WEBVTT - Will Physics Ever Explain Everything?

0:00:07.760 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, do you think physicists and scientists will ever

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:15.200
<v Speaker 1>come up with some equation that just describes everything, the

0:00:15.240 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>whole thing, you know, like one line of one line

0:00:18.160 --> 0:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>of symbols that just that sums up the entirety of

0:00:21.520 --> 0:00:24.560
<v Speaker 1>all of existence, the whole universe, on a T shirt.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sort of two minds about it. Like one, I

0:00:27.720 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 1>would love for that to happen because it means it

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:32.480
<v Speaker 1>would be a singular achievement in the human intellectual history.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:35.519
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's like, actually unravel all of the mysteries

0:00:35.520 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, which part to come up with it

0:00:37.640 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>or to put it on a T shirt? Um, yeah,

0:00:40.880 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to get down to the base layer of knowledge and

0:00:43.280 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 1>reveal like the source code of the universe, that would

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.920
<v Speaker 1>be amazing. On the other hand, that would kind of

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.920
<v Speaker 1>mean physics is over right, Like that's the fundamental goal

0:00:50.960 --> 0:00:52.920
<v Speaker 1>of physics. And if we get there and then we're done,

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>like what are we gonna do? So, you know, we

0:00:55.720 --> 0:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>have a whole raft of physicists becoming cartoonists or something.

0:00:58.400 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>So be careful. So your fear is that you'll be unemployed,

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that's right. Don't work too hard, you know, if you

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:07.080
<v Speaker 1>get too productive then you know, you work yourself out

0:01:07.120 --> 0:01:09.600
<v Speaker 1>of a job. That's exactly the concern. Maybe you'll just

0:01:09.640 --> 0:01:12.320
<v Speaker 1>take a little bit extra time to figure it out.

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right. I'll figure out the theory of everything, and

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I'll just keep it in a drawer in my office. Right,

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 1>and then the day before you retire, you're like, boom,

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:26.480
<v Speaker 1>Nobel prize. Please before I die quickly, Let's put Daniel

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>out of a job. Let's make this physicist unemployed. Hi,

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:47.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Ran and I'm Daniel, and this is our podcast

0:01:48.240 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge explain the universe, where we take the

0:01:51.800 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 1>entire universe and we roll it up into a burrito

0:01:54.360 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>so you can eat it for lunch or put it

0:01:56.200 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on your T shirt. That's right. Our goal is to

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.520
<v Speaker 1>take everything in the universe and make us that you

0:02:01.560 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>can actually understand it. We're not eager to have you

0:02:04.760 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>feel like you're in the presence of a great scientist

0:02:07.080 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>hearing things you'll never really understand. We want to break

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>things down so you can really understand them, you know,

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:14.359
<v Speaker 1>explain them to your grandma or that fat uncle or

0:02:14.400 --> 0:02:17.640
<v Speaker 1>family reunions. That's the goal of this podcast. Or show

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>off to your court, or is it the next water

0:02:19.680 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 1>cooler break, Yeah, or point out that they actually don't

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 1>understand what they're talking about, because you do, because you

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>listen to this awesome podcast. Today. On the podcast, we're

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:35.119
<v Speaker 1>going to tackle the biggest question in human knowledge. Right,

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that's right, the most fundamental, the deepest, the biggest question

0:02:39.000 --> 0:02:46.160
<v Speaker 1>in human intellectual history. What is that question? For him?

0:02:46.360 --> 0:02:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible for humans to know everything? Do you

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:54.280
<v Speaker 1>mean to know everything? Like? Where is that sock I

0:02:54.360 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>lost in the eighth grade? Yeah? Everything, some formula that

0:02:57.040 --> 0:03:01.160
<v Speaker 1>tells you where that so, you know, know, a theory

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of everything does not include location of all lost socks.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 1>That's impossible, right, And then we could just end the

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>podcast right now, because that's just impossible. No, A theory

0:03:09.520 --> 0:03:12.160
<v Speaker 1>of everything tries to describe the way things work. Right,

0:03:12.200 --> 0:03:14.480
<v Speaker 1>They can't possibly explain to all the details of everything

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:16.600
<v Speaker 1>that has happened because there's a lot of chaos there.

0:03:17.000 --> 0:03:18.880
<v Speaker 1>But you know, a theory of everything tries to say,

0:03:19.040 --> 0:03:22.000
<v Speaker 1>we understand the way everything works. We have a system

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that explains it, even the things we don't see or

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 1>where we can't see. That's right. It would have to

0:03:26.240 --> 0:03:28.560
<v Speaker 1>be a theory of everything. It would have to be

0:03:28.600 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 1>something that describes the universe at the deepest level, you know,

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.600
<v Speaker 1>sort of like the the end of our quest to

0:03:34.720 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>take the universe apart into its tiny little bits, to

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.600
<v Speaker 1>understand it at every level. That's right. Yeah, to have

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a theory which from which anything can be derived. Right,

0:03:45.080 --> 0:03:47.920
<v Speaker 1>all of physics and biology and chemistry and economics and

0:03:48.000 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>everything would just be the emergent phenomena that flow naturally

0:03:52.680 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 1>from this one fundamental theory, and then we'll know everything basically, right,

0:03:57.960 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>except for where those songs are. Yeah, So I went

0:04:00.800 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 1>out and I asked people, do you think it's possible,

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 1>given the fullness of time and a bunch of geniuses

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:10.600
<v Speaker 1>in the future, that physics could eventually describe everything, explain

0:04:10.760 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>everything in a single formula that goes onto a T shirt.

0:04:14.120 --> 0:04:16.479
<v Speaker 1>Do you think there's a theory of everything? Here's what

0:04:16.520 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>people had to say. Yes, Yeah, with due time, I

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:26.240
<v Speaker 1>think research will elucidate everything that we're looking for. Like,

0:04:26.320 --> 0:04:29.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm religious, I'm a Christian, so I believe that there

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>are some things that got made that just can't be

0:04:31.920 --> 0:04:35.520
<v Speaker 1>described by you know, sciences. So necess what I believed

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>that cool, I think it could happen. Gives you such

0:04:39.000 --> 0:04:45.240
<v Speaker 1>confidence it's math, and math in essence can describe everything.

0:04:45.480 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 1>So in theory, we can use math to describe everything.

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I think eventually, um, that can happen, but it's going

0:04:54.520 --> 0:04:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to take a long time and lots of work. All right,

0:04:58.800 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 1>So some people felt pretty off in in physicist. I

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>know those people. I love those people. They also sort

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>of terrified me, you know, I really appreciate their like, well,

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 1>physics has figured a bunch of about so I'm sure

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.520
<v Speaker 1>given enough time, they'll figure it out, you know, Like

0:05:12.760 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and the guy who said, like math describes everything, so

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of course that's kind of cool. But also it's a

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.159
<v Speaker 1>lot of pressure. You know, like if you feel like, well,

0:05:20.160 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>physics can figure everything out, then all you have to

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>do is sit in your office with pencil and paper

0:05:24.040 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and eventually all the answers in the universe will come

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:31.160
<v Speaker 1>to you. You know. It's um, yeah, it's a it's

0:05:31.160 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pressure. So I appreciate those people having

0:05:34.040 --> 0:05:37.120
<v Speaker 1>so much faith in us, but it's you know, if

0:05:37.160 --> 0:05:39.039
<v Speaker 1>we do figure out a theory everything, it's still a

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:40.680
<v Speaker 1>lot of work. You want to leave a little bit

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of room for like, hey, maybe we won't do it well,

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Um, and some people, some people definitely

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:50.440
<v Speaker 1>felt like it's impossible, you know, there's a gap. There

0:05:50.480 --> 0:05:53.320
<v Speaker 1>are things that humanity can never understand, you know. And

0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:55.880
<v Speaker 1>there was the one guy who thought, well, God creates

0:05:55.880 --> 0:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>some things that cannot be understood. And there's some people

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 1>who just thought humans are not smart enough, you know. Um,

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>and maybe we've been watching too many political tuctures or something,

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>which you know, I might be of the same opinion

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>if you watch enough of those things. So it's like

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:12.279
<v Speaker 1>people generally had faith in physicists, but not in human

0:06:12.279 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 1>beings in general, that's right, Yeah, yeah, And maybe those

0:06:15.680 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>people don't realize that physics is just people, right, Physics

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 1>is just people thinking. Um, there's no like deep physics

0:06:22.839 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>that's absent of humanity, right. Everything we do in physics

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is a model inside our head, our attempt to understand

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the universe. But it's always going to be inherently human, right,

0:06:33.400 --> 0:06:37.280
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing extra human about it. Well, you don't think

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>people like Einstein had some sort of extra capacity than

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.480
<v Speaker 1>most people. Oh no, I think Einstein was a super

0:06:43.560 --> 0:06:46.280
<v Speaker 1>duper human. But we're all human, right, and we think

0:06:46.320 --> 0:06:48.279
<v Speaker 1>about the universe in a certain way. We perceive it

0:06:48.279 --> 0:06:50.599
<v Speaker 1>in a certain way. Things make sense to us in

0:06:50.600 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a certain way. I mean, imagine if we met alien scientists, right,

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>what fraction of our human physics would be understandable to them?

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Skip over the part where we have to like develop

0:07:00.480 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a common language and you know, agree not to kill

0:07:02.680 --> 0:07:04.479
<v Speaker 1>each other. And you know, you've got a bunch of

0:07:04.520 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>the best alien physicists in the room and a bunch

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of the best human physicists in the room. Everybody's wearing

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the same lab coat, and you know, start comparing notes.

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.760
<v Speaker 1>How does that go? Well? I think that's a really

0:07:14.800 --> 0:07:17.680
<v Speaker 1>deep question. I think probably we would learn more about

0:07:17.720 --> 0:07:20.239
<v Speaker 1>the way the human mind works, like the human mind,

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>than the way the universe works, because I'm sure a

0:07:22.880 --> 0:07:25.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of the theories we've built reflect the way we

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>think and feel. Do you think it would be sort

0:07:27.400 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of like if we got together with a bunch of

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>chimpanzees and we're like, hey, guys, let's talk physics. How

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:35.840
<v Speaker 1>would that? You know? How that would go? They would

0:07:35.880 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>be trying to explain to them cut of physics, and

0:07:37.840 --> 0:07:41.880
<v Speaker 1>it just they just wouldn't be intellectually capable of grasping it, right,

0:07:41.920 --> 0:07:43.720
<v Speaker 1>even if you could speak to our language. Yeah, they

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>would probably just be throwing throwing poop at us while

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about cloning physics, which you know, I think

0:07:48.360 --> 0:07:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I've had that experience in the classroom, you know, lecturing

0:07:51.400 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to a bunch of people who just totally uninterested. Never

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:56.360
<v Speaker 1>actually got to the throwing poop part of the equation.

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>But sometimes I do feel like people aren't interested. Did

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>you just call your students a inticence, None of my

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 1>current students, of course. No, They're all are all very

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>they're wonderful. No, it's not a question of whether the

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.760
<v Speaker 1>aliens are smarter than us. I just think that the

0:08:12.760 --> 0:08:15.480
<v Speaker 1>theories we've come up with as humans are going to

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:18.320
<v Speaker 1>be indelible human. You know, there are product of a

0:08:18.400 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>human mind, and they cannot be separated from that. So

0:08:20.640 --> 0:08:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I think it's until we meet alien physicists, until we

0:08:24.320 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>find another intelligence with different set of biases and perspective

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and fundamental thoughts structure, that we can learn what about

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:34.599
<v Speaker 1>the physics we've developed is just human and what of

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:38.200
<v Speaker 1>it is actually fundamental and inescapable. It could be that

0:08:38.240 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing everything in the wrong way totally. Yeah, absolutely,

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:45.520
<v Speaker 1>everything we've learned is filtered through our experience, our consciousness. Right,

0:08:45.559 --> 0:08:47.360
<v Speaker 1>So we have these few senses. If you have a

0:08:47.360 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 1>different set of senses, you experience the universe differently, you

0:08:50.160 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>think very differently about the way the universe might be structured.

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean there's a lot of deeply flawed sci fi

0:08:54.800 --> 0:08:58.240
<v Speaker 1>movies which touch on this really important issue, like Arrival, right,

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Aliens and Arrival think about time differently,

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and so I'm sure their physics is built in a

0:09:03.240 --> 0:09:07.880
<v Speaker 1>completely different way. Ours is built on our limited experience,

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that's right, Yeah, absolutely, and a limited, very limited grant funding. Well,

0:09:16.000 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>let's bring it down. What does it actually mean to

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>have a theory of everything? Yeah? Does it mean an equation?

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Does it mean a set of axioms you know, or statements?

0:09:25.120 --> 0:09:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Or does it mean like a little computer to which

0:09:27.400 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>you can input anything and will tell you what the

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:31.800
<v Speaker 1>universe would do? Yeah? And it doesn't mean something which

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 1>will tell you where your lost socks are? Right? Um,

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:39.120
<v Speaker 1>then what's the point and why are we even doing this? Man? Um?

0:09:39.200 --> 0:09:41.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, the entire physics enterprises just to help you

0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:44.680
<v Speaker 1>find lost socks. Um. In my view, a theory of

0:09:44.720 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>everything would be a set of equations that describe the

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>way the universe works at its most fundamental level, meaning

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that from that anything else can be explained. You know,

0:09:56.360 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>take for example, our current understanding of chemistry, right, molecules interacting, etcetera.

0:10:02.240 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Now can you use that to explain hurricanes, right, or

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:09.440
<v Speaker 1>whether or you know, the solar system. Our current laws

0:10:09.440 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of physics and chemistry can explain things that are larger

0:10:12.600 --> 0:10:16.680
<v Speaker 1>emergent phenomenon that arise from those more fundamental aspects. Right,

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>So that works. So when you say explain, you actually

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.800
<v Speaker 1>mean like, we see something and then we can go

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:25.920
<v Speaker 1>back to your magic formula, and your magic formula would say, oh, yeah,

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>I can see how that came to be. Or if

0:10:28.920 --> 0:10:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I run it then we get the same result. That's right.

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Or you can encode those rules into a simulation and

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>predict exactly what's going to happen. Or you can be

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 1>super smart and do it in pencil and paper and say,

0:10:39.760 --> 0:10:43.439
<v Speaker 1>these equations predict that hurricanes will happen, or these equations

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>predict that planets will orbit the Sun. In this way,

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:48.800
<v Speaker 1>all these things that we see that we experience, these

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 1>are emergent phenomenon. Right. There are higher level events that

0:10:53.320 --> 0:10:57.880
<v Speaker 1>arise out of deeper, lower level rules. Right. So there

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.440
<v Speaker 1>was actually happening. You know, when example, you throw a baseball,

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>is all those particles are moving in tandem, and there's

0:11:04.280 --> 0:11:07.600
<v Speaker 1>all this quantum field theory that's happening um while that happens,

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you can describe the way baseball moves

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:13.760
<v Speaker 1>using a very simple parabolic formula. That parabolic formula can

0:11:13.800 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 1>be derived from the lower level set of rules. So

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like an onion. You know, we think

0:11:19.480 --> 0:11:22.599
<v Speaker 1>about theories of the universe in layers. It's like the

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>equations to describe the way things work in the macroscopic level,

0:11:26.080 --> 0:11:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, baseballs. Then there's equations that describe how things

0:11:29.120 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>work at the atomic level, and then there's equations to

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.559
<v Speaker 1>describe the way things work at the cork level or

0:11:33.600 --> 0:11:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the the electron level. Right, And so the idea is

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>a theory of everything would be the lowest level would

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:43.080
<v Speaker 1>be one from which everything else could be derived. In principle,

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>it's like the rules at the very very very very

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:49.560
<v Speaker 1>center of the onion exactly. Uh, if the universe is

0:11:49.559 --> 0:11:52.120
<v Speaker 1>a simulation, right, then this would be like the source

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>code of that simulation would be the basic rules for

0:11:54.720 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>which everything results. It's like you can have a rule

0:11:58.000 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>about economics Magrican makes you know, people respond to their

0:12:02.520 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 1>best interests where they go for the lowest price. That's

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:07.680
<v Speaker 1>a good theory, and it describes this complex phenomenon, but

0:12:08.240 --> 0:12:11.199
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't actually tell you the most basic thing that's

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>going on. That's right, and the most basic dance going

0:12:13.520 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>on is, you know, a bunch of particles are slashing

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.080
<v Speaker 1>around inside their head, you know, and you can describe

0:12:18.080 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>at different levels. You can describe at the particle level,

0:12:20.120 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>which is very cumbersome because there's so many particles that

0:12:23.400 --> 0:12:25.960
<v Speaker 1>doing these kind of calculations would be almost impossible. Or

0:12:26.000 --> 0:12:28.559
<v Speaker 1>you can describe it at the biochemical level. You know, Uh,

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:32.080
<v Speaker 1>these dopamine and this sort of neurotransmitter and all these

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:33.960
<v Speaker 1>things are happening. A lot of these things. You can

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>describe at lots of different levels, and you pick the

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:38.880
<v Speaker 1>level that's most appropriate. Right, you want to solve a

0:12:38.920 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 1>problem involving a baseball, You're gonna do a simple parabolic calculation.

0:12:42.400 --> 0:12:44.680
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to go with a heavy hitting quantum

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>field theory calculation. Right, But the theory of everything in

0:12:48.240 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>principle could derive anything else. Right, You can derive those

0:12:52.360 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 1>laws of parabolic motion, from the deepest level, from that

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.679
<v Speaker 1>the core of the onion. So that's the goal of

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.040
<v Speaker 1>the theory everything describe everything that happens in terms of

0:13:01.040 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the smallest, most fundamental units. Well, I think an even

0:13:04.400 --> 0:13:06.640
<v Speaker 1>bigger question is, how do you even know such a

0:13:06.679 --> 0:13:10.240
<v Speaker 1>thing is possible? Like, how do you know that everything

0:13:10.280 --> 0:13:14.320
<v Speaker 1>can be described by one equation or two equations or

0:13:14.360 --> 0:13:18.120
<v Speaker 1>three equations? Right? Like, what makes you think it's possible

0:13:18.120 --> 0:13:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to even understand everything? I know? It seems like hubrists right,

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.719
<v Speaker 1>Like somebody eat a bunch of mushrooms and had a

0:13:23.840 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>vision and now they're like, yes, I saw it, man,

0:13:26.280 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Like the universe makes sense man um Right, So it's

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>either a weed field dream or enormous hubrists um. What

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>makes us think it's possible is that we're making steady progress,

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.240
<v Speaker 1>you know. Um. I think about the way the world

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:42.240
<v Speaker 1>used to be a total mystery to people, you know,

0:13:42.320 --> 0:13:44.840
<v Speaker 1>thousands of years ago, so much about everyday life as

0:13:44.840 --> 0:13:47.400
<v Speaker 1>a mystery. And you know, we've cracked a lot of

0:13:47.400 --> 0:13:49.959
<v Speaker 1>those nuts. You know, everything that we thought was strange

0:13:50.000 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>or mysterious so we had to attribute to some bizarre

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>god with you know, unknown motives. We've understood in terms

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.720
<v Speaker 1>of natural phenomenon that which follow rules. So for some

0:13:59.760 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>rea sas and we don't understand, it appears that the

0:14:02.880 --> 0:14:06.400
<v Speaker 1>universe follows a set of rules. And those rules are

0:14:06.440 --> 0:14:09.600
<v Speaker 1>fairly constant, and so we can discover them by experimenting

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.840
<v Speaker 1>and tinkering and trying stuff. And humans seem to have

0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the capability, the mathematical, the logical, the scientific capability to

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>reveal these rules and then you know, use them for

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.240
<v Speaker 1>good or evil. Right, So you're saying you have faith

0:14:23.280 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in physicists and humans. I have some faith. I mean,

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>look at what look at what we have accomplished, and

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I look upon my great arts, look upon my works,

0:14:33.400 --> 0:14:37.280
<v Speaker 1>he mighty and despair. Now I love that poem Asymandias

0:14:37.280 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 1>because it's both positive and negative. Right, be jealous of

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 1>what I've accomplished, because you are so small, Or if

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>you think you're so great, remember that I was ones

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>great and have now fallen into dust. Um. Yes, So

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe that future physics looks at us and and says

0:14:51.760 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>they accomplished nothing. But I would say, what makes us

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.960
<v Speaker 1>think it's possible is that we're making steady progress. I mean,

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:00.160
<v Speaker 1>the kind of things we understand about the universe now

0:15:00.400 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>are incredible compared to what we understood a hundred years ago,

0:15:03.120 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 1>five years ago, five thousand years ago. But is there

0:15:07.000 --> 0:15:09.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe a limit? And let's get into it. But first

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break. So my favorite thing about

0:15:24.680 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 1>the theory of everything is it's acronym, its initials T

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 1>O E. So really, when you're talking about the theory

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:35.400
<v Speaker 1>of the universe, you're talking about the universe? Is big

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:40.600
<v Speaker 1>toe right? Right? Such a grand idea humbled by its acronym? Yeah? Yeah,

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>not not a great pr move there by physicists. Now

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>we have to find that secret circle of scientists who

0:15:47.600 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>are in charge of naming this stuff, because they got

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>some real work to do. I mean, I got notes,

0:15:51.200 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>let me tell you. I mean, the particles got ridiculous names.

0:15:54.280 --> 0:15:56.600
<v Speaker 1>The theory of everything is a silly name. I don't

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:57.960
<v Speaker 1>even know what the history of it is. Like. Who

0:15:58.000 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>was the first person to say theory of every Yeah?

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that Einstein was one of the first people

0:16:02.560 --> 0:16:04.960
<v Speaker 1>would like, seriously go after it. Of course he didn't

0:16:04.960 --> 0:16:09.520
<v Speaker 1>make much progress. Why not the everything theory? Right? Better

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>everything theory? Yeah? I like that? All right, Um, you

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.400
<v Speaker 1>should file a trademark for that. You'll get one penny

0:16:15.400 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 1>every time somebody says it. We talked about what it

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 1>means to say the theory of everything and what it

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>could be, and what we think when is possible? So

0:16:24.480 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 1>what do we know? Like, why isn't what we know

0:16:26.560 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>now a good theory of everything? What makes us think

0:16:29.400 --> 0:16:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have it yet? Right? Well, we do

0:16:32.320 --> 0:16:34.520
<v Speaker 1>know a lot. We've learned a lot about the universe.

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>And one thing that persuades us that things might be understandable,

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that it might be a simple theory of everything is

0:16:40.760 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that we're making a lot of progresses have been saying.

0:16:43.160 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>But it's more than that. Every time we peel back

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 1>a layer of reality and see what's underneath the description

0:16:48.600 --> 0:16:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that beneath it is simpler, right, Think, the level of

0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>complexity required to describe the universe keeps getting simpler and simpler.

0:16:55.760 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, for example, think about the objects in

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the universe. You want to describe everything in the universe.

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.880
<v Speaker 1>So there's like an infinite number of kinds of things. Right,

0:17:02.920 --> 0:17:06.119
<v Speaker 1>there's gas and stars and hamsters and ice cream and

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:09.239
<v Speaker 1>lamas and cartoonists and all this stuff. And you can

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:11.639
<v Speaker 1>explain all of that using a hundred basic building blocks.

0:17:11.840 --> 0:17:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Periodic table. You can explain the periodic table everything that's

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.639
<v Speaker 1>in that using just quirks and leptons. Right, you can

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.679
<v Speaker 1>build any atom out of out of just quirks and leptons.

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>So the number of pieces you need to describe basically

0:17:24.960 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 1>everything we've encountered keeps getting smaller. So so to me,

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that's progress. You're asking earlier, like why do we think

0:17:31.040 --> 0:17:32.880
<v Speaker 1>it's this is possible? How do we know we get there?

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So we're making this progress, and I feel like, how

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 1>will we know we get there when we get to

0:17:37.800 --> 0:17:41.119
<v Speaker 1>the simplest possible theory, You know, a theory that has

0:17:41.680 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>the smallest number of bits and the smallest number of parameters,

0:17:44.560 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 1>and has no hanging questions, no room to say, well

0:17:48.080 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 1>why this and not that, or why these two different

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.239
<v Speaker 1>things instead of just one thing. So when you can

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:56.120
<v Speaker 1>simplify it no longer, that's how you know you got there.

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So it's kind of about the number of ingredients that

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:00.920
<v Speaker 1>we think things are made out of. Kind of, right,

0:18:00.960 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 1>we went from a hundred elements in the periodic table

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:07.640
<v Speaker 1>of elements to like an electron and small particles. You're

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:11.440
<v Speaker 1>saying that maybe one day will get to one particle. Yeah,

0:18:11.480 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 1>you know what I mean, Like, if you go from

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.480
<v Speaker 1>infinity to a hundred to three, the next step is

0:18:15.640 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>just two and one, right, right? That when the goal

0:18:18.000 --> 0:18:20.400
<v Speaker 1>is to get to one. Right, And the deepest goal

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>in particle physics is to simplify the universe and explain

0:18:23.320 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>it in terms of just one thing. And I've just

0:18:25.119 --> 0:18:27.600
<v Speaker 1>had like a sort of personal epiphany, which is I

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 1>realized that one of the reasons that physics appeals to

0:18:30.240 --> 0:18:32.480
<v Speaker 1>me so much is this attempt to simplify. Like in

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:35.000
<v Speaker 1>my life, I'm always trying to simplify everything, Like, can

0:18:35.040 --> 0:18:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I get this simplify? Can I explain all these two

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 1>different things in terms of just one thing? Can I

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>just send one email to everybody? Is there a rule

0:18:42.320 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>that you know it kind of tells me how to

0:18:43.880 --> 0:18:46.320
<v Speaker 1>live my whole life? How do I respond to a

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>party invite? Or you know, is there a strategy for

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>making small talk and that works in any situation? And

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I love that what you mean, You're you're always trying

0:18:54.359 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to look for the underlying rules something. Yeah, I want

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 1>the theory of every conversation, right, I want to know

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.199
<v Speaker 1>how to handle how to navogate a party conversation, no

0:19:04.200 --> 0:19:07.240
<v Speaker 1>matter what happens. That would be a fantastic theory. Hopefully

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.280
<v Speaker 1>you'll figure it out before you start a podcast or

0:19:09.320 --> 0:19:19.240
<v Speaker 1>something a conversational too late. Is there a basic building

0:19:19.280 --> 0:19:21.960
<v Speaker 1>block of the universe out of which everything is built,

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>because right now we have twelve basic building blocks, so

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>we're definitely not there. Right we have six quarks and

0:19:29.600 --> 0:19:33.119
<v Speaker 1>six leftons. Only three of those twelve particles are ever

0:19:33.240 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 1>used to make atoms, and those twelve particles don't even

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>describe like the dark matter and everything else that's out

0:19:38.359 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>there in the universe. So not only do we know

0:19:40.920 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 1>there are other particles that we haven't discovered, but we

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:45.960
<v Speaker 1>also have questions about these particles, like why are there

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 1>so many? It would be great to narrow that down.

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So you're saying that we think there might be a

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:53.160
<v Speaker 1>theory of everything because there's plenty of still stuff still

0:19:53.200 --> 0:19:56.880
<v Speaker 1>left to explain, basically, right, like, we're not there yet

0:19:57.200 --> 0:19:59.520
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot we haven't explained. That's right, we're

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>not there yet, and we've been making steady progress and

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.320
<v Speaker 1>at every stage things get simpler, and so we suspect

0:20:05.520 --> 0:20:07.840
<v Speaker 1>that if we keep cracking the nut, then we'll get

0:20:07.880 --> 0:20:11.280
<v Speaker 1>simpler and simpler nuts. Until eventually maybe we'll get down

0:20:11.320 --> 0:20:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to the one thing that it built everything else is

0:20:13.480 --> 0:20:16.479
<v Speaker 1>built out of, and that would explain everything the peanut

0:20:16.520 --> 0:20:21.240
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. God, if we find that particle and

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>so many names at peanut, I'm gonna blame you for

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that horrid that's right, it's because then there's going to

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.479
<v Speaker 1>be the anti peanut, you know, um peanut on I um,

0:20:30.800 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>you know bound states of peanuts and oh man, it's

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:35.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a disaster. But you know that's not the

0:20:36.000 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 1>whole story. Right. There's particles, but there's then there's also forces.

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>So what do you think a theory of everything would

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:44.160
<v Speaker 1>look like? Like, Like, it'd be like everything is made

0:20:44.200 --> 0:20:47.440
<v Speaker 1>out of the peanut, and the peanut can be form

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.440
<v Speaker 1>an electron if it stacks up this way, or it

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>can form a cork if it stacks up this other way.

0:20:53.400 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Basically like the idea of the peanut and how it

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:57.800
<v Speaker 1>stacks up and how it gives rise to everything we

0:20:57.840 --> 0:20:59.600
<v Speaker 1>see around this. That would be sort of like the

0:20:59.600 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 1>theory of everything. Yeah. Well, the current form what we

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>use for to describe the deepest level of nature that

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.080
<v Speaker 1>we currently know is quantum field theory and quantum field

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:11.720
<v Speaker 1>theory works by describing the fields and the way the

0:21:11.760 --> 0:21:14.960
<v Speaker 1>fields interact with each other. So the fields give us

0:21:15.000 --> 0:21:17.880
<v Speaker 1>the particles, because particles are excited states of these fields.

0:21:18.160 --> 0:21:19.919
<v Speaker 1>And then the way the fields interact with us give

0:21:20.000 --> 0:21:23.239
<v Speaker 1>us forces. And so currently you can describe everything we

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:26.119
<v Speaker 1>know about particle physics just by describing these fields and

0:21:26.400 --> 0:21:28.320
<v Speaker 1>how they interact with each other, and so that we

0:21:28.320 --> 0:21:31.000
<v Speaker 1>can write down in a single equation it's called the Lagrangin,

0:21:31.440 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and from that lagrange and we can derive all the

0:21:34.040 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>rules of how everything works, how everything interacts with each other,

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and from that you get electrons and quirks and atoms.

0:21:39.359 --> 0:21:42.439
<v Speaker 1>That everything comes from this one equation, the Lagrangin. But

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of course their problems with it. As we said earlier,

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:46.919
<v Speaker 1>there's a bunch of different kinds of fields, you know,

0:21:46.960 --> 0:21:50.240
<v Speaker 1>which generate all these different particles, and not everything is

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:53.240
<v Speaker 1>described by this lagrangin. So that's what it would look like,

0:21:53.280 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>I think if it turns out that quantum fields are

0:21:56.440 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 1>the fundamental building block of the universe. But you know,

0:21:58.920 --> 0:22:01.919
<v Speaker 1>we don't nobody he believe that. But aren't aren't we

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:06.560
<v Speaker 1>saying that maybe there's just one field that maybe results

0:22:06.560 --> 0:22:09.080
<v Speaker 1>in these other multiple fields, that's right, or like these

0:22:09.119 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 1>these other fields are just combinations of maybe one fundamental

0:22:12.640 --> 0:22:16.240
<v Speaker 1>field exactly. If quantum field theory is the right way

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to think about the universe, then a theory of everything

0:22:19.040 --> 0:22:21.600
<v Speaker 1>as a quantum field theory would be a single field. Yeah,

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and it could interact with itself, and that could give

0:22:23.880 --> 0:22:26.639
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of interesting stuff. In coming up with quantum

0:22:26.640 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>field theories, we've made a lot of progress and bringing

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 1>together lots of different kinds of things to describe them

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of just one thing. You know. For example,

0:22:34.960 --> 0:22:38.639
<v Speaker 1>we used to think of electricity and magnetism is completely

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>different things. You know. Electricity was like zapping stuff, and

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.480
<v Speaker 1>magnetism was these weird rocks that pushed away each other

0:22:44.560 --> 0:22:48.200
<v Speaker 1>or attracted each other. Until people figured out, oh, actually

0:22:48.440 --> 0:22:51.600
<v Speaker 1>electricity and magnetism are two sides of the same coin.

0:22:51.640 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>They go hand in hand. They're like the same field. Yeah,

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.040
<v Speaker 1>they're just two parts of that. There are two manifestations

0:22:57.080 --> 0:22:59.879
<v Speaker 1>of the same field. Right, So they go us to

0:23:00.000 --> 0:23:02.240
<v Speaker 1>it down to like a theory with one field. It's

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 1>called the peanut field. And alright, alright, alright, I'm on

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:12.960
<v Speaker 1>board with the peanut field. Let's do it let's describe

0:23:12.960 --> 0:23:14.800
<v Speaker 1>the universe into So we got the peanut and we

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>got the toe. We got the mixed metaphors forhead the

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>universe a peanut or is it a toe? Maybe you

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:26.600
<v Speaker 1>can eat peanuts with your toes and then you wouldn't

0:23:26.600 --> 0:23:29.880
<v Speaker 1>eat slocks. So hey, that solves all of our problems.

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:32.119
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave folks with that visual and then take a

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:48.440
<v Speaker 1>quick break while you think about eating peanuts with your toes. Alright,

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 1>So we were talking about the theory of everything, and

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>currently we have quantum fields, and we were saying that

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>the theory of everything, if it was described using quantum fields,

0:23:56.640 --> 0:23:59.240
<v Speaker 1>would be a single field, and that field would generate

0:23:59.280 --> 0:24:01.240
<v Speaker 1>all the particles because they would be excited states of

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that field, and it would describe the way those particles

0:24:04.000 --> 0:24:07.040
<v Speaker 1>interact with each other and and form other sorts of

0:24:07.080 --> 0:24:09.760
<v Speaker 1>bound states, which would be more complex things like electrons,

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:12.680
<v Speaker 1>and everything would be made out of these one fundamental

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:15.600
<v Speaker 1>particle which came from this field, the peanut, the peanut

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>field exactly. Yes, what's interesting is that you're saying that

0:24:19.560 --> 0:24:22.040
<v Speaker 1>even if we have LATA in the future twenty years

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>from now, um, you know, I discovered the peanut field

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and it describes the other all the other fields that

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we know about. Right now, you're saying, we still wouldn't

0:24:30.440 --> 0:24:32.920
<v Speaker 1>know if that was it, if that was like the

0:24:33.000 --> 0:24:35.840
<v Speaker 1>ultimate theory. Well, it's hard to know for sure when

0:24:35.840 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>you're done, something is the ultimate theory, right, I mean,

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>say we have the peanut field, and it solves all

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the open problems in physics and Jorgego's and collects like

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 1>five Nobel Prizes for discovering this thing. Right. It unifies

0:24:46.119 --> 0:24:49.159
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanics and gravity, and it explains everything we know

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and dark matter and all that stuff. It tells what's

0:24:51.920 --> 0:24:55.000
<v Speaker 1>what happened at the Big Bang, right exactly whether we're

0:24:55.000 --> 0:24:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in a multiverse, right, and this is totally possible. Right.

0:24:58.040 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>But then you have that theory you write on a

0:24:59.600 --> 0:25:03.280
<v Speaker 1>piece of paper, and you're gonna have questions about that theory, right,

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:05.800
<v Speaker 1>Like say, for example, the theory has a number in it,

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:09.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, because all of all of our theories currently

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:11.400
<v Speaker 1>have numbers in it, you know, like speed of light,

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.679
<v Speaker 1>or there's basic physical units, but there's also sometimes just

0:25:14.760 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>numbers like one or four or two or pie or whatever,

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.400
<v Speaker 1>and you have to wonder, like what do those numbers mean?

0:25:20.440 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Do those numbers reveal something deep about the universe, right, Like,

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.200
<v Speaker 1>if your peanut theory has the number you know, five

0:25:27.280 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>in it, then that tells you that the universe is

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally like five ish in some way. And what does

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that mean? And that's a question, right, like why does

0:25:35.200 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the theory of the everything have the number five in it? Yeah,

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:40.359
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have to have a number. What if my theory

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:42.719
<v Speaker 1>is so pure and amazing and abstract that it just

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have any numbers in it, right, exactly, So your

0:25:45.240 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>peanut theory has the number five in it. And then

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:50.119
<v Speaker 1>a few years later some cleroscientists comes along with her

0:25:50.160 --> 0:25:53.719
<v Speaker 1>theory that has no arbitrary numbers in it, right, and

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.640
<v Speaker 1>she's like, actually, my theory is simpler than professor Jorges theory,

0:25:58.160 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and so um, he's got to deliver me all of

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:03.359
<v Speaker 1>his Nobel prizes. And so you know, that's how we

0:26:03.480 --> 0:26:06.400
<v Speaker 1>judge theories. We judge them by their simplicity. And that's

0:26:06.400 --> 0:26:08.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of what I was talking about earlier, Like it's

0:26:08.160 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>our human desire to explain the universe in terms of

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>a simple set of rules. Right. Maybe aliens think about

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>things differently and they don't look for one single equation

0:26:18.160 --> 0:26:20.879
<v Speaker 1>to describe everything, or a simplest equation, or maybe what

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.720
<v Speaker 1>they what they think is beautiful is a huge chaotic

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>mess of an equation and for some reason that really

0:26:26.040 --> 0:26:29.680
<v Speaker 1>satisfies their itch to understand the universe. Right, I think

0:26:29.720 --> 0:26:33.480
<v Speaker 1>there must be something deeply human about this whole process,

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's a bias we can't see because we've only

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.320
<v Speaker 1>ever talked to humans about it. Interesting, like maybe aliens

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>are happy with this crazy theory that explains where socks

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:45.360
<v Speaker 1>are and you know, do you know what I mean?

0:26:45.400 --> 0:26:48.600
<v Speaker 1>Like it's not reductive, it's maybe just like super complicated

0:26:49.080 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>because its all the little things exactly that could be

0:26:52.359 --> 0:26:53.959
<v Speaker 1>It could very well be, and they could be like,

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.080
<v Speaker 1>you guys are totally wasting your time. I don't even

0:26:56.119 --> 0:26:59.800
<v Speaker 1>know why you care. Right, And you know, there's another

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:02.359
<v Speaker 1>stability and we haven't even talked about, which is that

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:04.720
<v Speaker 1>there is no deepest level. Right. It could be that

0:27:04.800 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>it goes on forever. Things just get smaller and smaller,

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:09.840
<v Speaker 1>and like particle A is made out a little bits

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:11.920
<v Speaker 1>of B and and then you can make bees out

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:13.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of C, and C is made a

0:27:13.480 --> 0:27:15.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit of D and Okay, so I shouldn't be

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Particle Physics pr name and Committee obviously because

0:27:18.080 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>I can't come up with clever stuff on the top

0:27:19.600 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of my head. But it could just go on forever,

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>then wouldn't it stop at P for peanut? Absolutely? What

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean is what could be smaller than the unit one?

0:27:30.359 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean? Like, what could be more

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamental at one than one field and one particle? You

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>can't split one. Right. If you discover at some level

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>that everything the universe could be described in terms of

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>one field, that's great. But where does that field come from? Right?

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.359
<v Speaker 1>Is that field the fundamental thing in the university? Was

0:27:47.400 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>like the first thing made and first thing coded in

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the simulation? Or is it itself an emergent phenomena from

0:27:53.960 --> 0:27:56.359
<v Speaker 1>something simpler. Just because there's only one kind of particle

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.639
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean it's not made out of little bits of

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:01.520
<v Speaker 1>another kind of particle, Right, It could be made out

0:28:01.560 --> 0:28:04.439
<v Speaker 1>of two halves or something else. Yeah, exactly, you know

0:28:04.560 --> 0:28:08.880
<v Speaker 1>two units of sub peanuts, you know, um that come

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 1>together to make the glorious peanut. Or you're saying it

0:28:11.320 --> 0:28:14.119
<v Speaker 1>could be sort of infinitely divisible, you mean, like you know,

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>like peanut butter, like maybe the universe doesn't have a

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:21.720
<v Speaker 1>peanut in the middle. It's just this continuous, yummy smooth.

0:28:23.320 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 1>I think in the future you should have lunch before

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 1>we record these podcasts. Um. Yeah, it could be right,

0:28:31.600 --> 0:28:34.639
<v Speaker 1>It certainly could be. Although it seems so far everything

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we understand about the universe is that it seems to

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.360
<v Speaker 1>be quantized. You know that it's the smallest level. Everything

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>is quantized. So we think that particles or quantized excitations

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 1>of quantum fields um ruled the day. But you know,

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>it couldn't be that as you get deeper that you

0:28:49.440 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>get some sort of scale invariant matter that looks the

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:55.040
<v Speaker 1>same no matter how close you get up to it, right,

0:28:55.080 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that it doesn't resolve into tiny little bits. It's just

0:28:57.720 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>infinitely smooth. Yeah, that could totally be a post ability. Well,

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.200
<v Speaker 1>you're going to do an interesting idea a little bit before,

0:29:04.280 --> 0:29:06.800
<v Speaker 1>which is, why do we even want the theory of everything?

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:09.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it really going to help us cure cancer or

0:29:10.000 --> 0:29:11.800
<v Speaker 1>is it really going to solve global warming? If we

0:29:11.880 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>figure out these super quantum fields, what's motivating us as

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:18.640
<v Speaker 1>a species to look for these simplifications. I can't believe

0:29:18.760 --> 0:29:23.320
<v Speaker 1>that an artist, a cartoonist is demanding practical, immediate benefits

0:29:23.360 --> 0:29:27.600
<v Speaker 1>for my for my profession. And excuse me, you didn't

0:29:27.600 --> 0:29:30.040
<v Speaker 1>even mention the possibility that there could be like a

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.719
<v Speaker 1>deep human need to understand. You know that it adds

0:29:33.840 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the experience of being human to reveal mysteries of the universe. Right,

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:40.720
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't need to necessarily give you a better widget, right,

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 1>or cure cancer. It's just for me at least. It's

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>a deep desire to understand the world around me. I mean,

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if it comes out of evolutionary desires

0:29:48.760 --> 0:29:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to understand how things work so I can like better

0:29:51.160 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>protect myself from a saber tooth tier or something. But

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>humans have a deep desire to understand the way things work,

0:29:56.520 --> 0:29:59.560
<v Speaker 1>to reveal the rules and manipulate them. And so I

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:01.800
<v Speaker 1>just really want to understand. And you know, of course

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:05.600
<v Speaker 1>along the way, like funding for basic research has always

0:30:05.680 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>yielded tremendous technological advancements. I mean, we wouldn't be recorded

0:30:09.480 --> 0:30:12.400
<v Speaker 1>as podcast if it wasn't for funding for basic research.

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>So I can sing the praises of basic research um

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:20.120
<v Speaker 1>for decades because of all the spinoff it's generated incidentally accidentally, right,

0:30:20.200 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>not intentionally, but fundamentally. The reason we want to do

0:30:23.360 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 1>is just because we have this deep desire to know right,

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to understand the way the universe works. I mean, if

0:30:29.120 --> 0:30:32.040
<v Speaker 1>somebody told you, hey, Jorree, I have the theory of everything,

0:30:32.200 --> 0:30:33.719
<v Speaker 1>do you want to know it? You wouldn't be like

0:30:34.120 --> 0:30:37.280
<v Speaker 1>past off, I'm I'm busy making a peanut butter sandwich. Right,

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that would be an important moment, that would be like

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a deep thing to understand. So we've made a lot

0:30:45.040 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of progress and understand the theory of everything. You know, Um,

0:30:48.120 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we have boiled down matter into twelve particles. We have

0:30:53.080 --> 0:30:55.640
<v Speaker 1>described all the forces in terms of just a few.

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, we unified electricity and magnetism, and then we

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 1>also unified that with the weak nuclear force. We have

0:31:01.200 --> 0:31:04.240
<v Speaker 1>one force is called the electro weak force that describes

0:31:04.440 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 1>electricity and magnetism and the weak force. We still have

0:31:08.160 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>the strong nuclear force, which we haven't understood how to

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>put together with the other ones, right, and then we

0:31:13.640 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>still have gravity, which is a whole other mystery. We

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.960
<v Speaker 1>can talk about a whole other podcast, which resists all

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:21.480
<v Speaker 1>efforts to give it a quantum description and unify it

0:31:21.520 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>with everything. And even Einstein was not able to bring

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:27.640
<v Speaker 1>gravity to heal um. And then of course there's lots

0:31:27.640 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>of things in the universe we don't understand which are

0:31:29.480 --> 0:31:32.240
<v Speaker 1>not described by these bits. So we made a lot

0:31:32.280 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 1>of progress in understanding, but we still have a lot

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to go. So your basic message is keep physicists employed.

0:31:38.400 --> 0:31:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that the kind of that's right funding into physics, Yes, exactly,

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:46.320
<v Speaker 1>it's worthwhile. People got a long way to go. People

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:48.600
<v Speaker 1>think that we scientists have everything figured out, you know,

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 1>we can know these amazing phones and amazing technologies and

0:31:53.120 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>airplanes and rockets. You know, people sort of assumed that

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.400
<v Speaker 1>why why do we need more physics, but there could

0:31:59.440 --> 0:32:02.840
<v Speaker 1>be a whole lot of amazing things ahead of us, right, yeah, exactly.

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know folks a thousand years ago who were

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:07.880
<v Speaker 1>surrounded by mysteries, there are lot of opportunities that ever

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:10.680
<v Speaker 1>scientists to explain the way things work. These days, it's

0:32:10.680 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty unusual if you walk down the street for you

0:32:13.200 --> 0:32:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to see something that you don't think has a scientific explanation, right, Like,

0:32:17.280 --> 0:32:20.240
<v Speaker 1>very few people see miracles or ghosts or things that

0:32:20.280 --> 0:32:23.160
<v Speaker 1>they think are outside of the realm of science. And

0:32:23.200 --> 0:32:24.800
<v Speaker 1>that used to be every day, and now it's like

0:32:24.840 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty rare. I mean people go to magic shows just

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to have that experience, right, Um, but but there are

0:32:31.360 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 1>lots of things that we still don't understand. There're are

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 1>things that appear in your everyday life there at the

0:32:35.360 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>particle level or the tiny little level, or the cosmic scale.

0:32:39.040 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>But there are huge questions about the universe that we

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 1>we still have to unravel. All right, Well, I hope

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:48.600
<v Speaker 1>you guys enjoyed dipping your toes into this topic. Yeah,

0:32:48.680 --> 0:32:51.840
<v Speaker 1>we hope you enjoyed this slice of everything and peanuts

0:32:51.960 --> 0:32:55.080
<v Speaker 1>and peanut butter, the peanut butter theory of the universe.

0:32:55.360 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>It's spreading. It's really jiffy. Come see you next time.

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening. If you still have a question after

0:33:14.480 --> 0:33:17.600
<v Speaker 1>listening to all these explanations, please drop us a line.

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:19.800
<v Speaker 1>We'd love to hear from you. You can find us

0:33:19.800 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>at Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram at Daniel and Jorge that's

0:33:23.640 --> 0:33:27.040
<v Speaker 1>one word, or email us at Feedback at Daniel and

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:37.280
<v Speaker 1>Jorge dot com.