WEBVTT - Al Gore plans to break the petrostate stranglehold on climate progress

0:00:01.120 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to zero. I am Akshatrati today sewers sanity and solutions.

0:00:20.120 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 2>Here in Dubay.

0:00:21.000 --> 0:00:23.920
<v Speaker 1>Some hundred thousand people have arrived for COP twenty eight

0:00:24.040 --> 0:00:27.960
<v Speaker 1>from all around the world. For many, it's their first COP.

0:00:28.320 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>They have had to grapple with unfamiliar settings, abundant legalies,

0:00:32.440 --> 0:00:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and an intense schedule of meetings. Others have been here

0:00:36.400 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>since the start. COP is familiar ground. That's the case

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>for former US Vice President Al Gore, but he's much

0:00:45.360 --> 0:00:48.400
<v Speaker 1>more than a copcer. Many of today's climate activists have

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 1>told me that Al Gore's movie An Inconvenient Truth was

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>the reason they became activists in the first place. The

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:58.920
<v Speaker 1>movie won an Academy Award in two thousand and seven

0:00:59.200 --> 0:01:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and also bag him that year's Nobel Peace Prize alongside

0:01:03.160 --> 0:01:06.920
<v Speaker 1>the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, and he's been at

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.360
<v Speaker 1>it for much longer. He held hearings on climate change

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in the US Congress as far back as nineteen seventy six.

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Since then, he has become the de facto spokesman for

0:01:18.080 --> 0:01:22.640
<v Speaker 1>climate change. In recent years, and especially before this Climate Conference,

0:01:22.840 --> 0:01:26.000
<v Speaker 1>he's become much more vocal in calling out the villains.

0:01:26.319 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>He has castigated the role of Petro States and all

0:01:29.280 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>companies in shaping the COP agenda, saying they've taken the

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:37.560
<v Speaker 1>disguise off and are not good faith partners. I spoke

0:01:37.600 --> 0:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>with al Gore at the Bloombergreen Summit at COP twenty

0:01:40.120 --> 0:01:42.840
<v Speaker 1>eight in Dubai to ask him how to break the

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:47.639
<v Speaker 1>stranglehold Petro States have over COP, why tackling climate change

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:51.480
<v Speaker 1>solves many other problems, and why big emitters can no

0:01:51.600 --> 0:01:52.360
<v Speaker 1>longer hide.

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:05.520
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Thank you very much, enthusiastic fans of your

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 3>new book.

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>Well, thank you for your time. It's very precious.

0:02:11.919 --> 0:02:12.920
<v Speaker 2>Thank you for inviting me.

0:02:13.080 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Now let's start with something that you make very clear.

0:02:16.160 --> 0:02:19.680
<v Speaker 1>You say we use our atmosphere as a sewer. We

0:02:19.840 --> 0:02:22.800
<v Speaker 1>dump one hundred and sixty two million tons of COEO

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>doing it every day. You're also absolutely clear that COP

0:02:28.480 --> 0:02:32.519
<v Speaker 1>twenty eight must have countries agreeing to phasing out fossil

0:02:32.560 --> 0:02:38.320
<v Speaker 1>fuels without any caveats. But the reason it has taken

0:02:38.400 --> 0:02:42.640
<v Speaker 1>us until COP twenty eight to even talk about phasing

0:02:42.639 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>out fossil fuels is because of what happened at COP

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:49.359
<v Speaker 1>one in Berlin in nineteen ninety five.

0:02:50.320 --> 0:02:50.919
<v Speaker 2>You were there.

0:02:51.880 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>That's when it was decided that the progress at COPS

0:02:54.520 --> 0:02:58.560
<v Speaker 1>can only happen through consensus. Why are we stuck with

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:02.000
<v Speaker 1>this process that only pretty u is the minimum viable

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>progress that every country, including petrostates, agree on.

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:10.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, thank you for inviting me, and thank you for

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:13.160
<v Speaker 3>this question. I want to make a brief passing comment

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 3>about that thin blue line that you referred to. I

0:03:17.880 --> 0:03:21.280
<v Speaker 3>always want to make the point so that it really

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 3>sinks in if anybody hasn't really looked into this, that

0:03:25.919 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 3>thin blue line is blue because that's where the oxygen

0:03:29.280 --> 0:03:32.800
<v Speaker 3>is that refracts the blue light with nitrogen. You've got

0:03:32.800 --> 0:03:34.760
<v Speaker 3>a PhD in this stuff, so I have to be

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:38.880
<v Speaker 3>careful what I say. But if you could drive a

0:03:38.960 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 3>car straight up in the air at interstate highway speed,

0:03:41.720 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 3>you get to the top of it in five to

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 3>seven minutes. You could walk it in an hour. That's

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 3>what we're using as an open sower, and it lingers there.

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:55.640
<v Speaker 3>On average, each molecule stays one hundred years, and the

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 3>accumulated amount now traps as much extra heat as would

0:03:59.760 --> 0:04:03.680
<v Speaker 3>be lease by seven hundred and fifty thousand Erochma class

0:04:03.720 --> 0:04:07.400
<v Speaker 3>atomic bombs exploding on the Earth every twenty four hours.

0:04:07.840 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 3>So it's not a good thing. We need to stop

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.360
<v Speaker 3>doing this. And the reason we've had such difficulty even

0:04:14.480 --> 0:04:19.320
<v Speaker 3>discussing the main problem directly for all of these years.

0:04:19.360 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 3>Since the summer of nineteen ninety two I was in

0:04:22.160 --> 0:04:26.320
<v Speaker 3>Rio at the Earth Summit. It took three years to

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:31.680
<v Speaker 3>organize the first COP. The president was a charismatic young

0:04:32.040 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 3>environment minister from Germany, Angela Merkel, and the first order

0:04:36.640 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 3>of business was to adopt the rules for voting, and

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:46.839
<v Speaker 3>Saudi Arabia objected, and since a consensus was required before

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 3>the rules were adopted, it was laid on the table.

0:04:51.000 --> 0:04:54.120
<v Speaker 3>There was a very famous in those days, very famous

0:04:54.440 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 3>coal lobbyists from the United States named Don Perlman. Never

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 3>speak ill of the department, but he was extremely influential,

0:05:03.880 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 3>really legendary, working hand in glove with the Saudi Arabian delegation.

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 2>And so since the rules could not be.

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:16.760
<v Speaker 3>Adopted over Saudi Arabia's objections, the default procedure was the

0:05:16.839 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 3>requirement for consensus. And the word consensus differs in definition

0:05:24.400 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 3>from unanimity in the eye of the president of the COP.

0:05:29.120 --> 0:05:32.760
<v Speaker 3>So the enormous power wielded by the president of a

0:05:32.800 --> 0:05:38.520
<v Speaker 3>COP any COP comes from the discretion that person has

0:05:38.640 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 3>as the moderator, chair presiding officer to either recognize an

0:05:44.120 --> 0:05:47.520
<v Speaker 3>objection or not. And there have been plenty of times,

0:05:47.600 --> 0:05:51.760
<v Speaker 3>as you know, a shot where Vanuatu or one or

0:05:51.760 --> 0:05:56.320
<v Speaker 3>the other small most threatened nations near the back of

0:05:56.360 --> 0:05:59.040
<v Speaker 3>the chambers waving their arms to object.

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, seeing no injection, so ordered.

0:06:02.440 --> 0:06:07.320
<v Speaker 3>But if the Saudi delegation wherever they are, raises the head,

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 3>no we don't have consensus. Sorry, And so the situation

0:06:12.520 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 3>that leaves our world community in is that we have

0:06:17.080 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 3>to beg for permission from a Petro from the Petro states. Please, sir,

0:06:22.680 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 3>may we protect the future of humanity?

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:25.039
<v Speaker 1>No?

0:06:25.279 --> 0:06:25.599
<v Speaker 2>Sorry?

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:31.000
<v Speaker 3>And yesterday Abdu la Ziz Ben Solomon, the energy minister

0:06:31.600 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 3>in Saudi Arabia, gave an interview on television and RhoD

0:06:35.400 --> 0:06:39.559
<v Speaker 3>and was asked not about a measure to phase out

0:06:39.600 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 3>fossil fuels, which course is what we need, but a

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 3>measure to phase down fossil fuels. Would you accept that?

0:06:45.480 --> 0:06:48.640
<v Speaker 3>He said absolutely not. So here we are once again

0:06:48.800 --> 0:06:51.839
<v Speaker 3>we have to go to the largest Petro state and say,

0:06:52.279 --> 0:06:55.120
<v Speaker 3>may we have your permission to do something to protect

0:06:55.120 --> 0:06:57.320
<v Speaker 3>our grandchildren and all future generations.

0:06:57.480 --> 0:06:59.520
<v Speaker 2>No, absolutely not. Well, you have.

0:06:59.560 --> 0:07:03.760
<v Speaker 1>Said that there is a way to reform this cup process.

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.760
<v Speaker 1>It will require parties to bring a resolution sinx months

0:07:07.800 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>ahead of a COP. Yes, it will require seventy five

0:07:10.760 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>percent of the party, of course, voting in favor to

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>get rid of the consensus and put in place perhaps

0:07:17.440 --> 0:07:20.360
<v Speaker 1>a supermajority or whatever the party's decide, but something that

0:07:20.400 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>is not a consensus. Now do you think that can

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 1>ever happen? Are you pushing for it? And who else

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>needs to be involved to make it happen?

0:07:29.360 --> 0:07:32.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think it's difficult, extremely difficult, but I think

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 3>it is time to push for it because the stakes

0:07:35.160 --> 0:07:38.600
<v Speaker 3>are so high. We have to try every strategy to

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:44.120
<v Speaker 3>save our future. There's a detail that is important to emphasize,

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:50.160
<v Speaker 3>o shot. The amendment has to be to the underlying

0:07:50.840 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 3>treaty from Rio in ninety two. There are those international

0:07:55.800 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 3>lawyers who will hear this proposal for reform, and based

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:01.800
<v Speaker 3>on their none of dealing with these cops, they so, no,

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.200
<v Speaker 3>you can't do that, and they're right. If you just

0:08:05.320 --> 0:08:08.360
<v Speaker 3>try to amend the rules of the particular cop you can't.

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:11.000
<v Speaker 3>But if you go back to the original treaty, all

0:08:11.080 --> 0:08:15.440
<v Speaker 3>of these cops are legally appended to the original treaty,

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:19.480
<v Speaker 3>and if you amend that original treaty, you can put

0:08:19.560 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 3>in a super majority proposal. There are two countries, Papua

0:08:24.080 --> 0:08:29.880
<v Speaker 3>New Guinea and Mexico I believe that have jointly proposed

0:08:29.880 --> 0:08:34.199
<v Speaker 3>this several times in the past. You're really on top

0:08:34.240 --> 0:08:36.320
<v Speaker 3>of this because you've already pointed out it has to

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 3>be laid on the table six months before the COP

0:08:38.600 --> 0:08:41.880
<v Speaker 3>good for you, and it has not been this time.

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:46.280
<v Speaker 3>And of course this is not the president of the

0:08:46.320 --> 0:08:50.320
<v Speaker 3>COP to make this happen, but next time it should

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:54.600
<v Speaker 3>be done. I do plan to argue in favor of that,

0:08:55.240 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 3>and I do plan to do my best to round

0:08:58.080 --> 0:09:00.480
<v Speaker 3>up some advocates who will also do so.

0:09:01.120 --> 0:09:03.719
<v Speaker 1>You've made the case that the hegemonic system we have

0:09:03.840 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>right now that produces the most progress is democratic capitalism.

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.880
<v Speaker 1>We'll come to the democracy part a little later. Let's

0:09:12.920 --> 0:09:17.080
<v Speaker 1>focus on capitalism. After you left politics, you founded Generation

0:09:17.280 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Investment Management. It manages some thirty billion dollars.

0:09:20.880 --> 0:09:23.679
<v Speaker 2>It's forty five not didn't matter.

0:09:27.000 --> 0:09:28.800
<v Speaker 1>Its goal is to show that it's possible to do

0:09:28.880 --> 0:09:32.640
<v Speaker 1>good and to make money. An analysis by my colleague

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Stage ocassion looked at one of those funds where you've

0:09:36.480 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>invested in equities and found that about half of the

0:09:40.120 --> 0:09:43.880
<v Speaker 1>holdings had increase in emissions between twenty fifteen to twenty

0:09:43.920 --> 0:09:46.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty one, which is sort of the post Paris period.

0:09:46.760 --> 0:09:49.400
<v Speaker 1>Now that's not the only thing that's happened. There's been

0:09:49.480 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge political backlash on ESG the very metric that

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.120
<v Speaker 1>we can use to try and correct the problems that

0:09:57.679 --> 0:10:04.160
<v Speaker 1>unfettered capitalism that does not take externalities into consideration could correct.

0:10:04.559 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>But that backlash is causing many of the investors who

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:10.559
<v Speaker 1>could see light, who could figure out, yes, there is

0:10:10.600 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a way in which capitalism isn't a problem for climate change,

0:10:14.960 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>but a solution. So what needs to happen now, how

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>do we figure out whether capitalism can play a positive role?

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 3>The author of climate capitalism, So I'll do my best

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 3>to have this exchange with you. First of all, they're

0:10:33.920 --> 0:10:37.839
<v Speaker 3>two fund Dublin and London, and sometimes the numbers are

0:10:37.880 --> 0:10:41.480
<v Speaker 3>you have to add them both together. But in any case,

0:10:43.760 --> 0:10:47.720
<v Speaker 3>I co founded it with my partner David blood And

0:10:48.559 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 3>who was the CEO of Goldman's Access at Management for

0:10:52.240 --> 0:10:56.080
<v Speaker 3>eleven years, and other partners.

0:10:56.600 --> 0:10:57.360
<v Speaker 2>There's an old jog.

0:10:57.440 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 3>But it's literally true that I wanted to the business

0:11:00.679 --> 0:11:04.160
<v Speaker 3>blood and gore, But the other partners I mean.

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 2>Instant brand recognition, I mean, you know, come on.

0:11:11.520 --> 0:11:14.320
<v Speaker 3>But the other our other co founders were not really

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.720
<v Speaker 3>enthusiastic about it. But the whole theory is to invest

0:11:19.240 --> 0:11:24.840
<v Speaker 3>completely through the sustainability lens. Now on the large subject

0:11:24.880 --> 0:11:27.559
<v Speaker 3>you've rave stockshot and that you've studied and written about

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:28.280
<v Speaker 3>so eloquently.

0:11:29.840 --> 0:11:30.600
<v Speaker 2>I have some.

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:38.360
<v Speaker 3>Idiosyncratic views about this. First of all, I am a capitalist,

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:43.480
<v Speaker 3>and I do believe that capitalism is in a way

0:11:43.559 --> 0:11:46.439
<v Speaker 3>a bit like gravity in the sense that it's always

0:11:46.600 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 3>there and always has been, and to pretend otherwise is

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 3>a waste of time. I think they're thoughtful people who disagree.

0:11:55.600 --> 0:11:58.600
<v Speaker 3>But the you know, the the alternatives to the left

0:11:58.640 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 3>and right of of market capitalism that we're tried in

0:12:02.120 --> 0:12:05.360
<v Speaker 3>the twentieth century did not really work out too well.

0:12:05.440 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 3>And I do think that with reforms, capitalism is the

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 3>most useful tool to solve the climate crisis in North

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:19.120
<v Speaker 3>America and the European Union, well in North America. If

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.880
<v Speaker 3>you look at all of the capital that's been spent

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:25.319
<v Speaker 3>to deploy solar and wind ninety six percent of it

0:12:25.400 --> 0:12:31.160
<v Speaker 3>is from the private sector, only four percent from public funding. Now,

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 3>because of the unequal access to private lending in developing countries,

0:12:36.760 --> 0:12:41.560
<v Speaker 3>because of currency valuation, fluctuation risk and other country risks,

0:12:42.000 --> 0:12:47.439
<v Speaker 3>those percentages are often reversed. In Nigeria, only fourteen percent

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:51.120
<v Speaker 3>is from the capital is from private capital. For the

0:12:51.440 --> 0:12:56.000
<v Speaker 3>renewable energy revolution, eighty six percent has to come from

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 3>governments and they don't have it. So we need to

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 3>reform the acts to borrowing capacity for developing countries. But

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:08.600
<v Speaker 3>the reforms need to go much deeper than that. If

0:13:08.640 --> 0:13:11.440
<v Speaker 3>you'll give me, if you'll let me have just a

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:17.560
<v Speaker 3>moment on this. In the interwar period, in nineteen thirty seven,

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 3>when economists were trying to give policymakers better tools to

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:29.280
<v Speaker 3>avoid another great depression, a great legendary economists named Simon

0:13:29.400 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Kuznets came up with what are referred to as the

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 3>national accounts, and most corporate accounting categories are derived from

0:13:36.920 --> 0:13:41.000
<v Speaker 3>the national accounts, and it was a brilliant piece of work.

0:13:42.000 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 3>But when he received his many prizes and awards, he

0:13:45.920 --> 0:13:50.640
<v Speaker 3>made speeches and said, please do not use this system,

0:13:50.720 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 3>these national accounts as a guide for national economic policy

0:13:54.679 --> 0:13:57.800
<v Speaker 3>because it leaves too much out. And then seven years

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:02.480
<v Speaker 3>later in Bretton Woods it was completely codified and we

0:14:02.559 --> 0:14:04.760
<v Speaker 3>still use it. It's sort of like the old quirty

0:14:04.880 --> 0:14:08.560
<v Speaker 3>keyboard on the typewriters. It makes no sense, but it's

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 3>a difficult thing to change.

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:13.120
<v Speaker 1>This is the gross domestic product that we use the economics.

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 3>The version of it that is that is best known.

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 3>But he said what is left out? Four and four

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 3>categories of value, And of course these accounting categories are

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:27.680
<v Speaker 3>how we determine and decide what is valuable in our

0:14:27.760 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 3>lives and in the economy. What's left out The first

0:14:30.680 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 3>is fairly well known. It's almost a buzzphrase, negative externalities.

0:14:35.800 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 3>All of the global warming pollution is a negative externality.

0:14:40.440 --> 0:14:44.600
<v Speaker 3>It's not included in the accounting categories government or corporate.

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.160
<v Speaker 3>The second thing that's left out is a little bit

0:14:48.720 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 3>is less well known, positive externalities. Now, what's that If

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:58.840
<v Speaker 3>a community invests in mental health care, that's an expense

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 3>on the town budget. When the benefits of that care,

0:15:03.200 --> 0:15:07.240
<v Speaker 3>if it's delivered well, come rolling back in in the

0:15:07.360 --> 0:15:11.640
<v Speaker 3>years and even decades afterwards, that is not counted as income.

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 2>So the structural bias is to avoid.

0:15:16.400 --> 0:15:19.800
<v Speaker 3>The expense because you're not getting any income as a result.

0:15:19.880 --> 0:15:25.680
<v Speaker 3>The third category is depletion of natural resources. Now there

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:29.000
<v Speaker 3>are three categories that really exemplify this part of the problem.

0:15:29.800 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 3>Underground water, aquifers, out of sight, out of mind, soon

0:15:34.640 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 3>out of water, topsoil. We are still losing enormous amounts

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 3>of very valuable top soil that can only be replaced

0:15:43.840 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 3>over centuries. And then, most important of all, the web

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 3>of living species of which we humans are a part.

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 3>We're in the middle of a great extinction crisis, and

0:15:55.000 --> 0:15:57.600
<v Speaker 3>by some estimates, we could lose fifty percent of the

0:15:57.640 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 3>living species with which we share this earth in the

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:01.320
<v Speaker 3>century on our watch.

0:16:01.760 --> 0:16:02.800
<v Speaker 2>That can't be good.

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:07.560
<v Speaker 3>And the fourth thing that's left out is the distribution

0:16:07.960 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 3>of incomes and net worths, which are affected profoundly by

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 3>things like tax policy and regulatory policy. So if all

0:16:19.440 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 3>four of those things are left out, you get this

0:16:21.800 --> 0:16:26.880
<v Speaker 3>anomaly where oh, GDP went up three percent. Oh my gosh,

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 3>look this country has gone up five percent. Yay, big cheers,

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:35.320
<v Speaker 3>But it's accompanied by vast increases in global warming pollution,

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:42.520
<v Speaker 3>chronic under investment in public goods like education and healthcare,

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 3>and mental health care, and environmental protection, reckless depreciation of groundwater,

0:16:48.880 --> 0:16:54.080
<v Speaker 3>top soil, and the fraying of the biodiversity. So GDP

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:57.320
<v Speaker 3>goes up and people celebrate, and it's accompanied by all

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:01.200
<v Speaker 3>these bad things, plus the emergence of inequality that has

0:17:01.400 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 3>morphed into hyper inequality. And when the vast majority of

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:10.440
<v Speaker 3>income goes to the top one tenth of one percent

0:17:11.080 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 3>and the average middle class and most countries have no

0:17:16.280 --> 0:17:20.720
<v Speaker 3>inflation adjusted increase in income for forty five years, they

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 3>vote for some demagogic, populist authoritarian of which there are

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:29.600
<v Speaker 3>too many running around these days, including I'm embarrassed to

0:17:29.680 --> 0:17:32.680
<v Speaker 3>say back in my country.

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Well you knew I was going to ask you a

0:17:43.560 --> 0:17:47.160
<v Speaker 1>democracy question. Next, we are sitting here in a Petro

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>state which is done arguably more in the region move

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:55.200
<v Speaker 1>away from fossil fuels than other countries, yet a little

0:17:55.240 --> 0:17:58.399
<v Speaker 1>less than thirty percent of its flawed grows to messages

0:17:58.400 --> 0:17:59.120
<v Speaker 1>when you might say.

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.560
<v Speaker 3>They've moved away more away from Well, can't you write

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 3>the story that said maz dar has is not operating

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 3>twenty gigawatts of renewables but only three point two gigawats?

0:18:10.520 --> 0:18:13.359
<v Speaker 2>Did I did? I just wanted double check that.

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Compared to southi Arabia moving right, A.

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:26.919
<v Speaker 2>Compared to Saudi.

0:18:26.680 --> 0:18:31.640
<v Speaker 1>Arabia, the UAE gets its income goes domestic product lower yes,

0:18:31.680 --> 0:18:36.119
<v Speaker 1>low bar, so a lower bar. The US, on the

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>other hand, gets only three percent of his gross domestic

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>product from fossil fields. Yet when the Republican Party is

0:18:42.560 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>in power, it acts like a petro state it does

0:18:46.040 --> 0:18:50.399
<v Speaker 1>on climate change. So big question, what needs to be

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 1>done to fix the democratic crisis in the US, second

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest polluter annually, largest polluter historically, to make it a

0:18:59.359 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 1>credible power during the climate fight, not just under Joe

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Biden's leadership but every president.

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:09.439
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, yeah, yeah. My country is the largest producer of

0:19:09.440 --> 0:19:12.640
<v Speaker 3>oil now and largest producer of gas as well, more

0:19:12.680 --> 0:19:17.200
<v Speaker 3>oil and Saudi Arabia more gas than cover. But there

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 3>is a transition underway and the ira is, as most

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:27.680
<v Speaker 3>understand by far the best and biggest climate legislation any

0:19:27.680 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 3>countries ever passed. But to your larger question, Oxshot, alongside

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 3>the climate crisis, we also have a democracy crisis. I've

0:19:38.320 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 3>tried to understand the causes of this. They are many,

0:19:43.520 --> 0:19:47.840
<v Speaker 3>and I believe that the forgive, forgive, the geeky phrase.

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 3>The information ecosystem within which a self government government takes

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:59.680
<v Speaker 3>place is really important, and the institutions of representative democracy

0:20:00.359 --> 0:20:04.520
<v Speaker 3>innovated in the United States were constructed during the age

0:20:04.560 --> 0:20:09.720
<v Speaker 3>of the printing press. The shift from an information ecosystem

0:20:09.760 --> 0:20:14.920
<v Speaker 3>based on print to one based on broadcasting, and then

0:20:15.080 --> 0:20:19.360
<v Speaker 3>moving on to the Internet and to social media has

0:20:19.520 --> 0:20:26.720
<v Speaker 3>disrupted the balances that used to exist that made representative

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:34.400
<v Speaker 3>democracy work much better. These centralized information systems tempt autocrats

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:39.800
<v Speaker 3>to control information. You know, Hitler's book The Triumph of

0:20:39.840 --> 0:20:47.000
<v Speaker 3>the Will implies a question triumph over what. One thing

0:20:47.040 --> 0:20:52.600
<v Speaker 3>that triumphs over is the authority of knowledge because a free,

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:58.840
<v Speaker 3>self governing people rely on a shared base of knowledge

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:04.960
<v Speaker 3>that nerves as a basis for reasoning together collectively. But

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:10.960
<v Speaker 3>if you have social media that is dominated by algorithms

0:21:11.800 --> 0:21:16.399
<v Speaker 3>that pull people down these rabbit holes that are a

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 3>bit like picture plants. These algorithms, they are the digital

0:21:21.560 --> 0:21:24.520
<v Speaker 3>equivalent of ar fifteens. They ought to be banned. They

0:21:24.560 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 3>really ought to be banned. It's an abuse of the

0:21:28.160 --> 0:21:32.320
<v Speaker 3>public forum. But these when people are pulled down these

0:21:32.640 --> 0:21:34.879
<v Speaker 3>rabbit holes, you know what's at the bottom of the

0:21:34.960 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 3>rabbit hole. That's where the echo chamber is. And if

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:43.160
<v Speaker 3>you spend too much time in the echo chamber, what's

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:47.880
<v Speaker 3>weaponized is another form of AI, not artificial intelligence, artificial insanity.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:55.919
<v Speaker 3>I'm serious, I'm serious. Q Andon is just the best

0:21:56.000 --> 0:22:03.359
<v Speaker 3>known version of artificial insanity. These devices are the enemies

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.560
<v Speaker 3>of self government and they're the enemies of democracy. We

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:12.199
<v Speaker 3>need reforms for both democracy and capitalism. Both sets of

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:13.400
<v Speaker 3>reforms are possible.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.880
<v Speaker 1>Well, it seems tacking climate change might be actually easier

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:19.320
<v Speaker 1>than trying to figure out how to fix democracy.

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 3>Well, we hear this new word poly crisis, so many

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 3>different crises.

0:22:27.200 --> 0:22:27.800
<v Speaker 2>I think that.

0:22:30.320 --> 0:22:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Solving climate change is a poly solution, and I really

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 3>believe that because we have a shared planetary priority to

0:22:42.440 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 3>save humanity's future, we are in way more danger right

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:51.880
<v Speaker 3>now than most people realize. You're probably aware that one

0:22:51.920 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 3>and a half million people in East Africa are forced

0:22:55.080 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 3>from their homes today by another of the rain bombs.

0:22:59.520 --> 0:23:04.960
<v Speaker 3>That's the wreck consequence, much worse because of the climate crisis.

0:23:05.520 --> 0:23:09.200
<v Speaker 3>You may be aware that this summer here in Dubai,

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:14.679
<v Speaker 3>the feels like temperatures, the combination of temperature and humidity

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:18.919
<v Speaker 3>have been up to sixty degrees sixty two degrees in

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:23.440
<v Speaker 3>China last years temperature ever. But we are now seeing

0:23:23.640 --> 0:23:28.120
<v Speaker 3>a very real and present danger of a billion climate

0:23:28.200 --> 0:23:33.000
<v Speaker 3>refugees crossing international borders to escape conditions that the scientists

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:39.880
<v Speaker 3>tell us are becoming physiologically unlivable. And if this authoritarian

0:23:40.440 --> 0:23:44.880
<v Speaker 3>populism is provoked by a few million climate refugees coming

0:23:44.880 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 3>from the Eastern Mediterranean to Hungary and orban Land and whatever,

0:23:50.480 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 3>what about a billion, which is what the Lancet projects,

0:23:53.320 --> 0:23:57.400
<v Speaker 3>may be possible. So I honestly think that getting our

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:02.040
<v Speaker 3>collective act together in order to solve the climate crisis

0:24:02.359 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 3>could be the engine that pulls solutions for democracy and

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.560
<v Speaker 3>capitalism and the other the extinction crisis, Because if we

0:24:11.800 --> 0:24:18.200
<v Speaker 3>can reconstruct an ability to share a common base of

0:24:18.359 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 3>accepted knowledge and reason together towards solutions for our crises,

0:24:24.000 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 3>I think that is the pathway to restoration of sanity

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:28.639
<v Speaker 3>and self governance.

0:24:28.920 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 2>Thank you.

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>That's where our on stage conversation at the Bloomberg Green

0:24:37.240 --> 0:24:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Summit finished, but I was able to get some more

0:24:40.080 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 1>time with Al Gore backstage. That's coming up after the break.

0:24:53.000 --> 0:24:55.679
<v Speaker 1>One follow up question from something we talked about on stage.

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>We talked about moving to a supermajority system in the

0:24:58.960 --> 0:25:03.320
<v Speaker 1>cup process, but not having a consensus, which is the

0:25:03.359 --> 0:25:07.240
<v Speaker 1>current state, could also cause the process to be less

0:25:07.280 --> 0:25:11.200
<v Speaker 1>credible than say, the Paras agreement, which was achieved through consensus.

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Do you foresee if there is a reform, as you

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:20.840
<v Speaker 1>argue for, that cobs become even more irrelevant than they

0:25:20.920 --> 0:25:21.600
<v Speaker 1>already are.

0:25:22.160 --> 0:25:26.199
<v Speaker 3>I think they could become more controversial and difficult. But

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:28.879
<v Speaker 3>the old saying you got to break some eggs to

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:30.560
<v Speaker 3>make an omelet applies.

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:31.600
<v Speaker 2>In my view.

0:25:32.119 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 3>This isn't working. This isn't working. We have seen a dramatic,

0:25:36.840 --> 0:25:41.600
<v Speaker 3>almost miraculous rise in the deployment of solar and wind

0:25:41.680 --> 0:25:46.560
<v Speaker 3>electricity and electric vehicles and batteries, and regenerative agriculture is

0:25:46.600 --> 0:25:50.679
<v Speaker 3>not far behind, and maybe green hydrogen as well. But

0:25:50.840 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 3>we're still increasing the burning of fossil fuels every year

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 3>and that simply got to stop. And if this go along,

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:01.080
<v Speaker 3>get along, consensus begging permission from the Petro States is

0:26:01.119 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 3>not producing solutions. We have to change the process. Too

0:26:04.280 --> 0:26:07.600
<v Speaker 3>much is at stake. We can't just go along to

0:26:07.680 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 3>get along forever. There have been twenty eight of these

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:13.840
<v Speaker 3>cops now and the emissions are still going up every

0:26:14.000 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 3>single year except for the pandemic, and then they went

0:26:16.760 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 3>right back up up again after that. We can't continue this.

0:26:21.600 --> 0:26:24.320
<v Speaker 3>You know the old cliche. If you keep doing the

0:26:24.359 --> 0:26:28.240
<v Speaker 3>same thing over and over again getting the same terrible result,

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:32.119
<v Speaker 3>that's a definition of insanity. And we have to change

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 3>this process now.

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:36.000
<v Speaker 1>In preparation for this interview, we watched a lot of

0:26:36.040 --> 0:26:38.600
<v Speaker 1>your interviews, a lot of your podcast chats. One of

0:26:38.640 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>the things that I've seen has changed. You're a communicator

0:26:42.720 --> 0:26:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of science bar none. You're able to channel scientists and

0:26:46.359 --> 0:26:49.679
<v Speaker 1>get the message across like no other. But you have

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>also become angry. If I can say that your speeches

0:26:55.280 --> 0:26:58.919
<v Speaker 1>have become so powerful, what has changed in this time

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>of you trying to get the climate message out there.

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:07.679
<v Speaker 3>I would not use the word anger. I would be

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:13.160
<v Speaker 3>comfortable with the word passionate. And I guess I can

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.600
<v Speaker 3>fully understand why some of it may come across this anger.

0:27:17.119 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 3>Maybe I need to dial that back a little bit,

0:27:19.440 --> 0:27:23.680
<v Speaker 3>But whatever word you use to describe it, the reason

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:29.639
<v Speaker 3>why I have been a lot more passionate in recent years,

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:34.400
<v Speaker 3>I guess is because we're running out of time. It's

0:27:34.440 --> 0:27:39.040
<v Speaker 3>that simple. Really. I was raised in a family and

0:27:39.200 --> 0:27:45.879
<v Speaker 3>in a country that gave me the belief that reasonable

0:27:45.920 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 3>people could discuss facts and attempt to come to some

0:27:53.080 --> 0:27:56.159
<v Speaker 3>mutual agreement about what's more likely to be true than not,

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:02.800
<v Speaker 3>and then, after a discourse and the full airing of disagreements,

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:09.199
<v Speaker 3>come to enough of a mutual understanding to use that

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:14.000
<v Speaker 3>as a basis for collective action. In my faith tradition,

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:19.120
<v Speaker 3>there is the saying, come, let us reason together. And

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:23.080
<v Speaker 3>what we've witnessed, at least in my country, and I

0:28:23.119 --> 0:28:26.439
<v Speaker 3>see it in quite a few others as well in

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 3>recent years, is what seems to be a very cynical

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 3>use by powerful corporations and individuals sometimes to manipulate the

0:28:39.800 --> 0:28:44.800
<v Speaker 3>ways in which information is presented in the public square

0:28:45.160 --> 0:28:50.840
<v Speaker 3>and to distort it, and then, with repetition through advertising,

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:57.640
<v Speaker 3>to try to manhandle the process that used to be

0:28:57.760 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 3>more organic and you used to result in the emergence

0:29:01.960 --> 0:29:07.240
<v Speaker 3>of agreement. I'll give you an example when the scientists

0:29:07.240 --> 0:29:13.719
<v Speaker 3>and doctors decades ago found out that smoking cigarettes causes

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:20.480
<v Speaker 3>lung cancer. That's the kind of new knowledge that used

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 3>to serve as the basis for discussion and then mutual commitment.

0:29:25.920 --> 0:29:30.880
<v Speaker 3>But the tobacco companies in response to a famous surgeon

0:29:30.920 --> 0:29:36.320
<v Speaker 3>general's report in the US hired actors and dressed them

0:29:36.400 --> 0:29:39.959
<v Speaker 3>up to pretend to be doctors and put them on

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 3>camera with their white coats and stethoscopes, and had them

0:29:45.040 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 3>look into the camera and with all of the affected

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:54.880
<v Speaker 3>sincerity they could muster with their theatrical skills reassure people

0:29:54.880 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 3>that there were no health consequences at all, and one

0:29:57.840 --> 0:30:02.960
<v Speaker 3>hundred million people died. The same pr firms that came

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:07.560
<v Speaker 3>up with that strategy are now advising Exon Mobile and

0:30:07.680 --> 0:30:12.040
<v Speaker 3>Saudi Arabia and the team managing COP twenty eight.

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>We are now on day six of this coon and

0:30:15.320 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>yet there has been progress, or at least seemingly progressed.

0:30:19.160 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>There's a loss and damage fund. There's all this money

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.120
<v Speaker 1>being announced, which as investigative journalists we will find out

0:30:24.120 --> 0:30:27.760
<v Speaker 1>whether it's real or not. But those shiny objects are

0:30:27.800 --> 0:30:31.440
<v Speaker 1>being thrown at you. You've been part of these negotiations.

0:30:31.960 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>They are delicate, they require consensus. As we talked through it,

0:30:35.840 --> 0:30:39.280
<v Speaker 1>What does the moment as we stand now tell us

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 1>about how the next ten days are going to play

0:30:41.920 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 1>out before we do hopefully get a fossil fuel phase

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:46.640
<v Speaker 1>out agreed on.

0:30:47.080 --> 0:30:52.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's talk about some of what you describe as progress.

0:30:52.040 --> 0:30:55.840
<v Speaker 3>And example a you used was the loss and Damage fund.

0:30:57.040 --> 0:30:59.960
<v Speaker 3>I'm in favor of establishing the loss and damage fund.

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:04.480
<v Speaker 3>It was really essentially adopted last year charmel shake. So

0:31:04.600 --> 0:31:08.120
<v Speaker 3>it's pulled out again to recycle the appearance of victory.

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 3>So does that make it a huge victory or a

0:31:12.480 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 3>bright shiny object that distracts us from job number one?

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 3>Job number one is to phase out fossil fuels. The

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 3>climate crisis is a fossil fuel crisis, and all of

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 3>the time that we spend talking about something other than

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 3>that is first and foremost a distraction from the moral duty.

0:31:31.080 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 3>I think this cop has to start phasing out fossil

0:31:34.320 --> 0:31:38.040
<v Speaker 3>fuels as quickly as possible. And this whole discussion about

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.200
<v Speaker 3>unabated fossil fuels, as the Secretary of General said in

0:31:42.240 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 3>his opening speech, no abatement as they describe it as

0:31:47.440 --> 0:31:52.520
<v Speaker 3>the technologies now available make define it.

0:31:51.640 --> 0:31:52.280
<v Speaker 2>Is a ruse.

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:57.480
<v Speaker 3>Really, it's a you know, Oxford University conducted a massive

0:31:57.560 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 3>study of the phenomenon known as Wright's law, the cost

0:32:02.320 --> 0:32:06.600
<v Speaker 3>reduction curves for technologies, and we've seen in our lives,

0:32:06.640 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 3>some stunning examples, the mobile phones, the flat screen TVs,

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 3>not to mention computer chips, and so they studied all

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:16.760
<v Speaker 3>of them and some go down and cost very rapidly,

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.040
<v Speaker 3>some a bit slowly. They have a very small category

0:32:20.680 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 3>labeled non improving technologies. That's the category that carbon capture

0:32:26.760 --> 0:32:31.200
<v Speaker 3>and sequestration is in. For fifty years, there's been zero

0:32:31.640 --> 0:32:35.600
<v Speaker 3>reduction in cost for carbon capture and sequestration. So any

0:32:36.160 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 3>expectation of a magical breakthrough that brings the cost down,

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:48.160
<v Speaker 3>while not impossible. We've seen some surprising things in our lives,

0:32:48.440 --> 0:32:50.160
<v Speaker 3>but it's not likely.

0:32:50.720 --> 0:32:53.080
<v Speaker 1>The president of COPP has been the CEO of oil

0:32:53.120 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>company from the day he was announced as the cop president.

0:32:56.760 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>There's been plenty of pushback from civil society, some from politicians,

0:33:01.120 --> 0:33:04.440
<v Speaker 1>but none from the very diplomats who have to work

0:33:04.480 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>with him to try and get a deal. First, why

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.000
<v Speaker 1>was there not a push back from the diplomats? And second,

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:15.160
<v Speaker 1>where does that leave us for getting a fossil fuel

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:16.720
<v Speaker 1>phase out in the final community.

0:33:17.600 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, first of all, there was pushback, I mean I

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:24.520
<v Speaker 3>objected to it immediately, and one hundred and thirty elected officials,

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:30.520
<v Speaker 3>primarily from Europe and the United States drafted and signed

0:33:30.520 --> 0:33:34.400
<v Speaker 3>a very powerful letter objecting to it. But the process

0:33:34.480 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 3>by which the leadership of these cops is selected is

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:44.360
<v Speaker 3>itself in need of reform. It rotates between the different

0:33:44.720 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>regions of the world as they're defined by the United Nations,

0:33:48.040 --> 0:33:52.160
<v Speaker 3>and then there is a kind of competition between countries

0:33:52.240 --> 0:33:56.200
<v Speaker 3>in the region whose turn it is. The Republic of

0:33:56.320 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 3>Korea was the competition for the UAE. A lot of

0:34:00.680 --> 0:34:03.560
<v Speaker 3>deals were made between the UAE and career You aware

0:34:03.560 --> 0:34:07.400
<v Speaker 3>of that. Oh, you might look at the massive oil

0:34:07.440 --> 0:34:11.920
<v Speaker 3>storage facility placed by the UAE and South Korea, millions

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 3>of barrels, giving them first to purchase. You might look

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:18.040
<v Speaker 3>at the massive investment fund established by the UE and

0:34:18.280 --> 0:34:21.279
<v Speaker 3>South Korea. You might look at the military training relationships

0:34:21.280 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 3>that were established. And I really and truly do not

0:34:24.600 --> 0:34:28.680
<v Speaker 3>know for a fact that all of those deals and

0:34:28.760 --> 0:34:32.160
<v Speaker 3>all of that money had anything to do with Korea's

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:37.640
<v Speaker 3>surprising decision to withdraw from the competition and leave the

0:34:37.760 --> 0:34:40.480
<v Speaker 3>UAE as the only candidate. I do not know that.

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:44.359
<v Speaker 3>I do suspect that the Petro States, and they're not

0:34:44.400 --> 0:34:47.080
<v Speaker 3>the only ones, but the Petro States play these games

0:34:47.120 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 3>at a very high level look at the World Cup

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:58.760
<v Speaker 3>for football. Why is it that the day the surprising

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:03.000
<v Speaker 3>change in the regional rotation was announced, only one country

0:35:03.160 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 3>was prepared with a bid. No one else knew it

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:13.160
<v Speaker 3>was coming. In time, similar shenanigans take place in the

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:16.120
<v Speaker 3>selection of who's going to host these cops, and once

0:35:16.160 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 3>the country is selected, then that country has the authority

0:35:20.880 --> 0:35:23.600
<v Speaker 3>to name the president of the COP. I believe that

0:35:24.200 --> 0:35:28.320
<v Speaker 3>the UN Secretary General should share the authority for naming

0:35:28.360 --> 0:35:31.400
<v Speaker 3>the COP. Now the Secretary General doesn't want that authority,

0:35:31.440 --> 0:35:35.920
<v Speaker 3>and I'm sympathetic with his desire not to be involved

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:38.560
<v Speaker 3>with it, but I think we have to change this process.

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:43.120
<v Speaker 3>It's just not fit for purpose. We're now struggling. We

0:35:43.160 --> 0:35:44.920
<v Speaker 3>don't know where the next COP is going to be

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:50.239
<v Speaker 3>because another petro state, Russia, has objected to country after

0:35:50.320 --> 0:35:53.920
<v Speaker 3>country in Eastern Europe. Maybe Serbia will emerge as an

0:35:53.960 --> 0:35:59.120
<v Speaker 3>acceptable host, and then after that is Brazil, which is

0:35:59.160 --> 0:36:02.640
<v Speaker 3>on site, and then perhaps Australia. I think that's the

0:36:03.280 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 3>favored candidate. With the Pacific Island nations.

0:36:06.680 --> 0:36:09.319
<v Speaker 1>We're going into a period which is now less than

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:15.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve months, when President Biden is likely to rerun for election,

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:20.920
<v Speaker 1>probably against Donald Trump, and politics goes here and there.

0:36:21.120 --> 0:36:24.480
<v Speaker 1>You have the experience of that, but we also have

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:29.560
<v Speaker 1>finite time shrinking time. If you don't get Joe Biden reelected,

0:36:29.640 --> 0:36:32.839
<v Speaker 1>if you don't have a Democratic presidency, there is likely

0:36:32.880 --> 0:36:38.319
<v Speaker 1>going to be backsliding on climate probably pretty disastrous backsliding.

0:36:38.920 --> 0:36:41.400
<v Speaker 1>What is it in the next twelve months that you

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>think the Democratic Party and President Biden needs to do

0:36:46.160 --> 0:36:48.120
<v Speaker 1>to ensure that he gets re elected.

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:51.920
<v Speaker 3>Well, I should start by telling you that I am

0:36:51.960 --> 0:36:54.719
<v Speaker 3>a strong supporter of Joe Biden, and I think that

0:36:55.280 --> 0:36:58.680
<v Speaker 3>by any objective assessment, he's done a really good job

0:36:58.920 --> 0:37:02.680
<v Speaker 3>as president. But if you look at the pandemic and

0:37:02.840 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 3>the reorganization of supply chains, that s lasted a long

0:37:07.800 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 3>time in the wake of the pandemic and the inflation

0:37:10.840 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 3>that resulted. Inflation has come down dramatically, but the political

0:37:15.600 --> 0:37:20.040
<v Speaker 3>perception of inflation has a very long tail, and I

0:37:20.080 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 3>think that is one of the major reasons why he's

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:27.800
<v Speaker 3>not showing up as well as people like me would

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 3>like in the public opinion polls. It's also important to

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:33.239
<v Speaker 3>say that a year away from the election, there have

0:37:33.280 --> 0:37:35.640
<v Speaker 3>been many in common presidents who were in this kind

0:37:35.719 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 3>of political shape in the polling and a year later

0:37:39.200 --> 0:37:43.960
<v Speaker 3>one reelection. But I'm not going to dodge your question, Oxshot.

0:37:44.120 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 3>It's a definite prospect that this election might not turn

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:51.319
<v Speaker 3>out as most of us would like it to. And

0:37:52.040 --> 0:37:55.080
<v Speaker 3>what we should do in the meantime, those of us

0:37:55.400 --> 0:37:58.000
<v Speaker 3>like myself who are have at least one foot in

0:37:58.040 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 3>the political arena, needs to pull out all stops and

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:02.759
<v Speaker 3>help oh Biden get realcted.

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:05.960
<v Speaker 1>One of the initiatives you work on is Climate Trace.

0:38:06.400 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>It gives you information now much more granular on who

0:38:10.400 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 1>are the people producing CO two emissions. You've got satellite measurement,

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:19.040
<v Speaker 1>which means not many people can hide from this. But

0:38:19.080 --> 0:38:24.920
<v Speaker 1>you're also one who've said that facts alone don't change people.

0:38:25.360 --> 0:38:27.319
<v Speaker 1>So how do you square the circle that, yes, we

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>do need more transparency, we need more data to make

0:38:31.080 --> 0:38:34.399
<v Speaker 1>better decisions or convince more people about it. And yet,

0:38:34.440 --> 0:38:38.640
<v Speaker 1>if facts alone aren't going to convince people, why do

0:38:38.719 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>we pursue the path of getting more and more data

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:44.240
<v Speaker 1>to try and get people.

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.719
<v Speaker 3>Well, let's put this in perspective. Why would a company

0:38:49.040 --> 0:38:53.920
<v Speaker 3>go to the Climate Trace database in search of lower

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:59.960
<v Speaker 3>carbon emitting suppliers in their supply chain, not simply because

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 3>the facts are there, but it's important that the facts

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:09.439
<v Speaker 3>are there when they get pressure from their consumers, from

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:15.720
<v Speaker 3>their employees, from their executives, from the families of the executives,

0:39:16.040 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 3>from people all over the world who are increasingly aware

0:39:20.520 --> 0:39:23.640
<v Speaker 3>that we are in grave danger unless we sharply reduce

0:39:23.920 --> 0:39:29.080
<v Speaker 3>carbon emissions. So it's the combination of public, social, and

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:33.359
<v Speaker 3>economic pressure to get with the program and start being

0:39:33.400 --> 0:39:36.360
<v Speaker 3>part of the solution to the climate crisis that makes

0:39:36.440 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 3>these facts from Climate Trace valuable because the incentive to

0:39:42.080 --> 0:39:46.960
<v Speaker 3>use the facts is present because of activists, and this

0:39:47.040 --> 0:39:52.200
<v Speaker 3>is now the largest social movement in the history of

0:39:52.280 --> 0:39:55.680
<v Speaker 3>the world. There are young people and people of all

0:39:55.719 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 3>ages in every nation in the world. Some of the

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.919
<v Speaker 3>tatorships like North Korea, you don't see them as much,

0:40:02.960 --> 0:40:06.279
<v Speaker 3>but even there, I can tell you why. I know

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 3>that everywhere in the world there is rising pressure. We

0:40:12.040 --> 0:40:18.839
<v Speaker 3>as human beings have many limitations, many weaknesses, many legacies

0:40:18.880 --> 0:40:23.319
<v Speaker 3>of our long period of evolutionary development. We respond to

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 3>the threats that our ancient ancestors survived using our neocortex

0:40:28.280 --> 0:40:31.480
<v Speaker 3>and our reasoning capacity to communicate with one another about

0:40:31.680 --> 0:40:36.040
<v Speaker 3>more complex challenges and finding the solutions. So that takes time,

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:41.640
<v Speaker 3>but we have the capacity to rise above our limitations.

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 3>And you know how, I know that we've done it

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:48.560
<v Speaker 3>in the past, when the anti apartheid movement was successful,

0:40:48.560 --> 0:40:52.520
<v Speaker 3>the civil rights movement in my country, giving women the

0:40:52.640 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 3>right to vote, Educating women didn't used.

0:40:55.680 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 2>To be possible.

0:40:56.440 --> 0:40:59.279
<v Speaker 3>Now sixty five percent of the college graduates in the

0:40:59.480 --> 0:41:03.959
<v Speaker 3>UAE in Saudi Arabia are women. These social movements all

0:41:04.000 --> 0:41:08.720
<v Speaker 3>have one thing in common. After the distractions are cleared

0:41:08.760 --> 0:41:12.680
<v Speaker 3>away and the central choice is revealed as a choice

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:15.759
<v Speaker 3>between what's right and what's wrong, then at a very

0:41:15.840 --> 0:41:20.000
<v Speaker 3>deep level, the outcome becomes fore ordained because of who

0:41:20.080 --> 0:41:25.239
<v Speaker 3>we are in our deepest core. And this climate crisis

0:41:25.640 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 3>is now presenting us with an approaching political tipping point

0:41:30.560 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 3>where I'm convinced where we will have enough of a

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:36.919
<v Speaker 3>global consensus to take action.

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:41.200
<v Speaker 1>Now, this has been a tremendous conversation. We've talked about

0:41:41.480 --> 0:41:44.359
<v Speaker 1>a number of subjects anything to do with climate. Given

0:41:44.400 --> 0:41:46.920
<v Speaker 1>how many things it touches, we have to have a

0:41:46.920 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 1>wide range in conversation. But I want to bring us

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to a cluse. You speak to lots of people who

0:41:52.560 --> 0:41:56.240
<v Speaker 1>are in power in places who can make real change happen.

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:00.200
<v Speaker 1>When you think about what we need to do in

0:42:00.239 --> 0:42:03.720
<v Speaker 1>the urgency that we have, what is in your mind

0:42:03.920 --> 0:42:07.439
<v Speaker 1>the heuristic, which order of things would you bring up

0:42:07.719 --> 0:42:12.000
<v Speaker 1>with somebody that this, one, two, three are the things?

0:42:12.040 --> 0:42:15.040
<v Speaker 1>If we do them, we get this thing going faster

0:42:15.160 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>than we really need to.

0:42:16.440 --> 0:42:19.400
<v Speaker 3>Right now, we're using the sky as an open sewer,

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:25.080
<v Speaker 3>and our reckless spewing of heat trapping pollution into the

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:31.839
<v Speaker 3>sky is now causing these climate related horrific disasters to

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 3>be worse and worse and more intense and more frequent,

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:38.759
<v Speaker 3>and everybody knows it. If you want to change that,

0:42:39.440 --> 0:42:41.560
<v Speaker 3>if you want to say to our young people, you

0:42:41.600 --> 0:42:44.279
<v Speaker 3>don't have to be depressed about the future, You don't

0:42:44.320 --> 0:42:47.600
<v Speaker 3>have to have a dark outlook. We have a mental

0:42:47.600 --> 0:42:51.000
<v Speaker 3>health crisis around the world now, partly because young people

0:42:51.000 --> 0:42:56.240
<v Speaker 3>are losing hope. We need to restore hope. We need

0:42:56.520 --> 0:42:59.840
<v Speaker 3>to prove that we have the capacity as human beings

0:42:59.840 --> 0:43:03.920
<v Speaker 3>to save our future. And I always say that if

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:07.319
<v Speaker 3>you have any doubt that we as human beings have

0:43:07.400 --> 0:43:11.120
<v Speaker 3>the political will necessary to save ourselves, please remember that

0:43:11.280 --> 0:43:13.920
<v Speaker 3>political will is itself a renewable resource.

0:43:14.800 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, Vice President.

0:43:16.040 --> 0:43:17.560
<v Speaker 3>Thank you Akshat.

0:43:23.800 --> 0:43:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for listening to Zero. Apart from the podcast,

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:29.719
<v Speaker 1>every day at copp we publish the Bloomberg Green newsletter

0:43:30.080 --> 0:43:32.920
<v Speaker 1>full of all the latest at the Summit. Sign up

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 1>for free at Bloomberg dot com. There's a link in

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:38.319
<v Speaker 1>the show notes. Also, you can now listen to Zero

0:43:38.520 --> 0:43:43.160
<v Speaker 1>without ads. Just log into Apple Podcasts using your Bloomberg subscription.

0:43:44.040 --> 0:43:46.120
<v Speaker 1>If you like this episode, please take a moment to

0:43:46.200 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>rate or review on Apple Podcasts and Spotify. Share this

0:43:49.719 --> 0:43:53.839
<v Speaker 1>episode with a friend or with someone who enjoys Inconvenient truths.

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:56.360
<v Speaker 1>You can get in touch at Zero pod at Bloomberg

0:43:56.400 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 1>dot net. Zero's producer is Oscar Boyd and senior producer

0:44:00.160 --> 0:44:03.600
<v Speaker 1>is Christine driscoll Our. Theme music is composed by Wondering

0:44:04.200 --> 0:44:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Special thanks to Kira Bendrim, Meg Zavo and Abi Danzig.

0:44:08.760 --> 0:44:10.839
<v Speaker 1>I'm Akshatrati back next week.