WEBVTT - Jakobi Meyers vs. Courtland Sutton | Week 9 Lineup Advice: Must-Start Players, Sleepers, Sits, and Player Debates (Ep. 1423) 0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:04.400 Hello everybody, Welcome into the Fantasy Pros Football Podcast. I'm Ryan, 0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:07.280 warmly joined today by a couple of guys who are 0:00:07.320 --> 0:00:10.119 not dressed as they usually are. It's Andrew Erickson. 0:00:10.280 --> 0:00:14.080 As I mean, I'm the Dolphins head coach. Give the ball, 0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.440 aham and got to a back. Let's go. Let's go Dolphins. 0:00:18.440 --> 0:00:20.759 Remember we do have an audio only audience, so I 0:00:20.800 --> 0:00:22.759 want you need to actually say it out loud and 0:00:22.760 --> 0:00:24.840 not just trust people to know your costume, which does 0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:27.080 look great by the way. Ericson he is rocking the 0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.560 Mike McDaniel offense here, you know for Halloween fits. Who 0:00:31.600 --> 0:00:31.920 are you? 0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:35.560 I'm dan Quinn, coming off a big game. Didn't play 0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.440 our greatest game against the Bears last week, but you know, 0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:40.320 pulled off a pretty big play at the end. So 0:00:40.800 --> 0:00:41.960 floating on clouds right now. 0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:44.520 Favorite to win the Coach of the Year, dan Quinn. 0:00:44.600 --> 0:00:45.279 Congrats to you. 0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:50.200 Really ahead of Matt Lafleur, you are in first place. 0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:53.600 Play calling wizardry that he has overseen. 0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:57.840 Yeah, maybe dan Quinn's coaching extends as far as he's 0:00:57.880 --> 0:01:01.240 lucky enough to have Jade Daniels be an MVP candidate 0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:03.800 as a rookie he's been he's been good. I don't 0:01:03.840 --> 0:01:05.960 I don't actually don't want to like disparage Dan Quinny. 0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:07.720 He's been good, but yeah, I think well Floor has 0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:09.880 been more impressive. I would agree. 0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.759 Quinn's doing a terrific job, though. I mean, the Commanders 0:01:12.800 --> 0:01:15.400 are one of the funnest stories in the NFL this season. 0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:16.080 Without question. 0:01:17.280 --> 0:01:19.840 It is Halloween, of course, that's why we were addressed up. 0:01:19.880 --> 0:01:22.000 I am. I'm rocking the closest thing I have to 0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.520 Sean McVay, I don't really own any costumes or anything, 0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.160 but it's a it's a hoodie that has that coloring, 0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:29.000 and I've got the hair and facial hair for it, 0:01:29.120 --> 0:01:31.680 so I figured that's what i'd go with. I did 0:01:31.680 --> 0:01:34.119 not get the headset rocking like you two did, so 0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:36.840 you guys definitely both look more like coaches than I do, 0:01:37.280 --> 0:01:38.520 and and I respect it. 0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:40.480 Well because you didn't show up with the headset. You 0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:42.200 got to give us the coach speak. What are you expecting, 0:01:42.240 --> 0:01:44.240 Kyrien Williams are going to be split a play Quorum's 0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:46.480 pooka gonna play snapcount? What do you think? What do 0:01:46.520 --> 0:01:48.880 you think, Sean ovay, What's what's going on? Coach? You know. 0:01:49.120 --> 0:01:50.880 You know, guys, I just I just got I'm not 0:01:50.920 --> 0:01:52.840 good at impressions. I can't do it. I'm also kind 0:01:52.880 --> 0:01:55.120 of sick, you know, guys. You know, I just I 0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:57.360 really think cam Akers is gonna be huge this year. 0:01:57.400 --> 0:01:59.240 I want to trade back for him and give him 0:01:59.280 --> 0:02:03.280 the workout here. I fully recognize I have no ability 0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:05.720 to impersonate anybody, So that's not me thinking I have 0:02:05.720 --> 0:02:08.919 a good Sean McVay impression, just that I've been told 0:02:08.919 --> 0:02:10.520 on occasion that I kind of look like and when 0:02:10.560 --> 0:02:13.360 I wear the sweatshirt. So that's that's what I'm going with. 0:02:13.440 --> 0:02:15.960 That's my best, uh my best impression. Do you do 0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:17.880 you have a Mike McDaniel for us Erickson? 0:02:18.480 --> 0:02:21.360 I do not have a Mike McDaniel. It's just, I mean, 0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.600 I don't know what does he I mean, he's really smart. 0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:25.679 He's a smart guy, smarter than I am, So I 0:02:25.680 --> 0:02:27.720 don't know. I mean, I guess my impersonation. 0:02:27.240 --> 0:02:29.880 Would be could deny you could deny vaping on the 0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:30.919 sideline during a game? 0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:31.320 Do that? 0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.480 I could talk about how I spent two weeks in 0:02:33.520 --> 0:02:36.680 the bunker devising ways to get John who Smith the ball. 0:02:36.960 --> 0:02:40.040 Over two weeks fresh period. So that's about it. Though 0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:43.119 for my impersonations of mister Mike Daniel, we can't really 0:02:43.120 --> 0:02:46.359 have continue impression owned by the bills, including this week. 0:02:46.480 --> 0:02:48.880 Most likely we cannot really have fits to an impression 0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:50.919 of dan Quinn because I would have to bleep out 0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:51.640 every other word. 0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:52.560 Dude, is so. 0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.240 Throwing your headset all over the place like after the Hailmars. 0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:02.680 We're having some fun. Like I said, we are recorded 0:03:02.760 --> 0:03:06.360 obviously Thursday morning, so it is Halloween. Happy Halloween to 0:03:06.440 --> 0:03:10.800 everybody who is listening and watching, and hopefully this weekend 0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:14.200 Slated Games is full of treats more than tricks for 0:03:14.280 --> 0:03:17.440 your fantasy teams. This is our start sit show. We're 0:03:17.440 --> 0:03:19.800 gonna go through our favorite starts of the week, sits 0:03:19.960 --> 0:03:22.880 waiver ads. Are we starting or sending them some touchdown 0:03:22.880 --> 0:03:25.280 calls at the end of the show. It's our weekly 0:03:25.360 --> 0:03:27.560 Thursday show and a quick reminder for everyone. All of 0:03:27.600 --> 0:03:30.720 our weekly consensus rankings and tiers can be found at 0:03:30.720 --> 0:03:34.320 fantasypros dot com slash rankings. One last Halloween related thing, 0:03:34.320 --> 0:03:36.240 guys before we jump in, We've been doing this kind 0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:40.280 of internal at work candy bracket over the last couple 0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:42.480 of days kind of put together by HR and some 0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.720 of our coworkers. We're i think, going into the championship today, 0:03:47.240 --> 0:03:49.440 who is your guys as one of one of candy 0:03:49.480 --> 0:03:51.560 And I'm gonna say, I don't know if you're gonna 0:03:51.560 --> 0:03:53.760 pick this, but I'm gonna take Recy's peanut butter cups 0:03:53.800 --> 0:03:55.560 out of the equation because I think that is most 0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.240 people's one to one, and so just for the sake 0:03:58.240 --> 0:03:59.720 of mixing it up, if that was gonna be your 0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.280 one one, let's pick something else. Ericson what do you got? 0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:04.440 I mean, you can't put me on the spot like 0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.119 that when you take away the answer that I want 0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:08.760 to give. I know that's I try to I'm in 0:04:08.880 --> 0:04:12.080 the I'm in the I like to be right, not 0:04:12.080 --> 0:04:14.720 not trying to diversify. So I'm sorry, I'm just going 0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:16.320 with Reese's peanut butter cup. I can give you my 0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.240 last ranking, Dot completely ignored. I can give you the 0:04:19.440 --> 0:04:22.760 zero zero, which is Dots the worst candy ever. 0:04:24.360 --> 0:04:26.680 You know, you know who tweeted this morning what his 0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:30.039 one on one one is is d Bro and he's 0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.960 a candy corn. So I thought that's what you were 0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:34.880 going to say for your zero zero I think, I think. 0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.720 I think candy corn is gets a bad rap sometimes, 0:04:37.800 --> 0:04:40.080 but it's closer to Round fourteen than it is to 0:04:40.160 --> 0:04:43.360 a round one pick in my opinion fits. What about you? 0:04:43.440 --> 0:04:45.359 Yeah, I agree with that. I like candy corn, but 0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.839 it is not the one on one, so I'll go 0:04:47.880 --> 0:04:51.000 with KitKat. I mean, recess would certainly be in the conversation, 0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:55.679 Twix would be in the conversation, and one that got 0:04:55.800 --> 0:04:58.159 short shrift and got blown out in the first round 0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:01.880 in our competition. I love whopper. I'm a big whoppers guy, 0:05:01.920 --> 0:05:08.120 and whoppers stoppers are. Whoppers are devisive. My wife is like, 0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.200 what are you doing with She thinks whoppers are just horrible. 0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:14.120 The kids kept bringing all the whoppers. You're like, oh, baby, 0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:15.920 come to me, come to daddy, let's go. 0:05:16.360 --> 0:05:18.880 And the great thing is my kids did not like whoppers, 0:05:18.880 --> 0:05:21.839 so when they were of trick or treating age, I 0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:24.680 was coming in hoovering up all the whoppers. Baby. 0:05:25.200 --> 0:05:28.280 I quite like candy, but I'm pretty specifically candy. I like, 0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.720 I don't I don't do sour candies. I don't really 0:05:30.720 --> 0:05:32.719 love fruit candies that much either, Like I don't hate 0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:35.599 skittles or like Jolly Ranchers or whatever, but like they're 0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:40.120 not my favorite, and I also don't like caramel, so Snickers, 0:05:40.200 --> 0:05:42.240 Milky Way twigs like those are all pretty much ruled 0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.800 out for me. My Tier one is Recee's peanut butter 0:05:45.839 --> 0:05:48.120 cups and kit kats, so so those are both mentioned. 0:05:48.160 --> 0:05:50.480 I'll name the top of my Tier two, which is Eminem's, 0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.240 and I'll take any variety peanut m and ms, the 0:05:53.360 --> 0:05:57.800 like Crispy Eminem's, the peanut butter Eminem's, regular Mini em 0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:00.960 and M's are great. They're just classic, and I don't 0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:04.359 think they get enough enough hype for Like when I 0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:06.520 was sugar treating Eminem's, that was a top three candy 0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:08.279 you could put in my bag. I was really thrilled 0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:11.400 if I got any kind of Eminems. So they just 0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.720 got eliminated actually in our in our bracket. So we'll 0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.039 see how that wraps up. But yeah, you have to 0:06:17.040 --> 0:06:18.680 do candy talk on Halloween, right, so. 0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:20.240 Let's jump in. 0:06:20.920 --> 0:06:23.640 Speaking of adding candy to you to your bucket, how 0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:26.279 about some adding players to your off the waiver wire. 0:06:26.880 --> 0:06:28.880 That was a rough transition, but we're gonna power through. 0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:31.680 Are we starting or sitting these waiver Wire ads in 0:06:32.040 --> 0:06:34.360 week nine, there weren't a ton of options. I didn't 0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:36.320 feel like there were really any good running back options 0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.960 to even pick this week. Everybody was either too largely 0:06:39.040 --> 0:06:42.040 rostered already or just somebody that like is really more 0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:44.960 of a backup, like Stash guy. So I went away 0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:46.920 from any running backs in this section. We're gonna start 0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.800 with a couple of receivers here. Cedric Tillman the clear 0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:52.560 top option here. He is the recent's peanut butter cup 0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.279 of the Week nine waiver Wire in my opinion, fits 0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:57.480 you do the waiver Wire show. What was your approach 0:06:57.480 --> 0:07:00.360 to adding Tilman this week? I'm really excited Adam everywhere? 0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:01.680 And are you starting him in week nine? 0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:04.400 Oh you Mede my flag plant player from last week 0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.680 who had ninety nine yards and two touchdowns. Yes, so 0:07:08.080 --> 0:07:11.040 I am starting Cedric Tillman in a couple of leagues 0:07:11.080 --> 0:07:14.000 this week. I did pick him up. Spent pretty aggressively 0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:18.640 with fab in a couple of leagues. So for this week, 0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:20.920 the good news is that you know, things have gone 0:07:20.960 --> 0:07:24.280 swimmingly for Tillman lately the last couple of weeks and 0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.320 last week in jamis Winston's first start of the season 0:07:28.320 --> 0:07:32.640 seven ninety nine and two. Great stat line, but the 0:07:32.680 --> 0:07:35.320 matchup against the Chargers isn't that great. The Chargers of 0:07:35.360 --> 0:07:37.760 a lot of the third fewest fantasy points and third 0:07:37.800 --> 0:07:41.400 fewest receiving yards to wide receivers, and the Chargers are 0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:44.920 just really good at uglying up games. I'm a little 0:07:44.920 --> 0:07:47.240 worried about that, but we do know that Jameis Winston 0:07:47.320 --> 0:07:49.600 is going to throw aggressively downfield. The only thing is 0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:53.400 that Tillman's got to share targets with Elijah Moore, Jerry Judy, 0:07:53.440 --> 0:07:56.840 those guys are getting targets to and of course David Nijoku, 0:07:57.240 --> 0:07:59.840 who is at least the equal of the wide receivers 0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:02.760 in offense. So I've got Tillman wide receiver thirty two. 0:08:03.320 --> 0:08:05.520 I think in most normal sized leagues he has a 0:08:05.520 --> 0:08:07.120 wide receiver three or flex play. 0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:10.040 I don't want to be like a prisoner of the 0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:12.480 moment and just overreacting to you know, he had the 0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:14.240 best game of the bunch. He didn't even lead the 0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:16.560 team in targets in this last week. But I was 0:08:16.600 --> 0:08:18.400 in the stadium, I was in Cleveland for that game. 0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:21.680 Disappointing finished for me, I thought Tillman looked like the 0:08:21.680 --> 0:08:24.880 most legitimate star receiver of the bunch, Like in just 0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:27.440 just the eye test alone, I felt like he was 0:08:27.440 --> 0:08:29.200 the guy that looked most like in Alpha, he was 0:08:29.200 --> 0:08:31.320 the guy that looked most like I could see two 0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:33.439 months from now sitting here and calling him a league winner. 0:08:33.480 --> 0:08:36.600 I was like, so thoroughly impressed by Tilman, by his 0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.640 connection with Winston. Now was a banged up Ravens secondary. 0:08:39.679 --> 0:08:42.080 I kind of expected the Browns to throw, you know, 0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:44.400 all over the Ravens defense in this one, and they did. 0:08:44.640 --> 0:08:46.839 But I just thought Tilman looked looked like genuinely like 0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:47.240 a star. 0:08:47.440 --> 0:08:50.479 Honestly, He's He's physically imposing, for sure. 0:08:50.440 --> 0:08:50.840 Very much. 0:08:50.880 --> 0:08:50.920 So. 0:08:51.480 --> 0:08:53.320 I've seen some people kind of throwout the cop to 0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.640 like maybe you know the next Nico Columns as like 0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.120 this kind of physical specimen who takes a couple of 0:08:58.200 --> 0:09:00.559 years and then gets the right quarter back. Except in 0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:04.000 this case, direct quarterback isn't Scrout, it's Jamis Winston, which 0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:06.280 is fun ericson what are you doing with Tilman this week? 0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:08.240 I think he's a wide receiver three. I have him 0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:10.480 ranked pretty close to her. FITS has him at wide 0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:13.400 receiver thirty five. I think You just need to be 0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.040 aware that last week is probably not going to be 0:09:16.080 --> 0:09:18.760 a repeat performance this week. Last week it was kind 0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:21.600 of the perfect storm forty five pass attempts for Jamis 0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:23.800 Winston against a banged up secondary that they knew they 0:09:23.840 --> 0:09:26.360 had to throw the ball on. This Chargers game screams 0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.840 much more of a kind of a grosser game. Playing 0:09:29.960 --> 0:09:31.920 against the Chargers team that likes to run the football. 0:09:32.000 --> 0:09:33.360 You could see the Browns, I mean, lean on the 0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:34.960 run a little bit more. Look at the Chargers defense. 0:09:34.960 --> 0:09:37.360 I think it's a little bit weaker against the run. 0:09:37.400 --> 0:09:39.480 Then in the past, they don't really stack the box, 0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.400 they don't really try to stop the run. So I 0:09:41.400 --> 0:09:42.960 think maybe could see a little bit more Nick Chubb. 0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.319 So I don't think that he's the still think he's 0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:47.240 a wide receiver three because he's good, and I think 0:09:47.240 --> 0:09:49.760 that you're gonna see probably a more dramatic fall off 0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.520 with the Jerry Judy's the Elijah Moores of the world. 0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.760 And I still think that in joke, was probably still 0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.360 like the number one overall in terms of targets in 0:09:57.400 --> 0:09:59.280 this offense. But I think he's an okay start. I 0:09:59.280 --> 0:10:01.240 just wouldn't expect him to get you know, one hundred 0:10:01.280 --> 0:10:02.800 receiving yards and two touchdowns again. 0:10:04.000 --> 0:10:05.640 Do you agree with that last point? Fits that in 0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:07.640 Djoku's number one ahead of these receivers. 0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.720 I kind of do. Yeah. I mean, I like Nijoku 0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:14.240 is a must start absolutely now. And it's it's funny 0:10:14.240 --> 0:10:17.439 because he was borderline unusable earlier in the season, just 0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:18.000 like last. 0:10:17.840 --> 0:10:21.240 Year, you couldn't use it. They got round Watson and 0:10:21.280 --> 0:10:23.080 then he just went on a tear. Just do it again. 0:10:23.160 --> 0:10:23.840 It's crazy. 0:10:24.040 --> 0:10:26.320 Yeah, I guess like I would put Tilman as like 0:10:26.400 --> 0:10:27.840 he's a guy if I have him on my roster. 0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:29.880 I'm I'm looking for a place a way to start 0:10:29.920 --> 0:10:32.240 him this week, but I am managing expectations like you're 0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:35.280 certainly not expecting almost one hundred yards and two touchdowns again. 0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:40.199 Another receiver, a young guy, rookie Kean Coleman fits is 0:10:40.200 --> 0:10:42.320 somebody we talked a lot about on the Dynasty Show 0:10:42.320 --> 0:10:45.000 in the off season. Now seeing him kind of started 0:10:45.000 --> 0:10:47.560 to put it together a bit more. In this Bill's offense, 0:10:47.600 --> 0:10:49.600 they did Adamari Cooper, so it's not like he's the 0:10:49.640 --> 0:10:53.040 only target option any more. Khalushi Kirov obviously playing well too, 0:10:53.080 --> 0:10:55.959 but again rookie receivers in the second half of the 0:10:56.040 --> 0:10:58.720 rookie season. That's just a profile I want to go 0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:00.880 after as much as I possible we can. So if 0:11:00.880 --> 0:11:02.800 you added Coleman this week, are you starting him in 0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:03.400 Week nine? 0:11:03.800 --> 0:11:06.640 Borderline? And it's fun that we're getting to see this 0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:08.960 guy start to shine, like his ball skills are just 0:11:09.080 --> 0:11:12.360 freaky good. I've got him at wide receiver thirty six 0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:15.679 this week. He's just got a very wide range of outcomes. 0:11:16.280 --> 0:11:19.160 We just can't count on a lot of targets for 0:11:19.280 --> 0:11:22.440 him when he is sharing with Amari Cooper, Khalil Shakir, 0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:27.480 Dalton Kinkaid, James Cook, and we've got an offensive coordinator 0:11:27.520 --> 0:11:32.120 in Joe Brady who loves to run the ball. So fortunately, though, 0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:34.120 Keon Coleman is the kind of wide receiver who can 0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.800 pop on a limited number of targets. He's had seven 0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.360 in each of the last two weeks. He had in 0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.640 Week seven one hundred and twenty five yards against the Titans, 0:11:43.640 --> 0:11:46.520 in Week seven seventy yards and a touchdown last week 0:11:46.520 --> 0:11:49.880 against Seattle. So even with seven targets not a big 0:11:49.920 --> 0:11:52.040 target total, he has come through in each of the 0:11:52.120 --> 0:11:57.360 last two weeks. Boomer best flex option, though, I think 0:11:57.600 --> 0:12:02.480 just because we can't really on him being seriously involved. 0:12:02.800 --> 0:12:05.120 Maybe he makes a big play or two, but you 0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.760 know he's not going to get double digit targets. It's 0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:09.400 just not how this offense works. 0:12:10.000 --> 0:12:13.040 Erickson, I think I'm a little more optimistic about Keon 0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:15.679 Coleman this week. I'm not really looking at the matchup 0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.839 per se. It's just this is a rookie who was 0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:20.640 drafted at the top of the second round that is 0:12:20.720 --> 0:12:23.640 breaking out before our eyes. Why aren't we more excited 0:12:23.800 --> 0:12:25.839 about Keon Coleman. Yeah, I get that there's other targets 0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:29.040 in this offense, but who's the quarterback? Josh Allen like 0:12:29.559 --> 0:12:32.880 he can get by on maybe not as much volume 0:12:32.960 --> 0:12:35.680 as some of these other wide receivers. You look at 0:12:35.720 --> 0:12:37.839 what he's done over the last basically through the first 0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.079 eight weeks of the season, his receiving yards over expectation 0:12:40.720 --> 0:12:43.680 third most by rookie wide receiver, trailing only Jamar Chase 0:12:43.679 --> 0:12:46.520 and Justin Jefferson. That's the bucket of what he's done 0:12:46.600 --> 0:12:49.280 through eight weeks of the NFL season, and we're kind 0:12:49.280 --> 0:12:52.760 of ranking him EH wide receiver three. I feel like 0:12:52.800 --> 0:12:55.440 we need to be buying into what we're seeing in 0:12:55.480 --> 0:12:58.880 this breakout with Keon Coleman, because Fitz said it. He 0:12:59.040 --> 0:13:02.040 looks great like he is making contested catches in the 0:13:02.080 --> 0:13:04.320 red zone. So yeah, if he only gets five targets, well, 0:13:04.559 --> 0:13:05.960 I think that half of those are going to come 0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:07.840 in the end zone so he can come down with 0:13:07.840 --> 0:13:10.640 a touchdown. He's shown the big play ability. He has 0:13:10.760 --> 0:13:13.800 chemistry with Josh Allen, more so than Amari. Cooper's still 0:13:13.880 --> 0:13:17.040 new to the team, so I think that yes, the 0:13:17.160 --> 0:13:19.360 raw target volume hasn't really been there for him, but 0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.600 the high value opportunities. He's the air yards leader last 0:13:22.600 --> 0:13:24.679 two weeks, red zone target leader the last two weeks, 0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.160 and he still has a twenty two percent target chair, 0:13:26.160 --> 0:13:28.199 which is still really good. And I think one of 0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.240 the things to point out about his role, it's changed 0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.360 a little bit. Josh Allen is now looking for him 0:13:32.400 --> 0:13:34.840 on third downs. That's something that was not the case 0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:36.360 in the beginning of the season. So you're starting to 0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:39.120 see the trust with Josh Allen. And if I have 0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.320 to push my chips on on a receiver that's attached 0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:44.000 to Josh Allen, like that's the bet I'm making. I 0:13:44.000 --> 0:13:46.360 feel like it's going to work out for you most times. 0:13:46.400 --> 0:13:48.760 So I like Kean Coleman. Somebody asked me in discord, 0:13:49.080 --> 0:13:52.719 A'mari Cooper or Keon Coleman, and I had Cooper ranked 0:13:52.720 --> 0:13:54.240 ahead of him, just because you know he's the veteran. 0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.160 But then I thought about it and like, I don't 0:13:56.240 --> 0:13:57.960 think I would rather start a mark. I mean, both 0:13:57.960 --> 0:14:00.600 guys have boom or bust potential, but who's shown more 0:14:00.640 --> 0:14:02.839 the last two weeks when both guys been into playing 0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.960 in the same offense, It's been key On Coleman. So again, 0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.520 I think both guys have Like Fitz, I think boom 0:14:08.559 --> 0:14:10.640 or bust is the right way to approach it. But 0:14:11.040 --> 0:14:12.880 this rookie's breaking out and I don't want to miss it, 0:14:12.920 --> 0:14:14.280 So I'm going to chase these booms. 0:14:15.760 --> 0:14:18.079 Fits what other waiver wire ad. Since I didn't have 0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:19.800 any good running backs, I wanted to throw a quarterback 0:14:19.800 --> 0:14:21.480 in here in Jamis Winston. We already kind of talked 0:14:21.480 --> 0:14:24.520 about that offense a bit with Cedric Tillman was awesome 0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.960 against the Ravens again an appealing matchup. You know, guys 0:14:28.000 --> 0:14:32.040 that beat up Baltimore defense, but Jamis looked good. There's 0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:35.200 talent on the offense around him. If he plays at 0:14:35.200 --> 0:14:38.000 at a decent level, like even if people were saying 0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:39.640 the whole time, like if Deshaun Watson was just an 0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:42.120 average quarterback, this team would be a playoff contender. And 0:14:42.240 --> 0:14:43.760 you know, I think Jamis can at least give them 0:14:43.760 --> 0:14:46.320 average quarterback play. So what do you make of him 0:14:46.360 --> 0:14:48.480 starting in Week nine in that Chargers matchup? 0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:52.320 Oh, I am in his ECR is QB eighteen. I 0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:56.800 have got him QB nine. So Jamis is, Yeah, Jamis 0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:59.240 is just gonna let it. Rint Man so forty one 0:14:59.480 --> 0:15:02.360 past ten last week in his first start of the season, 0:15:02.880 --> 0:15:06.720 and Jamis throws it aggressively downfield. Here's an interesting stat 0:15:06.720 --> 0:15:11.000 from our good friend Jacob Gibbs of CBS. Jamis had 0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.720 two hundred and seventy five catchable air yards against the 0:15:13.800 --> 0:15:17.560 Ravens last week. The previous high and catchable air yards 0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:20.560 for any quarterback this season Brock Purdy with two hundred 0:15:20.560 --> 0:15:23.800 and thirteen, and only two other quarterbacks have produced two 0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:26.560 hundred or more catchable air yards in a game this season, 0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:30.520 Jordan Love and Dak Prescott. So I realized the matchup 0:15:30.560 --> 0:15:33.440 with the Chargers is not great, and there's always a 0:15:33.520 --> 0:15:36.320 chance Jamis is going to throw multiple interceptions because he 0:15:36.560 --> 0:15:39.360 is such an aggressive downfield passer. I don't care. I 0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:40.600 want this dude in my lineup. 0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:44.280 And by the way, essentially through multiple interceptions in this game, 0:15:44.560 --> 0:15:47.640 even when he was great that just weren't caught. We 0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:50.200 don't need to talk any more about that though. Eric said, 0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:51.920 Jamis Winston, where are you ranking him? 0:15:52.360 --> 0:15:54.480 Yeah, I'm more in line with where ECR has him. 0:15:54.520 --> 0:15:57.400 But I mean, I can't say I'm not convinced by 0:15:57.520 --> 0:16:00.400 fits about I gotta probably move him up at him 0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:02.200 as a QB streamer. I know I picked him up 0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:04.480 in a couple leagues where I had to drop Anthony Richardson. 0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:07.720 And I mean we saw this with Joe Flaka last year. 0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:09.560 The dude just let it rip the rest of the season. 0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:11.520 Didn't really it didn't even matter who he played. You 0:16:11.680 --> 0:16:13.880 just just started every single week. So I think we're 0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:18.440 beginning to see this Brown's offense really blossom. And if 0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.520 Winston's out there on your waiver wire, it's still not 0:16:20.520 --> 0:16:21.960 too late to hop on the bandwagon. I think the 0:16:21.960 --> 0:16:23.600 Browns win in an upset in this game. If they 0:16:23.600 --> 0:16:26.280 win and means they're scoring touchdowns. So yes, the Browns 0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:29.120 have impending regression because they could never score their team 0:16:29.160 --> 0:16:31.400 total with Deshaun Watson. Well, they got out with the 0:16:31.440 --> 0:16:33.240 team total last week with Winston, and I think you're 0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:34.920 going to continue to see that trend over and over 0:16:34.960 --> 0:16:36.800 and over again. So yeah, I'm gonna start. I'm gonna 0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:37.440 have to move him up. 0:16:38.240 --> 0:16:41.080 Do you don't think just quickly fits like this is 0:16:41.080 --> 0:16:43.200 like a long term Like if you had him in dynasty, 0:16:43.240 --> 0:16:45.000 would you be looking to just sell high if your 0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.160 rebuilding team hold on, if you're a contending team, Like, 0:16:48.480 --> 0:16:50.080 what do you make of him like long term? Or 0:16:50.160 --> 0:16:51.560 is this just like, hey, maybe the back half of 0:16:51.560 --> 0:16:53.400 the season will be another Joe Flacco. 0:16:54.480 --> 0:16:57.160 It's the interceptions, man. You can't live with the interceptions 0:16:57.240 --> 0:16:58.920 long term. That's why no one is going to go 0:16:59.000 --> 0:17:01.560 forward with Jamis Wing as their quarterback of the future. 0:17:01.560 --> 0:17:04.920 Like he's not going to be anyone's long term plan 0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:05.359 at QB. 0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.800 Yeah, all right, fits, who is your plant your flag 0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:10.280 player for week nine? 0:17:10.480 --> 0:17:12.760 Well it's Calvin Ridley, And I'm a little worried now 0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.320 because he has since shown up on the injury report, 0:17:15.359 --> 0:17:18.000 didn't practice with the shoulder issue on Wednesday. But in 0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:21.520 the Titans first game after trading away DeAndre Hopkins, Ridley 0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:25.200 had fifteen targets, ten catches, one hundred and forty three yards. 0:17:25.359 --> 0:17:28.719 A lot of people have been impatiently waiting for Calvin 0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.399 Ridley to live up to the vast potential he showed 0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.879 early in his career. I'm very encouraged that he was 0:17:34.920 --> 0:17:38.440 hyper targeted by Mason Rudolph last week with no DeAndre 0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.840 Hopkins in the picture. Optimistic, cautiously optimistic that continues. I 0:17:42.880 --> 0:17:46.480