WEBVTT - Mitu Gulati and Ugo Panizza on Haiti’s Odious Post-Colonial Debt

0:00:10.800 --> 0:00:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe. Wasn't Joe. It feels

0:00:18.880 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>like there's a lot of terrible things happening in the

0:00:22.560 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>world at the moment. Yeah, it does. The news has

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>been pretty grim, between the virus, Afghanistan, natural disasters. I

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>would I would, I would agree with your assessment. Yeah,

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:39.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think the sort of pace of the bad

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.080
<v Speaker 1>news means that a lot of stuff is kind of

0:00:42.120 --> 0:00:45.519
<v Speaker 1>getting buried in the news cycle very quickly after it happens.

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So we're recording this on auguste UM. Just a few

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:55.880
<v Speaker 1>days ago, there was a massive earthquake in Haiti. I

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.880
<v Speaker 1>think more than a thousand people are believed to be dead.

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:01.440
<v Speaker 1>But that death hole is probably going to go up

0:01:01.480 --> 0:01:05.720
<v Speaker 1>some more um. But that event has already sort of

0:01:05.720 --> 0:01:09.959
<v Speaker 1>been superseded by events in Afghanistan, and people have just

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>sort of moved on to the next big global drama.

0:01:14.480 --> 0:01:19.280
<v Speaker 1>But I wanted to dedicate this episode to Haiti because

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:22.760
<v Speaker 1>if you think about what the country has recently experienced,

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:26.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, the earthquake that I just mentioned came off

0:01:26.480 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the back of its president getting assassinated just last month,

0:01:30.920 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and then of course before that, Haiti has had a

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>long history of natural disasters, Hurricane matthew in, a really

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>really catastrophic earthquake back in and the country itself is

0:01:44.360 --> 0:01:47.240
<v Speaker 1>one of the poorest in the world, so it in

0:01:47.360 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 1>many ways it just feels like Haiti can't take a

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:54.080
<v Speaker 1>break or catch a break, right, I would say, pretty

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:58.040
<v Speaker 1>much all of my life, I think Haiti has been

0:01:58.440 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 1>been known for violence, extreme poverty, international attempts at reviving

0:02:05.800 --> 0:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the economy or domestic institutions that seem largely to have failed,

0:02:09.560 --> 0:02:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and then of course they sort of unforeseen disasters. But

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, within particularly the Western hemisphere, Haiti

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is known to have had an extraordinary, extraordinary, extraordinarily bad fortune. Yeah,

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you mentioned international efforts to revive the economy,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.919
<v Speaker 1>because today we are going to be talking about one

0:02:32.400 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>possible effort, and possibly the most obscure of those efforts,

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>which involves bonds UM that were issued more than let's see,

0:02:43.840 --> 0:02:48.240
<v Speaker 1>almost two hundred years ago UM as part of Haiti's

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.959
<v Speaker 1>independence movement, and there is a discussion now about whether

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:56.239
<v Speaker 1>or not you could possibly UM sort of unwind that

0:02:56.360 --> 0:03:01.440
<v Speaker 1>debt in order to pay reparations to So it's sort

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of um an obscure thing, but it fits right into

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 1>add lots and uh, you know our obsession with old debts,

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to get into it. I'm looking forward

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:15.560
<v Speaker 1>to this. This is odious debt one of the one

0:03:15.639 --> 0:03:17.560
<v Speaker 1>of the topics that I think you've really done a

0:03:17.639 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>great job sort of bringing to the forefront of media

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:22.560
<v Speaker 1>and odd lots and looking forward to this and talking

0:03:22.560 --> 0:03:25.800
<v Speaker 1>about this in the Haiti context. No, thank you. Um well,

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I have to credit one of our guests, Mit to Glate.

0:03:29.240 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>He's a professor at the University of Virginia. He's the

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.520
<v Speaker 1>one that introduced me to this concept. And we also

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>have his fellow researcher, Ugo Panizza, a professor at the

0:03:40.080 --> 0:03:45.360
<v Speaker 1>Graduate Institute of Geneva. So welcome Mitt and Uko, thank you.

0:03:46.000 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Shall we start with the very basics for people who

0:03:50.320 --> 0:03:55.320
<v Speaker 1>haven't heard the concept of odious debt before, what exactly

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:59.360
<v Speaker 1>do we mean when we say odious debt? So they're

0:03:59.360 --> 0:04:06.720
<v Speaker 1>theretly two meanings of odious debt as its discussed both

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:12.160
<v Speaker 1>in the popular press and in the academic slash legal literature.

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:15.920
<v Speaker 1>One meaning is just you know, any debt that you

0:04:15.960 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 1>don't like it's just has a bad odor and you

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:24.400
<v Speaker 1>don't want to pay it back. The more technical legal

0:04:24.480 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 1>meaning of odious debt is that it is debt incurred

0:04:30.520 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>by a despotic leader without the approval of the population

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>and the knowledge of the creditors, that these debts are

0:04:44.160 --> 0:04:50.080
<v Speaker 1>being used for purposes that are contrary to any benefit

0:04:50.279 --> 0:04:55.159
<v Speaker 1>that would result for the populace. So the classic example,

0:04:56.520 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know during the Bush administration, odious debtspeak very popular.

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:07.919
<v Speaker 1>When the US went into Iraq. The example was Saddam

0:05:08.000 --> 0:05:13.480
<v Speaker 1>Hussein borrowing hundreds of billions of dollars to buy arms,

0:05:13.560 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and those arms were then used to oppress the Iraqi people.

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So that that that is the popularized version of this

0:05:24.640 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 1>odious debt concept you mentioned. Okay, so we can understand

0:05:30.000 --> 0:05:34.919
<v Speaker 1>easily enough this idea that if a despotic leader borrows money,

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:37.840
<v Speaker 1>prep doesn't use the money in service of the public,

0:05:37.920 --> 0:05:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and then after they go it uh see, it's odious

0:05:41.520 --> 0:05:43.799
<v Speaker 1>the idea that the public would then have to bear

0:05:43.839 --> 0:05:47.040
<v Speaker 1>the cost of that debt. How much is in the

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.680
<v Speaker 1>determination or the thinking of when debt is odious? How

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 1>much or how difficult is it or how important is

0:05:53.880 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 1>it to establish that the lender understood this that when

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>they were lending that when someone bought the foreign debt

0:06:00.720 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>of a given country, that they were buying into debt

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>that really was not going to help the public in

0:06:07.760 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>any way. So usually the lender is not really analyzed

0:06:15.360 --> 0:06:21.719
<v Speaker 1>in these discussions of odious debts. Almost every discussion of

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:27.480
<v Speaker 1>odious debts. For example, take the Saddam Huseyne case, which

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is you know, the most recent a lot of the

0:06:30.160 --> 0:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>debts there were literally arms dealers selling arms to Saddam,

0:06:35.600 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>but the primary focus was on the despotism of the

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 1>leader of Saddam. It's really only in a case like

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Haiti and sort of more broadly colonial or imperial debts

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>that you begin to think about the lender. And that's

0:06:54.440 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>not something that we have traditionally done. So I want

0:06:59.160 --> 0:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>to get into the exact situation with Haiti and the

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 1>money involved, but before we do, you know, we're talking

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:12.760
<v Speaker 1>about a broad definition of odious debt that really focuses

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>on the borrower. And as you mentioned, the classical example

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is a despot who borrows lots of money that doesn't

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>necessarily benefit their country's population. How did that particular interpretation

0:07:27.600 --> 0:07:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of odious debt come into being because in some ways,

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:37.840
<v Speaker 1>like it seems very very um defined and specific. So

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>this is an interesting question that you ask, And you know,

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I've been working on this, and Ugo probably has a

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>different perspective, but he's also been working on this for

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 1>a long time. We worked together on a debts incurred

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:56.080
<v Speaker 1>by Nicolas Maduro in Venezuela, and sort of I always

0:07:56.120 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>took it for granted that, you know, if you have

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>a despotic leader borrowing the future governments, especially if they're

0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:07.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, democratic governments, they shouldn't be burdened by this debt,

0:08:07.120 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and it sort of seemed natural and logical and sensible,

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and I didn't think about it. It seemed right until

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>I started working with Hugo and or other two co

0:08:21.480 --> 0:08:27.160
<v Speaker 1>authors about the Haitian debt, And in that context, one

0:08:27.200 --> 0:08:31.160
<v Speaker 1>of our other co authors, Mark Widermer, started asking the

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:35.920
<v Speaker 1>question of you know, why have we framed this doctrine

0:08:36.040 --> 0:08:41.840
<v Speaker 1>in this particular fashion. And my best guests from the

0:08:42.000 --> 0:08:47.080
<v Speaker 1>literature and talking to anthropos social anthropologists who studied this

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>in more detail, is that it's a product of the

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:57.760
<v Speaker 1>interests who created this doctrine. Now, this is a doctrine

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that was created by the U. S State Department in

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:06.760
<v Speaker 1>the late eighteen hundreds after the Spanish American War. They

0:09:06.760 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to pay the debts that had been incurred

0:09:11.679 --> 0:09:15.400
<v Speaker 1>by Spain using Cuba as collateral, and so they said,

0:09:15.440 --> 0:09:19.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, you were despotic leader leaders putting down an

0:09:19.040 --> 0:09:23.800
<v Speaker 1>independence movement. And then the US again in UM two

0:09:23.800 --> 0:09:28.240
<v Speaker 1>thousand three two four, does not want to pay Saddam

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Hussein's debts. So the rejuvenation of the odious debt doctrine

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:38.320
<v Speaker 1>again is in the context of a despotic leader, but

0:09:39.480 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it never really touches colonial debts, where the leaders are

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.440
<v Speaker 1>not quite as despotic and much more complicated, in part

0:09:46.559 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 1>because the countries and the scholars who pushed this doctrine,

0:09:51.000 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we're pushing it in a particular context. I don't know, Hugo,

0:09:54.679 --> 0:09:57.920
<v Speaker 1>if you you have a different view, I mean I am.

0:09:57.960 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I am a former colonial s object then grew up

0:10:00.800 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>in the Caribbean, so I have a particularly jaundiced view

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.200
<v Speaker 1>of all of this. I mean, there is also another aspect.

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:11.680
<v Speaker 1>So there is the aspect from let's say the Angio movements,

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, kill the debt and all this sort of stuff,

0:10:14.840 --> 0:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>and these people would like to cancel all sorts of death.

0:10:19.720 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So there is a more I don't know, leftist if

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.079
<v Speaker 1>you want to call it this way perspective, right, and

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:29.679
<v Speaker 1>there there is a debate asked me to say it.

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:33.959
<v Speaker 1>It seems reasonable that when somebody borrows to oppress its

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.560
<v Speaker 1>own people this that should not be enforceable. But then

0:10:37.600 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>if you talk with market people, they tell you where

0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>you draw the line, right, It's like where where does

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.840
<v Speaker 1>the guy become a deskpot? And some people say, if

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>you start going there, then nobody will ever learn to

0:10:50.080 --> 0:10:54.000
<v Speaker 1>any country because you know, no countries a perfect democracy.

0:10:54.040 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>So these other there is this other dimension. So some

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.839
<v Speaker 1>people said that maybe you should have an expanted that

0:11:00.160 --> 0:11:03.480
<v Speaker 1>rational of obviousness. Right. So there is a famous paper

0:11:03.559 --> 0:11:08.600
<v Speaker 1>by malcol Michael Kramer and C. Chandra which says, you know,

0:11:09.280 --> 0:11:12.680
<v Speaker 1>at some point the official sector, my or the UN

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:16.080
<v Speaker 1>or whatever might declare this country's audious and from this

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>moment on that contracted by this person by this country

0:11:19.960 --> 0:11:22.240
<v Speaker 1>will not be enforceable. So there is a big also

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:26.880
<v Speaker 1>discussion on this exanta versus expost, which is different from

0:11:26.960 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the high heat case that we're talking about here. What

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:35.800
<v Speaker 1>do you walking through the basic contours of the Haiti situation,

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the numbers, the claims, just sort of like give us

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:43.440
<v Speaker 1>the sort of like basic summary of the colonial debt

0:11:43.480 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>that was incurred, why the debt was incurred, how much

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 1>it was and so forth. Okay, so I'll begin with

0:11:49.400 --> 0:11:53.959
<v Speaker 1>the easy part the story, which is wonderful, and then

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I'll give google the boring part about the numbers that

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>in the end are much more important. So I think

0:12:02.360 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 1>it's a bit embarrassing. Ugo and I both consider ourselves

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:10.200
<v Speaker 1>scholars of international debt and have been doing this for

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:15.040
<v Speaker 1>at least two decades, and neither of us had really

0:12:15.080 --> 0:12:22.400
<v Speaker 1>paid any attention to the Haitian independence debt of eighteen five.

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>We it just seemed like this old, obscure thing we

0:12:25.520 --> 0:12:29.920
<v Speaker 1>hadn't really heard of. It didn't seem relevant to most

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:36.160
<v Speaker 1>of what we did until this last semester last year. Really,

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:42.800
<v Speaker 1>when COVID hits and we decide in our classes, you know,

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:45.840
<v Speaker 1>maybe this is time to focus on some of the

0:12:45.920 --> 0:12:48.599
<v Speaker 1>poorer regions around the world and see what's going to

0:12:48.760 --> 0:12:54.079
<v Speaker 1>happen if they're really hit bad by COVID and they

0:12:54.160 --> 0:12:59.079
<v Speaker 1>need to think about what kind of financial recoveries can

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we get. Some of my students in my Sovereign Debt

0:13:02.320 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>class find this Haitian independence dead of eighteen twenty five,

0:13:06.880 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and I want to dismiss it because it is not

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>what I had planned that we would work on in

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the class. And then I started looking at it and

0:13:16.040 --> 0:13:19.199
<v Speaker 1>started talking to Ugo and our other co authors about it,

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:26.040
<v Speaker 1>and it's astounded. So in eighteen twenty five, Haiti has

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:30.600
<v Speaker 1>a debt imposed on it by France. France sends a

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>bunch of gun boats. I think there were fourteen gun

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:39.720
<v Speaker 1>boats with five hundred guns pointed at the Haitian capital,

0:13:40.559 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and France says to the Haitian people, look, we are

0:13:45.400 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>willing to recognize you as independent. Haiti had fought a

0:13:51.040 --> 0:13:55.600
<v Speaker 1>bloody revolution against France and one its independence in eighteen

0:13:55.640 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>o four. So two decades prior, the French under Napole

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Lion had tried to take back Hadi. They had failed.

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>And then finally in eight and this is after the

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:11.119
<v Speaker 1>Louisiana purchase, France sort of decides, you know, no more colonies,

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:13.600
<v Speaker 1>at least in that part of the world. It's just

0:14:13.640 --> 0:14:18.080
<v Speaker 1>too expensive when you keep losing, and so they try

0:14:18.120 --> 0:14:22.840
<v Speaker 1>to negotiate with Haiti. We will give you your independence,

0:14:22.880 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 1>We will recognize you as independent if you pay us

0:14:26.920 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and fifty million francs. Now, to get some

0:14:31.040 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>sense of how much this is, and we go will

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:39.040
<v Speaker 1>hopefully talk about what fraction of hades revenues it was

0:14:39.120 --> 0:14:42.760
<v Speaker 1>at that time. But the Louisiana purchase was about fifteen

0:14:42.800 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>million francs. This is a hundred and fifty million francs

0:14:46.320 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 1>they impose on Haiti with the gunboats pointed at them,

0:14:50.640 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 1>and the calculation of this amount the historical record is

0:14:55.160 --> 0:15:01.080
<v Speaker 1>not completely clear, but basically, the French King Charles needed

0:15:01.120 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 1>this money to pacify the former plantation owners and their

0:15:07.520 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>estates in France, and calculations were made based on the

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:17.600
<v Speaker 1>amount of loss that they suffered, specifically in terms of

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 1>the number of slaves who went free as a result

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>of the revolution. So that's the basic that's that's the

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:29.760
<v Speaker 1>debt that was imposed on Haiti. Haiti doesn't pay it

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:33.640
<v Speaker 1>back for almost a century, actually more than a century,

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>and much of Haitian borrowing in the next century is

0:15:37.800 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>just to pay back this extremely large debt that they

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.640
<v Speaker 1>owe to friends. Now in terms of specific numbers, um

0:15:45.640 --> 0:15:49.840
<v Speaker 1>I leave that to UGO, so maybe they we don't

0:15:49.880 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 1>have good estimates for GDP at that period and or revenues,

0:15:56.720 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>but whatever estimates we have suggested this amount about ten

0:16:00.960 --> 0:16:04.520
<v Speaker 1>years worth of revenue, so it's a very large number

0:16:05.400 --> 0:16:11.720
<v Speaker 1>and or about three times situs GDP based on on

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the on the numbers that that we have now. So

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:18.840
<v Speaker 1>they were very very large numbers. And and that's me

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:38.680
<v Speaker 1>to say it's more more than the Louisiana purchase. So

0:16:38.920 --> 0:16:42.280
<v Speaker 1>can we maybe talk a little bit more about why

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Haiti agreed to pay the indemnity? So, you know, you

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 1>mentioned there were gunboats um pointed at porter of Prince,

0:16:51.200 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 1>which seems quite threatening. But on the other hand, Hadi

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>did get something out of it. And I'm sort of

0:16:58.960 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>playing devil's advocate here, but they did get their independence

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 1>recognized by France, even though they were essentially, you know,

0:17:08.240 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>buying their freedom from slavery, which is terrible, but they

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:16.240
<v Speaker 1>got the recognition from France. That led to further recognition

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:20.600
<v Speaker 1>from places like Britain, um that opened up trade relationships

0:17:20.680 --> 0:17:23.479
<v Speaker 1>and things like that. Is there an argument to be

0:17:23.560 --> 0:17:29.160
<v Speaker 1>made that this can't be considered odious because the population,

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:33.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, got something out of the agreement. So you're

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 1>asking the really tough question. Haiti arguably itself proposed that

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.320
<v Speaker 1>it would pay something to France. Now they didn't propose

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:48.919
<v Speaker 1>this incredibly large amount. They were thinking more along the

0:17:48.960 --> 0:17:51.960
<v Speaker 1>lines of the Louisiana purchase, and that would have still

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.800
<v Speaker 1>been at least half their GDP for the year, but

0:17:55.760 --> 0:17:59.440
<v Speaker 1>perhaps manageable. Haiti at that point in time was one

0:17:59.440 --> 0:18:01.439
<v Speaker 1>of the rich as parts of the world, which is

0:18:01.560 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>why France was so desperate to hold onto it. They

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:09.119
<v Speaker 1>they were a huge source of French revenues at the

0:18:09.320 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 1>at that point in time. But the legal question of

0:18:14.960 --> 0:18:20.879
<v Speaker 1>whether or not Haiti could be charged by France for

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>a recognition or be independence or see for the slaves

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>fighting a revolution and becoming independent um is quite complicated.

0:18:34.800 --> 0:18:38.960
<v Speaker 1>It's not at all clear, at least in our research,

0:18:39.640 --> 0:18:43.040
<v Speaker 1>whether or not at that point in time it was

0:18:43.119 --> 0:18:49.919
<v Speaker 1>acceptable under international law for countries new countries to be

0:18:50.080 --> 0:18:55.000
<v Speaker 1>charged for somebody else recognizing them. The law is quite murky.

0:18:55.119 --> 0:18:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Now we know it happened, but whether it was legally

0:18:58.119 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>kosher is not year. Can you charge a new country

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:09.359
<v Speaker 1>for it becoming free and fighting a revolution? Again, not

0:19:09.560 --> 0:19:14.240
<v Speaker 1>at all clear, and then it's not clear either that

0:19:14.320 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>we would apply the laws and norms of that time

0:19:18.760 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 1>or whether we would apply modern conceptions of human rights,

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 1>where you know, making a d pay for the freedom

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of the slaves clearly wouldn't be acceptable. Yeah, maybe just

0:19:31.440 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>a mol anecdote that for the first fifteen years after independence,

0:19:36.560 --> 0:19:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Haiti was actually split in two countries, with the with

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:43.840
<v Speaker 1>the president in the south and the king in the north.

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>So the president was which was called the Pekion, was

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the first one to sort of propose paying some inmdernity,

0:19:51.680 --> 0:19:53.800
<v Speaker 1>but again, as me too said, he had in mind

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.160
<v Speaker 1>a much smaller amount, while the king in the north

0:19:58.320 --> 0:20:04.399
<v Speaker 1>was always opposed to it. So the idea that a

0:20:04.480 --> 0:20:09.040
<v Speaker 1>country would have to pay uh It's former colonial master

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:14.320
<v Speaker 1>for recognition, to pay this extraordinary sum to essentially escape,

0:20:14.760 --> 0:20:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, depart from slavery. Obviously, it's you know, it's grotesque,

0:20:20.080 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 1>it's awful. Why is it important, or you know, at

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>least intuitively it is. Why is it important to fold

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 1>it into the odious debt literature because obviously the contours

0:20:30.920 --> 0:20:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of it, well being I guess objectively and were morally odious,

0:20:35.520 --> 0:20:39.080
<v Speaker 1>are different than the sort of conception of the conception

0:20:39.080 --> 0:20:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that we talked about in the beginning of a Despot.

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Why is it important today in sort of the establishment

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.720
<v Speaker 1>of the study of odious debt to weave that in

0:20:48.880 --> 0:20:53.720
<v Speaker 1>as opposed to thinking of it as its own distinct concept.

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>What does that get? What does that accomplish? So again

0:20:57.880 --> 0:21:03.600
<v Speaker 1>you're asking an extreme, the good question and a tough one.

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Here's my take on this. The the odious debt movement

0:21:12.080 --> 0:21:16.560
<v Speaker 1>is a powerful one. Just the rhetoric of that movement

0:21:17.280 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>has a has had a lot of sway with NGOs,

0:21:22.280 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>with academics in the popular press. So to get this

0:21:28.640 --> 0:21:33.920
<v Speaker 1>debt that has really not gotten much attention, the Haitian

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:39.679
<v Speaker 1>independence debt of you ask anybody in Haiti, they know

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:43.120
<v Speaker 1>about it, they think about how many billions they are owed.

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>But ask people outside of Haiti, scholars who study this,

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 1>ask people in France, anywhere else in the world, they

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:57.000
<v Speaker 1>have no idea about this. To bring it into the

0:21:57.040 --> 0:22:02.240
<v Speaker 1>odious debt framework, and and this is as odious of

0:22:02.240 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>a debt that we've ever had in history, I think

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:13.240
<v Speaker 1>could give power, rhetorical power to the movement to get

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>some kind of compensation paid, but also would open the

0:22:18.640 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 1>door to other similar colonial debts that have not been

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:28.520
<v Speaker 1>included in the odious debt discussions. So that, I mean,

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>this goes back to the question that Tracy started with,

0:22:32.720 --> 0:22:36.240
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, how is it that the odious

0:22:36.320 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>debt discussions really have been very limited to these despotic

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:46.520
<v Speaker 1>leaders and whether or not sort of Western creditors will

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:49.520
<v Speaker 1>get paid back on their bonds when there are all

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 1>sorts of other stinky debts around the world, particularly colonial debts.

0:22:56.840 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, think of King Leopold of Congo. He borrowed

0:23:01.280 --> 0:23:05.280
<v Speaker 1>heavily on the international debt markets and then you know,

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:10.040
<v Speaker 1>basically committed genocide in the Congo. There's no discussion of

0:23:10.720 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, those debts. But but this one is is

0:23:14.040 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>a this one is among the really just the stinkiest

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 1>of those to my mind me too. You mentioned, um

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the rhetoric of odious debt being a powerful influence, and

0:23:28.920 --> 0:23:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I think here it's really important that we mentioned that

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.640
<v Speaker 1>even though there's been a lot of talk about Odia's debt,

0:23:35.240 --> 0:23:39.399
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't actually been um, sort of acted upon in

0:23:39.440 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 1>any real way. So the Iraqi debt that you mentioned earlier,

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.399
<v Speaker 1>and we actually recorded an episode a while back with

0:23:46.480 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Simon Hendrickson, who did some really great work on this.

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:53.120
<v Speaker 1>The Iraqi debt situation was basically the closest the world

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>ever got to actually acting on the principle of odious

0:23:57.160 --> 0:24:02.080
<v Speaker 1>debt and negating some borrowings under Saddam Hussein, But it

0:24:02.119 --> 0:24:07.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't actually happen. So I guess two questions, Why hasn't

0:24:07.480 --> 0:24:10.160
<v Speaker 1>it happened yet if everyone's talking about it so much?

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>And then secondly, what good is talking about odious debt

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>if it never actually comes to fruition. So I'll use

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the Iraqi example. You guys had a great episode with Simon,

0:24:27.480 --> 0:24:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and just drawing from Simon's work, discussing the Iraqi debt

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.399
<v Speaker 1>in terms of its odious nous was part of the

0:24:36.520 --> 0:24:41.400
<v Speaker 1>strategy of the legal team there, and they knew they

0:24:41.400 --> 0:24:46.440
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a leg to stand on if they actually

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 1>had to go to court and try to argue that

0:24:49.840 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this doctrine existed. Now, there are legal scholars who argue

0:24:53.600 --> 0:24:58.679
<v Speaker 1>that as a matter of customary international law, such a

0:24:58.720 --> 0:25:02.840
<v Speaker 1>doctrine has evolved. Alved I am skeptical that you could

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.640
<v Speaker 1>actually persuade a court to do that, but the rhetoric

0:25:06.800 --> 0:25:13.040
<v Speaker 1>of odious debt was powerful enough that the negotiators for

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Iraq were able to get in the Paris Club the

0:25:18.160 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 1>biggest write down of debt ever in history. I mean

0:25:22.800 --> 0:25:26.840
<v Speaker 1>it was something like a right down of debt. And

0:25:27.000 --> 0:25:31.679
<v Speaker 1>it was because at least in part, that they clothed

0:25:31.760 --> 0:25:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it in the rhetoric of odious debt. I mean, now,

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:41.480
<v Speaker 1>they did it brilliantly. I mean they got everyone basically

0:25:41.560 --> 0:25:46.119
<v Speaker 1>to agree to take this massive write down because nobody

0:25:46.160 --> 0:25:51.240
<v Speaker 1>wanted exposure of what had actually happened. And if we

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>go back in time to the strategy that the lawyers

0:25:56.320 --> 0:26:00.800
<v Speaker 1>for Haiti had planned in two thousand, between two thousand

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:04.800
<v Speaker 1>two and two thousand four, this was exactly what they

0:26:04.840 --> 0:26:07.400
<v Speaker 1>had in mind. They I don't think they thought they

0:26:07.480 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>really had much of a chance of sort of winning

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:15.200
<v Speaker 1>a legal case, but they wanted to get into court.

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And once they got into any kind of international jurisdiction

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:24.640
<v Speaker 1>and they got a hearing, then the atmospherics of how

0:26:24.720 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>bad this was was going to be on their side.

0:26:27.440 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>So that's a long winded answer to why this could

0:26:31.400 --> 0:26:37.720
<v Speaker 1>have really practical consequences. Can I add something crazy? I'm

0:26:37.760 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm by nature optimistic, and I remember one

0:26:41.560 --> 0:26:45.840
<v Speaker 1>episode and so if you remember around the in the nineties,

0:26:45.880 --> 0:26:50.320
<v Speaker 1>there were people campaigning for for multilateral debt relief, and

0:26:50.400 --> 0:26:54.080
<v Speaker 1>basically the position of the you know, US administration and

0:26:54.280 --> 0:26:57.000
<v Speaker 1>that ate at that point was that this is never

0:26:57.000 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>going to happen. And then at some point it just

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>happened it and the you know, the White House was

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:03.880
<v Speaker 1>on board, and the people who were on board were

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:06.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly the same people who two or three years before

0:27:06.840 --> 0:27:08.679
<v Speaker 1>I said this is never gonna happen. The you know,

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>the the World Bank is never going to cancel that

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>or by lo income countries. So in a sense, maybe

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, preparing the ground, the sort of building a

0:27:19.240 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>case for something that you think is right, maybe at

0:27:22.480 --> 0:27:26.199
<v Speaker 1>some point things can change. So I also see it

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is in this sense. But but but met always thinks

0:27:29.920 --> 0:27:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that I'm I'm a dreamer. Can we go if we

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:52.600
<v Speaker 1>go back to the details of Haiti. I mean, you

0:27:52.680 --> 0:27:58.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the stats are not particularly reliable from that time,

0:27:58.160 --> 0:28:02.399
<v Speaker 1>but maybe the debt was years worth of total total

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>revenue for the country at the time. And as you mentioned,

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:08.760
<v Speaker 1>it's still talked about today and we taught and as

0:28:08.800 --> 0:28:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Tracy and I discussed in the intro, Haiti is obviously

0:28:12.760 --> 0:28:16.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the poorest countries is known and under you know,

0:28:16.480 --> 0:28:18.199
<v Speaker 1>people think of it as one of the poorest countries

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 1>in the region. How much did that debt contribute to

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 1>the economic trajectory, the poor economic trajectory of Haiti some

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.600
<v Speaker 1>nearly two hundred years ago, or about two hundred years ago,

0:28:31.040 --> 0:28:36.120
<v Speaker 1>how much did that contribute to the economic and sort

0:28:36.160 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 1>of disaster that Haiti is known to be all these

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:42.880
<v Speaker 1>years later. So so we did a bunch of backup

0:28:43.040 --> 0:28:47.400
<v Speaker 1>of the envelope exercises. Some exercises are trying aimed at

0:28:47.400 --> 0:28:50.920
<v Speaker 1>trying to estimate how much this money would be worth today.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:55.520
<v Speaker 1>And another exercise is exactly focused on your question, Joe,

0:28:55.680 --> 0:28:59.600
<v Speaker 1>how much of the audible growth performance of of a

0:28:59.680 --> 0:29:02.920
<v Speaker 1>height year over the past to two years can be

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 1>attributed to this death. I'll tell you about the numbers.

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:10.680
<v Speaker 1>But before that, there is a document in in in

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.600
<v Speaker 1>a the classified document in the archives of the i

0:29:13.800 --> 0:29:16.680
<v Speaker 1>m F. And this is a report about of a

0:29:16.760 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>mission to a hitty in So the IMF must have

0:29:20.320 --> 0:29:22.920
<v Speaker 1>been one or two year old. And let me use

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.760
<v Speaker 1>this to just give a big thank you whoever manages

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the archives of the IMF, because they did an amazing service.

0:29:29.200 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>They put everything online, all these classified documents, and now

0:29:32.840 --> 0:29:35.400
<v Speaker 1>I can kind of read this stuff from my bedroom

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and it's it's fantastic. So anyway, this I m F

0:29:41.200 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 1>document starts by saying fiscal policy in Haiti in general

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:51.080
<v Speaker 1>has not been development promoting because it has priviolely been

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>primarily motivated by revenue els and basically to service the debt.

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.720
<v Speaker 1>And this has taken priority on any other type of

0:30:00.840 --> 0:30:05.080
<v Speaker 1>investment that promoted economic development. So without running any let's

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>say statistical analysis, there is this, you know, report from

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the fund from seven years ago that basically says there

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is some problem linked to the death. Having said this,

0:30:17.040 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 1>there are some econometric estimates on how that affects GDP growth,

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And there is a famous paper by three I m

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>F economists again Katy Pattillo and the Poisson and and

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:37.720
<v Speaker 1>Luca Ricci, which suggests ballpark estimates the high level of

0:30:37.760 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that reduced growth between one uh and two percentage point

0:30:43.520 --> 0:30:48.200
<v Speaker 1>per year. Now, if we apply the lower this estimated

0:30:48.240 --> 0:30:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to this, just we applied the one percent growth reducing effect,

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>we find that gdpeper carpet and heating now should be

0:30:57.480 --> 0:31:02.800
<v Speaker 1>about eight THO dollar, which is much higher than than

0:31:02.960 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>than what is today, and in fact, it would put

0:31:06.160 --> 0:31:10.520
<v Speaker 1>it basically at the same level of income per capita

0:31:10.600 --> 0:31:13.720
<v Speaker 1>of of the Dominican Republic. Now it's hard to say that,

0:31:13.760 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, without the death, would be the Dominican Republic,

0:31:16.920 --> 0:31:20.320
<v Speaker 1>But that's what you get from doing this calculation. And

0:31:20.360 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>then if you compute the present value of this differentially

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:28.360
<v Speaker 1>income per capita, you get, you know, a ridiculously high number.

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:31.080
<v Speaker 1>You get something like, you know, one trillion dollars, which is,

0:31:31.200 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, which is really a huge number. But even

0:31:35.280 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>if you get that the growth effect of the death,

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:43.720
<v Speaker 1>it's only one fifth of the lower bound estimate of

0:31:43.840 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>patio and quotas, you still get that the present value

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:53.160
<v Speaker 1>of the growth effect of this death is about fifty

0:31:53.160 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>one billion of two day's dollar, which is three times

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>of HIGHTUS GDP. Which interesting was that debtojpratio when the

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:09.040
<v Speaker 1>debt was creative? Um? Quite a coincidence? Um? Okay. So

0:32:09.040 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so here we have this debt burden, which Mittwo has

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:16.480
<v Speaker 1>described as like the stinkiest of all odious debt. We

0:32:16.600 --> 0:32:21.160
<v Speaker 1>have something that, as Ugo just laid out, basically contributed

0:32:21.560 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 1>to the long term poverty arc of Haiti. You can

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:31.120
<v Speaker 1>trace the impact of the debt on Haiti's current debt situation,

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, two hundred years later, which is pretty amazing.

0:32:35.160 --> 0:32:40.080
<v Speaker 1>What are the chances that odious debt actually comes into

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:45.520
<v Speaker 1>play and that we get some sort of legal process

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>exploring this option. I guess that's another way of saying,

0:32:48.640 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 1>what would illegal claim on this issue actually look like?

0:32:52.760 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 1>And is it more likely that we get a situation

0:32:56.920 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>similar to the Iraqi debt where the odious that is

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>used as an argument for some sort of additional financial

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:11.440
<v Speaker 1>aid rather than total reparations, you know, fifty billion dollars

0:33:11.520 --> 0:33:16.560
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, based on the economic impact of the original bonds.

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:20.400
<v Speaker 1>This in a sense brings us full circle to the

0:33:21.320 --> 0:33:26.000
<v Speaker 1>question that you have asked Tracy about the existence of

0:33:26.040 --> 0:33:31.240
<v Speaker 1>an odious debt doctrine. If you if we were really

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:35.480
<v Speaker 1>litigating this, so somehow we could get a jurisdiction like

0:33:35.560 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the International Court of Justice to hear this, and that

0:33:40.040 --> 0:33:42.520
<v Speaker 1>would be hard because France would have to agree to

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:47.840
<v Speaker 1>show up. Then I think it's a fairly straightforward legal

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>claim under international law. Even if you don't want to

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>use the odious debt doctrine here, you would just make

0:33:55.360 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the argument that this was an unjust illegal debt was

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>imposed in eighteen twenty five and the money needs to

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:09.320
<v Speaker 1>be returned, so we would call it just give us restitution.

0:34:09.680 --> 0:34:12.839
<v Speaker 1>You were not entitled to take our money. Give it

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:16.799
<v Speaker 1>back to us. And the way you would calculate damages

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:21.560
<v Speaker 1>for them having unjustly taken your money and not even

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:26.320
<v Speaker 1>imposing punitive damages would be said would be to ask,

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what are the opportunity costs of your having taken between

0:34:31.400 --> 0:34:34.320
<v Speaker 1>ninety million francs and a hundred and fifty million banks

0:34:34.440 --> 0:34:38.240
<v Speaker 1>depending on how you make the calculation back in eighteen

0:34:38.239 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>twenty five or over this lengthy period. So that's if

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 1>you get in to some kind of tribunal. Now, the

0:34:47.320 --> 0:34:54.040
<v Speaker 1>lawyers in two thousand four, under President Aristide, we're just

0:34:54.400 --> 0:35:00.239
<v Speaker 1>about to file a claim. There was this dream team

0:35:00.560 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>of lawyers from around the world who were working pro

0:35:04.200 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>bono for the Haitians, and they thought they had a

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>good chance of getting into a tribunal. And then President

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:18.480
<v Speaker 1>Aristide is overthrown and the new government decides that, uh,

0:35:18.520 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, it does not want to anger the French

0:35:21.520 --> 0:35:25.360
<v Speaker 1>who are supporting it in bringing such a claim, and

0:35:25.440 --> 0:35:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the whole thing disappears. But this is not as implausible

0:35:31.360 --> 0:35:35.200
<v Speaker 1>of a claim as I would have thought. Legally, the

0:35:35.239 --> 0:35:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Iraqi argument was this is um much more potent. But

0:35:43.440 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you have to get to some tribunal. And you know,

0:35:47.280 --> 0:35:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Ugo and I have presented our work in front of

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:56.560
<v Speaker 1>a few audiences, and often we are faced with our

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:01.080
<v Speaker 1>friends who are French economists who have never heard of this,

0:36:01.760 --> 0:36:06.759
<v Speaker 1>and they are completely outraged that that that France did this.

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean that their reaction is uh. I have not

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:13.799
<v Speaker 1>found their reaction to be defensive. Instead, it's why didn't

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.360
<v Speaker 1>I know about this? And what can we do to

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:20.120
<v Speaker 1>fix it? I do think that this is a matter

0:36:20.360 --> 0:36:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of public discussion and that will result in something positive,

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:31.920
<v Speaker 1>particularly given the horrible state that hades in now. Tragy,

0:36:32.000 --> 0:36:34.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a good place to leave it for me,

0:36:34.120 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>unless you have anything further that works for me. Yeah,

0:36:37.040 --> 0:36:39.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you you both laid it out the issue

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.600
<v Speaker 1>UM wonderfully. So thank you so much for coming on

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:46.399
<v Speaker 1>all thoughts and walking us through how two hundred year

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:50.759
<v Speaker 1>old debt could still be relevant to today. Thanks for

0:36:50.800 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 1>having us, Thank you so much. Thank you that would

0:36:53.600 --> 0:37:07.759
<v Speaker 1>frantaic that really I really appreciate it. So, Joe, this is,

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>as you can probably tell, a topic that I find

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>endlessly fascinating, partly because I think it says something wider

0:37:16.160 --> 0:37:20.120
<v Speaker 1>about financial debt. And I don't think we think about

0:37:20.160 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>this often enough. But debt is almost exclusively about morality

0:37:27.600 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 1>and fairness in the sense that in order for debt

0:37:31.200 --> 0:37:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to exist, you know, someone has to borrow and another

0:37:33.960 --> 0:37:38.800
<v Speaker 1>person has to lend, and someone ends up owing someone something.

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, and so there are so many judgments and

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:49.440
<v Speaker 1>norms that go into how that story is told of

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:53.800
<v Speaker 1>who owes what to whom and why. And I don't

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:57.800
<v Speaker 1>think we step back and sort of consider those norms

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:01.520
<v Speaker 1>enough and the judgments that are shaped thing how debt

0:38:01.520 --> 0:38:04.359
<v Speaker 1>actually functions and how we think about it. Yeah, you know.

0:38:04.440 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 1>The other thing I completely agree. You know. The other

0:38:06.920 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 1>thing that's interesting is, you know, finance in general is

0:38:10.920 --> 0:38:13.520
<v Speaker 1>like a kind of uh. I sometimes think of finance

0:38:13.560 --> 0:38:17.799
<v Speaker 1>as a time machine because you're essentially uh, you know,

0:38:17.920 --> 0:38:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you you can you can have cash right now that

0:38:20.760 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 1>would otherwise say, like if you borrow money, you can

0:38:23.000 --> 0:38:26.800
<v Speaker 1>have cash right now, that would otherwise take several years

0:38:26.800 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>worth of work. So you know, you're sort of transferring.

0:38:29.800 --> 0:38:34.840
<v Speaker 1>It's transferring of value, transferring of money across time, and

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:39.400
<v Speaker 1>you go and me to discusses like essentially an extremely

0:38:39.440 --> 0:38:42.359
<v Speaker 1>long version of that, and so you know, it's one thing.

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:44.880
<v Speaker 1>It's like we could all wrap in our heads very concretely,

0:38:44.920 --> 0:38:47.120
<v Speaker 1>how I say, debt that was taken out ten years

0:38:47.160 --> 0:38:50.960
<v Speaker 1>ago may affect us today. But there's no particular reason

0:38:51.080 --> 0:38:54.160
<v Speaker 1>to think that a debt that's two years old that

0:38:54.200 --> 0:38:57.239
<v Speaker 1>people have forgotten about, the people around the world don't

0:38:57.239 --> 0:39:00.719
<v Speaker 1>even know about or had never thought about before might

0:39:00.760 --> 0:39:05.960
<v Speaker 1>still be relevant today. It's kind of an extreme outlier,

0:39:06.400 --> 0:39:09.759
<v Speaker 1>but fundamentally, as you say, it's all part of the

0:39:09.800 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 1>same question. But I guess that's what makes this particular

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:17.759
<v Speaker 1>case extremely interesting and me to point it out sort

0:39:17.800 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 1>of like worth folding into the odious debt literature totally.

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:25.480
<v Speaker 1>And the other thing that I was thinking, and we've

0:39:25.480 --> 0:39:28.239
<v Speaker 1>been talking a lot about this on all thoughts for

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the past year now, but whether or not the extraordinary

0:39:31.320 --> 0:39:39.279
<v Speaker 1>circumstances of one spark a wider reckoning on some of

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:42.320
<v Speaker 1>these complicated issues. And I think, you know, we've spoken

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:46.480
<v Speaker 1>about attitudes towards debt shifting in the context of modern

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:51.120
<v Speaker 1>monetary theory and MMT. And I do wonder if given

0:39:51.160 --> 0:39:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the terrible humanitarian situation unfolding in Haiti, you know, you

0:39:55.480 --> 0:39:58.960
<v Speaker 1>have COVID, you have the president getting assassinated, now you

0:39:59.080 --> 0:40:04.279
<v Speaker 1>have another catastrophic earthquake. I do wonder if if you

0:40:04.320 --> 0:40:09.160
<v Speaker 1>could see a big shift in the narrative around something

0:40:09.200 --> 0:40:14.120
<v Speaker 1>like colonial era debt. Well that's interesting because me too

0:40:14.200 --> 0:40:19.520
<v Speaker 1>made this point that even prior so you know, it's like, okay,

0:40:19.600 --> 0:40:24.759
<v Speaker 1>why is this an important thing to classify as odious debt?

0:40:24.840 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 1>And as he pointed out, yes, there is the legal dimension,

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:30.560
<v Speaker 1>but there's also the activist dimension. There's the NGO dimension,

0:40:30.880 --> 0:40:34.120
<v Speaker 1>there's the kill the Debt movement, and so much like

0:40:34.360 --> 0:40:37.600
<v Speaker 1>m m T, which is sort of this hybrid between

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I would you know, I describe it as like a

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 1>hybrid between sort of like pure economics and political activism.

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:48.239
<v Speaker 1>It kind of feels like situations like this end up

0:40:48.280 --> 0:40:53.160
<v Speaker 1>being this hybrid between what's in the law, what's in

0:40:53.200 --> 0:40:57.680
<v Speaker 1>the sort of legal text, and also the general public

0:40:57.760 --> 0:41:00.600
<v Speaker 1>and the activism around these things. And so I think

0:41:00.719 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 1>you make a really apt point here that you know,

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:06.279
<v Speaker 1>we could be in a moment where there's just sort

0:41:06.280 --> 0:41:08.680
<v Speaker 1>of like more public awareness and then that has this

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>sort of like feed through effect to what happens in

0:41:10.840 --> 0:41:13.719
<v Speaker 1>various courts of law and marketplace totally. And I would

0:41:13.760 --> 0:41:16.719
<v Speaker 1>say that gets back to the sort of um morality

0:41:17.120 --> 0:41:20.480
<v Speaker 1>of bonds more widely, and this idea that you know,

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 1>ultimately a debt is about fairness um and achieving fairness

0:41:24.920 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>in the outcome. And so in many ways it's sort

0:41:27.680 --> 0:41:32.440
<v Speaker 1>of the perfect instrument through which to discuss the injustice

0:41:32.800 --> 0:41:37.440
<v Speaker 1>of um the past. Like it fits very nicely into

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 1>arguments because you can suddenly say, well, you owe us

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>x amount for damages inflicted you know, two hundred years ago,

0:41:46.040 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 1>and we can put some sort of quantity on them,

0:41:48.000 --> 0:41:50.400
<v Speaker 1>and we can talk about what the economic impact is.

0:41:50.960 --> 0:41:53.560
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, Joe, I could keep talking about this forever,

0:41:53.680 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>but we should probably go um, should we leave it there?

0:41:57.000 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's leave it there? Okay. This has been another episode

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of the All Thoughts podcast. I'm Tracy Alloway. You can

0:42:03.080 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>follow me on Twitter at Tracy Alloway and I'm Joe

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:08.680
<v Speaker 1>wi Isn't Thal. You can follow me on Twitter at

0:42:08.719 --> 0:42:12.680
<v Speaker 1>the Stalwart. Follow our guests on Twitter. Ugo Panitza, He's

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:17.160
<v Speaker 1>at Panizza. Follow our producer on Twitter. Laura Carlson. She's

0:42:17.200 --> 0:42:20.320
<v Speaker 1>at Laura M. Carlson. Follow the Bloomberg head of podcast,

0:42:20.360 --> 0:42:23.799
<v Speaker 1>Francesca Levi at Francesca Today, and check out all of

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.800
<v Speaker 1>our podcast at Bloomberg under the handle at podcasts. Thanks

0:42:27.840 --> 0:42:28.320
<v Speaker 1>for listening.