WEBVTT - Justin Wolfers & Dr. Abdul El-Sayed

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Molly John Fast and this is Fast Politics,

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:07.120
<v Speaker 1>where we discussed the top political headlines with some of

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:12.120
<v Speaker 1>today's best minds, and billionaire Ray Dallio says the US

0:00:12.200 --> 0:00:16.439
<v Speaker 1>is turning into an autocratic state. We have such a

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>great show for you today, Think like an economist. Justin

0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Wolfer stops by to talk about the latest in Trump's tarafors.

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Then we'll talk to doctor Abdul l said about his

0:00:28.960 --> 0:00:31.520
<v Speaker 1>run for the Senate in Michigan. But first, here are

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:32.920
<v Speaker 1>the stories the media is missing.

0:00:33.080 --> 0:00:33.519
<v Speaker 2>Savali.

0:00:33.680 --> 0:00:38.040
<v Speaker 3>There was hundreds of workers over billionaires Labor Day rallies,

0:00:38.080 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 3>and you know what, that is music to my ears

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.599
<v Speaker 3>because that's what I think the movement should be built on.

0:00:42.840 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Again another case of massive protests not covered by the

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:51.760
<v Speaker 1>mainstream media. We keep seeing this again and again, massive protests,

0:00:52.320 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>town halls, filled with angry people, horrible polling for Donald Trump,

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:00.400
<v Speaker 1>and we don't see it in the mainstream media. We

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:03.240
<v Speaker 1>don't see any of those stories reflect in the mainstream media.

0:01:03.400 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a question whether or not there's some anxiety

0:01:08.440 --> 0:01:13.040
<v Speaker 1>about reporting some of this stuff, like maybe it's hard

0:01:13.080 --> 0:01:16.320
<v Speaker 1>to track down, but like people standing in the middle

0:01:16.360 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 1>of their towns waving signs that should not be so

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:24.160
<v Speaker 1>hard to cover Labor Day's day about labor or in

0:01:24.680 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>and what better place to focus on during that day

0:01:28.240 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 1>than Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson, who has been really catapulted

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 1>into the national spotlight because of Trump's use of ice

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.959
<v Speaker 1>in the city and now the city again is in

0:01:39.040 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 1>Trump's crosshairs because he wants to federalize it. He denounced

0:01:43.160 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Trump's threat to deploy federal troops to the city as

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.639
<v Speaker 1>part of an immigration crepdown. He said, no federal troops

0:01:49.640 --> 0:01:52.840
<v Speaker 1>in the city of Chicago. At the workers over Billionaire's

0:01:53.000 --> 0:01:56.279
<v Speaker 1>demonstration in Chicago's Westloop, Johnson added, We're going to defend

0:01:56.280 --> 0:01:58.680
<v Speaker 1>our democracy. We're going to protect the humanity of every

0:01:58.720 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>single person in the city of Chicago. Go Over the weekend,

0:02:01.480 --> 0:02:05.440
<v Speaker 1>I interviewed kat Abba Guzala, and she's running for a

0:02:05.480 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>seat in Chicago, and she talked about just how aggressive

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.840
<v Speaker 1>ice has gotten in their city. As someone who lives

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>in a city New York City, haven't seen that but

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.079
<v Speaker 1>in New York, and so my hope is that he's

0:02:21.120 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>not doing it in New York. But I do have

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:26.280
<v Speaker 1>a sense that they're trying to do it in all

0:02:26.320 --> 0:02:28.799
<v Speaker 1>of the Blue cities to make us all really scared

0:02:28.840 --> 0:02:32.160
<v Speaker 1>and uncomfortable, and also to her people, and also to

0:02:32.240 --> 0:02:34.919
<v Speaker 1>deport people who've been in this country for years and

0:02:35.000 --> 0:02:36.760
<v Speaker 1>years and years. Look, this is going to be the

0:02:36.800 --> 0:02:39.480
<v Speaker 1>beginning of a lot of protests. People are not happy.

0:02:39.800 --> 0:02:44.280
<v Speaker 1>And these demonstrations took place in New York, Houston, Washington,

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:49.560
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles, Cleveland, Ohio, Greensboro. When people are mad, they protest.

0:02:49.720 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>We saw this in Trump's first administration. We're going to

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>see this again.

0:02:52.800 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 3>So by Trump is really really losing a court this week.

0:02:56.720 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 3>A judge ruled this morning that Trump illegally deployed National

0:02:59.639 --> 0:03:01.280
<v Speaker 3>guardens to Los Angeles.

0:03:01.600 --> 0:03:06.399
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Posse comma Tatis Act. Look is this was always

0:03:06.919 --> 0:03:10.079
<v Speaker 1>the thing. The law, like with so many things Trump

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.720
<v Speaker 1>is trying to do, the law says you can't do

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>this stuff. And here we have a US District Court

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Judge Charles Bryer in San Francisco, fifty two page filing.

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So not lightly. In short, defendants violated the Posse Commatatis Act.

0:03:27.560 --> 0:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, all of the Supreme Court experts

0:03:31.440 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>we talked to said the very same thing. Sending troops

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:38.320
<v Speaker 1>on the ground is a violation of an act which

0:03:38.320 --> 0:03:41.200
<v Speaker 1>says we don't use troops on our people. This is

0:03:41.240 --> 0:03:46.000
<v Speaker 1>the difference between a free country and a military dictatorship.

0:03:46.240 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Now again we get to a moment, as with many

0:03:49.280 --> 0:03:53.840
<v Speaker 1>moments in this political moment, where Trump now it's illegal,

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.880
<v Speaker 1>they can't do it. That doesn't mean they won't. And

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:00.840
<v Speaker 1>that is where we are right now. Again, in a

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:05.080
<v Speaker 1>world with a Supreme Court that wasn't completely in the tank,

0:04:05.720 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>you would say, well, the Supreme Court is not going

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>to allow this. But because they made Donald Trump mango

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>god king with the immunity ruling, we really don't know

0:04:14.600 --> 0:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>what's going to happen. But we do know, and I

0:04:17.480 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>think it's important for us to remember that there is

0:04:20.640 --> 0:04:23.840
<v Speaker 1>the law and this administration pretty much breaks it on

0:04:23.920 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the regular And maybe that's okay for now, but at

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.279
<v Speaker 1>some point the bill will come to and the American

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:33.159
<v Speaker 1>people will decide are we a lawless country where we

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.080
<v Speaker 1>allow people to break the law or are we not?

0:04:36.520 --> 0:04:39.359
<v Speaker 1>And I think ultimately, and I don't know when this happens,

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 1>if it's two years or five years, or fifteen years

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 1>or twenty years, but at some point, it's a big country.

0:04:46.240 --> 0:04:48.400
<v Speaker 1>It's been a democracy for a long time, and at

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 1>some point we're going to have to have a reconciliation

0:04:52.120 --> 0:04:54.960
<v Speaker 1>here about what it means to follow the law. I

0:04:55.000 --> 0:04:57.919
<v Speaker 1>don't know when that happens. So this is more legal

0:04:58.040 --> 0:05:00.839
<v Speaker 1>challenges I'm sure the Trump administration, and we'll run it

0:05:00.880 --> 0:05:03.599
<v Speaker 1>up to the Supreme Court. And again, at some point

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the Supreme Court is going to stop rubber stamping things.

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:10.359
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe they're not, and maybe you know, they just

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.039
<v Speaker 1>like the Republicans in Congress, become completely irrelevant.

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that sounds right. So Trump also, many people missed this.

0:05:18.320 --> 0:05:22.280
<v Speaker 3>On Friday, right before the holiday weekend, court struck down

0:05:22.520 --> 0:05:26.159
<v Speaker 3>his tariffs and boy they are as the kids say,

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:26.719
<v Speaker 3>big Matt.

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>So the tariffs are allowed to be in place for

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>forty five more days. But there's a great Peter Navarro quote, America.

0:05:37.120 --> 0:05:40.320
<v Speaker 1>It's the end of America. So we have the highest

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>tariffs of any developed nation. We are alienating China, Russia,

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:48.760
<v Speaker 1>those would be the ones that you kind of want

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:54.760
<v Speaker 1>to alienate, but driving into their arms India and Canada

0:05:54.800 --> 0:05:59.560
<v Speaker 1>and Mexico and Europe, and basically we are becoming parias

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in the world. And this may not even be legal.

0:06:02.520 --> 0:06:06.200
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it probably isn't legal. In fact, the Emergency

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Powers Act that Trump is using does not once use

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the word tariffs, which is kind of something to think about.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>So look this again, like with all of these other

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>court cases, will likely go to the Supreme Court. I

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>just want to specify one thing about this, and I

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:26.560
<v Speaker 1>think I've talked about it before, but the other side

0:06:26.680 --> 0:06:30.840
<v Speaker 1>of this case, simplify, is the Koch brother I think

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 1>we talked this about this on the last episode. Actually

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the Koch brother and a lot of really evil Republican donors.

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>So this is a case where if the Supreme Court

0:06:40.960 --> 0:06:42.919
<v Speaker 1>will have to decide whether or not they're going to

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 1>go against Leonard Leo. I think Leonard Leo is involved

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:48.480
<v Speaker 1>in this. Are they going to go against their donors

0:06:48.760 --> 0:06:51.440
<v Speaker 1>or their god king. You know, it's a very difficult

0:06:51.480 --> 0:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>decision for them, and I personally look forward to them

0:06:55.040 --> 0:06:59.320
<v Speaker 1>really struggling with this. But you know, the rich Republican

0:06:59.400 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 1>donors don't want tariffs and rich insane president does. So

0:07:05.920 --> 0:07:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's anybody's guess how this goes. By the way,

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 1>I just want to play the tape for a minute.

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Say the Supreme Court is like, no, you have no

0:07:15.120 --> 0:07:17.920
<v Speaker 1>legal powers for tariffs. They have to come off Okay,

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:20.320
<v Speaker 1>say that happens, which I think is the best case

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 1>scenario for all of us. Even if they do that,

0:07:23.240 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>even if they're like, okay, the Supreme Court, and then

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to assume that the Trump administration is going

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:29.640
<v Speaker 1>to be like, oh guy, the Supreme Court is right,

0:07:29.720 --> 0:07:32.679
<v Speaker 1>let's not do the tariffs, which again we have never

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:35.600
<v Speaker 1>seen Trump world ever. I mean, they might back down,

0:07:35.680 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's hard for me to imagine they back down

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.680
<v Speaker 1>on this. But even if those two things happened, which

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>would be kind of extraordinary, you would still have the

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>question of lowering the rates of things. And I'm not convinced,

0:07:48.840 --> 0:07:51.200
<v Speaker 1>like this is the problem with trade wars. Things get

0:07:51.200 --> 0:07:53.880
<v Speaker 1>more and more expensive. I'm not convinced that things get

0:07:53.960 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>cheaper when the trade war is over.

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 3>I've not heard a single person say how that.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:02.400
<v Speaker 1>Could happen, And in fact, we've interviewed people who have

0:08:02.600 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 1>said that it's very hard to get prices down after

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.640
<v Speaker 1>a trade war. So I do see a real world

0:08:09.680 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 1>in which Trump cooks us up into something real bad,

0:08:12.520 --> 0:08:14.840
<v Speaker 1>changes his mind at the last minute because he sees

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.560
<v Speaker 1>the wreckage that it's caused, and then is unable to reverse.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 3>It always makes me think of that meme that's like

0:08:21.200 --> 0:08:24.880
<v Speaker 3>the I do something stupid, I convince my followers it's good.

0:08:25.000 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 2>I reverse my decision.

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:29.960
<v Speaker 3>I convince my followers that everything is solved, and then

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:31.640
<v Speaker 3>it just repeats over.

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah and over and over.

0:08:33.160 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>Probably fine.

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that saysn't sound like decline to me.

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>No, In case you're wondering, decline is a choice.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:40.199
<v Speaker 2>And a woke construct anyway.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.880
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so, speaking of woke constructs, the Energy Department has

0:08:43.920 --> 0:08:46.160
<v Speaker 3>a climate report and you'll be shocked to hear it

0:08:46.200 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 3>has nothing but errors. It is totally just done very lazily,

0:08:49.840 --> 0:08:53.559
<v Speaker 3>probably in between jokes about really really stupid things that

0:08:53.640 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 3>are the Republicans discuss.

0:08:55.880 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so you're going to be shocked to hear that

0:09:00.559 --> 0:09:05.720
<v Speaker 1>this crew is bad at things pretty much everything. So

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.760
<v Speaker 1>this is not our best and our brightest. This is

0:09:08.880 --> 0:09:13.080
<v Speaker 1>our dumbest and our worst. And they are publishing things

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like they had a climate report and it is filled

0:09:17.240 --> 0:09:21.679
<v Speaker 1>with errors, and you know, look, this is all you know,

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:25.880
<v Speaker 1>these people don't understand science, and they are making a

0:09:25.920 --> 0:09:30.440
<v Speaker 1>gamble that climate change won't create that it's some kind

0:09:30.480 --> 0:09:33.760
<v Speaker 1>of liberal fallacy, and that's not how it is, and

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 1>there are lots and lots of scientists who know the truth.

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I think it's worth realizing, like, this is a war

0:09:40.760 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>on elites, this is a war on expertise, This is

0:09:43.760 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>a war on science, This is a war on education

0:09:47.679 --> 0:09:50.920
<v Speaker 1>and all of the kind of things that we hold dearest.

0:09:51.440 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>That's why they are against science and against progress and

0:09:55.440 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>against all the things you know that we cherish and

0:09:58.600 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>believe to be true. This is going to all end

0:10:01.360 --> 0:10:10.680
<v Speaker 1>in tears, all right. Justin Wolfers is the host of

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>The Thing Like an Economist podcast and a professor at

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the University of Michigan. Justin Wolfers, Welcome to Fast Politics.

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:20.600
<v Speaker 4>And Fast Economics malade.

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>So I want you to talk us through tariffs. I

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.160
<v Speaker 1>was told that trade wars are good and easy to win.

0:10:28.360 --> 0:10:33.040
<v Speaker 1>We now have the highest tariffs of any developed country

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>right in the world.

0:10:35.240 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 4>And it's not even close. And so, Molly, your question

0:10:39.200 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 4>actually gets to the foundational mistake at the base of

0:10:43.000 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 4>all of this. When Trump was growing up, other countries

0:10:46.040 --> 0:10:49.840
<v Speaker 4>had high tariffs. So when Trump was growing up, he

0:10:49.960 --> 0:10:53.280
<v Speaker 4>felt we were being screwed, and in some sense we were.

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:56.840
<v Speaker 4>When other countries divert their trade away from US, that

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 4>hurts them, but it also hurts American exporters. Subsequently, happened

0:11:01.040 --> 0:11:05.800
<v Speaker 4>was many decades, and during those decades, basically the entire

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:10.160
<v Speaker 4>industrialized world got rid of tariffs. Now, when I say

0:11:10.240 --> 0:11:13.400
<v Speaker 4>got rid of tariffs, I should say there's politics and everything.

0:11:13.600 --> 0:11:19.280
<v Speaker 4>And so there's an intellectual sense shared by shared never

0:11:19.320 --> 0:11:23.120
<v Speaker 4>industrialized country that openness to trade is a good thing.

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 4>If you can help me and I can help you,

0:11:26.120 --> 0:11:28.040
<v Speaker 4>well you can both be better off. Simple as that.

0:11:28.400 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 4>So we had a general agreement on trade and tariffs,

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:35.439
<v Speaker 4>and then we had a World Trade Organization. We had

0:11:36.200 --> 0:11:39.680
<v Speaker 4>Europe become a trading block, we had North America become

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:43.680
<v Speaker 4>a trading block. We had countries individually just decide that

0:11:44.520 --> 0:11:48.680
<v Speaker 4>charging Americans more to support dying industries is not a

0:11:48.679 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 4>good idea, and they did that in other countries too,

0:11:51.360 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 4>And so what happened was we basically had universal agreement

0:11:56.200 --> 0:12:00.680
<v Speaker 4>that tariffs should be low and close to zero. And

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:02.680
<v Speaker 4>then there was an asterisk, which is what happens is

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.040
<v Speaker 4>when you get in the room with someone with another

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 4>foreign leader and say, hey, I want to cut my

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 4>tariffs that it'll be even better if you do yours too,

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:12.000
<v Speaker 4>They'll say I agree, but I got a couple of

0:12:12.080 --> 0:12:15.960
<v Speaker 4>politically difficult industries in my home country. So let's like

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 4>eliminate tariffs everywhere we can, but there'll be a small

0:12:18.760 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 4>number of industries like the Canadian dairy industry, the American farmers,

0:12:23.040 --> 0:12:27.360
<v Speaker 4>the European mountains of butter where the politics are just

0:12:27.400 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 4>too hard. So let's agree we'll get tariffs down to

0:12:30.120 --> 0:12:32.120
<v Speaker 4>as close to zero as we can everywhere. But I'll

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 4>give you a bunch of political carve outs so you

0:12:33.880 --> 0:12:35.600
<v Speaker 4>can get re elected, and you'll give me a bunch

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:37.680
<v Speaker 4>so I can get re elected. What that means is,

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:40.199
<v Speaker 4>on the eve of the Trump trade war, the average

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 4>tariff right for every industrialized nation was between one and

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 4>two percent. And there are a few crazy countries that

0:12:45.720 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 4>have poorer countries that are small and run by idiosyncratic leaders.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:53.839
<v Speaker 4>There's some euphemism there. Autocrats tend to like tariffs, so

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:55.560
<v Speaker 4>there are a few countries that do have tariffs. But

0:12:55.640 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 4>even outside of the industrialized countries, tariffs had their day thereover.

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:03.160
<v Speaker 4>The reason this is central is it the most we

0:13:03.200 --> 0:13:05.199
<v Speaker 4>could ever have won out of the trade will if

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:07.920
<v Speaker 4>initially tariffs were two percent and the lowest they can

0:13:07.960 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 4>go as zero percent. The most we could ever win

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 4>is very very little, and in fact, getting that very

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 4>very little, he's going to be hotted in it's worth

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.960
<v Speaker 4>because these the industries where other countries have strong political interests,

0:13:19.040 --> 0:13:21.320
<v Speaker 4>it doesn't really matter we fight a trade. When we lose,

0:13:21.559 --> 0:13:25.680
<v Speaker 4>American consumers are screwed or we win, are not much changes.

0:13:26.000 --> 0:13:28.800
<v Speaker 4>It was asymmetric from the very beginning.

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So that I think is a really good point. And

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about asymmetric from the really big from the

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:36.720
<v Speaker 1>very beginning. I would love you to talk about because

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I haven't seen a ton of reporting.

0:13:38.679 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've seen some reporting on this, but it

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:42.960
<v Speaker 1>hasn't I feel like it hasn't captured those guys the

0:13:42.960 --> 0:13:46.680
<v Speaker 1>way it needs to, probably, which is what is happening

0:13:46.679 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>with India and tariffs, because it strikes me that what

0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:56.040
<v Speaker 1>happened here is that Trump got mad at India. The

0:13:56.480 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>excuse we heard was that they were buying Russian oil.

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:01.640
<v Speaker 1>I did know there was a sort of scam going

0:14:01.679 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>where they were buying Russian oil, processing it and then

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 1>selling it so that Russia could get around some of

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the terraffing, etc. But whatever happened now the net net

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>is we had pictures of Mody with g and also putin,

0:14:19.640 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>which strikes me as probably not the ideal situation.

0:14:23.880 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 4>I mean, one thing is men don't hug in public enough.

0:14:27.960 --> 0:14:33.760
<v Speaker 4>And I thought they were showing tremendous leadership, tremendous and

0:14:34.440 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 4>just a whole new masculinity.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>And if we mention we want our autocrats soft and fuzzy.

0:14:40.680 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 4>We want all our men to be comfortable cuddling in public.

0:14:44.680 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 4>What I would like is, if we get a foreign

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:50.000
<v Speaker 4>policy right, I want our cuddler over there, I would love.

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 4>I think President Trump doesn't cuddle enough in public either.

0:14:53.600 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 4>He does a whole lot of extraordinarily camp things, right,

0:14:57.400 --> 0:15:01.400
<v Speaker 4>but not Hugen dancing to Ymca. I'm just talking about camp.

0:15:01.440 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 4>I'm talking about just a modern, comfortable masculinity.

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>So our tariffs suppose, here's my question. Our tariff supposed

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 1>to drive business to other countries in a way that

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 1>cuts us out of the international world order? Is that

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>how it's supposed.

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.000
<v Speaker 4>To go on? Now, Well, if you were asking me,

0:15:20.280 --> 0:15:23.360
<v Speaker 4>if America disengaged from the rest of the world, would

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.440
<v Speaker 4>other people go looking for friends elsewhere? It seems blindingly

0:15:26.480 --> 0:15:27.760
<v Speaker 4>obvious the answer is yes.

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:28.920
<v Speaker 1>Does, doesn't it.

0:15:29.200 --> 0:15:33.880
<v Speaker 4>And so as a matter of foreign policy, maybe our

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 4>tariffs on China hurt the Chinese people. But the fact

0:15:38.440 --> 0:15:44.560
<v Speaker 4>that we have punitive tariffs, without direction, without predictability, that

0:15:45.400 --> 0:15:48.880
<v Speaker 4>not only are they punitive, I think people really really

0:15:48.960 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 4>misunderstand or fail to see the president comedy and he's

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:57.000
<v Speaker 4>a very funny man, actually has very real consequences. Yeah,

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 4>my brother lives in Canada. They hate us.

0:16:00.680 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>Just talking about my brother, I mean no, no, they

0:16:03.320 --> 0:16:07.760
<v Speaker 1>hate us. They hate us, and we have really really

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>alienated Canada and Mexico, like real these shocking and also

0:16:14.240 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 1>their economy is already suffering. This gets me to this

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.320
<v Speaker 1>next question I have for you, which is, we have

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>these tariffs, right, and we have this situation where the

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>market seems to not have priced in tariffs because they

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>think they're getting a rate cut and the rate cut

0:16:30.960 --> 0:16:34.640
<v Speaker 1>is enough to boost the market, and so who cares

0:16:34.640 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>about tariffs? But it strikes me that all is still

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>not fine in the American economy, and that the fact

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that stocks are going up while all these other indicators

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>are not and are in fact going in the other direction.

0:16:53.320 --> 0:16:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And then we have this and I'd love you to

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:58.080
<v Speaker 1>explain to us what is happening with the bond market too,

0:16:58.080 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 1>because that seems a bit scary and important.

0:17:02.120 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:17:02.880 --> 0:17:06.560
<v Speaker 4>So it's actually, I think, a very complicated story, but

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:08.879
<v Speaker 4>I think you're right to raise it because at one level, frankly,

0:17:08.920 --> 0:17:11.560
<v Speaker 4>it is embarrassing for liberals. We say the sky is falling,

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 4>this is very bad economic policy, yet people want to

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:15.800
<v Speaker 4>buy more of American stocks. So I just want to

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:18.119
<v Speaker 4>sort of slow down and work our way through it

0:17:18.119 --> 0:17:22.520
<v Speaker 4>a little. The first thing is, you know, I'm not

0:17:22.520 --> 0:17:25.160
<v Speaker 4>going to go all the stock markets, not the economy

0:17:25.200 --> 0:17:29.840
<v Speaker 4>on you. I am, but actually what we should read

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:34.000
<v Speaker 4>from stocks is interesting and subtle. So I'm not going

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 4>to be one of these people that says ignore the market.

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:37.359
<v Speaker 4>What I'm going to say is listen, but didn't do

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.400
<v Speaker 4>so in a sophisticated way. So the one thing that's

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.679
<v Speaker 4>utterly absolutely true, we are on an unbeaten run that

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 4>every time Trump leans into trump Ism, imposing more tariffs,

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 4>firing the BLS Commission, and putting fed independence at risk.

0:17:50.720 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 4>Every time he leans into trump Ism, stocks fall. It's

0:17:54.040 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 4>literally unbeaten. Since January twentieth, there's not a single day

0:17:57.400 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 4>where it's gone the other way. Every time Trump backs

0:18:00.119 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 4>off from trump Ism, stocks rise when he suspends tariffs,

0:18:05.280 --> 0:18:07.439
<v Speaker 4>when he tells the Chinese that we don't need to

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:10.000
<v Speaker 4>cut off all trade, and on and on it goes

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:14.199
<v Speaker 4>when the courts rule Trump's tariffs to be illegal every

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 4>single time. So what that tells you is the market's

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:20.720
<v Speaker 4>judgment is the value of American businesses are lower when

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:23.400
<v Speaker 4>the president's instincts are followed. I think the market's worth

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 4>following on this. Why is that Because we're talking about

0:18:25.760 --> 0:18:29.080
<v Speaker 4>something like tariff's. If there are benefits for the American economy,

0:18:29.480 --> 0:18:32.239
<v Speaker 4>they're all downstream of helping American business, and so if

0:18:32.240 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 4>they don't even help American business, there's no way we

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 4>get any of the benefits. And that happens before we

0:18:36.880 --> 0:18:39.080
<v Speaker 4>even get to the argument to the benefits to American

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:41.520
<v Speaker 4>business exceed the cost to American consumers, and so what

0:18:41.560 --> 0:18:43.639
<v Speaker 4>we do it's a very very shortcut argument. Normally in

0:18:43.680 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 4>economics we have to think about all the benefits and

0:18:45.320 --> 0:18:47.040
<v Speaker 4>all the costs, and here I can just say, hey, look,

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:49.400
<v Speaker 4>the market seems to think the guys who are meant

0:18:49.400 --> 0:18:52.879
<v Speaker 4>to benefit actually have the opposite effect. That's an unbeaten run. Okay,

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 4>But how do we then sort out. So that's true.

0:18:56.720 --> 0:18:59.240
<v Speaker 4>Yet at the same time stocks have continued to rise.

0:19:00.400 --> 0:19:02.879
<v Speaker 4>What's going on here? A little bit of it is,

0:19:02.920 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 4>there's two Americas. There's an AI boom, which is seven

0:19:06.640 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 4>big companies that are worth an enormous share of the

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 4>S and P five hundred, and if you look at

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 4>the rest of the companies, you're seeing less optimism. That

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.160
<v Speaker 4>are you still seeing some The other thing worth noting

0:19:18.359 --> 0:19:20.840
<v Speaker 4>is that Trump passed an enormous corporate tax code. Now

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:24.600
<v Speaker 4>that corporate tax cup means any money big American businesses

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:26.919
<v Speaker 4>get make, they get to keep more of it, a

0:19:26.920 --> 0:19:30.159
<v Speaker 4>lot more of it. That should have sent stocks to

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 4>the moon. It didn't. Actually, the amount it should have

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.760
<v Speaker 4>boosted stocks is much larger than the amount of stocks

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 4>have risen. Basically, the federal government's just given them a

0:19:37.320 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 4>whole bunch more money back. Of course they're worth more.

0:19:40.560 --> 0:19:42.560
<v Speaker 4>We can try and think about in a fairly careful

0:19:42.600 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 4>way how much more, And it turns out their value

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.560
<v Speaker 4>hasn't even risen that much.

0:19:47.760 --> 0:19:50.320
<v Speaker 1>So talk to us about the bond market. What's happening there.

0:19:50.400 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 4>I'm going to do one more thing on the stock market,

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:54.040
<v Speaker 4>partly because I'm not sure what's going on in the

0:19:54.040 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 4>bond market. I'm not sure what's on your main money.

0:19:56.520 --> 0:20:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Here's because of the difference between the law term and

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:02.360
<v Speaker 1>the short I understand.

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 4>Yeah. I want to say one more thing on the

0:20:03.800 --> 0:20:06.879
<v Speaker 4>stock market. Okay, stock market is big American companies. So

0:20:06.920 --> 0:20:09.479
<v Speaker 4>it's not small companies. It's not cart ups, it's not

0:20:09.560 --> 0:20:12.800
<v Speaker 4>you and I, it's not the government sector, it's not

0:20:12.920 --> 0:20:17.480
<v Speaker 4>lots of things. As we move to a trumpest form

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 4>of statism or crony capitalism or interventionist, whatever it is

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 4>you want to call it, the folks who can look

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.800
<v Speaker 4>for carveouts, Tim Apple can call the White House and

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 4>say I want tariffs to be different. Now, it turns

0:20:30.960 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 4>out Apple was founded in the garage by two guys

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.679
<v Speaker 4>in Silicon Valley. Right now, there are two guys in

0:20:36.680 --> 0:20:38.920
<v Speaker 4>a garage in Silicon Valley trying to start the next

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 4>multi trillion dollar business. Those guys can't call the White House.

0:20:43.440 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 4>So what this is is an enormous preference for existing

0:20:46.119 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 4>large companies over smaller startups. Now the cost of crony

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.879
<v Speaker 4>capital So the thing is who gains from crony capitalism,

0:20:53.000 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 4>the cronies, who loses everyone else, particularly entrepreneurs are the cronies.

0:20:58.560 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 4>They're the big ones who are in Trump's rolyodics. He

0:21:01.400 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 4>knows how to call and they'll pony up. It's CBS,

0:21:05.119 --> 0:21:07.679
<v Speaker 4>for instance, it's it is Apple, and on and on

0:21:07.760 --> 0:21:12.880
<v Speaker 4>it goes. So as we shift towards this form of capitalism,

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:15.159
<v Speaker 4>the value of big companies can rise even as the

0:21:15.200 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 4>value of the rest of the economy falls. The stock

0:21:17.040 --> 0:21:18.040
<v Speaker 4>market only reflects the.

0:21:18.040 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Former yields yond yields, right, So.

0:21:21.760 --> 0:21:24.360
<v Speaker 4>What's going on with bond yields? So here's the problem.

0:21:24.480 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 4>When you attack the FED and you say, what I

0:21:26.600 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 4>want to do is put a lunatic in, and I

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:32.640
<v Speaker 4>want the lunatic to always and everywhere move interest rates

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.440
<v Speaker 4>to be low. And I want to do that because

0:21:34.480 --> 0:21:36.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm a property developer, or because they want to move

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.400
<v Speaker 4>to what's called fiscal dominance. That's the word for the day,

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.080
<v Speaker 4>fiscal dominance. Fiscal dominance is when monetary policy is set

0:21:43.600 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 4>not in trying to smooth the ups and down to

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.840
<v Speaker 4>the economy, but instead to keep interest rates low so

0:21:50.920 --> 0:21:53.480
<v Speaker 4>that the government interest payments will be lower. It works,

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:56.240
<v Speaker 4>we pay less, but if you keep interstrates too low

0:21:56.280 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 4>for too long, you get high inflation. So if you want,

0:21:58.800 --> 0:21:59.480
<v Speaker 4>if I want.

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.280
<v Speaker 1>To, we already have inflation ticking up.

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.360
<v Speaker 4>We have moderate inflation. It's higher than it should be.

0:22:05.400 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 4>But that's not the scare story yet, right, right, but.

0:22:09.240 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, I know where this is going.

0:22:11.480 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 4>Go on. You know how exciting it is to be

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:20.720
<v Speaker 4>Molly Jong Farce economic advisor. I am economists to the stars,

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 4>economics teacher to the stars, and sometimes my stupid star

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:29.640
<v Speaker 4>Paul when she's worked through a few financial crises and

0:22:29.680 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 4>she ads written for that well known financial magazine Vanity Fair.

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:37.720
<v Speaker 1>And Vogue and known for covering.

0:22:37.440 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 4>You, are the closest I've going to come to. Vogue

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 4>is talking to you and doing Can we do this together?

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:45.679
<v Speaker 4>Come on, you can do it all. Go on to.

0:22:47.800 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Okay, talk about the bond market, girl, bond market market.

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:54.719
<v Speaker 4>I'm only going to talk bond market while you keep voguing.

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:56.160
<v Speaker 1>God damn it.

0:22:56.320 --> 0:22:59.120
<v Speaker 4>Okay, all right, it was too distracting for me. Thanks

0:22:59.119 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 4>for stopping mall Okay, So if we go the full

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:04.879
<v Speaker 4>trumpest future, which is basically what id On did in Turkey,

0:23:05.320 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 4>we point lunatics who could be interest rates too low

0:23:07.760 --> 0:23:10.639
<v Speaker 4>for too long inflation rises. You'll notice I use the

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:15.040
<v Speaker 4>word if may not happen good news. Problem is, if

0:23:15.040 --> 0:23:17.560
<v Speaker 4>I were to borrow money, say take a ten year

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.280
<v Speaker 4>loan today, the lender knows there's some chance it will happen.

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:25.200
<v Speaker 4>So therefore, already today, even without Trump having destroyed the FED,

0:23:25.320 --> 0:23:29.120
<v Speaker 4>the lender is weighing the possibility that Trump destroys the FED.

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 4>If he does, inflation will be really high, in which

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.640
<v Speaker 4>case interest rates will be really high, in which case

0:23:33.640 --> 0:23:35.359
<v Speaker 4>they're only going to be willing to lend me money

0:23:35.359 --> 0:23:38.320
<v Speaker 4>for ten years if they added an extra premium, Which

0:23:38.359 --> 0:23:41.480
<v Speaker 4>is the probability Trump destroys things, multiplied by what will

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:45.000
<v Speaker 4>happen to interest rates, And realize that when ERDA one

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:48.200
<v Speaker 4>did this in Turkey, interest rates went up above ninety

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 4>percent at some point, or inflation went to eighty six percent.

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:54.400
<v Speaker 4>So a small risk of a catastrophic outcome already right

0:23:54.440 --> 0:23:56.480
<v Speaker 4>now will add a lot to the interest rate that

0:23:56.520 --> 0:23:59.159
<v Speaker 4>I get charged. So that's long term interest rates. What

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Trump has managed to do, he's managed to make people

0:24:01.560 --> 0:24:04.399
<v Speaker 4>convinced he's pro what's called it dove, someone who's in

0:24:04.400 --> 0:24:07.240
<v Speaker 4>favor of low interest rates, which has led markets to

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 4>believe interest rates might be a little lower over the

0:24:09.080 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 4>next year or two. But it's led them to worry

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:13.920
<v Speaker 4>that on average, across all the possible states of nature,

0:24:13.920 --> 0:24:16.400
<v Speaker 4>they'll be higher in the future. So he's lowered some instrates,

0:24:16.440 --> 0:24:20.359
<v Speaker 4>has raised others. Which ones matter for business, the long ones.

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.159
<v Speaker 4>Your mortgage is a long run interest rate. Your business

0:24:23.160 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 4>loan is a long run interest rate. If I'm breaking

0:24:24.880 --> 0:24:27.159
<v Speaker 4>ground on the manufactory, it's a long run interestrate. So

0:24:27.320 --> 0:24:31.640
<v Speaker 4>Trump's desire it's a lower interest rates has in fact tustrates.

0:24:31.680 --> 0:24:33.879
<v Speaker 4>He's actually undone the very thing he was trying to do.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:37.479
<v Speaker 1>So I think that's a really a good point, and

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you could just for a minute, it

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>strikes me that there are other ways in which Donald

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:46.119
<v Speaker 1>Trump has done that, where he has said he wants

0:24:46.160 --> 0:24:49.480
<v Speaker 1>something and caused the opposite to happen.

0:24:49.760 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 4>Okay, should I talk about tariffs?

0:24:52.600 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean tariffs are a great example, right. I

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:57.960
<v Speaker 1>mean it just seems like so the tariffs he wants

0:24:57.960 --> 0:25:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to bring back American manufacturing. But the problems we see

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>is like, for example, it's cheaper with certain materials to

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:11.160
<v Speaker 1>actually make things somewhere else and import them. So yeah,

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>tuk us through that.

0:25:12.400 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 4>So there's a huge problem inside the White House. There's

0:25:16.119 --> 0:25:18.600
<v Speaker 4>some beliefs that I don't agree with. Fair Enough, we

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 4>can disagree on beliefs. There's ways of thinking about the

0:25:21.680 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 4>economy that I disagree with. I could be wrong, and

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:30.399
<v Speaker 4>there's sharing competence. I'm against that under all conditions. So

0:25:30.800 --> 0:25:32.560
<v Speaker 4>if I were talking in a normal country at a

0:25:32.560 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 4>normal time about tariffs, I would say, if you put

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 4>tariffs that are designed to help the manufacturing sector, you

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 4>will help the manufacturing sector. And the question is to

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 4>the benefits to manufacturers offset the cost to everyone else.

0:25:42.400 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 4>But the way we've gone about tariffs breaks every rule

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.720
<v Speaker 4>in the how to help Manufacturer's handbook, even though that's

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.760
<v Speaker 4>what they're trying to do. I'm going to lead with

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 4>the fact this is a Dallas FED survey where they

0:25:56.560 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 4>surveyed Texan manufacturers and they said, what if tariff's done

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:05.159
<v Speaker 4>for your business? Three point seven percent of manufacturers, this

0:26:05.240 --> 0:26:07.560
<v Speaker 4>is the group that's meant to help, three point seven

0:26:07.600 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 4>percent said it had helped. Something like ninety percent said

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.520
<v Speaker 4>it that hurt, and a few other and a few

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:15.920
<v Speaker 4>others you know, had different effects. You know, were unsure

0:26:15.960 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 4>what the effect was. So the way they've done it

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 4>actually fails to do what they were hoping to do. Well,

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:26.760
<v Speaker 4>here's I've got the numbers. They had a seventy two

0:26:26.800 --> 0:26:29.239
<v Speaker 4>percent of text and manufacturing firms set tariffs that had

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:33.320
<v Speaker 4>a negative impact, seventeen said no impact, seven percent didn't know,

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.679
<v Speaker 4>and three point seven percent set it that helped. It

0:26:36.720 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 4>would be if you'd said to me justin, I want

0:26:40.560 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 4>you to be as incompetent as you can. I want

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.360
<v Speaker 4>you to design a set of tariffs that will help

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 4>a mere three point seven percent of manufacturers, it would

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:49.640
<v Speaker 4>have hurt my head. I would have been, how can

0:26:49.640 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 4>I implement tariffs that only help a tiny sliver because

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:55.160
<v Speaker 4>it's reducing the competition from abroad. It does do that,

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.320
<v Speaker 4>it's hard to do. And then I would have remembered

0:26:58.320 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 4>page one of the tariff handbooks, don't put tariffs on inputs.

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 4>And so then I would have said, well, I know

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 4>what I'll do. If I really want to hurt American manufacturers,

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:10.480
<v Speaker 4>I will put tariffs on steel and aluminium and aluminum

0:27:10.480 --> 0:27:15.600
<v Speaker 4>as well. I will put tariffs on chips. I'll start

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 4>a trade war. So the input you want to get

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 4>from a broader harder to get. I will make it

0:27:20.040 --> 0:27:21.880
<v Speaker 4>so Canadians hate us and they don't want to buy

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:23.400
<v Speaker 4>any of the stuff that we produce.

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Right, this is like they would be our most, our

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 1>easiest trading partner, closest, easiest.

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:34.960
<v Speaker 4>I will get the rest of the world of likeness.

0:27:35.359 --> 0:27:37.080
<v Speaker 4>I will make it so there are a fewer skilled

0:27:37.080 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 4>workers for precision manufacturing by chasing away foreign students. I

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 4>will take the great engines of innovation and try to

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.800
<v Speaker 4>shop universities, being of course our universities. So it's actually

0:27:49.840 --> 0:27:53.080
<v Speaker 4>a striking accomplishment. But I actually think it's something we

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.680
<v Speaker 4>should talk more about. Not tariffs, not the bond rate,

0:27:56.960 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 4>but the extraordinary levels of incompetence, tariffs that are on

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 4>on Monday and off on Tuesday. This incompetence is above

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.600
<v Speaker 4>and beyond any ideological divide. It means they're not even

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 4>achieving the right wing goals that they're after.

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Thank God, we're out of Prat.

0:28:15.440 --> 0:28:19.320
<v Speaker 4>God, because it means not even the region, not even

0:28:20.000 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 4>no one wins from stupidity.

0:28:22.320 --> 0:28:28.159
<v Speaker 1>So thank you. Justin Walfer Hers doctor Abdul l Said

0:28:28.440 --> 0:28:31.959
<v Speaker 1>is running for the Democratic nomination for Senate in the

0:28:32.000 --> 0:28:35.840
<v Speaker 1>state of Michigan and is the former director of the

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Department of Health, Human and Veteran Services for Wayne County, Michigan.

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome too fast politics, doctor abdulahs.

0:28:44.880 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 5>Yet, thank you so much for having me. I appreciate

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:47.560
<v Speaker 5>you having here.

0:28:47.760 --> 0:28:51.080
<v Speaker 1>You're a doctor, but you are also running for the

0:28:51.200 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>United States Senate in the great state of Michigan. It's

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:01.680
<v Speaker 1>a primary. It's a crowded Democratic primary with three candidates.

0:29:01.880 --> 0:29:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And I interviewed you this weekend on the Weekend Show

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:07.840
<v Speaker 1>when I was filling in, and what I was really

0:29:07.880 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>struck by was that you have a very clear message

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:15.040
<v Speaker 1>about your lane in the Democratic Party. So would you

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:17.120
<v Speaker 1>talk us through what that message is.

0:29:17.480 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:29:17.800 --> 0:29:19.680
<v Speaker 6>I don't know that there's a doctor lane in most

0:29:19.680 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 6>Democratic primaries, but I think most Democratic primaries would be

0:29:22.520 --> 0:29:24.800
<v Speaker 6>better if there was one. I never grew up thinking

0:29:24.920 --> 0:29:27.640
<v Speaker 6>I'd be great to run for office. I actually grew

0:29:27.760 --> 0:29:29.360
<v Speaker 6>up with a lot of my mentors telling me I

0:29:29.400 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 6>should and thinking that's crazy.

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 5>Why would I do that.

0:29:31.600 --> 0:29:33.640
<v Speaker 6>I have an eleven letter first name that's got sounds

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:35.200
<v Speaker 6>that come out of parts of people's throats they.

0:29:35.200 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 5>Usually don't know they have. And I really wanted to be.

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 6>A doctor in large part because of the contrast of

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 6>my upbringing. I was raised by my father who's an

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 6>Egyptian immigrant, and my stepmom, Jackie, who's a daughter of

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 6>the American Revolution, from like right here in Michigan, literally

0:29:47.960 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 6>the middle of the state, and I would get sent

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:52.680
<v Speaker 6>off to Egypt often to spend most of my summer

0:29:52.760 --> 0:29:55.240
<v Speaker 6>with the wisest, most intelligent person I've ever met, who

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 6>was my grandmother, who never got to go to school.

0:29:57.080 --> 0:29:58.720
<v Speaker 5>She was the ninth to fourteen herself.

0:29:58.760 --> 0:30:01.080
<v Speaker 6>She gave birth to eight kids, got to raise six

0:30:01.120 --> 0:30:03.440
<v Speaker 6>because two died before their first birthday. She had this

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 6>incredible moral sense, and she always always would impress upon

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 6>me the fact that I had cousins who are smarter

0:30:10.000 --> 0:30:13.240
<v Speaker 6>and cousins who are harder working than cousins who did

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 6>all the right things. And the thing that I got

0:30:15.160 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 6>going for me more than any of the other ones

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 6>was that I had to go back to America at

0:30:18.560 --> 0:30:20.840
<v Speaker 6>the end of the summer. And the crazy thing right

0:30:20.960 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 6>was it would take me fifteen hours to get to

0:30:22.880 --> 0:30:25.560
<v Speaker 6>or from Egypt, and I travel though I didn't have

0:30:25.600 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 6>the language for it at the time, about ten years

0:30:27.480 --> 0:30:30.040
<v Speaker 6>different from life expectancy, and I didn't have to go

0:30:30.360 --> 0:30:32.920
<v Speaker 6>fifteen hours. I could go fifteen minutes from where I

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 6>grew up, just outside the city Detroit, into any neighborhood

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:37.480
<v Speaker 6>in the city and travel the same gap. And the

0:30:37.640 --> 0:30:41.000
<v Speaker 6>fact that I got all those opportunities that even my grandmother,

0:30:41.000 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 6>who'd never been to America at the time, got to understand,

0:30:43.800 --> 0:30:46.000
<v Speaker 6>and then there were kids whose families had been here

0:30:46.040 --> 0:30:48.360
<v Speaker 6>far longer than mine who didn't get them is the

0:30:48.400 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 6>reason I went into medicine. And when I realized that

0:30:50.800 --> 0:30:52.760
<v Speaker 6>the things that were making my patient sick had more

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 6>to do with there. They had to breathe the water,

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.240
<v Speaker 6>they had to drink, the jobs that they had or

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:00.239
<v Speaker 6>didn't have, the opportunity to eat healthy food that they

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.000
<v Speaker 6>had or didn't have the faster. I realized that I

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 6>was not long for the world of clinical practice, and

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:07.200
<v Speaker 6>I went into public health to do something about that,

0:31:07.240 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 6>and rebuilt Detroit's health department to put glasses on kids,

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.440
<v Speaker 6>to take on corporate polluters, ran Wayne Counties Health Department,

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:15.880
<v Speaker 6>the largest, most diverse county in the state, to do

0:31:15.920 --> 0:31:17.920
<v Speaker 6>things like eliminate medical debt and put a narcan in

0:31:17.920 --> 0:31:20.280
<v Speaker 6>one hundred locations. And so I see politics to me

0:31:20.640 --> 0:31:22.920
<v Speaker 6>as more of a continuation of an answer to the

0:31:23.000 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 6>question of why people get sick in the first place.

0:31:24.840 --> 0:31:27.440
<v Speaker 6>And once you run up against the political challenges that

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 6>people face and start asking why do they make decisions

0:31:30.560 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 6>like that, you start to question, well, you know, maybe

0:31:32.840 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 6>I should, I should put myself in the position to

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:37.640
<v Speaker 6>make those same decisions. And I told you, I grew

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 6>up telling people I would never run for office. In fact,

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 6>I graduated Valtctoria in my class at Michigan and the

0:31:42.760 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 6>main speaker who anybody actually went to listen to was

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 6>Bill Clinton, who after our speeches asked me, you should

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 6>run for office someday?

0:31:49.120 --> 0:31:51.240
<v Speaker 5>Why not? And I told them about my name. We

0:31:51.360 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 5>Bill chuckled about it.

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:54.680
<v Speaker 6>But I'm finally at a position now where I've I've

0:31:54.760 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 6>kind of come to realize that if you're not willing

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:59.200
<v Speaker 6>to articulate at the level of our politics, which to

0:31:59.240 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 6>me is a conversation about.

0:32:00.280 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 5>Who we are and who we want to be, that

0:32:01.840 --> 0:32:03.880
<v Speaker 5>ideal of an America.

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:06.240
<v Speaker 6>Centered around the well being of all of its kids,

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:08.240
<v Speaker 6>then I just don't know that we're going to be

0:32:08.240 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 6>able to take on either Trump or build the kind

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:11.960
<v Speaker 6>of America where Trump can't exist in the future.

0:32:12.280 --> 0:32:14.840
<v Speaker 1>One of the things that we see a lot and

0:32:14.880 --> 0:32:18.280
<v Speaker 1>by we I mean me in my second job, which

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is yelling at Democratic politicians about all the things they're

0:32:21.840 --> 0:32:22.760
<v Speaker 1>doing wrong.

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:24.520
<v Speaker 5>Which you do so well, Molly. I really appreciate you

0:32:24.600 --> 0:32:24.920
<v Speaker 5>doing it.

0:32:25.280 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>That's my hobby, by the way. And all those spokespeople

0:32:28.640 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>who think they're working me when I'm like, yes, let's

0:32:31.880 --> 0:32:34.680
<v Speaker 1>have a long conversation about what I feel your boss

0:32:34.760 --> 0:32:38.480
<v Speaker 1>is doing wrong. All of those people really hate me.

0:32:38.520 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>But one of the things that strip by is that

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:44.160
<v Speaker 1>it's very hard to get good people to run for office.

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:45.880
<v Speaker 5>This is a terrible way to live your life.

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:47.080
<v Speaker 6>Like I to be honest with you, like, I've have

0:32:47.080 --> 0:32:48.400
<v Speaker 6>a two year old and a seven year old, and

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 6>I don't get to see them most evenings. And you know,

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:53.360
<v Speaker 6>sometimes I think about, like, all right, if I win,

0:32:53.480 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 6>I'm going to be in DC four days a week,

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 6>and when I'm in Michigan, I'm going to be all

0:32:58.520 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 6>over the state being the senator and making sure that

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:04.720
<v Speaker 6>I'm listening to the folks I serve. And it doesn't

0:33:04.760 --> 0:33:06.719
<v Speaker 6>leave much room for the things that, like, you know,

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:10.080
<v Speaker 6>make you a person. And I think there's a lot

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:12.600
<v Speaker 6>of folks who do this because at some point they

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 6>really like the idea of being like listened to because

0:33:15.920 --> 0:33:17.960
<v Speaker 6>you have a position of power. I think it would

0:33:17.960 --> 0:33:19.880
<v Speaker 6>be better off if more of our politics was about

0:33:20.160 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 6>the question of what do you want to do with

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 6>your power?

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 5>Rather than do you want to be in power?

0:33:24.080 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I often tried to think of what politician I

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:30.920
<v Speaker 1>feel the most betrayed by. Is it a Kirsten Cinema.

0:33:31.240 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Is it a Joe Manchin, is it a you know?

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it someone who knew the right thing but couldn't

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>get it done. But it strikes me that in the

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.200
<v Speaker 1>moment we're in where public health has been so politicized,

0:33:46.520 --> 0:33:50.719
<v Speaker 1>the really the only solution is to have doctor senators.

0:33:50.920 --> 0:33:55.120
<v Speaker 1>And speaking of which, there is a Republican doctor senator

0:33:55.240 --> 0:33:57.720
<v Speaker 1>who was the designing book for R FK. Junior. And

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 1>I'd love you to talk us through a little little

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:03.960
<v Speaker 1>bit about that cowardice and also sort of what you

0:34:04.000 --> 0:34:06.320
<v Speaker 1>think watching it and what you're feelings are.

0:34:06.760 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I got to meet Bill Classidy.

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:13.200
<v Speaker 6>Actually I've testified before the Senate Budget Committee and Health, Education,

0:34:13.280 --> 0:34:16.279
<v Speaker 6>Labor and Pensions or HELP Committee before, and he was

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 6>the ranking member on the HELP Committee when I testified

0:34:19.719 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 6>on medical debt, and it was fascinating to me. We

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:24.880
<v Speaker 6>were having this conversation about the possibility of abolishing medical debt,

0:34:24.920 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 6>which of course nobody comes by because they were making

0:34:27.320 --> 0:34:29.319
<v Speaker 6>bad decisions. You know, you don't get medical debt because

0:34:29.320 --> 0:34:30.719
<v Speaker 6>you've got a Brazilian butt lift.

0:34:30.719 --> 0:34:31.880
<v Speaker 5>You get it because you got cancer.

0:34:32.080 --> 0:34:34.080
<v Speaker 6>He kept trying to make it about the three P

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:37.480
<v Speaker 6>forty B program, which is this obscure program that reimburses

0:34:37.480 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 6>for pharmaceuticals and at times gets misused by large hospitals.

0:34:42.040 --> 0:34:44.080
<v Speaker 6>But you know, really is is a key lifeline for

0:34:44.080 --> 0:34:46.480
<v Speaker 6>getting pharmaceuticals to people who need them. I remember watching

0:34:46.560 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 6>him squirm around this question of the RFK appointment because

0:34:50.719 --> 0:34:53.920
<v Speaker 6>as much as I disagree with his ideals, he and

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:55.360
<v Speaker 6>I received very different training.

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 5>I'll be in different eras.

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 6>But when you go through medical training, there's a very

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:02.120
<v Speaker 6>rigorous process by which you are taught to ask and

0:35:02.160 --> 0:35:05.600
<v Speaker 6>apply an analytical lens to every question you ask. And

0:35:05.840 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 6>it's not just an analytic lens from the position of

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 6>your brain, like does this make sense, it's also like

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:12.840
<v Speaker 6>an analytic place from the position of your caring for

0:35:12.880 --> 0:35:14.720
<v Speaker 6>the person in front of you. And I could see

0:35:14.920 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 6>he knew he was running in a bus saw And

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 6>then I also just watched that like flicker of his

0:35:19.600 --> 0:35:22.120
<v Speaker 6>political future in his eyes, and it was actually quite

0:35:22.160 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 6>illuminating to me, because I'm like, what's it worth? Like,

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:27.359
<v Speaker 6>you know, you've already lived the whole career as a doc.

0:35:27.600 --> 0:35:30.839
<v Speaker 6>You got elected to the US Senate by the pardnerance

0:35:30.880 --> 0:35:33.719
<v Speaker 6>of your neighbors in the state of Louisiana, And what's

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:36.759
<v Speaker 6>so good about the job that you can't just do

0:35:37.000 --> 0:35:39.560
<v Speaker 6>or say the thing that is so obviously wrong to you?

0:35:39.840 --> 0:35:43.040
<v Speaker 6>And I get that Donald Trump holds that entire party

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:45.959
<v Speaker 6>enthrall to him in the most brutal kind of way,

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:47.719
<v Speaker 6>But part of me says, like, if you're going to

0:35:47.800 --> 0:35:50.279
<v Speaker 6>go out on something, maybe as the doctor who got

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:51.879
<v Speaker 6>elected to the US Senate, you're going to go out

0:35:51.880 --> 0:35:53.960
<v Speaker 6>on the idea that we shouldn't appoint a guy who

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 6>has no business in any legitimate conversation about the public's

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:01.800
<v Speaker 6>health overseeing all of the public health infrastructure of this country.

0:36:01.880 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 6>And at the same time, there was a question for me,

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:05.759
<v Speaker 6>like I was asking myself, I'm like, how do you

0:36:06.200 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 6>when you put yourself in a position like this, how

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:09.840
<v Speaker 6>do you protect yourself from that? Like what is the

0:36:10.239 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 6>architecture of your morals or even your mind that keeps

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:19.560
<v Speaker 6>you from putting the obvious wrong ahead of the obvious right.

0:36:19.440 --> 0:36:20.840
<v Speaker 5>Just to save your political skin.

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:23.440
<v Speaker 6>I just think that maybe part of it is and

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:26.120
<v Speaker 6>maybe comes down to this. Bernie told me something when

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 6>I ran for office the first time in twenty eighteen.

0:36:28.080 --> 0:36:30.120
<v Speaker 6>He's like, you know, in this business, you're either really

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:32.719
<v Speaker 6>good at lying or withholding the truth, or you're really

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:34.120
<v Speaker 6>good at telling the truth. And he's like, you don't

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:35.359
<v Speaker 6>strike me as a good liar. I was like, no,

0:36:35.400 --> 0:36:37.200
<v Speaker 6>I couldn't do to save my life. So part of

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:39.359
<v Speaker 6>me says that the thing that you can do best

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 6>in this job is to be a really good teller

0:36:41.560 --> 0:36:43.440
<v Speaker 6>of truth. I think a little bit about my grandmother

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:47.200
<v Speaker 6>and about her leadership and my family, and about her

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 6>recognition of like the odd moral circumstances in which I

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:52.680
<v Speaker 6>was growing up, or like I'm the one of my

0:36:52.760 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 6>cousins who gets to have this incredible life and the

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:58.000
<v Speaker 6>others who are smarter, more capable than me, you know,

0:36:58.160 --> 0:37:02.319
<v Speaker 6>drive cabs or work working class jobs in Egypt, and

0:37:02.640 --> 0:37:04.359
<v Speaker 6>I hope that I can keep that. But like, there

0:37:04.400 --> 0:37:06.160
<v Speaker 6>is something corrupting about power. We know it.

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:07.920
<v Speaker 5>I mean, to your point, I'm trying to get to

0:37:07.960 --> 0:37:10.360
<v Speaker 5>really like Plummet. I don't know how we like get.

0:37:10.160 --> 0:37:13.000
<v Speaker 6>More folks to see the like moral core of the thing,

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:15.839
<v Speaker 6>or to be willing to be really good arbiters of truth,

0:37:15.840 --> 0:37:18.240
<v Speaker 6>because I think if we were really good arbiters of truth,

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:20.200
<v Speaker 6>I think the Democratic Party would be a very very

0:37:20.200 --> 0:37:21.800
<v Speaker 6>different place. I think our politics would be in a

0:37:21.840 --> 0:37:24.120
<v Speaker 6>different place. It's that we have nobody who's willing to

0:37:24.200 --> 0:37:26.440
<v Speaker 6>courageously or very few who are willing to courageously tell

0:37:26.480 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 6>the truth who get to positions of power to be

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:29.640
<v Speaker 6>able to tell it in a real way.

0:37:29.840 --> 0:37:31.839
<v Speaker 1>First of all, I want you to talk about, like

0:37:32.320 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 1>what the headwinds are you have this primary. You have

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:39.800
<v Speaker 1>two opponents, both women, both they occupy sort of different

0:37:39.880 --> 0:37:42.840
<v Speaker 1>lanes of the Democratic Party. If you win this primary,

0:37:43.040 --> 0:37:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you will go against the Republican. It's a purple state,

0:37:46.920 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>but there is definitely you have this sort of very

0:37:50.520 --> 0:37:54.120
<v Speaker 1>very scary like Michigan militia. And then it's a state

0:37:54.200 --> 0:37:57.759
<v Speaker 1>with like a lot of different kinds of people, a

0:37:57.760 --> 0:37:59.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of different kinds of voters, and a lot of

0:37:59.480 --> 0:38:01.839
<v Speaker 1>different kinds interests. First of all, I want to know

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:03.880
<v Speaker 1>how you win in Michigan and then I want to

0:38:03.920 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>know sort of what you envision is a senator, what that.

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:08.319
<v Speaker 4>Would look like.

0:38:08.800 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, the first thing I'll say is this, I think

0:38:11.040 --> 0:38:14.520
<v Speaker 6>we have an outdated political lens through which we try

0:38:14.520 --> 0:38:17.439
<v Speaker 6>to analyze our politics, which tends to be this right

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:21.000
<v Speaker 6>left to divide. And I think in accordance with that lens,

0:38:21.040 --> 0:38:23.239
<v Speaker 6>you would say, well, Abdul is running further to the

0:38:23.320 --> 0:38:25.840
<v Speaker 6>quote unquote left, and you would say that other candidates

0:38:25.880 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 6>are running either further to the right or somewhere between

0:38:28.280 --> 0:38:31.320
<v Speaker 6>the two of us. And I think the proper lens

0:38:31.320 --> 0:38:34.000
<v Speaker 6>for our politics today that helps explain why a state

0:38:34.040 --> 0:38:36.640
<v Speaker 6>like Michigan would both support a Bernie Sanders in a

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 6>primary and then vote for Donald Trump in a general

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:42.160
<v Speaker 6>election is more the separation between people who feel locked

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 6>out of our politics or institutions of power and the

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.880
<v Speaker 6>people locking them out. And I think if you understand

0:38:47.880 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 6>Michigan that way, I think this race and my entry

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:54.040
<v Speaker 6>into it makes a lot more sense. I'm somebody who,

0:38:54.080 --> 0:38:56.759
<v Speaker 6>by virtue of just happenstance, got to be in a

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 6>lot of the rooms that most people who look like

0:38:58.400 --> 0:39:01.240
<v Speaker 6>me get locked out of, and in so many ways

0:39:01.360 --> 0:39:03.560
<v Speaker 6>I've sort of looked at what's happening in those rooms

0:39:03.760 --> 0:39:07.719
<v Speaker 6>and felt just this deep guttural disgust to the way

0:39:07.719 --> 0:39:10.479
<v Speaker 6>that people are talked about and parsed and thought through.

0:39:10.800 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 6>And I have made my career about trying to unlock

0:39:14.040 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 6>a lot of those rooms.

0:39:15.320 --> 0:39:16.520
<v Speaker 5>So when I travel my state, and.

0:39:16.520 --> 0:39:19.080
<v Speaker 6>I've been to what fifty some cities, I've probably done

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:20.279
<v Speaker 6>nearly one hundred public events.

0:39:20.320 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 5>Because when your name's Abdul, you take nothing for granted.

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.520
<v Speaker 6>No matter where I go, people tell me the same stuff,

0:39:24.560 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 6>like you close your eyes and you could be in

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:29.279
<v Speaker 6>a town hall in Escanaba in the Upper Peninsula, or

0:39:29.360 --> 0:39:31.560
<v Speaker 6>a church in Redford, and people are literally using the

0:39:31.600 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 6>same exact words, just that they don't know that they're

0:39:34.080 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 6>using the same words. And So I think that a

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:41.040
<v Speaker 6>political movement built around unlocking our system and being one

0:39:41.120 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 6>hundred percent honest, clear and direct about the ways the

0:39:44.440 --> 0:39:46.840
<v Speaker 6>methods of the locking out that happened, the ways that

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 6>corporations can buy and sell politicians, the ways in which

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:53.799
<v Speaker 6>it's corrupted Republicans wholeheartedly, but also unfortunately too many Democrats,

0:39:53.920 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 6>The ways that I've rejected that system. I've never taken

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:57.719
<v Speaker 6>a dime of corporate money, both when I ran in

0:39:57.760 --> 0:39:59.719
<v Speaker 6>twenty eighteen, and when I'm running now, and I see

0:39:59.719 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 6>that I'm blocking as being a fundamental core value of

0:40:02.640 --> 0:40:04.360
<v Speaker 6>what I'm trying to do, I think I'm going to

0:40:04.400 --> 0:40:06.200
<v Speaker 6>win a lot of voters who otherwise.

0:40:05.800 --> 0:40:07.640
<v Speaker 5>Folks would code as quote unquote right wing.

0:40:07.920 --> 0:40:09.359
<v Speaker 6>Now, look, are there folks who are going to run

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 6>it who are going to vote against me because my

0:40:10.760 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 6>name is Abdul. Yes, but let's be clear, they're not

0:40:12.680 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 6>voting for any Democrat, right, So if like that's your assessment,

0:40:16.320 --> 0:40:18.440
<v Speaker 6>I think you're not really paying attention. But then the

0:40:18.520 --> 0:40:21.200
<v Speaker 6>other part of it is this think about who Democrats

0:40:21.280 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 6>lost in twenty twenty four. They lost mainly Arabs and

0:40:25.400 --> 0:40:29.240
<v Speaker 6>Muslims over the disastrous handling of Gaza, and they lost

0:40:29.280 --> 0:40:31.680
<v Speaker 6>young men over the notion that young men don't feel

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 6>like they have a place in the party. I happen

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 6>to be a younger I can't credibly call myself young anymore,

0:40:37.920 --> 0:40:42.200
<v Speaker 6>but a younger Arab Muslim man, and I think that

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.880
<v Speaker 6>that allows for a conversation that Democrats too often have

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:49.400
<v Speaker 6>not had. You couple that with the honesty and the

0:40:49.400 --> 0:40:52.120
<v Speaker 6>integrity of my message and the fact that I've been

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 6>saying and doing the same things now for a decade

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.560
<v Speaker 6>in Michigan politics. And yes, my name might be Abdul,

0:40:57.640 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 6>but like I'm the Abdul who wants to make sure

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:00.719
<v Speaker 6>you have healthcare, and the due who wants to make

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 6>sure you can keep your job and form a union

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:03.960
<v Speaker 6>if they're trying to take it away from you. And

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 6>I'm the Abdul who's fought against the big corporations who

0:41:06.040 --> 0:41:08.359
<v Speaker 6>are polluting your kids air, and the Abdul who put

0:41:08.360 --> 0:41:10.040
<v Speaker 6>a pair of glasses on your kids face, and the

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:12.920
<v Speaker 6>Abdul who forgave your medical debt. Like I think that

0:41:12.920 --> 0:41:15.320
<v Speaker 6>there's an opportunity here to win both in the primary

0:41:15.520 --> 0:41:17.880
<v Speaker 6>and the general. And so you know, maybe as a

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:20.360
<v Speaker 6>child of immigrant, like as a hazard of that, like

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 6>we do math, but like the math maths. And my

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:27.279
<v Speaker 6>job is to have the conversations that other Democrats are

0:41:27.320 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 6>not willing to have, because too often they're more interested

0:41:30.040 --> 0:41:32.600
<v Speaker 6>in the conversations they're having behind closed doors with the

0:41:32.640 --> 0:41:34.840
<v Speaker 6>corporation that's going to write them a pac check, conversations

0:41:34.840 --> 0:41:36.080
<v Speaker 6>that I've never had and will never have.

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:38.520
<v Speaker 1>We would love you to talk about the uncommitted movement

0:41:39.000 --> 0:41:42.360
<v Speaker 1>and just sort of what you tried to do there,

0:41:42.480 --> 0:41:45.279
<v Speaker 1>and there clearly was and I think a lot of

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:49.880
<v Speaker 1>us worried about this failure on the part of elected

0:41:49.920 --> 0:41:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Democrats running for office to address the situation. And I

0:41:55.040 --> 0:41:56.359
<v Speaker 1>wonder if you could talk about that.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:00.160
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, people see the difference between principles and political position,

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 6>and I think the difference is whether or not your

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:05.160
<v Speaker 6>principles apply in all places in all times, or if

0:42:05.160 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 6>they just apply in some places and sometimes, which makes

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:10.320
<v Speaker 6>them just political positions. And I've tried to be principled

0:42:10.520 --> 0:42:14.440
<v Speaker 6>about the question of where our tax dollars go. And

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:18.800
<v Speaker 6>I think a lot of us watched the just complete

0:42:18.840 --> 0:42:23.120
<v Speaker 6>dumpster fire of the Biden administration's mishandling of Gaza, and

0:42:23.160 --> 0:42:25.520
<v Speaker 6>I think it said a lot about his or his

0:42:25.560 --> 0:42:28.880
<v Speaker 6>administration's capacity to do the job. And I think the

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 6>question was, how do we make sure that folks understand

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:35.920
<v Speaker 6>the risk of this ahead of the general election? And

0:42:35.960 --> 0:42:39.920
<v Speaker 6>so when the Uncommitted movement started to organize, I endorsed

0:42:39.920 --> 0:42:42.600
<v Speaker 6>it because I think we saw that Joe Biden was

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:44.920
<v Speaker 6>not fit for the job in his handling of Gaza.

0:42:45.040 --> 0:42:47.400
<v Speaker 6>I think the whole world saw that after his first

0:42:47.680 --> 0:42:51.239
<v Speaker 6>disastrous debate performance and ultimately who is no longer the nominee.

0:42:51.320 --> 0:42:55.320
<v Speaker 6>And for me, the minute that Kamala Harris was announced

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 6>as the nominee for the party, I endorsed her. I

0:42:58.200 --> 0:43:00.880
<v Speaker 6>was the first Arab and or Muslim leader in Michigan

0:43:00.920 --> 0:43:02.680
<v Speaker 6>to do so. And the reason I did it and

0:43:02.760 --> 0:43:04.920
<v Speaker 6>it was not because I agreed with the administration's handling

0:43:05.000 --> 0:43:07.640
<v Speaker 6>of Gaza, but it was because whether you saw this

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 6>from the eyes of a child in the city of

0:43:09.200 --> 0:43:11.680
<v Speaker 6>Detroit whom I served, or the eyes of a child

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 6>in Gaza, there is no world in which Kamala Harris

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:17.720
<v Speaker 6>would not have been better every single day than Donald Trump.

0:43:17.800 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 6>And that to me is again a matter of principle, right,

0:43:20.320 --> 0:43:22.480
<v Speaker 6>And so you know, I endorsed her. But here's the

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:25.440
<v Speaker 6>hard part. One of the aspects of that was I

0:43:25.440 --> 0:43:27.760
<v Speaker 6>would have thought that that would give me some space

0:43:28.000 --> 0:43:30.560
<v Speaker 6>to have a conversation with the campaign and say, there

0:43:30.600 --> 0:43:33.240
<v Speaker 6>really needs to be some distance on this issue, because

0:43:33.239 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 6>there are a lot of voters for whom this is

0:43:35.280 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 6>a non starter and we're seeing the Natan Yahoo administration

0:43:38.719 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 6>disregard American public perspective or American political values, and you

0:43:44.120 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 6>need to call that out. And it didn't happen. And

0:43:45.960 --> 0:43:48.040
<v Speaker 6>at the same time, I'm on the phone with Arab

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:50.000
<v Speaker 6>and Muslim leaders being like, y'ah, this is insane. Donald

0:43:50.040 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 6>Trump tried to like stop people who look like you

0:43:52.120 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 6>from coming to this country. This is ridiculous, and he

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 6>is going to come after our community again.

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:59.680
<v Speaker 5>Okay, this is crazy, crazy, And unfortunately it was.

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:02.160
<v Speaker 6>You know, you can imagine the frustration of months and

0:44:02.200 --> 0:44:04.359
<v Speaker 6>months on the phone with these different groups of people

0:44:04.400 --> 0:44:06.399
<v Speaker 6>and nobody seems to be listening, and you're like caught

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.600
<v Speaker 6>in the middle, trying to be the arbiter of like

0:44:08.680 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 6>just basic logic and conventional wisdom and be like y'all,

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 6>like can we all recognize what's about to happen here?

0:44:14.200 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 6>And in some respects I think, you know, there are

0:44:17.520 --> 0:44:21.399
<v Speaker 6>frustrations obviously with the decisions that Arabin Muslim voters made.

0:44:21.800 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 5>I have a lot of those same frustrations.

0:44:23.600 --> 0:44:26.319
<v Speaker 6>And at the same time, we were talking about the

0:44:26.400 --> 0:44:28.359
<v Speaker 6>vice president of the United States, right, Like we're talking

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:32.320
<v Speaker 6>about very very powerful people who who made political decisions,

0:44:32.480 --> 0:44:34.840
<v Speaker 6>and these are political decisions that put them on the

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:40.120
<v Speaker 6>wrong side of the empathy anybody should have for dead, dying,

0:44:40.239 --> 0:44:44.239
<v Speaker 6>maimed children or orphan children and I just it was

0:44:44.320 --> 0:44:46.880
<v Speaker 6>just a dumpster fire waiting to happen, and it was

0:44:46.960 --> 0:44:49.400
<v Speaker 6>really truly one of the most frustrating four months of

0:44:49.400 --> 0:44:52.520
<v Speaker 6>my life. And so I supported Uncommitted because my principles

0:44:52.520 --> 0:44:56.280
<v Speaker 6>tell me that we owe a responsibility to our size

0:44:56.280 --> 0:44:59.200
<v Speaker 6>and our power not to spend our tax dollars writing

0:44:59.200 --> 0:45:01.680
<v Speaker 6>blank checks to foreign militaries who are dropping bombs on

0:45:01.719 --> 0:45:04.080
<v Speaker 6>other people's children when we have starving children here at home.

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:07.720
<v Speaker 6>And I endorsed Kamala Harris because I knew that Donald

0:45:07.719 --> 0:45:10.560
<v Speaker 6>Trump would be worse when it came to those same principles.

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. No, as someone who was on the Jewish side

0:45:16.000 --> 0:45:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of that conversation, the same exact thing. I mean, fancy

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:25.800
<v Speaker 1>Jews saying, well, he's better on Israel and me saying

0:45:25.920 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>a blank check to Israel to kill Palestinian children is

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 1>good for no One' sound good for Jews, it's not

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:35.719
<v Speaker 1>good for Israel, It's not good for anyone. And it's

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:39.520
<v Speaker 1>the same terrible tragedy and now it's just getting one

0:45:39.560 --> 0:45:40.359
<v Speaker 1>hundred times worse.

0:45:40.520 --> 0:45:42.799
<v Speaker 6>So much of this conversation, especially when it comes to

0:45:42.840 --> 0:45:46.600
<v Speaker 6>Michigan in Dearborn, boils down to a certain like tribalism

0:45:46.880 --> 0:45:47.480
<v Speaker 6>about this thing.

0:45:47.719 --> 0:45:48.520
<v Speaker 5>My position on.

0:45:48.560 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 6>Blank checks to foreign militaries applies to Egypt, where my

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:53.840
<v Speaker 6>folks immigrated from. It applies to Jordan, applies to Pakistan,

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 6>applies to Saudi Arabia. I just don't think that we

0:45:56.520 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 6>pay our tax dollars so that somebody can send blank

0:45:58.560 --> 0:46:00.919
<v Speaker 6>checks to another country's million terry. I think we pay

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:03.719
<v Speaker 6>them to invest in our own kids. Similarly, right, it

0:46:03.760 --> 0:46:07.480
<v Speaker 6>has been really frustrating to watch anybody, right, whether with

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:11.000
<v Speaker 6>good intention or bad intention, equate the actions of a

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:15.320
<v Speaker 6>foreign government with the will or the beliefs of Jewish

0:46:15.320 --> 0:46:19.120
<v Speaker 6>people or the Jewish faith. And I find any attempt

0:46:19.160 --> 0:46:22.120
<v Speaker 6>to do that as being essentially anti Semitic. Similarly right, Like,

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 6>it'd be a crazy thing off somebody who was like, well,

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:24.680
<v Speaker 6>the Egyptian government did this.

0:46:24.640 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 5>So clearly you believe, like no, like what f is that?

0:46:27.640 --> 0:46:27.759
<v Speaker 4>Right?

0:46:27.840 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Like?

0:46:28.040 --> 0:46:30.120
<v Speaker 6>And so when we do it to anybody, it's wrong.

0:46:30.200 --> 0:46:32.799
<v Speaker 6>Similarly right, there are basic principles that all of us

0:46:32.800 --> 0:46:34.920
<v Speaker 6>have to bring to this. I condemned Hamas from day one,

0:46:35.160 --> 0:46:37.799
<v Speaker 6>because anybody who puts children in harm's way is wrong.

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:41.200
<v Speaker 6>No context needed, right, And so what I've always tried

0:46:41.239 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 6>to ask is take the same principle and apply them everywhere,

0:46:43.920 --> 0:46:47.760
<v Speaker 6>independent of your own background, independent of who the actor

0:46:47.840 --> 0:46:51.759
<v Speaker 6>involved is, apply the same principles everywhere. And I think

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:53.400
<v Speaker 6>if we did a lot more of that, and we

0:46:53.480 --> 0:46:56.839
<v Speaker 6>had the courage to say what our principles were and

0:46:56.920 --> 0:46:59.719
<v Speaker 6>apply them evenly, I think that this would be a

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 6>far less challenging situation. And in the end, what the

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:05.480
<v Speaker 6>issue is is you've got a special interest regime that

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:07.799
<v Speaker 6>allows maga billionaires to spend a lot of money to

0:47:07.880 --> 0:47:09.520
<v Speaker 6>try and tell people what they can and can't say.

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:12.319
<v Speaker 6>And like that's the same issue as we have with

0:47:12.560 --> 0:47:15.480
<v Speaker 6>pharmaceutical money that comes in and tries to truck you

0:47:15.520 --> 0:47:17.720
<v Speaker 6>if you talk about Medicare for All or health insurance

0:47:17.760 --> 0:47:20.200
<v Speaker 6>CEOs or utilities who come in when you try to

0:47:20.239 --> 0:47:22.399
<v Speaker 6>regulate them. And we've got to sort of name the

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:26.080
<v Speaker 6>process and then also name our principles. And the contrast

0:47:26.160 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 6>between those things, I think is what can actually get

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 6>us back to a party that maybe can win elections again.

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You think the Democratic Party needs new leadership.

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:37.480
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think the Democratic Party needs to remember what

0:47:37.600 --> 0:47:40.040
<v Speaker 6>its base is about. Like here's the problem. There is

0:47:40.080 --> 0:47:44.600
<v Speaker 6>a fundamental wedge between Democratic Party voters or voters generally,

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:48.360
<v Speaker 6>and Democratic Party donors. We need leadership that is going

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:51.200
<v Speaker 6>to pay attention to the voters instead of the donors.

0:47:51.320 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 6>And you see a playout and it's like, we still

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 6>haven't learned the lesson. You look at this Gaza resolution

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:57.800
<v Speaker 6>at the DNC meeting, you're like, y'all, your base every

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:00.399
<v Speaker 6>poll that you have ever seen in the last month

0:48:00.480 --> 0:48:02.759
<v Speaker 6>or two has shown you that your base disagrees with

0:48:02.800 --> 0:48:05.120
<v Speaker 6>you on this. And yet and yet you cannot as

0:48:05.120 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 6>a party have the courage to proclaim that you agree

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 6>with where the base has moved, which, by the way,

0:48:10.400 --> 0:48:13.040
<v Speaker 6>is a statement of principle about what is happening with

0:48:13.160 --> 0:48:14.920
<v Speaker 6>our money, and you still can't say it.

0:48:15.000 --> 0:48:16.360
<v Speaker 5>And part of me is is like, what are you

0:48:16.440 --> 0:48:17.080
<v Speaker 5>worried about?

0:48:17.120 --> 0:48:18.840
<v Speaker 6>And the hard part to me is this, It's like,

0:48:18.880 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 6>there is a certain political economy and incentive set that

0:48:22.000 --> 0:48:25.040
<v Speaker 6>when you have the luxury suite on the Titanic, you're

0:48:25.040 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 6>more interested in keeping the luxury suite on the Titanic

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:29.800
<v Speaker 6>than you are and making sure that the Titanic doesn't sink.

0:48:30.000 --> 0:48:33.200
<v Speaker 6>And unfortunately, that's kind of how our party feels right now.

0:48:33.400 --> 0:48:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for joining us.

0:48:35.200 --> 0:48:38.440
<v Speaker 5>It was my privilege. I appreciate you having me a

0:48:39.560 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 5>moment ou.

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Jesse Canon.

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 3>So Maali, we previously discussed one of the most stupid

0:48:46.600 --> 0:48:49.960
<v Speaker 3>performative moronics I've come across in a minute, which is

0:48:50.000 --> 0:48:52.520
<v Speaker 3>that Oklahoma is going to test teachers from California and

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:55.239
<v Speaker 3>New York to make sure that they're America first, and

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:58.320
<v Speaker 3>the test is written by Brager, You who now seemed

0:48:58.360 --> 0:49:02.560
<v Speaker 3>to be the outsource for all things performatively stupid. Yeah,

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 3>what did it shocked you to hear that these questions

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:08.880
<v Speaker 3>are some of the most ridiculously stupid misinformation I've ever seen.

0:49:09.160 --> 0:49:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Who is coming from New York and California to go

0:49:11.760 --> 0:49:12.879
<v Speaker 1>teach at Oklahoma?

0:49:13.120 --> 0:49:13.239
<v Speaker 5>Like?

0:49:13.440 --> 0:49:16.000
<v Speaker 1>Who is doing that? Who's like I need to go

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:18.560
<v Speaker 1>to a state where they pay teachers less, where they

0:49:18.600 --> 0:49:21.520
<v Speaker 1>have less state taxes to pay for things. I want

0:49:21.560 --> 0:49:25.720
<v Speaker 1>to go work there because I mean Oklahoma. You guys

0:49:26.040 --> 0:49:28.799
<v Speaker 1>couldn't make yourselves any less appealing if you.

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:32.440
<v Speaker 3>Tried, agreed the thing, being though, you'd also have to go.

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:34.680
<v Speaker 3>I want to go here because I want to teach

0:49:34.760 --> 0:49:37.400
<v Speaker 3>kids absolutely not true facts.

0:49:37.800 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 1>Nobody's doing this. I mean this is like this crew

0:49:41.960 --> 0:49:45.919
<v Speaker 1>is so delusional about being a teacher. It's like their

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:50.480
<v Speaker 1>war on federal employees. They think federal employees are making

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:54.480
<v Speaker 1>billions of dollars and they're doing it because they want

0:49:54.520 --> 0:49:57.640
<v Speaker 1>to help people. Like it's the idea that somehow wanting

0:49:57.680 --> 0:50:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to help people is not in the calculate at all.

0:50:01.040 --> 0:50:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:50:01.480 --> 0:50:03.160
<v Speaker 3>I almost wish they would go back to the War

0:50:03.200 --> 0:50:05.680
<v Speaker 3>on Christmas because that one at least had no victims.

0:50:06.000 --> 0:50:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, well it did. It had victims of me. I

0:50:09.560 --> 0:50:11.360
<v Speaker 1>was a victim of the War on Christmas.

0:50:11.440 --> 0:50:13.799
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I'm a victim of Christmas music every year

0:50:13.800 --> 0:50:15.080
<v Speaker 3>and it makes me sad.

0:50:15.239 --> 0:50:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Happy Holidays, bitch. That's it for this episode of Fast Politics.

0:50:23.960 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Tune in every Monday, Wednesday, Thursday and Saturday to hear

0:50:29.960 --> 0:50:34.400
<v Speaker 1>the best minds and politics make sense of all this chaos.

0:50:34.640 --> 0:50:37.440
<v Speaker 1>If you enjoy this podcast, please send it to a

0:50:37.520 --> 0:50:41.520
<v Speaker 1>friend and keep the conversation going. Thanks for listening.