WEBVTT - 44 | Top 5 DH's, Pythagorean Win Expectancy, Something I Heard

0:00:00.960 --> 0:00:02.760
<v Speaker 1>You like to just baseball show and want to make

0:00:02.800 --> 0:00:04.400
<v Speaker 1>your own, let me tell you about Anchor.

0:00:04.680 --> 0:00:05.200
<v Speaker 2>It's free.

0:00:05.720 --> 0:00:07.720
<v Speaker 1>There's a creation tool that allows you to record and

0:00:07.920 --> 0:00:10.920
<v Speaker 1>edit your podcast right from your phone or computer. Now

0:00:10.920 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>you can even add any song from Spotify directly to

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.600
<v Speaker 1>your episodes. The possibilities are endless for what you can create,

0:00:17.640 --> 0:00:20.680
<v Speaker 1>whether it's music analysis, your own radio show, or something

0:00:20.720 --> 0:00:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the world's never seen before. Anchor will distribute your podcast

0:00:24.680 --> 0:00:27.840
<v Speaker 1>for you so it can be heard on Spotify, Apple Podcasts,

0:00:27.840 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and much more. You can make money from your podcast

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>with no minimum listenership. It's everything you need to make

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a podcast in one place. So download the free Anchor

0:00:37.880 --> 0:00:59.440
<v Speaker 1>app or go to anchor dot fm to get started.

0:01:02.760 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 2>We will see you to welcome out Big Tuesday, Big Tuesday,

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 2>twentieth Massive Tuesday. We're in the midst of an oat

0:01:25.920 --> 0:01:30.200
<v Speaker 2>milk versus almond milk debate, and I I'm team almond man.

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:35.040
<v Speaker 1>So riddle me this. Actually it's not a riddle. I

0:01:35.080 --> 0:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know why I start with. Riddle me this almond

0:01:38.319 --> 0:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>milk tastes a little bit worse, but oat milk I

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:47.560
<v Speaker 1>don't trust.

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 2>Why do I trust?

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Because well, for I don't really like, I don't trust

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>any of the milks they're made out of nuts or oats,

0:01:58.600 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's just water and then the nuts and then what.

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:06.880
<v Speaker 2>Wait, hold on, hold on, let me intro the pod.

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:09.880
<v Speaker 2>This is the Just Baseball Show. I'm Jack mcnill and

0:02:09.919 --> 0:02:14.920
<v Speaker 2>he's Peter Ave. There. The intro of the pod is done.

0:02:14.919 --> 0:02:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Now can we keep talking about nuts? Yeah? Yeah, and oats,

0:02:17.960 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 2>nuts and oats, nuts, oats, and I'm the nut guy,

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 2>not the oats.

0:02:22.040 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Make I feel like I'm I'm I'm thinking about it

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>all in one swoop because I've never really given it

0:02:27.560 --> 0:02:29.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of salt. But I put oat milk or

0:02:29.680 --> 0:02:33.120
<v Speaker 1>almond milk whatever I got. But I've never actually drank

0:02:33.200 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>them by themselves.

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:37.840
<v Speaker 2>Have you ever? I have drank? No way you will

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 2>buy itself?

0:02:38.919 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 1>What just in a glass of almond Like just a

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>glass of almond milk you're drinking and sip out.

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:44.440
<v Speaker 2>Of the cart And because I was curious, I was like, Okay,

0:02:44.440 --> 0:02:45.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm making true.

0:02:45.280 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>That's probably the only because like, when's the last time

0:02:47.360 --> 0:02:49.360
<v Speaker 1>I had a cup of almond milk or oat milk?

0:02:49.480 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Never? Never? Never?

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Also, can we tell everyone listening, like stop drinking regular milk?

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Who invented cows giving us milk? Why are we drinking

0:03:01.360 --> 0:03:02.160
<v Speaker 1>it from calves?

0:03:03.160 --> 0:03:07.520
<v Speaker 2>God? I guess was it a religious thing? The first farmer?

0:03:07.600 --> 0:03:10.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. You know what I'm drinking right now?

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>What cucumber, celery, spinach, lemon kale, parsley juice tastes like

0:03:18.360 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>compost delicious.

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:23.040
<v Speaker 2>That sounds actually phenomenal. I mean, I'm not a fan,

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.960
<v Speaker 2>it's not bad. I'm not a fan of some of

0:03:25.960 --> 0:03:29.079
<v Speaker 2>those veggie concoctions, but like that actually sounds like a

0:03:29.160 --> 0:03:29.760
<v Speaker 2>nice medley.

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.720
<v Speaker 1>And we talk about vitamins all the time, like sea moss,

0:03:32.760 --> 0:03:35.680
<v Speaker 1>corephill tablets, all these things, Like it makes your body

0:03:35.680 --> 0:03:39.440
<v Speaker 1>feel better. Vegetables, people take your vitamins. I'm telling you,

0:03:39.480 --> 0:03:41.400
<v Speaker 1>it makes your brain. And I'm not joking around, like

0:03:41.400 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 1>we're joking around about nuts and almonds and whatever. But

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.120
<v Speaker 1>like it, the vegetables genuinely work. And I know everyone

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.520
<v Speaker 1>knows that, but try it out, Like, put a juice

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>in your body. Put some of these vitamins in your body.

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:54.320
<v Speaker 1>It makes you feel better.

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:58.080
<v Speaker 2>Give it a whirl. I do want to pitch a

0:03:58.120 --> 0:04:01.760
<v Speaker 2>certain almond milk to you. It's Trade Joe's Vanilla Almond

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:05.840
<v Speaker 2>milk and it's conduced fat. Yea, If Trader Joe's is

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:11.520
<v Speaker 2>looking to sponsor a pod, this is the pod, isn't

0:04:11.520 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>it traded?

0:04:12.640 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 1>And the thing is there's a Trailer Joe's on the

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Lower east Side that we go to all the time,

0:04:17.160 --> 0:04:19.720
<v Speaker 1>Low east side of Manhattan. Yeah, and Trailer Joe's. I mean,

0:04:20.160 --> 0:04:23.000
<v Speaker 1>first of all, most underrated thing from Trailer Joe's the

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>bagged frozen passas.

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, really good.

0:04:26.920 --> 0:04:30.400
<v Speaker 1>Tell me you don't the yulki yunkcci.

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:31.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:04:32.520 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I studied abroad in Italy, so I'm basically fluent in

0:04:35.240 --> 0:04:37.080
<v Speaker 1>Italian and it's nyulki.

0:04:37.560 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Yeah, I agree. That's how I've said it my

0:04:40.560 --> 0:04:42.440
<v Speaker 2>entire life. And I agree that it's really good, the

0:04:42.480 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 2>cauliflower and yucky, really good, really really good. Throw that

0:04:47.960 --> 0:04:50.719
<v Speaker 2>puppy in an air fryer and that's that really right.

0:04:50.760 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 2>Well we talk about a yeah, airfrer, never done califier

0:04:55.400 --> 0:04:58.480
<v Speaker 2>and yolk and air fire and all right, let's get

0:04:58.520 --> 0:05:00.480
<v Speaker 2>let's talk baseball now, Okay, you want to talk baseball?

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.919
<v Speaker 2>Lance Lynn extended, how about that deal for the White Sox.

0:05:03.920 --> 0:05:07.479
<v Speaker 1>That was great, fantastic, good deal. Glad that he's extended.

0:05:07.520 --> 0:05:10.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's gonna ear a blow two. And it's

0:05:10.440 --> 0:05:12.919
<v Speaker 1>good that he's got some money. Oh, I mean he

0:05:13.000 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 1>had money, but like good that he's got some more

0:05:14.839 --> 0:05:17.480
<v Speaker 1>money now too, not enough money. Now he's got more money, right,

0:05:17.520 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>He's got a lot more money.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 2>I do want to shout out this quote before we

0:05:21.600 --> 0:05:25.359
<v Speaker 2>move on, lance Lynn. I'm paraphrasing here, but he pretty

0:05:25.440 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 2>much said after he signed his extension, why go into

0:05:29.320 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 2>free agency when you know where you want to be?

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 2>And he is now people's favorite White Sox. I think

0:05:35.279 --> 0:05:38.160
<v Speaker 2>the White Sox guys like playing for the White Sox.

0:05:38.200 --> 0:05:40.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you see Carlos Rodawn when they were talking

0:05:40.480 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>to him earlier in the season, that great interview.

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.119
<v Speaker 2>He doesn't want to leave either. None of these guys

0:05:45.160 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 2>want to leave Chicago. Isn't it awesome? There's an identity

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:52.240
<v Speaker 2>and then Carlin's I mean, they can't hold a candle

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.160
<v Speaker 2>to Starling Martze and his agent for for anything.

0:05:55.440 --> 0:05:58.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they're low balling him. The average Anneal value

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:00.560
<v Speaker 1>would be less than he's making right now. And I

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:02.400
<v Speaker 1>get that you're extending him and maybe as he gets

0:06:02.400 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>older it makes sense for I think he's what thirty

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.920
<v Speaker 1>three old. It's understandable, but you're you're short selling him.

0:06:08.960 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 1>And especially when the Marlins came out and said that

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>they were going to buy all these different pieces, said

0:06:13.400 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>they were going to spend the money, and then they

0:06:15.200 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>go out and low ball probably their best hitter in

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the lineup right now. Also, Buckston, seven years seventy million,

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:23.000
<v Speaker 1>that's what the Twins are offering him.

0:06:23.040 --> 0:06:25.000
<v Speaker 2>He probably won't take it.

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:27.880
<v Speaker 1>That's such a tough deal because if you look at

0:06:27.920 --> 0:06:30.320
<v Speaker 1>the talent that Buckston has, you're looking at two hundred

0:06:30.320 --> 0:06:32.520
<v Speaker 1>and fifty million, right If you look at the if

0:06:32.560 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>you look at how many games he's been injured and

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.680
<v Speaker 1>how many times he's actually on the field, seven years

0:06:37.720 --> 0:06:39.359
<v Speaker 1>seventy million kind of sounds accurate.

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:41.559
<v Speaker 2>It might actually sound high.

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>It might actually sound high, especially seven years for a

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.640
<v Speaker 1>guy who's really struggled to stay on the field. I

0:06:47.920 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>fall into the if you're Buckston, I understand not taking

0:06:55.600 --> 0:06:58.159
<v Speaker 1>the deal. But if you're the Twins, I understand not

0:06:58.279 --> 0:07:02.080
<v Speaker 1>giving him more. That's why I think Buxton is probably

0:07:02.080 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>going to get traded this deadline.

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:06.480
<v Speaker 2>We've got a great show today. We've got top five DHS.

0:07:06.520 --> 0:07:08.880
<v Speaker 2>We also have Kolby Olsen coming back on he just

0:07:08.920 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 2>wrote a great article, is pretty much your primer for

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 2>the second half, like here's where your team will likely

0:07:14.320 --> 0:07:16.640
<v Speaker 2>finish up. And he's our algorithm guy, so he made

0:07:16.680 --> 0:07:19.880
<v Speaker 2>the algorithm. But before we move on from this topic,

0:07:19.880 --> 0:07:24.080
<v Speaker 2>I want to I want to pose you this open market.

0:07:24.440 --> 0:07:27.320
<v Speaker 2>Who gets the bigger deal? Let's yeah, I'll make this

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 2>a two part question. Okay, who gets the longer deal?

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Who gets the more lucrative deal? Longer Buxton or Korea?

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Oh all right? Oh hard? I think longer. I think

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 2>the same thing. They're probably. I think they both get seven.

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 2>You think they both get seven because Korea I think

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:54.920
<v Speaker 2>seven years one to twenties kind of fair.

0:07:55.960 --> 0:07:59.040
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna want more. He's gonna want like one seventy five.

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 2>Okay, but how seven years? Okay, so Korea and Buxton

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.400
<v Speaker 2>seven years one p fifties put on your plate. Buxton

0:08:06.440 --> 0:08:09.120
<v Speaker 2>says hell yes and a heartbeat? Does Karrea say hell

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:13.800
<v Speaker 2>yes and a heartbeat? I think Buxton says yes. Correa

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:19.040
<v Speaker 2>says no. Even though who would I rather give it to?

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:22.240
<v Speaker 1>That's impossible because Buckston is more talented than Korea.

0:08:23.000 --> 0:08:24.240
<v Speaker 2>He just is.

0:08:25.200 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh, Karea is really good too. But Chris also had

0:08:27.240 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>his problem staying on the field. I know, I maybe

0:08:31.280 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a personal thing. I am in love with what

0:08:33.440 --> 0:08:36.439
<v Speaker 1>Buckston can do. If he stays on the field, He's

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:39.600
<v Speaker 1>a better player than Krea. I would give it to

0:08:39.760 --> 0:08:43.199
<v Speaker 1>Buxton first. I'd like to go in and check the medicals.

0:08:43.400 --> 0:08:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I'd like to go in and check how these guys

0:08:44.920 --> 0:08:47.439
<v Speaker 1>are actually training, because Cray has been fully healthy this year,

0:08:47.480 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 1>but Buckston is still struggling to stay on the field.

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I would give you know, my baseball mind is telling me,

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 1>don't be stupid, give it to Korea, but my heart

0:08:56.200 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 1>is saying, like, I would rather have Buxton on my team.

0:08:59.080 --> 0:09:02.480
<v Speaker 2>What do you think if Buxton works out for two years,

0:09:02.480 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 2>three years. I'm not talking physically works out. I'm talking like,

0:09:04.960 --> 0:09:07.400
<v Speaker 2>if he stays on the field he's healthy. Yeah, Like

0:09:08.160 --> 0:09:11.320
<v Speaker 2>he's one of the best center fielders in baseball. Like

0:09:11.360 --> 0:09:14.000
<v Speaker 2>he's one of the most talented players that there is. Right, So,

0:09:14.720 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 2>a healthy Buxton, if the injury bug subsides for him

0:09:18.679 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 2>and he's not hurt the next seven years, I mean,

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Byron Buxton' is a seven year, two hundred and fifty

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 2>million dollar guy. That's what I'm saying. Yeah, It's really

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:30.000
<v Speaker 2>hard because like I bank on Korea to stay on

0:09:30.000 --> 0:09:31.760
<v Speaker 2>the field more than I bank on Buxton. But like

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:35.400
<v Speaker 2>I have no idea with Byron Buxton. It's an impossible

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:38.319
<v Speaker 2>question that I post. You don't, I don't really impossible.

0:09:38.480 --> 0:09:42.520
<v Speaker 2>It's a great question though, before we get to Colby's,

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 2>before we get to a conversation with Colby about the

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 2>win and loss probabilities for the remainder of the year,

0:09:48.720 --> 0:09:50.120
<v Speaker 2>I do have something I heard, So we got a

0:09:50.120 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 2>straight away from Baseball real quick. Ugly Delicious is one

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 2>of my favorite shows on Netflix. Dave Chang. He pretty

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:03.440
<v Speaker 2>much dives into a certain food so like pizza, barbecue, steak,

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 2>and he will spend an hour long show on Netflix.

0:10:08.360 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 2>Did I just mention that, I think I did. You

0:10:09.760 --> 0:10:13.440
<v Speaker 2>did mention that? Yes, Yeah, he will dive in and

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:17.560
<v Speaker 2>he'll talk about, you know, the connotations behind the food,

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.839
<v Speaker 2>how it has been created. So like in the pizza episode,

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:25.440
<v Speaker 2>you know, he went to New York, he went to Detroit,

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 2>he went to Naples, Italy for wood fired pizza, all

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:34.880
<v Speaker 2>that steak. He went to you know, Bondai Beach in Sydney, Australia,

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>and then he goes to a steakhouse in New York,

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.560
<v Speaker 2>and then he talks about dry aging, and he talks about,

0:10:40.360 --> 0:10:45.080
<v Speaker 2>you know, the masculine connotations behind steak and how you

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:48.360
<v Speaker 2>know it kind of isolates women who want steak. It's

0:10:48.640 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 2>it's a fascinating show. I highly recommend you watching. I

0:10:51.480 --> 0:10:55.400
<v Speaker 2>just rewatched the steak episode. And once the Tigers get good,

0:10:55.800 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 2>once Riley Green, Spencer, Torress and Dingler. Yeah, once the

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:04.719
<v Speaker 2>Tigers get good, how did you get Yeah, so hold on.

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 2>Once the Tigers get good. There's a steakhouse slash bathhouse

0:11:10.200 --> 0:11:12.960
<v Speaker 2>in Detroit called the Schwitz that we gotta go to.

0:11:14.679 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 2>And the idea is in the basement, you've got like

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:21.200
<v Speaker 2>this one hundred year old bathhouse. It's men only two

0:11:21.240 --> 0:11:23.160
<v Speaker 2>days a week, women only two days a week, and

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:26.520
<v Speaker 2>then co ed two days a week, and you just

0:11:26.760 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 2>get butt naked, you you know, do the bathhouse things.

0:11:30.280 --> 0:11:31.920
<v Speaker 2>So like you're in a bunch of heat, you're in

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:35.079
<v Speaker 2>the spots type environment, and you hop into the cold tub.

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:37.440
<v Speaker 2>You get these natural remedies on you. Then you go

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 2>upstairs and you have a steak with the guys just

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:43.079
<v Speaker 2>in a robe. Dude. Actually, it's one of the best

0:11:43.120 --> 0:11:45.199
<v Speaker 2>steaks in Detroit. We gotta do it. And it's one

0:11:45.200 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 2>of the best steaks in Detroit. Yes, what's it called

0:11:48.400 --> 0:11:55.439
<v Speaker 2>the Schitz? The Schwitz sch v I t z the Schwitz. Dude,

0:11:55.760 --> 0:11:56.400
<v Speaker 2>we gotta go.

0:11:57.640 --> 0:12:00.240
<v Speaker 1>We'll record some content there that would be whole. I

0:12:00.280 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>mean twenty twenty seven when the Tigers are good.

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:06.040
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I a lot of time to get super fits

0:12:06.040 --> 0:12:07.640
<v Speaker 2>so we can record shirtless content.

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.080
<v Speaker 1>Also, did you see the uh did you see the

0:12:10.120 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Stroman fight ish with the Pirates?

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 2>No, what are you talking about? I saw Melrojas got

0:12:17.480 --> 0:12:19.680
<v Speaker 2>u suspended for a couple of games.

0:12:19.960 --> 0:12:24.360
<v Speaker 1>It was the It was the first baseman Joeganowski or

0:12:24.640 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>Jagganowski or John Lecgowski, John Negowski, Joggandowski, all right, I

0:12:29.640 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>combined him for baseball guys, John Mike Wazowski, John Negowski.

0:12:36.200 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 1>He was after Marcus Stroman got him to line out.

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:44.040
<v Speaker 1>John Degowski was like, are you talking shit? And Marcus

0:12:44.040 --> 0:12:46.559
<v Speaker 1>Stroman was just like, I'm not even talking to you.

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>You're John Nagowski and I'm Marcus Stroman. And John Nagowski

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:51.920
<v Speaker 1>took offense to that, obviously, and there was a little

0:12:51.920 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>scuffle and then they're just jawing in the dug out.

0:12:54.120 --> 0:12:57.120
<v Speaker 2>The baseball fights. Some of them are sick, some of

0:12:57.160 --> 0:12:59.920
<v Speaker 2>them are so lame. This goes into the lame category.

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:02.760
<v Speaker 2>But I'm also using this as an opportunity to talk

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:07.960
<v Speaker 2>about the Pirates a little bit. I like their lineup

0:13:08.240 --> 0:13:14.760
<v Speaker 2>a little You don't know, Yeah, their first three I do, Okay, Brian,

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Brian Hayes.

0:13:16.600 --> 0:13:20.200
<v Speaker 1>And Brian Reynolds. That that's a good three, Yes it is.

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 1>But the other six suck. Suck not the can you

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.080
<v Speaker 1>leave me alone? I'm trying to help the Pirates. Yeah,

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.319
<v Speaker 1>sure like they They are not.

0:13:34.200 --> 0:13:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Horrid.

0:13:35.720 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>They have there are some good parts to the Pirates.

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:41.400
<v Speaker 1>You're sitting there just like so bored. Can we get

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 1>on the DHS? And I get it. They just don't

0:13:45.520 --> 0:13:48.840
<v Speaker 1>Mitch that Chad cool, Mitch Keller. They don't have pitching,

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:52.080
<v Speaker 1>but they have some bullpen guys, and they have at

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:55.160
<v Speaker 1>least a good young core getting Henry Davis, He's gonna

0:13:55.160 --> 0:13:57.600
<v Speaker 1>slave to catch her with. Jacob Stallings is pretty good

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:02.800
<v Speaker 1>they have at the pieces. This is not a dumpster fire,

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:04.840
<v Speaker 1>as we may have called him in the past.

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's not a total blow up. I agree, it's not.

0:14:08.120 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 2>It's not.

0:14:08.679 --> 0:14:11.160
<v Speaker 1>And Brian Reynolds. I don't think he's gonna get traded.

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Pittsburgh says they want to build around him. He has

0:14:13.880 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 1>over three years of control.

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 2>I like it.

0:14:15.640 --> 0:14:17.679
<v Speaker 1>He is a good player. Brian Hay is going to

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:19.960
<v Speaker 1>be an All Star. You get Henry Davis up.

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 2>He's good.

0:14:20.840 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Like they have guys, and they killed the draft arm

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 1>late in our prospect guy said they had the best

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:29.280
<v Speaker 1>draft out of every single team. Having the first pick helps,

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:31.160
<v Speaker 1>but there's a lot of more picks to do, and

0:14:31.200 --> 0:14:33.840
<v Speaker 1>they had great second rounders, third, fourth, They killed it.

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:38.480
<v Speaker 1>The Pirates are The Pirates are an MLB team.

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Is is this Ben Cherrington's first year or second year

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.920
<v Speaker 2>in Pittsburgh? You think it's number two. Charrington was not

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:49.640
<v Speaker 2>horrible with the Red Sox. No, not at all. This

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 2>is not a disaster. Yeah, guy knows.

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't see really any disasters right now in baseball.

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Do you see any disasters?

0:14:58.200 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 2>Uh? Hard not to call Arizona a disaster. The Rockies

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:03.840
<v Speaker 2>are a disaster.

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, those really are the only two disasters. Because

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.360
<v Speaker 1>the Tigers at least have like a good young core.

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>The Pirates have a good young core sort of. Baltimore's

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.040
<v Speaker 1>got Baltimore's. Baltimore's got a lot of good prospects. The

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Mariners have a lot of good prospects. I mean, the

0:15:26.840 --> 0:15:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Rangers are approaching disaster, ah, but they've got some guys.

0:15:31.720 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:15:32.120 --> 0:15:32.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:15:34.080 --> 0:15:38.720
<v Speaker 2>The Rockies suck and horrible. I bet on the dime

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:42.600
<v Speaker 2>Backs today against the Pirates. Why I talk about a

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:44.000
<v Speaker 2>series I will not watch? I know.

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:45.920
<v Speaker 1>I even said the TikTok to. I was like, I'm

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>going with Divebacks Pirates. I doubt you watch it, but

0:15:49.400 --> 0:15:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I think the Diamacks are gonna win if you want to,

0:15:51.440 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>just if you want to place a bet and not

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>watch the game. Caleb Smith versus Chase g Young Dejeong.

0:15:58.120 --> 0:15:59.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not good with names, as you can probably tell.

0:15:59.800 --> 0:16:01.800
<v Speaker 1>I know the guy's not good with names, you know,

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:04.240
<v Speaker 1>John Gookowski from the Pirates.

0:16:04.280 --> 0:16:07.360
<v Speaker 2>The funniest part is I sent you MLB's pronunciation guide

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:10.160
<v Speaker 2>before the season, so it's possible. Feel free to look

0:16:10.200 --> 0:16:12.920
<v Speaker 2>at that PDF whenever you want. Now, I think it's

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 2>more fun if I just got a completely wrong. Yeah,

0:16:15.720 --> 0:16:18.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. It doesredibility, I get it. I doubt

0:16:18.640 --> 0:16:21.680
<v Speaker 2>all right. Now, we talked to Colby Olsen about teams

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 2>wins and losses. This was a very fun article on

0:16:24.880 --> 0:16:26.960
<v Speaker 2>just baseball dot com and we bring him in now.

0:16:30.000 --> 0:16:32.360
<v Speaker 2>So we're talking about this article on this site called

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.120
<v Speaker 2>just Baseball dot com. You should go visit this site.

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.880
<v Speaker 2>You should read this article. And the article is called

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 2>MLB's Second Half team Projections, Who should buy or sell?

0:16:42.560 --> 0:16:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Question Mark. It is by the guy who's on the

0:16:44.800 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 2>zoom right now, Colby Olsen. And what you did is

0:16:50.400 --> 0:16:53.400
<v Speaker 2>you took a lot of data and you compiled it

0:16:53.560 --> 0:16:55.240
<v Speaker 2>and you told us who was going to be good

0:16:55.280 --> 0:16:57.800
<v Speaker 2>or bad in the second half and where teams are

0:16:57.920 --> 0:17:00.120
<v Speaker 2>ending up. And the Giants are well over one hundred

0:17:00.160 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 2>wins and the Diamondbacks suck. I think everybody knew that,

0:17:04.760 --> 0:17:07.560
<v Speaker 2>but there are a lot of nuances to this. And

0:17:07.720 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 2>before we get into anything, just explain how you calculated

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:16.239
<v Speaker 2>and how you validated where you think teams are going

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to end up. Wait, Colby, before you answer that, I

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:22.159
<v Speaker 2>loved read this article first head because the first like

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:26.560
<v Speaker 2>big headlight is Pethagorean win expectancy and I hold on,

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:31.760
<v Speaker 2>hold on, hold, I was like, what the hell is that? Hold? No, no, no, dude, dude,

0:17:31.880 --> 0:17:36.439
<v Speaker 2>the best way possible shut up for a second. Stay

0:17:36.480 --> 0:17:43.880
<v Speaker 2>that word again that starts with the Petagorean Pythagorean god pathagoon.

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 4>You feel like you're back in junior year, pre couch

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 4>class in high school. Man, it's it's a square plus

0:17:50.280 --> 0:17:54.359
<v Speaker 4>B squad, right, don't exactly.

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 3>Don't let the big words scare you. Sometimes they're your friend.

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.560
<v Speaker 2>No words can if you can't pronounce them, then they

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:03.439
<v Speaker 2>can be your enemy.

0:18:04.320 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 4>So it sounds complicated, but it's really not, so let

0:18:09.480 --> 0:18:11.800
<v Speaker 4>me run you through it. So basically, the idea behind

0:18:11.840 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 4>Pythagora and win expectancy is that it models run differential, right,

0:18:16.840 --> 0:18:21.760
<v Speaker 4>So you take runs scored, you divide that by runs

0:18:21.840 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 4>scored plus runs given up, and that gives you basically

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.920
<v Speaker 4>a percentage that models out to be a win percentage.

0:18:29.640 --> 0:18:31.919
<v Speaker 4>So then what I did is I actually tweaked the

0:18:31.960 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 4>formula a little bit because I don't think runs scored

0:18:34.480 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 4>is a very good stat to use.

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:36.879
<v Speaker 3>It's not very predictive.

0:18:37.440 --> 0:18:40.560
<v Speaker 4>I decided to use weighted runs created, which you know

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 4>obviously goes into WRC plus, which we commonly use and

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:48.199
<v Speaker 4>we love as a stat. I use runs against, not

0:18:48.240 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 4>earned runs runs against, so you can include errors in

0:18:50.400 --> 0:18:53.240
<v Speaker 4>that formula. And then After doing that, once you get

0:18:53.240 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 4>the percentage. What I did was I multiplied that expected

0:18:56.880 --> 0:19:02.119
<v Speaker 4>win percentage times the remains games for each team and

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:07.120
<v Speaker 4>added those expected wins to their you know, current winds total,

0:19:07.240 --> 0:19:10.840
<v Speaker 4>and that's how I got my expected total wins for

0:19:10.920 --> 0:19:12.240
<v Speaker 4>each team.

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 2>That's awesome. A lot of steps, but it does make

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:17.679
<v Speaker 2>a lot of sense. And I do like that you

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:21.280
<v Speaker 2>use weighted runs created as opposed to just runs straight up,

0:19:21.400 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 2>because it also gives you some predictive qualities to that,

0:19:26.240 --> 0:19:28.919
<v Speaker 2>and I think that helps. The less prediction you have

0:19:29.000 --> 0:19:32.080
<v Speaker 2>to make, the better you are off, right.

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 3>I think too.

0:19:33.920 --> 0:19:36.199
<v Speaker 4>I think everyone listening right now should go read the

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:38.040
<v Speaker 4>article because I think when you read it and you

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:39.880
<v Speaker 4>see the formula in front of you and you can

0:19:39.960 --> 0:19:42.200
<v Speaker 4>kind of digest it a little bit easier.

0:19:42.560 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 3>So definitely, yeah, but yeah, I mean it did interesting,

0:19:51.200 --> 0:19:55.120
<v Speaker 3>interesting results. Right. You have the teams that you expect

0:19:55.119 --> 0:19:55.640
<v Speaker 3>at the top.

0:19:55.720 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 4>You have the Giants at you know, one of four wins,

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.359
<v Speaker 4>Dodgers at one oh two, the Astros at one hundred,

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:03.800
<v Speaker 4>and the White Sacks at one hundred. So those are expected,

0:20:04.160 --> 0:20:08.000
<v Speaker 4>but they're way above the field there because the red sox,

0:20:08.119 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 4>padres and rays are the fifth, sixth, and seven teams

0:20:12.240 --> 0:20:14.760
<v Speaker 4>and they're back in ninety four wins. So the interesting

0:20:14.800 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 4>thing about these results is it actually created kind of

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 4>a tier system, right. It created four clear favorites at

0:20:21.920 --> 0:20:25.800
<v Speaker 4>the top, another second tier of you know, wild card

0:20:25.840 --> 0:20:29.160
<v Speaker 4>teams plus the AL East n L East are very competitive,

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.560
<v Speaker 4>so all those teams are roped in. There a middle

0:20:31.600 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 4>tier kind of of like teams that Okay, are they

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 4>gonna buy?

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 3>Are they gonna sell? And then you have the dumpster

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 3>flyers in the back.

0:20:37.280 --> 0:20:38.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Colby, I have a question for you.

0:20:39.320 --> 0:20:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that you're our numbers guy, but I know

0:20:41.600 --> 0:20:43.959
<v Speaker 1>you turn on turn on the TV and watch baseball

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:44.880
<v Speaker 1>every single day just.

0:20:44.760 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 2>Like we do.

0:20:45.840 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you really think that the Giants are like, really

0:20:48.600 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>in one hundred and four win team? Because I wouldn't

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:54.879
<v Speaker 1>be shocked, because how can you be now with the

0:20:54.880 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>Giants and how good they've been to start the season.

0:20:57.440 --> 0:20:58.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they ended the first half of the best

0:20:58.920 --> 0:21:02.119
<v Speaker 1>record in baseball and they're just rolling like they're pitching

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 1>is good, their offense is good, they're everything down the

0:21:04.720 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>line is good.

0:21:05.760 --> 0:21:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Do you see them really at one oh four?

0:21:08.880 --> 0:21:11.159
<v Speaker 4>So I think that's a good question, and I do

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:13.679
<v Speaker 4>talk about this a little bit in the article as

0:21:13.720 --> 0:21:16.080
<v Speaker 4>I bring up strength of schedule in the second you

0:21:16.119 --> 0:21:18.600
<v Speaker 4>know part of the article, and strength of schedule is

0:21:18.640 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 4>really important here because the Giants have to play the Dodgers,

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 4>they have to play the Padres all the time. It's

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 4>just like playing the Al East, right, these teams have

0:21:27.320 --> 0:21:29.640
<v Speaker 4>to play each other, and it's hard to win all

0:21:29.680 --> 0:21:33.439
<v Speaker 4>the games against the Yankees and Blue Jayson Rays, you

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:34.000
<v Speaker 4>know what have you?

0:21:34.800 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 3>So, yeah, one oh four.

0:21:37.000 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 4>That projection doesn't take into account strength of schedule. And

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 4>that's why I talk about too like the White Sox,

0:21:42.800 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 4>right they play they have the easiest strength of schedule

0:21:45.600 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 4>in the first half, they have the fourth easiest in

0:21:47.680 --> 0:21:51.280
<v Speaker 4>the second half, so they could really outperform their one

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.280
<v Speaker 4>hundred win projection, whereas the Giants might have a tough

0:21:55.280 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 4>time winning one hundred and four games.

0:21:56.720 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah right, I mean one hundred and four just seems

0:22:00.640 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>And I also saw I feel like the Padres got

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:04.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of low baald here.

0:22:04.520 --> 0:22:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Do you think they got lowbald?

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 3>They may, they may be a little low ball. I

0:22:09.880 --> 0:22:12.639
<v Speaker 3>think you have to give context to all of these projections, right,

0:22:12.680 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 3>because it's based on the first half and how they performed,

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:17.359
<v Speaker 3>which is a big sample.

0:22:17.400 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 4>I mean it is ninety games. The Scary did underperform

0:22:21.480 --> 0:22:24.840
<v Speaker 4>in the first half. Surprisingly, I think they've dealt with

0:22:24.880 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 4>a little bit of inconsistency on the mound, some injuries,

0:22:27.840 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 4>and also met Is hurt. You know, you have Clevenger out.

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.240
<v Speaker 4>They haven't been getting the production from certain players that

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 4>they'd hope to.

0:22:35.760 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 3>Hosmer has been.

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Really bad, but the Padres are still you know, it's funny, right,

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:45.200
<v Speaker 4>they didn't perform to their expectations in the first half,

0:22:45.200 --> 0:22:48.640
<v Speaker 4>and yet we're still saying, Wow, their expectation is ninety

0:22:48.640 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 4>four wins, so it's like if they could turn it on, yeah,

0:22:51.440 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 4>they might be able to win under games for sure.

0:22:54.160 --> 0:22:56.800
<v Speaker 1>I also saw that year expected the Diamondbacks to win

0:22:56.880 --> 0:22:57.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty games.

0:22:58.280 --> 0:23:00.800
<v Speaker 2>We were just talking about our oldie teams in baseball

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:06.120
<v Speaker 2>are probably disasters. I mean, we were not calling the Pirates,

0:23:06.119 --> 0:23:08.600
<v Speaker 2>we're not calling the Tigers, we're not calling Oils disasters.

0:23:09.200 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 2>But the Diamondbacks and Rockies seem like disasters. Am I right?

0:23:12.560 --> 0:23:13.160
<v Speaker 2>Or am I right?

0:23:14.400 --> 0:23:14.680
<v Speaker 3>Well?

0:23:14.800 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 4>The Rockies are well when my projections I have them

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.560
<v Speaker 4>at seventy one wins, they seem like a team that's

0:23:20.600 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 4>you know, trying a little bit. They have they have

0:23:24.440 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 4>some good players, Earn Marquez, John Gray, you know.

0:23:28.119 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 2>Gone at the end of this month. Yeah, they'll be

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.639
<v Speaker 2>gone by the end of the episode release exactly.

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 4>So we can get into talking about more of the

0:23:34.880 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 4>trade deadline stuff now that we've gone through the strength

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 4>of schedule and my projections, I think that's where the

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:44.160
<v Speaker 4>fun comes in, right, yeah, real quick, before we get

0:23:44.200 --> 0:23:47.360
<v Speaker 4>to that, my eyes kind of gravitate on this chart

0:23:47.400 --> 0:23:50.480
<v Speaker 4>to the NL East because it is GM packed in

0:23:50.520 --> 0:23:52.680
<v Speaker 4>the middle. You've got the Mets at eighty six wins,

0:23:52.720 --> 0:23:56.320
<v Speaker 4>You've got Atlanta at eighty two, Washington at seventy nine,

0:23:56.440 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 4>Philly it's seventy nine, and then you've got the Marlins

0:23:59.320 --> 0:24:02.639
<v Speaker 4>at seventy That is jam.

0:24:02.440 --> 0:24:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Packed, and you've got the Mets spot on. It feels

0:24:05.920 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of spot on, right, Yeah, it does well.

0:24:08.800 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 4>And so the thing is too is I made these

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:14.920
<v Speaker 4>projections right before the second half started, and Philly's gone

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 4>to win a couple of games here, and they look

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 4>like they're only what four games back, three and a

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 4>half back from the Mets, and they look like they

0:24:22.200 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 4>could really make a push here. They're they're you know

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:28.880
<v Speaker 4>alec bohe comes back, starts hitting a little bit. They

0:24:28.880 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 4>could really make a push here, but the NA least

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:33.640
<v Speaker 4>is crowded. The Braves just lost to Kunya. They got

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:37.399
<v Speaker 4>Jack Peterson. They're probably gonna be big buyers. That that's

0:24:37.640 --> 0:24:42.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, that's what I've heard their gms. And so

0:24:42.680 --> 0:24:45.880
<v Speaker 4>the Mets are kind of in a danger zone right

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:49.879
<v Speaker 4>now where you once thought they had a grasp on

0:24:50.080 --> 0:24:52.520
<v Speaker 4>the division and now they're kind of letting its lip

0:24:52.560 --> 0:24:54.240
<v Speaker 4>and it's like, uh, oh, are we going to see

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 4>another Mets second half disaster where they fall apart? And

0:24:58.119 --> 0:25:00.320
<v Speaker 4>they move into August and September where they're you know,

0:25:00.359 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 4>only one or two games up, and so there's four

0:25:03.320 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 4>teams there. There's four teams.

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:06.760
<v Speaker 3>I think the interesting thing between the n AL and

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:08.879
<v Speaker 3>AL is that there's not enough spots.

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>Which is not enough spots one more team that I

0:25:11.200 --> 0:25:15.840
<v Speaker 1>was looking at. You have the Cardinals pretty damn low here,

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:20.199
<v Speaker 1>seventy five wins projected for the Cardinals. Oh that is

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:21.040
<v Speaker 1>low low.

0:25:21.080 --> 0:25:22.800
<v Speaker 2>And I know it's it's based on numbers.

0:25:22.840 --> 0:25:26.920
<v Speaker 1>It's not like like you're pushing in algorithms, and it's

0:25:27.080 --> 0:25:29.680
<v Speaker 1>much more complicated than I can comprehend considering I called

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:33.600
<v Speaker 1>it Pathagorum, and I know it's Pythagoran, but I thought

0:25:33.640 --> 0:25:38.560
<v Speaker 1>Pythagorium was funnier. I I just I don't see the

0:25:38.560 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 1>Cardinals finishing below eighty wins. I would be shocked, especially

0:25:42.119 --> 0:25:45.160
<v Speaker 1>get you get Jack flaerty Back. I still think they're

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:47.119
<v Speaker 1>gonna be big buyers of the deadline. I know that's not

0:25:47.160 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>incorporated into it, and I know it's based off the

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>first half, but like, I feel like for the rest

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.439
<v Speaker 1>of the season, you have the Cardinals as like a

0:25:54.480 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty five and fifty win kind of team, Like they'll

0:25:57.640 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 1>be even worse than they were in the first half.

0:26:00.200 --> 0:26:01.800
<v Speaker 2>Yep, yep.

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:05.040
<v Speaker 4>Well no, So I think the thing with the Cardinals

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:07.639
<v Speaker 4>right is they cannot hit.

0:26:08.800 --> 0:26:12.440
<v Speaker 3>They're pitching them can good. Their pitching has actually been

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:13.800
<v Speaker 3>surprisingly really good.

0:26:13.880 --> 0:26:16.840
<v Speaker 4>In the addition of Flarty would be huge for them,

0:26:17.240 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 4>but their outfielders don't provide much value. Tyler O'Neill hasn't

0:26:21.720 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 4>been hitting well. Other guys in that lineup have not

0:26:24.280 --> 0:26:28.760
<v Speaker 4>been hitting well. The reason that's really the reason there.

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:31.000
<v Speaker 4>It would be interesting.

0:26:31.040 --> 0:26:31.800
<v Speaker 3>I know you're a.

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:34.119
<v Speaker 4>Guy that's been pushing for them to go get story,

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:37.760
<v Speaker 4>which I don't think is gonna happen, but it would

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:40.520
<v Speaker 4>be interesting. I don't think that the Cardinals should give

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:41.520
<v Speaker 4>up anything of value.

0:26:41.880 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they would give up Nolan Gorman in

0:26:43.600 --> 0:26:45.159
<v Speaker 1>that deal? As soon as you said, I wouldn't give

0:26:45.200 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>up anything as value. That's their best prospect right now,

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:48.640
<v Speaker 1>at least at their base.

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:53.720
<v Speaker 4>I don't think so, just because I don't think they

0:26:53.880 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 4>really have a chance at the second wild card spot,

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:59.240
<v Speaker 4>and they're not going to catch the Brewers. Like I said,

0:27:00.160 --> 0:27:03.200
<v Speaker 4>both wild card races are really sham packed. I think

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Cincinnati is going to make a really tough play for

0:27:06.520 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 4>that second wildcard.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:09.720
<v Speaker 1>Now you have since he had eighty five wins, that's

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>ten wins above the Cardinals.

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 3>And I think they could be a team that goes

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:14.399
<v Speaker 3>and gets story.

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We know Luis Castillo in his last nine guess what

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.480
<v Speaker 1>his ZRA is in his last nine starts to five.

0:27:19.520 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 3>I bet he's doing I bet he's doing well.

0:27:21.680 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 2>Jack. What about you? What do you think right around two?

0:27:25.160 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 2>I think two to one.

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:31.239
<v Speaker 1>One seven, nine, Wow, he's on. Dude, Luis Castill when

0:27:31.280 --> 0:27:35.040
<v Speaker 1>he's on is disgusting. When he's off, horrid when he's off.

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>When he's not locating in that change up's going middle.

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:40.080
<v Speaker 1>He's horrid when he's locating. He's one of the best

0:27:40.080 --> 0:27:41.440
<v Speaker 1>pitchers in baseball.

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:45.320
<v Speaker 2>Ninety seven with the change Hey, Kolby Anaheim, if they

0:27:45.359 --> 0:27:48.000
<v Speaker 2>deal one of their outfield prospects for pitching, did they

0:27:48.000 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 2>shoot up this list. Yon Marshall's coming up.

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 3>Definitely.

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:54.520
<v Speaker 4>Definitely, And you have to remember that they didn't have

0:27:54.600 --> 0:27:57.600
<v Speaker 4>Trout for two months and you're getting back the best

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 4>player in baseball who's worth you know, for the last

0:28:01.040 --> 0:28:02.080
<v Speaker 4>sixty games.

0:28:01.840 --> 0:28:04.919
<v Speaker 3>Of the year, could be worth four total wins.

0:28:04.960 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 4>I mean, that's how valuable he is when he's off crazy.

0:28:08.680 --> 0:28:13.040
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, I mean, Trout could propel the Angels. And

0:28:14.080 --> 0:28:16.640
<v Speaker 4>as a baseball fan, you just really want to see

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 4>the Angels in the playoffs. You want to see Otani

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:20.520
<v Speaker 4>in the playoffs. You want to see Trout in the

0:28:20.520 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 4>playoffs because we just never have seen it. And it's

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 4>one of those things that you know, you go, Trout's

0:28:25.920 --> 0:28:27.840
<v Speaker 4>already a Hall of Fame. We don't have to discuss that.

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:30.480
<v Speaker 4>But at the end of the day, you know, when

0:28:30.520 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 4>he when we're talking about his legacy, it's gonna be

0:28:32.880 --> 0:28:35.960
<v Speaker 4>really important for Trout to have at least a series

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:37.160
<v Speaker 4>win on his resume.

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:41.320
<v Speaker 1>You know what's crazy, you guys are you know, Aaron

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:43.440
<v Speaker 1>Judge and Mike Trout have played the same amount of

0:28:43.440 --> 0:28:46.000
<v Speaker 1>games since their Judge debuted, and Aaron Judge is this

0:28:46.160 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 1>like injury prone guy, same amount of games? Interesting, right,

0:28:50.400 --> 0:28:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I believe it? You know, Judge's looking at me like

0:28:52.800 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't believe me because I don't, Judge.

0:28:59.200 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 2>Savant. It's the same amount of game. I mean, check

0:29:01.280 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Baseball Reference, check Kobe talk. He's the guest. All right, fine,

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:06.160
<v Speaker 2>go gooby. No.

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 4>I just wanted to say that Judge seems like a

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 4>guy that has never really dealt with a long term injury.

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:12.320
<v Speaker 4>He's always a guy that deals with these nagging, like

0:29:12.360 --> 0:29:16.440
<v Speaker 4>obleaque injuries and seems like, you know, maybe.

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 3>His results falter because of that. But he's fully healthy

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:21.240
<v Speaker 3>this year and he's raking.

0:29:21.520 --> 0:29:24.280
<v Speaker 2>He's a top five outfielder. Kobe last one for you

0:29:24.720 --> 0:29:27.840
<v Speaker 2>Boston at ninety four wins, Toronto right around at eighty

0:29:27.920 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 2>nine wins. I think the Blue Jays are going to

0:29:29.880 --> 0:29:32.959
<v Speaker 2>buy What do they have to buy to catch up

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:33.760
<v Speaker 2>to the Red Sox.

0:29:34.880 --> 0:29:38.280
<v Speaker 4>Well, the clear need for Blue Jays is obviously starting

0:29:38.320 --> 0:29:39.040
<v Speaker 4>pitching depth.

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 3>I think relief depth is the need for just about

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 3>anyone that's gonna contend.

0:29:44.880 --> 0:29:46.560
<v Speaker 4>But the Blue Jays should go and look for a

0:29:46.560 --> 0:29:50.840
<v Speaker 4>guy like Kyle Gibson. They should ask about Hermon Marquez.

0:29:50.840 --> 0:29:52.800
<v Speaker 4>I don't think that mark, you know, for the right

0:29:52.880 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 4>offer they I don't.

0:29:53.880 --> 0:29:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Think the Rockies are going to trade him. I think

0:29:55.440 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>they finally found their guy.

0:29:56.960 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think they did.

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:01.280
<v Speaker 4>He's only twenty six still, but get a guy like

0:30:01.360 --> 0:30:05.479
<v Speaker 4>Kyle Gibson. I Springer's coming back, you know you have

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 4>a full loaded lineup. This Blue Jays team is too

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:12.880
<v Speaker 4>good not to let fly completely. I mean, Nate Pearson's

0:30:12.920 --> 0:30:16.800
<v Speaker 4>coming back too. Alec Manoa has been I think he

0:30:16.920 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 4>has like a one to seven e RA in his

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 4>last six or seven. So the Blue Jays are looking

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:25.440
<v Speaker 4>really good. I would be terrified if I was the

0:30:25.480 --> 0:30:27.920
<v Speaker 4>Red Sox. So the Red Sox had one of the

0:30:27.920 --> 0:30:31.320
<v Speaker 4>best first halves we've ever seen, and now it's like

0:30:31.640 --> 0:30:35.080
<v Speaker 4>that probably was at this end of the spectrum. There's

0:30:35.120 --> 0:30:37.200
<v Speaker 4>twenty twenty season. Was that this end of the spectrum,

0:30:37.200 --> 0:30:39.520
<v Speaker 4>and they're probably gonna regress somewhere in the middle. So

0:30:39.560 --> 0:30:41.800
<v Speaker 4>I'd be scared. It could be anyone's game, even the Yankees.

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 4>The Yankees could make a comeback here. I know, Peter,

0:30:45.160 --> 0:30:49.760
<v Speaker 4>you've been down on the Yankees, but like they're probably

0:30:49.840 --> 0:30:52.240
<v Speaker 4>gonna buy big, I don't see it. I do not

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:55.120
<v Speaker 4>see a scenario where they don't buy big as well.

0:30:55.160 --> 0:30:57.520
<v Speaker 4>With that team, I mean, there's not much movement except

0:30:57.520 --> 0:30:59.440
<v Speaker 4>to buy. You can't really sell any of these guys.

0:30:59.560 --> 0:31:01.800
<v Speaker 4>They only have one free agent going into next season.

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:02.520
<v Speaker 4>This is the team.

0:31:04.200 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess, yeah, I mean, you're right, but we just

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:08.920
<v Speaker 1>don't I don't want to buy big. I don't want

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.600
<v Speaker 1>to just give away all of our prospects because we actually,

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Kobe, we were talking about it today. The

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Yankees farm system actually looks pretty decent. Look, they got

0:31:17.360 --> 0:31:20.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of high v low young right handers. They

0:31:20.320 --> 0:31:23.960
<v Speaker 1>got some shortstop prospects, they got some catching prospects. They

0:31:24.000 --> 0:31:29.360
<v Speaker 1>got Jason Dominguez, the son of whatever god you believe in.

0:31:30.280 --> 0:31:33.320
<v Speaker 1>He's still that son. But I do have one more question,

0:31:33.440 --> 0:31:36.800
<v Speaker 1>because the New York teams the big markets. You got

0:31:36.800 --> 0:31:39.320
<v Speaker 1>the Mets at eighty six wins, and you got the

0:31:39.360 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Yankees at if you round up eighty six wins as well,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>if you had to make a decision right now, who

0:31:45.920 --> 0:31:48.640
<v Speaker 1>you think actually ends up with more wins over a

0:31:48.680 --> 0:31:50.640
<v Speaker 1>full season. Mets are Yankees?

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Who you going with?

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 3>That's a really really good question.

0:31:57.000 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Because it's it's not even the Mets fault. They're a

0:31:58.920 --> 0:32:02.040
<v Speaker 1>little bit injured. They been injured all year. Like Lindor

0:32:02.160 --> 0:32:04.760
<v Speaker 1>just went on the d L L whatever you call

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:07.080
<v Speaker 1>it now, and it's I think it's been the ILE

0:32:07.160 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>now for four years. I still called d L. I

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:11.720
<v Speaker 1>probably always will still call d L and de Gram's

0:32:11.720 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>now on the IL two. I mean those are two.

0:32:15.320 --> 0:32:18.600
<v Speaker 4>Interesting, so like, yeah, one scenario there is like does

0:32:18.640 --> 0:32:21.480
<v Speaker 4>the team that wins more games have the better chance

0:32:21.480 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 4>in the playoffs?

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:26.560
<v Speaker 3>And that's the question. I don't know. I think that currently.

0:32:27.320 --> 0:32:29.320
<v Speaker 3>I still gotta stick with the Mets.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:30.920
<v Speaker 4>I think the Mets are going to go get a

0:32:30.920 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 4>guy like Chris Bryant and really load up, So I

0:32:34.680 --> 0:32:36.880
<v Speaker 4>gotta stick with the Mets. Taiwan Walker just had to

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 4>blow up. I mean that was just a weird game,

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 4>and he's still an amazing pitcher. Is there any word

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.600
<v Speaker 4>on Cinder I have not heard a word on Cinder Guard,

0:32:46.880 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 4>and that worries me because if they get him back

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:52.200
<v Speaker 4>that could be huge for the Mets as they go

0:32:52.240 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 4>into the playoffs. So it's it's gonna be a really

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.520
<v Speaker 4>interesting trade deadline and a really interesting end of the year.

0:33:01.320 --> 0:33:03.400
<v Speaker 4>So yeah, hopefully I'll be back, you know, in another

0:33:03.480 --> 0:33:05.320
<v Speaker 4>week and we can talk about the trade deadline more

0:33:05.320 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 4>as more rumors heat up.

0:33:07.440 --> 0:33:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Jack, have you heard the Gallo and Gibson to San

0:33:11.240 --> 0:33:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Diego for Mackenzie Goren pieces?

0:33:13.040 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 2>Have you heard about that deal? I have heard about

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:17.120
<v Speaker 2>that deal. What do you think about that deal? I

0:33:17.120 --> 0:33:18.920
<v Speaker 2>think it's fascinating And I'm not going to talk about

0:33:18.960 --> 0:33:21.280
<v Speaker 2>it because I am with the four way and TinCaps

0:33:21.280 --> 0:33:26.200
<v Speaker 2>and there are Padres affiliate So dude, come on, all right,

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 2>mL just second half team projections? Who should buy or sell?

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:31.680
<v Speaker 2>Colby Olsen appreciate you, man.

0:33:32.120 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, of course, thanks for having me, Guys.

0:33:33.800 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 4>I'm always happy to come on here and talk to

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:38.080
<v Speaker 4>you about stats, talk to you about how I actually

0:33:38.120 --> 0:33:39.200
<v Speaker 4>watch baseball.

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:39.040
<v Speaker 3>You know.

0:33:41.800 --> 0:33:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Okay, good conversation with Colby as usual. He's kind of

0:33:45.320 --> 0:33:48.800
<v Speaker 2>snuck his way onto the pod twice in not too

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 2>long a period of time.

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's smart as shit. He just knows what

0:33:53.320 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he's talking about. He's explaining expected weighted on base plusing

0:33:58.760 --> 0:34:03.479
<v Speaker 1>averaging double mctwists. Yeah, I think he's like and then

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but then you look at it's like, oh, Mike Trot's

0:34:05.080 --> 0:34:05.520
<v Speaker 1>Summer one.

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:09.600
<v Speaker 2>We knew that. Oh so my eyes like prove whatever.

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.399
<v Speaker 2>So I also agree that Mike Trot is the best,

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.240
<v Speaker 2>perfect good. I think it's crazy that the Giants hold

0:34:16.719 --> 0:34:20.399
<v Speaker 2>that top spot. It's crazy, right, we were not.

0:34:20.360 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>Expecting this that If that prediction prediction holds, it's one

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:29.360
<v Speaker 1>of the craziest seasons I think we've seen in like

0:34:29.400 --> 0:34:31.560
<v Speaker 1>the past decade of a team that maybe we were

0:34:31.600 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>expecting to be like what eighty to eighty three wins,

0:34:35.280 --> 0:34:37.680
<v Speaker 1>and now they're going to surpass that by twenty.

0:34:38.400 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 2>It doesn't make any sense. It doesn't make sense, but

0:34:41.480 --> 0:34:44.120
<v Speaker 2>it makes perfect sense. It does. It's the Giants. That's

0:34:44.120 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 2>what the Giants do. Hey, n L this year, at

0:34:47.239 --> 0:34:49.600
<v Speaker 2>the very least does not use a DH. Let's get

0:34:49.600 --> 0:34:53.319
<v Speaker 2>into the top five designated hitters. And this was a

0:34:53.400 --> 0:34:56.960
<v Speaker 2>short list. We're doing five, not ten. We only have

0:34:57.000 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 2>two honorable mentions. There are a many guys that in

0:35:01.520 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 2>our eyes qualify as a DH. I think that's because

0:35:05.520 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 2>of the way that the modern baseball player is built.

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.480
<v Speaker 2>They're not built like a DH anymore. Nobody really comes

0:35:10.520 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 2>in and it's like I can strictly hit and that's it.

0:35:13.600 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm not an athlete, not at all.

0:35:16.440 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>And we were even going over the list, I mean,

0:35:18.760 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>how many players only had two hundre played appearances at DH.

0:35:21.320 --> 0:35:23.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean there was a lot of guys to consider,

0:35:23.239 --> 0:35:26.279
<v Speaker 1>because a lot of guys have played DH before. But

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 1>this list is centered around guys who are dhs for

0:35:30.719 --> 0:35:33.239
<v Speaker 1>their team. You might see them throw out there and

0:35:33.360 --> 0:35:36.840
<v Speaker 1>left or right, but these are you slot them in

0:35:36.880 --> 0:35:38.120
<v Speaker 1>at DH and that's.

0:35:37.960 --> 0:35:42.239
<v Speaker 2>Their position, right. It makes sense. So who's over two hundred?

0:35:42.280 --> 0:35:44.080
<v Speaker 2>How many people we have over to under play appearances?

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 2>Like six? Eight? Yeah, I think eight guys and we

0:35:48.360 --> 0:35:51.759
<v Speaker 2>have seven including the honorable mentions. We did all that

0:35:51.840 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 2>we could, but hey, listen, six and seven are still

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:57.680
<v Speaker 2>very good baseball players, like.

0:35:57.680 --> 0:35:59.880
<v Speaker 1>Extremely good base If you're at six or seven out

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:01.000
<v Speaker 1>of position, you're awesome.

0:36:01.280 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and these guys are awesome. Honorable mentions Tampa Bay's

0:36:05.440 --> 0:36:09.480
<v Speaker 2>Austin Meadows and the fre animal Cleveland Indians franmill Rayes.

0:36:09.520 --> 0:36:13.520
<v Speaker 2>I mean, these guys mash in different ways. Meadows is

0:36:13.560 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 2>your classic Like, yes, throw them in right, he's got

0:36:15.920 --> 0:36:17.840
<v Speaker 2>a good arm, throw him in left. He's got a

0:36:17.840 --> 0:36:19.680
<v Speaker 2>good arm and can move around a little bit. But

0:36:20.120 --> 0:36:23.320
<v Speaker 2>his bread and butter is hitting the crap out of

0:36:23.320 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 2>the baseball and hitting line drives all the time. And

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.680
<v Speaker 2>then Franmil Reyes, Yeah, I guess you could put him

0:36:29.680 --> 0:36:31.480
<v Speaker 2>in left field, but like you don't really want to.

0:36:32.239 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 2>He just hits tanks all the time. The launch angle,

0:36:36.239 --> 0:36:40.440
<v Speaker 2>the average exit velocity all sky high. Like these are

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:45.160
<v Speaker 2>two of the most hard consistent contact players baseball.

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:49.280
<v Speaker 1>Has the for animal makes sense, I mean, the dude

0:36:49.520 --> 0:36:52.240
<v Speaker 1>just hits absolute nuke tanks.

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:53.600
<v Speaker 2>And Austin Meadows.

0:36:53.640 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I will always remember Austin Meadows no matter what he

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.600
<v Speaker 1>does for the rest of his career because he was

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:04.200
<v Speaker 1>involved in possibly the worst trade of our generation. Yeah,

0:37:04.600 --> 0:37:09.239
<v Speaker 1>Tyler Glasnaw Austin Meadows. And the guy you might not

0:37:09.280 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>have heard of, Shane Baz, who's going to be maybe

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:15.880
<v Speaker 1>the next great pitching prospect as good as Glass. Now,

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>we just watched him in the Future's Game. You heard

0:37:17.640 --> 0:37:21.560
<v Speaker 1>us talk about him, Shane Baz effortless ninety eight. He's

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:24.000
<v Speaker 1>going to be fantastic. And you know who the pirates

0:37:24.000 --> 0:37:25.640
<v Speaker 1>got in return in that deal.

0:37:26.360 --> 0:37:29.800
<v Speaker 2>Chris Archer, Baby Chris Archer, who's also on the Rays

0:37:29.920 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 2>right now. So sorry, Pirates not good. Not who the

0:37:35.600 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 2>pirates aside from glass Now and Shane Baz, it's been

0:37:39.760 --> 0:37:42.640
<v Speaker 2>Garrett Cole obviously that got away from them. Who else

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:44.080
<v Speaker 2>has gotten away from them in trades?

0:37:46.640 --> 0:37:52.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd have to go back and think, really, I think

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:53.839
<v Speaker 1>there's I don't know, no one's coming, No one's coming.

0:37:53.920 --> 0:37:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, jameson Tyan, I guess.

0:37:56.600 --> 0:37:58.719
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Tiwne is definitely one of them that I think.

0:37:58.680 --> 0:38:01.320
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Town's one of them. I don't know if they've

0:38:01.360 --> 0:38:04.040
<v Speaker 1>just been trading away all of their pictures. I think

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:06.399
<v Speaker 1>this has been kind of a like a recent seat thing,

0:38:06.520 --> 0:38:09.440
<v Speaker 1>like twenty fifteen, twenty sixteen. In the last couple of years.

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:11.799
<v Speaker 1>This has been really what the pirates have been doing.

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>And I don't do I understand.

0:38:13.800 --> 0:38:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Not really. We've done a lot of pirates conversation on

0:38:16.480 --> 0:38:19.120
<v Speaker 2>this podcast. It's good. They need some love. They don't

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.400
<v Speaker 2>get a lot of media attention. That's what we do. Jack,

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:25.000
<v Speaker 2>You're right, and Yen's is the word of Pittsburgh. Y

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 2>I n Z You ever heard that?

0:38:27.280 --> 0:38:27.360
<v Speaker 4>No?

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.960
<v Speaker 2>What does that mean, I think it means like y'all.

0:38:30.200 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Like Pittsburgh's version of y'all is yin's Yeah, So yin's

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:37.640
<v Speaker 2>that doesn't sound right at all.

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know the IV versus AH, because when I'm

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>when I'm looking for a group, I want awe rather

0:38:44.200 --> 0:38:45.319
<v Speaker 1>than E yeah.

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 2>Does that make sense? I just want to say hey

0:38:47.280 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 2>and have everybody hey, Hi, Hey, All.

0:38:51.280 --> 0:38:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Right, none of that nonsense anymore. We break into the

0:38:55.440 --> 0:39:00.759
<v Speaker 1>top five dhs at number five, Juhn Carlosan of the

0:39:00.800 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 1>New York Yankees. Gincarlo can definitely infuriate some Yankee fans,

0:39:04.920 --> 0:39:06.920
<v Speaker 1>but there is no doubt that he is still a

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:10.120
<v Speaker 1>top five DH in all of baseball. Hate on Stan

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:12.239
<v Speaker 1>all you want, but he hit three to ZHO eight

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs last year and he's still mashing home

0:39:15.239 --> 0:39:17.319
<v Speaker 1>runs with the best of them. I mean, his hard

0:39:17.400 --> 0:39:21.399
<v Speaker 1>hit rates are absolutely still really unmatched. He hasn't had

0:39:21.400 --> 0:39:23.279
<v Speaker 1>a year where he hit a ball at least one

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:25.279
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty miles an hour. I want to say

0:39:25.280 --> 0:39:28.440
<v Speaker 1>that again. Since twenty fifteen, he hasn't had a year

0:39:28.640 --> 0:39:30.799
<v Speaker 1>where he hit a ball at least one hundred and

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:31.879
<v Speaker 1>twenty miles an hour.

0:39:32.160 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 2>Nobody does that.

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:36.160
<v Speaker 1>The Yankees might have some problems, but Stan this season

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:38.799
<v Speaker 1>is far from one of them. Yeah, he makes a

0:39:38.800 --> 0:39:40.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, but he's still one of the better

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:44.160
<v Speaker 1>power bats in the entire game and is still definitely

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:45.120
<v Speaker 1>a top five DH.

0:39:47.360 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 2>Stantonian blasts man Stantonian blasts. I mean he's still that dude.

0:39:52.440 --> 0:39:56.960
<v Speaker 2>He's still that dude, which he sneakily only makes like

0:39:57.120 --> 0:39:59.439
<v Speaker 2>sixteen million dollars a year, and for a DH, that's

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.560
<v Speaker 2>a ton of mone But like that deal when it

0:40:01.600 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 2>first came out, was like, oh my god, this is groundbreaking.

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:06.600
<v Speaker 2>And now you look at the annual value of that

0:40:06.719 --> 0:40:09.360
<v Speaker 2>deal and it doesn't really match up with how the

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.920
<v Speaker 2>contract market has trended over the last couple of years.

0:40:13.080 --> 0:40:15.480
<v Speaker 1>Multiple teams are still paying his contract, though I don't

0:40:15.520 --> 0:40:17.400
<v Speaker 1>know how much he's actually bringing it.

0:40:19.040 --> 0:40:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I bet he's bringing it a lot. I bet he's

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 2>bringing in a lot. Three hundred and twenty five million

0:40:23.719 --> 0:40:28.359
<v Speaker 2>dollars over thirteen years. I have always enjoyed watching John

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:31.319
<v Speaker 2>Carlos Stanton, and like, I'm not a Yankee hater, I

0:40:31.360 --> 0:40:34.439
<v Speaker 2>certainly don't make the Yankees appointment viewing like Red Sox

0:40:34.520 --> 0:40:37.720
<v Speaker 2>Yankees on Sunday Night Baseball. Also, that lineup was terrible,

0:40:37.800 --> 0:40:42.280
<v Speaker 2>but they wont So that lineup looks bad. Yeah, well

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:46.279
<v Speaker 2>the whole team is out from COVID, Judge, Sella, all

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:46.760
<v Speaker 2>these guys.

0:40:47.160 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>And then you take Judge out of a lineup and

0:40:48.680 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>you look at Rugnidodor hitting third. Rugie you think and

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:54.920
<v Speaker 1>you think to yourself, God, where is this team gone?

0:40:56.200 --> 0:40:56.399
<v Speaker 3>Man?

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 2>It's tough. So yeah, Stanton's really good.

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:01.480
<v Speaker 1>Man.

0:41:01.520 --> 0:41:03.640
<v Speaker 2>He's not as good as number four, and the fourth

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:07.120
<v Speaker 2>best DH is Nelson Cruz. Cruse is forty one years

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:09.840
<v Speaker 2>old and he's in the ninety sixth percentile and average

0:41:09.880 --> 0:41:12.600
<v Speaker 2>exit velocity. I think that's all we gotta say, right.

0:41:14.120 --> 0:41:17.480
<v Speaker 2>He left Texas at thirty two years old after an

0:41:17.480 --> 0:41:21.400
<v Speaker 2>All Star twenty thirteen season when he hit twenty seven bombs.

0:41:21.719 --> 0:41:24.920
<v Speaker 2>Since then, his lowest total in a full season is

0:41:25.040 --> 0:41:28.520
<v Speaker 2>thirty seven, and his sixteen home runs in twenty twenty

0:41:28.880 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 2>averaged out to a full season would be right around

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:36.759
<v Speaker 2>forty and dude's durable. Since that thirty two year old

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.160
<v Speaker 2>left Texas, he's a five time All Star. He's finished

0:41:40.160 --> 0:41:43.319
<v Speaker 2>in the top ten of MVP voting five times in

0:41:43.360 --> 0:41:46.160
<v Speaker 2>all three years that he wasn't In All Star he

0:41:46.239 --> 0:41:49.200
<v Speaker 2>finished in the top fifteen of MVP voting. So he's

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:52.120
<v Speaker 2>always put together a great year. And is he going

0:41:52.200 --> 0:41:54.200
<v Speaker 2>to hit fifty bombs as a fifty year old? Are

0:41:54.239 --> 0:41:56.120
<v Speaker 2>we going to go fifty to fifty with Nelson Cruz.

0:41:57.080 --> 0:41:58.160
<v Speaker 2>It's a possibility.

0:41:59.440 --> 0:42:01.840
<v Speaker 1>And you know how there's the rumor going around that

0:42:01.880 --> 0:42:04.560
<v Speaker 1>Albert pool Hools slied about his age and he's actually older.

0:42:05.640 --> 0:42:08.319
<v Speaker 2>No, I didn't know that there's a rumor going around

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:11.600
<v Speaker 2>that Albert Pools is legit forty five. Huh. I had

0:42:11.600 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 2>no idea that that was a rumor.

0:42:14.280 --> 0:42:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And they're also I'm creating the rumor right now that

0:42:17.000 --> 0:42:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Nelson Cruz is actually lying about being older than he is,

0:42:20.040 --> 0:42:22.640
<v Speaker 1>that he's actually young too. I don't like he's lying

0:42:22.719 --> 0:42:25.040
<v Speaker 1>about like because he wants to seem cooler, that he's

0:42:25.160 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 1>legit thirty four. Dude, like Jorge Polonko seems as old

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:34.200
<v Speaker 1>as Nelson Cruise for no good reason, right.

0:42:34.080 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 2>So I think Horge Polanco gave some of his years

0:42:36.680 --> 0:42:42.800
<v Speaker 2>to Nelson Cruz. Something something's going on in Minnesota. Something man,

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 2>I like forty one years old and he's going to

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:48.560
<v Speaker 2>hit thirty five bombs and.

0:42:48.520 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>He'll be back next year too, probably had another thirty

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:54.080
<v Speaker 1>thirty five bombs again. Okay, what's stopping him from another

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 1>year after that of thirty thirty five bombs?

0:42:56.400 --> 0:43:02.000
<v Speaker 2>What's going to stop him? Clean slate, open market? How

0:43:02.080 --> 0:43:03.839
<v Speaker 2>much do you pay Nelson Cruz on a one year

0:43:03.840 --> 0:43:12.000
<v Speaker 2>deal next year? Twelve? You have eighteen million? Eighteen? Yeah,

0:43:12.040 --> 0:43:17.680
<v Speaker 2>he's forty two. Now that's stupid. That's twelve. I think more.

0:43:18.920 --> 0:43:20.120
<v Speaker 2>I think at least fifteen.

0:43:20.200 --> 0:43:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean if you gave him, would you be shocked

0:43:22.480 --> 0:43:24.480
<v Speaker 1>if you saw a two year, thirty million dollar deal

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:25.240
<v Speaker 1>for Nelson Cruise?

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Kind of. I mean, you're why having a forty

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 2>four year old guy like he rags he's the best

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:37.160
<v Speaker 2>hitter in that lineup. He'd be the best hitter in

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:40.640
<v Speaker 2>a lot of lineups right now, man, I mean you're right,

0:43:40.960 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, Just just go to three. This guy's

0:43:43.080 --> 0:43:44.439
<v Speaker 2>a lot younger than forty one.

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:47.160
<v Speaker 1>This guy is a lot younger than forty one. And

0:43:47.200 --> 0:43:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the third best DH in baseball is your Don Alvarez

0:43:52.040 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Houston Astros. Can I start by saying that

0:43:55.480 --> 0:43:58.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Jordan Alvarez will be a Hall of Famer

0:43:58.239 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 1>one day. He's got that type of pop in his

0:44:01.360 --> 0:44:04.840
<v Speaker 1>bat In his career one hundred and sixty seven games,

0:44:04.840 --> 0:44:09.000
<v Speaker 1>almost a more than a full season, he has forty

0:44:09.040 --> 0:44:12.400
<v Speaker 1>four home runs and he's hitting two ninety eight in

0:44:12.440 --> 0:44:15.640
<v Speaker 1>his batting average, a three eighty two on base and

0:44:15.680 --> 0:44:19.960
<v Speaker 1>he's slugging five eighty five. I think he's gonna finish

0:44:19.960 --> 0:44:22.279
<v Speaker 1>his career with over five hundred home runs and a

0:44:22.360 --> 0:44:23.879
<v Speaker 1>high enough average probably round two.

0:44:23.760 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Eighty two ninety.

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:28.480
<v Speaker 1>This man is seriously one of the best hitters in

0:44:28.600 --> 0:44:31.320
<v Speaker 1>all of baseball. But he's not one of these classic

0:44:31.480 --> 0:44:35.040
<v Speaker 1>bai Ol lefties that's swing and misses and pulls the ball.

0:44:35.080 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 2>Every time. You gotta go look at his hit spray chart.

0:44:37.719 --> 0:44:38.719
<v Speaker 2>It's gorgeous.

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:41.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he is a behemoth that sprays the ball

0:44:41.960 --> 0:44:45.000
<v Speaker 1>to every corner of the ballpark and is definitely the

0:44:45.000 --> 0:44:47.680
<v Speaker 1>third best dch in the entire league.

0:44:48.200 --> 0:44:51.920
<v Speaker 2>So our boy Bob Costas said that five hundred home

0:44:52.000 --> 0:44:54.640
<v Speaker 2>runs is now a hu hum? What do you think

0:44:54.640 --> 0:44:57.320
<v Speaker 2>about that? I love Bob.

0:44:57.840 --> 0:44:59.879
<v Speaker 1>One of the greatest moments in my life is interviewing Bob.

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:01.600
<v Speaker 1>Five hundred or runs is not ho hum.

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 2>No.

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.759
<v Speaker 1>You know how I know that because mcgougubret isn't even

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:07.200
<v Speaker 1>there yet, and Micgogubert is a legend, and the fact

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.200
<v Speaker 1>that he isn't there yet goes to show you how

0:45:09.239 --> 0:45:11.840
<v Speaker 1>hard that is. And that's where I think Jordan willind

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:16.400
<v Speaker 1>up that, Like the dude barrels literally everything, everything, everything,

0:45:16.840 --> 0:45:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Like I feel like he's using like a bigger barrel

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:23.480
<v Speaker 1>than everybody else, Like his bat is because it's right

0:45:23.520 --> 0:45:24.080
<v Speaker 1>in the middle.

0:45:24.239 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 2>You gotta watch, you gotta watch him hit.

0:45:25.840 --> 0:45:28.480
<v Speaker 1>I know you do, but it's like every single time

0:45:28.600 --> 0:45:31.399
<v Speaker 1>it's right in the middle of that barrel, whether it's

0:45:31.400 --> 0:45:33.279
<v Speaker 1>the left field, whether it's the centerfield, whether it's the

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:36.759
<v Speaker 1>right field, it's every time he barrels it more than

0:45:37.480 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you look at the percentages, it's all one

0:45:39.320 --> 0:45:43.120
<v Speaker 1>hundred percent percent max exit, all of that, Like it's

0:45:43.200 --> 0:45:47.320
<v Speaker 1>all right there, and he's just he's a freak. And

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:49.239
<v Speaker 1>remember he went he came over from the Dodgers in

0:45:49.239 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 1>that trade. He is not a guy the Ashos bread

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:54.160
<v Speaker 1>he he's a former Dodger farm man.

0:45:55.680 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 2>I would like try and add something about Jordan Alvarez,

0:45:58.480 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 2>but I think that was the perfect transition, bringing up

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:03.600
<v Speaker 2>Miguel Cabrera and barrels and all that stuff to the

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:10.680
<v Speaker 2>second best d in the game. I mean you're gonna like,

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't really care if you hate this or not. JD.

0:46:13.280 --> 0:46:16.719
<v Speaker 2>Martinez is at number two, and I would just rip

0:46:16.760 --> 0:46:18.839
<v Speaker 2>off a bunch of numbers. But that's not the best

0:46:18.920 --> 0:46:21.480
<v Speaker 2>use of our time with him. Let's talk about his

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:25.040
<v Speaker 2>bat path. If you catch JD. Martinez in the on

0:46:25.120 --> 0:46:28.239
<v Speaker 2>deck circle, you still might find him bringing the bat

0:46:28.280 --> 0:46:31.520
<v Speaker 2>through the zone with one hand his backhand, and he's

0:46:31.560 --> 0:46:34.759
<v Speaker 2>seeing it all the way through the zone. I don't

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:38.560
<v Speaker 2>think you could name five people playing right now that

0:46:38.719 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 2>even come close to the level of hyper focus and

0:46:42.560 --> 0:46:45.400
<v Speaker 2>the study habits that he brings. When it comes to

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 2>his swing, he might be the smartest hitter in the game. JD.

0:46:48.600 --> 0:46:52.520
<v Speaker 2>Martinez's swing has been manufactured by him to keep the

0:46:52.560 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 2>barrel in the zone for the longest time humanly possible.

0:46:57.239 --> 0:46:59.960
<v Speaker 2>Alex Spier, who does great work with the Boston Globe,

0:47:00.200 --> 0:47:02.600
<v Speaker 2>said his swing path has been copped to a ferris

0:47:02.600 --> 0:47:07.080
<v Speaker 2>wheel before. He doesn't swing particularly hard. He just has

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 2>his barrel in a position to hit longer than anyone else.

0:47:11.040 --> 0:47:12.880
<v Speaker 2>It starts in the back of the zone, it comes

0:47:13.080 --> 0:47:15.279
<v Speaker 2>all the way to the front of the zone, JD

0:47:15.440 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 2>has a career pull rate of thirty six and a

0:47:18.160 --> 0:47:21.640
<v Speaker 2>half percent, and so far this year he's gone to

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:24.720
<v Speaker 2>pull thirty four percent of the time, up the middle

0:47:24.800 --> 0:47:27.520
<v Speaker 2>thirty nine percent of the time, and the other way

0:47:27.640 --> 0:47:31.239
<v Speaker 2>twenty seven percent of the time. There's no other hitter

0:47:31.280 --> 0:47:34.400
<v Speaker 2>in baseball that hits to all fields with the power

0:47:34.480 --> 0:47:38.200
<v Speaker 2>that JD does. And he said that his career took

0:47:38.400 --> 0:47:40.600
<v Speaker 2>leaps after his time in Detroit because he got to

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:43.960
<v Speaker 2>study Megal Cabrera and that's I think the one guy

0:47:44.520 --> 0:47:47.120
<v Speaker 2>in recent memory that you can compare not only the

0:47:47.200 --> 0:47:52.120
<v Speaker 2>swing but the results for JD. Martinez too, said it

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:52.920
<v Speaker 2>very perfectly.

0:47:53.400 --> 0:47:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean JD Martinez is Manny Ramirez esque for the

0:47:57.400 --> 0:48:02.880
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox. He as a Yankee fan, He's always the

0:48:03.000 --> 0:48:06.840
<v Speaker 1>scariest at bat. I mean, Rafael Dever's probably hits the

0:48:06.920 --> 0:48:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Yankees even better, but JD Martinez when he's up a bat,

0:48:10.719 --> 0:48:13.200
<v Speaker 1>similar to the big Poppy, similar to the man Ramirez,

0:48:14.080 --> 0:48:16.719
<v Speaker 1>it's just a scary at bat, no matter what the situation,

0:48:16.800 --> 0:48:20.279
<v Speaker 1>no matter what the pitcher, no matter what ballpark. I'm

0:48:20.320 --> 0:48:23.680
<v Speaker 1>not saying he's the best hitter in the league, but

0:48:24.040 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 1>he's one of the scariest when I'm personally watching him play.

0:48:28.840 --> 0:48:32.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, the thing with him is like he's so strong,

0:48:32.600 --> 0:48:35.759
<v Speaker 2>he doesn't look the part, and he's so smart, he's

0:48:35.800 --> 0:48:38.320
<v Speaker 2>so smart, Like that is what takes.

0:48:38.040 --> 0:48:40.400
<v Speaker 1>That's where that's what puts him over the edge because

0:48:40.400 --> 0:48:44.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot of guys like have his level of power. Yeah,

0:48:44.040 --> 0:48:48.960
<v Speaker 1>like Jordon Can has the amount of power standing judge,

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:49.720
<v Speaker 1>like these.

0:48:49.520 --> 0:48:51.720
<v Speaker 2>Guys have this, They have more power.

0:48:52.400 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>But the way you use the power is something that

0:48:56.000 --> 0:48:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Jad Martinez really has mastered. And the doubles machine on

0:48:58.719 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 1>top of the home runs.

0:49:00.120 --> 0:49:02.879
<v Speaker 2>Nobody can go the other way and hit one over

0:49:02.920 --> 0:49:05.040
<v Speaker 2>the fence into the right center bullpen at Fenway like

0:49:05.120 --> 0:49:05.960
<v Speaker 2>Jad Martinez.

0:49:06.480 --> 0:49:09.200
<v Speaker 1>It almost looks like you're playing slow pitch softball and

0:49:09.239 --> 0:49:12.360
<v Speaker 1>you kind of look at the fielders and you think,

0:49:12.640 --> 0:49:14.879
<v Speaker 1>all right, where am I gonna place this ball? He

0:49:14.920 --> 0:49:17.920
<v Speaker 1>does that with ninety five cutting in like that's the

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:20.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of hitter he is. Reminds me of another not

0:49:21.239 --> 0:49:24.200
<v Speaker 1>reminds me sort of this. We were watching batting practice,

0:49:24.239 --> 0:49:27.400
<v Speaker 1>right and this was back when each row was on

0:49:27.400 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>the Yankees. I want to say four years ago. Okay,

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 1>maybe even sooner.

0:49:32.160 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 2>I don't really remember, but watching guys take VP and

0:49:36.000 --> 0:49:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Yankees are crushing balls, no doubt about it. But each row.

0:49:40.600 --> 0:49:43.279
<v Speaker 1>There's a scuttle bud around, like saying, eachro hit, the

0:49:43.360 --> 0:49:45.400
<v Speaker 1>home runs, hits some more runs. He looks in the crowd,

0:49:45.840 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>rattles off eleven, just bang right field porch, just bang.

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:51.879
<v Speaker 2>Eleven in a row.

0:49:52.719 --> 0:49:56.720
<v Speaker 1>And guys like that with such crazy bat control. Similar

0:49:56.800 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>with jad Martinez, like I said, just placing balls where

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>they want. And when you have that kind of power

0:50:02.760 --> 0:50:04.720
<v Speaker 1>and that kind of ability with the bat.

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:10.680
<v Speaker 2>To say, I mean like that's you're one.

0:50:10.600 --> 0:50:11.880
<v Speaker 1>Of the best players in baseball, and you're one of

0:50:11.880 --> 0:50:13.719
<v Speaker 1>the best headers in baseball, and you're the second best ech.

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:15.759
<v Speaker 2>But talk about Babe ruth Man.

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:22.280
<v Speaker 1>The number one best each in baseball and quite possibly

0:50:22.320 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the most talented player we've ever seen is sho he

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 1>O Tani of the Los Angeles Angels show Hey might

0:50:29.239 --> 0:50:30.880
<v Speaker 1>be the best player in all of baseball. I mean,

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:31.880
<v Speaker 1>who do we compare him to?

0:50:32.000 --> 0:50:33.240
<v Speaker 2>Babe ruth God.

0:50:33.800 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a chance that he isn't really a

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 1>human being, that he was sent down from an unknown

0:50:37.920 --> 0:50:41.359
<v Speaker 1>planet to take over America's pastime. I mean, he leads

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.799
<v Speaker 1>all of baseball in home runs with thirty four. As

0:50:43.800 --> 0:50:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a pitcher, he ranks with Judge and Stanton on hard

0:50:46.760 --> 0:50:50.000
<v Speaker 1>hit rates. He ranks near Buxton in sprint speed. He

0:50:50.040 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 1>has a similar strikeout percentage to Zach Wheeler. He is

0:50:53.320 --> 0:50:57.719
<v Speaker 1>just below Clayton Kershawn pitching. He's a superhuman, easily the

0:50:57.719 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 1>best each in baseball and is slowly becoming the best

0:51:01.200 --> 0:51:03.960
<v Speaker 1>player in the entire sport. But his teammate Mike Trout

0:51:04.040 --> 0:51:06.160
<v Speaker 1>might have something to say about that when he returns

0:51:06.200 --> 0:51:12.560
<v Speaker 1>from injury. But sho Hey Otani is uncomparable, unmatchable.

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:16.720
<v Speaker 2>And just amazing. They've got the two best players in baseball.

0:51:16.840 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 2>I like Mike Trout is This is so weird to say,

0:51:22.719 --> 0:51:26.200
<v Speaker 2>but Mike Trout is better at hitting and fielding than

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Jacob de Gram is at pitching when you combine the two.

0:51:29.239 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 2>So like Mike Trout, I think is a better position

0:51:31.680 --> 0:51:34.320
<v Speaker 2>player than Jacob de Gram is a pitcher, even though

0:51:34.680 --> 0:51:37.640
<v Speaker 2>that's really hard to say, but it's a toss up,

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 2>right I think nobody would make the argument right now

0:51:41.160 --> 0:51:43.360
<v Speaker 2>that Jacob de Gram should be ahead of Mike Trout

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:45.560
<v Speaker 2>if you were putting together your top ten players in

0:51:45.600 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 2>baseball right now. It should not be de Gram over Trout,

0:51:49.000 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 2>but Otani because he's so good at both.

0:51:51.960 --> 0:51:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean he slots in right there, I agree, right,

0:51:55.000 --> 0:51:57.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean we got to see Otani do it for

0:51:57.400 --> 0:51:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit longer, which is reasonable, just gotta see

0:51:59.719 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Tony do for a little longer. But I mean, shit,

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:08.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're starting four home runs, he's pitching three four ninety.

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:12.120
<v Speaker 2>Ra, you're the GM of the Seattle Kraken. Nobody's protected.

0:52:12.160 --> 0:52:14.560
<v Speaker 2>You got this expansion draft coming up, it's show. Hey,

0:52:14.719 --> 0:52:16.279
<v Speaker 2>he's won one. Think about this.

0:52:16.440 --> 0:52:18.520
<v Speaker 1>We had a question on Twitter and we blew up

0:52:18.520 --> 0:52:20.319
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok a little bit. Want your opinion on it.

0:52:21.640 --> 0:52:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Vladimir Gero Junior wins the triple crown shoe Heo Tani

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:32.680
<v Speaker 1>hits fifty home runs, strikes out two hundred guys, steals

0:52:32.719 --> 0:52:36.400
<v Speaker 1>twenty bags. Angels don't make the playoffs, Blue Jays do.

0:52:37.520 --> 0:52:38.280
<v Speaker 1>Who's your MVP?

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Otani? Me too, quickly? Otani? Quickly?

0:52:43.480 --> 0:52:46.520
<v Speaker 1>Otani right? Because I yeah, you give it to vlat

0:52:46.600 --> 0:52:49.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Vladdie. Triple Crown hasn't been done before since

0:52:49.400 --> 0:52:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Migul Cabrera. But I even commented back on the TikTok

0:52:53.520 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 1>because they were saying no one's really ever done the

0:52:55.200 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 1>triple crown instead of Meggia, I was like, name me

0:52:58.239 --> 0:53:01.439
<v Speaker 1>another season where it's where what Otania has been doing

0:53:01.480 --> 0:53:01.919
<v Speaker 1>has been.

0:53:01.800 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 2>Done, Like name me one, because you can't not even

0:53:04.719 --> 0:53:07.600
<v Speaker 2>Babe Ruth. That's also that's not a good take at all,

0:53:07.640 --> 0:53:09.960
<v Speaker 2>Like obviously the triple crown is very rare, but like

0:53:10.040 --> 0:53:12.080
<v Speaker 2>you've got Miggy who just did it at the beginning

0:53:12.080 --> 0:53:14.160
<v Speaker 2>of the twenty tens, and then like obviously you got

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:14.960
<v Speaker 2>to go back to Yaz.

0:53:15.000 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing, you know, but there's some triple crowns where

0:53:17.640 --> 0:53:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it was like forty five home runs, one hundred and

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:21.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty RBIs and three ten like that's been done before.

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:25.160
<v Speaker 2>There's a precedent. There's a precedent for the exactly, there

0:53:25.200 --> 0:53:28.399
<v Speaker 2>is a president. There's no precedent for what Showhy is doing.

0:53:28.800 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 1>No, it's it's like Tom Brady led the league in

0:53:32.120 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>touchdown passes and then went over and led the league

0:53:35.520 --> 0:53:39.520
<v Speaker 1>in interceptions. You can't do it in basketball because they

0:53:39.560 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 1>both there. It's it's uncomparable, it's unmatchable, and we're witnessing greatness.

0:53:44.800 --> 0:53:49.640
<v Speaker 2>We are we're witnessing greatness, and it's the quick twitch movements,

0:53:49.680 --> 0:53:54.319
<v Speaker 2>and it's the fine skills matched with pure athleticism and

0:53:54.360 --> 0:53:57.160
<v Speaker 2>this guy is the most gifted athlete I think the

0:53:57.200 --> 0:54:00.400
<v Speaker 2>world has right now, and on that, I think we

0:54:00.440 --> 0:54:04.640
<v Speaker 2>should wrap up this episode. Thank you everybody,