WEBVTT - Tesla's Cyber Rodeo and China's Lockdowns (Podcast)

0:00:03.360 --> 0:00:06.720
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:07.480 --> 0:00:12.000
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:12.080 --> 0:00:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Jack in San Francisco, and this

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour, an

0:00:31.280 --> 0:00:35.560
<v Speaker 1>alleged attack by Russia on civilians, including children, at a

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 1>train station being used for evacuations. The European Commission promises

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>war sanctions and financial aid. We'll have the latest. Let's

0:00:47.440 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>get this party started. We'll also get you the latest

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>from Tesla's cyber rodeo in Texas, where Elon Musk inaugurated

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>his newest factory. That's next, and the toll of China's

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:04.679
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns on its population and its economy. We'll talk about

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:07.280
<v Speaker 1>what it means for China's competitive advantage in tech and

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>more later this hour. I want to turn now to

0:01:10.760 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>the war on Ukraine. A horrific attack on civilians that

0:01:14.200 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>left at least fifty people dead, including children. Russian troops

0:01:17.720 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>reportedly bombed a train station that had become a hub

0:01:21.040 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 1>a critical hub for evacuations. Joining US now, our Washington

0:01:24.280 --> 0:01:28.280
<v Speaker 1>correspondent Emory hoardered and Anemory seems like widespread condemnation here

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>from the international community. Yes, certainly, as we've seen these

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.120
<v Speaker 1>horrific scenes. We should note that Russia says this was

0:01:36.720 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>they were not responsible for this, but all fingers are

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>pointing to Moscow when it comes to this missile attack

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>on a train station. Emily, as you say, this is

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 1>where civilians are using to evacuate from eastern Ukraine, in

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the dawn Bass region specifically because you do have Russia

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>changing course and really focusing their troops on eastern and

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>southern Ukraine. So a number of capitals around the world

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 1>are drawing condemnation at Russia for for this attack, including

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>in Washington. The President United States took to Twitter and

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:09.799
<v Speaker 1>had this to say. He said, the attack on the

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian train station is yet another horrific atrocity committed by Russia,

0:02:14.880 --> 0:02:18.359
<v Speaker 1>striking civilians who are trying to evacuate and reach safety.

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:20.519
<v Speaker 1>He went on to say, as many leaders have that

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:24.400
<v Speaker 1>they will continue their security assistance and weapons deliveries. And

0:02:24.440 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>we should also note Ursula vander Lyin of Europe was

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 1>in Kiev herself today and she said Russia should expect

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:35.480
<v Speaker 1>rolling sanctions. So let's talk about those sanctions. What further sanctions.

0:02:35.520 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Could we see out of this, I mean, what is

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:40.840
<v Speaker 1>their left to sanction at this point? It's a great question.

0:02:40.960 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>So we have the European package they finally pretty much

0:02:44.280 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>signed on the dotted line, and the biggest component of

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>their fifth package coming from the EU is a ban

0:02:50.080 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>on Russian coal imports. So on one hand, it's not

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money Ursula vunder Lyon put it about

0:02:56.560 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollars, but it does start to target something

0:03:00.960 --> 0:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that for many European countries was going to be off limits,

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and that's Russian fossil fuels. Then you have the Polish

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>ambassador saying today in Brussels, we already preparing work to

0:03:12.040 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>target Russian oil, Russian natural gas as well as nuclear fuel.

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:20.920
<v Speaker 1>This Emily is still the lifeblood and the lifeline Putin

0:03:21.000 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>has left in terms of the money he's able to

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.639
<v Speaker 1>get from those sales. Boombrom Economic says about three billion

0:03:26.680 --> 0:03:30.359
<v Speaker 1>dollars this year alone they will make on sales of commodities.

0:03:30.880 --> 0:03:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Now we're also following the aftermath of this cyber attack,

0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>again reportedly from Russia on Finland as they weigh NATO membership,

0:03:39.560 --> 0:03:42.400
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the significance of this. So This

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:45.160
<v Speaker 1>comes at a time when really we're seeing the polling

0:03:45.280 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>shift in days in Finland about whether or not and

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>they've always kind of played this keep the door open

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of what if they were to join NATO, And as

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>they are discussing this out in the open, especially in

0:03:56.680 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>UH finished media as well as Zelenski, the President of

0:04:00.880 --> 0:04:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Ukraine is addressing UH Finnish lawmakers, do you have this

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>cyber attack on a number of their government websites. I

0:04:09.000 --> 0:04:10.920
<v Speaker 1>was literally just talking to it. I was just looking

0:04:10.920 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>at my phone seeing what his final response was a

0:04:13.400 --> 0:04:16.280
<v Speaker 1>Finnish official who said they actually are used to these

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>types of cyber attacks and also they are preparing for more,

0:04:19.720 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and potentially this is something they need to be preparing

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 1>for as they discuss whether or not they should join NATO.

0:04:25.560 --> 0:04:28.719
<v Speaker 1>Russia has made it clear Putin does not want Finland,

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:32.120
<v Speaker 1>does not want Sweden in the NATO alliance. All right,

0:04:32.120 --> 0:04:35.040
<v Speaker 1>bloombergs Emory Harden, thank you so much for all of

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.919
<v Speaker 1>those updates. I do want to switch heres now and

0:04:37.960 --> 0:04:40.120
<v Speaker 1>get to a story we've been covering all week, and

0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that is elon Musk. Thursday night, the Tesla CEO held

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:45.920
<v Speaker 1>a rodeo event at the opening of his newest factory

0:04:46.120 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 1>in Austin, Texas. Let us deliver al first Tesla cars

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 1>made in Texas at this opening, which felt more Hollywood

0:04:59.880 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 1>than Silicon Valley. Must announced the production plans around three

0:05:02.960 --> 0:05:06.880
<v Speaker 1>products that have fallen well behind his original schedule, joining

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.440
<v Speaker 1>us now Bloomberg, Shan O'Kane, who was at the event

0:05:09.760 --> 0:05:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in person and Sean looked like a lot of enthusiasm

0:05:13.600 --> 0:05:16.040
<v Speaker 1>there from the attendees, including I think I saw a

0:05:16.160 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>video of people crying, Yeah, you're right. There is a

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.320
<v Speaker 1>lot of There are a lot of fans and owners there,

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:26.039
<v Speaker 1>but also a lot of employees who I think, we're

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 1>really happy to see the hard work that they've put

0:05:28.160 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 1>in over the last couple of years come to fruition

0:05:30.600 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>with these first model wied that were built at this factory,

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:35.920
<v Speaker 1>and honestly just the factory itself. The fact that they

0:05:35.920 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>were able to get this up so quickly in such

0:05:38.000 --> 0:05:40.440
<v Speaker 1>a short amount of time is really something that we

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.720
<v Speaker 1>don't really see too often here. It's something Tesla did

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>in China with its factory there. But so I think

0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.799
<v Speaker 1>that was all of those things played into overwhelming some people.

0:05:49.839 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>So does Tesla need this factory to keep up this

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>tour and pace. Yes, frankly, I mean they still have

0:05:57.520 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>some room to grow in China, and that's been a

0:05:59.279 --> 0:06:02.360
<v Speaker 1>huge boon to them. The China factory is really the

0:06:02.480 --> 0:06:05.520
<v Speaker 1>main reason why they've been able to grow their valuation

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and grow their uh, their deliveries honestly as much as

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:11.680
<v Speaker 1>they have over the last two years. But they are

0:06:11.800 --> 0:06:15.480
<v Speaker 1>nearly a capacity at the factory in Fremont, California, which

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk has said that they plan to try to

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>find a way to expand, although it will be tough

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:21.880
<v Speaker 1>for them to do that. They don't have a lot

0:06:21.880 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>of land there. Um. One thing they do have here

0:06:24.680 --> 0:06:27.240
<v Speaker 1>in Texas is a lot of land. They bought far

0:06:27.360 --> 0:06:30.240
<v Speaker 1>more land than even this massive factory is taking up

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.160
<v Speaker 1>right now, and so they have a lot of room

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 1>to grow. And even the graphic that he showed last

0:06:35.320 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 1>night of the factory and their plans for it includes

0:06:38.320 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>i would say probably about a quarter of it for

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:43.840
<v Speaker 1>future products. So even though they are planning to make

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>up to model wise a year at this factory, there's

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:49.839
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot more room to produce even

0:06:49.839 --> 0:06:51.880
<v Speaker 1>more here if they can get these new models like

0:06:51.880 --> 0:06:54.440
<v Speaker 1>the Cybertruck and anything else that Elon Musk has a

0:06:54.520 --> 0:06:58.280
<v Speaker 1>sleeve out of the design studio and into production. Elon

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:00.880
<v Speaker 1>Musk has may have it of throwing these launch parties.

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:03.279
<v Speaker 1>I've been to some of them at the Fremont Plan.

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:05.479
<v Speaker 1>But what does he get out of an event like

0:07:05.520 --> 0:07:11.080
<v Speaker 1>this is is this just you know, his version of marketing? Yes,

0:07:12.320 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>simply yes. But there are a couple of different angles

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>that I think they play with events like this. One

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of them is simply really just sort of appeasing the

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:23.400
<v Speaker 1>people here who have been following along and really helped

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 1>facilitate this happening in the first place. There was a

0:07:25.680 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of kudos thrown out to local government officials. Austin's Mayor,

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Steve Adler had been invited, although I don't think he

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:34.560
<v Speaker 1>attended because he came down with the COVID nineteen over

0:07:34.560 --> 0:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the weekend. They were Travis County officials. There um a

0:07:37.920 --> 0:07:41.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of local schools and workforce development groups who are

0:07:41.120 --> 0:07:44.400
<v Speaker 1>helping fill the sort of recruiting pipeline into the factory.

0:07:44.800 --> 0:07:47.760
<v Speaker 1>So it really sort of helps acknowledge all of the

0:07:47.760 --> 0:07:50.280
<v Speaker 1>work that those people have put into it, while also

0:07:50.360 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>setting them up for a good relationship moving forward. Uh,

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and then on top of that, it's really just, you know,

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>this is part of what feeds the beast of Tesla.

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:00.840
<v Speaker 1>You get these sort of quarter the events or maybe

0:08:00.840 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>once or twice a year, and they sort of feedback

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.120
<v Speaker 1>into the excitement. Even though he didn't really say too much,

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.640
<v Speaker 1>that was all that news worthy compared to some of

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the other speeches given in the past. Meantime, a different

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>reaction to Elon Musk at a different company, and that

0:08:14.520 --> 0:08:17.880
<v Speaker 1>is Twitter. We're hearing that some Twitter employees not happy

0:08:17.920 --> 0:08:21.840
<v Speaker 1>about Elon Musk joining the board, certainly not crying in

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>jubil Asian Um CEO Pagara says he's going to address

0:08:25.880 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the issue next week, potentially with an a M A

0:08:29.560 --> 0:08:32.720
<v Speaker 1>with Elon Musk himself. What are you hearing about this?

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's from what we've understand about the reaction

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>that the Twitter employees has had, it's, you know, in

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>some ways, it's kind of nice to see because we

0:08:41.880 --> 0:08:44.520
<v Speaker 1>don't see people say no to Elon a lot, at

0:08:44.559 --> 0:08:47.520
<v Speaker 1>least within his orbits. I mean, people obviously have strong

0:08:47.559 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>opinions about him and negative opinions about him, but within

0:08:50.520 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the companies that he runs and among the sort of

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.760
<v Speaker 1>executive ranks that he operates. We don't see a lot

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of pushback, at least publicly, and so to hear that

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the employees of Twitter, we're sort of standing up a

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 1>little bit and saying, hey, you know, Elon's behavior is

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:09.240
<v Speaker 1>very sort of public behavior on this platform, and it's

0:09:09.280 --> 0:09:11.319
<v Speaker 1>not really been in line with sort of the values

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>that par has been expressing he wants Twitter to carry forward.

0:09:15.720 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 1>And so they have some concerns about what that means

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and what it means for the platform's future to have

0:09:21.120 --> 0:09:23.240
<v Speaker 1>someone on the board and controlling so much of the

0:09:23.240 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 1>company who seems to be able to operate outside the

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>bounds of what they really want to allow on the platform. Okay, well,

0:09:31.280 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 1>certainly a lot of unanswered questions. They're Bloomberg, Shaan, Okaine,

0:09:34.480 --> 0:09:44.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I'm here in my apartment in Shanghai in

0:09:44.360 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the last day, suppose the last day of my lockdown,

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>but it looks like it's going to be extended. And

0:09:50.080 --> 0:09:53.640
<v Speaker 1>my biggest concern right now is food. Um running short

0:09:53.679 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of everything, And I want to give you a little

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>peekin sign my refrigerator. Mean, it looks so bad, but

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:00.720
<v Speaker 1>I got I got tell you a lot of stuff

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.360
<v Speaker 1>is pretty old. Um, we've got milk care. The exploration

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:09.280
<v Speaker 1>data is April one, The Brent's expliration date is March

0:10:09.640 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>thirty IF and today is April six. Thank god, I

0:10:12.520 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 1>still have a little bit of wine because I think

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to need it. So the biggest concern right

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>now for a lot of people is how to get food. Um.

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>For us, um, we have to order online through this

0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:28.360
<v Speaker 1>one grocery app called Dingdo my Chid. Basically in the evening,

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.360
<v Speaker 1>usually after nine pm, you go into the app and

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>see what's available. As you can see a lot of food,

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:38.360
<v Speaker 1>meat and vegetables already gone. The big problem seems to

0:10:38.400 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>be we can't get groceries delivered to our apartment because

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a lack of drivers delivering food in general because

0:10:45.240 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 1>of the lockdown, The number of cases continues to rise

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 1>in Shanghai and Jialing Province. Both areas are struggling with

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>the economic and personal ramvoications of the lockdowns, with food shortages,

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a lack of medical care, and shut up main factoring

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:04.840
<v Speaker 1>plants bringing misery to residents. Chan remains a hotspot for

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the current flair, despite in definitely extending a swooping lockdown

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>of its toy. Five million people originally intended to be

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:14.960
<v Speaker 1>carried out on two parts. The rising number of infections

0:11:15.000 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 1>led to a continuation of the restrictions in the eastern

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:20.679
<v Speaker 1>proportion of the city that were initially expected to be

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.680
<v Speaker 1>lifted last week. So one question that I'm getting asked

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is why didn't I, uh why and I stocked up

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.720
<v Speaker 1>on more food? Well, well, first, as you know, we

0:11:30.720 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 1>were told that my face A lockdown would last from

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Friday through Tuesday, and it's already Wednesday. Didn't know that

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it was gonna be extended. Obviously I could have gotten

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 1>more meat and vegetables, but even before the lockdown it

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>was kind of hard to find. You know. I still

0:11:48.080 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>have a lot of instant noodles, spam and the odd carrot,

0:11:54.040 --> 0:11:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the odd carrot, bloombergs allen one there under lockdown, Like

0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>many across Shanghai and Greater China, they submist hearts government

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 1>measure to contain the country's latest COVID outbreak. It's left

0:12:04.320 --> 0:12:07.360
<v Speaker 1>people struggling to eat, get food, essential supplies, and it's

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>putting even more pressure on an already stressed supply chain.

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about all of this and more with on

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:15.319
<v Speaker 1>your man Well, executive director of the Aspen Security Forum.

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 1>On you, that's just one example of the human toll

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:21.440
<v Speaker 1>this is taking. What's your take on this at scale?

0:12:21.520 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>What this means for China, what this means for its economy? Yeah,

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 1>nice to see you, Emily. It means that China's zero

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>COVID policy is coming apart at the seams. You know,

0:12:32.320 --> 0:12:36.040
<v Speaker 1>you saw Q four of one. The growth rate for

0:12:36.120 --> 0:12:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Chinese economy was about four percent. That's not as high

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:42.760
<v Speaker 1>as they wanted This year. They think they're going to

0:12:42.840 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 1>grow at five point five percent. But if they keep

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>having these extreme lockdowns, and I thought Alan's story was harrowing,

0:12:49.760 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't think you achieved those kinds of growth rates. Now,

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:55.720
<v Speaker 1>we know lots of American firms who are delivering food

0:12:55.720 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to their employees for exactly that reason. And of course

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it just hits all of the supply chains again, the lockdowns,

0:13:03.960 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>the road closures, they're affecting factories as well. Tesla and

0:13:07.520 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>Volkswagen for instance, they've suspended work at factories there. Do

0:13:11.679 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you see this having a long term impact on China's

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>ability to attract global businesses global manufacturing. Yeah, maybe not

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:22.760
<v Speaker 1>in the in the long term, but certainly in the

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.719
<v Speaker 1>medium term. You know, it's very hard to run a

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:26.760
<v Speaker 1>business in China if every couple of months it's going

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:29.040
<v Speaker 1>to get shut down again. You talked about the factories.

0:13:29.120 --> 0:13:33.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, Shanghai Disneyland is closed again, Fox, con Union,

0:13:33.160 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Microns on. All of these suppliers to big American tech

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:40.160
<v Speaker 1>firms are once again shut down, which makes it really hard.

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think it just accelerates the tech decoupling you

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:47.839
<v Speaker 1>see already with Western firms increasingly saying, well, maybe we

0:13:47.840 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 1>should look to the rest of Asia, or we should diversify,

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:53.319
<v Speaker 1>not entirely away from China, but we need to hedge

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>our bets a little bit. And I think this is

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.839
<v Speaker 1>going to accelerate that trend. There's already been a lot

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:01.560
<v Speaker 1>of pressure on Chinese tech companies because of the crackdown

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>by the Chinese government on tech companies in particular. We've

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.000
<v Speaker 1>seen the Chinese government perhaps trying to dial some of

0:14:08.040 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>that back, saying they're going to give US regulators more

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>information about these companies. But do you see this having

0:14:13.600 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a more sustained impact on China's tech world and its competitiveness.

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:21.520
<v Speaker 1>It does. It has a huge impact, but not just

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the lockdowns. It's sort of everything is swinging in the

0:14:25.080 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>direction of decoupling. I mean, you saw these huge crackdowns

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:32.120
<v Speaker 1>on Chinese tech last year. You and I talked about them,

0:14:32.160 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, um delisting people telling people they can't do

0:14:37.240 --> 0:14:40.920
<v Speaker 1>business in the United States under certain circumstances. And then

0:14:40.920 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of course it's coming from the U S to You

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.840
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the new SEC rule, which basically says, you know,

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're a Chinese company, you've got to follow US

0:14:49.640 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 1>accounting principles. Uh, they've got three years now to comply.

0:14:53.680 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 1>But other than that, if you don't comply, we're going

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to delist you. So you just see this trend happening

0:14:59.240 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>in every direct and I think Emily will continue. Now

0:15:03.640 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we still haven't seen a distinct steer from China and

0:15:07.400 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 1>its position on Russia, and of course China's under a

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure from the international community. What do you

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>expect to happen there and how do you expect that

0:15:15.600 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>to influence the US relationship with China and China's relationship

0:15:19.560 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>with the rest of the world. Yeah, it's it's such

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a good question. It's been really interesting to see because

0:15:25.080 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>I think Shijin Ping and his team were surprised by

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>how brutal and gruesome Putin's invasion of Ukraine has been,

0:15:32.840 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>and there was vacillating for a week or two. Now

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the politics of China has come out solidly in favor

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:40.960
<v Speaker 1>of Russia. If you look at what's censored on the

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>Chinese Internet, anything pro Ukraine is censored and taken down immediately.

0:15:46.840 --> 0:15:50.640
<v Speaker 1>All of the Russian propaganda gets through. So on the

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>political side there with the Russians. On the business side,

0:15:54.360 --> 0:15:58.400
<v Speaker 1>not so much. I mean, so far, we've heard anecdotally

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.640
<v Speaker 1>that all of the big Chinese tech firms are complying

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 1>with Western sanctions on China, as are the big Chinese banks,

0:16:05.880 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>even though their government is saying, hey, you should be

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.080
<v Speaker 1>doing what you can to support the Russians. I mean

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a perfect example is d D, the big taxi service,

0:16:15.800 --> 0:16:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the sort of uber of China, announced right away they

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>were closing in Russia, and then after pressure from the

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Chinese government, they started back up their Russian operation. So

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 1>what do you think this means quickly for the longer term? Then,

0:16:28.720 --> 0:16:31.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, is it is it status quo for China's

0:16:31.360 --> 0:16:34.040
<v Speaker 1>relationship with the rest of the world, or could we

0:16:34.120 --> 0:16:37.960
<v Speaker 1>see a shift? Yeah? I think China will stay just

0:16:38.280 --> 0:16:40.640
<v Speaker 1>below the level where they're going to be subject to

0:16:40.680 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>secondary sanctions from the US and Europe, and so they'll

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.360
<v Speaker 1>keep playing this game. They'll probably buy a little bit

0:16:46.440 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>more oil from Russia. They'll try to help their Russian

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 1>friends as much as possible without really running a foul

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:56.680
<v Speaker 1>with what the rest of the world wants. Because if

0:16:56.720 --> 0:16:59.400
<v Speaker 1>you remember, Emily, this is the year that hijin Pain

0:16:59.520 --> 0:17:02.520
<v Speaker 1>wants to be voted forever leader of China, so he

0:17:02.560 --> 0:17:05.160
<v Speaker 1>needs things to be fairly calm, at least until the fall.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:09.879
<v Speaker 1>All right, Anya want Manuel always appreciate your analysis and insights. Here,

0:17:09.880 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>executive director of the Aspen Security Forum, Thank you. Amazon

0:17:22.359 --> 0:17:28.639
<v Speaker 1>employees in Bessemer, Alabama, voting night against forming a union.

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:32.159
<v Speaker 1>That result is now being challenged. A labor group claims

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:35.719
<v Speaker 1>Amazon interfered with the election by prohibiting employees from talking

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.520
<v Speaker 1>about the union during work hours or posting about it.

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Joining us now Bloomberg's Spencer soaper Spencer, what exactly is

0:17:42.800 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this labor union expressing here? Yes, so they they're saying

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon was inconsistent with its rules, that it it

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 1>allowed anti union employees to discuss you know, their uh

0:17:58.920 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 1>reasons for not wanting the union in work spaces, and

0:18:01.600 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 1>that they could display anti union literature, but that similar

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>things done by employees or on the pro union side

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:12.240
<v Speaker 1>were discouraged and prohibited. Um, and that some people were

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:16.160
<v Speaker 1>even fired, you know, for for being pro union. So

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the beef on the union side. Even though Amazon

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>appears to have won this, there's still several votes, you know,

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>several hundred votes that were disputed that that could be

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>counted and could uh potentially tip the tide of the

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>election the other way. And so in to preempt that,

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Amazon actually filed its own own objections as well, basically

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>saying a lot of similar things as the union, so

0:18:41.680 --> 0:18:43.560
<v Speaker 1>or just in a lot of illegal manoeuvering. Right now,

0:18:44.200 --> 0:18:47.200
<v Speaker 1>this vote was already a do over. I mean, how

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>likely is it there could be another do over? Yeah,

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that's a that's a great question. How many How long

0:18:55.040 --> 0:18:58.880
<v Speaker 1>is this gonna go on? Um? So time will tell,

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>especially uh if those challenge ballots um make a difference,

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 1>because that first vote was quite decisive, I mean, the

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:13.480
<v Speaker 1>the union lost handily. Um. But the National Labor Relations

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Board said, look, Amazon, you played dirty pool. We gotta

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>do it over and now the gap is narrowed significantly.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So okay, I think the first thing, wat hang on

0:19:23.440 --> 0:19:26.560
<v Speaker 1>contested ballots, change things, Spencer. We're just getting a headline

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.240
<v Speaker 1>that Amazon has challenged the union win in the New

0:19:29.320 --> 0:19:32.200
<v Speaker 1>York election. Remember the result was reversed and that's election

0:19:32.280 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that happened the very same day in New York. Now Amazon,

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:39.400
<v Speaker 1>Amazon is challenging that quickly. What does that mean? Yeah,

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was expected. Um, there's gonna be a

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:44.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of legal maneuverings and things are moving very fast

0:19:44.760 --> 0:19:47.760
<v Speaker 1>right now. But Amazon is basically trying to argue that

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the turnout was very small in in that election, and

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>that a majority of workers did not vote for the union.

0:19:53.880 --> 0:19:56.240
<v Speaker 1>That really you had a small, a small voter turnout,

0:19:56.240 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>And they're alleging that the National Labor Relations Board actually

0:19:59.119 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 1>tarnished this proces tess by getting a little bit too

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.119
<v Speaker 1>deeply involved and workers may have felt like the like

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the government was actually advocating for the union. Wow. So

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>now we're looking at both folks being challenged, but for

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:15.080
<v Speaker 1>different reasons. Bloomberg Spencer, soaper who covers Amazon for a Spencer,

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you will keep us up to date. Thank you,

0:20:26.160 --> 0:20:38.119
<v Speaker 1>scared dragon God said, actually, Juan, there, it is the

0:20:38.200 --> 0:20:41.840
<v Speaker 1>SpaceX Falcon nine rocket taking off at eleven seventeen a m.

0:20:41.880 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Eastern Time from the Kennedy Space Center in Florida in

0:20:44.800 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>its first private mission to the International Space Station. Let's

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:50.720
<v Speaker 1>bring in our own ed Ludlow now who attended the launch,

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.879
<v Speaker 1>to talk about just how big a milestone this is

0:20:53.960 --> 0:20:56.480
<v Speaker 1>in the private space race, and bring us the details

0:20:56.520 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>from the ground. How's the crew right, you know, it

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>was just another flawless execution by SpaceX, the cruel. Well,

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>after about two hours aboard the capsule in that orbit

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>or the orbits were path they took off their space

0:21:09.960 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>suits them and they had their first space meal. But

0:21:12.640 --> 0:21:15.000
<v Speaker 1>as you know, it's a twenty hour trip from here

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in the KPE up to the International Space Station. They're

0:21:17.240 --> 0:21:19.840
<v Speaker 1>due to dock at around nine thirty a m. Eastern

0:21:19.880 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>time on Saturday. And everything went as planned, you know,

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>as you know, I sat here in the thunder and

0:21:24.960 --> 0:21:28.600
<v Speaker 1>lightning on Thursday night, but the weather really clear cleared up,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>some high pressure brought coal dry air into the equation

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 1>and space X were able to lift off on schedule

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 1>the Friday morning. So let's talk about what's going to

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:41.440
<v Speaker 1>happen on the I S S. So they're gonna meet

0:21:41.480 --> 0:21:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Russian astronauts. Yeah, yeah, I mean this has been the question, right.

0:21:46.160 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>The backdrop is the tensions between the United States and

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Russia because of the war in Ukraine, and there are

0:21:51.280 --> 0:21:53.959
<v Speaker 1>three Russian cosmonauts aboard. I spoke to a number of

0:21:54.280 --> 0:21:56.359
<v Speaker 1>NASRA fish who who officially have told me that if

0:21:56.400 --> 0:21:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the Russians invited the private astronauts for dinner, they could

0:21:59.400 --> 0:22:01.040
<v Speaker 1>go across the that side of the I S S

0:22:01.040 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and have dinner. But there's bigger issues here. Here's what

0:22:03.560 --> 0:22:08.639
<v Speaker 1>Bill Nelson, administrator of NASA, had to say. Even with

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the terrible things that Vladimir Putin is putting on the

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:22.919
<v Speaker 1>Ukrainian people, I expect the professional relationship between astronauts and

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:30.200
<v Speaker 1>cosmonauts to continue. The point that Bill Nelson made there

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 1>is the same that CAFFE leaders made on Thursday, that

0:22:33.119 --> 0:22:36.080
<v Speaker 1>whatever is happening down here on Earth, in space, there's

0:22:36.200 --> 0:22:40.399
<v Speaker 1>peace and there is a professional relationship between NASA and

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Russia's space agency ros Cosmos. And frankly, none of the

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>officials I spoke to thought that that was going to

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.320
<v Speaker 1>change in the nearter So give us the bigger picture here,

0:22:50.400 --> 0:22:54.639
<v Speaker 1>and ed axiom isn't just about sending rich people to space,

0:22:54.720 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>though they did confirm with US yesterday and they sink

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:03.440
<v Speaker 1>at past million dollars. What are a bigger ambition to Yeah,

0:23:03.480 --> 0:23:05.840
<v Speaker 1>your spawn m you know, part of this Axiom plan

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:10.600
<v Speaker 1>is to send their own private International Space Station module up.

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>That module attaches to the existing International Space Station and

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they develop it and upgrades over time. Because as you know,

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:22.000
<v Speaker 1>the I S S has a shelf life. It's due

0:23:22.000 --> 0:23:27.040
<v Speaker 1>to be deep decommissioned in one and then de orbited

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to crash into the ocean somewhere here on planet Earth.

0:23:30.320 --> 0:23:33.639
<v Speaker 1>So this is about NASA passing the bat on to

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.879
<v Speaker 1>the private sector. Cost NASA four billion U S dollars

0:23:37.119 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 1>a year to maintain an upgrade I S S. And

0:23:40.320 --> 0:23:42.159
<v Speaker 1>what they want to do is have the private sector

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>take on that burden, that cost burden, but also the

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>development upkeep burden. So in the future we have private

0:23:48.600 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 1>or commercial space stations in lower orbit. That frees up

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:53.959
<v Speaker 1>money for NASA to do other things in And as

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the big priority for NASA is the Moon

0:23:56.840 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 1>and then Mars, and what about space sex itself. We

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>just saw elon Musk and Naguri, a Tesla factory in Austin.

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:09.720
<v Speaker 1>He's very busy, it seems, with his new Twitter board membership.

0:24:10.000 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, what does this mean for for the SpaceX

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.719
<v Speaker 1>part of Elon Musk's empire, you know, the the Action

0:24:16.760 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 1>mission and being here at the Kennedy Space Center over

0:24:19.240 --> 0:24:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the last few days has been interesting because SpaceX is

0:24:22.160 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>not preoccupied with these kind of smaller objectives in their

0:24:26.080 --> 0:24:28.600
<v Speaker 1>eyes of getting folks to and from Earth to and

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 1>sactional space station. You know, they have these contracts with NASA.

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>They were just awarded more nations by MASSA. But as

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:36.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, Elon Musk has his sites set on Mars.

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:41.040
<v Speaker 1>They're developing the next generation of launch system in Starship.

0:24:41.119 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>They hope to test an orbit or test of Starship

0:24:43.960 --> 0:24:46.560
<v Speaker 1>at some point in the next six months, and their

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.160
<v Speaker 1>ambitions are greater than that. But in the meantime, this

0:24:50.240 --> 0:24:54.360
<v Speaker 1>is another example of SpaceX dominating the market for launch

0:24:54.640 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>to orbit. You know, they account for eight of the

0:24:57.400 --> 0:24:59.760
<v Speaker 1>payload that is sent from Earth into space. Right now,

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we talk a lot about Russia and China as space

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>superpowers alongside the United States. Really it's SpaceX that dominates

0:25:06.320 --> 0:25:09.960
<v Speaker 1>this market. And alongside satellite launch with Starlink and taking

0:25:10.000 --> 0:25:13.479
<v Speaker 1>satellites with third parties, they're making money off this. We

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:16.080
<v Speaker 1>think this is a good money maker for them. And

0:25:16.160 --> 0:25:18.480
<v Speaker 1>as we know from your interview on Thursday, right, Axiom

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:21.240
<v Speaker 1>is sold out for a X two x three and

0:25:21.240 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>they're probably going to be sold out pretty soon for

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.879
<v Speaker 1>a X four. So it's an interesting dynamic for SpaceX

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 1>that has much bigger picture designs. All right, Ad Ludlow

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on the ground in kick Canaveral, Florida, and thank you

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>so much for your coverage from there and for the

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:48.320
<v Speaker 1>launch throughout the day time for our crypto report now

0:25:48.320 --> 0:25:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and Bitcoin ending the week on a down note, trading

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.159
<v Speaker 1>lower for the fifth consecutive day, even as Bitcoin one

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of the crypto industry's biggest conferences, is drawing to a

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>close in Miami. I want to bring in our crypto contributor,

0:26:00.480 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Sali Bostic now for more Snali, what's your read on this? Well,

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:05.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a few things here, Emily, and we've been talking

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>about it all year. What is the catalyst? What is

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>going to drive bitcoin higher than not only this year,

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.360
<v Speaker 1>but where it was last year. We have five straight days,

0:26:14.400 --> 0:26:16.560
<v Speaker 1>as you said, of declines. We are back down to

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:20.040
<v Speaker 1>forty two thousand, six hundred or seven hundred dollars or so.

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Remember throughout March we got a little higher than that.

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.600
<v Speaker 1>We did get to forty seven thousand, touch forty eight thousand,

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:30.199
<v Speaker 1>but you know, we are above forty so we have

0:26:30.400 --> 0:26:33.000
<v Speaker 1>hit kind of a floor here. There's not that same

0:26:33.080 --> 0:26:36.240
<v Speaker 1>fear of things really going much lower. There's a lot

0:26:36.280 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 1>of conversations about legitimizing the asset, more companies using the

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Lightning network. That was a huge story this week. But

0:26:43.280 --> 0:26:45.359
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, it's not just about

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:49.320
<v Speaker 1>the same people who are picking up bitcoin the Lightning

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 1>network at a marginal rate. This is going to be

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:55.560
<v Speaker 1>about countries and companies adopting Bitcoin at a much bigger

0:26:55.640 --> 0:27:00.480
<v Speaker 1>rate as the asset class stars to mature. All right, Shanali,

0:27:00.560 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>stay with us. I want to bring in our next

0:27:02.359 --> 0:27:06.560
<v Speaker 1>guest who is actually joining us from Bitcoin two in

0:27:06.760 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Miami block Stream CEO Adam Back. Adam, thanks so much

0:27:10.119 --> 0:27:12.080
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. You've been a player in this industry

0:27:12.320 --> 0:27:14.760
<v Speaker 1>for such a long time, and I'm so curious what's

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:18.600
<v Speaker 1>the mood there after the many many years you've been

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto industry. And how much do you think

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:26.720
<v Speaker 1>is changing in this moment. Well, it's a much bigger

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:29.760
<v Speaker 1>conference for bitcoins than I've seen before. I think something

0:27:29.840 --> 0:27:36.400
<v Speaker 1>like people present very big venue, high production values. Say,

0:27:36.760 --> 0:27:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it's introducing bitcoin to many more attenders and a wider audience.

0:27:43.080 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>You're working on something new and interesting with block and

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>powered by Testla Solar, a new mine. Talk to us

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 1>about you know, what are the details where it will

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 1>be located, what you'll be doing there, and what it

0:27:56.640 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>means from an energy perspective. Right, So it's a joint

0:28:03.440 --> 0:28:07.199
<v Speaker 1>projects between block Stream and block formerly known as Square

0:28:07.760 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>and Tesla is building the solar infrastructure and also providing

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla Bigger Pack which is a battery, so it's

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>actually solar and battery so that it runs, you know,

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.600
<v Speaker 1>not just during the day. And what that means for

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the energy infrastructure is that it's a first step for

0:28:25.840 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>us to prove about the thesis that a number of

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 1>people have put forward and we thought we would go

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>from theory to practice and actually build it alongside the

0:28:35.560 --> 0:28:40.280
<v Speaker 1>block and that is that um bitcoin mining can actually

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:45.920
<v Speaker 1>help make new power projects, nubrem power projects more cost effective,

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:49.000
<v Speaker 1>make them more profitable and effort easier to finance and

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:53.920
<v Speaker 1>physically build the energy infrastructure for the future. Adam, how

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:56.360
<v Speaker 1>do you feel about the ability of bitcoin to become

0:28:56.400 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>more energy efficient, especially as the merge comes for theorium

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:06.360
<v Speaker 1>and the ethereum is really so focused on energy efficiency. Yeah,

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that's actually mistake in the sense that if

0:29:09.600 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>we look back to gold historically, um society looks for

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>hard money, and what what made gold a good money

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:21.880
<v Speaker 1>was the relative scarcity and this sort of inherent cost

0:29:22.040 --> 0:29:26.880
<v Speaker 1>of extracting more mining more that comes with scarcity, and

0:29:26.920 --> 0:29:31.440
<v Speaker 1>so something which doesn't have any inherent scarcity effectively becomes

0:29:31.480 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>similar to a share in a company managed by some

0:29:34.280 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>officers of the company, or like a fear currency like

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 1>US dollar or the Euro, which is managed by a

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.120
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy committee. So I think it's very difficult to

0:29:42.160 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>imagine that kind of currency, you know, the old coins

0:29:45.480 --> 0:29:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and so forth, reaching global acceptance as a as a

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>new digital gold. You know. I'm also curious you mentioned

0:29:52.920 --> 0:29:55.080
<v Speaker 1>your work with a block I'm wondering what you think.

0:29:55.200 --> 0:29:58.320
<v Speaker 1>We interviewed also Elizabeth Stark of Lightning Lads. Jack Dorsey

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is a backer there for her her for her company

0:30:01.880 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>and I'm wondering what impact do you think Jack Dorsey

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:06.760
<v Speaker 1>overall is going to have on the adoption of bitcoin

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:10.240
<v Speaker 1>across the world. Well, it's pretty interesting. I think sometime

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 1>last year he made the observation that he thought the

0:30:12.880 --> 0:30:16.320
<v Speaker 1>most important and useful place for him to use his

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>time on Earth is with bitcoin, and so you know,

0:30:20.680 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>promptly he stepped down let's see of Twitter and actually

0:30:23.800 --> 0:30:26.360
<v Speaker 1>devoted his energies to two bitcoin. So I think that's

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 1>very positive. I want to double down, Adam on your

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on a Theoryum, your work was in that original

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>white paper written by Satoshi Nakamoto all those many years ago.

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:39.560
<v Speaker 1>If you're not bullish on etherorium, then how do you

0:30:39.600 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>see the crypto market actually playing out? Like where are

0:30:43.600 --> 0:30:47.440
<v Speaker 1>we in the next ten years? Um? Well, I think

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin is the investival asset class, and the other sort

0:30:52.480 --> 0:30:57.800
<v Speaker 1>of smart contract cryptocurrencies of which there are many competing um,

0:30:57.960 --> 0:31:03.240
<v Speaker 1>are more like startups or services and not not really

0:31:03.240 --> 0:31:07.800
<v Speaker 1>an esset class. I think personally that the utility token

0:31:07.880 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>concept is is mispriced and that the value, the fundamental

0:31:11.480 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>value of those tokens should be much lower. So there's

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 1>a an investor called John Feffer, who wrote an analyst

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.320
<v Speaker 1>report on this topic and just just looked at the

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>business economics from an x KKR investor perspective of such

0:31:25.480 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 1>chains and the fundamental business value of the utility tokens

0:31:29.200 --> 0:31:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and concluded that they should be sort of just in

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:35.560
<v Speaker 1>time boughts. What doesn't make sense economically to keep inventory.

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:39.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think the valuations are sort of out of

0:31:39.440 --> 0:31:43.560
<v Speaker 1>kilter with the fundamental value and sort of driven sort

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of kept afloat by speculation basically. Interestingly, also want to

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>talk more about the energy efficiency aspect of this, because

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the Tesla Magapac is powering a bitcoin mining facility at

0:31:54.720 --> 0:31:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a box stream mining site. What impact do you think

0:31:58.400 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk will have on the future of bitcoin moving forward? Well, well,

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he's famously a quiet bitclin I believe he

0:32:07.800 --> 0:32:10.720
<v Speaker 1>said himself and through a number of his companies, So

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 1>he's certainly a big holder and long time holder. And

0:32:16.080 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're excited to um bring Tesla into into

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:24.080
<v Speaker 1>the mining space via the acquisition of the Mega Pac

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:29.600
<v Speaker 1>and the the installation by Tesla of the solar arrays. Adam,

0:32:29.640 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm creous what you make of the evolving relationship of

0:32:33.480 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk and Jack Dorsey given you know Ellen, you know,

0:32:37.280 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 1>both of them playing a big role in the crypto community,

0:32:40.560 --> 0:32:44.880
<v Speaker 1>crypto Twitter huge community, and Elon Musk now joining the

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>board of Twitter with Jack Dorsey support as the largest shareholder. Yeah,

0:32:50.040 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, actually I'm quite positive on Elon joining Twitter's

0:32:54.440 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 1>board because there was some unfortunate incidents during the last

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:02.600
<v Speaker 1>few years with Twitter's kind of content mediation deep platform

0:33:02.680 --> 0:33:04.640
<v Speaker 1>NG and that kind of thing got pretty controversial, and

0:33:04.680 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Ellen's views on on that direction that's similar

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:10.360
<v Speaker 1>to my own. So I'm hoping for him to be

0:33:10.360 --> 0:33:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a positive improvement, uh to Twitter. Adam, you mentioned earlier

0:33:15.800 --> 0:33:20.200
<v Speaker 1>about the valuations that we're seeing in bitcoin today artificially

0:33:20.560 --> 0:33:23.120
<v Speaker 1>held to where it is right now. So where do

0:33:23.160 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>you think it goes to the end of the year

0:33:25.400 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and what we'll take it there? Um, Well, it's it's

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of surprising to me in a sense that it's

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>already not a lot higher because the many of the

0:33:35.800 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>on chain metrics and the news flow you know, throughout

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the year are sort of bullish indicators. You know, the

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>number of coins net coins moving off exchanges, which indicates

0:33:47.320 --> 0:33:50.480
<v Speaker 1>large buyers buying and storing the number of coins left

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>on exchange to be the pool of potentially bought coins,

0:33:54.600 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 1>the news flow of new ETFs in various countries, new

0:33:59.000 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>financial institution providing bitcoin rely it's financial instruments. Um, so

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of kind of positive news flow. And

0:34:08.160 --> 0:34:12.280
<v Speaker 1>I think that, uh, you know, the current bitcoin price

0:34:12.440 --> 0:34:15.720
<v Speaker 1>ranges to do with similar factors that affect the wider

0:34:15.760 --> 0:34:22.080
<v Speaker 1>market I Ukraine and the COVID's economic effects. And say,

0:34:22.160 --> 0:34:26.160
<v Speaker 1>for Blocks Room CEO Adam Backed, pleasure to have you

0:34:26.400 --> 0:34:29.080
<v Speaker 1>as always along with our very own Shinnelle BOSSI thank

0:34:29.080 --> 0:34:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you both well. Also to come out of the Bitcoin conference,

0:34:32.840 --> 0:34:36.960
<v Speaker 1>billionaire entrepreneur Peter Tele called Warren Buffett, Jamie Diamond, and

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Larry Fink members of a finance gerontocracy. He said they're

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:46.880
<v Speaker 1>opposed to a revolutionary youth movement quote unquote that embraces bitcoin.

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:50.240
<v Speaker 1>To'll blame the finance titans for the digital currencies failure

0:34:50.600 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 1>to hit a hundred thousand dollars or get even close.

0:35:03.200 --> 0:35:05.399
<v Speaker 1>For the third year in a row, Apple will hold

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:10.239
<v Speaker 1>its Annual Developer Conference w w DC virtually. That means

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>developers and Apple watchers will need to tune in online

0:35:13.760 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>to watch the introduction of iOS sixteen, Watch OS nine,

0:35:17.960 --> 0:35:20.919
<v Speaker 1>t v O S sixteen, Mac OS thirteen, and other

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:24.239
<v Speaker 1>new software and services. The one new wrinkled this year

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:27.719
<v Speaker 1>is that Apple will allow a small number of students, developers,

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:30.240
<v Speaker 1>and members of the press to watch the keynote videos

0:35:30.320 --> 0:35:34.760
<v Speaker 1>from Apple headquarters. Still, all developer sessions and other aspects

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:38.480
<v Speaker 1>of the conference will be online only. Despite its virtual nature,

0:35:38.719 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm still expecting a fairly jampacked conference. I'm expecting a

0:35:42.760 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 1>fairly significant update with iOS six teen, code named Sydney,

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:50.280
<v Speaker 1>including changes to notifications. There also should be major fitness

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>tracking and health upgrades for the Apple Watch. But for

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:56.799
<v Speaker 1>those expecting some major iOS design overhaul, the last being

0:35:56.840 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>about a decade ago with IO seven, I wouldn't hold

0:35:59.520 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>my breath at least for this year. Apples also likely

0:36:03.000 --> 0:36:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to launch some new Max in the w WDC timeframe,

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>and this may include a major revamp to the Maple Gair.

0:36:09.120 --> 0:36:11.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that new Air will be the biggest upgrade

0:36:11.600 --> 0:36:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to the product in its history. Apple has a history

0:36:14.520 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>of announcing new Max at the conference, including when it

0:36:17.520 --> 0:36:20.680
<v Speaker 1>introduced the transition from Intel to Apple Silicon two years ago.

0:36:21.360 --> 0:36:24.399
<v Speaker 1>I'm also still expecting Apple to hold off on showcasing

0:36:24.640 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>it's mixed reality headset hardware until later this year or

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:30.759
<v Speaker 1>next year at the earliest. Still, maybe we'll see a

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>preview of some new A R and VR software to

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>get the show rolling him Mark Erman, This is power On.

0:36:39.520 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>Don't forget. You can subscribe to Mark's weekly power On

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:46.520
<v Speaker 1>newsletter Bloomberg dot com. Well sell robin Hood. That is

0:36:46.560 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>the message from Goldman sacks. It comes less than a

0:36:48.719 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>year since robin Hood's much hyped I p O, which

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.960
<v Speaker 1>was led by Goldman. The news caused the stock to

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>sink even lower, down more than from its post ip

0:36:57.760 --> 0:37:00.160
<v Speaker 1>O record high. For more on what it all me as,

0:37:00.200 --> 0:37:03.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by Bloomberg's Anti Massa. So why is Goldman,

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 1>of all companies saying cell now? So it's a bit

0:37:08.080 --> 0:37:11.839
<v Speaker 1>of an awkward situation because Goldman did lead the robin

0:37:11.880 --> 0:37:15.120
<v Speaker 1>Hood i p O. But Goldman's analysts have downgraded now

0:37:15.160 --> 0:37:19.759
<v Speaker 1>the stock um to a cell from neutral. And what

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:22.400
<v Speaker 1>they said is that the path to profitability is looking

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:24.799
<v Speaker 1>pretty fraught for robin Hood and it would take a

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:30.480
<v Speaker 1>lot for this company to achieve profitability by So what's

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 1>changed since the I p O? Has something gone wrong.

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:38.640
<v Speaker 1>The retail trading environment has changed a lot. Even in

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:42.240
<v Speaker 1>the past year. We saw an enormous boom in retail

0:37:42.320 --> 0:37:46.040
<v Speaker 1>trading that happened over the course of the pandemic and

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:50.000
<v Speaker 1>really escalated during the game stop run up that happened

0:37:50.040 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 1>in early one. That was all happening in the lead

0:37:53.880 --> 0:37:55.880
<v Speaker 1>up to Robin Hood's I p O, which happened in

0:37:56.280 --> 0:37:59.919
<v Speaker 1>July of last year. What's happened in the intervening months

0:38:00.239 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 1>is retail trading activity has continued to taper off, and

0:38:04.360 --> 0:38:08.160
<v Speaker 1>now retail trading is making up more like sevent of

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:13.239
<v Speaker 1>equities overall market volume, where you saw it higher more

0:38:13.400 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>like two percent in those feverish days of the MEME

0:38:17.719 --> 0:38:22.280
<v Speaker 1>stock run ups. So robin Hood's contending with this question

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:27.840
<v Speaker 1>of how it will earn money beyond just sheer transaction volume,

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:31.799
<v Speaker 1>or if Robin Hood saying the growth is going to

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.120
<v Speaker 1>come from I know they've been talking up crypto. In fact,

0:38:34.120 --> 0:38:36.319
<v Speaker 1>they've actually been doing that since the I p O

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>building out crypto products. Could that be it? Yeah? What

0:38:42.320 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>one thing that Robin Hood has pitched, as many fin

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:48.040
<v Speaker 1>techs have, is the idea that it can become more

0:38:48.080 --> 0:38:52.120
<v Speaker 1>like a financial supermarket for its customers, offering much more

0:38:52.200 --> 0:38:57.040
<v Speaker 1>than just mirror trading and moving into new areas including

0:38:57.080 --> 0:39:01.600
<v Speaker 1>retirement accounts, crypto expand its crypto offering, as you mentioned,

0:39:02.080 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and it has been making strides towards some of those goals.

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:10.919
<v Speaker 1>So just this week, robin Hood did open up its

0:39:10.960 --> 0:39:14.799
<v Speaker 1>crypto wallets product. It had a waitlist going and it's

0:39:14.840 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 1>beginning to offer that product now, and it is working

0:39:19.200 --> 0:39:23.760
<v Speaker 1>towards those other some of those other pitched products such

0:39:23.800 --> 0:39:28.200
<v Speaker 1>as UM retirement accounts. But the big question remains whether

0:39:28.320 --> 0:39:32.680
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood customers want all those products from robin Hood specifically,

0:39:33.080 --> 0:39:35.919
<v Speaker 1>or whether they might be getting those services from other

0:39:36.000 --> 0:39:38.520
<v Speaker 1>apps UM and it's a it's a big part of

0:39:38.960 --> 0:39:42.280
<v Speaker 1>robin its growth strategy to sell their customers on more

0:39:42.400 --> 0:39:46.640
<v Speaker 1>than trading all day. Now, the robin Hood bulls that

0:39:46.680 --> 0:39:49.960
<v Speaker 1>are still out there talk about gen z and the

0:39:50.000 --> 0:39:54.040
<v Speaker 1>future of a rising generation that's going to be investing more.

0:39:54.239 --> 0:39:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Could that be robin hood savior quickly? It It could be,

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:02.960
<v Speaker 1>but it really depends right now. They're very dependent on

0:40:03.360 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 1>trading volumes and they want to diversify away from that.

0:40:07.120 --> 0:40:09.920
<v Speaker 1>But the question remains whether they can and whether the

0:40:09.960 --> 0:40:13.799
<v Speaker 1>customers will come when they deliver those new products, all right,

0:40:13.960 --> 0:40:17.759
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Annie Massa on Robin Hood's struggles. Thank you so much,

0:40:17.800 --> 0:40:19.920
<v Speaker 1>Annie for that analysis.