WEBVTT - Steve Eisman on the Three Big Macro Stories of Our Time

0:00:03.120 --> 0:00:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, Radio News.

0:00:20.360 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Hello and welcome to another episode of the All Thoughts Podcast.

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway.

0:00:24.720 --> 0:00:25.880
<v Speaker 3>And I'm Jolle Wisenthal.

0:00:26.400 --> 0:00:28.640
<v Speaker 2>Joe, does it feel like we're at a turning point

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.560
<v Speaker 2>of some sort? I feel like that's always a dangerous

0:00:31.640 --> 0:00:34.599
<v Speaker 2>question to ask on a podcast, because the tendency is

0:00:35.080 --> 0:00:37.440
<v Speaker 2>to call turning points or say we're at, you know,

0:00:37.560 --> 0:00:41.239
<v Speaker 2>the beginning of some new structural shift. Yeah, because that's

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 2>kind of what everyone wants to hear, Right, You.

0:00:44.000 --> 0:00:46.839
<v Speaker 3>Don't have been thinking about That's like super meta and

0:00:46.920 --> 0:00:49.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe beyond the scope of anything that we talk about

0:00:49.720 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 3>on a podcast. But just since we're talking about big moments.

0:00:53.600 --> 0:00:57.160
<v Speaker 3>When I was a kid, probably my parents thought that

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.520
<v Speaker 3>the future would look very different when I'm an adult,

0:00:59.560 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>you know. But now I think that for my kids

0:01:03.800 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 3>the future will look so radically different that that I

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.880
<v Speaker 3>just can't imagine twenty or thirty years from now anything

0:01:10.920 --> 0:01:14.200
<v Speaker 3>being remotely similar to it is today, due to various

0:01:14.240 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 3>things that we're seeing with tech and geopolitics and things

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 3>like that.

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 2>Particularly Ai, I don't know, back to the future promised

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.679
<v Speaker 2>we'd have flying cars by now, and I'm still waiting.

0:01:23.000 --> 0:01:25.480
<v Speaker 3>They did get video conference. I guess that's too right,

0:01:25.520 --> 0:01:27.280
<v Speaker 3>So that's one thing, but yes, you're right.

0:01:27.200 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 2>All right. Well, there's obviously plenty that we could talk

0:01:30.480 --> 0:01:32.480
<v Speaker 2>about when it comes to the future, like what is

0:01:32.520 --> 0:01:35.119
<v Speaker 2>realistic and what is sort of pie in the sky

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:37.960
<v Speaker 2>thinking like flying cars. I suspect we're not going to

0:01:38.040 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 2>have those for a while because of various reasons. But

0:01:41.080 --> 0:01:42.959
<v Speaker 2>one person we do like to speak to when it

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.119
<v Speaker 2>comes to thinking big picture and kind of talking about

0:01:46.200 --> 0:01:50.760
<v Speaker 2>these potential paradigm shifts is Steve Eisman. Of course, he's

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 2>been on the show a couple of times. He's the

0:01:52.960 --> 0:01:56.400
<v Speaker 2>managing director at Newburger Berman and Steve, thank you so

0:01:56.480 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>much for coming back on all thoughts.

0:01:58.000 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 4>Thanks for having me again.

0:01:59.440 --> 0:02:02.560
<v Speaker 2>So big picture thoughts, what are you thinking at the moment?

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:05.720
<v Speaker 2>The last time we had you on, you were talking

0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 2>about a paradigm shift as interest rates got higher, And

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.240
<v Speaker 2>it seems like investors are starting to ratchet down their

0:02:11.280 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 2>expectations for cuts right now, so we might actually get

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 2>that higher interest rate environment for longer.

0:02:18.160 --> 0:02:20.080
<v Speaker 4>You know, let's just start with the FED so we

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 4>get that out of the way as quickly as possible.

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.200
<v Speaker 4>I have felt for a long time. The FED is

0:02:25.280 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 4>extremely insensitive to its own impact on markets. You know,

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:33.240
<v Speaker 4>last was it last week when Powell.

0:02:32.919 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 3>Spoke, So we're recording this April second, but he spoke

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 3>on for I'm.

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 4>Good, you know, when he said that he thought that

0:02:40.840 --> 0:02:45.160
<v Speaker 4>because rates are higher, financial conditions are tight. That was

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 4>a little weird. I mean, right, credit spreads are extremely narrow.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:53.080
<v Speaker 4>I've always felt that, like I said, the Fed's insensitive

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 4>to its own impact on the markets. It's clearly Fed

0:02:56.639 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 4>wants to cut rates. It once seems to want to

0:02:58.680 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 4>cut rates very very badly. Why wants to cut rates

0:03:01.480 --> 0:03:05.800
<v Speaker 4>so badly? I don't understand in that they've engineered something

0:03:05.840 --> 0:03:09.200
<v Speaker 4>that's really pretty fantastic. You know. Not only is there

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 4>no soft landing, there doesn't need to be any landing.

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:13.320
<v Speaker 4>And as far as you know, the data that I

0:03:13.400 --> 0:03:16.160
<v Speaker 4>can see, there seems to be something of a reacceleration

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 4>in the economy right now. So why would you cut rates?

0:03:19.840 --> 0:03:25.360
<v Speaker 4>What's your rush? You know? The actual What I would say,

0:03:25.400 --> 0:03:27.440
<v Speaker 4>even though I think the FED is going to cut rates,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:29.519
<v Speaker 4>the fear that I think should be out there is

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:31.560
<v Speaker 4>that if they do cut rates and be even more

0:03:31.600 --> 0:03:34.480
<v Speaker 4>of resurgence in the economy and there'd be a resurgence

0:03:34.520 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 4>and inflation. So what's why would you rush to take

0:03:37.960 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 4>that risk? I don't get it.

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 3>It's funny you start off. You started off talking about

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 3>financial conditions. Actually I wrote about them a little bit

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.280
<v Speaker 3>more a little bit this morning, and the question that

0:03:47.360 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 3>I have in my mind measures of financial conditions are

0:03:51.080 --> 0:03:54.600
<v Speaker 3>clearly loose, right, so the stock market is basically at

0:03:54.640 --> 0:03:58.680
<v Speaker 3>all time highs and put into financial conditions as you mentioned,

0:03:58.720 --> 0:04:01.720
<v Speaker 3>credit spreads are pretty tough, and then of course crypto,

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 3>which maybe you have thoughts about going to the moon.

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.120
<v Speaker 3>So all kinds of measures of in liquid market loosening.

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:11.559
<v Speaker 3>On the other hand, the IPO window still hasn't totally reopened.

0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:16.720
<v Speaker 3>It's not obvious that private investment is reaccelerating in some

0:04:17.000 --> 0:04:21.160
<v Speaker 3>dramatic way, hiring intentions. The labor market continues to at

0:04:21.240 --> 0:04:24.240
<v Speaker 3>least normalize. It's not falling apart by any stretch, but

0:04:24.320 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 3>it's nowhere near where it was. You know a couple

0:04:27.480 --> 0:04:30.039
<v Speaker 3>of years ago. Are those tight credit spreads and high

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 3>stock prices translating into the economic variables employment and inflation

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 3>that the federally cares about.

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:39.960
<v Speaker 4>Inflation, I can say I think it's too early to

0:04:40.000 --> 0:04:42.360
<v Speaker 4>say what's happening there. I mean, the other thing I

0:04:42.360 --> 0:04:44.559
<v Speaker 4>could say is that from the companies that I speak

0:04:44.600 --> 0:04:48.479
<v Speaker 4>to on the industrial side, things seem to have reaccelerated

0:04:48.520 --> 0:04:51.919
<v Speaker 4>this year. Orders it picked up, Supply chain problems aren't

0:04:52.040 --> 0:04:56.080
<v Speaker 4>as much of an issue. Nobody's really talking about firing anybody,

0:04:56.600 --> 0:04:59.120
<v Speaker 4>you know. Is it perfect? Yeah? What's perfect?

0:04:59.320 --> 0:04:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Sure?

0:04:59.720 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 4>But things are pretty good. Yeah.

0:05:02.560 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 2>My framework for understanding this is that the FED basically

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 2>can look through loose financial conditions on the assumption that

0:05:10.720 --> 0:05:13.039
<v Speaker 2>if it does build out investment and a lot of

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 2>the inflationary pressures that we've seen have come about from

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:20.599
<v Speaker 2>supply constraints, then it maybe is reducing inflation longer term

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 2>rather than leading to additional inflationary pressures. But one thing

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.120
<v Speaker 2>I have to imagine they might not be huge fans

0:05:28.120 --> 0:05:32.560
<v Speaker 2>of is crypto. Crypto's back, right. I think bitcoins down

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 2>as we're recording this, but it surged to a new

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 2>all time high. I don't think anyone was really expecting

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:42.200
<v Speaker 2>crypto to come back in this way when rates are

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 2>you still at the highest level in DEPA.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 4>That's because it has nothing to do with rates. Okay,

0:05:48.400 --> 0:05:51.800
<v Speaker 4>so well, let's backtrack first. Sure, here's my big uber picture.

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:56.440
<v Speaker 4>You look, in bad times, people focus on balance sheets

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:59.600
<v Speaker 4>and credit quality, and good times they focus on stories.

0:06:00.440 --> 0:06:04.280
<v Speaker 4>And there are three I think great stories of our

0:06:04.320 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 4>time right now, and those are AI and everything having

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 4>to do with it, infrastructure, and crypto. And I believe

0:06:11.880 --> 0:06:14.000
<v Speaker 4>in the first two and I don't believe in the third,

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:18.120
<v Speaker 4>the thing about crypto. And here's me getting on my soapbox,

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:20.240
<v Speaker 4>so everybody can take this with the grainess whole. I

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 4>have no position in crypto, and I never have. But

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:25.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, there are two issues with respect to crypto.

0:06:26.040 --> 0:06:29.400
<v Speaker 4>Number one, is it a currency? And number two, if

0:06:29.400 --> 0:06:32.400
<v Speaker 4>it's a currency, why should you own it? So let's

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:37.320
<v Speaker 4>bypass issue number one because that's kind of philosophical and say, okay,

0:06:37.360 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 4>it's a currency, why should you own it? And the

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.000
<v Speaker 4>people who are advocates of crypto will say exactly the

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 4>same thing, which is that there's a problem with FIA currencies,

0:06:46.279 --> 0:06:48.800
<v Speaker 4>which is government currencies. There's been too much of it,

0:06:48.839 --> 0:06:52.240
<v Speaker 4>there's too much bonduitions, there's too much debt, blah blah blah.

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:56.440
<v Speaker 4>And so if you want to hedge against FIA currency

0:06:56.760 --> 0:06:59.960
<v Speaker 4>by crypto, in other words, crypto is like digital gold.

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 4>If that's the case and the theory is correct, then

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.680
<v Speaker 4>how should crypto act. Crypto should do well when on

0:07:08.839 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 4>days like today where people are starting to worry about

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 4>inflation again, interest rates are up and the market is

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 4>down and NASDAK is down, and crypto should do poorly

0:07:17.480 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 4>when interest rates are lower, nobody cares about inflation, and

0:07:21.120 --> 0:07:24.560
<v Speaker 4>Nvidia is up twenty five percent. And how does crypto

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.920
<v Speaker 4>actually act. It acts exactly opposite to its own thesis,

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 4>which is the correlation between crypto and NASDAK is very,

0:07:32.320 --> 0:07:34.480
<v Speaker 4>very very high. So what does that say to me?

0:07:34.960 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 4>That crypto is just another way that people like to

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 4>speculate on because they like to speculate. That's all. That's all.

0:07:40.680 --> 0:07:43.440
<v Speaker 4>That's its only use. That and money.

0:07:43.240 --> 0:07:47.920
<v Speaker 3>Laundering, which is a use. Okay, So the three big

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 3>stories of our time that people are into AI, infrastructure,

0:07:52.760 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 3>and crypto, two of which you believe in. We know

0:07:56.040 --> 0:07:58.320
<v Speaker 3>you don't believe in one of them. Let's go to

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:01.120
<v Speaker 3>infrastructure for a second, because you mentioned that you talked

0:08:01.120 --> 0:08:05.160
<v Speaker 3>to a lot of industrial companies. Companies that would be theoretically,

0:08:05.240 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 3>I assume prime to take advantage of a lot of

0:08:08.560 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 3>the building out that's going on. So what are they

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 3>saying to you specifically right now? I mean you mentioned

0:08:13.440 --> 0:08:15.960
<v Speaker 3>that they're not talking about job cuts, But where are

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 3>we in the broader infrastructure cycle Because we saw all

0:08:19.720 --> 0:08:22.920
<v Speaker 3>of this money, we saw these various bill We're.

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 4>At the beginning. So here's my soapbox again. I think

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 4>that there are several sort of themes that weave its

0:08:30.160 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 4>way into infrastructure. So one is on shoring. You know,

0:08:33.720 --> 0:08:39.040
<v Speaker 4>the world spent forty years creating global supply chain that

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 4>was incredibly efficient and inexpensive and deflationary and turned out

0:08:47.320 --> 0:08:51.040
<v Speaker 4>we all learned during COVID also very brittle. So you're

0:08:51.080 --> 0:08:54.120
<v Speaker 4>a CEO. You got a free pass the first time.

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:57.000
<v Speaker 4>You know, if you had supply chain problems, nobody's going

0:08:57.040 --> 0:08:59.240
<v Speaker 4>to blame you that you had supply chain problems because

0:08:59.240 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 4>of pandemic. Nobody predicted you get one buy that apple.

0:09:03.760 --> 0:09:06.319
<v Speaker 4>If for some reason you have a supply chain problem, again,

0:09:06.800 --> 0:09:10.840
<v Speaker 4>that's on you. You get fired for that. So companies

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:12.960
<v Speaker 4>are bringing parts of their supply chain back to the

0:09:13.000 --> 0:09:16.400
<v Speaker 4>United States. That's a ten year story and we're like

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 4>in year two. That's them one theme. Two is data centers,

0:09:21.800 --> 0:09:25.800
<v Speaker 4>which is AI offset offshoot, but it also has industrial

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 4>o implications because number one, the GPUs that Nvidia and

0:09:29.200 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 4>AMD is selling utilize three times more electricity than a CPU,

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.720
<v Speaker 4>and they're also incredibly hotter, so they require a lot

0:09:36.760 --> 0:09:38.680
<v Speaker 4>more of the whole cooling systems that you have to

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 4>put into those data centers and brings us to theme three,

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.000
<v Speaker 4>which is improvement in the grid. Now, the grid needed

0:09:46.040 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 4>improvement before because of all the pressure that we're putting

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 4>on it from electrification, etc. But now that you add

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:54.719
<v Speaker 4>the GPUs on top of it, the pressure on the

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.480
<v Speaker 4>grid is even higher. So you know all the industrial

0:09:58.520 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 4>companies that deal with utility that are spending a ton

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:04.319
<v Speaker 4>of money to improve their grids. That's also a very

0:10:04.360 --> 0:10:06.880
<v Speaker 4>long term theme and also pretty much in its early stages.

0:10:06.960 --> 0:10:10.120
<v Speaker 4>And the last part is greenification, which has been a

0:10:10.120 --> 0:10:12.360
<v Speaker 4>long standing theme, but it's going to keep going. And

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 4>you take all four of those boxes and you turbocharge them.

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:18.280
<v Speaker 4>By the fact that the United States has not had

0:10:18.280 --> 0:10:21.800
<v Speaker 4>an industrial policy in anyone's lifetime, and it has one now.

0:10:21.960 --> 0:10:27.040
<v Speaker 4>The combination of the IRA and the IIJA adds up

0:10:27.080 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 4>to about one point two trillion dollars over ten years,

0:10:30.200 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 4>So that'll turbocharge all the four themes that it just

0:10:32.840 --> 0:10:35.480
<v Speaker 4>spoke about. That's why infrastructure is so interesting.

0:10:35.760 --> 0:10:38.439
<v Speaker 2>So I remember one of the last times we spoke

0:10:38.480 --> 0:10:42.480
<v Speaker 2>to you, you mentioned a specific company, Quantus Services, which

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:45.000
<v Speaker 2>does electrification of the grids something like that.

0:10:45.520 --> 0:10:48.880
<v Speaker 4>It's an engineering construction company, and one of the things

0:10:48.920 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 4>that it does is if utility wants to build a

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:53.439
<v Speaker 4>new plant, et cetera, Quanta builds it for.

0:10:53.440 --> 0:10:56.160
<v Speaker 2>Them, and that one is up. I think around forty

0:10:56.240 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 2>percent since we spoke to you, which has been like

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.679
<v Speaker 2>less than a year or so. Are those the kind

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:03.160
<v Speaker 2>of companies that you're trying to find?

0:11:03.600 --> 0:11:07.440
<v Speaker 4>Yes, they're those. Then there are some, you know, materials

0:11:07.480 --> 0:11:10.600
<v Speaker 4>companies that are going to be building the roads, the bridges,

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 4>et cetera, and you know, everything basically that surrounds that world.

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Would you do pure commodity plays? I mean, copper was

0:11:17.760 --> 0:11:18.240
<v Speaker 2>a big one.

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't do commodities. These are the things I don't do.

0:11:20.400 --> 0:11:23.320
<v Speaker 4>I don't do commodities. I don't do oil, I don't

0:11:23.320 --> 0:11:25.559
<v Speaker 4>trade currency. I don't trade commodities and do any of

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 4>that stuff. I just buy stocks.

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 3>Say more about some of these because everyone knows in video,

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.560
<v Speaker 3>but you do see this in the sell side research

0:11:33.679 --> 0:11:36.720
<v Speaker 3>that's coming out, which is that everyone is looking for

0:11:37.360 --> 0:11:42.439
<v Speaker 3>these secondary and tertiary plays on AI and so quantus services.

0:11:42.720 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 3>Congratulations on the good pick there, But what are the

0:11:45.880 --> 0:11:49.959
<v Speaker 3>other types of companies that you're looking at as part

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:53.440
<v Speaker 3>of this in areas like cooling, which is obviously going

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 3>to be huge, or you know, electrical component We got

0:11:56.600 --> 0:12:00.559
<v Speaker 3>ism manufacturing out yesterday, transformers can you to be in

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:04.320
<v Speaker 3>shortage for basically three straight years? What is your process

0:12:04.360 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 3>and how are you going about identifying the secondary and

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 3>tertiary maybe AI data center plays out there.

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.679
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean there are it's you know, it's all

0:12:14.720 --> 0:12:16.960
<v Speaker 4>the offshoots of the four boxes that I mentioned. There

0:12:17.040 --> 0:12:20.839
<v Speaker 4>is the cooling part, there's the grid construction part that

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 4>there are the utilities that are more on the green

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:27.160
<v Speaker 4>side than on the not green side. I mean, there's

0:12:27.240 --> 0:12:29.199
<v Speaker 4>just a lot to do. I mean, the other thing

0:12:29.240 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 4>that people are that we're trying to figure out is, Okay,

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:36.960
<v Speaker 4>there's Nvidia, there's a MD There's there's Microsoft, you know,

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:41.120
<v Speaker 4>one of our newer stocks. There's Oracle, you know, anyone

0:12:41.200 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 4>who has a huge database of anything consumer businesses. You know,

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:50.200
<v Speaker 4>in the world of AI is probably sitting on a

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.920
<v Speaker 4>gold mine. Whether the question is whether they can monetize it.

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:57.440
<v Speaker 4>And then then the next level, which I don't have

0:12:57.520 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 4>an answer to, is Okay, everybody's trying to invent apps.

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.320
<v Speaker 4>Whose apps are going to do well? Although my guess

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:07.240
<v Speaker 4>is that one of the bigger beneficiaries is probably going

0:13:07.280 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 4>to be Apple, because at the end of the day,

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.800
<v Speaker 4>the consumer I can't possibly predict what apps are going

0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:16.960
<v Speaker 4>to do well. But let's assume they're a bunch of them,

0:13:17.000 --> 0:13:20.440
<v Speaker 4>and let's assume that a bunch of them are for

0:13:20.520 --> 0:13:23.040
<v Speaker 4>the consumer. I have no idea what those are, but

0:13:23.120 --> 0:13:26.560
<v Speaker 4>let's assume that they exist, they are created, people are

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 4>going to use them on their phone, so AI is

0:13:29.200 --> 0:13:31.760
<v Speaker 4>going to have to be on the phone, which so

0:13:32.240 --> 0:13:34.719
<v Speaker 4>you know, assume what I'm hearing is that Apple is

0:13:34.760 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 4>talking to every AI creator in the world to say,

0:13:37.920 --> 0:13:40.920
<v Speaker 4>you know, come on our platform because we'll make your

0:13:41.040 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 4>app more efficient. They'll probably roll something out in June

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 4>when they have their I don't know if it's an

0:13:46.720 --> 0:13:50.199
<v Speaker 4>investor day or tech day, but you know, Apple potentially

0:13:50.320 --> 0:13:52.439
<v Speaker 4>eventually is going to be one of the bigger beneficiaries

0:13:52.440 --> 0:13:53.200
<v Speaker 4>in the second wave.

0:13:53.880 --> 0:13:55.800
<v Speaker 2>Speaking of waves, This is one of the reasons we

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.719
<v Speaker 2>wanted to talk to you. How do you separate the

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:04.600
<v Speaker 2>hype around owned AI versus the reality the real opportunity

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:07.000
<v Speaker 2>there because we are seeing this dynamic in the market

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.319
<v Speaker 2>now where you know, companies are just mentioning AI in

0:14:10.440 --> 0:14:14.280
<v Speaker 2>their press release. Right, everyone's doing AI, everyone's looking into AI.

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.800
<v Speaker 2>And again, one of the reasons we like talking to

0:14:17.800 --> 0:14:20.640
<v Speaker 2>you is because you are well known for the due

0:14:20.680 --> 0:14:24.000
<v Speaker 2>diligence that you do on various things, most famously on

0:14:24.040 --> 0:14:27.120
<v Speaker 2>the housing market before two thousand and eight. So how

0:14:27.120 --> 0:14:30.320
<v Speaker 2>are you separating the sort of fact from fiction here?

0:14:31.520 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, the facts are that AI at this

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 4>point is really only benefiting a very small number of companies,

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 4>most of whom were very, very very large. So that's

0:14:44.760 --> 0:14:47.400
<v Speaker 4>we have focused our attention on everything else at this

0:14:47.480 --> 0:14:51.400
<v Speaker 4>point seems to me to be hype or potential, and

0:14:52.280 --> 0:14:55.040
<v Speaker 4>we don't own those companies. We own the ones where

0:14:55.200 --> 0:14:57.600
<v Speaker 4>what's obvious. After that, we'll sing.

0:14:57.560 --> 0:15:16.400
<v Speaker 3>It, you know. Tracy asked about the due diligence process,

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:18.120
<v Speaker 3>and I sort of want to keep driving at this

0:15:18.200 --> 0:15:20.680
<v Speaker 3>because you mentioned one company, but like, there are a

0:15:20.720 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 3>bunch of companies out there that probably sell some component

0:15:25.200 --> 0:15:29.240
<v Speaker 3>that is useful for utilities. There's probably various companies out

0:15:29.240 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 3>there that sell cables that connect those and video chips

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 3>from one to another, and there's various companies that sell

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:40.040
<v Speaker 3>cooling solutions, et cetera. And so in that due diligence process,

0:15:40.080 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 3>like how do you start that, Like what is your

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of open up the window of like what does

0:15:44.440 --> 0:15:47.000
<v Speaker 3>it look like the process of identifying them?

0:15:47.040 --> 0:15:49.280
<v Speaker 4>Well in terms of let's talk on the infrastructure.

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:50.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah, that's the part of it.

0:15:51.400 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 4>I have narrowed down that world to where I think

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 4>it's significant to about eighty company Okay, And of those eighty,

0:16:08.360 --> 0:16:14.720
<v Speaker 4>I would say about thirty are very very interesting. The

0:16:14.800 --> 0:16:17.640
<v Speaker 4>other fifty or not so interesting at this point?

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:20.720
<v Speaker 3>Is that a function of when it's the eighty or

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.640
<v Speaker 3>the thirty? Is that about talking to people in the

0:16:23.680 --> 0:16:25.440
<v Speaker 3>space and saying, hey, what products do you use?

0:16:25.840 --> 0:16:28.600
<v Speaker 4>No, I mean it's I mean, I've been doing research

0:16:28.640 --> 0:16:29.720
<v Speaker 4>on this for the last two years.

0:16:29.840 --> 0:16:31.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so what does that look like.

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 4>It's a lot of work, It's a lot of reading,

0:16:33.880 --> 0:16:36.040
<v Speaker 4>you know, it's going to a lot of meetings. You know.

0:16:36.080 --> 0:16:40.560
<v Speaker 4>The area that I find is not interesting, for example,

0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 4>is residential solar Resisolar, I think is just an area

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:48.840
<v Speaker 4>that did very, very well during COVID, but was actually

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:52.880
<v Speaker 4>a major beneficiary of zero rates because people who put

0:16:52.880 --> 0:16:54.960
<v Speaker 4>a you know, it costs about thirty thousand dollars to

0:16:55.000 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 4>put a solar system on your roof, and ninety nine

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 4>percent of people finance it. And when they were financing

0:17:00.880 --> 0:17:03.040
<v Speaker 4>it during COVID, they were financing it at three percent,

0:17:03.120 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 4>and today, if they need to finance it, they're going

0:17:04.680 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 4>to need to fancy it at around nine And one

0:17:06.680 --> 0:17:08.320
<v Speaker 4>thing I learned in great school is that nine is

0:17:08.320 --> 0:17:11.400
<v Speaker 4>a lot more than three, and so sales are negative.

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:14.199
<v Speaker 4>Now how long they'll stay negative, I don't know, but

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:17.399
<v Speaker 4>I'm not interested in speculating about it, because the fundamentals

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:20.800
<v Speaker 4>right now are poor. On the other hand, you know,

0:17:20.920 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 4>just from a pure fundamental perspective, some of the solar

0:17:25.240 --> 0:17:28.399
<v Speaker 4>panel companies that sell stuff to utility they're doing quite well.

0:17:28.520 --> 0:17:30.760
<v Speaker 2>So the other thing that's happened since we last spoke

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 2>to you is that we are about ten or twelve

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 2>months closer to a presidential election in the US. Does

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 2>the infrastructure thesis take a hit if we were to

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 2>get Trump in office?

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:49.320
<v Speaker 4>This perception is reality, so the perception would be that

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:53.560
<v Speaker 4>a Republican administration would be less positive on gratification, and

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:55.720
<v Speaker 4>so maybe some of those stocks would take a hit

0:17:55.840 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 4>because of rhetoric. I think the reality is number one,

0:18:00.000 --> 0:18:02.280
<v Speaker 4>and the states that benefit for most of this stuff

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 4>are actually red states, including on the solar side. And

0:18:06.800 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 4>number two. You know, one of the reasons why US

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:14.760
<v Speaker 4>solar panel companies, like a coupley like First Solar doing

0:18:14.800 --> 0:18:18.399
<v Speaker 4>so well is because there are major tariffs against Chinese

0:18:18.440 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 4>solar producers. Those tariffs were created by President Trump, not

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.959
<v Speaker 4>by President Biden. President Biden just reaffirmed them. So at

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:27.640
<v Speaker 4>the end of the day, I don't think it's gonna matter,

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 4>although there'll be a lot of noise.

0:18:31.160 --> 0:18:33.600
<v Speaker 3>On the near shoring. You know, this is one of

0:18:33.640 --> 0:18:37.280
<v Speaker 3>those things where it's always hard, at least from my

0:18:37.400 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 3>perspective to disentangle like what's talk. You know, you see

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:43.119
<v Speaker 3>a lot of like there might be like a McKinsey

0:18:43.160 --> 0:18:46.360
<v Speaker 3>white paper about the benefits of near shoring, and it's like, okay.

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:47.320
<v Speaker 4>But oh I don't care about stuff.

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 3>Yeah no, no, I know, I know. So I'm trying

0:18:49.119 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 3>to like understand like the what are they doing specifically

0:18:52.680 --> 0:18:56.879
<v Speaker 3>the companies, the industrial companies that you're talking to, what

0:18:57.119 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 3>actually is being built either in the US.

0:19:00.119 --> 0:19:02.320
<v Speaker 4>You know it is a long like, you know, two

0:19:02.359 --> 0:19:05.239
<v Speaker 4>hour conversation kind of Look, there's some factories that are

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 4>being built here. There's some chip factories being bilit here.

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.600
<v Speaker 4>There's some other kinds of factories being built here. You

0:19:10.640 --> 0:19:12.879
<v Speaker 4>know they All you need to do is listen to

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:15.560
<v Speaker 4>let's say the Eaton conference call when they report, to

0:19:15.680 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 4>understand that they're doing very very well, and they'll do

0:19:18.240 --> 0:19:20.880
<v Speaker 4>very well for a long time because of those trends.

0:19:21.160 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 4>Eating corp Yes, etn etn'. I don't own it, but

0:19:26.640 --> 0:19:28.480
<v Speaker 4>I done a lot of research on it. You can't

0:19:28.480 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 4>own everything. And they're a company saying what, that's a

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:34.560
<v Speaker 4>company that does electrification for factories.

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:37.040
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, this stalks on well, and they're saying what specifically on.

0:19:36.960 --> 0:19:38.320
<v Speaker 4>Their calls, they got a lot of orders.

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:42.280
<v Speaker 3>Okay, that's what they're saying. I'm looking at those share

0:19:42.920 --> 0:19:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Eating Corporation, POC manufacturers engineered products for industrial vehicle construction,

0:19:47.480 --> 0:19:48.920
<v Speaker 3>commercial on aerospace markets.

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 4>Or take a company right products, fluid connect Take a

0:19:52.240 --> 0:19:55.720
<v Speaker 4>company like a newer company. It's not it's an older company,

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 4>but it's a new company listen called CRH which is

0:19:58.480 --> 0:20:02.159
<v Speaker 4>a materials company. The headquarters is in Ireland, but seventy

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:05.360
<v Speaker 4>five percent of the business in the United States. They

0:20:05.400 --> 0:20:10.520
<v Speaker 4>do roads, cement, all that stuff. And on the commercial side,

0:20:10.560 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 4>things are picking up, and they're partially picking up because

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:16.800
<v Speaker 4>of the IRA and the IgA. Money just starting to

0:20:16.840 --> 0:20:18.840
<v Speaker 4>be spent. And one of the things that was sent

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 4>on the conference call by the CFO was that this

0:20:21.720 --> 0:20:26.920
<v Speaker 4>is this is now golden age for infrastructure. I never

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 4>heard anybody say I call this a golden age for

0:20:29.040 --> 0:20:30.879
<v Speaker 4>their industry, but he said it.

0:20:32.040 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, some of the stocks they look a little ai

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:36.200
<v Speaker 2>ish when you look at the charts.

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:38.080
<v Speaker 3>Street line yeah, straight line up.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 4>So CRCH is funny because this is a perfect example

0:20:42.240 --> 0:20:46.040
<v Speaker 4>of why the thesis that markets are efficient is sometimes nonsense.

0:20:46.880 --> 0:20:51.359
<v Speaker 4>So CRCH was a Irish listed UK listed company with

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:54.679
<v Speaker 4>seventy five percent of its businesses in the US. So

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:59.440
<v Speaker 4>materials companies in Europe sell it literally half the multiples

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:05.680
<v Speaker 4>of US companies for whatever reason. And of course all

0:21:05.720 --> 0:21:09.000
<v Speaker 4>the cell side analysts who covered CRCH were European analysts,

0:21:09.400 --> 0:21:11.960
<v Speaker 4>and the people who cover Volcan materials, let's say, are

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 4>US analysts. So crch and September relisted in the US

0:21:17.600 --> 0:21:19.879
<v Speaker 4>under thesis said hey, we might get a better valuation

0:21:20.040 --> 0:21:22.560
<v Speaker 4>because we're seventy five percent US, and all of a

0:21:22.600 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 4>sudden people are And that's what we started to buy

0:21:24.600 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 4>it because we said to ourselves, this thing sells it

0:21:29.720 --> 0:21:32.600
<v Speaker 4>less than half the multiple of its US comps because

0:21:32.680 --> 0:21:33.880
<v Speaker 4>it has a different audience.

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 2>That's so funn that's like cell side analyst arbitrage.

0:21:36.960 --> 0:21:40.240
<v Speaker 4>That's exactly what, exactly right, it was cell side analyst arbitrage,

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:42.640
<v Speaker 4>and all of a sudden you had US analysts pick

0:21:42.680 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 4>it up and say, wait a second, this is seventy

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 4>five percent US. What am I missing? Huh?

0:21:47.720 --> 0:21:51.639
<v Speaker 2>So one thing that comes up in infrastructure conversations is

0:21:51.840 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 2>this idea of crowding out. So the government is spending

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:58.679
<v Speaker 2>billions and billions of dollars through various programs on building

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:02.560
<v Speaker 2>out infrastructure, I identifying new opportunities, and you know, we

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.960
<v Speaker 2>speak to people like Jiggershaw from the Department of Energy's

0:22:06.119 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 2>Loan Office program about how he makes his investments as

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 2>a private investor. Do you ever feel like you're competing

0:22:13.560 --> 0:22:16.719
<v Speaker 2>with the government in this area in things like renewables

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.399
<v Speaker 2>or green energy, or innation.

0:22:18.720 --> 0:22:21.280
<v Speaker 4>I mean, I don't do private investing, so it's not

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.520
<v Speaker 4>my problem. I just do public equities.

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.439
<v Speaker 2>Okay, But as a non government investor, do you feel

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 2>like it's harder to identify opportunities because the government is

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 2>in the mix now more than they used to be, or.

0:22:34.320 --> 0:22:35.560
<v Speaker 4>It's just another part of the story.

0:22:35.640 --> 0:22:37.360
<v Speaker 2>Huh, how do you take it into account?

0:22:38.119 --> 0:22:40.520
<v Speaker 4>They're spending money just trying to figure out who's benefiting.

0:22:40.840 --> 0:22:42.320
<v Speaker 4>Just follow the money, follow the money.

0:22:43.480 --> 0:22:46.919
<v Speaker 3>On electrification, you mentioned the grid, and there seems to

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.400
<v Speaker 3>be this incredibly wide consensus that the grid is not

0:22:50.560 --> 0:22:52.000
<v Speaker 3>currently sufficient.

0:22:52.920 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 4>That is what in Silicon Valley and the tech world.

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 4>That's what they're worried about. They're all talking, they're all

0:22:58.200 --> 0:22:58.959
<v Speaker 4>petrified of it.

0:22:59.000 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 3>Who's going to pay for it?

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:00.199
<v Speaker 2>Is?

0:23:00.240 --> 0:23:03.159
<v Speaker 3>This was not something the IRA spent a lot of

0:23:03.200 --> 0:23:05.320
<v Speaker 3>money in a lot of areas, but it did not

0:23:05.600 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 3>really do anything for the grid itself. And there is

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 3>even a lot of acknowledgement.

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's five hundred billion dollars in tax credits for

0:23:18.760 --> 0:23:23.320
<v Speaker 4>green energy stuff. Sure, absolutely, And so you know a

0:23:23.359 --> 0:23:27.639
<v Speaker 4>company Lightinexterra, which is will build let's say a solar field,

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 4>gets a tax credit to do it. Yes, so that

0:23:32.560 --> 0:23:33.520
<v Speaker 4>does that does help.

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:36.160
<v Speaker 3>Then there's the lines and the wires, and so there's

0:23:36.160 --> 0:23:39.520
<v Speaker 3>all these questions about regulations, and there's the question about money,

0:23:39.600 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 3>et cetera. Who's paying for basically the I mean you

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:48.400
<v Speaker 3>mentioned generation on the solar field side, who's paying for

0:23:48.920 --> 0:23:51.399
<v Speaker 3>the lines that will connect all these solar fields?

0:23:51.440 --> 0:23:53.800
<v Speaker 4>All the utilities are doing that. Okay, So if you

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:56.159
<v Speaker 4>look at the end of every year, when all the

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.080
<v Speaker 4>utilities are put their fourth quarter, at least most of them,

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:06.479
<v Speaker 4>they put out their three year capex budget projections, so

0:24:06.520 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 4>they only comes out once a year. So we just

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:13.520
<v Speaker 4>went through that period. So of the twenty companies that

0:24:13.960 --> 0:24:19.240
<v Speaker 4>are very good Newburger Bermam Utility Analyst covers, the average

0:24:19.280 --> 0:24:22.480
<v Speaker 4>increase in the three year capex budget is twenty percent.

0:24:23.680 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 3>Over the last year over the last year.

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:30.000
<v Speaker 4>In other words, a three year combined forward is twenty

0:24:30.000 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 4>percent higher than than last year's three year budget. That's

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 4>basically twenty percent because you're adding one more year or

0:24:36.440 --> 0:24:39.239
<v Speaker 4>something like that. That's a lot of money, you know,

0:24:39.280 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 4>and it's been going up and up and up and

0:24:41.000 --> 0:24:44.159
<v Speaker 4>up and up every single year because utilities keep spending

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:45.399
<v Speaker 4>money to improve their grids.

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:49.600
<v Speaker 2>What's the investment opportunity there though? Do you buy the

0:24:49.640 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 2>actual utilities or do you buy the sort of like peripheration.

0:24:52.800 --> 0:24:55.879
<v Speaker 4>You can buy some of the utilities, you know, Unfortunately,

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 4>utilities are very interest rate sensitive stocks. So and you know,

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.160
<v Speaker 4>in a day life today, probably I'm guessing because rates

0:25:02.240 --> 0:25:03.840
<v Speaker 4>or op utilities will go down.

0:25:04.400 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 3>But the market opens in two minutes.

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:12.440
<v Speaker 4>But I think some of the utilities that are more

0:25:12.480 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 4>on the greenish side are an interesting opportunity.

0:25:16.920 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 2>So you've been looking at the infrastructure space for two

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 2>years now, as you mentioned, what was the surprising thing

0:25:23.720 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 2>you learned or how does this particular industry vary from

0:25:28.400 --> 0:25:30.840
<v Speaker 2>other areas that you have looked at previously.

0:25:31.840 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 4>I think the big change is that if you take

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:39.400
<v Speaker 4>all the eighty companies, most of them are what would

0:25:39.480 --> 0:25:45.720
<v Speaker 4>traditionally be considered very cyclical companies, very traditional cyclical, cyclical

0:25:45.760 --> 0:25:51.560
<v Speaker 4>companies with no good secular story other than how's the

0:25:51.600 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 4>economy doing. And for the first time and since I

0:25:55.040 --> 0:25:58.439
<v Speaker 4>can remember, this whole group now has a real secular story.

0:25:58.920 --> 0:26:01.359
<v Speaker 4>You know, not that they're not sick, they are cyclical,

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:04.919
<v Speaker 4>but they have secular tailwinds that they've never really had before,

0:26:05.080 --> 0:26:07.440
<v Speaker 4>and those tailwinds are going to last quite a long time.

0:26:07.840 --> 0:26:11.640
<v Speaker 3>That's the change the xcel u E t F has opened.

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 3>It's down a little bit, but down about a tenth

0:26:13.680 --> 0:26:16.400
<v Speaker 3>of a percent. There you go. You can count that.

0:26:16.680 --> 0:26:20.119
<v Speaker 3>Count that count for me. Yeah, count that as a

0:26:20.280 --> 0:26:25.720
<v Speaker 3>w So. Sticking on this theme of the grid and electrification,

0:26:26.440 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 3>actually you mentioned oh now it's up, it's up, so

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:32.720
<v Speaker 3>I'm taking it all. Okay, now it's flat.

0:26:33.160 --> 0:26:35.439
<v Speaker 4>Well, you know what they say about our business. Peacock today,

0:26:35.480 --> 0:26:36.600
<v Speaker 4>feather duster tomorrow.

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 3>That's a good one. No, this is the question I

0:26:39.200 --> 0:26:42.840
<v Speaker 3>want to ask those three year projections that the utilities

0:26:42.920 --> 0:26:44.920
<v Speaker 3>are coming up with, and you sort of talk about

0:26:44.920 --> 0:26:48.000
<v Speaker 3>this shift from cyclical industries to secular, how did those

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:51.400
<v Speaker 3>three year projections compare us a five years ago and

0:26:51.560 --> 0:26:53.520
<v Speaker 3>no one was talking about AI and no one was

0:26:53.560 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 3>talking about the elect or very.

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:57.160
<v Speaker 4>I wish I wrot my charge, okay, and I don't

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 4>have my chart, but my guess is that the cap

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.800
<v Speaker 4>the three year CAPEX budget today versus five years ago,

0:27:04.160 --> 0:27:07.240
<v Speaker 4>it's probably fifty percent higher at least. Yeah.

0:27:07.240 --> 0:27:10.160
<v Speaker 3>This is something that Jiggershah who Tracy mentioned, has talked

0:27:10.200 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 3>about which is then basically for the first time and

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:18.560
<v Speaker 3>forever actual there's growth, and then demand which there basically

0:27:18.600 --> 0:27:19.159
<v Speaker 3>wasn't before.

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:19.600
<v Speaker 4>Correct.

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:24.239
<v Speaker 2>Wait, can I ask something slightly off topic, but I

0:27:24.280 --> 0:27:28.800
<v Speaker 2>think is of interest. So we recently had the sentencing

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:33.560
<v Speaker 2>of Sam Bankman freed, and he was the subject of

0:27:33.600 --> 0:27:36.359
<v Speaker 2>a Michael Lewis book, as were you in a very

0:27:36.440 --> 0:27:38.959
<v Speaker 2>different capacity. Have you heard from Michael Lewis at all?

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you keep in touch with him?

0:27:40.320 --> 0:27:42.160
<v Speaker 4>We haven't spoken in a couple of years now.

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Did you follow the SPF trial very marginally?

0:27:45.880 --> 0:27:47.320
<v Speaker 4>I have really an opinion about it.

0:27:47.359 --> 0:27:48.160
<v Speaker 2>Did you read the book?

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:49.320
<v Speaker 4>I did not read the book.

0:27:49.400 --> 0:27:51.160
<v Speaker 2>Okay, this isn't a very interesting line.

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.679
<v Speaker 3>I like that was a good line of questioning, Tracy.

0:27:54.880 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>I try.

0:27:55.560 --> 0:27:57.080
<v Speaker 3>It had the potential, had.

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.639
<v Speaker 4>The potential to go somewhere. Unfortunately it's not going on.

0:28:00.160 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 4>The guest shot it down.

0:28:01.800 --> 0:28:05.119
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, all right. So I hear all this stuff about

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:07.880
<v Speaker 2>excitement about data centers, and as far as I can tell,

0:28:08.000 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 2>like part of the play is investing in I guess

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.080
<v Speaker 2>data center reads something like that, Well they're only two.

0:28:14.240 --> 0:28:15.160
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, right?

0:28:15.680 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 2>Or you invest in like HVAC and the companies that

0:28:18.760 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 2>do the cooling around them. Yeah, so how do you

0:28:22.400 --> 0:28:25.040
<v Speaker 2>actually play that thesis? That's what I don't get.

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:28.080
<v Speaker 4>Well, I mean, like I said, you can own everything,

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 4>So I mean, I'm not gonna talk about what I

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:31.960
<v Speaker 4>have a position at these things. You know, Verdive is

0:28:32.119 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 4>the sort of the pure play to sell cooling stuff

0:28:35.840 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 4>into data centers. The stock has gone stratispheric. You know,

0:28:40.120 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 4>the multiple is really high, so you're playing there's a

0:28:43.360 --> 0:28:46.480
<v Speaker 4>lot of risk in that, not that the fundamentals are bad.

0:28:47.040 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 4>Equin X and Digital Realty are a more steady eddy

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:53.120
<v Speaker 4>kind of play. You know, what you're dealing with is

0:28:53.160 --> 0:28:59.240
<v Speaker 4>that the whole AI story is coming and so the

0:28:59.280 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 4>demand is going to go up, but you're still dealing

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:05.400
<v Speaker 4>with CAPEX budgets having come down in tech, so the

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:09.400
<v Speaker 4>growth is still not great or as good as people

0:29:09.400 --> 0:29:12.440
<v Speaker 4>would hope, but it's coming. So that that's seen and

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:14.200
<v Speaker 4>yang on the data centers and they are only two

0:29:14.280 --> 0:29:14.560
<v Speaker 4>of them.

0:29:15.360 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 3>One of the things that we've seen with data centers,

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:21.360
<v Speaker 3>and I think it was a few weeks ago, there

0:29:21.360 --> 0:29:24.760
<v Speaker 3>were some headlines about Microsoft wanting to have on site

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 3>nuclear power generation and we've talked a little bit about

0:29:28.000 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 3>on this show about the hope the promise of small

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:35.360
<v Speaker 3>modular reactors, which haven't really taken off, but maybe that

0:29:35.400 --> 0:29:39.640
<v Speaker 3>could be a solution for some of these huge CAPEX data.

0:29:39.680 --> 0:29:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Have you looked at nuclear at all?

0:29:41.160 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 4>I haven't looked at nuclear. The regulatory situation there is

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 4>just so complicated, you know. The one kind of I

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 4>think it was a Constellation Energy is the utility that's

0:29:49.800 --> 0:29:54.680
<v Speaker 4>done incredibly well because it has nuclear, but it's not creating,

0:29:54.800 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 4>as far as I know, more nuclear plants. It's just

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.320
<v Speaker 4>that the value of its existing nuclear plants have gone

0:29:59.400 --> 0:29:59.880
<v Speaker 4>up a lot.

0:30:00.080 --> 0:30:02.320
<v Speaker 3>That is a nice looking stock. On the other hand,

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 3>New Scale who's tickers literally SMR standing for small modular reactors,

0:30:10.240 --> 0:30:12.120
<v Speaker 3>That stock has not done so well, though it did

0:30:12.120 --> 0:30:14.360
<v Speaker 3>get a pop. I guess on that Microsoft headline.

0:30:15.120 --> 0:30:17.320
<v Speaker 2>It is interesting. One of the things that's sort of

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.880
<v Speaker 2>emerging from those conversation is even though we're talking about

0:30:20.880 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 2>new technologies and things like that, a lot of the

0:30:24.040 --> 0:30:27.719
<v Speaker 2>benefits seem to be accruing to the biggest players in

0:30:27.760 --> 0:30:30.000
<v Speaker 2>the market. So like the big companies, I don't think

0:30:30.120 --> 0:30:33.360
<v Speaker 2>this time last year anyone would have expected Microsoft to

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 2>emerge as a leader in AI, and yet that's exactly

0:30:37.520 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 2>what's happened. Is that what people should be focused on, Like,

0:30:40.480 --> 0:30:44.760
<v Speaker 2>who's going to dominate these CAPEX heavy tech plays. It's

0:30:44.840 --> 0:30:46.440
<v Speaker 2>going to be the guys with the money and the

0:30:46.560 --> 0:30:47.920
<v Speaker 2>like existing connections.

0:30:48.200 --> 0:30:50.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's two parts to this. There's no question

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 4>at this point the dominant players are the big boys

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 4>and they're going to be spending the money. And then

0:30:56.520 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 4>you know, they'll be interesting smaller companies that create apps,

0:30:59.680 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 4>and we have no idea who those are at this point.

0:31:02.440 --> 0:31:04.360
<v Speaker 4>None one day they'll show up on your phone.

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 3>Something I'm curious about with the data center reads is

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.600
<v Speaker 3>that their reads. I mean, I'm sure, I know they

0:31:10.640 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 3>talk about the AI opportunity and the demand for compute

0:31:15.080 --> 0:31:18.959
<v Speaker 3>that's going to in theoretic theoretically keep exploding for years.

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 3>But on the other hand, like they're not Google, they're

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.760
<v Speaker 3>not Amazon with AWS, they're not in Nvidia. Is there

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:30.000
<v Speaker 3>a risk that like they just can't compete with the

0:31:30.040 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 3>sort of like specialized, more tech forward companies that are

0:31:33.200 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 3>at the very cutting edge of this.

0:31:35.480 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know, the hyperscalers want to build their

0:31:38.880 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 4>own data centers, but you know, an Equinex for example,

0:31:43.280 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 4>services everybody who's not a hyperscaler, So they will do

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:51.040
<v Speaker 4>really well when all the apps that are going to

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:53.320
<v Speaker 4>be created get created and people need to put their

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.040
<v Speaker 4>stuff in the cloud, they'll do it through equinex. So

0:31:56.080 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 4>it really Digital Realty is more of a hyperscaler.

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 3>Can you see more about Oracle? For a long time

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 3>I sort of thought of that. They always seem to

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:23.000
<v Speaker 3>be straddling in my mind where it's like, and I

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 3>don't know that much about the company, but they always

0:32:25.120 --> 0:32:27.000
<v Speaker 3>seem to be sort of on the cusp of like,

0:32:27.360 --> 0:32:30.600
<v Speaker 3>are they in the category of the hyperscalers. Are they

0:32:30.640 --> 0:32:35.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of a legacy software database business that you know, well, they.

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 4>Are legacy software database business that's moving to the cloud. Yes,

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:41.440
<v Speaker 4>they're an AI play. You know. The problem with the

0:32:41.480 --> 0:32:43.480
<v Speaker 4>stock has been that every couple of quarters they have

0:32:43.520 --> 0:32:47.520
<v Speaker 4>a really bad quarter and they say sorry by this

0:32:47.560 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 4>most right, But in this most recent quarter it seems

0:32:50.160 --> 0:32:52.440
<v Speaker 4>to have at least for now gotten their act together.

0:32:52.440 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 3>And what's working for them.

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 4>You know, the demand because of AI or moving stuff

0:32:58.600 --> 0:33:01.280
<v Speaker 4>into the cloud, to move their database into the cloud,

0:33:01.360 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 4>seems to be increasing. Their problem, they say, is that

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:06.720
<v Speaker 4>they haven't been able to buy enough chips to satisfy

0:33:06.760 --> 0:33:09.520
<v Speaker 4>the demand. You know, when you think about that, that's

0:33:09.520 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 4>probably it's a better problem to have than the alternative.

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:15.960
<v Speaker 4>And they seem to be getting their act together, so

0:33:16.280 --> 0:33:18.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, they finally announced a good quarter and people

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 4>got excited about it, which is why the stock finally

0:33:20.240 --> 0:33:22.440
<v Speaker 4>did well. That's a more recent purchase of ours.

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 2>Have you tried any of the AI chatbots yet? Chat gpt,

0:33:27.880 --> 0:33:29.800
<v Speaker 2>you're too old? You know you can make you can

0:33:29.840 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 2>make comic books on some of them.

0:33:32.160 --> 0:33:34.360
<v Speaker 4>Yes, that you should make a comic book on a

0:33:34.600 --> 0:33:35.800
<v Speaker 4>chat chat Joe.

0:33:35.840 --> 0:33:38.120
<v Speaker 2>I didn't realize Steve's a comic book fan.

0:33:38.720 --> 0:33:41.800
<v Speaker 3>Yes, so is there what's the comic book play?

0:33:43.160 --> 0:33:45.680
<v Speaker 4>There's no comic book investing plan that I know of

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 4>comic You know, the comic bit is a small.

0:33:47.280 --> 0:33:49.400
<v Speaker 3>Business, but you're really into comic books totally.

0:33:49.440 --> 0:33:51.320
<v Speaker 4>I own the one of the largest digital comic book

0:33:51.360 --> 0:33:52.360
<v Speaker 4>collections in the world.

0:33:52.840 --> 0:33:53.440
<v Speaker 3>What does it mean?

0:33:54.880 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 2>What is that.

0:33:57.720 --> 0:33:57.920
<v Speaker 4>Way?

0:33:58.720 --> 0:33:59.080
<v Speaker 3>What is it?

0:33:59.120 --> 0:34:03.280
<v Speaker 4>Instead of buying a physical book, you now read your

0:34:03.280 --> 0:34:07.520
<v Speaker 4>book on your kindle. So comic books became the same thing.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:10.279
<v Speaker 4>There was an app called Comicsology where you would buy

0:34:10.320 --> 0:34:14.400
<v Speaker 4>your comic on Comicsology and you read it on your iPad,

0:34:14.600 --> 0:34:17.880
<v Speaker 4>and Amazon bought it, and so my comic book collection

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:20.319
<v Speaker 4>is now in my kindle. So the size of my

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:22.680
<v Speaker 4>comic book collection, I'm very proud to say, as of

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 4>this morning, was ten eight hundred and sixty three comics,

0:34:25.800 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 4>on which I have read every single one, for real,

0:34:28.320 --> 0:34:32.760
<v Speaker 4>for real, I'm doing this since twenty twelve.

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.600
<v Speaker 3>You know, I imagine, like, I don't know, I mean,

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 3>what's the attraction, what's the attraction spending so much of

0:34:41.560 --> 0:34:43.480
<v Speaker 3>your time here in life?

0:34:43.560 --> 0:34:44.280
<v Speaker 4>I like to read.

0:34:44.719 --> 0:34:48.239
<v Speaker 3>I read a lot of books, read non comic books.

0:34:48.680 --> 0:34:52.600
<v Speaker 4>I read a tremendous number of books, books, nonfiction and fiction,

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:56.239
<v Speaker 4>and I've always enjoyed reading comics, and the comics have

0:34:56.280 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 4>actually gotten very, very sophisticated in terms of literature, and

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:01.719
<v Speaker 4>I enjoy reading them.

0:35:02.000 --> 0:35:02.960
<v Speaker 2>What's your favorite?

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.080
<v Speaker 4>Oh, that's easy. The greatest comic book ever written is

0:35:06.120 --> 0:35:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Sandman Oh by Neil gam Yeah.

0:35:09.160 --> 0:35:12.919
<v Speaker 2>I used to have a Sandman themed tarot card deck

0:35:13.160 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 2>for some reason, even though I know.

0:35:14.840 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 4>The first season on Netflix was actually quite good.

0:35:17.600 --> 0:35:19.120
<v Speaker 3>What's it about? I don't know anything about.

0:35:19.400 --> 0:35:20.680
<v Speaker 4>Salmon is the god of dreams.

0:35:20.760 --> 0:35:23.480
<v Speaker 3>My son is into Spider Man, so I'm trying to

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:25.239
<v Speaker 3>like bond with him by like getting him.

0:35:25.280 --> 0:35:27.160
<v Speaker 4>I could write a dissertation on Spider Man.

0:35:27.480 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Oh literally, what would.

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:31.719
<v Speaker 4>You actually have a little might have a literary theory

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:32.279
<v Speaker 4>of Spider Man.

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:34.160
<v Speaker 3>Good, tell me this. I need some stuff to like

0:35:34.200 --> 0:35:35.640
<v Speaker 3>bond with my son over this.

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:38.640
<v Speaker 4>Well, you should get your son to read the newer

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 4>Spider Man who's called Miles Morales. Oh yeah, he loves

0:35:42.400 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 4>Lyles Miles. So my literary theory on Spider Man is

0:35:45.520 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 4>that Peter Parker was actually Jewish.

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:51.839
<v Speaker 3>Metaphor keep going, see here's why.

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 4>So first of all, the guy who created him, Stanley

0:35:53.880 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 4>is Jewish or was Jewish. Who is Peter Parker? So

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:04.960
<v Speaker 4>Peter Parker is raised by his elderly, kindly aunt who

0:36:05.000 --> 0:36:12.200
<v Speaker 4>looks like your Jewish grandmother. He marries the girl next door,

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 4>who's who's the gorgeous non Jewish girls every Jewish boys fantasy,

0:36:18.480 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 4>and and and he and he's consumed by he's a

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:24.800
<v Speaker 4>science geek nerd. And he's consumed by a sense of

0:36:24.800 --> 0:36:28.360
<v Speaker 4>guilt and social responsibility. So who is that? That's that

0:36:28.520 --> 0:36:31.439
<v Speaker 4>Jewish kid? This is this that's my literary theory. I've

0:36:31.440 --> 0:36:32.759
<v Speaker 4>had it for a very long time.

0:36:33.800 --> 0:36:35.560
<v Speaker 3>Do you think Superman is Jewish.

0:36:35.600 --> 0:36:41.000
<v Speaker 4>Definitely not, absolutely not, although he was created by Jewish guys.

0:36:41.280 --> 0:36:43.799
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, because I thought he was Jewish because some of

0:36:43.840 --> 0:36:47.319
<v Speaker 3>the other names of his like relatives, and I don't Again,

0:36:47.400 --> 0:36:49.160
<v Speaker 3>I'm not a big comic person, but like they have

0:36:49.400 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 3>sort of I thought they sounded sort of Niskay, you're

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 3>way off.

0:36:53.160 --> 0:36:57.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, I'm desperately trying to think of some sort of

0:36:57.360 --> 0:36:59.120
<v Speaker 2>finance or markets related.

0:36:58.800 --> 0:36:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Comic book, some way to bring this.

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:04.080
<v Speaker 2>We could just talk about comic books.

0:37:04.120 --> 0:37:05.400
<v Speaker 4>Well, the only thing you could bring it up to

0:37:05.560 --> 0:37:08.719
<v Speaker 4>is I have no opinion on Disney, Okay, but I

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:10.120
<v Speaker 4>can tell you what I think is wrong with the

0:37:10.120 --> 0:37:11.560
<v Speaker 4>Marvel comic book movies.

0:37:11.680 --> 0:37:14.000
<v Speaker 2>Tell us Disney owns.

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:16.239
<v Speaker 4>Disney owns Marvel, and that's been a big source of

0:37:16.280 --> 0:37:20.279
<v Speaker 4>their profitability. So I think the problem with Marvel is

0:37:20.320 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 4>that they've lost their story. And they are two parts

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:26.480
<v Speaker 4>of this. So part one was they had a great story.

0:37:26.840 --> 0:37:29.759
<v Speaker 4>It was a very complicated story where the villain only

0:37:29.800 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 4>got revealed years after they started the whole process. You know,

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:35.920
<v Speaker 4>it was multiple stories with tangents, but in the end

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:38.520
<v Speaker 4>all wolve it's way back into the last two movies.

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.400
<v Speaker 4>And then it was over, and they have not been

0:37:42.440 --> 0:37:44.880
<v Speaker 4>able to find a new story, and they've been basically

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.720
<v Speaker 4>floundering because they don't have one. And the other major problem,

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.799
<v Speaker 4>which is even more serious than the first, is that

0:37:53.480 --> 0:37:57.160
<v Speaker 4>there's a concept in comics called the trinity. So in

0:37:57.280 --> 0:38:00.760
<v Speaker 4>DC it's Superman, Batman, and Wonder Woman. That's the core,

0:38:01.280 --> 0:38:04.839
<v Speaker 4>And in Marvel it's Captain America, Thor and Iron Man.

0:38:05.640 --> 0:38:07.399
<v Speaker 4>And at the end of the last Marvel comic, iron

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:11.839
<v Speaker 4>Man's dead. Captain America is over ninety years old, and unfortunately,

0:38:11.880 --> 0:38:14.000
<v Speaker 4>since then, Thor has been made into a comedic joke.

0:38:14.640 --> 0:38:17.000
<v Speaker 4>So you've lost your trinity. So even if you had

0:38:17.000 --> 0:38:19.479
<v Speaker 4>a story, nobody, I don't who's going to care because

0:38:19.680 --> 0:38:22.080
<v Speaker 4>because people care about those three characters with anything else

0:38:22.120 --> 0:38:24.480
<v Speaker 4>and they're gone, can't make thesis.

0:38:24.560 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 2>They you just start the whole thing over. Well, you

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:27.480
<v Speaker 2>can read both Spider.

0:38:27.200 --> 0:38:29.399
<v Speaker 4>Man, but you know you have to get new, Uh,

0:38:29.640 --> 0:38:31.080
<v Speaker 4>you have to start for fresh. I don't know if

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 4>they're willing to do that yet.

0:38:32.719 --> 0:38:35.759
<v Speaker 3>This is such a refreshing, interesting take. We could just

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:38.480
<v Speaker 3>talk about this because I do know like as someone

0:38:38.560 --> 0:38:40.600
<v Speaker 3>who I kind of like going to the movies, but

0:38:41.160 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 3>unlike you, I was never a big comic book reader

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 3>during that sort of Marvel era of movies, when it

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:49.080
<v Speaker 3>just seemed like the only movies that were in the

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 3>theaters were just these endless superhero movies. I just like

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:55.040
<v Speaker 3>totally tuned down, and so I was there religiously.

0:38:55.239 --> 0:38:55.439
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:38:55.480 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 3>So, but I for one was like kind of I

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 3>am relieved and sort of the idea of Hollywood's are

0:39:02.120 --> 0:39:06.359
<v Speaker 3>going post superhero and maybe making movies again like Oppenheimer

0:39:06.440 --> 0:39:07.200
<v Speaker 3>with normal people.

0:39:07.239 --> 0:39:08.919
<v Speaker 4>By the way, Dune Part two was very good.

0:39:09.200 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 3>I've been meaning to.

0:39:10.320 --> 0:39:11.080
<v Speaker 2>I haven't seen it yet.

0:39:11.120 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 3>No spoilers, I haven't seen it yet either, but I

0:39:14.520 --> 0:39:16.640
<v Speaker 3>don't know. I for one am excited about a sort

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:18.040
<v Speaker 3>of post superhero.

0:39:18.400 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 4>That's that's fine. I'm just talking about the problem with Marvelers. Yeah,

0:39:22.640 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 4>but it's but it's a big connect to Disney.

0:39:26.120 --> 0:39:27.280
<v Speaker 3>But right, but it's connected.

0:39:27.360 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 4>Right.

0:39:27.520 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 3>So it's like these stories have just gotten tired for

0:39:29.719 --> 0:39:32.279
<v Speaker 3>people because there's nowhere to go for them.

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:35.560
<v Speaker 4>Well, you you need a new story, you need and

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 4>they haven't found one, you know. So if I go back,

0:39:38.320 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 4>you know, and I'll show you how into this. I

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 4>Am Loki. Season three was terrible. The Marvel's movie, which

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 4>is recently was awful. Guardians of the Game, Like, what

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:48.880
<v Speaker 4>made it awful? Because they all look awful. It was

0:39:48.960 --> 0:39:53.719
<v Speaker 4>just stupid. The story was dumb, it wasn't interesting, and

0:39:53.760 --> 0:39:55.600
<v Speaker 4>they tried to make it too much of a They

0:39:55.600 --> 0:39:57.720
<v Speaker 4>have a tendency to try and make the movies too funny,

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:01.520
<v Speaker 4>and it doesn't translate very well anymore. And then the

0:40:01.560 --> 0:40:05.080
<v Speaker 4>Guardians of the Galaxy Part three was so boring. I

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 4>almost walked out three times.

0:40:06.840 --> 0:40:09.440
<v Speaker 2>Was that one disturbed me because there's a lot of

0:40:09.440 --> 0:40:11.640
<v Speaker 2>animal cruelty in that one and it was just kind

0:40:11.640 --> 0:40:12.879
<v Speaker 2>of sad to watch.

0:40:13.040 --> 0:40:14.880
<v Speaker 4>There was a lot of animal cruelty to it. They

0:40:14.920 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 4>tried to make it relevant. Yeah, it was just a

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:18.240
<v Speaker 4>bad story.

0:40:18.840 --> 0:40:22.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Has the market for comic books changed in the

0:40:22.719 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 2>sense that so everyone knows if you have a really

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:28.720
<v Speaker 2>successful comic book. Nowadays you can get a franchise attached

0:40:28.760 --> 0:40:32.480
<v Speaker 2>to a film franchise. Does anyone come up with characters

0:40:32.520 --> 0:40:35.400
<v Speaker 2>based on the idea of like what will play well

0:40:35.640 --> 0:40:39.279
<v Speaker 2>on screen? Overall? It feels like you don't actually get

0:40:39.320 --> 0:40:41.880
<v Speaker 2>that many new characters in new comic books.

0:40:41.920 --> 0:40:43.400
<v Speaker 4>That many new comics there really.

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Are seems a shame. It seems like it would solve

0:40:46.239 --> 0:40:48.279
<v Speaker 2>the story problem if we were actually coming up with

0:40:48.320 --> 0:40:48.920
<v Speaker 2>new stories.

0:40:49.840 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 4>Well, there's new stories, and then there's new characters. There's

0:40:52.160 --> 0:40:55.160
<v Speaker 4>always new stories. But you know the problem with Marvel

0:40:55.239 --> 0:40:56.920
<v Speaker 4>is they don't have a story. They just don't have

0:40:56.960 --> 0:40:57.400
<v Speaker 4>a story.

0:40:58.400 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 3>I didn't realize that. I didn't anything about this. I

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:03.880
<v Speaker 3>just sort of assumed that there every superhero thing was

0:41:03.920 --> 0:41:06.760
<v Speaker 3>just sort of this endless story that could go on forever.

0:41:06.800 --> 0:41:07.919
<v Speaker 3>Well it does.

0:41:08.000 --> 0:41:11.040
<v Speaker 4>But when you're making movies, yeah, you know, they what

0:41:11.080 --> 0:41:15.560
<v Speaker 4>they had was this They had all these different origin stories.

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:17.319
<v Speaker 4>But then at the end of the day, all the

0:41:17.360 --> 0:41:21.120
<v Speaker 4>movies were going towards this one central story, which was

0:41:21.160 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 4>the last two movies, and then it was over. So

0:41:24.000 --> 0:41:25.879
<v Speaker 4>now you got to like start again, and they haven't

0:41:25.920 --> 0:41:27.840
<v Speaker 4>been able to find how to start again.

0:41:28.280 --> 0:41:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Here's my desperate attempt to bring us back to our

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:36.719
<v Speaker 2>core content. If you could come up with a comic finance,

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:41.440
<v Speaker 2>investing markets economics crossover, what would it be?

0:41:43.760 --> 0:41:45.759
<v Speaker 4>Oh, boy, I don't know, I don't know.

0:41:45.840 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 2>That's that's that's super portfolio.

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:50.440
<v Speaker 4>No, no, you know. I used to joke when I

0:41:50.440 --> 0:41:54.880
<v Speaker 4>was Halloween, I'd take my kids around just as me

0:41:55.000 --> 0:41:57.480
<v Speaker 4>and they'd say, who I say, I'm a hedge fund manager.

0:41:57.520 --> 0:41:58.680
<v Speaker 4>I'm the scariest person.

0:42:00.880 --> 0:42:01.680
<v Speaker 2>That's low effort.

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 3>Should we go back to some of your big themes?

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:07.879
<v Speaker 4>Sure? Why not? Okay, this was more fun though.

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:11.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, actually, this has been a true light bulb

0:42:11.040 --> 0:42:13.440
<v Speaker 3>moment because all I knew is that people weren't really

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:15.239
<v Speaker 3>watching the Marvel movie is the way they were three

0:42:15.360 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 3>or four year old. And now for the first time

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:19.799
<v Speaker 3>it took me.

0:42:19.960 --> 0:42:22.120
<v Speaker 4>Especially now that one of my favorite characters has always

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 4>been four h huh and the last movie was so bad.

0:42:24.640 --> 0:42:28.400
<v Speaker 4>I was offended. Really, yes, it's like, how dare you

0:42:28.440 --> 0:42:29.400
<v Speaker 4>do that to my character?

0:42:30.000 --> 0:42:33.880
<v Speaker 3>Interesting? God, I really don't know exactly where to take this,

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:37.200
<v Speaker 3>but let's I want to let's just maybe go back

0:42:37.200 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 3>to some of the infrastructure sure questions. It sounds to

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 3>me like and maybe this is a sort of investing

0:42:45.440 --> 0:42:48.799
<v Speaker 3>philosophy question. And you mentioned the sort of the cell

0:42:48.880 --> 0:42:52.480
<v Speaker 3>side analyst arbitrage with that one company that got listed here.

0:42:52.960 --> 0:42:55.160
<v Speaker 3>You mentioned the fact that even if there's a change

0:42:55.200 --> 0:42:59.200
<v Speaker 3>in administration, that doesn't necessarily change the underlying stories. It

0:42:59.280 --> 0:43:03.160
<v Speaker 3>sounds to me like, from a philosophical perspective, your view

0:43:03.440 --> 0:43:08.000
<v Speaker 3>is there are big long term trends and don't count.

0:43:07.719 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 3>Don't presume they're all priced in immediately. Even if we

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.400
<v Speaker 3>can all agree that there's ten years of growing electricity demand,

0:43:14.440 --> 0:43:18.480
<v Speaker 3>there's ten years of demand for greater cooling solutions or

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:20.680
<v Speaker 3>whatever it is, or more cement or more copper.

0:43:21.440 --> 0:43:24.120
<v Speaker 4>I'm not a great believer in it's all priced in. Yeah,

0:43:24.160 --> 0:43:26.480
<v Speaker 4>that's I don't subscribe to me.

0:43:26.600 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's sort of one that I wanted to get

0:43:28.120 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 3>you on, Like, how do you think about that question?

0:43:30.040 --> 0:43:32.000
<v Speaker 3>Because I have, like the way I think I have

0:43:32.080 --> 0:43:34.120
<v Speaker 3>journalists brands, so I assumed if I know about it,

0:43:34.120 --> 0:43:34.920
<v Speaker 3>it's already priced in.

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:37.920
<v Speaker 4>I mean, you know what people say, it's all priced in.

0:43:38.000 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 4>My question to them is always how do you know?

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:43.200
<v Speaker 4>Did you get the old planet Earth into group therapy?

0:43:43.239 --> 0:43:45.080
<v Speaker 4>And ask everybody like is it priced in?

0:43:45.320 --> 0:43:45.400
<v Speaker 1>Like?

0:43:45.520 --> 0:43:47.560
<v Speaker 4>How would you know that? Look, this is a story.

0:43:48.080 --> 0:43:49.920
<v Speaker 4>It's a story that's going to last a long time,

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 4>and as long as it keeps going, people are going

0:43:51.760 --> 0:43:53.200
<v Speaker 4>to want to own it. I mean it gets back

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:56.320
<v Speaker 4>to what I said before. In good times, people traffic

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 4>and stories and as long as the story is there

0:44:00.200 --> 0:44:01.759
<v Speaker 4>by the stock. I mean, if you go back to

0:44:02.360 --> 0:44:05.680
<v Speaker 4>you know the Internet bubble. What killed the Internet bubble?

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:09.520
<v Speaker 4>It wasn't valuation. It wasn't that it was all priced in.

0:44:09.880 --> 0:44:12.759
<v Speaker 4>What killed it was that the US engine to a

0:44:12.840 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 4>recession and these companies' fundamentals fell apart. That's what killed It.

0:44:18.120 --> 0:44:20.960
<v Speaker 4>Wasn't that that they were very expensive. Well obviously they

0:44:21.000 --> 0:44:24.600
<v Speaker 4>were in retrospect. So this, you know, they have this

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:26.279
<v Speaker 4>infrastructure store. I think it is just going to go

0:44:26.320 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 4>on for a very very long time. And as long

0:44:28.680 --> 0:44:30.920
<v Speaker 4>as that's the case, people want to own so many stocks.

0:44:31.840 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 2>All right, Steve, it was so good talking to you again.

0:44:34.800 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 2>We talked about infrastructure, AI, crypto, and of course comic books.

0:44:38.560 --> 0:44:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Slightly unexpected, but a lot of fun. Thank you so

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:56.000
<v Speaker 2>much for coming back on our thoughts. Thank you, Joe.

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:58.279
<v Speaker 2>That was really fun. I did not expect us to

0:44:58.320 --> 0:45:01.239
<v Speaker 2>spend twenty minutes talking about books, but I enjoyed it.

0:45:01.320 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 3>No, I'm really excited tonight. Like I said, I'm going

0:45:03.400 --> 0:45:05.640
<v Speaker 3>to go home and tell my son that like him,

0:45:05.760 --> 0:45:08.920
<v Speaker 3>Peter Parker is Jewish, and see if that mean. Like

0:45:08.960 --> 0:45:11.160
<v Speaker 3>I said, I got a bond with my son over

0:45:11.200 --> 0:45:13.319
<v Speaker 3>his Spider Man affinity. So that'll be a line.

0:45:13.520 --> 0:45:15.960
<v Speaker 2>You got to develop a literary theory of Spider Man,

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:18.320
<v Speaker 2>just like Steve. That's what you need to do. No,

0:45:18.520 --> 0:45:20.279
<v Speaker 2>there is a lot of interesting stuff in there. I

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:23.399
<v Speaker 2>thought the point about stories, so you know, in good

0:45:23.440 --> 0:45:26.720
<v Speaker 2>times people are into stories, and then what really tends

0:45:26.760 --> 0:45:29.760
<v Speaker 2>to knock those theses are when the bad times start,

0:45:29.880 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 2>and that's when things start crumbling. So far, you know, again,

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:36.640
<v Speaker 2>it is now April of twenty twenty four. We do

0:45:36.760 --> 0:45:40.800
<v Speaker 2>not seem to be on the immediate cusp of a recession,

0:45:40.880 --> 0:45:43.920
<v Speaker 2>so you can see why people continue to get excited

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:46.719
<v Speaker 2>about these stories. The other thing I thought was interesting

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:49.279
<v Speaker 2>was the idea that like, okay, well, a lot of

0:45:49.280 --> 0:45:53.120
<v Speaker 2>the infrastructure programs have been started under the Biden administration. Yeah,

0:45:53.160 --> 0:45:57.239
<v Speaker 2>but there are aspects and themes that emanated from the

0:45:57.280 --> 0:46:01.680
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration, so things like the subsidy for solar panels

0:46:01.680 --> 0:46:03.960
<v Speaker 2>in the fact that we're not importing as many Chinese

0:46:03.960 --> 0:46:07.239
<v Speaker 2>solar power panels as we used to and that would

0:46:07.280 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 2>be expected to continue. So yeah, that was interesting totally.

0:46:12.040 --> 0:46:14.600
<v Speaker 3>In general, I liked his point at the very end

0:46:14.640 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 3>about his belief that things aren't just priced in immediately

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.160
<v Speaker 3>and as long as things are good, people will write

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:24.120
<v Speaker 3>the story I mean, look, so a year ago. By

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:27.799
<v Speaker 3>a year ago, so April twenty twenty three, it was

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:33.319
<v Speaker 3>unambiguously understood that in video was a key player in AI, right,

0:46:33.360 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 3>it was everyone had used Chad GPT by that point,

0:46:36.520 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 3>everyone knew was trained on in video chips. Everyone's like, oh,

0:46:39.560 --> 0:46:42.480
<v Speaker 3>this is crazy, And in that time, in video is

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 3>up over fourfold. And I don't think there's like some

0:46:45.640 --> 0:46:49.719
<v Speaker 3>new information that about in video or AI that's come out.

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:52.879
<v Speaker 3>It's basically like, oh, just the storage is very good.

0:46:52.880 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 3>And maybe some of the numbers and the degree to

0:46:54.920 --> 0:46:57.279
<v Speaker 3>which other companies have piled in or wanted to buy

0:46:57.320 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 3>chips is true. But to his point, these this idea

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 3>that it's all priced in the moment we're aware of

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:05.600
<v Speaker 3>the situation is probably a good thing to internalize.

0:47:05.719 --> 0:47:08.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, And I always think life would be so boring

0:47:08.520 --> 0:47:11.000
<v Speaker 2>if you went around just assuming that everything was priced

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:13.560
<v Speaker 2>in immediately, right, Like, what are we even doing here?

0:47:13.719 --> 0:47:15.799
<v Speaker 2>If we really believe that?

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:19.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, why do we have a investment industry at all?

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:21.359
<v Speaker 3>If everything I kind of still believe that, but.

0:47:21.480 --> 0:47:23.840
<v Speaker 2>I don't take I refuse to believe it.

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:27.080
<v Speaker 3>Well, you would be a better investor than I would, No.

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 2>I wouldn't okay, shall we leave it there?

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:30.640
<v Speaker 3>Let's leave it there.

0:47:30.760 --> 0:47:33.400
<v Speaker 2>This has been another episode of the Odd Thoughts podcast.

0:47:33.480 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm Tracy Alloway. You can follow me at Tracy Alloway and.

0:47:36.600 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 3>I'm Joe Wisenthal. You can follow me at the Stalwart.

0:47:39.360 --> 0:47:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Follow our producers Carmen Rodriguez at Carman Arman dash Ol

0:47:42.880 --> 0:47:46.160
<v Speaker 3>Bennett at Dashbot and kel Brooks at Keil Brooks. Thank

0:47:46.200 --> 0:47:49.360
<v Speaker 3>you to our producer Moses Ondam. For more odd Lots content,

0:47:49.400 --> 0:47:51.719
<v Speaker 3>go to Bloomberg dot com slash odd Lots, where we

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:55.239
<v Speaker 3>have transcripts, blog and a newsletter and you can chat

0:47:55.239 --> 0:47:57.919
<v Speaker 3>about all of these topics in the discord twenty four

0:47:57.920 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 3>to seven with fellow listeners dot gg slash oud Lots.

0:48:02.680 --> 0:48:05.359
<v Speaker 2>And if you enjoy odd Lots, if you like it

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:08.319
<v Speaker 2>when we talk to Steve Eisman about comic books, then

0:48:08.360 --> 0:48:11.880
<v Speaker 2>please leave us a positive review on your favorite podcast platform.

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:15.040
<v Speaker 2>And remember, if you are a Bloomberg subscriber, you can

0:48:15.080 --> 0:48:18.399
<v Speaker 2>listen to all of our episodes absolutely ad free. All

0:48:18.440 --> 0:48:20.759
<v Speaker 2>you need to do is connect your Bloomberg account with

0:48:21.040 --> 0:48:23.240
<v Speaker 2>Apple Podcasts. Thanks for listening