WEBVTT - This Is What Happens if the US Actually Hits the Debt Ceiling

0:00:10.160 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the ad Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and Joe uh debt ceiling. Oh, I'm

0:00:19.280 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>so excited we're doing a trillion dollar coin episode. I

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>knew you were going to say that and to annoy me. Yes,

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>this is not an episode on the trillion dollar coin.

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>If you are interested in that particular piece of um

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:39.959
<v Speaker 1>finance thought experiment, you can check out our previous episode

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 1>on the topic. I think it was over an hour long,

0:00:43.320 --> 0:00:47.239
<v Speaker 1>all about the trillion dollar coin. Yeah, okay, check out

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that episode if you want to talk about the trillion

0:00:48.920 --> 0:00:51.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar coin. But today we're going to be discussing something

0:00:51.560 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>slightly different. We are going to be talking about what

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:59.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly happens if the US actually does default, right, because

0:00:59.760 --> 0:01:02.800
<v Speaker 1>if there's like just a lot of uncertainty about this

0:01:03.080 --> 0:01:05.800
<v Speaker 1>question of like okay, like what happens if they don't

0:01:05.840 --> 0:01:09.319
<v Speaker 1>raise the dead ceiling? And what are the constraints, what

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:11.880
<v Speaker 1>are the various things that could happen, Like how bad

0:01:11.920 --> 0:01:14.199
<v Speaker 1>would it be if we actually, like didn't pay the debt?

0:01:14.600 --> 0:01:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Does the White House have ability to pay some debt

0:01:18.360 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>but not others? Like it's pretty uncertain, Like it seems

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:25.040
<v Speaker 1>bad right, like it is lame and defaulting was bad.

0:01:25.360 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Russia default was bad, and Russia is like this like tiny?

0:01:29.800 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>You know how big was russia debt nothing? So like

0:01:34.000 --> 0:01:38.520
<v Speaker 1>it is a moving feast of uncertainty, like a twirling

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>whirlwind of chaos and uncertainty and open questions over exactly

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 1>what happens. And there are all these moving parts. I

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>think we really need to sit down and discuss them

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>and kind of talk about it in an almost sequential way,

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.800
<v Speaker 1>like this is what happens if this happens, and then

0:01:54.840 --> 0:01:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that happens. So we really do have the perfect guest

0:01:58.400 --> 0:02:00.680
<v Speaker 1>for this. We're going to be speaking with Joe Perks

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:03.840
<v Speaker 1>and add thoughts favorite of course, he is also global

0:02:03.960 --> 0:02:07.800
<v Speaker 1>macro strategist over at Bespoke Investment Groups. So George, thank

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you so much for coming back on all thoughts. Hey all,

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me. Let's start with the basics, since

0:02:14.240 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about this as a sort of primer episode

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>on the debt ceiling and the debt limit. When we

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:24.799
<v Speaker 1>talk about limits on US debt, what do we mean exactly?

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>So the US is really unique in a very frustrating

0:02:28.720 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 1>way in that not only do we have restraints on

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>spending in terms of Congress authorizing and the President signing

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:40.560
<v Speaker 1>into law bills that create government spending um and then

0:02:40.560 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>appropriations processes after that, you know, throughout the year, we

0:02:44.880 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>also have this break on the total amount of debt

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that can be issued. So Congress can at the same

0:02:51.520 --> 0:02:56.160
<v Speaker 1>time instruct the government bureaucracies to go out and spend money,

0:02:56.200 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>but at the same time say, oh, well, you can't

0:02:58.160 --> 0:03:01.120
<v Speaker 1>actually issue debt to you that spending we've told you

0:03:01.160 --> 0:03:03.000
<v Speaker 1>to do. And oh, by the way, you can't collect

0:03:03.000 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 1>anymore in taxes because we also control that and we've

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>told you the amount you can collect in taxes. So

0:03:07.240 --> 0:03:10.960
<v Speaker 1>it's this contradiction in terms of instructions to the executive

0:03:10.960 --> 0:03:14.920
<v Speaker 1>branch and to various federal government bureaucracies from Congress and

0:03:14.960 --> 0:03:17.360
<v Speaker 1>from the President, and it's it's a thing that's been

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>around in US politics for a long time. But you know,

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I think the most important thing to understand about it

0:03:23.200 --> 0:03:26.079
<v Speaker 1>is that it's just it's nonsensical. It doesn't make sense

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>for there to be this extra restraint on top of

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the existing safeguards against you know, in a representative democracy

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>where people are elected and then they authorize the spending

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of the population. We also have this thing

0:03:39.400 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>where there's a debt, there's a debt limit that that

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>serves as sort of a secondary veto point on government spending.

0:03:45.880 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>Defenders of the debt ceiling law would say, look, kind

0:03:49.720 --> 0:03:52.120
<v Speaker 1>of that's true, but it is good to have this

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>debate every couple of years about our level of indebtedness.

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:59.840
<v Speaker 1>This can be used as a break of sorts for

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>or constraining spending. In the Dead Ceiling fight, there really

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:08.120
<v Speaker 1>was cuts and the cuts to the growth of federal spending.

0:04:08.520 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're saying, like, okay, like this is like

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the sort of like maddening law makes no sense. Does

0:04:13.720 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the dead ceiling have a history of like being used

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 1>to sort of regroup and retrain our thoughts about how

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>much we're spending. The short answer is no. And I

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.880
<v Speaker 1>think that the more consistent way to think about it

0:04:24.920 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>historically is that it's used by one factionum or another

0:04:30.120 --> 0:04:33.000
<v Speaker 1>in US politics against whoever happens to sort of be

0:04:33.360 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the party in control. So you know, this is this

0:04:35.880 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>is a bi partisan thing. It's used both ways. Both

0:04:37.720 --> 0:04:40.119
<v Speaker 1>parties have declined to get rid of the dead ceiling

0:04:40.120 --> 0:04:42.479
<v Speaker 1>on a permanent basis when they've been empowered. So I

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:44.520
<v Speaker 1>don't mean to say that this is a red versus

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>blue you know, one side an abuser of this versus

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>the other. But what it does is it just it

0:04:49.320 --> 0:04:52.919
<v Speaker 1>creates a veto point and allows the legislative minority to

0:04:52.960 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>extract what it wants from or some of what it

0:04:55.440 --> 0:04:59.440
<v Speaker 1>wants from the legislative majority. Now that's not necessarily the

0:04:59.520 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>end of the w old, but there are a couple

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of things to think about here. First, the U S

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:05.600
<v Speaker 1>system of government is already full of veto points, right,

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>whether it's process of buils through committees, process of builds

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.320
<v Speaker 1>through the House, process of builds through the Senate, judicial

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:14.720
<v Speaker 1>checks on all that, the executive branch, the high requirement

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:16.520
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate to sign things in the law. There

0:05:16.520 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>are some exceptions, but basically you need a supermajority in

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>the Senate to get things signed in the law. So

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.600
<v Speaker 1>there's just we have a replete number of veto points,

0:05:23.640 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 1>adding you know, just one more. The benefits are pretty

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 1>negligible even if you agree that that. You know, controlling

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:33.840
<v Speaker 1>the debts size is a super important public policy goal.

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't happen to agree with that, but let's take

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that as given. Even then, there are costs associated with

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:40.839
<v Speaker 1>this that that are very real. And the cost is

0:05:41.240 --> 0:05:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the credibility of the U. S is ability to pay

0:05:43.320 --> 0:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>its debts on time in full. And you know, there

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:49.719
<v Speaker 1>are real questions about the United States Treasuries ability to

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 1>settle out coupon and interest payments on debt, let alone,

0:05:53.120 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>payments to Social Security recipients, payments to government contractors, government employeescetera, etcetera.

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:01.560
<v Speaker 1>This year because of this death ceiling being present. And

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>again I think it's really important to emphasize debt ceiling

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.120
<v Speaker 1>being present. Even though those payments, all those payments that

0:06:07.160 --> 0:06:09.160
<v Speaker 1>are set to go out, all the spending, all the

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>payments that are set to come into the treasury and

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.479
<v Speaker 1>formed taxes, all of that has already been approved by Congress.

0:06:13.640 --> 0:06:16.080
<v Speaker 1>The debt ceiling is a secondary approval's process that has

0:06:16.120 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with keeping a lid on on spending

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>in a direct sense. So, George, you you just set

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.000
<v Speaker 1>out the stakes kind of perfectly there. But talk to us.

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>You also mentioned the treasury. Talk to us about extraordinary measures,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>because the U. S. Treasury has already said that it's

0:06:34.400 --> 0:06:38.120
<v Speaker 1>started to take these extraordinary measures in order to meet

0:06:38.480 --> 0:06:41.960
<v Speaker 1>its obligations because we have in fact already exceeded that

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:45.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty one point four trillion dollar or whatever it is

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>borrowing limit. What are the extraordinary measures and how do

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>they actually play out here? So there are a variety

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>of things that go into the extraordinary measures behind the scenes.

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the simplest way to think about it is

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:02.800
<v Speaker 1>changing timing of payments and sort of where there's flexibility

0:07:02.880 --> 0:07:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to defer payments or to pay them, you know, without

0:07:06.760 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>issuing debts, to wait for new payments to new tax

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>payments to come in before sending out existing payments. That's

0:07:12.360 --> 0:07:14.920
<v Speaker 1>one way to think about it. The most important thing, though,

0:07:15.200 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 1>is spending down the balance that's recorded in the Treasury

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>General account at the Federal Reserve. So the Federal Reserve

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>is the United States Treasuries fiscal agent, which basically means

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.120
<v Speaker 1>that that payments are being made via the feed. So

0:07:29.440 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>if you're if you're the Treasury, you don't have a

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>checking account at a private bank. You have a checking

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.960
<v Speaker 1>account at the Fed. There are ways in which the

0:07:38.040 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>government is nothing like household, but in terms of access

0:07:41.520 --> 0:07:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to a checking account, that is one way the government

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>is like a household. There is a account at the

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Fed again called the Treasury General Account that is essentially

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>a cash balance, a balance available for payments that is

0:07:53.360 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>used to settle payments owed by the Treasury to other

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>individuals or entities throughout the economy. And what the Treasury

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>has been able to do since whether they're able to

0:08:03.920 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>do it beforehand, but what if they've done as a

0:08:05.760 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>matter of course since, is build up this this Treasure

0:08:09.360 --> 0:08:12.480
<v Speaker 1>General Account in the period leading up to debt ceiling

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:16.920
<v Speaker 1>limits being reached, because that allows for flexibility over the

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:20.040
<v Speaker 1>subsequent months. Basically, if you know that you're going to

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>be without a paycheck for a couple of months, you

0:08:21.920 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>save some cash away and your checking account. You're not

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>going to buy a long term investment with it because

0:08:25.720 --> 0:08:27.200
<v Speaker 1>you know you'll need it, but you'll have a little

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:29.240
<v Speaker 1>balance in your checking account, and then when your paycheck

0:08:29.280 --> 0:08:30.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't come through, you can still pay your rent for

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:32.319
<v Speaker 1>a couple of months. You can't do it indefinitely, but

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you have this sort of cushion there, and that's sort

0:08:34.400 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>of what the charge of General Account spend down is

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>and that's the core of extraordinary measures that that allows

0:08:39.160 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury to continue to make all the payments it's

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:45.800
<v Speaker 1>mandated to buy law, you know, whether that's UH payments

0:08:45.840 --> 0:08:51.480
<v Speaker 1>to contractors, payments to employees, payments to beneficiaries, whatever, payments

0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:54.240
<v Speaker 1>to holders of the national debt. All those can continue

0:08:54.240 --> 0:08:56.160
<v Speaker 1>to go out the door as normal, in part because

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 1>there's this cash balance at the t g A that's

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>being spent down. Okay, we have these sort of like

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:03.280
<v Speaker 1>they're called extraordinary measures, but they're not like that weird.

0:09:03.320 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 1>They're like little like they're more like, you know, short

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>term cash management techniques that allow the government to make

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>its obligations for a few extra months. Let's talk about like, okay,

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.280
<v Speaker 1>when those run out, what happens? Like where where do

0:09:18.400 --> 0:09:20.439
<v Speaker 1>things stand? You know? People talk, I don't know, like

0:09:20.960 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>what is your estimate for when like the sort of

0:09:23.720 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>real debt limit is right when we no longer have

0:09:26.640 --> 0:09:29.719
<v Speaker 1>these sort of drop dead Yeah, so the X date

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 1>the drop dead date? Talk about like what happens as

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:35.640
<v Speaker 1>we get closer to that. I so, I personally don't

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:37.760
<v Speaker 1>think my estimate is any better than what we've heard

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 1>from charity or from the Secretary Treasury yelling, she says

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.200
<v Speaker 1>June five, this sort of her best estimate, but one,

0:09:44.240 --> 0:09:46.160
<v Speaker 1>It's important to understand that she described it as having

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>considerable uncertainty. So, for instance, if we have a really

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:52.079
<v Speaker 1>really strong tax collection season or really really weak tax

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.400
<v Speaker 1>collection season over the next three months, that's going to

0:09:54.480 --> 0:09:56.760
<v Speaker 1>have big implications for the timing here, right, just because

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a huge percentage of cash flows in and out of

0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury take lace over over tax season. So you know,

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:04.880
<v Speaker 1>there's just all sorts of uncertainties. Also, private sector of

0:10:04.920 --> 0:10:07.760
<v Speaker 1>visibility is is not great into all the timing of

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>payments in there and their size. So I'll just make

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that you know, I think sometime in May June is

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:15.199
<v Speaker 1>probably the right way to think about it. Um, late mate,

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.679
<v Speaker 1>early June, we'll we'll hit this drop dead day where

0:10:18.320 --> 0:10:21.120
<v Speaker 1>essentially there are more payments being requested from the Treasury

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.200
<v Speaker 1>than there is cash balance plus payments being made to

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the Treasury. At that point, I think it's important to

0:10:26.440 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 1>stress that we don't actually know what's going to happen.

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Nobody knows. There may be Treasury bureaucrats somewhere that know, um,

0:10:32.000 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 1>but for all intents and purposes, they're they're not saying anything,

0:10:35.559 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>and we we can't really be sure the I think

0:10:38.880 --> 0:10:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the most popular in terms of like people saying, well,

0:10:41.320 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 1>why don't you just do this option is something called prioritization,

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>which is to make some payments and not others. So

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>what does that look like? For instance, if the Treasury

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>sees that they have a payment due to the holder

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>of a long term Treasury bond, they will make that

0:10:53.960 --> 0:10:56.280
<v Speaker 1>coupon payment, but they won't necessarily make a payment to,

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:59.440
<v Speaker 1>for instance, employees of the federal government for their paycheck.

0:11:00.040 --> 0:11:02.680
<v Speaker 1>How you assign a matrix of sort of like who

0:11:02.720 --> 0:11:05.079
<v Speaker 1>gets paid and who doesn't get paid in that scenario

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:08.840
<v Speaker 1>is a super fraught political question that deserves a lot

0:11:08.920 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>of discussion. It's all hypothetical because the Treasury has said, well,

0:11:12.840 --> 0:11:15.080
<v Speaker 1>we can't actually do this, We don't have the technical

0:11:15.120 --> 0:11:18.079
<v Speaker 1>abilities to do this. Now, they may be bluffing when

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 1>they say that one way to sort of get a

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:22.720
<v Speaker 1>better outcome around the death ceiling from the Treasury's perspective,

0:11:22.760 --> 0:11:24.679
<v Speaker 1>because if you're the bureaucrats of the Treasury, what you

0:11:24.720 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 1>care about is just being able to do what Congress

0:11:26.720 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 1>has told you to do in terms of making payments

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:30.800
<v Speaker 1>in and out of the Treasure General account. You don't

0:11:30.840 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>really care about the political fight. You just want to

0:11:33.360 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>do your job, and from that perspective, Treasury has signaled

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:40.320
<v Speaker 1>quite aggressively, Look, we cannot do prioritization. So if if

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:42.040
<v Speaker 1>we hit the X date, then we're not gonna be

0:11:42.080 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 1>able to say, oh, make this payment but not that payment.

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Whether that's true or whether that's sort of signaling in

0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>a game that makes default very very costly for whoever

0:11:49.720 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>lets it happen is an unclear thing, like like one.

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:56.520
<v Speaker 1>One possible explanation is that Treasury is saying that as

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>a way to signal to, for instance, congressional Republicans that hey,

0:11:59.679 --> 0:12:01.959
<v Speaker 1>y'all can't do this or it's gonna be really really bad.

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:06.439
<v Speaker 1>If Treasury is being honest around prioritization, and again I

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:08.240
<v Speaker 1>don't have any insight, and you know, I don't have

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>a way to say like, oh, they're not being honest,

0:12:10.160 --> 0:12:13.359
<v Speaker 1>but it's definitely possible that they're. They're sort of presenting

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:16.040
<v Speaker 1>a reality that's a little bit less the case than

0:12:16.200 --> 0:12:19.320
<v Speaker 1>is other than than it really is. But assuming they're

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:23.160
<v Speaker 1>being honest, then when Treasury runs out of cash, you

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:26.280
<v Speaker 1>come to this second scenario called a general default, and

0:12:26.360 --> 0:12:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that is basically saying we're not going to make any

0:12:28.480 --> 0:12:30.760
<v Speaker 1>payments to anybody because everyone's on an equal footing. We

0:12:30.760 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>can't tell payments apart, and we are just not going

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>to make payments until the debt ceiling is lifted. That

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:40.840
<v Speaker 1>would be enormously disruptive and would obviously involve an outright

0:12:40.880 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>default on certain US securities. There would probably be make goals,

0:12:44.000 --> 0:12:46.160
<v Speaker 1>but there would be a default. There would also be

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a default on everything from Social Security checks to government

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.560
<v Speaker 1>employe paychecks. The military wouldn't get paid, Military contractors don't

0:12:51.600 --> 0:12:54.959
<v Speaker 1>get paid, any government contractor would get paid. Cash out

0:12:55.000 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of the Treasury would entirely stop. So I think in

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>terms of the first two options around like what Treasury

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>can do in terms of making payments, like the rest

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:04.600
<v Speaker 1>pull in terms of making payments, those are the two extremes.

0:13:04.760 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 1>Absolute prioritization would be they have this matrix of different

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:10.480
<v Speaker 1>priorities and they make them as they're able to, and

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 1>some people don't get the payments their owned, but Treasury

0:13:13.160 --> 0:13:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is able to finally tune that to like reflect what

0:13:15.559 --> 0:13:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they want to do. That's one spectrum, and the other

0:13:18.040 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>spectrum is general fault. Nobody gets anything until the debt

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>gets a little bit, so Obviously, general default of the

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>US sounds very, very bad and dire. But one of

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:49.920
<v Speaker 1>the things we've seen in previous debt ceiling dramas is

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 1>that as we get closer and closer to that prospect,

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 1>we tend to see market participants buying US government debt

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>as a sort of flight to safety play. So what

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>would it mean for the actual treasury market if we

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:07.560
<v Speaker 1>got to that general default point? What would you expect

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to see? Well, that is where things get really fun,

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:14.040
<v Speaker 1>because you have to sort of competing definitions of fund

0:14:14.080 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 1>may vary. Fund may not apply to the non exactly.

0:14:21.040 --> 0:14:24.880
<v Speaker 1>So on the one hand, any missed payment on something

0:14:24.920 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>that is assumed as a just a general functioning bedrock

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:33.600
<v Speaker 1>principle of financial markets to never miss payments, whether it's

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.400
<v Speaker 1>principal or khun having a miss payment on that creates

0:14:36.520 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>all sorts of headaches. Not only is are are you

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe creating four sellers of people who are not allowed

0:14:42.680 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>to hold securities that have defaulted? And we can come

0:14:45.280 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 1>back to that later, but let's assume that there's some

0:14:47.400 --> 0:14:48.960
<v Speaker 1>segment of the market that says we're not allowed to

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>hold these. We we we just can't be seen holding these,

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>So we have to sell them. On the other hand,

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:55.880
<v Speaker 1>some segment of the market would say, look, this is

0:14:55.880 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 1>a political fight. It's not a it's not a lack

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.680
<v Speaker 1>of ability to pay, it's a lack of willingness to pay.

0:15:00.720 --> 0:15:03.080
<v Speaker 1>That's going to be temporary. So we will accept some

0:15:03.360 --> 0:15:06.680
<v Speaker 1>trivial risk premium to hold these securities because at some

0:15:06.760 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>point we trust that we're gonna be made whole. You know,

0:15:08.800 --> 0:15:10.800
<v Speaker 1>we might lose a little bit, but but you know

0:15:10.840 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be paid something for holding these defaulted

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>securities in the meantime, so we'll hold onto those. So

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>figuring out who has these securities, who has to sell them,

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:21.520
<v Speaker 1>who wants to sell them, what prices there the people

0:15:21.560 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>who want to sell them are willing to trade at

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:26.400
<v Speaker 1>versus the other side of the of the demand for

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:28.280
<v Speaker 1>these of ALTI securities by people with a little bit

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.120
<v Speaker 1>looser risk tolerance. That's going to be a really there's

0:15:31.160 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of volatility. As those securities work themselves out,

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.160
<v Speaker 1>there will be a series of bills around the debt

0:15:37.200 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>ceiling maturity or around the debt ceiling X state that

0:15:40.280 --> 0:15:44.680
<v Speaker 1>will be probably the most impacted relative to their historical volatility. Bills.

0:15:44.720 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Remember don't pay coop on payments, so you know, your

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.320
<v Speaker 1>whole payment of interest comes with the maturity of the bill,

0:15:50.720 --> 0:15:54.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, as a percentage of of your total

0:15:54.480 --> 0:15:56.400
<v Speaker 1>cash flow for the instrument, bills are going to be

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot more impacted. And they're also much less volatile historically,

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:02.000
<v Speaker 1>so you know, if you if you see for selling,

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.320
<v Speaker 1>you can see sort of more outside moves in those

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.479
<v Speaker 1>in those word are typically much safer, less volatile securities.

0:16:07.840 --> 0:16:10.200
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you've got notes, bonds, notes and

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>bonds which are longer term. You know, if you're thinking

0:16:12.440 --> 0:16:15.080
<v Speaker 1>about a third year bond, one missed coupon payment, that

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that you know you probably get paid back in cash

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a month later. It doesn't really matter as much to

0:16:19.360 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the to the total value of the security. So it's

0:16:22.000 --> 0:16:25.640
<v Speaker 1>plausible that you see long term securities that miss coupon

0:16:25.680 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 1>payments during that period outperform the front end of the

0:16:29.480 --> 0:16:32.160
<v Speaker 1>Yolker or or or or fall. You know how their

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>yields fall, prices go up in absolute terms because of

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.800
<v Speaker 1>general risk of version. Now there's also a scenario here

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>where and we're sort of getting far out into hypotheticals

0:16:41.840 --> 0:16:45.480
<v Speaker 1>without really stressing what are our metrics for like this

0:16:45.600 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>scenario are But there's also a scenario here where basically

0:16:49.560 --> 0:16:52.160
<v Speaker 1>there isn't much change in the treasury market because the

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 1>people who are willing to pay more and the people

0:16:53.760 --> 0:16:55.680
<v Speaker 1>who are forced to sell or want to sell are

0:16:55.680 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 1>relatively evenly matched, and everything kind of just trades out

0:16:58.160 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 1>at equilibrium levels. That's a very real possibility, is it

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:04.159
<v Speaker 1>my expectation? Probably not, But like it's it's something you

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:06.639
<v Speaker 1>have to think about. So one of the things that

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:11.199
<v Speaker 1>makes treasuries special is that they are used for collateral

0:17:11.440 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 1>in the repo market. So you know, if you're loaning

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:17.600
<v Speaker 1>or borrowing a large amount of money, you will often

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>use treasury securities as your collateral slash security in order

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:24.359
<v Speaker 1>to do that. What would be the impact on the

0:17:24.440 --> 0:17:28.480
<v Speaker 1>repo market if you had doubts over whether or not

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 1>some of these bonds are in default or are in

0:17:30.840 --> 0:17:33.520
<v Speaker 1>fact going to be receiving their coupon payments on schedule.

0:17:34.200 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it's probably best to think about the repo

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 1>markets an extension of the cash treasury market from that perspective,

0:17:39.200 --> 0:17:41.400
<v Speaker 1>And in this scenario, I think there will be some

0:17:41.600 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>repo market makers who are willing and able to take

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 1>quote unquote defaulted treasuries as collateral and maybe apply some

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:51.880
<v Speaker 1>small haircut to them, but are willing to do it

0:17:52.080 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 1>for a relatively small increase in their income from from

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the activity. You know, just like there will be people

0:17:57.520 --> 0:18:00.000
<v Speaker 1>who will be willing to pay, you know, slightly less

0:18:00.080 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 1>than than typical for for a similar security because it's defaulted.

0:18:03.640 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 1>But but not like you know half as much, you

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.320
<v Speaker 1>know that kind of thing. But we don't really know

0:18:09.640 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>the other thing, and I think this affects both the

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 1>repo market and the cash market is we don't really

0:18:13.800 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>know how well the back end settlement systems and trading

0:18:17.359 --> 0:18:20.320
<v Speaker 1>systems are going to handle being able to trade something

0:18:20.320 --> 0:18:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that's already past maturity right like and hopefully their QA

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>and DEV people at banks and at funds and at

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.840
<v Speaker 1>other providers who are thinking about this and have have

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.400
<v Speaker 1>tested this. But what happens if I have to buy

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:35.639
<v Speaker 1>on recording this February ninth? What happens if I have

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:39.240
<v Speaker 1>to buy on February ninth a bill that shows that

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:42.400
<v Speaker 1>that has a maturity data associated with it a February seven?

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Can the systems even accept that? Or it does it

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 1>throw an error and say no, you're not allowed to

0:18:46.119 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>do that. I'm so glad you brought this up because

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>this is something I've wondered about exactly, which is that

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with most financial instruments, when we're talking about default, you know,

0:18:54.000 --> 0:18:56.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just like it's kind of an economic question, well

0:18:56.560 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 1>what's there when you're going to get your recovery, etcetera.

0:18:59.119 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And I've always wondered whether like a US debt default,

0:19:02.680 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 1>like would it almost be more like the Y two

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:09.840
<v Speaker 1>K problems. See this is a crossover episode between the

0:19:10.040 --> 0:19:13.720
<v Speaker 1>Y companies have terrible software and the U. S Treasury. No,

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.480
<v Speaker 1>this is exactly what I've wondered whether rather whether we're

0:19:16.480 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>thinking about it the risks is sort of the wrong dimension,

0:19:19.200 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's actually kind of like creates all just sort

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:25.600
<v Speaker 1>of technical things like here's the one instrument that no

0:19:25.640 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 1>one ever thinks about missing a payment on, etcetera. Right,

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like, uh, you know, I don't I don't know

0:19:32.320 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>what the analogy would be, but I'm glad you brought

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.520
<v Speaker 1>this up because it seems like this could be the

0:19:36.520 --> 0:19:39.320
<v Speaker 1>one thing. It's like, did they even like code the

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:42.600
<v Speaker 1>possibility that some of these instruments wouldn't get paid and

0:19:42.640 --> 0:19:45.040
<v Speaker 1>what kind of like I mean it's kind of specultive, right, Like,

0:19:45.040 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to answer, but I'm glad you brought this up. Yeah,

0:19:48.400 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think the team over Hindsight Capital would say, well,

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I sure hope they'd this because you know, you've known

0:19:54.119 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it's a possibility. Yeah, when are we gonna get this?

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Every single trade their way ahead of things. Um, but yeah,

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean we've known this is at least the hypothetical

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 1>possibility since at least, so you would hope right that

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:10.399
<v Speaker 1>that there have been some efforts to make sure that

0:20:10.400 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>settlement systems can handle this sort of thing. But just

0:20:13.400 --> 0:20:16.200
<v Speaker 1>because you would hope that doesn't and you can actually

0:20:16.200 --> 0:20:18.760
<v Speaker 1>say like, oh, yeah, that's that's how it works. I

0:20:18.800 --> 0:20:21.199
<v Speaker 1>know at some level there would be able to be

0:20:21.240 --> 0:20:24.560
<v Speaker 1>settlement of treasury securities and defaulted. I mean, you can

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>do stuff over the phone, you can do stuff with

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:31.080
<v Speaker 1>manual settlement procedures, but there's just no way that the

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:33.479
<v Speaker 1>markets canna be able to handle super high volumes if

0:20:33.520 --> 0:20:37.000
<v Speaker 1>everyone's normal trading systems are just not working correctly because of,

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>for instance, a maturity date that's prior to a settlement date, right, Like,

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's just I think there would probably be some disruptions there.

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So you know that adds a liquidity dimension, and you know,

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.359
<v Speaker 1>liquidity being withdrawn possibly due to due to issues on

0:20:52.400 --> 0:20:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the in the software, on top of the absolute risk

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.680
<v Speaker 1>premiums that people are willing to to bear. And you

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>know this all applies equally to repo to you know, um,

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>with repos. Instead of thinking like, oh, I want to

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:04.640
<v Speaker 1>buy your sell bond, it's like, oh, if I want

0:21:04.640 --> 0:21:06.520
<v Speaker 1>to use this bond as collateral, can my system accept

0:21:06.560 --> 0:21:08.200
<v Speaker 1>to this collateral if it's got a date that's later

0:21:08.240 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 1>than you know, same same principles basically. So yeah, I

0:21:11.160 --> 0:21:13.199
<v Speaker 1>mean I don't know the answer to any of this,

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:15.800
<v Speaker 1>to be clear, Like I used to work relatively close

0:21:15.800 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to bank settlement systems back at my prior role, but

0:21:18.720 --> 0:21:21.159
<v Speaker 1>I haven't been near a bank settlement systems in almost

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.760
<v Speaker 1>a decade now, So you know, I I don't know, um,

0:21:24.800 --> 0:21:28.879
<v Speaker 1>and I'm not sure anyone anywhere knows with great certainty

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.960
<v Speaker 1>what the aggregate trading community, whether it's fast money, real money,

0:21:33.040 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, what they can handle in this respect. But um, yeah,

0:21:36.280 --> 0:21:40.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. So I want to talk about another

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:42.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, go back to this idea or talk about

0:21:42.200 --> 0:21:45.159
<v Speaker 1>this idea of you hear payment prioritization, and of course,

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.680
<v Speaker 1>as you mentioned, Treasury hasn't assisted. Maybe they're bluffing that.

0:21:49.840 --> 0:21:53.320
<v Speaker 1>It's technically they don't have the capability to say shut

0:21:53.320 --> 0:21:56.919
<v Speaker 1>off one kind of payments easily while say like making

0:21:56.960 --> 0:21:59.639
<v Speaker 1>sure that we continue to pay a debt. But setting

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:03.560
<v Speaker 1>us technical questions of whether they can do that. What

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.679
<v Speaker 1>about like the political questions of who gets to decide

0:22:08.440 --> 0:22:11.399
<v Speaker 1>what shuts down? Because if you're Biden and it's like, okay,

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:13.680
<v Speaker 1>like we're not gonna pay the military, and look, the

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are preventing the military are brave men and women

0:22:17.280 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>from getting paid. Look, and then the Republicans might say, well,

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.399
<v Speaker 1>you didn't have to shut down military payment, etcetera. You

0:22:22.440 --> 0:22:25.680
<v Speaker 1>could have like done something less impactful, etcetera. But who

0:22:25.720 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>gets to decide even a prioritization what doesn't doesn't get paid? Yeah,

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>I think totally there are deep political questions about every

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>facet of this whole problem. And I think it does

0:22:36.840 --> 0:22:39.800
<v Speaker 1>illustrate so well how debt is a fundamentally political thing.

0:22:39.800 --> 0:22:43.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we have our constitution because the first crack

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:46.840
<v Speaker 1>post revolution at at creating a structure for governance in

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 1>the US didn't handle debt well, like, that's literally why

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>we have a constitution, the constitution we have today. Obviously

0:22:52.560 --> 0:22:55.000
<v Speaker 1>there's more stuff in the Constitution than just management of debt,

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.520
<v Speaker 1>but there is a general problem here where you are

0:22:59.600 --> 0:23:04.639
<v Speaker 1>taking what was the purview of Congress and elected representatives

0:23:04.640 --> 0:23:09.600
<v Speaker 1>in assigning payments to various stakeholders that the Treasury faces

0:23:09.640 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on a on a settlement basis, and you're you're taking

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:14.160
<v Speaker 1>that away and you're handing it to Treasury with no

0:23:14.720 --> 0:23:17.760
<v Speaker 1>explicit decision to do so. If you're going to prioritize

0:23:17.840 --> 0:23:20.480
<v Speaker 1>without legislation, and there will be no legislation on this,

0:23:20.680 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, then Treasury unelective bureaucrats at Treasury are just

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:25.800
<v Speaker 1>being told to make the best of it that they

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:28.840
<v Speaker 1>can and have fun figuring it out. That is not

0:23:28.880 --> 0:23:30.840
<v Speaker 1>how a government's supposed to be run, right, I mean,

0:23:31.000 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>that's not how a democracy is supposed to function. If

0:23:33.320 --> 0:23:36.560
<v Speaker 1>Congress had wanted to delegate prioritization to Treasury and said

0:23:36.560 --> 0:23:39.280
<v Speaker 1>that explicitly, that would be a fine whatever, that their purview,

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.120
<v Speaker 1>But that's not what's going on here. It's Congress saying, well,

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:44.159
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to do anything, so just do the

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:46.280
<v Speaker 1>best you can and throwing it back to Treasury. And

0:23:46.320 --> 0:23:48.879
<v Speaker 1>when you get that outcome, I mean, that's not going

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to be good for anybody, regardless of who the winners

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:53.520
<v Speaker 1>and losers Treasury picks are, if they even have the

0:23:53.560 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 1>ability to make those picks. It's it's it's it's a

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.119
<v Speaker 1>pretty deep irony that that a representative democratic system is

0:24:00.440 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 1>doing this to itself. And again, I just I want

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.080
<v Speaker 1>to emphasize that this is Congress doing it to itself.

0:24:05.119 --> 0:24:07.720
<v Speaker 1>This is not this is this is not inherent thing

0:24:07.760 --> 0:24:10.639
<v Speaker 1>around that national debt management. This is a series of

0:24:10.680 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 1>bad decisions that have been made by elected representatives over

0:24:14.640 --> 0:24:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the past thirty or forty years that have gotten us

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.880
<v Speaker 1>to this point. And it's entirely a self inflicted situation.

0:24:20.200 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is such an important point to make,

0:24:22.600 --> 0:24:26.239
<v Speaker 1>this idea that debt is ultimately a social construct and

0:24:26.440 --> 0:24:29.200
<v Speaker 1>inherently political in many ways. You know, it tells a

0:24:29.320 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>story of who owes who what and why, and so

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:37.359
<v Speaker 1>it's immediately caught up in you know, the potential for

0:24:37.440 --> 0:24:42.840
<v Speaker 1>different narratives. You mentioned how self defeating a lot of

0:24:42.880 --> 0:24:45.240
<v Speaker 1>this tends to be in the US, and it does

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 1>seem to put it mildly that defaulting on US debt

0:24:48.119 --> 0:24:51.040
<v Speaker 1>would be bad. So what would happen if, you know,

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch just just decided to ignore Congress on this,

0:24:55.440 --> 0:24:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Like what if people just go off and you know,

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the president goes off and does his own So earlier

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.120
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about, I mentioned how fun it would

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 1>be if we had a general default and what that

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 1>would mean for the treasure market as for the treasury

0:25:07.760 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>market functioning fund, same thing for constitutional fund in this

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:14.119
<v Speaker 1>instance that you just described. Um So, just as a

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 1>bit of background, if you read section four the fourteenth Amendment,

0:25:16.440 --> 0:25:19.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the key reconstruction amendments after the Civil War,

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:21.920
<v Speaker 1>there's a clause that says the validity of the public

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:24.360
<v Speaker 1>dat of the United States, authorized by law, including debts

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services and

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:30.120
<v Speaker 1>suppressing insurrection and rebellion, shall not be questioned. So this

0:25:30.200 --> 0:25:33.080
<v Speaker 1>is just basically saying, like there's a general constitutional principle

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>that if the United States government owes someone something, you

0:25:35.920 --> 0:25:38.000
<v Speaker 1>can't get in the way of that right like that,

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>that's the plain text reading of that. How far do

0:25:40.840 --> 0:25:43.119
<v Speaker 1>those powers go? It's an it's an interesting question. No,

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.879
<v Speaker 1>one's ever really litigated it. This this this clause section

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 1>four was mentioned in a in litigation around a new

0:25:50.400 --> 0:25:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Deal case, but it wasn't it wasn't really directly established

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.440
<v Speaker 1>to be read in a maximalist or minimalist way. Other

0:25:56.480 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>parts of the fourteenth Amendment have been litigated to the

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 1>end of time. I mean, it is one of the

0:26:01.359 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>most litigated parts of the entire Constitution that the Spring

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Court heres cases on. But this particular section has very

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.280
<v Speaker 1>little litigation associated with it, so we don't really know

0:26:09.359 --> 0:26:11.800
<v Speaker 1>what courts would do. But if you read that that

0:26:11.800 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that text, just as you know, sort of a plain text,

0:26:15.240 --> 0:26:18.040
<v Speaker 1>then it seems to create a constitutional obligation to pay

0:26:18.080 --> 0:26:20.640
<v Speaker 1>the public debt of the United States. And it's one

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 1>thing to say, well, you know, we can't pay the

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:25.080
<v Speaker 1>public debt because we've run out of dollars. But we

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>know you and I, Joe and Tracy and hopefully odd

0:26:27.320 --> 0:26:30.400
<v Speaker 1>lots of listeners at this point know that to treasury

0:26:30.440 --> 0:26:33.400
<v Speaker 1>creates dollars. In the Federal Reserve creates dollars, and there's

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 1>no there's no lack of those dollars there there you

0:26:36.760 --> 0:26:38.959
<v Speaker 1>can't run out of them. So that's not that's not

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a restraint. What what then, is preventing the federal government,

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>or specifically the executive branch and the Treasury, from going

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:48.960
<v Speaker 1>out and doing what the Constitution tells it to do

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:51.440
<v Speaker 1>by preventing people from questioning the debt and just saying,

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>restraints on issuance of debt to make good on payments

0:26:56.800 --> 0:27:01.120
<v Speaker 1>owed by the United States to third parties are I'm constitutional.

0:27:01.200 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 1>The dead ceiling is I'm constitutional, and we're going to

0:27:03.320 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>keep issuing debt until to to make payments until someone

0:27:06.920 --> 0:27:11.520
<v Speaker 1>tells us to stop. That path is one that is

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>hard to see from a political a political group that

0:27:16.920 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 1>has been as risk averse as the Biden administration has been.

0:27:19.760 --> 0:27:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But I do think you can make a very good

0:27:22.040 --> 0:27:24.919
<v Speaker 1>case that in an emergency, a situation where there's a

0:27:24.920 --> 0:27:28.439
<v Speaker 1>general default, where you know markets are crashing, where you

0:27:28.480 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 1>know there's there's massive economic disruption, that this is a

0:27:32.040 --> 0:27:34.680
<v Speaker 1>good choice to be made, that that that the debt

0:27:34.760 --> 0:27:37.920
<v Speaker 1>ceiling is totally self defeating. It's a it's a it

0:27:37.960 --> 0:27:40.119
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't exists in the first place. And by the way,

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a constitutional reading right here. Now. I'm not a

0:27:43.480 --> 0:27:46.320
<v Speaker 1>constitutional scholar. I'm not a constitutional lawyer. I'm none of

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>those things. Um, like jay Z said, you know, I

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>passed the bar, but I know a little bit. I

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 1>know enough to know that this could hypothetically work. But

0:27:56.480 --> 0:27:58.840
<v Speaker 1>that's about it. So I don't think I would predict

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that the bid administration should or could go out and

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 1>do this. But it is interesting to think about how

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>these powers appear to be given to them by the Constitution,

0:28:07.280 --> 0:28:10.800
<v Speaker 1>and that there could be a Supreme Court case settled

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:16.680
<v Speaker 1>based on whether the US has just issued bonds that

0:28:16.720 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>are illegal under the Constitution. You know. Again fun, So, okay,

0:28:23.640 --> 0:28:26.000
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to have like a coin conversation. But

0:28:26.040 --> 0:28:30.240
<v Speaker 1>this does get to the other possibility, which is these

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:35.159
<v Speaker 1>technical workarounds that people believe exists in the law. So

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.360
<v Speaker 1>one possibility one of these workarounds could be invoked the

0:28:38.400 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>fourteenth Amendment, And it seems pretty clear the history on

0:28:41.160 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that does not seem to be particularly ambiguous about why

0:28:44.600 --> 0:28:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it's there, And it's kind of you know, I'm reading

0:28:46.520 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>on Congress dot gov inspired by the desire to put

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 1>beyond question the obligations for the government issued during the

0:28:52.240 --> 0:28:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Civil War, and so like, I don't know, like it

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem particularly ambiguous, but setting aside the fourteenth, talk

0:28:58.840 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to us about some of these other ideas in the

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:05.479
<v Speaker 1>law to avoid a default. I think the easiest one

0:29:05.480 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>to understand and easy by the you know, if you

0:29:08.080 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 1>know a little bit of bond math, The easiest one

0:29:10.200 --> 0:29:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to understand is this idea of issuing very high coupon bonds.

0:29:13.960 --> 0:29:17.320
<v Speaker 1>So when when we issue a bond, typically what happens

0:29:17.400 --> 0:29:21.160
<v Speaker 1>is there's a bullet bond. Is the is the standard

0:29:21.240 --> 0:29:23.880
<v Speaker 1>term for what people think of, as you know, for instance,

0:29:23.920 --> 0:29:26.760
<v Speaker 1>a treasury bond, where you get a series of payments

0:29:26.800 --> 0:29:29.840
<v Speaker 1>over time that are called coupons, that are regular small payments,

0:29:29.840 --> 0:29:31.239
<v Speaker 1>and then you get a big payment at the end,

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:34.600
<v Speaker 1>which is called the principle. Right principle is you know,

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>typically you you pay you you quote the price of

0:29:37.800 --> 0:29:40.800
<v Speaker 1>a bond as the percentage of the principal payment that

0:29:40.840 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>you will receive at the end. So for instance of

0:29:42.320 --> 0:29:45.719
<v Speaker 1>bondus trading at that means you pay now and then

0:29:45.760 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you get the series of coupon payments associated with that

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:50.000
<v Speaker 1>bond and the principal payment at the end, which is

0:29:50.000 --> 0:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>a hundred. When Treasury auctions securities they are sensitive to

0:29:55.080 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>they basically want to set the price of those securities

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 1>just below one when they're first issued. Um, they don't

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>want to issue bonds at a premium. And they also

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:06.960
<v Speaker 1>have a serious other constraints, like, for instance, the minimum

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:10.440
<v Speaker 1>increment of coupon. So what they'll do is they'll issue

0:30:11.000 --> 0:30:15.160
<v Speaker 1>bonds with a coupon that sets the um the principal

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:19.320
<v Speaker 1>payment um or sorry, sets the auction price just below

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 1>a hundred when they when they issue. So, for instance,

0:30:22.360 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not going to go out and issue a fifteen

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:29.040
<v Speaker 1>coupon coupon bond when the prevailing yield on treasure securities

0:30:29.160 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>is like five percent, right like like like, they're never

0:30:31.000 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>going to do that. But that's just like an internal

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>norm that's not like written in law anywhere. They don't

0:30:35.720 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>have a legal obligation to do it that way. If

0:30:38.000 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 1>they wanted to, they could go out and issue a

0:30:40.040 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>bond that matures with a principal value of a hundred

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and pays coupon payments of a hundred, you know, hundred

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.600
<v Speaker 1>per year for the next thirty years. Say so let's say,

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>for instance, they did this, they said, well, we're gonna

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 1>issue what's called a super high coupon bond, and again

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this is nonsense territory from a from a pure finance perspective.

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.160
<v Speaker 1>But let's say they go out and and that bond

0:31:02.200 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 1>that matures thirty years from now at a phase five,

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.240
<v Speaker 1>it will pay a hundred and coupons every year as

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the you know, four percent coupon on the

0:31:09.640 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>most recently issue third or bond something like that. So

0:31:12.240 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 1>if you do the bond math on that, if you

0:31:13.920 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 1>if you discount all those cash flows back to present

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 1>value at the current prevailing interest rate, what you've got

0:31:19.600 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>is an eighteen hundred dollar You receive eighteen hundred dollars

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>today for the bond maturing at a hundred in the future.

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 1>And the reason you get that is because it's got

0:31:27.440 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 1>that long string of payments associated with it, whether the

0:31:30.480 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>same size as the as the principal payment. You've basically

0:31:33.760 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 1>issued a zero coupon strip, all in one instrument for

0:31:37.680 --> 0:31:40.640
<v Speaker 1>the next thirty years. And you've done that, you're the

0:31:40.720 --> 0:31:43.000
<v Speaker 1>impact to the debt ceiling is a hundred, but you

0:31:43.040 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>now have another seventeen hundred in your in your pocket

0:31:45.880 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>because of those coupon payments. Those coupon payments aren't covered

0:31:48.640 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 1>by the debt sailing their coupon payments not principal payments.

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Right that when when Treasury counts debt, they're not counting

0:31:55.640 --> 0:31:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the coup the interest costs, they're counting the principal value.

0:31:59.680 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 1>So hundred dollars is I mean, like like it's a

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:07.840
<v Speaker 1>technicality where you can say, well, the coupon isn't principal,

0:32:07.920 --> 0:32:11.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's still cash in my pocket now delivered at

0:32:11.760 --> 0:32:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a later date that doesn't count against the dead ceiling.

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:17.440
<v Speaker 1>So you know, that would be another technical workaround they

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 1>could use. Again, this one is on much less dicey

0:32:21.600 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>legal footing. There are lots of reasons why Treasury maybe

0:32:24.400 --> 0:32:26.000
<v Speaker 1>want to say we don't want to do this, Um,

0:32:26.120 --> 0:32:27.720
<v Speaker 1>we don't have any interest in this, we're not able

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>to do this whatever. There There could be lots of

0:32:30.200 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>reasons for that, but but legally it's it's not quite

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>as dicey as saying to Congress in the Supreme Court, well,

0:32:35.120 --> 0:32:36.680
<v Speaker 1>we're just going to keep issuing Debton. You know, take

0:32:36.720 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 1>your best shot at stopping us. I'm trying to think

0:32:39.360 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>what would be a harder sell to the public is that,

0:32:41.960 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, issuing a high coupon bond that like gets

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you immediate proceeds that are a lot more than the

0:32:48.320 --> 0:32:51.520
<v Speaker 1>actual issue once amount, or is it a large novelty coin. Well,

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so I was gonna you know, the novelty coin.

0:32:55.080 --> 0:32:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you know, well, we know the headlines are

0:32:57.880 --> 0:32:59.760
<v Speaker 1>gonna be on that. But you know, at the same time,

0:32:59.800 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm imagining Biden is borrowing at a hundred percent

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:06.760
<v Speaker 1>interest rates from China to like the payday loan to

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like you know, like the the The headlines could go

0:33:10.040 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in either direction, for sure, Yeah, I mean, but then

0:33:13.560 --> 0:33:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you have to explain like like what how it's even

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:18.640
<v Speaker 1>possible to borrow a hundred percent interest rates or or

0:33:18.680 --> 0:33:20.880
<v Speaker 1>like what is even happening there? I mean, I do

0:33:21.000 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>think both the coin for for all it's downsides tracing.

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I know how much you love the coin, but you

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:32.000
<v Speaker 1>know the benefit of both the high coupon bond plan

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and the coin plan is that they're weird incantations, you know,

0:33:35.160 --> 0:33:39.240
<v Speaker 1>run by technocrats. They're not They're not like a tangible

0:33:39.280 --> 0:33:41.239
<v Speaker 1>thing where it's like the U. S Constitution and like

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 1>this sort of feeling that the world is going straight.

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>It's like, oh, well they said the right words and

0:33:46.320 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 1>everything is fixed now. So who cares is is how

0:33:48.840 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>people tend to think about this stuff. I think. Whereas

0:33:51.640 --> 0:33:53.640
<v Speaker 1>when you're talking about the Supreme Court and the Constitution

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>and Article um section four of the fourteenth Amendment and

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>the history and that, people get very arpen arms all

0:33:59.880 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 1>the Constitution, you know whatever. Whereas if it's just like, oh,

0:34:02.040 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>well we just said the right words magically to the

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 1>bond market and now everything's fine, I think you get

0:34:06.280 --> 0:34:09.880
<v Speaker 1>a very different you know, feeling from that politically. But

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that's speculation on that part. This is something that's important,

0:34:13.000 --> 0:34:15.759
<v Speaker 1>which is that okay, let's say the administration to say,

0:34:15.800 --> 0:34:18.920
<v Speaker 1>you know what, the fourteenth Amendment says, the dead sailing

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 1>is invalid. We're just going to ignore it and continue

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.200
<v Speaker 1>fiscal operations as normal. And then, as you pointed out,

0:34:25.400 --> 0:34:28.480
<v Speaker 1>there might be some ambiguity about whether the bonds issued

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>after that moment are legal, and maybe there would be

0:34:30.920 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>get to the Supreme Court. We don't really know what

0:34:32.600 --> 0:34:35.759
<v Speaker 1>they were going to say. But to some extent, this

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:39.520
<v Speaker 1>even applies to any other solution as well, including the

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>high coupon bonds, including the coin, which is that like

0:34:43.280 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 1>someone could sue over the coin, Like no one's gonna

0:34:45.320 --> 0:34:46.920
<v Speaker 1>stop it. And if like five out of the nine

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court justices says you can't issue a hundred year bonds,

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:52.960
<v Speaker 1>like that's clearly in violation to the spirit of the

0:34:53.000 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 1>dead Sailing law. You know, you're still issuing debt at

0:34:56.239 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 1>a time when we're not supposed to issue any more

0:34:58.160 --> 0:35:01.520
<v Speaker 1>debt Like the uncertain the exist in almost any of

0:35:01.560 --> 0:35:04.800
<v Speaker 1>these scenarios for sure. And you know we set it before,

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'll say it again, this is all a political question,

0:35:07.719 --> 0:35:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a social question, right like that, Like political power means

0:35:12.040 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>telling people to do something that they don't want to do.

0:35:14.560 --> 0:35:18.359
<v Speaker 1>That is what political power is, right, And whether it's

0:35:18.400 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the Biden administration forcing issuance of new debt, whether it's

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.959
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court stepping into either validate that or or

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.800
<v Speaker 1>or invalidate that. You know, that's the fourteenth a medi scenario,

0:35:28.320 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>or whether it's the Biden administrations saying, Okay, we're not

0:35:30.920 --> 0:35:33.919
<v Speaker 1>going to make any payments regardless of who doesn't get paid,

0:35:34.080 --> 0:35:37.640
<v Speaker 1>or it's prioritization where some people get paid, for instance,

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:40.160
<v Speaker 1>bond holders maybe get paid, but you know, retirees don't

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.720
<v Speaker 1>like whatever approach you take to this. At some point

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>someone is being told you don't get what you want

0:35:46.200 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>because you can't stop me, you know, under our system,

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>right like like you physically can't stop me, or you know,

0:35:52.800 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>enough of other political bodies have sided with me so

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that you can't get done what's what you want to

0:35:57.560 --> 0:36:00.160
<v Speaker 1>get done? And you know this is a like at

0:36:00.160 --> 0:36:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the end of the day, the dead ceiling has lots

0:36:01.600 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of interesting financial and economic and analytical things to explore,

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 1>but it's always going to come back to being a

0:36:08.040 --> 0:36:11.719
<v Speaker 1>political problem. Was created by politicians. It's it's being exacerbated

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:15.160
<v Speaker 1>by politicians, and it will be solved through political means

0:36:15.200 --> 0:36:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and nothing else. And you know, I just I'll always

0:36:18.200 --> 0:36:22.040
<v Speaker 1>come back to that. I I really in that. From

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that perspective, I cannot emphasize enough that that Congress has

0:36:25.640 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>created this problem for itself, and if there was justice,

0:36:29.520 --> 0:36:32.480
<v Speaker 1>then Congress would lose power in some sense over this,

0:36:32.520 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 1>whether it's the death ceiling is invalidated by the Supreme

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Quarter or by the by administration or whatever, or you know,

0:36:37.719 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>some other solution. Unfortunately, like the world doesn't work based

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:44.160
<v Speaker 1>on karmic justice, So I don't think we can hope

0:36:44.200 --> 0:36:46.120
<v Speaker 1>that oh well, the you know, Congress gets its come

0:36:46.200 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>up in but maybe they will. I mean, we'll see.

0:36:48.160 --> 0:36:49.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's gonna be an interesting few months here,

0:36:50.000 --> 0:37:09.000
<v Speaker 1>to say the least. So the overarching theme of this

0:37:09.120 --> 0:37:13.399
<v Speaker 1>conversation is just mass uncertainty, lots of hypothetical shooting out

0:37:13.440 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 1>in every different direction, and no one really knows what's

0:37:17.880 --> 0:37:21.120
<v Speaker 1>going to happen when we finally hit that X date,

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:24.279
<v Speaker 1>the drop dead date. But there is something sort of

0:37:24.320 --> 0:37:27.319
<v Speaker 1>more immediate, a potential more immediate impact. And I think

0:37:27.360 --> 0:37:29.400
<v Speaker 1>we touched on this when we were talking about t

0:37:29.560 --> 0:37:32.080
<v Speaker 1>g A balances, this idea of you know, the Treasury

0:37:32.160 --> 0:37:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is checking account at the Fed. It does have an

0:37:35.640 --> 0:37:38.880
<v Speaker 1>impact on liquidity. So what's going on with the t

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:41.080
<v Speaker 1>g A. You know, if there's more money in there,

0:37:41.120 --> 0:37:43.640
<v Speaker 1>if there's less money in there, it can mean different

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>levels of liquidity for the broader economic system, for companies

0:37:48.200 --> 0:37:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that might be due payments from the government. Talk to

0:37:51.280 --> 0:37:55.160
<v Speaker 1>us a little bit about the immediate impact of all

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this discussion over the debt ceiling on market liquidity and

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 1>money harry policy as well. Yeah, so this is kind

0:38:02.440 --> 0:38:05.399
<v Speaker 1>of a perverse thing about how the mechanics of of

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the t g A being inflated with that sort of

0:38:09.000 --> 0:38:12.280
<v Speaker 1>cushion we discussed earlier. It's perverse how this works, because

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:15.560
<v Speaker 1>when the Treasury is building up that cushion, they are

0:38:15.600 --> 0:38:19.080
<v Speaker 1>withdrawing aggurate liquidity from the private sector. Treasury is withdrawing

0:38:19.120 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 1>liquidity from the private sector because that increase in t

0:38:23.400 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>g A balances is being funded by some combination of

0:38:27.000 --> 0:38:29.880
<v Speaker 1>higher debt and you know, higher tax as relative depending

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:32.920
<v Speaker 1>it's debt, right, the Treasury is issuing more bills and

0:38:33.000 --> 0:38:35.640
<v Speaker 1>more notes and bonds than they technically need for the

0:38:35.719 --> 0:38:39.000
<v Speaker 1>specific period in time. That means cash balances are being

0:38:39.040 --> 0:38:42.000
<v Speaker 1>dragged out of the private sector and to the Treasury's

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>cash balance. At the FED, that's a federal reserve liability,

0:38:46.360 --> 0:38:48.239
<v Speaker 1>just like a FED fund is, but in the but

0:38:48.320 --> 0:38:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the liability that the FED holds in the t g A,

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the only asset, the only person who can hold that

0:38:52.920 --> 0:38:56.800
<v Speaker 1>as an asset is Treasury, whereas Federal reserve FED funds

0:38:56.960 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>are an asset that can be held by the banking

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 1>sector and used to match against deposits that are an

0:39:02.640 --> 0:39:04.800
<v Speaker 1>asset of the rest of the private sector. So basically

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:07.359
<v Speaker 1>it's like reverse quite right, when this TJ is being

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:10.759
<v Speaker 1>built up, it's it's it's pulling liquidity out of the

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>private sector and storing it in the t g A.

0:39:14.320 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>Then the t as the t J is released, it

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 1>does the opposite, right, so it unleashes private sector liquidity

0:39:20.160 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>because that liability of the Federal of the Federal Reserve

0:39:24.080 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to the Treasury is being spent down. The payments are

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.400
<v Speaker 1>wounding up as assets of the rest of the private

0:39:29.400 --> 0:39:31.319
<v Speaker 1>sector or the rest of the world. Basically, everybody but

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the federal government funded by Federal Reserve FED funds liabilities

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>of the of the FED. So it's basically a countercyclical thing,

0:39:39.200 --> 0:39:41.160
<v Speaker 1>right Like it's it's as as times are good and

0:39:41.160 --> 0:39:43.239
<v Speaker 1>we're you know, go along and t g gets built

0:39:43.280 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>up and then we've got worried about that ceiling. But

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:48.759
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, a bunch of liquidity as being unleashed. Now,

0:39:49.120 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>the sizes here are not necessarily huge. It sort of

0:39:53.120 --> 0:39:55.920
<v Speaker 1>depends on the specific instance. But the size of the

0:39:55.960 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>t g A has gotten pretty big relative to the

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:00.200
<v Speaker 1>rest of the Fed's balance sheet as a matter of course.

0:40:01.440 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>So prior to the global financial crisis two thousand seven,

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 1>two eight kind of range, the TJA was less than

0:40:07.040 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the FEDS balance sheet. Basically payments in

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:12.120
<v Speaker 1>payments out almost precisely matched each other day to day.

0:40:12.440 --> 0:40:14.879
<v Speaker 1>From two eight fifteen, it built up a little bit

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.640
<v Speaker 1>because just the scope of federal government spending went up.

0:40:17.719 --> 0:40:20.480
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot more issuance of debt with post

0:40:20.520 --> 0:40:24.399
<v Speaker 1>crisis deficits that were that slowly sort of declined from

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the peaks in two thousand nine. But then when we

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>get to and treasure says, okay, well we want to

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.399
<v Speaker 1>start building up this this cash balance from average six

0:40:32.400 --> 0:40:34.440
<v Speaker 1>percent of the Fed's balance sheet UM so it was

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>below one percent before the goal financial crisis immediately after

0:40:37.320 --> 0:40:42.640
<v Speaker 1>is about two after that. After six since q it's

0:40:42.680 --> 0:40:44.759
<v Speaker 1>been eleven percent of the FEDS balance sheet. That's a

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>huge percentage of the FEDS balance sheet, and it swings

0:40:47.320 --> 0:40:50.040
<v Speaker 1>around quite a lot, unlike, for instance, the q AST

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>purchase portfolio. So basically you've got this complicating factor that

0:40:54.680 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 1>has nothing to do with the FEDS monetary policy UM

0:40:57.320 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>setting that the FEDS, the FED is not changing policy

0:41:00.640 --> 0:41:04.400
<v Speaker 1>based on treasury cash management, and yet it's got this

0:41:04.560 --> 0:41:07.759
<v Speaker 1>this sort of impact on aggregate private sector liquidity, both

0:41:07.800 --> 0:41:09.960
<v Speaker 1>positive and negative depending on what's going on with the

0:41:09.960 --> 0:41:11.840
<v Speaker 1>t g A UH, do you have to account for

0:41:12.040 --> 0:41:14.160
<v Speaker 1>so you know, as we see the t g A

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:18.919
<v Speaker 1>spend down over the next few months, it's already underway. Um,

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that will have an impact on aggregate private sector liquidity.

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.799
<v Speaker 1>That will be kind of sort of counterintuitive. I guess

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:27.759
<v Speaker 1>you could say. Right now, there's about five hundred and

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty billion in the Treasure General account. That's down from

0:41:31.960 --> 0:41:35.279
<v Speaker 1>a peak of almost a trillion in May of last year.

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 1>The recent peak, it's it's it's it's sort of trended

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.840
<v Speaker 1>lower over the past seven months or so, and that

0:41:40.880 --> 0:41:43.440
<v Speaker 1>will continue to trend lower as we go from five

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:47.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty down to zero presumably or near zero at the

0:41:47.120 --> 0:41:48.919
<v Speaker 1>X date. All right, I want to ask one more

0:41:48.920 --> 0:41:52.759
<v Speaker 1>markets related question, and I think there's this fantasy that

0:41:52.840 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 1>people have, which is that the stock market becomes the

0:41:55.800 --> 0:41:59.279
<v Speaker 1>sort of forcing mechanism. The example that everyone would site

0:41:59.360 --> 0:42:02.359
<v Speaker 1>is the tarp out. It failed in two thousand and eight,

0:42:02.360 --> 0:42:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and the stock market crashed some more, and then they

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>passed it a couple of days later. It doesn't seem

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:09.960
<v Speaker 1>like that dynamic really holds with the dead ceiling, because

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:13.920
<v Speaker 1>even though there's this potential for catastrophe, on certainty, the

0:42:14.000 --> 0:42:17.359
<v Speaker 1>view amongst stocks investors seems to be they always get

0:42:17.400 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>it done in the end. Why would I sell my stock, etcetera.

0:42:20.840 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Like can you talk a little bit about, like, as

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:25.640
<v Speaker 1>we get closer, is there any sort of like history

0:42:25.719 --> 0:42:29.919
<v Speaker 1>or like the sort of interplay between market volatility and

0:42:30.400 --> 0:42:32.520
<v Speaker 1>pressure to just like all right, let's get it past.

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:35.040
<v Speaker 1>There is no doubt that there is a feedback loop

0:42:35.080 --> 0:42:37.920
<v Speaker 1>between asset markets and how politicians think in this country.

0:42:37.960 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean, using a more recent example from then the

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.000
<v Speaker 1>top vote, which I think is a good, good one,

0:42:43.360 --> 0:42:46.120
<v Speaker 1>you could look to what happened in the spring of right,

0:42:46.160 --> 0:42:49.040
<v Speaker 1>we saw a degree of fiscal stimulus and a degree

0:42:49.040 --> 0:42:53.680
<v Speaker 1>of support for households that completely unprecedented in American history

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and completely like if you had dreamed up the scenario

0:42:57.360 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 1>where that happens, even if you had you know, no

0:43:00.000 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>one about COVID coming, and you had said, okay, well,

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.799
<v Speaker 1>then you're going to see this public sector response to that,

0:43:05.040 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think anyone would have believed you. They just said, no,

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 1>there's no way that the Republican Congress will will do that.

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:13.640
<v Speaker 1>There's no way that there are no Republicans and Congress

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:15.080
<v Speaker 1>will okay that, There's no way that I'll get through

0:43:15.200 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>filibusters and all that, and it absolutely did, and it

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>did so immediately because asset markets were in free fault

0:43:21.280 --> 0:43:24.800
<v Speaker 1>right there. There is a lot more feedback to political

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:26.800
<v Speaker 1>economy in this country and to political out comes in

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 1>this country from the stock market then from the unplaying right.

0:43:29.880 --> 0:43:32.399
<v Speaker 1>That is just how things work. I'm not defending that,

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just the reality. So I do think that if

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 1>we if we see stock markets start to false you know, measurably,

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, like like big volatility, big downside in the

0:43:44.200 --> 0:43:47.000
<v Speaker 1>months or weeks leading up to the sort of X

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:49.400
<v Speaker 1>state as it sort of becomes more clear, then you

0:43:49.440 --> 0:43:51.879
<v Speaker 1>will definitely seem a lot of pressure on politicians to

0:43:51.880 --> 0:43:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to just just raise the dang thing, you know, have

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 1>your fights about something else. Whether that comes from people

0:43:57.920 --> 0:44:01.360
<v Speaker 1>within the respective ideological goals of each party, whether that

0:44:01.400 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>comes from the public as a whole, it's unclear, but

0:44:04.600 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>either way there will be significant pressure. If, however, stock

0:44:07.520 --> 0:44:10.279
<v Speaker 1>markets say, well, you know, like they'll figure it out

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and event you know, maybe there there'll be a default,

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.480
<v Speaker 1>but like they'll pay those back eventually, and people be

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:17.239
<v Speaker 1>commented and like area with plenty of people that are

0:44:17.280 --> 0:44:19.120
<v Speaker 1>willing to pick up an extra twenty five basis points

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:20.919
<v Speaker 1>in a Treasury bill to hold it for a few

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:22.880
<v Speaker 1>months while they figure out this, this this out and

0:44:22.880 --> 0:44:24.719
<v Speaker 1>it'll be fine, and so we can just sort of

0:44:24.719 --> 0:44:26.880
<v Speaker 1>look past that. If if that happens, that's a recipe

0:44:26.920 --> 0:44:29.280
<v Speaker 1>for a much more protracted fight and a much longer

0:44:29.320 --> 0:44:32.960
<v Speaker 1>time past the X date with you know, uncertainty going on. Now.

0:44:33.080 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>My view would be that if you if you get

0:44:34.640 --> 0:44:39.080
<v Speaker 1>to the X date, even if you have prioritization, barring

0:44:39.320 --> 0:44:41.680
<v Speaker 1>using one of the technical workarounds we discussed, so either

0:44:41.719 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the coin or using high coupon bonds or um just

0:44:45.480 --> 0:44:47.840
<v Speaker 1>saying well, this violates the fourteenth Amendment, so we're going

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:50.840
<v Speaker 1>to ignore the death ceiling if you if you you know,

0:44:51.360 --> 0:44:54.400
<v Speaker 1>don't have those and you have either prioritization, which Treasury

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:56.839
<v Speaker 1>said isn't possible but could be possible and you're working

0:44:56.840 --> 0:44:59.840
<v Speaker 1>through prioritization, or if you're just doing a general default,

0:44:59.840 --> 0:45:01.960
<v Speaker 1>We're we're not paying any payments until the dead ceilings race,

0:45:02.000 --> 0:45:03.880
<v Speaker 1>because that's that's what the law tells us to do.

0:45:03.920 --> 0:45:06.800
<v Speaker 1>If if I'm the Treasury, okay, either way in either

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 1>a prior to a severe prioritization scenario or a general default,

0:45:11.040 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you're going to have large economic impacts from that, right,

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:16.440
<v Speaker 1>Like like that, the volume of outgoing payments that are

0:45:16.480 --> 0:45:18.840
<v Speaker 1>not going to show up in the bank accounts of

0:45:18.840 --> 0:45:20.920
<v Speaker 1>people that want to spend them, whether those are businesses

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:23.280
<v Speaker 1>whether their individuals, is going to be really big. Social

0:45:23.280 --> 0:45:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Security is a really good example. Like if you start

0:45:25.000 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 1>paying Social Security, the entire economy grants to a halt

0:45:27.200 --> 0:45:29.560
<v Speaker 1>about a month. There's just not it's it's just such

0:45:29.560 --> 0:45:32.080
<v Speaker 1>a huge cash flow for such a large percentagers of

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:35.799
<v Speaker 1>population that you can't So eventually there will be a

0:45:35.800 --> 0:45:37.919
<v Speaker 1>feedback to asset markets. This will not last forever where

0:45:38.000 --> 0:45:39.439
<v Speaker 1>it's just kind of the new normal that the US

0:45:39.520 --> 0:45:42.279
<v Speaker 1>is permanently you know, has the destiny in place, and

0:45:42.360 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, only making some outgoing payments. Eventually the economy

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:48.200
<v Speaker 1>starts to collapse, the stock market starts to collapse, and

0:45:48.400 --> 0:45:51.080
<v Speaker 1>you you know, you see and another interesting thing, just

0:45:51.120 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>to work it back to the Fed. An interesting thing

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 1>to think about it is if the economy is collapsing

0:45:55.920 --> 0:45:58.920
<v Speaker 1>because all these payments aren't going out and the stock

0:45:58.960 --> 0:46:00.799
<v Speaker 1>market is in free fault us, the FED step in

0:46:00.880 --> 0:46:02.640
<v Speaker 1>to say, okay, well we're going to cut rates now.

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:04.719
<v Speaker 1>Because the economies and free fall because of what's going

0:46:04.760 --> 0:46:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on with the dead sailing or do they say not

0:46:08.080 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>our problem? I don't know. I don't have a good

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:11.640
<v Speaker 1>answer for that. I don't I don't think a good

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:14.040
<v Speaker 1>answer exists, but it's something interesting to think about. It

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>feels like this is one of those topics where there

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:19.040
<v Speaker 1>just aren't a lot of good answers. But George did

0:46:19.040 --> 0:46:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a good job. Yeah, you did a great job. There's

0:46:21.200 --> 0:46:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot of uncertainty and hypotheticals as we've been talking about.

0:46:24.400 --> 0:46:27.080
<v Speaker 1>It's not an easy thing to sort of lay out

0:46:27.120 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 1>all the different options and what might happen depending on

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 1>what's pursued. But George, it was great having you on.

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>You did a great job. Thank you so much. Yeah,

0:46:35.200 --> 0:46:36.439
<v Speaker 1>thanks for having me on. I mean I can stick

0:46:36.440 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 1>around for another three hours and we can get all

0:46:39.080 --> 0:46:41.799
<v Speaker 1>the different hypotheticals if you want. All right, now our

0:46:41.920 --> 0:46:45.520
<v Speaker 1>to the coin conversation. Okay, I'm thanks man, let's go.

0:46:46.000 --> 0:47:03.000
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for having me on, George. Thanks George. Joe. There's

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot to unpack from that conversation. I agree, But

0:47:05.760 --> 0:47:08.120
<v Speaker 1>George did like a great job, Like you know, there

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:11.080
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of uncertainty. I guess because it's something

0:47:11.120 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 1>that had been lodged in my mind. But like, I'm

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:16.279
<v Speaker 1>glad he brought up that question of like the software

0:47:16.320 --> 0:47:19.680
<v Speaker 1>element of defaulted debt, because it's just something like I

0:47:19.719 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 1>want like people like you know, like we don't talk

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>about debt in those terms. It seems totally like a

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.839
<v Speaker 1>Y two K thing, as you mentioned, where people just

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.400
<v Speaker 1>would not expect US treasuries to default. And anyway, why

0:47:32.440 --> 0:47:34.759
<v Speaker 1>would you prepare for such a scenario, because if that

0:47:34.800 --> 0:47:36.799
<v Speaker 1>were to happen, then it would be the collapse of

0:47:36.880 --> 0:47:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the financial system as we know it. But yet here

0:47:39.640 --> 0:47:43.800
<v Speaker 1>we are, you know, after two thousand eleven, after having

0:47:43.880 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a very similar conversation. The other thing that's stuck out

0:47:47.239 --> 0:47:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in my mind was George's point about, you know, ultimately

0:47:50.960 --> 0:47:53.760
<v Speaker 1>this is a political process and it plays out in debt.

0:47:53.840 --> 0:47:56.360
<v Speaker 1>But the reason it plays out in the debt market

0:47:56.440 --> 0:48:01.359
<v Speaker 1>is because debt is inherently, I think, so tied up

0:48:01.680 --> 0:48:07.400
<v Speaker 1>with questions of morality and justice, and it's so easy

0:48:07.520 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 1>to build a political narrative on top of something that

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:16.520
<v Speaker 1>is ultimately about who owes what to who and why? Absolutely,

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:18.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think that's why it's really notable

0:48:19.560 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 1>that this was written into the constitution, and we run

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:24.440
<v Speaker 1>into the constitution after the Civil War. And what we

0:48:24.480 --> 0:48:28.239
<v Speaker 1>did have that coin conversation was with Roman Grande. He

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:30.839
<v Speaker 1>talked about this as well, which is that like this

0:48:31.000 --> 0:48:34.480
<v Speaker 1>fear that in the pursuit of the Civil War that

0:48:34.600 --> 0:48:39.680
<v Speaker 1>southern representative representatives from the formerly confederate state would try

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:42.160
<v Speaker 1>to induce a default because it's like, oh, we don't

0:48:42.200 --> 0:48:46.000
<v Speaker 1>want to pay the debts of the northern government that

0:48:46.080 --> 0:48:48.279
<v Speaker 1>fought a war against does and so they did, like

0:48:48.320 --> 0:48:49.920
<v Speaker 1>they this is like, you know, it gets to like

0:48:50.200 --> 0:48:53.520
<v Speaker 1>deep constitutional questions and it continues to play out over

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:57.000
<v Speaker 1>and over again in different forms, the political weaponization of debt.

0:48:57.320 --> 0:48:59.640
<v Speaker 1>It seems to be happening more often because I think

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:02.960
<v Speaker 1>people have realized that it is an effective pressure point.

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:06.479
<v Speaker 1>As George laid out well on that happy note. Shall

0:49:06.520 --> 0:49:08.799
<v Speaker 1>we leave it there, Let's leave it there. Okay. This

0:49:08.840 --> 0:49:11.719
<v Speaker 1>has been another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast. I'm

0:49:11.719 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Tracy Alloway. You can follow me on Twitter at Tracy

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Alloway and I'm Joe Why Wasn't Though. You can follow

0:49:16.880 --> 0:49:20.640
<v Speaker 1>me on Twitter at the Stalwart. George doesn't really tweet anymore,

0:49:20.680 --> 0:49:22.279
<v Speaker 1>but maybe he'll come back one day, so I'll plug

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it anyway. His handle is at Perks. Follow our producer

0:49:26.080 --> 0:49:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Carmen Rodriguez at Carmen Armand and Dash Bennett at dashbot.

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:33.040
<v Speaker 1>And check out all of our podcasts at Bloomberg. Under

0:49:33.080 --> 0:49:36.960
<v Speaker 1>the handle at podcasts and some more odd Lots content.

0:49:37.040 --> 0:49:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots when we

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:42.480
<v Speaker 1>push the transcripts. We have a blog, a weekly newsletter

0:49:42.520 --> 0:49:45.279
<v Speaker 1>that goes out every Friday. Go there, sign up. Thanks

0:49:45.320 --> 0:50:09.440
<v Speaker 1>for listening. See to