inflation

0:15:42.600 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 1>target of two percent. The market doesn't believe that the

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:52.800
<v Speaker 1>FED has control over inflation. The market believes. Millions of people,

0:15:52.920 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>billions of people and data points believe that the FED

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.640
<v Speaker 1>has completely lost control of over inflation, just like I'm saying.

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:01.400
<v Speaker 1>And the reason we can see this in this yield curve.

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>If the market believe the Fed's two percent target, then

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:08.440
<v Speaker 1>they would happily be buying notes on the on the

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>back end at four point eight percent. Right, if I

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 1>believe that we'd have two percent inflation, I'll gladly buy

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:16.880
<v Speaker 1>a note at four point eight percent. That means that

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:21.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm guaranteed a almost three percent return over ten years.

0:16:22.520 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>The markets, but the markets don't believe that. The markets

0:16:27.600 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 1>don't believe the fed's narrative. The markets don't believe that

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>they're going to continue to see this two percent target.

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>They think inflation is going to be higher. That's what

0:16:37.400 --> 0:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>we're witnessing. We're witnessing the free market signal that it

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.160
<v Speaker 1>no longer believes the Fed's two percent target is realistic.

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.520
<v Speaker 1>They don't believe it's attainable, and all the data supporting

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:50.280
<v Speaker 1>this is there. It includes the average inflation rate since

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:54.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy one being three point nine seven four percent.

0:16:55.720 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Since nineteen seventy one, the average inflation rate has been

0:16:58.200 --> 0:17:00.560
<v Speaker 1>four percent, not two percent like the Fed wants to

0:17:00.560 --> 0:17:04.760
<v Speaker 1>get to. And again, if the market did believe the Fed,

0:17:05.119 --> 0:17:07.399
<v Speaker 1>then they would be buying the ten year note to

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:09.640
<v Speaker 1>lock in those real rates of return, not selling it.

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 2>But they're not. They're selling it.

0:17:12.040 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 1>The selling the rising rates signals the market fields it's

0:17:15.560 --> 0:17:18.920
<v Speaker 1>not being properly compensated for the real inflation risk, which

0:17:18.960 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 1>is greater than the previous consensus of two percent. So

0:17:21.840 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve resteepening, specifically at the long end, is

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.560
<v Speaker 1>telling us the Fed's lost control of the yield curve.

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:36.879
<v Speaker 1>It's a big deal, amah and the Fed. The Fed

0:17:37.160 --> 0:17:39.720
<v Speaker 1>is trying to regain confidence in the market. They're trying

0:17:39.720 --> 0:17:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to tell us. We've seen several I think seven Fed

0:17:42.680 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 1>boat board governors came out in the last week trying

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to what we call jab owe the market talk it

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:51.679
<v Speaker 1>back down, saying we think enough has been done. We

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:53.760
<v Speaker 1>think the market is taking care of itself. We think

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>that we don't need to raise rates anymore. We think

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 1>we've we've saw the inflation problem. Congratulations. Let me pat

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.040
<v Speaker 1>ourselves on the back here real quick. So this is

0:18:05.080 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 1>what the Fed is trying to tell us, but the

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:09.719
<v Speaker 1>markets don't believe it. If you're just tuning in, you're

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Mark mash Show breaking down some of

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the latest breaking news headlines this week so you can

0:18:13.640 --> 0:18:15.520
<v Speaker 1>understand it. I have a lot more to cover when

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:17.479
<v Speaker 1>we come back. I'm gonna dig deeper into the bonds

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 1>so you can understand exactly what's going on, what you

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>need to do, and more.

0:18:20.840 --> 0:18:23.000
<v Speaker 2>Don't go away, I'll be here back all right, Welcome back.

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>If you're just tune in your listening to the Mark

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Maas Show, we're talking through some of the latest breaking

0:18:26.640 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 1>news headlines this week so you can understand what the

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:30.119
<v Speaker 1>heck is going on out.

0:18:29.960 --> 0:18:30.600
<v Speaker 2>There in the world.

0:18:30.760 --> 0:18:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Of course, always looking at through the lens of politics, finance,

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.360
<v Speaker 1>and technology, you're really looking at the convergence of those

0:18:36.400 --> 0:18:39.439
<v Speaker 1>three things to bring greater context into what's going on

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>into the world. Now, we were talking about inflation, we were

0:18:42.800 --> 0:18:45.359
<v Speaker 1>talking about the bonds, and specifically how the bonds are

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 1>calling the Fed's bluff.

0:18:47.400 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 2>They don't believe.

0:18:48.680 --> 0:18:51.080
<v Speaker 1>The market doesn't believe, as evidence through the yield curve

0:18:51.280 --> 0:18:53.919
<v Speaker 1>that inflation is coming back down to two percent, and

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.440
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing all types of problems.

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:57.440
<v Speaker 2>In the bond market.

0:18:58.080 --> 0:19:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Nobody wants to buy it, wants to buy it, and

0:19:00.680 --> 0:19:02.760
<v Speaker 1>the reason why is because they know the government is

0:19:02.800 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to print money. The amount of money

0:19:05.920 --> 0:19:09.199
<v Speaker 1>printing is I don't even know the word. I'm speechless.

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.320
<v Speaker 1>I've never seen this before. No one's ever seen this before.

0:19:11.359 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>As a matter of fact, there is so much debt.

0:19:14.680 --> 0:19:19.320
<v Speaker 1>The government is spending so much money at an unprecedented

0:19:19.400 --> 0:19:21.879
<v Speaker 1>level that it just boggles the mind. Let me let

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>me break it down for you. It took the US

0:19:24.400 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>government just eighteen days to add more than five hundred

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars in debt after passing the thirty three trillion

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:37.159
<v Speaker 1>dollar debt run. Now, to put this into sort of

0:19:37.200 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>some context, it took from the founding of the United

0:19:40.320 --> 0:19:44.280
<v Speaker 1>States all the way until nineteen eighty one to get

0:19:44.320 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>to one trillion.

0:19:45.160 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 2>Dollars of debt.

0:19:47.000 --> 0:19:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Okay, from beginning to nineteen eighty one, and now we

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.159
<v Speaker 1>hit that run rate in less than two months.

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 2>I don't even know what to say about that.

0:19:59.040 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>It took the US until March of nineteen seventy five

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>do you get to its first five hundred billion, and

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.040
<v Speaker 1>now it did that in eighteen days.

0:20:08.000 --> 0:20:08.640
<v Speaker 2>It's insane.

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>And so now we're starting to witness that the market

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:14.080
<v Speaker 1>is starting to wake up to the fact that sure,

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 1>sure it's risk free because sure the government's going to

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:20.480
<v Speaker 1>pay me back, but they're going to be paying me

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:25.400
<v Speaker 1>back with heavily devalue dollars. I don't want that. And

0:20:25.440 --> 0:20:29.880
<v Speaker 1>not to mention, the demand is still mostly there. There's

0:20:29.920 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 1>still people in the market other nations, governments, etc. Banks,

0:20:33.960 --> 0:20:37.480
<v Speaker 1>pension funds that still want to buy the US debt.

0:20:37.800 --> 0:20:41.919
<v Speaker 1>So there still is demand for the supply of the

0:20:42.000 --> 0:20:45.679
<v Speaker 1>US debt. The problem isn't the demand. The problem is

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the supply. The problem is they've pushed the supply up

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>so much that the demand is just.

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Not high enough.

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:56.080
<v Speaker 1>That's where we're at, and we can see that really

0:20:56.240 --> 0:20:58.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this has changed sort of in this

0:20:59.200 --> 0:21:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand is really when we saw this massive change,

0:21:02.359 --> 0:21:05.520
<v Speaker 1>when we really entered in this quantitative easy era, and

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>really in twenty fourteen we saw it shift even more

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:12.120
<v Speaker 1>in twenty fourteen. What shifted is we started to see

0:21:12.119 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that central banks around the world wanted to stop growing

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:21.359
<v Speaker 1>their holdings of US treasuries, and so that started to

0:21:21.359 --> 0:21:24.280
<v Speaker 1>put a limit onto well, not so how much debt

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that could be issued, but really the function of the

0:21:27.400 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>US treasury market overall. In order the US treasury market

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>cannot have dysfunction, we need to have liquidity in the system.

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>If the dysfunction gets too high, if the financial system

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work properly, if the liquidity dries up, the whole

0:21:44.240 --> 0:21:47.920
<v Speaker 1>thing can seize and freeze, and the whole system melts down.

0:21:48.240 --> 0:21:49.040
<v Speaker 2>Nobody wants that.

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.160
<v Speaker 1>As much as I want to see the entire system

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 1>rebuilt on a sound money system, a Bitcoin standard, if

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you will, I don't want that to happen tomorrow. We

0:22:00.040 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>don't want a disorderly breakdown of the market. And so

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.480
<v Speaker 1>the FED certainly does not want this dysfunction to be high.

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>But because of the fact that we don't have as

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.280
<v Speaker 1>many buyers in the market and because of the increased demand,

0:22:14.080 --> 0:22:17.200
<v Speaker 1>something has to give. The FED has been holding this

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:20.639
<v Speaker 1>position of being hawkish. They want to continue to shrink

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 1>their bounds. They want to continue to tighten the market.

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:24.919
<v Speaker 1>But how can they shrink their bounds. How can they

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.879
<v Speaker 1>tighten the market when the government needs to continue to

0:22:27.880 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>put more debt out and nobody else will buy it.

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>They certainly can't. They're going to have to do something.

0:22:35.480 --> 0:22:39.600
<v Speaker 1>They're going to have to Well, really, it's only one.

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess they have two options. Either one they have

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to inject more US dollar liquidity into the system, or

0:22:46.040 --> 0:22:49.399
<v Speaker 1>two they have to face the US recession. But a

0:22:49.480 --> 0:22:52.640
<v Speaker 1>US recession isn't as in a policy choice they can make,

0:22:53.000 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>because if they did, if they chose the recession, the

0:22:55.560 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>resulting increase in unemployment would drive a complete blowout in deficits,

0:23:00.920 --> 0:23:04.280
<v Speaker 1>which would likely drive a rise in US treasury yields

0:23:04.320 --> 0:23:07.760
<v Speaker 1>in a recession, again, sending the US into a debt

0:23:07.800 --> 0:23:11.119
<v Speaker 1>spiral that discredits the FED and the Treasury and ultimately

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:15.480
<v Speaker 1>forces a system systematic, systemic reset.

0:23:15.760 --> 0:23:16.679
<v Speaker 2>So what do I mean by that?

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 1>So, Yeah, the government is sort of like you and I,

0:23:21.760 --> 0:23:23.639
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a business. They have income and they

0:23:23.680 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>have expenses. The government has tax revenue that comes in

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>and then they spend that tax revenue on lots of

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:31.240
<v Speaker 1>different things.

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 2>In pre pandemic times.

0:23:33.960 --> 0:23:37.399
<v Speaker 1>The US government was spending about four and a half

0:23:37.560 --> 0:23:39.959
<v Speaker 1>trillion I think it was about four point eight trillion

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:43.640
<v Speaker 1>dollars per year. That was the annual budget after the pandemic.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>And now today they're spending about I think six point

0:23:47.280 --> 0:23:50.960
<v Speaker 1>eight about a fifty percent increase in annual spending of

0:23:51.000 --> 0:23:53.919
<v Speaker 1>the government. The problem is that they didn't have a

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent increase in income. As a matter of fact,

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:01.720
<v Speaker 1>the income went down. So the government is now living

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.520
<v Speaker 1>off of credit cards, if you will. Now, why did

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the income go down? Well, because as we're moving more

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 1>towards the recession, people are spending less money. A majority

0:24:13.480 --> 0:24:16.600
<v Speaker 1>of that tax revenue comes from capital gains. So when

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.960
<v Speaker 1>your stocks are going up and your house is going up,

0:24:19.040 --> 0:24:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and you're selling your stocks, you're selling your bitcoin, you're

0:24:21.400 --> 0:24:24.399
<v Speaker 1>selling your real estate, you have capital gains tax you

0:24:24.480 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 1>have to pay. But when asset prices aren't going up anymore,

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.280
<v Speaker 1>there's no capital gains, and so they lose a lot

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:30.919
<v Speaker 1>a lot.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:33.720
<v Speaker 2>Of their revenue any other number of things.

0:24:33.760 --> 0:24:38.280
<v Speaker 1>And so what happens is if this has already happened now,

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>if the FED doesn't inject liquidity, and we go into

0:24:41.640 --> 0:24:44.840
<v Speaker 1>a massive recession or any recession for that matter, then

0:24:44.840 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>that's even less income for the government, which means their

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.800
<v Speaker 1>deficit goes from two trillion a year to three trillion

0:24:51.320 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>or four trillion or whatever it is. Now, what do

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:55.960
<v Speaker 1>they do Well, they need more credit cards, so they

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.640
<v Speaker 1>need to issue more treasuries. But there's not enough buyers

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:01.959
<v Speaker 1>for the tr treasuries. And what does that do. Well,

0:25:02.000 --> 0:25:04.679
<v Speaker 1>If there's not enough buyers, then that pushes the price up.

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>The price has to continue to go up to attract

0:25:06.560 --> 0:25:11.760
<v Speaker 1>more buyers, and if that happens, the US goes into

0:25:11.800 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>a debt spiral. Now, as I said, I think in

0:25:15.640 --> 0:25:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the last segment, I said that the market is already

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:21.399
<v Speaker 1>telling us this yield curve resteepening uninverting, is already telling

0:25:21.480 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>us that the market doesn't believe the Fed's narrative anymore.

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:26.960
<v Speaker 1>They the market is saying, we don't believe the FED

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>can get inflation back down, and so the FED is

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 1>already discredited. If this continues to get worse, they're only

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:36.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be discredited even more. Now, this isn't the

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:38.640
<v Speaker 1>first time we've seen this, all right, So we've seen

0:25:38.680 --> 0:25:40.680
<v Speaker 1>this many times since about twenty fourteen. Like I said,

0:25:40.720 --> 0:25:41.719
<v Speaker 1>when things really changed.

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:43.960
<v Speaker 2>So since since since.

0:25:43.800 --> 0:25:45.560
<v Speaker 1>This has happened, we've seen this cycle play out I

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>think five times. In twenty fourteen, the US dollar was

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:54.440
<v Speaker 1>weakened at something called the Shanghai Accords, So the dollar

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>had gotten too strong. It created all this treasury dysfunction,

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>and so they had this meeting and they agreed that

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.200
<v Speaker 1>the doll or the usl would be weakened in order

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:09.480
<v Speaker 1>for this degree resolved, and they did. In twenty eighteen

0:26:09.560 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight nineteen, the FED was raising rates. Drone Palate

0:26:12.440 --> 0:26:14.639
<v Speaker 1>just come into office. He was full of fire and

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>vinegar and he was going to fix things. He started

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.920
<v Speaker 1>raising rates and caused a lot of treasury market dysfunction.

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>The FED had to pause rates, and then the FED

0:26:22.640 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>was forced into quantitata easy and they didn't call it

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.000
<v Speaker 1>that to address the repol rate spike in September of

0:26:29.000 --> 0:26:30.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty nineteen, A lot of people don't know this, but

0:26:30.840 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the market had actually the yield curve had actually inverted

0:26:34.040 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>and the market actually locked up in September twenty nineteen.

0:26:36.680 --> 0:26:39.040
<v Speaker 1>So while most people think that the entire market was

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.280
<v Speaker 1>crashed because of the pandemic, it actually had started in

0:26:41.280 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 1>September of twenty nineteen. Then we saw it again in

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>March of twenty twenty, the Fed pause, they're not QE

0:26:48.600 --> 0:26:51.960
<v Speaker 1>into the first quarter of twenty twenty and then they

0:26:52.040 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 1>watched the market crash into the pandemic, and then they

0:26:55.680 --> 0:26:59.720
<v Speaker 1>jumped in. Did anything that was net necessary, super quantity

0:26:59.720 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>of easy and if you will. Then September twenty twenty two,

0:27:02.480 --> 0:27:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the Fed started to tighten. The Treasury started to run

0:27:05.200 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>down its treasury this TGA account as we call it,

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:10.399
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury General Account, and this was in response to

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the UK guilt crisis. We covered that back then. So

0:27:13.800 --> 0:27:17.760
<v Speaker 1>each time this market start starts to get dysfunctional, they

0:27:17.840 --> 0:27:20.119
<v Speaker 1>have to move in. And we can see right now

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 1>there's an index called the Move Index MOVE and it

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>shows the volatility in the bond market, and we can

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>see that this dysfunction is nearing another all time high.

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:34.560
<v Speaker 1>We can see that this tells us that there's problems.

0:27:34.240 --> 0:27:35.680
<v Speaker 2>Coming around the horizon.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.359
<v Speaker 1>So hang on to your hats, be prepared to protect

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>yourself and there's a lot more to come. If you're

0:27:41.480 --> 0:27:43.160
<v Speaker 1>just tuning in you listening to the Mark Mass Show,

0:27:43.520 --> 0:27:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking through some of the latest breaking news headlines

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of this week. Looking through the lens of politics, finance,

0:27:48.359 --> 0:27:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and technology. I got a lot more to cover when

0:27:50.359 --> 0:27:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I come back after this very short break.

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:54.440
<v Speaker 2>Don't go away, I'll bear back, all.

0:27:54.400 --> 0:27:56.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, Welcome back. If you're just tune in, you're listening

0:27:56.080 --> 0:27:58.199
<v Speaker 1>to the Mark Mass Show. We're running through some of

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>the latest breaking news headlines, so you know what the

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 1>heck is going on now. One of the big themes,

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:07.960
<v Speaker 1>unfortunately for this week and really for the last year,

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.960
<v Speaker 1>is war. Now, there's all types of wars, and I'm

0:28:12.000 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>not talking about a physical, a hot war. What I'm

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:15.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about right now.

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 2>Is trade wars.

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've been saying for a long time that

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:21.880
<v Speaker 1>I think the World War III is really a war

0:28:21.920 --> 0:28:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of information and money. I'm still hoping that's true. Unfortunately,

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:31.359
<v Speaker 1>it's looking like it might be going more towards the

0:28:31.400 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 1>hot war.

0:28:31.880 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 2>Let's certainly hope not.

0:28:32.800 --> 0:28:35.479
<v Speaker 1>But if I'm looking at the financial war, we can

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 1>see things really seem to get kicked off into sort

0:28:38.000 --> 0:28:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of high gear. Maybe when Trump was in and we

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:43.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of had these tariffs started to happen with China,

0:28:44.080 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and that has just continued on a lot of it

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.880
<v Speaker 1>has been seemingly a shift towards trying to kind of

0:28:50.960 --> 0:28:54.320
<v Speaker 1>keep China in their place, trying to keep them from

0:28:54.400 --> 0:28:57.320
<v Speaker 1>rising up and challenging the United States, which is interesting

0:28:57.400 --> 0:29:00.600
<v Speaker 1>because you might also argue there's people in the United

0:29:00.600 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>States crime family, you know, like that, that want to

0:29:05.880 --> 0:29:09.200
<v Speaker 1>see China rise up. But that's because there's lots of

0:29:09.240 --> 0:29:12.160
<v Speaker 1>warring factions in the United States and there's certainly some

0:29:12.240 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>specifically the military, that sees China as a threat. Now

0:29:15.760 --> 0:29:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I've covered this in the past. I made a whole

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 1>YouTube video about it as well my main YouTube channel,

0:29:20.680 --> 0:29:24.920
<v Speaker 1>just Mark on Mark Moss, talking about how basically the

0:29:25.000 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>United States sent China back to the dark ages and

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.400
<v Speaker 1>what do I mean by that. Well, the Biden administration

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>had continued to escalate things and had cut China off

0:29:35.680 --> 0:29:39.440
<v Speaker 1>from receiving microchips, specifically level two and level three. There's

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:43.840
<v Speaker 1>basically three levels of microchips. Level one being just like

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the supermost basic that go in like an old school

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>alarm clock, and then level two level three being the

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:52.959
<v Speaker 1>very most advanced chips that you would need for AI

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:57.000
<v Speaker 1>iPhones things like that. And so the Biden administration had

0:29:57.040 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>decided to basically take those more advanced chips away from

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:03.200
<v Speaker 1>China and not just the chips, but everything that they

0:30:03.280 --> 0:30:09.080
<v Speaker 1>need around manufacturing and servicing around those chips, and so

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.440
<v Speaker 1>there were sanctions placed on all the manufacturers, even other

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.959
<v Speaker 1>nations that supply those parts of machines to China. And

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:17.880
<v Speaker 1>so I kind of made the case that this literally

0:30:17.920 --> 0:30:22.960
<v Speaker 1>sends them back to the dark ages because without advanced microchips,

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>you basically don't have technology. I mean again, you don't

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.800
<v Speaker 1>have iPhones, like, you don't have AI, you don't have

0:30:29.800 --> 0:30:31.880
<v Speaker 1>any of these things. And so this was going to.

0:30:31.920 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Be a very very big deal.

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Now, of course, China's not happy about that. They've retaliated.

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I've covered this I think on my main YouTube channel

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>as well, where they said, okay, aha, then we'll ban

0:30:43.360 --> 0:30:46.400
<v Speaker 1>exports to you, and so the then China banned the

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>United States from getting a couple key commodities that we

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.680
<v Speaker 1>really need gallium and geranium. Those are commodities that are

0:30:53.800 --> 0:30:58.080
<v Speaker 1>used for in the EV space, for renewable energy things

0:30:58.080 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>like that, and so of course the United States has

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:04.880
<v Speaker 1>this policy to transition everything into renewables, unreliables, if you will,

0:31:05.080 --> 0:31:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and it can be very difficult without those exports. China

0:31:08.600 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 1>said that why would we continue to export our finite

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>materials to a nation that we're not friendly with, right,

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:20.720
<v Speaker 1>and so they're escalating this war, and it took another

0:31:20.800 --> 0:31:23.480
<v Speaker 1>turn for the worst, well the worst if you're China,

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I suppose. And basically we saw this week the US

0:31:26.800 --> 0:31:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Commerce Department set new rules on semiconductor exports, limiting the

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:35.320
<v Speaker 1>ability of American chip making companies like Nvidia and Intel

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:39.480
<v Speaker 1>to sell AI chips to China. So basically what we're

0:31:39.480 --> 0:31:42.360
<v Speaker 1>seeing as the Biden administration is continuing to tighten the

0:31:42.400 --> 0:31:46.640
<v Speaker 1>restrictions on China's ability to buy these advanced semiconductors, and

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>this of course fuels the friction with US businesses that

0:31:51.120 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>sell to China, to the Chinese market. So if you're

0:31:55.080 --> 0:31:58.800
<v Speaker 1>in Vidia and if you're in Intel, and now you

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.080
<v Speaker 1>can't sell your to China.

0:32:00.840 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 2>Anymore, that's a pretty big deal. That's a pretty big deal.

0:32:04.440 --> 0:32:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Now, the Commerce Department said Tuesday that it would significantly

0:32:06.840 --> 0:32:10.640
<v Speaker 1>constrict exports of artificial intelligence chips, making it tougher for

0:32:10.800 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>US companies to sell their chips or to introduce new

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>chips to circumvent the rules.

0:32:17.240 --> 0:32:18.240
<v Speaker 2>And so that's part of this.

0:32:18.360 --> 0:32:22.280
<v Speaker 1>So capitalism for what it is, everyone's trying to figure

0:32:22.280 --> 0:32:24.280
<v Speaker 1>out ways to get around this instead of trying to

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.440
<v Speaker 1>tighten that noose, circumvent the rules to do that. Now,

0:32:27.480 --> 0:32:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the goal, according to Commerce Secretary Gina Ramando, is to

0:32:31.480 --> 0:32:35.640
<v Speaker 1>limit China's access to advanced semiconductors that could fuel breakthroughs

0:32:35.920 --> 0:32:41.640
<v Speaker 1>in artificial intelligence and sophisticated computers. Of course they are

0:32:41.800 --> 0:32:44.200
<v Speaker 1>they want to keep them in the dark ages now,

0:32:44.200 --> 0:32:48.800
<v Speaker 1>these chips, the US doesn't want China to have them,

0:32:49.320 --> 0:32:52.720
<v Speaker 1>and at the same time, they're critical for China for

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese, right obviously, that's why they're trying to cut

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:58.920
<v Speaker 1>them off. They're not just critical for the Chinese, they're

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>critical for Chinese these military applications, she said, And this

0:33:03.880 --> 0:33:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is a nod to the concerns that the US could

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 1>fall behind China in key defense technologies. Now, the updated

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>rules significantly expand the US government's authority to determine what

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:17.800
<v Speaker 1>products US companies can and can't sell in the name

0:33:17.840 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>of national security. Of course, everything's a matter of national

0:33:21.440 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 1>security today everything and of course in times of war

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.720
<v Speaker 1>then we just continue to expand those rules of national security,

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:33.560
<v Speaker 1>and pretty much everything's a war today.

0:33:33.560 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 2>As a matter of fact, I was thinking about this

0:33:35.080 --> 0:33:35.600
<v Speaker 2>the other day.

0:33:37.080 --> 0:33:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Pretty much everything the government declares as a war gets worse,

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>not better. So I was just thinking that, like, since

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:52.960
<v Speaker 1>nineteen seventy one, I believe the DEA, the Drug Enforcement Agency,

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 1>was formed, and since then the US has spent trillions

0:33:57.160 --> 0:34:00.520
<v Speaker 1>of dollars fighting the war on drugs. But yet drugs

0:34:00.520 --> 0:34:03.680
<v Speaker 1>are bigger, and they're a bigger problem today than they

0:34:03.720 --> 0:34:08.080
<v Speaker 1>ever have been. So when they put the war on drugs,

0:34:08.120 --> 0:34:09.919
<v Speaker 1>drugs weren't really a problem. And as a matter of fact,

0:34:09.920 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>most drugs were just legal.

0:34:10.880 --> 0:34:11.479
<v Speaker 2>In the United States.

0:34:11.560 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I think cocaine and ecstasy and things like that that

0:34:13.760 --> 0:34:16.920
<v Speaker 1>were fine. There wasn't a big problem. Now, after making

0:34:16.960 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 1>it a war and spending trillions of dollars, drugs are

0:34:19.560 --> 0:34:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the biggest problem. As a matter of fact, it's the

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 1>number one cause of death for eighteen to thirty five

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:27.360
<v Speaker 1>year olds. We've emboldened the drug cartels down in Mexico.

0:34:27.680 --> 0:34:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Now they're a billion dollars potentially trillion dollar businesses because

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we fought.

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:33.439
<v Speaker 2>A war on drugs, just making it worse.

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.840
<v Speaker 1>We have a war on obesity, but yet obesity is

0:34:36.880 --> 0:34:39.479
<v Speaker 1>worse than it's ever been. It's like the main cause

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of death in the United States. We have a war

0:34:42.120 --> 0:34:45.080
<v Speaker 1>on poverty. Weet today we have more poor people than.

0:34:44.960 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Any time in history. Well, I don't want to say

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:49.560
<v Speaker 2>any time in history. That's maybe a little bit of

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 2>an exaggeration.

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But there's a reason why we have people striking all

0:34:54.600 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 1>throughout the United States. I reported earlier that home prices

0:34:59.440 --> 0:35:02.680
<v Speaker 1>are up now fifty percent, not home prices, but the

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 1>but the home payments are at fifty percent in last

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:05.880
<v Speaker 1>three years. But waits haven't kept up with it. So

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:09.719
<v Speaker 1>this war on poverty isn't really helping. And so we

0:35:09.760 --> 0:35:13.440
<v Speaker 1>have a war on terrorism. Right, they've signaled this war

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:16.920
<v Speaker 1>on terrorism spent. I don't even know if we added

0:35:17.000 --> 0:35:20.920
<v Speaker 1>up probably twenty thirty trillion dollars on terrorism. And yet

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:23.720
<v Speaker 1>terrorism is a bigger, worse problem today than it was before.

0:35:24.000 --> 0:35:26.920
<v Speaker 1>And so every war that the government declares just seems

0:35:26.960 --> 0:35:28.839
<v Speaker 1>to get bigger, just seems to get worse. And now

0:35:29.040 --> 0:35:32.920
<v Speaker 1>here we have a war with China, and if history

0:35:33.000 --> 0:35:36.440
<v Speaker 1>is our guide, unfortunately it's probably only gonna get bigger

0:35:36.560 --> 0:35:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and worse, which of course it does. Right, that's what

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:42.279
<v Speaker 1>happens with wars. That happened with the fights. You get escalation, right,

0:35:42.520 --> 0:35:45.560
<v Speaker 1>I call you a name. You threaten me, I push you,

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:47.880
<v Speaker 1>You punch me. I get a knife, you get a gun,

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and we just escalate from there until cooler heads prevail,

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:57.080
<v Speaker 1>until people are able to sit down think about this

0:35:57.200 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 1>clearly and come up with some sort of residence. Now,

0:36:00.800 --> 0:36:03.720
<v Speaker 1>in a situation like this where the US is afraid

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:07.279
<v Speaker 1>that China will overtake us, that's a legitimate concern, something

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>they probably should have thought about twenty years ago before

0:36:09.920 --> 0:36:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they shipped all our manufacturing off to China. Today it's

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of like what we say, closing the barn door

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:17.120
<v Speaker 1>after the cows were already.

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:17.720
<v Speaker 2>Gone, so to speak.

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.319
<v Speaker 1>And so now it's a much bigger problem that I'm

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:24.279
<v Speaker 1>not really sure where this goes, but I can tell

0:36:24.280 --> 0:36:26.680
<v Speaker 1>you it's going to be a rocky road, not just

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.880
<v Speaker 1>for the relationship between China, what potentially China may do

0:36:30.040 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>with Taiwan, which I was looking today before the show

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to see if I could find like some sort of

0:36:35.480 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>betting markets. So typically there's betting markets where you can

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>like place wagers on who will be the next president

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:41.080
<v Speaker 1>things like that.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 2>I wasn't able to.

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Find one, but if I had to guess, I'm guessing

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:47.839
<v Speaker 1>there's at least a seventy five percent chance that China

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:48.760
<v Speaker 1>goes after Taiwan.

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 2>There's not a lot we can do with it.

0:36:51.040 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 1>So it certainly continues to add towards that. It continues

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a drag on US businesses like in video

0:36:59.320 --> 0:37:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and Intel, and so we'll keep you up to date

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:03.840
<v Speaker 1>on what's going on with this. If you're just tuning in,

0:37:03.960 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you've been listening to The Mark Ma Show talking about

0:37:07.160 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the latest breaking news headlines this week as we chart

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>the decentralized revolution. That's what I got.

0:37:12.000 --> 0:37:13.640
<v Speaker 2>Thanks so much for listening. Until next time,