WEBVTT - Tech News: Time's Up for These Apple Watches in the US

0:00:04.480 --> 0:00:12.680
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from iHeartRadio. Hey there,

0:00:12.680 --> 0:00:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host, Jonathan Strickland.

0:00:15.960 --> 0:00:19.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm an executive producer with iHeart Podcasts and How the

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>tech are you. It's time for the tech news for Thursday,

0:00:22.200 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>December twenty first, twenty twenty three. First up, I mentioned

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:29.640
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week that Apple planned to remove Apple Watch

0:00:29.840 --> 0:00:33.959
<v Speaker 1>Series nine and Ultra two models from store shelves here

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:37.240
<v Speaker 1>in the United States starting at three pm two day.

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Apple appealed to the International Trade Commission or ITC about

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 1>this matter about a ban on these products and asked

0:00:47.400 --> 0:00:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the ITC to allow Apple to continue selling them until

0:00:51.960 --> 0:00:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the appeal has been decided, and the ITC said no, Dice.

0:00:57.080 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>This all has to do with a little blood oxygen

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>sensor that's inside these particular models of Apple Watches, and

0:01:05.080 --> 0:01:08.959
<v Speaker 1>how another company called Masimo claims that Apple has committed

0:01:08.959 --> 0:01:12.480
<v Speaker 1>patent infringement. Other models of the Apple Watch do not

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:14.960
<v Speaker 1>include the sensor, so they will not be part of

0:01:15.000 --> 0:01:16.959
<v Speaker 1>the band. They will continue to be on sale in

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Apple stores. And while Apple may still win its appeal

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>in the future, it means that for the moment it

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.920
<v Speaker 1>cannot legally sell those models of Apple watches here in

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the United States. If you've been dragging your feet and

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 1>you plan to pick one up this weekend, and you

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:34.240
<v Speaker 1>happen to live in the US of A, I got

0:01:34.319 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 1>bad news for you. Actually, you've got the bad news

0:01:37.480 --> 0:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>because I just told you, Except there is one possible

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>glint of light. Apple only has control over its stock

0:01:45.200 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>in its own stores. If you go to a third

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>party retailer like a Best Buy, those stores are not

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 1>required to pull the models off of their shells, so

0:01:54.600 --> 0:01:57.440
<v Speaker 1>they can continue selling them for as long as their

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:00.640
<v Speaker 1>supplies last. But once those supplies are gone, well, those

0:02:00.640 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>stores are going to have to wait for the outcome

0:02:02.240 --> 0:02:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of the appeal, just like Apple is. One of the

0:02:05.680 --> 0:02:08.560
<v Speaker 1>really big stories lurking in the background of twenty twenty three,

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>which I'll cover in greater detail in an upcoming episode,

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is the Microsoft acquisition of video game giant Activision Blizzard.

0:02:17.280 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a corporate move that stirred up an awful

0:02:20.360 --> 0:02:23.480
<v Speaker 1>lot of resistance all around the world for various reasons,

0:02:24.000 --> 0:02:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and part of that story was about the CEO of Activision,

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>a guy named Bobby Kodik. He's, to put it lightly,

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>a controversial figure Activision Blizzard had already been in the

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>news before Microsoft even announced its plan to acquire the

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 1>company because multiple former and current Activision employees at the

0:02:43.480 --> 0:02:46.400
<v Speaker 1>time were stepping forward and alleging that the company had

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>a toxic work culture and that executives turned a blind

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:55.280
<v Speaker 1>eye toward allegations of serious issues like sexual harassment. Those

0:02:55.320 --> 0:02:58.960
<v Speaker 1>claims went all the way up to Codek. Kodik essentially

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.400
<v Speaker 1>said he wasn't aware that there were any problems anyway.

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:05.680
<v Speaker 1>There have been calls for Kodek's resignation for a couple

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 1>of years up to this point. Before twenty twenty three

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:12.840
<v Speaker 1>is over, it's finally going to happen. Microsoft released a

0:03:12.840 --> 0:03:16.120
<v Speaker 1>memo revealing that Kodek will be stepping down on December

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.680
<v Speaker 1>twenty ninth. A few other high ranking executives at Activision

0:03:19.680 --> 0:03:22.959
<v Speaker 1>Blizzard will also be departing the company over the next

0:03:23.000 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 1>few months after a transition period, but most of Activision's

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:31.760
<v Speaker 1>leadership structure is going to remain intact. There's also been

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a few changes over at Microsoft's Xbox division, with some

0:03:35.760 --> 0:03:39.520
<v Speaker 1>leaders exiting the company and Microsoft largely focused on promoting

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>from within to replace them, which is I think that's refreshing.

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure I'll dive deeper into all of this really soon. Meanwhile,

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>over at Sony, that company's game division is looking toward

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the near future in a pretty grim light. So according

0:03:56.200 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>to tech Spot, some internal documents at Sony show a

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>pessimist view of the next few years. These documents are

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>now made public due to a different news story that

0:04:06.520 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I didn't cover about some hackers stealing a whole bunch

0:04:09.800 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of data, something that Sony has actually had to face before. Apparently,

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:17.840
<v Speaker 1>the internal analysis came to the conclusion that Sony has

0:04:17.920 --> 0:04:21.600
<v Speaker 1>not been as innovative and aggressive as it has been

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>in years past. The company reached a point where it

0:04:24.560 --> 0:04:28.480
<v Speaker 1>was outperforming Microsoft, especially in hardware sales. In fact, by

0:04:28.480 --> 0:04:32.240
<v Speaker 1>some estimates, Sony was outperforming Microsoft at a rate of

0:04:32.560 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>three to one. In the face of essentially a lack

0:04:36.200 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of competition, the company got a little complacent. Now, the

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:44.720
<v Speaker 1>papers say Microsoft is leaping ahead and it's leaving Sony

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.760
<v Speaker 1>scrambling to catch up. This is largely due to that

0:04:47.920 --> 0:04:52.239
<v Speaker 1>acquisition of Activision Blizzard, that company makes some extremely popular

0:04:52.400 --> 0:04:57.679
<v Speaker 1>video games. The papers also indicate that Sony's analysts believe

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.719
<v Speaker 1>the company could face a one and a half billion

0:05:00.120 --> 0:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>dollar shortfall by twenty twenty seven. That's billion with a B.

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 1>On the one hand, there's no arguing that's bad, right,

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.919
<v Speaker 1>A billion and a half shortfall is not good. But

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:15.839
<v Speaker 1>then lighting a fire under the toukus of Sony to

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.080
<v Speaker 1>get competition up in the space ultimately ends up being

0:05:19.520 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 1>a great thing for all gamers, whether they favor Sony

0:05:23.480 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>or Microsoft. While it's tough for Sony, it's a pretty

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.839
<v Speaker 1>darn great thing in the long run for gamers in general. Now,

0:05:30.880 --> 0:05:32.960
<v Speaker 1>if you want to learn more about this, you should

0:05:33.000 --> 0:05:36.039
<v Speaker 1>check out the article by Cal Jeffrey in tech Spot.

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:41.120
<v Speaker 1>It is titled Activision Apocalypse. Sony forecasts one point five

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar loss by twenty twenty seven after Microsoft merger.

0:05:47.000 --> 0:05:49.520
<v Speaker 1>Not long ago, I talked about a recall that Tesla

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:52.640
<v Speaker 1>is facing that affects nearly every Tesla vehicle on the

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.480
<v Speaker 1>road here in the United States, and how it's really

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.719
<v Speaker 1>a software recall, so it's not gonna require Tesla owners

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:01.920
<v Speaker 1>to drive to a dealership or anything. I can't say

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.839
<v Speaker 1>the same thing about Toyota, which is recalling around a

0:06:06.040 --> 0:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>million cars here in the United States across both Toyota

0:06:09.760 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and Lexus brands, and this is due to an issue

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:18.200
<v Speaker 1>with airbags that are in the front passenger side of vehicles. Namely,

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>these air bags may not deploy in the event of

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>a crash, which, as you can imagine, severely diminishes their

0:06:24.520 --> 0:06:28.840
<v Speaker 1>effectiveness as an airbag. Apparently, the issue is in the

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>sensors that detect if a passenger is in the passenger seat,

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:37.120
<v Speaker 1>so a defective design has resulted in some cases with

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a short circuit issue. This completed circuit indicates that there's

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>no one in the passenger seat, so you could be

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:46.840
<v Speaker 1>sitting there, and because there's this short circuit in the sensors,

0:06:47.360 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it thinks that you're not there, so if you're in

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.960
<v Speaker 1>a crash, it does not deploy the passenger side airbag,

0:06:53.000 --> 0:06:57.040
<v Speaker 1>and that can result in really serious injuries. Obviously, So

0:06:57.279 --> 0:06:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the recall is for a selection of Toyota and Lexis

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:03.720
<v Speaker 1>vias that have model years between twenty twenty and twenty

0:07:03.800 --> 0:07:07.479
<v Speaker 1>twenty two. In at least one model's case, I recommend

0:07:07.560 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>looking into it if you drive a Toyota, just to

0:07:09.840 --> 0:07:12.400
<v Speaker 1>see if your vehicle is one of the ones that

0:07:12.480 --> 0:07:16.760
<v Speaker 1>needs repair. Toyota is going to offer free repairs for

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 1>this issue at no cost to the owner, and the

0:07:19.520 --> 0:07:21.960
<v Speaker 1>company says it will be reaching out to customers early

0:07:22.080 --> 0:07:24.440
<v Speaker 1>next year. In any case, just keep an eye out.

0:07:24.480 --> 0:07:27.120
<v Speaker 1>If you drive a Toyota, you may want to make

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 1>sure that you can go by and get this fixed.

0:07:29.920 --> 0:07:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And hopefully you'll never need it, but it's good to

0:07:32.760 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>have it fixed in case you do. A collection of

0:07:37.200 --> 0:07:43.400
<v Speaker 1>journalists at Reuter's published an amazing piece titled Tesla blamed

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:47.200
<v Speaker 1>drivers for failures of parts at Long New were defective

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and it is well worth reading, so high recommendation that

0:07:51.000 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>you go to Reuters dot com and find this article

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 1>because it's fantastic. But the headline tells you the gist

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>of what takes up most of the story. That Tesla

0:08:01.760 --> 0:08:05.760
<v Speaker 1>customers have encountered all sorts of problems that when you

0:08:05.800 --> 0:08:08.040
<v Speaker 1>look at them and aggregate, you think, oh, well, this

0:08:08.120 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>is clearly a default in design or manufacturing, because the

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 1>same problem is happening to multiple people in different vehicles.

0:08:17.880 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>And some of these are minor issues, but some of

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>them are potentially life threatening failures, particularly if you were

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 1>operating the vehicle, say on the highway when it happened.

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 1>But Tesla's response to a lot of these issues was

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 1>to claim that the fault lie with the drivers, not

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.320
<v Speaker 1>with the vehicles, that somehow these drivers had done something

0:08:37.880 --> 0:08:40.960
<v Speaker 1>that caused the damage to the vehicle, when in fact,

0:08:41.080 --> 0:08:46.800
<v Speaker 1>internal documents show that Tesla engineers were aware of problems

0:08:46.800 --> 0:08:50.440
<v Speaker 1>in car design and manufacturing that led to the manifestation

0:08:50.600 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>of these issues. Now, according to the Reuter's investigation, this

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>whole story stretches back at least seven years, so for

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:02.640
<v Speaker 1>the better part of a decade, the company, Tesla, has

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 1>tried to pass the buck in these cases and to

0:09:06.920 --> 0:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>put blame on drivers. It's something that has affected thousands

0:09:11.440 --> 0:09:13.880
<v Speaker 1>of Tesla owners, and not just here in the United States.

0:09:14.280 --> 0:09:19.040
<v Speaker 1>In fact, it's a damning fact that Tesla ultimately issued

0:09:19.080 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 1>some recalls in China hardware recalls after facing regulators who

0:09:24.440 --> 0:09:28.960
<v Speaker 1>were not having any of Tesla's nonsense and forcing the

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:32.320
<v Speaker 1>company to recall certain vehicles in order to make fixes,

0:09:32.840 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>sometimes multiple fixes because the initial fix didn't actually fix

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.800
<v Speaker 1>the problem. But here in the United States, Tesla has

0:09:38.880 --> 0:09:41.480
<v Speaker 1>largely been able to avoid that and continue to make

0:09:41.480 --> 0:09:45.040
<v Speaker 1>the argument that any failures and vehicles were due to

0:09:45.280 --> 0:09:48.920
<v Speaker 1>user error. Essentially, it's pretty ugly stuff, and the report

0:09:48.960 --> 0:09:52.600
<v Speaker 1>in Reuters is extensive. It is a very very long

0:09:52.720 --> 0:09:55.560
<v Speaker 1>article that covers a lot more detail than what I've

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.280
<v Speaker 1>just said, but I highly recommend you read the whole thing.

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 1>And again, that article is tip Tesla blamed drivers for

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:07.840
<v Speaker 1>failures of parts at long new word defective. Okay, got

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:10.840
<v Speaker 1>some more news items to get through, including one about

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:13.880
<v Speaker 1>some driverless car info, but first let's take a quick

0:10:13.920 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>break to thank our sponsor. We're back. So yesterday, that

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:30.800
<v Speaker 1>being Wednesday, the twentieth of December, way Mo, the Alphabet

0:10:30.840 --> 0:10:35.240
<v Speaker 1>spinoff that develops and operates autonomous vehicles, released a report

0:10:35.280 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 1>that said collectively its driverless cars had driven more than

0:10:39.120 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>seven million miles. The company also claimed that in the

0:10:43.440 --> 0:10:46.839
<v Speaker 1>course of driving those seven million miles, there had only

0:10:46.880 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>been three accidents that involved a minor injury and nothing

0:10:51.920 --> 0:10:56.920
<v Speaker 1>more serious than that. Now, statistically, this suggests that driverless

0:10:56.960 --> 0:11:02.240
<v Speaker 1>cars are safer than those piloted by human beings. However,

0:11:02.640 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 1>it gets super tricky to do this kind of comparison.

0:11:06.040 --> 0:11:08.520
<v Speaker 1>You have to take a lot of variables into account.

0:11:08.880 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>For instance, where does WEIMO drive? Because the accident rates

0:11:12.960 --> 0:11:16.280
<v Speaker 1>for one city are different from other cities. So the

0:11:16.320 --> 0:11:20.280
<v Speaker 1>answer to the question where does WEIMO drive? Is primarily Phoenix, Arizona,

0:11:20.520 --> 0:11:24.120
<v Speaker 1>and San Francisco, California. Then you have to look at

0:11:24.440 --> 0:11:28.920
<v Speaker 1>what are the average accident rates that involve injuries in

0:11:28.960 --> 0:11:34.640
<v Speaker 1>those specific places, and can you compare per million of

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:39.080
<v Speaker 1>human miles driven versus million of autonomous vehicle miles driven. So,

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>according to ours Technica, if you were to look at

0:11:42.679 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the number of accidents that involve an injury, should humans

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>be driving those seven million miles, it would be closer

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 1>to thirteen incidents as opposed to three. So there are

0:11:52.880 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>ten more accidents per seven million miles driven if the

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:01.640
<v Speaker 1>drivers are human beings as oppose to autonomous But again,

0:12:01.679 --> 0:12:05.200
<v Speaker 1>it's not really that simple to get into meaningful comparisons.

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You actually need way more miles driven by autonomous vehicles. However,

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:14.680
<v Speaker 1>according to WEIMO, Phoenix drivers get into accidents about three

0:12:14.760 --> 0:12:19.440
<v Speaker 1>times more often than driverless vehicles driving in Phoenix, and

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in San Francisco, it's even more dramatic. Human drivers rack

0:12:23.080 --> 0:12:28.679
<v Speaker 1>up accidents six times as often as the driverless vehicles did. Now, again,

0:12:28.720 --> 0:12:31.840
<v Speaker 1>these comparisons are tricky to make. We don't have enough

0:12:31.920 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>data to really definitively say anything, but common sense does

0:12:36.040 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>tell us that an autonomous vehicle, if it is properly

0:12:39.520 --> 0:12:43.679
<v Speaker 1>designed and it operates well, should be safer than human drivers.

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:46.719
<v Speaker 1>It should have far greater awareness of its surroundings. It

0:12:46.760 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>should be able to react much more quickly. It makes

0:12:50.080 --> 0:12:52.960
<v Speaker 1>sense that it should be safer, and that is actually

0:12:52.960 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest selling points of autonomous drivers. Right.

0:12:55.520 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>So in a way, this news is not surprising. It

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.400
<v Speaker 1>would be shocking if weimo said, well, we try, but

0:13:00.480 --> 0:13:03.560
<v Speaker 1>turns out that travelist cars are ten times more dangerous

0:13:03.600 --> 0:13:06.560
<v Speaker 1>than human driven vehicles. That would be shocking. We would

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 1>start to think we were in maximum overdrive or something.

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you don't know what that is, I hesitate

0:13:12.040 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to tell you to look it up. Part of me

0:13:14.040 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>wants you to look it up, because I mean, Emilio

0:13:16.200 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>ESTEVEZKT y'all, and a green Goblin semitruck. I'm getting off track.

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:27.079
<v Speaker 1>We have had cases of autonomous vehicles that were involved

0:13:27.240 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>in truly catastrophic accidents that led to tragedy. But we

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:37.360
<v Speaker 1>also have to remember human beings are responsible for tragic accidents.

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Essentially every single day, I mean, thousands of people in

0:13:40.600 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the US die from traffic accidents each year. It's just

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:47.959
<v Speaker 1>that it's really notable when it's an autonomous vehicle that's

0:13:48.000 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 1>at fault. Right, There's something kind of scary and sinister

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.480
<v Speaker 1>about that, And we're just accepting of the fact that

0:13:53.559 --> 0:13:56.880
<v Speaker 1>human beings are responsible for these kinds of accidents. But

0:13:56.960 --> 0:13:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I do get it. I mean, like the thought of

0:13:59.720 --> 0:14:04.200
<v Speaker 1>giving up control to some other entity and then being

0:14:04.240 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>in an accident through no fault of your own, that's terrifying,

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I understand. But I do think that this report shows

0:14:10.880 --> 0:14:13.839
<v Speaker 1>we are moving in the correct direction. Right. I still

0:14:13.920 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 1>want a future with autonomous vehicles because I do believe

0:14:17.360 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>that when that technology is sufficiently sophisticated and safe, it

0:14:21.840 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>will mean tens of thousands of people will avoid being

0:14:26.200 --> 0:14:29.600
<v Speaker 1>involved in a fatal accent. Now, ironically, they'll never know

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:32.800
<v Speaker 1>that because they'll just live. Right. You can't know that

0:14:32.880 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you avoided a deadly accident. You just did. And but

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that when you look back and you think

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.000
<v Speaker 1>about the thousands of people who have passed away because

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of traffic accidents and the impact that has on their

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>immediate circle and then society as a whole, you just

0:14:50.160 --> 0:14:52.760
<v Speaker 1>start to see where autonomous vehicles could be a huge benefit.

0:14:53.320 --> 0:14:56.280
<v Speaker 1>But we want to make sure that we are implementing

0:14:56.320 --> 0:14:59.880
<v Speaker 1>that when the technology is actually ready to take on

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.600
<v Speaker 1>that burden. So I think this is a step in

0:15:02.640 --> 0:15:06.000
<v Speaker 1>that direction. I would be fibbing. However, if I said

0:15:06.040 --> 0:15:08.200
<v Speaker 1>I was just as optimistic about it as I was

0:15:08.280 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago, a lot more cautious about it these days.

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:15.960
<v Speaker 1>On a related note, if you live in California or

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:19.200
<v Speaker 1>Nevada and you find yourself driving behind a Mercedes Benz

0:15:19.240 --> 0:15:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and you notice that it has these weird turquoise tail lights,

0:15:23.160 --> 0:15:26.120
<v Speaker 1>well that means you're actually behind a vehicle that's in

0:15:26.160 --> 0:15:31.840
<v Speaker 1>an autonomous mode. They actually are piloting this in California Nevada.

0:15:31.880 --> 0:15:35.240
<v Speaker 1>They got approval to do it where they are deploying

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a level three driver assist feature, but when it's in operation,

0:15:40.760 --> 0:15:42.840
<v Speaker 1>these turquoise tail lights will come on. I think that's

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:45.840
<v Speaker 1>a neat idea. Now I've rambled on about autonomous cars

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:47.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot already, so I'm not going to go into

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>more detail about this, but I highly recommend Jonathan M.

0:15:53.040 --> 0:15:57.480
<v Speaker 1>Gittland's article in Ours Technica titled Turquoise tail lights tell

0:15:57.480 --> 0:16:01.720
<v Speaker 1>you this Mercedes is driving autonomously. The headline is just

0:16:01.800 --> 0:16:04.880
<v Speaker 1>the tip of the iceberg. As to the entire discussion

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>about autonomous vehicles. It's cute, but Gitland did an amazing job.

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>You should check out that article. And again, I have

0:16:12.400 --> 0:16:14.840
<v Speaker 1>no connection with Ours Technica or Gitland or any of

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the articles or authors that I mentioned in this episode.

0:16:18.320 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>These are just works that I think are really good

0:16:20.960 --> 0:16:24.880
<v Speaker 1>and you should read them. Laura Pattison of CNN has

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>a piece titled Scientists successfully replicate historic nuclear fusion breakthrough

0:16:30.320 --> 0:16:34.560
<v Speaker 1>three times. This is worth celebrating, so as a reminder.

0:16:34.760 --> 0:16:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Today's nuclear power plants, the ones that are generating electricity

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>for the power grid, they work through the process of

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 1>nuclear fission. That's when you take a heavy atom and

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you split that atom apart, which releases a tremendous amount

0:16:48.040 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of energy as well as some subatomic particles that help

0:16:50.600 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>keep the process going, and you harness that energy to

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:57.880
<v Speaker 1>generate electricity. Nuclear fusion is different. You take two very

0:16:57.960 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>lightweight atoms, like two hydrogen atom, and you force them

0:17:01.880 --> 0:17:05.720
<v Speaker 1>to be very very very close to each other. When

0:17:05.720 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 1>you do this, they fuse together and as they do,

0:17:08.680 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 1>they release a tremendous amount of energy that then you

0:17:11.680 --> 0:17:15.480
<v Speaker 1>can also harness for electricity. Now, unlike fission, you don't

0:17:15.520 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>end up generating radioactive byproducts. With fusion, there's no danger

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>of a nuclear meltdown either. Fusion is how stars work.

0:17:24.800 --> 0:17:27.919
<v Speaker 1>Our Sun emits energy through the process, and if we

0:17:27.960 --> 0:17:30.919
<v Speaker 1>could nail it here on Earth, we would potentially have

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>an energy source that can meet all of our needs

0:17:33.119 --> 0:17:36.320
<v Speaker 1>for the foreseeable future. I won't say forever, because we

0:17:36.440 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>humans are really good at taking more than what we need. Anyway.

0:17:40.280 --> 0:17:43.119
<v Speaker 1>This story is about how scientists at the Livermore National

0:17:43.200 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Laboratory in California have achieved nuclear fusion multiple times over

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.160
<v Speaker 1>the last year, and that these reactions actually released more

0:17:52.320 --> 0:17:56.320
<v Speaker 1>energy than was required for ignition. Now that last bit

0:17:56.440 --> 0:17:59.240
<v Speaker 1>does need a little bit of an asterisk. The reactions

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>released more in energy that was contained within the lasers

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:06.119
<v Speaker 1>that forced the two atoms to come together. The energy

0:18:06.160 --> 0:18:09.040
<v Speaker 1>within the lasers was at one level, the release of

0:18:09.119 --> 0:18:12.720
<v Speaker 1>energy was at a higher level. However, in order to

0:18:13.560 --> 0:18:16.880
<v Speaker 1>energize the lasers, we had to tap into more energy

0:18:16.920 --> 0:18:20.919
<v Speaker 1>than was emitted in the release. So it's still a

0:18:20.960 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>net loss when you're looking at a big picture, and

0:18:23.400 --> 0:18:26.439
<v Speaker 1>that's something that has to change right otherwise you're going

0:18:26.480 --> 0:18:28.520
<v Speaker 1>to be pouring more energy into the process than you're

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:33.080
<v Speaker 1>getting out of it, and ultimately it's a losing proposition. However,

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 1>this is still an amazing scientific achievement that could lead

0:18:36.920 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>us to a future of plentiful and clean energy. For

0:18:41.119 --> 0:18:44.920
<v Speaker 1>an article recommendation, check out Ariel Shapiro's piece in The

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Verge titled the four podcast stories that will Shape twenty

0:18:49.320 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>twenty four. I don't often comment on the podcast business.

0:18:53.440 --> 0:18:56.119
<v Speaker 1>It feels a little bit too much like inside Baseball

0:18:56.440 --> 0:18:59.760
<v Speaker 1>to me, and goodness knows, I deal with it all

0:18:59.760 --> 0:19:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the time as an executive producer, so I get sick

0:19:02.119 --> 0:19:05.159
<v Speaker 1>of it too. Plus when the news is rough, and

0:19:05.200 --> 0:19:08.879
<v Speaker 1>this year got a little rough in podcasting, y'all, it

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:12.040
<v Speaker 1>gets a bit demoralizing to talk about it. But this

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:14.440
<v Speaker 1>piece in The Verge covers lots of things that I've

0:19:14.440 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 1>been observing all year. It's worth looking into if you're

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:22.760
<v Speaker 1>curious about the business that is show subset podcasting. It's

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>always good to educate yourself, especially if you're thinking about

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>getting into the business, because knowing what the environment is

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and the trends that are going can really inform you

0:19:32.359 --> 0:19:35.439
<v Speaker 1>so that you make good decisions, like whether or not

0:19:35.480 --> 0:19:37.800
<v Speaker 1>you actually want to go through with it. All right,

0:19:38.400 --> 0:19:41.360
<v Speaker 1>That's enough. With all that, though, I hope you are

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>all well and I'll talk to you again really soon.

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:56.640
<v Speaker 1>Tech Stuff is an iHeartRadio production. For more podcasts from iHeartRadio,

0:19:56.960 --> 0:20:00.399
<v Speaker 1>visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or where whoever you

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.