WEBVTT - How Jane Street, CitSec Are Usurping Wall Street

0:00:01.400 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Jane Street, Citadel Securities, Virtue Financial. These aren't necessarily household

0:00:07.160 --> 0:00:11.880
<v Speaker 1>names that these high frequency trading firms dominate financial markets.

0:00:12.480 --> 0:00:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Companies like these control up to half of equity trading

0:00:15.880 --> 0:00:19.200
<v Speaker 1>volumes in the US, and their revenues are surging. In

0:00:19.239 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>the second quarter alone, Jane Street made over ten billion

0:00:23.000 --> 0:00:26.160
<v Speaker 1>dollars in net trading revenue, beating out all of Wall

0:00:26.160 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Street's biggest banks, including JP Morgan and Goldman Sachs.

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:35.000
<v Speaker 2>But it's also raised some questions. Earlier this year, Indian

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:40.239
<v Speaker 2>regulator SABBY accused Jane Street of market manipulation, something the

0:00:40.280 --> 0:00:44.800
<v Speaker 2>company has denied. So how do these electronic market makers

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:48.880
<v Speaker 2>get an edge and make so much profit? How much

0:00:48.880 --> 0:00:52.080
<v Speaker 2>of a threat do they pose to traditional Wall Street banks?

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>And can they replicate their success in Asia.

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Asia Centric from Bloomberg Intelligence. I'm John

0:01:01.200 --> 0:01:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Lee in Hong Kong and.

0:01:02.320 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 2>I'm Kajudmitrivelso in Hong Kong.

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>Today we're covering the sacred world of electronic market makers

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:12.040
<v Speaker 1>with Larry tab head of market structured Research at Bloomberg

0:01:12.040 --> 0:01:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Intelligence based in the US.

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 3>Larry, Welcome to the show.

0:01:15.880 --> 0:01:18.040
<v Speaker 4>Glad to be here, Katya, John.

0:01:18.200 --> 0:01:21.840
<v Speaker 2>Well, Larry, maybe we could start just, you know, kind

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 2>of back to basics. What are electronic market makers? Is

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 2>it the same as high frequency traders? How do they work?

0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 2>And wire people? Kind of raising eyebrows.

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:34.160
<v Speaker 5>You know, Kacha, that's a great question. There are a

0:01:34.160 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 5>lot of subtle differences, but by and large, these are companies.

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:42.319
<v Speaker 5>You know, there aren't humans making decisions. Mostly they're machines

0:01:42.400 --> 0:01:46.480
<v Speaker 5>making decisions, and they're making decisions by analyzing a tremendous

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 5>amount of data from the various exchanges and trading venues

0:01:51.480 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 5>and ascertaining is it time to buyer?

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 4>Is a time to sell? Now?

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.440
<v Speaker 5>The high frequency traders, and you know, the ones that

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:04.280
<v Speaker 5>are priced a little bit more nefariously, generally take more

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 5>liquidity than they provide. And what that means is that

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 5>when they see a price that's mispriced, they're going to

0:02:12.720 --> 0:02:14.760
<v Speaker 5>jump on it, and they're going to be faster to

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:17.440
<v Speaker 5>the market than you or me or anybody looking at

0:02:17.480 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 5>market data and reacting with a keyboard. The market makers,

0:02:21.760 --> 0:02:24.239
<v Speaker 5>which tend to be thought of a little bit more positively,

0:02:24.919 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 5>they're a little bit more on the opposite side. They're

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 5>providing liquidity. They're the guys, you know, creating the price

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 5>that you see on the screen. Their goal is to

0:02:33.680 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 5>outcompete other people who are providing prices and try to

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 5>trade without their price being stale and getting picked off

0:02:42.040 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 5>by someone on the other side. You know, this is

0:02:44.480 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 5>not one versus the other. A lot of times it's

0:02:47.520 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 5>combinations of both, because anybody who provides liquidity eventually is

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:53.960
<v Speaker 5>going to take liquidity. Anybody takes liquidity is going to

0:02:53.960 --> 0:02:57.880
<v Speaker 5>provide liquidity, So it's just a matter of degrees. As

0:02:57.919 --> 0:03:00.360
<v Speaker 5>well as, to a certain extent, a lot of quote

0:03:00.400 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 5>unquote market makers are registered with exchanges because they get

0:03:03.919 --> 0:03:08.600
<v Speaker 5>special pricing for providing quotes and providing bids and offers

0:03:09.000 --> 0:03:10.359
<v Speaker 5>as long as the market is open.

0:03:11.240 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 3>Lart, you made an interesting point.

0:03:12.440 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 1>You're saying that these are computer programs or algorithms. Were

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.800
<v Speaker 1>they traditionally done by humans in the past. This was

0:03:20.040 --> 0:03:22.799
<v Speaker 1>an area that was traditionally dominated by Wall Street, Right.

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:26.320
<v Speaker 5>These are the guys that you saw, you know, jumping

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:29.040
<v Speaker 5>up and down and screaming in pits historically, and actually

0:03:29.120 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 5>a lot of them come out of the CME and

0:03:32.080 --> 0:03:35.920
<v Speaker 5>traditional futures exchanges, you know, like trading places where they're

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.440
<v Speaker 5>trying to buy and sell large, concentrated or whatever they

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 5>were trading back when the dan Ackroyd days and Eddie

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 5>Murphy days. But yeah, these positions were mostly done by

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 5>humans with paper tickets, gathering around centralized posts on exchanges,

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 5>buying and selling. A lot of that has been automated

0:03:54.320 --> 0:03:57.200
<v Speaker 5>to a certain extent. A lot of these strategies. You know,

0:03:57.280 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 5>they're not the same, and they're absolutely not the same,

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 5>but they do similar functions that they used to do

0:04:02.040 --> 0:04:02.840
<v Speaker 5>with at exchanges.

0:04:03.640 --> 0:04:06.200
<v Speaker 2>So how are they able to trade so quickly? You

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:08.920
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that it's usually a computer, so I'm guessing this

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:10.880
<v Speaker 2>is like an algorithm that's set up.

0:04:11.680 --> 0:04:15.720
<v Speaker 5>The market makers have different types of strategies, okay, and

0:04:15.840 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 5>each of the different market makers, given their backgrounds, have

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:22.359
<v Speaker 5>different strategies, so it's not like they're role of running

0:04:22.360 --> 0:04:23.560
<v Speaker 5>off the same cueues.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:24.800
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:04:24.839 --> 0:04:27.960
<v Speaker 5>The simplest type of strategy is a provide and take

0:04:28.040 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 5>strategy where they buy one thing and they sell it

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:34.200
<v Speaker 5>either at a better price or in a different location

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 5>at a better price, or they buy something and sell something.

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 5>You know, there's a share of IBM they buy, they

0:04:40.800 --> 0:04:43.440
<v Speaker 5>turn around and sell it. Then you get into more

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:48.920
<v Speaker 5>sophisticated strategies where you're trading an underlying stock and you're

0:04:48.960 --> 0:04:52.240
<v Speaker 5>hedging it or you're training it against an ETF or

0:04:52.279 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 5>a future or an option, and so you're looking at

0:04:55.839 --> 0:04:59.400
<v Speaker 5>you know, the price of IBM maybe against the tech basket,

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:01.599
<v Speaker 5>or you're looking at it against the S and P

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:04.479
<v Speaker 5>five hundred or a future or an option based on

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:06.920
<v Speaker 5>the S and P five hundred, or the QQQ at

0:05:06.960 --> 0:05:09.920
<v Speaker 5>you know, Nasdaq Tech basket, and then you get into

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.960
<v Speaker 5>the next derivative of that is an ETF. And that's

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:19.039
<v Speaker 5>kind of where Jane Street. That was Jeane Street's main business,

0:05:19.040 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 5>making markets and ETFs, so they could better understand less

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:27.080
<v Speaker 5>liquid actually more bonds than stocks, but they do a

0:05:27.120 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 5>big job in stocks, and they can take liquidity from

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 5>individual investors selling bonds and then turn those bonds into

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 5>ETFs and turn that liquidity over and then you start

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 5>getting into even more complicated things like I'm going to

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.640
<v Speaker 5>do parish trades, or you know, I believe one share

0:05:45.680 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 5>of IBM is worth one of HP and one of Apple,

0:05:48.960 --> 0:05:52.040
<v Speaker 5>and so you wind up with one stock to another stock.

0:05:52.680 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 5>And so there are all these different types of strategies

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 5>as well as different locations. So less so in Asia,

0:05:59.640 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 5>but more or so in the States. In Europe, the

0:06:03.000 --> 0:06:08.320
<v Speaker 5>equity marketplace is very fragmented. We have sixteen equity exchanges

0:06:08.400 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 5>plus another thirty two or so dark pools.

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:12.360
<v Speaker 4>So if you.

0:06:12.360 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 5>Can understand which exchanges lead versus which exchange is lag

0:06:17.839 --> 0:06:21.200
<v Speaker 5>and where liquidity may possibly be sitting in dark pools,

0:06:22.000 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 5>you can execute within microseconds at one venue, turned around

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 5>and sell it off in another venue.

0:06:28.000 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 2>And sorry, what's a dark pool? Just for listeners? I

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:32.839
<v Speaker 2>mean you can't say dark pool to a reporter and

0:06:32.880 --> 0:06:33.640
<v Speaker 2>not have me ask.

0:06:34.880 --> 0:06:35.840
<v Speaker 4>No, that's fine.

0:06:37.080 --> 0:06:40.480
<v Speaker 5>In the US they're called alternative trading systems. In Europe

0:06:40.520 --> 0:06:44.720
<v Speaker 5>they're called MtFs. In Japan they're called pts's. But by

0:06:44.760 --> 0:06:48.080
<v Speaker 5>and large it's a non exchange marketplace. Many of them

0:06:48.200 --> 0:06:52.840
<v Speaker 5>don't display quotes, so you're used to seeing the Hong

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:55.880
<v Speaker 5>Kong Exchange have a bit or an offer on a stock,

0:06:55.920 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 5>and you see the quotes because you see them, they're

0:06:59.480 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 5>in effect lit up. A dark pool still has bids

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:07.360
<v Speaker 5>and offers for stocks, but they're not displayed, so you

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 5>actually have to go to them and say, hey, look,

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 5>I want to trade synpore telephone. Does anybody want to

0:07:13.800 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 5>buy or sell Singapore telephone in this alternative trading system,

0:07:17.840 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 5>and they may say yes, they have a buyer or

0:07:19.920 --> 0:07:22.440
<v Speaker 5>seller that may want to trade at the bid or

0:07:22.480 --> 0:07:26.680
<v Speaker 5>the offer or the midpoint or somewhere in between, or

0:07:26.720 --> 0:07:28.720
<v Speaker 5>they may say no, we don't and they turn around

0:07:28.800 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 5>and send your order back to you one filled, in

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 5>which case you have to go to some other place

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:36.800
<v Speaker 5>and look for in These high frequency traders or market

0:07:36.800 --> 0:07:40.320
<v Speaker 5>makers are connected to all of these venues at very

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 5>very high speeds. Now when we're talking about high speeds,

0:07:43.440 --> 0:07:46.679
<v Speaker 5>we're not talking about seconds. We're not even talking about

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 5>milliseconds or thousands of a second. We're talking millions of

0:07:50.800 --> 0:07:55.840
<v Speaker 5>a second and faster, so very very very quick. You know,

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.480
<v Speaker 5>they aggregate all of the market data from all these

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:02.720
<v Speaker 5>different vings news put them into a unified what we

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 5>call the montage, basically a bigger order book, and so

0:08:06.560 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 5>they know if they get a bid for this asset

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:11.280
<v Speaker 5>or that asset, they know that they can turn it

0:08:11.320 --> 0:08:14.000
<v Speaker 5>around or sell it in another venue, and they can

0:08:14.000 --> 0:08:14.960
<v Speaker 5>do it super quick.

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Asia Centric is produced by Bloomberg Intelligence. We're more than

0:08:19.240 --> 0:08:23.080
<v Speaker 1>five hundred experienced analysts and strategists work around the clock

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>to bring you timely world class research. Our coverage spans

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>two hundred market industries, currencies, commodities, and industries, as well

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:34.000
<v Speaker 1>as over two thousand equities and credits. To learn more

0:08:34.040 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>about Bloomberg Intelligence, visit bi go on the Bloomberg terminal.

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:41.280
<v Speaker 1>If you like what you hear, don't forget to subscribe

0:08:41.320 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>and share.

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 3>Larry.

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:47.479
<v Speaker 1>What's the relationship between say, these retail brokers like Robinhood,

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't charge any commission rates and these electronic market makers.

0:08:52.480 --> 0:08:55.200
<v Speaker 5>Oh man, now you're getting deeper into the weeds in

0:08:55.280 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 5>the States. Less so in Europe because Europe doesn't favor this.

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.360
<v Speaker 5>But in the States they have something called payment for orterflow.

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 5>And what payment for order flow is that the retail

0:09:07.440 --> 0:09:11.199
<v Speaker 5>broker gets paid. So robin Hood gets paid by Jane

0:09:11.200 --> 0:09:15.520
<v Speaker 5>Street or Virtue or Citadel a fraction of a cent

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:19.160
<v Speaker 5>to send their order to one of these market makers

0:09:19.600 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 5>and they execute it in the US. As long as

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 5>they execute at work better than the best price that's

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 5>displayed in the market, everything's fine. So in the States

0:09:31.360 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 5>they have these arrangements where Robinhood will send their order

0:09:34.679 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 5>flow to usually a half dozen of these guys, maybe

0:09:38.320 --> 0:09:41.920
<v Speaker 5>three or four, and they get paid for that order flow,

0:09:42.480 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 5>they generally get zero point one the zero point two

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:52.199
<v Speaker 5>cents per share. Generally it's around eleven to twelve cents

0:09:52.200 --> 0:09:55.320
<v Speaker 5>per hundred shares, and that's the payment for order flow

0:09:55.360 --> 0:09:59.280
<v Speaker 5>they get. And because of that, and because Citadel or

0:09:59.360 --> 0:10:03.000
<v Speaker 5>Jane st referred to, gets the first look at this trade,

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:06.280
<v Speaker 5>they're able to price it better than they would price

0:10:06.440 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 5>a trade done on an exchange or trading venue. So

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 5>by and large, the retail investor gets a better price

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:16.440
<v Speaker 5>and the market maker shares a bit of that profit

0:10:16.520 --> 0:10:17.640
<v Speaker 5>with the retail broker.

0:10:18.960 --> 0:10:21.920
<v Speaker 2>Just talking about robin Hood and this concept that the

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:24.960
<v Speaker 2>retail investor would end up getting a better price, there's

0:10:24.960 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 2>this idea that high frequency trading is crowding out or

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:32.559
<v Speaker 2>you know, the retail investor would always be on the

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:35.079
<v Speaker 2>losing end because by the time you think about a trade,

0:10:35.160 --> 0:10:39.319
<v Speaker 2>make the trade on a platform like Robinhood, these algorithms

0:10:39.320 --> 0:10:42.640
<v Speaker 2>have already you know, it's already happened, the trade has

0:10:42.679 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 2>already been made by another company. So yeah, what would

0:10:46.240 --> 0:10:46.719
<v Speaker 2>you say to that.

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 5>I think that's a little idealistic. First of all, by

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:54.959
<v Speaker 5>the time the Robinhood investor sees that data, Citadels of

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:59.120
<v Speaker 5>the world have traded a thousand times, So Citadel is

0:10:59.200 --> 0:11:01.720
<v Speaker 5>working on a you know, as I said, a microsecond

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:06.200
<v Speaker 5>to a sub micro second basis. And most retail investors,

0:11:06.280 --> 0:11:11.640
<v Speaker 5>especially ones that they're trading on a handheld device, hey,

0:11:11.880 --> 0:11:14.679
<v Speaker 5>they're not trading anywhere near the kind of frequency that

0:11:14.840 --> 0:11:18.719
<v Speaker 5>Citadel or chained for Eat, Virtue or xtx or any

0:11:18.720 --> 0:11:22.640
<v Speaker 5>of these guys trade aut So they're really completely different markets. Now,

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:26.240
<v Speaker 5>if you're saying that you've got somebody with a super

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 5>powerful computer that's sitting crunching all these numbers, then you

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 5>have a little bit better argument that Citadel is picking

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.200
<v Speaker 5>their pockets. But for retail investors getting better than the

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 5>best bid, best offer, it's pretty hard to argue with it.

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 5>So they're in very different games. The individual investors time

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 5>frame is not seconds or a sub seconds at best.

0:11:49.440 --> 0:11:53.640
<v Speaker 5>They're you know, a couple of minutes, hours hopefully, you know,

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:58.160
<v Speaker 5>they're looking at years or more than that. I've always

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 5>been a fan of saying generally that most retail traders,

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 5>you know, that's not a wealth creation business.

0:12:05.800 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 4>It's mostly a wealth destruction business.

0:12:08.280 --> 0:12:11.160
<v Speaker 5>Most individuals don't have the time or patients to really

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:15.720
<v Speaker 5>look at it, or analyze the market or really, you know,

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 5>you really have to be special to make money this

0:12:18.440 --> 0:12:21.080
<v Speaker 5>day in a day out. They're better off with much

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 5>buying good companies and holding them.

0:12:23.920 --> 0:12:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Larry, we talked earlier of the competitive landscape between these

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.320
<v Speaker 1>market makers and you know the sell side or you

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.839
<v Speaker 1>know traditional Wall Street investment banks. You talked about how

0:12:32.880 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>they have It sounds like they have superior technology. Is

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.439
<v Speaker 1>that the reason why they sort of started dominating the

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 1>market making space and displaced started displacing Cell sign Absolutely?

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:45.319
<v Speaker 3>Is there any other reasons?

0:12:45.679 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, it's not just the technology, it's the ability to

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.199
<v Speaker 5>use it and the agility of their infrastructure. And what

0:12:52.240 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 5>that means is if you think about somebody ely JP Morgan,

0:12:56.120 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 5>or Bank of America or HSBC, you know, any any

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 5>large bank that you would know that as a market

0:13:03.520 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 5>making armor or capital markets arm. First of all, we're

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:10.720
<v Speaker 5>no longer in a world where these are investment banks

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:16.880
<v Speaker 5>versus commercial banks or retail banks. These are large diversified organizations.

0:13:17.480 --> 0:13:20.840
<v Speaker 5>So when the head of trading says, I need to

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 5>go buy a new connectivity line between here in Chicago,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:29.360
<v Speaker 5>or between New York and Singapore, or New York and London,

0:13:29.520 --> 0:13:33.040
<v Speaker 5>or Singapore and Tokyo or whatever. The head of the

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:36.200
<v Speaker 5>bank has to say, Okay, well they have to justify

0:13:36.240 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 5>that expense. You know, should I give the money to

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.280
<v Speaker 5>the guy who just wants to buy a faster communications

0:13:41.320 --> 0:13:45.160
<v Speaker 5>line that's going to buy me three milliseconds maybe? Or

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.680
<v Speaker 5>do I really want to buy new ATMs for the company,

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 5>or do I want to enhance my credit card business,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 5>or do I want to put that to make more loans.

0:13:53.840 --> 0:13:56.120
<v Speaker 5>So right off the bat, you know, in these banks

0:13:56.160 --> 0:13:59.240
<v Speaker 5>there's a capital allocation process that takes time.

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:01.960
<v Speaker 4>It's not like you know, someone with.

0:14:02.679 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 5>In the trading arm a Bank of American can just

0:14:04.840 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 5>go buy a million dollars worth of servers and have

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 5>them delivered in a week or even a month. This

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.120
<v Speaker 5>process can take six months to a year just to

0:14:14.200 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 5>deploy a single server. And so these trading firms, on

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 5>the other hand, they allocate capital very quickly, and they

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:27.080
<v Speaker 5>know that these investments make or break their businesses, so

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 5>they tend to be much more agile and invest in

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:34.560
<v Speaker 5>this technology much faster than what the traditional bank would do.

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 5>If you think about the technology investment and jp work,

0:14:38.160 --> 0:14:40.720
<v Speaker 5>and I think they said there were five to ten

0:14:40.880 --> 0:14:44.320
<v Speaker 5>billion dollars a year on tech. That completely towards any

0:14:44.360 --> 0:14:47.480
<v Speaker 5>of these guys, all of these guys combined, but they're

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:50.480
<v Speaker 5>allocating it over such wide you know your raise. They're

0:14:50.520 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 5>not paying their stabs the kind of money you know,

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:56.200
<v Speaker 5>consider an l and those guys are paying guys coming

0:14:56.200 --> 0:14:58.320
<v Speaker 5>out of school almost a half a million dollars a

0:14:58.400 --> 0:15:02.400
<v Speaker 5>year with no work exp sperience. I wish Bloomber paid

0:15:02.400 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 5>that kind of salary.

0:15:05.280 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 3>This is an assign.

0:15:06.440 --> 0:15:09.520
<v Speaker 1>During my last business trip from Singapore to Hong Kong,

0:15:09.560 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>when I landed at Hong Kong Airport and I was

0:15:11.560 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>walking through the airport gates, I literally saw a hotel

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>chauffeur have a sign and it said Jane Street Intern.

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I was like, and I was like, well, these interns

0:15:24.160 --> 0:15:27.240
<v Speaker 1>have hotel chauffeurs. I went straight to the train by the.

0:15:27.160 --> 0:15:29.640
<v Speaker 5>Way, right right, I go, and I got a London

0:15:30.120 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 5>I'm gone to he Throw Express and I don't have

0:15:33.000 --> 0:15:36.280
<v Speaker 5>a Bloomberg show for picking me up. But it's crazy

0:15:36.360 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 5>that they're paying these people. And these people are really talented,

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 5>and that's why there's a bidding war for them. So

0:15:42.440 --> 0:15:46.680
<v Speaker 5>all through the value chain as well as the regulatory side,

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:52.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, before the crisis, Morgan, Stanley, Goldman, Zachs, Merrill, Lynch,

0:15:52.880 --> 0:15:56.320
<v Speaker 5>these guys were regulated as non bank broker dealers and

0:15:56.440 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 5>they didn't have to deal with the regulatory burden of

0:15:59.560 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 5>being a bit. After the crisis, they all became banks.

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 5>They were kind of forced to become banks. That comes

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 5>with a much larger regulatory burden. And actually, if you

0:16:10.920 --> 0:16:12.600
<v Speaker 5>look at some of the Dodd Frank stuff and a

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 5>lot of the Basil three stuff, the regulators didn't want

0:16:16.080 --> 0:16:18.600
<v Speaker 5>them to take trading risks. And so you think that

0:16:18.680 --> 0:16:22.680
<v Speaker 5>these guys get boxed out of the business. Not really so,

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:27.000
<v Speaker 5>James Street, Citadel revert to a lot of these guys

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 5>prime with the big banks. That's where they get their

0:16:30.400 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 5>credit from. So now a Bank of America and we're

0:16:34.680 --> 0:16:39.520
<v Speaker 5>Stanley taking the trading risks. They're taking the risks on

0:16:39.560 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 5>the back end, on the lending custody, the banking relationship,

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 5>from holding all the securities in cash that is being

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:49.960
<v Speaker 5>used to do a lot of this trading. So they've

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 5>gone from the front of the line, you know, in

0:16:51.880 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 5>terms of trading, to kind of the back of the

0:16:54.320 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 5>line where they're making a lot of their money, you know,

0:16:56.760 --> 0:16:59.000
<v Speaker 5>lending and doing securities lending.

0:17:00.080 --> 0:17:02.280
<v Speaker 1>So would it be a simplification to say that on

0:17:02.360 --> 0:17:06.920
<v Speaker 1>one end, like these electronic market makers HFTs competitors to

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street banks on the trading side, absolutely, but they're

0:17:09.560 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 1>also customers on the prime side as well as you know,

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the commission revenue.

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:14.119
<v Speaker 4>Big customers.

0:17:14.520 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 5>Not necessarily the commission side. It's more the financing side.

0:17:19.280 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 5>It's more on the back end. It's more you know,

0:17:22.840 --> 0:17:24.040
<v Speaker 5>they're they're clearing banks.

0:17:25.040 --> 0:17:28.320
<v Speaker 2>Since we're talking about that, I wonder what could go

0:17:28.680 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 2>wrong in that situation. You know the regulatory risk, of course,

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.520
<v Speaker 2>but when you're borrowing so much from banks and you're

0:17:35.600 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 2>using it to make these trades, I mean, what are

0:17:38.000 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 2>some of the issues that regulators where folks like Elizabeth

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:43.600
<v Speaker 2>Warren might be particularly worried about.

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 5>Let's not get into my senator, She's worried about everything.

0:17:47.560 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 5>So everybody's saying, oh, all these high frequency traders, bad, bad, bad,

0:17:50.960 --> 0:17:53.680
<v Speaker 5>bad bad. All these high frequency market makers are putting

0:17:53.680 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 5>these wonderful broker dealers out of business. On the other hand,

0:17:56.640 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 5>we have not seen a marketmaker collapse. If you go

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 5>back fifteen twenty years, every year or two you'd see

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 5>a big Bank, Bearings Bank, Sumi Tomo Trading, and Copper.

0:18:09.720 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Nick Eaton, he was Bearings, Lahman Brothers best done well.

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 4>Lehman was a little different.

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 5>But you know, with human trading, things are done over

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.800
<v Speaker 5>the phone, and you write tickets and those tickets have

0:18:23.880 --> 0:18:26.359
<v Speaker 5>to be processed and the deals are done by phone.

0:18:27.200 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 5>So John Arkati, I'm talking with you. I buy a

0:18:31.760 --> 0:18:33.560
<v Speaker 5>bunch of stock, or I buy a bunch of bonds

0:18:33.560 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 5>from you. Guys, we negotiate a price. You say we're done.

0:18:37.280 --> 0:18:40.240
<v Speaker 5>I say we're done. I'm supposed to write a ticket

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 5>and have that process. What if that ticket sits in

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:46.719
<v Speaker 5>my drawer because all of a sudden the price has

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 5>gone away from me. You know this trade. My back

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 5>office doesn't know this trade. You try to send me

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:56.120
<v Speaker 5>securities and get payment. My back office says, we don't

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.879
<v Speaker 5>know this trade. And then the next thing is I

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.679
<v Speaker 5>double down because I'm right, Because I'm a huge trader,

0:19:01.760 --> 0:19:04.600
<v Speaker 5>I can never be wrong. So I do a trade

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:06.719
<v Speaker 5>instead of with contient, I do it with a John's company.

0:19:07.280 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 5>And I don't put that trip ticket because that looks

0:19:09.359 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 5>like it's going south, and I don't put that in

0:19:11.200 --> 0:19:11.840
<v Speaker 5>my system.

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 4>And all of a sudden.

0:19:13.600 --> 0:19:17.560
<v Speaker 5>These positions can get rather large to the tune of

0:19:17.680 --> 0:19:20.000
<v Speaker 5>what used to be human. You know, billions of dollars

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:23.120
<v Speaker 5>of trading losses. You never see that at these places,

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 5>especially since night blew up, because they had four risk systems.

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 5>Most of these systems are done electronically, they're automatically processed.

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:34.840
<v Speaker 5>They go through a central risk book. The central risk

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:39.399
<v Speaker 5>manager looks at the positions constantly and says, hey, Larry,

0:19:39.480 --> 0:19:42.040
<v Speaker 5>you know you're overexposed. I'm going to go sell out

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:46.760
<v Speaker 5>these positions. So think about trading strategies. If I'm a

0:19:46.760 --> 0:19:49.320
<v Speaker 5>market maker, my job is to buy at the bid

0:19:49.359 --> 0:19:52.120
<v Speaker 5>and sell at the offer. I'm working on a tiny spread,

0:19:52.640 --> 0:19:56.040
<v Speaker 5>especially if the markets that I'm working in are moving

0:19:56.040 --> 0:20:00.240
<v Speaker 5>in you know, milliseconds in microseconds. I am very very

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:05.119
<v Speaker 5>finely balanced on that knife edge. Okay, So if I

0:20:05.160 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 5>want to stay fairly risk neutral, whatever I buy, I

0:20:09.520 --> 0:20:11.600
<v Speaker 5>need to get rid of her hedge. Whatever I sell,

0:20:11.680 --> 0:20:15.400
<v Speaker 5>I need to acquire or hedge. And so my position

0:20:15.560 --> 0:20:19.840
<v Speaker 5>needs to be pretty risk monitored or managed all the time.

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:23.280
<v Speaker 5>And so these guys tend not to take huge positions.

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 5>They tend to take lots of small positions. And that's

0:20:26.640 --> 0:20:28.880
<v Speaker 5>a certain extent makes them less risky. I also think

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:31.879
<v Speaker 5>about it, so if I had to make a market

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.240
<v Speaker 5>and the market traded once a day, I got to

0:20:35.280 --> 0:20:37.879
<v Speaker 5>quote very wide prices, and if I want to do

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:39.439
<v Speaker 5>any type of volume, I have to do it in

0:20:39.480 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 5>big size. If the market moves faster, then I have

0:20:43.560 --> 0:20:45.800
<v Speaker 5>more chance to get in and get out. And if

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.920
<v Speaker 5>the market moves even faster, I can make tighter prices

0:20:48.960 --> 0:20:52.000
<v Speaker 5>and get in and out quicker. And to a certain extent,

0:20:52.480 --> 0:20:55.399
<v Speaker 5>if I take too large a position, the market can

0:20:55.440 --> 0:20:58.560
<v Speaker 5>move against me pretty quickly if the market moves really fast.

0:20:59.119 --> 0:21:02.840
<v Speaker 5>So these business models really don't support the taking of

0:21:03.000 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 5>very large positions. That said, some of these entities have

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 5>hedge funds, and those hedge funds work differently. They have

0:21:10.359 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 5>more capital, they could take longer positions, but the market

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.000
<v Speaker 5>making side generally doesn't. They had to get in and

0:21:16.040 --> 0:21:17.720
<v Speaker 5>get out, or get in and hedge.

0:21:18.320 --> 0:21:20.320
<v Speaker 3>Laurie, I wanted to bring this discussion to Asia.

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Now there's been a lot of news that you know,

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:25.280
<v Speaker 1>some of these marketmakers are expanding into this region. I

0:21:25.280 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>think Citadel Securities is hiring aggressively in Asia. There's also

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:32.159
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jane Street Jaane Street's already been here for

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a while and then made a lot of money. Now

0:21:35.359 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>they do have some regulatory risks in India. Yeah, yeah,

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>like the regulator is accusing them of market manipulation. And

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>by the way, Jane Street's vehemently denying these allegations. I

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.119
<v Speaker 1>think they will find over five hundred million dollars. But

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.040
<v Speaker 1>having said that, the regulator said that they made of

0:21:52.119 --> 0:21:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it as four billion dollars over two years.

0:21:54.400 --> 0:21:57.080
<v Speaker 5>I don't know there was some huge number. Yeah, I

0:21:57.080 --> 0:21:59.560
<v Speaker 5>don't know whether that's true or not. Whether they were

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 5>in a minuteulating the market or not.

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:01.879
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:22:02.119 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 5>In a certain extent, they could have been taking large

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 5>positions just because the business model generally doesn't support it.

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 5>If they're making enough money, risk managers tend to look

0:22:11.880 --> 0:22:14.520
<v Speaker 5>the opposite way sometimes. I think we'll have to just

0:22:14.920 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 5>see how that plays out. But from what I understand,

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:23.200
<v Speaker 5>the Indian market had very special structures that the derivatives

0:22:23.280 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 5>market was much more liquid than the cash market, and

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:30.280
<v Speaker 5>so there was a very significant arbitrage between the options

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 5>market and the cash market. Now, whether playing one against

0:22:34.359 --> 0:22:38.480
<v Speaker 5>the other tightens the spread between the derivatives and the

0:22:38.520 --> 0:22:41.520
<v Speaker 5>cash market, which is what it's supposed to do or

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:45.640
<v Speaker 5>whether it was manipulative. I have no idea. We'll see

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 5>how that plays out in court. But theoretically, if the

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 5>options market goes one way and I can buy an

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:56.399
<v Speaker 5>option at a theoretical cash price of ten and the

0:22:56.440 --> 0:23:00.560
<v Speaker 5>actual cash prices is eight, I would be buying at

0:23:00.600 --> 0:23:03.080
<v Speaker 5>eight dollars and selling in the derivatives market at ten

0:23:03.160 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 5>all day long and pocketing the two. That's the business model,

0:23:07.520 --> 0:23:10.359
<v Speaker 5>and theoretically what should happen is the cash price should

0:23:10.400 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 5>go up and the derivatives price should go down. That's

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:16.119
<v Speaker 5>how arbitrage works. Now what actually happened, I don't know.

0:23:16.800 --> 0:23:19.880
<v Speaker 5>Getting onto broader Asia, I think there's some really interesting

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:23.400
<v Speaker 5>things going on in ASA. Generally, the market makers move

0:23:23.480 --> 0:23:28.159
<v Speaker 5>into markets based on capitalization as well as the economics

0:23:28.160 --> 0:23:31.800
<v Speaker 5>in the market. So needs to be enough volume to

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:35.240
<v Speaker 5>make it worthwhile, and generally there needs to be the

0:23:35.280 --> 0:23:38.240
<v Speaker 5>ability to hedge or get out of the position. Whether

0:23:38.320 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 5>that means that the cash market is fragmented like in

0:23:42.240 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 5>US equities market, but let's just say in mainland China

0:23:47.160 --> 0:23:49.160
<v Speaker 5>it's hard to buy and sell on the same day.

0:23:49.760 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 5>That becomes very hard, or if you only have a

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 5>single market and there's one queue, it becomes very competitive

0:23:56.600 --> 0:23:59.280
<v Speaker 5>to get in. So you'll see these guys go into

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.840
<v Speaker 5>the market based on the size of the market, So

0:24:01.840 --> 0:24:05.560
<v Speaker 5>how much is traded there's only a single market, or

0:24:05.600 --> 0:24:09.840
<v Speaker 5>whether there's multiple markets like Japan you know has pts's

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 5>and based on a derivatives market, whether there's the ability

0:24:13.600 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 5>to arbitrage cash versus stocks, or cash versus options, cash

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:24.760
<v Speaker 5>versus ETFs, cash versus single stock futures or index based futures.

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 5>That's kind of you know, will be how these guys

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 5>will pick the markets that they.

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Enter, and do you think they'll be able to replicate

0:24:32.560 --> 0:24:34.760
<v Speaker 1>the success that they've had in the US with Asia,

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:36.199
<v Speaker 1>Like we already know that Jain Street makes a lot

0:24:36.200 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>of money in Asia, but for the others as well, that's.

0:24:39.359 --> 0:24:41.959
<v Speaker 5>A good question because they have not been as successful

0:24:42.040 --> 0:24:45.080
<v Speaker 5>in Europe. They do okay in Europe, but not nearly

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 5>as well as they do in the US, mostly because

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.359
<v Speaker 5>there's a lot more trading in the States than there

0:24:49.440 --> 0:24:52.400
<v Speaker 5>is in Europe. You know, there's time market's like eight

0:24:52.440 --> 0:24:55.359
<v Speaker 5>to ten times bigger in the States. Asia to a

0:24:55.359 --> 0:24:58.640
<v Speaker 5>certain extent is smaller, but it really it depends on

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 5>how efficient the markets are. Who are they trading against,

0:25:02.160 --> 0:25:05.600
<v Speaker 5>is an institutional market or retail market? How quickly does

0:25:05.640 --> 0:25:07.760
<v Speaker 5>the market move, How quickly can they get out and

0:25:07.800 --> 0:25:10.480
<v Speaker 5>find the other side of the trade. I think over

0:25:10.680 --> 0:25:14.040
<v Speaker 5>time all these markets will become like you know, pretty

0:25:14.080 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 5>much fully electronic. Whether it's Jane Street who wins, or

0:25:18.480 --> 0:25:21.639
<v Speaker 5>Citadel who wins, or a local player who wins. You

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:24.520
<v Speaker 5>know that's going to rue the level ofsistication in the

0:25:24.520 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 5>market structure.

0:25:25.920 --> 0:25:28.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and letter, before we let you go, we have

0:25:28.960 --> 0:25:30.240
<v Speaker 1>to ask, like, how do you get a job at

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:31.040
<v Speaker 1>one of these places?

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:38.960
<v Speaker 5>Generally they're looking for very mathematically advanced folks. You either

0:25:39.280 --> 0:25:43.520
<v Speaker 5>need to code really really well, or you need to

0:25:43.720 --> 0:25:46.840
<v Speaker 5>have really good quantitative skills. And that doesn't necessarily mean

0:25:46.960 --> 0:25:50.560
<v Speaker 5>just math. You could be a physics major or you know,

0:25:50.720 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 5>nuclear scientists or something.

0:25:52.240 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 4>So somebody who can really.

0:25:53.680 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 5>Handle lots of big data and lots of analytics and

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 5>have a kind of a different way of thinking.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:00.639
<v Speaker 4>They're generally not looking at.

0:26:00.560 --> 0:26:03.680
<v Speaker 5>Finance majors or economics majors, are looking at much more

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 5>technical type folks.

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:08.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay, great, thanks Larry for joining the show.

0:26:08.880 --> 0:26:10.439
<v Speaker 4>Great to be here. A lot of fun doing this.

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Age Eccentric from Bloomberg Intelligence. I'm

0:26:14.880 --> 0:26:16.640
<v Speaker 1>John Lee in Hong Kong, and.

0:26:16.560 --> 0:26:19.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm katjadme Treva, also in Hong Kong. You can catch

0:26:19.520 --> 0:26:23.840
<v Speaker 2>all our episodes on Spotify, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you listen.

0:26:24.440 --> 0:26:28.080
<v Speaker 2>And this was produced and edited by Clara Chen. Thanks

0:26:28.119 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 2>so much