WEBVTT - Fargo: Lies, Myths, and Murder, plus The Invite | #1072

0:00:21.244 --> 0:00:24.604
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all you

0:00:24.605 --> 0:00:27.565
<v Speaker 1>can watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in

0:00:27.685 --> 0:00:31.365
<v Speaker 1>just two visits. See any standard two D movie anytime

0:00:31.725 --> 0:00:34.805
<v Speaker 1>with no blackoutdates or restrictions. Sign up now on the

0:00:34.885 --> 0:00:37.245
<v Speaker 1>Regal app or at the link in our description and

0:00:37.445 --> 0:00:41.685
<v Speaker 1>use code film spot twenty six to receive fifteen percent off.

0:00:42.045 --> 0:00:44.525
<v Speaker 2>What kind of a show you guys putting on here today?

0:00:44.644 --> 0:00:45.765
<v Speaker 2>You're not interested in armed?

0:00:45.925 --> 0:00:46.084
<v Speaker 1>Now?

0:00:46.284 --> 0:00:47.885
<v Speaker 2>No, Look, we're going to do this thing. We're going

0:00:47.925 --> 0:00:48.205
<v Speaker 2>to have a.

0:00:48.205 --> 0:00:54.605
<v Speaker 3>Conversation from Chicago. This is film Spotting. I'm Adam Kempinar and.

0:00:54.525 --> 0:00:55.405
<v Speaker 1>I'm Josh Larson.

0:00:55.725 --> 0:00:57.245
<v Speaker 4>I'm Carrie Linda Garden.

0:00:57.285 --> 0:00:59.965
<v Speaker 3>You got the car, you've been brand new, burnt numbers here.

0:01:00.245 --> 0:01:02.245
<v Speaker 3>You want your own wife, kidnap our dad.

0:01:02.285 --> 0:01:03.565
<v Speaker 1>He's real, well owned, so.

0:01:03.605 --> 0:01:04.484
<v Speaker 3>Why don't you just ask.

0:01:04.405 --> 0:01:06.045
<v Speaker 4>Him for the money.

0:01:07.125 --> 0:01:10.925
<v Speaker 3>See, these are personal matters, personal matters. Thirty years ago,

0:01:11.005 --> 0:01:14.205
<v Speaker 3>the Coen Brothers were the quirky team behind five features,

0:01:14.245 --> 0:01:18.925
<v Speaker 3>most notably and profitably raising Arizona. Fargo made them Best

0:01:18.925 --> 0:01:22.685
<v Speaker 3>Picture nominees and star Francis McDow dorman a Best Actress winner.

0:01:22.845 --> 0:01:24.925
<v Speaker 1>This week, we'll try to cool you off with an

0:01:24.965 --> 0:01:29.285
<v Speaker 1>anniversary review of The Wintry Crime Caper, plus Olivia Wilde's

0:01:29.324 --> 0:01:33.044
<v Speaker 1>The Invite and David Wayne's Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity

0:01:33.084 --> 0:01:36.765
<v Speaker 1>Sex Pass. That and more. You betcha ahead on film Spotting.

0:01:43.725 --> 0:01:47.445
<v Speaker 3>Welcome to Film Spotting. Last week here, Josh, we discussed

0:01:47.485 --> 0:01:51.765
<v Speaker 3>the biggest moneymaker of nineteen ninety six, Independence Day. That's

0:01:51.765 --> 0:01:56.165
<v Speaker 3>how we celebrated July fourth and that film's thirtieth anniversary.

0:01:56.205 --> 0:01:59.404
<v Speaker 3>Now we're going to discuss what I think was the

0:01:59.445 --> 0:02:05.045
<v Speaker 3>best film of nineteen ninety six overall, and that's Fargo.

0:02:05.325 --> 0:02:08.525
<v Speaker 3>Back on episode I think three seventeen, before you joined

0:02:08.565 --> 0:02:11.605
<v Speaker 3>the show, we did our top five films of nineteen

0:02:11.685 --> 0:02:14.485
<v Speaker 3>ninety six, and I did have Fargo in the number

0:02:14.485 --> 0:02:16.765
<v Speaker 3>one slot. You know what it was competing with in

0:02:16.845 --> 0:02:18.285
<v Speaker 3>the number two slot.

0:02:18.965 --> 0:02:19.644
<v Speaker 1>Ninety six.

0:02:19.685 --> 0:02:22.445
<v Speaker 3>Any guests, Oh gosh, I don't think.

0:02:22.685 --> 0:02:25.885
<v Speaker 1>I don't even think I have a top Breaking the Waves, Trainspotting.

0:02:28.245 --> 0:02:31.204
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, Breaking the Waves actually I think was my number five,

0:02:31.484 --> 0:02:35.885
<v Speaker 3>but number two was another film, coincidentally about a small

0:02:35.924 --> 0:02:39.045
<v Speaker 3>town sheriff investigating a murder, which I don't think I

0:02:39.125 --> 0:02:42.644
<v Speaker 3>realized at the time they had that in common Lone

0:02:42.644 --> 0:02:45.565
<v Speaker 3>Star from ritactor John Sales.

0:02:45.565 --> 0:02:49.365
<v Speaker 1>Of course, solid list. You know, it's just registering now

0:02:49.445 --> 0:02:52.965
<v Speaker 1>that we are doing back to back nineteen ninety six films.

0:02:52.965 --> 0:02:56.005
<v Speaker 1>I don't know exactly that didn't hit me earlier, but

0:02:56.885 --> 0:02:58.965
<v Speaker 1>we haven't done. I have to look at that and

0:02:59.005 --> 0:03:01.325
<v Speaker 1>see what my top five of ninety six would be.

0:03:02.525 --> 0:03:05.365
<v Speaker 1>I had not start compiling top tens at that point,

0:03:05.445 --> 0:03:07.484
<v Speaker 1>at least on my website. I feel like James and

0:03:07.525 --> 0:03:10.245
<v Speaker 1>the Giant Peach might be up there for me. I

0:03:10.245 --> 0:03:13.285
<v Speaker 1>remember loving that from that year. Spike Lee had I

0:03:13.285 --> 0:03:15.524
<v Speaker 1>think Get on the Bus from that year. I don't

0:03:15.565 --> 0:03:17.765
<v Speaker 1>know if I would have put that in my top five,

0:03:17.805 --> 0:03:21.285
<v Speaker 1>but a good film, yeah, I have to revisit ye.

0:03:21.405 --> 0:03:23.885
<v Speaker 1>But we're doing our best these last two weeks at least.

0:03:24.165 --> 0:03:27.285
<v Speaker 3>Well, this isn't so much about getting in the time

0:03:27.365 --> 0:03:31.364
<v Speaker 3>machine and going back to nineteen ninety six and commemorating

0:03:31.445 --> 0:03:36.245
<v Speaker 3>that year. It's really about our pantheon project. Fargo is

0:03:36.285 --> 0:03:38.765
<v Speaker 3>a film that is in the film spotting pantheon, but

0:03:38.925 --> 0:03:42.245
<v Speaker 3>we have never discussed it, and we are going to

0:03:42.325 --> 0:03:45.285
<v Speaker 3>remedy that here on this show. You also caught up

0:03:45.325 --> 0:03:47.765
<v Speaker 3>with a movie I'm eager to see Olivia Wilde's the

0:03:47.845 --> 0:03:51.805
<v Speaker 3>Invite that expands to more cities. This weekend, we both

0:03:51.845 --> 0:03:55.605
<v Speaker 3>saw David Wayne's Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass.

0:03:55.925 --> 0:03:59.285
<v Speaker 3>We'll have some talk about both later plus poll results.

0:03:59.605 --> 0:04:02.525
<v Speaker 3>Our listeners are going to weigh in on the best

0:04:02.725 --> 0:04:07.725
<v Speaker 3>pair of nineties blockbusters. Some good feedback there. A reminder,

0:04:07.765 --> 0:04:10.245
<v Speaker 3>Film Spotting is now available as a video podcast. You

0:04:10.285 --> 0:04:13.725
<v Speaker 3>can watch us talk over at YouTube dot com slash

0:04:13.845 --> 0:04:17.925
<v Speaker 3>film Spotting up. First, Fargo at thirty.

0:04:17.725 --> 0:04:19.245
<v Speaker 5>Did you look in a citation book?

0:04:19.965 --> 0:04:23.685
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Vehicle E Rodion was a Tan Sierra at two

0:04:23.725 --> 0:04:27.805
<v Speaker 2>eighteen am under a plate number for DLR. I figured

0:04:27.805 --> 0:04:29.805
<v Speaker 2>they stopped him or shot him before he could finish

0:04:29.805 --> 0:04:33.165
<v Speaker 2>filling out to tag number. So I got the state

0:04:33.205 --> 0:04:35.844
<v Speaker 2>looking for a Sierra with a tech starting DLR. They

0:04:35.845 --> 0:04:36.844
<v Speaker 2>don't got no match yet.

0:04:38.964 --> 0:04:41.005
<v Speaker 5>I'm not sure that I agree with you one hundred

0:04:41.045 --> 0:04:42.365
<v Speaker 5>percent on your please work there Low.

0:04:42.765 --> 0:04:46.404
<v Speaker 3>Thirty years later, it's easy to forget how decisively Fargo

0:04:46.565 --> 0:04:50.765
<v Speaker 3>reoriented the Cohen Brothers' careers. Nineteen ninety one's Barton Fink

0:04:50.844 --> 0:04:54.085
<v Speaker 3>earned Joel and Ethan their first three Academy Award nominations

0:04:54.404 --> 0:04:58.445
<v Speaker 3>Best Art Direction costume design and supporting actor. But Fargo

0:04:58.645 --> 0:05:02.885
<v Speaker 3>was easily their most commercial, critical and awards circuit success,

0:05:03.045 --> 0:05:06.525
<v Speaker 3>earning seven Oscar noms and winning two. The film was

0:05:06.565 --> 0:05:10.525
<v Speaker 3>so instantly highly regarded Roger Ebert said, it emerges as

0:05:10.565 --> 0:05:13.005
<v Speaker 3>one of the best films I've ever seen that when

0:05:13.045 --> 0:05:16.125
<v Speaker 3>the American Film Institute put out its one hundred years

0:05:16.125 --> 0:05:18.765
<v Speaker 3>one hundred Movies list a couple of years later, it

0:05:18.805 --> 0:05:22.125
<v Speaker 3>was Fargo, not Best Picture winner The English Patient that

0:05:22.245 --> 0:05:24.845
<v Speaker 3>made the cut, the most recent movie to do so

0:05:25.605 --> 0:05:29.285
<v Speaker 3>what was so different about this Cone's effort? Reading reviews

0:05:29.284 --> 0:05:32.085
<v Speaker 3>from the period makes you wonder if the mischievous brothers

0:05:32.125 --> 0:05:34.724
<v Speaker 3>didn't set a movie in the frozen tundra of the Midwest,

0:05:34.885 --> 0:05:39.005
<v Speaker 3>winkingly to show critics what a truly cold movie was.

0:05:39.725 --> 0:05:42.325
<v Speaker 3>In Sight and Sounds in May nineteen ninety six issue,

0:05:42.525 --> 0:05:45.885
<v Speaker 3>Lizzie Frank cited it as a common term for their ludic,

0:05:45.964 --> 0:05:49.525
<v Speaker 3>ironic approach to cinema and the detached precision with which

0:05:49.565 --> 0:05:52.604
<v Speaker 3>they unravel their stories. In her March eighth New York

0:05:52.645 --> 0:05:58.485
<v Speaker 3>Times review, Janet Maslin called them coolly cerebral filmmakers. Oddly coincidentally,

0:05:58.605 --> 0:06:02.525
<v Speaker 3>Frank and Maslin both used the word perversely to describe

0:06:02.525 --> 0:06:06.645
<v Speaker 3>Fargo's great irony that despite the film's frigid sending and

0:06:07.085 --> 0:06:10.645
<v Speaker 3>noir inflected plot, which finds a Twin Cities car salesman

0:06:10.925 --> 0:06:13.525
<v Speaker 3>scheming to have his wife kidnapped to collect the ransom

0:06:13.565 --> 0:06:16.364
<v Speaker 3>from his rich father in law, the Cones reveal a

0:06:16.445 --> 0:06:20.885
<v Speaker 3>surprising warmth. While I vaguely recall some claims of contempt

0:06:21.045 --> 0:06:24.805
<v Speaker 3>at the time, there's undeniable affection in their portrayal of

0:06:24.844 --> 0:06:29.525
<v Speaker 3>Francis mcdormand's incessantly hungry seven months pregnant Minnesota and ice,

0:06:29.605 --> 0:06:33.485
<v Speaker 3>Marge Gunderson and her droll duck painting, ice fishing, egg

0:06:33.565 --> 0:06:36.885
<v Speaker 3>making husband Norm, son of a Gunderson played by John

0:06:36.964 --> 0:06:40.205
<v Speaker 3>Carol Lynch. So much affection, in fact, that we could

0:06:40.245 --> 0:06:43.485
<v Speaker 3>discuss whether the Cones have presented another such vision of

0:06:43.525 --> 0:06:47.565
<v Speaker 3>earnest tenderness, since whether such an abundance of heart is

0:06:47.605 --> 0:06:50.165
<v Speaker 3>good or bad depends on your perspective. On a twenty

0:06:50.205 --> 0:06:53.205
<v Speaker 3>twenty two episode of the Unspooled podcast with Paul Sheer

0:06:53.284 --> 0:06:56.364
<v Speaker 3>and front of the show Amy Nicholson, Amy tempers Paul's

0:06:56.485 --> 0:07:00.325
<v Speaker 3>enthusiasm for Fargo, calling it the Radison. You know it's

0:07:00.365 --> 0:07:03.885
<v Speaker 3>pretty good. She just prefers her Cone movies to be

0:07:04.005 --> 0:07:08.925
<v Speaker 3>more Coheny. According to her, it's their most naturalistic. They're

0:07:08.964 --> 0:07:11.565
<v Speaker 3>having the least fun behind the camera. I'll note here

0:07:11.605 --> 0:07:16.205
<v Speaker 3>that Fargo was their third straight collaboration with cinematographer Roger Deakins,

0:07:16.685 --> 0:07:19.125
<v Speaker 3>and because of that shift in tone, they perhaps were

0:07:19.165 --> 0:07:22.845
<v Speaker 3>being rewarded for being nicer human beings. It's not a

0:07:22.925 --> 0:07:25.925
<v Speaker 3>lesser Cone film in terms of talent, but lesser Cone

0:07:25.925 --> 0:07:28.684
<v Speaker 3>in terms of the amount of Cone that's in the film.

0:07:28.885 --> 0:07:32.525
<v Speaker 3>Amy concludes rating it on a scale against two titles

0:07:32.565 --> 0:07:37.845
<v Speaker 3>she prefers, raising Arizona and The Big Lebowski. Josh, I

0:07:37.885 --> 0:07:40.645
<v Speaker 3>want your perspective. Do you take issue with any part

0:07:40.685 --> 0:07:43.565
<v Speaker 3>of Amy's assessment of Fargo? How much do you weigh

0:07:43.645 --> 0:07:46.445
<v Speaker 3>the amount of Cohen that's in the film when you

0:07:46.525 --> 0:07:49.645
<v Speaker 3>are judging any Cone film? And where does that leave

0:07:49.685 --> 0:07:51.485
<v Speaker 3>you with Fargo?

0:07:51.925 --> 0:07:54.405
<v Speaker 1>Oh, you're setting me up to disagree with the great

0:07:54.405 --> 0:08:00.005
<v Speaker 1>Amy Nicholson's fair. I do one of our favorite critics,

0:08:00.165 --> 0:08:03.525
<v Speaker 1>and I understand where she's coming from. I get the impulse.

0:08:03.565 --> 0:08:06.485
<v Speaker 1>I also feel not having a full handle of her

0:08:06.805 --> 0:08:09.725
<v Speaker 1>understanding of the Coen Brothers. If you name Lebowski, and

0:08:09.805 --> 0:08:13.445
<v Speaker 1>raising Arizona as among their best. I understand what you're

0:08:13.485 --> 0:08:16.285
<v Speaker 1>looking for in a Coen Brothers film. That is definitely

0:08:16.325 --> 0:08:18.925
<v Speaker 1>a particular vein. It is one I appreciate as well,

0:08:19.965 --> 0:08:26.205
<v Speaker 1>and Fargo's now operating in that register. Absolutely. I would disagree, however,

0:08:26.845 --> 0:08:31.885
<v Speaker 1>in that it is warm and fuzzy. I think I

0:08:32.005 --> 0:08:35.885
<v Speaker 1>understand where you would land, especially those original reviews comparing

0:08:35.925 --> 0:08:39.685
<v Speaker 1>that to the movies that came before from them. But

0:08:40.885 --> 0:08:43.205
<v Speaker 1>I find this for me, this is a question when

0:08:43.245 --> 0:08:47.005
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the Cohen of nihilism on the far

0:08:47.205 --> 0:08:53.245
<v Speaker 1>end in their movies, and flickers of hope, glimmers of

0:08:53.285 --> 0:09:01.125
<v Speaker 1>grace amidst really bizarre, awful evil. That's what a lot

0:09:01.165 --> 0:09:04.325
<v Speaker 1>of their movies hold. And so I have always thought

0:09:04.365 --> 0:09:09.805
<v Speaker 1>of Firego as one, despite Marge Gunderson's presence, that falls

0:09:09.885 --> 0:09:13.005
<v Speaker 1>closer towards the nihilism end, closer towards the no country

0:09:13.005 --> 0:09:16.165
<v Speaker 1>for old men, and closer toward the battlet of buster

0:09:16.285 --> 0:09:20.285
<v Speaker 1>scrugs and a serious man. That's how I think about

0:09:20.285 --> 0:09:27.885
<v Speaker 1>their films, so than realism or naturalism, it's nihilism, and

0:09:27.925 --> 0:09:31.125
<v Speaker 1>perhaps we have a reason to livesm I don't think.

0:09:31.605 --> 0:09:33.605
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we ever go for full throated hope

0:09:33.645 --> 0:09:36.725
<v Speaker 1>to a Coen Brothers movie, although some offer something like

0:09:36.725 --> 0:09:40.765
<v Speaker 1>that more than others, and I still land there with Fargo.

0:09:41.885 --> 0:09:46.725
<v Speaker 1>But I appreciate the nuances it brings to that attitude

0:09:47.485 --> 0:09:50.005
<v Speaker 1>more and more every time I have revisited this movie

0:09:50.045 --> 0:09:54.325
<v Speaker 1>countless times, Adam, and it is continually revealing new depths

0:09:54.365 --> 0:09:56.965
<v Speaker 1>to me. I'm thrilled we get to talk about this.

0:09:57.125 --> 0:10:00.205
<v Speaker 1>We have some movement on a ranked list for me,

0:10:00.405 --> 0:10:03.245
<v Speaker 1>which you know does happen when we revisit films, but

0:10:03.885 --> 0:10:06.885
<v Speaker 1>not always. This isn't dramatic movement, but I'm going to

0:10:06.925 --> 0:10:13.125
<v Speaker 1>be bumping Fargo up further after this revisit. And yeah,

0:10:13.205 --> 0:10:15.885
<v Speaker 1>I just think it has to do with where it's

0:10:15.965 --> 0:10:19.605
<v Speaker 1>landing on this central question of evil again in the world,

0:10:21.125 --> 0:10:25.045
<v Speaker 1>what possibility there is to resist it as an outside force.

0:10:25.245 --> 0:10:29.165
<v Speaker 1>And here's where Fargo moved ahead for me as an

0:10:29.205 --> 0:10:33.925
<v Speaker 1>inside force, as an interior wrangling that we have to

0:10:33.965 --> 0:10:37.605
<v Speaker 1>wrestle with. I identified this earlier in William H. Macy's

0:10:37.684 --> 0:10:41.125
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Lundegard, that he's the everyman. He's not the hard

0:10:41.125 --> 0:10:43.565
<v Speaker 1>and criminal, but he's the guy more like us who

0:10:43.684 --> 0:10:46.845
<v Speaker 1>might find themselves in a somewhat similar situation, what choices

0:10:46.885 --> 0:10:49.885
<v Speaker 1>would you make? What would you do? This watch Adam,

0:10:50.325 --> 0:10:53.645
<v Speaker 1>And previously I saw Marge as an opposition to that,

0:10:53.885 --> 0:10:57.084
<v Speaker 1>as the you know, the shining hope, the warm comfort,

0:10:57.165 --> 0:11:03.205
<v Speaker 1>the force of gentle justice. This watch, I recognized Marge's

0:11:03.645 --> 0:11:08.245
<v Speaker 1>struggle with that question as well. How do we make

0:11:08.885 --> 0:11:13.645
<v Speaker 1>the moral decisions within ourselves? What does it even mean

0:11:13.765 --> 0:11:16.965
<v Speaker 1>for Marge? That's something I had not considered before, and

0:11:17.045 --> 0:11:20.045
<v Speaker 1>I think is a through line here. I think a

0:11:20.125 --> 0:11:23.165
<v Speaker 1>key scene for this is the most perplexing, mysterious scene

0:11:23.205 --> 0:11:26.725
<v Speaker 1>for anyone who watches Firego Mike Yanagita. I want to

0:11:26.765 --> 0:11:29.525
<v Speaker 1>break down Mike Yanagita as we get to this, because

0:11:29.525 --> 0:11:32.765
<v Speaker 1>I think it's it unlocked this for me in regard

0:11:32.885 --> 0:11:38.805
<v Speaker 1>to Marge. But yeah, Fargo's brilliant. I don't have the

0:11:38.804 --> 0:11:41.405
<v Speaker 1>same problems. It sounds like Amy has. I think the

0:11:41.485 --> 0:11:44.405
<v Speaker 1>filmmaking is there. If it's more subtle, we'll talk deacons.

0:11:45.165 --> 0:11:47.925
<v Speaker 1>And I also think that you know, you could argue

0:11:47.965 --> 0:11:50.565
<v Speaker 1>even no Country is maybe more naturalistic. I think we

0:11:50.605 --> 0:11:54.365
<v Speaker 1>get a fair amount of cohenisms here, especially in Steve

0:11:54.365 --> 0:11:58.885
<v Speaker 1>Buscemi and Peter Stormeyer's back and forth as the criminals

0:11:58.925 --> 0:12:03.285
<v Speaker 1>the hardened criminals here, So I do it does sound

0:12:03.325 --> 0:12:05.925
<v Speaker 1>like I like Fargo better than Amy for different reasons

0:12:06.045 --> 0:12:08.045
<v Speaker 1>and see it a bit differently than her as well.

0:12:08.965 --> 0:12:11.804
<v Speaker 1>Is there any shifting here for you in terms of

0:12:12.445 --> 0:12:15.365
<v Speaker 1>in the Cohen canon or on any of these questions

0:12:15.365 --> 0:12:16.005
<v Speaker 1>you just raised.

0:12:16.965 --> 0:12:18.725
<v Speaker 3>I'll get there, but I already had it in my

0:12:18.765 --> 0:12:22.405
<v Speaker 3>top three and it's definitely staying there in my top three.

0:12:22.485 --> 0:12:24.925
<v Speaker 3>I think this is the first time I've watched it

0:12:25.205 --> 0:12:27.725
<v Speaker 3>though in its entirety, since I saw it in the theater.

0:12:27.804 --> 0:12:30.165
<v Speaker 3>I don't know how that's possible, but I have said,

0:12:30.165 --> 0:12:32.485
<v Speaker 3>and this is usually the case with these Sacred Cows,

0:12:32.885 --> 0:12:37.085
<v Speaker 3>I don't get to revisit a lot of films, and

0:12:37.125 --> 0:12:39.605
<v Speaker 3>that might just be because of the number of children

0:12:39.925 --> 0:12:43.085
<v Speaker 3>I have, and also doing this show, I'm usually trying

0:12:43.125 --> 0:12:46.285
<v Speaker 3>to see new things, and I'm always prioritizing new films,

0:12:46.285 --> 0:12:49.205
<v Speaker 3>and that's why we end up doing these Sacred Cows.

0:12:49.205 --> 0:12:52.885
<v Speaker 3>That's the impetus for these types of reviews. So I

0:12:52.925 --> 0:12:55.405
<v Speaker 3>felt like I was seeing this, even though I do

0:12:55.485 --> 0:12:58.845
<v Speaker 3>also feel like I know these scenes so well, I

0:12:58.885 --> 0:13:01.405
<v Speaker 3>felt like I was seeing it with very fresh eyes.

0:13:01.485 --> 0:13:05.085
<v Speaker 3>I do want to note that Amy definitely doesn't say

0:13:05.125 --> 0:13:09.605
<v Speaker 3>the movies warm and fuzzy, nor do I think from

0:13:09.605 --> 0:13:11.525
<v Speaker 3>what I saw Janet Maslin or Sit and Sound do.

0:13:11.645 --> 0:13:14.205
<v Speaker 3>But they do say it's warmer, and I think Amy's

0:13:14.245 --> 0:13:17.645
<v Speaker 3>actual word that she says is there's some warm heartedness.

0:13:17.845 --> 0:13:21.165
<v Speaker 3>I do really like your dichotomy, and I think that

0:13:21.165 --> 0:13:23.925
<v Speaker 3>that's appropriate. I see that as well. Maybe we can

0:13:24.005 --> 0:13:29.605
<v Speaker 3>call it nihilism versus optimism. Some optimism that's definitely there.

0:13:29.725 --> 0:13:32.485
<v Speaker 3>I also want to give this perspective, and we've dated

0:13:32.485 --> 0:13:35.765
<v Speaker 3>ourselves in this way before. I certainly have multiple times

0:13:35.765 --> 0:13:39.045
<v Speaker 3>on this show back in ninety six. So here's where

0:13:39.045 --> 0:13:41.845
<v Speaker 3>I'm at. Seeing this in the theater. I really begin

0:13:41.965 --> 0:13:45.245
<v Speaker 3>my journey as a cinophile in ninety two ninety three.

0:13:45.804 --> 0:13:49.165
<v Speaker 3>I saw Raising Arizona as a kid. Loved that movie

0:13:49.485 --> 0:13:51.125
<v Speaker 3>as a kid, but I don't know who the Coen

0:13:51.205 --> 0:13:57.685
<v Speaker 3>Brothers are. I'm just enjoying that movie. So two hugely

0:13:57.725 --> 0:14:01.084
<v Speaker 3>important movies to me as I'm starting to become a

0:14:01.125 --> 0:14:06.565
<v Speaker 3>serious movie fan are Miller's Crossing and Parton think renting

0:14:06.684 --> 0:14:13.285
<v Speaker 3>those films, just trying to process those as narratives which

0:14:14.325 --> 0:14:17.845
<v Speaker 3>Miller's crossing. Maybe I'm just now figuring out when we

0:14:17.925 --> 0:14:21.325
<v Speaker 3>wrestled with that a few years ago, and we we

0:14:21.405 --> 0:14:24.045
<v Speaker 3>put that back in our feed just a few days ago,

0:14:24.205 --> 0:14:28.765
<v Speaker 3>wrestling with those as narratives, processing those two, processing the filmmaking,

0:14:29.045 --> 0:14:33.645
<v Speaker 3>they were formative. So then a few years later, just

0:14:33.685 --> 0:14:36.245
<v Speaker 3>a few years later, I get to go see a

0:14:36.365 --> 0:14:40.285
<v Speaker 3>Cone Brothers movie in the theater on the big screen,

0:14:40.805 --> 0:14:45.565
<v Speaker 3>and not only that it's being hailed by everybody as

0:14:45.645 --> 0:14:48.365
<v Speaker 3>their best film, and not only that one of the

0:14:48.405 --> 0:14:50.725
<v Speaker 3>best films of the year, and then I go in

0:14:51.365 --> 0:14:56.445
<v Speaker 3>and it delivers. I also think it's incredible. That may

0:14:56.485 --> 0:14:59.285
<v Speaker 3>be part of why, even though I do think I've

0:14:59.325 --> 0:15:02.325
<v Speaker 3>only seen it once, maybe I rewatched it once over

0:15:02.445 --> 0:15:04.165
<v Speaker 3>one other time over the last thirty years that I

0:15:04.165 --> 0:15:07.605
<v Speaker 3>don't recall. Maybe that's why this film still does have

0:15:08.125 --> 0:15:11.245
<v Speaker 3>such a hold on me, Why even though I hadn't

0:15:11.285 --> 0:15:13.965
<v Speaker 3>seen it recently. When I formed that Cone Brothers list,

0:15:14.525 --> 0:15:17.525
<v Speaker 3>I put it there in the top three. I agree

0:15:17.565 --> 0:15:19.245
<v Speaker 3>with you. I do think there's a flaw in the

0:15:19.245 --> 0:15:22.405
<v Speaker 3>comparison with other films like Raising Arizona in The Big

0:15:22.485 --> 0:15:26.605
<v Speaker 3>Lebowski in that just very they're very different movies. She

0:15:27.365 --> 0:15:31.005
<v Speaker 3>gave Paul the choice if three TVs are on, and

0:15:31.045 --> 0:15:33.685
<v Speaker 3>those are the three movies playing? Which which one are

0:15:33.725 --> 0:15:36.765
<v Speaker 3>you watching? I don't really know how i'd answer that question, Josh,

0:15:36.765 --> 0:15:40.085
<v Speaker 3>but I do know that one's a screwball comedy effectively

0:15:40.125 --> 0:15:43.485
<v Speaker 3>a live action cartoon, and the others an absurdist genre subversion.

0:15:43.805 --> 0:15:46.885
<v Speaker 3>They are, They're just they're just way more playful and

0:15:47.765 --> 0:15:51.325
<v Speaker 3>coolly detached. But they're also going for laughs in a

0:15:51.325 --> 0:15:54.765
<v Speaker 3>way that that Fargo isn't, even though Fargo is often

0:15:55.125 --> 0:15:57.165
<v Speaker 3>very funny. You're right, it's just not operating.

0:15:57.245 --> 0:15:59.925
<v Speaker 1>It's a volume. It's a volume level for me as well.

0:16:00.085 --> 0:16:03.565
<v Speaker 1>I think Raising Arizona and Lebowski are operating at a hot,

0:16:03.725 --> 0:16:05.205
<v Speaker 1>higher volume compared to Firego.

0:16:05.405 --> 0:16:08.965
<v Speaker 3>Yes, I think that's appropriate to the camera work point.

0:16:09.045 --> 0:16:11.685
<v Speaker 3>It may not be as ostentatious with the camera as

0:16:11.725 --> 0:16:14.765
<v Speaker 3>some of their other films, But and I've obviously listened

0:16:14.805 --> 0:16:17.205
<v Speaker 3>to more of the conversation than you have, I don't

0:16:17.245 --> 0:16:20.165
<v Speaker 3>think Amy gives the cinematography enough credit. I think we

0:16:20.245 --> 0:16:22.565
<v Speaker 3>may get into that a little bit more, but I

0:16:22.605 --> 0:16:25.965
<v Speaker 3>would say the biggest issue is I think it's distinctiveness,

0:16:26.485 --> 0:16:30.205
<v Speaker 3>as you are speaking to how the film does still

0:16:30.765 --> 0:16:33.565
<v Speaker 3>not only then, but still stand out in their filmography.

0:16:34.965 --> 0:16:37.605
<v Speaker 3>I think that's what makes it special. That's not something

0:16:37.645 --> 0:16:42.285
<v Speaker 3>I hold against it, and they are my first or

0:16:42.365 --> 0:16:47.845
<v Speaker 3>second favorite living filmmakers. Their top three films on my list.

0:16:48.605 --> 0:16:51.125
<v Speaker 3>Certainly could we all say this, but it's true, could

0:16:51.165 --> 0:16:54.285
<v Speaker 3>be rearranged daily. I don't remember when I put the

0:16:54.285 --> 0:16:56.645
<v Speaker 3>list together on letterbox Josh, but when I made it,

0:16:56.725 --> 0:16:59.165
<v Speaker 3>I did put No Country at number one. I put

0:16:59.205 --> 0:17:02.365
<v Speaker 3>Fargo at two, and I put Inside Lewin Davis at

0:17:02.485 --> 0:17:05.885
<v Speaker 3>number three. Now, before I looked at the list on letterboxed,

0:17:05.965 --> 0:17:08.605
<v Speaker 3>I actually thought I had Fargo number one, and after

0:17:08.645 --> 0:17:11.125
<v Speaker 3>rewatching it, I was ready to come here on the

0:17:11.125 --> 0:17:15.205
<v Speaker 3>show and say, great, it gets to stay there, firmly

0:17:15.445 --> 0:17:19.765
<v Speaker 3>ensconced in the number one spot. And maybe Lewin Davis

0:17:20.085 --> 0:17:23.845
<v Speaker 3>is a carecter who doesn't offer the warmth and the

0:17:23.885 --> 0:17:28.405
<v Speaker 3>heart that margin Norm do. But for me, he's a

0:17:28.525 --> 0:17:32.965
<v Speaker 3>richer character, He's a more complex character. I think he's

0:17:33.045 --> 0:17:37.445
<v Speaker 3>tormented by this push and pull between the solitary life

0:17:37.445 --> 0:17:40.845
<v Speaker 3>of the artist and just his natural bastard self and

0:17:40.925 --> 0:17:44.165
<v Speaker 3>recognizing that there could be another path, a path, a

0:17:44.165 --> 0:17:48.085
<v Speaker 3>path of optimism and hope, like Margin Norm, something that

0:17:48.405 --> 0:17:52.285
<v Speaker 3>a more domestic life that could be satisfying perhaps, and

0:17:52.325 --> 0:17:55.205
<v Speaker 3>there's a soulfulness and depth to that character combined with

0:17:55.205 --> 0:17:57.605
<v Speaker 3>all the movies big ideas that I really connect with.

0:17:57.845 --> 0:18:00.245
<v Speaker 3>And I just say that all to illustrate how much

0:18:00.605 --> 0:18:03.285
<v Speaker 3>I do love those three films. And that's the reason

0:18:03.285 --> 0:18:06.765
<v Speaker 3>why I could even put Lewin Davis quite honestly in

0:18:06.845 --> 0:18:13.085
<v Speaker 3>that top spot. But when I rewatched this Josh, I

0:18:13.245 --> 0:18:16.685
<v Speaker 3>was very comfortable keeping it there. And before I dig

0:18:16.845 --> 0:18:21.885
<v Speaker 3>into the main reasons why, I'll say that whether it's

0:18:22.165 --> 0:18:25.805
<v Speaker 3>movies like Miller's Crossing, The Big Lebowski, and Barton Fink

0:18:25.845 --> 0:18:29.325
<v Speaker 3>where I liked them but didn't fully appreciate them on

0:18:29.405 --> 0:18:32.205
<v Speaker 3>first viewing, or a movie like Lewin Davis, which I

0:18:32.245 --> 0:18:36.165
<v Speaker 3>love from the start. Cone Brothers movies, they don't just

0:18:36.285 --> 0:18:39.205
<v Speaker 3>reward rewatches for me. I feel like the best way

0:18:39.205 --> 0:18:44.165
<v Speaker 3>to describe it is that when I'm lucky, I'll detect

0:18:44.285 --> 0:18:47.805
<v Speaker 3>a cipher. There's some kind of code, there's something that

0:18:47.925 --> 0:18:51.405
<v Speaker 3>unlocks the movie for me that helps me to understand

0:18:51.525 --> 0:18:55.245
<v Speaker 3>and appreciate them more. And I think, maybe going back

0:18:55.245 --> 0:18:59.245
<v Speaker 3>to my setup thinking about these movies in those in

0:18:59.285 --> 0:19:02.565
<v Speaker 3>those terms about how precisely crafted they are, maybe cipher

0:19:02.685 --> 0:19:06.565
<v Speaker 3>is the is the best word. I did find that

0:19:06.685 --> 0:19:10.205
<v Speaker 3>here something was unlocked for me here watching it this time,

0:19:10.245 --> 0:19:13.685
<v Speaker 3>maybe maybe a couple related things that we can dig into.

0:19:14.125 --> 0:19:16.085
<v Speaker 3>That that did, even though I'm going to keep it

0:19:16.125 --> 0:19:19.165
<v Speaker 3>in its number two spot, that did even elevate my

0:19:19.325 --> 0:19:20.285
<v Speaker 3>esteem for this film.

0:19:21.045 --> 0:19:23.445
<v Speaker 1>Well, let me get my ranked list housekeeping out of

0:19:23.445 --> 0:19:25.685
<v Speaker 1>the way for me. I'm going to move it ahead

0:19:27.205 --> 0:19:29.205
<v Speaker 1>to the number four slot. I head at number five.

0:19:29.285 --> 0:19:32.845
<v Speaker 1>I'm moving it ahead of Hale Caesar, which I love,

0:19:33.005 --> 0:19:35.245
<v Speaker 1>you know, beyond most people. And I did have that

0:19:35.765 --> 0:19:38.085
<v Speaker 1>slightly ahead of fire Go, but I'm swapping those two.

0:19:38.125 --> 0:19:39.885
<v Speaker 1>So I'm moving fire Go ahead of Hale Caesar to

0:19:39.965 --> 0:19:42.725
<v Speaker 1>number four. That means it's still behind my top three,

0:19:42.845 --> 0:19:46.485
<v Speaker 1>which are Miller's Crossing. As I've talked about on the show.

0:19:46.685 --> 0:19:48.845
<v Speaker 1>Did see that in the theater? For whatever reason, they

0:19:48.845 --> 0:19:50.925
<v Speaker 1>were on my radar? That film was on my radar.

0:19:51.285 --> 0:19:53.885
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, Debbie and I were into gangster

0:19:54.045 --> 0:19:56.325
<v Speaker 1>movies at the time. That's why it was on my radar.

0:19:56.805 --> 0:20:01.165
<v Speaker 1>That was like the WHOA, what is this experience with

0:20:01.205 --> 0:20:03.205
<v Speaker 1>Miller's Crossing? And so that makes it tough to knock

0:20:03.245 --> 0:20:05.525
<v Speaker 1>it from number one. After that, I have No Country,

0:20:05.765 --> 0:20:08.005
<v Speaker 1>and then another unusual pick for me, I have True

0:20:08.045 --> 0:20:11.285
<v Speaker 1>grit as their third best film, but Firego's coming up

0:20:11.285 --> 0:20:13.285
<v Speaker 1>on that. You know, to your point, if I watch

0:20:13.325 --> 0:20:15.205
<v Speaker 1>those two back to back, who knows what would happen.

0:20:16.125 --> 0:20:20.005
<v Speaker 1>But easily moving this into number four after this rewatch

0:20:20.085 --> 0:20:23.165
<v Speaker 1>what unlocked for me? It's an extension, I would say,

0:20:23.165 --> 0:20:26.885
<v Speaker 1>audam of something that was gradually unlocking the last time

0:20:26.965 --> 0:20:28.925
<v Speaker 1>I watched this, this was twenty twenty one, so not

0:20:29.005 --> 0:20:31.645
<v Speaker 1>that long ago. We were doing to think Christian movie

0:20:31.645 --> 0:20:34.765
<v Speaker 1>Club series on the Coen Brothers at the time. And

0:20:35.285 --> 0:20:37.765
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting it's related to something you just said, which

0:20:38.405 --> 0:20:41.525
<v Speaker 1>I think is correct, comparing Lewin Davis to Margin Norm.

0:20:41.605 --> 0:20:45.965
<v Speaker 1>You know this domestic happy life they could have on

0:20:46.045 --> 0:20:51.685
<v Speaker 1>this watch how happy is this life that Marge and

0:20:51.725 --> 0:20:53.885
<v Speaker 1>Norms share? And I'm not saying this is something that

0:20:54.405 --> 0:20:58.365
<v Speaker 1>I entirely missed earlier, or that is even a criticism film.

0:20:58.365 --> 0:21:01.365
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a nuance that the film is

0:21:01.485 --> 0:21:05.605
<v Speaker 1>offering that I didn't pick up on until now, because

0:21:05.725 --> 0:21:08.605
<v Speaker 1>I probably just love this notion of Margin Norm as

0:21:08.645 --> 0:21:11.645
<v Speaker 1>these contrasts not only to the Cohen universe but to

0:21:11.685 --> 0:21:15.765
<v Speaker 1>the Fargo universe. It was so cozy to get any

0:21:15.805 --> 0:21:17.805
<v Speaker 1>scene of the two of them and catch your breath

0:21:18.485 --> 0:21:22.885
<v Speaker 1>away from Jerry's frantic Maine, away from the frighteningness of

0:21:22.925 --> 0:21:26.365
<v Speaker 1>the criminals, away from all the other elements in the

0:21:26.405 --> 0:21:30.645
<v Speaker 1>movie the cold, Away from the cold exterior scenes. Here

0:21:30.725 --> 0:21:34.845
<v Speaker 1>is Marge and Norm sharing a meal together, quietly happy.

0:21:35.205 --> 0:21:36.005
<v Speaker 1>Just let me have that.

0:21:36.365 --> 0:21:39.965
<v Speaker 5>What do we got here? Arby's how's a paint?

0:21:40.045 --> 0:21:40.245
<v Speaker 2>Coin?

0:21:40.925 --> 0:21:41.805
<v Speaker 1>Pretty good?

0:21:43.245 --> 0:21:45.485
<v Speaker 3>Oh no, the Halpman's are entering a painting this year.

0:21:46.325 --> 0:21:47.365
<v Speaker 5>On your better Nam.

0:21:48.245 --> 0:21:49.085
<v Speaker 3>They're real good.

0:21:50.205 --> 0:21:54.165
<v Speaker 4>They're good, Norm, But you're better Nom?

0:21:54.245 --> 0:21:54.685
<v Speaker 1>You think so?

0:21:57.525 --> 0:21:58.845
<v Speaker 5>You got Arby's all over me?

0:22:00.805 --> 0:22:03.485
<v Speaker 1>I think, to the movie's credit, it is more complicated,

0:22:04.005 --> 0:22:08.525
<v Speaker 1>and on this watch, you know, I think it's really

0:22:08.605 --> 0:22:13.645
<v Speaker 1>about Marge's awareness of her own susceptibility to some sort

0:22:13.685 --> 0:22:17.845
<v Speaker 1>of moral failure, and that a key thing this movie

0:22:17.885 --> 0:22:24.405
<v Speaker 1>is asking us is are humans capable of contentment? And

0:22:24.925 --> 0:22:28.085
<v Speaker 1>this is in opposition to another human drive, which is greed,

0:22:28.285 --> 0:22:30.605
<v Speaker 1>which is what's driving everything else in the film, right,

0:22:31.045 --> 0:22:34.725
<v Speaker 1>and contentment is a virtue that this movie shows us

0:22:34.885 --> 0:22:39.845
<v Speaker 1>is so difficult to cultivate. And here's where Mike Yanagita

0:22:40.085 --> 0:22:44.165
<v Speaker 1>comes in. So again, this classmate, high school classmate, does

0:22:44.205 --> 0:22:46.725
<v Speaker 1>that sound right? Or yeah, he had to be high

0:22:46.725 --> 0:22:49.125
<v Speaker 1>school right, Yeah, I don't think he was a college classmate.

0:22:49.165 --> 0:22:51.005
<v Speaker 1>So high school classmate calls Margin in the middle of

0:22:51.005 --> 0:22:53.365
<v Speaker 1>the night because he saw her on TV investigating this

0:22:53.485 --> 0:22:55.805
<v Speaker 1>case and wants to meet her up in the meet

0:22:55.805 --> 0:22:58.685
<v Speaker 1>with her in the Twin Cities. And I think this

0:22:58.765 --> 0:23:01.125
<v Speaker 1>whole sequence presents her And maybe some people got this

0:23:01.165 --> 0:23:03.085
<v Speaker 1>the first time around. I know I didn't in nineteen

0:23:03.125 --> 0:23:06.685
<v Speaker 1>ninety six. It wasn't until again, the most recent visiting

0:23:06.685 --> 0:23:09.285
<v Speaker 1>where this kind of opened up for me. They meet,

0:23:09.965 --> 0:23:13.205
<v Speaker 1>and you know, notice what Marge wears. She wears this

0:23:13.285 --> 0:23:15.365
<v Speaker 1>blouse that we haven't seen her in anything like that

0:23:15.445 --> 0:23:18.165
<v Speaker 1>for this meeting. She touches her hair a little bit

0:23:18.165 --> 0:23:20.925
<v Speaker 1>before approaching him at the table. She goes there so

0:23:21.005 --> 0:23:24.205
<v Speaker 1>supposedly to follow a lead for the case, but she

0:23:24.285 --> 0:23:27.285
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make that decision until after Mike's call. And notice

0:23:27.365 --> 0:23:30.165
<v Speaker 1>Norm's response, his surprise that she's going to go there

0:23:30.205 --> 0:23:35.205
<v Speaker 1>for this. And I just think here that we're seeing Marge.

0:23:35.765 --> 0:23:39.245
<v Speaker 1>Once Mike clearly starts making a move, she rebuffs his

0:23:39.285 --> 0:23:43.125
<v Speaker 1>awkward advances, but that mortified look she has, she looks down,

0:23:43.805 --> 0:23:47.765
<v Speaker 1>and she realizes for the first time that he'd been

0:23:47.805 --> 0:23:50.485
<v Speaker 1>fooling her, and she'd been fooling herself.

0:23:51.005 --> 0:23:53.565
<v Speaker 3>I shouldn't have done this such.

0:23:54.965 --> 0:23:58.925
<v Speaker 4>I thought we'd have a really tearth time. You were

0:23:59.005 --> 0:24:03.805
<v Speaker 4>such a super lady, and then I'm so lovely.

0:24:09.445 --> 0:24:13.165
<v Speaker 1>In a sense, it's almost like that question Marge asks

0:24:13.165 --> 0:24:16.165
<v Speaker 1>Stor Mayor at the very end, Adam, And for what?

0:24:17.125 --> 0:24:19.525
<v Speaker 1>Like why why did you? Was it worth all this?

0:24:19.725 --> 0:24:22.285
<v Speaker 1>And for what? It's almost like you could be asking herself,

0:24:22.605 --> 0:24:25.245
<v Speaker 1>or is asking herself that same question in that moment,

0:24:25.645 --> 0:24:29.245
<v Speaker 1>Why am I here? And for what? And so it's

0:24:29.245 --> 0:24:32.605
<v Speaker 1>not just Jerry, it's not just the killers. Where we're

0:24:32.645 --> 0:24:36.205
<v Speaker 1>living a moral life is the Sisyphian task, even in

0:24:36.245 --> 0:24:40.605
<v Speaker 1>a loving marriage like margin Norms, it's a Siciphian task

0:24:40.645 --> 0:24:43.845
<v Speaker 1>because you gotta get up every day. You've gotta here's

0:24:43.885 --> 0:24:47.605
<v Speaker 1>the imagery. You've gotta go scrape the ice off the windshield.

0:24:47.925 --> 0:24:51.485
<v Speaker 1>Yet again, the perfect moment in this movie of Jerry

0:24:52.125 --> 0:24:56.445
<v Speaker 1>failing to do that, his Sisyphian boulder is the ice

0:24:56.485 --> 0:24:59.605
<v Speaker 1>on the windshield. It's gonna come back. You're gonna have

0:24:59.725 --> 0:25:01.725
<v Speaker 1>to push that rock up again. You're gonna have to

0:25:01.765 --> 0:25:04.925
<v Speaker 1>scrape that windshield again. The prowler is always gonna need

0:25:04.965 --> 0:25:10.085
<v Speaker 1>to jump. This is just living a life of contentment,

0:25:10.565 --> 0:25:13.045
<v Speaker 1>which is so hard for us to do. And this

0:25:13.085 --> 0:25:15.125
<v Speaker 1>was the first time I realized it's hard for Marge

0:25:15.325 --> 0:25:18.245
<v Speaker 1>as well, which just made her, of course, so much

0:25:18.285 --> 0:25:19.645
<v Speaker 1>deeper of a character.

0:25:20.045 --> 0:25:23.045
<v Speaker 3>This is gonna be very ha hard because in order

0:25:23.085 --> 0:25:26.005
<v Speaker 3>to get into margin norm and to get into the

0:25:26.045 --> 0:25:29.845
<v Speaker 3>Mike Yanagita scene, which as far as I can tell, Josh,

0:25:29.885 --> 0:25:33.885
<v Speaker 3>people still either wildly I won't even say they wildly misunderstand,

0:25:33.925 --> 0:25:37.085
<v Speaker 3>because anytime I hear anybody talk about it, they just

0:25:37.165 --> 0:25:39.245
<v Speaker 3>kind of throw in the towel. And I actually don't

0:25:39.245 --> 0:25:42.525
<v Speaker 3>think it's that complicated. I think it's complex, but I

0:25:42.525 --> 0:25:44.765
<v Speaker 3>think there's lots of ways to come at it, and

0:25:44.845 --> 0:25:47.325
<v Speaker 3>I think there's lots of conclusions we can draw from it,

0:25:47.605 --> 0:25:51.045
<v Speaker 3>as you already have. I want to discuss both of

0:25:51.125 --> 0:25:53.925
<v Speaker 3>the things that you just dug into, but in order

0:25:53.965 --> 0:25:57.605
<v Speaker 3>to get there, I have to explain what my unlock was,

0:25:59.045 --> 0:26:01.525
<v Speaker 3>and that may take a little while, so I'm trying

0:26:01.525 --> 0:26:04.005
<v Speaker 3>to I'm trying to best figure this out. I will

0:26:04.005 --> 0:26:07.205
<v Speaker 3>note very quickly that you do love true grit and

0:26:07.205 --> 0:26:09.245
<v Speaker 3>I've always known that about you, and True Grit is

0:26:09.285 --> 0:26:12.445
<v Speaker 3>the movie I most need to have that second watch

0:26:12.605 --> 0:26:16.685
<v Speaker 3>experience with. And I'm praying. I'm expecting, but I'm praying.

0:26:16.765 --> 0:26:18.885
<v Speaker 3>I liked it. I liked it quite a bit, but

0:26:19.245 --> 0:26:22.045
<v Speaker 3>I'm praying that the unlocked will happen. That that is

0:26:22.125 --> 0:26:24.805
<v Speaker 3>just hard to get sometimes in the theater with any movie,

0:26:24.805 --> 0:26:27.125
<v Speaker 3>but especially with a Cone real.

0:26:27.005 --> 0:26:30.165
<v Speaker 1>Quick, real quick, I find and perhaps their most optimistic,

0:26:30.405 --> 0:26:31.965
<v Speaker 1>which may be why I.

0:26:31.925 --> 0:26:34.725
<v Speaker 3>Had it there. Yeah, so let me try to explain

0:26:35.405 --> 0:26:40.845
<v Speaker 3>how I get to where you're at. But my path

0:26:41.165 --> 0:26:45.365
<v Speaker 3>and I think I think people, at least based on

0:26:45.525 --> 0:26:49.325
<v Speaker 3>what I've heard over the years, may underestimate the significance

0:26:50.165 --> 0:26:53.605
<v Speaker 3>of the opening text that this is a true story,

0:26:53.685 --> 0:26:58.205
<v Speaker 3>the events depicted, that whole thing. You know. Everybody sort

0:26:58.245 --> 0:27:02.365
<v Speaker 3>of goes, Oh, those tricky Cone brothers, aren't they funny?

0:27:02.885 --> 0:27:06.125
<v Speaker 3>Playing with our expectations and keeping us on our toes?

0:27:06.885 --> 0:27:13.085
<v Speaker 3>And my take this time as Fargo remains gripping decades later,

0:27:13.485 --> 0:27:18.205
<v Speaker 3>not just for its craft and darkly comic story, but

0:27:18.325 --> 0:27:23.805
<v Speaker 3>for the way it turns myth making, storytelling, and deception

0:27:25.125 --> 0:27:29.205
<v Speaker 3>into its central preoccupation. That's what myths are myths are

0:27:29.245 --> 0:27:36.005
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally just storytelling and deception. We've got fundamentally a movie

0:27:36.045 --> 0:27:43.925
<v Speaker 3>about people who lie that opens with one right, it's

0:27:44.045 --> 0:27:46.845
<v Speaker 3>not based on a true story. The filmmakers tell us

0:27:46.885 --> 0:27:50.845
<v Speaker 3>a lie right off the jump. And even the name,

0:27:51.205 --> 0:27:53.645
<v Speaker 3>even the name of the movies a bit of misdirection

0:27:54.125 --> 0:27:58.005
<v Speaker 3>since it almost exclusively takes place in Minnesota. It is

0:27:58.045 --> 0:28:02.845
<v Speaker 3>about Minnesotan's but it's called Fargo, and even the name

0:28:03.085 --> 0:28:06.045
<v Speaker 3>and if this is too simple, I don't really care,

0:28:06.485 --> 0:28:10.845
<v Speaker 3>but even the name Fargo is symbolic of the nature

0:28:10.845 --> 0:28:13.285
<v Speaker 3>of lying and what we see happen in this movie

0:28:13.605 --> 0:28:17.565
<v Speaker 3>with violence in this scheme too. Once you start, how

0:28:17.605 --> 0:28:20.205
<v Speaker 3>far does it go? Once you start? You can't stop.

0:28:20.525 --> 0:28:23.885
<v Speaker 3>The lies just continue to compound, right, Jerry can't stop

0:28:23.925 --> 0:28:27.045
<v Speaker 3>the kidnapping from happening once he sets it all in

0:28:27.085 --> 0:28:32.725
<v Speaker 3>motion in Fargo. And what I love about the opening exchange,

0:28:32.725 --> 0:28:36.005
<v Speaker 3>and this is something about the movie overall, Josh, that

0:28:36.045 --> 0:28:38.645
<v Speaker 3>I just think is brilliant about it, not that it

0:28:38.685 --> 0:28:42.125
<v Speaker 3>should be a surprise. With the Coen Brothers film What

0:28:42.205 --> 0:28:44.445
<v Speaker 3>is It? Ninety eight minutes, I truly don't think that

0:28:44.525 --> 0:28:49.045
<v Speaker 3>there is a scene that's wasted at all. In terms

0:28:49.045 --> 0:28:54.485
<v Speaker 3>of I don't story, story plot plus character. In that

0:28:54.645 --> 0:28:59.765
<v Speaker 3>opening exchange with Carl and grimsrude or maybe we should

0:28:59.765 --> 0:29:04.605
<v Speaker 3>just call him BOUSHEMI and Stormare, they don't just accept

0:29:04.685 --> 0:29:07.765
<v Speaker 3>the deal, right. They ask him a bunch of questions.

0:29:08.365 --> 0:29:12.925
<v Speaker 3>They want to understand the story. They want to understand

0:29:13.005 --> 0:29:17.205
<v Speaker 3>why he's asking them to do this. What kind of

0:29:17.205 --> 0:29:20.965
<v Speaker 3>trouble you and Jerry Well, that's that's I'm not gonna

0:29:21.125 --> 0:29:24.205
<v Speaker 3>get into into. See, I just need the money now,

0:29:24.205 --> 0:29:26.805
<v Speaker 3>her dad, he's real well off, So why don't you

0:29:26.805 --> 0:29:29.285
<v Speaker 3>just ask him for the money or your wife, you know,

0:29:29.485 --> 0:29:30.725
<v Speaker 3>or your wife Jerry.

0:29:30.885 --> 0:29:31.125
<v Speaker 4>Well.

0:29:31.645 --> 0:29:34.805
<v Speaker 3>One of their their great screenwriting strokes is that they

0:29:35.845 --> 0:29:41.165
<v Speaker 3>for the entire movie withhold the reason why Jerry needs

0:29:41.165 --> 0:29:44.885
<v Speaker 3>the money. He withholds it from them, which means they

0:29:44.925 --> 0:29:48.085
<v Speaker 3>also withhold it from us. We're in the same position

0:29:48.165 --> 0:29:50.405
<v Speaker 3>the hired thugs are the entire movie, right that we

0:29:50.525 --> 0:29:53.645
<v Speaker 3>have no idea and Boushemy and we don't need to know.

0:29:53.765 --> 0:29:56.325
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter. We just know he needs the money desperately.

0:29:56.765 --> 0:30:00.165
<v Speaker 3>And so when Bouscemi says this, he goes right at

0:30:00.205 --> 0:30:03.605
<v Speaker 3>the end of that scene at the bar, he goes, Okay, Jerry,

0:30:03.645 --> 0:30:06.645
<v Speaker 3>you're tasking us to perform this mission, but you won't.

0:30:07.165 --> 0:30:11.165
<v Speaker 3>You won't. Basically, he's saying, you won't give us the details,

0:30:11.365 --> 0:30:14.805
<v Speaker 3>you won't tell us why, and then he goes, Okay,

0:30:15.085 --> 0:30:17.885
<v Speaker 3>let's take a look at that, Sierra. We as an

0:30:17.965 --> 0:30:20.645
<v Speaker 3>audience could be saying that to the Coen Brothers. Your

0:30:20.685 --> 0:30:23.965
<v Speaker 3>task us to perform our duties as audience members to

0:30:24.085 --> 0:30:26.805
<v Speaker 3>buy into all this, to get invested in this and

0:30:26.885 --> 0:30:29.285
<v Speaker 3>go on this journey. But you're not going to tell

0:30:29.365 --> 0:30:32.765
<v Speaker 3>us why he needs the money. Oh you know what, efit.

0:30:33.005 --> 0:30:37.365
<v Speaker 3>Let's just get the plot in motion. And I love that.

0:30:37.845 --> 0:30:39.845
<v Speaker 3>But even if you think about it, Josh, why is

0:30:39.885 --> 0:30:43.365
<v Speaker 3>the movie said in BRAINERD because it's it's a fun

0:30:43.765 --> 0:30:46.725
<v Speaker 3>word to say, because they wanted, you know, the silliest

0:30:46.725 --> 0:30:49.845
<v Speaker 3>sounding small Minnesota town. I bet there are others that

0:30:49.885 --> 0:30:54.005
<v Speaker 3>could compete with that. It's because it claims Paul Bunyan

0:30:54.845 --> 0:30:59.365
<v Speaker 3>Babe the Blue Ox, which everybody says when BRAINERD is mentioned,

0:31:00.645 --> 0:31:03.845
<v Speaker 3>Paul Bunyan's not real, Babe the Blue Ox isn't real.

0:31:04.045 --> 0:31:07.325
<v Speaker 3>They're characters out of folk tales. They're they're part of

0:31:07.365 --> 0:31:10.245
<v Speaker 3>the mythic Great White North. They're part of this story.

0:31:10.325 --> 0:31:13.925
<v Speaker 3>We there're stories we tell ourselves to define ourselves. Right,

0:31:14.525 --> 0:31:19.125
<v Speaker 3>And almost every single scene, this is where Yanna Geeda

0:31:19.205 --> 0:31:22.925
<v Speaker 3>comes in certainly right, almost every single scene. And I'll

0:31:22.925 --> 0:31:25.765
<v Speaker 3>hold off on getting into my proof here because I

0:31:25.805 --> 0:31:28.005
<v Speaker 3>want to get to the heart of the matter. Almost

0:31:28.005 --> 0:31:32.805
<v Speaker 3>every single scene involves storytelling and truth or deception in

0:31:32.845 --> 0:31:37.605
<v Speaker 3>this In this film, there are so many of them.

0:31:38.005 --> 0:31:39.725
<v Speaker 3>So how does this fit in with what you were saying?

0:31:40.405 --> 0:31:44.845
<v Speaker 3>I think what we see in this movie ultimately are

0:31:44.885 --> 0:31:52.245
<v Speaker 3>the Kohene brothers playing with and subverting myths surrounding American

0:31:52.245 --> 0:31:55.365
<v Speaker 3>life and the American family. And maybe one of the

0:31:55.485 --> 0:32:02.605
<v Speaker 3>key ideas, certainly that we're sold is that happiness is possible,

0:32:02.885 --> 0:32:05.085
<v Speaker 3>and not only that happiness is possible, but that it's

0:32:05.325 --> 0:32:09.645
<v Speaker 3>that it's required, that it's that it's it's an expectation

0:32:10.165 --> 0:32:12.685
<v Speaker 3>of American life. And so in this movie we get

0:32:13.565 --> 0:32:17.725
<v Speaker 3>here's the thing. I think we get three distinct visions,

0:32:18.365 --> 0:32:22.445
<v Speaker 3>at least three distinct visions of dematic life. There's the

0:32:22.485 --> 0:32:28.325
<v Speaker 3>one Jerry pretends to be living and that his wife

0:32:29.285 --> 0:32:33.925
<v Speaker 3>firmly believes that she is living. Okay, then there's margin

0:32:34.005 --> 0:32:38.845
<v Speaker 3>norm and I am gonna I want to discuss the

0:32:38.965 --> 0:32:42.125
<v Speaker 3>ending a bit more and yanagita, but I'll just say overall,

0:32:42.205 --> 0:32:44.485
<v Speaker 3>I'm with you that I have always read it as

0:32:44.805 --> 0:32:49.365
<v Speaker 3>very loving, black and white. You know, very clear that

0:32:49.405 --> 0:32:53.805
<v Speaker 3>they that everything's perfect, and I'm still very close to that.

0:32:54.005 --> 0:32:57.245
<v Speaker 3>I love for sure that it's a happy marriage. Clearly

0:32:57.525 --> 0:33:00.565
<v Speaker 3>they depend on each other, the way he he insists

0:33:00.645 --> 0:33:03.765
<v Speaker 3>on making her breakfast because his pregnant wife needs to eat,

0:33:04.405 --> 0:33:07.925
<v Speaker 3>needs nourishment, no matter how early it is, and of

0:33:08.005 --> 0:33:10.605
<v Speaker 3>course fix or some eggs, and then of course he's

0:33:10.605 --> 0:33:13.605
<v Speaker 3>there to help give the prowler a jump. I love

0:33:14.565 --> 0:33:18.365
<v Speaker 3>I read it this way. I love that when when

0:33:19.325 --> 0:33:22.845
<v Speaker 3>they meet, no matter what's happened on the job, I

0:33:22.965 --> 0:33:24.885
<v Speaker 3>like that he doesn't ask her a bunch of questions.

0:33:24.925 --> 0:33:26.965
<v Speaker 3>I think it reflects the fact that he just trusts

0:33:26.965 --> 0:33:29.885
<v Speaker 3>that his wife knows what she's doing. He doesn't need

0:33:29.925 --> 0:33:32.365
<v Speaker 3>to get into her business, he doesn't need to offer

0:33:32.405 --> 0:33:36.325
<v Speaker 3>her any tips or suggestions. He's letting her do what

0:33:37.085 --> 0:33:39.445
<v Speaker 3>she does. And I do think, even though I want

0:33:39.485 --> 0:33:41.365
<v Speaker 3>to unpack it more in a minute, I do think

0:33:41.405 --> 0:33:43.725
<v Speaker 3>that that last line, heck, norm we're doing pretty good here,

0:33:44.805 --> 0:33:47.725
<v Speaker 3>is genuinely moving. At least it was this time. I

0:33:47.725 --> 0:33:50.485
<v Speaker 3>didn't give it much thought in the theater in ninety six.

0:33:50.925 --> 0:33:54.845
<v Speaker 3>This time genuinely moving. But here's my big point. Aren't

0:33:54.845 --> 0:34:00.285
<v Speaker 3>the two criminals just sort of replicating domestic life, but

0:34:00.405 --> 0:34:05.205
<v Speaker 3>a completely deranged version of domestic life. They've got a house,

0:34:05.725 --> 0:34:11.285
<v Speaker 3>they're staying at a house with a wife. He's even

0:34:11.525 --> 0:34:15.165
<v Speaker 3>eating a TV dinner when we find him. He's eating

0:34:15.205 --> 0:34:18.805
<v Speaker 3>TV dinners. And the thing is they're miserable out there.

0:34:20.085 --> 0:34:23.325
<v Speaker 3>They could just be making choices we're talking about, like

0:34:23.364 --> 0:34:26.925
<v Speaker 3>making choices for happiness. They could just be choosing another

0:34:26.965 --> 0:34:31.364
<v Speaker 3>path and living that domestic life for real, rather than

0:34:31.405 --> 0:34:35.245
<v Speaker 3>replicating it as part of this crime. And they could

0:34:35.285 --> 0:34:37.965
<v Speaker 3>have a functioning TV where they could actually get reception

0:34:38.085 --> 0:34:40.725
<v Speaker 3>and watch whatever they wanted. And in some ways it's

0:34:40.725 --> 0:34:47.365
<v Speaker 3>even a dream alternate reality to suburban family dreams, because

0:34:47.485 --> 0:34:50.605
<v Speaker 3>who doesn't dream about having a second house out on

0:34:50.645 --> 0:34:55.205
<v Speaker 3>the lake, right, But it's a terrible experience where terrible

0:34:55.245 --> 0:34:58.445
<v Speaker 3>things are happening inside that house. And it even just

0:34:58.525 --> 0:35:00.565
<v Speaker 3>occurred to me here at the last minute that that

0:35:01.125 --> 0:35:05.565
<v Speaker 3>comedic duo of stormare in Bouscemi is so perfect and

0:35:05.605 --> 0:35:10.925
<v Speaker 3>it fits a very conventional comedic mode right to have opposites,

0:35:11.885 --> 0:35:13.885
<v Speaker 3>the small guy and the big guy, the guy who

0:35:13.965 --> 0:35:17.285
<v Speaker 3>talks too much, the guy who doesn't talk at all.

0:35:17.325 --> 0:35:19.325
<v Speaker 3>But if you put it into this scheme that I'm

0:35:19.365 --> 0:35:22.965
<v Speaker 3>talking about, they all almost feel to me like the

0:35:23.005 --> 0:35:28.725
<v Speaker 3>split personality of the quote unquote conventional American husband ones

0:35:28.765 --> 0:35:35.325
<v Speaker 3>at home, he's gruff, he's silent, he's completely emotionless. He's

0:35:35.445 --> 0:35:39.725
<v Speaker 3>just there eating his dinner, unhappy, ignoring his wife. And

0:35:39.805 --> 0:35:42.685
<v Speaker 3>what's the other doing. He's doing what other husbands do.

0:35:42.965 --> 0:35:45.765
<v Speaker 3>He's going crazy out there on the lake as we

0:35:45.845 --> 0:35:49.325
<v Speaker 3>hear about him, and he's stepping out for trists with

0:35:49.525 --> 0:35:52.965
<v Speaker 3>a prostitute. It's like there's a perfect schism there. And

0:35:53.685 --> 0:35:56.924
<v Speaker 3>watching how Josh And in nineteen ninety six, this would

0:35:56.925 --> 0:35:58.805
<v Speaker 3>have been true to some extent, it would have been

0:35:58.845 --> 0:36:01.845
<v Speaker 3>truer in eighty seven, when this movie is set. Something

0:36:01.845 --> 0:36:06.685
<v Speaker 3>about how we consistently see at the end and earlier

0:36:06.725 --> 0:36:10.205
<v Speaker 3>scenes the glow of the TV, all these different characters

0:36:10.245 --> 0:36:12.685
<v Speaker 3>in their different settings, watching like The Tonight Show with

0:36:12.765 --> 0:36:17.645
<v Speaker 3>Johnny Carson, that same glow, no matter their situations, no

0:36:17.685 --> 0:36:20.605
<v Speaker 3>matter how messed up they are, all these characters are

0:36:20.605 --> 0:36:22.685
<v Speaker 3>just ending up in the same places. They've all just

0:36:22.765 --> 0:36:26.565
<v Speaker 3>made radically different choices to get there, and all are

0:36:26.605 --> 0:36:29.965
<v Speaker 3>experiencing different levels of happiness.

0:36:30.285 --> 0:36:33.365
<v Speaker 1>To your point, Yeah, and I think I love the

0:36:33.445 --> 0:36:37.085
<v Speaker 1>idea of them as this bickering couple. They're definitely to

0:36:37.165 --> 0:36:39.444
<v Speaker 1>take a historical look at this. This was the era

0:36:39.525 --> 0:36:42.645
<v Speaker 1>of the loquacious criminal couples, wasn't it, or at least

0:36:42.685 --> 0:36:46.005
<v Speaker 1>just criminals. Because we've got this is nineteen ninety six,

0:36:46.605 --> 0:36:49.805
<v Speaker 1>following Usual Suspects in ninety five, and then of course

0:36:49.845 --> 0:36:52.605
<v Speaker 1>we get what pulp fiction in ninety four maybe the

0:36:52.685 --> 0:36:57.005
<v Speaker 1>definitive the trend setter for this. I think about Boushemi

0:36:57.085 --> 0:37:01.005
<v Speaker 1>and Stormare when they're arguing about stopping for pancakes or steak,

0:37:01.365 --> 0:37:04.964
<v Speaker 1>you know, pulp Fiction's raal with cheese comes to mind.

0:37:05.045 --> 0:37:08.445
<v Speaker 1>There Also to your description of their first meeting with

0:37:08.525 --> 0:37:12.005
<v Speaker 1>Jerry in the bar, I love in addition to the

0:37:12.005 --> 0:37:14.125
<v Speaker 1>things you talked about that they try to talk him

0:37:14.125 --> 0:37:16.725
<v Speaker 1>out of the plan because it's so dumb. It's like

0:37:16.805 --> 0:37:20.404
<v Speaker 1>these all these guys have is like money to make,

0:37:20.685 --> 0:37:24.005
<v Speaker 1>but they're so perplexed by his choices they try to

0:37:24.045 --> 0:37:25.405
<v Speaker 1>talk him him out.

0:37:25.325 --> 0:37:28.125
<v Speaker 3>Of the story. It doesn't make sense, It doesn't check out.

0:37:28.165 --> 0:37:28.765
<v Speaker 3>That's what I love it.

0:37:28.805 --> 0:37:32.245
<v Speaker 1>A great screenwriting touch there. Yeah. So the only other

0:37:32.285 --> 0:37:34.925
<v Speaker 1>thing I'd add about margin Norm and it sounds like

0:37:34.965 --> 0:37:37.364
<v Speaker 1>we are in the same place. I just I just

0:37:37.445 --> 0:37:41.765
<v Speaker 1>want to re emphasize again to place her mindset and

0:37:41.845 --> 0:37:46.125
<v Speaker 1>decision making and sort of moral awakening here in context.

0:37:46.885 --> 0:37:49.485
<v Speaker 1>I read their lunches. I read them this time the

0:37:49.485 --> 0:37:52.485
<v Speaker 1>same way you did. He doesn't get into her business.

0:37:53.205 --> 0:37:56.525
<v Speaker 1>At first, it was like, so caring, but also yes,

0:37:56.565 --> 0:38:00.925
<v Speaker 1>but if he's doing this every day, it's almost become

0:38:01.005 --> 0:38:05.125
<v Speaker 1>more routine. It's a nice routine. It's a caring routine.

0:38:05.565 --> 0:38:07.605
<v Speaker 1>I think every time we see them together, unless they're

0:38:07.645 --> 0:38:10.365
<v Speaker 1>in bed, they're eating, they go to the buffet restaurant,

0:38:10.845 --> 0:38:13.645
<v Speaker 1>and you get this sense that maybe this is like

0:38:13.685 --> 0:38:16.605
<v Speaker 1>what they do every Thursday night, you know. And the

0:38:16.685 --> 0:38:20.325
<v Speaker 1>camera pans over the options, which don't look great, but

0:38:21.005 --> 0:38:23.884
<v Speaker 1>it's what they've got, it's what it does the job. Right,

0:38:24.085 --> 0:38:27.645
<v Speaker 1>there's a reading of this where marriage is doing the

0:38:27.805 --> 0:38:33.364
<v Speaker 1>job for Marge and Norm and should there be more? Right,

0:38:33.725 --> 0:38:37.765
<v Speaker 1>that's the question. Should I have more? That's the question

0:38:37.845 --> 0:38:41.845
<v Speaker 1>for Marge in this very minor domestic scenario. It's the

0:38:41.925 --> 0:38:45.485
<v Speaker 1>question for Jerry in his life scenario, and it's the

0:38:45.565 --> 0:38:49.085
<v Speaker 1>question for BUSHEMI and storm Are and their criminal scenario.

0:38:49.285 --> 0:38:51.845
<v Speaker 1>You know what, how can I get more? Because I

0:38:51.965 --> 0:38:54.645
<v Speaker 1>deserve more? And I think Jerry is interesting in this regard.

0:38:54.965 --> 0:38:59.885
<v Speaker 1>Another thing that nuanced a bit for me was again

0:38:59.925 --> 0:39:01.884
<v Speaker 1>I saw him as the everyman, the one we can

0:39:01.925 --> 0:39:04.725
<v Speaker 1>relate to. We probably don't run scams like the vin

0:39:04.805 --> 0:39:07.085
<v Speaker 1>number scam he would want to do, but you know,

0:39:07.125 --> 0:39:10.045
<v Speaker 1>we make our own moral choices here and there and

0:39:10.365 --> 0:39:13.045
<v Speaker 1>fudge things and maybe it could snowball out of control.

0:39:13.125 --> 0:39:17.404
<v Speaker 1>So we can recognize Jerry here though, I saw him

0:39:17.405 --> 0:39:20.485
<v Speaker 1>as even more devious than that, and sort of like

0:39:20.605 --> 0:39:24.565
<v Speaker 1>one of the original sinners of this movie. If Marge

0:39:24.605 --> 0:39:28.045
<v Speaker 1>is presented with if life has presented her brought her

0:39:28.045 --> 0:39:31.005
<v Speaker 1>to a point where she is being challenged with a

0:39:31.125 --> 0:39:35.285
<v Speaker 1>question of right or wrong. Jerry, I thought, was maybe

0:39:35.325 --> 0:39:39.325
<v Speaker 1>born looking for the wrong choice. It's the true coat

0:39:39.445 --> 0:39:42.565
<v Speaker 1>gag the customer who yells at him, you're a bald

0:39:42.605 --> 0:39:46.165
<v Speaker 1>face liar, you know, telling us that Jerry does this

0:39:46.285 --> 0:39:50.805
<v Speaker 1>even in his supposed legit business. Was Jerry's original sin

0:39:51.405 --> 0:39:56.765
<v Speaker 1>possibly marrying jan for her family's money. I was thinking

0:39:56.805 --> 0:40:00.245
<v Speaker 1>about it watching this where originally I thought he's just

0:40:00.285 --> 0:40:02.685
<v Speaker 1>a guy who, you know, has a bore of a

0:40:02.725 --> 0:40:04.925
<v Speaker 1>father in law who's holding it over him because he

0:40:05.005 --> 0:40:07.965
<v Speaker 1>wasn't at successful. Then I'm reathing Jerry and everything he

0:40:08.405 --> 0:40:10.805
<v Speaker 1>does is for his own gain. I'm thinking maybe this

0:40:10.845 --> 0:40:12.965
<v Speaker 1>guy was like ask Jan out on a date in

0:40:13.045 --> 0:40:16.045
<v Speaker 1>high school because her dad was rich, and now he's

0:40:16.085 --> 0:40:20.165
<v Speaker 1>just perpetuating that further into his life. I just think, Macy,

0:40:20.565 --> 0:40:22.965
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jerry was I think my number five Cohen

0:40:23.045 --> 0:40:26.964
<v Speaker 1>character when we did that list, and the performance here

0:40:27.085 --> 0:40:32.085
<v Speaker 1>is incredible, incredible in its own nuance. His face looks

0:40:32.085 --> 0:40:34.485
<v Speaker 1>like he has a continuous case of diarrhea, yet he

0:40:34.565 --> 0:40:38.805
<v Speaker 1>manages to project so much more going on beneath that.

0:40:39.365 --> 0:40:42.565
<v Speaker 1>And I love the touch when Marge knows Jerry's line

0:40:42.845 --> 0:40:47.165
<v Speaker 1>when in one of their interviews when the Midwestern politeness drops.

0:40:48.165 --> 0:40:51.645
<v Speaker 1>Everyone else throughout this movie, not the criminals. Everyone else

0:40:51.725 --> 0:40:55.565
<v Speaker 1>is polite no matter what the situation. But when Jerry says, ma'am,

0:40:55.805 --> 0:40:57.245
<v Speaker 1>I answered your question.

0:40:57.045 --> 0:40:59.165
<v Speaker 3>Ma'am, I answered your question.

0:41:00.045 --> 0:41:04.645
<v Speaker 4>I'm sorry, sir, ma'am, I answered your question. I answered

0:41:04.645 --> 0:41:08.885
<v Speaker 4>the dark. I'm cooperating here, and there's.

0:41:08.005 --> 0:41:10.805
<v Speaker 1>No the light changes in her eyes because she's like,

0:41:11.445 --> 0:41:15.965
<v Speaker 1>he would only say it that way if he was lying.

0:41:16.085 --> 0:41:18.965
<v Speaker 5>Sir, you have no Kyle to get snippy with me.

0:41:19.045 --> 0:41:20.405
<v Speaker 5>I'm just doing my job here.

0:41:22.365 --> 0:41:24.445
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think it does relate to this general

0:41:24.485 --> 0:41:29.844
<v Speaker 1>idea of when we can't cultivate contentment, what choices are

0:41:29.885 --> 0:41:32.685
<v Speaker 1>we going to make? Then that'll be destructive for ourselves

0:41:32.845 --> 0:41:35.325
<v Speaker 1>and for others. It relates to the line you pulled

0:41:35.325 --> 0:41:39.605
<v Speaker 1>out at the end, if Myerge doesn't fully believe that yet,

0:41:39.925 --> 0:41:43.525
<v Speaker 1>she's recognizing that contentment might be possible here with norm

0:41:43.805 --> 0:41:47.325
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be work, you know, the ice scraper

0:41:47.445 --> 0:41:50.445
<v Speaker 1>have to come out again. But I think she's recognizing

0:41:50.485 --> 0:41:53.685
<v Speaker 1>this is the choice that she's content to make to go.

0:41:53.605 --> 0:41:58.845
<v Speaker 3>In that direction. A couple titles I wanted to highlight

0:41:59.045 --> 0:42:01.805
<v Speaker 3>this week, josh as I was looking at the Regal

0:42:02.205 --> 0:42:06.805
<v Speaker 3>Cinema's website r egmovies dot com. Plus there's a link

0:42:06.965 --> 0:42:09.485
<v Speaker 3>in our show notes that I hope people are clicking on.

0:42:09.925 --> 0:42:13.965
<v Speaker 3>They have two limited engagements of note and these may

0:42:13.965 --> 0:42:17.525
<v Speaker 3>be playing at different times wherever you were located, So

0:42:17.845 --> 0:42:20.805
<v Speaker 3>just visit the website check it out. But they're showing

0:42:21.045 --> 0:42:25.845
<v Speaker 3>American Psycho and they're also showing my neighbor Totoro. You

0:42:25.965 --> 0:42:29.924
<v Speaker 3>never go wrong seeing Miyazaki on the big screen, which

0:42:29.965 --> 0:42:32.125
<v Speaker 3>I've never seen any of these older movies on the

0:42:32.125 --> 0:42:35.645
<v Speaker 3>big screen. And then American Psycho, the Mary Heron movie

0:42:35.685 --> 0:42:38.925
<v Speaker 3>is a film I desperately need to revisit. But in

0:42:38.925 --> 0:42:41.884
<v Speaker 3>addition to those limited engagements, you can of course see

0:42:41.885 --> 0:42:45.325
<v Speaker 3>the movie that is expanding to more screens, the movie

0:42:45.445 --> 0:42:50.165
<v Speaker 3>that you're highly recommending, the movie that seems very likely

0:42:50.525 --> 0:42:53.645
<v Speaker 3>to be on a lot of midyear best of lists

0:42:53.685 --> 0:42:56.725
<v Speaker 3>and quite possibly some end of year lists. It is

0:42:57.445 --> 0:43:01.925
<v Speaker 3>The Invite, Olivia Wilde's new film with Regal Unlimited. That's

0:43:01.965 --> 0:43:04.845
<v Speaker 3>a movie I can see for free. Regal Unlimited is

0:43:04.885 --> 0:43:06.964
<v Speaker 3>the all you can watch movie subscription pass that pays

0:43:07.005 --> 0:43:11.325
<v Speaker 3>for itself in just two visits. Regal is offering our

0:43:11.365 --> 0:43:14.565
<v Speaker 3>listeners endless movies for less, because all you have to

0:43:14.565 --> 0:43:16.805
<v Speaker 3>do is sign up with the code film Spot twenty

0:43:16.845 --> 0:43:20.565
<v Speaker 3>six to get fifteen percent off. You can see any

0:43:20.605 --> 0:43:23.404
<v Speaker 3>standard two D movie, and last I checked, there isn't

0:43:23.405 --> 0:43:26.605
<v Speaker 3>a three D version of The Invite, Josh, not that

0:43:26.605 --> 0:43:29.325
<v Speaker 3>I'm aware of. Okay, So you can see the Invite,

0:43:29.885 --> 0:43:33.085
<v Speaker 3>no blackout dates or restrictions, and you don't just save

0:43:33.125 --> 0:43:35.765
<v Speaker 3>money on tickets, you save on snacks as well, ten

0:43:35.805 --> 0:43:39.445
<v Speaker 3>percent off all non alcoholic concessions. Sign up now in

0:43:39.485 --> 0:43:41.765
<v Speaker 3>the regal app or at the link in our description.

0:43:42.125 --> 0:43:45.405
<v Speaker 3>That code again is film Spot twenty six to receive

0:43:45.405 --> 0:43:52.884
<v Speaker 3>your disking. I want to get a little bit more

0:43:52.885 --> 0:43:55.924
<v Speaker 3>into Macy and how I saw the character this time,

0:43:55.965 --> 0:44:00.485
<v Speaker 3>which is very similar, if not exactly how you're reading it,

0:44:00.725 --> 0:44:06.005
<v Speaker 3>But to get back a little bit to Marge and Yanagita,

0:44:06.125 --> 0:44:11.805
<v Speaker 3>specifically that scene. I don't I guess understand as I

0:44:11.845 --> 0:44:14.925
<v Speaker 3>mentioned earlier, how people are coming up so blank on

0:44:14.965 --> 0:44:16.005
<v Speaker 3>this scene. I was trying to.

0:44:15.925 --> 0:44:18.125
<v Speaker 1>Think what I think it is. I'll just say real quick,

0:44:18.165 --> 0:44:20.045
<v Speaker 1>I think it's the length of it. I think it

0:44:20.125 --> 0:44:22.125
<v Speaker 1>might be like and I don't think it's too long.

0:44:22.165 --> 0:44:23.885
<v Speaker 1>I'm not saying that. I just think if it had

0:44:23.925 --> 0:44:27.045
<v Speaker 1>been a blip, like almost the conversation between the one

0:44:28.325 --> 0:44:31.645
<v Speaker 1>trooper who goes talk to the neighbor who overheard Bushami

0:44:31.765 --> 0:44:33.845
<v Speaker 1>say something that's like a minute and a half scene,

0:44:33.925 --> 0:44:35.965
<v Speaker 1>I think then people would have been fine. But that

0:44:36.045 --> 0:44:40.205
<v Speaker 1>Yannighita gets a significant chunk is what really perplexes well.

0:44:40.525 --> 0:44:44.285
<v Speaker 3>I think tied to that, Josh, I think it's genuinely

0:44:46.805 --> 0:44:49.765
<v Speaker 3>this may sound like more than I mean it to,

0:44:49.845 --> 0:44:53.125
<v Speaker 3>but I think it's genuinely a disturbing scene too. I

0:44:53.165 --> 0:44:56.845
<v Speaker 3>think it's a hard watch. I think the emotional terrain

0:44:57.325 --> 0:45:01.245
<v Speaker 3>that he covers in that scene makes us uncomfortable, and

0:45:01.285 --> 0:45:03.845
<v Speaker 3>I think that's where the humor even comes from. I

0:45:03.885 --> 0:45:06.525
<v Speaker 3>was trying to think back. I don't remember exactly the

0:45:06.605 --> 0:45:09.045
<v Speaker 3>experience I had in the theater in nineteen ninety six,

0:45:09.365 --> 0:45:12.605
<v Speaker 3>but if you asked me what my recollection was, I

0:45:12.645 --> 0:45:16.285
<v Speaker 3>would tell you that I think I remember people laughing,

0:45:16.525 --> 0:45:19.404
<v Speaker 3>and that I might have even laughed myself because Mike

0:45:19.765 --> 0:45:23.965
<v Speaker 3>is so desperate and he seems so lost, and the

0:45:24.045 --> 0:45:28.845
<v Speaker 3>way he is trying to cling to Marge, even though

0:45:29.125 --> 0:45:32.485
<v Speaker 3>he seems so sad, he's so pathetic that you kind

0:45:32.485 --> 0:45:34.964
<v Speaker 3>of can't help but laugh. But I think it's more

0:45:35.285 --> 0:45:40.765
<v Speaker 3>that uncomfortable laughter rather than really laughing at him. And

0:45:41.525 --> 0:45:46.685
<v Speaker 3>this time I didn't feel that type of discomfort. I

0:45:46.845 --> 0:45:49.805
<v Speaker 3>just felt real sadness for this character. Now that might

0:45:49.845 --> 0:45:54.165
<v Speaker 3>be because I know the truth of his situation, but

0:45:54.685 --> 0:45:56.805
<v Speaker 3>in terms of how that scene functions in the movie,

0:45:58.085 --> 0:46:03.605
<v Speaker 3>his lying seems to trigger her right the next day

0:46:03.645 --> 0:46:05.884
<v Speaker 3>as she's driving out of town. That seems to be

0:46:06.005 --> 0:46:09.445
<v Speaker 3>the trigger for her thinking. This goes back to my

0:46:09.485 --> 0:46:12.245
<v Speaker 3>idea of storytelling and deception. Something doesn't check out with

0:46:12.845 --> 0:46:16.765
<v Speaker 3>the story I was getting from Shep and Jerry. I'm

0:46:16.765 --> 0:46:18.725
<v Speaker 3>going to go back. I think that was part of it,

0:46:18.725 --> 0:46:21.485
<v Speaker 3>that just the night before she heard this and in

0:46:21.525 --> 0:46:24.725
<v Speaker 3>the phone call that morning where it's revealed right that

0:46:24.725 --> 0:46:27.485
<v Speaker 3>that's she just finds out that morning before she got

0:46:27.525 --> 0:46:30.325
<v Speaker 3>in the car that she's been lied to. Obviously, I

0:46:30.365 --> 0:46:35.765
<v Speaker 3>also think, to my entire point about the myth making element,

0:46:36.405 --> 0:46:42.565
<v Speaker 3>he has concocted an entire narrative around his life to

0:46:42.685 --> 0:46:48.965
<v Speaker 3>earn her sympathy. That's absolutely essential. But then he has

0:46:49.485 --> 0:46:52.964
<v Speaker 3>as part of that narrative he has revealed that all

0:46:53.125 --> 0:46:57.285
<v Speaker 3>he is seeking in life, all he is clinging to,

0:46:57.525 --> 0:47:01.205
<v Speaker 3>is the hope that maybe someday he'll have a relationship

0:47:01.285 --> 0:47:05.885
<v Speaker 3>like margin Norm have. That's another vision of domestic life.

0:47:06.045 --> 0:47:10.445
<v Speaker 3>It's the absence. It's the absence of having someone in

0:47:10.485 --> 0:47:13.205
<v Speaker 3>your life that can be that that other to you,

0:47:13.405 --> 0:47:17.445
<v Speaker 3>like like Norm is for Marge. The thing that is

0:47:18.005 --> 0:47:21.525
<v Speaker 3>very interesting is seeing at this time, as you did,

0:47:22.605 --> 0:47:27.485
<v Speaker 3>where she puts on that outfit and she kind of

0:47:27.485 --> 0:47:33.085
<v Speaker 3>adjusts herself, and you go, she is she getting herself

0:47:33.125 --> 0:47:37.085
<v Speaker 3>ready because she wants to impress Mike. Is that entering

0:47:37.085 --> 0:47:41.444
<v Speaker 3>her mind at all? I always read it as it's

0:47:41.445 --> 0:47:43.565
<v Speaker 3>the first time. It's the first time we've seen her

0:47:43.645 --> 0:47:47.085
<v Speaker 3>outside of her work clothes. It's the first time we've

0:47:47.125 --> 0:47:49.485
<v Speaker 3>seen her in civilian clothes. And so when she's kind

0:47:49.485 --> 0:47:51.924
<v Speaker 3>of pulling at her clothes, it's like she almost doesn't

0:47:51.965 --> 0:47:54.205
<v Speaker 3>know what to do with herself. She's in civilian clothes,

0:47:54.245 --> 0:47:57.685
<v Speaker 3>and it feels it feels awkward. And do we really

0:47:57.725 --> 0:47:59.924
<v Speaker 3>think that she hasn't seen this guy in a hundred

0:48:00.005 --> 0:48:03.965
<v Speaker 3>years and she all of a sudden is having some

0:48:04.405 --> 0:48:07.965
<v Speaker 3>fantasy about him, like like she's thinking about another life

0:48:08.005 --> 0:48:10.685
<v Speaker 3>with another guy that isn't norm That seems a little

0:48:10.685 --> 0:48:15.245
<v Speaker 3>bit hard, hard to swallow, but maybe it does just

0:48:15.565 --> 0:48:18.885
<v Speaker 3>open enough of a door, just enough of a portal

0:48:18.965 --> 0:48:24.924
<v Speaker 3>in her mind that what happens. What happens is when

0:48:24.965 --> 0:48:30.725
<v Speaker 3>you watch then that last scene, that last line when

0:48:30.765 --> 0:48:37.045
<v Speaker 3>she says, hey, we're doing pretty good here, you can

0:48:37.125 --> 0:48:41.844
<v Speaker 3>realize that two things can be true at once, that

0:48:42.245 --> 0:48:47.405
<v Speaker 3>she absolutely means it, that it is true it's with

0:48:47.525 --> 0:48:50.325
<v Speaker 3>full conviction that she loves Norm with all her heart

0:48:50.525 --> 0:48:52.685
<v Speaker 3>and he loves her, and they can't wait for their

0:48:52.725 --> 0:48:56.085
<v Speaker 3>baby to come and they're going to be extraordinarily happy

0:48:56.885 --> 0:49:02.605
<v Speaker 3>for the rest of their lives together. But it is prompted,

0:49:02.925 --> 0:49:06.085
<v Speaker 3>She's provoked in a way to say it because it

0:49:06.285 --> 0:49:09.364
<v Speaker 3>is a bit of an affirmation. She feels like she

0:49:09.525 --> 0:49:13.605
<v Speaker 3>needs to say it, that she needs to affirm. If

0:49:13.645 --> 0:49:16.404
<v Speaker 3>you're fully content and you know it, you don't need

0:49:16.445 --> 0:49:19.925
<v Speaker 3>to necessarily reinforce it. You just exist in the moment.

0:49:20.405 --> 0:49:23.884
<v Speaker 3>The fact that she needs to tell Norm that everything's

0:49:24.205 --> 0:49:29.325
<v Speaker 3>great right suggest that she needs to hear it for herself.

0:49:29.925 --> 0:49:32.165
<v Speaker 1>But I also think a fallacy that the movie is

0:49:32.165 --> 0:49:37.125
<v Speaker 1>exposing is that in a world that the Cohens usually

0:49:37.165 --> 0:49:41.125
<v Speaker 1>see as messed up, if not outright evil, that's what

0:49:41.165 --> 0:49:46.525
<v Speaker 1>we see in their movies. Maybe happiness is impossible, maybe

0:49:46.565 --> 0:49:50.045
<v Speaker 1>it's just not possible, but but something like contentment is

0:49:51.085 --> 0:49:52.405
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of that's kind.

0:49:52.245 --> 0:49:56.125
<v Speaker 3>Of thee Well, that's took a read for me.

0:49:56.725 --> 0:49:58.885
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I don't know that they're always going

0:49:58.965 --> 0:50:02.605
<v Speaker 1>to have this perfectly you know, happy domestics.

0:50:02.605 --> 0:50:06.045
<v Speaker 3>As much as any happy marriage is moments I guess

0:50:06.085 --> 0:50:09.725
<v Speaker 3>that's Josh. Yes. But the the other thing I did,

0:50:09.805 --> 0:50:13.725
<v Speaker 3>I did just want to add, going back to my

0:50:13.725 --> 0:50:16.565
<v Speaker 3>my notion of of of myth making here and storytelling

0:50:17.085 --> 0:50:19.205
<v Speaker 3>is what stands out to me too about that scene

0:50:19.245 --> 0:50:24.445
<v Speaker 3>is what precedes it, okay, because he has entered his

0:50:25.685 --> 0:50:31.525
<v Speaker 3>painting into that contest and he wants to win. And throughout,

0:50:31.725 --> 0:50:36.605
<v Speaker 3>as I said, felt this entire movie, people have been

0:50:37.485 --> 0:50:42.085
<v Speaker 3>stretching the truth outright, lying, doing whatever they have to

0:50:42.165 --> 0:50:46.045
<v Speaker 3>do to get what they want, and only causing fur

0:50:46.045 --> 0:50:52.605
<v Speaker 3>their damage. And in this scene, he's upset because he

0:50:52.685 --> 0:50:57.725
<v Speaker 3>didn't win. He says, the Houtman's blue wing teal got

0:50:57.725 --> 0:51:01.285
<v Speaker 3>the twenty nine cent and people don't much use the

0:51:01.925 --> 0:51:05.725
<v Speaker 3>three cent, which is what he got. And there's something

0:51:05.765 --> 0:51:08.965
<v Speaker 3>that I'm still fully unpacking, Josh. But when I was

0:51:09.005 --> 0:51:12.165
<v Speaker 3>thinking about the way I read the film, I love

0:51:12.245 --> 0:51:16.005
<v Speaker 3>the fact that she says to him, over Pete's sake,

0:51:16.045 --> 0:51:20.325
<v Speaker 3>of course they do whenever they raise the postage, people

0:51:20.405 --> 0:51:24.325
<v Speaker 3>need the little stamps. And he says, yeah. She says

0:51:24.325 --> 0:51:25.965
<v Speaker 3>when they're stuck with a bunch of the old ones,

0:51:26.125 --> 0:51:29.245
<v Speaker 3>and he goes, yeah, I guess like she tells him.

0:51:29.405 --> 0:51:32.045
<v Speaker 3>She tells him a little story, the story he needs

0:51:32.085 --> 0:51:35.605
<v Speaker 3>to hear, and how how true is it? Maybe it's

0:51:35.645 --> 0:51:39.445
<v Speaker 3>fully true, Josh, Maybe it's fully true, because yes they

0:51:39.445 --> 0:51:42.085
<v Speaker 3>do when they do raise the stamps, you do need

0:51:42.125 --> 0:51:46.085
<v Speaker 3>the old ones. That is a reality of American postal life.

0:51:46.805 --> 0:51:51.525
<v Speaker 3>But it's still something a wife is telling her husband

0:51:52.125 --> 0:51:55.605
<v Speaker 3>to make him feel better. So there's something about the

0:51:55.645 --> 0:51:58.445
<v Speaker 3>fact that that you're that the movie in that final

0:51:58.525 --> 0:52:04.445
<v Speaker 3>moment is encapsulating the truth and a story that he

0:52:04.525 --> 0:52:06.845
<v Speaker 3>needs to hear. But there's also some symbolism in it

0:52:06.885 --> 0:52:12.765
<v Speaker 3>where it's like, times change, the stamp, this this steady thing.

0:52:13.325 --> 0:52:16.725
<v Speaker 3>Times change. But you know what, we'll just digest and

0:52:16.765 --> 0:52:19.525
<v Speaker 3>we'll move on and we've got each other and we'll

0:52:19.525 --> 0:52:20.005
<v Speaker 3>be fine.

0:52:20.125 --> 0:52:23.444
<v Speaker 4>People don't mutch you the three cent Oh, of course

0:52:23.445 --> 0:52:28.005
<v Speaker 4>they do. Whenever they raise a postage, people need the

0:52:28.045 --> 0:52:32.605
<v Speaker 4>little stamps. Yeah, when they're still with a bunch of

0:52:32.605 --> 0:52:41.165
<v Speaker 4>the old ones. Yeah, I guess it's terrific. I'm so

0:52:41.285 --> 0:52:42.125
<v Speaker 4>pretty and normal.

0:52:43.245 --> 0:52:45.245
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think it works for that reading. Absolutely. I

0:52:45.245 --> 0:52:47.605
<v Speaker 1>think it's a nice gesture of the goodness they do

0:52:47.685 --> 0:52:50.485
<v Speaker 1>have in their marriage. Neither of us is suggesting that

0:52:50.525 --> 0:52:54.085
<v Speaker 1>this was a false marriage that they had Barge's response

0:52:54.125 --> 0:52:55.925
<v Speaker 1>in that way shows how much they do care for

0:52:55.965 --> 0:53:00.165
<v Speaker 1>each other, and in my reading it absolutely is a

0:53:00.245 --> 0:53:02.925
<v Speaker 1>symbol of contentment. You're not always going to get the

0:53:02.965 --> 0:53:06.285
<v Speaker 1>twenty nine cent stamp. You know what, Maybe you can

0:53:06.325 --> 0:53:08.725
<v Speaker 1>be happy with a three cent stamp, and she helps

0:53:08.805 --> 0:53:11.525
<v Speaker 1>him find out that he can be happy with that. Okay,

0:53:11.565 --> 0:53:16.325
<v Speaker 1>last thing on Mike Yanagita, because I just realized this

0:53:16.445 --> 0:53:21.405
<v Speaker 1>with this viewing, Adam. We've seen Stephen Park given credible

0:53:21.445 --> 0:53:27.365
<v Speaker 1>performance not that long ago in Wes Anderson's The French Dispatch.

0:53:27.445 --> 0:53:31.765
<v Speaker 1>He was he was Nascafier, Lieutenant Niscoffier, the chef for

0:53:31.885 --> 0:53:36.645
<v Speaker 1>the police Commissar. So how about that, because I just

0:53:36.685 --> 0:53:38.765
<v Speaker 1>think we also need to give credits as I think

0:53:38.765 --> 0:53:42.005
<v Speaker 1>we've been hinted at Tuparc in the tightrope he's walking

0:53:42.045 --> 0:53:45.245
<v Speaker 1>in this scene where he can't make the guy a joke.

0:53:45.765 --> 0:53:49.364
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you. He registers emotionally incredibly strongly, even

0:53:49.405 --> 0:53:53.885
<v Speaker 1>as he's very silly and awkward and off putting at

0:53:53.925 --> 0:53:55.884
<v Speaker 1>the same time. I mean, this is a tightrope back

0:53:56.125 --> 0:53:58.365
<v Speaker 1>and to just come into the movie for one scene

0:53:58.445 --> 0:54:04.525
<v Speaker 1>like this, and perhaps it sounds like deliver the definitive scene. Yeah,

0:54:04.525 --> 0:54:07.525
<v Speaker 1>what a what a performance there by by Stephen Park.

0:54:07.885 --> 0:54:11.005
<v Speaker 1>Do we need to say more about McDormand or do

0:54:11.325 --> 0:54:13.325
<v Speaker 1>but we go here?

0:54:13.685 --> 0:54:15.965
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I want to talk about McDormand and Deacon's but

0:54:16.005 --> 0:54:18.884
<v Speaker 3>I do want to say something about about Macy if

0:54:18.925 --> 0:54:21.364
<v Speaker 3>I can, even though I go to Echo, I'm gonna

0:54:21.365 --> 0:54:23.045
<v Speaker 3>ache have a lot of it, you said, I. I

0:54:23.125 --> 0:54:29.805
<v Speaker 3>do think it's a stunning performance, the desperation that he conveys,

0:54:30.085 --> 0:54:36.085
<v Speaker 3>and specifically in in the meeting with with Stan and Wade,

0:54:36.845 --> 0:54:39.005
<v Speaker 3>with the father in law and his guy Stall in

0:54:39.085 --> 0:54:42.924
<v Speaker 3>that meeting when it when it turns, when he realizes

0:54:43.085 --> 0:54:46.125
<v Speaker 3>the moment where he realizes it's not it's not going

0:54:46.205 --> 0:54:49.125
<v Speaker 3>to go that it looks so promising and then it

0:54:49.165 --> 0:54:51.605
<v Speaker 3>flips and he realizes it's not going to work out

0:54:52.085 --> 0:54:58.245
<v Speaker 3>the way Macy silently conveys that this is sunk and

0:54:58.285 --> 0:55:02.605
<v Speaker 3>he knows he is screwed. Is is so powerful and

0:55:02.845 --> 0:55:06.445
<v Speaker 3>and I say powerful because I will get into this

0:55:06.485 --> 0:55:09.045
<v Speaker 3>more in just a second. I do think it for

0:55:09.125 --> 0:55:12.485
<v Speaker 3>as much of a weasel and terrible person that he

0:55:12.525 --> 0:55:15.005
<v Speaker 3>clearly is who sets all of these terrible things in motion,

0:55:15.445 --> 0:55:19.285
<v Speaker 3>I do think he is remarkably human and that comes

0:55:19.325 --> 0:55:23.645
<v Speaker 3>through in his character, but performance wise too is.

0:55:23.805 --> 0:55:25.765
<v Speaker 1>Real quick there and that moment you're talking about, you

0:55:25.765 --> 0:55:28.445
<v Speaker 1>know what it is. He's doing two things. He's conveying

0:55:28.525 --> 0:55:34.165
<v Speaker 1>the desperation that his scheme is falling apart simultaneously. The

0:55:34.205 --> 0:55:36.245
<v Speaker 1>other side of this, this was the way for him

0:55:36.245 --> 0:55:38.285
<v Speaker 1>to get respect from his father in law as a

0:55:38.325 --> 0:55:42.884
<v Speaker 1>man who can make that money. And Macy hits both

0:55:42.885 --> 0:55:44.525
<v Speaker 1>of those notes without saying a thing.

0:55:44.925 --> 0:55:50.605
<v Speaker 3>That's exactly it. The tiny voice crack this gets right

0:55:50.645 --> 0:55:52.605
<v Speaker 3>at that. And I'm going to talk about this with

0:55:52.685 --> 0:55:55.045
<v Speaker 3>Deacons too. And in one of the choices with the

0:55:55.045 --> 0:55:58.045
<v Speaker 3>production design and the way they shoot it, you said,

0:55:58.125 --> 0:56:02.405
<v Speaker 3>maybe he always wanted Maybe his original sin was was

0:56:02.445 --> 0:56:05.245
<v Speaker 3>something back he dated her and married her just for

0:56:05.285 --> 0:56:09.325
<v Speaker 3>his mind, or maybe this was a building in his

0:56:09.485 --> 0:56:14.045
<v Speaker 3>mind of insecurity over time, maybe he's he's felt that

0:56:14.125 --> 0:56:19.725
<v Speaker 3>he's never gotten the respect he deserved from life, including

0:56:19.765 --> 0:56:25.805
<v Speaker 3>his father in law. And when he says to Marge, well,

0:56:25.845 --> 0:56:30.005
<v Speaker 3>I should know I'm the executive sales manager, and he

0:56:30.045 --> 0:56:32.965
<v Speaker 3>has to say his title, his full title, and the

0:56:33.005 --> 0:56:37.725
<v Speaker 3>way his voice just subtly cracks on his executive could

0:56:37.725 --> 0:56:42.565
<v Speaker 3>not be could not be more more perfect, and I

0:56:42.925 --> 0:56:45.085
<v Speaker 3>also want to go back and note that that that

0:56:45.165 --> 0:56:48.405
<v Speaker 3>true coat exchange is one of the more memorable sequences

0:56:48.405 --> 0:56:51.605
<v Speaker 3>in the entire film, and and that that too, this

0:56:51.805 --> 0:56:55.325
<v Speaker 3>is his flaw and what makes him human but also

0:56:55.605 --> 0:56:58.525
<v Speaker 3>a character on the level and and this is the

0:56:58.525 --> 0:57:02.165
<v Speaker 3>the playground that the the Cones play in on the

0:57:02.245 --> 0:57:05.485
<v Speaker 3>level of a Greek character or a Shakespearean character. His

0:57:05.645 --> 0:57:10.045
<v Speaker 3>fundamental tragic flaw is that he is, perhaps in seeking

0:57:10.085 --> 0:57:13.364
<v Speaker 3>this respect, part of it is that he is I

0:57:13.445 --> 0:57:19.165
<v Speaker 3>believe incapable of being honest. I believe that he is

0:57:19.205 --> 0:57:24.485
<v Speaker 3>fundamentally incapable of telling the truth. He can't stop himself.

0:57:24.805 --> 0:57:27.405
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't matter what that guy says. It's not about

0:57:27.405 --> 0:57:29.685
<v Speaker 3>the money. What's he going to get out of that

0:57:29.725 --> 0:57:32.485
<v Speaker 3>true coat another four hundred dollars. He does not care

0:57:32.525 --> 0:57:36.005
<v Speaker 3>about the money. And he even and I think Macy

0:57:36.125 --> 0:57:39.245
<v Speaker 3>captures this and the Cones capture this, he does care

0:57:40.525 --> 0:57:43.645
<v Speaker 3>about the guy calling him a bald faced liar to

0:57:43.725 --> 0:57:46.205
<v Speaker 3>his face. We get the close up. You can tell

0:57:46.285 --> 0:57:49.925
<v Speaker 3>that it does hurt him, It wounds him that he's

0:57:50.045 --> 0:57:52.285
<v Speaker 3>called a liar to his face, but not enough that

0:57:52.365 --> 0:57:55.845
<v Speaker 3>it stops him from doing it. He'll do it every

0:57:55.885 --> 0:57:58.965
<v Speaker 3>single time, because it's in his nature to do it

0:57:59.205 --> 0:58:01.965
<v Speaker 3>and he can't stop himself from doing it. But the

0:58:02.005 --> 0:58:04.765
<v Speaker 3>way you know that he's got that insecurity as well

0:58:05.365 --> 0:58:09.165
<v Speaker 3>is when he says and that in that meeting scene,

0:58:09.805 --> 0:58:12.525
<v Speaker 3>you know, well, this will be a real good deal

0:58:12.605 --> 0:58:14.845
<v Speaker 3>for Gene and Scotty, meaning he says, Gene and Scotty

0:58:14.925 --> 0:58:18.005
<v Speaker 3>have nothing to worry about. Yeah, yeah, doesn't matter. It

0:58:18.085 --> 0:58:23.165
<v Speaker 3>doesn't matter about Dagger. He's completely inconsequential. But they will

0:58:23.205 --> 0:58:25.885
<v Speaker 3>always Yeah, they never have to worry, is what he says.

0:58:26.165 --> 0:58:28.685
<v Speaker 3>They will always be taken care of. So yeah, I

0:58:28.685 --> 0:58:30.965
<v Speaker 3>think he's always I think he's always fighting for that.

0:58:31.245 --> 0:58:33.605
<v Speaker 3>But to the human part, as I said, you see

0:58:33.605 --> 0:58:36.245
<v Speaker 3>that he's wounded, but not enough to ever change. How

0:58:36.285 --> 0:58:40.685
<v Speaker 3>about when when they say after the crime has happened,

0:58:40.725 --> 0:58:43.725
<v Speaker 3>and I think Stan maybe says something about like how

0:58:43.885 --> 0:58:44.965
<v Speaker 3>Scotty taking.

0:58:44.925 --> 0:58:47.525
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, poor Scotty, Poor.

0:58:47.365 --> 0:58:49.805
<v Speaker 3>Scotty, who's such a little twit at the beginning, but

0:58:49.925 --> 0:58:54.125
<v Speaker 3>you of course genuinely feel for him at that moment.

0:58:54.405 --> 0:58:59.285
<v Speaker 3>You see on Macy's face, on Jerry's face that he

0:58:59.605 --> 0:59:02.485
<v Speaker 3>of course hasn't thought for a second, nope, how this

0:59:02.885 --> 0:59:05.805
<v Speaker 3>is going to affect his son, and I think you

0:59:05.925 --> 0:59:10.805
<v Speaker 3>see that he is thinking, oh no, this is going

0:59:10.885 --> 0:59:13.645
<v Speaker 3>to be really hard on him. He does care how

0:59:13.645 --> 0:59:17.125
<v Speaker 3>this will affect Scotty, not enough to change anything that

0:59:17.165 --> 0:59:20.285
<v Speaker 3>he's doing. He's even ask Scotty to lie on his

0:59:20.405 --> 0:59:22.485
<v Speaker 3>behalf right, and he's going to continue every part of

0:59:22.485 --> 0:59:25.125
<v Speaker 3>this deception because again it's in his nature and he

0:59:25.125 --> 0:59:29.405
<v Speaker 3>can't stop himself. But he does care. So the fact

0:59:29.405 --> 0:59:33.605
<v Speaker 3>that the Cone Brothers make him that kind of character,

0:59:33.725 --> 0:59:38.045
<v Speaker 3>with that depth, and the fact that Macy portrays all

0:59:38.085 --> 0:59:41.925
<v Speaker 3>of that is crucial to the success of this movie.

0:59:42.205 --> 0:59:44.165
<v Speaker 3>And one deacons thing I'll say, and maybe this will

0:59:44.165 --> 0:59:46.685
<v Speaker 3>transition into some of the filmmaking and we'll circle back

0:59:46.725 --> 0:59:50.645
<v Speaker 3>around to the best actress is there's a shot Josh

0:59:51.485 --> 0:59:53.525
<v Speaker 3>in this film. I think it might be the second

0:59:53.565 --> 1:00:00.045
<v Speaker 3>time Riley Diefenbach Gmac calls about the serial numbers. Yeah,

1:00:00.085 --> 1:00:03.605
<v Speaker 3>and I think it's that because they then cut to

1:00:04.085 --> 1:00:07.805
<v Speaker 3>a wide shot looking at his office across the showroom,

1:00:08.125 --> 1:00:10.845
<v Speaker 3>like he's in profile standing at his desk, and we

1:00:10.925 --> 1:00:16.445
<v Speaker 3>see the office from across the showroom and the way

1:00:16.485 --> 1:00:19.885
<v Speaker 3>that the production design is set up, the way it

1:00:20.325 --> 1:00:26.085
<v Speaker 3>everything is is established with the framing his office looks

1:00:26.605 --> 1:00:29.085
<v Speaker 3>like he's in his cuss. Yeah, it looks like he's

1:00:29.165 --> 1:00:32.885
<v Speaker 3>already in jail. But not only that, we add to it.

1:00:32.885 --> 1:00:36.645
<v Speaker 3>It's like this daytime noir touch where all the beams

1:00:36.685 --> 1:00:40.405
<v Speaker 3>in the showroom look like they've imprisoned him. But not

1:00:40.445 --> 1:00:45.325
<v Speaker 3>only that, beams and the shades, the blinds in his

1:00:45.405 --> 1:00:51.165
<v Speaker 3>office all are vertical, and our additional bars that are

1:00:51.165 --> 1:00:53.285
<v Speaker 3>holding him in. But here's the thing I noticed this

1:00:53.325 --> 1:00:57.605
<v Speaker 3>time that really stood out this guy. Here's how insecure

1:00:57.965 --> 1:01:03.245
<v Speaker 3>Jerry is. This guy has more trophies in his office.

1:01:03.445 --> 1:01:05.645
<v Speaker 3>It does than Tom Brady does.

1:01:06.285 --> 1:01:06.405
<v Speaker 1>He.

1:01:06.805 --> 1:01:09.565
<v Speaker 3>I don't know if he's sponsored. I don't know if

1:01:09.565 --> 1:01:13.165
<v Speaker 3>he sponsored Little League teams or or know what they are.

1:01:13.805 --> 1:01:16.365
<v Speaker 1>What they are, you sell ten true coats.

1:01:16.685 --> 1:01:19.365
<v Speaker 3>Get there, you go. Maybe that's it. Maybe all he

1:01:19.445 --> 1:01:24.285
<v Speaker 3>wants is the trophies Josh has. He they go across

1:01:24.365 --> 1:01:28.445
<v Speaker 3>one wall and then over the other, and and the

1:01:28.445 --> 1:01:32.845
<v Speaker 3>way Deacons and the Coen Brothers frame this is that

1:01:33.165 --> 1:01:38.525
<v Speaker 3>in his door there's a reflection that shows more bars

1:01:38.685 --> 1:01:42.365
<v Speaker 3>and trophies. So it just amplifies it even more. The

1:01:42.405 --> 1:01:45.365
<v Speaker 3>way he's already a prisoner, and the fact that he

1:01:45.445 --> 1:01:49.725
<v Speaker 3>is just inundated. He's his office is overrun with trophies.

1:01:49.765 --> 1:01:50.485
<v Speaker 3>It's incredible.

1:01:51.165 --> 1:01:54.685
<v Speaker 1>It's so good. And I broke that exact thing down

1:01:54.885 --> 1:01:57.245
<v Speaker 1>when I did that TC Movie Club thing a couple

1:01:57.245 --> 1:01:59.285
<v Speaker 1>of years ago. I made a video essay for it,

1:01:59.725 --> 1:02:03.085
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, pulled that out to emphasize it. Maybe I'll

1:02:03.125 --> 1:02:04.565
<v Speaker 1>link to that in the show note. So it's fun

1:02:04.605 --> 1:02:07.725
<v Speaker 1>to look at that again. Deacon's brilliant here, and the

1:02:07.805 --> 1:02:09.645
<v Speaker 1>thing I think of first, It's the thing I think

1:02:09.645 --> 1:02:15.765
<v Speaker 1>of first with Firego is this wide out visual milieu

1:02:16.005 --> 1:02:20.805
<v Speaker 1>which they employ. I love the midwestern setting just so

1:02:20.885 --> 1:02:24.245
<v Speaker 1>that it is a quintessential American film and giving us

1:02:24.245 --> 1:02:27.365
<v Speaker 1>something that's not you know, New York or La crime movie.

1:02:27.805 --> 1:02:33.165
<v Speaker 1>But it's also so effectively used as mood and thematic

1:02:33.845 --> 1:02:38.965
<v Speaker 1>visual support. And what they're capturing here is that moment

1:02:39.085 --> 1:02:42.085
<v Speaker 1>and we know this because of where we live. When

1:02:42.285 --> 1:02:45.685
<v Speaker 1>it's been snowing for a while and it's starting to

1:02:45.725 --> 1:02:49.125
<v Speaker 1>warm up just a little bit, the sky is not clear,

1:02:49.805 --> 1:02:53.525
<v Speaker 1>and so the snow is evaporating slightly, but it has

1:02:53.605 --> 1:02:58.485
<v Speaker 1>nowhere to go, and you just feel like you're encased

1:02:58.485 --> 1:03:02.805
<v Speaker 1>in gray. Right, it's all of one. Let's go back

1:03:02.845 --> 1:03:06.725
<v Speaker 1>to our back Room's Exit eight conversation. It's a limital

1:03:06.765 --> 1:03:11.125
<v Speaker 1>space we're in here. And again, if I'm seeing this

1:03:11.245 --> 1:03:15.325
<v Speaker 1>movie as mostly a meditation on how to navigate a

1:03:15.365 --> 1:03:20.565
<v Speaker 1>moral universe when everything is murky, could there be a

1:03:20.565 --> 1:03:23.445
<v Speaker 1>better It's the first thing we see of Jerry's car

1:03:23.605 --> 1:03:29.245
<v Speaker 1>emerging from this where Marge has arrested Stormare, and she

1:03:29.405 --> 1:03:32.165
<v Speaker 1>pulls over and waits amidst this white out, so that

1:03:32.325 --> 1:03:35.805
<v Speaker 1>for the other police cars to arrive, we get variations

1:03:35.805 --> 1:03:38.685
<v Speaker 1>of it even on night at night. Think about that

1:03:38.805 --> 1:03:41.565
<v Speaker 1>scene where Stormyre is chasing the people who witness them

1:03:41.605 --> 1:03:46.125
<v Speaker 1>shoot the trooper, and we have that karahead disappear into

1:03:46.165 --> 1:03:50.885
<v Speaker 1>the darkness. So much imagery here of not quite being

1:03:50.925 --> 1:03:53.765
<v Speaker 1>able to see what we want to see or get

1:03:53.765 --> 1:03:57.445
<v Speaker 1>our bearings for where we are. And that is practical,

1:03:57.965 --> 1:04:03.485
<v Speaker 1>but it's also deeply existential for almost everyone of these characters.

1:04:03.925 --> 1:04:06.525
<v Speaker 1>And when we think of great cinematography, I think we

1:04:06.565 --> 1:04:11.485
<v Speaker 1>think of dramatic lighting. Lighting, We notice landscapes that are

1:04:11.525 --> 1:04:17.565
<v Speaker 1>clear and overpowering colors just like wow stuff. And what

1:04:17.805 --> 1:04:22.325
<v Speaker 1>Deacons is doing here is take making the most mundane,

1:04:22.645 --> 1:04:28.445
<v Speaker 1>banal visual elements you could hand a cinematographer and creating

1:04:28.925 --> 1:04:35.325
<v Speaker 1>deeply monumental, important, impactful meaning from it in visual terms,

1:04:35.565 --> 1:04:37.365
<v Speaker 1>it's genius.

1:04:37.565 --> 1:04:42.485
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And just creating atmosphere that you feel. You don't

1:04:42.485 --> 1:04:46.485
<v Speaker 3>have to necessarily dissect it, you feel it. The opening

1:04:46.965 --> 1:04:49.725
<v Speaker 3>is that everything about the opening of this film with

1:04:49.765 --> 1:04:52.805
<v Speaker 3>that car emerging, and you described it so well, But

1:04:52.885 --> 1:04:55.765
<v Speaker 3>then you do also have to add in how effectively

1:04:55.805 --> 1:04:59.845
<v Speaker 3>that's working in tandem throughout the entire movie with Cargomerwell's score.

1:04:59.885 --> 1:05:02.205
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, and all this time.

1:05:03.005 --> 1:05:05.645
<v Speaker 3>This I'm going to use to support my overall point

1:05:05.645 --> 1:05:09.325
<v Speaker 3>about this film too. That main theme he's using, it

1:05:09.925 --> 1:05:12.045
<v Speaker 3>has that feel to it, and you look up a

1:05:12.045 --> 1:05:15.045
<v Speaker 3>little bit some of the details on it. He's taken

1:05:15.685 --> 1:05:20.125
<v Speaker 3>a Norwegian folk melody. This this is it is something

1:05:20.165 --> 1:05:24.245
<v Speaker 3>people recognize. This is something people know. He's reappropriated it, right,

1:05:24.285 --> 1:05:27.165
<v Speaker 3>This is a familiar tune and he's using it in

1:05:27.805 --> 1:05:31.925
<v Speaker 3>a new way. But the shot that I do think

1:05:31.965 --> 1:05:34.725
<v Speaker 3>of and the camera isn't You're right, it's not doing

1:05:34.885 --> 1:05:38.765
<v Speaker 3>dramatic things. It doesn't have to. It is how it

1:05:38.805 --> 1:05:41.525
<v Speaker 3>makes you feel. It's what it evokes when you watch

1:05:41.605 --> 1:05:46.125
<v Speaker 3>that aerial shot after that meeting, how it goes so

1:05:46.325 --> 1:05:49.325
<v Speaker 3>terribly wrong, and you know that he has no chance

1:05:49.725 --> 1:05:52.725
<v Speaker 3>of getting this money. That aerial shot of him walking

1:05:52.725 --> 1:05:56.885
<v Speaker 3>to his car, and his car is the only one

1:05:56.885 --> 1:05:58.365
<v Speaker 3>in the parking lot, but you have sort of those

1:05:58.405 --> 1:06:03.205
<v Speaker 3>planters in the lights. The emptiness of that, yeah, isolation,

1:06:03.725 --> 1:06:08.525
<v Speaker 3>the bleakness, and then yes, the indignity of the windshield

1:06:08.605 --> 1:06:12.325
<v Speaker 3>scrape on top of it. It must not be that

1:06:12.445 --> 1:06:14.285
<v Speaker 3>clever of a thing to say, because you said it

1:06:14.325 --> 1:06:16.485
<v Speaker 3>and I had it in my notes too. It is

1:06:16.565 --> 1:06:21.125
<v Speaker 3>the midwesterner's version of Sissyphis's boulder, that is what it is.

1:06:21.405 --> 1:06:23.325
<v Speaker 3>And he just he just gives in and lets the

1:06:23.365 --> 1:06:27.845
<v Speaker 3>boulder roll over him right totally. He just loses it.

1:06:32.125 --> 1:06:34.765
<v Speaker 3>He just can't take it anymore. But but the way

1:06:34.805 --> 1:06:39.365
<v Speaker 3>the county roads are shot, the endlessness to it, the

1:06:39.445 --> 1:06:44.685
<v Speaker 3>endlessness of the fence when when plants the scraper, like

1:06:45.085 --> 1:06:48.125
<v Speaker 3>we know, without knowing anything else that's going to happen,

1:06:48.565 --> 1:06:50.925
<v Speaker 3>that nobody is ever going to find that money until

1:06:50.925 --> 1:06:53.565
<v Speaker 3>it thaws, of course, But but nobody else is ever

1:06:53.645 --> 1:06:56.885
<v Speaker 3>coming back to find where I got to help Scott?

1:06:57.045 --> 1:06:58.485
<v Speaker 1>Is it? I don't know, I don't know how, But

1:06:58.685 --> 1:07:00.285
<v Speaker 1>can Scotty just come across it.

1:07:00.445 --> 1:07:04.405
<v Speaker 3>You hope, But I even noticed this, Josh when that

1:07:04.405 --> 1:07:08.245
<v Speaker 3>that here again, it's an expansive wide shot, and it's

1:07:08.285 --> 1:07:11.645
<v Speaker 3>just how it how Deacons uses the environment, uses that

1:07:11.725 --> 1:07:18.005
<v Speaker 3>white that white space. When Marge has just shot storm

1:07:18.005 --> 1:07:22.165
<v Speaker 3>are grimsrude and she we we see her make that

1:07:22.285 --> 1:07:26.285
<v Speaker 3>long walk as he's laying down and as she goes

1:07:26.325 --> 1:07:30.165
<v Speaker 3>out the way is this the poster too, The way

1:07:30.845 --> 1:07:34.285
<v Speaker 3>the way the trees, the way the trees on the

1:07:34.405 --> 1:07:38.805
<v Speaker 3>land are bent, It couldn't be more perfect. It's as

1:07:38.845 --> 1:07:42.165
<v Speaker 3>if the trees even are are bent towards him, like

1:07:42.205 --> 1:07:46.645
<v Speaker 3>they're like they're incriminating him somehow. There's something about it

1:07:46.685 --> 1:07:51.365
<v Speaker 3>that just feels so right in that moment and ominous

1:07:51.565 --> 1:07:54.685
<v Speaker 3>in a way. Just an extra little bit of that

1:07:54.925 --> 1:07:56.085
<v Speaker 3>tension that you need.

1:07:56.165 --> 1:07:58.125
<v Speaker 1>And your point about the tactile nature of all this,

1:07:58.325 --> 1:08:01.525
<v Speaker 1>you know, hurt the crunching in the snow when she's

1:08:02.085 --> 1:08:04.725
<v Speaker 1>walking out there, when any characters really are walking outside,

1:08:04.765 --> 1:08:08.725
<v Speaker 1>they're very attuned to putting that noise on the soundtrack.

1:08:08.805 --> 1:08:11.405
<v Speaker 1>There is so much, you know, foggy breath in the air.

1:08:11.805 --> 1:08:14.365
<v Speaker 1>We feel the heavy burden of these sweaters and the

1:08:14.445 --> 1:08:17.844
<v Speaker 1>parkas and the gloves and the hats, and it all

1:08:18.005 --> 1:08:23.405
<v Speaker 1>again is not just cultural context even it's also thematic context.

1:08:23.525 --> 1:08:25.764
<v Speaker 1>I did not know that about the Burwell score, but

1:08:25.805 --> 1:08:29.165
<v Speaker 1>that makes perfect sense because I think of it as

1:08:29.205 --> 1:08:34.125
<v Speaker 1>being having quaint elements. I would exactly then builds to

1:08:34.205 --> 1:08:37.205
<v Speaker 1>this momentous which speaks to your point about the myth

1:08:37.245 --> 1:08:41.965
<v Speaker 1>making this momentous almost you know, biblical sense when it

1:08:42.045 --> 1:08:45.205
<v Speaker 1>really starts to swell. So yeah, I think this is

1:08:45.485 --> 1:08:49.525
<v Speaker 1>absolutely all time work from Carter Burwell, as we're as well,

1:08:49.525 --> 1:08:52.885
<v Speaker 1>and it does work really well in concert with the cinematography.

1:08:52.725 --> 1:08:53.845
<v Speaker 1>They are of a piece.

1:08:55.085 --> 1:08:57.405
<v Speaker 3>So Marge, we've been talking a while, but we do

1:08:57.485 --> 1:09:02.045
<v Speaker 3>need to talk about the Best Actress winner, Marge Gunderson

1:09:02.125 --> 1:09:05.564
<v Speaker 3>here a little bit. What stands out about her performance?

1:09:05.605 --> 1:09:07.564
<v Speaker 3>To you? One thing that stood out to me this

1:09:07.645 --> 1:09:10.485
<v Speaker 3>time is realizing that in a ninety eight minute movie,

1:09:10.885 --> 1:09:13.764
<v Speaker 3>the Best Actress winner doesn't show up until thirty minutes

1:09:13.765 --> 1:09:15.724
<v Speaker 3>into the film. Oh crazy, it's amazing.

1:09:16.085 --> 1:09:18.605
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, you know, I didn't. It was more of a

1:09:18.685 --> 1:09:21.325
<v Speaker 1>character realization, as I talked about at length here about

1:09:21.405 --> 1:09:26.085
<v Speaker 1>Marge's wrestling with contentment. But in terms of the performance,

1:09:26.325 --> 1:09:29.125
<v Speaker 1>I would just say, and honestly, I look at I

1:09:29.165 --> 1:09:31.325
<v Speaker 1>don't know why we did this our Coen character's list,

1:09:31.445 --> 1:09:34.285
<v Speaker 1>and I had a group of canon characters at the

1:09:34.285 --> 1:09:38.165
<v Speaker 1>top that I didn't allow for my top five, which

1:09:38.205 --> 1:09:41.725
<v Speaker 1>meant Marge didn't make my top five, which is absolutely asinine.

1:09:41.965 --> 1:09:43.564
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know what I was thinking with all

1:09:43.565 --> 1:09:46.325
<v Speaker 1>of that too. The hell I felt then too many

1:09:46.365 --> 1:09:49.245
<v Speaker 1>characters to consider. I don't know what I was doing anyway.

1:09:50.285 --> 1:09:54.525
<v Speaker 1>The performance itself, I think, is on an even more

1:09:54.685 --> 1:09:58.045
<v Speaker 1>nuanced level than what Stephen Park is doing with Mike Yanagita,

1:09:58.125 --> 1:10:01.125
<v Speaker 1>but asked essentially to do the same thing is to

1:10:01.245 --> 1:10:07.765
<v Speaker 1>be funny and moving and carry the existential weight of

1:10:07.805 --> 1:10:11.724
<v Speaker 1>the movie. And I think McDormand manages all those things.

1:10:12.605 --> 1:10:16.885
<v Speaker 1>She makes Marge's whip smart. She has her own sense

1:10:16.885 --> 1:10:20.045
<v Speaker 1>of humor that's not outside you know, you could argue,

1:10:20.285 --> 1:10:22.885
<v Speaker 1>and maybe one the nitpicks with this goes back to

1:10:22.885 --> 1:10:25.885
<v Speaker 1>the loquacious Criminals, is that Storm Mayer and Bushemi, as

1:10:25.965 --> 1:10:28.285
<v Speaker 1>entertaining as they are, are very much movie types, right.

1:10:28.765 --> 1:10:30.965
<v Speaker 1>They're funny the way people are funny in the movies.

1:10:31.645 --> 1:10:34.804
<v Speaker 1>Marge is both funny for the movie and a funny person.

1:10:35.365 --> 1:10:40.045
<v Speaker 1>And I think that it takes skill. For mcdormant to

1:10:40.085 --> 1:10:42.165
<v Speaker 1>be able to do both of those things at the

1:10:42.205 --> 1:10:45.525
<v Speaker 1>same time, she's completely believable. She's part police chief, part

1:10:46.005 --> 1:10:49.045
<v Speaker 1>your favorite primary school teacher. You know, she's like the

1:10:49.085 --> 1:10:51.205
<v Speaker 1>school teacher doesn't want to yell at the kids, but

1:10:51.885 --> 1:10:55.125
<v Speaker 1>if she has to, she will, and she'll do it firmly,

1:10:55.525 --> 1:10:59.725
<v Speaker 1>and you know she doesn't. Basically, she's always seems disappointed

1:11:00.645 --> 1:11:04.685
<v Speaker 1>but not reluctant to arrest a wrongdoer. And I think

1:11:04.685 --> 1:11:07.005
<v Speaker 1>it's because she sees the good in people or wants to.

1:11:07.565 --> 1:11:09.604
<v Speaker 1>I think it relates to what I've been talking about.

1:11:09.645 --> 1:11:12.485
<v Speaker 1>I think she sees and thinks of herself as good,

1:11:13.445 --> 1:11:16.445
<v Speaker 1>essentially at the bottom of it good and is deeply

1:11:16.445 --> 1:11:20.045
<v Speaker 1>distressed when she realizes that she might struggle with things too.

1:11:20.685 --> 1:11:23.365
<v Speaker 1>And if you are asking her to also do all

1:11:23.445 --> 1:11:26.085
<v Speaker 1>of this in that last it's not even a conversation.

1:11:26.165 --> 1:11:28.804
<v Speaker 1>The monologue too, Stormayer in the back of her prowler,

1:11:30.325 --> 1:11:34.045
<v Speaker 1>just musing. There's one thing, Adam, when you ask a

1:11:34.125 --> 1:11:38.125
<v Speaker 1>character to deliver the thematic huft of a film, and

1:11:38.285 --> 1:11:42.365
<v Speaker 1>the character is doing that. In other words, that's in

1:11:42.405 --> 1:11:44.725
<v Speaker 1>the realm of the story. The character is giving the

1:11:44.805 --> 1:11:48.325
<v Speaker 1>lesson in that scene, we're getting the thematic huft of

1:11:48.365 --> 1:11:53.125
<v Speaker 1>the film, I feel, and Marge Gunderson is realizing it

1:11:53.685 --> 1:11:57.485
<v Speaker 1>herself in the moment as she's talking. And that's the

1:11:57.605 --> 1:12:01.125
<v Speaker 1>level of performance we're getting there, is that this growing

1:12:01.245 --> 1:12:04.725
<v Speaker 1>self awareness that is opening up to the character the

1:12:04.765 --> 1:12:06.285
<v Speaker 1>same time it's opening to the audience.

1:12:06.685 --> 1:12:08.805
<v Speaker 5>There's more to life than a little money, you know,

1:12:19.645 --> 1:12:31.165
<v Speaker 5>don't you know that? And here you are and it's

1:12:31.165 --> 1:12:33.445
<v Speaker 5>a beautiful day.

1:12:34.205 --> 1:12:40.205
<v Speaker 3>The best performances always feel like they're not overly calculated.

1:12:40.365 --> 1:12:43.405
<v Speaker 3>They feel like real life. They feel like characters are

1:12:43.845 --> 1:12:50.205
<v Speaker 3>discovering themselves and their emotions or whatever their epiphanies are

1:12:50.365 --> 1:12:54.644
<v Speaker 3>in the moment. And that is how this character feels throughout,

1:12:54.725 --> 1:12:58.885
<v Speaker 3>not only with important ideas, but also just moment to

1:12:58.965 --> 1:13:03.445
<v Speaker 3>moment with the humor. We now or in the wake

1:13:03.485 --> 1:13:08.885
<v Speaker 3>of this movie, we can call on certain lines or

1:13:08.925 --> 1:13:12.125
<v Speaker 3>it becomes sort of an SNL type punchline with the

1:13:12.205 --> 1:13:14.805
<v Speaker 3>accent and certain things that she says. But when you

1:13:14.965 --> 1:13:17.685
<v Speaker 3>watch it, when you actually watch her say things like

1:13:18.165 --> 1:13:22.365
<v Speaker 3>that's your accomplice in the wood Chipper, she's not mcdormand's

1:13:22.445 --> 1:13:28.804
<v Speaker 3>not overdoing anything in this film. She is downplaying everything

1:13:28.885 --> 1:13:33.005
<v Speaker 3>and playing this character completely straight, and to your point

1:13:33.045 --> 1:13:36.485
<v Speaker 3>about her seeing the good and everything, you can actually

1:13:36.605 --> 1:13:40.845
<v Speaker 3>argue she's not that great of a cop because shep

1:13:40.965 --> 1:13:44.805
<v Speaker 3>is totally suspect and Jerry is very suspect based on

1:13:44.845 --> 1:13:47.525
<v Speaker 3>their behavior, and what does she do. She takes them

1:13:47.525 --> 1:13:50.245
<v Speaker 3>at their words. She's about ready to head home without

1:13:50.285 --> 1:13:54.285
<v Speaker 3>further investigation. But that's also something I like about the

1:13:54.365 --> 1:13:59.644
<v Speaker 3>character is people describe Marge and I also in fairness.

1:13:59.685 --> 1:14:03.925
<v Speaker 3>I mean, mcdorman's wonderful. There's just no questioning that. But

1:14:04.045 --> 1:14:05.965
<v Speaker 3>a lot of times, if we're being honest with ourselves,

1:14:06.005 --> 1:14:08.005
<v Speaker 3>when we're talking about how much we love a performance,

1:14:08.325 --> 1:14:10.325
<v Speaker 3>a lot of times we are talking about the nuance

1:14:10.685 --> 1:14:14.405
<v Speaker 3>of the character and the dimensions to that character and

1:14:14.445 --> 1:14:20.684
<v Speaker 3>what that performer brings out. And with this character, nothing

1:14:21.765 --> 1:14:28.165
<v Speaker 3>the sheriff, nothing Marge Gunderson does, feels extraordinary. And that's

1:14:28.205 --> 1:14:32.045
<v Speaker 3>so appropriate for this film because in so many ways,

1:14:32.085 --> 1:14:36.085
<v Speaker 3>not only is it the Midwest and whatever, but in

1:14:36.165 --> 1:14:40.405
<v Speaker 3>so many ways this film is puncturing this notion of

1:14:40.605 --> 1:14:45.445
<v Speaker 3>traditional crime thrillers with many things that it's doing, and

1:14:46.605 --> 1:14:49.765
<v Speaker 3>in that regard, this sheriff is not one of those

1:14:49.805 --> 1:14:53.604
<v Speaker 3>detectives or one of those lawyers where they have some

1:14:53.805 --> 1:14:58.405
<v Speaker 3>extraordinary talent or always come up with some magical insight

1:14:58.485 --> 1:15:00.885
<v Speaker 3>at the last minute. What does she do. She's just

1:15:01.005 --> 1:15:05.804
<v Speaker 3>doing very solid, fundamental police work. That's how she solves

1:15:05.805 --> 1:15:11.085
<v Speaker 3>this case. She's just following leads. Yeah. And and the

1:15:11.125 --> 1:15:14.285
<v Speaker 3>thing is that even Lou and the other cops, even

1:15:14.285 --> 1:15:17.724
<v Speaker 3>though maybe we maybe we want to be a little

1:15:17.725 --> 1:15:21.005
<v Speaker 3>condescending or someone could be because of their accents watching it,

1:15:21.085 --> 1:15:24.684
<v Speaker 3>guess what, they're fine cops. They do their job too.

1:15:24.965 --> 1:15:27.085
<v Speaker 3>They do their job well. The only thing that she

1:15:27.325 --> 1:15:29.845
<v Speaker 3>is smarter than Lou about is that she deciphers what

1:15:30.005 --> 1:15:33.885
<v Speaker 3>DLR means. Otherwise they all do their jobs. There's nothing

1:15:34.085 --> 1:15:39.925
<v Speaker 3>there's nothing actually silly or dumb about any of those characters.

1:15:40.005 --> 1:15:41.845
<v Speaker 3>There's no there's no Barney Fif's here. And so I

1:15:41.885 --> 1:15:44.845
<v Speaker 3>love the fact that she's she's just a good cop.

1:15:45.125 --> 1:15:47.405
<v Speaker 3>She's a good sheriff is what is what she is,

1:15:47.525 --> 1:15:51.325
<v Speaker 3>And the discovery to her character I think is really

1:15:51.405 --> 1:15:54.885
<v Speaker 3>app There's just no there's no glibness, and there's no

1:15:55.045 --> 1:15:59.325
<v Speaker 3>attempt to play Marge as a funny character.

1:15:59.485 --> 1:16:02.845
<v Speaker 1>And that's so important, which brings us, you know, back

1:16:02.885 --> 1:16:05.965
<v Speaker 1>to I think it sounds like from that conversation Amy

1:16:06.045 --> 1:16:08.925
<v Speaker 1>Nicholson did observe and was right about, is like there

1:16:09.085 --> 1:16:12.125
<v Speaker 1>is this there's not only this interdecency to Marge, but

1:16:12.205 --> 1:16:16.965
<v Speaker 1>there's a appreciation of it and a yearning for it

1:16:17.005 --> 1:16:19.805
<v Speaker 1>in others to Marge, which does stand outside of the

1:16:19.805 --> 1:16:22.405
<v Speaker 1>Cohen can I think absolutely.

1:16:23.085 --> 1:16:26.285
<v Speaker 3>Just finally going back to Macy real quick and myth

1:16:26.325 --> 1:16:30.285
<v Speaker 3>making or storytelling and deception. His best scene, his best

1:16:30.325 --> 1:16:34.485
<v Speaker 3>moment might actually be when he has to perform and

1:16:34.525 --> 1:16:38.325
<v Speaker 3>we start off camera hearing him rehearsing what he's going

1:16:38.365 --> 1:16:41.645
<v Speaker 3>to say after he finds out the gene is gone. Yeah,

1:16:41.805 --> 1:16:45.125
<v Speaker 3>and and then of course what happens when he actually

1:16:45.805 --> 1:16:48.525
<v Speaker 3>gets on the line with the real receptionist or whatever.

1:16:48.685 --> 1:16:51.725
<v Speaker 3>He can't he can't perform. He just wage gust of

1:16:51.805 --> 1:16:53.685
<v Speaker 3>simple or whatever he says. You know, he just he

1:16:53.765 --> 1:16:56.845
<v Speaker 3>just goes into normal mode. But he's he's rehearsing it

1:16:57.365 --> 1:17:00.285
<v Speaker 3>because he knows at this point he's he's supposed to

1:17:00.365 --> 1:17:02.925
<v Speaker 3>do something. He's supposed to pretend, he's supposed to put

1:17:02.965 --> 1:17:05.724
<v Speaker 3>on a certain behavior. But I said that the movie

1:17:05.805 --> 1:17:10.325
<v Speaker 3>punctures our expectations in that way. This is the brilliance

1:17:10.365 --> 1:17:12.724
<v Speaker 3>again I'll use that word of the Cone Brothers moments

1:17:12.805 --> 1:17:18.685
<v Speaker 3>like Bouscemi walking up to the glass, and rather than

1:17:18.725 --> 1:17:22.965
<v Speaker 3>it feeling like a thrilling moment from a crime movie,

1:17:23.845 --> 1:17:28.325
<v Speaker 3>the break in, she does what I think a lot

1:17:28.325 --> 1:17:30.125
<v Speaker 3>of us actually would do in that moment is we'd

1:17:30.125 --> 1:17:32.405
<v Speaker 3>sit there and go what the hell is happening? We

1:17:32.445 --> 1:17:35.525
<v Speaker 3>wouldn't know how to uly react, And she doesn't really

1:17:35.565 --> 1:17:39.604
<v Speaker 3>react until it gets crazy when he breaks the glass

1:17:39.645 --> 1:17:43.885
<v Speaker 3>and the violence Josh of the dark humor the way

1:17:44.245 --> 1:17:46.644
<v Speaker 3>and only the Cone Brothers do it on this level,

1:17:47.205 --> 1:17:50.805
<v Speaker 3>that balancing of dark humor, where when she comes out

1:17:50.845 --> 1:17:54.525
<v Speaker 3>of the shower like a chicken with its head cut

1:17:54.565 --> 1:17:57.525
<v Speaker 3>off with a shower curtain and falls down the stairs,

1:17:58.685 --> 1:18:02.405
<v Speaker 3>there's a part of you, inevitably that wants to or

1:18:02.525 --> 1:18:06.045
<v Speaker 3>can't help but laugh, because there's something apherently funny about

1:18:06.045 --> 1:18:08.604
<v Speaker 3>a character running around like that, even though it's terrifying.

1:18:09.405 --> 1:18:14.604
<v Speaker 3>And then what happens later it's mirrored when she gets

1:18:14.645 --> 1:18:16.604
<v Speaker 3>out with the bag over her head at the house

1:18:16.765 --> 1:18:19.445
<v Speaker 3>at the lake and she starts running around again crazy,

1:18:19.645 --> 1:18:23.205
<v Speaker 3>except now they're nothing funny about it. Now we know,

1:18:24.565 --> 1:18:26.885
<v Speaker 3>now we know what those characters are capable of now

1:18:26.885 --> 1:18:30.205
<v Speaker 3>we know that she's in real danger, and it's it's

1:18:30.365 --> 1:18:34.165
<v Speaker 3>it's a heightened experience from a terror standpoint.

1:18:34.085 --> 1:18:36.245
<v Speaker 1>Real quick, and maybe listeners can help with us. It's

1:18:36.245 --> 1:18:40.005
<v Speaker 1>something I noticed regarding that break in sequence when she's

1:18:40.045 --> 1:18:43.604
<v Speaker 1>watching that morning TV host or TV show. The host

1:18:43.725 --> 1:18:46.644
<v Speaker 1>says they're talking about a cruise event that they want

1:18:46.965 --> 1:18:50.245
<v Speaker 1>a contest, they want people to enter, and I think

1:18:50.325 --> 1:18:54.365
<v Speaker 1>the the host ends signs off with like, that's the truth, Ruth.

1:18:55.085 --> 1:18:58.005
<v Speaker 1>And I'm thinking to myself, I think that I've only

1:18:58.085 --> 1:19:01.285
<v Speaker 1>heard that and do the right thing, right Jackson, and

1:19:01.605 --> 1:19:03.965
<v Speaker 1>and so I did a quick search if that's a

1:19:03.965 --> 1:19:07.644
<v Speaker 1>phrase that pre dates do the right thing, and I didn't.

1:19:07.765 --> 1:19:13.564
<v Speaker 1>It has anything. There must be something. It was just

1:19:13.685 --> 1:19:16.765
<v Speaker 1>like so bizarre that that shows up in this like

1:19:17.245 --> 1:19:22.525
<v Speaker 1>whitebread morning TV host. Now that's the throwaway sequence in Firego.

1:19:22.645 --> 1:19:24.604
<v Speaker 1>I was like, what is going on here? If anyone

1:19:24.645 --> 1:19:27.165
<v Speaker 1>knows the backstory, let us know. But I think we've

1:19:27.165 --> 1:19:29.725
<v Speaker 1>had a day so much about Firego. That's where we've

1:19:30.165 --> 1:19:32.525
<v Speaker 1>ended up on that little tidbit.

1:19:33.045 --> 1:19:38.245
<v Speaker 3>Bargo currently streaming on Netflix and twob and is available vod.

1:19:39.205 --> 1:19:43.005
<v Speaker 3>Let's take a minute to thank family members Joseph Carr

1:19:43.005 --> 1:19:48.765
<v Speaker 3>in Barnett, North London, and Michael Soderberg in Tucson, Arizona.

1:19:49.245 --> 1:19:51.365
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to them both, they wrote in with a few

1:19:51.405 --> 1:19:54.085
<v Speaker 1>notes for us. Joseph told us this membership has been

1:19:54.085 --> 1:19:56.564
<v Speaker 1>a long time coming. Okay. The first email I sent

1:19:56.565 --> 1:19:58.925
<v Speaker 1>to you, guys was in twenty time film Spotting number

1:19:58.965 --> 1:20:02.245
<v Speaker 1>three oh seven, which was a Mattie Ballgame plus guest

1:20:02.445 --> 1:20:06.525
<v Speaker 1>Steve Procopi episode about musical moments. So it's been at

1:20:06.645 --> 1:20:10.125
<v Speaker 1>least fifteen years. As for Michael, he said, I don't

1:20:10.125 --> 1:20:12.604
<v Speaker 1>remember how I found you, but I'm a fairly new listener.

1:20:12.925 --> 1:20:15.765
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the earliest episodes was Hobbs and

1:20:15.925 --> 1:20:20.085
<v Speaker 1>Shaw in twenty nineteen. I remember really enjoying the mix

1:20:20.165 --> 1:20:24.485
<v Speaker 1>of both high and low art in your selections that,

1:20:25.285 --> 1:20:27.085
<v Speaker 1>let me make clear at him that is Fast and

1:20:27.125 --> 1:20:29.724
<v Speaker 1>Furious presents Hobbs in Shaw.

1:20:30.165 --> 1:20:33.445
<v Speaker 3>Yes, thank you, good movie. I don't think I agreed

1:20:33.485 --> 1:20:36.684
<v Speaker 3>with you quite as much on that episode, but tie

1:20:36.685 --> 1:20:39.925
<v Speaker 3>back to Fargo. High and Low, a kidnapping movie that's

1:20:39.965 --> 1:20:44.525
<v Speaker 3>one of the Coen Brothers' favorites. Appropriate to our Fargo conversation.

1:20:44.605 --> 1:20:46.885
<v Speaker 3>I love that Joseph got turned onto film spotting with

1:20:46.965 --> 1:20:50.405
<v Speaker 3>an episode that neither of us were posts on and

1:20:50.445 --> 1:20:54.325
<v Speaker 3>he's still listening. That's a good stuck around. Okay, Favorite

1:20:54.325 --> 1:20:57.005
<v Speaker 3>show segments, Joseph says, it's the marathons that I fell

1:20:57.045 --> 1:20:58.564
<v Speaker 3>in love with. There are so many that have opened

1:20:58.605 --> 1:21:03.965
<v Speaker 3>my world. Lubitch, Ray Brassan Ofles, That's Satuga, not Nicholas Oofles,

1:21:04.045 --> 1:21:06.925
<v Speaker 3>Iranian Cinema, all of which I'd probably never have come

1:21:06.965 --> 1:21:09.405
<v Speaker 3>across except through film spotting. But if there's one marathon

1:21:09.445 --> 1:21:12.165
<v Speaker 3>that stands out to me in particular, it's Powlin Pressberger,

1:21:12.405 --> 1:21:15.564
<v Speaker 3>whose films I've revisited many many times over the years,

1:21:15.605 --> 1:21:19.285
<v Speaker 3>including on the big screen. Colonel Blint for the Win. Yes,

1:21:19.925 --> 1:21:22.845
<v Speaker 3>Michael says, I always loved the Oscars episodes with Michael

1:21:22.885 --> 1:21:26.045
<v Speaker 3>Phillips and the seeming ambivalence with which everyone approaches the

1:21:26.085 --> 1:21:29.525
<v Speaker 3>Academy Awards. This is perfect, Like I don't care, but

1:21:29.605 --> 1:21:30.725
<v Speaker 3>also I kind of do.

1:21:32.005 --> 1:21:34.445
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I think Michael may honestly, nothing.

1:21:34.165 --> 1:21:37.525
<v Speaker 3>Sums it up better like I don't care, but I

1:21:37.685 --> 1:21:38.725
<v Speaker 3>also kind of do.

1:21:39.485 --> 1:21:42.445
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, that's it. You gotta Michael, nicely done. We

1:21:42.485 --> 1:21:44.205
<v Speaker 1>asked them both if there was a review we got

1:21:44.205 --> 1:21:47.365
<v Speaker 1>wrong for Joseph. I don't generally get on with Christopher

1:21:47.445 --> 1:21:50.885
<v Speaker 1>Nolan films, with some notable exceptions, and I still cringe

1:21:50.925 --> 1:21:54.205
<v Speaker 1>at the dialogue I recall from Interstellar. I probably need

1:21:54.245 --> 1:21:56.245
<v Speaker 1>to revisit it to give it a second chance. But

1:21:56.325 --> 1:21:58.965
<v Speaker 1>my recollection of the opening scenes of Interstellar is that

1:21:59.005 --> 1:22:02.365
<v Speaker 1>the dialogue seems so functional, expository, and clunky that I

1:22:02.445 --> 1:22:04.885
<v Speaker 1>just can't bring myself to spend my precious time to

1:22:04.965 --> 1:22:08.365
<v Speaker 1>reconsider it. I think that puts me on team Josh.

1:22:08.525 --> 1:22:10.045
<v Speaker 3>I guess so we're cool.

1:22:10.085 --> 1:22:13.165
<v Speaker 1>We're close, sir. I've warmed to Interstellar, but I do

1:22:13.285 --> 1:22:17.485
<v Speaker 1>still have those concerns Joseph, so sure, welcome teammate.

1:22:18.005 --> 1:22:20.165
<v Speaker 3>Well. I hope Joseph. I don't know for sure when

1:22:20.165 --> 1:22:22.125
<v Speaker 3>he submitted this. It could have been a while ago.

1:22:22.165 --> 1:22:25.485
<v Speaker 3>I hope Joseph has a chance to listen to the

1:22:25.565 --> 1:22:28.765
<v Speaker 3>movie Deathmatch episode we just published in our feed this

1:22:28.845 --> 1:22:32.405
<v Speaker 3>week in honor of the Odyssey coming out. We've got

1:22:32.565 --> 1:22:37.765
<v Speaker 3>pop culture scientists Abigail James talking about Interstellar, defending that

1:22:38.005 --> 1:22:44.885
<v Speaker 3>against Bilga Abiri and Inception. Very enlightening conversation. Who knows,

1:22:44.925 --> 1:22:48.125
<v Speaker 3>she might just change your opinion about Interstellar or at

1:22:48.205 --> 1:22:51.045
<v Speaker 3>least give you some fodder to revisit the film. So

1:22:51.605 --> 1:22:54.525
<v Speaker 3>we thank you Joseph and Michael for being family members

1:22:54.605 --> 1:22:57.604
<v Speaker 3>and for all of those years of listening to the show.

1:22:57.805 --> 1:23:00.845
<v Speaker 3>You can follow Joseph on letterbox. He is film Egg.

1:23:01.325 --> 1:23:06.045
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty self explanatory. Michael is at Mix. That's m

1:23:06.125 --> 1:23:09.925
<v Speaker 3>i ckes. There you go. In addition to keeping us

1:23:09.925 --> 1:23:13.005
<v Speaker 3>doing what we're doing, membership comes with perks like listening

1:23:13.005 --> 1:23:15.765
<v Speaker 3>early in ed free our weekly newsletter, get to be

1:23:15.765 --> 1:23:18.245
<v Speaker 3>part of the Film Spotting Family discord. You get monthly

1:23:18.285 --> 1:23:22.645
<v Speaker 3>bonus shows like our recent discussion of David Robert Mitchell's

1:23:22.685 --> 1:23:26.325
<v Speaker 3>It Follows and our July bonus. Since we do have

1:23:27.085 --> 1:23:30.365
<v Speaker 3>coming up next week our top five films of the

1:23:30.445 --> 1:23:34.325
<v Speaker 3>year so far, we're gonna riff on our favorite performances

1:23:34.565 --> 1:23:36.725
<v Speaker 3>of the year so far. So we're gonna check in

1:23:37.685 --> 1:23:40.365
<v Speaker 3>to get working through lists years and yeah, and then

1:23:40.445 --> 1:23:44.085
<v Speaker 3>Josh Film Spotting Madness Best of the twenties and thirties,

1:23:44.085 --> 1:23:48.925
<v Speaker 3>an exclusive tournament with prizes, Bracket challenge with prizes we're

1:23:48.925 --> 1:23:52.205
<v Speaker 3>gonna give away. Oh man, we had a couple things

1:23:52.245 --> 1:23:54.205
<v Speaker 3>to give away. I'm blanking now I know one of

1:23:54.245 --> 1:23:59.285
<v Speaker 3>them is a signed Film Spotting Fest two poster. Very

1:23:59.365 --> 1:24:03.365
<v Speaker 3>nice and give that away. We are doing that exclusively

1:24:03.405 --> 1:24:06.285
<v Speaker 3>for the film Spotting Family that's gonna start Monday the thirteenth,

1:24:06.325 --> 1:24:08.925
<v Speaker 3>So if you want to participate in that, you just

1:24:08.965 --> 1:24:11.765
<v Speaker 3>got to be a family member. You have time learn

1:24:11.805 --> 1:24:14.445
<v Speaker 3>more at film Spottingfamily dot com.

1:24:14.565 --> 1:24:19.965
<v Speaker 4>Hi, Hi, come in, nice to see you. We are

1:24:20.125 --> 1:24:21.604
<v Speaker 4>so happy fear here.

1:24:23.205 --> 1:24:27.165
<v Speaker 3>The Invite is Olivia Wilde's third film as a director.

1:24:27.245 --> 1:24:29.885
<v Speaker 3>She made BookSmart in twenty nineteen, followed that up with

1:24:30.005 --> 1:24:33.165
<v Speaker 3>Don't Worry Darling in twenty twenty two. That was a

1:24:33.165 --> 1:24:37.005
<v Speaker 3>film that was largely piled on by audiences and critics,

1:24:37.605 --> 1:24:40.245
<v Speaker 3>including me. But you went for it so much so,

1:24:40.285 --> 1:24:43.165
<v Speaker 3>in fact, that it made your top ten list in

1:24:43.245 --> 1:24:48.325
<v Speaker 3>twenty two. You have seen The Invite, which also stars

1:24:48.365 --> 1:24:51.845
<v Speaker 3>wild with Seth Rogen as her husband, and Penelope Cruz

1:24:51.965 --> 1:24:58.564
<v Speaker 3>and Edward Norton as their enigmatic neighbors. Is wild for you? Batting?

1:24:58.645 --> 1:25:02.165
<v Speaker 3>Three for three, perfect one hundred, perfect, one thousand. I

1:25:02.165 --> 1:25:02.964
<v Speaker 3>should say.

1:25:03.445 --> 1:25:08.325
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely this was a delight. I don't know, it just felt,

1:25:08.805 --> 1:25:12.405
<v Speaker 1>you know, comic chamber drama. It's not necessarily that inventive.

1:25:12.485 --> 1:25:14.685
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the last time I saw one a

1:25:14.765 --> 1:25:18.724
<v Speaker 1>genre piece like this that was just so fun to see,

1:25:18.805 --> 1:25:22.325
<v Speaker 1>especially with a theater with a crowd. And I also

1:25:22.405 --> 1:25:26.125
<v Speaker 1>don't know, Adam, I'll have to think about this some more,

1:25:26.325 --> 1:25:30.525
<v Speaker 1>But we've had directors who give lead or co lead

1:25:30.565 --> 1:25:34.325
<v Speaker 1>performances in the movies they're directing. How often is it

1:25:35.085 --> 1:25:38.685
<v Speaker 1>that the best thing about that movie is the director's

1:25:39.525 --> 1:25:43.125
<v Speaker 1>lead or co lead performance, Because for me, that's what

1:25:43.165 --> 1:25:47.605
<v Speaker 1>we get here. Wild is on screen the standout of

1:25:47.645 --> 1:25:51.564
<v Speaker 1>the invite for me, and that is while acknowledging that

1:25:51.725 --> 1:25:56.005
<v Speaker 1>all four of the main characters, the main players in

1:25:56.045 --> 1:25:59.405
<v Speaker 1>this cast are fantastic. They each do their own thing

1:25:59.965 --> 1:26:02.684
<v Speaker 1>that makes this movie work as well as it does,

1:26:02.845 --> 1:26:05.564
<v Speaker 1>I mean to give them their credit. At Rogan Is

1:26:06.245 --> 1:26:09.365
<v Speaker 1>he's delivering the one liners you'd expect, but also probably

1:26:09.445 --> 1:26:12.325
<v Speaker 1>delivering the deepest well of sadness that this movie has,

1:26:12.925 --> 1:26:16.325
<v Speaker 1>So he's doing great work. You look at Edward Norton,

1:26:16.765 --> 1:26:20.644
<v Speaker 1>just delightful also as this kind of a zen prankster,

1:26:21.125 --> 1:26:24.925
<v Speaker 1>this calm, but he's disrupting things at the same time.

1:26:25.485 --> 1:26:28.245
<v Speaker 1>And Cruise. It's interesting because I haven't seen every one

1:26:28.285 --> 1:26:31.325
<v Speaker 1>of her English language performances, and she's given some good ones,

1:26:31.925 --> 1:26:35.485
<v Speaker 1>but this is I think her best that I have seen.

1:26:35.685 --> 1:26:39.525
<v Speaker 1>This is adapted from a Spanish language play that was

1:26:39.565 --> 1:26:42.604
<v Speaker 1>turned into a movie. She wasn't involved in either of those,

1:26:43.045 --> 1:26:46.405
<v Speaker 1>so I don't know if there's any perhaps some cultural

1:26:46.645 --> 1:26:51.604
<v Speaker 1>translation going on here that allowed her to deliver such

1:26:51.605 --> 1:26:54.045
<v Speaker 1>a great performance here. But she's really sharp in terms

1:26:54.085 --> 1:26:57.564
<v Speaker 1>of the repartee and also has this she's a sly

1:26:57.725 --> 1:27:01.885
<v Speaker 1>provocateur as well. Just a glance that Penelope Cruz gives

1:27:01.925 --> 1:27:04.965
<v Speaker 1>in scenes here will throw the entire dynamic off in

1:27:05.005 --> 1:27:07.965
<v Speaker 1>a chaotic way. So she's really good. But Wild Adam

1:27:08.925 --> 1:27:13.485
<v Speaker 1>is the gyrations on her face playing this woman who

1:27:13.565 --> 1:27:17.684
<v Speaker 1>is deeply constricted, which we've seen that type. But also

1:27:18.285 --> 1:27:19.885
<v Speaker 1>again it goes back to what you're talking about in

1:27:19.965 --> 1:27:23.205
<v Speaker 1>Firego realize over the course of this night, what she's

1:27:23.285 --> 1:27:29.965
<v Speaker 1>willing to entertain to bring something fresh and new to

1:27:30.085 --> 1:27:35.365
<v Speaker 1>her life, to her marriage, to herself, and the way

1:27:35.405 --> 1:27:38.325
<v Speaker 1>Wild responds to things that her husband says or that

1:27:38.405 --> 1:27:41.564
<v Speaker 1>her neighbors say, and then eventually to things that she

1:27:41.765 --> 1:27:45.925
<v Speaker 1>says and she starts surprising herself. It is just a

1:27:45.965 --> 1:27:47.925
<v Speaker 1>phrase that kept coming to mind is one that you'll

1:27:47.965 --> 1:27:52.045
<v Speaker 1>hear on like NBA podcasts. It's a quick twitch performance

1:27:52.125 --> 1:27:56.845
<v Speaker 1>where just like the muscles are there doing immediately what

1:27:56.885 --> 1:27:59.325
<v Speaker 1>she needs them to do for every moment in a

1:27:59.365 --> 1:28:03.965
<v Speaker 1>movie that's incredibly fast and quick and quippy. And yeah,

1:28:03.965 --> 1:28:06.325
<v Speaker 1>the invite is it's some of the most fun I've

1:28:06.365 --> 1:28:08.885
<v Speaker 1>had in a theater this kind of fun in quite

1:28:08.925 --> 1:28:11.245
<v Speaker 1>a while. So people need to get out there and

1:28:11.325 --> 1:28:12.245
<v Speaker 1>check this out.

1:28:12.365 --> 1:28:15.085
<v Speaker 3>It expands to more cities this weekend. I will finally

1:28:15.085 --> 1:28:17.485
<v Speaker 3>get a chance to see it this weekend. I hope

1:28:17.485 --> 1:28:20.604
<v Speaker 3>I have as much fun as you, and who knows,

1:28:20.645 --> 1:28:23.445
<v Speaker 3>maybe it will make my top five list next week

1:28:23.445 --> 1:28:26.684
<v Speaker 3>when we share our favorite films of the year so far.

1:28:27.325 --> 1:28:29.405
<v Speaker 4>I had a celebrity free past thing with my fiance,

1:28:29.525 --> 1:28:31.245
<v Speaker 4>but he took it literally, so now I need to

1:28:31.245 --> 1:28:32.845
<v Speaker 4>have sex with John Ham to even out the score

1:28:32.885 --> 1:28:33.885
<v Speaker 4>and save my relationship.

1:28:33.965 --> 1:28:34.605
<v Speaker 5>You do the do you know?

1:28:34.965 --> 1:28:38.485
<v Speaker 3>I do the doos Gaale needs to do the nasty

1:28:38.565 --> 1:28:44.445
<v Speaker 3>with mister John hamm asap seems so so sorry that

1:28:44.485 --> 1:28:45.045
<v Speaker 3>we got.

1:28:44.845 --> 1:28:48.604
<v Speaker 1>You fired, right, Adam. We both caught up with director

1:28:48.685 --> 1:28:52.445
<v Speaker 1>David Wayne's latest Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass.

1:28:53.325 --> 1:28:56.485
<v Speaker 1>That title plus directed by David Wayne, should give you

1:28:56.525 --> 1:28:59.125
<v Speaker 1>some idea of what's going on with this movie. It

1:28:59.165 --> 1:29:02.445
<v Speaker 1>stars Zoey Deutsch as Gail, a small town woman who's

1:29:02.965 --> 1:29:07.724
<v Speaker 1>fiance takes their celebrity sex pass joke literally. That puts

1:29:07.725 --> 1:29:09.805
<v Speaker 1>her on a mission to even the playing field and

1:29:09.885 --> 1:29:13.365
<v Speaker 1>have sex with a guy named John Ham. So she

1:29:13.445 --> 1:29:16.405
<v Speaker 1>heads to La with that in mind. Adam, we've been

1:29:16.405 --> 1:29:18.765
<v Speaker 1>talking about David Wayne on the show because we hot

1:29:18.845 --> 1:29:22.765
<v Speaker 1>American Summer. His prob we most beloved film was part

1:29:22.765 --> 1:29:26.525
<v Speaker 1>of Film Spotting Fest two a couple of weekends ago,

1:29:27.005 --> 1:29:31.245
<v Speaker 1>and we had David Wayne introduce that screening with a

1:29:31.325 --> 1:29:34.845
<v Speaker 1>video he was kind enough to send in. He's been

1:29:34.885 --> 1:29:37.165
<v Speaker 1>listening to the show for years now. You know, this

1:29:37.205 --> 1:29:39.405
<v Speaker 1>always makes me nervous when I hear of anyone at

1:29:39.445 --> 1:29:42.725
<v Speaker 1>any level of filmmaking, Yes, who happens to listen to

1:29:42.765 --> 1:29:46.525
<v Speaker 1>the show. Makes me feel like a fraud, especially so

1:29:46.645 --> 1:29:50.925
<v Speaker 1>when it's an accomplished, beloved filmmaker like David Wayne. So

1:29:52.165 --> 1:29:54.685
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, this isn't a review we're letting I'm

1:29:54.765 --> 1:29:57.605
<v Speaker 1>letting people know that a friend of the show is

1:29:57.645 --> 1:30:01.205
<v Speaker 1>a new movie out, And what I can say is

1:30:01.285 --> 1:30:03.564
<v Speaker 1>one of the things I talked about when we watched

1:30:03.605 --> 1:30:05.925
<v Speaker 1>Wet Hot American Summer and discussed it afterward. Is the

1:30:05.965 --> 1:30:08.965
<v Speaker 1>absurdism that I think I didn't give enough credit for

1:30:09.005 --> 1:30:11.644
<v Speaker 1>it to Wet Hot American Summer when I first saw

1:30:11.685 --> 1:30:16.165
<v Speaker 1>that come out. And I think the one absurd touch

1:30:16.165 --> 1:30:18.405
<v Speaker 1>I want to highlight here, which isn't a spoiler at all.

1:30:19.005 --> 1:30:22.365
<v Speaker 1>It's a minor character, John Ham's guard. I forget how

1:30:22.405 --> 1:30:25.405
<v Speaker 1>he even gets into this story about going to a bullfight,

1:30:25.965 --> 1:30:27.485
<v Speaker 1>and I forget if he's there with his wife or

1:30:27.525 --> 1:30:30.845
<v Speaker 1>his girlfriend or something. Yeah, the bull, the bull leaps

1:30:30.885 --> 1:30:34.205
<v Speaker 1>into the stands and impales her or It's this gory,

1:30:34.725 --> 1:30:37.045
<v Speaker 1>horrible story that keeps going on. It has no reason

1:30:37.085 --> 1:30:41.085
<v Speaker 1>to be in this movie whatsoever. Yeah, the chef's kiss.

1:30:42.085 --> 1:30:44.405
<v Speaker 1>And I don't remember how how they even got this

1:30:44.525 --> 1:30:48.125
<v Speaker 1>is an insert shot of a bull. It must be

1:30:48.165 --> 1:30:51.445
<v Speaker 1>real footage. It looks like real footage leaping into the

1:30:51.485 --> 1:30:54.245
<v Speaker 1>stands of a bullfight. It's like a second and a half.

1:30:55.565 --> 1:30:57.165
<v Speaker 1>And then he just goes on with his story and

1:30:57.205 --> 1:30:59.845
<v Speaker 1>the movie goes on with its plot. I mean, you

1:30:59.925 --> 1:31:02.525
<v Speaker 1>get stuff like that in Gail Daughtry, which is how

1:31:02.565 --> 1:31:05.205
<v Speaker 1>you know it is a David Wayne movie. And the

1:31:05.485 --> 1:31:07.805
<v Speaker 1>question I had for you also is how soon did

1:31:07.845 --> 1:31:09.564
<v Speaker 1>you realize this was also going to be a Wizard

1:31:09.605 --> 1:31:10.285
<v Speaker 1>of Oz riff.

1:31:10.925 --> 1:31:13.725
<v Speaker 3>You know, I don't know how soon it was, but

1:31:14.205 --> 1:31:18.765
<v Speaker 3>you recognize a couple of illusions. Certainly by the end

1:31:18.845 --> 1:31:20.725
<v Speaker 3>that's very late. But there's a there's a moment with

1:31:20.845 --> 1:31:23.445
<v Speaker 3>her slippers, right with her shoes, and there's there are

1:31:23.485 --> 1:31:25.925
<v Speaker 3>some there are some, there are some I think before

1:31:25.965 --> 1:31:29.045
<v Speaker 3>that for sure, but I didn't skipping right, little skipping

1:31:30.005 --> 1:31:32.885
<v Speaker 3>of course, right. And and the fact that she is

1:31:32.925 --> 1:31:34.845
<v Speaker 3>she is like Dorothy in the Land of Oz, who

1:31:34.965 --> 1:31:39.325
<v Speaker 3>keeps acquiring new people as part of her entourage along

1:31:39.365 --> 1:31:41.525
<v Speaker 3>the way, and they all have they all have certain skills,

1:31:41.565 --> 1:31:46.485
<v Speaker 3>I suppose as well, so that element is definitely there.

1:31:46.565 --> 1:31:49.725
<v Speaker 3>I like that you brought up the absurdity because one

1:31:49.725 --> 1:31:52.205
<v Speaker 3>of the things that stood out to me that I

1:31:52.245 --> 1:31:56.685
<v Speaker 3>really liked about Gail Daughtry is that absurd tone. And

1:31:56.685 --> 1:32:00.564
<v Speaker 3>what I mean is specifically that something I struggle with

1:32:01.445 --> 1:32:07.724
<v Speaker 3>often with comedies is that line you have to walk

1:32:08.525 --> 1:32:14.765
<v Speaker 3>where you're putting us in the real world, but you're

1:32:14.805 --> 1:32:18.805
<v Speaker 3>also having things happen that are clearly happening in a

1:32:18.845 --> 1:32:24.085
<v Speaker 3>comedic universe where they could happen my brain struggles with

1:32:24.165 --> 1:32:27.925
<v Speaker 3>that very often, and maybe it's maybe it's just me,

1:32:28.525 --> 1:32:31.285
<v Speaker 3>but it's a comedy, and and people that's there, that's

1:32:31.325 --> 1:32:33.285
<v Speaker 3>the reasoning when I bring those things up. Well, it's

1:32:33.325 --> 1:32:36.764
<v Speaker 3>a comedy. It's it's goofy, goofy things are going to happen, okay,

1:32:36.765 --> 1:32:39.365
<v Speaker 3>But everything else about the movie, all the other stakes

1:32:39.765 --> 1:32:42.485
<v Speaker 3>to the movie are happening in the real world, Okay.

1:32:43.325 --> 1:32:46.965
<v Speaker 3>In this movie. You know, you know from the opening

1:32:47.365 --> 1:32:51.965
<v Speaker 3>pretty much from the opening narration Fred mellm Head's postal

1:32:52.005 --> 1:32:55.285
<v Speaker 3>worker who is our guide through this story. You know

1:32:55.445 --> 1:32:59.525
<v Speaker 3>from his tone, you know from the script and the

1:32:59.525 --> 1:33:03.765
<v Speaker 3>things he's saying that this isn't the real world, that

1:33:04.565 --> 1:33:07.405
<v Speaker 3>totally crazy, absurd things are going to happen, and that

1:33:07.685 --> 1:33:12.405
<v Speaker 3>anything can happen in this universe. And so I knew

1:33:12.405 --> 1:33:14.365
<v Speaker 3>what ground I was on, and I knew that I

1:33:14.365 --> 1:33:17.125
<v Speaker 3>could go with it. And if I didn't totally know,

1:33:17.685 --> 1:33:21.445
<v Speaker 3>I absolutely knew. By the time we get to the

1:33:21.525 --> 1:33:26.644
<v Speaker 3>Jennifer Aniston book signing and the fiance says, I got

1:33:26.645 --> 1:33:28.605
<v Speaker 3>to go back in and get what my sunglasses or

1:33:28.605 --> 1:33:31.805
<v Speaker 3>something like that, and then doesn't come back because he's

1:33:31.845 --> 1:33:34.525
<v Speaker 3>having sex with Jennifer Aniston in the back room for

1:33:34.725 --> 1:33:35.525
<v Speaker 3>multiple hours.

1:33:35.725 --> 1:33:39.485
<v Speaker 1>I did. That's like, yeah, I did. Like how just

1:33:39.525 --> 1:33:41.684
<v Speaker 1>got that out of the way, you know, didn't waste

1:33:41.725 --> 1:33:46.245
<v Speaker 1>twenty minutes setting up the fiance's move right, No.

1:33:45.725 --> 1:33:50.764
<v Speaker 3>No, And there's there's no conflict in him or anything

1:33:50.845 --> 1:33:54.604
<v Speaker 3>like that. He just moments earlier says, well, it would

1:33:54.605 --> 1:33:56.645
<v Speaker 3>be Jennifer Aniston, and then he takes advantage of it,

1:33:56.805 --> 1:33:59.604
<v Speaker 3>and that sets up all the action of the film.

1:33:59.645 --> 1:34:02.165
<v Speaker 3>So I knew the universe we were in. I went

1:34:02.205 --> 1:34:05.805
<v Speaker 3>along with it, and then you get the type of

1:34:05.885 --> 1:34:10.885
<v Speaker 3>humor that I expect from David Wayne and I love.

1:34:11.165 --> 1:34:13.644
<v Speaker 3>And it's the jokes that make me laugh the most

1:34:14.405 --> 1:34:19.525
<v Speaker 3>are like when Richard Kine shows up and he's just

1:34:19.565 --> 1:34:24.125
<v Speaker 3>a taxi cab driver in La. Who is who is

1:34:24.645 --> 1:34:31.525
<v Speaker 3>taking Zoe Deutsch's character and her friend what is her?

1:34:32.085 --> 1:34:37.604
<v Speaker 3>Her character's name Otto played by Miles Gutierra Hiley. They're together.

1:34:37.685 --> 1:34:41.085
<v Speaker 3>They fly out to La in pursuit of John Hamm.

1:34:41.085 --> 1:34:45.245
<v Speaker 3>He's there to help her in this pursuit and just

1:34:45.285 --> 1:34:48.684
<v Speaker 3>completely straight faced, he explains that I know why you're here.

1:34:49.005 --> 1:34:52.245
<v Speaker 3>Everybody comes out here expecting to be the next Elizabeth Perkins,

1:34:52.805 --> 1:34:57.685
<v Speaker 3>but there's only one Elizabeth Perkins, and that slayed me.

1:34:58.365 --> 1:35:02.005
<v Speaker 1>Nice callback too with a yep, yes there is Yeah,

1:35:02.085 --> 1:35:05.405
<v Speaker 1>I also want to you know, there's so many you know,

1:35:05.645 --> 1:35:10.045
<v Speaker 1>cameos and guests in here, but I think one of

1:35:10.085 --> 1:35:13.645
<v Speaker 1>the performances I enjoyed the most was a newcomer to me,

1:35:13.685 --> 1:35:16.525
<v Speaker 1>at least, Ben Wang. It's Caleb, one of the people

1:35:16.645 --> 1:35:20.684
<v Speaker 1>she picks up along the way, an aspiring agent, and

1:35:21.045 --> 1:35:26.885
<v Speaker 1>I just love the energy he brought, which is, I

1:35:26.885 --> 1:35:29.564
<v Speaker 1>don't know, there's something he popped because his character had

1:35:29.605 --> 1:35:33.765
<v Speaker 1>this clear comic identity and yeah tone he was going

1:35:33.805 --> 1:35:37.045
<v Speaker 1>to go for the entire time, and he stayed consistent

1:35:37.085 --> 1:35:40.165
<v Speaker 1>in that and almost always worked. So yeah, well, it

1:35:40.245 --> 1:35:41.965
<v Speaker 1>was fun to see a lot of the cameos. I

1:35:41.965 --> 1:35:44.245
<v Speaker 1>think Ben Wang was a highlight too.

1:35:44.325 --> 1:35:47.684
<v Speaker 3>He's very good. And speaking of what how to American Summer,

1:35:48.005 --> 1:35:52.604
<v Speaker 3>this movie really is what happens when the State remakes

1:35:52.645 --> 1:35:55.205
<v Speaker 3>The Wizard of Oz by way of What Hot American Summer,

1:35:55.245 --> 1:35:58.085
<v Speaker 3>because it seemed like they were determined to get in

1:35:58.325 --> 1:36:01.365
<v Speaker 3>almost or a lot of key members of the cast

1:36:01.365 --> 1:36:05.045
<v Speaker 3>from What Hot American Summer. Marguerite Moreau shows us there

1:36:05.245 --> 1:36:07.805
<v Speaker 3>for a moment and Paul Rudd's going to show up.

1:36:07.805 --> 1:36:09.805
<v Speaker 3>Of course, there are a bunch of key members too,

1:36:09.965 --> 1:36:12.525
<v Speaker 3>like Mike Lee and Black who you expect to see

1:36:12.525 --> 1:36:16.125
<v Speaker 3>in Jolo Trulio from that group, but it is as

1:36:16.125 --> 1:36:18.605
<v Speaker 3>if they're trying to make sure that we get some

1:36:18.685 --> 1:36:23.005
<v Speaker 3>of those very familiar faces into the film. That's Gail

1:36:23.085 --> 1:36:28.445
<v Speaker 3>Daughtry and The Celebrity Sex Pass, which is out in

1:36:28.605 --> 1:36:31.605
<v Speaker 3>limited release now. If you get a chance to see it,

1:36:31.725 --> 1:36:33.365
<v Speaker 3>or any of the films we've talked about so far

1:36:33.365 --> 1:36:35.565
<v Speaker 3>in the show, we'd love to hear your thoughts feedback

1:36:35.645 --> 1:36:40.165
<v Speaker 3>at filmspotting dot net. How big. That's what we call

1:36:40.205 --> 1:36:43.325
<v Speaker 3>a global killer. Nothing would survived, not even bacteria.

1:36:43.885 --> 1:36:46.325
<v Speaker 4>The United States government just asked us to save the world.

1:36:46.485 --> 1:36:48.325
<v Speaker 5>Anybody want to say no, don't think.

1:36:48.165 --> 1:36:50.685
<v Speaker 3>I'll get a hazard pay out of this time. For

1:36:50.965 --> 1:36:53.285
<v Speaker 3>some poll results, a couple of weeks ago, we asked

1:36:53.325 --> 1:36:57.005
<v Speaker 3>you to choose one pair of nineties blockbusters two films

1:36:57.405 --> 1:37:01.365
<v Speaker 3>per movie year, the top two movies at the domestic

1:37:01.405 --> 1:37:03.925
<v Speaker 3>box office. There's ten of them, Josh, so let's just

1:37:03.965 --> 1:37:06.245
<v Speaker 3>dig right into the results.

1:37:06.765 --> 1:37:10.005
<v Speaker 1>Last place went to the year nineteen ninety two and

1:37:10.045 --> 1:37:13.645
<v Speaker 1>the pair of Aladdin and Home Alone two only got

1:37:13.685 --> 1:37:16.045
<v Speaker 1>one percent of the vote. Two percent of the vote

1:37:16.885 --> 1:37:19.125
<v Speaker 1>for Home Alone and Ghost that was the year nineteen

1:37:19.205 --> 1:37:21.005
<v Speaker 1>ninety I thought for sure there was more Home Alone

1:37:21.205 --> 1:37:23.804
<v Speaker 1>love out there, all right, jumping up to six percent

1:37:23.885 --> 1:37:26.365
<v Speaker 1>of the vote. That went to nineteen ninety five Toy

1:37:26.405 --> 1:37:30.884
<v Speaker 1>Story and Batman Forever. Nineteen ninety nine came next, Phantom

1:37:30.885 --> 1:37:33.725
<v Speaker 1>Menace in the sixth sense with only seven percent of

1:37:33.725 --> 1:37:35.564
<v Speaker 1>the vote. You lobb, H'm pretty hard for that one.

1:37:35.685 --> 1:37:39.724
<v Speaker 1>I thought, Yeah, then we've got nineteen ninety eight saving

1:37:39.765 --> 1:37:43.684
<v Speaker 1>Private Ryan and Armageddon with eight percent of the vote. Okay,

1:37:43.805 --> 1:37:47.085
<v Speaker 1>jumping into another tier here, ten percent of the vote

1:37:47.365 --> 1:37:50.804
<v Speaker 1>went to nineteen ninety six for Independence Day and Twister.

1:37:51.405 --> 1:37:53.525
<v Speaker 1>Thirteen percent of the vote went to nineteen ninety four

1:37:53.645 --> 1:37:56.564
<v Speaker 1>Forrest Gump and the Lion King. I think that's where

1:37:56.605 --> 1:37:59.645
<v Speaker 1>I landed if I remember correctly. Fourteen percent of the

1:37:59.685 --> 1:38:03.405
<v Speaker 1>vote went to nineteen ninety seven. That's Titanic and Men

1:38:03.525 --> 1:38:08.644
<v Speaker 1>in Black. Second place in this poll with sixteen percent

1:38:08.765 --> 1:38:12.165
<v Speaker 1>of the vote was the year nineteen ninety one, Terminator

1:38:12.205 --> 1:38:16.725
<v Speaker 1>two and Prince of Thieves. Wow T two doing a

1:38:16.765 --> 1:38:20.125
<v Speaker 1>lot of work there. I have to guess that means

1:38:20.725 --> 1:38:24.725
<v Speaker 1>the win of our poll. Incredible, just incredible, twenty three

1:38:24.805 --> 1:38:28.445
<v Speaker 1>percent of the vote. Missus Doubtfire, Just missus Doutfire took

1:38:28.485 --> 1:38:30.485
<v Speaker 1>you on its own. No, actually it was got a

1:38:30.485 --> 1:38:34.365
<v Speaker 1>little help from Jurassic Park nineteen ninety three. There, Missus Doubtfire.

1:38:34.485 --> 1:38:37.845
<v Speaker 1>Jurassic Park win this poll with twenty three percent of

1:38:37.845 --> 1:38:38.285
<v Speaker 1>the vote.

1:38:38.365 --> 1:38:41.564
<v Speaker 3>The nineties kids in their dinosaurs, they just incredible love

1:38:41.645 --> 1:38:44.165
<v Speaker 3>playing with their toys. Scott g let me get this straight.

1:38:44.205 --> 1:38:46.245
<v Speaker 3>You're asking us to pick one of these pairs, and

1:38:46.285 --> 1:38:49.125
<v Speaker 3>every other film released that year gets dumped in the incinerator.

1:38:49.325 --> 1:38:51.325
<v Speaker 3>You guys are sick. This is a poll where we're

1:38:51.325 --> 1:38:54.045
<v Speaker 3>supposed to punish hundreds of perfectly decent films for not

1:38:54.085 --> 1:38:57.724
<v Speaker 3>having the highest grosses. Oh and the rules apparently state

1:38:57.805 --> 1:39:00.445
<v Speaker 3>that every movie from every other year of the decade

1:39:00.685 --> 1:39:04.045
<v Speaker 3>century eternity, they all get eliminated as well. This poll

1:39:04.085 --> 1:39:05.925
<v Speaker 3>is a crime against cinema, to say nothing of the

1:39:05.965 --> 1:39:09.365
<v Speaker 3>fact that I can't choose between saving Whoopi Goldberg's performance

1:39:09.405 --> 1:39:13.485
<v Speaker 3>in Ghost or Tony Kollett's in the sixth sense, they

1:39:13.565 --> 1:39:16.405
<v Speaker 3>do both involve ghosts, don't they. I sentenced all three

1:39:16.445 --> 1:39:19.645
<v Speaker 3>of you to six months of NonStop Michael Bays screenings,

1:39:19.765 --> 1:39:20.885
<v Speaker 3>especially you s.

1:39:22.245 --> 1:39:24.685
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't know why why we're getting punished for

1:39:24.845 --> 1:39:26.604
<v Speaker 1>Sam's invention here.

1:39:26.445 --> 1:39:28.684
<v Speaker 3>But yeah, that's true. He did we okay, though.

1:39:29.005 --> 1:39:32.685
<v Speaker 1>We did, Sam went full fanos here. No planets were

1:39:32.685 --> 1:39:33.685
<v Speaker 1>preserved at all.

1:39:33.845 --> 1:39:34.085
<v Speaker 3>Right.

1:39:35.405 --> 1:39:38.765
<v Speaker 1>We also heard from Matthew Gladys it's nineteen ninety six

1:39:38.845 --> 1:39:41.485
<v Speaker 1>in a walk, Independence Day and Twister. I know it

1:39:41.525 --> 1:39:44.405
<v Speaker 1>sounds crazy when you have Saving Private Ryan six Sons

1:39:44.445 --> 1:39:47.485
<v Speaker 1>Drassic parkin T two, but hear me out, missus Doubtfire

1:39:47.605 --> 1:39:51.245
<v Speaker 1>ninety three is pretty met. Armageddon ninety eight is Armageddon,

1:39:51.405 --> 1:39:53.525
<v Speaker 1>and if I never hear that Brian Adams song again,

1:39:53.525 --> 1:39:56.525
<v Speaker 1>it will be too soon. Plus ninety six has arguably

1:39:56.565 --> 1:40:00.844
<v Speaker 1>the most stacked casts, Will Smith, Jeff Goldblum, the criminally

1:40:00.925 --> 1:40:05.564
<v Speaker 1>underrated Mary McDonald, jud Hirsch, Robert Loja, James Rebhorn, Randy

1:40:05.645 --> 1:40:10.925
<v Speaker 1>not necessarily the lesser Quaid in Independence Day, Philip Seymour Hoffman,

1:40:11.005 --> 1:40:14.684
<v Speaker 1>Ellen Rock and both Bps, Bill Pullman and Bill Paxton

1:40:14.725 --> 1:40:17.005
<v Speaker 1>and Twister Game Over, Man.

1:40:17.845 --> 1:40:22.005
<v Speaker 3>Came Over Man, jud Hirsh you lost Josh there, sorry,

1:40:22.845 --> 1:40:25.604
<v Speaker 3>Rick says, Terminator Too is the only one of these

1:40:25.645 --> 1:40:28.805
<v Speaker 3>movies I absolutely need in my life. I think, yes,

1:40:28.845 --> 1:40:30.485
<v Speaker 3>a lot of people were there and that's why it's

1:40:30.485 --> 1:40:33.005
<v Speaker 3>in second place. And Prince of Thieves has a strong

1:40:33.085 --> 1:40:36.165
<v Speaker 3>nostalgia draw for me. Oh, everything I do, I do

1:40:36.285 --> 1:40:37.764
<v Speaker 3>it for nineteen ninety one.

1:40:38.485 --> 1:40:42.644
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm glad you have that, Rick Andrew Howell here,

1:40:42.725 --> 1:40:45.325
<v Speaker 1>I can't live without T two. And my bonus is

1:40:45.365 --> 1:40:49.125
<v Speaker 1>I get Alan Rickman as a foppy Hans Gruber lest

1:40:49.165 --> 1:40:51.884
<v Speaker 1>you can forget. Rickman plays the evil Sheriff of Nottingham

1:40:51.885 --> 1:40:54.965
<v Speaker 1>and Prince of Thieves says shared us that note.

1:40:55.005 --> 1:40:58.445
<v Speaker 3>I think that's true. Double up on Alan Rickman. Oliver

1:40:58.565 --> 1:41:01.125
<v Speaker 3>Chang says ninety nine is totally a nostalgia pick for me.

1:41:01.525 --> 1:41:03.765
<v Speaker 3>I have vivid memories of seeing the first trailer for

1:41:03.845 --> 1:41:05.925
<v Speaker 3>The Phantom Menace in the summer of ninety eight and

1:41:05.965 --> 1:41:08.845
<v Speaker 3>then going to an opening night midnight screening where we

1:41:08.885 --> 1:41:11.165
<v Speaker 3>went to the theater a couple hours early to get

1:41:11.165 --> 1:41:13.045
<v Speaker 3>our spot in line so we could get a decent

1:41:13.085 --> 1:41:15.125
<v Speaker 3>seat since there was no such thing as a reserved seating.

1:41:15.165 --> 1:41:17.645
<v Speaker 3>I was right there with you. It was Survival of

1:41:17.685 --> 1:41:19.885
<v Speaker 3>the Fittest back in the day, then going back the

1:41:19.925 --> 1:41:21.685
<v Speaker 3>next night and seeing it again, and just because it

1:41:21.725 --> 1:41:24.285
<v Speaker 3>was Star Wars. I was not right there with how

1:41:24.325 --> 1:41:26.925
<v Speaker 3>can I allow those memories to go into the incinerator?

1:41:26.925 --> 1:41:29.165
<v Speaker 3>And of course six cents is amazing. This was a

1:41:29.205 --> 1:41:32.365
<v Speaker 3>no brainer. I can't imagine my life without either of

1:41:32.405 --> 1:41:33.045
<v Speaker 3>these films.

1:41:33.685 --> 1:41:36.405
<v Speaker 1>Fair enough, Oliver, all right, one more here from Jeff Clark.

1:41:36.845 --> 1:41:40.325
<v Speaker 1>Spielberg made d Day scarier than an asteroid destroying all

1:41:40.365 --> 1:41:42.805
<v Speaker 1>life on Earth, and in Armageddon we had a range

1:41:42.845 --> 1:41:46.485
<v Speaker 1>of really solid actors, including Steve Buscemi, who explains what

1:41:46.565 --> 1:41:50.005
<v Speaker 1>the phrase space psychosis means, which is helpful since I've

1:41:50.085 --> 1:41:51.765
<v Speaker 1>not seen it used elsewhere.

1:41:52.125 --> 1:41:56.045
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I like your reasoning a lot there, Jeff. We

1:41:56.125 --> 1:41:58.685
<v Speaker 3>think everyone who voted in that poll and sent in

1:41:58.805 --> 1:42:03.205
<v Speaker 3>some feedback. Our new poll looks ahead to next week's

1:42:03.445 --> 1:42:06.725
<v Speaker 3>top five of twenty twenty six so far. So we

1:42:06.805 --> 1:42:11.685
<v Speaker 3>are asking you what is the best film of the

1:42:11.765 --> 1:42:15.885
<v Speaker 3>year so far? And here are the choices we're giving you.

1:42:16.885 --> 1:42:21.845
<v Speaker 1>Twenty eight years later, The Bone Temple, Back Rooms, Disclosure Day,

1:42:22.485 --> 1:42:28.325
<v Speaker 1>the Drama Obsession Project, Hail Mary, The Sheep Detectives, and.

1:42:28.565 --> 1:42:32.205
<v Speaker 3>Other Now, I thought that we did a pretty good job.

1:42:32.245 --> 1:42:35.125
<v Speaker 3>This was largely Sam's doing, as these poll questions always are.

1:42:35.325 --> 1:42:37.205
<v Speaker 3>I thought we did a pretty good job, even though

1:42:38.245 --> 1:42:41.085
<v Speaker 3>I recall us both telling Sam he could leave out

1:42:41.125 --> 1:42:45.045
<v Speaker 3>back rooms, and sure enough, back rooms is in dead last.

1:42:45.125 --> 1:42:47.445
<v Speaker 3>So I don't know why back rooms is here. But

1:42:47.565 --> 1:42:49.445
<v Speaker 3>that's fine. It's there if you want to vote for it,

1:42:49.845 --> 1:42:52.685
<v Speaker 3>if you're one of the few, the happy few. Is

1:42:52.765 --> 1:42:55.805
<v Speaker 3>your number one? Well, I was going to say additionally,

1:42:56.405 --> 1:42:59.005
<v Speaker 3>I thought it was a good list. But Other, and

1:42:59.085 --> 1:43:03.564
<v Speaker 3>this this is not uncommon. Other is decidedly in second place,

1:43:03.765 --> 1:43:05.845
<v Speaker 3>so a lot of people are taking the field. Josh,

1:43:05.845 --> 1:43:07.085
<v Speaker 3>But is your number one.

1:43:06.925 --> 1:43:11.365
<v Speaker 1>On the list? I haven't finalized. There's two vne for

1:43:11.445 --> 1:43:13.724
<v Speaker 1>number one, and I will say one of those options

1:43:13.805 --> 1:43:17.045
<v Speaker 1>is on this list, and then obviously the other. You know,

1:43:17.125 --> 1:43:21.285
<v Speaker 1>I would go in the direction of Other. I think

1:43:21.325 --> 1:43:23.485
<v Speaker 1>I'll probably right now. If I had to choose in

1:43:23.525 --> 1:43:25.724
<v Speaker 1>this moment, it would be one of the titles we offered.

1:43:27.045 --> 1:43:30.045
<v Speaker 3>Okay, how about you. No, I would be voting other.

1:43:30.565 --> 1:43:36.285
<v Speaker 3>My number one interest is not there. I look forward

1:43:36.325 --> 1:43:39.365
<v Speaker 3>to sharing it next week. I will give a little hint. No,

1:43:39.605 --> 1:43:42.125
<v Speaker 3>I guess I was going to say it hadn't been

1:43:42.165 --> 1:43:45.845
<v Speaker 3>reviewed on the show. Maybe that's true. I know we

1:43:45.965 --> 1:43:48.365
<v Speaker 3>didn't discuss my number one on the show. So there

1:43:48.405 --> 1:43:49.525
<v Speaker 3>you go, I will.

1:43:49.885 --> 1:43:53.245
<v Speaker 1>Say we both we both have you know, at least

1:43:53.245 --> 1:43:54.925
<v Speaker 1>a title or two we want to be sure to

1:43:54.965 --> 1:43:58.245
<v Speaker 1>fit in. Yes, so things will very much likely be

1:43:58.485 --> 1:44:01.125
<v Speaker 1>in flux. But yeah, it'll be interesting to see where

1:44:01.365 --> 1:44:04.365
<v Speaker 1>where listeners land on this best of the Year so far.

1:44:04.765 --> 1:44:07.285
<v Speaker 3>Vote in that poll, leave a comment. We may read

1:44:07.325 --> 1:44:10.165
<v Speaker 3>your feedback on air. You can do that at film

1:44:10.205 --> 1:44:13.165
<v Speaker 3>spotting dot net right there at the main page. Josh,

1:44:13.245 --> 1:44:13.885
<v Speaker 3>that's our show.

1:44:14.165 --> 1:44:16.205
<v Speaker 1>If you'd like to connect with us on social media,

1:44:16.245 --> 1:44:20.445
<v Speaker 1>you can find Adam and the show on Instagram, Facebook, Letterbox, YouTube,

1:44:20.445 --> 1:44:23.684
<v Speaker 1>and blue Sky at film Spotting. I'm at those places

1:44:23.765 --> 1:44:27.764
<v Speaker 1>as well as Larsen on film. We are independently produced

1:44:27.845 --> 1:44:30.845
<v Speaker 1>and listener supported. You can support the show by joining

1:44:30.885 --> 1:44:34.885
<v Speaker 1>the film Spotting Family at film spottingfamily dot com. You

1:44:34.925 --> 1:44:38.285
<v Speaker 1>can listen early and ad free. You'll also get monthly

1:44:38.365 --> 1:44:41.205
<v Speaker 1>bonus episodes, a weekly newsletter, and access to the entire

1:44:41.325 --> 1:44:44.285
<v Speaker 1>show archive. For show t shirts and other merch go

1:44:44.365 --> 1:44:46.925
<v Speaker 1>to film spotting dot net slash shop.

1:44:47.565 --> 1:44:50.965
<v Speaker 3>Out in limited release this weekend is David Wayne's new

1:44:50.965 --> 1:44:55.085
<v Speaker 3>film Gail Daughtry and the Celebrity Sex Pass. In wide release,

1:44:55.285 --> 1:44:59.085
<v Speaker 3>Evil Deadburn. This is the sixth Evil Dead movie, the

1:44:59.165 --> 1:45:04.924
<v Speaker 3>third Ramy Less installment since twenty thirteen. Complete Us, Josh,

1:45:05.485 --> 1:45:08.485
<v Speaker 3>I think I saw the first of those three, which

1:45:08.525 --> 1:45:11.445
<v Speaker 3>I liked quite a bit. Haven't caught the last two.

1:45:12.045 --> 1:45:16.445
<v Speaker 3>The invite is expanding. Josh strongly encourages you to see it.

1:45:16.965 --> 1:45:23.605
<v Speaker 3>Next week Big Things coming Monday, the debut episode of

1:45:23.645 --> 1:45:27.045
<v Speaker 3>the movie Racket with Michael Phillips. He has a guest

1:45:27.405 --> 1:45:31.445
<v Speaker 3>Michael Shannon, where they will be discussing what France saw.

1:45:31.565 --> 1:45:33.684
<v Speaker 3>Trufoe said that there's no such thing as an anti

1:45:33.765 --> 1:45:38.165
<v Speaker 3>war movie. They'll discuss whether or not Francois trufo is right.

1:45:38.245 --> 1:45:42.205
<v Speaker 3>That's Monday. On Tuesday, film Spotting SVU. The state of

1:45:42.285 --> 1:45:45.325
<v Speaker 3>streaming they're going to talk about to be a deep

1:45:45.365 --> 1:45:49.045
<v Speaker 3>dive into the Free with Ad Free with Ad streamer

1:45:49.245 --> 1:45:52.805
<v Speaker 3>Josh's favorite channel on the Internet. The Next Picture Show.

1:45:53.045 --> 1:45:58.045
<v Speaker 3>On Thursday, Your beloved True Grit from the Coen Brothers, Josh.

1:45:58.285 --> 1:46:02.005
<v Speaker 3>They will be pairing that with the new Supergirl.

1:46:02.405 --> 1:46:03.045
<v Speaker 1>How about that.

1:46:03.485 --> 1:46:06.965
<v Speaker 3>I may have to see Supergirl just to listen to

1:46:07.565 --> 1:46:10.965
<v Speaker 3>this pairing because it sounds fascinating. And then Friday, we

1:46:11.045 --> 1:46:12.765
<v Speaker 3>will have for you our top five films of the

1:46:12.805 --> 1:46:13.365
<v Speaker 3>year so far.

1:46:14.485 --> 1:46:17.285
<v Speaker 1>Film Spotting is produced by Golden Joe Desso and Sam

1:46:17.365 --> 1:46:20.604
<v Speaker 1>van Holgren. Without Sam and Golden Joe, this show wouldn't go.

1:46:21.045 --> 1:46:24.405
<v Speaker 1>Our production assistant is Sophie Kempinar. Special thanks to everyone

1:46:24.445 --> 1:46:28.405
<v Speaker 1>at wbe Z Chicago. More information is available at wbez

1:46:28.685 --> 1:46:31.765
<v Speaker 1>dot org for Film Spotting. I'm Josh Larson and I

1:46:31.885 --> 1:46:32.644
<v Speaker 1>Madam Kempinar.

1:46:32.845 --> 1:46:33.684
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening.

1:46:34.005 --> 1:46:36.965
<v Speaker 2>This conversation can serve no purpose anymore.

1:46:37.845 --> 1:46:38.325
<v Speaker 4>Good Bye.