WEBVTT - Office Debt Is Blowing Up; Budweiser Loses Crown

0:00:15.480 --> 0:00:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to The Credit Edge, a weekly markets podcast.

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:21.360
<v Speaker 1>My name is James Crumbie. I'm a senior editor at Bloomberg.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:24.040
<v Speaker 1>This week, we're very pleased to welcome to the show

0:00:24.160 --> 0:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>Scott Carpenter, who covers structured finance for Bloomberg News in

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.120
<v Speaker 1>New York. How are you doing, Scott, doing very well?

0:00:30.160 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me. We're also delighted to see Louise Parker,

0:00:33.720 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 1>who covers consumer companies for Bloomberg Intelligence based in London.

0:00:37.440 --> 0:00:39.160
<v Speaker 1>Hello Louise, Hi.

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:40.480
<v Speaker 2>James, thanks for having a long story.

0:00:41.280 --> 0:00:43.000
<v Speaker 1>We'll be coming back to Louise later in the show

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:46.400
<v Speaker 1>to talk about two of my favorite things, beer and

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>the US culture wars. So do stay with us. But first,

0:00:50.320 --> 0:00:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Scott Carpenter with Bloomberg News office buildings. Why are they

0:00:53.800 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>under such pressure now? Why is everything blowing up?

0:00:57.280 --> 0:01:03.040
<v Speaker 3>Well? The short answer is from home. Now. You might

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:09.399
<v Speaker 3>remember back in February everything kind of this story exploded

0:01:09.440 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 3>onto the scene when Brookfield defaulted on to La office towers.

0:01:18.680 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 3>Brookfield is a very big company. It's not as though

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:25.119
<v Speaker 3>that company is facing serious distress. What it was doing

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:29.399
<v Speaker 3>was realizing whoa A lot of people are working from home?

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:29.720
<v Speaker 2>Now?

0:01:30.360 --> 0:01:33.920
<v Speaker 3>These buildings aren't worth as much as they used to

0:01:33.920 --> 0:01:39.240
<v Speaker 3>be their office buildings, so they chose to default, which

0:01:39.319 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 3>meant that they're effectively not choosing to refinance. And then

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 3>not too much long after that, another big company, Pimco,

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:55.840
<v Speaker 3>also defaulted on some office towers and for similar reasons.

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:58.960
<v Speaker 3>You've been seeing more and more of this over time,

0:02:00.600 --> 0:02:03.400
<v Speaker 3>and it's become almost a staple of headlines. You see,

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 3>this office building is falling behind, or this one is defaulted,

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 3>and so on. And one thing that happened recently is

0:02:13.320 --> 0:02:17.040
<v Speaker 3>that these defaults are piling up and they're starting to

0:02:17.240 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 3>rise at a faster radar, not only defaults, but also

0:02:20.919 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 3>the rate at which office loans are falling behind on

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 3>their payments.

0:02:26.760 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>So sorry, let me just tell you that. So, people

0:02:28.680 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>aren't going back to the office because of you know,

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 1>obviously we're working from home for much of the pandemic.

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>But now people are going back to the office. Everyone's

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 1>coming into work, the subway's a pact. What's going on

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:40.679
<v Speaker 1>and why I think coming to a head right now?

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.519
<v Speaker 3>Two reasons. First, even though people are going back to

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 3>the office, there's a new regime of the three day

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 3>work week. This has changed everything it means that yes,

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 3>you're going back to the office, but you're not going

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 3>as much. And companies know this and they're looking to

0:02:58.200 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 3>downsize into smaller offices. So they're they're looking to shift

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:06.360
<v Speaker 3>from one building to a smaller building, maybe a more modern,

0:03:06.480 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 3>nicer building as well. It's a good opportunity. The other

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:10.520
<v Speaker 3>thing is higher interest rates.

0:03:10.639 --> 0:03:13.640
<v Speaker 1>So people use those desks and they share them, so

0:03:14.040 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>they go in. People come in different days. I mean,

0:03:15.960 --> 0:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>it seems like there's big peaks and troughs in that

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>whole return to work thing. Everyone's coming in on Tuesdays

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:23.160
<v Speaker 1>to Thursday and off one Monday to Friday. Don't you

0:03:23.160 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>still need the same kind of office to do that.

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you do. There's always going to be office. The

0:03:27.360 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 3>offices are always going to be around. I think people,

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 3>I think companies are looking at this thinking this is

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.360
<v Speaker 3>this is our moment to switch to a nicer office.

0:03:36.840 --> 0:03:39.680
<v Speaker 3>They're they're changing things up and they're just they're just

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 3>realizing that far fewer people are coming into the office.

0:03:44.240 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 3>I think that I think the standard work week is

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 3>now three days a week in the office, two at

0:03:51.920 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 3>home or the or the or the similar two days

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.840
<v Speaker 3>a week in the office three days at home. Overall,

0:03:58.960 --> 0:04:03.600
<v Speaker 3>that result in all lot less demand for offices office space.

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:06.160
<v Speaker 1>So let's talk about the other point. You raise higher

0:04:06.160 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>interest rates. Obviously rates have shot up much faster and

0:04:10.200 --> 0:04:13.480
<v Speaker 1>much more than most people expected. Why does that become

0:04:13.520 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>such a problem for office buildings.

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.479
<v Speaker 3>Well, if you're an office landlord and you need to

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:23.200
<v Speaker 3>rent out some space at a nice, fancy building, you

0:04:23.279 --> 0:04:25.240
<v Speaker 3>used to be able to do that at pretty low rates,

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 3>but then the Fed raised rates. Now either you want

0:04:29.960 --> 0:04:34.719
<v Speaker 3>to maybe you need to refinance your existing loan. Suddenly

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 3>it's a lot higher, you know, several percentage points higher,

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:43.680
<v Speaker 3>which can really start to add up. So you combine

0:04:43.760 --> 0:04:46.960
<v Speaker 3>that with the fact that you don't need that office

0:04:47.040 --> 0:04:50.120
<v Speaker 3>quite as much as you used to, and suddenly you're

0:04:50.120 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 3>looking at alternatives. You want a smaller office, you want

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:56.280
<v Speaker 3>to move to somewhere else. It just overall makes it

0:04:56.480 --> 0:05:00.359
<v Speaker 3>much less, much more expensive and therefore lesser active.

0:05:01.400 --> 0:05:03.520
<v Speaker 1>So you've written, you mentioned to philps, but you've written

0:05:03.520 --> 0:05:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot about delinquencies. What does that mean? Why delinquent

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>office loans out a five year high.

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:16.320
<v Speaker 3>A delinquency is a word that means you've fallen behind

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:24.400
<v Speaker 3>on your payments, usually an interest payment and delinquency rates

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:26.200
<v Speaker 3>on office loans right a five year high, so they're

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.640
<v Speaker 3>about there are four percent, and this is according to Trepp,

0:05:29.839 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 3>which keeps which attracts a lot of data on offices

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:36.839
<v Speaker 3>and commercial real estate property. Four percent doesn't sound like

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.920
<v Speaker 3>a whole lot, but it's the highest since twenty eighteen.

0:05:41.640 --> 0:05:45.359
<v Speaker 3>And remember back in twenty eighteen, there were still a

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 3>lot of office loans out there from the pre two

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 3>thousand and eight era when it were very easy loan terms,

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:58.800
<v Speaker 3>and probably some office company borrowers were getting loans that

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:03.520
<v Speaker 3>they shouldn't have been. So now now it's different. Now

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 3>what we're seeing is related to the pandemic, and it's

0:06:08.320 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 3>by all accounts, it's going higher. This is probably going

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:16.560
<v Speaker 3>to be just the beginning of the sharp uptick in

0:06:16.960 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 3>the rate at which these office loans are falling behind.

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 3>There was a there was another there was a podcast

0:06:23.560 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 3>co host of Trapp who said it could get to

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 3>ten percent by the end of this year. So ten

0:06:29.200 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 3>percent of all office loans at least tied to a

0:06:32.440 --> 0:06:36.560
<v Speaker 3>certain part of the finance sector CMBs that will fall

0:06:36.600 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 3>behind at least thirty days behind on one of their payments.

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:43.839
<v Speaker 1>So you mentioned CMBs, which immediately sets off jogging alarms

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in my head. Explain what that is? I mean, you know,

0:06:46.200 --> 0:06:50.240
<v Speaker 1>anytime there's an acronym in finance often ends in TIS.

0:06:50.839 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>What's the CMBs.

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 3>CNBS stands for commercial mortgage backed securities, And you can

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 3>think of it as a pool. It's a pool of

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 3>commercial loans, a big part of which's office. So for example,

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:11.840
<v Speaker 3>you could take an office loan and remember these are

0:07:11.920 --> 0:07:13.520
<v Speaker 3>that's going to be a big loans, that's going to

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:17.320
<v Speaker 3>be millions, you know, tens of millions of dollars. And

0:07:17.360 --> 0:07:21.600
<v Speaker 3>then you take twenty or so other loans. Some of

0:07:21.600 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 3>those are office loans, some of their some of those

0:07:24.040 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 3>are loans on industrial properties, some of those are loans

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 3>on retail properties. And you and each of those is

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 3>is producing regular interest payments every month, maybe millions of dollars.

0:07:40.360 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 3>So all together, if you combine all of these loans,

0:07:43.720 --> 0:07:48.400
<v Speaker 3>you've got it income streams Suddenly that's you know, that's

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 3>worth a lot of money, and investors will pay for

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:56.520
<v Speaker 3>that income stream. That is a CMBs when you combine

0:07:56.560 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 3>the income streams from these different properties into a steady

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 3>overall stream of payments, and the problem recently is that

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 3>offices used to be a super safe part of this

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 3>income stream that's going into these cnbs, and that's starting

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 3>to change now they're no longer safe. There's there's big problems.

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 3>People don't really know how bad it's going to get,

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 3>and it's making the lenders in the CMBs, the ones

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 3>who are buying the income stream, it's making them very nervous.

0:08:33.880 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Sounds a lot to me like two thousand and eight subprime.

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.640
<v Speaker 1>Should we worry about all that all over again?

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.679
<v Speaker 3>I don't think we should worry about that. This is

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 3>a fundamentally different space. I think if you go all

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:52.600
<v Speaker 3>the way back to subprime mortgages, that was some seriously

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 3>risky loans for it, just to put it in perspective

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.520
<v Speaker 3>that I think the default right, So the share of

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 3>those loans of prime mortgages, remember those are also much

0:09:04.120 --> 0:09:08.360
<v Speaker 3>much smaller because they were individual borrowers that defaulted was

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, at the peak twenty thirty maybe forty percent

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.440
<v Speaker 3>or so. These are not going to have nearly the

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 3>same default, right. It's going to be below I don't want,

0:09:20.280 --> 0:09:23.720
<v Speaker 3>you know, below ten, maybe five, I don't know, but

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:26.560
<v Speaker 3>not in the same universe. These are corporate borrowers, they're

0:09:26.600 --> 0:09:31.960
<v Speaker 3>generally a little bit safer. Nevertheless, though you are seeing

0:09:31.960 --> 0:09:34.360
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of an increase, and that's at a minimum.

0:09:34.360 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 3>It's going to make people nervous.

0:09:35.920 --> 0:09:38.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it does sound particularly worrying when you've got

0:09:38.720 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>all these big office buildings just sitting out there unoccupied.

0:09:43.480 --> 0:09:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I travel around the United States and also Candada.

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:50.319
<v Speaker 1>Look at Toronto. I mean, it's just full of high

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>rise buildings, a lot of them unoccupied. They're commercial and

0:09:54.440 --> 0:09:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they can't be retrofitted, they can't suddenly be changed into condos.

0:09:57.920 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>So what's the endgame here.

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 3>Nobody really knows. But I think one thing that everybody's

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 3>talking about is how bad is this going to get

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:12.880
<v Speaker 3>for the banks. Banks buy a lot of commercial real estate,

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 3>especially regional banks, that they're pretty exposed to commercial real estate.

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I'm not sure how exposed they are to this particular slice,

0:10:20.679 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 3>which is CMBs, but there's definitely going to be some

0:10:25.280 --> 0:10:29.680
<v Speaker 3>pain that. I think the top sort of national banks

0:10:30.120 --> 0:10:32.760
<v Speaker 3>tend to be some of the biggest lenders of cnbs.

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:35.600
<v Speaker 3>They're fine, They're obviously going to be fine, but they're

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.319
<v Speaker 3>still gonna you know, they're still going to be experiencing

0:10:38.360 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 3>some pain over this. Then, so there's that the investors,

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 3>the banks that are buying the cnbs or the lending

0:10:45.920 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 3>into them, that are going to take a hit. And

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 3>then it's going to be a lot harder for anybody

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 3>who wants to refinance to refinance because rates are so

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.880
<v Speaker 3>much higher. Let's say you need to refinance an office loan,

0:11:01.400 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 3>Suddenly you might not be able to afford it, and

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:10.319
<v Speaker 3>that could be that could lead to some problems as well. Ultimately,

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.600
<v Speaker 3>I'm not really sure what's going to happen. I don't

0:11:12.600 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 3>think anybody is really sure, aside from the fact that

0:11:17.520 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 3>we do have this one big seismic trend rippling through

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 3>the whole sector, which is people are not working in

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:25.439
<v Speaker 3>the office as often as they used to.

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Are there any particular parts of the United States that

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:28.800
<v Speaker 1>are particularly exposed.

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:32.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, you hear about some markets that are worse than others.

0:11:33.840 --> 0:11:37.280
<v Speaker 3>Los Angeles is downtown LA. We had a great story

0:11:37.320 --> 0:11:41.720
<v Speaker 3>by John Gidtelson a week or a couple of weeks

0:11:41.720 --> 0:11:45.400
<v Speaker 3>ago about how Los Angeles office towers are really struggling.

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 3>It's not viewed as a very attractive space, and that's

0:11:51.600 --> 0:11:55.200
<v Speaker 3>where there's been a lot of defaults on office buildings.

0:11:55.440 --> 0:11:57.880
<v Speaker 3>That was where that was where Brookfield defaulted on those

0:11:57.920 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 3>two LA office towers. That that catapulted this trend into

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:04.640
<v Speaker 3>the into the headlines, and then I think there have

0:12:04.679 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 3>been a couple since then. Yeah, so I'd say LA

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 3>is a is an area to watch and that that,

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 3>in my mind stands out. There are a couple of others.

0:12:15.360 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>To be clear, when you're talking about investors like Brookfield,

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, these are big, deep pocketed investors. They're not

0:12:19.720 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>struggling for cash, but they are effectually be walking away

0:12:22.360 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>from some of these real estate assets that they own.

0:12:25.679 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 3>Yep, that's right there. It's it's you could call it

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:31.839
<v Speaker 3>a strategic default. It's not. It's not a default driven

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:35.520
<v Speaker 3>by they would really like to refinance. They just they can't.

0:12:35.559 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 3>They don't have any money, so they have to. It's

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.839
<v Speaker 3>a default where they're saying it's just not worth it

0:12:41.480 --> 0:12:45.040
<v Speaker 3>to keep paying into this thing. So yeah, back in February,

0:12:45.080 --> 0:12:49.240
<v Speaker 3>Brookfield was coming up against this big maturity date and

0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 3>it thought and it's and it decided, you know what,

0:12:53.280 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 3>rather than refinance this thing and pay higher rates, we're

0:12:56.880 --> 0:12:59.000
<v Speaker 3>just going to walk away. That made the most sense

0:12:59.040 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 3>for them.

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:02.840
<v Speaker 1>So before we talk to Louise Parker at Boomberg Contlligence,

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.680
<v Speaker 1>what's the next big story to watch here? Do you think, Scott?

0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.439
<v Speaker 3>Does it have to be related to to office US

0:13:10.520 --> 0:13:13.319
<v Speaker 3>anything instructured finance, which tends to scare a lot of

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:18.000
<v Speaker 3>people generally, Well, everybody's looking at subprime auto loans. I'm

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 3>working on subprime auto loans these days, for subprime model loans.

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 3>The reason it's interesting to me is because they get

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:29.400
<v Speaker 3>packaged into bonds, just like these office loans do. And

0:13:30.800 --> 0:13:33.559
<v Speaker 3>what is going to the big question is what will

0:13:33.640 --> 0:13:37.839
<v Speaker 3>happen with interest rates now being a lot higher and

0:13:38.040 --> 0:13:43.720
<v Speaker 3>more and more subprime borrowers are falling behind on their payments.

0:13:44.400 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 3>There's gonna be some pain for some bondholders who are

0:13:48.600 --> 0:13:52.520
<v Speaker 3>exposed to people falling behind. It's going to be pretty limited,

0:13:52.559 --> 0:13:57.480
<v Speaker 3>though there's a couple of deep subprime companies that are

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:00.880
<v Speaker 3>that are more exposed than others. Overall, well, I think

0:14:01.120 --> 0:14:04.240
<v Speaker 3>people are not fundamentally too worried, but yeah, there could be.

0:14:04.280 --> 0:14:07.280
<v Speaker 3>There could be a little bit of pain for some

0:14:07.400 --> 0:14:12.040
<v Speaker 3>of the more deep some prime borrowers. And if those

0:14:12.120 --> 0:14:16.640
<v Speaker 3>loans get packaged into bonds, those bonds could be facing

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:17.560
<v Speaker 3>a bit of stress.

0:14:17.880 --> 0:14:19.840
<v Speaker 1>Very excited to see what you come up with on

0:14:19.880 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>that great stuff. Scott the Carpenter from Bloomberg News, thanks

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us.

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:25.400
<v Speaker 3>Thanks very much. I read all of.

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Scott's scoops on the Bloomberg terminal and of course at

0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot com. So, as I mentioned earlier, we're very

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:33.480
<v Speaker 1>pleased to have with us Louise Parker, who looks at

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:37.160
<v Speaker 1>consumer companies for Bloomberg Intelligence, and we're here to talk

0:14:37.200 --> 0:14:40.280
<v Speaker 1>about the King of beers. What's the situation, Louise.

0:14:40.640 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, h James or is it the king of beers?

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Certainly in the US in recent weeks, bud Light has

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 2>lost its crown. It has been the number one beer

0:14:51.440 --> 0:14:55.800
<v Speaker 2>in the US market for over twenty years and going

0:14:55.840 --> 0:15:01.520
<v Speaker 2>back to early April in so a Twitter or not,

0:15:01.600 --> 0:15:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Actually I think it was Instagram and Twitter post by

0:15:04.760 --> 0:15:10.200
<v Speaker 2>a transgender I guess someone who had a marketing alliance

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 2>with the company. She was celebrating her one year since

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:19.920
<v Speaker 2>transition and had one can of bud Light with her

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 2>image on it, and the market for bud Light just

0:15:23.840 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 2>fell through the floor. In the world of social media,

0:15:27.760 --> 0:15:31.239
<v Speaker 2>there was a boycott for bud Lights, and anytime customers

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.840
<v Speaker 2>are alienated by your advertising and the company says to

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 2>their customers, this was not a marketing campaign. Okay, anytime

0:15:40.640 --> 0:15:43.120
<v Speaker 2>you are in social media and you're paying someone to

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.360
<v Speaker 2>push your brand, that is marketing. That is a campaign.

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 2>The senior management behind the marketing alliance have been pushed aside,

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 2>let's say, not necessarily sacked, but no longer in their positions,

0:15:56.480 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>and senior management at AB InBev, who owns brand bud Light,

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 2>having come out to say, we messed up. We made

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:08.720
<v Speaker 2>a mistake of just carrying on like nothing's changed. But

0:16:08.880 --> 0:16:12.000
<v Speaker 2>now we're seeing in the numbers coming through from May

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 2>that bud Light has actually lost its crown to be

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:18.560
<v Speaker 2>the number one beer in the US market to modelo

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 2>especial and interesting thing there is. But the ABI used

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 2>to own that brand in America, but they had to

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 2>sell it for concentration reasons when they bought sab Miller

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.680
<v Speaker 2>about six years ago, so they owned the brand Modello

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:34.760
<v Speaker 2>outside of America. But now it has the number one

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 2>position in America. And as you and I were chudding recently, James,

0:16:39.040 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 2>this is a cultural war. Now I don't reside in

0:16:41.560 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 2>the US so maybe you can tell me what you're

0:16:43.320 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 2>seeing on the airwaves about what's happening to bud Light.

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:50.320
<v Speaker 1>Well, I live in the bubble of New York City

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>and in particular Brooklyn, so everyone's drinking bud Light all

0:16:52.720 --> 0:16:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the time. I prefer other types of alcoholic beverage, but

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>other beers are available too. But why, I mean, this

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is fascinating exactly these say culture wars. But why are

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we talking about this on a credit show? Why does

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it affect the company so badly in terms of its revenue?

0:17:11.000 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, it does because bud Light is such an important beer.

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:18.240
<v Speaker 2>Only they only generate seventeen percent of their total beer

0:17:18.320 --> 0:17:22.160
<v Speaker 2>volume in the North American market, so that's US, Canada,

0:17:22.240 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 2>and Mexico. But they generate that's volume, sales volume seventeen percent,

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:30.880
<v Speaker 2>but it's almost thirty percent, twenty eight point seven percent

0:17:31.160 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 2>of sales revenue. And when you get to Ibida, that's

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 2>where they're not some Bolts earnings, it's over thirty percent,

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:41.520
<v Speaker 2>thirty point five percent. I'm not going to try and

0:17:41.880 --> 0:17:44.760
<v Speaker 2>do a presentation here, but those numbers are coming down.

0:17:44.840 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 2>So this is consensus are saying that volumes across North America,

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.720
<v Speaker 2>across all of their brands. Now they have a lot

0:17:51.720 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 2>of brands which have also lost here. So they have

0:17:54.560 --> 0:17:59.920
<v Speaker 2>not just bud Light, they have Michelo Vulture. They own Budweiser,

0:18:00.320 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 2>bush Light, and Natural Light, and they had to also

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 2>sell Corona, And so the brands that are gaining share

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.080
<v Speaker 2>are the ones that they used to own. So any

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 2>any brand that is not owned by ABI is actually

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:16.280
<v Speaker 2>gaining share. Add to the detriment of Bidlight and all

0:18:16.320 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 2>of its sister brands under ABI umbrella. And what the

0:18:21.400 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 2>analyst is saying this year is that North American volumes

0:18:24.080 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 2>will be down five percent. That's in revenue, that's only

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 2>one percent, But they're seeing North America ebit yards down

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 2>eight percent. Now that's why I care as a credit analyst.

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:39.560
<v Speaker 2>It's had a pretty dramatic impact on the share price

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:42.199
<v Speaker 2>for ABI bod in the US as the ticker is,

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:46.960
<v Speaker 2>but it's off its lows. It was down about seventeen percent.

0:18:47.240 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 2>It's off the lows now, but the bonds spreads haven't

0:18:51.400 --> 0:18:54.160
<v Speaker 2>really moved. So I care as a credit analyst. What's

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 2>happening on the cash bonds The company has. ABI has

0:18:58.320 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 2>bonds in sterling, euros dollars and I've looked at it

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 2>this week against some of its peers in the beverage world,

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.320
<v Speaker 2>and they really haven't moved, they haven't widened, They've just

0:19:08.520 --> 0:19:13.520
<v Speaker 2>tracked the peer group for beverages. It is interesting for

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:16.600
<v Speaker 2>this company because they levered up five six years ago.

0:19:16.600 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 2>As I said, when they bought sab Miller, they took

0:19:18.960 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 2>on over one hundred billion dollars of debt. They've managed

0:19:22.000 --> 0:19:25.040
<v Speaker 2>to reduce that down to about seventy billion and reduced

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:28.240
<v Speaker 2>leverage from upwards five times down to three and a

0:19:28.280 --> 0:19:33.040
<v Speaker 2>half time. So they've just retained or just regained a

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 2>single A credit rating. And it's great for the company

0:19:36.920 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 2>because they're in the market buying back bonds. The way

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.399
<v Speaker 2>they reduce their debt is tendering their their bonds. But

0:19:43.560 --> 0:19:48.879
<v Speaker 2>now the sort of advanced situation where with declining earnings,

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 2>they very well have to look at what the knock

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.600
<v Speaker 2>on effect to cash flow is. Will the bid for

0:19:53.680 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 2>the bonds be supported by buybacks if their cash flow

0:19:56.840 --> 0:20:00.600
<v Speaker 2>is indeed reducing? So that's why could and Less care.

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>But the equity is down and the bonds aren't. Do

0:20:03.119 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>we expect the bonds to start falling in to catch

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:05.439
<v Speaker 1>catch up?

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 2>With the equity Eventually, yeah, really good question. Possibly we

0:20:10.080 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 2>won't see the full extent of this, even though we

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.320
<v Speaker 2>get volume data on a week to week basis. The

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:18.439
<v Speaker 2>information industry informations out there and it's on the terminal

0:20:18.480 --> 0:20:21.359
<v Speaker 2>for people that want to look at it. The company

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:23.760
<v Speaker 2>won't report their second quarter results until the first week

0:20:23.800 --> 0:20:26.919
<v Speaker 2>of August, and that's when we might see them have

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:30.440
<v Speaker 2>to reduce their guidance. We haven't seen anything to date.

0:20:30.640 --> 0:20:33.280
<v Speaker 2>We saw when their first quarter came out, which was

0:20:33.320 --> 0:20:38.199
<v Speaker 2>three weeks after this transgender influencer posted on Instagram, and

0:20:38.440 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 2>they were like, well, North America's only once then have

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 2>had volume with bud Light, it's not important. Well, I

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 2>think they missed the point and they missed the opportunity

0:20:45.920 --> 0:20:49.040
<v Speaker 2>to actually say, mere Copple, we got this wrong. We're

0:20:49.080 --> 0:20:52.199
<v Speaker 2>going to talk to our core customers. And they have

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 2>rolled out new advertising, but the damage has been done,

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.040
<v Speaker 2>and some equity analysts out there are saying, will they

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:01.600
<v Speaker 2>ever get back the market share that they've lost. Certainly

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:04.680
<v Speaker 2>with bud Light, they've alienated customers and that's a real

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:06.440
<v Speaker 2>problem for a consumer company.

0:21:06.760 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>So one tweet loses them billions of dollars. The equity

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>tanks the bonds could follow. Is it really as simple

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 1>as that or was there anything else going on that

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 1>you could attribute this move to.

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a polarization of society in America. I mean,

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm sitting in London and or we just see what

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 2>we see and we're obviously not on the ground there.

0:21:27.880 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 2>This has not affected their global sales. This has not

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:34.040
<v Speaker 2>had a knock on effect to the London, Paris Frankfort.

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:36.960
<v Speaker 2>You know, they're beers, which we don't drink a little

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 2>budde over here. I must say sorry about that. But

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 2>they own cellar Atoa, they owned bets, they own left

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 2>they you know, this is a global portfolio of beers.

0:21:46.680 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 2>It hasn't had a huge effect in South America, in Asia, Pacific,

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.080
<v Speaker 2>across Europe. This is a North America problem for the

0:21:54.119 --> 0:21:57.040
<v Speaker 2>company and they have to address it. They literally have

0:21:57.119 --> 0:21:59.399
<v Speaker 2>to come out and say this is what happened, this

0:21:59.560 --> 0:22:03.200
<v Speaker 2>is how I fixing it. Sorry for the upset because

0:22:03.240 --> 0:22:06.800
<v Speaker 2>people have boycotted this through social media and it's happening

0:22:06.840 --> 0:22:10.639
<v Speaker 2>at the bars. They're having to repurchase beer that is

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:14.200
<v Speaker 2>expired because from their distributives, because the bars aren't taking it.

0:22:14.280 --> 0:22:16.520
<v Speaker 2>They can't sell it. So people are walking into a

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.160
<v Speaker 2>bar where they would have ordered a bid light, they're

0:22:19.160 --> 0:22:22.960
<v Speaker 2>going for anything but an abi beer, and that is

0:22:23.000 --> 0:22:23.439
<v Speaker 2>a problem.

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.560
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like they're also a warning for other companies.

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's lots of other consumer companies that you know,

0:22:29.440 --> 0:22:33.320
<v Speaker 1>every time there's a special event or a commemoration or

0:22:33.400 --> 0:22:35.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's Pride month this month. I mean, companies

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:38.400
<v Speaker 1>feel the need to make a statement on these things,

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:40.760
<v Speaker 1>on these issues. But then you're seeing this sort of

0:22:40.800 --> 0:22:45.320
<v Speaker 1>backlash for for various reasons in the States. What's the strategy.

0:22:45.359 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>What do other consumer companies do they just keep quiet

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.200
<v Speaker 1>or they you know, how do others learn from this?

0:22:50.840 --> 0:22:53.040
<v Speaker 2>It's really hard joined because damned if you do, damned

0:22:53.040 --> 0:22:55.680
<v Speaker 2>if you don't. I mean, my personal news feed is

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 2>full of pride celebration, as you would expect for any

0:23:00.160 --> 0:23:02.720
<v Speaker 2>whether you know, you get Mother's Day, you get fatherestay

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:06.159
<v Speaker 2>and the consumer companies roll out their advertising around that.

0:23:06.640 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 2>And pride is huge because people celebrate, they get together

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:12.520
<v Speaker 2>with their friendship groups and they'll have a drink and

0:23:12.600 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 2>that might be in a bud light, you know, you

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 2>never know, but they have to read the room. They

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:21.359
<v Speaker 2>have to see when they do misstep that they've made

0:23:21.400 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 2>a mistake and they have to address it. Like they

0:23:24.640 --> 0:23:28.399
<v Speaker 2>were trying to target a very small part of the

0:23:28.480 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 2>population and alienated a large part of the population who

0:23:32.640 --> 0:23:35.639
<v Speaker 2>actually uses their product, who drinks their beer. It's a

0:23:35.760 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 2>really tricky question and.

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:38.720
<v Speaker 1>They should have said sorry.

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:40.240
<v Speaker 2>They should have said sorry.

0:23:40.560 --> 0:23:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Are there any other companies in this boat as far

0:23:42.359 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>as you can see, Louise in terms of consumer stuff

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>that you cover, well, I.

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Don't cover target, but they were in a similar situation

0:23:48.280 --> 0:23:52.720
<v Speaker 2>in recent weeks with again with Pride, they had special

0:23:52.760 --> 0:23:58.280
<v Speaker 2>filmsuits for people who are transitioning, and mums yelled foul

0:23:58.359 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 2>and said, you're targeting to In fact, they were not

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 2>targeting children. Sorry to use upon the company they aimed target.

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 2>They were not aimed at children. They were adult sized,

0:24:08.080 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 2>and they moved all their stock to the back of

0:24:10.119 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 2>the store and some stores just pulled the merchandise altogether.

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:16.960
<v Speaker 2>So it's really hard when people are on a bandwagon.

0:24:17.960 --> 0:24:20.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you swerve to your curve do you just avoid

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 2>it all together? It's a really difficult one. But when

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:25.119
<v Speaker 2>you're in the business of selling a product, you are

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 2>producing it. You have to sell you have to have

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:30.639
<v Speaker 2>the flow through of volumes or else you're having the

0:24:30.720 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 2>shot shot down production. This is that's how serious it

0:24:33.880 --> 0:24:35.760
<v Speaker 2>can get. If people don't take your product the end

0:24:35.760 --> 0:24:38.200
<v Speaker 2>of the day, you have to consider what to do

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:42.160
<v Speaker 2>with that product. Do we continue to ship the manufacture

0:24:42.200 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 2>volumes and ship the volumes that we have been It's

0:24:44.240 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 2>not you don't move beer from North America to South America,

0:24:48.000 --> 0:24:50.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, you just don't. You have local brands, and

0:24:50.320 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 2>you make those brands where where the consumer will consume them,

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 2>where they'll drink them. And if they're not actually you know,

0:24:56.720 --> 0:24:59.879
<v Speaker 2>asking for ad a bud light, that's that's troublesome.

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>And the Budweiser maker and Heiser Bush, that's they're still

0:25:02.800 --> 0:25:04.200
<v Speaker 1>in trouble here. They're not out of the woods.

0:25:05.080 --> 0:25:08.199
<v Speaker 2>Not yeah, I mean this has been going on, as

0:25:08.240 --> 0:25:12.360
<v Speaker 2>I said, since the beginning of April, and where what's

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 2>troublesome for me is that this is the peak summer

0:25:15.920 --> 0:25:19.639
<v Speaker 2>season that we're invented, and so families get together, you

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 2>get together with your friends that we can you have

0:25:21.720 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 2>a barbecue, you go for a picnique, you have you know,

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:27.679
<v Speaker 2>a callerbox. What if you call it ESQ on Australian

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:32.040
<v Speaker 2>of beer, wine, whatever other things you like to consume.

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:37.480
<v Speaker 2>And if you're avoiding one brand, that's an issue. You know,

0:25:37.880 --> 0:25:40.840
<v Speaker 2>people people might change their mind. But the social media

0:25:40.880 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 2>over this is massive. I mean, I don't look at

0:25:43.520 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 2>all this toff typically, but I did some research for

0:25:45.600 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 2>this chat and it's it's just one way. It's there's

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:50.240
<v Speaker 2>a real.

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Polarization total mindfield. Amazing, Yeah, very very interesting.

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:55.080
<v Speaker 3>Thank you very much.

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>Louise Parker of Bloomberg Intelligence. Read all your great analysis

0:25:59.640 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Louise on the Bloomberg Terminal. Do check it out and

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:04.000
<v Speaker 1>we hope to see you back on the show soon.

0:26:04.720 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 1>And thanks again to Scott Carpenter from Bloomberg News. Read

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:10.359
<v Speaker 1>all of his great distress debt scoops and strut to

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>finance scoops on the Terminal and at Bloomberg dot Com.

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm James Crombie. It's been a pleasure having you join

0:26:16.600 --> 0:26:18.680
<v Speaker 1>us again next week on the Credit Edge.