1 00:00:02,640 --> 00:00:05,320 Speaker 1: Welcome to the Bloomberg Penel Podcast. I'm Paul swing you, 2 00:00:05,360 --> 00:00:07,680 Speaker 1: along with my co host Lisa Brahma wits. Each day 3 00:00:07,720 --> 00:00:10,240 Speaker 1: we bring you the most noteworthy and useful interviews for 4 00:00:10,280 --> 00:00:12,520 Speaker 1: you and your money, whether at the grocery store or 5 00:00:12,560 --> 00:00:15,480 Speaker 1: the trading floor. Find a Bloomberg Penl podcast on Apple 6 00:00:15,520 --> 00:00:17,960 Speaker 1: podcast or wherever you listen to podcasts, as well as 7 00:00:17,960 --> 00:00:21,480 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com. Bernie Sanders emerged the front runner 8 00:00:21,520 --> 00:00:25,480 Speaker 1: for the Democratic primary after the New Hampshire election yesterday. 9 00:00:25,880 --> 00:00:28,200 Speaker 1: There is a question what it means for Wall Street 10 00:00:28,240 --> 00:00:31,440 Speaker 1: and right now it seems like the market just doesn't 11 00:00:31,480 --> 00:00:33,960 Speaker 1: really care. We've got new highs and the NASDAC and 12 00:00:34,000 --> 00:00:36,199 Speaker 1: the SMP and this is different from Senator war and 13 00:00:36,280 --> 00:00:38,360 Speaker 1: when she was taking the lead there seemed to be 14 00:00:38,479 --> 00:00:41,599 Speaker 1: a more negative effect on markets near Kaisar has been 15 00:00:41,640 --> 00:00:45,480 Speaker 1: tracking this columnist for Bloomberg Opinion, also founder of Unison Advisers, 16 00:00:45,720 --> 00:00:48,320 Speaker 1: joining us from A nine and studio in Washington, d C. 17 00:00:48,760 --> 00:00:52,360 Speaker 1: New Are you surprised at the market's complacency about the 18 00:00:52,400 --> 00:00:56,120 Speaker 1: potential shift to a different form of populism should Bernie 19 00:00:56,160 --> 00:01:00,200 Speaker 1: Sanders win high? Lisa, I am surprised in the US 20 00:01:00,280 --> 00:01:02,920 Speaker 1: that the narrative seems to be that if Bernie Sanders wins, 21 00:01:02,920 --> 00:01:05,120 Speaker 1: the market's going to tank, and so I would think 22 00:01:05,120 --> 00:01:07,800 Speaker 1: that that sort of um, that sentiment would weave its 23 00:01:07,800 --> 00:01:10,080 Speaker 1: way into the market. On the other hand, you know, 24 00:01:10,160 --> 00:01:13,040 Speaker 1: as I wrote in my column today, I actually think 25 00:01:13,080 --> 00:01:15,920 Speaker 1: that if Sanders wins, that could give the market a lift. 26 00:01:16,400 --> 00:01:18,800 Speaker 1: And it's possible that the market is just rejecting the 27 00:01:18,800 --> 00:01:21,319 Speaker 1: popular narrative, that the market is just not listening to 28 00:01:21,360 --> 00:01:24,520 Speaker 1: what everyone else is saying. It's interesting with you know, 29 00:01:24,560 --> 00:01:28,280 Speaker 1: a populist in the White House. Um, you know, like 30 00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:31,280 Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders, what is the when you when you talk 31 00:01:31,319 --> 00:01:34,440 Speaker 1: to market participants, investors, did they think that's good for 32 00:01:34,920 --> 00:01:39,120 Speaker 1: growth or not? You know, there seems to be just 33 00:01:39,440 --> 00:01:41,840 Speaker 1: a lot of from from the feedback that I get 34 00:01:41,959 --> 00:01:44,080 Speaker 1: and and the conversations that I'm having, there just seems 35 00:01:44,080 --> 00:01:48,080 Speaker 1: to be a ton of barrish response around Sanders in general, Um, 36 00:01:48,240 --> 00:01:51,200 Speaker 1: bad for the economy, bad for acid price, is bad 37 00:01:51,240 --> 00:01:54,040 Speaker 1: for you know, pretty much anything you can imagine. UM 38 00:01:54,040 --> 00:01:56,800 Speaker 1: that has to do with free markets. And I'm not 39 00:01:56,840 --> 00:02:00,040 Speaker 1: necessarily saying that that view is wrong, But when I 40 00:02:00,040 --> 00:02:01,800 Speaker 1: am saying is that one of the things I think 41 00:02:01,800 --> 00:02:03,760 Speaker 1: we can be sure about with Sanders is that he's 42 00:02:03,760 --> 00:02:07,160 Speaker 1: going to spend a lot, and he's proposing to finance 43 00:02:07,200 --> 00:02:09,800 Speaker 1: some of that with higher taxes. But that seems to 44 00:02:09,800 --> 00:02:12,200 Speaker 1: me is not going to pay for you know, college 45 00:02:12,240 --> 00:02:14,359 Speaker 1: for all and housing and health care for all and 46 00:02:14,400 --> 00:02:16,400 Speaker 1: a green New Deal, and so he's gonna have to 47 00:02:16,480 --> 00:02:19,919 Speaker 1: run up the federal deficits, the fiscal deficits we've had 48 00:02:20,120 --> 00:02:23,919 Speaker 1: in recent years, and in general, that should stimulate the economy. 49 00:02:24,000 --> 00:02:26,560 Speaker 1: Not heard it. It's interesting. I was reading a story 50 00:02:26,600 --> 00:02:29,160 Speaker 1: on the Bloomberg and it talks about all the reasons 51 00:02:29,200 --> 00:02:33,280 Speaker 1: why markets may be dismissing the potential for another version 52 00:02:33,440 --> 00:02:37,000 Speaker 1: of populism. Uh. And one of them is that Bernie 53 00:02:37,040 --> 00:02:39,800 Speaker 1: Sanders won't get anything done if he gets elected, because 54 00:02:39,800 --> 00:02:42,960 Speaker 1: you'll have a split Senate, uh where spen a senate 55 00:02:42,960 --> 00:02:47,079 Speaker 1: in Congress Senate and House of Representatives Democrat versus Republican. 56 00:02:47,480 --> 00:02:50,639 Speaker 1: Other people saying, well, he'll just spend more. Which is it? 57 00:02:50,800 --> 00:02:52,760 Speaker 1: Do you think that he will actually be effective in 58 00:02:52,840 --> 00:02:56,600 Speaker 1: passing these proposals? You know, that's such an interesting question 59 00:02:56,680 --> 00:02:59,560 Speaker 1: because I think, you know, obviously it's very hard to 60 00:02:59,600 --> 00:03:03,920 Speaker 1: know for sure, But I think the baseline case is 61 00:03:03,960 --> 00:03:06,080 Speaker 1: that the things that people worry about the most with 62 00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:09,920 Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders nationalizing, you know, broad swaths of our economy 63 00:03:10,400 --> 00:03:13,240 Speaker 1: UM is not going to happen precisely because of what 64 00:03:13,280 --> 00:03:14,760 Speaker 1: you say, Lisa, that he's just not going to have 65 00:03:14,800 --> 00:03:17,959 Speaker 1: the legislative muscle or I think the popular support to 66 00:03:17,960 --> 00:03:20,080 Speaker 1: be able to do it. But I think he can 67 00:03:20,120 --> 00:03:23,720 Speaker 1: do things around the edges that would increase spending UM, 68 00:03:23,800 --> 00:03:28,320 Speaker 1: you know, like maybe subsidies for for for college, maybe 69 00:03:28,360 --> 00:03:30,959 Speaker 1: some new green, new deal initiatives. So I don't think 70 00:03:31,240 --> 00:03:33,079 Speaker 1: if he becomes president, I don't think that he's gonna 71 00:03:33,080 --> 00:03:34,520 Speaker 1: be able to do as much as people fear, but 72 00:03:34,560 --> 00:03:36,360 Speaker 1: I think he will be able to do enough that 73 00:03:36,520 --> 00:03:39,040 Speaker 1: spending can be expected to go up. What about the 74 00:03:39,080 --> 00:03:43,560 Speaker 1: narrative that uh A Bernie Sanders as a Democrat to 75 00:03:43,600 --> 00:03:45,720 Speaker 1: go up against Trump is in fact bullish for the 76 00:03:45,760 --> 00:03:49,000 Speaker 1: market because the expectation is that Trump will win handily 77 00:03:49,000 --> 00:03:52,600 Speaker 1: in what former years of pro business type of uh 78 00:03:52,640 --> 00:03:55,920 Speaker 1: of an administration. You know, that seems to be the consensus. 79 00:03:55,960 --> 00:03:58,680 Speaker 1: I think now that that the reason markets are quiet 80 00:03:58,720 --> 00:04:01,680 Speaker 1: is because they're just not buying UM. The the Bernie 81 00:04:01,760 --> 00:04:04,800 Speaker 1: candidacy It'll be interesting to see how this unfold. I mean, 82 00:04:04,840 --> 00:04:06,880 Speaker 1: obviously he's gaining a lot of momentum if he wins 83 00:04:06,880 --> 00:04:09,360 Speaker 1: in the next couple of primaries, and there starts to 84 00:04:09,360 --> 00:04:13,360 Speaker 1: be some consensus around him as the nominee um and 85 00:04:13,440 --> 00:04:15,200 Speaker 1: the betting markets start to say maybe he has a 86 00:04:15,280 --> 00:04:18,960 Speaker 1: chance against Trump Um, then then maybe the market changes, 87 00:04:19,279 --> 00:04:20,680 Speaker 1: you know, one of the things to look at. You know, 88 00:04:20,680 --> 00:04:23,839 Speaker 1: people forget that Bernie Sanders upset Hillary Clinton in sixteen 89 00:04:23,880 --> 00:04:26,800 Speaker 1: in Michigan, and and it's possible that Bernie Sanders will 90 00:04:26,800 --> 00:04:29,680 Speaker 1: be more popular in the Upper Midwest than anyone currently believes. 91 00:04:30,360 --> 00:04:32,200 Speaker 1: And if that is the case, If that appears to 92 00:04:32,240 --> 00:04:34,640 Speaker 1: be the case, I would expect some sort of reaction 93 00:04:34,680 --> 00:04:37,360 Speaker 1: from markets. So look out for that near. I've heard 94 00:04:37,440 --> 00:04:40,680 Speaker 1: everyone make an argument about why a potential Bernie Sanders 95 00:04:40,800 --> 00:04:44,839 Speaker 1: or Senator Warren when would be good or bad for markets. 96 00:04:44,839 --> 00:04:48,279 Speaker 1: How effective is it to bet on elections? It's a 97 00:04:48,279 --> 00:04:51,480 Speaker 1: horrible idea, Lisa Um, you know, so, I mean, is 98 00:04:51,520 --> 00:04:53,160 Speaker 1: it even worth it? I mean, because a lot of 99 00:04:53,160 --> 00:04:55,880 Speaker 1: people are paying attention and expecting more volatility ahead of 100 00:04:55,920 --> 00:04:59,880 Speaker 1: the November election this year. Yeah, I don't, I don't. 101 00:05:00,000 --> 00:05:02,240 Speaker 1: I don't think in general that people ought to uh 102 00:05:02,520 --> 00:05:05,080 Speaker 1: out to make their out of invest based on their 103 00:05:05,120 --> 00:05:07,880 Speaker 1: predictions of the future, because none of us are very 104 00:05:07,960 --> 00:05:10,599 Speaker 1: particularly good at predicting. Um. You know, that's just I 105 00:05:10,640 --> 00:05:14,159 Speaker 1: think just ranks speculation. But I think it is useful 106 00:05:14,240 --> 00:05:16,360 Speaker 1: to consider when when there's a narrative, and one of 107 00:05:16,360 --> 00:05:17,840 Speaker 1: the reasons I wrote this column is when there's a 108 00:05:17,960 --> 00:05:20,880 Speaker 1: narrative that seems to to pervade the market, um, which 109 00:05:20,920 --> 00:05:23,800 Speaker 1: I think there is a narrative about Sanders wrecking the market. Um, 110 00:05:23,839 --> 00:05:25,680 Speaker 1: I think it's helpful to perhaps look at the other 111 00:05:25,720 --> 00:05:27,400 Speaker 1: side of it and say, wait a second, maybe the 112 00:05:27,400 --> 00:05:30,040 Speaker 1: assumptions that you're making are not going to work out well. Um. 113 00:05:30,080 --> 00:05:32,080 Speaker 1: And I'm hoping that that will make you know, that 114 00:05:32,080 --> 00:05:34,599 Speaker 1: would inject some humility and some of the predictions that 115 00:05:34,600 --> 00:05:37,000 Speaker 1: we're hearing near k Sor Thank you so much for 116 00:05:37,200 --> 00:05:39,440 Speaker 1: joining us near as a calumnist for Bloomberg Opinion also 117 00:05:39,520 --> 00:05:42,520 Speaker 1: founder of Union Advisors. Joining us from the Bloomberg ninety 118 00:05:42,800 --> 00:05:45,280 Speaker 1: one studio in Washington, d C. You can find all 119 00:05:45,279 --> 00:05:47,760 Speaker 1: the opinion stuff Bloomberg dot com, Slash Opinion, as well 120 00:05:47,760 --> 00:05:53,600 Speaker 1: as O P. I. N. Go on the terminal well. 121 00:05:53,600 --> 00:05:58,080 Speaker 1: With global yields at exceptionally low levels around the world, 122 00:05:58,160 --> 00:06:01,599 Speaker 1: including some negative yield in place like Germany, Switzerland and Japan, 123 00:06:01,640 --> 00:06:05,039 Speaker 1: where does he fixed income manager go for yield? I 124 00:06:05,040 --> 00:06:06,920 Speaker 1: think our next guests can help us out here. Paul 125 00:06:06,960 --> 00:06:10,120 Speaker 1: Brain had a fixingcoming Newton Investment Management with about sixty 126 00:06:10,200 --> 00:06:12,880 Speaker 1: six billion dollars under management. He's based in London, but 127 00:06:12,960 --> 00:06:15,960 Speaker 1: joining us here in our Bloomberg Interactor Broker studio. His 128 00:06:16,000 --> 00:06:19,680 Speaker 1: last name is actually Brain. No I was I was 129 00:06:19,720 --> 00:06:21,440 Speaker 1: just gonna let it go and just let him. I'm 130 00:06:21,480 --> 00:06:23,200 Speaker 1: not going to let that go? Was it? How was 131 00:06:23,200 --> 00:06:27,520 Speaker 1: it growing up with the last name brain? Damn challenging, challenge, 132 00:06:28,520 --> 00:06:30,920 Speaker 1: So one of those names that people don't forget right, 133 00:06:31,560 --> 00:06:34,239 Speaker 1: People just don't believe it's brain. It was called me Brian. 134 00:06:36,000 --> 00:06:38,280 Speaker 1: I would the pressure to get me, the pressure to 135 00:06:38,320 --> 00:06:39,960 Speaker 1: get good marks in school? I wink should have been 136 00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:43,400 Speaker 1: a surgeon that would have made it so Mucheesi exactly. So, 137 00:06:43,480 --> 00:06:46,880 Speaker 1: Paul again, talk to us about kind of the fixed 138 00:06:46,920 --> 00:06:49,719 Speaker 1: income markets. You're out there, you're supposed looking for yield. 139 00:06:50,400 --> 00:06:51,800 Speaker 1: Where do you go, what do you do? How do 140 00:06:51,839 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 1: you frame it up for your portfolio? Well? Yeah, I'm 141 00:06:55,440 --> 00:06:57,839 Speaker 1: the first thing to let's say, obviously yould aren't always returns, 142 00:06:57,960 --> 00:07:00,839 Speaker 1: so we all we are using comment bond that perhaps 143 00:07:00,880 --> 00:07:03,960 Speaker 1: do have very low yields. We've we try to stay 144 00:07:03,960 --> 00:07:08,239 Speaker 1: clear those negative yielders, and there are alternatives to European yields. 145 00:07:08,240 --> 00:07:10,560 Speaker 1: You've got over to US yields, Australia, New Zealand and 146 00:07:10,840 --> 00:07:13,520 Speaker 1: a few there are some European countries with positive yields 147 00:07:13,840 --> 00:07:16,920 Speaker 1: um but there's also credit, there's emerging markets. We have 148 00:07:17,520 --> 00:07:21,160 Speaker 1: strategies that are opportunistic and we tend to shop around 149 00:07:21,160 --> 00:07:23,840 Speaker 1: the globe, so we are looking for those markets that 150 00:07:24,080 --> 00:07:26,480 Speaker 1: still have a positive yield but also the potential breads 151 00:07:26,520 --> 00:07:29,200 Speaker 1: for yields to go lower. We don't see this environment 152 00:07:29,280 --> 00:07:31,640 Speaker 1: changing anytime soon. We're not looking for yields to back 153 00:07:31,760 --> 00:07:35,200 Speaker 1: up in any meaningful ways. So this sort of search 154 00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:38,400 Speaker 1: for yield, chase for for returns is still gonna be 155 00:07:38,400 --> 00:07:40,640 Speaker 1: with us for a while. Emerging markets was one call 156 00:07:40,720 --> 00:07:42,760 Speaker 1: heading into this year that that would be an area 157 00:07:42,760 --> 00:07:46,480 Speaker 1: that would have perform in particular local currency, emerging markets debt. 158 00:07:46,920 --> 00:07:50,440 Speaker 1: The belief also hinging on the dollar continuing to weaken 159 00:07:50,600 --> 00:07:53,000 Speaker 1: or not continuing starting a weekend, because we've seen it 160 00:07:53,360 --> 00:07:56,720 Speaker 1: near near the highs versus some peers. I'm just wondering, 161 00:07:57,240 --> 00:07:59,720 Speaker 1: we're not seeing that. How much does that change your 162 00:07:59,800 --> 00:08:04,320 Speaker 1: view on emerging markets? Um, the from a tactical point 163 00:08:04,320 --> 00:08:06,200 Speaker 1: of view, you've got to got to suggest that with 164 00:08:06,320 --> 00:08:07,920 Speaker 1: things like the virus are out out there, with the 165 00:08:08,000 --> 00:08:11,080 Speaker 1: geopolitical risk, it's quite high the dollar has a potential 166 00:08:11,160 --> 00:08:14,160 Speaker 1: to to stay firm. That is true, But is that 167 00:08:14,200 --> 00:08:16,640 Speaker 1: going to change the interest rate outlook for some of 168 00:08:16,640 --> 00:08:18,800 Speaker 1: those emerging market countries. Some of the reasons why by 169 00:08:19,120 --> 00:08:22,040 Speaker 1: local currency emerging markets is because they can cut interestrates. 170 00:08:22,400 --> 00:08:25,560 Speaker 1: It is because of course their currencies can appreciate over time. 171 00:08:25,720 --> 00:08:29,400 Speaker 1: So strategically we still like local currency markets. In fact, 172 00:08:29,440 --> 00:08:34,520 Speaker 1: we're taking advantage of weakness to to increase exposure. UM Technically, 173 00:08:34,600 --> 00:08:36,600 Speaker 1: we've also got dollars as well, so we have a 174 00:08:36,920 --> 00:08:39,480 Speaker 1: sort of a barbell approach there. So as you step 175 00:08:39,520 --> 00:08:41,800 Speaker 1: back and think about, you know where it's called eleven 176 00:08:41,880 --> 00:08:44,200 Speaker 1: years into this economic cycle here in the United States, 177 00:08:44,440 --> 00:08:47,400 Speaker 1: how do you think about allocating your fixing com portfolio 178 00:08:47,440 --> 00:08:50,679 Speaker 1: between investment grade maybe going out? You know, how you've 179 00:08:50,720 --> 00:08:52,880 Speaker 1: taken some more risk you mentioned you just meant talked 180 00:08:52,880 --> 00:08:56,400 Speaker 1: about emerging markets, how do you think about your allocation now, Well, 181 00:08:56,880 --> 00:08:59,480 Speaker 1: with the backdrop of a benign interest rate environment, that's say, 182 00:08:59,520 --> 00:09:02,120 Speaker 1: an interstrate environment that's not going to change radically one 183 00:09:02,120 --> 00:09:05,200 Speaker 1: way or the other, you can still chase after some 184 00:09:05,240 --> 00:09:07,960 Speaker 1: of those opportunities, some of those spreads. So a broad 185 00:09:08,000 --> 00:09:11,040 Speaker 1: exposure to these markets, risk markets like high yield, I 186 00:09:11,080 --> 00:09:14,199 Speaker 1: think is okay, but you have to be very selective. 187 00:09:14,240 --> 00:09:15,800 Speaker 1: I think very for a company point of view, and 188 00:09:15,800 --> 00:09:18,240 Speaker 1: from a set to point of view, the dispersion within 189 00:09:18,280 --> 00:09:20,240 Speaker 1: credit is still there. There's a there is a big 190 00:09:20,240 --> 00:09:22,679 Speaker 1: difference between the ones that are okay and the ones 191 00:09:22,720 --> 00:09:25,199 Speaker 1: that are not. We're seeing, as you saw last year, 192 00:09:25,240 --> 00:09:29,959 Speaker 1: companies suffer when they miss earnings reports and P and 193 00:09:30,040 --> 00:09:32,800 Speaker 1: L numbers. It's only credit quality problems out there that 194 00:09:32,800 --> 00:09:36,360 Speaker 1: you're seeing in your portfoliore creeping up or because again 195 00:09:36,440 --> 00:09:38,800 Speaker 1: kind of late in the cycle here and it seems 196 00:09:38,800 --> 00:09:41,440 Speaker 1: like you might have some credit quality issues. That that 197 00:09:41,600 --> 00:09:45,400 Speaker 1: is true, that's certainly keeping us not at our maximum exposure. 198 00:09:45,480 --> 00:09:48,360 Speaker 1: So it's an environment that does support risk on trades, 199 00:09:48,880 --> 00:09:51,320 Speaker 1: but we're going to be mindful of that possibility that 200 00:09:51,400 --> 00:09:54,800 Speaker 1: it's a fragile economic environment. Therefore it's a fragile environment 201 00:09:54,800 --> 00:09:57,199 Speaker 1: for credit and spreads are pretty tight. So well, well, 202 00:09:57,480 --> 00:10:00,720 Speaker 1: we're balancing some of that exposure by having some some 203 00:10:00,800 --> 00:10:04,840 Speaker 1: safe haven assets like US treasures, UM and other government 204 00:10:04,880 --> 00:10:07,600 Speaker 1: bonds with our credit exposure. When was the last time 205 00:10:07,600 --> 00:10:10,320 Speaker 1: that you changed your allocation around? Well, with the last 206 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:13,240 Speaker 1: couple of years, I've seen as being the fairly dynamic. 207 00:10:13,280 --> 00:10:15,680 Speaker 1: The strategy we run is called dynamic, and it's lived 208 00:10:15,720 --> 00:10:18,439 Speaker 1: up to his name. Two thousand eighteen, we were very 209 00:10:19,040 --> 00:10:21,480 Speaker 1: defensive in terms of interest rate risk and credit risk, 210 00:10:21,760 --> 00:10:24,760 Speaker 1: just brought down both of those leavers, so exposure to 211 00:10:24,880 --> 00:10:28,839 Speaker 1: both of those was record lows. Two thousand nineteen, we 212 00:10:29,000 --> 00:10:31,079 Speaker 1: went back the other way, so we we we scaled 213 00:10:31,160 --> 00:10:34,120 Speaker 1: up adjuration risk, interest rate risk, and also our credit 214 00:10:34,200 --> 00:10:36,560 Speaker 1: risk by moving back into merger markets, high yield and 215 00:10:36,640 --> 00:10:40,000 Speaker 1: also government bonds at the same time. Two thousand twenties 216 00:10:40,120 --> 00:10:43,400 Speaker 1: going to be a bit more of a carry environment, 217 00:10:43,400 --> 00:10:45,720 Speaker 1: more an environment where you want to just hang onto 218 00:10:45,760 --> 00:10:48,280 Speaker 1: those returns. You're not going to get big moves and 219 00:10:48,320 --> 00:10:51,200 Speaker 1: be very particular about your security selection and your set 220 00:10:51,240 --> 00:10:53,920 Speaker 1: to selection. What could actually happen that would force you 221 00:10:54,000 --> 00:10:58,400 Speaker 1: to rethink that the two outlies to that central goldilocks 222 00:10:58,480 --> 00:11:02,240 Speaker 1: environment are of course a recession um and the opposite, 223 00:11:02,280 --> 00:11:04,800 Speaker 1: of course is a pickup and inflation. That's that's just 224 00:11:04,880 --> 00:11:06,960 Speaker 1: stating the obvious. But if we move back to a 225 00:11:07,040 --> 00:11:09,440 Speaker 1: rising intestrate environment as we saw in two thousand and eighteen, 226 00:11:09,440 --> 00:11:12,240 Speaker 1: then of course fixed income markets are going to suffer. 227 00:11:12,520 --> 00:11:16,160 Speaker 1: If we move to an environment of collapsing economies, you're 228 00:11:16,200 --> 00:11:19,560 Speaker 1: going to see credit suffer in particular. Neither those scenarios 229 00:11:19,600 --> 00:11:22,199 Speaker 1: have particularly high weights at the moment. But what we're 230 00:11:22,040 --> 00:11:24,920 Speaker 1: monitoring to see whether those two can be triggered is 231 00:11:25,400 --> 00:11:28,480 Speaker 1: it's really China. The slowdown in economic growth in China 232 00:11:28,520 --> 00:11:31,760 Speaker 1: before the virus is something that does concern us um 233 00:11:32,080 --> 00:11:35,800 Speaker 1: that's the global manufacturing base, for instance. And then the 234 00:11:35,800 --> 00:11:37,800 Speaker 1: other side of that is just the ramping up of 235 00:11:38,160 --> 00:11:41,480 Speaker 1: potential fiscal spending leading to inflation, which is a longer 236 00:11:41,559 --> 00:11:43,160 Speaker 1: term story, not one that we're hit this year, but 237 00:11:43,280 --> 00:11:46,760 Speaker 1: something to constantly monitor. Pobrain, thank you so much for 238 00:11:46,760 --> 00:11:49,640 Speaker 1: being with us. I gotta say I love your name. 239 00:11:49,720 --> 00:11:52,040 Speaker 1: I think it's absolutely wonderful. Paperin is head of fixed 240 00:11:52,080 --> 00:11:54,439 Speaker 1: income at Newton Investment Management, which is owned by b 241 00:11:54,559 --> 00:11:57,480 Speaker 1: and Y Melon and overseas about six sixty six billion 242 00:11:57,520 --> 00:12:00,280 Speaker 1: dollars of assets from whide It, normally based in London, 243 00:12:00,400 --> 00:12:03,520 Speaker 1: joining us here in our interactive broker studio. Is definitely 244 00:12:03,559 --> 00:12:06,839 Speaker 1: an interesting time to be investing in fixed income where 245 00:12:06,880 --> 00:12:10,680 Speaker 1: the income portion has been dropped off for a huge 246 00:12:10,800 --> 00:12:24,520 Speaker 1: portion of markets globally. You know, we have attention Paul 247 00:12:24,520 --> 00:12:27,319 Speaker 1: on this show where there's a lot going on in Washington, 248 00:12:27,440 --> 00:12:29,920 Speaker 1: d C. And it's hard to know when it crosses 249 00:12:30,080 --> 00:12:34,280 Speaker 1: over into the realm of markets and the broader zeitgeist 250 00:12:34,440 --> 00:12:38,000 Speaker 1: of the United States beyond the Beltway. Noah Felman joining 251 00:12:38,080 --> 00:12:41,600 Speaker 1: us on a story that does percolate on that very 252 00:12:41,679 --> 00:12:44,199 Speaker 1: much so. Noah Feldman, Professor of Law at Harvard University, 253 00:12:44,240 --> 00:12:47,840 Speaker 1: also a Bloomberg Opinion columnist, uh and Professor, I'd love 254 00:12:47,840 --> 00:12:50,240 Speaker 1: to get your take on what just happened with the 255 00:12:50,280 --> 00:12:55,079 Speaker 1: Department of Justice coming in making a recommendation to revise 256 00:12:55,200 --> 00:12:58,959 Speaker 1: the sentencing recommendation by prosecutors in the Roger Stone case 257 00:12:59,480 --> 00:13:03,760 Speaker 1: after President Trump tweeted about it, and then the subsequent 258 00:13:03,920 --> 00:13:07,400 Speaker 1: resignation of those prosecutors. Can you just give us a 259 00:13:07,440 --> 00:13:10,480 Speaker 1: sense how big of a deal is this It's a 260 00:13:10,559 --> 00:13:12,840 Speaker 1: very big deal when it comes to the independence of 261 00:13:12,840 --> 00:13:16,400 Speaker 1: the Department of Justice from political influence, especially from the president. 262 00:13:16,880 --> 00:13:18,680 Speaker 1: So what you have to understand is that you under 263 00:13:18,679 --> 00:13:21,920 Speaker 1: our constitution, the Department of Justice isn't an independent agency. 264 00:13:22,000 --> 00:13:24,920 Speaker 1: But because everyone understands that if you don't have real 265 00:13:24,960 --> 00:13:27,360 Speaker 1: independence and the people who investigate in prosecute crime, you 266 00:13:27,400 --> 00:13:29,680 Speaker 1: won't live under the rule of law. There's a strong 267 00:13:29,720 --> 00:13:33,040 Speaker 1: tradition of the executive branch respecting the judgments of the 268 00:13:33,080 --> 00:13:35,520 Speaker 1: Department of Justice. And what's bad here is not just 269 00:13:35,720 --> 00:13:39,160 Speaker 1: that the Department of Justice reversed a recommendation for a 270 00:13:39,160 --> 00:13:42,000 Speaker 1: strong sentence by its prosecutors, but that they did it 271 00:13:42,080 --> 00:13:45,800 Speaker 1: after a presidential tweet and in a case of Roger Stone, 272 00:13:46,080 --> 00:13:49,120 Speaker 1: who lied to Congress to protect the president. So it 273 00:13:49,200 --> 00:13:51,440 Speaker 1: really looks like the Department of Justice is just knuckling 274 00:13:51,559 --> 00:13:55,160 Speaker 1: under to Donald Trump, no matter what they Department Justice 275 00:13:55,200 --> 00:13:57,800 Speaker 1: may claim to the contrary. So clearly some pressure being 276 00:13:57,800 --> 00:14:02,800 Speaker 1: applied by Attorney General William barr Um. How uncommon is 277 00:14:02,840 --> 00:14:05,560 Speaker 1: it for that to occur, for the Attorney General to 278 00:14:05,640 --> 00:14:09,880 Speaker 1: insert himself or herself into a d o J proceeding 279 00:14:09,960 --> 00:14:12,800 Speaker 1: like this, Well, it's extremely uncommon for it to happen 280 00:14:12,880 --> 00:14:15,120 Speaker 1: in this way after the fact. So you might imagine 281 00:14:15,160 --> 00:14:17,160 Speaker 1: in a very very high profile case, you would go, 282 00:14:17,600 --> 00:14:19,160 Speaker 1: you know, through the chain, and someone would say, well, 283 00:14:19,200 --> 00:14:21,240 Speaker 1: let's check with the mainjustice and maybe the Attorney General 284 00:14:21,240 --> 00:14:23,920 Speaker 1: before we ask for a sentence. But what's extremely rare 285 00:14:24,000 --> 00:14:26,240 Speaker 1: is that when the Department has filed a document with 286 00:14:26,320 --> 00:14:28,440 Speaker 1: the court saying this is how many years we think 287 00:14:28,480 --> 00:14:31,560 Speaker 1: this defendant deserves, that the autorian Joe would then come 288 00:14:31,560 --> 00:14:35,120 Speaker 1: in after the fact and after a presidential tweet and say, 289 00:14:35,200 --> 00:14:38,320 Speaker 1: we're changing our mind, We're reversing ourselves, We're retracting that moment, 290 00:14:38,480 --> 00:14:41,800 Speaker 1: putting anyone that undercuts the independence of the prosecutors. And 291 00:14:41,880 --> 00:14:45,200 Speaker 1: that's why those four prosecutors all stepped down from this case. 292 00:14:45,600 --> 00:14:48,520 Speaker 1: It's essentially the closest that a government employee can come 293 00:14:48,560 --> 00:14:50,960 Speaker 1: to an official protest. It's a way of saying, Okay, 294 00:14:51,000 --> 00:14:52,600 Speaker 1: if you're you're going to do this over our heads 295 00:14:52,600 --> 00:14:54,200 Speaker 1: and we want no part of it, now, can you 296 00:14:54,240 --> 00:14:56,640 Speaker 1: give us a sense in the bigger picture, giving your 297 00:14:56,680 --> 00:15:00,440 Speaker 1: experience clerking on the Supreme Court, giving your experi arians 298 00:15:00,560 --> 00:15:04,480 Speaker 1: studying history and and Harvard, just getting a sense of 299 00:15:05,000 --> 00:15:08,120 Speaker 1: the potential implications here. I mean, you said it was 300 00:15:08,160 --> 00:15:10,240 Speaker 1: it's a really big deal, But what does that mean. 301 00:15:11,480 --> 00:15:15,479 Speaker 1: What it means is that this president is now completely 302 00:15:15,880 --> 00:15:18,240 Speaker 1: you know, feeling his capacity to do whatever he wants 303 00:15:18,280 --> 00:15:21,640 Speaker 1: in the aftermath of the failed impeachment. Um, you know, 304 00:15:21,680 --> 00:15:24,000 Speaker 1: he's going to be able to do whatever he wants. 305 00:15:24,040 --> 00:15:26,480 Speaker 1: But it more importantly, I think even more importantly than that, 306 00:15:26,560 --> 00:15:29,480 Speaker 1: in the long run, it undercuts public trust in the 307 00:15:29,560 --> 00:15:31,960 Speaker 1: FBI and the Department of Justice, and it undercuts the 308 00:15:32,040 --> 00:15:34,600 Speaker 1: basic idea that we live in a country where you 309 00:15:34,640 --> 00:15:38,400 Speaker 1: won't be prison imprisoned, or prosecuted or sentenced based on 310 00:15:38,440 --> 00:15:41,160 Speaker 1: who your friends are or whether you're in with the administration, 311 00:15:41,360 --> 00:15:43,320 Speaker 1: but rather based on whether you've broken the law and 312 00:15:43,360 --> 00:15:45,400 Speaker 1: how serious your crimes are. You know, if we lose 313 00:15:45,440 --> 00:15:48,680 Speaker 1: as a public our faith in that, then that deeply 314 00:15:48,760 --> 00:15:51,360 Speaker 1: undercuts the capacity of our country to go forward as 315 00:15:51,360 --> 00:15:53,680 Speaker 1: the rule of law country, losing the faith in it. 316 00:15:54,120 --> 00:15:56,520 Speaker 1: But there is a pushback that people have to this, 317 00:15:57,080 --> 00:16:00,440 Speaker 1: that is, it's always been this way. It's just that 318 00:16:00,560 --> 00:16:04,480 Speaker 1: President Trump is upfront with it, and there's less subtlety 319 00:16:04,680 --> 00:16:07,960 Speaker 1: about some of the machinations behind the scenes. Why we 320 00:16:08,000 --> 00:16:10,040 Speaker 1: certainly have heard that with respect some of the travel 321 00:16:10,080 --> 00:16:13,240 Speaker 1: bands and other things that they have done. Is that 322 00:16:13,320 --> 00:16:15,040 Speaker 1: the case, I mean that sort of, I don't think so. 323 00:16:15,200 --> 00:16:17,720 Speaker 1: I don't think the history bears out that claim. You know, certainly, 324 00:16:17,800 --> 00:16:20,000 Speaker 1: in all of the years that I've been exposed to 325 00:16:20,040 --> 00:16:22,400 Speaker 1: the Department of Justice and had you know, close colleagues 326 00:16:22,400 --> 00:16:26,000 Speaker 1: and friends who worked there, there's been an extraordinarily strong 327 00:16:26,160 --> 00:16:31,080 Speaker 1: tradition of prosecutorial independence, and that's been deeply eroded throughout 328 00:16:31,080 --> 00:16:33,320 Speaker 1: this administration, but especially now. And you have to add 329 00:16:33,360 --> 00:16:36,120 Speaker 1: to that the fact that this prosecution was started by 330 00:16:36,360 --> 00:16:39,720 Speaker 1: Robert Mueller's team. They filed this prosecution, and indeed several 331 00:16:39,720 --> 00:16:43,080 Speaker 1: of the prosecutors who were still involved were from Mueller's team. 332 00:16:43,120 --> 00:16:47,160 Speaker 1: That was supposed to be a special prosecutor who was independent, 333 00:16:47,200 --> 00:16:49,880 Speaker 1: who wasn't pushed around by the by the Attorney in general, 334 00:16:49,960 --> 00:16:52,240 Speaker 1: by the president. And so that was the whole point 335 00:16:52,280 --> 00:16:55,400 Speaker 1: of it. And to undercut that really doesn't have a precedent, 336 00:16:55,440 --> 00:16:58,080 Speaker 1: you know, it basically says special prosecutor isn't actually all 337 00:16:58,080 --> 00:17:01,520 Speaker 1: that independent? No, I just next thirty seconds, what's the 338 00:17:01,640 --> 00:17:05,520 Speaker 1: role if any oversight wise that Congress could I guess 339 00:17:05,600 --> 00:17:08,800 Speaker 1: exercise The most of the Congress can do at this 340 00:17:08,840 --> 00:17:12,280 Speaker 1: stage is call for an investigation. They can ask the 341 00:17:12,320 --> 00:17:16,840 Speaker 1: Attorney General and the U. S. Attorney for for Washington, 342 00:17:16,920 --> 00:17:20,359 Speaker 1: d C. To come and testify before it and ask 343 00:17:20,480 --> 00:17:24,159 Speaker 1: them how the decision process went and create greater transparency 344 00:17:24,320 --> 00:17:28,480 Speaker 1: around this. But there's really no other institutional check available, 345 00:17:28,520 --> 00:17:31,080 Speaker 1: and the ultimate check, which is impeachment, has already been 346 00:17:31,160 --> 00:17:34,280 Speaker 1: used and it didn't work. No Feldman, thanks so much 347 00:17:34,320 --> 00:17:37,080 Speaker 1: for joining us. We really appreciate your perspective. Noah Feldman's 348 00:17:37,119 --> 00:17:41,800 Speaker 1: professor law at Harvard University, also a Bloomberg Opinion columnist. UH. 349 00:17:41,840 --> 00:17:44,200 Speaker 1: He also has a witness in the House impeachment investigation, 350 00:17:44,240 --> 00:17:45,760 Speaker 1: and it was a clerk to the U. S. Supreme 351 00:17:45,800 --> 00:17:49,359 Speaker 1: Court Justice David Suitor, So lots of experience with the 352 00:17:49,480 --> 00:17:53,120 Speaker 1: law within the belt Way. You can read Noah's work 353 00:17:53,160 --> 00:17:56,960 Speaker 1: on Bloomberg Opinion at Bloomberg dot com slash opinion uh 354 00:17:57,000 --> 00:17:59,080 Speaker 1: and on the Terminal and O P I N GO. 355 00:17:59,359 --> 00:18:01,840 Speaker 1: Lots of great work that those folks do, kind of 356 00:18:01,880 --> 00:18:04,200 Speaker 1: peeling back the onion on a lot of important issues. 357 00:18:08,680 --> 00:18:13,040 Speaker 1: Tis the season of love and affection and collective guilt 358 00:18:13,119 --> 00:18:17,480 Speaker 1: and pressure to get something for your significant other. Uh, 359 00:18:17,520 --> 00:18:20,000 Speaker 1: it is Valentine's Day coming up on Friday? Are you 360 00:18:20,000 --> 00:18:23,320 Speaker 1: doing anything, Paul, I'm sure we are actually Eagles concert. 361 00:18:23,680 --> 00:18:28,000 Speaker 1: Eagles that's with the family. Okay, well, it is a question. 362 00:18:28,119 --> 00:18:29,960 Speaker 1: You know, what is sort of the appropriate gift. I 363 00:18:30,000 --> 00:18:32,879 Speaker 1: will say that. Um My older son even asked me 364 00:18:32,920 --> 00:18:34,840 Speaker 1: that at one point and I thought, oh my goodness, 365 00:18:35,200 --> 00:18:38,000 Speaker 1: I can't believe already having this conversation between us now, 366 00:18:38,000 --> 00:18:40,040 Speaker 1: someone probably could have waited a bit better than I did. 367 00:18:40,119 --> 00:18:43,920 Speaker 1: Chris McCann, president, chief executive officer of one Flowers dot 368 00:18:43,960 --> 00:18:46,480 Speaker 1: Com in based in Long Island here with us in 369 00:18:46,520 --> 00:18:50,199 Speaker 1: our interactive broker studios. Is flowers still the go to thing? 370 00:18:50,400 --> 00:18:53,280 Speaker 1: Is that what people go for on Valentine's Day? Valentine's 371 00:18:53,320 --> 00:18:54,919 Speaker 1: Day is just such a great day and when you 372 00:18:54,960 --> 00:18:57,440 Speaker 1: really look at it being the holiday of love, it 373 00:18:58,200 --> 00:19:00,199 Speaker 1: is it is for you because it counts are a 374 00:19:00,240 --> 00:19:03,320 Speaker 1: significant portion of your sales. So yes, flowers are the 375 00:19:03,440 --> 00:19:07,680 Speaker 1: go to a gift. They must have gift, especially if 376 00:19:07,680 --> 00:19:09,920 Speaker 1: you want to express yourself and connect with so many 377 00:19:09,960 --> 00:19:13,440 Speaker 1: important people, especially your significant other. Roses say at all, 378 00:19:14,359 --> 00:19:18,080 Speaker 1: that's still to go to or an Eagles concert, but 379 00:19:18,160 --> 00:19:19,879 Speaker 1: you still have to have the roses before you go 380 00:19:19,920 --> 00:19:24,280 Speaker 1: to an eagle. Okay, stuff, That's what some of the 381 00:19:24,280 --> 00:19:27,000 Speaker 1: new products or something that people are doing today and 382 00:19:27,000 --> 00:19:28,639 Speaker 1: maybe they didn't do five or ten, ten years. And 383 00:19:28,720 --> 00:19:30,120 Speaker 1: one of the things that we do is to make 384 00:19:30,119 --> 00:19:32,520 Speaker 1: sure that we have accessible price points for everything. So 385 00:19:32,640 --> 00:19:36,000 Speaker 1: roses all the most dominant flower in the most popular 386 00:19:36,040 --> 00:19:38,720 Speaker 1: flower for Valentine's Day. We bring in other things like, 387 00:19:38,760 --> 00:19:41,919 Speaker 1: for example, even preserved roses. So we have these magnificent 388 00:19:42,000 --> 00:19:44,720 Speaker 1: roses that are called which come in this nice round box, 389 00:19:44,760 --> 00:19:46,960 Speaker 1: a heart shaped box, and they they'll last you for 390 00:19:47,240 --> 00:19:50,200 Speaker 1: over six months. Can I be a little cynical here, 391 00:19:50,280 --> 00:19:53,000 Speaker 1: I'm sorry I have this time even get started this 392 00:19:53,080 --> 00:19:55,520 Speaker 1: thing where people are supposed to go out and buy 393 00:19:55,520 --> 00:19:58,159 Speaker 1: things for for for their significant others vountable. It's the 394 00:19:58,200 --> 00:20:00,880 Speaker 1: Feast of Saint Valentine, right, and it's all about love 395 00:20:00,920 --> 00:20:03,320 Speaker 1: and romance. But what we love about it really is 396 00:20:03,359 --> 00:20:06,280 Speaker 1: that has expanded beyond that. So when now people and 397 00:20:06,320 --> 00:20:08,600 Speaker 1: you see the growth and average spend according the National 398 00:20:08,640 --> 00:20:12,080 Speaker 1: Retail Federation, where you're seeing growth because people are buying 399 00:20:12,119 --> 00:20:15,560 Speaker 1: more to express themselves to family members, co workers, friends, 400 00:20:15,880 --> 00:20:18,800 Speaker 1: not just as significant other. Of course, a spouse or 401 00:20:18,800 --> 00:20:21,879 Speaker 1: a significant o. There's still accounts for about that spend, 402 00:20:22,280 --> 00:20:24,480 Speaker 1: but we need to do that, we need to express 403 00:20:25,359 --> 00:20:28,240 Speaker 1: this is really interesting. Hang on, so is for the 404 00:20:28,280 --> 00:20:31,040 Speaker 1: significant other? How has that changed over time? How much 405 00:20:31,160 --> 00:20:34,760 Speaker 1: more have have sort of friends, coworkers? Really people are 406 00:20:34,800 --> 00:20:38,760 Speaker 1: buying so that stayed about the same. Yes, yes, flowers 407 00:20:38,760 --> 00:20:40,919 Speaker 1: and gifts digital greeting cards if you just want to 408 00:20:40,920 --> 00:20:42,679 Speaker 1: do something simple, and you could do that with some 409 00:20:42,760 --> 00:20:46,440 Speaker 1: e cards from one Flowers of course, But really we 410 00:20:46,600 --> 00:20:49,080 Speaker 1: were seeing the growth in the category is from more 411 00:20:49,080 --> 00:20:52,080 Speaker 1: and more connections. People need to manage relationships on a 412 00:20:52,119 --> 00:20:55,560 Speaker 1: broad network, not just the romantic relationship that you have, 413 00:20:55,880 --> 00:20:59,720 Speaker 1: and we are relationship company. So how do you manage 414 00:20:59,760 --> 00:21:02,800 Speaker 1: like surgeon volume and demand on a day like Mother's 415 00:21:02,840 --> 00:21:06,080 Speaker 1: Day or Valentine's Day? Is that? I mean? I would 416 00:21:06,080 --> 00:21:10,159 Speaker 1: think that'd be a kind of logistical struggle. It's wildly complex. 417 00:21:10,200 --> 00:21:11,920 Speaker 1: The good news is we've been doing this for over 418 00:21:12,000 --> 00:21:14,240 Speaker 1: forty years now, and we have a bunch of people 419 00:21:14,240 --> 00:21:15,840 Speaker 1: that have been with us a long time, and then 420 00:21:15,840 --> 00:21:18,320 Speaker 1: we complement that staff with new people all the time. 421 00:21:18,680 --> 00:21:21,359 Speaker 1: I'm really really proud of the team the way we execute, 422 00:21:21,560 --> 00:21:23,439 Speaker 1: especially if you look at our results coming out of 423 00:21:23,480 --> 00:21:26,960 Speaker 1: this last first half of year. The execution was phenomenal. 424 00:21:27,000 --> 00:21:29,680 Speaker 1: We grew the top line by seven percent, but we 425 00:21:29,960 --> 00:21:32,399 Speaker 1: we had increased the guidance for the second half of 426 00:21:32,400 --> 00:21:34,400 Speaker 1: the year on EPs from a growth rate of eight 427 00:21:34,400 --> 00:21:37,800 Speaker 1: to ten percent to fifteen to seventeen percent because of 428 00:21:37,840 --> 00:21:41,040 Speaker 1: the way we're executing and showing leverage on our operating platform. Paul, 429 00:21:41,080 --> 00:21:43,960 Speaker 1: have you ever bought flowers for any of your co workers? 430 00:21:44,480 --> 00:21:47,560 Speaker 1: Co workers? Note? Have you ever bought a Valentine's gift 431 00:21:47,560 --> 00:21:51,240 Speaker 1: friend co workers? I've actually got a list of names 432 00:21:51,400 --> 00:21:54,200 Speaker 1: from my kids schools, so that I'm supposed to give 433 00:21:54,200 --> 00:21:57,880 Speaker 1: out Valentine's to everyone at school with their names on it. 434 00:21:58,119 --> 00:22:01,000 Speaker 1: And that's a thing that's done everybody, and and my 435 00:22:01,080 --> 00:22:03,880 Speaker 1: kids always get mad if it's not a sufficient thing. Well, 436 00:22:03,880 --> 00:22:08,960 Speaker 1: how about chocolate covered berries for a coworker from Sharry's Berries, 437 00:22:07,200 --> 00:22:13,800 Speaker 1: a company we acquired this past August. But I'm wondering 438 00:22:14,480 --> 00:22:18,640 Speaker 1: about delivery right now? How challenging is it given that 439 00:22:18,680 --> 00:22:22,959 Speaker 1: there is a competitive landscape, uh, with something that rhymes 440 00:22:22,960 --> 00:22:26,159 Speaker 1: with Amazon dot Com. That's kind of you know, the 441 00:22:26,160 --> 00:22:28,440 Speaker 1: big the big player here. As we look at deliveries 442 00:22:28,440 --> 00:22:30,840 Speaker 1: I think the floral network that we have bloom That 443 00:22:30,960 --> 00:22:33,040 Speaker 1: has always been in the same day delivery business, so 444 00:22:33,080 --> 00:22:34,800 Speaker 1: we've been out in front of that curve for a 445 00:22:34,840 --> 00:22:37,000 Speaker 1: long time. But one of the things that we're saying 446 00:22:37,000 --> 00:22:39,199 Speaker 1: that's making it even better for us and the retail 447 00:22:39,240 --> 00:22:42,320 Speaker 1: Flora's to make those deliveries is the onslaught of new 448 00:22:42,400 --> 00:22:45,280 Speaker 1: delivery companies, whether that be companies like a door Dash 449 00:22:45,640 --> 00:22:48,800 Speaker 1: or a deliver or or some of these other third 450 00:22:48,840 --> 00:22:52,040 Speaker 1: party delivery companies. So we have access to those companies 451 00:22:52,080 --> 00:22:54,760 Speaker 1: as well as our own networks of delivery personnel. So 452 00:22:54,800 --> 00:22:57,400 Speaker 1: it's actually making it better for us, even though we've 453 00:22:57,440 --> 00:22:59,800 Speaker 1: been the pioneer and same day delivery. Well, looking at 454 00:22:59,800 --> 00:23:01,240 Speaker 1: your but I was just looking at the financials on 455 00:23:01,280 --> 00:23:04,320 Speaker 1: the Bloomberg terminal, and you're a lot more than a 456 00:23:04,440 --> 00:23:06,719 Speaker 1: flower company. I mean, it's this, it's the gift. I mean, 457 00:23:06,800 --> 00:23:10,119 Speaker 1: so what else besides flowers kind of drives your business. Well, 458 00:23:10,119 --> 00:23:11,680 Speaker 1: that's why I was going to recommend also, I for 459 00:23:11,800 --> 00:23:14,720 Speaker 1: Valentine's Day, besides the berries, maybe a nice doughnut bouquet 460 00:23:14,720 --> 00:23:17,480 Speaker 1: from Harry and David. So we've moved into the gomet 461 00:23:17,520 --> 00:23:20,320 Speaker 1: food category over the past number of years, because that's 462 00:23:20,320 --> 00:23:22,520 Speaker 1: what our customers tell us they're using to express and 463 00:23:22,560 --> 00:23:25,280 Speaker 1: connect with the important people in their lives. So Harry 464 00:23:25,280 --> 00:23:28,720 Speaker 1: and David, Cheryl's Cookies, one hundred of baskets, food bouquets, 465 00:23:28,720 --> 00:23:32,320 Speaker 1: Sharry's Berries, the popcorn factory, a couple of others, to 466 00:23:32,359 --> 00:23:34,639 Speaker 1: the point where that's more than half of our business today. 467 00:23:35,119 --> 00:23:37,479 Speaker 1: What would you want to get for Valentine's Day? I 468 00:23:37,520 --> 00:23:39,360 Speaker 1: don't know. There's a lot that that cherry sounded good, 469 00:23:39,400 --> 00:23:42,280 Speaker 1: the chocolate thing, Maji. Yeah, Well, I mean, would you 470 00:23:42,320 --> 00:23:46,000 Speaker 1: want to be getting Valentine's gifts from your coworkers. I'm 471 00:23:46,000 --> 00:23:48,719 Speaker 1: gonna make this as awkward for your absolute Possibly you're like, 472 00:23:48,760 --> 00:23:51,920 Speaker 1: oh my god, let me get back to the Bloomberg terminal. Exactly, 473 00:23:52,560 --> 00:23:56,360 Speaker 1: but we need to work on this a little bit interesting. 474 00:23:56,440 --> 00:23:58,640 Speaker 1: Chris McCann, thanks so much for joining us. Get ready 475 00:23:58,680 --> 00:24:00,560 Speaker 1: for the big day. Chris mccamp press it in, CEO 476 00:24:00,560 --> 00:24:04,600 Speaker 1: of Flowers dot Com, Inc. Based in Long Island. Yes, 477 00:24:04,640 --> 00:24:06,640 Speaker 1: I'm gonna make it awkward for you, Paul. Yes, let's 478 00:24:06,720 --> 00:24:09,800 Speaker 1: keep going. They carry on. You can cite numbers on 479 00:24:09,880 --> 00:24:13,320 Speaker 1: the on the exactly we got Valentine's Day coming up 480 00:24:13,320 --> 00:24:16,280 Speaker 1: on Friday, and one flowers dot com will be there. 481 00:24:16,440 --> 00:24:18,720 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast. 482 00:24:18,840 --> 00:24:21,480 Speaker 1: You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts 483 00:24:21,560 --> 00:24:24,639 Speaker 1: or whatever podcast platform you prefer. Paul Sweeney, I'm on 484 00:24:24,680 --> 00:24:27,239 Speaker 1: Twitter at pt Sweeney. I'm Lisa abram Woy. It's I'm 485 00:24:27,280 --> 00:24:30,160 Speaker 1: on Twitter at Lisa abram Woit's one before the podcast. 486 00:24:30,160 --> 00:24:32,760 Speaker 1: You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio