WEBVTT - Apple, Amazon, Twitter Earnings

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.880
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay I'm Emily check in San Francisco and this

0:00:27.000 --> 0:00:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour, Apple

0:00:29.480 --> 0:00:33.880
<v Speaker 1>share soar after an impressive second quarter records almost across

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the ward, beats on iPhone sales, iPad Mac, an all

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:41.320
<v Speaker 1>time services record, also for the services business. I spoke

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.760
<v Speaker 1>with Apple CEO Tim Cook and will tell you what

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:46.800
<v Speaker 1>he had to say. And just as Elon Musku is

0:00:46.840 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 1>poised to take over Twitter, revenue misses the slowest growth

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in six quarters. This on top of a new report

0:00:53.360 --> 0:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>that the FTC is investigating how Musk disclosed his purchases

0:00:56.880 --> 0:01:00.480
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter shares as he amassed a massive steak in

0:01:00.600 --> 0:01:05.039
<v Speaker 1>secret and qualcom source as the Chip Giant diversifies beyond

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:09.320
<v Speaker 1>phones to cars, networks and computers, CEO Cristiano Amman joins

0:01:09.400 --> 0:01:11.840
<v Speaker 1>us later this hour. We will get to all of

0:01:11.880 --> 0:01:14.080
<v Speaker 1>that in a moment, but first we are watching Apple

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and Amazon results. Also out this hour, Bloombriggs Emily Grafao

0:01:18.280 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 1>joins us now to see how investors are reacting. Emily

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>take it away hi Emily Will was a largely green

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:25.600
<v Speaker 1>day for the US stock marke at the SMP five

0:01:25.680 --> 0:01:28.679
<v Speaker 1>hundred ended up two point four seven percent, and the

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:32.119
<v Speaker 1>tech heavy Nasdaq one hundred also ended up higher three

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.800
<v Speaker 1>by three point four eight percent. That was the largest

0:01:34.840 --> 0:01:38.119
<v Speaker 1>one day game since March sixteenth. We also saw yields

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:41.400
<v Speaker 1>higher but didn't seem to bother US equity investors from

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>buying up stocks. And of course it was a largely

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>risk on day. So we also saw bitcoin finishing the

0:01:46.840 --> 0:01:49.040
<v Speaker 1>day in New York higher. We tend to see that

0:01:49.240 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>risk on trade. Bitcoin tends to get higher. But the

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>big story of the day was really all about the

0:01:54.560 --> 0:01:57.240
<v Speaker 1>big tech earnings coming up. We're gonna look at Apple

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:01.000
<v Speaker 1>right now because the stock is rallying after reported earnings.

0:02:01.040 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>They are up right now about point four seven percent.

0:02:04.200 --> 0:02:07.320
<v Speaker 1>They beat on sales, they beat on profits. They reported

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>sales rising to about ninety seven point three billion dollars

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in the quarter. It was largely fueled by demand for

0:02:13.680 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>iPhones demand for their web services. They also announced a

0:02:17.360 --> 0:02:20.400
<v Speaker 1>ninety billion dollar stock buy back program, and so you're

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:23.640
<v Speaker 1>really seeing that optimism reflected uh in the stock price,

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.880
<v Speaker 1>but it wasn't positive for all of the big tech companies.

0:02:26.919 --> 0:02:30.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at Amazon right now, down nine point five

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.040
<v Speaker 1>four percent in the post market. They missed on sales

0:02:34.080 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>for this quarter, but they also projected um a forward

0:02:37.600 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>guidance that was lower than analysts expected for the next quarter.

0:02:41.200 --> 0:02:43.200
<v Speaker 1>And it was the same thing for Intel. You're seeing

0:02:43.240 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 1>until down about four uh percent in the post market.

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:50.360
<v Speaker 1>They also projected that that forward guidance for the next

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:53.919
<v Speaker 1>quarter was going to be lower than analyst estimates. Twitter

0:02:54.160 --> 0:02:56.680
<v Speaker 1>also reported earnings this morning. It was one of the

0:02:56.720 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 1>final earnings reports before Mr Elon Musk take the company private.

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:04.720
<v Speaker 1>They did miss on revenue, but interesting to note they

0:03:04.760 --> 0:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>did report a six increase in their daily active users,

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>so daily active users grew to million, and that beat estimates.

0:03:14.800 --> 0:03:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And then we're also seeing again that Apple shares falling

0:03:17.160 --> 0:03:19.920
<v Speaker 1>lectually a little bit now um in the postmarket. Emily,

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 1>all right, Emily graffe O, thank you. Lots to break

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.080
<v Speaker 1>down throughout the show. I want to start with Apple

0:03:25.120 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 1>beating estimates yet again, shares rising in extended trading. This

0:03:29.680 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Apple's biggest non holiday quarter ever. I spoke with Apple

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 1>CEO Tim Cook just moments ago to break down his

0:03:37.600 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>remarks and the numbers I want to bring in. Juliasc

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:42.160
<v Speaker 1>vice president and principal analyst at Forrester Research, and Tom

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>Giles are Bloomberg Tech Executive editor. Thank you both for

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 1>being here. Looking across the board, it is fairly impressive

0:03:48.680 --> 0:03:51.640
<v Speaker 1>to see how Apple weathered the macro environment. On the

0:03:51.680 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>call with me, Tim Cook said it was a record quarter.

0:03:54.680 --> 0:03:57.680
<v Speaker 1>We grew in each of our categories except iPad, where

0:03:57.720 --> 0:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>we had very significant supply constraints. He said they did

0:04:02.080 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>experience apply constraints, but they were significantly lower than what

0:04:05.920 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 1>they experienced in December, and that they were all silicon

0:04:09.040 --> 0:04:12.880
<v Speaker 1>shortage related, so chip issue related. And it's of course

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that's an industry wide issue that affected several of their products. Julie,

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>what's your big takeaway that despite they supply constraints, despite

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>macro economic uncertainty, Apple still blowing it out of the water. Yeah, no,

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>it's it's exciting to watch. And I think you know,

0:04:28.720 --> 0:04:30.600
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we always know about Apple

0:04:30.800 --> 0:04:34.960
<v Speaker 1>is there in terms of like worldwide market share for

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>something like smartphones or PCs, they have a minority stake

0:04:38.360 --> 0:04:40.919
<v Speaker 1>relative to Android and some other platforms, so there's always

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:43.200
<v Speaker 1>going to be a lot of upside and Apple is

0:04:43.240 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>always going in a forward direction. It's very common that

0:04:46.000 --> 0:04:49.880
<v Speaker 1>if I own an iOS smartphone or I own laptop maclaptop,

0:04:50.200 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>are more likely to buy an Apple device with my

0:04:52.480 --> 0:04:55.640
<v Speaker 1>next purchase, a more likely to buy Apple services. So

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the stickiness of their devices and services is very high.

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And so yeah, there's a lot of upside for Apple

0:05:01.480 --> 0:05:05.480
<v Speaker 1>ahead as we look forward, Tom, how don't score this

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>with with Amazon's results, which we're going to dig into

0:05:08.120 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>a little later in the show, but sluggish second quarter sales. Uh.

0:05:11.520 --> 0:05:15.479
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook did say they're seeing inflationary pressure, but that

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 1>in their op X and gross margins you see that

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>reflected and they're navigating that as best they can. But

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 1>still these numbers, it's a night and day situation here.

0:05:25.320 --> 0:05:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Apple benefited from the fact they introduced a new lower

0:05:29.400 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>cost iPhone that started to kick in during the quarter.

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 1>iPhone continues to be this big money maker for them,

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and they really took advantage of that. And as your

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>other guests pointed out, services they keep they keep adding services,

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 1>and they keep making that an attractive proposition for iPhone

0:05:46.680 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 1>owners and getting you to come back to it, whether

0:05:49.440 --> 0:05:52.599
<v Speaker 1>it's app downloads, whether it's entertainment, etcetera. So it just

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:57.000
<v Speaker 1>keeps going on and on and on Amazon huge contrast

0:05:57.320 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>inflation inflation. Inflation seems to be a big issue there.

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.760
<v Speaker 1>You're talking about rising fuel costs. Remember we broke the

0:06:03.800 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 1>news that they imposed a surcharge for their their partners

0:06:08.160 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>to account for rising fuel costs and other inflationary pressures.

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:16.719
<v Speaker 1>That took a toll over. Capacity is another important story

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 1>about Amazon, and they really invested in warehouses, they invested

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:24.719
<v Speaker 1>in people because remember Amazon had this surge in demand

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:27.160
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. We were all at home, we were

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:32.719
<v Speaker 1>all ordering everything online, and that hugely benefited Amazon. That

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:36.080
<v Speaker 1>party cannot continue forever, and we are starting to see

0:06:36.120 --> 0:06:39.839
<v Speaker 1>the effects of the trail off in the pandemic fueled

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.120
<v Speaker 1>boom that Amazon benefited from for so long. Now. I

0:06:43.160 --> 0:06:45.159
<v Speaker 1>did ask for Tim Cook for more color on the

0:06:45.200 --> 0:06:46.960
<v Speaker 1>current corn and what he sees through the end of

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the year, when it comes to demand, when it comes

0:06:49.880 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to supply chain issues, when it comes to Russia. He

0:06:52.800 --> 0:06:54.160
<v Speaker 1>said they'd get into all of that on the call,

0:06:54.200 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>and we are listening in and you can follow on

0:06:56.400 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 1>along at our t live block. He actually said they're

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be giving an number on Russia revenue specifically,

0:07:02.360 --> 0:07:04.239
<v Speaker 1>and what kind of a hit they took their given

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that they paused sales of products. Julie, what is your

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>outlook on how Apple will continue to whether supply constraints

0:07:11.760 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>should they persist given an ongoing lockdown in China? Yeah, so,

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.520
<v Speaker 1>well that thing is supply chain analysts. I think, you know, Emily,

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you really kicked it off, and you started the call

0:07:22.240 --> 0:07:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and said, you know, despite whatever happens, whether there's a war,

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:27.280
<v Speaker 1>there's a pandemic, there's supply chain issue, there's a lockdown

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:31.120
<v Speaker 1>in China, Apple continues to weather it will. So you know,

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they just seem to be somehow better positioned than perhaps

0:07:33.680 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 1>some of their competitors and consumer electronics to ride through

0:07:36.960 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>the supply chain issues even though it is impacting you know,

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>one or two of their categories today. So I just

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 1>tend to never underestimate what Apple can get done. All right,

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:47.000
<v Speaker 1>I want to talk a little bit more about their

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>services business, because, of course the other big story in

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.440
<v Speaker 1>the business world is streaming and the decline we saw

0:07:52.440 --> 0:07:55.080
<v Speaker 1>on Netflix subscribers. Of course, Apple has a signal, you know,

0:07:55.120 --> 0:07:57.680
<v Speaker 1>a significant position or has made a significant bet there

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:00.680
<v Speaker 1>with TV Plus, and I asked know how that's doing

0:08:00.720 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 1>and if they're still as bullish on streaming. He said,

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 1>we're very bullish. Our philosophy for TV plus from the

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:09.400
<v Speaker 1>beginning and it continues unchanged is to create high quality,

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 1>original content that aligns well with our values and to

0:08:12.320 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>be one of the most desire platforms for storytellers. And

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I feel we're doing a pretty good job of that.

0:08:17.000 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>He highlighted Coda, which of course won the Oscar for

0:08:21.840 --> 0:08:24.400
<v Speaker 1>Best Picture and I think was extraordinary. He highlighted the

0:08:24.440 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>success of ted Lasso. You know, you know, certainly not

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.480
<v Speaker 1>as big a bet on on on streaming as as

0:08:30.520 --> 0:08:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Netflix has made um on streaming. But Tom, what do

0:08:33.960 --> 0:08:35.640
<v Speaker 1>you make of the fact that this is an area

0:08:35.679 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that they're going to continue to invest in. They're coming

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>from behind here. They don't have to prove themselves in

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the way Netflix is the is the player to really

0:08:44.800 --> 0:08:48.040
<v Speaker 1>knock off on this on streaming right now, and we're

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 1>starting to see that happen. Apple is a much smaller

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>player there they are, they're coming from behind, and it's

0:08:56.040 --> 0:08:59.120
<v Speaker 1>all upside to them. It's one of many businesses. This

0:08:59.200 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>is a very law overall percentage when you think about

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.360
<v Speaker 1>where they get their revenue from. It's almost like gravy

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:09.000
<v Speaker 1>for them in some ways, and they're not betting the

0:09:09.080 --> 0:09:12.600
<v Speaker 1>farm on streaming. They are investing in great shows. We're

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>all waiting for the next season of ted Lasso, but

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:19.480
<v Speaker 1>it's not the centerpiece of their of their strategy. I'm

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:22.560
<v Speaker 1>very curious to hear on the call any more detail

0:09:22.600 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 1>they can give us about their user numbers, the time

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:28.400
<v Speaker 1>being spent, and are they getting any of the subscribers

0:09:28.400 --> 0:09:30.840
<v Speaker 1>who are maybe not spending as much time on Netflix

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>right now? And just on the supply chain. I want

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.360
<v Speaker 1>to add on something Julie said, think about where China

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:40.240
<v Speaker 1>is the lockdowns. Are the parts of China that are

0:09:40.280 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that Apple is really dependent on, are not the parts

0:09:43.040 --> 0:09:46.680
<v Speaker 1>of China that are really most severely hurt right now.

0:09:47.520 --> 0:09:50.000
<v Speaker 1>I was very surprised at how upbeat Tim Cook was

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>about the supply chain issue, how much better it's getting.

0:09:54.040 --> 0:09:58.080
<v Speaker 1>The question is if the lockdown spread much more significantly

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:00.960
<v Speaker 1>throughout China than what happens top All right, we'll be

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.680
<v Speaker 1>listening for all of that on the call. Tom Giles,

0:10:03.679 --> 0:10:07.520
<v Speaker 1>our executive editor, thank you as well as juliask much

0:10:07.520 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>more to come we're gonna be talking about Amazon falling

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>after less than stellar results. Break down all of that,

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>including what role inflation and the supply chain is playing

0:10:16.840 --> 0:10:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in the miss That is next. This is Bloomberg, Amazon

0:10:29.240 --> 0:10:31.880
<v Speaker 1>tumbling after a less than stellar earnings report, including a

0:10:31.920 --> 0:10:34.080
<v Speaker 1>loss in the first quarter and projected loss in the

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>second quarter. I'm joined now by Melissa Burdic, president and

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 1>co founder of pack few, and of course a former

0:10:39.400 --> 0:10:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Amazon employee. Melissa, what's your takeaway here, especially given the

0:10:43.360 --> 0:10:48.000
<v Speaker 1>strong numbers from Apple. I know that's a pretty crazy

0:10:48.080 --> 0:10:49.959
<v Speaker 1>but like the gentleman said, the bore and really is

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:53.560
<v Speaker 1>apples and oranges. Um. You know, this quarter people return

0:10:53.640 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>to stores. There's also more competition in e commerce. There's

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>more sites people are shopping at in addition to going

0:10:59.640 --> 0:11:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to school, is Walmart and Sapart, Target, They all have

0:11:02.600 --> 0:11:05.160
<v Speaker 1>a target on Amazon's back, and they're they're getting better.

0:11:05.679 --> 0:11:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Another thing too, is that you know the supply chain georages,

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:12.199
<v Speaker 1>of course everyone knew about. Brands are also taking a

0:11:12.280 --> 0:11:15.040
<v Speaker 1>lot of cost increases and spending some time negotiating with

0:11:15.080 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Amazon trying to get those costs increases through, and sometimes

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:20.880
<v Speaker 1>they stop shipping during that time as they were doing

0:11:20.920 --> 0:11:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that negotiation, and then the other thing that also happened.

0:11:23.880 --> 0:11:27.319
<v Speaker 1>You know, Amazon did increase crime rate from one nineteen

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.160
<v Speaker 1>a month to one thirty nine. In terms of their

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:33.400
<v Speaker 1>membership feed and we do you see the subscription revenue

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.599
<v Speaker 1>was slightly higher eight point four billion last quarter or

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.480
<v Speaker 1>eight point one billion this quarter. But that's definitely something

0:11:40.000 --> 0:11:45.040
<v Speaker 1>to watch. So, you know, what about the supply chain

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.920
<v Speaker 1>issues we're seeing Apple, for example, navigating you know, ongoing

0:11:48.960 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>supply issues quite well. You know, what is it that

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Amazon needs to do? And you know, if it's Apples

0:11:54.360 --> 0:11:58.200
<v Speaker 1>two oranges, how are Amazon supply issues different from what

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:03.360
<v Speaker 1>a company like Apple is facing. It's just so different

0:12:03.360 --> 0:12:06.960
<v Speaker 1>because Amazon relies on merchants, you know, third party merchants

0:12:07.000 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and brands versus Apple has whole control over just what

0:12:10.679 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>they're selling. So especially with the lockdown in China where

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:18.520
<v Speaker 1>there's zero tolerance of COVID sellers, you know, there's no

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.960
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing during that time frame, so sellers are not able

0:12:22.000 --> 0:12:24.640
<v Speaker 1>to get their goods. The Amazon is just reliant on

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, their party marketplace and retailers or i'm sorry,

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:31.920
<v Speaker 1>brands that are reliant on the manufacturing supply chains. It's

0:12:32.000 --> 0:12:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really Amazon in the marketplace that is trying to

0:12:35.120 --> 0:12:37.040
<v Speaker 1>broker all these things, and it's the brands and the

0:12:37.120 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 1>third party sellers that are really having struggles and challenges there. Meantime,

0:12:42.760 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>of course, we're seeing wage inflation, rising gas prices. You know,

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.720
<v Speaker 1>how is this all going to impact consumer spending, you know,

0:12:50.760 --> 0:12:54.920
<v Speaker 1>which is like the bread and butter of Amazon dot Com. Yeah,

0:12:54.960 --> 0:12:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree, And one one thing, just to correct the

0:12:57.679 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>last gentleman did say that Amazon implemented a fuel searcharts.

0:13:01.520 --> 0:13:04.280
<v Speaker 1>It actually goes into effect at the end of April, UM,

0:13:04.320 --> 0:13:06.320
<v Speaker 1>so in a couple of days from now, actually think today.

0:13:06.920 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that impacted too much yet. But

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:12.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the reality is is that prices are going up,

0:13:12.600 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 1>costs are going up, so um, there will be some slowing,

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>but there are some bright spots, you know. One of

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:20.679
<v Speaker 1>the things that people are just point about with Q

0:13:20.880 --> 0:13:24.559
<v Speaker 1>two that also had some you know, poor guidance, and

0:13:24.640 --> 0:13:27.679
<v Speaker 1>I think the market light but Prime Day is always

0:13:27.720 --> 0:13:29.839
<v Speaker 1>a shining star, and that's actually going to be in

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Q three this year, and so I do think that

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.440
<v Speaker 1>customers are going to be looking for deals and Amazon

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>has the capacity they've built up the supply chain. They're

0:13:38.360 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be having a huge Q three this uh

0:13:41.480 --> 0:13:44.520
<v Speaker 1>this year with Prime Day. Let's talk a little bit

0:13:44.559 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>about about streaming because Amazon also has a bet here

0:13:47.679 --> 0:13:51.440
<v Speaker 1>and it impacts potentially prime subscription. We we saw what

0:13:51.480 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>happened with Netflix. We just heard Apple CEO Tim Cook

0:13:54.400 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 1>telling me they're still very bullish on Apple TV plus.

0:13:58.440 --> 0:14:00.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, this is a big area of ending for

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:03.400
<v Speaker 1>all of these companies. Should Amazon continue to be pouring

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>money into this and how does it impact the bottom line.

0:14:06.720 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm super positive on Amazon streaming opportunity. They just bought

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>MGM that closed last month, so that gives them access

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 1>to senting tholls and TV shows and four thousand films.

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna have the most expensive show this this fall,

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>which sounds pretty cool with the Lord the Rings, and

0:14:24.200 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 1>then they're also talking about bring an NFL game to

0:14:26.960 --> 0:14:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Black Friday. What's beautiful about Amazon streaming opportunity is also

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.440
<v Speaker 1>their ad revenue that they can get from all these shows.

0:14:34.840 --> 0:14:37.520
<v Speaker 1>This is premium inventory that they can put through their

0:14:37.560 --> 0:14:42.120
<v Speaker 1>advertising network, UM thirty one billion dollars last year and

0:14:42.320 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>uh so that's that's a really great opportunity for them.

0:14:44.960 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>But also speaking about advertising. That also was a slight

0:14:48.160 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>miss for them this quarter as well. Um, it missed expectations,

0:14:52.160 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 1>but it kind of goes back to you know, brands

0:14:54.360 --> 0:14:57.680
<v Speaker 1>can't advertise what they don't have, so supply chain also

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 1>impacted advertising, So UM, I don't really saw that our

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.680
<v Speaker 1>business all right, Patty's Melissa Verdick, thank you as always

0:15:05.720 --> 0:15:08.120
<v Speaker 1>for your analysis. There will continue to follow the Amazon

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>call as well. Onto more earnings now, and let's take

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>a look at Twitter revenue missing analyst estimates. And this

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.920
<v Speaker 1>one of the last earnings reports before Elon Musk plans

0:15:25.960 --> 0:15:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to take over the company. We're seeing a slowdown in advertising.

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Musk has signal he doesn't necessarily want Twitter to rely

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>on ads and might prefer a subscription model. Could this

0:15:35.480 --> 0:15:38.520
<v Speaker 1>accelerate that plan? Let's ask our next guest, Scott Kessler,

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>global head of technology at Third Bridge, how do you

0:15:42.120 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>think Elon Musk is looking at these ad results? Scott Um,

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:51.520
<v Speaker 1>thanks a lot, Emily. I think honestly, they're largely in line.

0:15:51.600 --> 0:15:54.320
<v Speaker 1>I think when you see uh the m d AU

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:57.560
<v Speaker 1>number go up so significantly, I think there are positives

0:15:57.600 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>to take from the results, and I think he's probably

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.800
<v Speaker 1>also reading a lot of the tweets about people suddenly

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 1>gaining a lot more followers, um, and they're obviously constructive

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>on that. So let's talk a little bit about then

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the broader ad industry. Clearly we're seeing digital ads take

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.120
<v Speaker 1>a toll. We saw it at Metta, we saw it

0:16:17.320 --> 0:16:20.560
<v Speaker 1>at Snap. You know, how do you expect this to

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>play out over the course of the year if the

0:16:23.040 --> 0:16:29.240
<v Speaker 1>macro environment doesn't significantly change. Yeah. Well, what's interesting is historically,

0:16:29.680 --> 0:16:34.480
<v Speaker 1>if you had kind of uh um, challenging economic backdrop,

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:40.040
<v Speaker 1>it would seem like those areas, including historically digital advertising

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 1>would actually perform better because the thought is that the

0:16:44.360 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>shift over from say, legacy or traditional advertising to digital

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:54.360
<v Speaker 1>advertising would accelerate given that more challenging backdrop. Now is

0:16:54.360 --> 0:16:57.480
<v Speaker 1>a different time though, however, because of the impact, among

0:16:57.520 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>other things, of id f A, which had a negative

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:06.960
<v Speaker 1>impact on a lot of digital and social media advertising companies,

0:17:07.440 --> 0:17:10.639
<v Speaker 1>and it's one of the primary reasons that we've seen

0:17:11.320 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 1>meta platforms struggle so mightily, and people cheered, uh when

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:21.720
<v Speaker 1>the company generated seven percent revenue growth. So, uh, let's

0:17:21.760 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about this Elon deal. How bullish

0:17:25.119 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>are you on this? You know, clearly Twitter has a

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of potential I think everyone can agree that has

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:33.560
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily been realized from a business perspective, from a

0:17:33.680 --> 0:17:37.159
<v Speaker 1>user's perspective, from uh an influenced perspective, but you know,

0:17:37.359 --> 0:17:40.880
<v Speaker 1>still very controversial whether or not he's going to be

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>good for this platform. Yeah. I mean, look, I think

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that everyone can agree on, and

0:17:47.359 --> 0:17:51.520
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of different opinions on this proposed transaction,

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>is that if Elon Musk ends up buying Twitter, a

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of change is going to come to the company

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and to the platform. Now, whether those changes are going

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:04.520
<v Speaker 1>to be for the good, for the bad, or otherwise

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>remains to be seen. But a lot of us who

0:18:07.640 --> 0:18:10.439
<v Speaker 1>have been using Twitter for a lot of time would

0:18:10.480 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that it's largely the same platform that it was

0:18:13.880 --> 0:18:17.040
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, and that and of itself, I think

0:18:17.440 --> 0:18:21.359
<v Speaker 1>speaks to some of the issues that people have around Twitter.

0:18:21.440 --> 0:18:24.879
<v Speaker 1>The edit button, for example, that Musk has highlighted in

0:18:25.000 --> 0:18:28.080
<v Speaker 1>some of his tweets. That being said, however, I think

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:32.199
<v Speaker 1>the reality is that I look at it as you know,

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a pendulum, right that sits between Twitter's focus historically on

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>health and safety, at least over the last couple of

0:18:39.560 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>years and Musk's indicated focus on free speech, we've seen

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that pendulum swing quite far to health and safety. Musk

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.880
<v Speaker 1>obviously wants to shift it more uh to free speech.

0:18:51.320 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>What that will do, in effect is render less relevant

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>or maybe irrelevant. The notion of content moderation, which Twitter

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of money on, has a lot of

0:19:01.800 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>employees doing, and that's clearly an area that Musk would

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:09.680
<v Speaker 1>seemingly look to make cuts to help not only fulfill

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 1>his free speech goal, but also to help preserve and

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>grow free cash flow. The Information is reporting that the

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>FTC has opened an inquiry into how Musk disclosed his

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Twitter steak and whether or not he followed the rules there.

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of this and potential regulatory headwinds

0:19:32.160 --> 0:19:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to this deal? Yeah, Look, I think a lot of

0:19:35.280 --> 0:19:39.840
<v Speaker 1>people have been looking for potential hold ups in this transaction,

0:19:39.920 --> 0:19:44.080
<v Speaker 1>especially legal and regulatory ones. Um. Look, I don't know

0:19:44.119 --> 0:19:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the specifics of the inquiry, what exactly they're focused on. Um.

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.680
<v Speaker 1>Musk is no stranger to a lot of these types

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:54.120
<v Speaker 1>of issues. Um, but he's been able to push through them.

0:19:54.160 --> 0:19:57.199
<v Speaker 1>I can't imagine that those types of issues are going

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 1>to hold up this deal. I think at the end

0:19:59.640 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of the day, a this really comes down to does

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk fall through honest financing and consummate the transaction

0:20:08.280 --> 0:20:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and what happens next? And I frankly think there are

0:20:10.480 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions about the financing and the fall through,

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.880
<v Speaker 1>but in terms of legal and regulatory I don't expect

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>that to be the primary impediment for this deal going through.

0:20:22.400 --> 0:20:27.000
<v Speaker 1>All right, Scott Kessler, Third Bridge, Global head of Technology,

0:20:27.040 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. All of us very

0:20:29.080 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>anxious to see how these how this deal plays out. Meantime,

0:20:33.560 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Snap is trying to make it even easier to take

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a selfie. The company just unveiled this yellow, square shaped

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 1>flying camera drone called Pixie. Snap c e O Evan

0:20:44.880 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Spiegel said the inspiration for the Pixie was, quote, what

0:20:47.640 --> 0:20:51.919
<v Speaker 1>would feel like if Tinkerbell were your personal photographer? Well,

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:55.159
<v Speaker 1>now you can have that personal photographer for two dollars.

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.359
<v Speaker 1>The Pixie is available for pre order only in the

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>US and France and is expected to begin shipping next month.

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to Bloomberg Technology and Emily Chang in San Francisco.

0:21:13.280 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Anyone concerned about falling chip demand post pandemic need look

0:21:16.960 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>no further than qual Calm for reassurance, posting better than

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.159
<v Speaker 1>expected earnings and a strong sales forecast. This thanks in

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>large part to see On CEO Christiano Almond's plan to

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>diversify the company beyond smartphones. Aumon joins me. Now, Cristiano,

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.600
<v Speaker 1>great to have you back with us. You know you

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>ended the call by thanking analysts for all the questions

0:21:37.440 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 1>about phones, but reminded them that qual Calm is so

0:21:40.480 --> 0:21:44.399
<v Speaker 1>much more than a communications chip company. Now, how do

0:21:44.440 --> 0:21:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you see these earnings proving that out look? Uh? First

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of all, great talking to you know, Emily. Uh. And

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>strategy is working for the companies. It's it's really working.

0:21:55.200 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 1>We we are now growing across the whole business in

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.160
<v Speaker 1>a number of different in Mark gets hands, It's yes,

0:22:01.240 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>it's a great story, will continue to be a great story.

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>I think we're doing well there. Um, I guess like

0:22:06.760 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>no good did go to goes unpunished as by doing

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.680
<v Speaker 1>well and hance it. So I think we're we get

0:22:12.720 --> 0:22:16.080
<v Speaker 1>all those questions, but the reality is the IoT growth

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:20.960
<v Speaker 1>has been incredible. We grew sixty um and until we

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>added three billion dollars to our design when pipeline within

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the quarter. So the company is truly changing from what

0:22:29.520 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 1>is perceived to be a communication company for the handsOn market.

0:22:34.600 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>It's really a connected processor company for the intelligent edge.

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:43.080
<v Speaker 1>And uh, you know, hopefully that message came across. You've

0:22:43.080 --> 0:22:46.080
<v Speaker 1>gotten so many questions over the years about your relationship

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>with Apple, including from yours truly, but the call focused

0:22:49.720 --> 0:22:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a lot on Samsung. Is it better for Qualcom to

0:22:53.680 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 1>have Samsung as a customer a successful customer, as opposed

0:22:57.880 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>to Apple? And if so, why, Well, that's a very

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.720
<v Speaker 1>good question, and I think it goes to the heart

0:23:05.040 --> 0:23:09.320
<v Speaker 1>of our mobile strategy is so, here's the reason we're

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:12.040
<v Speaker 1>doing so well enhance its and we had the outline

0:23:12.040 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 1>and the call exactually one of the fastest growing uh

0:23:15.080 --> 0:23:18.959
<v Speaker 1>in a revenue for US and and silicon content and

0:23:18.960 --> 0:23:22.360
<v Speaker 1>and of course earnings is on the processor side. So

0:23:23.160 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we we put the following strategy in place. We want

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 1>to be synonymous with premium and high tier Android. We

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 1>when when you think about a flagship Android, you think

0:23:35.160 --> 0:23:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Snapdragon and snap Dragon eight. It's really becoming the platform

0:23:39.760 --> 0:23:44.000
<v Speaker 1>of choice across every o EM, from Samsung to Vivo, OPO,

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>shall me Huawei honor UH to build their phones UH

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:52.000
<v Speaker 1>in the flagship category. And what's happening go back to

0:23:52.040 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>your question when we sell, When we sell a snap

0:23:57.720 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 1>Dragon eight series into a ALEXS twenty two from a

0:24:02.320 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>revenue UH and in an earning standpoint, is probably equivalent

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>of selling modems to five iPhones. So it's a great trade.

0:24:14.160 --> 0:24:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So and especially when you look at the decision made

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:19.960
<v Speaker 1>by Samsung as a result of the strategy of being

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>very focused, and the snap Dragon been winning in all categories,

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the best oft smartphone camera in the ward, the highest,

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:31.639
<v Speaker 1>the XO mark scores the fastest AI, lowest power with

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>with a graphics and CPU performance. That is driving the

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:42.600
<v Speaker 1>shift from four percent to seventy. So Galaxys one, we're

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>now we're seventy plus. You know, you've been pretty optimistic

0:24:47.720 --> 0:24:50.600
<v Speaker 1>about supply issues easing through the end of the year.

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>And I just got off a call with Apple CEO

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:55.560
<v Speaker 1>Tim Cook, and here's what he told me about supply

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>at least over the last quarter. Said, we did experience

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:02.240
<v Speaker 1>significant can we it experienced supply constraints, but they were

0:25:02.280 --> 0:25:06.160
<v Speaker 1>significantly lower than what we experienced in the December quarter,

0:25:06.280 --> 0:25:08.960
<v Speaker 1>and they were all silicon shorts related, so that the

0:25:09.040 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 1>industry wide issue with silicon that affected us on several

0:25:13.880 --> 0:25:17.720
<v Speaker 1>of our products. UM. I didn't get a lot of

0:25:17.760 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 1>color on supply issues in the current quarter, but you know,

0:25:22.000 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>how would you square that with what you're seeing. Look,

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it's very consistent what what he said. If you remember

0:25:29.480 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>we said that in this year of two thou two

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we expect supply to improve dramatically. That it is true.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:40.320
<v Speaker 1>We said that the second half who have a significant

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>improvements in supply. That is happening. But having said that,

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.679
<v Speaker 1>would still have more demandant supply. We are now not

0:25:47.920 --> 0:25:52.879
<v Speaker 1>the main constraint or supply constraint. And especially for the

0:25:52.960 --> 0:25:57.000
<v Speaker 1>company which is now part of the digital transformation trans

0:25:57.080 --> 0:25:59.399
<v Speaker 1>they've seen enterprise and that's driving a lot of growth

0:25:59.400 --> 0:26:02.240
<v Speaker 1>in our IoT business. UM in addition to all to

0:26:02.440 --> 0:26:06.720
<v Speaker 1>enhance its now you gave a huge target for revenue

0:26:06.720 --> 0:26:09.879
<v Speaker 1>coming from automotive, sixteen billion dollars, and I'm curious how

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:13.159
<v Speaker 1>quickly we get to that massive total given where the

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 1>business is today, which is it's growing, but it's still

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:20.440
<v Speaker 1>relatively small. Yeah. No, it's the way to the way

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:22.639
<v Speaker 1>to think about automotive, and I think that's the reason

0:26:22.960 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>we provide that metric off the design winds UH that

0:26:26.960 --> 0:26:31.280
<v Speaker 1>we have. We're winning the future, UH, you know, silicon

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in in the automobile industry, we're with twenty six brands.

0:26:36.440 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Now we see traction with our Snapdragon digital chassis. We're

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:45.479
<v Speaker 1>winning across digital cockpit, you know, connectivity with the cloud

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>and now a death and autonomy. And the way to

0:26:48.560 --> 0:26:51.880
<v Speaker 1>think about it is when we talk about a sixteen

0:26:52.280 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars design wing pipeline, you'll think about cars that

0:26:56.520 --> 0:27:00.720
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be launching in the twenty four, twenty something,

0:27:00.720 --> 0:27:02.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty and twenty four all the way to twenty five

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:05.960
<v Speaker 1>time frame, and then they stay in production for uh

0:27:06.119 --> 0:27:10.000
<v Speaker 1>five to six years. So it's it's it's almost a

0:27:10.080 --> 0:27:14.000
<v Speaker 1>contracted backlog. And we just added three billion to the

0:27:14.040 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 1>metric used to be thirteen billion dollars. In the quarter

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.160
<v Speaker 1>we had three billion more UH. And one of the

0:27:20.200 --> 0:27:24.080
<v Speaker 1>biggest components of that is our contract with still luntis

0:27:25.480 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>now Qualcom. As you've said, you want Qualcom to be

0:27:28.960 --> 0:27:31.600
<v Speaker 1>judged by well by how well it transforms to a

0:27:31.680 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>company far beyond phones, and we have seen Qualcom take

0:27:34.720 --> 0:27:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a beating um along with other

0:27:37.600 --> 0:27:40.800
<v Speaker 1>chip companies, though of course the shares sword today. Is

0:27:40.840 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 1>there something that you think investors still aren't seeing that

0:27:43.720 --> 0:27:48.120
<v Speaker 1>you want them to see in terms of this broader transition? Oh? Absolutely,

0:27:48.960 --> 0:27:50.719
<v Speaker 1>you know. The way, the way I will answer your

0:27:50.840 --> 0:27:55.920
<v Speaker 1>question is investors have the tendency to just think about

0:27:56.440 --> 0:27:58.800
<v Speaker 1>the handsets and just because we're doing well and hands

0:27:58.840 --> 0:28:03.119
<v Speaker 1>it's we did we to on the market that was

0:28:03.320 --> 0:28:07.080
<v Speaker 1>flat to to a negative bias and we grew in

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the year the border. But uh, the reality is there

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.640
<v Speaker 1>is a broader story with Qualcom, which is our technology

0:28:15.800 --> 0:28:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is going to power those billions of devices that are

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>really enabling the cloud economy. And we see that happening

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.120
<v Speaker 1>with the growth rates that we have in our IoT business,

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>uh across consumer uh the as networking in enterprise. And

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>just as I was watching uh you right before you

0:28:35.640 --> 0:28:38.840
<v Speaker 1>made a comment about the new A drone of Snap

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that's our chip. That's one of our many IoT categories

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that we have. All right, Well, it's great when we

0:28:46.440 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 1>can hear about your customers that I know for a

0:28:49.120 --> 0:28:51.960
<v Speaker 1>long time you haven't been able to talk about your customers.

0:28:51.960 --> 0:28:55.120
<v Speaker 1>So thanks for some of the specifics there. Calcom CEO

0:28:55.240 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Cristiano Alman appreciate it. Meantime, Microsoft block Ster deal for

0:29:00.520 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 1>Activision Blizzard just got a bit closer to reality after

0:29:03.760 --> 0:29:07.040
<v Speaker 1>a shareholder vote. So why is Wall Street betting that

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the merger won't actually happen. Bloomberg's Broody Ford joins US

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>now with the latest, Sobrity, give us the broader context here.

0:29:14.320 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>There's there was a shareholder vote. Um, the deal seems

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to be moving forward, but still investors are skeptical. Yeah, exactly,

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:26.440
<v Speaker 1>so the shareholders voted to advance the deal today. It's

0:29:26.440 --> 0:29:29.560
<v Speaker 1>an important step that had to happen. Um, but all

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.720
<v Speaker 1>together not too surprising. So all eyes now are on

0:29:33.760 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 1>what the regulators do. I mean, this deal has a

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 1>little over a year from now to close, and it

0:29:38.360 --> 0:29:42.479
<v Speaker 1>has to clear through the US, the EU, China, Um,

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.640
<v Speaker 1>I think Brad Smith or Microsoft's at a seventeen countries

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:47.560
<v Speaker 1>that has to pass through. But I mean really, all

0:29:47.560 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>eyes are on the US competition enforces here and whether

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 1>or not they will move to try to block this

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:59.360
<v Speaker 1>deal on anti competitive grounds. So what's the likelihood that happens? Yeah, well,

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 1>Ill Street saying that in there in the metric, it

0:30:04.360 --> 0:30:08.440
<v Speaker 1>is three times more likely for a Microsoft Activision deal

0:30:08.480 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>to fall apart than Twitter. UM. So right now, let's

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.240
<v Speaker 1>say you own Activision stock, you will get paid ninety

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>if this deal closes. Right now, it's trading in about

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the mid seventies, meaning that you know, people are seeing

0:30:21.040 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 1>a decent chance that this does not go as planned. UM.

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>And that could be either that the FTC sues and

0:30:26.840 --> 0:30:30.080
<v Speaker 1>successfully blocks it in court, or that you know, it

0:30:30.080 --> 0:30:33.160
<v Speaker 1>gets tied up in litigation so long that other reasons

0:30:33.200 --> 0:30:35.280
<v Speaker 1>can creep in that can make the deal fall apart.

0:30:37.000 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>So what are the odds What are the odds of

0:30:39.680 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>deal falls apart? Well, it's really hard to say, right.

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, so the for decades mergers in the US

0:30:46.000 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 1>were very much just kind of allowed to go through

0:30:48.040 --> 0:30:51.800
<v Speaker 1>is pretty hands off. But agency leaders right now have

0:30:52.080 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>said that big tech companies should not be allowed to

0:30:55.640 --> 0:31:00.280
<v Speaker 1>grow via acquisition. UM. Microsoft has very good reputation should

0:31:00.320 --> 0:31:03.200
<v Speaker 1>in DC, It's escaped a lot of the tech lash.

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:06.800
<v Speaker 1>That being said, you know, it still is the number

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 1>two company in the country. So the idea is that

0:31:09.800 --> 0:31:12.440
<v Speaker 1>they are really looking for a way to get their

0:31:12.440 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>hands dirty and maybe have some new court precedents about

0:31:15.400 --> 0:31:17.800
<v Speaker 1>big tech mergers. And this could be the case, why

0:31:17.800 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they or not it works. You know, we'll see, but

0:31:20.080 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people think it could happen. All right,

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>bloomberks broty for it, Thank you, thanks much. Coming up

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:28.560
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood dirting is also out and the online brokerage continually.

0:31:28.600 --> 0:31:32.800
<v Speaker 1>It's for into crypto listing more cryptocurrencies like Salana. Our

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Crypto report coming up next with that conference in the

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>Bahamas still underway. Is the need of the community dictates

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the development of the protocol because the protocol is owned

0:31:45.720 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 1>by the community. A lot of the work that Salona

0:31:48.040 --> 0:31:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Labs does and a lot of the work the Salanta

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Foundation funds is around building primitives that are open source,

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>that can be taken by anyone and turned into amazing

0:31:55.960 --> 0:32:11.239
<v Speaker 1>products built on the Salana blockchain. It time for our

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 1>crypto report now and robin Hood just reporting their results

0:32:13.720 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that as it aims to become a bigger player in crypto.

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Here to break it all down, Bloomberg's own Annie Massa, Annie,

0:32:21.240 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>what are the headline takeaways from these results? This was

0:32:24.440 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>a really difficult quarter for robin Hood, and it was

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:30.040
<v Speaker 1>always going to be a stark comparison between this first

0:32:30.080 --> 0:32:32.360
<v Speaker 1>quarter and last first quarter when we saw the huge

0:32:32.480 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>run up in game Stop and other memestocks, but it

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>was worse than analysts anticipated. We saw losses across all

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:44.920
<v Speaker 1>kinds of product categories, transaction revenue sliding, and revenue and

0:32:45.000 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 1>earnings both missing Wall Streets estimates. So let's talk about

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>how they're trying to grow their crypto play and influence

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto market as the company you know, faces

0:32:57.120 --> 0:32:59.680
<v Speaker 1>some you know, big challenges up ahead. I mean they're

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:03.719
<v Speaker 1>going through some pretty big job cuts and the stack

0:33:04.280 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>way down. That's right. The stock has really plummeted since

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the I p O. The central struggle that robin Hood

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>is dealing with right now is this question of whether

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:17.200
<v Speaker 1>it can actually get users involved in more than trading

0:33:17.240 --> 0:33:20.000
<v Speaker 1>on its platform. And in the meantime, it's trying to

0:33:20.080 --> 0:33:23.640
<v Speaker 1>keep up with with investors and go where they're going.

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>So on the crypto side, for instance, it's introduced some

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>new tokens, including the long anticipated Shiba knew coin, and

0:33:32.480 --> 0:33:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that was a recent development. So so robin hood is

0:33:35.200 --> 0:33:37.880
<v Speaker 1>introducing some new products to trade and at the same

0:33:37.920 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>time trying to grow the types of products that it

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>offers to investors in areas like retirement accounts. It added

0:33:46.040 --> 0:33:48.760
<v Speaker 1>crypto wallets, So it's offering all these new products as well.

0:33:49.800 --> 0:33:52.760
<v Speaker 1>So what are you looking for here next? How do

0:33:52.800 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you expect robin Hood to navigate these challenges? You know,

0:33:56.520 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>well Street Darling often very controverse deal. But but now

0:34:02.200 --> 0:34:04.880
<v Speaker 1>a year into being a public company, a lot of

0:34:04.920 --> 0:34:09.200
<v Speaker 1>big kind of existential issues. It is an existential issue,

0:34:09.239 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's something investors will be watching closely

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:14.759
<v Speaker 1>whether robin Hood can deliver on this message that it has,

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:18.600
<v Speaker 1>that it can expand with its users, grow with its users,

0:34:18.840 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and and touch more parts of their financial lives. So far,

0:34:22.760 --> 0:34:26.719
<v Speaker 1>transaction revenues are still the core driver of revenues at

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.800
<v Speaker 1>this company, and it remains to be seen whether customers

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:32.600
<v Speaker 1>will go to robin Hood for other types of products

0:34:32.640 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. They certainly are going to trade, but the

0:34:35.160 --> 0:34:38.040
<v Speaker 1>issue that robin Hood's facing is that trading activity is

0:34:38.080 --> 0:34:40.840
<v Speaker 1>coming way down from where it was during the pandemic.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:43.120
<v Speaker 1>How much do you think that has to do with

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 1>the macro environment, I mean inflation, rising gas prices, not

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of not a lot of money to be

0:34:48.960 --> 0:34:52.920
<v Speaker 1>spending right now on discretionary items like new equities and crypto.

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 1>That's a great point that was something that the management

0:34:57.080 --> 0:35:00.480
<v Speaker 1>addressed in both the earnings call and a call with quarters.

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.600
<v Speaker 1>They said, listen, robin Hood has been a company that's

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.640
<v Speaker 1>mostly operated in an environment for much of its history

0:35:06.920 --> 0:35:10.680
<v Speaker 1>where inflation has been low, interest rates have been low,

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>and now we're starting to see inflation, uh, come way

0:35:14.640 --> 0:35:18.000
<v Speaker 1>back and the Federal Reserve trying to curb that. So

0:35:18.280 --> 0:35:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the issue for robin Hood is can it weather that

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:24.080
<v Speaker 1>storm if people do lose interest in putting their discretionary

0:35:24.120 --> 0:35:28.680
<v Speaker 1>income towards trading. All right, we'll continue to follow that story.

0:35:28.719 --> 0:35:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Blue marx Any Massa, who covers robin Hood for us.

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Let's wrap up now by taking another look

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:44.759
<v Speaker 1>at Apple's results. Dan Ives of web Bush Securities here, Dan,

0:35:44.800 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>you've been listening in on the call. What are your

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 1>what are your headline takeaways? Obviously an impressive quarter Apple

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:58.000
<v Speaker 1>weathering supply shortages, weathering inflation with some record results. Yeah. Look,

0:35:58.080 --> 0:36:02.440
<v Speaker 1>I didn't get to tell two cities. Demand story remains robust.

0:36:02.920 --> 0:36:06.120
<v Speaker 1>I think demand out stripping supply by about ten million

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 1>iPhone units. But he talked about supply chain. That's the

0:36:10.280 --> 0:36:12.840
<v Speaker 1>big part of the call. It looks like four to

0:36:12.920 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 1>eight billion terms of a headwind book. I believe the

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:18.920
<v Speaker 1>street the knee jerk is down in terms of the stock,

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 1>but I believe what they're gonna start to look on

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the other side of it's in a normalized an environment.

0:36:25.520 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>That's really really the streets focused on, even though these

0:36:28.000 --> 0:36:33.000
<v Speaker 1>supply chain issues in China clearly ahead wind. I spoke

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.520
<v Speaker 1>to Apple CEO Tim Cook, and he talked about the

0:36:35.560 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>supply shortages, double down on the fact that this was

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:40.160
<v Speaker 1>a record quarter and that they grew in every category

0:36:40.239 --> 0:36:45.320
<v Speaker 1>except for iPad, where they had the most significant supply constraints.

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:48.920
<v Speaker 1>He explained they really had to do with silicon. And

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:52.319
<v Speaker 1>we're hearing uh Lucamya Street, the CFO of Apple, double

0:36:52.400 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>down on that on the call right now. Um, and

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:58.400
<v Speaker 1>these are silicon constraints they're saying that go beyond the

0:36:58.440 --> 0:37:01.799
<v Speaker 1>shutdowns in China. How do you expect Apple to continue

0:37:02.360 --> 0:37:06.680
<v Speaker 1>to navigate that in an ongoing you know, COVID lockdown,

0:37:08.320 --> 0:37:12.080
<v Speaker 1>You know, no doubt with China, it's on two parts, right,

0:37:12.280 --> 0:37:17.000
<v Speaker 1>demand as well as supply. Key part of the China story. Look,

0:37:17.000 --> 0:37:19.480
<v Speaker 1>if it's going to happen read happened the June quarter,

0:37:19.760 --> 0:37:23.200
<v Speaker 1>because ultimately this is all the build up to iPhone fourteen,

0:37:23.680 --> 0:37:25.720
<v Speaker 1>which will be in September. And if you look at Apple,

0:37:25.719 --> 0:37:28.200
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the demand trends that we're seeing,

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:32.880
<v Speaker 1>and it's important demands not softened. So I also believe

0:37:32.960 --> 0:37:37.279
<v Speaker 1>they'll ultimately be able to push the price increases that

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:39.920
<v Speaker 1>we see over the coming called six months on the

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:44.160
<v Speaker 1>next iPhone three two consumers. And that's why it's one

0:37:44.320 --> 0:37:47.840
<v Speaker 1>The supply chain issues are well known, but the demand

0:37:47.880 --> 0:37:50.960
<v Speaker 1>stories what investors are really looking at to see if

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>there's any cracks from the armor, and Emily, we're not

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>seeing them. What is't you a huge reaction in the

0:37:57.120 --> 0:37:59.200
<v Speaker 1>stock And I wonder why that is because it certainly

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:05.160
<v Speaker 1>seems like App well is uh fairly well insulated from

0:38:05.200 --> 0:38:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the macro economic issues that other tech companies are facing.

0:38:08.400 --> 0:38:10.839
<v Speaker 1>Obviously we're seeing, you know, a big hit to digital

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:14.280
<v Speaker 1>advertising which not only affected Alphabet on YouTube, but Meta

0:38:14.560 --> 0:38:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and Twitter and also impact on consumer demand. Given these

0:38:18.320 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>sluggish results from Amazon, you know, is Apple different? I

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.440
<v Speaker 1>think there are different and I think what we're seeing

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:32.919
<v Speaker 1>in tact, there's a narrative that's emerging. Enterprise is strong. Microsoft,

0:38:33.400 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 1>I think cybersecurity cloud even at the Google parton of cloud,

0:38:37.160 --> 0:38:40.040
<v Speaker 1>and so has Amazon. And you look at Apple more

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:45.600
<v Speaker 1>tetarn like because this hand up demand cycle for iPhone,

0:38:45.600 --> 0:38:49.720
<v Speaker 1>which I think continues into next year, is underestimated, along

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:53.759
<v Speaker 1>with on the services side, services beat the whisper. So

0:38:53.960 --> 0:38:58.000
<v Speaker 1>that's really the story that's emerging here that Apple continues

0:38:58.120 --> 0:39:03.359
<v Speaker 1>despite everything. We're seeing demand now strip supply Now, Dan,

0:39:03.480 --> 0:39:08.439
<v Speaker 1>we're getting some new details on Elon Musk's pitch when

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:12.200
<v Speaker 1>he when he made a pitch to buy Twitter, that

0:39:12.480 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 1>his pitch featured job cuts and other ways to make money.

0:39:17.120 --> 0:39:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean certainly hinted at, you know, wanting to potentially

0:39:19.800 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>move away from advertising, being more interested in a subscription model.

0:39:24.800 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>But his pitch does focus on, you know, turning it

0:39:27.719 --> 0:39:33.040
<v Speaker 1>into a more profitable business, boosting cash flow, monetizing the platform.

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:35.480
<v Speaker 1>He also brought up his his track record at Tesla

0:39:35.480 --> 0:39:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and spacek Space access proofs his success. What do you

0:39:39.000 --> 0:39:43.799
<v Speaker 1>make of that, Okay, I think from a business model perspective,

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe it goes to a paid subscription model. I

0:39:46.719 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>think they'll have a free piece, but ultimately that's probably

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:52.799
<v Speaker 1>a key part of the strategy going forward. And in

0:39:52.880 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>terms of some of the job cuts with some of

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the cost cutting. I mean, look, this is essentially whoeveraged

0:39:58.000 --> 0:40:01.360
<v Speaker 1>buy out the only given to averaging Testla shares to

0:40:01.480 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>do it. So it's going to create some more uncertainty

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>going forward. It's still a long time till this closes.

0:40:08.640 --> 0:40:12.160
<v Speaker 1>But that's why right now for Musk, the easy part

0:40:12.600 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 1>relatively with buying Twitter, the hard part is going to

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:20.120
<v Speaker 1>be fixing it. Can you do it? Do you think

0:40:20.160 --> 0:40:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you Musk can do it? Look, I believe it's another

0:40:23.480 --> 0:40:26.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a whole another animal than a Testa, a space X,

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:30.799
<v Speaker 1>not technology. We're talking on social media. It's been an

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:34.760
<v Speaker 1>uphill battle for the last decade and I continue to believe.

0:40:34.840 --> 0:40:37.799
<v Speaker 1>I think Tessa Sheryld has believe this is that this

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>isn't going to be a hrculean R challenge from Musk,

0:40:42.760 --> 0:40:45.120
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's why you're seeing the overhang on

0:40:45.160 --> 0:40:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Tesla shares because you essentially leverage the position in Testa

0:40:50.200 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to buy Twitter and ultimately test A share olders that

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>are stealing the brunt of this, you know, soap opera

0:40:57.160 --> 0:41:01.839
<v Speaker 1>playing out soap opera and need Dan Ives of wed

0:41:01.880 --> 0:41:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Bush Securities, Thanks so much for your insights. There will

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>continue to watch what happens with Twitter. Of course, we'll

0:41:07.960 --> 0:41:11.200
<v Speaker 1>be continuing to follow along the latest on Apple and

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Amazon results. And that does it for this edition of

0:41:14.040 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Before we go, I just want to say

0:41:17.520 --> 0:41:21.920
<v Speaker 1>a special goodbye to a very special person on our

0:41:21.960 --> 0:41:25.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg team, Mallory Abelhausen, who has been here running the

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 1>show on the floor of Bloomberg Technology for ten years.

0:41:30.680 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Ten years, so almost as long as I have. She

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 1>is moving on to her next adventure, moving to New York,

0:41:36.120 --> 0:41:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg in New York. She's not leaving the Bloomberg family.

0:41:38.120 --> 0:41:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And we're so so grateful for all of the time

0:41:40.760 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you have spent with us, and the energy and love

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and heart that you bring to this show and helping

0:41:44.560 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>me us put a show on from my basement for

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.920
<v Speaker 1>eighteen months in a pandemic um. You will be missed

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:52.839
<v Speaker 1>and we wish you love I love you too. All Right,

0:41:53.000 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that does it for the show. We'll be back tomorrow.

0:41:55.600 --> 0:42:00.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm Emily checking in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Op