WEBVTT - Netflix Adds 9.33 Million Customers, Crushing Street Forecasts

0:00:02.920 --> 0:00:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news. This is Bloomberg Business

0:00:10.720 --> 0:00:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Wait inside from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:00:14.000 --> 0:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine, plus global business, finance and

0:00:18.400 --> 0:00:22.880
<v Speaker 1>tech news. The Bloomberg Business Week Podcast with Carol Messer

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.759
<v Speaker 1>and Tim Stenebeck from Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.000
<v Speaker 2>All Right, everybody, we're gonna stay with Netflix right now

0:00:29.080 --> 0:00:32.279
<v Speaker 2>because the stock is down just about five percent here

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 2>in the aftermarket. Kind of the red stickies, as we

0:00:34.560 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 2>like to say, the big headlines at Bloomberg. This was

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:39.239
<v Speaker 2>a blowout number. I can feel like it shocked all

0:00:39.240 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>of us. First quarter streaming paid net change in terms

0:00:42.760 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 2>of the subscribers up nine point three three million. Timmy

0:00:46.520 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 2>estimate was four point eight four million.

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 3>That's not the only beat.

0:00:49.640 --> 0:00:52.159
<v Speaker 4>First quarter EPs coming at five dollars and twenty eight

0:00:52.200 --> 0:00:54.400
<v Speaker 4>cents per share. Estimates were for four dollars and fifty

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 4>two cents. The company also out with second quarter EPs,

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.160
<v Speaker 4>the guidance for sixty eight versus it's a four fifty four.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:03.480
<v Speaker 3>And then another big headline.

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:06.000
<v Speaker 4>We should note they're going to end reporting quarterly membership

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.360
<v Speaker 4>numbers next year. We got a great group of folks

0:01:08.400 --> 0:01:10.160
<v Speaker 4>with us right now to help us break down these numbers.

0:01:10.200 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 4>Paul Sweeney is co host of Bloomberg Surveillance. He joins

0:01:12.640 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 4>us on the phone from New Jersey. Paul spent thirty

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 4>years as a media analyst, also with US as Bloomberg

0:01:17.000 --> 0:01:19.680
<v Speaker 4>News earnings reporter Red Brown. Hey, Paul, I want to

0:01:19.680 --> 0:01:21.160
<v Speaker 4>start with you because I got to tell you, I'm

0:01:21.160 --> 0:01:24.600
<v Speaker 4>pretty surprised by the reaction to these numbers, considering they

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:27.160
<v Speaker 4>were such it was such a blowout quarter. Why do

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:29.319
<v Speaker 4>you think the stock is moving lower in the after hours.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:31.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think it's a little bit by the rumor.

0:01:31.600 --> 0:01:33.479
<v Speaker 5>So the news people have been hyping up this quarter

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 5>as a really big quarter because you know, the paid

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 5>subscription was going to fuel subscriber growth. Yet again here

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:42.080
<v Speaker 5>that a big beat on subs last quarter. So the

0:01:42.120 --> 0:01:44.880
<v Speaker 5>stock was up about twenty five percent since they reported

0:01:45.000 --> 0:01:47.000
<v Speaker 5>in January. So it's probably just taking back some of

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.440
<v Speaker 5>those games. But you know, across the board, the subscriber

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 5>numbers really really were impressive. One thing to note about

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 5>that big subscriber beat to the last couple of quarters.

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:58.240
<v Speaker 5>These are kind of short term phenomena. As you know,

0:01:58.320 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 5>the people that were sharing accounts now we're paying for

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:04.640
<v Speaker 5>their owns and that'll fade out over the next several quarters,

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 5>and then the focus will become, i think, on the

0:02:07.560 --> 0:02:09.920
<v Speaker 5>advertising side of the business as well.

0:02:10.200 --> 0:02:12.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's interesting. Do you care, Paul to hear that

0:02:12.520 --> 0:02:15.280
<v Speaker 2>they're going to end reporting quarterly membership numbers next year?

0:02:15.600 --> 0:02:17.160
<v Speaker 2>It feels like it's something we focus on.

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, yeah, it really is, and that, quite frankly, that

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 5>had been the primary driver of this stock really since

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:27.240
<v Speaker 5>it switched to this digital streaming format. That was the

0:02:27.440 --> 0:02:30.280
<v Speaker 5>metric that moved the stock. The company really wants to

0:02:30.320 --> 0:02:33.280
<v Speaker 5>get away from that and get more towards Hey, guys,

0:02:33.360 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 5>just view us as you would any other company stock.

0:02:36.560 --> 0:02:39.559
<v Speaker 5>Look at revenue, look at cash flow, look at profitability,

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 5>all those types of things, and let's focus less on

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:45.320
<v Speaker 5>subscriber growth because, quite frankly, we pretty much got pretty

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 5>much everybody that's out there, so it's really not so

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.280
<v Speaker 5>much subscriber story. It's more how much money can we

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 5>make off each subscriber?

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:52.280
<v Speaker 3>Paul, one more to you.

0:02:52.320 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 4>And then I want to bring in Red Brown, our

0:02:53.880 --> 0:02:57.239
<v Speaker 4>earnings reporter who's been watching these numbers closely. Why would

0:02:57.280 --> 0:03:00.040
<v Speaker 4>a company Is there any positive way to read in

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.960
<v Speaker 4>to a company like Netflix no longer reporting this. I mean,

0:03:03.040 --> 0:03:06.400
<v Speaker 4>no question, the more data for investors the better. Is

0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:08.119
<v Speaker 4>this a negative this is a negative sign?

0:03:08.240 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 5>No? Oh yeah, I think. I think for an investor

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 5>and an analyst, you always want more information, particularly when

0:03:14.880 --> 0:03:18.440
<v Speaker 5>it's critical information in terms of what drives the growth

0:03:18.520 --> 0:03:21.080
<v Speaker 5>of the business. And it's obviously just it's subscribers and

0:03:21.080 --> 0:03:24.160
<v Speaker 5>how much revenue you generate off each subscriber. It's pretty simple,

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:25.919
<v Speaker 5>so I you take one of those data points away.

0:03:26.120 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 5>But we've seen other companies in other industries do that,

0:03:29.400 --> 0:03:33.640
<v Speaker 5>particularly subscriber based industries. They try to get you away

0:03:33.639 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 5>from that number and get you back to where are

0:03:36.680 --> 0:03:39.240
<v Speaker 5>Look how they are managing the business, and what they're

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 5>telling you is we're not managing the business to maximize

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.400
<v Speaker 5>subscriber with We're managing the business to maximize revenue and

0:03:44.440 --> 0:03:48.839
<v Speaker 5>profit per user. That's our management focus and that's how

0:03:48.880 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 5>we look at it, and that's how we think you

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:51.040
<v Speaker 5>should look at it.

0:03:51.120 --> 0:03:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Red Brown, come on in on it. We talk earnings

0:03:53.000 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 2>with you all the time. You know, I'm watching Netflix

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:59.000
<v Speaker 2>shares that have been bouncing around in the aftermarket a

0:03:59.000 --> 0:04:01.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of moves right now, This still lower down about

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:02.200
<v Speaker 2>three and a half percent.

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, I think what might be explaining a

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 6>little bit of the negative movement too, as we saw

0:04:06.960 --> 0:04:10.680
<v Speaker 6>them actually boost their full year outlook for operating margin.

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 6>They beat EPs in the first quarter. Their guidance for

0:04:14.640 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 6>the second quarter was ahead of estimates as well, But

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 6>it seems like there's a little bit of a disconnect

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.719
<v Speaker 6>between the full year number. If you know, those two

0:04:21.720 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 6>pretty healthy beats are not translating to the full year

0:04:25.400 --> 0:04:29.000
<v Speaker 6>analysts investors might start to question maybe where in that

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 6>back half of the year are things starting to slow

0:04:31.240 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 6>down as well. So I think that might also be

0:04:33.600 --> 0:04:36.159
<v Speaker 6>factoring in here a little bit to the negative price

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 6>movement we're seeing.

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 2>Let's speak a little bit to what Paul was saying,

0:04:38.640 --> 0:04:40.440
<v Speaker 2>and I think it's a good point that we talked

0:04:40.480 --> 0:04:42.920
<v Speaker 2>about it earlier. Just you know, this stock has been

0:04:42.960 --> 0:04:46.000
<v Speaker 2>on fire this year, and you know, it looks like

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 2>the numbers are are pretty upbeat, but it has been

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.600
<v Speaker 2>such an outperformer this year, and I just do wonder

0:04:52.640 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 2>how much of that is at play as well.

0:04:54.360 --> 0:04:56.800
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean, if you look at what analysts are

0:04:57.400 --> 0:04:59.360
<v Speaker 6>rating for the stock, that it's kind of topped out

0:04:59.360 --> 0:05:02.680
<v Speaker 6>at the analyst ratings point at this point. So you know,

0:05:03.040 --> 0:05:06.480
<v Speaker 6>even with these really impressive numbers, uh, maybe the it's

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 6>just kind of a hit hit its ceiling for the

0:05:08.880 --> 0:05:09.360
<v Speaker 6>time being.

0:05:09.680 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Red, it's so interesting, you know, I was saying

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 4>as we were going into our beyond the bell our

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 4>our coverage with TV as we you know, waited for

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.960
<v Speaker 4>these Netflix earnings, I was saying, you know, this could

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.400
<v Speaker 4>really set the tone for the quarter for a lot

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:24.520
<v Speaker 4>of the consumer tech companies that are set to report

0:05:24.560 --> 0:05:27.599
<v Speaker 4>in the coming weeks. And yet yet we get a

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.520
<v Speaker 4>blowout number pretty much across the board, and we see

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:32.240
<v Speaker 4>a negative reaction like this, and I'm wondering how we

0:05:32.279 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 4>can extrapolate this beyond Netflix.

0:05:34.440 --> 0:05:37.080
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, it's a good question. I mean, people have been

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:39.599
<v Speaker 6>really focused on earnings this quarter, and a lot of

0:05:39.640 --> 0:05:41.839
<v Speaker 6>analysts are saying, you know, focus on the numbers, don't

0:05:41.839 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 6>buy unto the hype, and has really big implications for

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.880
<v Speaker 6>the stock market at general at the moment. So I

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.360
<v Speaker 6>don't know if if people kind of are on edge

0:05:51.360 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 6>and looking for any excuse to sell at the moment, Yeah,

0:05:54.640 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 6>it could. It could paint a pessimistic picture for the

0:05:57.760 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 6>remainder of the quarter. Here probably for.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 2>Us to come on back in here. I'm just thinking,

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:03.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, we're getting ready for the analyst calls, and

0:06:03.240 --> 0:06:04.440
<v Speaker 2>I feel like there's going to be a fair amount

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 2>of questions, especially as you see the stock kind of

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:09.279
<v Speaker 2>bouncing around here. What's kind of the top one or

0:06:09.279 --> 0:06:11.200
<v Speaker 2>two questions that you would want to be putting up

0:06:11.520 --> 0:06:13.040
<v Speaker 2>on that call.

0:06:13.160 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, one revenue and one cost question. The revenue side

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:19.799
<v Speaker 5>is talk to us about the advertising component. How well

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 5>is that catching on with subscribers. How many subscribers are

0:06:23.000 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 5>going to the advertising tier, and that's a big thing

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 5>because that's going to be one of the drivers going forward.

0:06:28.040 --> 0:06:29.640
<v Speaker 5>And then a second one on the call side is

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:32.560
<v Speaker 5>where are we on our programming budget you need to

0:06:32.600 --> 0:06:35.800
<v Speaker 5>spend more to drive more subscriber growth or are is

0:06:35.800 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 5>a company at a good level of spend? Because if

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:40.039
<v Speaker 5>they are at a good level of spend, boy, the

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:43.400
<v Speaker 5>profits just really start churning for this company, and the

0:06:43.440 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 5>free cash flow as well.

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 4>I do want to bring in some of the advertising

0:06:46.160 --> 0:06:48.920
<v Speaker 4>information that you mentioned, Paul in the letter. The company

0:06:49.200 --> 0:06:51.400
<v Speaker 4>did come out and say that ADS membership grew sixty

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:54.560
<v Speaker 4>five percent quarter on quarter after rising nearly seventy percent

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.440
<v Speaker 4>sequentially in each of Q three twenty three and Q

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:00.679
<v Speaker 4>four twenty three. They're also saying that over forty percent

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.000
<v Speaker 4>of all sign ups in our ads markets, remember it's

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 4>not fully rolled out, are coming from our ads plan

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 4>for advertisers. The companies focusing on measurement solutions, including new

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:14.239
<v Speaker 4>partnerships with Kantar and Lucid for brand awareness and recall,

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:17.160
<v Speaker 4>and then Nielsen Catalina solutions for sales lift. Paul, I

0:07:17.200 --> 0:07:18.680
<v Speaker 4>don't have to tell you because you've been covering this

0:07:18.720 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 4>for years. How wild is it for us to talk

0:07:21.320 --> 0:07:23.720
<v Speaker 4>about Netflix and measurement because this is a company that

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 4>for years was like, we don't care about ratings, We're

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 4>never going to share any numbers, We're never going to

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 4>do ads, never, never, never, And here they are talking

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 4>about Nielsen.

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, exactly, this is crazy. It's a great point. They're

0:07:36.000 --> 0:07:38.760
<v Speaker 5>going to have to start the disclosing audience levels of

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 5>some degree, but we already know that the advertising video

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:46.120
<v Speaker 5>on demand model is a very successful model. Advertisers are

0:07:46.160 --> 0:07:50.440
<v Speaker 5>switching some linear TV broadcasting cable to the more digital platforms,

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 5>and they've been itching to get to the streaming base

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.760
<v Speaker 5>of Netflix. So there will be a lot of advertisers demand,

0:07:58.640 --> 0:08:01.280
<v Speaker 5>and you know, Netflix is going to have to provide

0:08:01.320 --> 0:08:04.239
<v Speaker 5>the advertisers and their agencies with some data because system

0:08:04.240 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 5>they can just get a sense of pricing and value.

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you know.

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.760
<v Speaker 2>And the other thing is like I'm thinking about content, right,

0:08:09.840 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, original content versus licensing. And when we were

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 2>talking with Githa rang an ant On earlier, she said,

0:08:14.360 --> 0:08:17.040
<v Speaker 2>you know, one of the upsides is that they are,

0:08:17.120 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 2>you know, doing a lot of licensing deals. They had suits,

0:08:19.440 --> 0:08:21.240
<v Speaker 2>they just did something with sex and the City that's

0:08:21.320 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 2>just coming out. I mean, when you think about it,

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Paul as an analyst and somebody who understands the space,

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, cheaper to do a licensing deal versus creating

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:29.800
<v Speaker 2>that original content.

0:08:30.800 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 5>It is generally speaking, it is much cheaper to license

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 5>the show than to create it, particularly the shows that

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 5>they make, which are extraordinarily high quality, and they have

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 5>very big budgets and other good and that's the that's

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 5>the investment part. The good is is it does drive

0:08:47.120 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 5>subscriber growth. So I think most investors would say that's

0:08:49.920 --> 0:08:52.960
<v Speaker 5>a good investment to make in original programming. We got

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.160
<v Speaker 5>to find a balance here and so and that's the

0:08:55.160 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 5>same and that's true for the media companies. They have

0:08:56.679 --> 0:08:59.720
<v Speaker 5>to find a balance on what they licensed to Netflix

0:08:59.720 --> 0:09:01.599
<v Speaker 5>and what they keep on their own streaming services.

0:09:02.000 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 4>Red Let's say you had a chance to ask management

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 4>question today on the call that's coming up.

0:09:06.480 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 3>What do you want to hear about?

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I mean we're talking about programming and what's going

0:09:09.440 --> 0:09:11.120
<v Speaker 6>to be driving growth in the future. I think there's

0:09:11.120 --> 0:09:14.200
<v Speaker 6>a big question around sports. Yeah, what what level of

0:09:14.200 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 6>investment are they planning on putting in that that area?

0:09:16.960 --> 0:09:20.959
<v Speaker 6>We know it's highly competitive, it's really crowded, it's very expensive.

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 6>They are kind of stipping their toe in with some

0:09:23.600 --> 0:09:27.560
<v Speaker 6>of these combat sports. But yeah, it be we wwe

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 6>the Jake Paul and Mike Tyson fight later this summer.

0:09:30.880 --> 0:09:33.080
<v Speaker 6>We will want to hear kind of what is their strategy.

0:09:33.120 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 6>They've been on the sidelines for a while now, and

0:09:36.600 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 6>you know, have they been able to see the mess

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 6>that sports streaming has been from, you know, paying billions

0:09:42.360 --> 0:09:44.480
<v Speaker 6>and millions of dollars? Do they have a different strategy

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.320
<v Speaker 6>like they have in so many other cases in the market.

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:50.320
<v Speaker 2>I do wonder too, And I'm just looking at something

0:09:50.360 --> 0:09:53.040
<v Speaker 2>like a Walt Disney in the aftermarket and Obviously, it's

0:09:53.080 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 2>not just about streaming. It's just down slightly down about

0:09:55.480 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 2>one tenth of one percent here, Warner Brothers, Discovery, same store.

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:01.760
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Paul, is there anything that you kind of

0:10:01.760 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 2>extrapolglate when you look at something like a Netflix and

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 2>then what it means for some of the other streaming

0:10:06.400 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 2>services that are out there.

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.960
<v Speaker 5>I think it's actually all net positive, which is it

0:10:11.080 --> 0:10:14.600
<v Speaker 5>just shows you the strength of the streaming business model.

0:10:14.600 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 5>We now know when you look at Netflix's financials that

0:10:17.240 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 5>it can be extraordinarily profitable, generate really high returns. So

0:10:22.120 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 5>now the question is who else can join Netflix with

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 5>those types of financial metrics? Ken Disney do it, Ken

0:10:29.600 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 5>Warner Brothers, Discovery, Ken Powermount. That's kind of the question

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 5>a lot of those investors are asking themselves. But they

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:38.559
<v Speaker 5>can be done here if you look at Netflix west In.

0:10:38.600 --> 0:10:41.160
<v Speaker 2>Paul Sweeney, thank you so much. We so appreciate it.

0:10:41.240 --> 0:10:44.120
<v Speaker 2>Our own Paul Sweeney, who has covered the media industry

0:10:44.160 --> 0:10:46.559
<v Speaker 2>and did as a banker for many years, thirty years

0:10:46.600 --> 0:10:49.160
<v Speaker 2>as a media analyst, so really great to get his insight.

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:51.720
<v Speaker 2>We're going to continue with Red Brown. We're also going

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 2>to roll into it our Githa Ranganathan, who covers the

0:10:54.440 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 2>media space for our Bloomberg Intelligence team. You know, getha

0:10:57.440 --> 0:10:59.880
<v Speaker 2>you called it on the subscriber numbers.

0:11:00.360 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 3>She really did. Can you remind everyone what she told

0:11:02.320 --> 0:11:03.079
<v Speaker 3>us a couple hours ago?

0:11:03.240 --> 0:11:05.320
<v Speaker 2>You said it was going to be a much higher number.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 2>It is a much higher number. Walk us through the quarter?

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 2>And why is it that?

0:11:09.920 --> 0:11:10.240
<v Speaker 7>Though?

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I'm assuming you're watching the stock in

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:15.440
<v Speaker 2>the aftermarket. It's down about two point six percent. It

0:11:15.559 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 2>just has been bouncing around a lot. Walk us through

0:11:18.400 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 2>the quarter? Maybe why you think, I mean, should investors

0:11:20.960 --> 0:11:21.880
<v Speaker 2>be disappointed here?

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:23.319
<v Speaker 5>So?

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.720
<v Speaker 8>Absolutely right, Carol, it was a blowout quarter. I mean,

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:28.840
<v Speaker 8>I think it came in much higher than expected. We

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 8>were kind of thinking maybe six seven million dollar seven

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.040
<v Speaker 8>million subscriber ads net ads range.

0:11:35.440 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 7>This was, of course way above that. But I think

0:11:37.280 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 7>what is really.

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 8>Kind of causing a little bit of concern here is

0:11:40.880 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 8>that they are going to stop reporting subscriber metrics altogether,

0:11:45.559 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 8>and that I think is coming as a little bit

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:51.200
<v Speaker 8>of a disappointment. I mean, Netflix is out and out

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 8>a subscriber story, or at least it always has been,

0:11:55.320 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 8>and so this is kind of going to require a

0:11:57.160 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 8>complete change in the mindset of investors, right, you know,

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.680
<v Speaker 8>this is this was always such an easy model to follow.

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 8>You know, you just multiply subscribers by the monthly price

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.719
<v Speaker 8>that you pay, and you you, you know, you kind

0:12:08.720 --> 0:12:10.840
<v Speaker 8>of have your whole model. But now they're going to

0:12:10.840 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 8>stop reporting subscriber numbers. They're going to stop reporting the

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.319
<v Speaker 8>average revenue per user. So it's kind of going to

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 8>it's it's definitely becoming. It's I would say, it's gone

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 8>from kind of high growth to now more you know, uh,

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:30.120
<v Speaker 8>definitely a very profitable company, but obviously they do seem

0:12:30.160 --> 0:12:33.200
<v Speaker 8>to be kind of signaling that subscriber growth that the

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:34.839
<v Speaker 8>party is going to be over at some point.

0:12:34.960 --> 0:12:37.959
<v Speaker 4>Correct me if I'm wrong, Githa. But did Netflix used

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:41.480
<v Speaker 4>to report churn and then they stopped reporting churn and

0:12:41.559 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 4>that was a really big deal to investors when that happened.

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:48.400
<v Speaker 8>That was a very very long time ago. Yes, they did,

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 8>they would, they would mention it, and yeah, they did

0:12:51.200 --> 0:12:52.360
<v Speaker 8>stop reporting it.

0:12:52.400 --> 0:12:53.760
<v Speaker 7>But subscribers, again.

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:57.320
<v Speaker 8>This is the bread and butter of this whole streaming business.

0:12:57.400 --> 0:13:00.320
<v Speaker 8>So I think it's it's definitely going to require people

0:13:00.360 --> 0:13:01.920
<v Speaker 8>are going to take some time to kind of digest

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:03.240
<v Speaker 8>that getha.

0:13:03.280 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 6>We've seen them they have started to give us a

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 6>little bit more viewership on information over the past year

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 6>or so. Do you think that that is part of

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:14.560
<v Speaker 6>them kind of trying to signal that, you know, ads

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 6>are going to become a bigger part of our business,

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 6>and you know how big of a part of their business.

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:20.720
<v Speaker 6>Do you think that will be in the next couple

0:13:20.760 --> 0:13:21.200
<v Speaker 6>of years.

0:13:22.400 --> 0:13:24.640
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So right now, they haven't really given us any

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:28.080
<v Speaker 8>concrete metrics around advertising, I mean, other than the first

0:13:28.160 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 8>number that they gave us in January, which was roughly

0:13:30.080 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 8>about twenty five million active users. They did report something

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:36.400
<v Speaker 8>today by saying, you know that they've seen like forty

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:38.520
<v Speaker 8>percent of their new signups are actually on the adyar,

0:13:38.600 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 8>but we don't actually have a concrete number. That said,

0:13:42.040 --> 0:13:44.439
<v Speaker 8>I think what they're doing, they're they're they're still kind

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:48.719
<v Speaker 8>of taking pretty a pretty measured approach, but there are

0:13:48.760 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 8>signals that they really are looking to get or to

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 8>scale up their advertising business, and I think sports is

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:56.440
<v Speaker 8>obviously a big way that they're going to do that.

0:13:57.200 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 8>You know, you obviously saw that the WWE deal. There

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:01.199
<v Speaker 8>are a few more things that are out there on

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 8>the horizon obviously the NBA being a big one, and

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 8>they if they make an aggressive bid for that, then

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 8>that really tells us how serious they are about advertising.

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:11.679
<v Speaker 8>And I think potentially what they're what we're looking at

0:14:11.679 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 8>in terms of advertising dollars if they get everything right.

0:14:14.880 --> 0:14:15.440
<v Speaker 7>It has been a.

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:18.960
<v Speaker 8>Little bit underwhelming so far, but if they you know,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 8>if they're able to execute with the sports and the

0:14:22.200 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 8>other live events expected to be at least ten to

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 8>fifteen percent of their revenue by twenty twenty five, So

0:14:30.000 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 8>you know, you're looking at a forty forty five billion

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.120
<v Speaker 8>dollar business. I think you're going to see four to

0:14:34.200 --> 0:14:36.200
<v Speaker 8>five billion at least in advertising.

0:14:36.280 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 2>It is kind of interesting, and you know, Githa, we

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:40.240
<v Speaker 2>all kind of kid. It's like, I only have so

0:14:40.280 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 2>many hours to watch all this stuff, and so we're

0:14:42.160 --> 0:14:44.080
<v Speaker 2>picking and choosing, and it seems like there's so much

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 2>out there. I mean, the company said in their letter

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:49.480
<v Speaker 2>to shareholders, with more than two people per household on average,

0:14:49.520 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 2>we have an audience of over half a billion, and

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 2>then they go on to say no entertainment companies ever

0:14:54.480 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 2>programmed at this scale and with this ambition before. But

0:14:57.240 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 2>it does feel like, you know, and listening to you

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 2>talk that, you know, them not reporting their quarterly membership

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:07.560
<v Speaker 2>numbers in the future, that they are conceding that there

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 2>is just a point that we're going to max out.

0:15:10.000 --> 0:15:12.640
<v Speaker 2>We can just only sign up so many people. And

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 2>that means even on a global scale, right.

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:18.240
<v Speaker 8>Yes, on a global scale. So back in the day,

0:15:18.320 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 8>you know, maybe even about three four years ago, they

0:15:20.440 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 8>would always talk about this one billion number as their

0:15:23.520 --> 0:15:26.800
<v Speaker 8>total addressable market. About two years ago, that's when the

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 8>great Netflix reset and the Great correction happened, they kind

0:15:29.600 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 8>of toned that down. They said, you know, it's probably

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 8>closer to about four hundred five hundred million as the

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 8>total addressable market looks like it's you know, probably even

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 8>slightly smaller than that, you know, so they definitely are

0:15:41.600 --> 0:15:44.120
<v Speaker 8>conceding that there is an upper limit, There is a

0:15:44.120 --> 0:15:46.880
<v Speaker 8>ceiling to kind of the growth here.

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 2>But is there something like I always laugh about this

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 2>sometimes when we talk about some of these big tech names.

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 2>We used to talk about this a lot. By Apple,

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 2>We'd be like, Oh, it's a disappointing number, yet they

0:15:55.240 --> 0:15:57.440
<v Speaker 2>still sell a lot of stuff, And I understand it's

0:15:57.440 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 2>growth trends and trajectory. Can we still though, can see

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 2>that Netflix still is kind of the big behemoth in

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:03.480
<v Speaker 2>this space.

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 7>They absolutely are.

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 8>They have completely cemented their dominance when it comes to

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 8>this whole streaming wars. I mean, I think the streaming

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.280
<v Speaker 8>wars are pretty much over. They are the winner, There's

0:16:14.320 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 8>no doubt about that. And now it's just about them

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.240
<v Speaker 8>kind of you know, getting into different verticals, kind of

0:16:20.280 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 8>becoming that that you know, that one service they probably

0:16:23.360 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 8>will you know, kind of absorbi absorb a lot of

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 8>the other smaller streaming services. I think, just because they're

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.080
<v Speaker 8>licensing so much of content from them and they you know,

0:16:33.120 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 8>it's just but at this point, it's definitely going to

0:16:35.640 --> 0:16:38.280
<v Speaker 8>become you know, how much pricing power do they have?

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 8>So right now we are at about fifteen and a

0:16:40.280 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 8>half dollars for a standard plan in the US. How

0:16:43.640 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 8>much upside is there? Can that go to twenty twenty

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:48.560
<v Speaker 8>five dollars? That is kind of the big question.

0:16:48.960 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 4>So it's funny as you're saying this, I'm thinking to myself, Okay, well,

0:16:51.320 --> 0:16:53.680
<v Speaker 4>you know, twenty years ago, all we wanted was all

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 4>the card options for TV, and we kind of got

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:56.920
<v Speaker 4>that now and I think a lot of us are

0:16:56.960 --> 0:16:58.000
<v Speaker 4>spending more on.

0:16:57.920 --> 0:16:59.640
<v Speaker 3>All a combination of all these services.

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 4>Given that you know, it's Paramount, it's Hulu, it's Max,

0:17:02.080 --> 0:17:04.560
<v Speaker 4>it's Disney Plus, it's Netflix, just to name a few.

0:17:05.440 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 4>I do wonder, getha, where the growth is for Netflix

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:10.960
<v Speaker 4>at this point. Is it in the ad supported model,

0:17:11.040 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 4>is it outside of the United States? Where is that

0:17:14.400 --> 0:17:17.760
<v Speaker 4>growth coming from? As the company matures, Is it raising prices?

0:17:18.680 --> 0:17:21.959
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's actually tim it's all of the above, and

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 8>it's just you know, it's going to be a very

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.399
<v Speaker 8>it's a very tough balancing act for them because they

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 8>don't want to do anything too quickly and too rashly,

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 8>which is why when they were kind of implementing their

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 8>whole password sharing crackdown, they were very careful not to

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 8>raise prices because you know, they didn't want to anger

0:17:37.200 --> 0:17:40.199
<v Speaker 8>you know, existing customers. So again, it's going to be

0:17:40.480 --> 0:17:42.240
<v Speaker 8>it's going to be tricky. They're kind of walking a

0:17:42.280 --> 0:17:45.280
<v Speaker 8>tight trope here. But yeah, they are going to use

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 8>all the different levels that they have to kind of

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.600
<v Speaker 8>keep profitability, which is their main metric right now, profitability

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 8>and margins kind of climbing up.

0:17:54.400 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 6>Githa. Before the report, in the analys, I was speaking

0:17:57.200 --> 0:17:59.400
<v Speaker 6>to a lot of them made a big deal about

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.200
<v Speaker 6>the T Mobile partnership that they were working on. How

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.480
<v Speaker 6>do you see that factoring into the future. Do you

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:07.840
<v Speaker 6>think that that has been a successful program and do

0:18:07.880 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 6>you can you expect to see them maybe do some

0:18:10.320 --> 0:18:12.760
<v Speaker 6>some more types of those partnerships.

0:18:13.720 --> 0:18:14.240
<v Speaker 7>Absolutely.

0:18:14.320 --> 0:18:17.280
<v Speaker 8>I think that is going to become a critical critical

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 8>factor for for Netflix if it really kind of wants

0:18:20.040 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 8>to grow its subscribers. So what they did with T

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 8>Mobile was kind of they're offering their ad supported plan,

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 8>which is the seven dollars monthly plan to you know,

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:30.399
<v Speaker 8>select Tea Mobile members for free, and they're going to

0:18:30.440 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 8>do a lot more of that.

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:32.960
<v Speaker 7>The having a low.

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:35.080
<v Speaker 8>Priced plan kind of really gives them a lot of

0:18:35.119 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 8>flexibility because they can add subscribers. But then again, they're

0:18:39.720 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 8>not necessarily losing our poop because remember they're the greater

0:18:43.200 --> 0:18:46.000
<v Speaker 8>the subscribers they have, they can always kind of appeal

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:49.360
<v Speaker 8>to advertise the advertising community, so and kind of makeup

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 8>or offset for any of that our poo differential from

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 8>from their advertising dollars. I think that's going to definitely,

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 8>uh play a much bigger role, not just in the US,

0:18:58.119 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 8>but of course across the world as well. They're going

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:01.960
<v Speaker 8>to have of those kinds of telecom partnerships.

0:19:02.040 --> 0:19:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Keitha, what do we, you know, kind of pull from

0:19:04.240 --> 0:19:07.119
<v Speaker 2>this when it means to like Disney Streaming and Warner

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 2>Brothers Discovery and some of the other services that are

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:09.960
<v Speaker 2>out there.

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 8>So for all of those other services, I think subscriber

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:16.800
<v Speaker 8>growth is not the primary focus anymore. It's kind of

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:21.919
<v Speaker 8>moved now, Carol, to profitability, where obviously, again Netflix leads

0:19:21.960 --> 0:19:25.119
<v Speaker 8>the back. A lot of these other services have made

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:28.560
<v Speaker 8>a good progress, I would say, really good progress when

0:19:28.560 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 8>it comes to at least they're not profitable yet, but

0:19:32.080 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 8>they're you know, moderating their losses. Disney obviously is the

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.199
<v Speaker 8>big one to watch for there, and now they have

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 8>the model in place. You know, you've seen exactly what

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:42.359
<v Speaker 8>Netflix has accomplished. They all know exactly what they have

0:19:42.440 --> 0:19:44.239
<v Speaker 8>to do. It's just going to be a question of

0:19:44.720 --> 0:19:46.440
<v Speaker 8>how well they do it and can they get there

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:47.119
<v Speaker 8>quick enough?

0:19:47.640 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 4>Githa, do you think there's any consumer confusion? I mean, okay,

0:19:50.520 --> 0:19:51.960
<v Speaker 4>I know the answer to this is yes, and I

0:19:52.000 --> 0:19:52.879
<v Speaker 4>just don't know how to solve it.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 3>The consumer confusion about where to watch something.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mentioned Sex and the City and I was

0:19:57.119 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 4>shocked to hear that that's on Netflix.

0:19:58.480 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 3>It's an HBO show.

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.640
<v Speaker 4>Somebody in our smolcast chat mentioned in the office, well,

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:04.960
<v Speaker 4>I think that's now on Peacock, but it was on Netflix.

0:20:05.640 --> 0:20:08.360
<v Speaker 4>Friends a former NBC show or No, Seinfeld is now

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:08.920
<v Speaker 4>on Netflix.

0:20:08.920 --> 0:20:10.040
<v Speaker 2>I believe it's confusing.

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.160
<v Speaker 3>See is that right? I don't know, like you know.

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.680
<v Speaker 8>It is how discovery is the Biggest's not content or

0:20:16.720 --> 0:20:19.600
<v Speaker 8>it's really just discovery is the biggest problem right now

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.480
<v Speaker 8>in the whole of you know, the streaming space. And

0:20:22.600 --> 0:20:24.240
<v Speaker 8>at the end of the day, we're kind of looking

0:20:24.280 --> 0:20:28.280
<v Speaker 8>for that one or what we're waiting for, is that

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:32.520
<v Speaker 8>one aggregator or reaggregator that can kind of take all

0:20:32.560 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 8>the shows that you really want to watch and do it.

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 7>I don't know who it's going to be. Is it

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 7>going to be YouTube?

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 8>Maybe it is. It could be Amazon, it could be Apple.

0:20:38.960 --> 0:20:42.360
<v Speaker 8>But but we're all waiting for that. Again, I'm sure

0:20:42.600 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 8>exactly it's going to happen.

0:20:43.800 --> 0:20:44.480
<v Speaker 3>Roku doesn't.

0:20:44.480 --> 0:20:46.359
<v Speaker 4>Okay, Roku does a really good job of that, but

0:20:46.600 --> 0:20:48.879
<v Speaker 4>you've got to have be signed into everything on your

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 4>Roku and plus that means you're only watching on TV.

0:20:51.640 --> 0:20:53.480
<v Speaker 4>You're not watching it on the iPad or on like

0:20:53.480 --> 0:20:54.120
<v Speaker 4>your phone.

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:55.520
<v Speaker 7>And there's still is friction.

0:20:55.720 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there is still a lot of friction.

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.199
<v Speaker 2>Final thought, Githa, I'm just thinking of our invest our

0:21:00.240 --> 0:21:03.160
<v Speaker 2>audience as we work through this. Netflix share is still

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>down about three and a quarter percent here.

0:21:06.680 --> 0:21:08.479
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, So I think the big question is really going

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 8>to be, you know, on the call of you know,

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:14.480
<v Speaker 8>what how many subscribers do or how many you know

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:16.800
<v Speaker 8>subscribers do you think you've captured from the whole password

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.800
<v Speaker 8>sharing initiative. I think the numbers that they're originally identified

0:21:19.800 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 8>was one hundred million households. I think people will definitely

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:24.880
<v Speaker 8>want to know what percentage of that has already been

0:21:25.800 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 8>kind of captured, just given the strong subscriber metrics, and

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 8>then they'll kind of try to figure out how much

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:32.200
<v Speaker 8>more Runway is left.

0:21:32.280 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 2>Rockstar as always, Githa Rang and Nathan, thank you so much.

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:37.200
<v Speaker 2>Tech and media analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, Red Brown, final

0:21:37.240 --> 0:21:39.080
<v Speaker 2>thoughts for you just twenty seconds here. I mean stocks

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 2>down in the aftermarket, but we'll see what happens tomorrow.

0:21:41.359 --> 0:21:44.200
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, We'll see what happens tomorrow and for the remainder

0:21:44.200 --> 0:21:45.439
<v Speaker 6>of the year, I think you know they put up

0:21:45.440 --> 0:21:48.080
<v Speaker 6>strong financials and that could easily bounce back. You know,

0:21:48.080 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 6>this quick reaction, but the investors love the short term.

0:21:51.080 --> 0:21:52.680
<v Speaker 3>It depends on what they say on the.

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.240
<v Speaker 2>Call exactly, and it'll be interesting to do if some

0:21:55.359 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 2>investors may say, well wait, it's a little bit cheaper

0:21:57.200 --> 0:22:00.000
<v Speaker 2>than it was and I want the exposure red.

0:22:00.160 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 7>Thank you.

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.520
<v Speaker 2>So also a rock star, yes, yes, induticking with Kemes

0:22:03.520 --> 0:22:04.520
<v Speaker 2>a rock group here right now.

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:05.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we had a great group.

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:11.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Catch us

0:22:11.359 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 1>live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern. Listen

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.800
<v Speaker 1>on Apple car Play and then brout Auto with a

0:22:16.800 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business app or watch us live on YouTube.

0:22:21.840 --> 0:22:26.080
<v Speaker 2>So the overall every trade it is lower on this Thursday.

0:22:26.119 --> 0:22:30.080
<v Speaker 2>So too, though, is the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index. It has

0:22:30.119 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 2>dropped more than ten percent folks since March seventh, so

0:22:33.160 --> 0:22:35.479
<v Speaker 2>an official technical correction, if you will, and that has

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:36.280
<v Speaker 2>caught our attention.

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.160
<v Speaker 4>Meantime, A giant in the space just selling off shares

0:22:39.200 --> 0:22:43.160
<v Speaker 4>of TSMC Taiwan Semiconductor at Manufacturing down about four point

0:22:43.280 --> 0:22:46.199
<v Speaker 4>five percent right now, this as it's scaled back its outlook.

0:22:46.240 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 4>Free chip market expansion, Carol cautioning that the smartphone into

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 4>PC markets still remain weak.

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:53.439
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I feel like we're all on notice. All right,

0:22:53.480 --> 0:22:55.200
<v Speaker 2>let's get more on the group. Let's bring in Bloomberg

0:22:55.240 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 2>News managing editor of Technology and Global Security. She's Lindawan

0:22:58.600 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 2>and she joins us here in studio. All right, Lynn,

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:05.879
<v Speaker 2>let's start with TSMC investors definitely not happy with the results.

0:23:05.880 --> 0:23:08.880
<v Speaker 2>It's the world's largest maker of advanced chips, cutting its

0:23:08.960 --> 0:23:13.200
<v Speaker 2>expectations for twenty twenty four market growth. It sounds like

0:23:13.280 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 2>bad news. How how do you read it? What does

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 2>it really mean?

0:23:16.480 --> 0:23:18.320
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean it does put us on notice. Right,

0:23:18.400 --> 0:23:21.240
<v Speaker 9>we're just starting to see the chips companies report. You

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:25.399
<v Speaker 9>got Intel next week, possibly Texas Instruments too, and so

0:23:26.000 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 9>this is like a potential sign of what's to come

0:23:29.119 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 9>in the coming weeks. It's a nuanced picture though.

0:23:32.320 --> 0:23:32.600
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:36.200
<v Speaker 9>The outlook was bad. It was definitively bad. They were

0:23:36.240 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 9>talking about weakness and the PC market, weakness and the

0:23:39.640 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 9>smartphone market. But that really outshadowed a very good beat

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:49.960
<v Speaker 9>on revenue, outlook on like potential sales, on the fact

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 9>that AI has growth, and so like we've been talking

0:23:53.840 --> 0:23:56.040
<v Speaker 9>the three of us have been talking about how nuanced

0:23:56.040 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 9>the chips recovery and the chips room from AI has

0:23:58.880 --> 0:24:01.119
<v Speaker 9>been for a few quarters. Now I would say this

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 9>is like the most nuanced that I've seen it. It's like, up,

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 9>that's right.

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:08.679
<v Speaker 2>Do they have it right? Or do they not have

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:10.800
<v Speaker 2>it necessarily right? Because you say it's nuanced.

0:24:10.800 --> 0:24:14.200
<v Speaker 9>It depends on how you feel about AI and whether

0:24:14.400 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 9>AI can make up for this ongoing slump in the

0:24:17.480 --> 0:24:21.399
<v Speaker 9>PC market and in the personal and in the in

0:24:21.440 --> 0:24:24.400
<v Speaker 9>the phone market. Right, yeah, Like can AI be enough

0:24:24.440 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 9>to save these giant chip companies like Intel and TSMC

0:24:30.400 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 9>like that remains to be seen, but it does make

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:37.080
<v Speaker 9>you question, you know, how you will see the fortunes

0:24:37.080 --> 0:24:40.439
<v Speaker 9>of Nvidia diverge from like TSMC and the others that

0:24:40.520 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 9>make you know, the chips that go into cars and

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:44.080
<v Speaker 9>phones and PCs.

0:24:44.280 --> 0:24:47.200
<v Speaker 2>And Nvidia is at about six ten seven percent today, right.

0:24:47.200 --> 0:24:49.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Okay, more on in Nvidia in just a minute,

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:50.520
<v Speaker 4>But first I want to talk a little bit about

0:24:50.560 --> 0:24:53.639
<v Speaker 4>asm R because I'm wondering if perhaps some investors might

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 4>have seen this coming after ASML's results yesterday.

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean they're both very nuanced pictures, and that's

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.919
<v Speaker 9>exactly why we brought ASML up in that TSMC story,

0:25:02.920 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 9>because this is now the second company that has said, whoa, like,

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.679
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing a bit slower of a market than we

0:25:10.720 --> 0:25:13.200
<v Speaker 9>thought we were, but are also but is also giving

0:25:13.240 --> 0:25:16.720
<v Speaker 9>a great alex. So in ASML's case, there was something

0:25:16.840 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 9>like a more than sixty percent drop in their orders,

0:25:20.320 --> 0:25:23.879
<v Speaker 9>and that is a that is bearished definitively. And yet

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 9>most of the story and the narrative around its earnings

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:31.199
<v Speaker 9>was like, but don't worry, that's just temporary. AI is

0:25:31.240 --> 0:25:33.879
<v Speaker 9>going to lift us back up. Demanding all these other

0:25:33.960 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 9>chip markets is going to lift us back up. I

0:25:36.080 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 9>think it's like a short term versus long term picture, right,

0:25:39.320 --> 0:25:41.280
<v Speaker 9>there's a lull in the short term. People are still

0:25:41.400 --> 0:25:44.880
<v Speaker 9>drawing down inventory. An ASML's case, they make the chip

0:25:44.920 --> 0:25:48.760
<v Speaker 9>machinery that makes the chips, right, so they're even further upstream.

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:50.760
<v Speaker 9>And you think about the chip plants that are being

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:54.400
<v Speaker 9>built in the US and Germany and across Asia. Those

0:25:54.440 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 9>have a long lead time. So what they're banking on

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.760
<v Speaker 9>is that, yes, while we're working through inventory now, there

0:26:01.800 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 9>will be a boom in the coming years as construction

0:26:05.160 --> 0:26:05.640
<v Speaker 9>gets way.

0:26:05.720 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, Loser's demand on the other side, ultimately the end users, right,

0:26:08.960 --> 0:26:10.919
<v Speaker 2>because I mean it's great, Like and let's go to

0:26:11.119 --> 0:26:13.720
<v Speaker 2>the money that's being put in. We have Bloomberg News

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:19.879
<v Speaker 2>reporting exclusively about Micron technology. They're right, six billion dollars Intel, Taiwan,

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 2>Semi have already right, or they also are going to

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:25.360
<v Speaker 2>accept some loans as part of all of this awards

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.719
<v Speaker 2>packaging that's coming out. Can we assume you can do

0:26:28.800 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 2>a lot of investments if they build them, Will the

0:26:31.840 --> 0:26:34.080
<v Speaker 2>demand come? Can we assume that demand's going to be

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 2>there ultimately or it depends where we are.

0:26:36.080 --> 0:26:39.120
<v Speaker 9>That's hard to saying, you know, And there has been

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:41.919
<v Speaker 9>this narrative around the fact that like the market is

0:26:42.119 --> 0:26:47.840
<v Speaker 9>underestimating how much data center demand there is actually going

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.040
<v Speaker 9>to be an AI. We had an executive at a

0:26:50.040 --> 0:26:53.240
<v Speaker 9>Bloomberg Intelligence AI summit not too long ago, just a

0:26:53.280 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 9>few weeks ago. Come up and he's like at one

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:59.840
<v Speaker 9>of the hottest AI data center startups, and he was like,

0:26:59.800 --> 0:27:03.120
<v Speaker 9>a year ago, we were talking about investments in the billions,

0:27:03.119 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 9>and now we're talking tens of billions. Next year, we

0:27:05.920 --> 0:27:10.240
<v Speaker 9>may be talking exponentially more than that, because that is

0:27:10.280 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 9>what AI demand in data centers looks like. But you know,

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 9>the TSMC story pointed out that we had today that

0:27:17.720 --> 0:27:20.199
<v Speaker 9>some analysts are like pouring cold water on that idea

0:27:20.240 --> 0:27:24.320
<v Speaker 9>and are wondering whether the forecasts will hold up and

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 9>whether they may actually disappoint. That's a big question mark.

0:27:27.560 --> 0:27:30.440
<v Speaker 9>It depends on how long the a the AI hype lasts.

0:27:30.560 --> 0:27:32.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, so that I was going to say it brings

0:27:32.080 --> 0:27:35.199
<v Speaker 4>us to Nvidia, Yeah, go, okay, because that company our

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:37.760
<v Speaker 4>reporting earnings till next month, the twenty second of next month.

0:27:37.800 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 4>They're always last, they are, but you know, it gives

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.000
<v Speaker 4>us lots of time to talk about I'm ahead of earnings.

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:44.640
<v Speaker 4>Shares are down from all time highs of nine hundred

0:27:44.640 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 4>and seventy four dollars just a little bit ago, trading

0:27:47.680 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 4>now at eight forty four. In recent weeks, we've seen

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.400
<v Speaker 4>some companies come out with their own chips to try

0:27:53.400 --> 0:27:57.240
<v Speaker 4>to compete with Nvidia. Meta comes to mind, Intel comes

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 4>to mind. Do these things hold a candle to what

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:00.439
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia it can do?

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.439
<v Speaker 9>I think in video is still seen as the leader

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:06.879
<v Speaker 9>in the pack, but you have seen these other upstarts

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 9>challenge them. You have seen some established chip makers. We

0:28:12.359 --> 0:28:15.119
<v Speaker 9>had one in the office not too long ago, that is,

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.359
<v Speaker 9>you know, coming out with its own chip and its

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 9>own chip design. I think, you know, the challenge for

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.840
<v Speaker 9>in Nvidia now and going forward is how do you

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:29.480
<v Speaker 9>maintain that first mover advantage and keep it. It's honestly

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:32.119
<v Speaker 9>the same challenge that ASML is facing. How do you

0:28:32.320 --> 0:28:35.440
<v Speaker 9>keep up and ahead of the competition on the chip

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:38.520
<v Speaker 9>machines too. Everybody is in this race to advance it.

0:28:40.320 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 9>Then again, like the to be sure on in video

0:28:42.440 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 9>earnings always is that everybody every quarter is like this

0:28:46.040 --> 0:28:48.240
<v Speaker 9>is gonna be the quarter where they disappoint. They can't

0:28:48.400 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 9>keep this up for this long and every quarter they

0:28:51.480 --> 0:28:54.239
<v Speaker 9>defy expectations. So I think you have to, like, you know,

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:56.640
<v Speaker 9>brace yourself for the idea that they may be able

0:28:56.640 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 9>to surprise on the upside.

0:28:57.560 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 2>Again, Lynn, twenty seconds, what's the next focal point for

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:02.680
<v Speaker 2>you as you watch this space the chip space or

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 2>the AI space, chip space, the chips space.

0:29:06.480 --> 0:29:11.240
<v Speaker 9>More spending on the government side, Okay, more being allocated.

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:13.160
<v Speaker 9>What I'd really love to know is where the rest

0:29:13.160 --> 0:29:16.720
<v Speaker 9>of the twelve billion dollars in US ships spending goes?

0:29:17.080 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 9>After Microsoft, I mean after Micron, you still got a

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 9>whole lot of money left, and you know, with the

0:29:24.160 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 9>big companies out of the way, you could see a

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.000
<v Speaker 9>lot of smaller names crowded in that space and make

0:29:29.000 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 9>a name for themselves.

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:33.000
<v Speaker 2>As they say, always right, follow the money, basically all right,

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.880
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg News Managing Editor of Technology and Global Security, Lynn,

0:29:35.920 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 2>thank you so much. Lindawan joining us here.

0:29:39.480 --> 0:29:43.320
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week Podcast. Listen live

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>each weekday starting at two pm Eastern on applecar Play

0:29:46.640 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 1>and Android Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:29:52.840 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 1>York station just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg. Eleven thirty.

0:29:58.000 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 4>Well sales have previously owned homes in the US fell

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 4>in March from a one year high. Underscore is the

0:30:03.080 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 4>lingering impact of high mortgage rates and elevated prices. Meantime,

0:30:06.800 --> 0:30:10.280
<v Speaker 4>a great story by Bloomberg's Matt Bosler today on how

0:30:10.320 --> 0:30:13.120
<v Speaker 4>rents are the Fed's biggest stumbling block when it comes

0:30:13.120 --> 0:30:17.480
<v Speaker 4>to taming US inflation. Housing market of course incredibly important

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.280
<v Speaker 4>to the economy and investors, and there are cross currents

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:21.160
<v Speaker 4>out there for sure.

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which is why we knew we wanted to check

0:30:22.960 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 2>in once again with Kate Kaminski. She's chief operating officer

0:30:25.800 --> 0:30:29.440
<v Speaker 2>of the privately owned and asset and real estate investment

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:32.719
<v Speaker 2>company Walton Global. They've got about three point three billion

0:30:32.760 --> 0:30:36.760
<v Speaker 2>in assets under management, over ninety thousand acres under management

0:30:36.800 --> 0:30:38.960
<v Speaker 2>here in the United States. She's with us once again

0:30:38.960 --> 0:30:41.840
<v Speaker 2>from Scottsdale, Arizona. Kate, good to have you back. How

0:30:41.840 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 2>are you.

0:30:43.480 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 10>I'm great.

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 2>How are you doing doing well? Try to keep up

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 2>with everything that's coming up, and it sometimes feels cross

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.080
<v Speaker 2>currents are coming at us. Last time we talked late February,

0:30:52.120 --> 0:30:55.080
<v Speaker 2>you said pretty excited about twenty twenty four. Are you

0:30:55.280 --> 0:30:58.640
<v Speaker 2>still pretty excited about this year? Are you less excited,

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 2>more excited? Tell me what's since February.

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 10>Well, you know, looking at the March numbers that came out,

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:09.640
<v Speaker 10>I mean, we've definitely seen things plummet a little bit

0:31:09.760 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 10>since since we last spoke. We're down about fourteen percent

0:31:14.080 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 10>for new home starts, but if you look at it

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 10>year over year, we're still up twenty one percent year

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:24.440
<v Speaker 10>over years. So I would say my sentiment hasn't changed

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 10>from that perspective because we're still seeing you know, at

0:31:28.520 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 10>least for Walton's business where we really focus in delivering

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:37.760
<v Speaker 10>land to new home builders. Companies like Horton put out

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 10>their earnings today and I mean they just had one

0:31:40.960 --> 0:31:45.320
<v Speaker 10>of their strongest quarters ever and so their stocks up.

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 10>I think home builder sentiments up. There's definitely headwinds with

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 10>what we're seeing with inflation creeping up, mortgage rates creeping up.

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 10>I think they went over seven today, So we've got

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:03.280
<v Speaker 10>to get that under control. But we remain bullish on

0:32:03.280 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 10>on the outlook in the new new home building space

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 10>most definitely.

0:32:07.480 --> 0:32:09.440
<v Speaker 4>So what happens if rates don't go down? What happens

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:11.440
<v Speaker 4>to your business over the next year, Kate? I mean

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:13.440
<v Speaker 4>there's been lots of talk this year, just in the

0:32:13.520 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 4>last few weeks, actually a lot in the last few

0:32:15.880 --> 0:32:19.280
<v Speaker 4>days that the Fed may not even lower interest rates

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.440
<v Speaker 4>this year. What does that mean for your business at

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Walton Global?

0:32:23.240 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I mean we're we're reading the same economic data

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:32.719
<v Speaker 10>points and preparing for the fact that there may not

0:32:32.760 --> 0:32:35.560
<v Speaker 10>be any rate cuts. We certainly hope that there will be,

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.440
<v Speaker 10>but especially given it's an election year, I think we're

0:32:39.880 --> 0:32:43.960
<v Speaker 10>all we have to keep our seatbelt done and go

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:47.360
<v Speaker 10>along for this ride. But with that, you know, we're

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 10>we're continuing to hold study in terms of transactions and

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:56.800
<v Speaker 10>think that this is actually going to catapult forward additional

0:32:56.800 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 10>transactions for Walton's business because you know, what we focus

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:06.240
<v Speaker 10>on is providing future land supply to the new home

0:33:06.240 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 10>building space, and really we do that through a just

0:33:10.560 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 10>in time inventory approach, you knowing nothing you haven't heard

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:17.360
<v Speaker 10>about or we haven't talked about before, whereby the builders

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 10>are not paying for that land today, they're paying for

0:33:19.720 --> 0:33:23.200
<v Speaker 10>it in the future. And with Walton's approach, it's when

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:25.760
<v Speaker 10>they're actually selling a home to a third party. But

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 10>so as builders continue to look to preserve cash they

0:33:30.320 --> 0:33:33.440
<v Speaker 10>have on hand today, I think that there's going to

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 10>be even more demand for these unique structures whereby they

0:33:37.440 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 10>can defer land buying costs, even development costs. I think

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 10>we'll start to see a lot more of that over

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 10>the coming years, and especially this year, so that the

0:33:47.400 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 10>builders can take capital that they have on hand, which

0:33:50.880 --> 0:33:54.200
<v Speaker 10>they have a lot, and use that for things like

0:33:54.400 --> 0:33:58.000
<v Speaker 10>continuing to buy down mortgage rates, because I don't think

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.880
<v Speaker 10>that that's going to be a program we see go

0:34:00.960 --> 0:34:04.320
<v Speaker 10>away anytime soon. That's how we're going to get buyers

0:34:04.320 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 10>into homes.

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:07.920
<v Speaker 2>Right, And as you did say earlier, US homebuilder sentiment

0:34:07.960 --> 0:34:10.160
<v Speaker 2>holding at fifty one in April, so it came in

0:34:10.200 --> 0:34:14.360
<v Speaker 2>line with forecasted numbers by the analyst community that was

0:34:14.360 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 2>a little bit earlier in the week. Having said that, right,

0:34:17.080 --> 0:34:20.040
<v Speaker 2>you guys do buy land and then homebuilders buy that land.

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:23.160
<v Speaker 2>Is there any changes in the types of activity that

0:34:23.200 --> 0:34:26.040
<v Speaker 2>you were seeing or where they want to be building regionally?

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:29.400
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about regional variations with you before and like

0:34:29.440 --> 0:34:31.920
<v Speaker 2>all of the activity that's happening down south, what can

0:34:31.960 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 2>you tell us, and sometimes that information gets a little

0:34:35.040 --> 0:34:36.480
<v Speaker 2>bit more nuanced and interesting.

0:34:37.960 --> 0:34:42.920
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, you know, again, the data that came out on March,

0:34:42.960 --> 0:34:45.560
<v Speaker 10>it's it's showing that that we saw that decrease and

0:34:45.680 --> 0:34:48.719
<v Speaker 10>starts from February over March right across the country. So

0:34:49.280 --> 0:34:51.680
<v Speaker 10>I'm not going to say that you know, there are

0:34:51.960 --> 0:34:55.840
<v Speaker 10>there's one region in particular that that didn't see some

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:59.440
<v Speaker 10>softening from February to March. But again, looking at things,

0:34:59.520 --> 0:35:03.920
<v Speaker 10>you know, over a year, we're still seeing continued increases

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 10>strengthen in the numbers, which I think is leading to

0:35:08.160 --> 0:35:11.680
<v Speaker 10>that you know, home builder sentiment and and good performance

0:35:11.719 --> 0:35:13.839
<v Speaker 10>that we're going to see from these builders. In Q one,

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:19.720
<v Speaker 10>we continue to be extremely focused on that southern half

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 10>of the US as we continue to see more companies

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.719
<v Speaker 10>relocate to these markets, job growth within those markets, and

0:35:27.239 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 10>population growth, which is you know, at historic eyes. I

0:35:32.280 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 10>think that the southern portion of the country is going

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:37.960
<v Speaker 10>to continue to be an area that that you know,

0:35:38.000 --> 0:35:41.240
<v Speaker 10>we can can really look to for strong results.

0:35:41.480 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 4>Kate again to remind every one of what you guys do.

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:46.520
<v Speaker 4>You manage land. You buy it from folks, you manage it,

0:35:46.560 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 4>you hold on to it, and then you sell it

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 4>to the large home builders, some of whom you've already

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:53.279
<v Speaker 4>mentioned during our interview. I'm wondering about the other side

0:35:53.280 --> 0:35:56.239
<v Speaker 4>of the equation, going and acquiring that land right now.

0:35:56.480 --> 0:35:58.239
<v Speaker 4>What are you what trends are you noticing? Are you

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:00.200
<v Speaker 4>able to buy all the land that you want to

0:36:00.200 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 4>buy right now? Where are the opportunities? How are prices?

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:08.560
<v Speaker 10>You know, land price prices like everything have been rising,

0:36:09.080 --> 0:36:12.839
<v Speaker 10>and it's getting more and more competitive to buy development

0:36:12.880 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 10>ready land. And that's that's really the key key phrase there.

0:36:16.960 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 10>I keep driving home this point as we have these interviews,

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:30.040
<v Speaker 10>but we're not seeing anything loosen in terms of restrictions

0:36:30.120 --> 0:36:35.480
<v Speaker 10>on you know, development ready land across the US, municipalities

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 10>looking to approve land, and then even more important the

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 10>infrastructure injections, you know, spending to get servicing to that

0:36:46.360 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 10>land for it to be developed on. But so, you know,

0:36:49.640 --> 0:36:53.799
<v Speaker 10>all of these factors are making the the development ready

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.520
<v Speaker 10>lands supply even more and more constraint.

0:36:56.920 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 9>You know, we've got.

0:36:57.520 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 10>Around ninety thousand acres under management. That makes us one

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:04.319
<v Speaker 10>of the largest owners of development ready land and in

0:37:04.360 --> 0:37:08.400
<v Speaker 10>the US. But we're we're continuing to look every week

0:37:08.520 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 10>for new acquisition opportunities because we just think it's going

0:37:12.680 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 10>to get tighter and tighter. But so we're certainly advocating

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:21.360
<v Speaker 10>for you know, how can we affect change to get

0:37:21.680 --> 0:37:28.919
<v Speaker 10>land approved, mostly for high density residential development, to get infrastructure,

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 10>you know, spending in approvals so that places you know,

0:37:33.480 --> 0:37:35.759
<v Speaker 10>like here in Arizona where we have water challenges, we

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:38.960
<v Speaker 10>need to figure that out because the population continues to grow.

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was going to say how much climate change

0:37:40.760 --> 0:37:42.480
<v Speaker 2>is impacting kind of all of what you do? Just

0:37:42.480 --> 0:37:44.520
<v Speaker 2>got about thirty seconds left here. What can you tell

0:37:44.600 --> 0:37:46.560
<v Speaker 2>us on that? That's certainly something we're thinking a lot

0:37:46.560 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 2>about here at Bloomberg and got our Earth Day coming

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 2>up on Monday, so kind of thinking about that too.

0:37:51.600 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 2>How is that complicating the situation? And again just got

0:37:54.000 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 2>about twenty seconds.

0:37:55.840 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's huge. You know, Florida just put some moratoriums

0:38:01.560 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 10>on development to really figure out what's happening with wetlands

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.360
<v Speaker 10>in Florida, and so I would say that it's really

0:38:10.440 --> 0:38:15.239
<v Speaker 10>region specific and the environmental impact within those markets. But

0:38:15.280 --> 0:38:19.719
<v Speaker 10>there's a compromise here, and I think we need the

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:23.319
<v Speaker 10>government to work with the builders and developers and landowners

0:38:23.360 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 10>to figure that out.

0:38:24.640 --> 0:38:27.120
<v Speaker 2>Gota ron Kate, thank you so much. Kay Kaminski, CEO

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:28.160
<v Speaker 2>of Walton Global.

0:38:29.000 --> 0:38:32.400
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. Can't just

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern Listen

0:38:35.840 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 1>on Apple, car Play and Androut Auto with a Bloomberg

0:38:38.520 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Business act or want us live on YouTube?

0:38:43.800 --> 0:38:44.839
<v Speaker 4>Can I see this on the radio?

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.279
<v Speaker 2>Carol, Well, I don't know. You can always say it once.

0:38:47.440 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 4>The rent, as they say, is too damn high and

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 4>still increasing too fast.

0:38:52.400 --> 0:38:54.399
<v Speaker 3>Just still here, okay, I'm still here. Here's what we mean.

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:55.200
<v Speaker 3>Here's what we mean.

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:55.479
<v Speaker 7>Okay.

0:38:55.719 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, when inflation peaked above seven percent back in twenty

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty two, it was relatively broad based to cross goods

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:03.440
<v Speaker 4>and services. In twenty twenty four, with inflation back below

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.759
<v Speaker 4>three percent, it's no longer the case. What's left of

0:39:06.800 --> 0:39:08.840
<v Speaker 4>the problem is now mainly about housing.

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:11.279
<v Speaker 2>Interesting and the new issue of Bloomberg Business Week Matt

0:39:11.320 --> 0:39:14.840
<v Speaker 2>Bosler and Jennifer Epstein right about the Fed's biggest stumbling

0:39:14.880 --> 0:39:18.319
<v Speaker 2>block in taming US inflation. Matt is Bloomberg News US

0:39:18.440 --> 0:39:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Economy reporter. He joins us here in a Bloomberg Interactive

0:39:21.320 --> 0:39:24.319
<v Speaker 2>broker studio. Really timely story makes no sense. And we've

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:27.240
<v Speaker 2>talked so much about kind of what makes inflation sticky,

0:39:27.400 --> 0:39:28.840
<v Speaker 2>laid all out for us and what you found in

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:29.440
<v Speaker 2>your reporting.

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.920
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so, you know, we're used to kind of hyperventilating

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 11>around the monthly inflation numbers when they come out every month,

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 11>and the story is always like, oh, what happened with

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:40.359
<v Speaker 11>goods prices? They're falling, or oh, core services is looking hot.

0:39:40.400 --> 0:39:42.160
<v Speaker 11>That must mean the labor markets too tight, and so

0:39:42.200 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 11>on and so forth. But the truth is, if you

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.200
<v Speaker 11>really look at the numbers, like the kind of big

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:49.760
<v Speaker 11>underlying component that determines the trend of the overall inflation

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.560
<v Speaker 11>index always comes back to rental inflation. And so we're

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.520
<v Speaker 11>in a situation now where not only is that usually

0:39:56.600 --> 0:39:59.160
<v Speaker 11>the most important, but it's especially the most important right

0:39:59.160 --> 0:40:02.359
<v Speaker 11>now because it's also the component of inflation that has

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 11>been slowest to come down compared to goods and services

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 11>and food and energy. And so if you start to

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:10.720
<v Speaker 11>dig into those numbers, what's going on there, it looks

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 11>really interesting on a regional basis, where you're seeing, you know,

0:40:14.160 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 11>very high rental inflation still in like the Northeast and

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.319
<v Speaker 11>the Midwest. It's actually coming down very quickly in the

0:40:19.360 --> 0:40:21.279
<v Speaker 11>West and the South, where in a lot of those

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:23.480
<v Speaker 11>cities they've been building a lot of housing over the

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:24.280
<v Speaker 11>last figure.

0:40:24.600 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, you increase supply and prices come to welcome to ECO. Well,

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 4>I want to make sure I get this right.

0:40:31.200 --> 0:40:33.080
<v Speaker 11>Supply and demand, supply and demand.

0:40:33.200 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Okay.

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:35.800
<v Speaker 4>So it actually brings me to a serious point because

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:38.560
<v Speaker 4>the fedcher has been asked about this several times over

0:40:38.600 --> 0:40:41.440
<v Speaker 4>the last couple of years, probably more than several You

0:40:41.480 --> 0:40:44.480
<v Speaker 4>follow kind of everything he has to say, but he

0:40:44.520 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 4>doesn't have control over zoning, he doesn't have control over

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 4>where homes are built. The FED really has a limited

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 4>toolkit when it comes to this stuff. So what can

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.440
<v Speaker 4>the FED do to tackle rent inflation?

0:40:58.280 --> 0:41:02.200
<v Speaker 11>Well, that's a really tricky question because typically the way

0:41:02.200 --> 0:41:05.400
<v Speaker 11>they think about it is, Okay, if we raise interest rates,

0:41:05.520 --> 0:41:08.240
<v Speaker 11>that will reduce demand in the economy, which will reduce

0:41:08.280 --> 0:41:11.120
<v Speaker 11>demand for housing overall, because people have less money to

0:41:11.160 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 11>spend on things like housing. But the problem is with

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:18.960
<v Speaker 11>housing in particular, sort of that relationship between interest rates

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:22.200
<v Speaker 11>and rental inflation. Kind of the sign on that relationship,

0:41:22.200 --> 0:41:24.320
<v Speaker 11>whether it's a positive or negative correlation, can be a

0:41:24.320 --> 0:41:27.799
<v Speaker 11>little ambiguous, because there's also reasons to think that, oh,

0:41:27.840 --> 0:41:31.560
<v Speaker 11>maybe higher interest rates might you know, not be great

0:41:31.600 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 11>for housing supply, right if you're trying to finance construction

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:35.280
<v Speaker 11>of housing.

0:41:35.360 --> 0:41:37.040
<v Speaker 2>We just talked about that with a guest in the

0:41:37.080 --> 0:41:38.400
<v Speaker 2>last hour, but go ahead.

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:40.799
<v Speaker 11>Right, And so there's things like that. I think most

0:41:40.800 --> 0:41:43.520
<v Speaker 11>people still believe that on the effect is that you

0:41:43.640 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 11>raise interest rates and that's going to slow housing.

0:41:46.080 --> 0:41:46.760
<v Speaker 2>On the margin.

0:41:47.239 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 11>But it's a lot harder to kind of make that

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:55.080
<v Speaker 11>case versus some other more clear cut kind of components

0:41:55.080 --> 0:41:57.600
<v Speaker 11>of the inflation index where it makes more sense.

0:41:57.640 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 2>What actually makes up the rent component specifically, is it

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.439
<v Speaker 2>rental any kind of housing like, just break it down

0:42:04.440 --> 0:42:04.680
<v Speaker 2>for me.

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:09.839
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, So it's it's partly it's mostly multifamily housing. There's

0:42:09.880 --> 0:42:13.160
<v Speaker 11>also a lot of you know, single family detached housing

0:42:13.239 --> 0:42:15.719
<v Speaker 11>that is, you know, on the rental market. And so

0:42:16.920 --> 0:42:18.680
<v Speaker 11>this has been kind of a story lately with some

0:42:18.760 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 11>of the drama around the inflation numbers over the last

0:42:21.120 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 11>few months and some of these emails that the BLS

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:25.480
<v Speaker 11>has been sending out to quote unquote Super YEARSS and

0:42:25.520 --> 0:42:28.600
<v Speaker 11>so on and so forth. Part of the problem with

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:31.400
<v Speaker 11>trying to figure out what exactly is going on is

0:42:31.400 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 11>that the BLS doesn't publish the weight of single family

0:42:34.600 --> 0:42:37.239
<v Speaker 11>versus multifamily housing in the index. So you kind of

0:42:37.280 --> 0:42:38.080
<v Speaker 11>have to guess.

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Because I guess I just just for a moment, like

0:42:39.560 --> 0:42:42.000
<v Speaker 2>I just think about higher rate environment. You can't afford

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:43.839
<v Speaker 2>to buy a home, right because the mortgage rates are higher,

0:42:43.880 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 2>so you end up renting more, and that just drives

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:48.640
<v Speaker 2>up rental prices even more. It's as simple as that,

0:42:48.760 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 2>is it, or somewhat well.

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:51.879
<v Speaker 11>I mean, so that's part of the reason why it's

0:42:51.920 --> 0:42:54.399
<v Speaker 11>not clear that raising interest rates will reduce housing demand,

0:42:54.440 --> 0:42:56.880
<v Speaker 11>because that's one of the big countervailing effects that people,

0:42:57.120 --> 0:43:00.440
<v Speaker 11>you know, speculate about. There's another kind of more interesting

0:43:01.160 --> 0:43:04.680
<v Speaker 11>component of this interest rates and rental inflation conversation, which

0:43:04.719 --> 0:43:07.400
<v Speaker 11>has to do with the way that the CPI numbers

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:11.160
<v Speaker 11>are constructed in particular, which is that, you know, we've

0:43:11.160 --> 0:43:14.000
<v Speaker 11>been talking a lot about these measures of market rents

0:43:14.040 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 11>on new leases right from Zillo Group or the BLS

0:43:17.440 --> 0:43:20.160
<v Speaker 11>is even publishing their own now, and those show that

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 11>rents have rental inflation has either slowed a lot or

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:27.200
<v Speaker 11>rents are outright declining in a lot of places. The

0:43:27.280 --> 0:43:31.480
<v Speaker 11>problem is, the CPI numbers measure the average rents for

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 11>all tenants, and I think it's something like ninety percent

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:36.520
<v Speaker 11>of tenants don't move in a given year, and so

0:43:36.760 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 11>the CPI numbers are dominated by people who aren't moving,

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:42.640
<v Speaker 11>and so it takes some time for you know, those

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.520
<v Speaker 11>market rents to get into the kind of like average rents.

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:49.040
<v Speaker 11>And one theory that we talk about in the story

0:43:49.080 --> 0:43:51.200
<v Speaker 11>a little bit is that high interest rates may be

0:43:51.280 --> 0:43:53.680
<v Speaker 11>affecting the amount of time it takes for market rents

0:43:53.719 --> 0:43:56.320
<v Speaker 11>to get into the average rent figures because there's just

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 11>less turnover and so the housing stocks turning over less

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 11>and therefore or you know, those market rents aren't being

0:44:01.760 --> 0:44:03.840
<v Speaker 11>reflected in the full housing stock as quickly.

0:44:04.080 --> 0:44:07.360
<v Speaker 4>I don't mean to ask a question that involves moving goalposts,

0:44:07.440 --> 0:44:09.080
<v Speaker 4>but Carol and I do talk a lot about a

0:44:09.080 --> 0:44:11.319
<v Speaker 4>two percent inflation goal and whether or not that is

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:13.600
<v Speaker 4>something that needs to be revisited. I think there are

0:44:13.640 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 4>a lot of couch houses that I know yet. But

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.480
<v Speaker 4>what about just stripping out what happens when you strip

0:44:18.520 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 4>out housing and so called supercore, because it actually is

0:44:23.440 --> 0:44:26.399
<v Speaker 4>pretty significant, and now some analysts are stripping that out

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:28.040
<v Speaker 4>when they look at how inflation is moving.

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so if you do that, inflation is basically back

0:44:32.160 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 11>very close to two percent. This housing thing is really

0:44:35.120 --> 0:44:38.040
<v Speaker 11>like the last, you know, big remaining piece of the issue.

0:44:38.080 --> 0:44:40.799
<v Speaker 11>If we were stripping out housing, you know, on the

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:43.040
<v Speaker 11>core PCEE indicator that the FED likes to look at,

0:44:43.040 --> 0:44:44.839
<v Speaker 11>we'd be talking about more like two point two two

0:44:44.880 --> 0:44:47.880
<v Speaker 11>point three percent inflation. And you can imagine the conversation

0:44:47.920 --> 0:44:49.880
<v Speaker 11>would be very different, given that we have five and

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:52.000
<v Speaker 11>a half percent interest rates really different.

0:44:52.280 --> 0:44:54.879
<v Speaker 2>Thirty seconds left. Wrapping up, I'm just thinking about folks

0:44:54.880 --> 0:44:56.680
<v Speaker 2>who are listening to us and watching us right now.

0:44:56.719 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 2>What do you think is it that they have to

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:00.560
<v Speaker 2>kind of take away from this as they think about

0:45:00.560 --> 0:45:03.560
<v Speaker 2>either the investment environment or ultimately what the FED can

0:45:03.680 --> 0:45:06.040
<v Speaker 2>or can't do based on this data.

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:08.239
<v Speaker 11>So I think the big thing is to, you know,

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:10.799
<v Speaker 11>keep an eye on the rental inflation numbers when we're

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 11>looking at the monthly inflation statistics in particular, and you know,

0:45:15.840 --> 0:45:19.040
<v Speaker 11>think about kind of what's going to get us down

0:45:19.200 --> 0:45:22.759
<v Speaker 11>back to kind of pre pandemic run rate for those

0:45:22.800 --> 0:45:27.440
<v Speaker 11>rental inflation numbers. A lot of people are forecasting that

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:29.879
<v Speaker 11>that's going to happen any month now. They've been saying

0:45:29.920 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 11>that for a couple of months, so we'll just have

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:35.080
<v Speaker 11>to see. But if that does happen in the next

0:45:35.080 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 11>couple months, then you know, the inflation conversation could change

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 11>again pretty dramatically.

0:45:39.480 --> 0:45:41.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, which we've seen some big swings swings in it.

0:45:41.520 --> 0:45:42.440
<v Speaker 3>All, right, exactly?

0:45:42.480 --> 0:45:44.719
<v Speaker 4>Did I mention that Matt's story is featured in the

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:47.520
<v Speaker 4>forthcoming issue of BusinessWeek magazine. It's available now on the

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:51.120
<v Speaker 4>Bloomberg terminal and at Bloomberg dot com slash business Week.

0:45:51.040 --> 0:45:53.719
<v Speaker 2>A great read. Mepos us Economy reporter at Bloomberg News.

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:56.400
<v Speaker 2>Here in our interactive broker studio, Matt thank you so much.

0:46:01.239 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 1>A journal now about you let me drive?

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:08.480
<v Speaker 5>No, no, no, no, please go ju honey please, I'll do

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 5>the driving.

0:46:09.040 --> 0:46:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Gravel, let's mate, I want to dry it.

0:46:13.760 --> 0:46:15.640
<v Speaker 4>It's a good question time.

0:46:18.440 --> 0:46:20.320
<v Speaker 1>This is the drive to the clothes.

0:46:20.560 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 3>Don com think we'll buy around.

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Each other down on Bluebird Radio.

0:46:25.040 --> 0:46:27.319
<v Speaker 2>All right, everybody just got about eighteen minutes left to

0:46:27.400 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 2>end the trading session, getting ready to wrap up the

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:32.359
<v Speaker 2>trading day and get to those Netflix earnings, which are

0:46:32.400 --> 0:46:35.040
<v Speaker 2>definitely a focal point after the closing. About Charlie just

0:46:35.040 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 2>breaking down the numbers, a bit of a mixed trade,

0:46:36.719 --> 0:46:39.560
<v Speaker 2>but lower in particular on the Nasdaq one hundred, down

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:41.719
<v Speaker 2>about four tenths of a percent, and again on a

0:46:41.840 --> 0:46:45.120
<v Speaker 2>day where we've seen some movement in US treasury yields.

0:46:45.120 --> 0:46:47.759
<v Speaker 2>Al though, we're offesome of our highs. But as Charlie mentioned,

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:49.879
<v Speaker 2>looking at the ten, you're four point sixty three right

0:46:49.880 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 2>now to your note, with the yield of four point

0:46:51.360 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 2>ninety eight, it's so just shy of that five percent mark.

0:46:54.239 --> 0:46:58.080
<v Speaker 2>But keeping an eye on that higher or high for longer.

0:46:58.320 --> 0:46:59.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's get to our drive to the clothes.

0:46:59.840 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 4>For that, we go to Burns McKinney portfolio manager at

0:47:03.080 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 4>NFJ Investment Group, Burns, joining us from Dallas, Texas this afternoon.

0:47:07.160 --> 0:47:07.880
<v Speaker 3>Burns, how are you.

0:47:09.120 --> 0:47:10.520
<v Speaker 12>I'm doing great. Thanks, thanks for having me.

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:11.680
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it's good to have you with us.

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:14.560
<v Speaker 4>What do you make of this rising rate environment? I mean,

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 4>it's kind of funny for me to stay rising rate

0:47:16.120 --> 0:47:17.799
<v Speaker 4>environment because that's the environment that we've been in for

0:47:17.800 --> 0:47:20.839
<v Speaker 4>the last eighteen to twenty four months. But it does

0:47:20.880 --> 0:47:24.120
<v Speaker 4>seem like investors are a little concerned that the Fed

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:25.359
<v Speaker 4>is not going to be cutting this year.

0:47:27.120 --> 0:47:30.000
<v Speaker 12>That's definitely been the most prevalent narrative over the last

0:47:30.040 --> 0:47:32.720
<v Speaker 12>week or so. You know, we've had three straight months

0:47:32.719 --> 0:47:37.239
<v Speaker 12>of stubbornly difficult to tamp down last mile inflation, and

0:47:37.280 --> 0:47:39.960
<v Speaker 12>so when you had Jay Powell earlier this week suggests

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:42.920
<v Speaker 12>that really the Fed's in no hurry to cut rates

0:47:43.600 --> 0:47:46.560
<v Speaker 12>and suggested that rates might be higher for longer, you

0:47:46.600 --> 0:47:49.799
<v Speaker 12>saw a convergence between, you know, what investors were thinking

0:47:49.840 --> 0:47:51.319
<v Speaker 12>and what the Fed had been saying for a while.

0:47:51.480 --> 0:47:53.360
<v Speaker 12>At the beginning of this year, we were talking or

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:56.480
<v Speaker 12>the market was expecting six or seven rate cuts, and

0:47:57.560 --> 0:48:00.000
<v Speaker 12>really calendar to date, we've gone from that to about

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:03.879
<v Speaker 12>maybe one to two rate cuts. Now, the good news

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:06.320
<v Speaker 12>is on this front is that you know, we're seeing

0:48:06.360 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 12>higher bond yields, but it really it hasn't derailed anything yet.

0:48:10.239 --> 0:48:13.120
<v Speaker 12>You've still seen, despite the fact we've had a tough week,

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:16.880
<v Speaker 12>equities are up this year. It hasn't affected the economy

0:48:17.000 --> 0:48:19.560
<v Speaker 12>so much. I mean, the jobs reports have been very strong.

0:48:20.160 --> 0:48:22.600
<v Speaker 12>In fact, what's interesting is that despite the fact that

0:48:22.640 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 12>there's a lag in FED policy, they started hiking rates

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 12>two years ago, and in fact, over the last twenty

0:48:28.000 --> 0:48:32.240
<v Speaker 12>four months, unemployment has been below four percent for over

0:48:32.320 --> 0:48:34.759
<v Speaker 12>twenty four months in a row. The last time we

0:48:34.840 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 12>saw a run that long for low unemployment was over

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:42.840
<v Speaker 12>fifty years ago. So jobs have been very strong, and

0:48:42.880 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 12>really it just it buys the FED time and patience.

0:48:45.280 --> 0:48:46.719
<v Speaker 12>It's sort of like, you know, if you're on a

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:49.360
<v Speaker 12>road trip, if your car's getting a little better mileage

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:51.279
<v Speaker 12>than you expected, then maybe you can make it a

0:48:51.280 --> 0:48:55.520
<v Speaker 12>few more exits before having to take that stop. But

0:48:55.600 --> 0:48:57.320
<v Speaker 12>what it does mean is higher rates for longer.

0:48:57.600 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we're just kicking off earnings. You know, we're

0:48:59.760 --> 0:49:02.440
<v Speaker 2>kind of little bit on pins and needles awaiting those

0:49:02.480 --> 0:49:04.800
<v Speaker 2>Netflix results coming up after the close of the belt

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 2>because they're one of the big megacap names, right the

0:49:07.000 --> 0:49:09.280
<v Speaker 2>tech names that we really kind of follow very closely.

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Having said that, you've got some names, especially within the

0:49:13.280 --> 0:49:17.399
<v Speaker 2>value world, that you are finding interesting. Starbucks is among them.

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:19.680
<v Speaker 2>What is it about Starbucks that you find interesting at

0:49:19.680 --> 0:49:21.000
<v Speaker 2>this point? And I'm just pulling it up on the

0:49:21.000 --> 0:49:24.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg stocks down about nine percent so far this year,

0:49:25.680 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 2>and we're looking at what a forward looking pe of

0:49:27.640 --> 0:49:29.799
<v Speaker 2>about twenty one, but we know that they've been going

0:49:29.800 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 2>through some things.

0:49:32.000 --> 0:49:34.759
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, we're looking for again, we're contrarians, and we're looking

0:49:34.800 --> 0:49:36.839
<v Speaker 12>for the babies that've been thrown out with the bath water.

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 12>Starbucks has been lagging of late, and as a result,

0:49:39.880 --> 0:49:42.719
<v Speaker 12>what you're able to get is a growth name at

0:49:42.760 --> 0:49:45.799
<v Speaker 12>a reasonable price. You noted this traded about twenty one

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:49.279
<v Speaker 12>times earnings over the last decade, it's averaged closer to

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 12>thirty times earnings, and in fact, outside of that brief

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:55.440
<v Speaker 12>run during the pandemic, this is the cheapest Starbucks has

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:58.280
<v Speaker 12>been on a pe multiple basis over the last ten years.

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:01.400
<v Speaker 12>So you have that they've been very generous with shareholders,

0:50:01.400 --> 0:50:04.720
<v Speaker 12>that their dividend payouts gone up by nearly twenty percent

0:50:04.800 --> 0:50:07.279
<v Speaker 12>per year for a ten year run. That's a great

0:50:07.280 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 12>way to keep up with the inflation. And in this

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 12>type of market, you know, pricing power is paramount, and

0:50:13.160 --> 0:50:15.719
<v Speaker 12>what they sell is they're the dominant player in an

0:50:15.719 --> 0:50:18.520
<v Speaker 12>addictive product. So they've been able as a result of

0:50:18.560 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 12>that consistently grow sales. And yeah, just I always like

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:23.879
<v Speaker 12>to look at stocks that you maybe have a little

0:50:23.880 --> 0:50:26.000
<v Speaker 12>experience in. You know, when I'm on the road for business,

0:50:26.000 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 12>I might stop in there for a brief water. My

0:50:29.320 --> 0:50:32.440
<v Speaker 12>daughter does her homework there, my son meets up with

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:34.360
<v Speaker 12>his friends there. Now, I kind of like to describe

0:50:34.360 --> 0:50:37.200
<v Speaker 12>Starbucks as the town square of the twenty first century.

0:50:37.239 --> 0:50:38.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, that's what Howard Schultz wanted.

0:50:39.280 --> 0:50:42.719
<v Speaker 4>Like you're like, this is literally, like, you know, the

0:50:42.719 --> 0:50:45.279
<v Speaker 4>thesis of Howard Schultz. The question is can they can

0:50:45.280 --> 0:50:47.319
<v Speaker 4>they do it in a way that not not only

0:50:47.360 --> 0:50:50.719
<v Speaker 4>satisfies customers but also their employees as they've had the

0:50:51.080 --> 0:50:53.280
<v Speaker 4>labor challenges over the last couple of years, dock.

0:50:53.120 --> 0:50:55.360
<v Speaker 2>Hasn't really gone anywhere in the last couple of years.

0:50:55.400 --> 0:50:57.160
<v Speaker 2>And you know, I feel like I'm gonna, you know,

0:50:57.239 --> 0:50:59.399
<v Speaker 2>mimic our something my husband saying, just because it's on sale,

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:01.759
<v Speaker 2>doesn't mean it's a deal. Like so, I'm just saying, right,

0:51:01.840 --> 0:51:05.279
<v Speaker 2>unless there's the growth there, you know, how patient do

0:51:05.360 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 2>investors need to be?

0:51:08.719 --> 0:51:11.040
<v Speaker 12>Well, again, the fact that you know that the margins

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:13.319
<v Speaker 12>have been pinched a little bit over the last couple

0:51:13.360 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 12>of few quarters. You know, that's one of the reasons

0:51:15.600 --> 0:51:18.880
<v Speaker 12>why investors do get such a great evaluation. And you know,

0:51:18.960 --> 0:51:20.799
<v Speaker 12>noting the fact that it's not just cheap on a

0:51:20.840 --> 0:51:24.000
<v Speaker 12>relative basis, this is the cheapest it's been in a decade.

0:51:24.080 --> 0:51:26.279
<v Speaker 12>And so you know, when you start off, you know,

0:51:26.440 --> 0:51:28.160
<v Speaker 12>values what you get what you pay for it, and

0:51:28.200 --> 0:51:30.280
<v Speaker 12>as a result, it just kind of you know, shifts

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:34.080
<v Speaker 12>that risk reward to the upside for investors. As far

0:51:34.120 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 12>as getting an affordable starting point. You know, you've got

0:51:37.120 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 12>a company that just efficient operations. You know, same store

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:43.360
<v Speaker 12>sales have continued to grow at three to four percent

0:51:43.440 --> 0:51:47.360
<v Speaker 12>per year. It's been very consistent on that front. And again,

0:51:47.440 --> 0:51:49.279
<v Speaker 12>you know, I mean there's very few companies that have

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:52.000
<v Speaker 12>really demonstrated the type of pricing power that they have,

0:51:52.200 --> 0:51:55.480
<v Speaker 12>and so especially in an inflationary environment, that's the type

0:51:55.480 --> 0:51:58.040
<v Speaker 12>of thing we're looking for. That and as I said,

0:51:58.120 --> 0:52:00.800
<v Speaker 12>you's growing dividends. You know, in case things go sideways,

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:01.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, they'll they'll pay you.

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:05.680
<v Speaker 4>To Wait, hey, what about Crowncastle. This is a company

0:52:05.719 --> 0:52:07.040
<v Speaker 4>that is it's a rate.

0:52:07.320 --> 0:52:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:52:07.640 --> 0:52:12.000
<v Speaker 4>They do infrastructure for wireless communications, think cell towers and

0:52:12.040 --> 0:52:14.200
<v Speaker 4>the like. You're also bullish on Crowncastle.

0:52:14.200 --> 0:52:18.080
<v Speaker 12>Why, Uh yeah, that's one again. I you know, I

0:52:18.120 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 12>think that for one, you know, you just have to

0:52:20.200 --> 0:52:22.400
<v Speaker 12>kind of bear in mind that you know, the the

0:52:22.440 --> 0:52:26.640
<v Speaker 12>stock market's actually pricing in a pretty positive scenario. Investors

0:52:26.680 --> 0:52:28.960
<v Speaker 12>aren't looking to play defense right now. I think, you know,

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:31.040
<v Speaker 12>no one's thinking about a recession now the way they

0:52:31.040 --> 0:52:33.120
<v Speaker 12>were a year ago. And you know, in the case

0:52:33.120 --> 0:52:35.920
<v Speaker 12>of Crowncastle, yeah, they're they own cell towers.

0:52:36.360 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:52:36.600 --> 0:52:39.879
<v Speaker 12>They they pay a consistent six percent dividend deal, which

0:52:39.920 --> 0:52:42.879
<v Speaker 12>is another great way to play defense. You know, as

0:52:42.880 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 12>far as you have cellular service, I mean basically, you know,

0:52:45.600 --> 0:52:47.960
<v Speaker 12>there is just a play on the rising demand for

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:51.480
<v Speaker 12>digital content. Five G in fact, is even more profitable

0:52:51.480 --> 0:52:53.960
<v Speaker 12>for these guys, and it's the type of thing where

0:52:53.960 --> 0:52:57.719
<v Speaker 12>they sign long term contracts with their clients and with

0:52:57.800 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 12>automatic inflation escalators. And then nice thing for us is

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:02.640
<v Speaker 12>we don't have to be smart enough to know, you know,

0:53:02.680 --> 0:53:05.239
<v Speaker 12>which streaming service or which you know websites are going

0:53:05.280 --> 0:53:07.200
<v Speaker 12>to be the successful ones. It's kind of that pick

0:53:07.200 --> 0:53:09.719
<v Speaker 12>and shovel play in the twenty first century, whereby you

0:53:09.800 --> 0:53:11.960
<v Speaker 12>know they you know, regardless, people are gonna have to

0:53:12.000 --> 0:53:14.680
<v Speaker 12>use their cell phones. I was listening to a radio

0:53:14.680 --> 0:53:17.040
<v Speaker 12>show the other day where someone was hypothetically asked, what

0:53:17.040 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 12>would you give up first? You're heating and air conditioning

0:53:19.360 --> 0:53:21.680
<v Speaker 12>or your cell phone? And I'm not to say which

0:53:21.719 --> 0:53:23.200
<v Speaker 12>side of the coin I'm going to be on on that,

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:25.080
<v Speaker 12>but the fact that people were even asking that question

0:53:25.480 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 12>does significant does indicate that they do, you know, cell

0:53:29.160 --> 0:53:29.760
<v Speaker 12>a very importantly.

0:53:29.760 --> 0:53:30.560
<v Speaker 3>It depends on where you live.

0:53:30.600 --> 0:53:32.239
<v Speaker 4>If you live in California, you don't need heater or

0:53:32.239 --> 0:53:34.920
<v Speaker 4>air conditioning for a lot of them ask, So that's

0:53:34.920 --> 0:53:38.040
<v Speaker 4>an easy ask anywhere else in the country, though you

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:38.759
<v Speaker 4>might have to.

0:53:39.320 --> 0:53:40.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think twice about.

0:53:40.280 --> 0:53:41.120
<v Speaker 6>That, Dallas.

0:53:41.520 --> 0:53:44.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I can't imagine. I mean, cell phones at this

0:53:44.400 --> 0:53:46.400
<v Speaker 2>point are kind of almost I don't want to say

0:53:46.400 --> 0:53:46.680
<v Speaker 2>they are.

0:53:46.760 --> 0:53:50.040
<v Speaker 3>Utility, but no question are I think you can say that.

0:53:50.239 --> 0:53:53.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, no doubt about it. Yeah, Burns, thank you so much.

0:53:53.719 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 2>Fun to talk a couple of names with you. I

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 2>really appreciate it. Burns McKinney's portfolio manager at NFJA Investment Group,

0:53:59.080 --> 0:54:00.440
<v Speaker 2>joining us from Dallas, Texas.

0:54:00.480 --> 0:54:02.120
<v Speaker 4>He also likes the Next Era Energy. We didn't get

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:03.759
<v Speaker 4>to talk to him about that. Next time he comes on,

0:54:03.760 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 4>we'll chat with him about that. Likes Reed's healthcare industrials.

0:54:06.640 --> 0:54:08.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm looking at Next Era. It's going to report

0:54:08.600 --> 0:54:11.360
<v Speaker 2>next week, guys, before the market on April twenty third.

0:54:11.640 --> 0:54:14.520
<v Speaker 2>It is up about six percent. It's got a dividend

0:54:14.560 --> 0:54:16.720
<v Speaker 2>yield of about three point two percent. But it's interesting.

0:54:17.040 --> 0:54:19.400
<v Speaker 2>We've talked about the power grid and energy and utilities

0:54:19.400 --> 0:54:22.239
<v Speaker 2>a little bit this week, so we'll see what they

0:54:22.280 --> 0:54:23.280
<v Speaker 2>have to say. Ultimately.

0:54:23.920 --> 0:54:26.840
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Business Week podcast. I'll a a

0:54:26.920 --> 0:54:30.680
<v Speaker 1>little on Apple, Spotify and anywhere else you get your podcast.

0:54:31.200 --> 0:54:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Listen live weekday afternoons from two to five pm Eastern

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio app, tune In, and

0:54:38.160 --> 0:54:40.879
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business App. You can also watch us live

0:54:41.000 --> 0:54:44.520
<v Speaker 1>every weekday on YouTube and always on the Bloomberg Germany

0:54:44.560 --> 0:54:44.840
<v Speaker 1>alone