WEBVTT - From Fossil Fuels to Climate Action with Tom Steyer

0:00:00.680 --> 0:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I know that if we don't do this, we're flirting

0:00:05.400 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>with disaster. But what I really think we should focus

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 1>on is we can build the most beautiful future that

0:00:13.400 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>anyone can imagine too. Yeah, of course we're trying to

0:00:16.200 --> 0:00:19.360
<v Speaker 1>avoid this huge problem, but really what we're trying to

0:00:19.440 --> 0:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>do is build this incredible future better than anybody's ever lived,

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:27.800
<v Speaker 1>than humans have ever had it in the history of

0:00:27.800 --> 0:00:30.000
<v Speaker 1>the planet. That's what we're really trying to create is

0:00:30.040 --> 0:00:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a fantastic future.

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.239
<v Speaker 2>Oh fucked.

0:00:38.280 --> 0:00:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Hi.

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm Chris Turney and this is I'm Fucking the Future,

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 3>a show about a climate crisis and what we can

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:50.159
<v Speaker 3>do about it. The future can sometimes seem bleak, so

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:53.159
<v Speaker 3>every episode we'll talk to someone with a big idea

0:00:53.240 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 3>for turning things around. I believe it. Together, we really

0:00:56.880 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 3>can on fuck this. Let's get started.

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:04.000
<v Speaker 2>We fucking the future.

0:01:06.080 --> 0:01:08.600
<v Speaker 3>There are a lot of ways you can fight global heating.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 3>You can eat less meat, you can drive an electric car,

0:01:13.160 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 3>or you can try to become president of the United States.

0:01:16.840 --> 0:01:20.119
<v Speaker 3>That's what our guest today decides to do. His name

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:21.200
<v Speaker 3>is Tom Steyer.

0:01:21.800 --> 0:01:22.000
<v Speaker 1>Here.

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:24.560
<v Speaker 3>He is one of the Democratic primary debates Back in

0:01:24.640 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty.

0:01:26.000 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 4>Rachel I'm the only person on this stage who will

0:01:28.440 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 4>say that climate is the number one priority for me.

0:01:31.959 --> 0:01:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Vice President Biden wrong say it. Senator Warren won't say it.

0:01:36.800 --> 0:01:39.679
<v Speaker 4>It's a state of emergency, and I would declare a

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:43.480
<v Speaker 4>state of emergency on day one. I've spent a decade

0:01:43.720 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 4>fighting and beating oil companies, stopping pipelines, stopping fossil fuel plants,

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 4>ensuring clean energy across the country.

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>I know that we have to do this. I also

0:01:54.760 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>know that we can do this.

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 3>Tom doesn't fit a profile of your typical climate activists,

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 3>because Tom is a wildly successful businessman who made his

0:02:04.560 --> 0:02:08.880
<v Speaker 3>fortune in part by investing in fossil fuel companies. Here's

0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 3>Tom on CNN talking about his time in the private sector.

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Our company invested in every part of the American economy,

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:19.639
<v Speaker 1>including oil and gas and coal, and I realized as

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:22.399
<v Speaker 1>we were doing it, I basically thought, the American government works.

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:25.320
<v Speaker 1>If there's a big problem, the American government will solve it.

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:29.200
<v Speaker 1>And somewhere around fourteen or fifteen years ago, I thought,

0:02:29.440 --> 0:02:32.760
<v Speaker 1>this doesn't seem to be working. There's this huge, unintended

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.639
<v Speaker 1>consequence of having a fossil fuel economy, which is climate

0:02:35.720 --> 0:02:39.920
<v Speaker 1>change and I started to do whatever I could to

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>try and solve this problem.

0:02:41.880 --> 0:02:47.840
<v Speaker 3>Then the climate crisis is a direct result of industrialization

0:02:48.600 --> 0:02:52.600
<v Speaker 3>of runaway business development. But Tom has come to believe

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:56.120
<v Speaker 3>that one way we can fight against global heating is

0:02:56.200 --> 0:03:00.240
<v Speaker 3>through the power of business and industry. In twenty twenty one,

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:05.080
<v Speaker 3>Tom founded Galvanized Climate Solutions. It's a financial firm but

0:03:05.320 --> 0:03:09.600
<v Speaker 3>only invests in companies making a positive climate impact. How

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 3>did Tom go from fossil fuel investor to climate advocate,

0:03:14.440 --> 0:03:18.120
<v Speaker 3>I asked him. So, I think a lot of people

0:03:18.120 --> 0:03:22.320
<v Speaker 3>are having their are harr moment, that oh fuck climate

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.480
<v Speaker 3>change is real moment for me. I remember I was

0:03:25.520 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 3>a nerdy teenager. It was back in nineteen eighty seven

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:30.400
<v Speaker 3>at the weather station and a hurricane hit London, and

0:03:30.520 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 3>just a year later British Prime Minister Margret Factor was

0:03:33.360 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 3>given these powerful speeches about climate change and we're going

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:39.000
<v Speaker 3>to do something about it. So what is your aha,

0:03:39.120 --> 0:03:40.120
<v Speaker 3>oh fuck moment?

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Basically I had spent a summer when I was twenty

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 1>four up in Alaska. I had an office job, but

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>I basically spent every weekend out in the woods, climbing, fishing, canoeing,

0:03:55.640 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>everything I could think of to get as far deep

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.960
<v Speaker 1>into the woods as I could. Incredible summer. And then

0:04:01.520 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I went back with my family, including four kids, to

0:04:05.560 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>give them the same appreciation that i'd have show them

0:04:09.120 --> 0:04:14.200
<v Speaker 1>how incredibly fertile and wild America was, you know, the

0:04:14.400 --> 0:04:19.440
<v Speaker 1>huge fish, the incredible animals, the birds, just how incredibly

0:04:19.560 --> 0:04:22.920
<v Speaker 1>rich the country is. And basically we got up there

0:04:23.640 --> 0:04:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and we did see that, But what we also saw

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>inescapably was well, this place is melting.

0:04:29.880 --> 0:04:33.039
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's pause here for a segment we like to

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 3>call holy fuck.

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Fuck.

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:46.640
<v Speaker 3>When Tom says for Alaska is melting, he means literally melting.

0:04:47.120 --> 0:04:50.360
<v Speaker 3>The average temperature across Alaska has increased by up to

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.080
<v Speaker 3>six degrees fahrenheit over the last forty years. That's more

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:56.960
<v Speaker 3>than three times for warming of the rest of the country.

0:04:57.600 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 3>This has led to a dramatic melting of glacier across

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 3>the state. It's a trend that's set to continue, with

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:07.200
<v Speaker 3>at least half of Alaska's remaining ice expected to disappear

0:05:07.440 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 3>in the coming years. This matters for two reasons. First,

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:14.839
<v Speaker 3>the melting of glaciers in Alaska and across the Arctic

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 3>are one of the biggest causes of rising sea levels today. Second,

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:23.159
<v Speaker 3>this heating is also melting Arctic sea ice, which you

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:26.279
<v Speaker 3>can think of as a world's air conditioner. This is

0:05:26.279 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 3>a thin layer of the Earth's surface that's totally frozen,

0:05:30.520 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 3>and since sea ice is mostly white, it reflects sunlight,

0:05:34.520 --> 0:05:37.679
<v Speaker 3>which pushes at heat off the Earth's surface and back

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:41.160
<v Speaker 3>into space. And if that ice isn't there, then the

0:05:41.200 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 3>sunlight gets absorbed into the ocean, warming the waters and

0:05:45.440 --> 0:05:49.839
<v Speaker 3>melting more ice. It's a vicious cycle, and it's one

0:05:49.880 --> 0:05:52.359
<v Speaker 3>of those facts that just stops in your tracks and

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 3>makes you say, holy fuck.

0:05:56.320 --> 0:05:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Fuck.

0:06:00.480 --> 0:06:04.400
<v Speaker 3>Okay, back to Tom, seeing all this change in Alaska change,

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:06.760
<v Speaker 3>what was happening so fast, was shocking to him.

0:06:06.800 --> 0:06:10.120
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we had as a family, both my

0:06:10.240 --> 0:06:12.200
<v Speaker 1>wife's side of the family and my side of the family,

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.919
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of years of going into the woods in North America.

0:06:16.000 --> 0:06:18.720
<v Speaker 1>And so it wasn't like going to Disneyland. It was

0:06:18.800 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 1>going to this place that Americans have gone, well Native

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:29.839
<v Speaker 1>Americans for thousands of years and immigrants like us for

0:06:30.000 --> 0:06:36.039
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of years to find meaning and spirituality and beauty

0:06:36.200 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 1>and incredible natural wealth.

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Tom saw how in just one generation, so much of

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.600
<v Speaker 3>Alaska's landscape had changed, and like a lot of people,

0:06:48.040 --> 0:06:50.120
<v Speaker 3>Tom at first looked to the government to solve a

0:06:50.160 --> 0:06:54.720
<v Speaker 3>climate crisis. He supported politicians and causes that were pro climate,

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:58.600
<v Speaker 3>and eventually he took a stab at running for office himself.

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:03.400
<v Speaker 3>Tom's presidential platform was heavily focused on climate action. Here's

0:07:03.400 --> 0:07:04.200
<v Speaker 3>one of his ads.

0:07:04.600 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Tom Steyer. I'm running for president, and I'm

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>committed to creating a sustainable future for all Americans. Our

0:07:12.720 --> 0:07:16.800
<v Speaker 1>planet is at a crossroads. Wildfires are taking lives and

0:07:16.840 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>destroying communities. Prolonged heat waves and extreme storms are putting

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.760
<v Speaker 1>the vulnerable at risk. We can't continue to deny science

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.880
<v Speaker 1>and roll back environmental protections. We must treat the climate

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 1>crisis with the urgency it demands. That's why, on day

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>one of my presidency, I will declare the climate crisis

0:07:38.520 --> 0:07:39.680
<v Speaker 1>a National Emergency.

0:07:40.760 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 3>Tom helped make climate a more central focus in the election,

0:07:44.520 --> 0:07:48.360
<v Speaker 3>but ultimately he didn't manage to win the presidency, and

0:07:48.440 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 3>so he decides to shift gears. Tom had spent a

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 3>lot of time trying to convince people that fighting the

0:07:54.640 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 3>climate crisis was for riving to do, but he thought,

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 3>what if he could appeal to people more pragmatic interests.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 3>What if doing the right thing for the climate was

0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:08.680
<v Speaker 3>also the right thing for their bank accounts. It's an

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.120
<v Speaker 3>idea Tom calls movement capitalism.

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:20.440
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know, capitalism scales, profitability scales. It's somewhat cynical

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 1>of me to say, but unfortunately, I think it's realistic

0:08:23.440 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>for me to also say altruism doesn't scale.

0:08:25.960 --> 0:08:28.960
<v Speaker 3>Right, or it scales less. I mean, we see more

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:32.120
<v Speaker 3>and more consumers choosing to buy from climate conscious companies,

0:08:32.360 --> 0:08:34.120
<v Speaker 3>but it's not moving a needle in the way that

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:36.520
<v Speaker 3>would incentivize other companies to do the same.

0:08:36.640 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, we need to have these changes be profitable so

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that people can make the decisions in their own self interest.

0:08:46.640 --> 0:08:51.079
<v Speaker 1>And so it's not that I think capitalism is by

0:08:51.200 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 1>definition good, it's capitalism can be good. Capitalism is basically,

0:08:57.720 --> 0:09:00.280
<v Speaker 1>we're going to produce what you want, so you pay

0:09:00.360 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>us money. That's capitalism. Like, you tell us what you

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:08.319
<v Speaker 1>want and we'll produce it if you'll pay us for it. Okay,

0:09:08.400 --> 0:09:11.680
<v Speaker 1>And the idea is okay, So my self interest is

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>to produce something you want yours. You're just going to

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 1>get whatever you want, you tell me, and I'll make it.

0:09:16.440 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And so in this if society decides we need to

0:09:21.240 --> 0:09:24.959
<v Speaker 1>do things that take into account the cost of pollution,

0:09:25.440 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>then we're just going to say we're going to produce

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>all the things you want, but we're not going to pollute.

0:09:31.120 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>And if you think about it, there's nothing wrong with oil.

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Oil is this incredibly powerful energy source. People did it

0:09:38.800 --> 0:09:41.880
<v Speaker 1>as a way of moving cars, moving ships, moving planes.

0:09:41.920 --> 0:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>They weren't trying to destroy the world. They were basically

0:09:44.160 --> 0:09:49.079
<v Speaker 1>giving people exactly what they wanted energy. It just turned

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.080
<v Speaker 1>out there was this unintended consequence that in burning the

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:54.800
<v Speaker 1>oil and burning the natural gas and burning the coal,

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:57.360
<v Speaker 1>we were going to basically heat up the planet in

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.200
<v Speaker 1>a way that was going to cause all kinds of

0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:04.080
<v Speaker 1>problems for human beings and all the other eight million

0:10:04.080 --> 0:10:08.680
<v Speaker 1>species on the planet Earth. And so all we're saying is, okay,

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>let's give people what they really want, which is all

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 1>of that capability for them to move around and to

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 1>fuel the things that they like in a way that

0:10:18.440 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have this unintended consequence that basically burns clean And

0:10:22.040 --> 0:10:25.200
<v Speaker 1>if we can do that, then we're basically producing what

0:10:25.240 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>people want. And for that to really happen in a

0:10:28.040 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>big way, then we need to build big businesses that

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.480
<v Speaker 1>hire people and paying them competitive wages and really give

0:10:34.480 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 1>an incentive for this thing to grow.

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Weird fucking the future. Weird fucking the future.

0:10:50.120 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 3>For years, a big obstacle in getting people to switch

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.320
<v Speaker 3>to renewable energy sources was cost. Solar and wind was

0:10:57.400 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 3>just too expensive compared to oil and coal. But in

0:11:00.800 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 3>the past few years that's all changed. Clean energy is

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:08.240
<v Speaker 3>now far cheaper than fossil fuels. Fa'st creates a lot

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:11.200
<v Speaker 3>of demand, and that in turn is to an explosion

0:11:11.280 --> 0:11:14.760
<v Speaker 3>of investment by the private sector. It's one example of

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.520
<v Speaker 3>a positive alignment of business interests and climate interests.

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Well, a ton of things have changed in terms of

0:11:21.520 --> 0:11:24.040
<v Speaker 1>making it possible for the private sector and step up.

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>If you just look at the amount of money that's

0:11:28.040 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>being invested in climate solutions, that's being invested in clean

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>energy versus fossil fuel for the first time. Last year,

0:11:34.440 --> 0:11:36.280
<v Speaker 1>I think more money was invested in clean energy to

0:11:36.320 --> 0:11:41.200
<v Speaker 1>possi fuels. So there's no question that relatively the private

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.360
<v Speaker 1>sector is stepping up. I think the costs have crossed

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:48.360
<v Speaker 1>in terms of electricity generation, whether it be solar or

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>wind or batteries. I think the costs of evs electrical vehicles, Yeah, yeah,

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to be a lot lower, both in terms

0:11:57.040 --> 0:11:58.679
<v Speaker 1>of how much it cost to buy, but how much

0:11:58.679 --> 0:12:01.120
<v Speaker 1>it cost to maintained much it cost to fill up

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 1>than internal combustion engines. You know, we're seeing really the

0:12:06.520 --> 0:12:11.680
<v Speaker 1>tipping points in multiple technologies where basically you're not asking

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.720
<v Speaker 1>someone to make a sacrifice, that we're in this place

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, this is just the smart thing to do.

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:21.600
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as we see that those really rapid

0:12:21.760 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>adoptions around the world, we're going to see that be

0:12:26.280 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the dominant technologies and that really we're going to see

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:33.559
<v Speaker 1>the end of the fossil fuel layer.

0:12:34.440 --> 0:12:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, I can't wait for that. I mean, that's

0:12:36.920 --> 0:12:40.200
<v Speaker 3>just an amazing headline, isn't it. The amount of investment

0:12:40.200 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 3>in this space is extraordinary, and just seeing the changing costs.

0:12:44.480 --> 0:12:46.960
<v Speaker 3>But why things got so much cheaper, Tom, I mean,

0:12:47.000 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 3>what's actually driving out change?

0:12:48.720 --> 0:12:51.800
<v Speaker 1>If you think about when I first went to work

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>forty years ago, the computer that would fill a room

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>now would have a tiny fraction of the capability of

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>your iPhone because that multiplication of capabilities every single year.

0:13:09.440 --> 0:13:12.840
<v Speaker 1>And so we see that kind of technological advancement, which

0:13:12.880 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>is increasing productivity and reduced cost in every one of

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>these technologies, whether it's solar or wind, or batteries or evs. So,

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:25.120
<v Speaker 1>for instance, in solar, I think the way that people

0:13:25.120 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>think about it is that every doubling of solar capacity

0:13:31.080 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in the world leads to a twenty four percent drop

0:13:34.679 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>in price for the equivalent amount of energy. So as

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:42.359
<v Speaker 1>that goes on, it's like it just goes down inexorably.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're selling oil and gas, like there's

0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:49.760
<v Speaker 1>no doubt next year your competitor is going to be

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:52.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot cheaper, and the year after that, by the way,

0:13:52.480 --> 0:13:54.000
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be a lot cheaper.

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:55.480
<v Speaker 3>A game change, isn't it.

0:13:55.520 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 1>And so that's not true of fossil fuels. You know,

0:13:59.400 --> 0:14:05.200
<v Speaker 1>fossil fue mules become harder to find, more remote, more

0:14:05.320 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>difficult to reach. The price of oil has gone up

0:14:08.360 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>about two percent a year, you know, forever. So in fact,

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got one technology that's going up very gradually but continuously,

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and one that's going down very steeply. If you look

0:14:20.200 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 1>at the cost of a kilowatt hour of energy, and

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>whether you look at coal or natural gas or wind

0:14:28.720 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>or solar wind and solar by farther too.

0:14:30.400 --> 0:14:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Cheapness, fast, incredible change for world, and you see it happen.

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.440
<v Speaker 3>This speed is scale, that's just amazing.

0:14:36.840 --> 0:14:39.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, China is the biggest car market in the world.

0:14:41.240 --> 0:14:46.160
<v Speaker 1>China is scheduled to have eighty percent car sales be

0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:51.120
<v Speaker 1>evs by twenty thirty. Eighty percent eight zero percent. Those

0:14:51.160 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>cars do not need to fill up. So when this happens,

0:14:55.360 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Once the sales move like that, then the percentages of

0:14:58.120 --> 0:15:01.560
<v Speaker 1>the fleet just in egg changed and you can see

0:15:01.560 --> 0:15:03.240
<v Speaker 1>the end of the fossil fuel era.

0:15:03.720 --> 0:15:07.320
<v Speaker 3>We're already seeing this happening around the world. Here's a

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:09.440
<v Speaker 3>news clip from a recent cast show in China.

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:13.520
<v Speaker 5>Foreign automakers, including American brands, are now playing attention to

0:15:13.600 --> 0:15:16.600
<v Speaker 5>Chinese players like bud It's number one in China and

0:15:16.640 --> 0:15:19.600
<v Speaker 5>the competition is now so intense it sparked an EV

0:15:19.800 --> 0:15:20.760
<v Speaker 5>price war. Here.

0:15:21.080 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 3>From a climate perspective, an EV price war is exactly

0:15:24.760 --> 0:15:28.200
<v Speaker 3>what we want to see. As EV's become more affordable

0:15:28.200 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 3>to buy, it incentivizes consumers to buy greener cars, which

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 3>in turn incentivizes companies to build more and better electric vehicles.

0:15:38.000 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 3>It's the power of capitalism.

0:15:40.560 --> 0:15:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I drive electric Mustang and so you know, did I

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.720
<v Speaker 1>buy it because I wanted to have no emissions? Yeah?

0:15:47.760 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I really only considered an electric car last time time

0:15:49.840 --> 0:15:53.720
<v Speaker 1>before I a plug in hybrid. But honestly, it has

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>amazing pickup. It has way better pickup than any car

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I've ever done drive. I mean, it's like being in

0:16:01.360 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 1>a rocket, you know. I think we're going to see

0:16:04.120 --> 0:16:06.280
<v Speaker 1>this is going to enable a lot of things where

0:16:06.280 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you go. It's not just that we have clean air,

0:16:11.720 --> 0:16:17.760
<v Speaker 1>safe water, normal temperatures, normal seasons. It's also a great ribe.

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 3>In twenty twenty one, Tom took this concept of movement

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 3>capitalism a step further. He found in a business called

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.560
<v Speaker 3>Galvanized Climate Solutions. It's an investment firm with two goals.

0:16:31.240 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 3>Make a positive climate impact and make investors a lot

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:39.400
<v Speaker 3>of money. So you're helping investors find those opportunities, those

0:16:39.440 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 3>amazing opportunities to decarbonize economy, builviss and our cities, our communities.

0:16:45.800 --> 0:16:48.280
<v Speaker 3>But I'm curioused to know are they really aware of

0:16:48.320 --> 0:16:50.720
<v Speaker 3>what they're doing? I mean, are the investors aware of

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 3>the rest of economic system if they don't take action

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:56.600
<v Speaker 3>on global heating and is that a motivator for them.

0:16:56.800 --> 0:17:02.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think that our investor have two motivations. One

0:17:02.600 --> 0:17:06.800
<v Speaker 1>is they want to get and we must deliver good returns.

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Market returns are better. Our goal is to have the

0:17:09.280 --> 0:17:12.199
<v Speaker 1>highest returns in the world. And we believe that the

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:16.720
<v Speaker 1>need for this change is a really huge demand generator

0:17:16.800 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>revenue generator for these businesses. But I think everybody who's

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 1>investing explicitly in galvanized climate solutions knows we will only

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.720
<v Speaker 1>invest in things that have positive climate impact.

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:36.840
<v Speaker 3>So what kind of investments can actually have a positive

0:17:36.920 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 3>climate impact. We're going to spend a few minutes talking

0:17:40.040 --> 0:17:45.600
<v Speaker 3>about free areas where Toms's opportunity, real estate, information technology,

0:17:45.960 --> 0:17:49.960
<v Speaker 3>and something called sequestration. Let's start with the first one,

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:54.119
<v Speaker 3>real estate. How can investing in real estate have a

0:17:54.160 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 3>climate impact?

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>We're doing a fund to do net zero real estate

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and basically what is mean? That means generating electricity differently

0:18:03.680 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>reskinning the building using heat pumps, and to do this

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 1>in a way that gets better returns. And why is

0:18:10.800 --> 0:18:13.919
<v Speaker 1>it important to do this? Eighty percent of the buildings

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 1>in the US that exist right now will still be

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:18.600
<v Speaker 1>in use in twenty fifty.

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:23.119
<v Speaker 3>Those buildings are carbon super producers. A lot of the

0:18:23.160 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure around us today was built at a time when

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 3>sustainable architecture wasn't at the top of people's minds. The

0:18:30.160 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 3>result is pretty astounding. Across the world, buildings makeup as

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 3>staggering thirty nine percent of all greenhouse gas emissions thirty

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 3>nine percent. Most of that comes from what we do

0:18:42.600 --> 0:18:46.679
<v Speaker 3>in those buildings, think heating and cooling the units we

0:18:46.720 --> 0:18:49.879
<v Speaker 3>live and work in. So yes, some of it is

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.040
<v Speaker 3>due to how much energy we used to build them,

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.280
<v Speaker 3>but these emissions could be greatly reduced if we made

0:18:55.320 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 3>small changes to how we run them. So all of

0:18:58.640 --> 0:19:01.840
<v Speaker 3>that is to say, of these buildings are powered matters

0:19:01.880 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 3>a lot in our fights to combat the climate crisis.

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>We have to reformat these buildings, and we have to

0:19:08.480 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>do it in a way that makes the landlord's richer,

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:16.040
<v Speaker 1>because if that isn't true, they ain't going to do it.

0:19:16.760 --> 0:19:19.639
<v Speaker 1>So we have to do it and prove it and

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>develop the kind of you know, the recipe to do it,

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 1>so everybody goes like wall, Chris is doing it. If

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris is doing it, I can do it.

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 3>For Tom and his partners. It's not just enough to

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:35.680
<v Speaker 3>find companies that have an innovative business plan or a

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 3>cool new technology, it has to be something that works

0:19:38.880 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 3>in the real world. Sometimes when we imagine a green future,

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 3>we think of a world in which all the old

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 3>polluting technology has been wiped away and replaced with something

0:19:49.119 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 3>shiny and new. But real estate is a perfect example

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:56.440
<v Speaker 3>of why that doesn't work. We can't tear down every

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:58.520
<v Speaker 3>home in the world and replace it with a most

0:19:58.560 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 3>climate friendly alternative. It would take decades and cost an

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 3>absolute fortune, not to mention, of course, construction itself has

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:08.520
<v Speaker 3>a climate impact.

0:20:08.680 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, two of the things I'd say about this

0:20:10.640 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>are one is we're not going to be able to

0:20:13.200 --> 0:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>rebuild all the industry, the industrial plants, manufacturing plants either

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the questions, and this is a real question

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>for technology. Let's say you have a cool technology, but

0:20:22.320 --> 0:20:25.960
<v Speaker 1>it means we have to rebuild every plant in the world. Okay, sorry,

0:20:26.240 --> 0:20:28.480
<v Speaker 1>We're going to have to take your technology and figure

0:20:28.480 --> 0:20:31.639
<v Speaker 1>out how to do it within the footprints of the

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:35.560
<v Speaker 1>existing plants in a way that makes those owners richer,

0:20:36.440 --> 0:20:38.439
<v Speaker 1>because that's why they're going to do it. And you know,

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:42.480
<v Speaker 1>we're looking at some technologies which just from an efficiency standpoint,

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>if they had no CO two impact at all, make

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:49.720
<v Speaker 1>people multiples of their money in the first year. That's

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:50.520
<v Speaker 1>what we need.

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 3>That's a complete noe brainer.

0:20:52.040 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 1>Isn't it. Yees. So it's like you sit here and

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:56.920
<v Speaker 1>go like, Okay, I'll do that. I'm glad it does

0:20:56.960 --> 0:21:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the CO two thing, but I'm doing it for the money.

0:21:00.920 --> 0:21:04.119
<v Speaker 1>That's one thing that's really true is within the footprint

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.320
<v Speaker 1>of the existing building or situation.

0:21:09.160 --> 0:21:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Okay, let's move on to Tom's second big investment opportunity,

0:21:14.160 --> 0:21:18.200
<v Speaker 3>information technology. As he sees it, one of the big

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 3>challenges in creating a cleaner future is that we don't

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 3>actually know how much we're actually polluting.

0:21:24.200 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>And when we think about how we're going to solve

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:30.840
<v Speaker 1>this problem, people think about all of these gadgets, solar

0:21:31.720 --> 0:21:39.720
<v Speaker 1>wind batteries, electric vehicles, things you can touch. But if

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:42.600
<v Speaker 1>you're going to manage that, you have to know the information.

0:21:43.119 --> 0:21:47.199
<v Speaker 1>If you're going to change your carbon footprint, you have

0:21:47.240 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>to know what your carbon footprint is, you have to

0:21:49.960 --> 0:21:51.920
<v Speaker 1>know where it's going to come from. So I always

0:21:51.920 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>say to people, Okay, what's the carbon footprint of my sweater?

0:21:56.520 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, and neither does anyone else. But until

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 1>the people making the sweater know, and until I know,

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:04.679
<v Speaker 1>how are we going to change our carbon foot right?

0:22:04.760 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 1>How do I not buy the sweater that's made the

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:09.520
<v Speaker 1>wrong way if I don't know how they're made. So

0:22:09.680 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>a lot of this is going to be about information,

0:22:13.200 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 1>transparency and holding people accountable to what they're doing.

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 3>Do you know the climate impact of all the choices

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 3>you make? Can you tell if one sweater is better

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 3>for the environment than another? In most cases, the answer

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:34.520
<v Speaker 3>is probably no, And that's in part because measure the

0:22:34.560 --> 0:22:37.640
<v Speaker 3>climate impact of something is a lot more complicated than

0:22:37.680 --> 0:22:40.440
<v Speaker 3>you might think. It brings us to a concept known

0:22:40.480 --> 0:22:43.800
<v Speaker 3>as scope free and a segment we like to call

0:22:44.119 --> 0:22:45.639
<v Speaker 3>what the fuck are you talking about?

0:22:46.760 --> 0:22:49.160
<v Speaker 1>What the fuck are you talking about?

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 3>When businesses want to measure their environmental impact, they use

0:22:55.280 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 3>something called the Greenhouse Gas Protocol. This piffy title is

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 3>an international standard for how we classify where emissions are

0:23:03.920 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 3>coming from, and, confusingly, these classifications are known as scopes.

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.680
<v Speaker 3>Scope one emissions are the direct pollution produced by a company.

0:23:14.200 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 3>To stick with Tom's sweater example, imagine you run a

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:22.200
<v Speaker 3>sweater making factory. The emissions from your company vehicles transporting

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:26.159
<v Speaker 3>the sweaters are scope one Scope two emissions are created

0:23:26.240 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 3>by the power your factory uses, So these are the

0:23:29.280 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 3>emissions from a secondary source. The power plant that supplies

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 3>your electricity is your sweater factory run by a coal

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:40.199
<v Speaker 3>powered plant or by a wind farm. And finally, scope

0:23:40.280 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 3>free emissions are all the other pollution linked with a

0:23:43.040 --> 0:23:47.320
<v Speaker 3>company's activities. Your sweater factory uses yarn that you bought

0:23:47.359 --> 0:23:50.800
<v Speaker 3>from somewhere. How much pollution did the yarn factory create?

0:23:51.600 --> 0:23:54.880
<v Speaker 3>Your employees are commuting to work each day? Are they

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:59.000
<v Speaker 3>driving bicycles or monster trucks? When you try to add

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:02.399
<v Speaker 3>all these up, enough to make your head spin. And

0:24:02.400 --> 0:24:05.439
<v Speaker 3>it's why scope free emissions are the hardest to measure

0:24:05.760 --> 0:24:08.639
<v Speaker 3>and why they're almost always for biggest source of emissions

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:12.000
<v Speaker 3>for a business. But if we really want to understand

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:14.679
<v Speaker 3>our climate impact, we have to be able to measure

0:24:14.800 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 3>scope free emissions. And this is something that Tom can

0:24:18.200 --> 0:24:22.720
<v Speaker 3>help with by investing in information technology. And that's what

0:24:22.760 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 3>the fuck we're talking about? What the fuck? Okay, back

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:34.159
<v Speaker 3>to Tom. You'll be shocked to hear most businesses hate

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:38.040
<v Speaker 3>the idea of measuring scope free emissions. It shows that

0:24:38.119 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 3>their products are much dirtier. But if they just measured

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:42.400
<v Speaker 3>scopes one and two.

0:24:42.600 --> 0:24:45.199
<v Speaker 1>You know, the Chamber of Commerce is dramatically opposed to

0:24:45.240 --> 0:24:47.919
<v Speaker 1>it would be a huge problem for companies, and I

0:24:47.960 --> 0:24:51.440
<v Speaker 1>believe once people know what's going on, that's going to

0:24:51.480 --> 0:24:55.240
<v Speaker 1>put immense pressure on those companies to get their emissions

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:58.440
<v Speaker 1>under control. As long as you don't know what you're doing,

0:24:59.080 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you have plausible deniability and you can't be expected your honor.

0:25:04.160 --> 0:25:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea it was true. As soon as

0:25:06.200 --> 0:25:08.760
<v Speaker 1>I found out it was true, I acted on it.

0:25:09.119 --> 0:25:11.840
<v Speaker 1>So the longer I don't know it's true, the longer

0:25:11.840 --> 0:25:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I have plausible deniability and you know, and no one

0:25:15.440 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>can really come after you. So that's why the truth

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in this and the measurement of this is so important,

0:25:23.520 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 1>because basically, people are polluting for free and they love

0:25:27.440 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 1>it because, you know what, who wants to pay for

0:25:30.520 --> 0:25:35.280
<v Speaker 1>their pollution? Nobody. So they're like, we've never paid for it,

0:25:35.280 --> 0:25:38.280
<v Speaker 1>it's free. Why should we suddenly have to pay for

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>our pollution just because that pollution might ruin the world.

0:25:41.440 --> 0:25:43.679
<v Speaker 1>It's like, well, that seems like a pretty good reason.

0:25:44.280 --> 0:25:47.280
<v Speaker 3>Given all of this, why would any business measure its

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 3>scope free emissions? Simply put, the government is going to

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:54.720
<v Speaker 3>make them do it. They have are multiple laws and

0:25:54.800 --> 0:25:58.200
<v Speaker 3>policies being debated as we speak that would have this effect.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:03.199
<v Speaker 3>The big business is it's already allure in California. So

0:26:03.320 --> 0:26:06.439
<v Speaker 3>if every company is suddenly required to measure their scope

0:26:06.440 --> 0:26:09.520
<v Speaker 3>free emissions and you are in the technology that does

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 3>for measurement, that seems like a pretty good business to me.

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 3>But besides being a cool business idea, Tom thinks the

0:26:19.680 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 3>environmental impact could be huge because given the choice, people

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 3>prefer to buy stuff that doesn't destroy the planet.

0:26:28.760 --> 0:26:30.879
<v Speaker 1>That's been polled just you know, Chris, if you go

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>around the world, seventy six percent of consumer's claim that

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:42.640
<v Speaker 1>they would take environmentalism into account when making consumer decisions. Now,

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:46.200
<v Speaker 1>do I believe that mostly No, Most people by the

0:26:46.280 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>cheapest best thing they can find, regardless of how it

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 1>was produced. But in the United States of America, the

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:58.720
<v Speaker 1>estimate is from also detailed polling data that's something like

0:26:58.840 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 1>eighteen to twenty percent the people really will take it

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:04.960
<v Speaker 1>into account? I would, but I believe if twenty percent

0:27:04.960 --> 0:27:08.879
<v Speaker 1>of Americans are willing to take it into account in

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:14.119
<v Speaker 1>making their purchase decisions, that is a huge companies.

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 2>We're fucking the future. We're fucking the future.

0:27:29.880 --> 0:27:33.320
<v Speaker 3>That brings us to Tom's third and final investment idea

0:27:33.359 --> 0:27:36.760
<v Speaker 3>for today. It's something called sequestration.

0:27:37.359 --> 0:27:39.520
<v Speaker 1>One of the big verticals which is going to be

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>a trillion dollar industry that doesn't exist right now is sequestration.

0:27:44.400 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 1>And sequestration is simply somehow taking CO two or methane

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:55.160
<v Speaker 1>out of the atmosphere and somehow sequestering it or sticking

0:27:55.200 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 1>at someplace where it's going to stay.

0:27:57.280 --> 0:28:00.639
<v Speaker 3>Obviously, the reason we have global heating is burning a

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 3>lot of dirty fossil fuels, and the emissions are floating

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:09.080
<v Speaker 3>around in our atmosphere. Sequestration companies pull the carbon out

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 3>of the air and pump it underground or store it somewhere.

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.919
<v Speaker 3>And here's the thing, it doesn't matter where you store it,

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.200
<v Speaker 3>as long as that carbon is out of the atmosphere.

0:28:20.640 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 3>And that's where Tom sees big opportunity.

0:28:23.720 --> 0:28:27.239
<v Speaker 1>One of the points that's true about that is a

0:28:27.280 --> 0:28:31.879
<v Speaker 1>ton of CO two sequestered in Kenya is worth every

0:28:31.920 --> 0:28:35.399
<v Speaker 1>bit as much as a ton of two that's sequestered

0:28:36.000 --> 0:28:41.440
<v Speaker 1>in Brisbane or Berlin or Iowa. And so if it

0:28:41.480 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 1>can be done less expensively, in Kenya, and if the

0:28:48.200 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>money that's paid for it is exactly the same as

0:28:50.920 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>in any of those other three spots around the world,

0:28:53.920 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>but that money means a lot more relative to the

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:02.000
<v Speaker 1>annual average income in Kenya than it does in Germany,

0:29:02.000 --> 0:29:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Australia or the US, then that's a gigantic opportunity for

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the people of the world. It's a gigantic opportunity for

0:29:10.080 --> 0:29:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the people of Kenya, and it's a real way to

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>redistribute and build capability around the world and reallocate money

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:20.400
<v Speaker 1>to the tune of at least a trillion dollars year.

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 3>At trillion dollars.

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Wow.

0:29:24.600 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 3>So these are some of the opportunities that Tom believes

0:29:27.560 --> 0:29:30.080
<v Speaker 3>are out there. We're doing the right thing for the

0:29:30.160 --> 0:29:32.240
<v Speaker 3>climate can be big business.

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if we're producing goods and services that are cheaper, better,

0:29:38.040 --> 0:29:41.720
<v Speaker 1>faster and cleaner, they're going to get adopted. I mean,

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 1>for hundreds of years, new technologies have come in and

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>replaced old technologies, and they've done it in the form

0:29:49.520 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>of an s where that takes a long time to

0:29:52.440 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>develop them, the costs finally change and then there's rapid

0:29:57.120 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 1>adoption over a period of time. So that's happened. I mean,

0:30:00.920 --> 0:30:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I doubt Chris that you've been using that much whale

0:30:03.480 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 1>oil recently.

0:30:04.640 --> 0:30:06.520
<v Speaker 3>No, that is true.

0:30:06.640 --> 0:30:10.120
<v Speaker 1>But if private sector can prove that doing the right

0:30:10.200 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is cheaper and easy to adopt, than governments can

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 1>do other things to support it and make it ubiquitous. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's this interactive thing of Okay, we need to

0:30:20.600 --> 0:30:22.880
<v Speaker 1>do this. How can we make it possible for the

0:30:22.920 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>private sector to do it and to scale? Okay, now

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that they've proved it's cheaper and better, how do we

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:32.200
<v Speaker 1>make it not a good solution but basically ubiquitous solution,

0:30:32.520 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>so that we just move all the way. If you

0:30:35.040 --> 0:30:36.920
<v Speaker 1>miss this, you're missing the boat.

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:40.760
<v Speaker 3>It's so important for people to have that vision that's

0:30:40.880 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 3>positive for the future, something that's actually really empowering.

0:30:44.360 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Look, I think that this is just a huge tailwind

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:50.720
<v Speaker 1>for companies that are are behind this change, and it's

0:30:50.760 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be that if you go back and look

0:30:53.440 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>over the last ten or twenty years, people have dramatically

0:30:56.920 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 1>underestimated the speed and size of this change, and they

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:03.680
<v Speaker 1>are going to continue to underestimate it.

0:31:05.160 --> 0:31:08.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm completely inspired. I'm sure our listeners are too.

0:31:08.720 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Thanks so much, Chris, Thank you very much, really enjoyed

0:31:11.400 --> 0:31:12.280
<v Speaker 1>it so much fun.

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.200
<v Speaker 3>I have to say I didn't expect to feel so

0:31:16.360 --> 0:31:20.600
<v Speaker 3>inspired by a conversation about real estate investing. But Tom

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 3>is pointing a way towards something we in the environmental

0:31:23.040 --> 0:31:26.960
<v Speaker 3>community we often overlook. We sometimes think about businesses and

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 3>corporations as our adversaries. I mean, after all, industrialization is

0:31:31.000 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 3>what has caused this climate crisis, but harnessed in the

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.840
<v Speaker 3>right way, these same forces can also be our partners

0:31:37.880 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 3>in the fight against global heating. And the truth is,

0:31:41.360 --> 0:31:44.720
<v Speaker 3>if we're going to unfucked things, we're really going to

0:31:44.760 --> 0:31:50.680
<v Speaker 3>need their help. So in this episode, we've talked a

0:31:50.720 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 3>lot about climate friendly investments, but what can you do

0:31:54.200 --> 0:31:58.000
<v Speaker 3>if you're not a venture capitalist? To answer that question,

0:31:58.120 --> 0:32:00.120
<v Speaker 3>I'd like to bring in my friend Maggie bed for

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:03.640
<v Speaker 3>a final segment this week, something we call what the

0:32:03.680 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 3>fuck can I Do?

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.160
<v Speaker 2>What the fuck can I do?

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 3>Hey, Maggie, Well, Tom Stad's interview was all about using

0:32:12.000 --> 0:32:15.360
<v Speaker 3>a power of capitalism to fight global heating, but not

0:32:15.440 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 3>all of us are billionaire venture capitalists, So what can

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:19.120
<v Speaker 3>we do?

0:32:19.400 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 6>Well, you may not be a billionaire yet, but you

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.120
<v Speaker 6>might have, say a savings account, maybe you have a

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:29.200
<v Speaker 6>retirement account through your work or something, and so one

0:32:29.280 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 6>thing you can do is make sure that whatever money

0:32:32.520 --> 0:32:36.560
<v Speaker 6>you have, it's not going to support the burning.

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Of fossil fuels.

0:32:37.800 --> 0:32:41.800
<v Speaker 7>It's a strategy that is known as devestment. So make

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:46.200
<v Speaker 7>sure that you don't own any stocks in fossil fuel companies,

0:32:46.320 --> 0:32:50.760
<v Speaker 7>either directly or through any mutual funds or other funds

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:54.280
<v Speaker 7>you might have in a retirement account or or something similar.

0:32:54.800 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 7>And there are lots of funds from big banks like

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 7>Fidelity that anyone can invest in instead that are specifically

0:33:02.560 --> 0:33:07.040
<v Speaker 7>pro climate. So check with your financial advisor or whomever

0:33:07.200 --> 0:33:10.840
<v Speaker 7>you really trust for financial advice, but tell them that

0:33:10.960 --> 0:33:15.040
<v Speaker 7>this matters to you. And lastly, make sure that your

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 7>bank is climate friendly. We've put a link in the

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:22.320
<v Speaker 7>show notes to a site that has great lists of

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:26.560
<v Speaker 7>pro climate banks. Take a look and make sure your

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 7>bank isn't propping up fossil fuel companies.

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Maggie, that is so important, isn't it.

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:34.959
<v Speaker 7>Thank you?

0:33:35.720 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 3>And for everyone listening out there. That's what the fuck

0:33:38.320 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 3>you can do to help?

0:33:39.920 --> 0:33:42.240
<v Speaker 2>What fuck can I do?

0:33:43.720 --> 0:33:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh? We're fucked.

0:33:50.120 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 3>That's all for this episode. Next time on the Fucking

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.520
<v Speaker 3>the Future, psychologist, doctor Lisa van Susteren will talk to

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:59.640
<v Speaker 3>us about how climate is impacting our mental health and

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 3>what we can do about it.

0:34:01.480 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 8>Oh, it's even desirable, frankly to be outraged and angry.

0:34:07.040 --> 0:34:10.680
<v Speaker 8>Many studies show that that is the prelude to taking action,

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:15.839
<v Speaker 8>that it is protective to be angry and outraged. They

0:34:15.960 --> 0:34:19.560
<v Speaker 8>are healthy emotions to an unhealthy.

0:34:18.960 --> 0:34:23.720
<v Speaker 3>Condition until then, I'm Chris Turney signing off from Sydney, Australia.

0:34:23.880 --> 0:34:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for joining me in I'm Fucking the Future.

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:29.840
<v Speaker 2>Weird Fucking the Future.

0:34:34.560 --> 0:34:37.319
<v Speaker 3>I'm Fucking the Future is produced by Imagine Audio and

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 3>Awfully Nice for iHeart Podcasts and hosted by me Chris Turney.

0:34:41.920 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 3>The show is written by Meredith Bryan. I'm Fucking the

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:48.440
<v Speaker 3>Future is produced by Amber von Schassen and Rene Colvert.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:53.000
<v Speaker 3>Ron Howard, Brian Grazer, Carl Welker and Nathan Chloke are

0:34:53.040 --> 0:34:56.760
<v Speaker 3>the executive producers from Imagine Audio. Jesse Burton and Katie

0:34:56.760 --> 0:35:00.800
<v Speaker 3>Hodges are the executive producers from Awfully Nice. Sound design

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:04.840
<v Speaker 3>and mixing by Evan Arnette, original music by Lily Hayden

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:09.640
<v Speaker 3>and producing services by Peter McGuigan. Sam Swinnerton wrote our theme,

0:35:09.719 --> 0:35:13.200
<v Speaker 3>and all those fun jingles. If you enjoyed this episode,

0:35:13.360 --> 0:35:16.080
<v Speaker 3>be sure to rate and review Unfucking the Future on

0:35:16.200 --> 0:35:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Apple Podcasts or whether you get your podcasts