WEBVTT - Bloomberg Law Brief: Voter Panel Wins Small Victory (Audio)

0:00:00.040 --> 0:00:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And now it's time for our daily Bloomberg labbrare for

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>exploring legal issues in the news. And Today Bloomberg lawho

0:00:05.840 --> 0:00:08.959
<v Speaker 1>Student Grosso and Greg Stuart discuss a victory for President

0:00:09.000 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump's Voter Fraud Commission after a federal judge cleared the

0:00:12.400 --> 0:00:15.160
<v Speaker 1>way for the panel to gather personal data on voters.

0:00:15.440 --> 0:00:18.159
<v Speaker 1>They speak with David Becker, founder and executive director of

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the Center for Election Innovation and Research, and Hans von Spakovsky,

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>manager of the Election Law Reform Initiative at the Heritage

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:30.240
<v Speaker 1>Foundation and a member of President Trump's Advisory Commission on

0:00:30.280 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Election Integrity. David, how did the judge reach her decision,

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:41.760
<v Speaker 1>particularly regarding the infringement of privacy rights? Well, I think, UM,

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>some of the statements made by UM by the commission

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>UH confirmed that this is just a request that UH

0:00:49.760 --> 0:00:53.960
<v Speaker 1>there were some options that UM I think they might

0:00:53.960 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>have been storing the information in a way that at

0:00:56.040 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>least the judge seemed satisfied UH might be might sufficiently

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:03.440
<v Speaker 1>protect privacy rights. I think there's still some questions out

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.640
<v Speaker 1>there with regard to that. I think that given that

0:01:06.680 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>it was just a request, given that some of this

0:01:08.480 --> 0:01:11.360
<v Speaker 1>information was public, what she found at this point was

0:01:11.400 --> 0:01:15.920
<v Speaker 1>there wasn't enough evidence to grant a temporary restraining extraining

0:01:16.000 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 1>order or a preliminary injunction, and found that at least

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>at this point the plaintiffs were not likely to um

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:23.880
<v Speaker 1>to win on the merits. I think, you know. One

0:01:23.920 --> 0:01:27.319
<v Speaker 1>of the things that was was was heavily stressed in

0:01:27.360 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>her opinion though, was that this is only a request,

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 1>that there is not a demand for information. And then

0:01:32.360 --> 0:01:35.080
<v Speaker 1>there's another question which will have to answer um at

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>some point, which is is this information going to be

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.040
<v Speaker 1>any of any use at all to determine anything related

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:42.600
<v Speaker 1>to election integrity? And so let me just ask you

0:01:42.640 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to start with the practical implications. What what does this opinion,

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:50.560
<v Speaker 1>this decision from Judge Clarke Telly give the Commission that

0:01:50.600 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>it might not not have had beforehand. Well, it was

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.960
<v Speaker 1>an obviously obviously logical decision because if you look at

0:01:57.960 --> 0:02:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the letter that was sent out by the Commission, uh,

0:02:00.800 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 1>they asked for publicly available information. So the idea that

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>somehow there was going to be some huge invasion of

0:02:07.040 --> 0:02:10.559
<v Speaker 1>privacy is just not true. All of the states provide

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:13.120
<v Speaker 1>this very same information. For example, I mean, if you

0:02:13.120 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 1>go to the website of the State Election Board of Virginia,

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and remember Terry mccaullus, the governor, was one of the

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:22.400
<v Speaker 1>people that was outraged at this. You'll find that they

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of pages where they talk about how

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>uh they provide information registered voters, list um voting history,

0:02:31.560 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>to political parties, candidates, uh, nonprofit organizations, members of the public.

0:02:37.520 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>So all the commission was asking for was the same

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of publicly available information that these states already provide

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 1>basically to anyone who walks in the door. That's David Becker,

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.679
<v Speaker 1>founder of the Center for Election Innovation and Research, and

0:02:51.840 --> 0:02:55.320
<v Speaker 1>Hans von spakov Ski, manager of the Election Law Reform

0:02:55.360 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Initiative at the Heritage Foundation and a member of President

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:02.519
<v Speaker 1>Trump's Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. Is spoke with Bloomberg

0:03:02.560 --> 0:03:04.919
<v Speaker 1>Law host doom Grasso and Greg's store. You can listen

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Law weekdays at one pm Wall Street Time

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>here on Bloomberg Radio. And among the top legal stories

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Law, Celgene has agreed to pay two hundred

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.639
<v Speaker 1>eighty million dollars to settle a whistle blower fraud lawsuit

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>a former employees as the company used illegal claims desern

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:24.840
<v Speaker 1>its cancer drugs into blockbuster sellers. Celgene denies the allegations,

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>and that's this morning's Bloomberg Law Brie. If you can

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>find more illegal news at Bloomberg law dot com and

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg BNA dot com. Attorneys will find exceptional legal research

0:03:34.560 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 1>and business development tools there as well. Visit Bloomberg Law

0:03:38.360 --> 0:03:42.720
<v Speaker 1>dot com and Bloomberg Bena dot com for more information