WEBVTT - You're A Table Full Of Pimmels

0:00:01.880 --> 0:00:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio, the George

0:00:06.240 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 1>Washington Broadcast.

0:00:07.360 --> 0:00:11.320
<v Speaker 2>Center, Jack Armstrong and Joe Getty arm Strong and Gatty

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:17.280
<v Speaker 2>and he Armstrong and Yetty.

0:00:24.280 --> 0:00:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Germany is cracking down. We were with the German police

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>as they conducted early morning raids on citizens who had

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>been accused of hate speech, threats and inciting violence online.

0:00:38.040 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 3>In the United States.

0:00:38.880 --> 0:00:40.440
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people look at this and say, this

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 1>is restricting free speech.

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.440
<v Speaker 2>It's a threat to democracy.

0:00:44.240 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 4>Free speech meets boundaries.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 2>Wow, and yeah, you throw in the German accent and

0:00:52.159 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>that's really something that's from that's from sixty minutes Sunday night,

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 2>coming on the heels of jd Vance giving Europe a

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:03.560
<v Speaker 2>lecture about censorship and be an anti free speech over

0:01:03.600 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 2>the weekend.

0:01:04.520 --> 0:01:10.199
<v Speaker 5>And as we will discuss, the sixty minutes report was gleefully, weirdly,

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 5>troublingly positive about the idea of restricting free speech if

0:01:14.280 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 5>it's the wrong speech. Made even more notable their awful

0:01:19.080 --> 0:01:21.600
<v Speaker 5>attitude by the fact that it occurred on the same

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:25.199
<v Speaker 5>day as this clip Margaret Brennan talking to Marco Rubio on.

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.080
<v Speaker 6>Face the Nation, he was standing in a country where

0:01:28.160 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 6>free speech was weaponized to kentuct a genocide, and he

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.279
<v Speaker 6>met with the head of a political party that has

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:42.520
<v Speaker 6>far right views and some historic ties to extreme groups.

0:01:43.480 --> 0:01:46.959
<v Speaker 5>Margaret Brennan attempting to suggest that JD. Vance shouldn't have

0:01:47.000 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 5>advocated free speech because free speech is what led to

0:01:49.600 --> 0:01:55.680
<v Speaker 5>the genocide in Germany against the Jews, which is almost

0:01:55.800 --> 0:02:00.920
<v Speaker 5>hilariously idiotic and so wildly inaccurate. It's barely worth the

0:02:00.960 --> 0:02:05.280
<v Speaker 5>time to describe how incredibly inaccurate it was free speech

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 5>under Hitler. When was that exactly, asks every historian on Earth.

0:02:11.160 --> 0:02:13.519
<v Speaker 2>I know, I'm mister hyperbole, but I feel like that's

0:02:13.560 --> 0:02:17.280
<v Speaker 2>one of the craziest things I've ever heard. One of

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:21.760
<v Speaker 2>the major Sunday Show anchors say it is Jada Advan Questionably,

0:02:21.840 --> 0:02:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Jade Evans was standing in Germany where the rise of

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:29.760
<v Speaker 2>fascism having in a genocide and they weaponized free speech.

0:02:30.560 --> 0:02:35.840
<v Speaker 2>What are you talking about? Oh my god, Yeah, she's nuts.

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:40.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm so lost on this. I don't understand their worldview.

0:02:40.639 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 2>I guess we'll learn more of this. Well I do.

0:02:44.320 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 5>I can describe it to you exactly. It's the lust

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 5>for power. If you control speech, you control everything else.

0:02:50.120 --> 0:02:52.360
<v Speaker 2>But how does that work in a democracy, don't you

0:02:52.760 --> 0:02:55.959
<v Speaker 2>The other side gets to do it too when they're

0:02:55.960 --> 0:02:58.040
<v Speaker 2>in charge. Again.

0:02:58.240 --> 0:03:01.560
<v Speaker 5>I hate even going to that argument because then it

0:03:01.639 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 5>makes it a conditional thing. Well, for practical reasons, I

0:03:06.040 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 5>guess you're right. I won't limit free speech. I don't

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:15.079
<v Speaker 5>even want to go there, right, It's horrific, horrific, and

0:03:15.840 --> 0:03:18.359
<v Speaker 5>how you get there in a democracy. The other thing

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 5>is you declare an emergency. Happens all the time both parties.

0:03:21.800 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 5>This is Trump's doing it right now, and I don't

0:03:23.760 --> 0:03:26.760
<v Speaker 5>approve of it. There are half a dozen different emergencies

0:03:26.760 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 5>he's declared which are highly questionable for the purpose of

0:03:29.560 --> 0:03:32.080
<v Speaker 5>gaining emergency powers. I hate it on both sides. We

0:03:32.120 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 5>need to stop anyway back to sixty minutes. Do you

0:03:34.600 --> 0:03:37.680
<v Speaker 5>want to ring lean our way through the cliffs? Doesn't

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.040
<v Speaker 5>really matter. We can start with eighty Michael.

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>It's six oh one on a Tuesday morning, and we

0:03:43.600 --> 0:03:46.520
<v Speaker 1>were with state police as they rated this apartment in

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>northwest Germany.

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 4>Just to put it inside them at the moment hum

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 4>of the.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Eden inside, six armed officers searched to suspects home, then

0:03:55.320 --> 0:04:00.120
<v Speaker 1>seized his laptop and sell phone. Prosecutors say those electronics

0:04:00.160 --> 0:04:03.560
<v Speaker 1>may have been used to commit a crime, the crime

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>posting a racist cartoon online at the exact same time

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:09.360
<v Speaker 1>across Germany, it's.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 3>All the online as Unsas for Newborn hold.

0:04:11.760 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>More than fifty similar raids played out, part of what

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:19.400
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors say is a coordinated effort to curb online hate

0:04:19.400 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 1>speech in Germany.

0:04:20.839 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 2>And the one guy points out, maybe it will be

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.760
<v Speaker 2>in one of these clips, the seven thousand cases or

0:04:27.760 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 2>something that they investigated last year. Wow, that's a lot

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 2>in a country much smaller than the United States. Imagine

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 2>what that would look like in the United States. And

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 2>hate speech, of course, the one of the problems with

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.159
<v Speaker 2>hate speech being who's determining its hate speech, who's making

0:04:43.200 --> 0:04:46.479
<v Speaker 2>the judgment on that? Yeah, Sharon Alfonsi very helpful.

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 5>He just saved us the trouble and told us the

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 5>cartoon was racist, putting aside whether you know you should

0:04:51.320 --> 0:04:54.039
<v Speaker 5>limit free speech on the basis of quote unquote racism anyway,

0:04:54.400 --> 0:04:55.760
<v Speaker 5>but yeah, what did it say?

0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 2>In what sense? Was it racist? Who is it racist against?

0:04:58.400 --> 0:04:58.479
<v Speaker 7>What?

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 5>Give me the specific fixed you're asking for the right

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:03.680
<v Speaker 5>to censor me, and you just say, take my word.

0:05:03.720 --> 0:05:05.479
<v Speaker 2>It was terrible. This part is amazing.

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:09.280
<v Speaker 1>Wasn't the typical reaction when the police show up at

0:05:09.279 --> 0:05:12.480
<v Speaker 1>somebody's door and they say, hey, we will leave.

0:05:12.560 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 3>You wrote this on the internet, they say.

0:05:15.640 --> 0:05:18.480
<v Speaker 8>In Germany, we say that's what my mos off, my zogenduff.

0:05:18.520 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 8>And so we here with crimes of talking posting an

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 8>internet and the people are surprised that this is really

0:05:26.240 --> 0:05:29.280
<v Speaker 8>illegal to post these kind of words.

0:05:29.360 --> 0:05:31.400
<v Speaker 3>They don't think it was illegal. Oh, they don't think

0:05:31.440 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 3>it was illegal.

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.400
<v Speaker 8>And they say, no, that's my free speech, and we

0:05:35.480 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 8>say no, yeah, free speech as well, but it also

0:05:38.360 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 8>has limits.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.159
<v Speaker 2>I don't see. I don't, I can't. I've got to

0:05:44.200 --> 0:05:47.359
<v Speaker 2>accept that. It's just true that obviously, smart people in

0:05:47.440 --> 0:05:49.920
<v Speaker 2>charge of things can say words like that. How can

0:05:49.960 --> 0:05:52.200
<v Speaker 2>you sail it? Free speech has its limits, Well, then

0:05:52.240 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 2>it's not free speech. You just nullified the first part

0:05:55.760 --> 0:05:58.040
<v Speaker 2>of your sentence. What the second part of the sentence.

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:02.960
<v Speaker 5>Everybody understands that there are certain limits, but they are

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:06.560
<v Speaker 5>extremely limited limits. The people like this just say, hey,

0:06:06.600 --> 0:06:08.719
<v Speaker 5>because there are limits, there there can be more limits,

0:06:08.720 --> 0:06:10.160
<v Speaker 5>and I will decide what limits there are.

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Control your soul's desire for freedom. Yeah, that's which I respond. No,

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:18.080
<v Speaker 2>you don't get to decided. No freaking way control your

0:06:18.080 --> 0:06:20.960
<v Speaker 2>soul's desire for freedom, they say in China. This part

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 2>amazed me. I was unaware of this.

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:26.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a legal to display Nazi symbolism, a swasika, deny

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>the Holocaust.

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 2>That's that's clear.

0:06:29.320 --> 0:06:32.920
<v Speaker 1>Is it a crime to insult somebody in public? Yes, yes,

0:06:33.800 --> 0:06:36.320
<v Speaker 1>and it's a crime to insult them online as well.

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:36.839
<v Speaker 2>Yes.

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 3>The fine could be even higher.

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.680
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, if you insult someone in the internet, why because

0:06:43.920 --> 0:06:47.360
<v Speaker 8>in Internet it stays there. If we are talking at

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 8>face to face, you insult me and sold you okay, finish.

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 8>But if you're in the internet, if I insult you

0:06:52.839 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 8>or a politician, that.

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:55.000
<v Speaker 9>Sticks around forever.

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:55.479
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:06:55.560 --> 0:06:58.320
<v Speaker 2>So she says to these three people, it's a fine,

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 2>there's a fine two in if you insult someone, and

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 2>they'll just say yeah, like you know, of course what

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.719
<v Speaker 2>and what defines an insult?

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 5>And folks keep in mind, remember we're still in the

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 5>era certainly on university campuses and in government in some

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 5>other places where if you are insulted that's proof that

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.000
<v Speaker 5>the other person is done wrong. You remember, I didn't

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:25.600
<v Speaker 5>mean that to be racist. It doesn't matter what you meant,

0:07:25.840 --> 0:07:29.360
<v Speaker 5>it's how I received it, So you give the person

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 5>receiving it the carte blanche to declare whatever they want

0:07:33.760 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 5>to be insulting or hurtful, or racist or abusive, Islam

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.880
<v Speaker 5>or whatever, and therefore that falls within.

0:07:40.720 --> 0:07:41.720
<v Speaker 2>Well, that's hate speech.

0:07:41.800 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 5>Sorry, we're going to take away your right to say

0:07:43.960 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 5>any to make any criticism that anybody could even implausibly

0:07:47.680 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 5>claim is insulting.

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:49.400
<v Speaker 3>It's horrible.

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.720
<v Speaker 2>So somebody posts the Chancellor is a moron, I assume

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 2>that would be a crime. Maybe you didn't post it,

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe you just did this.

0:07:57.680 --> 0:08:01.880
<v Speaker 1>If somebody posts something that's not true and then somebody

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.800
<v Speaker 1>else reposts it or likes it, are they committing a crime.

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 8>In the case of reposting it as a crime as well,

0:08:08.600 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 8>because the reader contistinguished whether you just invented this or

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:14.680
<v Speaker 8>just reposted it.

0:08:14.760 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 3>That's the same for us.

0:08:17.280 --> 0:08:18.920
<v Speaker 2>So when I was listening to that one, I was

0:08:18.960 --> 0:08:23.760
<v Speaker 2>thinking about it was an official Biden Harris campaign ad

0:08:24.600 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 2>that way we had playing in the United States. Donald

0:08:27.640 --> 0:08:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Trump threatens a bloodbath if he loses, which was absolutely

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 2>a lie in misinformation on the side that sixty Minutes

0:08:37.320 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 2>is on. Would you consider that a crime or only

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 2>when it's coming from the other side. See that's that's

0:08:43.240 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 2>where the rubber meets the road on this whole thing

0:08:45.040 --> 0:08:47.559
<v Speaker 2>and it gets, you know, unworkable.

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:08:48.200 --> 0:08:52.000
<v Speaker 5>I happen to have a couple of articles, think pieces, etc.

0:08:52.280 --> 0:08:55.520
<v Speaker 5>That point out how incredibly one sided this is. It's

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 5>just a lust for power the other thing that really

0:08:58.200 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 5>and it's funny, we're talking about one of the most

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.920
<v Speaker 5>fun ndamental human rights that any human beings ever enjoyed.

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 5>But you know what annoyed the crap out of me

0:09:06.040 --> 0:09:07.440
<v Speaker 5>was when they're and I'm not sure if we have

0:09:07.480 --> 0:09:09.480
<v Speaker 5>these clips, but they were talking about the fines, which

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.520
<v Speaker 5>are fairly heavy. I mean it's thousands of dollars in

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:15.240
<v Speaker 5>fines and multiple offenses can put you in jail. But

0:09:15.360 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 5>some people just have their phones and their laptops confiscated

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 5>for good.

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 2>They don't get them back.

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:25.720
<v Speaker 5>And Cheryl Fonsi said, your phone, wow, because everything's on there.

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:26.679
<v Speaker 2>That is tough.

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 5>And she was amused at the idea of these people

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.400
<v Speaker 5>who indulged in what the Germans are calling hate speech

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 5>getting their devices taken away and not getting access to

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:37.880
<v Speaker 5>them anymore.

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:40.760
<v Speaker 2>She thought that was funny, an insensitive joke. They come

0:09:40.800 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>and take your laptop and your phone and you don't

0:09:42.520 --> 0:09:46.559
<v Speaker 2>get it back, and to a certain crowd, that's awesome.

0:09:46.800 --> 0:09:49.120
<v Speaker 2>This story I found amusing, but it.

0:09:49.040 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Was a twenty twenty one case involving a local politician

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:57.640
<v Speaker 1>named Andy Grot that captured the country's attention. Grow complained

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about a tweet that called him a pimmel, a German

0:10:00.679 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>word for the mail, anatomy that triggered a police rate

0:10:04.320 --> 0:10:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and accusations of excessive censorship by the government. As prosecutors

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 1>explain to us, in Germany, it's okay to debate politics online,

0:10:13.760 --> 0:10:16.840
<v Speaker 1>but it can be a crime to call anyone a pimle,

0:10:17.400 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>even a politician. So it sounds like you're saying it's

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:27.560
<v Speaker 1>okay to criticize a politician's policy, but not to say

0:10:27.760 --> 0:10:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you're a jerk and idiot.

0:10:29.720 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Exactly. Yeah, commen's like your son of a bitch. Excuse

0:10:33.120 --> 0:10:35.360
<v Speaker 3>me forward. This word has nothing to.

0:10:35.320 --> 0:10:39.080
<v Speaker 8>Do with a political discussions or a contribution.

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:39.439
<v Speaker 3>To a discussion.

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:43.080
<v Speaker 2>But that's amazing.

0:10:44.240 --> 0:10:48.640
<v Speaker 5>It's one of the great canards that sensors use. Here's

0:10:48.679 --> 0:10:53.240
<v Speaker 5>an example where I'm censoring something reasonably right, and then

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:55.840
<v Speaker 5>you're supposed to extrapolate from there therefore, I trust you

0:10:55.880 --> 0:10:58.880
<v Speaker 5>to censor whenever you want. F you know, and you

0:10:58.960 --> 0:11:03.000
<v Speaker 5>are a piml a table full of pimbles, right.

0:11:03.040 --> 0:11:05.920
<v Speaker 2>I kept thinking that as they used various examples. I thought, yeah,

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 2>it'd be nice if you could censor that and not

0:11:08.440 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 2>other stuff. But once you open the door, then you

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:18.560
<v Speaker 2>start making choices, and who's making those choices? And he

0:11:18.600 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 2>gets out of hand really really fast.

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:24.920
<v Speaker 5>A little more from this absolute abhorrent sixty minutes driving

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 5>a nail in their own coffin report after a word

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:31.440
<v Speaker 5>from our friends at Simply Save Home Security, every twenty

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.959
<v Speaker 5>six seconds a burglary takes place in the US courting

0:11:33.960 --> 0:11:37.439
<v Speaker 5>the FBI. That means by the time this commercial ends,

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:40.160
<v Speaker 5>dozens of homes will have been targeted and a couple

0:11:40.200 --> 0:11:40.839
<v Speaker 5>broken into.

0:11:41.160 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 2>You got some pimble trying to get in your house,

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and the Simply Safe cameras will catch that and they'll

0:11:47.040 --> 0:11:49.079
<v Speaker 2>be able to stop them before they get in. That's

0:11:49.160 --> 0:11:51.720
<v Speaker 2>one of the cool things with the active guard outdoor protection,

0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 2>catching pimbles before they get in your home, to kick

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:58.120
<v Speaker 2>them right in a gripping sack. No long term contracts

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.600
<v Speaker 2>or cancelation fees. You know why that is what's simply safe.

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:02.720
<v Speaker 2>Because they believe in their product, they believe you're gonna

0:12:02.760 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 2>like it. They don't have to lock you in for

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years, whether you like it or not.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.360
<v Speaker 5>In traditional security systems only take action after the pimol

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:10.040
<v Speaker 5>is broken in.

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 2>That's too late.

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:13.680
<v Speaker 5>Simply Safe's active guard outdoor protection can help prevent break

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:16.880
<v Speaker 5>ins before they happen. They can talk to the scumbag,

0:12:17.000 --> 0:12:19.800
<v Speaker 5>they can call the cops, turn on your spotlights all

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:23.559
<v Speaker 5>before the break in. Visit simply safe dot com slash

0:12:23.640 --> 0:12:26.080
<v Speaker 5>armstrong claim fifty percent off a new system with a

0:12:26.120 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 5>professional monitoring plan, and your first month is free.

0:12:28.920 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Again.

0:12:29.160 --> 0:12:33.839
<v Speaker 5>That's simplysafe dot com slash armstrong fifty percent off. There's

0:12:33.960 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 5>no safe flight simply Safe.

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:38.160
<v Speaker 2>We'll have to play some more of this from the

0:12:38.200 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 2>sixty minutes when we come back, some more amazing stories.

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.640
<v Speaker 2>But we all lived through this in the United States,

0:12:42.679 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 2>so we know how off track this can get so fast.

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 2>When it was basically against the rules to say, you know,

0:12:52.679 --> 0:12:54.679
<v Speaker 2>I think the virus probably came out of that lab,

0:12:54.800 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 2>you couldn't say it for a couple of years.

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, or you would be punished, maybe not by law

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:02.040
<v Speaker 5>enforce in the ways we're used to. But you would

0:13:02.040 --> 0:13:04.559
<v Speaker 5>be punished by proxy by the government.

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:08.280
<v Speaker 2>And CBS, it would seem, and many others. A lot

0:13:08.280 --> 0:13:11.040
<v Speaker 2>of college professors want it to be against the law

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:15.439
<v Speaker 2>to post misinformation and again.

0:13:15.960 --> 0:13:19.080
<v Speaker 5>Misinformation like if you get the inoculation, you can still

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 5>get COVID and you can still spread it.

0:13:21.360 --> 0:13:25.400
<v Speaker 2>That is dangerous misinformation. Wow, it's scary. One true, they're

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:27.840
<v Speaker 2>so enthusiastic about it there in Germany, and then we

0:13:27.880 --> 0:13:30.760
<v Speaker 2>got and then CBS is enthusiastic about it too. That

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.120
<v Speaker 2>is freaking frightening. We got a lot more on the way.

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:43.040
<v Speaker 1>I can show your soul's desire for freedom.

0:13:39.720 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 2>SNL fifty anniversary special that I watched the whole thing

0:13:43.840 --> 0:13:45.840
<v Speaker 2>on Sunday night. I was highly amused.

0:13:47.080 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 5>I had to stop, like a lot of people after

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.640
<v Speaker 5>an early sketch. I went back to it later, but

0:13:51.679 --> 0:13:52.760
<v Speaker 5>it was incredibly annoying.

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:57.160
<v Speaker 2>I couldn't believe the star studded audience. Oh my god,

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:01.080
<v Speaker 2>that was That was quite the collection of famous people

0:14:01.360 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 2>in one room. We're focusing a little bit on sixty

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 2>minutes from Sunday night because it was one of the

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 2>more astounding things I've ever seen and I've watched practically

0:14:09.920 --> 0:14:14.080
<v Speaker 2>every Sixty Minutes episode of the last forty years. That

0:14:14.240 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 2>was just crazy CBS's enthusiasm for cracking down on free speech,

0:14:19.920 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>and they're sort of like portraying Germany's models. Isn't this

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.880
<v Speaker 2>fantastic how they'll arrest you if you insult somebody, or

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.320
<v Speaker 2>if you put a cartoon somebody doesn't like on the internet,

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 2>or if you engage in misinformation and disinformation.

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:36.600
<v Speaker 5>I would characterize it as sixty Minutes gets an enthusiastic

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 5>lesson from the Germans on how to crack down on

0:14:39.320 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 5>irresponsible speech.

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.480
<v Speaker 2>There's a little of German authorities laying out how it works.

0:14:43.800 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Josephine Ballone is a CEO of Hate eight, a Berlin

0:14:47.640 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 1>based human rights organization that supports victims of online violence.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 9>In the United States.

0:14:53.640 --> 0:14:55.160
<v Speaker 1>A lot of people look at this and say, this

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.520
<v Speaker 1>is restricting free speech. It's a threat to democracy.

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Free speech needs boundaries, and in the case of Germany,

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 4>these boundaries are part of our constitution. Without boundaries, a

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 4>very small group of people can rely on endless freedom

0:15:15.640 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 4>to say anything that they want while everyone else is

0:15:19.680 --> 0:15:21.040
<v Speaker 4>scared and intimidated.

0:15:21.360 --> 0:15:25.200
<v Speaker 1>In your fears that if people are freely attacked online

0:15:25.280 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>that they'll withdraw from the discussion.

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:30.960
<v Speaker 4>This is not only a field, it's already taking place.

0:15:31.280 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 3>Already.

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.800
<v Speaker 4>Half of the Internet users in Germany are afraid to

0:15:34.960 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 4>express their political opinion and they rarely participate in public

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:41.600
<v Speaker 4>debates online anymore, half of the internet users.

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm honest to god, I was listening to this in

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 2>my car. I had to pull over my car and

0:15:47.560 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 2>replay that. I was so amazed at what that woman

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 2>just said. So first of all, she says, without boundaries,

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 2>a small group of people could control the conversation, and

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:03.720
<v Speaker 2>with boundaries, a small group of people controls the conversation.

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:08.280
<v Speaker 2>And I mean, come on, obviously, And then she says, uh,

0:16:08.320 --> 0:16:09.960
<v Speaker 2>what did she say? It lit it on my mind

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 2>was the next thing she said. Damn it. I got

0:16:13.600 --> 0:16:15.360
<v Speaker 2>so worked up over the first part. How does she

0:16:15.440 --> 0:16:19.440
<v Speaker 2>not understand that, Yeah, a few people control the conversation.

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 2>Then you argue against them. So you're suggesting a small

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.200
<v Speaker 2>group of people control the entire conversation.

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh.

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.960
<v Speaker 2>The second part was if you have there are people

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:31.760
<v Speaker 2>out there that are intimidated to put things online because

0:16:31.800 --> 0:16:34.360
<v Speaker 2>somebody will say something mean to them. So you want

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:38.480
<v Speaker 2>rules where everybody's intimidated to say what they think because

0:16:38.480 --> 0:16:43.240
<v Speaker 2>they'll Linda find her in jail. What are you talking about? Yeah?

0:16:43.280 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 5>And just as an American the history of who gets

0:16:46.560 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 5>ruined and run out of their career and harassed and

0:16:49.440 --> 0:16:52.960
<v Speaker 5>docked because they made a politically incorrect comment many years ago.

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it cuts both ways, doesn't it. And then fine,

0:16:55.600 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 2>and then this little part here where this politician was

0:16:58.600 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 2>talking about how she had been in online or wronged

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:06.520
<v Speaker 2>online and how she handled it, the little one ady

0:17:06.640 --> 0:17:10.280
<v Speaker 2>the b This court said, in case of.

0:17:11.760 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 9>Public servants which have public offices and jobs, it's public

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 9>interest that their personal rights are protected, because otherwise no

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:24.760
<v Speaker 9>one would go for these jobs. You know that wore

0:17:24.840 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 9>tom democracy.

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:30.200
<v Speaker 1>After all this, are you seeing less hateful comments now

0:17:30.240 --> 0:17:31.840
<v Speaker 1>on your social media feeds?

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:36.560
<v Speaker 9>Yes, there are less hateful comments. And there was one

0:17:36.880 --> 0:17:40.600
<v Speaker 9>tweet which says, don't say that to her, she will

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:41.359
<v Speaker 9>take you to court.

0:17:42.359 --> 0:17:43.240
<v Speaker 2>You might sue them.

0:17:44.040 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 3>I might sue them.

0:17:45.280 --> 0:17:47.399
<v Speaker 2>And the cherway of Ponzi was just, oh, yes, you

0:17:47.480 --> 0:17:50.879
<v Speaker 2>might sue them. Isn't that great? Somebody said something negative

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:55.040
<v Speaker 2>of you about you online and you'll sue them. That's fantastic. JD.

0:17:55.200 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 5>Vance's fabulous speech in front of the Euros. In a

0:17:58.359 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 5>related story, stay with US Armstrong and Getty in Munich.

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 3>This week, Vice President JD.

0:18:05.760 --> 0:18:09.600
<v Speaker 5>Vance stunned America's European allies by saying it is their

0:18:09.680 --> 0:18:13.360
<v Speaker 5>governments and not Russia or China that represent the biggest

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 5>threat to security in the region.

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:18.080
<v Speaker 10>The threat that I worry the most about visa the

0:18:18.240 --> 0:18:21.720
<v Speaker 10>Europe is not Russia, it's not China, it's not any

0:18:21.760 --> 0:18:25.360
<v Speaker 10>other external actor. And what I worry about is the

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:30.480
<v Speaker 10>threat from within the retreat of Europe from some of

0:18:30.520 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 10>its most fundamental values.

0:18:32.280 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're going to get a little more of what

0:18:34.119 --> 0:18:36.240
<v Speaker 2>JD said in Europe, and he is talking about this

0:18:36.280 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 2>free speech stuff. We're talking a lot about it this

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.120
<v Speaker 2>hour because it's well one, it's a really, really big deal,

0:18:42.359 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 2>and Joe and I are really into it. But I

0:18:46.600 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 2>continue to be shocked. We got a text from somebody

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:51.120
<v Speaker 2>who said, yeah, I saw the promos for sixty minutes

0:18:51.160 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 2>and I just assumed they were going to take a

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 2>somewhat adversarial approach as a news outlet to what they're

0:18:56.840 --> 0:18:59.520
<v Speaker 2>doing in Germany. But no, they were cheerleaders for the

0:18:59.560 --> 0:19:03.560
<v Speaker 2>fact that Germany is censoring all kinds of speech, which

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:09.520
<v Speaker 2>is interesting. But anyway to jd Vance's attack on Europe,

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.040
<v Speaker 2>which the Europeans did not take well, specifically the Germans.

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:15.600
<v Speaker 2>He gave the speech in Munich. This is from the

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:19.680
<v Speaker 2>Financial Times. A prominent German politician told me that was

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:23.880
<v Speaker 2>a direct assault on European democracy. The senior diplomat said,

0:19:23.920 --> 0:19:26.480
<v Speaker 2>it is very clear now Europe is alone. When I

0:19:26.480 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 2>ask him if he now regarded the US as an adversary,

0:19:28.880 --> 0:19:34.520
<v Speaker 2>he replied yes, the senior German diplomat Yeah, yeah.

0:19:34.720 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 5>More analysis of the back and forth to come. But

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 5>let's get jd Vance in his own words. First ball,

0:19:40.480 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 5>flesh out the thing you already heard ninety two.

0:19:42.960 --> 0:19:46.439
<v Speaker 10>Michael, The threat that I worry the most about visa

0:19:46.480 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 10>e Europe is not Russia, it's not China, it's not

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:53.560
<v Speaker 10>any other external actor. And what I worry about is

0:19:53.640 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 10>the threat from within, the retreat of Europe from some

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:02.199
<v Speaker 10>of its most fundamental values, values shared with the United

0:20:02.200 --> 0:20:03.000
<v Speaker 10>States of America.

0:20:03.520 --> 0:20:06.159
<v Speaker 2>Well, that just added one half a sentence. Sorry, next clip.

0:20:06.400 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 10>And speaking up and expressing opinions isn't election interference, even

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:15.160
<v Speaker 10>when people express views outside your own country, and even

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:19.119
<v Speaker 10>when those people are very influential. And trust me, I

0:20:19.160 --> 0:20:22.920
<v Speaker 10>say this with all humor. If American democracy can survive

0:20:23.119 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 10>ten years of Thunberg scolding you guys can survive a

0:20:27.080 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 10>few months of Elon Musk. But what German democracy, what

0:20:33.240 --> 0:20:38.200
<v Speaker 10>no democracy, American, German or European will survive, is telling

0:20:38.240 --> 0:20:41.720
<v Speaker 10>millions of voters that their thoughts and concerns, their aspirations,

0:20:42.119 --> 0:20:46.600
<v Speaker 10>their pleas for relief are invalid or unworthy of even

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:47.919
<v Speaker 10>being considered.

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Yet, I remember if he said it in a speech

0:20:50.080 --> 0:20:52.679
<v Speaker 2>or just an interviewed afterwards, the rise of some of

0:20:52.680 --> 0:20:56.720
<v Speaker 2>these parties on the right is because they're not getting

0:20:56.920 --> 0:20:58.760
<v Speaker 2>that their voice is not heard in any way.

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:01.760
<v Speaker 5>Right, Yeah, Indeed, that was the point I was going

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:03.679
<v Speaker 5>to get to a little more of JD. If you

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:06.200
<v Speaker 5>were afraid of the voices, the opinions, and the conscience

0:21:06.240 --> 0:21:10.000
<v Speaker 5>that guide your own people, then there's nothing America can

0:21:10.040 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 5>do for you. Among the problems he went on to

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:17.159
<v Speaker 5>list where governments dismissing voters concerns, shutting down their media,

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 5>and violating the basic liberties of the religious and as

0:21:21.280 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 5>Jack points out, and I've said so many times, if

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 5>you either instill enough fear or you actually regulate it

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:35.080
<v Speaker 5>to the point that your mainstream can't express what your

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:38.960
<v Speaker 5>people are feeling. Parties are gonna rise up on the

0:21:38.960 --> 0:21:42.360
<v Speaker 5>far right or the far left. They're gonna express those feelings,

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.680
<v Speaker 5>and people who normally wouldn't be attracted to them are

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:48.439
<v Speaker 5>gonna say, finally, that party speaks for me.

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm going with that party. Yeah, but they're neo Nazis.

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:51.880
<v Speaker 2>I don't care.

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 5>They're the first party that says what I feel. If

0:21:55.320 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 5>you want extremism, suppress people's speech, tell them what's not

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:03.840
<v Speaker 5>accept to say. That's how you get That's how you

0:22:03.880 --> 0:22:05.040
<v Speaker 5>get extremism.

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, to a certain extent. That's how Trump got elected.

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I mean the people that vote for him despite you know,

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:14.239
<v Speaker 2>the flaws that they don't like. It's like, uh, you

0:22:14.359 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 2>constantly see reality not being your reality, not being expressed

0:22:19.480 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 2>in mainstream media. It's very angry.

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:24.640
<v Speaker 5>So in response to what Vance just said and more

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.639
<v Speaker 5>that we hadn't played, the German Defense Minister said that

0:22:27.720 --> 0:22:32.600
<v Speaker 5>Vance's words were quote not acceptable, which beautifully made Vance's point.

0:22:32.640 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 5>There was the VP of the United States arguing that

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 5>the Europeans had become far too comfortable telling people what

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:40.320
<v Speaker 5>they could and could not say, and instead of developing

0:22:40.359 --> 0:22:42.879
<v Speaker 5>a counter theory, the first official the issue or a

0:22:42.960 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 5>joinder told him he shouldn't have said that. Thank you

0:22:45.880 --> 0:22:51.720
<v Speaker 5>for making my point for me, Hair official, Sir, unbelievable.

0:22:52.119 --> 0:22:54.760
<v Speaker 2>One of my favorite pundits said, in Europe, especially in Germany,

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:57.320
<v Speaker 2>you have basically two choices. Either you agree with the

0:22:57.359 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 2>prevailing narrative on issues like COVID, climate, immigration, Trump, in

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:05.800
<v Speaker 2>which case you are a responsible, kind, democratic and all

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.840
<v Speaker 2>the other approving adjectives and everything is fine in your life.

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.320
<v Speaker 2>Or you question or disagree with the direction on any

0:23:12.320 --> 0:23:15.199
<v Speaker 2>of those things and think that your leaders might not

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:17.680
<v Speaker 2>be getting it right, in which case you're a populist

0:23:17.760 --> 0:23:20.840
<v Speaker 2>or racist. You're uneducated, of course, you're far far right

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 2>or far right in you're a threat to the country

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.920
<v Speaker 2>and your views need to be taken off the Internet

0:23:27.000 --> 0:23:29.280
<v Speaker 2>or shut down or find if you express them in public.

0:23:30.680 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 5>So Marco Rubio was interviewed on Face the Nation by

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:37.879
<v Speaker 5>the absolute idiot Margaret Brennan. That would get me a

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:39.840
<v Speaker 5>jail time in Germany.

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 2>For no, it's.

0:23:41.720 --> 0:23:46.600
<v Speaker 5>Astonishing her lack of wisdom. It's like a some girl

0:23:46.600 --> 0:23:48.800
<v Speaker 5>who was raised in the woods like Nellen doesn't have

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 5>the power of speech. She appears to be a normal intelligence,

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 5>but is so completely blind to the realities of the world.

0:23:55.960 --> 0:23:59.879
<v Speaker 5>She just doesn't make any sense. But she interviewed Marco

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.840
<v Speaker 5>Rubio and I want to get to her most influenced

0:24:04.240 --> 0:24:08.199
<v Speaker 5>I'm sorry infamous in the idiotic clip. But first this

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 5>about the speech in general ninety four, I.

0:24:11.119 --> 0:24:14.360
<v Speaker 6>Want to ask you about what happened in Munich, Germany.

0:24:14.359 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 6>At the Security conference, Vice President Vance gave a speech

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 6>and he told us allies that the threat he worries

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 6>about the most is not Russia, it is not China.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 6>He called it the threat from within, and he lectured

0:24:27.440 --> 0:24:31.359
<v Speaker 6>about what he described as censorship, mainly focusing though on

0:24:31.440 --> 0:24:34.720
<v Speaker 6>including more views from the right. He also met with

0:24:34.760 --> 0:24:38.119
<v Speaker 6>the leader of a far right party known as the AfD, which,

0:24:38.160 --> 0:24:42.800
<v Speaker 6>as you know, is under investigation and monitoring by German

0:24:42.840 --> 0:24:44.720
<v Speaker 6>intelligence because of extremism.

0:24:45.960 --> 0:24:47.040
<v Speaker 2>What did all of.

0:24:46.920 --> 0:24:51.840
<v Speaker 6>This accomplish other than irritating our allies, Well, why would.

0:24:51.640 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 11>Our allies there anybody be irritated by free speech and

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.000
<v Speaker 11>by someone giving their opinion. We are, after all, democracies.

0:24:57.000 --> 0:25:01.360
<v Speaker 11>Thesic Munich Security Conference is largely a conference of democracies.

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.119
<v Speaker 11>In which one of the things that we cherish in

0:25:03.240 --> 0:25:06.240
<v Speaker 11>value is the ability to speak feely and provide your opinions.

0:25:06.680 --> 0:25:08.600
<v Speaker 11>And so I think if anyone's angry about his word,

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:10.199
<v Speaker 11>they don't have to agree with him, but to be

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:12.359
<v Speaker 11>angry about it, I think actually makes this point.

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:17.639
<v Speaker 5>Whether it's the American left or you know, in the past,

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 5>the right, or the Europeans. It's like talking to somebody

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:25.560
<v Speaker 5>who doesn't understands steam. There's a boiling pot and there's

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 5>steam pouring out of it, and they say, don't worry,

0:25:29.400 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 5>I'll take care of this steam. And they clamp the

0:25:31.600 --> 0:25:36.320
<v Speaker 5>lid down, and then they're astounded by what happens next.

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:40.719
<v Speaker 5>Unbelievable lack of wisdom. And then Jack, unless you want

0:25:40.800 --> 0:25:43.879
<v Speaker 5>to jump in there, this which should go down and

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:45.680
<v Speaker 5>broadcast in for me for the rest of time.

0:25:45.840 --> 0:25:47.639
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was just going to point out. Jonathan Turley

0:25:47.680 --> 0:25:49.679
<v Speaker 2>wrote a great column in The New York Post yesterday,

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:53.760
<v Speaker 2>Vance rightly excoriates europe what values are we defending and

0:25:55.119 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 2>compared the speech to Reagan's mister Garbichev, tear down this

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:03.159
<v Speaker 2>wall speech, and it's possible importance for the culture of

0:26:03.240 --> 0:26:06.200
<v Speaker 2>free speech and different points of view. But he also

0:26:06.520 --> 0:26:09.600
<v Speaker 2>what Bill Crystal of CNN, who used to be at

0:26:09.600 --> 0:26:11.919
<v Speaker 2>the Weekly Standard and his dad is one of the

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:14.600
<v Speaker 2>fathers of conservativism or whatever, said said the speech was

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.560
<v Speaker 2>a humiliation for the United States and a confirmation that

0:26:17.640 --> 0:26:21.879
<v Speaker 2>this administration isn't on the side of the democracies. Yeah, wow,

0:26:22.080 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 2>absolutely amazing.

0:26:23.800 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 5>And Vance's greater point geo politically speaking, was that, hey, dudes,

0:26:29.240 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 5>you're not listening to your people.

0:26:31.680 --> 0:26:33.240
<v Speaker 2>That steam is building up.

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:36.399
<v Speaker 5>It's expressing itself in whether the AfD in Germany or

0:26:36.400 --> 0:26:39.800
<v Speaker 5>whatever parties that you marine La penn in France in

0:26:39.880 --> 0:26:42.800
<v Speaker 5>ways that you don't like. So how about you let

0:26:42.840 --> 0:26:45.200
<v Speaker 5>people release that steam and you listen to your people.

0:26:45.280 --> 0:26:47.719
<v Speaker 5>Otherwise you are going to crumble and we will not

0:26:47.800 --> 0:26:50.520
<v Speaker 5>have you as allies anymore because you have crumbled.

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:53.080
<v Speaker 2>So it's a very very practical strategy.

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:55.600
<v Speaker 5>It's not just like he was making a rhetorical argument

0:26:55.640 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 5>because he likes to argue. He sees our allies falling apart.

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.879
<v Speaker 5>And then this again, this moment. You know, if I

0:27:04.000 --> 0:27:07.439
<v Speaker 5>was going to limit free speech, I would revoke CBS's

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 5>license to broadcast based purely on the sheer stupidity of

0:27:12.960 --> 0:27:13.960
<v Speaker 5>clip ninety six.

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.199
<v Speaker 6>He was standing in a country where free speech was

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 6>weaponized to conduct a genocide, and he met with the

0:27:22.400 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 6>head of a political party that has far right views

0:27:27.359 --> 0:27:33.119
<v Speaker 6>and some historic ties to extreme groups. The context of

0:27:33.160 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 6>that was changing the tone of it.

0:27:37.840 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 2>And you know that that.

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:41.840
<v Speaker 6>The censorship disagree with you specifically about the right.

0:27:41.920 --> 0:27:44.240
<v Speaker 11>Now I have to disagree with you. The free speech

0:27:44.280 --> 0:27:46.520
<v Speaker 11>was not used to conduct a genocide. The genocide was

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 11>conducted by an authoritarian Nazi regime that happened to also

0:27:49.600 --> 0:27:52.560
<v Speaker 11>be genocidal because they hated Jews, and they hated minorities,

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 11>and they hated those that they had a list of

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.959
<v Speaker 11>people they hated, but primarily the Jews. There was no

0:27:57.000 --> 0:27:58.320
<v Speaker 11>free speech in Nazi Germany.

0:27:58.359 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 2>There was none.

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:01.399
<v Speaker 11>There was also no OP position in Nazi Germany. They

0:28:01.400 --> 0:28:03.919
<v Speaker 11>were a sole and only party that governed that country.

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 11>So that's not an accurate reflection of history.

0:28:06.280 --> 0:28:10.200
<v Speaker 5>A phrase weaponized free speech is something well and tag

0:28:10.280 --> 0:28:13.760
<v Speaker 5>me Marco, I want to jump in here. Far from

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 5>being an example of free speech weaponized to conduct a genocide,

0:28:19.480 --> 0:28:23.360
<v Speaker 5>Germany under Hitler was engaged in precisely the sort of

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:30.440
<v Speaker 5>democratic authoritarianism that Vance was condemning. It was exactly the

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 5>opposite of what the ninny Margaret Brennan suggested. He was

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.560
<v Speaker 5>standing in a country where a free speech was weaponized

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 5>to commit a genocide. Good lord, what an ignoramus. Uh.

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 2>What Jonathan Turley calls the haymaker from Vance's speech is

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:49.520
<v Speaker 2>when he said, if you're running in fear of your

0:28:49.520 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 2>own voters, there's nothing American can do for you. Nor,

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 2>for the matter, is there anything you can do for

0:28:55.360 --> 0:29:00.160
<v Speaker 2>the American people that elected me and Donald Trump. If

0:29:00.200 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 2>you're running in fear from your own voters, there's nothing

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 2>America can do for you. And that's what they're doing

0:29:05.440 --> 0:29:08.640
<v Speaker 2>with the censorship. They don't like the point of view

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 2>of a big chunk of their countries, and so they're

0:29:11.640 --> 0:29:14.640
<v Speaker 2>trying to outlaw that point of view, which is not

0:29:14.680 --> 0:29:15.920
<v Speaker 2>going to work. Yeah.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:19.120
<v Speaker 5>Their inability to deal with steam, as I described it before,

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 5>is partly practical because the steam is rising because of

0:29:24.360 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 5>their policies, namely rampant immigration, open immigration from the Muslim

0:29:31.040 --> 0:29:34.120
<v Speaker 5>world especially, and also economic policies.

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 2>But the other part of it is ideological.

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:39.960
<v Speaker 5>They are so intensely uncomfortable with the conversation about, Hey,

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.360
<v Speaker 5>we've let all these people who do not share our values,

0:29:43.400 --> 0:29:46.240
<v Speaker 5>They do not share our culture. In fact, they despise

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:50.160
<v Speaker 5>our culture, and they've been tasked with overturning it in

0:29:50.200 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 5>the name of Sharia, for instance.

0:29:52.720 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 2>This is not good.

0:29:53.960 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 5>They are so intensely uncomfortable with that for political correctness

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.040
<v Speaker 5>reasons to use the cliched old phrase that they I

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 5>can't even permit it, and so they cheerfully inform a

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 5>cheerful share in ALPHONSI on CBS that, well, free speech

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:07.600
<v Speaker 5>has its limits.

0:30:07.640 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 2>We must we must correl.

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.720
<v Speaker 5>It, so nobody says anything rude and we will just

0:30:12.040 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 5>clamp that lid on and that'll get rid of the steam.

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 2>Well, good luck, And let me guess you could say

0:30:17.720 --> 0:30:20.360
<v Speaker 2>practically anything about people on the right and that wouldn't

0:30:20.360 --> 0:30:22.800
<v Speaker 2>be considered rude or an attack or anything like that.

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 5>That just facts, just facts. Oh yeah, it's entirely one sided.

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 2>That is really something. What a very very frightening weekend

0:30:31.240 --> 0:30:32.719
<v Speaker 2>from the standpoint of free speech.

0:30:33.480 --> 0:30:36.280
<v Speaker 5>But you know, getting back to Reagan's mister Garbachev's speech,

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 5>I think Turley's not overstating how important it is to

0:30:42.280 --> 0:30:45.000
<v Speaker 5>go to their homes say that out loud in front

0:30:45.000 --> 0:30:48.720
<v Speaker 5>of the world. Y'all are committing suicide because you don't

0:30:48.800 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 5>listen to your people.

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 2>If you had any comments on that, you could Our

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 2>text line is four one five two nine KFTC.

0:30:59.240 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 7>Fun fact, a person born during the first season of

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 7>Saturday Night Live could today be easily dead of natural costume.

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 2>Now you're going to see a lot of familiar things.

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:19.560
<v Speaker 7>Tonight, musical guest sketches, cameo appearances, the news, and this

0:31:20.440 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 7>is the monologue, traditionally the weakest part of the show. Yes,

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:28.760
<v Speaker 7>the monologue is like a rent controlled tenant.

0:31:29.280 --> 0:31:34.600
<v Speaker 2>It's not going anywhere, even though it stinks. I thought

0:31:35.000 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 2>the Saturday A Live Show is really, really entertaining. I

0:31:37.200 --> 0:31:39.880
<v Speaker 2>really enjoyed it. I thought it was the opening. So

0:31:39.920 --> 0:31:42.120
<v Speaker 2>they opened with Paul Simon and a musical thing with

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:45.640
<v Speaker 2>the hot it girl of the time, that Sabrina Carpenter

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:47.960
<v Speaker 2>Werman who shows up everywhere. It's funny how the whole

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 2>it girl thing is is for real. Save your money, dear,

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 2>you can yet up kidding because there'll be another hot

0:31:53.840 --> 0:31:57.120
<v Speaker 2>young blonde come along. But I liked her line about

0:31:57.160 --> 0:32:01.920
<v Speaker 2>the famous Paul Simon George Harryson duet from way back

0:32:01.960 --> 0:32:03.920
<v Speaker 2>in the day, Like second season or something like that

0:32:03.960 --> 0:32:06.840
<v Speaker 2>on Sarah Life, and she said I wasn't even born

0:32:06.920 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 2>yet and neither were my parents. And I thought, holy crap,

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:17.680
<v Speaker 2>that's true. Her parents weren't important yet. I thought the

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:20.160
<v Speaker 2>big giant musical number at the end about New York

0:32:20.200 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 2>and everything with John Mulaney as an area, I thought, Wow,

0:32:22.720 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 2>that was some art. That was some amazing stuff there,

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:27.080
<v Speaker 2>just really really cool.

0:32:27.560 --> 0:32:29.280
<v Speaker 5>I was shocked if you didn't see at the extent

0:32:29.320 --> 0:32:32.720
<v Speaker 5>to which it was new comedy. Yeah, with just zillions

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.160
<v Speaker 5>of I assumed they'd be a flashback show, and it

0:32:35.240 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 5>had some, but it was mostly newly produced stuff and

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 5>a lot of it was really good. A lot of

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 5>it was not, but that's the nature of you know,

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 5>that sketch comedy. Yeah, that was a lot of the

0:32:43.960 --> 0:32:47.720
<v Speaker 5>more famous sketches, like the the being abducted by alien

0:32:47.760 --> 0:32:54.200
<v Speaker 5>stuff and just you know. Anyway, they displayed Kneed Meryl

0:32:54.320 --> 0:32:55.400
<v Speaker 5>Streep as guests star.

0:32:55.560 --> 0:33:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, pretty funny. I thought, Eddie Murphy doing Tracy Morgan's

0:33:00.040 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 2>standing next to Tracy Morgan was pretty dang hilarious. Yes,

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.360
<v Speaker 2>that was very funny. And Ken Topson say you too,

0:33:07.640 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 2>you could be related, and Tracy Morgan says, I don't

0:33:11.320 --> 0:33:15.920
<v Speaker 2>see it. Oh, I left so hard at that show.

0:33:16.360 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 5>Let me acknowledge briefly the infamous Dug thing where the

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:21.880
<v Speaker 5>punchline of the black Jeopardy sketch was that a Trump

0:33:21.960 --> 0:33:24.600
<v Speaker 5>supporter is such as stupid racist he won't even shake

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:26.960
<v Speaker 5>the hand of a black man, right, at which I

0:33:27.120 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 5>turned it.

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>Off for a while. I was like, no, sorry, you

0:33:29.680 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 2>don't want me okay, bye. So a different topic here

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 2>came across this on the NPR feed. So I don't

0:33:37.840 --> 0:33:41.400
<v Speaker 2>use emojis, but the rest of you people do for

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.200
<v Speaker 2>some reason. And apparently if you do a thumbs up,

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 2>there are six different skin colors you can choose for

0:33:47.600 --> 0:33:50.560
<v Speaker 2>the thumbs up. There used to just be yellow, but

0:33:50.640 --> 0:33:56.360
<v Speaker 2>now there's yellow, I don't know, slightly, tan, more tan,

0:33:56.560 --> 0:34:00.200
<v Speaker 2>even more tan, Brown, and black are your choices, and

0:34:00.440 --> 0:34:02.680
<v Speaker 2>it's like a paint chip. You get a thrd worse store.

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 2>And NPR had an article which I didn't click on

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:08.520
<v Speaker 2>and read that said some white people may choose the

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:13.680
<v Speaker 2>yellow thumbs up because it feels neutral, but academics argue

0:34:14.640 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 2>opting out of the actual white guy thumb I guess

0:34:19.360 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 2>signals a lack of awareness about white privilege, akin to

0:34:22.239 --> 0:34:26.279
<v Speaker 2>society associating whiteness with being raceless. So it's kind of

0:34:26.280 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 2>the whole anti racist thing. If you choose the yellow

0:34:28.800 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 2>guy thumbs up, it is a racist move because you're

0:34:31.520 --> 0:34:33.400
<v Speaker 2>claiming there's a neutral or something. I don't know what

0:34:33.400 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 2>it was, but I just found that quite hilarious.

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:37.920
<v Speaker 5>And everything is based on race all the time, so

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 5>you need to pick an accurate skin tone and then

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:45.040
<v Speaker 5>acknowledge your white thumbs up supremacy. You know what, you people,

0:34:45.960 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 5>you had your day and you're still having it in

0:34:47.960 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 5>government to some extent and on campuses. But we're coming

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 5>for you.

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:54.360
<v Speaker 2>We had this story a couple of weeks ago. It's obvious,

0:34:54.400 --> 0:34:56.279
<v Speaker 2>but I hadn't thought about it before. But now I

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:58.560
<v Speaker 2>think about it every time I hear academics say or

0:34:58.600 --> 0:35:02.200
<v Speaker 2>experts say. I got to remember that academics and experts

0:35:02.200 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 2>are like, depending on the uh, what their expertise is,

0:35:08.960 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 2>one hundred percent of them are progressives. Sometimes it gets

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 2>down to as few as ninety eight percent of them

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 2>are progressives. But so if you go to experts, they're

0:35:18.440 --> 0:35:23.759
<v Speaker 2>all on one side. So of course the experts say this, yeah, yeah,

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 2>just remember this.

0:35:25.040 --> 0:35:27.480
<v Speaker 5>If an expert's quoted. There's a good chance that is

0:35:27.520 --> 0:35:31.560
<v Speaker 5>a professor. Professors are the media's favorite experts, and if

0:35:31.600 --> 0:35:33.920
<v Speaker 5>it's a professor, it's going to be a progressive person

0:35:33.960 --> 0:35:34.720
<v Speaker 5>almost always.

0:35:34.760 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, you're incredibly one side. Experts think this is dangerous. Okay,

0:35:38.400 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 2>so you ask progressives and nobody else. But that's hilarious.

0:35:41.920 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 2>You're showing your white privilege if you don't, if you

0:35:44.120 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 2>if you use the yellow thumbs up. So think think

0:35:46.960 --> 0:35:49.759
<v Speaker 2>about that throughout the day. I just like the Simpsons.

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:55.799
<v Speaker 2>You evil be funny, racist bastard. N PR has that

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.799
<v Speaker 2>been defunded yet? Please not yet Doje's working on it.

0:35:59.440 --> 0:36:01.360
<v Speaker 2>We got a lot more on the way and some

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:02.960
<v Speaker 2>of the news of the day. They're meeting in Saudi

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:05.399
<v Speaker 2>Arabia right now about trying to wind down the war

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:09.800
<v Speaker 2>in Ukraine, among other things. Armstrong and Getty