WEBVTT - TechStuff Has Klout

0:00:02.560 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Get in touch with technology with tech Stuff from how

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:14.280
<v Speaker 1>stuff works dot com. Greetings and salutations everyone, and welcome

0:00:14.280 --> 0:00:16.040
<v Speaker 1>to tech Stuff. My name is Chris Paulette, and I

0:00:16.079 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>am an editor at how stuff works dot com. Sitting

0:00:18.600 --> 0:00:21.520
<v Speaker 1>across from me as usual as senior writer Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I've just been informed that I'm too important for this episode. Yeah,

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>so today we wanted to talk about clout and whether

0:00:31.960 --> 0:00:35.120
<v Speaker 1>whether or not you have any yea, uh, maybe not

0:00:35.200 --> 0:00:37.520
<v Speaker 1>you personally. You know that guy over there, he's got

0:00:37.520 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>no cloud. Apparently I apparently I have some. Um the

0:00:41.360 --> 0:00:45.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a not insignificant amount, though not nearly as much

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>as you know, like justin Bieber. Uh so, what is cloud? So?

0:00:49.280 --> 0:00:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Cloud is this company of the San Francisco that was

0:00:52.840 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>founded by Joe Fernandez back in two thousand and eight.

0:00:56.600 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>He started to build it when he couldn't talk. Did

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you know about this? There's an article and Wired and

0:01:04.319 --> 0:01:06.960
<v Speaker 1>I actually revisited it. It's it's called what Your Cloud

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>Score Really Means. It's from Seth Stevenson. Actually read it

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in the print edition, but I went back and revisited

0:01:12.440 --> 0:01:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it so I could throw it my electronic notes. Yeah.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:20.600
<v Speaker 1>He Uh, this is really really funny. He Um had

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.919
<v Speaker 1>had had to have his jaw wired shut. That's not funny.

0:01:25.040 --> 0:01:28.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's funny. But because he couldn't talk,

0:01:29.360 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>he started, uh, he started tweeting and using Facebook to

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.640
<v Speaker 1>communicate with people because it was driving him nuts that

0:01:35.720 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>he couldn't talk to people, he said, And in fact

0:01:38.640 --> 0:01:41.000
<v Speaker 1>he said he couldn't his mom didn't even understand what

0:01:41.040 --> 0:01:47.600
<v Speaker 1>he was Yeah. Really, uh so, I mean, thankfully he's

0:01:47.760 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>apparently all better now. But I've seen I've seen interviews

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>with him where he was not wired shut and he

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:55.800
<v Speaker 1>was talking. Yes, so he actually started, uh, he actually

0:01:55.800 --> 0:02:00.200
<v Speaker 1>started talking about or tweeting tweeting about this also two

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 1>different things about um restaurants that he had been to

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:08.040
<v Speaker 1>and making recommendations and you know, again kind of iron

0:02:08.200 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>as they point out in the article, kind of ironic.

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>He couldn't open his mouth and go eat there, but

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>basically product recommendations. He started thinking, because he had had

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>some experience with with statistics and started thinking, yew, how

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>many people am I talking to? And and to who

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>are they talking and how much influence do they have

0:02:26.800 --> 0:02:31.680
<v Speaker 1>over people who buy stuff or go shopping or go

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:34.799
<v Speaker 1>out to eat with these different people, and that's when

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:39.040
<v Speaker 1>he started. He started making some rudimentary calculations, rudimentary by

0:02:39.040 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>the terms of clouds algorithms today, and started putting together

0:02:43.360 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 1>this idea of you know, how much influence do people

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 1>have in the social media? So that's this is really

0:02:52.400 --> 0:02:56.440
<v Speaker 1>an interesting concept to me because some people would have

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you believe that influence can be measured solely by things

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:04.320
<v Speaker 1>like the number of followers you happen to have on

0:03:04.480 --> 0:03:09.480
<v Speaker 1>social networks. But Fernandez point is that's not necessarily the case.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.560
<v Speaker 1>You could have lots of people following you, but if

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.959
<v Speaker 1>no one's really paying attention to what you have to say,

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.959
<v Speaker 1>and they're following you anyway, then your influence isn't that great.

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's a lot of people who could potentially

0:03:21.280 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>hear you, but no one's really listening to you, and

0:03:23.639 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>that's a problem. So you could you could conversely have

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:31.360
<v Speaker 1>relatively few followers compared to someone who has millions, like

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, Justin Bieber has got millions of followers on Twitter.

0:03:35.040 --> 0:03:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Now he happens to be very influential on Twitter. So

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>that's I've heard that it's kind of a bad example.

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 1>But let's say let's say you've got someone who's got

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>over example, let's say, lets say you've got someone who's

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.800
<v Speaker 1>got over a million followers, but for some reason, their

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 1>cloud score is not that high. The reason for that

0:03:49.360 --> 0:03:51.920
<v Speaker 1>might be that perhaps a lot of those followers aren't

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:56.280
<v Speaker 1>real people, they might be boughts, So that could be

0:03:56.360 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 1>one factor. But what Fernandez wanted to do was men

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>sure how much impact a person has on their various

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.560
<v Speaker 1>social circles and on the web in general. Uh, not

0:04:07.720 --> 0:04:10.200
<v Speaker 1>just how many people are following them, and those are

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>those are two different things. So he built this, uh,

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:18.920
<v Speaker 1>this company, and this algorithm helped to Yeah. The his side,

0:04:18.920 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 1>of course, is called Clout with a k um, And

0:04:22.720 --> 0:04:26.839
<v Speaker 1>since its inception there have been other imitators. I don't

0:04:26.839 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>know if some of them were actually out beforehand. And

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:33.440
<v Speaker 1>Twitter itself is working on its own implementation of a

0:04:33.480 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>similar software that would allow you to see, like when

0:04:36.320 --> 0:04:38.800
<v Speaker 1>you tweet, how how much of your audience are you

0:04:38.880 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 1>actually reaching when you send out a Twitter message. And

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this really applies to people who have lots and lots

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>of followers. So for example, if you take me, I

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>don't have you know, thousands and thousands of I've got

0:04:51.120 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>like four thousand followers, which that's a that's a lot

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:55.880
<v Speaker 1>for me because I'm like, well, I'm just a guy,

0:04:56.040 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm a guy that four thousand people follow

0:04:58.560 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>I hope that I'm interesting in to justify that. But

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.280
<v Speaker 1>there are other people out there who have millions of followers,

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but they don't know necessarily how many of those people

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>they're reaching when they send out a message. Yeah, just

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>just for independent confirmation, I am sitting here directly across

0:05:12.440 --> 0:05:17.760
<v Speaker 1>from from Jonathan and he is, in fact just a guy. Yes, um,

0:05:17.800 --> 0:05:19.679
<v Speaker 1>I'm just a guy with a sixty five cloud score

0:05:19.680 --> 0:05:22.559
<v Speaker 1>though that's true. And then and part of the reason

0:05:22.640 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that that Jonathan does have a sixty five cloud score,

0:05:25.040 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's of the day we're recording this. These things

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>do change. It could be, it could be it could

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>be in the low forties. By the famous Podcas goes out,

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason that that Jonathan has a cloud

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:38.040
<v Speaker 1>score of sixty five is because there are a lot

0:05:38.040 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>of people following him. But he's also well networked with

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.760
<v Speaker 1>people also in the tech world, So there are people

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>who share his tweets with other people. That's part of

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 1>the score. There there are people who who talk back

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:54.800
<v Speaker 1>to him. Who also have they talk back to me?

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Shut up? You see what I did there? Yes? I

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>do who. There are people who have conversations with him

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.240
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, let's go with that, who are also influential

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.400
<v Speaker 1>uh in the Twitter sphere and on cloud and therefore,

0:06:09.960 --> 0:06:15.520
<v Speaker 1>uh that boosts his reputation UM and his his ability

0:06:15.600 --> 0:06:18.359
<v Speaker 1>to uh to network with other people, and so therefore

0:06:18.440 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>he has a higher score than than maybe some other

0:06:21.160 --> 0:06:23.680
<v Speaker 1>people with more followers. This might sound really familiar to you,

0:06:23.800 --> 0:06:26.559
<v Speaker 1>especially if you are familiar with like Google's page rank

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>algorithms what used to be called page rank anyway, UH.

0:06:29.800 --> 0:06:33.560
<v Speaker 1>The idea that Google would use this complex formula to

0:06:33.640 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>determine how well various sites would rank and search for

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:42.720
<v Speaker 1>any particular term that you're searching for. So, when you're

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>searching for, I don't know, uh, cool tech gifts for

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the holidays, then Google would look through its use its

0:06:51.800 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>algorithm and rank all these pages that relate to those

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 1>search terms and give you the highest ranked ones. And

0:06:58.200 --> 0:07:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that ranking is based on lots of different factors, including

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.960
<v Speaker 1>how many websites link into it and how old that

0:07:05.040 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>particular website that you're looking at is, and and other

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:10.440
<v Speaker 1>factors as well, there's a lot of stuff that goes

0:07:10.440 --> 0:07:13.360
<v Speaker 1>into it. This is the same idea except for people

0:07:13.560 --> 0:07:16.440
<v Speaker 1>instead of pages. It's it's how well a person ranks,

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:19.640
<v Speaker 1>partly due to their behavior online, partly due to their

0:07:19.680 --> 0:07:22.240
<v Speaker 1>network that's around them, partly due to how many people

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:24.480
<v Speaker 1>are following them. There are a lot of different factors

0:07:24.520 --> 0:07:27.720
<v Speaker 1>at play. There's actually a web page on cloud site

0:07:28.000 --> 0:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>that goes into the different factors that that they will

0:07:30.360 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>admit to. Now, they don't give you the nuts and bolts.

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:37.200
<v Speaker 1>It's a secret sauce if you will. Clearly, you wouldn't

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>want to be able to give out all the information

0:07:39.720 --> 0:07:42.560
<v Speaker 1>because then people would game the system like crazy just

0:07:42.600 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>to get their clouds score up, which is not the

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:47.720
<v Speaker 1>purpose of the of the site at all, or to

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to start a competitor to another good point, Um, yeah,

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>let's let's talk. I'll mention a little bit more about

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>what what they say, Uh, competitors are critics. I should say,

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.960
<v Speaker 1>actually a size cloud because it's usually the comparison I've

0:08:03.960 --> 0:08:06.880
<v Speaker 1>seen as to a credit score, because the credit reporting

0:08:06.920 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>agencies don't tell consumers what's actually going into your score.

0:08:13.720 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Um and in the case in the case of credit

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>it has to do with. You know how much you spend,

0:08:18.760 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>how quickly you pay it back? UM. You know how

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:25.000
<v Speaker 1>many cards credit cards you have, are credit accounts, lines

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>of credit that you have open, and lots of different

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:30.840
<v Speaker 1>little proprietary things, and each of them has a little

0:08:30.880 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>different mix. Well, the cloud is sort of the same way.

0:08:33.840 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>They tell you roughly what goes into it, but they

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>don't tell you exactly how much weight each one carries. UM.

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>It's based primarily on on Twitter and Facebook. UM. This

0:08:42.920 --> 0:08:45.960
<v Speaker 1>is not really much of a secret. Things like mentions

0:08:46.080 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 1>of your name and Facebook posts UM, people who who

0:08:51.960 --> 0:08:54.760
<v Speaker 1>are engaged with a lot of brands on there, the

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 1>likes that you have, the TV shows you like, UM,

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the the UH stores that you like on Facebook, UM,

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:05.000
<v Speaker 1>the number of comments you have, people who subscribe to

0:09:05.040 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you UH, the number of friends. Obviously that's a metric

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and obvious metric. You know how many people follow you

0:09:10.960 --> 0:09:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter, how many people follow you on Facebook, people

0:09:13.960 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>who mention you on on Twitter or people who UM,

0:09:17.760 --> 0:09:20.360
<v Speaker 1>people you reply to and people who reply to you

0:09:20.559 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 1>shows your engagement with that network. They've also extended it

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to UH to Google Plus, LinkedIn, four Square, Wikipedia, UM,

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:34.120
<v Speaker 1>things on on LinkedIn, Um, they go by your reported title.

0:09:34.320 --> 0:09:36.559
<v Speaker 1>So if you say you're CEO of the world now

0:09:36.640 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 1>and guess that that would probably help your Cloud score. Yeah, so,

0:09:39.600 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 1>although I think that's probably hard to verify. These are

0:09:42.559 --> 0:09:47.080
<v Speaker 1>relatively new in the in the cloud world, these these

0:09:47.200 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>UM these items, because before what that was really looking

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:53.199
<v Speaker 1>at was Twitter and Facebook mainly first it was Twitter

0:09:53.240 --> 0:09:56.199
<v Speaker 1>and then it was fok then and then also linked

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:00.400
<v Speaker 1>you could choose to link stuff to your your or cloud.

0:10:00.440 --> 0:10:03.320
<v Speaker 1>If you create a cloud um account, you could choose

0:10:03.320 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 1>to link things like Google Plus, Facebook, Twitter and other

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 1>platforms as well. Now it looks at these other elements

0:10:10.040 --> 0:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>like Wikipedia or if you are mentioned in something like

0:10:12.720 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times, so that it can determine all right, well, um,

0:10:18.360 --> 0:10:21.840
<v Speaker 1>you know you're getting press, people are writing about you,

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>so then that means you are more influential than someone

0:10:24.800 --> 0:10:27.400
<v Speaker 1>who is not getting pressed, So that would impact your

0:10:27.400 --> 0:10:30.160
<v Speaker 1>score as well. Yeah, if you want to sign up

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:33.400
<v Speaker 1>for Cloud, you would sign up using your Twitter or

0:10:33.559 --> 0:10:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Facebook information. Basically, once you're logged in, you can you

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 1>can uh sign up for Cloud and it will access

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>your account UM and it will say, okay, do you

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>want to add your other accounts? Do you want to

0:10:45.040 --> 0:10:46.880
<v Speaker 1>add these other accounts and they're even more than they're

0:10:46.920 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>mentioned here, things like Flicker and other accounts and things

0:10:50.360 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>um and so yeah, what what Jonathan said is is true.

0:10:53.679 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>They're also measuring this information whether or not you sign

0:10:56.720 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 1>up for Cloud because you're you're if you have a

0:11:00.000 --> 0:11:03.600
<v Speaker 1>bitter account and it's public and you are sending out messages,

0:11:04.040 --> 0:11:07.679
<v Speaker 1>that's public record, that's stuff that anyone can access. So

0:11:07.720 --> 0:11:11.320
<v Speaker 1>what Cloud does is it will automatically start to index

0:11:11.400 --> 0:11:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you and look at how other people are responding to you.

0:11:14.960 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>So whether you have signed up for a Cloud or not,

0:11:17.800 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you may have a cloud score, and uh, you know

0:11:21.640 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>the we have we mentioned what the range of scores is.

0:11:25.880 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>It's between one and one hundred. So the higher your

0:11:29.240 --> 0:11:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Cloud score, the more the more cloud you have, and

0:11:31.880 --> 0:11:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the more influence you would theoretically have over the web

0:11:35.920 --> 0:11:41.560
<v Speaker 1>based upon uh, you know, the algorithms assessment of you.

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Most people are not like you would think the average

0:11:44.679 --> 0:11:47.360
<v Speaker 1>would be fifty, but the average is really closer to

0:11:47.480 --> 0:11:51.800
<v Speaker 1>the twenties range. And it's that the people who are

0:11:51.880 --> 0:11:56.839
<v Speaker 1>fifty or higher are are assumed to be more influential

0:11:56.960 --> 0:12:02.360
<v Speaker 1>in whatever fields they've been identified as being experts in. Yeah,

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:05.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry. I was gonna say, if you sign up,

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:08.040
<v Speaker 1>you'll find out that they ask you, hey, what are

0:12:08.040 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 1>you influential in? Yeah, And it turns out like if

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>I log into my cloud and I'd look to see

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.480
<v Speaker 1>what I'm influential in. There's some things you would expect,

0:12:14.480 --> 0:12:17.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, like technology is up there, which that that

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. I do a tech podcast, I write tech

0:12:20.679 --> 0:12:23.960
<v Speaker 1>articles for a website. Uh, that makes sense. There are

0:12:23.960 --> 0:12:27.560
<v Speaker 1>other things like Atlanta restaurants. Huh, I didn't know that

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I was that influential with Atlanta restaurants. I should get

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:34.040
<v Speaker 1>better tables, darn it. Um. But yeah, there there are

0:12:34.120 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>other things that I look at on that people have

0:12:36.280 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>identified me as being influential. And some of them may

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:43.880
<v Speaker 1>be jokes, but that's that's kind of interesting to me. Yeah,

0:12:43.880 --> 0:12:46.679
<v Speaker 1>and I think I think here is a good point

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.320
<v Speaker 1>to point out. And then there are critics and their

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>proponents of cloud, just like anything else. But um, I

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:54.719
<v Speaker 1>think it's a good point to go right down the

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>middle and say, look, this is what one person and

0:12:58.480 --> 0:13:01.280
<v Speaker 1>his company have done, you know, as as as Joe

0:13:01.400 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 1>built this company up, this is how they chose to

0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:09.400
<v Speaker 1>measure people and it's not it's it's based on one system. Yeah,

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>so it's not really I think, Uh, it was a

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:13.520
<v Speaker 1>couple of years ago, or was a couple of years

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>ago last year where they where they rejiggered the algorithm

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and pop was this year. It was this year that

0:13:19.520 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>was late earlier this year when they changed it because

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:29.840
<v Speaker 1>my score, my score skyrocketed. I had been around sixty

0:13:29.840 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>two and uh, and then I jumped all the way

0:13:34.640 --> 0:13:37.240
<v Speaker 1>up to sixty nine. I was almost seventy. It was

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.520
<v Speaker 1>very close to seventy, and I was thinking, whoa, how

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:42.800
<v Speaker 1>did that happen? Holy cow, I'm more And that's started

0:13:42.840 --> 0:13:46.319
<v Speaker 1>comparing myself because the cars. You know, I'm a bit

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of an egomaniac, you know, I admit this. And so

0:13:49.640 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>I was like, let me see what my good friend

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>I as actar of this weekend tech Let me on

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>tech news today. Let me see what how he ranks.

0:13:56.960 --> 0:14:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh he's he's at sixty five. He's lower than I am.

0:14:02.080 --> 0:14:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Gosh I as and of course now I think he

0:14:04.000 --> 0:14:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I think he ranks rightfully so above me, because these things,

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>do you know? It was it was like an initial

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>shock because people's scores change pretty dramatically, some went up

0:14:14.440 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 1>quite a bit, some went down, and then it's been

0:14:17.920 --> 0:14:21.480
<v Speaker 1>slowly kind of readjusting to where it needs to be

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:25.000
<v Speaker 1>based on all this new information. Um, and you know

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this this is canna be really challenging because you're building

0:14:27.360 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>an algorithm that needs to identify people, and it needs

0:14:31.400 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>to be able to make sure it links to the

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>right person, because, as it turns out, there's some folks

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>out there who share the same name as other people,

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 1>and so you have a lot of false positives. For instance,

0:14:42.560 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>if you were to search Jonathan Strickland in the metro

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta area, Uh, some mug shots to be popping up,

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and none of them are me today Today, Okay, but

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>let's be fair. Today has the recording of this podcast,

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But none of those mug shots would be me. Who

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.600
<v Speaker 1>knows what tomorrow may brain. But that's the thing is

0:15:00.640 --> 0:15:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that it could end up identifying this stuff like, oh, John,

0:15:02.720 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>this is being written about in criminal newsletters. That's odd,

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 1>but I guess that a Justice Cloud score Like, no,

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that's not me, that's another Jonathan Strickland and the same

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>spelling and everything. But you know, so the algorithm has

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:18.520
<v Speaker 1>to take that stuff into account. The other thing that's

0:15:18.640 --> 0:15:22.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of a controversy with cloud is how companies are

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>using cloud in various ways. Yeah, let's let's uh. I

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 1>was going to get into the critics in a minute.

0:15:28.880 --> 0:15:31.040
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, uh, this and this is the next

0:15:31.080 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>section in my head is very slender. All right. So

0:15:35.040 --> 0:15:38.200
<v Speaker 1>what is cloud other than other than influence a measure

0:15:38.200 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>of influence in the social media world. An idea of

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of that, what does cloud get you? Very little or

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.040
<v Speaker 1>or a lot or a lot, depending on how high

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.600
<v Speaker 1>your cloud already is. Um, yeah, it's cloud is a

0:15:53.640 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>weird thing. In some cases, all it might get you

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.320
<v Speaker 1>is bragging rights in the sense of you know, you

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>you measure your cloud against your buddy, like your buddy

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I s Actar this weekend tech news today, and then

0:16:05.160 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>you say, hey, look at that, or you may say

0:16:09.360 --> 0:16:12.680
<v Speaker 1>go up because you mentioned in very well and deservedly.

0:16:12.800 --> 0:16:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So the man does good work. Uh as much as

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I joke. He he is an actual friend of mine.

0:16:18.600 --> 0:16:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh so maybe not after this podcast, but he. You know,

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the these these numbers for a large part of the

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.280
<v Speaker 1>population may not mean much, although it can tell you

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:33.760
<v Speaker 1>how effective you are online. So in a in a sense,

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.280
<v Speaker 1>it's doing what it's supposed to do. It's telling you

0:16:36.320 --> 0:16:38.440
<v Speaker 1>what your impact is. And if your impact is low,

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you might say, you know what, you might be cool

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 1>with it. You might be saying, oh, you know, I

0:16:43.560 --> 0:16:45.360
<v Speaker 1>just use this for fun, to stay in touch with

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:47.200
<v Speaker 1>my friends. That's all I use it for that. I

0:16:47.200 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>don't care. But if you're trying to get a message

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:53.520
<v Speaker 1>out there, then what it's telling you is your message

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 1>is not being heard. It's not it's not punishing you.

0:16:56.560 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>This number is related back to that algorithm. And if

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you want to make sure your message is heard by

0:17:01.960 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>more people, you need to look into ways of delivering

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:07.639
<v Speaker 1>that message in in a in a way that that

0:17:08.000 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>interests people, that get other people talking, that goes beyond

0:17:11.640 --> 0:17:14.480
<v Speaker 1>just your immediate circle of followers. And if you're able

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:16.600
<v Speaker 1>to crack that code. And by the way, I do

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.199
<v Speaker 1>not have the secret sauce for that. There are some

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:22.600
<v Speaker 1>messages I send out there that go bonkers and I think, Wow,

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 1>that's amazing, and then I and then I'll I'll sit

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:28.640
<v Speaker 1>there and I'll craft what I think is the most brilliant, funny,

0:17:29.040 --> 0:17:31.919
<v Speaker 1>uh timely tweet of all time, and I send it

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.719
<v Speaker 1>out and no one replies, No one favorites, no one retweets,

0:17:36.200 --> 0:17:38.439
<v Speaker 1>So I mean I don't have that secret sauce. Definitely

0:17:38.560 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>you need to ask people who have a much higher

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Cloth score than I do. But if your score is low,

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:44.840
<v Speaker 1>that could be an indicator that, hey, you need to

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.439
<v Speaker 1>change things so that you can make sure that whatever

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>message you're sending out there is being heard by the

0:17:49.440 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>right people. Yeah, yeah, and so and and for somebody like, um,

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:57.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, for politicians for example, yeah, um, this is

0:17:57.480 --> 0:18:01.320
<v Speaker 1>incredibly important, or entrepreneurs to who get their name out.

0:18:01.680 --> 0:18:04.880
<v Speaker 1>And then there's the the other group of people who

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:08.360
<v Speaker 1>are are short of in between there there they're doing

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:10.640
<v Speaker 1>this shorter because they want to, and then they might

0:18:10.680 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>be getting perks are cloud perks. So so if you

0:18:16.160 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 1>are an influential person, then you are an attractive person

0:18:20.720 --> 0:18:25.080
<v Speaker 1>for certain brands. If you are influential in a particular field.

0:18:25.160 --> 0:18:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Let's say with me, I'm apparently I'm influential on technology

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and Atlanta restaurants. Then let's say an Atlanta restaurant opens

0:18:32.520 --> 0:18:37.000
<v Speaker 1>up and they are cloud savvy, they understand how cloud works,

0:18:37.160 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>they and they know, hey, if we convince this guy

0:18:40.960 --> 0:18:44.919
<v Speaker 1>to come into our restaurant and eat our food and

0:18:44.960 --> 0:18:47.520
<v Speaker 1>we really pull out all the stops. He's gonna go

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:50.240
<v Speaker 1>out and he's going to talk about this incredible experience

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>he had. And because his influence is high in this area,

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that means we could see a return on that investment.

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:01.160
<v Speaker 1>We could see people come in because as we tapped

0:19:01.240 --> 0:19:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the right person to talk about this, and that can

0:19:04.440 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>go across all sorts of industries. So that being said,

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I'll come out and say it right now. I have

0:19:08.960 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>not received any cloud perks. I am not I don't

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.399
<v Speaker 1>use cloud to get cloud perks. I'm not saying that

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>I would never use one. If one came along, that

0:19:18.000 --> 0:19:21.479
<v Speaker 1>was just unbelievable and I'm like, hey, this is exactly

0:19:21.520 --> 0:19:23.960
<v Speaker 1>why I need and exactly how I need it, I

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>would probably do it. But I've never had that. I've

0:19:26.560 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>never had that happen. Yeah, the companies, the companies involved

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in cloud perks are generally people who want to do

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:37.879
<v Speaker 1>some promotion. That's it's pretty simple. Um. And so once

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:40.920
<v Speaker 1>you get your cloud score up to a certain level,

0:19:40.960 --> 0:19:43.480
<v Speaker 1>and it could it depends on what it is. Yeah,

0:19:43.480 --> 0:19:46.000
<v Speaker 1>it depends on the company. Like some companies will say, okay,

0:19:46.040 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>anyone who's below a seventy five. We're not interested in

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.080
<v Speaker 1>because that's not that's not worth the time it would

0:19:52.119 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 1>take to do this. Yeah, but you might, um, you

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:59.560
<v Speaker 1>might pass let's say thirty, and they'll say, hey, people

0:19:59.560 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>with cloud score of thirty, we'll give you a coupon

0:20:02.440 --> 0:20:05.920
<v Speaker 1>for a free UM six pack of our new soda flavor.

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>Go ahead and redeem it at your local store. You know,

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>tell us where to mail the coupon. So they mail

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.560
<v Speaker 1>the coupon and you get the beverage and you try

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:16.159
<v Speaker 1>and go, hey, this stuff is pretty good. What they're hoping,

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>but there is no requirement to do. What they're hoping

0:20:19.080 --> 0:20:21.720
<v Speaker 1>is you're going to share that experience with their friends. Hey,

0:20:21.960 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>I was uncloud. They sent me a coupon. I tried

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. It tastes like a combination of mangoes and feet,

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:29.040
<v Speaker 1>But I happen to like the taste of mangoes and feet.

0:20:29.440 --> 0:20:32.439
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna, you know, tweet this on Facebook and

0:20:32.480 --> 0:20:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and put it on my Google Plus account and

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it on LinkedIn. That you just did exactly what

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the promoters were what. Apparently my choice of mangoes and

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:47.160
<v Speaker 1>feet was not just I just wanted to do something,

0:20:47.160 --> 0:20:49.600
<v Speaker 1>so trying not to think about that taste right now.

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.119
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to say something silly. I don't like

0:20:53.240 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>mangoes and I really don't like feet. But yeah, okay,

0:20:57.080 --> 0:21:00.560
<v Speaker 1>so UM, so that's essentially what they're hoping that you

0:21:00.520 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 1>will say that cloud for it for its uh, you know,

0:21:05.200 --> 0:21:08.399
<v Speaker 1>just to to promote its own credibility here. And I

0:21:08.400 --> 0:21:10.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like it's fair to mention this cloud says. There's

0:21:10.640 --> 0:21:16.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely no obligation on your part as a cloud participant

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:18.880
<v Speaker 1>if you get a perk to promote it in any

0:21:18.880 --> 0:21:21.200
<v Speaker 1>way at all. You can take them up on the perk,

0:21:21.240 --> 0:21:24.199
<v Speaker 1>you can decline the perk, you can tweet about it

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:27.959
<v Speaker 1>or not. Um and uh. And you know it's up

0:21:28.000 --> 0:21:30.320
<v Speaker 1>to you whether you you could say, hey, this stuff

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:32.560
<v Speaker 1>is nasty. I don't ever want to see it again.

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 1>I hope they pull it from the market fast before

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I sue them. Um. You know it that that is

0:21:37.800 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>completely up to you. But it depends on partially on

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:43.919
<v Speaker 1>your cloud score, and it depends partially on generally, and

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:48.760
<v Speaker 1>it depends partially generally on what areas you are influential.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:52.240
<v Speaker 1>And I would assume that uh, President Obama and Justin

0:21:52.280 --> 0:21:55.880
<v Speaker 1>Bieber probably you know, get all the Cloud perks they want,

0:21:55.880 --> 0:21:58.080
<v Speaker 1>they probably can't, don't take anyone up on them. Yeah,

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.360
<v Speaker 1>there's also we should also point out that UM with

0:22:01.480 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>perks comes the responsibility of revealing the fact that you

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:11.239
<v Speaker 1>have received this as a perk, because, uh, there's an

0:22:11.280 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 1>ethical problem if you don't do that, and a legal

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:18.120
<v Speaker 1>problem too in the United States. Um. You know the

0:22:18.119 --> 0:22:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the quote unquote mommy bloggers, UM without Cloud, this was

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>going on for a while and they were not revealing

0:22:25.320 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>that they had received this as a Again to its credit, Cloud,

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Uh encourages you to remember if you're going to post this,

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.800
<v Speaker 1>say hey, I got it free because I was here. Yeah.

0:22:37.240 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, yes, the clouds not condoning unethical behavior, which

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's important to remember because their critics who

0:22:45.960 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of overlook that. Um, And that's why I wanted

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>to mention that what you get for it first before

0:22:51.840 --> 0:22:54.200
<v Speaker 1>we got to the critics. Yeah, so it's it's gotten.

0:22:54.240 --> 0:22:58.919
<v Speaker 1>It's become a great tool for companies to try and

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:03.199
<v Speaker 1>court influencers, and in some cases it may be that

0:23:03.280 --> 0:23:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a company says, hey, this person is really influential in

0:23:06.280 --> 0:23:08.680
<v Speaker 1>the field that we're involved in, let's not just give

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:12.280
<v Speaker 1>them a perk. Let's hire them to do something for us.

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>So in that case, you're talking about like you might

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:17.879
<v Speaker 1>have a freelancer out there who is just an incredible

0:23:17.920 --> 0:23:21.320
<v Speaker 1>influencer in a particular industry, and then this company says,

0:23:21.480 --> 0:23:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this is who we need to get to represent our

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:27.880
<v Speaker 1>brand or to message out something about our brand. Uh,

0:23:27.920 --> 0:23:30.159
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to actually hire them. Maybe it's a

0:23:30.240 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>contract for a certain number of appearances, or maybe we

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:37.200
<v Speaker 1>actually give them a job offer. And that's another way

0:23:37.240 --> 0:23:41.639
<v Speaker 1>that people are using cloud Some companies, particularly advertising firms,

0:23:41.680 --> 0:23:45.919
<v Speaker 1>marketing firms, places where uh, your ability to get a

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.680
<v Speaker 1>message out is clearly an important part of your job.

0:23:49.359 --> 0:23:52.640
<v Speaker 1>They are looking at cloud scores because if you if

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>you're going into an ad agency and you're saying, hey,

0:23:56.080 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I know how to message out information. I am. I

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.560
<v Speaker 1>am the guy that you need or the lady you

0:24:02.640 --> 0:24:05.800
<v Speaker 1>need to hire for this position because I know what

0:24:05.840 --> 0:24:07.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing, And then they look up your cloud score

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and it's like twenty two. They'll say, hey, um, can

0:24:11.560 --> 0:24:14.080
<v Speaker 1>you show us a better example than your cloud score,

0:24:14.080 --> 0:24:16.719
<v Speaker 1>because according to this you are not getting your message

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:21.720
<v Speaker 1>heard and and that's you know, that's also drawn some criticism.

0:24:21.760 --> 0:24:24.320
<v Speaker 1>People have said, well, how is that fair? And the

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:27.840
<v Speaker 1>counter argument is to say, well, if the algorithm is

0:24:27.880 --> 0:24:31.679
<v Speaker 1>measuring how well a message is going out across networks

0:24:32.200 --> 0:24:35.040
<v Speaker 1>and the and the score is really low, how would

0:24:35.080 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it be fair to this company to hire someone who

0:24:37.680 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>is not as good as a different, uh potential employee

0:24:42.359 --> 0:24:44.440
<v Speaker 1>who has a much higher cloud score, who has proven

0:24:44.520 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>that they are able to get a message out across networks. Yeah. Yeah,

0:24:48.040 --> 0:24:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the the cloud score has come into hiring practices recently. Um,

0:24:52.880 --> 0:24:57.119
<v Speaker 1>I've seen articles written on it and uh, you know

0:24:57.119 --> 0:25:00.359
<v Speaker 1>people who were unaware of the cloud score, you know,

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>they hadn't signed up for it, didn't know it existed. Uh,

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of taken aback by the fact that there is

0:25:05.119 --> 0:25:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a cloud score. Yes, you are being measured. Um, that's

0:25:08.880 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a little uh, that's a little weird I think for

0:25:11.080 --> 0:25:15.240
<v Speaker 1>some people, um, and people without knowing. And it's again

0:25:15.320 --> 0:25:18.919
<v Speaker 1>the reason they compare the cloud score to the credit

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:22.680
<v Speaker 1>credit score is that without knowing exactly what you're being

0:25:22.720 --> 0:25:26.200
<v Speaker 1>measured on, it's difficult to improve on it. Um. It

0:25:26.240 --> 0:25:28.520
<v Speaker 1>could be a bit of a treadmill to to constantly

0:25:28.560 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>try to figure out what to say next and how

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:33.000
<v Speaker 1>often to say it, exactly what way to say it

0:25:33.040 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>in because what time to say it? Because there are

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:38.720
<v Speaker 1>you know those are that That's something I actually take

0:25:38.760 --> 0:25:42.160
<v Speaker 1>into consideration. You see, I, Chris and I we don't

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:46.760
<v Speaker 1>just uh interface with social networks for ourselves. Sometimes we

0:25:46.800 --> 0:25:48.879
<v Speaker 1>have to. We do it for our text of brand,

0:25:49.240 --> 0:25:52.000
<v Speaker 1>right because because we want we want people to know

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>what we are doing as tech stuff. We want to

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.439
<v Speaker 1>stay engaged with our audience. We want to know what

0:25:56.480 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>they're thinking. So uh, but there comes a time were

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you're like, should I post this now because my audience

0:26:03.960 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 1>might be asleep, you know, and then you think, well,

0:26:07.000 --> 0:26:10.119
<v Speaker 1>considering how many of us are tuned into the social

0:26:10.160 --> 0:26:13.960
<v Speaker 1>networking crazes out there, a message that was posted four

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:17.439
<v Speaker 1>hours ago may never be seen. You know, if I

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>log into Twitter and there's a message that was posted

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:22.400
<v Speaker 1>about four hours ago that I think would have been amazing,

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I might never get to that because to page back

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:31.120
<v Speaker 1>through that many tweets, uh is a daunting task. I'd

0:26:31.119 --> 0:26:33.200
<v Speaker 1>have to clear out a half hour, forty five minutes

0:26:33.200 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>of my schedule just to do that. So you know,

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.080
<v Speaker 1>that also comes into place when you should post if

0:26:39.080 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you're trying to, if you're if you're really trying to

0:26:41.119 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>use social networking to get a message out. You know,

0:26:44.800 --> 0:26:48.159
<v Speaker 1>if you're just using social networking to say I watched

0:26:48.160 --> 0:26:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that episode of Blah blah blah last night and it

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:53.760
<v Speaker 1>was phenomenal. It may not matter that you post it

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:57.760
<v Speaker 1>at two in the morning or eight am or four pm.

0:26:57.800 --> 0:27:01.040
<v Speaker 1>It may not have any impact there, and that might

0:27:01.080 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>be fine for you. There's nothing wrong with that. Um.

0:27:04.040 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 1>The other element of this is, unlike the credit score,

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the cloud score is something that I think a lot

0:27:09.119 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of people are not aware of, and that's a problem,

0:27:13.280 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, because they could be judged on something that

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:19.840
<v Speaker 1>they themselves had no knowledge of going into, you know,

0:27:19.920 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>a job interview. Yeah. I also found an article by

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>a Manachum Wecker about a professor at Florida State University

0:27:28.119 --> 0:27:32.560
<v Speaker 1>who was using cloud to grade his students in class. Now,

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:37.639
<v Speaker 1>it was for a marketing class. It was, you know,

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:41.960
<v Speaker 1>for an electronic marketing class. So people were upset about it.

0:27:42.000 --> 0:27:44.320
<v Speaker 1>But it kind of makes me think, well that this

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>is specifically a metric for measuring your ability to market

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>yourself in electronic media. Maybe clouds. I don't know that

0:27:53.480 --> 0:27:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I would make it the soul thing that you grade

0:27:56.359 --> 0:27:59.480
<v Speaker 1>someone on, but it probably at least belongs in part

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of it um or should build an awareness that the

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.159
<v Speaker 1>class should build an awareness of its prominence in in

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>today's society. For that, but I wanted to mention to

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:11.840
<v Speaker 1>one thing that where it doesn't compare to a credit score, however,

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 1>is there are more than one agency developing credit scores

0:28:15.200 --> 0:28:19.239
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. Cloud is not alone, but it

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:23.560
<v Speaker 1>is an unusual prominence in it's a cloud, it turns out,

0:28:23.760 --> 0:28:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you might say that. So yeah, it's if we if

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:35.160
<v Speaker 1>we assume that that the cloud algorithm is looking at

0:28:35.240 --> 0:28:41.680
<v Speaker 1>things in a very methodical and measured way, and that

0:28:41.880 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>it is, in the end of the day, looking at

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the how how influential people are based upon how widely

0:28:49.400 --> 0:28:51.840
<v Speaker 1>their message has heard and how many people are writing

0:28:51.840 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>about that person, then cloud and of itself is an

0:28:57.200 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>interesting and I think valuable service for people who are

0:29:00.480 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>trying to get a message out. It's it's not it's

0:29:03.040 --> 0:29:05.880
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily a good thing or bad thing. It's a

0:29:06.000 --> 0:29:08.959
<v Speaker 1>useful tool. Um. The way other people are using this

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:13.080
<v Speaker 1>tool might be, you know, might make you upset or

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it might throw you depending on your cloud score. Um,

0:29:16.680 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>but that's you know, again, you can't blame the tool

0:29:19.400 --> 0:29:21.960
<v Speaker 1>for the way people are using it, right, I mean,

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 1>same thing we could say about Twitter. Twitter. When it

0:29:24.280 --> 0:29:27.240
<v Speaker 1>was launched, people were talking about Twitter being a way

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:28.800
<v Speaker 1>that you would send out a message to a group

0:29:28.800 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of friends. Right. That was the main use case of Twitter.

0:29:32.680 --> 0:29:36.920
<v Speaker 1>That is totally changed since Twitter launched. And one of

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:38.840
<v Speaker 1>these days we are going to do an episode or

0:29:38.880 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>at least at least one episode about the Twitter will

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.440
<v Speaker 1>probably be a two parter, but the story of Twitter

0:29:43.480 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>to really talk about the foundation of it, what it

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>was originally meant for, and what it has turned into,

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 1>especially in light of the controversy of how Twitter has

0:29:51.520 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 1>handled the whole API approach and third party developers, because

0:29:56.080 --> 0:30:00.680
<v Speaker 1>that's definitely caused a lot of frustration in the tech world. Um,

0:30:00.720 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you've got companies like Cloud that are

0:30:03.640 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>very much leveraging Twitter to get, you know, to to

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>become a valuable service. So, um, at the end of

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the day, does cloud really matter? I guess it depends

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:20.040
<v Speaker 1>on the industry you're in. And uh, the nice thing

0:30:20.040 --> 0:30:23.560
<v Speaker 1>about the cloud score is it's not static. It will

0:30:23.640 --> 0:30:27.880
<v Speaker 1>change over time and if you are dedicated to increasing

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 1>that cloud score, you can do it in legitimate ways.

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully the Cloud algorithm will be able to take into

0:30:35.200 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>account things like dummy Twitter accounts or dummy Facebook accounts,

0:30:40.120 --> 0:30:43.120
<v Speaker 1>so that if you were to get a huge number

0:30:43.160 --> 0:30:46.280
<v Speaker 1>of followers immediately, it would not automatically adjust your score

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.680
<v Speaker 1>because obviously you could gain that system. I mean, there

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>are companies out there already that only exists to provide

0:30:54.760 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>people fake essentially fake accounts. Uh. There are even other

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.959
<v Speaker 1>ones that will try and get real accounts to follow you.

0:31:02.280 --> 0:31:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But there's this whole um I scratch your back, you

0:31:07.200 --> 0:31:09.959
<v Speaker 1>scratched mine approach where you like, if you follow these

0:31:09.960 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>twenty people, these twenty people will follow you back. You know.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>That's kind of you know, almost like a pyramid scheme

0:31:16.440 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter followers. I would hope that the Cloud algorithm

0:31:19.000 --> 0:31:21.960
<v Speaker 1>takes that into account and again really concentrates more on

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:29.680
<v Speaker 1>the impact and hopefully avoids counting false positives, because otherwise

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna become another service that everyone gains, and

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:37.560
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it will be meaningless. Like when every when everyone

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>has really high cloud, nobody does. It's like the incredible Right,

0:31:43.920 --> 0:31:46.800
<v Speaker 1>that was an incredible podcast. Let's close it off, guys,

0:31:47.400 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we have finished our episode about Cloud. If you have

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>a topic we definitely need to talk about. Get your

0:31:53.560 --> 0:31:55.920
<v Speaker 1>cloud square up to about fifty or so and so

0:31:56.040 --> 0:31:58.160
<v Speaker 1>now I'm just kidding. Just send us a message, send

0:31:58.200 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>it through email our Addressice Tex stuff at Discovery dot com,

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:04.240
<v Speaker 1>or let's not on Facebook or Twitter, or handle it

0:32:04.320 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 1>both of those. Is tech stuff, h sw and Chris

0:32:07.200 --> 0:32:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and I will talk to you again really soon. You

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:12.320
<v Speaker 1>should try this stuff. It tastes like pineapple and feet.

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 1>For more on this and thousands of other topics, is

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it how stuff works dot com