WEBVTT - The Iran war revealed that China has a new oil weapon

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. America's war with Iran

0:00:09.560 --> 0:00:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is now in its fifth month, with only a few

0:00:12.880 --> 0:00:16.799
<v Speaker 1>brief weeks of peace in between. That means the largest

0:00:16.840 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>oil and gas supply shock to the world continues to deepen.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Early on in the war, as you heard on this

0:00:23.320 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>podcast and so many other places, analysts were worried about

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the oil price shooting up to two hundred dollars a barrel,

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:36.040
<v Speaker 1>causing a global recession and stoking panic in the markets.

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:41.519
<v Speaker 1>That didn't happen. The oil price didn't even reach one

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:46.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and thirty dollars a barrel. This is zero. I'm

0:00:46.159 --> 0:00:49.960
<v Speaker 1>Akshadharati this week, Where did the panic go? And what

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 1>happens next? Joining me to discuss the impacts of the

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Iran war on global energy markets is Javier Plus, a

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg opinion columnist covering energy and commodities. He's also a

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.279
<v Speaker 1>co author of the book The World for Sale, Money, Power,

0:01:05.360 --> 0:01:09.039
<v Speaker 1>and the Traders who barter the Earth's resources Have Welcome

0:01:09.040 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>to Zero. Thank you for having me, So let's go

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.040
<v Speaker 1>back in time. On March fifth, barely a week into

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the war, you wrote a column title, this Isn't an

0:01:18.560 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 1>energy crisis, at least not yet. Now, fine, mons On,

0:01:23.040 --> 0:01:26.919
<v Speaker 1>you were right. We haven't quite seen an energy crisis

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of the scale in oil markets as we have seen

0:01:29.959 --> 0:01:33.880
<v Speaker 1>in the past. But for the wrong reasons.

0:01:33.680 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Oh absolutely, for the wrong resource. I'm very happy to

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 2>admit that I was right for the wrong resource, which

0:01:39.600 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 2>effectively means I was wrong. So in some ways I

0:01:44.160 --> 0:01:47.280
<v Speaker 2>got very lucky that these didn't turn out as a

0:01:47.319 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 2>full energy crisis. There were some elements on that column

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:53.640
<v Speaker 2>that I think I was on the money at the world.

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.320
<v Speaker 2>All that elements I wasn't. I think that the biggest

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.600
<v Speaker 2>one that I miss is I thought that the White

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:02.800
<v Speaker 2>House was conscious that this needed to be a quick conflict,

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.960
<v Speaker 2>that they were going to go in and out rather quickly.

0:02:06.040 --> 0:02:09.560
<v Speaker 2>That has proven completely a mistake. What I think I

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 2>got more right was that this was a crisis, that

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:17.799
<v Speaker 2>there was a big deal for the oil market. There

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:22.200
<v Speaker 2>was a significant deal for the LNG market, but doesn't

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 2>mean the gas market. The gas market is a much

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.920
<v Speaker 2>larger piece that the LNG market. And I said that

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:32.639
<v Speaker 2>there was a risk of analyzing the crisis of this

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 2>shock if the global economy was still in nineteen seventy

0:02:36.480 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 2>three seventy four when the first oil crisis hit. And

0:02:39.480 --> 0:02:41.919
<v Speaker 2>I think that the global economy is very different for

0:02:42.200 --> 0:02:44.000
<v Speaker 2>a number of reasons, and we can go into them.

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:48.200
<v Speaker 2>What surprised me, and I think that we had Bloomberg

0:02:48.200 --> 0:02:52.680
<v Speaker 2>opinion work quite quickly to recognize of the importance of it,

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:57.079
<v Speaker 2>was the role of China in this crisis. China pre

0:02:57.200 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 2>war on the sea worn market. This is the rue

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:03.920
<v Speaker 2>oil that this boat by Danker was buying anywhere from

0:03:04.320 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 2>ten to twelve million barros a day depending on the month.

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 2>I would say on average eleven million barrows a day

0:03:11.120 --> 0:03:14.600
<v Speaker 2>in June, China boat less than six million bars a

0:03:14.639 --> 0:03:17.239
<v Speaker 2>days and more than a fifty percent reduction in total

0:03:17.320 --> 0:03:21.200
<v Speaker 2>oil imports from kind of pre war levels or forty

0:03:21.320 --> 0:03:24.400
<v Speaker 2>forty to fifty percent drop. And that really changed the

0:03:24.440 --> 0:03:30.840
<v Speaker 2>market completely because China acted as a balancing mechanism. I

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:34.280
<v Speaker 2>call it the invisible hand of the oil market. It

0:03:34.400 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 2>was very visible and very directed by Beijing. The price

0:03:37.920 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 2>have gone uppen, and certainly it is a bit painful,

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.160
<v Speaker 2>but it has not been a complete flown, blown up

0:03:43.280 --> 0:03:46.240
<v Speaker 2>crisis that people will complain and and looking at the

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:51.200
<v Speaker 2>global economy, nothing suggests we I mean inflation is contained,

0:03:51.280 --> 0:03:55.360
<v Speaker 2>is under three percent. Interest rates have not really gone

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 2>up meaningfully. Yes we are. We look at the bond

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 2>market that you know, the highest number of yeares, but

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:03.640
<v Speaker 2>there are many other reasons for that. The stock market

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:10.240
<v Speaker 2>keeps going up, Unemployment remains low. Nothing really says crisis,

0:04:10.240 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 2>and certainly nothing similar to the crisis of nineteen seventy three,

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:16.599
<v Speaker 2>seventy four or any other oil crisis that we have

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 2>had seence. But yeah, I was right, but only for

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 2>the worn reasons.

0:04:21.000 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>Let's go through the numbers here, because you know, two

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 1>hundred dollars a barrel was floated. Now we're recording this

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.719
<v Speaker 1>on August third, and the price of oil is below

0:04:29.760 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>eighty five dollars a barrel, and you know, Iran and

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the US are apparently talking again. But it did not

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:39.440
<v Speaker 1>even go beyond one hundred and thirty dollars at its

0:04:39.680 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 1>very peak.

0:04:40.240 --> 0:04:40.720
<v Speaker 2>In the war.

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.600
<v Speaker 1>You talked about how China was about five million barrels

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>a day of sort of buffer provided taking, essentially not

0:04:49.400 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 1>taking that supply and allowing the rest of the world

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:55.320
<v Speaker 1>to not panic as much. Another five to seven million

0:04:55.320 --> 0:04:59.080
<v Speaker 1>barrels a day came from oil rerouting that happened where

0:04:59.160 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 1>Saudi's got about five million barrels a day going outside

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:05.880
<v Speaker 1>hormones into the Red Sea, and same thing the UA

0:05:05.920 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>about two million barrels a day. That takes you about

0:05:08.640 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>twelve million barrels a day. There was the release of

0:05:11.920 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 1>the Strategic Petroleum Reserve, which goes between two and three

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.039
<v Speaker 1>million barrels a day. That still leaves two or three

0:05:18.240 --> 0:05:20.440
<v Speaker 1>million barrels a day those.

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:23.840
<v Speaker 2>Comms commercial inventories. We have been draining commercial inventories the

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:27.320
<v Speaker 2>market also at the beginning of the war. Now clearly

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.160
<v Speaker 2>we know that it was over supply, so supply was

0:05:30.200 --> 0:05:32.719
<v Speaker 2>running above demand and the rest of the world has

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.400
<v Speaker 2>not kept juice. A steady oil production in the Americas

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 2>is booming the United States. When you count every barrel

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 2>in the US, and I like to count not usee

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 2>the crude, but also condensates and natural gas liquids because

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 2>we count them from the demand side. When we talk

0:05:47.640 --> 0:05:49.880
<v Speaker 2>about one hundred million bars a day of demand, we

0:05:50.000 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 2>mean all total oil liquids. You count every barrel in

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the US. The US is producing a million barrels a

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.799
<v Speaker 2>day more than a year ago. You look at production

0:05:58.920 --> 0:06:02.320
<v Speaker 2>of Brazil is app twenty percent year on year. Venezuela

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:05.160
<v Speaker 2>is doing more, Argentina is doing a bit more, Colombia

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 2>is doing a bit more. And you know they are incremental.

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 2>I mean, so a lot of these countries are doing

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 2>fifty thousand baros a day more, which is almost a

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:14.880
<v Speaker 2>statistical noise. But you put all of that statistical noise together.

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:19.840
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Americas from the north of Alaska all

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>the way to Tierra del Fuego in Argentina probably is

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 2>producing about two million bars a day more than a

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:28.520
<v Speaker 2>year ago. That's making a difference. I give you an

0:06:28.560 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 2>example a country that has been suffering for a long

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 2>civil war and a lot of unstability. Livia. Livia production

0:06:37.240 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 2>last month. Probably the data is a bit fuzzy, but

0:06:41.400 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 2>Livia most likely produced the most oil last month since

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>the very early days of the revolution in twenty eleven

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:52.880
<v Speaker 2>twenty twelve. A lot of that has helped on the market.

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:55.800
<v Speaker 1>But the big story is the China story, is the

0:06:55.839 --> 0:06:59.000
<v Speaker 1>five million barrels a day story. What do we know

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.479
<v Speaker 1>and what do we not know about how China pulled

0:07:02.520 --> 0:07:02.960
<v Speaker 1>us off?

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:06.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that we know very little. So what we

0:07:06.440 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 2>know is that China has reduced its purchases of seaborne

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 2>crude significantly. That's what we know that China pre war

0:07:14.960 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 2>was buying somewhere around eleven million dollars a day, and

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>that in June it bote less than six. That has

0:07:21.360 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 2>increased a bit to probably six and a half in July,

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.160
<v Speaker 2>but we are still massively down. This is the less

0:07:27.520 --> 0:07:32.280
<v Speaker 2>purchases by China in at least ten years. How China

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:37.360
<v Speaker 2>has done it, that's when it became conjecture at best,

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not going to claim to know how China

0:07:40.000 --> 0:07:42.360
<v Speaker 2>has done it. One of the problems is that China

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:45.440
<v Speaker 2>does not provide data on his inventories. It does not

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.200
<v Speaker 2>provide even an estimate of his demand for oil. Many

0:07:48.280 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 2>other countries provide estimates every month in Europe, every week

0:07:52.880 --> 0:07:56.840
<v Speaker 2>in the United States. China simply does not publish any information.

0:07:56.920 --> 0:08:00.440
<v Speaker 2>So everyone is trying to guess what is happening, and

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 2>we can see things. I mean, clearly, demand has come down.

0:08:05.160 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Clearly the Chinese economy is not enjoying the best of

0:08:08.320 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 2>the days. But to justify a drop of forty percent

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 2>inputs of oil, I don't think so. Probably China is

0:08:16.840 --> 0:08:21.640
<v Speaker 2>releasing sant oil from strategic inventories or commercial inventories. It

0:08:21.640 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 2>seems that son oil has been released, but not a

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:27.720
<v Speaker 2>significant lot. There are a number of elements. Probably China

0:08:27.760 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 2>have a lot of stock piles of refined products and

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 2>they've been running that down. They probably have a lot

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 2>of stockpile on plastics or plastic commodities they may have

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 2>been running down. China is unique in the rest of

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.559
<v Speaker 2>the world that has a big chemical industry that you

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:48.520
<v Speaker 2>coal rather an oil or gas as a fed stock.

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Probably they're running that harder. But is that much capacity

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:56.120
<v Speaker 2>to completely explain everything. I think they may explain a

0:08:56.160 --> 0:08:58.560
<v Speaker 2>portion of it, but not the whole thing. So those

0:08:58.600 --> 0:09:01.600
<v Speaker 2>are elements that may play role, but we don't really know.

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>In one of your columns, you estimated back of the

0:09:04.320 --> 0:09:07.320
<v Speaker 1>envelope that if China did drain some of its reserves,

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 1>it's about one hundred million barrels, So you know, that's

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:11.800
<v Speaker 1>less than a million barrels a day in the last

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:15.360
<v Speaker 1>five months. Some analysts like Rory Johnston talks about four

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:20.839
<v Speaker 1>hundred million barrels that China may have contributed, including commercial inventories, and.

0:09:20.840 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 2>I like the range is huge. The range is huge,

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 2>and one of the problems is. I'm not going to dispute.

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.719
<v Speaker 2>I have told to Rory about that. You know, he

0:09:30.120 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>probably is right. We simply don't know, and we are

0:09:33.320 --> 0:09:36.960
<v Speaker 2>relying on on a lot of these estimates are based

0:09:37.000 --> 0:09:41.120
<v Speaker 2>on satellite data that rely on or measuring the shadow

0:09:41.160 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 2>of tanks, etcetera, etcetera. So you know, the margin of

0:09:44.280 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 2>error is significant. It's also clear that the Chinese economy

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 2>is very different than the Chinese economy of ten years ago.

0:09:50.720 --> 0:09:54.079
<v Speaker 2>There are a significant number of evs and significant number

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:57.440
<v Speaker 2>of electric tracks, et cetera, et cetera, gas tracks, so

0:09:57.559 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>all of that may have played a role. But the

0:10:00.160 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 2>that the energy transition has helped China. But if China

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 2>was able to reduce demands so much because they can't

0:10:05.320 --> 0:10:07.120
<v Speaker 2>run on ebs, what it was not doing it in

0:10:07.200 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 2>January rather than now. So I think that has also

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:10.080
<v Speaker 2>played a role.

0:10:10.160 --> 0:10:13.959
<v Speaker 1>Staying with conjecture, why do you think China did it?

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 2>I think that China has done it, first of all,

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:20.240
<v Speaker 2>because it has no interest whatsoever on very high prices.

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:22.400
<v Speaker 2>At the end of the day, China is the world's

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 2>largest oil important so it's going to be affected. I

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 2>don't think that China has an interest on an economic

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.800
<v Speaker 2>crisis in the Southeast Asia where it depends a lot

0:10:32.120 --> 0:10:35.200
<v Speaker 2>on the well being of those countries for his own

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 2>well being. I mean, I don't think that this is

0:10:36.960 --> 0:10:41.720
<v Speaker 2>China being particularly generous, is helping others to help itself

0:10:42.120 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 2>just generally. I think that China wants a healthy global economy.

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 2>But then a lot of this happened at the same

0:10:49.880 --> 0:10:53.400
<v Speaker 2>time that China and the United States were having a

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 2>strategic dialogue. So is there anything under the table that

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the Why has said, you help me here, I will

0:11:03.120 --> 0:11:07.320
<v Speaker 2>go easier on trade on Taiwan? We simply don't know.

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, to pretend that the oil import level of

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:17.000
<v Speaker 2>China has not been part of the Washington Beijing conversation,

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.640
<v Speaker 2>I think it will be naive. But is that the key?

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 2>Simply we don't know.

0:11:22.480 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>It is very interesting. I mean, this White House has

0:11:24.679 --> 0:11:26.959
<v Speaker 1>not been as leaky as the first Trump White House,

0:11:27.480 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>but we do get pretty good reporting coming out of

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the White House. So the fact that we've not heard

0:11:32.000 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>anything on oil price conversations with China is interesting. But

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>there is an aspect of this which to me is

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.360
<v Speaker 1>still confusing, which is that if we are running down

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 1>reserves and in places like the US, for example, reserves

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:50.600
<v Speaker 1>are not their lowest level since the early eighties. Yes,

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>the panic hasn't shown up yet, but how long do

0:11:53.920 --> 0:11:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you think this war can continue before that panic does happen?

0:11:59.040 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, very much the and so for how long China

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 2>can sustain this very low level of demand into the

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:09.480
<v Speaker 2>international market. It also very much depends of and that

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:11.360
<v Speaker 2>is also a big question of what we are not

0:12:11.440 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 2>a two hundred and we are at below eighty five today,

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.240
<v Speaker 2>and it is that the straight of hormones is close,

0:12:18.840 --> 0:12:22.000
<v Speaker 2>but an awful amount of oil is leaking every day

0:12:22.040 --> 0:12:25.479
<v Speaker 2>through the Strada hormos what we call the dark shuttles.

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.959
<v Speaker 2>These are oil tankers that they go dark. By that

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 2>we mean that they are not advertising where they are located.

0:12:32.800 --> 0:12:36.679
<v Speaker 2>By international agreement, every big oil tanker has to have

0:12:36.840 --> 0:12:40.920
<v Speaker 2>effectively a GPS broadcast into the wall. Here I am,

0:12:41.040 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 2>and this is my position, this is my speed, and

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 2>this is my draft and my name.

0:12:46.120 --> 0:12:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Don't come and crash into me.

0:12:47.320 --> 0:12:50.199
<v Speaker 2>Please don't crash with me. Please. I carry two million

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 2>bowels of oil, So that would be a very bad idea.

0:12:53.400 --> 0:12:56.920
<v Speaker 2>Those those transponders that they are called the I system

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 2>can be disconnected and they have disconnected. So tankers go

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 2>dark and they shuttle between the terminals inside the Persian

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:08.439
<v Speaker 2>Golf and the Gulf of Man where they run the

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:11.640
<v Speaker 2>boot with another oil tanker. They get alongside, and we

0:13:11.720 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 2>call that a ship to ship transfer, and they move

0:13:14.320 --> 0:13:16.400
<v Speaker 2>the oil from one to the other, and then one

0:13:16.440 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 2>tanker goes back to the Persian Golf to pick up

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 2>another cargo, very dangerous. Some sailors have died because of

0:13:23.080 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 2>that attacks and the other tanker goes into the high

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>seas to the destination we reckon that anywhere from three

0:13:30.960 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 2>to five million barrows a day of crude keeps flowing

0:13:34.160 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 2>on these dark transits, and that has been important. So

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:41.440
<v Speaker 2>if the dark transits continue, if China keeps a lead

0:13:41.520 --> 0:13:44.880
<v Speaker 2>on his purchases, we can carry on for a while

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:48.600
<v Speaker 2>before we exhaust our researchs. And have a column recently

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.680
<v Speaker 2>mentioning that there is no doubt that the reserves are down,

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 2>both strategic and commercial, but they are not completely out.

0:13:57.000 --> 0:14:00.320
<v Speaker 2>Strategic reserves. China has at least a billion barrels. The

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:05.959
<v Speaker 2>International Energy Agency member countries have probably a billion barrels

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:09.000
<v Speaker 2>left on the reserve. Japan and South Korea are sitting

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.520
<v Speaker 2>on a significant amount of crude oil the US is low.

0:14:12.840 --> 0:14:16.120
<v Speaker 2>But in some ways there is a lot of emphasis

0:14:16.120 --> 0:14:18.880
<v Speaker 2>on the fact that the Strategic Petroleum Reserve of the

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 2>US is at his lowest since nineteen eighty three. But

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 2>we knew this the day that the SPR release was announced,

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>because we can do the match. We knew what starting

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 2>point the reserve was, and the US promised to release

0:14:33.760 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and seventy two million barrels, so we knew

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 2>that by the end of that period we were going

0:14:38.360 --> 0:14:41.320
<v Speaker 2>to be this low. That's no commun as a surprise.

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 2>A lot of people are making what I would call

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:50.960
<v Speaker 2>exaggerated claims about what comes next, But I also think

0:14:51.000 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 2>that I would emphasize the SPR was designed to be

0:14:56.160 --> 0:14:57.359
<v Speaker 2>used in a moment.

0:14:57.120 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>Of crisis exactly, and it's been used, and.

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 2>It's been used. We may have our own political views

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 2>about whether these wars should have been started or not,

0:15:06.600 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 2>but we are in the situation that we are, and

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 2>the war is ongoing, and there is a supply shock,

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and the playbook to react to our supply shock is

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:16.080
<v Speaker 2>to use the SPR.

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, you talked about the fact that maybe Iran

0:15:19.640 --> 0:15:22.400
<v Speaker 1>overplaced its hand by trying to keep the Street closed

0:15:22.400 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 1>for a longer time. But if it does that, you

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:27.680
<v Speaker 1>know there are the reason which the oil can get out.

0:15:28.320 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>More pipelines are already being announced. We did see though,

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:34.880
<v Speaker 1>after the twenty twenty two energy crisis, which you know

0:15:34.920 --> 0:15:37.760
<v Speaker 1>in your own words was a full blown energy crisis

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:40.840
<v Speaker 1>because the price of oil, gas, coal and electricity all

0:15:40.880 --> 0:15:42.080
<v Speaker 1>went up simultaneously.

0:15:42.080 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Sorry I'm interrupting that, but we in some ways we

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 2>have forgotten how bad it was. I mean, around this

0:15:49.320 --> 0:15:53.200
<v Speaker 2>time in twenty twenty two, the price of electricity on

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:55.760
<v Speaker 2>the spot market in Europe was close to one thousand

0:15:56.120 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 2>euros per mecab at hours around one hundred today. Twenty

0:16:00.880 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 2>twenty two, particularly on the electricity market, was so extreme,

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 2>so painful, that only effectively European governments bailing out businesses

0:16:10.960 --> 0:16:14.120
<v Speaker 2>and families. We went through it, and then I will

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 2>say we got quite lucky. But yes, I agree with you.

0:16:17.880 --> 0:16:19.720
<v Speaker 2>Twenty twenty two was very different.

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And we saw a reaction from importing nations. At the time,

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Europe was the worst it and so Europe's

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.480
<v Speaker 1>reaction mattered a lot. From twenty twenty two. It did

0:16:27.520 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>all the things right, It doubled down on renewables. It

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>tried to electrify as much as possible. It got energy

0:16:33.000 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 1>from wherever it could get lerng, it tried to get

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 1>its cold supply chain sorted out. It did lots and

0:16:37.920 --> 0:16:41.440
<v Speaker 1>lots of things. But Europe has money and they could

0:16:41.520 --> 0:16:45.000
<v Speaker 1>react in a way that allowed them to address these

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>critical supply shocks this time around. A lot of developing

0:16:49.160 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>countries have been hit by that supply shock. And what

0:16:52.760 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 1>have we seen in the last five months. We've seen

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.360
<v Speaker 1>record in imports of solar panels and electric cars and batteries,

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>all coming from China. So maybe China didn't plan for this,

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 1>but China is certainly benefiting from developing countries choosing to

0:17:07.480 --> 0:17:11.159
<v Speaker 1>get more and more of these clean energy resources. Do

0:17:11.240 --> 0:17:16.920
<v Speaker 1>you think countries become especially important countries become wary of

0:17:16.960 --> 0:17:19.399
<v Speaker 1>this reliance that they have on fossil fuels as a

0:17:19.400 --> 0:17:22.480
<v Speaker 1>result of these two crises that have happened in this decade,

0:17:22.800 --> 0:17:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and try and find faster ways to transition.

0:17:26.240 --> 0:17:28.240
<v Speaker 2>I think that what we are going to see is

0:17:28.280 --> 0:17:32.480
<v Speaker 2>that countries are going to get wary of importing energy. Certainly,

0:17:32.600 --> 0:17:36.280
<v Speaker 2>fossil fuel energy in many places is important, So I

0:17:36.280 --> 0:17:39.159
<v Speaker 2>think that some fossil fuels are going to suffer. I

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:44.439
<v Speaker 2>really struggle to see a number of countries trust in

0:17:44.480 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 2>the LERG market going forward, because they have been hit

0:17:48.119 --> 0:17:51.000
<v Speaker 2>twice in four and a half years, and I think

0:17:51.040 --> 0:17:53.520
<v Speaker 2>that they will say, well, that was more than enough.

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.040
<v Speaker 2>But just generally, I think that there's going to be

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:59.919
<v Speaker 2>a tendency to try to be as self reliant as

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 2>possible on energy that could mean, and obviously that self

0:18:05.000 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 2>reliance is very different on fossil fuels, which is a flow.

0:18:08.800 --> 0:18:11.880
<v Speaker 2>You need to buy those molecules time after time after

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:14.960
<v Speaker 2>time that relying on say solar panels, which you may

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:17.560
<v Speaker 2>need to impose from China, but you buy them once

0:18:17.600 --> 0:18:19.399
<v Speaker 2>and they run for the next twenty years or twenty

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:22.920
<v Speaker 2>five years. The same thing with probably batteries, wind power,

0:18:23.000 --> 0:18:27.200
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, et cetera, so many countries. I'm not saying that,

0:18:27.359 --> 0:18:30.240
<v Speaker 2>you know, perhaps relying only on a source of solar

0:18:30.280 --> 0:18:34.760
<v Speaker 2>panels like China, that also brings some challenges. But green

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 2>energy is very different to fossil fuels in the sense

0:18:37.600 --> 0:18:39.399
<v Speaker 2>that one is a flow and the other one is

0:18:39.400 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 2>a stock. So I think that's important. What I think

0:18:42.160 --> 0:18:44.520
<v Speaker 2>we're going to see is trying to what I have

0:18:44.680 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 2>called and other people have been calling the rise of

0:18:47.040 --> 0:18:51.840
<v Speaker 2>domestic energy. So if a country has access to domestic energy,

0:18:51.840 --> 0:18:54.720
<v Speaker 2>they're going to try to maximize that energy. That the

0:18:55.520 --> 0:18:58.080
<v Speaker 2>solution is going to be different for different countries. So

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:01.639
<v Speaker 2>for some countries it's going to be they have solar,

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 2>let's try to do as many solar panels. Yes, we

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:05.679
<v Speaker 2>need to import them from China, but then once we

0:19:05.760 --> 0:19:09.080
<v Speaker 2>have imported, they produce electricity for twenty years, so that's good.

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 2>It maybe call a maybe domestic oil and gas production.

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 2>I mean has one other aspect that we have not

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:19.200
<v Speaker 2>mentioned on China. Chinese gas production is an all time

0:19:19.320 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 2>high oil production that deep about ten years ago has

0:19:23.840 --> 0:19:28.720
<v Speaker 2>returned and China is producing about five to six hundred

0:19:28.760 --> 0:19:30.840
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars a day more than it was used producing

0:19:30.840 --> 0:19:33.440
<v Speaker 2>a number of years ago, and that about six years ago,

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.080
<v Speaker 2>so that's also important. So I do think that we

0:19:36.119 --> 0:19:40.679
<v Speaker 2>are going to see a movement to support sources of

0:19:41.040 --> 0:19:44.960
<v Speaker 2>energy that one can produce either at home or perhaps

0:19:45.080 --> 0:19:50.000
<v Speaker 2>regionally in countries that you have close political and economic relationships.

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:54.240
<v Speaker 2>But generally I think that the one that loses power

0:19:54.359 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 2>here it's going to be oil and internationally trade gas

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 2>by dunker After.

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:07.280
<v Speaker 1>The break, how will the strait of horror moves closure

0:20:07.320 --> 0:20:11.080
<v Speaker 1>affect global food prices. If you're enjoying this episode of Zero,

0:20:11.160 --> 0:20:13.000
<v Speaker 1>please take a moment to rate and review the show

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 1>on whichever platform you're listening on. Recently, listener MPL twelve

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.000
<v Speaker 1>nine wrote the interview with Gerald Butts of Eurasia Group

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>was a cracking episode of a consistently excellent show. Thanks

0:20:24.960 --> 0:20:39.879
<v Speaker 1>MPL twelve nine. You have seen many energy crises in

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:43.360
<v Speaker 1>your time covering energy energy crises. Some of them can

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:47.680
<v Speaker 1>have many long term impacts, but one other aspect of

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:50.639
<v Speaker 1>the energy markets is the forecasting, and the forecasting can

0:20:50.680 --> 0:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>be fun but also can come to bite you. So

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>I was writing a story about the fact that this

0:20:57.200 --> 0:21:00.919
<v Speaker 1>year will reach three terror Warts of Soul, and no

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>one really noticed because you know, it's another terror award.

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 1>We just had another Terrra award two years ago, so okay.

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 1>But when the first Terrawart was installed in twenty twenty two,

0:21:11.720 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>we had a BLOUE mcginney I put out in an analysis

0:21:14.520 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and at that time they were expecting solar to reach

0:21:18.560 --> 0:21:23.960
<v Speaker 1>nine terror awarts after twenty fifty. Today they're expecting that

0:21:24.040 --> 0:21:27.399
<v Speaker 1>to reach in twenty thirty six. So clearly solar has

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>been like a very surprise story, even for the most

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:34.520
<v Speaker 1>bullish people. But from your perspective, beyond solar, what has

0:21:34.600 --> 0:21:36.880
<v Speaker 1>surprised you about the energy transition?

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:39.040
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the one that you know that I have

0:21:39.119 --> 0:21:42.680
<v Speaker 2>been writing in Qualott is the resilience of coal. Call

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:46.080
<v Speaker 2>is the source of energy that refuses to go away.

0:21:46.520 --> 0:21:49.359
<v Speaker 2>The fact that probably in twenty twenty six we are

0:21:49.359 --> 0:21:52.359
<v Speaker 2>going to see record the amount for call. Yes, for sure,

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>as a share of global energy that shared is going down.

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.240
<v Speaker 2>But what we care for the planet is the amount

0:21:58.240 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 2>of tones that we are consuming and therefore burning, and

0:22:02.160 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 2>the amount of CO two that we are releasing. That

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.480
<v Speaker 2>keeps surprising me because for the last ten years we

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 2>have been talking about when coal is gonna pick, and

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 2>every year keeps going up. And I was just looking

0:22:14.880 --> 0:22:16.680
<v Speaker 2>and you know, this is a snapshot, and I think

0:22:16.680 --> 0:22:19.520
<v Speaker 2>that you know, I'm very happy to raise my hand

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 2>and say that I have been the first one who

0:22:21.920 --> 0:22:25.720
<v Speaker 2>has underestimated solar. I mean, solar has been and it

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:31.560
<v Speaker 2>is the fastest growing source of electricity worldwide and is

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:36.360
<v Speaker 2>doing rather well. But if you look for example, as

0:22:36.359 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 2>at of the analysis of the International Agency did on

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:43.119
<v Speaker 2>electricity markets two years ago, and it was just looking

0:22:43.200 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 2>at what at the end of twenty twenty four, what

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 2>the world looks like in twenty twenty six. They underestimated

0:22:50.440 --> 0:22:54.640
<v Speaker 2>the amount of coal and overestimated renewables. In part that's

0:22:54.680 --> 0:22:57.760
<v Speaker 2>because we have had a bad period of wind generation.

0:22:58.359 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 2>We have had low win speeds in a number of

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 2>markets and that has had an impact. But that is

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 2>interesting and obviously coal will not be doing as well

0:23:07.840 --> 0:23:10.520
<v Speaker 2>as he's doing this year. Have the work have not

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:14.159
<v Speaker 2>not not started? To me? That is one area that

0:23:14.320 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 2>is surprising. The other area is how well a number

0:23:19.800 --> 0:23:24.800
<v Speaker 2>of developing countries are adapting to solar. Pakistan has been

0:23:25.840 --> 0:23:29.080
<v Speaker 2>a poster poster child of that. Therefore, and in some

0:23:29.200 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 2>ways because solar in some markets in Europe, degrees are

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.440
<v Speaker 2>struggling to adapt with that. We don't have enough battery,

0:23:38.800 --> 0:23:42.040
<v Speaker 2>the connections are not good enough. Voltage control can be

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.320
<v Speaker 2>a challenge with some you know of the earlier technologies

0:23:46.400 --> 0:23:50.159
<v Speaker 2>with solar, and and obviously solar rams up very very

0:23:50.240 --> 0:23:52.399
<v Speaker 2>quickly in the morning and then you know pigs and

0:23:52.440 --> 0:23:55.439
<v Speaker 2>then you know there has a big cleaflike drop in

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:57.800
<v Speaker 2>the evening at times when also the demand is going up.

0:23:57.840 --> 0:24:00.280
<v Speaker 2>So it's very difficult to accommodate that from a great

0:24:00.359 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 2>perspective when you have a nice young white or a

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 2>big real young greed like in the US. But in

0:24:06.320 --> 0:24:10.119
<v Speaker 2>some developing countries it's just basically families putting a few

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.879
<v Speaker 2>solar panels in the roof and when they have power,

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 2>they have power. When there is no power in the

0:24:14.600 --> 0:24:17.119
<v Speaker 2>evening where they don't have power, but it's working, it

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.239
<v Speaker 2>provides enough energy through a number of hours. And there

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 2>are a number of developing countries saying, well, yes, I

0:24:23.119 --> 0:24:26.200
<v Speaker 2>mean solar has difficulties, particularly we don't have enough batteries,

0:24:26.200 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 2>but it does seventy five percent of what we need.

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:34.360
<v Speaker 2>We don't need ninety nine point ninety ninety nine perfection.

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Seventy five percent is good for us. And that has

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:42.040
<v Speaker 2>been also a very interesting kind of lesson that at

0:24:42.080 --> 0:24:46.639
<v Speaker 2>times we do not need to engineer or price for perfection.

0:24:46.880 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 2>That they are a number of developing countries that that's

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.119
<v Speaker 2>seventy five percent is good for them. Yeah.

0:24:52.359 --> 0:24:54.600
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing I think, you know, maybe five

0:24:54.680 --> 0:24:57.080
<v Speaker 1>or ten years from now, the thing we'll talk about

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:01.480
<v Speaker 1>where maybe our forecasts were less optimistic than they could

0:25:01.480 --> 0:25:05.240
<v Speaker 1>have been. Is batteries. So if you take there's a

0:25:05.600 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>lovely chart of all technologies that once they reach ten

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.400
<v Speaker 1>terrawot hours of production, and how quickly did they get

0:25:12.440 --> 0:25:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to five hundred tarot hours? And so nuclear, gas, oil

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:20.280
<v Speaker 1>like they all like follow pretty similar trajectory. And then

0:25:20.480 --> 0:25:23.239
<v Speaker 1>wind also actually follows a very similar trajectory. But then

0:25:23.280 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 1>solar breaks out and really speeds up much faster than

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:29.439
<v Speaker 1>anything else. And now we're already seeing early signs of

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:34.280
<v Speaker 1>batteries being even faster. Because batteries are not producing energy,

0:25:34.440 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 1>they can absorb any form of electricity from the grid,

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.120
<v Speaker 1>and so that allows them to be just much more

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:41.520
<v Speaker 1>flexible in doing what we do.

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 2>The batteries will change, and they are changing already degrees.

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.640
<v Speaker 2>But I mean just generally technology. I mean, it is

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 2>an important lesson that energy is about engineering and every

0:25:52.160 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 2>time we develop, I mean in so many ways. And

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 2>this is also why they shock twenty six is different

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 2>to previous shocks in oil. We have shades, which you know,

0:26:07.040 --> 0:26:10.399
<v Speaker 2>I mean you have told me when I started covering

0:26:10.400 --> 0:26:16.600
<v Speaker 2>the market twenty five plus years ago that the second

0:26:16.720 --> 0:26:21.280
<v Speaker 2>largest provider supplier of oil to Japan in any given

0:26:21.359 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 2>month was going to be the United States. And I

0:26:25.560 --> 0:26:30.640
<v Speaker 2>would have said that you have completely lost it, because

0:26:31.080 --> 0:26:35.400
<v Speaker 2>at that point twenty five years ago that sounded completely impossible.

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the US was the largest oil important, his

0:26:38.080 --> 0:26:43.679
<v Speaker 2>production was declining, and however, in June, Japan imported a

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 2>third of his oil from the United States. And that

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 2>is all into the engineering progress that it has been

0:26:50.359 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 2>made to develop shale. So can we have another crisis

0:26:54.600 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 2>ten fifteen years ago that it will be very different

0:26:57.080 --> 0:27:00.320
<v Speaker 2>because we have electri five even faster than we thought.

0:27:00.880 --> 0:27:04.520
<v Speaker 2>Batteries are playing a huge role just because engineers have

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:09.200
<v Speaker 2>achieved new breakthroughs. I think that that's absolutely possible. And

0:27:09.720 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 2>one thing that I have learned the hard way, and

0:27:13.000 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 2>I have got many times rang is do not bet

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 2>against an engineering You provide enough time and enough money

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 2>to solve a problem, because they will solve it. And

0:27:23.600 --> 0:27:28.199
<v Speaker 2>every energy crisis or energy shock creates a problem and

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:34.120
<v Speaker 2>an incentive for engineers to find effective, cheap ways to

0:27:34.200 --> 0:27:35.320
<v Speaker 2>solve that problem.

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Now, you also think a lot about geopolitics because energy

0:27:38.480 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and geopolitics are so interlinked. All the time we've seen

0:27:42.440 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>in China with this ability to be flexible on its

0:27:45.640 --> 0:27:49.160
<v Speaker 1>oil imports, as you put it, a new oil price

0:27:49.280 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>weapon from China. But China also has all these electricity

0:27:53.680 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>technologies that it's developing for itself and of course for exporting.

0:27:58.000 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of the conversation around the fact

0:28:01.240 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>that the US, with its ability to extract oil and

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 1>gas as efficiently and at the scale that it does,

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>is more and more a petro state, not in the

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:12.840
<v Speaker 1>classic sense of an economic petro state, but as a

0:28:12.960 --> 0:28:17.200
<v Speaker 1>power and China, with its ability to be a flexible

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:21.120
<v Speaker 1>consumer of energy because of its electricity and an exporter

0:28:21.240 --> 0:28:24.480
<v Speaker 1>of electricity technology, is an electro state. Do you think

0:28:24.720 --> 0:28:27.800
<v Speaker 1>this is a new dimension to geopolitics or it's just

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, overblown.

0:28:29.320 --> 0:28:32.600
<v Speaker 2>No, I think that we have a new dimension of politics.

0:28:32.640 --> 0:28:34.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the fact that the US is producing more

0:28:34.480 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 2>than twenty million hours a day of oil has changed

0:28:37.160 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 2>completely the equation of the oil market. The fact that

0:28:40.000 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 2>China seems to be but we don't really understand the mechanics,

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>but seems to be able to swen his oil demand

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:50.360
<v Speaker 2>has created what I have called a swing consumer, similar

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 2>to the way that we used to call Saudi Arabia

0:28:52.920 --> 0:28:55.479
<v Speaker 2>the swing producer. Because his ability to respond to our

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 2>crisis increasing production. I really like it. A comment by

0:29:00.160 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 2>Jason Bordov at A Columbia A guess of you on

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.480
<v Speaker 2>previous podcasts. He used to work at the White House

0:29:06.520 --> 0:29:10.200
<v Speaker 2>and there the Obama administration, and Jason said that, and

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:13.040
<v Speaker 2>probably he knows that first hand because he was in government,

0:29:13.080 --> 0:29:16.120
<v Speaker 2>that the first goal by a US president when there

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 2>was an oil problem was to Saudi Arabia to react.

0:29:19.120 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 2>And so maybe in the future the first goal is

0:29:21.040 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 2>to Beijing to ask them to reduce imports so they

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 2>can balance the market. It's very interesting. It will be

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 2>interesting what happened with politics in the US. We have

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 2>a new administration coming in about three years will be

0:29:35.360 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 2>more friendly to reality, which is that you know, solar

0:29:39.760 --> 0:29:42.280
<v Speaker 2>and guin are developing the batteries because you look at

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:45.600
<v Speaker 2>you look at Texas. Texas is a superpower on oil

0:29:45.640 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 2>and guys, but it's also becoming a real player in

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:52.520
<v Speaker 2>solar and particularly in battery and flexibility on the greed.

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 2>So that's where I am still a bit of an

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 2>optimist about the US because the engineering capability of that

0:29:59.280 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 2>country and the capitalist system. At the end of the day,

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 2>the batteries in the US are being deployed because they

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:08.280
<v Speaker 2>make commercial sense. There is no much of subsidies here

0:30:08.440 --> 0:30:11.719
<v Speaker 2>is just the power of row money and money is

0:30:11.800 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 2>speaking and it says to invest us that this is

0:30:14.840 --> 0:30:17.520
<v Speaker 2>a technology that you are going to make money. The

0:30:17.600 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 2>investment is going to continue, and the engineering effort is

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:23.680
<v Speaker 2>going to continue, no matter what the White House is saying.

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:31.080
<v Speaker 2>But my only query with electro state on China is,

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:33.719
<v Speaker 2>and I know that you're not making that argument, but

0:30:34.000 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 2>for some people, electro state means clean, and China still

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 2>produce half of his electricity from coal consumes you put,

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:45.280
<v Speaker 2>I think that the wall is about one hundred and

0:30:45.400 --> 0:30:48.840
<v Speaker 2>ninety four countries, and China consumes as much coal as

0:30:48.880 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 2>one hundred and ninety three of those countries together. So yes,

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:56.080
<v Speaker 2>it is an electro state. The amount of electrification of

0:30:56.160 --> 0:30:59.920
<v Speaker 2>his energy system is amazing, but a lot of that

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the electricity is coming from the own source.

0:31:02.920 --> 0:31:05.800
<v Speaker 1>You're getting these very interesting examples coming up, and the

0:31:05.880 --> 0:31:08.760
<v Speaker 1>energy transition is just a fun bit to follow. But

0:31:09.040 --> 0:31:12.120
<v Speaker 1>you also cover other commodities, and while you're here, I

0:31:12.160 --> 0:31:16.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like I need to ask you about, you know, fertilizer,

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.239
<v Speaker 1>which is also a commodity that used to come out

0:31:19.240 --> 0:31:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of the state of hormones in significant quantities go to

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>developing countries. Was something that developing countries were really freaked

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:30.080
<v Speaker 1>out about, especially growing into the growing season in the summer.

0:31:30.680 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Now you look at wheat market, or rice market, or

0:31:35.240 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>soft commodity markets and a similar story is playing out.

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:40.000
<v Speaker 1>It's not panic.

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:44.160
<v Speaker 2>Why well, first of all, because there is a lot

0:31:44.200 --> 0:31:49.320
<v Speaker 2>of domestic production. The global international market place a significant

0:31:49.320 --> 0:31:53.720
<v Speaker 2>but not majoritary role on the fertilizer market. Prices went

0:31:53.760 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 2>to a point where every fertilizer plan outside the strait

0:31:56.920 --> 0:32:00.480
<v Speaker 2>of hormos went into max production, and that really have

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 2>a big, big impact. We have some surpluses. China produce

0:32:07.240 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 2>about eighty percent of his nitrogen fertilizer from corn rather

0:32:11.040 --> 0:32:15.920
<v Speaker 2>than from natural gas, so China was insulated and thankfully

0:32:16.120 --> 0:32:20.080
<v Speaker 2>the starting point from a number of crops like wheat, corn, soybean,

0:32:20.400 --> 0:32:25.720
<v Speaker 2>rice was of several years of surpluses inventories. Global stocks

0:32:25.720 --> 0:32:29.080
<v Speaker 2>of those communities were high, and therefore there was not

0:32:29.920 --> 0:32:33.320
<v Speaker 2>an impact as we will have expected. The other reason

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 2>is that a lot of people were trying to draw

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 2>a parallel line in between the twenty twenty two invasion

0:32:39.760 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 2>of Ukraine by Russia. And now the war between the

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:48.200
<v Speaker 2>US and Israel and Iran in twenty twenty six. Forgetting that.

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:50.400
<v Speaker 2>The big impact of twenty twenty two was the fact

0:32:50.440 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 2>that the two countries at war, the country that was

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 2>launching the world and the country was invaded. Those are

0:32:56.440 --> 0:32:59.040
<v Speaker 2>two what we call bread basket countries. They are huge

0:32:59.080 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 2>producers of agri cultural commodity. Is the case of the

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 2>Middle East, there is no production of agricultural commodity is Indeed,

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:11.160
<v Speaker 2>one of the jokes of the commodity market is that

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 2>Middle East countries produce hydro carbons to import carbohydrates. So

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 2>that the world has not had an impact of reducing

0:33:20.280 --> 0:33:23.960
<v Speaker 2>the supply of wheat of cone to the market. We're

0:33:24.000 --> 0:33:26.600
<v Speaker 2>not out of the boots because we have an anno.

0:33:27.160 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 2>And whether the impact is uneven and some countries receive

0:33:31.680 --> 0:33:35.320
<v Speaker 2>more rains and perhaps they can have more production, others

0:33:35.360 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 2>are going to have a deficit. And not every al

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Ninia phenomenon have played exactly the same way, but an

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 2>al Nino weather phenomenon alongside climate change, and you know

0:33:47.040 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 2>it is very hot this year, particularly in northwest Europe,

0:33:51.200 --> 0:33:54.000
<v Speaker 2>that can be difficult and we can lose crops, and

0:33:54.000 --> 0:33:57.239
<v Speaker 2>I have seen crops can get lost very quickly. We

0:33:57.240 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 2>can lose twenty five percent of production in a matter

0:33:59.560 --> 0:34:03.080
<v Speaker 2>of a few weeks. So far, so good. We have

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 2>not had any significant losses. Most of the harvest in

0:34:06.800 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Europe is already done. A lot of the harvest in

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 2>the United States and Canada has been done. Same thing

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 2>in Russia. But you know, this is perhaps a compounding impact.

0:34:16.480 --> 0:34:20.839
<v Speaker 2>We have high fertilizer prices, we have high diesel prices,

0:34:21.120 --> 0:34:25.240
<v Speaker 2>and we have unstable weather that they could have an impact.

0:34:25.280 --> 0:34:29.799
<v Speaker 2>So in the case of food, I will say, perhaps

0:34:29.840 --> 0:34:32.680
<v Speaker 2>the war is not the most important thing, but I

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 2>will keep a watch on a Nino and what is

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:39.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be the situation in early twenty twenty seven.

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:41.880
<v Speaker 2>An area on food commodities that we are having a

0:34:42.000 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 2>huge impact is going to be in an aquaculture. And

0:34:46.000 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 2>an interesting fact, the world consumes today more fish and

0:34:49.800 --> 0:34:55.680
<v Speaker 2>seafood from aquaculture that from the high seas for wild catches.

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 2>For aquaculture, fish meal is scret and that's effectively a

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:06.400
<v Speaker 2>small fishes like anchovies that we capture dry mail and

0:35:06.440 --> 0:35:11.280
<v Speaker 2>produce the fed stock to do salmon, shrims, et cetera,

0:35:11.360 --> 0:35:14.959
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. The price of fish meal has gone absolutely

0:35:15.000 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 2>through the roof. There is a huge job in anchovy

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.799
<v Speaker 2>captures in Peru, which I call the Saudi Arabia of anchovies,

0:35:22.280 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 2>and that is going to have an impact. So you

0:35:24.840 --> 0:35:28.760
<v Speaker 2>fancy salmon of s rims. I have bad news because

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:31.040
<v Speaker 2>in six to nine months from now, we're going to

0:35:31.040 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 2>see an impact. Also, you take Omega three dieted supplement

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 2>as I do, because I'm reaching the age where I

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:42.840
<v Speaker 2>need every supplement. Uh, then you are going to find

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:44.640
<v Speaker 2>that the price of YOUU Omega three is going to

0:35:44.680 --> 0:35:45.600
<v Speaker 2>go up quite a lot.

0:35:45.760 --> 0:35:48.040
<v Speaker 1>And on the theme of sort of choke points that

0:35:48.120 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>are not war related but are showing up, you wrote

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:54.719
<v Speaker 1>about the state of the River Rhine, which you know

0:35:54.840 --> 0:35:58.440
<v Speaker 1>acts as a conveyor belt for so many commodities chemicals, oil,

0:35:58.760 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 1>steel and of course to take coal into power plants

0:36:01.960 --> 0:36:05.280
<v Speaker 1>in Germany. You know, companies like BASF are hugely affected

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:08.920
<v Speaker 1>when the Rhine is affected, and currently rhine is at

0:36:08.920 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>a record low. There was a recent study from the

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.239
<v Speaker 1>researchers at the World Where the Attribution Group that concluded

0:36:15.280 --> 0:36:18.719
<v Speaker 1>that the severity of the drought in the region was

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:22.080
<v Speaker 1>worsened by climate change. Do you think you know we're

0:36:22.120 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 1>in this era where ESG is not the hot topic.

0:36:25.760 --> 0:36:28.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, net zero is a political football. But do

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you think from a pure capitalism commercial point of view

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:36.680
<v Speaker 1>that corporations need to think are they underestimating the risks

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:38.399
<v Speaker 1>of climate change to their supply chain.

0:36:38.960 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 2>I think that in the case of the Rhine, you

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.120
<v Speaker 2>see a huge attempt to adapt. We have a big

0:36:44.239 --> 0:36:48.759
<v Speaker 2>drought in twenty eighteen and sceince. Then a new generation

0:36:48.920 --> 0:36:52.359
<v Speaker 2>of barges have been developed for the Rhine where they

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:55.760
<v Speaker 2>can go even at the very low levels of water,

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:59.640
<v Speaker 2>but there are limits. I mean, like you may see

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.800
<v Speaker 2>that they just go down to effectively zero on the

0:37:02.960 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 2>on the n aviation channel. So that doesn't matter how

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:08.040
<v Speaker 2>much advertation you do, you're not going to be able

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:12.760
<v Speaker 2>to transport anything. I do think that companies are spending

0:37:12.800 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot more time to prepare for this, but ultimately,

0:37:17.920 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, some of the companies that they are preparing

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 2>for for for this situation, they may be contributing to

0:37:23.080 --> 0:37:26.000
<v Speaker 2>the situation because there are huge consumers of natural gas

0:37:26.040 --> 0:37:29.920
<v Speaker 2>for chemical production. Not that we have many other alternatives

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 2>to to guys. I mean, the other alternatives for petro

0:37:32.360 --> 0:37:36.560
<v Speaker 2>chemicals will be called the only kind of climate change

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 2>more friendly at it you will be to try to

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 2>reduce your consumption of plastics. I do see quite a

0:37:41.800 --> 0:37:47.600
<v Speaker 2>lot of work now on resilience of supply chains just

0:37:47.760 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 2>generally across the board, not just because climate change, but

0:37:52.480 --> 0:37:55.120
<v Speaker 2>I think that that's one big reason, but just generally

0:37:56.680 --> 0:38:00.359
<v Speaker 2>a lot of companies. You know, we were lucky least

0:38:00.400 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 2>my generation. We kind of became into adulthood. The iron

0:38:06.440 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 2>world has fallen, the number of conflicts was coming down.

0:38:10.800 --> 0:38:14.239
<v Speaker 2>There was a time I ran the Africa there is

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:17.040
<v Speaker 2>for a short period at the Financial Times, and one

0:38:17.040 --> 0:38:20.279
<v Speaker 2>of my surprises just looking at the Africa continent was

0:38:20.360 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 2>how peaceful was about ten years ago when I was

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:26.200
<v Speaker 2>doing that job than fifteen years ago compared to what

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:30.120
<v Speaker 2>it was in the eighties. We really benefited from a

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:33.120
<v Speaker 2>bit of a used to be called the past Americana,

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:36.800
<v Speaker 2>and that really meant that supply changes were a lot easier.

0:38:36.840 --> 0:38:39.520
<v Speaker 2>You could buy from point A to point B a

0:38:39.640 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 2>transport without worry about civil water a coudeta, or whether

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 2>there's going to be enough water on the river. Today,

0:38:47.080 --> 0:38:50.120
<v Speaker 2>a lot of those assumptions from climate change to global

0:38:50.120 --> 0:38:54.360
<v Speaker 2>geopolitics have changed and we are more in a fragmented world,

0:38:55.400 --> 0:39:01.480
<v Speaker 2>more volatile, perhaps more dangerous, certainly hotter, drier, and everyone

0:39:01.560 --> 0:39:02.640
<v Speaker 2>is having to adapt to that.

0:39:03.000 --> 0:39:04.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to make a note of this because

0:39:04.800 --> 0:39:07.960
<v Speaker 1>this happened this morning. The Romanian Army carried out a

0:39:07.960 --> 0:39:11.399
<v Speaker 1>control explosion to divert water to ensure that they could

0:39:11.400 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>cool the nuclear power plant. So you know, it's also

0:39:14.160 --> 0:39:18.840
<v Speaker 1>affecting the clean sources of power, the stable sources of

0:39:18.880 --> 0:39:21.920
<v Speaker 1>power that we have considered to be you know, absolutely

0:39:21.960 --> 0:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>necessary for the transition.

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 2>It's having I mean, like the droughts on the Rhine

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:32.000
<v Speaker 2>and the Danube are having a huge impact across supply

0:39:32.120 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 2>chains and energy supplies. And what worries me is that

0:39:35.520 --> 0:39:38.000
<v Speaker 2>as we are recording this at the beginning of Augos,

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:43.320
<v Speaker 2>typically both rivers and just generally every river in northwest

0:39:43.400 --> 0:39:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Europe sees the low point of the year around the

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 2>end of September the beginning of October, just before the

0:39:50.280 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 2>autumn rains start. The whole melting of the snow has ended.

0:39:55.960 --> 0:40:00.399
<v Speaker 2>We have had the whole summer period of limited rain.

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.640
<v Speaker 2>If we follow the pattern, we're going to see even

0:40:04.719 --> 0:40:08.400
<v Speaker 2>lower and lower levels on every river for the next

0:40:09.000 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 2>eight to ten weeks, so we do really need urgently rain.

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Given all this, and given the politics of climate change,

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>do you see that you know, the awareness of climate

0:40:22.200 --> 0:40:25.400
<v Speaker 1>change is now much more in people's consciousness. This is

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:27.440
<v Speaker 1>true even in the US, not just in Europe, but

0:40:27.480 --> 0:40:30.000
<v Speaker 1>also in developing countries. Do you think at some point

0:40:30.040 --> 0:40:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the politics comes together to try and maybe not in

0:40:33.600 --> 0:40:36.200
<v Speaker 1>at zero by twenty fifty, but support climate action in

0:40:36.239 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 1>a way that starts to really address the problem.

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:44.720
<v Speaker 2>I think that the awareness on climate change is widespread.

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that other than some pockets on some corners

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:52.880
<v Speaker 2>of the political discourse, the science of climate change is

0:40:52.960 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 2>very well understood. But I also think that what is

0:40:56.719 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 2>very well understood is that the course of adaptation, the

0:41:00.320 --> 0:41:06.759
<v Speaker 2>cause of action, is expensive and it entails certain sacrifices.

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:11.359
<v Speaker 2>I cannot have a sense, talking to many politicians, even

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 2>on the left in Europe, that our countries are not

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 2>prepared to do what it will take for climate change

0:41:19.280 --> 0:41:22.640
<v Speaker 2>if not everyone is responding at the same time. Was

0:41:22.760 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 2>earlier this year talking to a senior European politicians on

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the left of the argument saying, I am absolutely pro

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:33.600
<v Speaker 2>climate change action, but if that's going to cost my

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 2>heavy industry and jobs, and I'm just shifting emissions to

0:41:38.239 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 2>another country. I just need to stop there. And I

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 2>think that there is also alongside more acceptance of the

0:41:45.920 --> 0:41:49.040
<v Speaker 2>consequences of climate change we all have seen how hot

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:53.320
<v Speaker 2>got this summer, and more acceptance of the science. But

0:41:53.640 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 2>I think it's just universal or in a few kind

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:00.880
<v Speaker 2>of dark corners of the political discourse. I think that

0:42:00.920 --> 0:42:06.440
<v Speaker 2>there is also a widespreyers acknowledgement that it comes with course,

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 2>and that those costs will be significant, and I don't

0:42:10.360 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 2>think that we as a society are yet prepared for

0:42:13.640 --> 0:42:14.719
<v Speaker 2>comparison of those course.

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Javier, thank you for having me, and thank

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 1>you for listening to Zero. Now for the sound of

0:42:22.920 --> 0:42:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the week. That is the sound of an oil tanker

0:42:35.920 --> 0:42:39.839
<v Speaker 1>blowing its foghorn off the coast of San Francisco. If

0:42:39.880 --> 0:42:41.799
<v Speaker 1>you liked this episode, please take a moment to rate

0:42:41.840 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>and review the show on Apple Podcasts, YouTube, and Spotify.

0:42:45.400 --> 0:42:48.320
<v Speaker 1>This episode was produced by Oscar boyd Our. Theme music

0:42:48.360 --> 0:42:51.480
<v Speaker 1>is composed by wonder Lee. Special thanks to Moses Andam

0:42:51.680 --> 0:42:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Laura Milan, Summer Maxwell and Alessa McDonald, I am Akshadarati

0:42:56.400 --> 0:42:57.080
<v Speaker 1>back soon