WEBVTT - MLB Post Break Futures Update (Ep. 94)

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:02.640
<v Speaker 1>It's time to place your bets right coming down, let's

0:00:02.680 --> 0:00:07.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to the pros one. Welcome to everybody to betting pros.

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:09.320
<v Speaker 1>It's me Joey p Joe Pizza for you. We got

0:00:09.320 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>a great show for you today as always. Yes, we're

0:00:12.720 --> 0:00:15.720
<v Speaker 1>past the halfway part of the Major League Baseball season. Yes,

0:00:16.239 --> 0:00:17.800
<v Speaker 1>so the home run Derby is in the rear view,

0:00:17.880 --> 0:00:19.960
<v Speaker 1>so is the All Star Game. But there have been

0:00:20.000 --> 0:00:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot of injuries to talk about here that really

0:00:22.520 --> 0:00:25.479
<v Speaker 1>are going to affect not only futures of players, but

0:00:25.560 --> 0:00:28.280
<v Speaker 1>futures of teams. And there's nobody better to get the

0:00:28.360 --> 0:00:31.880
<v Speaker 1>inside information than a real Major League Baseball insider. He

0:00:32.000 --> 0:00:34.159
<v Speaker 1>is my former co host of Fantasy Sports Today and

0:00:34.200 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the current co host there at Sports Grid as well.

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.360
<v Speaker 1>And not only that, he also covers the Marlins everything

0:00:39.400 --> 0:00:41.960
<v Speaker 1>going on with them. He's the one, the only Craig Mish.

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Mish Welcome to the show, my friend. It's been too

0:00:44.640 --> 0:00:47.040
<v Speaker 1>long and here we are talking little baseball today. It's

0:00:47.040 --> 0:00:47.840
<v Speaker 1>good to see your face.

0:00:48.120 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 2>It is great to see you, Joe. Hope you and

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:51.519
<v Speaker 2>your family are well. Thanks for the invitation.

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 1>By the way, Yeah, well you know we're gonna be

0:00:53.680 --> 0:00:56.120
<v Speaker 1>doing some Football and Sports Grid together every Sunday, and

0:00:56.160 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I figured, you know what, I haven't talked to Miss

0:00:58.760 --> 0:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>in a few weeks here months. Maybe it's time to

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>make sure we dust off the old brand, which is

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 1>Joey P and Craignish, which you can't kill. I mean,

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>really share man, it is. It is stunning. You know,

0:01:10.800 --> 0:01:12.360
<v Speaker 1>we're coming up on a decade. I don't know what

0:01:12.400 --> 0:01:14.800
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna get me for the ten year anniversary.

0:01:14.160 --> 0:01:16.640
<v Speaker 2>But I know the nice you know, it's funny. It's

0:01:16.640 --> 0:01:18.760
<v Speaker 2>funny that you bring that up because we were talking

0:01:18.800 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 2>about you the other day on the show. We were

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:23.640
<v Speaker 2>on the air and something came up. I think it

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 2>was Space Jam. I want to say, I don't know

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:27.560
<v Speaker 2>what it was, but I said, if Joe Piece of

0:01:27.600 --> 0:01:29.840
<v Speaker 2>P was on this show, this is what he would

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 2>say about Space Jam. I'm not gonna watch it now,

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 2>but I promise you eventually I will. It may not

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.119
<v Speaker 2>be today, it may not be tomorrow, but I guarantee

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:41.720
<v Speaker 2>you eventually, and then and then I and I will

0:01:41.720 --> 0:01:44.200
<v Speaker 2>ask Joe about this weekly. He still will not watch it,

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.760
<v Speaker 2>he does not have the time, but eventually he will

0:01:46.800 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 2>and he will give a fair review on it at

0:01:49.080 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 2>his pace.

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, I got a show for you when baseball is

0:01:51.920 --> 0:01:53.960
<v Speaker 1>over and you get some more time. We're not traveling

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>anymore or do anything. The Boys. Have you watched The Boys?

0:01:57.360 --> 0:02:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, Amazon Prime. Let the Superheroes are kind

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>of the bad guys. So The Heroes is like the

0:02:04.600 --> 0:02:07.480
<v Speaker 1>anti hero kind of thing going on. It is amazing.

0:02:07.840 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>It is one of the most clever, dark, funny shows

0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.399
<v Speaker 1>I've ever seen, turns all that superhero stuff on its

0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:16.480
<v Speaker 1>ear and it is really well acted. So there you go.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>So you got a little shows, you get that, you

0:02:18.080 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>get a little everything here. But let's talk here with

0:02:20.400 --> 0:02:22.840
<v Speaker 1>Craig Mitch because the Jacob de Gram injury in the

0:02:22.919 --> 0:02:25.560
<v Speaker 1>National League has really changed the dynamic of what's going

0:02:25.600 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>on all of a sudden. Now the MVP odds have

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>come down from all the places here over I'm betting

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:33.600
<v Speaker 1>pros and you can't wager on that, can't wager on

0:02:33.639 --> 0:02:37.080
<v Speaker 1>this young right now. And I'm curious to ask you this, Craig,

0:02:37.120 --> 0:02:39.399
<v Speaker 1>because you have the Acunya injury just a few weeks

0:02:39.400 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>ago to which changed the dynamic of that race. Tatist

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of was the guy that I thought people should

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.079
<v Speaker 1>be on, but now it's just Jacob de gram injury.

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:49.519
<v Speaker 1>If da Grom comes back healthy, what do you think

0:02:49.560 --> 0:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that line's going to look like in anticipation? Is this

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:54.880
<v Speaker 1>the last time also to get in and tatus or

0:02:54.919 --> 0:02:56.919
<v Speaker 1>maybe is there a third guy like Juan Sota who's

0:02:56.919 --> 0:02:59.720
<v Speaker 1>getting red hot, who could finish and maybe carry the

0:02:59.800 --> 0:03:02.919
<v Speaker 1>now single handedly to the playoffs. What's your thoughts about

0:03:02.919 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the National League right now? MVP race the way.

0:03:05.080 --> 0:03:07.920
<v Speaker 2>It stands, Yeah, look, I mean at this point you

0:03:07.919 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 2>can make a case for a lot of different players

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 2>for the MVP. It was interesting that two weeks ago,

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:14.360
<v Speaker 2>if you would have asked this question, you would have

0:03:14.360 --> 0:03:16.720
<v Speaker 2>said the Grama's got the cy Young and the MVP

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>locked up. I still think he's got a great shot

0:03:19.639 --> 0:03:21.720
<v Speaker 2>at the Cy Young Award, especially if he only misses

0:03:21.760 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 2>two or three starts. But I think that as you

0:03:23.960 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 2>look around the league and you look at some of

0:03:25.560 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 2>the teams in the National League, it's unfortunate, but no

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 2>one really sticks out. Milwaukee has kind of had a

0:03:31.160 --> 0:03:34.079
<v Speaker 2>great pitching season, but their hitting has sort of been

0:03:34.280 --> 0:03:37.360
<v Speaker 2>ah so far. You can't throw Christian Yelich into that category,

0:03:37.480 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 2>and certainly they've gotten enough done to be where there are,

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:43.320
<v Speaker 2>but I don't see an MVP on that team. The

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Los Angeles Dodgers, Joe are just so well rounded that

0:03:47.080 --> 0:03:49.360
<v Speaker 2>you could name five or six guys on that club

0:03:49.680 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 2>and say, hey, I mean they have MVP type numbers.

0:03:52.040 --> 0:03:54.720
<v Speaker 2>But with that takeaway from the others. So of course

0:03:54.760 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 2>you mentioned the key name, and that is Fernando Tattis,

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.560
<v Speaker 2>junior on the San Diego Padres, and I think that, look,

0:04:00.600 --> 0:04:03.080
<v Speaker 2>you still have an opportunity, whatever his odds are at

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.280
<v Speaker 2>this point, whenever they get reposted, to take advantage of that.

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 2>The Giants, I mean, look, Buster Posey, by the way,

0:04:09.480 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 2>is making the case for an MVP season. I mean,

0:04:11.640 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 2>he's not gonna win, probably, but my gosh, this guy

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:15.440
<v Speaker 2>just was on the injured list. He comes right back,

0:04:15.480 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 2>hits a home run in his first game back. The

0:04:17.720 --> 0:04:20.520
<v Speaker 2>Giants are having a great season as well. You mentioned

0:04:20.520 --> 0:04:24.200
<v Speaker 2>Sodo the Nationals first half MVP to stay in. It

0:04:24.279 --> 0:04:27.880
<v Speaker 2>was Schwarber. It was not Sodo. So I'm curious when

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Schwarber comes back next week or the week after, how

0:04:31.160 --> 0:04:33.520
<v Speaker 2>that will affect Soda. Will it make him better? Will

0:04:33.560 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 2>it put more light on Schwarber at this point? But look,

0:04:37.000 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 2>you can make the case that if Sodo goes on

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 2>in absolute tear, he potentially could win it. Put Joe,

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:45.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't see the Nationals winning the division, and usually

0:04:45.720 --> 0:04:48.760
<v Speaker 2>they try to give the MVP to a player that's

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:51.240
<v Speaker 2>on a winning team. Mike Trout may have something else

0:04:51.240 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 2>to say about that over the last decade, but I

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 2>think in this case, Tatis is the name that you mentioned,

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.880
<v Speaker 2>and it would really seem to me that if they

0:05:00.080 --> 0:05:02.159
<v Speaker 2>make the postseason that he would be the favorite.

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:04.600
<v Speaker 1>And he's got the narrative to playing through the season

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>with that shoulder injury too. He also had a COVID

0:05:07.160 --> 0:05:09.000
<v Speaker 1>test earlier in the year to miss some time there.

0:05:09.120 --> 0:05:11.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think he's just had a brilliant season. To me,

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that was the guy you know when you look at

0:05:13.839 --> 0:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the MV. Excuse me the Cy Young race though, now too,

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>with Jacob de Gram on pause, is it time to

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.080
<v Speaker 1>start after now? This is not the first time, the

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>second time, this is the third time Jacob de Grom

0:05:22.960 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>has experienced some issues here with different parts of the

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>arm right, is it time to start kicking the tires

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on Brandon Woodruff or Corbyn Burns or maybe even a

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:33.479
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Gosman we mentioned the Giants and Buster Post, and

0:05:33.520 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>we kind of forget about the Giants quite a bit.

0:05:35.800 --> 0:05:38.240
<v Speaker 1>I know this past week wasn't the best start for

0:05:38.320 --> 0:05:40.800
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Gosman that he's had this year, but still Gossman's

0:05:40.839 --> 0:05:43.960
<v Speaker 1>been spectacular from a number standpoint. Is it worth throwing

0:05:43.960 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 1>any long shot money in any of those guys?

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, look, they shouldn't really be long shots

0:05:48.240 --> 0:05:50.080
<v Speaker 2>honestly at this point. Burns was the one that I

0:05:50.120 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 2>liked going into the season, and then unfortunately he had

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:54.960
<v Speaker 2>the COVID at the at the beginning of the season

0:05:54.960 --> 0:05:57.159
<v Speaker 2>that kind of shut him down. He and Burns have

0:05:57.400 --> 0:06:00.440
<v Speaker 2>really close numbers in terms of their stats the course

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:02.240
<v Speaker 2>of the season, so it could be either of those

0:06:02.279 --> 0:06:04.720
<v Speaker 2>guys going on a run. That's how Jake Arietta won

0:06:04.760 --> 0:06:06.279
<v Speaker 2>the Cy Young Award a couple of years ago. His

0:06:06.279 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 2>first half was okay, his second half was unbelievable and

0:06:09.000 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 2>he just pushed his way all the way to the

0:06:11.279 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 2>Cy Young. But yes, Kevin Gossman, unfortunately for me, that

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.680
<v Speaker 2>is the name of the guy that has has had

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 2>a fantastic season. He plays on a really good team.

0:06:22.520 --> 0:06:25.520
<v Speaker 2>He could potentially carry them to the best record in

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:29.040
<v Speaker 2>the entire Major League Baseball. So yeah, Joe, I definitely

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:34.160
<v Speaker 2>think that's him a very deep dart throw at this point,

0:06:34.480 --> 0:06:38.520
<v Speaker 2>if you have a player that saves forty games at

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.200
<v Speaker 2>a forty tries in his first forty tries, I think

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 2>you at least have to have him in the conversation

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 2>in Alex Reyes. I don't think he's gonna win the

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Cy Young Award, But you're talking about somebody that is

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 2>on pace to do, somebody something that no one else

0:06:52.120 --> 0:06:53.920
<v Speaker 2>has in the history of baseball, which is from your

0:06:53.920 --> 0:06:56.600
<v Speaker 2>first save to the end, not blow one. And I

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.679
<v Speaker 2>just at least want to mention that because if things

0:06:59.720 --> 0:07:01.560
<v Speaker 2>go and a couple of the other names that you

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:04.440
<v Speaker 2>mentioned go down, maybe that's part of the conversation. But

0:07:04.480 --> 0:07:06.360
<v Speaker 2>I don't see him winning a deep dark throw there.

0:07:06.600 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about the American League here for

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a second and show Hey, Tani, you know, I gotta

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:13.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you I learned from my good pal Craig Mish

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.720
<v Speaker 1>from doing show after show with him. He said, just

0:07:15.880 --> 0:07:18.200
<v Speaker 1>get the guy you want before you think it's gonna

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.400
<v Speaker 1>get away from you, and don't go betting a million things.

0:07:20.520 --> 0:07:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Just go find the thing that you think you believe

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in and then watch it and then get in before

0:07:24.680 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 1>you think it's going to get away. And I did.

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>I got in on show hal Tan and be very

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>proud of me. But nice fat bet there at six

0:07:30.920 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 1>point fifty for the MVP odds now he is at

0:07:34.720 --> 0:07:37.600
<v Speaker 1>minus three sixty and the plus side of that, so

0:07:37.640 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>that is way gone. Yeah, here's my question to you,

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>is this it's over? We all think it's over. If

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a scenario where shoe Aotani, let's say, injury did

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:47.120
<v Speaker 1>happen like all of a sudden, we have injury to

0:07:47.160 --> 0:07:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Ronald Cooney and all of a sudden that changes the dynamic.

0:07:49.480 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>Has Otani already done enough that it doesn't matter? But

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>or is Vlad's possibility of winning a triple crown? Does

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that really kind of match up at all? I keep saying, no,

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't matter because Otani's already built up so much

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:02.880
<v Speaker 1>equity with the pitching side. Do you think that Vlad

0:08:02.920 --> 0:08:05.679
<v Speaker 1>can do anything to get this award back on his side?

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Well, I mean, let's be fair. If Otani decided to

0:08:09.560 --> 0:08:12.040
<v Speaker 2>leave the United States today and go back to Japan

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:14.720
<v Speaker 2>and never play again, he would not win the MVP

0:08:14.960 --> 0:08:17.440
<v Speaker 2>somebody else would win it, But that's the kind of

0:08:17.480 --> 0:08:20.560
<v Speaker 2>extraordinary circumstance that I think that it would require. I

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 2>would say, I'm looking at the calendar the twentieth of July.

0:08:23.520 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I think if Otani just makes two more weeks or

0:08:26.640 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 2>three more weeks, I don't think it'll matter, but not

0:08:29.000 --> 0:08:33.000
<v Speaker 2>quite yet because vladd is having an unbelievable season, but

0:08:33.240 --> 0:08:37.240
<v Speaker 2>a triple crown or not Otani that was the right call.

0:08:37.280 --> 0:08:39.240
<v Speaker 2>I think you and I talked about betting Otani last

0:08:39.280 --> 0:08:41.760
<v Speaker 2>year before the season. Winning the MVP is just it

0:08:41.840 --> 0:08:44.080
<v Speaker 2>had to happen at some point, even if he was

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 2>just decent, they had to give him the MVP. I

0:08:46.440 --> 0:08:49.440
<v Speaker 2>think the bigger story, Joe is that for the next

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:54.040
<v Speaker 2>ten years, if Shohei Otani is just does eighty percent

0:08:54.160 --> 0:08:57.800
<v Speaker 2>of what he's doing now, not great, but just good,

0:08:58.480 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 2>how do they not give him the MVP? Like this

0:09:00.520 --> 0:09:02.959
<v Speaker 2>is what they're setting themselves up for for the next decade.

0:09:03.000 --> 0:09:05.880
<v Speaker 2>So it's gonna be really interesting moving forward because somebody

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 2>could have an unbelievable year and Otani just kind of

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:10.400
<v Speaker 2>does what he does, and then what are you just

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:12.160
<v Speaker 2>not going to give him the MVP the next year?

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.080
<v Speaker 2>So fascinating moving forward. But you got Otani this year

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 2>for sure.

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, And of course the regret is not getting it

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.120
<v Speaker 1>at twenty to one. But I think part of it

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:21.840
<v Speaker 1>is when you look at those numbers in the preseason,

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:24.160
<v Speaker 1>you like things and you go, yeah, but he's gotta

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>hit a certain number of innings first, Like it's got

0:09:26.120 --> 0:09:27.640
<v Speaker 1>to get to a point where you start to believe

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:29.599
<v Speaker 1>the narrative of the two way player, that it's not

0:09:29.640 --> 0:09:31.839
<v Speaker 1>a gimmick, that it's a reality. And I feel like

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:33.560
<v Speaker 1>we got to a point where it's actually the reality

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>with Otani, and then you started to see it go

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>from twenty to fifteen to ten, and it kept going

0:09:37.480 --> 0:09:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and going, and I said, all right, I can't wait

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:42.040
<v Speaker 1>anymore for this. But it stinks for Vlad because Vlats

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>is having a transcendent breakout year that we've all been

0:09:44.480 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 1>waiting for. The race that's kind of close in the

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.640
<v Speaker 1>American League, though, is not the MVP. It's the Saw

0:09:49.720 --> 0:09:52.440
<v Speaker 1>Young Because you got lanceln at plus four hundred on

0:09:52.520 --> 0:09:55.360
<v Speaker 1>betting pros that's a consensus number. You got carls renon

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>plus two hundred, and of course Garrett Cole at the

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.640
<v Speaker 1>top at minus one thirty four, he is still the

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:02.720
<v Speaker 1>prohibit favorite, and with the Yankee struggles, do you think

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>he should still be the prohibitive favorite. I know, Rodonn's

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:07.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of came out of nowhere and that's been a

0:10:07.160 --> 0:10:09.720
<v Speaker 1>great story. And maybe if it weren't for Trey Mancini,

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe Comeback Player of the Year would be his award.

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 1>But I think that one might be locked up for Trey.

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>But what about Lance Linn. I keep kind of pounding

0:10:16.400 --> 0:10:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the table for this guy because I feel like he

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get a lot of respect. The White Sox just

0:10:20.280 --> 0:10:23.480
<v Speaker 1>extended him two more years. Do you see any value

0:10:23.520 --> 0:10:26.880
<v Speaker 1>there putting plus four hundred over on lanceln for the

0:10:26.880 --> 0:10:28.079
<v Speaker 1>sy in in the American League?

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not really, not really. I think he profiles as

0:10:31.360 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 2>a very good pitcher that it probably does not get

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:37.839
<v Speaker 2>the respect that he deserves because he's one of the

0:10:37.840 --> 0:10:39.920
<v Speaker 2>few guys that gets very deep into the games. But

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Rodonna has the No hitter behind him, and I think

0:10:43.160 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 2>that if it came down to those two, I think

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.559
<v Speaker 2>Rodnan would end up winning the cy Young. Look, We're

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:49.280
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to see what happens with Garrett Cole. It

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:52.040
<v Speaker 2>was a rocky first couple of starts after the non

0:10:52.080 --> 0:10:54.160
<v Speaker 2>sticky stuff, but then even in the rain, he pitched

0:10:54.160 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 2>really well last time out. So my guess is that

0:10:56.880 --> 0:10:59.400
<v Speaker 2>it's gonna be between Cole and Rodin. And of course

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 2>we still have seventy games to play, so anybody could

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:04.200
<v Speaker 2>jump into the mix at this point. But those are

0:11:04.200 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 2>the names. I think that you nailed all the names

0:11:05.920 --> 0:11:07.080
<v Speaker 2>that are possible.

0:11:07.000 --> 0:11:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Now with those seventy games left to play, Let's talk

0:11:09.040 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of win totals here. Let's start with

0:11:11.160 --> 0:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>those Yankees where at ninety five and a half minus

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.120
<v Speaker 1>won twelve on the under on the over minus one ten.

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>Your feelings on the Yankees right now and that number

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 1>ninety five and a half, I know you know that

0:11:23.480 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 1>injury to Tyra Glass now really change the dynamic. What

0:11:26.600 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the Rays look like without that true ace every fifth day.

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:32.680
<v Speaker 1>I think they're a very different team. Boston's played very well,

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:35.480
<v Speaker 1>the Toronto Blue Jays like they are going to be

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>an up and coming team here in these last seventy

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>games to deal with and contend with. And let's be honest,

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the Yankees have not played up to their abilities.

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So when you're looking at this team right now, do

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you think ninety five and a half. They are going

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to come close to that number this year, And do

0:11:48.920 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>they have a run in them the way they're currently constituted.

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:54.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think that they'll hit the ninety five.

0:11:54.160 --> 0:11:56.439
<v Speaker 2>But the other part of this, too is that the

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 2>better conversation is to do this on August first, because

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.240
<v Speaker 2>you just don't know which direction the Yankees are going

0:12:03.280 --> 0:12:05.840
<v Speaker 2>to go and what they would add and how much

0:12:05.880 --> 0:12:10.199
<v Speaker 2>that could add to what they have. So on paper, no,

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 2>I don't think that they I don't think they win

0:12:13.440 --> 0:12:17.560
<v Speaker 2>ninety games right now. But truthfully, Joe, the market is

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 2>not going to dictate the outcome of this until the

0:12:19.880 --> 0:12:22.440
<v Speaker 2>trade deadline comes and goes on the thirtieth. We really

0:12:22.520 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 2>didn't have a genuine trade deadline last year. We played

0:12:25.120 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 2>thirty days of baseball a trade deadline, and then go

0:12:27.320 --> 0:12:29.559
<v Speaker 2>and run toward the rest of the season. This is

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 2>going to be very different this year. Other thing that

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 2>I would say is, unlike previous years, you're in a

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 2>better position to know which teams are going to get

0:12:38.360 --> 0:12:41.520
<v Speaker 2>better from both a reality and wagering standpoint than you

0:12:41.640 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 2>ever have, Joe. We can actually identify the teams that

0:12:44.920 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 2>are out this year, it's pretty easy to do. Usually

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.920
<v Speaker 2>everyone complains we don't know who's in and who's out.

0:12:51.120 --> 0:12:52.840
<v Speaker 2>I think you do. I mean, you know who the

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.400
<v Speaker 2>teams of the National League pretty much are. The three

0:12:55.400 --> 0:12:57.160
<v Speaker 2>teams of the National League West are going to get in.

0:12:57.480 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 2>Cincinnati has fallen back, you could throw a dart them,

0:13:00.400 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 2>but Milwaukee's the Central winner. And then look, the East

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:05.280
<v Speaker 2>is definitely a wreck and that's up for grabs. But

0:13:05.600 --> 0:13:07.720
<v Speaker 2>you pretty much know everyone in the NL. You know

0:13:07.760 --> 0:13:11.000
<v Speaker 2>the Astros are in in the AL. Boston would have

0:13:11.040 --> 0:13:15.120
<v Speaker 2>to completely fall flat. I mean, you probably know that

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 2>the good teams are gonna get better and the bad

0:13:16.840 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 2>teams are gonna get worse.

0:13:18.400 --> 0:13:20.280
<v Speaker 1>So where the Yankees are a buyer or seller?

0:13:20.400 --> 0:13:23.440
<v Speaker 2>You think they always are buyers. They're never seller, So

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:25.760
<v Speaker 2>they'll buy something. I just don't know how far they'll go.

0:13:26.120 --> 0:13:28.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's talk about the Astros since you mentioned

0:13:28.360 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>them to eighty seven and a half. Is that number

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.160
<v Speaker 1>here minus one eighteen on the over, minus one ten

0:13:33.320 --> 0:13:36.480
<v Speaker 1>on the under on consensus line at betting pros. So

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:39.280
<v Speaker 1>do you think with this Astros team lately? You've seen

0:13:39.520 --> 0:13:41.959
<v Speaker 1>Lance mccullor's pitch very well. Garcia They've gotten a lot

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>for Amber Valdez came back and was a house on

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:45.679
<v Speaker 1>fire and then kind of cooled off recently, maybe a

0:13:45.679 --> 0:13:47.439
<v Speaker 1>little dead arm. I'm not sure what's going on there,

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>but look, this team scores a ton of runs and

0:13:49.240 --> 0:13:50.600
<v Speaker 1>they have a lot of depth. When they have guys

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.079
<v Speaker 1>like Christian Javier, they could throw in there if they

0:13:53.080 --> 0:13:55.560
<v Speaker 1>have to into a rotation spot. Do you think the

0:13:55.600 --> 0:13:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Astros run away with this division? You think eighty seven

0:13:57.679 --> 0:13:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half is going to be their thing? Or

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 1>do you think the A's are going to stay there

0:14:00.120 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>all the way to the bitter end? With them?

0:14:02.120 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 2>I think Houston will be a team that adds at

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:07.240
<v Speaker 2>the deadline, and I think that they are well positioned

0:14:07.280 --> 0:14:09.880
<v Speaker 2>to even win the American League Pennant. So if I

0:14:10.000 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 2>had to go one way or the other on them,

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 2>it would be over the eighty seven. Remember, they're going

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:16.920
<v Speaker 2>to get a lot of games against Texas down the stretch.

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 2>That's going to be pretty easy for them. The Rangers

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:21.920
<v Speaker 2>have looked horrible virtually from the start of the season,

0:14:22.560 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 2>So Houston, some people feel like they have overachieved. I

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.320
<v Speaker 2>really don't think so. I feel like the talent has

0:14:28.360 --> 0:14:31.200
<v Speaker 2>always been there. They just haven't all put it together

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:33.320
<v Speaker 2>since they won that World Series a couple of years ago.

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:35.080
<v Speaker 2>But it seems like the mental stuff is gone. They're

0:14:35.080 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 2>going to get Alex Pregman back, They're gonna get Carlos

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Korea back. You mentioned the pitching. They're probably another starter

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:45.440
<v Speaker 2>away from getting over the top. But look, I mean,

0:14:45.840 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 2>they're saying that Justin Verlander is not going to pitch

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:53.160
<v Speaker 2>this season. They're saying that, but talk to me on

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:55.640
<v Speaker 2>September first to see if that is really the case.

0:14:55.680 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 2>And by the way, we haven't heard anything from him

0:14:57.760 --> 0:14:58.800
<v Speaker 2>in a lot of PEP.

0:14:58.840 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I was gonna ask, you know, we've really you haven't heard,

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and usually there's some kind of well he's he's doing

0:15:03.760 --> 0:15:06.120
<v Speaker 1>baseball activities, which I'm not even sure at this point

0:15:06.200 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>what that is. I'm sure you can actually answer that

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.600
<v Speaker 1>question what baseball activities really mean. I don't know if

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that means like you're just playing RBI baseball Nintendo. I

0:15:13.040 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know if you just like trading baseball cars. But

0:15:14.960 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>baseball activities, that's what we've got. Let's talk about the

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:19.520
<v Speaker 1>West of the National League, because you said three teams

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.200
<v Speaker 1>are gonna come out into the playoffs from there, ninety

0:15:22.200 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>four and a half is the number for the Padres

0:15:24.280 --> 0:15:26.480
<v Speaker 1>minus one twelve on the over, minus one ten on

0:15:26.600 --> 0:15:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the under. For the Dodgers. That number is one oh

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>two and a half, and that is minus one to

0:15:32.720 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 1>eighteen minus one ten, so one oh two and a

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>half for the Dodgers. For the Padres side, you got

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.200
<v Speaker 1>ninety four and a half. Any feelings one way or

0:15:40.200 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>another about these two teams because the Dodgers clearly right

0:15:43.360 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>now with the Bower issues going on with playt Kershaw's injury,

0:15:47.000 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we have Gavin Luck sitting the DL, and obviously we

0:15:49.960 --> 0:15:53.360
<v Speaker 1>still have some questions regarding Mookie Bett's health too, which

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>is not great. Bellinger has been terrible. Some no wonder

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I know they keep winning games, but

0:15:58.200 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a little concerned with the Dodgers and the Padres feel

0:16:00.240 --> 0:16:03.160
<v Speaker 1>like the opposite, even though they've had their hurdles. It

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>feels to me like the Padres, you and I have

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:07.320
<v Speaker 1>said it, they're all in. They've got the goods in

0:16:07.360 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>the minor league system to make a huge acquisition, be

0:16:10.120 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 1>at a Barrios, be it a big time pitcher like that,

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.440
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could bring in and really change the dynamic

0:16:15.480 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>of this rotation. Do you think ninety four and a

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 1>half and the total for the Dodgers world two and

0:16:21.040 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a half is within their reach there? Do you like

0:16:22.720 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the over under if you had a lean on either.

0:16:24.840 --> 0:16:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Well, with the Dodgers, it's the kind of thing

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:28.280
<v Speaker 2>where I still go back to the beginning of the

0:16:28.280 --> 0:16:30.680
<v Speaker 2>season when I see a total of one hundred or over.

0:16:31.080 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 2>There's just so much variance, Joe. In the last two

0:16:33.200 --> 0:16:36.360
<v Speaker 2>weeks of the season. The Dodgers clearly are not playing

0:16:36.360 --> 0:16:39.760
<v Speaker 2>for September. They're playing to win at all. We don't

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 2>know how injured Clayton Kershaw is, Joe. There's a chance

0:16:42.520 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>if they needed him the pitch, could he tomorrow maybe?

0:16:45.360 --> 0:16:46.760
<v Speaker 2>But do they need him right now?

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 2>And they've shown a propensity to just throw their guys

0:16:49.320 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 2>on the injured list and let them sit for weeks.

0:16:51.120 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 2>Bellinger has been out, Speaker's been out, Bets has been out,

0:16:53.640 --> 0:16:56.080
<v Speaker 2>They've all been out, and they simply don't care. They

0:16:56.160 --> 0:16:58.680
<v Speaker 2>just need to get themselves into a position at the

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 2>end of September to fight with the Padres and fight

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:03.840
<v Speaker 2>with the Giants. So no real lean for me on

0:17:03.880 --> 0:17:06.200
<v Speaker 2>the Dodgers, because I could honestly see them with ninety

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.119
<v Speaker 2>nine wins going into the last week of the season,

0:17:08.400 --> 0:17:10.680
<v Speaker 2>winging them all or losing them all. Don't and I

0:17:10.720 --> 0:17:12.280
<v Speaker 2>don't think that it will matter. I even think that

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.200
<v Speaker 2>they're okay with the wild card. I don't even think

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 2>they care about the pas all that much. I lean

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 2>under on the Padres, really under on the Padres too fast,

0:17:21.720 --> 0:17:24.880
<v Speaker 2>you know. I think that everything has gone very well

0:17:24.880 --> 0:17:27.240
<v Speaker 2>for them. I think that from a betting perspective, you

0:17:27.280 --> 0:17:29.959
<v Speaker 2>got to be really careful about just buying into buzz

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:33.040
<v Speaker 2>and buying into excitement. And yes, the crowds are going crazy,

0:17:33.200 --> 0:17:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and yes they're hitting Grand Slams, and yes, that's all fun.

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 2>But do they have enough pitching?

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Like have we seen right now? No, I don't think.

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.359
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think they do, and I'm not sure

0:17:43.400 --> 0:17:48.080
<v Speaker 2>they will. So they've they've made a huge, you know,

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 2>motion in the off season to add everything that they

0:17:50.840 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 2>did in terms of pitching, and to be quite honest

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 2>with you, I still don't think it's enough. Like Snell

0:17:56.040 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 2>has not looked right you Darvish. Now we'll see. I

0:17:58.480 --> 0:18:00.200
<v Speaker 2>mean he's coming off the injury list now, so that's

0:18:00.240 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 2>gonna be a big key for them. Of course, Clevenger

0:18:02.240 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 2>has been out for the year. Since the beginning of

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.960
<v Speaker 2>the year, Danelson Lamed's been on and off. The bullpen's

0:18:06.000 --> 0:18:09.439
<v Speaker 2>been okay. So for me, I think the Padres are

0:18:09.440 --> 0:18:12.679
<v Speaker 2>gonna get in. But I'm starting to think that the

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Giants are the better team. And I did not think

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:18.120
<v Speaker 2>I'd be saying that, But the Giants look very good

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.760
<v Speaker 2>at this point, and that's another club that all of

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 2>a sudden is gonna be going for it here.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I gotta say, I'm trying my best to start to

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:28.040
<v Speaker 1>believe in the Giants, but then I start reminding myself, well,

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.520
<v Speaker 1>second half buster posey.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 2>You know it's true.

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Does he went down? He's a catcher. Looking at the

0:18:34.000 --> 0:18:36.000
<v Speaker 1>rest of these pitchers, the Alex Woods, and are they gonna

0:18:36.000 --> 0:18:38.199
<v Speaker 1>stay healthy? Desko Finie gonna get enough from them? I

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:40.920
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Gosman's been great, and I do believe in Gosman,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>But does Alex Dickerson in the middle of that order, really,

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, screamed terrifying lineup protection.

0:18:46.320 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's true, that's true. But let me ask

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:50.560
<v Speaker 2>you this, did you think that the Giants were gonna

0:18:50.600 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 2>win all those World Series with the squads that they

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:53.920
<v Speaker 2>had back then when they did that too.

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.159
<v Speaker 1>No, he had that one pitcher, and I don't know

0:18:57.200 --> 0:18:59.160
<v Speaker 1>if Gosman could be what Bumgarner was, a guy who

0:18:59.160 --> 0:19:00.600
<v Speaker 1>could pitch, you know, every two hours.

0:19:00.640 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 2>It's fair, it's a fair assessment. But the thing with

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.320
<v Speaker 2>the Giants is that I would say that like the

0:19:07.640 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 2>Contrarian too, that is that they're getting better now. It's

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:13.920
<v Speaker 2>not even like you could say, well, Craig, they've played

0:19:13.920 --> 0:19:16.080
<v Speaker 2>five hundred baseball over the last month and it doesn't

0:19:16.080 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 2>seem to be going very well, and they kind of

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:19.840
<v Speaker 2>got off to that great start. Like they're getting better,

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 2>they're pulling away from teams. So at some point soon

0:19:24.600 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 2>I think we have to start recognizing that they're just

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.800
<v Speaker 2>a good team. And who had Gabe Kapler winning manager

0:19:28.800 --> 0:19:29.200
<v Speaker 2>of the Year.

0:19:29.840 --> 0:19:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I had that on my Bengo card

0:19:31.200 --> 0:19:33.479
<v Speaker 1>I got a check. Nope, did not have that one

0:19:33.520 --> 0:19:35.520
<v Speaker 1>at all. Let's talk about the East since you mentioned

0:19:35.560 --> 0:19:39.280
<v Speaker 1>them in the National League, because again de grom Lindor,

0:19:39.400 --> 0:19:40.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is why he's a Mets fan. You

0:19:40.680 --> 0:19:42.919
<v Speaker 1>can't have nice things. I always preface and you know,

0:19:43.240 --> 0:19:45.480
<v Speaker 1>self loathing. This is why we are because the minute

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>you start to feel good about something, you know you're

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>looking forward to it. You come back from the All

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:52.520
<v Speaker 1>Star Break, Pi Alonso wins the home run derby, you're thinking, look,

0:19:52.560 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>baseball's fun again. De gram is great. He's not even

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:56.920
<v Speaker 1>pitching the All Star Game because he cares so much

0:19:56.960 --> 0:19:59.480
<v Speaker 1>about the team winning and all this blah blah blah,

0:19:59.520 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and to back here we are. Everybody's hurt again. This

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>is tough. The number for the Mets ninety and a

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>half minus one eighteen, minus one ten on the over,

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 1>minus one eighteen on the under. So ninety and a

0:20:11.240 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>half is that number for the Mets. The Mets continue

0:20:13.240 --> 0:20:16.480
<v Speaker 1>to find ways to win games, yesterday being another bizarre one,

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.800
<v Speaker 1>A strange game in Cincinnati to say the least. I

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:23.960
<v Speaker 1>guess here's my question to you, Acunya out the Braves

0:20:24.000 --> 0:20:26.399
<v Speaker 1>missing a ton of pieces, including now Ian Anderson on

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>the aisle the Phillies. I don't know that bullpen's still trash.

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I think we could agree on that. Still looking at

0:20:32.200 --> 0:20:33.760
<v Speaker 1>the rest of that rotation and have a lot of

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.639
<v Speaker 1>question marks the Nationals kicking around. Do you think that

0:20:37.760 --> 0:20:39.720
<v Speaker 1>this is locked up? Is it the Mets and is

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 1>ninety and a half the number. Can they sustain all

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.760
<v Speaker 1>these other injuries? Can they get Carrasco back? Can they

0:20:45.160 --> 0:20:47.399
<v Speaker 1>just continue to pull rabbits out of their hat and

0:20:47.480 --> 0:20:48.840
<v Speaker 1>hit this ninety nine and a half.

0:20:49.240 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, So I look, we unfortunately, we can eliminate Miami.

0:20:52.800 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 2>It's just they've they have not had aura you even

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:58.439
<v Speaker 2>ask you, they have. We got to eliminate Miami from it.

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.119
<v Speaker 2>My heart hurts, but that's just the true. I'm going

0:21:01.160 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 2>to eliminate Washington from the conversation.

0:21:03.560 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I just I don't think thebourg recent setback.

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Look, they went on. They went on a three week

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:14.400
<v Speaker 2>run with the hottest player I may have ever seen

0:21:14.400 --> 0:21:17.119
<v Speaker 2>in Kyle Schwarber, and that was their whole season. They're

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 2>under five hundred. So let me ask you this, Okay,

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.240
<v Speaker 2>the Braves, the Braves, I'm in agreement with you there.

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:24.600
<v Speaker 2>I think too many injuries. I think they're trying to

0:21:24.640 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 2>stay in it. I don't think that they will. I

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:28.880
<v Speaker 2>agree with you. You can't lose a guy like Akunya.

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 2>Smiley has not been really great for them all season.

0:21:32.080 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Their acquisitions haven't worked out. Ozuna, you know, going off

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:39.000
<v Speaker 2>the deep end this year. All those things happen, I'll

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 2>eliminate Atlanta from the conversation as well. So I would

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:45.000
<v Speaker 2>ask you this, Joe, Dave don Browski is the general

0:21:45.040 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 2>manager of the Philadelphia Phillies, who has all who has

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 2>been in this seat many times, with the Marlins, with

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:52.760
<v Speaker 2>the Tigers, with the Red Sox World Series. On all

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.359
<v Speaker 2>those three teams, I'm not saying the Phillies have a

0:21:54.359 --> 0:21:56.560
<v Speaker 2>World Series seat. Do you think that on July thirty

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:58.720
<v Speaker 2>at Dave Don Browski is not going to go out

0:21:58.880 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 2>and get some crazy to help them. If I told

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.280
<v Speaker 2>you that the Phillies got Craig Kimberl on July thirtieth

0:22:05.320 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 2>and he was their closer, I think you, Joe would

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 2>feel differently about the Phillies at that point, or any

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.320
<v Speaker 2>other closing by it, you would say, wow, okay, well,

0:22:12.359 --> 0:22:14.600
<v Speaker 2>now maybe they have a guy to close out the

0:22:14.640 --> 0:22:16.920
<v Speaker 2>Knife now. Anybody who they've gotten in the past has

0:22:16.960 --> 0:22:18.639
<v Speaker 2>not worked out. It doesn't matter who the name is.

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.040
<v Speaker 2>Brandon Workman was phenomenal last year in the first half.

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 2>He goes to Philadelphia can't pitch anymore. I'm not going

0:22:24.119 --> 0:22:26.359
<v Speaker 2>to rule Philadelphia is a little bit of a strange team.

0:22:26.680 --> 0:22:29.840
<v Speaker 2>They definitely have an odd clubhouse. It doesn't always seem

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:33.399
<v Speaker 2>to fit. But talent wise, you put Philadelphia's lineup against

0:22:33.440 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 2>the Mets, it's there. You put their pitching, Philadelphia's pitching

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.240
<v Speaker 2>against the Mets when they're right Wheeler and Nola, it

0:22:41.359 --> 0:22:45.159
<v Speaker 2>is there. They don't have the bullpen pieces, but this

0:22:45.320 --> 0:22:48.400
<v Speaker 2>is a close enough. These two teams are close enough

0:22:48.400 --> 0:22:50.879
<v Speaker 2>within the division that when they play each other, I

0:22:50.920 --> 0:22:53.879
<v Speaker 2>think it's going to get decided. So for me, I

0:22:53.960 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 2>still think the Mets have a good shot, but I

0:22:56.200 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 2>will not rule out Philadelphia. I think that's the team

0:22:58.840 --> 0:22:59.720
<v Speaker 2>that could catch them.

0:23:00.359 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 1>You know what I mean, You certainly make a good

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>case if Zach Wheeler especially can continue to pitch the

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:06.960
<v Speaker 1>way he has this year. No one's been erratic, that's

0:23:07.000 --> 0:23:09.680
<v Speaker 1>the tough thing about. The only guy more erratic is

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Blake Snell. We just talked about what the padres. I mean,

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:13.960
<v Speaker 1>you look at those home road splits. He's got an

0:23:13.960 --> 0:23:16.760
<v Speaker 1>era at home under two and on the road it's ten.

0:23:17.240 --> 0:23:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't remember recent remembory seeing anything as crazy as that.

0:23:20.119 --> 0:23:23.200
<v Speaker 1>That Yan Chen, Yeah, well way and Chen, I remember

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.280
<v Speaker 1>who there was another guy a couple of year, Lance

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 1>mccullors had an era like that two years ago. It

0:23:27.400 --> 0:23:29.800
<v Speaker 1>was just bizarre. He couldn't believe that the splits. So

0:23:29.920 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>let's see how Craig feels about the Mets and the

0:23:31.640 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>Phillies and some other teams. Here we get to the

0:23:33.400 --> 0:23:37.600
<v Speaker 1>National League representation. Here, the Dodgers plus one seventy five

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to win the National League. The Mets are the next

0:23:39.320 --> 0:23:42.360
<v Speaker 1>closest at plus four fifty, the Padres at plus four

0:23:42.320 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>to forty. Then you've got six plus six hundred for

0:23:45.480 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the Milwaukee Brewers, plus seven for the Giants, and the

0:23:48.840 --> 0:23:54.240
<v Speaker 1>Phillies plus twenty three hundred. So when you're looking right now,

0:23:54.359 --> 0:23:55.879
<v Speaker 1>who do you think is the team that's going to

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:57.399
<v Speaker 1>come out of the National League? Because we all know

0:23:57.480 --> 0:23:59.800
<v Speaker 1>getting into playoffs is one thing short series is, And

0:24:00.640 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>can the Brewers' rotation handle the innings that are going

0:24:03.600 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>to be out there, not just in the season, but

0:24:05.200 --> 0:24:07.919
<v Speaker 1>then on top of that, can Freddy Peralta and Corbyn

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Burns continue to be that good when you cross over

0:24:10.280 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and fifty hundred and sixty innings because that's

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the pace they're going to be on. Is that enough

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>in a short series with that lineup? Do you like

0:24:16.880 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the Mets? Do you like the Dodgers? Where you like

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to put your money for the National League?

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'll still take LA at almost two to one.

0:24:24.080 --> 0:24:26.879
<v Speaker 2>I think there's still some value there. I think that

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 2>the Dodgers will replace Bauer at the trade deadline. They're

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.520
<v Speaker 2>a very clear buyer, they Joe. They acquired you Darvish,

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 2>remember that out of nowhere a couple of years ago,

0:24:37.720 --> 0:24:39.879
<v Speaker 2>and they made a run with him. They're going to

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 2>do something similar to that. Like you don't think Max

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Sure's are is going to be on the Dodgers, Joe?

0:24:45.040 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 2>But would it shock you if Max Shus ended up

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 2>on the Dodgers?

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:50.719
<v Speaker 1>And if your Max Sure's I can understand saying okay

0:24:50.720 --> 0:24:54.200
<v Speaker 1>to that one. What about Charlie Morton? Another guy too

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:54.919
<v Speaker 1>may shock me?

0:24:55.800 --> 0:24:56.639
<v Speaker 2>Maybe Charlie?

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah?

0:24:56.880 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 2>On Atlanta? Yeah, I mean I don't know that Atlanta

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.640
<v Speaker 2>will be that far see Morton deal, Joe would probably

0:25:01.680 --> 0:25:04.280
<v Speaker 2>happen like through the waivers on August thirty first? Is

0:25:05.040 --> 0:25:07.360
<v Speaker 2>I think Atlanta? I mean, we're still we're only nine

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.119
<v Speaker 2>days away. I don't unless the Braves lose every game

0:25:10.200 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 2>between now and then. The feeling I get is that

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 2>they're still gonna fight for a while. People forget that

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:18.880
<v Speaker 2>other deadline. And that's a perfect example of a guy

0:25:18.960 --> 0:25:22.000
<v Speaker 2>that could get traded, you know, right there, because he

0:25:22.040 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 2>does have some money to pay. There are a lot of

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.000
<v Speaker 2>teams would just be like, what are we gonna do

0:25:26.040 --> 0:25:28.439
<v Speaker 2>with this guy? We don't need him. So it's a

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.000
<v Speaker 2>good name, definitely, so, but more of a name I

0:25:31.000 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 2>think for a month from now, I braves believe they

0:25:34.359 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 2>still have a chance. We got to at least acknowledge that.

0:25:37.119 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, So the American League possibly more complicated. We

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 1>have the Astros plus two hundred, the White Sox at

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 1>plus three ten consensus betting line over at betting pros.

0:25:45.880 --> 0:25:47.919
<v Speaker 1>On the Red Sox side, he got plus five to fifty,

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.520
<v Speaker 1>than Tampa plus seven hundred, the Oakland A's plus nine

0:25:50.520 --> 0:25:53.440
<v Speaker 1>to fifty, and the Toronto Blue Jays ten to one.

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Which there's something about the Blue Jays, Craig and I

0:25:55.960 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know when they get back to Canada, if they're

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna have capacity seating, how that's going to work out

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.600
<v Speaker 1>eventually for them. But sometimes those young teams that just

0:26:03.640 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know they're not supposed to be there, they are

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>incredibly dangerous they're finally gonna get George Springer here, the

0:26:09.000 --> 0:26:10.879
<v Speaker 1>George Springer we hope here in the second half that

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:13.320
<v Speaker 1>they were hoping in the first half healthy. You see

0:26:13.359 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>the lineup, You see what FLA's doing. Robbie Ray has

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:17.239
<v Speaker 1>been a revelation. I mean, how good has he been

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this season? Ree's pitching a little better. I know, Minoa

0:26:19.960 --> 0:26:22.199
<v Speaker 1>just went on the il. The Blue Jay is kind

0:26:22.200 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of a fun one to just throw some darts at.

0:26:24.240 --> 0:26:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe at the end, if they can get hot, can

0:26:26.080 --> 0:26:28.280
<v Speaker 1>they add another starting pitcher or is it just down

0:26:28.320 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 1>to the favorites like the White Sox and the Astros,

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Because I look at the White Sox, they get Lja

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:36.159
<v Speaker 1>Menez back healthy and Robert back healthy. That you know

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that staff of pitchers that to me is the toughest

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>out in the American League, incorting to a small series,

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a short series with three arms. So what do you

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:45.560
<v Speaker 1>think the American League winner is going to be.

0:26:45.840 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's fun to talk about the Blue Jays, but

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:50.119
<v Speaker 2>I think you're burning the money. You know, the other

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:52.639
<v Speaker 2>night they lost what thirteen and nothing to Boston. You

0:26:52.640 --> 0:26:55.520
<v Speaker 2>don't win a World Series with like that. Like they're

0:26:55.560 --> 0:26:57.920
<v Speaker 2>pitching is just not good enough, and look, it may

0:26:57.920 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 2>be a different story next year, and hitting is something

0:27:01.119 --> 0:27:04.160
<v Speaker 2>that is sort of sustainable, where you could see all

0:27:04.200 --> 0:27:06.320
<v Speaker 2>of their guys that are hitting and having springer for

0:27:06.359 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 2>a full year. Next year, you could see the Blue

0:27:08.080 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 2>and the Blue Jays being home and being good like

0:27:10.880 --> 0:27:13.600
<v Speaker 2>all those things. I can see they do not have

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:15.359
<v Speaker 2>enough this year. By the way, they do not have

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.120
<v Speaker 2>enough in the back end of the bullpen too. So

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.680
<v Speaker 2>I could see them being fun, making a run, great

0:27:20.720 --> 0:27:23.840
<v Speaker 2>to be in Canada, maybe making the postseason, maybe being

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:27.040
<v Speaker 2>a wild card. But no, I do not see them

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:29.520
<v Speaker 2>winning the World Series or even winning the American Link.

0:27:29.600 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 2>I think there are much better teams there, So I

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 2>guess my focus probably would be either on Houston in

0:27:37.720 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 2>the West or the White Sox in the Central. I

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:42.640
<v Speaker 2>think it's fair to think that one of those two

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 2>teams will do it. Listen, I was completely wrong on Boston.

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:48.080
<v Speaker 2>I didn't think they'd be anything near what they are.

0:27:48.560 --> 0:27:51.080
<v Speaker 2>I still can't figure it out. They have no pitching whatsoever,

0:27:51.480 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>and yet they have one of the best records in baseball.

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 2>So shame on me for not knowing that.

0:27:55.760 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 1>One an think it's shame on you or I don't

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.840
<v Speaker 1>think anybody could have expected what happens Boston this year.

0:28:00.920 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>And Nadia Valdi's been very good. Usually he's incredibly hittable,

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>and you've gotten some gutty performances from some of the

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:09.800
<v Speaker 1>other pitchers. But I mean, who knows when they get

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.600
<v Speaker 1>Chris saleback how good he could probably be. We'll see.

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's an addition that, you know, Tommy John, these

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.240
<v Speaker 1>guys come back and it's not velocity. It never goes well,

0:28:17.440 --> 0:28:20.000
<v Speaker 1>no it doesn't, but it's never velocity. When they all say, well,

0:28:20.160 --> 0:28:22.360
<v Speaker 1>VLOSSI looks good, I'm like, well, that's fine, but what's

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:24.320
<v Speaker 1>the feel for pitching? That to me is always the

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>big problem.

0:28:24.800 --> 0:28:27.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, the data from the last I saw the

0:28:27.359 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 2>other day. The data from the last five like solid

0:28:29.840 --> 0:28:32.159
<v Speaker 2>pitchers that came off Tommy John and came back in

0:28:32.200 --> 0:28:34.320
<v Speaker 2>the second half of the season, none of them were

0:28:34.320 --> 0:28:37.040
<v Speaker 2>good zero zip none like no good stats.

0:28:37.119 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>Every year people draft them in fantasy, going, oh, I'm

0:28:39.560 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna have this Ace comeback in July or August. It's

0:28:42.160 --> 0:28:44.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna be so huge, right, I don't know why people

0:28:44.640 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>do that. All right, So where do you go for

0:28:48.160 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>the champion? Right now? I know it's only the end

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 1>of July. We still got to and change left in

0:28:53.200 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>terms of months to play. I'm still feeling those White

0:28:55.960 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Sox man. I just think that White Sox team's got

0:28:58.360 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of pitching, a lot of allent, very deep

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:04.040
<v Speaker 1>lineup when they're healthy, and they're getting healthier. And that's

0:29:04.040 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>another team too. That's staggering. Think about the injuries when

0:29:06.120 --> 0:29:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you talk about the Mets injuries, how about the White

0:29:08.120 --> 0:29:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Sox injuries this year? The things that they've had to overcome,

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and yet here they are just blowing away the competition

0:29:13.480 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in that division. Who do you like? You like the

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Dodgers plus three ninety, you got the Astros plus four

0:29:18.480 --> 0:29:20.520
<v Speaker 1>fifty to one at all, the White Sox for plus

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 1>seven fifty with that pitching, and then after that the Padres,

0:29:23.600 --> 0:29:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Mets and Red Sox. So right now, who do you

0:29:25.960 --> 0:29:28.320
<v Speaker 1>think is the favorite? Is it the Dodgers after all?

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Or do you think somebody else, like maybe the villainous

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Houston Astros us against the world might be the better wager?

0:29:34.440 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, boy, it's so boring to take the favorite. And

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.320
<v Speaker 2>you know me, and you've known me long enough, and

0:29:39.320 --> 0:29:41.160
<v Speaker 2>you know me long enough not to take the favorite

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 2>it greates you.

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:43.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm actually shocked you even went to the Dodge to

0:29:43.960 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 1>the National League.

0:29:45.200 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I am so scared they're going to end up

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:53.600
<v Speaker 2>with somebody really good next week. Yeah, I'm really you know,

0:29:53.720 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 2>it's just when you're when you're there and you've been

0:29:57.280 --> 0:29:59.480
<v Speaker 2>in the war and you've won the World Series and

0:29:59.480 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 2>then you got to the World Series and everyone expects

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:04.440
<v Speaker 2>you to be there. You have that obligation, Joe, to

0:30:04.480 --> 0:30:08.760
<v Speaker 2>get better. And this is a team that does it.

0:30:08.960 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 2>Like they really look like almost the old Yankees to

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:14.080
<v Speaker 2>a degree, Joe like almost them. Like they go out

0:30:14.120 --> 0:30:16.400
<v Speaker 2>and they say, oh, you know, this may look like

0:30:16.440 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 2>it's enough, but no, let's just go ahead and get

0:30:18.120 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 2>the best player at some position. So what is the answer, Like,

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:24.560
<v Speaker 2>who are they going to get? I don't know, and

0:30:24.880 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 2>I wish I could tell you, But your sure, there's

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:29.360
<v Speaker 2>the thing that I brought up. I was just kidding.

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:30.720
<v Speaker 2>By the way, I don't think he's gonna get traded.

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:33.280
<v Speaker 2>I think he's gonna stay in Washington. But I feel

0:30:33.320 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 2>like LA will fortify and they'll add some major pieces

0:30:37.240 --> 0:30:39.880
<v Speaker 2>to their team, and I think they have a great

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.000
<v Speaker 2>shot to win the World Series again. I just don't

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 2>like any team in the American League. The White Sox

0:30:44.080 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 2>are good. They could get there for sure, but to

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:47.960
<v Speaker 2>win to win it all, I don't know. Also, the

0:30:48.000 --> 0:30:49.600
<v Speaker 2>other thing I want to say, you're totally right that

0:30:49.600 --> 0:30:52.400
<v Speaker 2>the White Socks have overcome injuries, but and you follow

0:30:52.440 --> 0:30:54.560
<v Speaker 2>it every day, but like we could go through all

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 2>thirty teams, and yes, there are a lot of teams

0:30:57.280 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 2>that have not overcome injuries, but everybody has like five

0:31:00.280 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 2>or six injuries.

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Sure, it's insane, but I look at they lost Magical

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:06.200
<v Speaker 1>for the year, They lost to Lloyd before the season started.

0:31:06.200 --> 0:31:09.560
<v Speaker 1>They lose Robert right, you know as the season began. Uh,

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:11.320
<v Speaker 1>and I Bray. You everyone's complaining about a Bray You

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>mean lot. You look at the numbers, it's still pretty

0:31:13.560 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>darn good. He's still at the top they do. And

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:18.560
<v Speaker 1>you look at that lineup some days and you go,

0:31:18.600 --> 0:31:20.840
<v Speaker 1>who are these guys that they're throwing out there? You know?

0:31:20.960 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>And they continue to just show up in the pitching matters.

0:31:24.720 --> 0:31:28.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, in short series, you throw Gilito, Lynn Rodin Kikeel.

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:30.160
<v Speaker 1>That's a pretty it.

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Sounds good, it sounds good, but is it good enough

0:31:32.680 --> 0:31:33.800
<v Speaker 2>to beat l A. I'm not sure.

0:31:34.000 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>We shall find out, all right, last question for you,

0:31:36.280 --> 0:31:38.560
<v Speaker 1>then I'll let you go your gut instincts. Do we

0:31:38.600 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>see Trevor Bauer pitch again in twenty twenty one?

0:31:40.640 --> 0:31:42.720
<v Speaker 2>For the doctors, it's like a such a loaded question.

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 2>It's like and by the way, this is And sometimes

0:31:45.320 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 2>I can tell you with information, and sometimes I can

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 2>tell you that I'm guessing. But I would guess no,

0:31:50.240 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 2>I would guess no. I just I don't know enough

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 2>about the situation. All I'm doing is reading along with

0:31:55.600 --> 0:31:59.120
<v Speaker 2>with everybody else. But give given the nature of how

0:31:59.200 --> 0:32:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Major League Baseball has chosen to handle these sort of cases,

0:32:02.200 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 2>which is basically, hey, we uh, you know, we're gonna

0:32:05.360 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna shut this down. We're gonna figure out and

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:09.840
<v Speaker 2>then we'll go ahead and delegate. Whether or not you

0:32:09.960 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 2>agree with that, that's not up for me. But I

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 2>do think that that's the way that Baseball is going

0:32:13.880 --> 0:32:17.480
<v Speaker 2>to handle this thing. And no, I mean I just

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:20.239
<v Speaker 2>don't think that. I just don't. I don't think so.

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:23.320
<v Speaker 2>But better indication will be next week, Joe, if they

0:32:23.360 --> 0:32:24.880
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and get a big starting pitcher. What does

0:32:24.880 --> 0:32:25.280
<v Speaker 2>that tell you?

0:32:25.520 --> 0:32:28.040
<v Speaker 1>It tells me exactly the answer to that question. There

0:32:28.080 --> 0:32:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you have it. You can follow him on the Twitter

0:32:29.520 --> 0:32:31.960
<v Speaker 1>machine at Craig Mish and of course check him out

0:32:32.000 --> 0:32:34.040
<v Speaker 1>every day on Sports Grid from twelve to see you

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:36.520
<v Speaker 1>on Fantasy Sports Today of course covering the Marlins, and

0:32:36.520 --> 0:32:39.160
<v Speaker 1>with me on Sunday mornings. Starting soon in a couple

0:32:39.200 --> 0:32:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of weeks, my goodness, it's gonna be Football Time Sports

0:32:41.680 --> 0:32:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Today Sunday edition with Matt Striker, myself and Craig Mish. Greig,

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.880
<v Speaker 1>we appreciate your time as always. I know you're busy,

0:32:47.960 --> 0:32:50.280
<v Speaker 1>so get out to the ballpark. I know you always

0:32:50.320 --> 0:32:52.000
<v Speaker 1>got somewhere to be, so that'll do it for us.

0:32:52.040 --> 0:32:54.120
<v Speaker 1>But the story of the game goes on for Craig Mish,

0:32:54.120 --> 0:33:03.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm Joey P. We'll see you next time. Kids became