WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - September 10th, 2021

0:00:01.040 --> 0:00:05.400
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week Inside from the reporters and

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:09.200
<v Speaker 1>editors who bring you America's most trusted business magazine, plus

0:00:09.240 --> 0:00:13.200
<v Speaker 1>global business finance and tech news as it happened. Bloomberg

0:00:13.240 --> 0:00:16.759
<v Speaker 1>Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:00:16.800 --> 0:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Stinevin on Bloomberg Radio. Hi, everyone, Welcome to the weekend

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:24.959
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week. Carol Masser is taking some

0:00:25.040 --> 0:00:28.080
<v Speaker 1>well deserved time off. Coming up this hour, it's not

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a week without talking about the shrinking gap between traditional

0:00:31.240 --> 0:00:34.000
<v Speaker 1>finance and crypto. Plus, we're gonna hear from one tech

0:00:34.120 --> 0:00:37.560
<v Speaker 1>CEO who's focusing on the fight against ransomware, and next

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 1>hour we hear from the CEO of lands End. He

0:00:40.320 --> 0:00:42.519
<v Speaker 1>talks to us about the outlook for the holidays and

0:00:42.600 --> 0:00:45.479
<v Speaker 1>how tough it's been to find employees. All that and

0:00:45.520 --> 0:00:47.600
<v Speaker 1>more to come over the next two hours, but we

0:00:47.680 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 1>begin with the current issue of Bloomberg Business Week magazine.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:53.479
<v Speaker 1>It's the City's issue and feature stories about cities all

0:00:53.520 --> 0:00:56.520
<v Speaker 1>over the world, the challenges they faced throughout the pandemic,

0:00:56.560 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and what they'll look like years into the future. It

0:00:59.440 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>also takes a close look at one area of Seattle,

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:05.280
<v Speaker 1>a commercial district that has undergone trial by virus. The

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:08.559
<v Speaker 1>pandemic changed the heartbeat of urban areas across the US,

0:01:08.640 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 1>and a few more so than the Pike Pine corridor

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.319
<v Speaker 1>of Seattle's Capitol Hill neighborhood. I spoke with Noah bou Hire,

0:01:14.440 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>finance reporter for Bloomberg News, and I was joined by

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:20.640
<v Speaker 1>my Bloomberg Quick Take colleague Katie Greifeldt. Well, it's UM.

0:01:20.680 --> 0:01:23.440
<v Speaker 1>I think what a lot of people would imagine as

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>a Biburne at all hours, retail arts, commercial district. There's

0:01:29.560 --> 0:01:34.640
<v Speaker 1>music venues, a ton of restaurant. UM. It's not uh,

0:01:34.880 --> 0:01:37.160
<v Speaker 1>giant buildings, but you've got a lot of you know,

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>for six seven eight story UM apartment blocks that have

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:44.480
<v Speaker 1>retail at the ground floor. So it was really the

0:01:44.520 --> 0:01:48.880
<v Speaker 1>part of Seattle that that that felt most citylike outside

0:01:48.880 --> 0:01:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of UM downtown. And what happened over the last year

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:54.760
<v Speaker 1>as the pandemic took hold and commuters started staying home

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.880
<v Speaker 1>and not going to those restaurants, and and then just

0:01:56.920 --> 0:01:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a few months later, in the aftermath of the murder

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of George Floyd, UM activists took to the streets there

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 1>to demand racial justice. Yeah, so look, it was an

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>interesting UM neighborhood to follow for all those reasons you

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:14.959
<v Speaker 1>just mentioned. UM. You know, a lot of the businesses

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:19.800
<v Speaker 1>in in this corridor UH were the kinds of places

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that you know, relied on a vibrant street life and

0:02:22.760 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and and people being able to get together. And obviously

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic UM made that difficult. And UM the other

0:02:29.840 --> 0:02:32.320
<v Speaker 1>thing that was interesting about this neighborhood is that there

0:02:32.360 --> 0:02:37.560
<v Speaker 1>are just a ton of UM, smaller businesses. So you know, uh,

0:02:38.360 --> 0:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has one of their Grocery Stories stores there. There's

0:02:41.440 --> 0:02:45.040
<v Speaker 1>a Starbucks reserve Rosty in the neighborhood, so there's some

0:02:45.080 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 1>corporate presence, but there were also a lot of small

0:02:48.440 --> 0:02:53.120
<v Speaker 1>uh scrappy businesses that just had to figure it out. UM.

0:02:53.200 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 1>And UH you know, with this piece, I I followed

0:02:57.280 --> 0:02:59.799
<v Speaker 1>UM a number of them uh through the last year

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 1>and a half to figure out how they did it.

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Because while you know a number of businesses did UM

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>go under during the pandemic, UM, a lot managed to

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:17.440
<v Speaker 1>get to this point uh through UM the generosity of customers,

0:03:17.480 --> 0:03:23.799
<v Speaker 1>through UM government assistance programs, and just a lot of

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>scrappiness that I don't think um uh people and fully appreciated,

0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and so no, it's a great piece. And one of

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:34.800
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why it's such a good read is because

0:03:34.840 --> 0:03:37.040
<v Speaker 1>you did track a group of four businesses over the

0:03:37.080 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>past year and a half. And I'm curious, you know,

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned the scrappiness of the businesses and the business owners,

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:47.360
<v Speaker 1>but I'm curious if there was a uniting common denominator

0:03:47.520 --> 0:03:50.839
<v Speaker 1>and how they were all able to get through the pandemic. Yeah,

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. UM I I really think it

0:03:53.320 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 1>is the constellation of factors it was. It was you know,

0:03:57.320 --> 0:04:02.520
<v Speaker 1>these these were established businesses with loyal customers and UM.

0:04:02.560 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, to the extent UH some of them were

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 1>able to do go fund means government assistance, which is

0:04:08.400 --> 0:04:12.920
<v Speaker 1>absolutely key UH programs like the Paycheck Protection Program. Pretty

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.840
<v Speaker 1>much everyone took that money. UM. It was either a

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:20.719
<v Speaker 1>form of bridge financing or UM uh to get them

0:04:20.720 --> 0:04:24.719
<v Speaker 1>to other federal grants or UM or or it was

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the thing itself that that helped get them through UM.

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.760
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, I think another uh under appreciated

0:04:31.800 --> 0:04:33.919
<v Speaker 1>part of this is that, UM, we're talking about a

0:04:33.960 --> 0:04:35.840
<v Speaker 1>city where a lot of people have been willing to

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:39.640
<v Speaker 1>get vaccinated, and even though we've had pretty strong, um

0:04:39.640 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 1>strong public health restrictions here in Washington State throughout the pandemic.

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>UM people were willing to go back to this neighborhood

0:04:48.320 --> 0:04:51.560
<v Speaker 1>when when those things lifted, because we're talking about a

0:04:51.600 --> 0:04:56.120
<v Speaker 1>city where you know, seventy five more than seventy of

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:01.640
<v Speaker 1>UH people twelve and up have have gotten their jobs. Well,

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:05.000
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting because one of the one of the elements

0:05:05.040 --> 0:05:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of this that really sticks out to me, that really

0:05:06.880 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>caught my attention is the graphical representation of the change

0:05:10.680 --> 0:05:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in weekly visits from that are in here charts that

0:05:14.440 --> 0:05:18.679
<v Speaker 1>just show how foot traffic has not returned to retail

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:24.200
<v Speaker 1>establishments there too, restaurants there even after the vaccine rollout,

0:05:24.279 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>to music venues for example, in some cases restaurant visits

0:05:28.720 --> 0:05:33.760
<v Speaker 1>are still down even after vaccinations fifty from nineteen. How

0:05:33.760 --> 0:05:36.960
<v Speaker 1>are these business owners dealing with that? Yeah, that's a

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a great question. I do. I do want to

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.000
<v Speaker 1>highlight that the data here is really interesting. We were

0:05:41.040 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>able to get foot traffic data on about fifty locations

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.920
<v Speaker 1>around this neighborhood. Most of them were you know, commercial establishments,

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:53.039
<v Speaker 1>and UM, I think that data really does show you,

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:57.040
<v Speaker 1>like you said, that things are a far are far, far,

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 1>far from being back to normal. Um and the reason

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:03.680
<v Speaker 1>these businesses are still you know, any of these owners

0:06:03.680 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 1>will tell you things are not back to normal. I

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.720
<v Speaker 1>mean they are. They are still very much in the

0:06:08.760 --> 0:06:11.120
<v Speaker 1>thick of this. And we're, you know, going into the

0:06:11.160 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>fall when things like outdoor dining are going to be

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:17.480
<v Speaker 1>harder to do, and frankly and Seattle just not comfortable

0:06:18.360 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>because it rains so much here. So I think that's

0:06:21.520 --> 0:06:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a big part of this part of this story is

0:06:23.880 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that these businesses have been resilient, but they are by

0:06:27.839 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>no means, you know, out of the ways yet. That

0:06:30.240 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>was Bloomberg Finance reporter Noah Boo Hire. You're listening to

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week coming out of the CEO of cracking

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a bank, on closing the gap between crypto and traditional finance.

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:51.640
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:06:51.680 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Spinovik from Bloomberg Radio. Now,

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.360
<v Speaker 1>this past week was a particularly notable one for crypto.

0:07:00.600 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>We had the Bitcoin flash crash, where the crypto suddenly

0:07:03.080 --> 0:07:07.800
<v Speaker 1>plunged sevent in just minutes. David Knitsky is the CEO

0:07:07.920 --> 0:07:10.240
<v Speaker 1>at crack and Bank. It's one of the largest crypto

0:07:10.320 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>exchanges with over eight million users worldwide. They've had about

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>one million new sign ups in the second quarter of

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I spoke with David and I was joined by my

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.720
<v Speaker 1>quick Take co host Katie Greifeld. We started by asking

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.440
<v Speaker 1>why he's chosen Wyoming for the company headquarters. Wyoming past

0:07:25.560 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the first of its kind new regulatory license here for

0:07:29.680 --> 0:07:34.320
<v Speaker 1>a special special purpose depository institution. It's a state chartered bank.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>And up until now, crypto companies have really been round

0:07:37.440 --> 0:07:41.440
<v Speaker 1>peg square hold into existing licenses and regimes that didn't

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>make a ton of sense, and we're kind of locked

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>out of the existing banking mold. So for that reason,

0:07:46.400 --> 0:07:49.120
<v Speaker 1>we'll bring in the US business under a more certain,

0:07:49.240 --> 0:07:53.160
<v Speaker 1>more formal, and better regulatory regime, as well as expanding

0:07:53.200 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 1>in the new opportunities, new products and markets. As you see,

0:07:55.880 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>everything's converging between crypto, neo bank, spintech, traditional and were

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:01.520
<v Speaker 1>we want to be at the heart of that market.

0:08:01.520 --> 0:08:03.840
<v Speaker 1>But but you do call yourself a bank, Yeah, we are.

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 1>We are state chartered bank, and so Wyoming is interesting.

0:08:06.800 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Obviously has positioned itself to be a crypto hotbed. Where

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 1>does that stand with the rest of the United States.

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Are other states moving towards Wyoming or is Wyoming really

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:20.800
<v Speaker 1>an outlier at this point? Why? I mean, definitely got

0:08:20.800 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the ball started, but the ball rolling. But a number

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>of states have let's say, borrowed liberally from the Wyoming

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:30.680
<v Speaker 1>playbook and enacted their own version of a similar charter,

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 1>and it's provoking federal regulators to take action as well.

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of the beauty of our republic and our

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>system here where states can be the laboratories of innovation

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and push things forward faster than the federal government have.

0:08:43.720 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 1>So it's really been a spark that's moved the whole

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>industry forward. David, you say that kracking will be the

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:53.080
<v Speaker 1>first United States crypto bank, It's I'm wondering the problem

0:08:53.120 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 1>that you're're setting out to solve here, what is not

0:08:55.120 --> 0:08:58.079
<v Speaker 1>being met by traditional finance. Yeah, so in the traditional

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.720
<v Speaker 1>regimes right now, you can either apply for fifty state

0:09:01.760 --> 0:09:05.400
<v Speaker 1>money transmission licenses or you can try and none of

0:09:05.400 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>them have like crypto specific language. They're built for like

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Western unions and fin techs of the world. And then

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:14.760
<v Speaker 1>or you could try to pursue a banking license. But

0:09:15.040 --> 0:09:17.199
<v Speaker 1>the federal regulators b C, the s c i C

0:09:17.600 --> 0:09:21.079
<v Speaker 1>have been inconsistent about that UM and they don't have

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.840
<v Speaker 1>written moved about how they're going to treat crypto that

0:09:23.920 --> 0:09:26.959
<v Speaker 1>has a dedicated supervisory and oversight manual. We just want

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:29.359
<v Speaker 1>to know, Hey, this is how we're gonna be regulated

0:09:29.559 --> 0:09:32.000
<v Speaker 1>and what our expectations are and we can meet them.

0:09:32.120 --> 0:09:35.560
<v Speaker 1>So for those reasons, the lack of clarity around some

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of the stuff in other states is really suboptimal. And

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 1>banking has been a traditional problem for crypto cracking is

0:09:42.000 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>lucky to have a swath of good third party banking partners,

0:09:45.559 --> 0:09:48.240
<v Speaker 1>but there's nothing like vertically integrating and controlling your own

0:09:48.280 --> 0:09:50.680
<v Speaker 1>destiny direct to the FED. And so, David, I've always

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 1>been curious, you know, how do you scale? Obviously there

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>are regulatory hurdles, but in terms of the average American

0:09:57.280 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>who maybe only has a passing understand ending of what

0:10:00.920 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin and what cryptocurrencies are, how do you convince them

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.720
<v Speaker 1>that this is the next, you know, wave of banking,

0:10:07.760 --> 0:10:11.400
<v Speaker 1>this is the next evolution of how you handle money.

0:10:11.440 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>How do you bring that message beyond just the cryptocurrency community. Yeah, Well, one,

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the crypto currency community is is growing rapidly and more

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>and more kind of mainstream adoption is taking place. We

0:10:23.400 --> 0:10:25.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's going to continue. So on the one hand,

0:10:25.640 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the market is coming to us. But on the other hand, yeah,

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>just banking license lets us offer online mobile checking accounts

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:37.199
<v Speaker 1>and savings accounts and traditional equities brokerage, things like that

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 1>that you know mainstream America are used to. And so

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.079
<v Speaker 1>if you put that side by side or crypto, it's

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a kind of a great conversion mechanism. You do know

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>on the Cracking Banks website that you are not f

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 1>d I c ensured. The money that you put in,

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:50.920
<v Speaker 1>the crypto you put in is not f d I

0:10:50.920 --> 0:10:53.360
<v Speaker 1>c ensured. Explain why that is a little bit and

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 1>why you think that consumers from who might be a

0:10:56.920 --> 0:10:59.720
<v Speaker 1>little concerned about that should or should not be Yeah, anything,

0:11:00.200 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 1>their advantages to our structure. So the way that the

0:11:03.280 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>SPDI charter works is we are required to be a

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:09.719
<v Speaker 1>fully reserved, fully back bank, so we maintain we take

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>customer deposits and we keep a hundred percent of it

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>in cash, so we don't have the types of market

0:11:15.400 --> 0:11:18.679
<v Speaker 1>or credit risks or insolvency risks that the FBI c

0:11:18.920 --> 0:11:21.600
<v Speaker 1>was meant to protect against. So as a result, we're

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of exempt from having to apply for that. There

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>is no you know, risk because we're not lending money

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:29.200
<v Speaker 1>out in the mortgage portfolios, we're not putting it into

0:11:29.600 --> 0:11:32.480
<v Speaker 1>we're not even putting the treasuries, let alone longer duration

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:36.040
<v Speaker 1>or risk your instruments. Given the increased interest in crypto

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:39.360
<v Speaker 1>the way, we do see traditional financial institutions starting to

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:43.000
<v Speaker 1>embrace it. If you expect to get significant competition from

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>the big names in banking and even community banks, yeah,

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean I expect more and more to realize the

0:11:47.960 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunity and come to the market. We welcome them, not

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.360
<v Speaker 1>particularly concerned about it. As you see any new like

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.240
<v Speaker 1>technology medium, normally it's the folks who are kind of

0:11:56.240 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 1>that native to that medium are the ones that do best.

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll be pretty cha vallenging for institutions and

0:12:01.720 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>incumbents to really adopt the crypto fully. But I think

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>it does help the market more broadly, and I do

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>think the question is to find the existing financial industry

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:13.200
<v Speaker 1>coming to crypto rather than crypto coming to the financial industry.

0:12:13.240 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>And so I want to switch gears and talk about

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:17.400
<v Speaker 1>stable coins because I'm kind of obsessed with them. For

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>those listening who don't know, stable coins are cryptocurrencies that

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 1>try to maintain a fixed exchange rate with a fiat currency,

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>usually it's the dollar. They try to maintain a one

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>to one peg. They've come under a lot of scrutiny lately.

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Some people might have heard of Tether. It's the largest

0:12:34.640 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 1>stable coin. It was supposed to be back to one

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>for one by US dollars. We learned in May that

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. That actually holds a ton of commercial paper,

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:46.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe thirty one billion. If you look at Tether's market cap,

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:51.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious what that could look like going forward. We

0:12:51.280 --> 0:12:55.439
<v Speaker 1>know that Treasury Secretary Jin Yellen is concerned about stable coins.

0:12:55.800 --> 0:12:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Some FED policymakers have made worried noises as well. I'm

0:12:59.600 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>curious even whether you think that we could see regulation

0:13:02.240 --> 0:13:06.120
<v Speaker 1>in that space. Yeah. I always expect regulation in thought

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:09.319
<v Speaker 1>new financial markets, no doubt. I think the stable coins

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>are a net benefit and a boon. In fact, the

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 1>US should love stable coins. It is the best way

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>to maintain our dollar reserve and hegemony and for our

0:13:21.200 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of global reach and global economic cloud. And so

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.080
<v Speaker 1>the U s should love stable coins. But we know

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.280
<v Speaker 1>that the US doesn't love stable coins, and you do

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>have banks like Barkley's warning that this could raise some

0:13:31.120 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>really thorny issues for the FED. If there is a

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 1>run on Tether people trying to redeem their holdings, that

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:40.280
<v Speaker 1>could cause Tether to dump commercial paper on mass, and

0:13:40.320 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>the commercial paper market is crucially important to just the

0:13:44.600 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>functioning of companies. So I'm curious what would get the

0:13:47.520 --> 0:13:50.240
<v Speaker 1>US on board if they should love stable coins. Not

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:53.120
<v Speaker 1>surprising that a bank would be wary of something that

0:13:53.440 --> 0:13:56.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely is competitive to it, And there are certain areas

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.360
<v Speaker 1>of stable coins that you know could potentially use a

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit more and parency, no doubt, And in fact,

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 1>even teather, which is certainly the more questionable ones in

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:08.760
<v Speaker 1>the market, like it's getting better and it is definitely changing.

0:14:08.840 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 1>It's kind of like balance sheet to these concerns. So

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 1>I do think that's going to change over time, and

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.360
<v Speaker 1>there's going to be more transparency, whether by force or

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:19.360
<v Speaker 1>just by market dynamics. So I expect that to happen

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:22.440
<v Speaker 1>sooner rather than later. That was David Kannitski, CEO at

0:14:22.480 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>Cracking Bank, Still Ahead on Bloomberg Business Week. Who wins

0:14:25.720 --> 0:14:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and who loses? In the Age of Tech Titans, We're

0:14:28.600 --> 0:14:30.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna hear from the man who literally wrote the book

0:14:30.920 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 1>on it. This is Bloomberg Broadcasting from the financial capital

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:43.360
<v Speaker 1>of the World, Bloomberg eleven Rio in New York to Washington,

0:14:43.440 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>d C. Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one O six one

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>does San Francisco, Bloomberg nine six to the country Sirius

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.400
<v Speaker 1>XM Chamber one nine and around the globe the Bloomberg

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Business and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business

0:14:59.080 --> 0:15:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Week with Kara A Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim

0:15:02.360 --> 0:15:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Stinovin on Bloomberg Radio. Many people may think that they

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:10.000
<v Speaker 1>understand the secrets to the success of Silicon Valley and

0:15:10.040 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>the Thing stocks, but the truth is well a lot

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>more complicated. That's at least according to investment banker and

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Columbia Business School professor Jonathan Knee. He's the author of

0:15:19.280 --> 0:15:22.120
<v Speaker 1>the new book The Platform Delusion, Who Wins and Who

0:15:22.120 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>Loses in the Age of Tech Titans. We spoke to

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 1>him earlier in the week. I was joined by Bloomberg's

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>West Coast correspondent at Ludlow, and we started by asking

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>him if there's any secret to the success of these

0:15:32.560 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>big tech companies, calling them platforms is a way that

0:15:35.960 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>makes people feel comfortable that, well, they're all doing great,

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's the secret. But the reality is many more

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:48.160
<v Speaker 1>platform businesses are unsuccessful than our successful and when you

0:15:48.240 --> 0:15:52.360
<v Speaker 1>look at the sources of strength of each of those businesses,

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>they are quite different. So let's start with Apple, for example,

0:15:57.520 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of news about Apple, including the

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.520
<v Speaker 1>fact that we do expect the company to unveil hardware

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and is that my colleague at though my co host

0:16:05.640 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 1>on the show reported one of the key people in

0:16:08.520 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 1>the Apple's car program, excuse me, has been posted going

0:16:10.760 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>to Ford. Let's start with Apple. What's what's the secret Apple? Well, look,

0:16:14.400 --> 0:16:17.520
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day, Apple is a product company,

0:16:17.560 --> 0:16:21.880
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, the vast majority of Apple's revenues has

0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>been for since the death of Steve Jobs, has been

0:16:26.160 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>from a single product, the iPhone. That is still the case,

0:16:30.440 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that is still a majority of their revenues. But what

0:16:33.720 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>makes it so phenomenally profitable is in fact the platform

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>aspect of the business, which is really the app store,

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that has created an ecosystem of wild and extraordinary profitability

0:16:48.360 --> 0:16:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and the new leadership post Jobs has done a phenomenal

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 1>job of monetizing that ecosystem and monetizing that product. But

0:16:57.440 --> 0:17:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you know what, in the world of products, eventually everything

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 1>is a toaster. So if you if you don't come

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.120
<v Speaker 1>up with a new one, a radical, new one, at

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.520
<v Speaker 1>some point, you're not going to be able to ring

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.639
<v Speaker 1>out any more juice from that lemon. There's more to go.

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>It's a phenomenally profitable and fantastic company, but eventually you've

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:20.520
<v Speaker 1>got to come up with something new, which is why

0:17:20.560 --> 0:17:23.440
<v Speaker 1>you hear them throwing out crazy ideas like well, I'm

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:26.160
<v Speaker 1>going to build a car. Healthcare is the next thing

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for Apple, which is fine in theory, but there's no

0:17:29.920 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>evidence that those are things that Apple is very good at.

0:17:33.040 --> 0:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>How do you assess this basket of mega cap tech

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>companies as we come out of the pandemic. It seems

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 1>they found some relevancy, some stickiness. But what is your

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>main takeaway of the fortunes of those companies from COVID nineteen, Well,

0:17:47.400 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 1>in many cases, what you've seen is phenomenon that we're

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:57.160
<v Speaker 1>going to happen eventually being pulled forward, people being willing,

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:02.120
<v Speaker 1>even even your grandma's willing to buy groceries online when

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the alternative is getting a deadly virus. So it definitely

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>helped a number in permanent ways. But it's very important

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>with a number of companies, not just the big ones,

0:18:15.400 --> 0:18:19.119
<v Speaker 1>to distinguish things that are pulled forward and permanent and

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:24.400
<v Speaker 1>things that basically gave companies that frankly didn't have much

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:28.760
<v Speaker 1>reason to survive a an extra whiff of life and

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.320
<v Speaker 1>it's not gonna last after things normalize. That's not the

0:18:32.320 --> 0:18:34.880
<v Speaker 1>case with any of those guys. All those guys are

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:36.639
<v Speaker 1>going to be here for a long time. A're going

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.359
<v Speaker 1>going to do well. And mostly it's a pull forward phenomena.

0:18:39.840 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>But at least two of the five fang companies are

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:49.679
<v Speaker 1>in incredibly competitive marketplaces, Netflix and Amazon at least the

0:18:49.680 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 1>part of Amazon is that is an e commerce and

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:55.320
<v Speaker 1>those are both very low margin businesses and they are

0:18:55.359 --> 0:18:59.200
<v Speaker 1>both facing more competition than ever before. Well, let's talk

0:18:59.200 --> 0:19:01.600
<v Speaker 1>a little about that, Anathan, because you write in the

0:19:01.640 --> 0:19:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Platform Delusion who wins and who loses in the Age

0:19:03.920 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>of tech Titans, that there is this myth that these

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:12.200
<v Speaker 1>companies are invincible and that discourages competition. Where are these

0:19:12.200 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>companies vulnerable well, each one has got a different achilles heel.

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the strongest one. You said, Google sits

0:19:18.560 --> 0:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on top, and it sits on top for a reason.

0:19:20.960 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 1>In search, it's mind blowing business. It is unlike many

0:19:26.960 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>cases where people talk about learning and AI and big data,

0:19:33.000 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>where actually, in practice those things don't do very much

0:19:36.400 --> 0:19:38.720
<v Speaker 1>for you. In the case of Google, it does do

0:19:38.800 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot for you. And the thing about Google that's

0:19:41.240 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>so incredible is it keeps doing more and more as

0:19:45.640 --> 0:19:49.520
<v Speaker 1>it gets more and more activity. So in search it's

0:19:49.560 --> 0:19:53.879
<v Speaker 1>a monster. But what's their achilles heel. It's that in

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:58.280
<v Speaker 1>anything other than search, their track record is miserable, I

0:19:58.280 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>mean miserable. A great example of that is their attempt

0:20:02.119 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to compete with Amazon in AWS. It started trying to

0:20:06.040 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>compete with AWS at exactly the same time as Microsoft.

0:20:10.800 --> 0:20:13.359
<v Speaker 1>That's Columbia Business School professor Jonathan Knee. He's also the

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:15.760
<v Speaker 1>author of the new book The Platform Delusion. Who Wins

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.600
<v Speaker 1>and Who Loses in the Age of Tech Titans. You're

0:20:18.600 --> 0:20:21.560
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Up next, we stay with

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry, but move closer to cybersecurity. This is Bloomberg.

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:37.240
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio. It seems

0:20:42.640 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>like each week we learn of a new hacker attack

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:47.439
<v Speaker 1>on some computer network, whether it's on a pipeline at

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 1>meat processing facility, the subway system here in New York,

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 1>or even the u N as we learned just this week,

0:20:52.960 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>we spoke to Wendy Thomas, the CEO of the global

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.679
<v Speaker 1>cybersecurity company Secure Works, just as she was appointed CEO.

0:20:58.840 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>This week she's book with me and Bloomberg's Katie Greifeld Well,

0:21:02.760 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>always feeling great about leading an organization that does such

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>amazing work. Secure Works is all about securing organizations globally,

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>and frankly, it's just a privilege for me to continue

0:21:13.640 --> 0:21:15.639
<v Speaker 1>to fight the good fight with secure What do you

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>see as the main challenge right now? Not just facing

0:21:17.800 --> 0:21:20.640
<v Speaker 1>Secure Works, but facing each and every company that operates

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>right now in a world where it seems like each

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>and every day we hear new ransomware attacks, new cybersecurity threats,

0:21:27.000 --> 0:21:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and companies essentially being taken to their knees. Were ransom

0:21:30.080 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>You've absolutely hit on one of the prevailing trends in

0:21:33.720 --> 0:21:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the security space. And you know, it's easy to take

0:21:36.480 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 1>away from all these headlines that the attackers may be

0:21:39.080 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>winning the fight. Frankly, we see many threat actors now

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:47.159
<v Speaker 1>frankly offering ransomware as a service and so for you know,

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>hud six dollars, you can purchase hacking tools on the

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 1>dark web, and when the barriers to entry are low

0:21:52.880 --> 0:21:56.280
<v Speaker 1>and the rewards are high, you see proliferation of this

0:21:56.359 --> 0:22:00.400
<v Speaker 1>type of crime. In fact, the ransomware payouts in globally

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:03.639
<v Speaker 1>alone we're about twenty billion dollars. So that is a

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>top security concern for all of us. The stats show

0:22:07.840 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that there's a ransomware attack on a business every eleven seconds.

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:14.760
<v Speaker 1>So these attacks are, as you said, hitting closer and

0:22:14.760 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>closer at a home for all of us, as supply

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.840
<v Speaker 1>chains and food and gas are disrupted, and we see

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:23.760
<v Speaker 1>headlines as business leaders and feel a responsibility to protect

0:22:23.800 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>our organizations going forward. And here's the thing. It's such

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:29.879
<v Speaker 1>an opportunistic crime. It can feel when you're attacked that

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:33.439
<v Speaker 1>you were targeted, but frankly, they're very rarely targeted at

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:36.919
<v Speaker 1>a specific company or even an industry. They're targeted at

0:22:36.960 --> 0:22:40.240
<v Speaker 1>companies that are an easy target. Let's talk about that,

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it is opportunistic, that it's not necessarily

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:49.440
<v Speaker 1>companies being targeted or singled out. I mean, how should

0:22:49.520 --> 0:22:52.879
<v Speaker 1>businesses take that information that it is opportunistic? How do

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:56.280
<v Speaker 1>you even protect your business against that? What you want

0:22:56.280 --> 0:23:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to be is a very expensive and hard target to hit. Right,

0:23:00.400 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>Ransomware is all about a very lucrative criminal enterprise. And

0:23:05.560 --> 0:23:09.760
<v Speaker 1>so if you set the foundational protections in place in

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:12.720
<v Speaker 1>a business, it is not complex, but it is it

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>is diligent to protect your business with good security hygiene,

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:22.400
<v Speaker 1>strong passwords, multi factor authentication, being very guarded about your

0:23:22.960 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I T admin. Right, those are great ways to prevent

0:23:26.440 --> 0:23:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the easy entry. Because companies are are really only as

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.160
<v Speaker 1>strong as their weakest link. Right, That adversary only has

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to find one crack in the armor to get in,

0:23:36.920 --> 0:23:39.400
<v Speaker 1>and so we believe that you have to do everything

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:42.199
<v Speaker 1>you can to be a hard target for them, and

0:23:42.280 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>it secure works. We also believe that eventually they're going

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to find a way in some some employee will probably

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:51.280
<v Speaker 1>click on that phishing email. So you've got to have

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.760
<v Speaker 1>complete visibility to detect anything and everything across your digital estate.

0:23:56.400 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And then, because speed is of the essence, you've got

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:01.760
<v Speaker 1>to have the ability to contain those threats in an

0:24:01.760 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 1>automated way before real damage can be done. So, if

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:06.919
<v Speaker 1>it is inevitable that someone will gain access to a

0:24:06.960 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>company network, what's the next step that the company needs

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:12.840
<v Speaker 1>to take to minimize damage. That's where the ability to

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 1>be prepared for when when they're in and so that

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>the time to detect them has to be absolutely rapid.

0:24:21.280 --> 0:24:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And then the ability to have a platform like the

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 1>tageous platform that Secure Works has. It tells you what

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.440
<v Speaker 1>good looks like. Right, it says this has happened, this

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:33.840
<v Speaker 1>is who the threat actor is, this is the asset

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>they're targeting, and it's important to your organization click this button.

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.240
<v Speaker 1>It's time to contain this threat immediately. So it's that

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 1>mean time to remediation. That is, it is important so

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that that threat actor doesn't have the time to get

0:24:47.840 --> 0:24:50.359
<v Speaker 1>to a place where they can deploy that ransomware and

0:24:50.359 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>cripple your organization. We've really seen a proliferation of attacks

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:58.119
<v Speaker 1>over the past few months. I'm curious why now, why

0:24:58.359 --> 0:25:01.560
<v Speaker 1>have we seen just such a uptick in hacks. I

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.240
<v Speaker 1>think for a combination of of an increase in hacks,

0:25:04.280 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and certainly the shift to remote work increase the attack

0:25:09.200 --> 0:25:12.320
<v Speaker 1>surface in the midst of the pandemic, and there were

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:16.199
<v Speaker 1>opportunistic opportunities for those threat actors to also use the

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>fear or lack of information around the pandemic to create

0:25:19.960 --> 0:25:24.400
<v Speaker 1>different kinds of attack vectors phishing emails around vaccine answers

0:25:24.400 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of thing. But I also think that

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 1>the impact of those has been much larger, impacting everyday

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 1>citizens like the pipeline attack, and because of that, the

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>headlines and the focus of of even government has increased

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:40.159
<v Speaker 1>as a result of that. Wendy, whenever I'm talking to

0:25:40.200 --> 0:25:43.840
<v Speaker 1>a cybersecurity expert someone in a position like yours, I

0:25:43.880 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>want to ask, yes, about what companies can do, but

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>also about what we can do as individuals. I mean,

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:51.400
<v Speaker 1>we carry around these phones with so much information on them.

0:25:51.520 --> 0:25:54.600
<v Speaker 1>We have our email accounts that you know allow us

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:57.159
<v Speaker 1>to reset passwords if we forgot a password. What is

0:25:57.160 --> 0:25:59.800
<v Speaker 1>the best way that we can think about protecting our own,

0:25:59.800 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>per small data when it's out in so many places.

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>What are some best practices for us? Well, first of all,

0:26:04.600 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I say that security is a team sport, right, and

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.280
<v Speaker 1>so one of the things that's important to Secure Works

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is increasing cyberliteracy generally, because if you make yourself again

0:26:15.000 --> 0:26:19.080
<v Speaker 1>a difficult target, then the likelihood that that you'll be

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:24.159
<v Speaker 1>opportunistically targeted is lower. But your information does have value.

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Your your contact, your banking information, and to the extent

0:26:28.000 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 1>that you don't put multi factor authentication in place around

0:26:32.840 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 1>your particularly banking or other sensitive information or application access,

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>you're creating unnecessary exposure strong passwords, not your dog's name,

0:26:43.040 --> 0:26:46.879
<v Speaker 1>not your anything around your family. So there's just the

0:26:47.000 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 1>same kind of hardening of compromise and access that companies

0:26:51.440 --> 0:26:54.520
<v Speaker 1>need to do, the same thing that individuals need to do.

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.399
<v Speaker 1>And frankly, just be aware of where you're putting your information,

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>especially on a public computer library or such, and that

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of awareness and vigilance will help keep you safe. Okay, well,

0:27:05.359 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>I definitely need to go update a few passwords, but

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:10.639
<v Speaker 1>I do want to get a check on the secure

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>Works business because you took over effective as of September three.

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Secure Works reported earnings on September two, and they were

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit below analysts expectations. Both second quarter revenue

0:27:23.280 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>and the forecasts going forward for the third quarter and

0:27:27.760 --> 0:27:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the fiscal year. Revenue below what analysts had been expecting,

0:27:32.160 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and the stock is still up about eight percent, but

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>definitely a rough week yesterday, plunging about for the week.

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 1>So Wendy, I know you just took over. You're still

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>getting the seat warm, but I'm curious, what's your priority

0:27:47.119 --> 0:27:49.639
<v Speaker 1>going forward? How do you right the ship? So we

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:53.960
<v Speaker 1>actually have the right answer for today's toughest security challenges.

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:57.440
<v Speaker 1>And inside of the secure Works business, which was founded

0:27:57.480 --> 0:28:00.480
<v Speaker 1>about twenty years ago, we first started this fight with

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:04.240
<v Speaker 1>really a services based approach to security. And as we've

0:28:04.280 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>talked about, because of the technology evolution of the tools

0:28:08.359 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 1>and threat actor's hand and the pace of this fight

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and the need for automated, rapid machine learning fuel detections

0:28:15.480 --> 0:28:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and orchestrated remediation to prevent the kind of massive breaches

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and costs that we see in modern times, about four

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 1>years ago we started to build a modern security platform

0:28:28.200 --> 0:28:32.240
<v Speaker 1>called Tageous that is all about taking that full detection

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:36.040
<v Speaker 1>and response automation capability and putting it all together in

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a way that can solve the real security challenges of today.

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>That business inside of secure Works is total services business

0:28:44.040 --> 0:28:47.960
<v Speaker 1>is actually growing incredibly fast. Two and second quarter over

0:28:48.080 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>last year hit a hundred million. Are are just two

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 1>years after we launched the solution, and so while we

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.400
<v Speaker 1>are shifting away from some of the services that we

0:28:57.520 --> 0:29:00.960
<v Speaker 1>previously offered as part of the total revenue, the right

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.920
<v Speaker 1>answer and the true value for customers in the security

0:29:03.960 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>space is this emerging XDR platform and that's a ship

0:29:07.320 --> 0:29:10.920
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna keep sailing. I'm wondering about breakdown of revenues

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>in the fiscal year one where we are now revenue

0:29:14.920 --> 0:29:18.840
<v Speaker 1>comes from managed security and threat intelligence comes from security

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:21.720
<v Speaker 1>and risk consulting solutions. How do you want to see

0:29:21.720 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>that mixed change? We would like to see our XDR

0:29:25.400 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 1>solutions are tageous solutions be about of our total revenue,

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and we shared that as a long term model. When

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 1>you say long term, how many years are you thinking here, well,

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>we don't have an exact number out there. That that's

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>a that's a few years out. And I think the

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:44.160
<v Speaker 1>importance of continuing to provide some degree of consulting services

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:47.480
<v Speaker 1>to help customers really mature their security program is an

0:29:47.480 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>important overall part of the business model to keep them secure.

0:29:51.240 --> 0:29:53.520
<v Speaker 1>And so, Wendy, you made the point earlier that the

0:29:53.560 --> 0:29:56.000
<v Speaker 1>attacks that we've seen they haven't been targeted. They've been

0:29:56.040 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 1>more opportunistic in nature versus companies being singled out. But

0:30:01.280 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, have you noticed any industry, or any type

0:30:05.760 --> 0:30:10.080
<v Speaker 1>of country or not countries company being particularly vulnerable to

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:14.640
<v Speaker 1>ransomware attacks. We absolutely have seen certain industries that are

0:30:14.680 --> 0:30:19.720
<v Speaker 1>more vulnerable. If you think about where the security adoption

0:30:19.840 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>started many years ago, financial services companies were a lucrative

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>target and they had a lot of compliance requirements. They

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>became security hardened very quickly, and you don't often see

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:34.560
<v Speaker 1>them in the headlines today. What you see again are

0:30:34.600 --> 0:30:39.640
<v Speaker 1>those unfortunately easier targets. So you see now unfortunately educational institutions,

0:30:39.760 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 1>universities even k through twelve school systems under attack, or

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.280
<v Speaker 1>manufacturing companies who have had to go through very rapid

0:30:47.320 --> 0:30:51.320
<v Speaker 1>digital transformation and so their exposure of their attack service

0:30:51.320 --> 0:30:55.400
<v Speaker 1>has increased. We unfortunately see that those organizations, if they

0:30:55.400 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 1>have not partnered with someone like secure Works to help

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>put that security in place, they are quite vulnerable and

0:31:01.880 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>often successfully attacked that Secure Work CEO Wendy Thomas. That

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 1>wraps up the first hour of the weekend edition of

0:31:07.960 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Tim Stanobek. Coming

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>up in our next hour, the CEO of lands And

0:31:13.600 --> 0:31:16.320
<v Speaker 1>joins us to talk all about the struggle to find employees.

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Plus we talk gender diversity with the CEO of Heineken USA.

0:31:21.120 --> 0:31:29.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week, inside from

0:31:29.720 --> 0:31:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the reporters and editors who bring you America's most trusted

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 1>business magazine, plus global business, finance and tech news. As

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>it happened, Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes. Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio. Hello, I'm Tim Stanebek.

0:31:46.640 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 1>My co host Carol Master is off this week. Plenty

0:31:49.520 --> 0:31:51.680
<v Speaker 1>ahead in our second hour of the weekend edition of

0:31:51.720 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week, just as kids head back to school

0:31:55.000 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>and retailers start thinking about the holiday season, we're going

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>to hear from the CEO of lands end Us. The

0:32:00.400 --> 0:32:02.800
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Honeken USA joins us to talk all about

0:32:02.800 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>gender diversity in the beer business. All of that to come,

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.200
<v Speaker 1>but first up this hour, the classic pay phone. Think

0:32:09.240 --> 0:32:12.280
<v Speaker 1>about what it evokes. For so many years, it was

0:32:12.360 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 1>really the only way for any of us to communicate

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>with one another when we weren't at home or when

0:32:16.760 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>we weren't at work, but with smartphones nearly everywhere, it's

0:32:20.760 --> 0:32:23.360
<v Speaker 1>relatively rare that the pay phones that are still out

0:32:23.400 --> 0:32:26.800
<v Speaker 1>there are even used. Joined by my colleague Ed Ludlow,

0:32:26.880 --> 0:32:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I heard from David Dudley, a writer for Bloomberg City Lab,

0:32:30.240 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>who profiled a photographer who's working to document surviving pay phones.

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:37.360
<v Speaker 1>So I spent the day with a gentleman named Eric Kunzman,

0:32:37.440 --> 0:32:41.960
<v Speaker 1>who is a photographer and a photography professor in Rochester,

0:32:42.040 --> 0:32:45.040
<v Speaker 1>New York, and a couple of years ago, he became

0:32:45.080 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of fascinated by the fact that it seemed like

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>the neighborhood that he had moved to studio too was

0:32:50.280 --> 0:32:53.800
<v Speaker 1>was full of payphones, and he hadn't noticed that in

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:55.680
<v Speaker 1>other parts of town. This is sort of a lower

0:32:55.680 --> 0:32:59.840
<v Speaker 1>income part of Rochester. And he started um to this

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:04.520
<v Speaker 1>sort of take images portraits of the payphones that he

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:08.600
<v Speaker 1>saw in the neighborhood, usually in front of convenience stores

0:33:08.800 --> 0:33:12.640
<v Speaker 1>and gas stations. And this sort of expanded into this

0:33:12.720 --> 0:33:16.920
<v Speaker 1>sort of a kind of a global quest that he

0:33:17.000 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>has launched to document every single payphone and Monroe County,

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:25.440
<v Speaker 1>New York. I'm a Londoner, right, I think phone box,

0:33:25.480 --> 0:33:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I think iconic red phone box. I think tourism. But

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:31.880
<v Speaker 1>as part of this process, what exactly what do you

0:33:32.400 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>learn about any neighborhoods given phone box? What does it

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>tell you about the economy, about the people in that place. Well,

0:33:38.920 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Eric sort of theorized that some of these these phones

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:46.080
<v Speaker 1>were basically just sort of forgotten. They've been sort of

0:33:46.360 --> 0:33:50.720
<v Speaker 1>installed in the nineties or earlier, and because no one

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.040
<v Speaker 1>had renovated the building that they were attached to, or

0:33:53.080 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>no one had bothered to call the phone company and say, hey,

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:59.160
<v Speaker 1>could you remove this thing, the machines themselves has sort

0:33:59.160 --> 0:34:02.280
<v Speaker 1>of persisted. So was sort of like a geography of

0:34:02.320 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>the more sort of economically left behind parts of the city.

0:34:05.320 --> 0:34:07.560
<v Speaker 1>And as part of his project, he sort of mapped

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:12.000
<v Speaker 1>all the phones across the county and overlaid that with

0:34:12.000 --> 0:34:14.799
<v Speaker 1>with economic data and other information. So he became sort

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.680
<v Speaker 1>of interested sort of what the the whole kind of social,

0:34:18.040 --> 0:34:23.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of geography of telephones meant um, which sort of

0:34:23.520 --> 0:34:25.880
<v Speaker 1>made this more than just sort of an aesthetic project.

0:34:25.920 --> 0:34:28.440
<v Speaker 1>It was sort of a social documentary. I do find

0:34:28.480 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that the the idea that this is based in Rochester

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:34.239
<v Speaker 1>New York just fascinating. As you point out, it was

0:34:34.280 --> 0:34:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the home of George and Eastman, the founder of Eastman Kodak,

0:34:37.160 --> 0:34:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and at its nineteen seventies peak, the photography giant employed

0:34:40.239 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 1>about fifty thou people and fueled a quarter of the

0:34:43.520 --> 0:34:48.200
<v Speaker 1>city's economic activity. It's absolutely a different picture in this

0:34:48.480 --> 0:34:52.000
<v Speaker 1>day and age, David, And I'm wondering the juxtaposition of

0:34:52.000 --> 0:34:54.399
<v Speaker 1>that and the symbolism there that this project is being

0:34:54.440 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>done on film, first of all, uh, in in a

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>place where Eastman Kodak was for so long the stalwart

0:35:01.680 --> 0:35:04.399
<v Speaker 1>of the economy. Yeah. No, I mean it's that's sort

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of part of the conceit here as a sort of

0:35:06.400 --> 0:35:11.200
<v Speaker 1>this convergence of of obsolete technologies, uh, that that Eric

0:35:11.200 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>really still finds value in. He is a he is

0:35:13.280 --> 0:35:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a film photographer, die Hard. He has sort of a

0:35:17.120 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>a shrine to Kodak film in his studio. So he's

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>shooting these things on an old half of Black Cameron film,

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:30.120
<v Speaker 1>using the this this product that is so associated with

0:35:30.120 --> 0:35:32.800
<v Speaker 1>with Rochester and with the wealth that sort of built

0:35:32.800 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the city, and it's sort of part of his his

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.760
<v Speaker 1>his sort of thesis that there is value in things

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>that that that might not be cutting edge technology anymore,

0:35:42.239 --> 0:35:46.720
<v Speaker 1>but are still useful and still still serve different people.

0:35:46.800 --> 0:35:50.000
<v Speaker 1>They're really encouraged Bloomberg Radio listeners to go on Bloomberg

0:35:50.040 --> 0:35:51.800
<v Speaker 1>dot com onto the Bloomberg terminal and look at the

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>actual photographs themselves. As Tim said, short and film. But

0:35:55.600 --> 0:35:58.400
<v Speaker 1>there's something missing from every single photograph. There are no

0:35:58.600 --> 0:36:01.279
<v Speaker 1>people in any of the shots a tool. Why is that?

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:03.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want you to sort of think about who

0:36:03.640 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>who is using the phone. He wanted you to sort

0:36:05.719 --> 0:36:09.640
<v Speaker 1>of leave that to your imagination because really, you know,

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:11.399
<v Speaker 1>and those of us who are out in age when

0:36:11.520 --> 0:36:17.000
<v Speaker 1>we uh use payphones more regularly. In the eighties and nineties, um,

0:36:17.160 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 1>it was a public amenity. Everyone used the payphone, and

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:22.839
<v Speaker 1>now it's sort of perceived as something as a communication

0:36:22.880 --> 0:36:26.480
<v Speaker 1>device of last resort for people who really have no resources.

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:29.279
<v Speaker 1>And he really wanted you to think about who who

0:36:29.360 --> 0:36:32.799
<v Speaker 1>might need that phone. And uh so it's this sort

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:37.879
<v Speaker 1>of gallery of of of unpeopled landscapes where you sort

0:36:37.920 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of see the phone as part of a kind of

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:45.319
<v Speaker 1>a streetscape. But yeah, there's no there are no people there.

0:36:45.360 --> 0:36:50.080
<v Speaker 1>They're they're used sometimes, He's he's got data from from

0:36:50.120 --> 0:36:52.880
<v Speaker 1>the telecom that still operates them that says that you

0:36:52.920 --> 0:36:54.680
<v Speaker 1>know that most of these phones are used a couple

0:36:54.680 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>of times a week still. Uh, the handful that are

0:36:57.200 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 1>still working, a lot of them are just sort of corpses.

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:03.400
<v Speaker 1>They're their handsets are broken, the inside has been removed.

0:37:03.440 --> 0:37:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But some of them still work and and those that

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 1>do still do find people who need to use them.

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:11.279
<v Speaker 1>What did the company that oversees these phones, that these

0:37:11.280 --> 0:37:16.279
<v Speaker 1>phones belong to, Frontier tell you about the status of

0:37:16.320 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>the phones. It's not really a priority for your communications

0:37:19.719 --> 0:37:22.560
<v Speaker 1>right now. This is a telecom that is, you know,

0:37:22.680 --> 0:37:26.879
<v Speaker 1>pivoting to fiber optics and you know, cutting edge technologies.

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:30.360
<v Speaker 1>But it also happens to have about fifteen hundred of

0:37:30.400 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>these phones scattered around the county. It's unlikely it's a

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:38.680
<v Speaker 1>major profit center. Let's just say it's a it's a

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:41.759
<v Speaker 1>it's a very very declining business. There less than a

0:37:41.840 --> 0:37:45.000
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand pay phones across all of the United States,

0:37:45.000 --> 0:37:48.399
<v Speaker 1>probably a lot less. And uh, you know, it's it's

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:53.200
<v Speaker 1>very much a a part of the telephone tunations business

0:37:53.280 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 1>that has has really been left in the past. That's

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.480
<v Speaker 1>David Dudley from Bloomberg City Lab. You're listening to Bloomberg

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Business Week. Coming up, we explore the pandemics impact on

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:07.120
<v Speaker 1>learning trends for women with an executive from Corsera. That's next.

0:38:07.360 --> 0:38:25.320
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:38:25.400 --> 0:38:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stinovik from Bloomberg Radio.

0:38:31.160 --> 0:38:33.280
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to believe that students going back to school

0:38:33.280 --> 0:38:35.200
<v Speaker 1>are entering their third year of class as a mid

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a pandemic, and it's unclear at this point what exactly

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 1>things are going to look like when it comes to

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>remote versus in person learning. Corsera is a company that

0:38:43.080 --> 0:38:45.720
<v Speaker 1>has been working on online education for nearly a decade,

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:48.440
<v Speaker 1>way before we were even talking about the pandemic. The

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:51.479
<v Speaker 1>company works with hundreds of companies and universities to offer

0:38:51.560 --> 0:38:55.320
<v Speaker 1>professional development courses. And we spoke to Dr Emily Sanz,

0:38:55.360 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>the vice president of data Science at Corsera, on what

0:38:58.560 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 1>learning trends we're seeing, and of course on the impact

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:03.280
<v Speaker 1>of the pandemic has had when it comes to online

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 1>learning and skilling. You know, brief contexts on Coursera bit

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 1>to situate the report. We were co founded by Professor's

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Daphne Caller and Andrew ng really with the mission to

0:39:12.640 --> 0:39:15.720
<v Speaker 1>provide universal access to world class learning, and we believe

0:39:15.760 --> 0:39:18.400
<v Speaker 1>new skills can open doors to new opportunities for folks

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:21.040
<v Speaker 1>from a range of backgrounds and giving more women around

0:39:21.040 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the world access to top quality learning, including in stem

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:27.319
<v Speaker 1>and digital fields that are fast growing in the labor

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>market has been a big part of our work since

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, inspired in no small part by by Daphne's leadership.

0:39:32.960 --> 0:39:35.479
<v Speaker 1>So the report was really inspired by the macro labor

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>market trends we've been seeing amid the pandemic in particularly

0:39:38.160 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>with UM women dropping out of the labor market UM

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and the unemployment crisis UM that has disproportionately impacted women,

0:39:45.400 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 1>And so we took a look at how was that

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 1>feeding through to their learning decisions UM and what if

0:39:51.880 --> 0:39:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that imply about where the labor market might be headed?

0:39:54.520 --> 0:39:57.280
<v Speaker 1>So emily, what are the skills that women are looking

0:39:57.320 --> 0:39:59.600
<v Speaker 1>for when they turned to online learning? Are they turning

0:39:59.640 --> 0:40:02.920
<v Speaker 1>to change jobs? Are they trying to get ahead and

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the jobs they already have? Yeah, so you know, we

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.399
<v Speaker 1>are seeing overall women turning to OurMine education at higher

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.520
<v Speaker 1>rates than pre pandemic and actually their growth and online

0:40:12.560 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>learning UM is outpacing that of men during the pandemic,

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>So that means the gender gap in online learning is

0:40:18.920 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>starting to close. UM. This is a worldwide trend, but

0:40:21.680 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>it holds through to the US as well. UM. And

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:26.239
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that's really striking, you know, you

0:40:26.239 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>can look at overall course enrollments from women. They're increasing

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:36.279
<v Speaker 1>from about in to in Almost half of all course

0:40:36.360 --> 0:40:38.880
<v Speaker 1>enrollments now are coming from women. But I'm party to

0:40:38.920 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>see that this includes really strong growth in female enrollments

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:45.279
<v Speaker 1>in STEM courses and an entry level professional certificates, so

0:40:45.320 --> 0:40:48.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the most job relevant content. UM. To your question,

0:40:48.640 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 1>we do see women looking to advance in their current careers,

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:55.600
<v Speaker 1>especially those that are already in technology oriented fields like

0:40:55.800 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>data and computer science. UM. STEM course enrollments in the

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:04.440
<v Speaker 1>US from women increase from about pre pandemic about um

0:41:04.480 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 1>in this year. But we're also seeing a lot of

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.440
<v Speaker 1>women investing in online learning in order to transition to

0:41:09.520 --> 0:41:14.600
<v Speaker 1>new careers. Especially entry level professional certificate enrollments for women

0:41:14.640 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>have really exploded. They were about seven of those enrollments

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:21.240
<v Speaker 1>for by women in and it's now a much healthier

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:25.960
<v Speaker 1>one as during the pandemic, women are looking to transition

0:41:25.960 --> 0:41:28.600
<v Speaker 1>to those entry level roles. We saw with the jolts,

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:31.400
<v Speaker 1>the job openings and labor turnover survey that this imbalance

0:41:31.520 --> 0:41:33.920
<v Speaker 1>just continues to exist between the number of jobs that

0:41:33.960 --> 0:41:36.440
<v Speaker 1>are available and the number of people who are unemployed.

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.600
<v Speaker 1>They're not necessarily meeting there is there is this imbalance

0:41:39.640 --> 0:41:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that still exists. What is your data tell you about

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:45.719
<v Speaker 1>the way that people can use courserah coursework to actually

0:41:46.200 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>get that job and be qualified for that job that's

0:41:48.960 --> 0:41:52.239
<v Speaker 1>out there. It's a great question, and I think that's

0:41:52.360 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>actually a lot of what we're seeing with this growth

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:58.760
<v Speaker 1>in global enrollments, but especially in female littlements. Right, many people,

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:00.879
<v Speaker 1>but in particular women, dropped as the labor market during

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:03.680
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, including to care for children and other family members.

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:06.719
<v Speaker 1>They anticipated wanting to go back to work when childcare

0:42:06.719 --> 0:42:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and other family constrains ease, and they know that developing

0:42:09.640 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>incremental job relevant skills now can help them do that,

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>can help them re enter the workforce in a better

0:42:14.719 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 1>position than they left. And this isn't just about the

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 1>pandemic um There are more and more jobs that are

0:42:18.960 --> 0:42:22.400
<v Speaker 1>requiring digital skills. Digitization of a lot of customer employee

0:42:22.400 --> 0:42:26.120
<v Speaker 1>workflowes have certainly been accelerated during COVID and and so

0:42:26.320 --> 0:42:28.800
<v Speaker 1>while women have on average been very busy during the pandemic,

0:42:28.840 --> 0:42:31.319
<v Speaker 1>I have two little ones myself. The business is real.

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:33.760
<v Speaker 1>They just sunfortunately managed to make the space to develop

0:42:33.840 --> 0:42:35.800
<v Speaker 1>these new skills, to prepare them to re enter the

0:42:35.840 --> 0:42:39.400
<v Speaker 1>labor market and potentially to even re enter in newer

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:42.160
<v Speaker 1>and more rewarding positions. Are faster growing and more lucrative

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:45.680
<v Speaker 1>than their former roles. Um and you know, really meeting

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:48.919
<v Speaker 1>that increased demand for digital skills. Tell us about who

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:51.760
<v Speaker 1>has been taking cours, error courses and how that's different

0:42:52.280 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>from what we saw pre pandemic, and how that's evolved,

0:42:56.000 --> 0:42:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Like like who is the ideal you know, user of

0:42:58.920 --> 0:43:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the product or typical I should say, not necessarily ideal typical. Yeah,

0:43:03.560 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>so our learners are very heterogeneous. We actually have just

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:10.200
<v Speaker 1>shy of ninety million registered learners on the platform, including

0:43:10.239 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>over sixteen million from the from the US, and I

0:43:14.000 --> 0:43:17.360
<v Speaker 1>would say that during the pandemic, we've seen a couple

0:43:17.640 --> 0:43:20.800
<v Speaker 1>of major shifts in the composition of those individuals, although

0:43:20.840 --> 0:43:23.440
<v Speaker 1>they continue to be very diverse in their backgrounds and goals.

0:43:23.440 --> 0:43:27.360
<v Speaker 1>And interests. One major change has been, as I mentioned earlier,

0:43:27.800 --> 0:43:32.400
<v Speaker 1>UM disproportionately women joining the platform to learn across the board,

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:35.880
<v Speaker 1>but especially in STEM and preparing for digital jobs. And

0:43:35.880 --> 0:43:38.320
<v Speaker 1>then the second big shift we've seen is increasingly folks

0:43:38.360 --> 0:43:41.160
<v Speaker 1>coming to Corsera not just to upscale in their current role,

0:43:41.640 --> 0:43:45.279
<v Speaker 1>but actually to prepare themselves to enter new jobs, including

0:43:45.640 --> 0:43:47.960
<v Speaker 1>entry level digital jobs. I think things like, how do

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I become a Google I T support special, how do

0:43:51.160 --> 0:43:53.799
<v Speaker 1>I become an entry level data analysts, social media marketer,

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:56.720
<v Speaker 1>a data engineer UM. You know, early days of Coursera,

0:43:56.800 --> 0:43:58.759
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the folks who joined the platform with

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:01.839
<v Speaker 1>folks who already had advanced degrees, including graduate degrees. Now,

0:44:01.880 --> 0:44:04.959
<v Speaker 1>increasingly we're seeing people coming in who are in blue

0:44:04.960 --> 0:44:08.440
<v Speaker 1>color jobs. Their work is being disrupted with increased automation,

0:44:08.640 --> 0:44:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and they're looking for UM that gateway certificate program that

0:44:12.280 --> 0:44:14.200
<v Speaker 1>can really be their foot in the door to an

0:44:14.280 --> 0:44:17.120
<v Speaker 1>entry level digital job. And that's been awesome to see.

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:19.160
<v Speaker 1>We serve A learners, we asked them about the outcomes

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:22.760
<v Speaker 1>they're experiencing. UM. The vast majority of report positive career

0:44:22.800 --> 0:44:25.359
<v Speaker 1>outcomes improving their performance at work or selecting a new

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>career path and where we see the strongest outcome is

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 1>from those professional certificate programs, especially the entry level ones,

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.319
<v Speaker 1>which are again aimed at preparing folks for those entry

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.920
<v Speaker 1>level digitals. So a question about this, how much is

0:44:38.000 --> 0:44:44.719
<v Speaker 1>this replacing people need to go back to professional schools.

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:48.359
<v Speaker 1>The reason I asked that is because we're sitting here

0:44:48.400 --> 0:44:51.160
<v Speaker 1>in a country where so many people are saddled with

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>so much student debt, and there's a lot of questions

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:59.080
<v Speaker 1>about whether we can recreate the model so that school

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:03.760
<v Speaker 1>training gaining skills is both more affordable and most useful

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>for the workforce. So are people doing uh, professional certificate

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:12.080
<v Speaker 1>programs rather than going back to school? Absolutely, And you know,

0:45:12.160 --> 0:45:15.680
<v Speaker 1>we actually have a range of learning programs from individual

0:45:15.680 --> 0:45:18.160
<v Speaker 1>courses to professional certificate programs all the way up to

0:45:18.239 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>full diploma bearing degrees. But you hit the nail on

0:45:20.880 --> 0:45:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the head that it needs to be one affordable and

0:45:23.480 --> 0:45:27.080
<v Speaker 1>then too flexible. Right in today's world, learning can and

0:45:27.120 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>should be done on your own time. You can take

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:32.040
<v Speaker 1>a class from the world's best instructor as well you know,

0:45:32.080 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 1>cooking dinner or driving the kids to the park. And

0:45:33.880 --> 0:45:36.120
<v Speaker 1>when you have to do hands on applied learning, you

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:38.200
<v Speaker 1>know where you really need to be at a computer,

0:45:38.440 --> 0:45:40.279
<v Speaker 1>you can also do that on your own time and

0:45:40.320 --> 0:45:42.560
<v Speaker 1>whatever little talkts you can find for you. And so

0:45:42.719 --> 0:45:45.440
<v Speaker 1>I do think a lot of it is is cost reduction,

0:45:45.600 --> 0:45:49.400
<v Speaker 1>being able to access this without um going into serious

0:45:49.440 --> 0:45:52.480
<v Speaker 1>debt um. But there's also a real component around being

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:55.560
<v Speaker 1>able to continue to live your life, keep your job,

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.839
<v Speaker 1>be with your family, and progress in your career through

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:01.799
<v Speaker 1>online learning that thank and unlock a future career opportunity.

0:46:02.000 --> 0:46:05.279
<v Speaker 1>That's Coursera's VP of Data Science, Dr Emily sans So

0:46:05.400 --> 0:46:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to come on at Bloomberg Business Week. Back to school

0:46:07.640 --> 0:46:10.239
<v Speaker 1>means it's time for back to school shopping. We're gonna

0:46:10.239 --> 0:46:13.080
<v Speaker 1>hear from the CEO of lands End. This is Bloomberg

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting from the financial capital of the World, Bloomberg eleven

0:46:21.360 --> 0:46:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Frio in New York to Washington, d C. Bloomberg to Boston,

0:46:26.080 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg one, O six one to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine

0:46:30.000 --> 0:46:33.240
<v Speaker 1>to the country Sirius XM Chamber one nine and around

0:46:33.280 --> 0:46:37.239
<v Speaker 1>the globe the Bloomberg Business and Bloomberg Radio dot Com.

0:46:37.360 --> 0:46:41.440
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:46:41.520 --> 0:46:47.000
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes, Tim Stenovan on Bloomberg Radio. Lands End sees

0:46:47.040 --> 0:46:50.479
<v Speaker 1>sales rebounding his in person classes resume, underscoring the broad

0:46:50.520 --> 0:46:52.840
<v Speaker 1>strength that retailers are seeing in the crucial back to

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:56.920
<v Speaker 1>school shopping season. Jerome Griffith, the CEO of lands End,

0:46:57.040 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>joined Ed Ludlow and me this week to give us

0:46:59.160 --> 0:47:02.280
<v Speaker 1>an update on supply chain challenges and how the company

0:47:02.360 --> 0:47:05.560
<v Speaker 1>has had to raise wages to find workers even prior

0:47:05.600 --> 0:47:07.279
<v Speaker 1>to the pandemic. One of the things we wanted to

0:47:07.280 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>do was to sort of spread the risk we have

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:15.560
<v Speaker 1>been producing about our products out of China up going

0:47:15.560 --> 0:47:20.759
<v Speaker 1>into and we get to to expand that out into

0:47:20.840 --> 0:47:23.359
<v Speaker 1>other countries so that we weren't really dependent so much

0:47:23.360 --> 0:47:26.600
<v Speaker 1>on one country at all. What's happened to us over

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:30.040
<v Speaker 1>the course of the last let's a year to year

0:47:30.080 --> 0:47:33.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half is that products getting into the States

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:37.240
<v Speaker 1>have started to slow down dramatically and costs have really risen,

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:41.040
<v Speaker 1>not just costs on shipping, but costs on raw materials.

0:47:41.080 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>So you see cotton costs and we do a lot

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of cotton um rising pretty significantly, But then you look

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:50.480
<v Speaker 1>at just the cost of shipping things from any country here,

0:47:50.520 --> 0:47:54.240
<v Speaker 1>whereas containers three years ago, we're costing around four thousand

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars a container. The last six months, they have been

0:47:57.960 --> 0:48:00.400
<v Speaker 1>up in the twelve of the fifteen thousand dollar arrange,

0:48:00.440 --> 0:48:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and I've heard quotes as high as twenty five dollars

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:06.319
<v Speaker 1>for a container. And the same things happened with airshipping,

0:48:06.320 --> 0:48:08.759
<v Speaker 1>not that we ship a lot by air, but but

0:48:08.840 --> 0:48:11.360
<v Speaker 1>those costs have been going up as well. So you know,

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>we will continue to look at expanding our network to

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:18.799
<v Speaker 1>make sure that we have a little bit more options

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:20.960
<v Speaker 1>than than just going to one, two or three different

0:48:20.960 --> 0:48:24.040
<v Speaker 1>places in order to get get products made and shipped.

0:48:24.840 --> 0:48:26.520
<v Speaker 1>Such a pleasure to have you US. I love speaking

0:48:26.520 --> 0:48:29.160
<v Speaker 1>to the retailers because you you have such a lens

0:48:29.360 --> 0:48:31.800
<v Speaker 1>into what's going on in our US and global economy.

0:48:32.200 --> 0:48:33.839
<v Speaker 1>You know, supply chain one thing. I want to talk

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>a little bit about the labor market. You know how

0:48:36.080 --> 0:48:39.760
<v Speaker 1>it lands end dealing with a pretty tight labor market.

0:48:39.800 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how are you staffing stores, facilities? You guys

0:48:42.600 --> 0:48:44.920
<v Speaker 1>seem to be seeing some growth now in e commerce.

0:48:44.960 --> 0:48:47.439
<v Speaker 1>What is the priority for hiring? E commerce really runs

0:48:47.440 --> 0:48:50.480
<v Speaker 1>out of our corporate office, and that's of our business.

0:48:50.480 --> 0:48:54.640
<v Speaker 1>So that's been running along relatively well. UM for the

0:48:54.680 --> 0:48:58.480
<v Speaker 1>last two years, our core businesses, our US direct e

0:48:58.560 --> 0:49:00.960
<v Speaker 1>commerce business, and then if the ad on the international

0:49:00.960 --> 0:49:03.040
<v Speaker 1>businesses and the B two B businesses which we do

0:49:03.080 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>online UH, it creates you know, quite a large, large

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:10.480
<v Speaker 1>annual volume what's happening with with these businesses. And we've

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:12.560
<v Speaker 1>been able to hire people because you know, we're an

0:49:12.560 --> 0:49:16.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting company and the company is also doing well, so

0:49:16.560 --> 0:49:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, that tends to attract people. Where we've where

0:49:19.000 --> 0:49:23.040
<v Speaker 1>we struggle somewhat is just logistically how we ship goods

0:49:23.080 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>out to UH customers. We are based in Wisconsin. We

0:49:26.800 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>have three major facilities there and we're a major employer

0:49:29.920 --> 0:49:33.560
<v Speaker 1>in southern Wisconsin. What you've seen with the labor market

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 1>as of the last six to nine months is people

0:49:37.640 --> 0:49:39.600
<v Speaker 1>aren't working as much, so it's been very difficult to

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:42.879
<v Speaker 1>entice people. We've given two raises so far this year.

0:49:42.920 --> 0:49:45.520
<v Speaker 1>We've put on peak peak incentives for people to come

0:49:45.520 --> 0:49:47.480
<v Speaker 1>into work, and we've had people working, you know, over

0:49:47.520 --> 0:49:50.239
<v Speaker 1>time just to get the goods out the door. What

0:49:50.280 --> 0:49:52.400
<v Speaker 1>we're we have just made it through our back to

0:49:52.440 --> 0:49:55.960
<v Speaker 1>school peak, which actually worked out okay for us, and

0:49:56.000 --> 0:49:59.000
<v Speaker 1>we'll be going into another hiring phase and it will

0:49:59.040 --> 0:50:00.759
<v Speaker 1>be determined. You know, what of the people that have

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>been getting unemployment and staying home are going to be

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:05.120
<v Speaker 1>ready to come back to work for the unemployment stops?

0:50:05.160 --> 0:50:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they will be the day in most places?

0:50:07.360 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 1>I think so and I hope so. But I have

0:50:10.880 --> 0:50:13.279
<v Speaker 1>learned in the last year that I don't know when

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you say you've had to raise wages twice, what are

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:17.640
<v Speaker 1>we talking about here? Where are they right now? Depends

0:50:17.680 --> 0:50:21.240
<v Speaker 1>on your your average. We've raised raised them through between

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:23.800
<v Speaker 1>three and four percent in May and another percent and

0:50:23.840 --> 0:50:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a half just this past month. Um and obviously starting

0:50:27.800 --> 0:50:30.040
<v Speaker 1>salaries are over fifteen bucks. So you know, we've been

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 1>doing the right thing by the market. Uh, And the

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>market really dictates, you know, what you need to do

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:35.759
<v Speaker 1>for the people who have been with you for a

0:50:35.800 --> 0:50:37.560
<v Speaker 1>long time. Because we're a fifty eight year old company.

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:39.680
<v Speaker 1>You know, we've had we've had people that have worked

0:50:39.680 --> 0:50:43.080
<v Speaker 1>for us for thirty five years, and you know, very

0:50:43.120 --> 0:50:45.560
<v Speaker 1>loyal employees, and you want to make sure that they're happy. Sure,

0:50:45.560 --> 0:50:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm a brit acclimatizing into life in the United States,

0:50:48.560 --> 0:50:50.960
<v Speaker 1>so I kind of asked this hesitantly, But should we

0:50:51.000 --> 0:50:56.120
<v Speaker 1>talk about the holiday season? Jost approaching. Everyone keeps telling

0:50:56.160 --> 0:50:58.839
<v Speaker 1>me fast approaching the holiday season. How's it looking from

0:50:58.880 --> 0:51:01.160
<v Speaker 1>your perspective? I think the holiday season is going to

0:51:01.200 --> 0:51:03.759
<v Speaker 1>depending on getting goods here. Um. You know, this would

0:51:03.800 --> 0:51:06.480
<v Speaker 1>be my forty three Christmas since I graduated college, and

0:51:06.560 --> 0:51:10.279
<v Speaker 1>everyone gets just a little bit harder. But um, what

0:51:10.320 --> 0:51:12.680
<v Speaker 1>we think, And you know, we've seen pretty good demand

0:51:13.160 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>coming up until now, we haven't seen a huge slowdown

0:51:16.560 --> 0:51:18.279
<v Speaker 1>in demand. We think the man is still going to

0:51:18.360 --> 0:51:20.640
<v Speaker 1>be there and every year, you know, it ends up

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:23.680
<v Speaker 1>coming coming around because people always end up going out

0:51:23.680 --> 0:51:25.440
<v Speaker 1>shopping for for Christmas. I think the people that are

0:51:25.480 --> 0:51:27.880
<v Speaker 1>going to win, and this is our mentality, are the

0:51:27.920 --> 0:51:30.240
<v Speaker 1>people that service the customer. If you're servicing the customer,

0:51:30.280 --> 0:51:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you'll win. Yes, maybe your cost might be a bit higher,

0:51:32.880 --> 0:51:34.520
<v Speaker 1>but as long as you can serve as a customer

0:51:34.520 --> 0:51:36.359
<v Speaker 1>and keep them happy and keep them coming back, you'll

0:51:36.400 --> 0:51:38.200
<v Speaker 1>continue to win. As a brand. How early do you

0:51:38.200 --> 0:51:40.640
<v Speaker 1>want consumers to order from you for the holiday season?

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 1>You know people start now. Uh. And we saw it

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:46.360
<v Speaker 1>last year, and we saw it for back to school

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this year. You know, people started early, ordering early and

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:53.080
<v Speaker 1>back to school and they started ordering more. UH. And

0:51:53.280 --> 0:51:55.000
<v Speaker 1>my sense is the same thing is going to happen

0:51:55.040 --> 0:51:57.520
<v Speaker 1>this year, is that people will shop early and they'll

0:51:57.520 --> 0:52:00.960
<v Speaker 1>want to buy more because they've had ten up demand

0:52:01.120 --> 0:52:04.359
<v Speaker 1>and they have good savings right now and people will

0:52:04.360 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 1>want to spend. That's Lands and CEO Jerome Griffith. You're

0:52:07.960 --> 0:52:10.719
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week. Coming up, we're ending the

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:12.960
<v Speaker 1>week with a beer and a look at how the

0:52:13.000 --> 0:52:16.239
<v Speaker 1>booze industry is working on gender diversity. We hear from

0:52:16.239 --> 0:52:19.560
<v Speaker 1>the head of Heineken USA, Maggie Timeny. That's next. This

0:52:19.920 --> 0:52:29.760
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich from Bloomberg Radio.

0:52:35.480 --> 0:52:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Here at Bloomberg Business Week, we we talk a lot

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about and we record a lot about gender equity when

0:52:40.440 --> 0:52:42.680
<v Speaker 1>it comes to representation at the top companies in the

0:52:42.760 --> 0:52:45.919
<v Speaker 1>United States, and that's the top companies in the world. Well,

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the gender diversity in the alcoholic beverage industry has historically

0:52:50.040 --> 0:52:54.040
<v Speaker 1>been not so good. It's been male dominated. But one

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 1>company is trying to shed a little light on that

0:52:56.640 --> 0:52:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and changes that have been made in recent years. That

0:52:58.960 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 1>company is Heineken U S a and we have Maggie

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:05.720
<v Speaker 1>Timony joining us, now chief executive officer of Heineken USA.

0:53:05.800 --> 0:53:08.360
<v Speaker 1>She joins us on the phone from Connecticut. I was

0:53:08.440 --> 0:53:11.239
<v Speaker 1>joined by my Bloomberg Quickday co host Katie Greifeld. So,

0:53:11.360 --> 0:53:14.000
<v Speaker 1>Maggie Haneken USA has a new white paper out titled

0:53:14.040 --> 0:53:17.719
<v Speaker 1>behind the Label Gender Diversity in the Alcoholic Beverage Industry.

0:53:18.160 --> 0:53:21.440
<v Speaker 1>What prompted you to take a deep dive into this topic? Hi,

0:53:21.600 --> 0:53:24.960
<v Speaker 1>tim how are you good? Afternoon greetings from Connecticut. Yes,

0:53:25.080 --> 0:53:28.359
<v Speaker 1>we are. You know, I'm a woman, uh, and I've

0:53:28.400 --> 0:53:31.280
<v Speaker 1>been in the alcohol beverage industry for many, many years

0:53:31.320 --> 0:53:33.960
<v Speaker 1>and I looked around the room over the years and

0:53:34.040 --> 0:53:38.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't see many diverse faces. So Heineken USA it

0:53:38.160 --> 0:53:41.120
<v Speaker 1>took a leadership position on God with a cohort of

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:45.759
<v Speaker 1>senior females across alcohol beverage and we had a discussion

0:53:45.800 --> 0:53:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and we said, you know, it's really incumbent upon us

0:53:48.800 --> 0:53:51.040
<v Speaker 1>to highlight the path and pave the way for the

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 1>future generations of women. And I think, you know, it's

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:58.759
<v Speaker 1>easy not to do anything to raise the profile of

0:53:59.480 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 1>highlighting path for females and our in our future females

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in our industry. But we said it's incumbent upon us

0:54:05.520 --> 0:54:08.520
<v Speaker 1>to take on that task and put it firmly on

0:54:08.520 --> 0:54:12.759
<v Speaker 1>our shoulders. And so how do you do that? I mean,

0:54:12.880 --> 0:54:17.120
<v Speaker 1>is that through recruitment or advancement for women already in

0:54:17.160 --> 0:54:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the industry, or I imagine some combination. I think it's

0:54:21.480 --> 0:54:25.000
<v Speaker 1>a combination that two things. You know, when consumers look

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:27.520
<v Speaker 1>at and the think about Heineken USA, they think about

0:54:27.520 --> 0:54:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the brand, and the same with other outbad companies. So

0:54:30.440 --> 0:54:33.239
<v Speaker 1>I think we need to ensure that we market the

0:54:33.360 --> 0:54:37.080
<v Speaker 1>people behind the beverages and the actual industry behind behind

0:54:37.120 --> 0:54:41.160
<v Speaker 1>the beverages. These are these are fully blown businesses with

0:54:41.680 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>P and L's and breweries and marketing departments and finance

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:48.640
<v Speaker 1>departments and HR departments and sales departments, et cetera. That's

0:54:48.719 --> 0:54:52.319
<v Speaker 1>number one, let's market our industry for others. Number two,

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:55.239
<v Speaker 1>we need to elevate our recruiting programs. We don't do

0:54:55.440 --> 0:54:58.520
<v Speaker 1>enough to ensure that we have a breadth and depth

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 1>and scope of coverage across you know, different universities, and

0:55:03.680 --> 0:55:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to highlight in particular to females. You can have a

0:55:06.920 --> 0:55:11.320
<v Speaker 1>big opportunity and alcohol beverage at the same time. Katy

0:55:11.480 --> 0:55:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we also need to level the playing fields

0:55:14.239 --> 0:55:17.839
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that we're very flexible in how we show

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:21.080
<v Speaker 1>up at work and where and where you can work.

0:55:21.160 --> 0:55:23.320
<v Speaker 1>You can work from home, you can work from an office.

0:55:23.600 --> 0:55:26.480
<v Speaker 1>We need to highlight that to all of our future talent.

0:55:27.280 --> 0:55:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Give us some numbers here, Give us some data about

0:55:29.360 --> 0:55:32.560
<v Speaker 1>what you found in the industry and how it compares

0:55:32.600 --> 0:55:35.160
<v Speaker 1>to other industries, because I think it's fair to say

0:55:35.160 --> 0:55:37.640
<v Speaker 1>there are many industries when it comes to the corporate

0:55:37.640 --> 0:55:41.759
<v Speaker 1>world that are dominated by men. Yeah, when we look

0:55:41.760 --> 0:55:44.120
<v Speaker 1>at the recent studies, the percentage of women and see

0:55:44.160 --> 0:55:47.520
<v Speaker 1>sweet roles across the marketplace remains relatively smaller. We all

0:55:47.560 --> 0:55:50.920
<v Speaker 1>know that it's sort of a tent. When we look

0:55:51.000 --> 0:55:53.400
<v Speaker 1>at women and sea sweet roles and food and beverage,

0:55:53.400 --> 0:55:56.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a little bit lower at twenty percent. However, we

0:55:56.120 --> 0:55:58.360
<v Speaker 1>look at women and see seat rules and food and

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:03.080
<v Speaker 1>beverage distribution, it's just ten. And you know, I mean

0:56:03.080 --> 0:56:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you look at generals the sweet roles, we know that

0:56:05.160 --> 0:56:08.600
<v Speaker 1>it's dropped from two. So you know, we talk a

0:56:08.640 --> 0:56:13.440
<v Speaker 1>lot about gender diversity and you know, females and their careers,

0:56:13.800 --> 0:56:15.960
<v Speaker 1>but the numbers are showing that we're actually going in

0:56:16.000 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 1>the wrong direction. So how do we sustainably bring these

0:56:20.200 --> 0:56:22.879
<v Speaker 1>numbers up and kick them up and then build off

0:56:22.880 --> 0:56:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that base. That's our challenge across all industries and in

0:56:26.600 --> 0:56:30.239
<v Speaker 1>particular focus on outbets. And so, Maggie, you mentioned that

0:56:30.280 --> 0:56:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the numbers are going in the wrong direction. I'm curious

0:56:34.200 --> 0:56:38.359
<v Speaker 1>what role the pandemic played in that, because obviously it's

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:41.960
<v Speaker 1>been a while since myself has been at a at

0:56:42.000 --> 0:56:46.400
<v Speaker 1>an in person conference just meeting people organically to network.

0:56:47.000 --> 0:56:49.320
<v Speaker 1>How does that factor, and that we've all been virtual

0:56:49.440 --> 0:56:53.560
<v Speaker 1>for really a year and a half. Yeah, I think,

0:56:53.680 --> 0:56:55.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I would if I can link that

0:56:55.160 --> 0:56:59.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit to mentorship and ally ship. Um, you know,

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:03.880
<v Speaker 1>when you look at females in the workplace, we need

0:57:03.920 --> 0:57:08.239
<v Speaker 1>to be more flexible because our female voice is not

0:57:08.400 --> 0:57:10.680
<v Speaker 1>heard when you're not in the room. And I think

0:57:10.719 --> 0:57:13.759
<v Speaker 1>being virtual has not helped females in terms of their

0:57:13.800 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 1>progression or even staying in the workforce. So how do

0:57:17.760 --> 0:57:21.400
<v Speaker 1>we move away from mentorship and and move towards ally

0:57:21.440 --> 0:57:24.200
<v Speaker 1>ships so that when you're not in the room, somebody

0:57:24.320 --> 0:57:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is speaking and your voice is heard v as somebody help,

0:57:28.080 --> 0:57:33.520
<v Speaker 1>v as somebody else on your behalf and at Haneken USA.

0:57:33.560 --> 0:57:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I just want to say that you've done we we

0:57:36.280 --> 0:57:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, over ten years ago we launched the Women's

0:57:38.520 --> 0:57:41.920
<v Speaker 1>Leadership Forum. We have forty eight percent females at Heineken

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:47.240
<v Speaker 1>USA and globally for Heineken, we're looking to increase to

0:57:47.520 --> 0:57:53.240
<v Speaker 1>thirty percent female of females in leadership positions senior leadership

0:57:53.240 --> 0:57:57.760
<v Speaker 1>positions by twenty thirty. We have made that commitment. What's

0:57:57.760 --> 0:58:00.840
<v Speaker 1>interesting because I look at your website and in preparation

0:58:00.960 --> 0:58:03.720
<v Speaker 1>for this interview, and something sticks out to me. Um

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 1>brands that are about substance rather than status, social rather

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:11.520
<v Speaker 1>than exclusive, personalized rather than mass. That's what you consider

0:58:11.560 --> 0:58:17.120
<v Speaker 1>your portfolio of quote upscale international brands. I'm wondering how

0:58:17.280 --> 0:58:20.960
<v Speaker 1>this report dovetails with the identity that you want consumers

0:58:21.000 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to have when they pick up a Heineken or when

0:58:24.320 --> 0:58:26.440
<v Speaker 1>they pick up a dose a Keise or an Arizona

0:58:26.480 --> 0:58:31.720
<v Speaker 1>Sunrise Heart Seltzer or one of your emerging brands. You know,

0:58:32.200 --> 0:58:34.720
<v Speaker 1>and let mean you know we are a family owned company,

0:58:34.800 --> 0:58:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Heineken globally and I'm not sure if you know this

0:58:37.600 --> 0:58:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to him, but we are majority owned by the Heineken

0:58:41.200 --> 0:58:44.760
<v Speaker 1>family and Charlie Heineken is our is, our owner and

0:58:44.760 --> 0:58:48.800
<v Speaker 1>our founders. So we we put a lot of focus

0:58:49.040 --> 0:58:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and we put our money where our motives when it

0:58:50.960 --> 0:58:55.440
<v Speaker 1>comes to gender diversity and inclusion and diversity globally at Heineken,

0:58:56.520 --> 0:59:02.840
<v Speaker 1>so we ensure that our advertising include diverse consumers. Because

0:59:02.840 --> 0:59:06.000
<v Speaker 1>our brands are consumed by their first consumers. We ensure

0:59:06.040 --> 0:59:09.120
<v Speaker 1>that our agencies are diverse. We ensured that the communities

0:59:09.120 --> 0:59:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in which we operate that we give we provided diverse

0:59:12.560 --> 0:59:16.000
<v Speaker 1>lens to all of the philanthropic efforts that we make.

0:59:17.680 --> 0:59:22.960
<v Speaker 1>And so, Maggie, Heineken you know, matches its words with actions.

0:59:23.280 --> 0:59:25.440
<v Speaker 1>But again I keep going back to your point that

0:59:25.560 --> 0:59:27.960
<v Speaker 1>at an industry wide level, the numbers are going the

0:59:28.040 --> 0:59:32.280
<v Speaker 1>wrong wrong way, the gender disparity is getting worse. How

0:59:32.360 --> 0:59:35.680
<v Speaker 1>does that reverse? What would be the catalyst to to

0:59:35.920 --> 0:59:38.280
<v Speaker 1>actually make the numbers go in the right direction? And

0:59:38.480 --> 0:59:42.560
<v Speaker 1>how long might that take? You know what? It really

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:44.840
<v Speaker 1>could take a long time, Which is why were we

0:59:44.960 --> 0:59:48.439
<v Speaker 1>at Heineken USA, together with other across the industry, other

0:59:48.600 --> 0:59:52.920
<v Speaker 1>senior females are launching this campaign to look behind the label.

0:59:53.760 --> 0:59:59.080
<v Speaker 1>We want to showcase our industry two people to consumers

0:59:59.320 --> 1:00:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to showcase swat what's behind the beer they're drinking, what's

1:00:03.080 --> 1:00:06.520
<v Speaker 1>behind the wine they're drinking, what's behind the spirit spirit

1:00:06.560 --> 1:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>they're drinking because there's a There's a lot of fantastic

1:00:09.920 --> 1:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>people who love this beautiful industry, and I were so

1:00:14.000 --> 1:00:16.240
<v Speaker 1>proud to work for this industry, and many who have

1:00:16.320 --> 1:00:18.360
<v Speaker 1>left the industry always say, oh God, I really want

1:00:18.400 --> 1:00:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to go back, so behind the label. Our first chapter

1:00:22.520 --> 1:00:26.520
<v Speaker 1>in our book is to showcase the people behind the

1:00:26.600 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>industry so that our consumers and society at large can

1:00:30.440 --> 1:00:33.080
<v Speaker 1>look and say, I admire that industry and I want

1:00:33.120 --> 1:00:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to work there. I want to talk a little bit

1:00:36.000 --> 1:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>more about the business and get an update on you

1:00:38.520 --> 1:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>from the business. Many people may not know that Heineken

1:00:41.120 --> 1:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>USA is the parent company of Red Stripes, Strong Boat, Tiger,

1:00:44.240 --> 1:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>and Still Light, among many other beers and and spirits.

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>I wonder about emerging areas. I wonder about innovation. Where

1:00:53.520 --> 1:00:58.080
<v Speaker 1>are you really bullish? Where are you seeing growth? You know?

1:00:58.120 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>I think, um, you know, years and years and years ago,

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>it was the bigger brand, largers and consumers were happy

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>with that. I think with the advent of social media

1:01:09.840 --> 1:01:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and there are really no boundaries between countries anymore. You know,

1:01:13.640 --> 1:01:17.560
<v Speaker 1>there's no geographic boundaries because people are on the phone, iPad,

1:01:17.720 --> 1:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>surfing the nest and and they're experiencing brands in different ways,

1:01:22.520 --> 1:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and and people can say, well, that is that a

1:01:25.160 --> 1:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>big challenge. That's really that's really an opportunity that we

1:01:28.960 --> 1:01:31.959
<v Speaker 1>can take our global brands from around the world and

1:01:32.080 --> 1:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>have them show up for our consumers in their locale

1:01:35.280 --> 1:01:37.480
<v Speaker 1>and how our consumers want them to do. Out number one,

1:01:37.840 --> 1:01:40.800
<v Speaker 1>number two, we have a huge opportunity to innovate. The

1:01:40.880 --> 1:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>lines for consumers are very very blurred and what they're

1:01:44.160 --> 1:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>looking for in the product, whether it's be lower calorie,

1:01:47.520 --> 1:01:50.400
<v Speaker 1>lower alcohol, or what their own Heineken zero points there

1:01:50.400 --> 1:01:53.800
<v Speaker 1>are no alcohol. We need to ensure that we are

1:01:53.880 --> 1:01:58.320
<v Speaker 1>innovating and innovating at speed and being extremely agile and

1:01:58.400 --> 1:02:02.000
<v Speaker 1>nimble to deliver for comes for our consumers what they want.

1:02:02.040 --> 1:02:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And consumers today Tim and Katie are very promiscuous. They're

1:02:05.520 --> 1:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>going to try a plethora of different products, and we

1:02:08.200 --> 1:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>need to make sure that we are adapting and being

1:02:10.480 --> 1:02:13.560
<v Speaker 1>fast to market to satisfy those consumer needs. Hey, just

1:02:13.600 --> 1:02:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in the last thirty seconds we have with you, Maggie,

1:02:15.320 --> 1:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>you pique my interest when you talked about the no

1:02:17.400 --> 1:02:19.840
<v Speaker 1>alcohol beer, the Heineken version of that, what type of

1:02:19.840 --> 1:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>growth are you seeing there, because we have spoken recently

1:02:22.000 --> 1:02:24.880
<v Speaker 1>to the CEO and founder of Athletic Brewing who's raised

1:02:25.200 --> 1:02:27.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of venture capital money and sees growth just

1:02:27.400 --> 1:02:31.000
<v Speaker 1>off the charts in about twenty seconds. Yeah, we come.

1:02:31.200 --> 1:02:34.360
<v Speaker 1>We we are still seeing in your three double digit growth,

1:02:34.480 --> 1:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>high double digit growth um and a lot of new

1:02:38.040 --> 1:02:41.400
<v Speaker 1>consumers actually coming into the beer category. And it was

1:02:41.440 --> 1:02:44.120
<v Speaker 1>just fantastic that week that our brewers took twenty years

1:02:44.120 --> 1:02:47.120
<v Speaker 1>to develop what I think is the perfect product, Heineken

1:02:47.200 --> 1:02:49.880
<v Speaker 1>zero zero. Please, if you haven't, try to go out

1:02:49.960 --> 1:02:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and try it. It is phenomenal. That's Maggie Timony, the

1:02:53.040 --> 1:02:55.920
<v Speaker 1>head of Heineken USA. And that wraps up the weekend

1:02:56.040 --> 1:02:58.680
<v Speaker 1>edition of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. Thanks so

1:02:58.760 --> 1:03:01.480
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. I'm Tim Stanovic. Be sure to

1:03:01.480 --> 1:03:03.880
<v Speaker 1>tune into our Bloomberg Business Week Daily show. It airs

1:03:03.880 --> 1:03:05.960
<v Speaker 1>Monday through Friday and starts at two pm Wall Street

1:03:05.960 --> 1:03:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Time on Bloomberg Radio. You can also watch our daily

1:03:08.680 --> 1:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>broadcast on YouTube. Just search Bloomberg Global News. Also check

1:03:13.240 --> 1:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>out our Bloomberg Business Week podcast. You can find it

1:03:15.800 --> 1:03:19.560
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com, Apple, or wherever you get your podcasts.

1:03:19.920 --> 1:03:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Business Week is available on newsstands, now, at bloomberg

1:03:23.000 --> 1:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>dot com and on the Bloomberg Terminal. You can also

1:03:25.640 --> 1:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>see me at Bloomberg. Quick Take available on bloomberg dot com,

1:03:28.880 --> 1:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>slash Qt, and streaming platforms like Roku, Apple TV, Samsung

1:03:33.000 --> 1:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>TV and more. Have a great weekend. This is Bloomberg.