WEBVTT - Hard To See Coal Rebound Despite Trump's EPA Rollback

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg p m L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Bramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg p m L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Today,

0:00:32.880 --> 0:00:37.400
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's administration unveiled its plans to dramatically weakened pollution

0:00:37.600 --> 0:00:41.440
<v Speaker 1>limits on coal fired power plants by shifting most of

0:00:41.440 --> 0:00:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the regulatory burden to states. This basically is another way

0:00:45.600 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>to basically foster the coal industry, as President Trump has

0:00:49.560 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>promised to do. Here to talk a little bit about that,

0:00:51.720 --> 0:00:54.640
<v Speaker 1>as Ethan Zindler ahead of America's for Bloomberg any f

0:00:55.000 --> 0:00:57.720
<v Speaker 1>coming to us from Washington, d c. Ethan, thank you

0:00:57.760 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us. So can we just start

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 1>with an overview of what exactly President Trump's administration is

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to do here. So first and foremost, there was

0:01:05.120 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>an effort under the Obama administration called the Clean Power

0:01:08.160 --> 0:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Plan that would have set a national goal of reducing

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>CEO two missions from the power sector. The goal was

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 1>to cut CEO two emissions by twenty thirty. We're very

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>actually very far along towards that goal already. But the

0:01:23.360 --> 0:01:26.479
<v Speaker 1>new rule, which was essentially has now been rolled out

0:01:26.520 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 1>by the Trump administration UH sets no specific long term

0:01:30.560 --> 0:01:34.559
<v Speaker 1>goals for CEO two emissions and essentially says states, you guys,

0:01:34.600 --> 0:01:36.560
<v Speaker 1>go away and figure out how much you want to

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:40.959
<v Speaker 1>do on your own to try to address CEO two reductions. Okay,

0:01:41.120 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 1>So just to give a sense, and this is something

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that you noted that as of the end of last year,

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the US already achieved pent UH CEO two reductions that

0:01:51.400 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>had aimed to reach by In other words, it was

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.520
<v Speaker 1>really ahead of schedule. And I'm wondering how much does

0:01:56.600 --> 0:01:59.640
<v Speaker 1>President Trump's how much too, is President Trump's actions set

0:01:59.720 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>us back or do they have no impact whatsoever. Well,

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>this is one of those stories, and especially someone here

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>in Washington, which is I think you know, gets a

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of attention, justifiably because it represents the perspective of

0:02:12.200 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the administration and the way they view climate and frankly,

0:02:15.200 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>whether they care about climate at all, which is unclear.

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:20.960
<v Speaker 1>But it's very important to put this in the larger

0:02:21.000 --> 0:02:23.400
<v Speaker 1>context of the trends that are going on in the

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.639
<v Speaker 1>power sector anyway, And as I mentioned, you know, we've

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:30.679
<v Speaker 1>reduced our missions from two thousand five levels already as

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 1>of your end two thousand seventeen. Our view is that

0:02:34.040 --> 0:02:38.040
<v Speaker 1>the US power sector will continue to de carbonize. Natural

0:02:38.080 --> 0:02:42.000
<v Speaker 1>gas is cheap, renewables are cheap, and essentially coal is

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>getting phased out, and frankly, this regulation probably won't change

0:02:46.240 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>that in any substantial way. So symbolically it's important, But

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>as far as the market's concerned, UH and as far

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>as the US emissions path is concerned, from the power sector,

0:02:57.160 --> 0:02:59.120
<v Speaker 1>at least an our view is not likely to make

0:02:59.160 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a big difference. Can you give us any update on

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the coal industry and whether there has been an increased

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>in UH in jobs there or an increase in profitability

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:09.640
<v Speaker 1>since President Trump took office. I'm looking right now at Peabody,

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for example, one of the big US coal companies. Their

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>shares are up more than this year, so they are

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.920
<v Speaker 1>beating the broader large indexes. Well, it's all it's all

0:03:18.960 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>relative to I mean, take a look at where they were.

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.680
<v Speaker 1>They were there fair enough and and I think generally speaking,

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think there's been plenty of sort of

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:31.680
<v Speaker 1>favorable publicity around the coal industry with this administration saying

0:03:31.720 --> 0:03:33.600
<v Speaker 1>they want to do more things, and they are taking

0:03:33.600 --> 0:03:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a number of regulatory steps to try to be supportive.

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:40.080
<v Speaker 1>But but our general view is that the economics are

0:03:40.120 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the economics, and gas is very cheap in the US,

0:03:43.080 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and the consensus view is that it's going to stay

0:03:45.160 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>cheap for a very long time. Renewable prices have been

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>down substantially, and with the text credits to support them,

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 1>they also undercut coal. So it's hard to see the

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:59.520
<v Speaker 1>US coal power sector making a major rebound regardless of

0:03:59.560 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>these very US efforts. You know, I want to put

0:04:01.440 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>you on the spot here and talk about the flip

0:04:03.360 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>side of of coal and what you're talking about, which

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>is the renewable side solar, uh when other types of

0:04:10.680 --> 0:04:14.680
<v Speaker 1>energy production that's considered to be more environmentally friendly. The

0:04:14.760 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>US had been accelerating the production of those types of

0:04:17.760 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>energy quite significantly under Obama. I'm wondering has that changed

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>at all, or has the pace of adoption continued to

0:04:24.680 --> 0:04:29.080
<v Speaker 1>gain steam under President Trump. I would say that, you know,

0:04:29.120 --> 0:04:31.359
<v Speaker 1>we have seen a bit of a slowing on the

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 1>renewables build side post Trump um. But I wouldn't directly

0:04:35.839 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>attribute that to any actions that he's taken. There have

0:04:38.600 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>been policies in place that essentially we're due to sunset

0:04:41.920 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're coming up towards the end of some of those,

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and that's part of what sort of frontloaded some of

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the activity, uh, sort of coincidentally into Obama's term. But

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.880
<v Speaker 1>generally speaking, you know, we continue to see projects get built.

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>There is support for renewables at the state level on

0:04:57.400 --> 0:05:00.240
<v Speaker 1>a policy basis, there are tax credits, but most importanly

0:05:00.279 --> 0:05:03.839
<v Speaker 1>for renewables, the price of the equipment has just come down,

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>particularly for solar, so enormously. I mean, by the end

0:05:06.560 --> 0:05:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of the year. To put this in context, a solar

0:05:09.000 --> 0:05:12.239
<v Speaker 1>module sold from a Chinese company will sell for about

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.200
<v Speaker 1>cents a lot. I realized that means nothing to your listeners,

0:05:15.240 --> 0:05:17.880
<v Speaker 1>but ten years ago that number was about eight dollars

0:05:17.880 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot, ten dollars a lot. So the technological advancements

0:05:22.760 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and the cost declines have just been tremendous. Okay, So

0:05:26.080 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering going forward, how much can one presidential

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>administration shift the policies and sort of shift the landscape

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:35.240
<v Speaker 1>for energy consumption at this point, and how much really

0:05:35.320 --> 0:05:39.800
<v Speaker 1>is it just the market determining what people use. It's

0:05:39.920 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>mostly market. I think that the administration can sort of

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.240
<v Speaker 1>try and steer a ship, but it takes years to

0:05:46.279 --> 0:05:48.679
<v Speaker 1>try and make real adjustments. And I would also argue

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.400
<v Speaker 1>that some of the most important sort of policies that

0:05:51.440 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 1>can affect energy, that the course of direction for the

0:05:54.760 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>power sector, are not ones that an administration can do unilaterally.

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.839
<v Speaker 1>You would be Congress um. So, for instance, if you

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:04.880
<v Speaker 1>really wanted to help the coal industry, the best thing

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.880
<v Speaker 1>you could do is probably create a new tax credit

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:11.159
<v Speaker 1>or subsidy to support that. But that is not something

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:14.200
<v Speaker 1>that the administration can do on its own. It's something

0:06:14.240 --> 0:06:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Congress needs to help it within um. Despite the fact

0:06:17.160 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that Congress seems very inclined to help this administration in

0:06:19.680 --> 0:06:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways, I think people would say that

0:06:22.440 --> 0:06:24.480
<v Speaker 1>that would be a tough thing to get through even

0:06:24.560 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>this Congress, and certainly the one that's coming would be

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:30.200
<v Speaker 1>less would probably be less inclined to be supportive of

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>something like that, given the fact that the Republican part

0:06:33.839 --> 0:06:35.880
<v Speaker 1>of the government is expected to lose some seats in

0:06:35.920 --> 0:06:38.240
<v Speaker 1>the upcoming interm election. Is that what you're imply Yeah,

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that does seem to be what people think is going

0:06:39.960 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>to happen so far. One thing I'm wondering is if

0:06:42.320 --> 0:06:46.200
<v Speaker 1>you stripped away all subsidies for solar and wind, would

0:06:46.400 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>those methods of energy production still be economically competitive with

0:06:52.080 --> 0:06:55.640
<v Speaker 1>the fossil fuels? Yes, in some places, know and others?

0:06:55.800 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>Is the long, long story short. If the winds are

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:01.800
<v Speaker 1>strong enough and the sun shine bright enough, projects are

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:05.040
<v Speaker 1>absolutely cost competitive. We're seeing that in places like Oklahoma

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.720
<v Speaker 1>and Arizona and other parts of the California and other

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.320
<v Speaker 1>parts of the world. The other question is how expensive

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>is the existing generation from those fossil sources. Uh. It

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:18.239
<v Speaker 1>really varies from different parts of the country. But the

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>long story short is right now renewables are cost competitive

0:07:21.520 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>in a number of places around the world, including number

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of prices in the United States, but not everywhere. And

0:07:27.160 --> 0:07:29.600
<v Speaker 1>coal with respect to that, is there anything that President

0:07:29.640 --> 0:07:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Trump can do or that you're watching that will have

0:07:31.520 --> 0:07:36.559
<v Speaker 1>material impact to support coal unilaterally? I think the Trump

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.120
<v Speaker 1>administration is trying to do most of the things that

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:43.080
<v Speaker 1>it has within its power to support the coal industry. Um,

0:07:43.080 --> 0:07:45.360
<v Speaker 1>but it is it is frankly just going to be

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:49.560
<v Speaker 1>challenging so long as gas prices remain low um if

0:07:49.600 --> 0:07:52.040
<v Speaker 1>they frankly, if the administration wanted to do something to

0:07:52.120 --> 0:07:56.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of artificially raise the cost of um of gas production,

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:58.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what that step would be, tax or whatever.

0:07:59.000 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>UM That would probably also helped Cole, but again that's

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:04.600
<v Speaker 1>something that Congress would probably have to be involved in.

0:08:04.800 --> 0:08:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Zindler, thank you so much for that wonderful perspective.

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Ethan Zindler's head of America's for Bloomberg based in Washington,

0:08:11.640 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>d C. That's Bloomberg and E f uh And definitely

0:08:15.040 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>an interesting time with some revocation of Obama era environmental rules.

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:24.040
<v Speaker 1>How much effective they actually have that remains to be determined.

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.120
<v Speaker 1>There are some companies that are the the intersection of

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.839
<v Speaker 1>some of the trade tensions that have been ongoing, and

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>then there's some that face a changing landscape with respect

0:08:46.760 --> 0:08:51.439
<v Speaker 1>to new regulations or regulatory rollbacks. Our next guest potentially

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.439
<v Speaker 1>is at the intersection of both, and that is Mark Vignano.

0:08:54.840 --> 0:08:58.680
<v Speaker 1>He is chief executive of Commoors, which is based in Wilmington, Delaware.

0:08:58.679 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>You might know Commors by some of its brands like

0:09:01.320 --> 0:09:05.640
<v Speaker 1>tef Line, which is sort of means so much to

0:09:05.679 --> 0:09:08.000
<v Speaker 1>so many people as well as free on Mark. Thank

0:09:08.040 --> 0:09:09.559
<v Speaker 1>you so much for being with us. So happy to

0:09:09.559 --> 0:09:12.240
<v Speaker 1>be here. So I want to start with the concept

0:09:12.240 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>of this company has its business the US and the

0:09:15.840 --> 0:09:18.079
<v Speaker 1>rest of its outside of the United States. And I'm wondering,

0:09:18.080 --> 0:09:20.720
<v Speaker 1>at a time when you do have escalating trade tensions,

0:09:21.280 --> 0:09:23.520
<v Speaker 1>how have you been affected. Yeah, so if you think

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 1>about trade, you know, and I know the administration today

0:09:26.520 --> 0:09:29.839
<v Speaker 1>is really trying to get this level playing field. Um.

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:32.040
<v Speaker 1>From from our standpoint, there's lots of ways to deal

0:09:32.080 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 1>with that level playing field. One area is something that

0:09:35.400 --> 0:09:38.360
<v Speaker 1>we are very important to us as the key Galley Agreement.

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:42.320
<v Speaker 1>That ke Galley Agreement is connected to the Montreal Protocol. Basically,

0:09:42.760 --> 0:09:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's a business first, a US business first kind of

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:49.880
<v Speaker 1>effective trade agreement where American can win. So it's it's

0:09:49.920 --> 0:09:53.559
<v Speaker 1>allows us to can just lay out when this went

0:09:53.600 --> 0:09:57.240
<v Speaker 1>into so what it is. We manufacture a refrigent called Optition,

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>which is low the lowest global warming potential refrigerant in

0:10:00.640 --> 0:10:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the world, lower global warming than any other refrigerants. Many

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:09.199
<v Speaker 1>countries have adopted the Gali Agreement, which allows the use

0:10:09.240 --> 0:10:14.280
<v Speaker 1>of those in relationship to hfc's or there are traditional refrigerants,

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:16.880
<v Speaker 1>and so here in the US, we want to see

0:10:16.880 --> 0:10:19.520
<v Speaker 1>that adoption happen as well, because it's going to benefit

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:24.119
<v Speaker 1>companies like Commor's, companies like Honeywell that actually have developed

0:10:24.120 --> 0:10:26.640
<v Speaker 1>this molecule and be able to bring it in So

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:29.640
<v Speaker 1>you can, jobs are created here in the US because

0:10:29.679 --> 0:10:32.480
<v Speaker 1>of it, Manufacturing facilities are being put in place here

0:10:32.480 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in the US because of it, and so it's a

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.439
<v Speaker 1>way for US to be able to utilize US based

0:10:37.440 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 1>technology versus Chinese based technology which is in our refrigerants today.

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, So this is actually really interesting because what

0:10:43.559 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>it hints at is this idea that if the US

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 1>tries to go it alone and have a different set

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:55.880
<v Speaker 1>of regulations with respect to curbing certain environmentally harmful gases,

0:10:57.040 --> 0:10:59.719
<v Speaker 1>that perhaps it won't be privy to agreements that will

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>actually foster jobs and opportunities in the US. Is that

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:08.119
<v Speaker 1>basically what's it's effectively a business trade agreement that benefits

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.760
<v Speaker 1>and creates a win for the US. So you're exactly right,

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:14.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're going to manufacture that here in the US.

0:11:14.360 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>It's going to create thousands of jobs because of it,

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:19.559
<v Speaker 1>and it's going to be exported to the whole world,

0:11:19.760 --> 0:11:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but also can be used here in the US at

0:11:21.720 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the same time. So as we talk about trade, you know,

0:11:24.960 --> 0:11:27.199
<v Speaker 1>it's it's about how do you how do you create

0:11:27.240 --> 0:11:30.319
<v Speaker 1>free trade for companies like commors, And that's really what

0:11:30.320 --> 0:11:33.720
<v Speaker 1>we're looking for, Okay, But arguably, I mean, if you're

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>selling this, why does it matter whether the US is

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.240
<v Speaker 1>involved in those agreements or not, Because the more it's

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 1>a huge market opportunity here in the US. So of

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:46.760
<v Speaker 1>automobiles in Europe already used this refrigerant. About half of

0:11:46.800 --> 0:11:49.640
<v Speaker 1>the auto park here in the US uses it. But

0:11:50.000 --> 0:11:54.760
<v Speaker 1>stationary refrigeration, stationary air conditioning is really a driver for US,

0:11:54.920 --> 0:11:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and the growth is here in the US. This is

0:11:56.720 --> 0:11:59.959
<v Speaker 1>really interesting to me. It also makes raises a question

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of whether a greater proportion of your business has actually

0:12:03.640 --> 0:12:06.320
<v Speaker 1>gone outside of the US as you've seen some of

0:12:06.320 --> 0:12:08.160
<v Speaker 1>these other countries adopted. Have you seen the mix of

0:12:08.200 --> 0:12:12.079
<v Speaker 1>business shift more to UH foreign countries rather than the

0:12:12.160 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 1>US over the bunch. Well, it's interesting because as a

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:16.600
<v Speaker 1>as a global company, you know, we we're the world

0:12:16.679 --> 0:12:19.280
<v Speaker 1>leader in t O two or the world leader in refrigerants,

0:12:19.320 --> 0:12:22.560
<v Speaker 1>with the world leader in Flora polymers um. But this

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:27.480
<v Speaker 1>specific product we're talking about, which is a refrigerant. You know,

0:12:27.600 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we think of refrigerants as the old freon, right optition

0:12:30.559 --> 0:12:32.880
<v Speaker 1>is the new free on, if you will. Most of

0:12:32.920 --> 0:12:37.359
<v Speaker 1>our sales are outside the US because of adoption of

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.240
<v Speaker 1>these regulations, and we think this could be a great

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>opportunity for the US for business purposes. It creates jobs here.

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>It's just not great for the environment. It creates jobs here,

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and it really rewards the companies that have developed this.

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>So UM, I want to talk a little bit about

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.440
<v Speaker 1>some other policies that are being implemented or at least

0:12:56.360 --> 0:13:01.800
<v Speaker 1>trying to be affected across the Trumpetitus straation. Antiregulation has

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:05.440
<v Speaker 1>been a huge theme, and we've seen certain regulatory rollbacks,

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 1>in particular today with proposals to make it easier for

0:13:08.559 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>coal companies to exist and thrive. I'm just wondering, in

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:16.040
<v Speaker 1>terms of your industry, have you seen a significant regulatory rollback.

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>We haven't. You know, we participate in the chemistry industry,

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:22.680
<v Speaker 1>so from that standpoint, we haven't seen a significant rollback.

0:13:22.760 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, the way we look at it is,

0:13:25.160 --> 0:13:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, regulation isn't always bad for business. It could

0:13:28.440 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>be a positive for business. You know, I gave the

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:33.000
<v Speaker 1>example of Cagali a second ago, where it could be

0:13:33.080 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 1>a positive. But at the same time, it can also

0:13:35.520 --> 0:13:38.600
<v Speaker 1>create clarity for a company in terms of how to operate,

0:13:38.920 --> 0:13:41.199
<v Speaker 1>so you don't have to operate differently state to state.

0:13:41.240 --> 0:13:43.960
<v Speaker 1>You can operate the same across So we haven't seen

0:13:44.160 --> 0:13:48.000
<v Speaker 1>significant rollbacks that are affecting us, But to us, regulation,

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>if it's based on science and if it's based on risk,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 1>can be very helpful to a company. At the same time, Um,

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm I was interested. I saw a couple of articles

0:13:57.040 --> 0:13:59.520
<v Speaker 1>about this pollution SADA. It's been going on with commors

0:14:00.080 --> 0:14:03.559
<v Speaker 1>and some North Carolina residents about a spill and how

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.640
<v Speaker 1>much you're getting involved or not. And one thing that

0:14:06.679 --> 0:14:10.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm wondering is do regulations protect you in a way

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.319
<v Speaker 1>or if they did roll back some of these regulations,

0:14:14.520 --> 0:14:17.280
<v Speaker 1>would you change anything about your business? Yeah? For us,

0:14:17.440 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, um, so you you mentioned the situation that

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with. What would she take very seriously, Again,

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>we don't believe we have any health hazard, but the

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>community doesn't like things being put into the error into

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>the water, So I don't think it would change the

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:35.320
<v Speaker 1>way we operate because We're going to try to operate

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>within the realm of the community and what they want

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>and what they need from that standpoint. But again, when

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>you're looking at a level playing field across the US,

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.200
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to be able to navigate state to state.

0:14:47.280 --> 0:14:49.320
<v Speaker 1>You want to be able to have something that gives

0:14:49.360 --> 0:14:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you clarity across the whole US as you're operating. That's

0:14:52.080 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 1>a really good point and one that I hadn't thought

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:55.840
<v Speaker 1>that much about. Thank you so much for being here.

0:14:56.000 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>It's always it's really a pleasure speaking with you. Mark Vicnano.

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:02.960
<v Speaker 1>He is chief executive of Commore's UH, the leading I

0:15:03.000 --> 0:15:06.440
<v Speaker 1>Guess refrigerant company and UH and creator of Teflon and

0:15:06.520 --> 0:15:08.720
<v Speaker 1>free on and all of those things and the new

0:15:08.760 --> 0:15:11.200
<v Speaker 1>free On. It's based in Wilmington, Delaware, but he's here

0:15:11.240 --> 0:15:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in our eleven three oh studios. The Year of zero

0:15:30.920 --> 0:15:33.800
<v Speaker 1>investors do not want to pay anything, and investment firms

0:15:33.800 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>are realizing to keep said investors they need to offer

0:15:36.720 --> 0:15:40.440
<v Speaker 1>them free funds and free trading. Evidently here to talk

0:15:40.440 --> 0:15:44.800
<v Speaker 1>about that. Eric Balcuna, Senior et F analysts for Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:15:44.800 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>So Eric to this morning's news. JP Morgan is planning

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 1>to roll out a mobile brokerage platform next week, including

0:15:51.840 --> 0:15:57.400
<v Speaker 1>free research as well as some free trading discuss Yeah,

0:15:57.440 --> 0:15:59.120
<v Speaker 1>and you know, you just hit on one of the

0:15:59.160 --> 0:16:01.840
<v Speaker 1>things that was buried lead in my opinion, which is

0:16:01.880 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>free research. That's the department I'm in. So knowing that

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.240
<v Speaker 1>it's going to start being becoming free hits home for me.

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.120
<v Speaker 1>This is where we've been going for a while. There's

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of startups like robin Hood or robo Advisors.

0:16:16.520 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>You know, on the streets you see people offering this

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:21.920
<v Speaker 1>stuff already for free, and then you see Vanguard get

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>in and then of course, uh, you know, the big

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>guys are going to follow suit. And the reason is

0:16:27.640 --> 0:16:30.760
<v Speaker 1>because people want it that way, the customers speak with

0:16:30.800 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>their with their feet, and for JPM, we're going to

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:35.720
<v Speaker 1>do it. It's especially huge. It reminds me of the

0:16:35.760 --> 0:16:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Fidelity zero thing, where when you heard Vanguard offering free

0:16:39.680 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 1>t F trading, it's like, well that's what they do,

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they're you know, but you know when Fidelity went zero,

0:16:44.960 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>it's like, whoa, aren't they the big active shop. And

0:16:47.040 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>now here you have JP Morgan, who people just don't

0:16:49.720 --> 0:16:53.360
<v Speaker 1>associate with that kind of mentality offering free so I

0:16:53.400 --> 0:16:56.760
<v Speaker 1>think this is equal to the Fidelity announcement in terms

0:16:56.840 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of just shaking people to their core in the financial industry.

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>So you said this is what customers want. I also

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.680
<v Speaker 1>want free housing. I also want, you know, free incredible

0:17:06.800 --> 0:17:09.800
<v Speaker 1>dinners with my husband, and hey, it would be really

0:17:09.920 --> 0:17:13.080
<v Speaker 1>nice to have a free manicures. People want a lot

0:17:13.119 --> 0:17:15.600
<v Speaker 1>of things free. They don't get them. And my question

0:17:15.720 --> 0:17:19.119
<v Speaker 1>is how can these firms be offering zero fee funds

0:17:19.119 --> 0:17:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and zero fee trading? At what point do they make

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:24.920
<v Speaker 1>no money as a result. Yeah, it's a good question,

0:17:25.080 --> 0:17:27.399
<v Speaker 1>and so for let's go for it, just JP Morgan.

0:17:28.080 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>One way they can do this is by free t

0:17:30.440 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>F trading. You can sell the order flow to market makers. Um,

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 1>and that is worth something. Last year Schwab made, according

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 1>to Dave rid Or, my colleague, a hundred and fourteen

0:17:40.080 --> 0:17:42.879
<v Speaker 1>million in selling that order flow of e t F

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:44.720
<v Speaker 1>trading and stock trading. Wait, hold on a second, what

0:17:44.760 --> 0:17:47.280
<v Speaker 1>does that mean? So basically they can sell to a

0:17:47.280 --> 0:17:49.880
<v Speaker 1>market maker all of the orders that come in. They

0:17:49.920 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 1>can then offer that and sell that to a market

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.440
<v Speaker 1>maker who will then get first DIBs on that order

0:17:55.440 --> 0:17:58.960
<v Speaker 1>flow for a very small fee. It might affect the

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.800
<v Speaker 1>retail client in a basis point, so it's minimal, but

0:18:02.840 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>if you add all that up, you do get some revenue.

0:18:05.640 --> 0:18:08.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not a lot though. Some people overestimate this thing

0:18:09.000 --> 0:18:11.679
<v Speaker 1>of order flow. They all also on the fidelity side

0:18:12.160 --> 0:18:15.800
<v Speaker 1>with a free fund people overestimate securities lending that is

0:18:15.840 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>not worth that much either. Both of these cases, these

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:21.920
<v Speaker 1>are lost leaders right. What they're really trying to sell

0:18:21.960 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>you is is loans, credit cards in chaping Works case,

0:18:24.600 --> 0:18:27.399
<v Speaker 1>or fidelities case, active mutual funds. They have plenty of

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>products that make a lot of revenue, and so I

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>think they're just reading the writing on the wall and

0:18:31.720 --> 0:18:34.280
<v Speaker 1>they're going, look, this is the way millennials wanted the

0:18:35.600 --> 0:18:38.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of investors who are following them. Let's just

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>go there now, you know, rip the band aid off

0:18:40.720 --> 0:18:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and we'll work out how to make money in other ways.

0:18:44.000 --> 0:18:47.879
<v Speaker 1>But I don't really see any other direction this is

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>going to go, because again, this is what the people want.

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:55.399
<v Speaker 1>So tdmre trade right now shares down more than five

0:18:56.520 --> 0:18:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Charles Schwab shares also sharply down. I'm just trying to

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:01.879
<v Speaker 1>figure out, are we going to look at some kind

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:05.560
<v Speaker 1>of massive consolidation in the brokerage industry similar to what

0:19:05.640 --> 0:19:08.119
<v Speaker 1>we have been seeing, or perhaps it needs to frankly

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.920
<v Speaker 1>escalate to meet analysts expectations in the asset management industry.

0:19:12.040 --> 0:19:14.560
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to all signs point to consolidation

0:19:14.560 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 1>across the financial industry because of this intense cost obsession,

0:19:19.760 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>whether it's a cost obsession and expense ratios of funds

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:27.199
<v Speaker 1>or for free trading um. You can't live on a

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.560
<v Speaker 1>couple of basis points alone. Everybody knows that, right, so

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:32.440
<v Speaker 1>scale is one way to get cheaper, obviously up selling

0:19:32.480 --> 0:19:35.359
<v Speaker 1>them on higher price products. The reason you're probably not

0:19:35.400 --> 0:19:38.920
<v Speaker 1>going to see this kind of mass consolidation right now

0:19:39.160 --> 0:19:41.560
<v Speaker 1>or in the near term is the market has been

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:44.240
<v Speaker 1>so good to these companies. I just looked at you know,

0:19:44.280 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 1>active mutual funds alone have grown assets by seven trillion

0:19:47.520 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>just in the last ten years on market appreciation alone,

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:54.560
<v Speaker 1>no flows. So the market has really helped the financial

0:19:54.560 --> 0:19:59.240
<v Speaker 1>industry not have to really face this challenge. So I

0:19:59.280 --> 0:20:02.119
<v Speaker 1>do think if the market gets choppy or goes down,

0:20:02.560 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>then I think you'll see people sort of looking to

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>partner up UM and get scale and go cheaper. You know,

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:11.479
<v Speaker 1>I have to wonder there's really no free lunch, right,

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.600
<v Speaker 1>And I have to wonder when you start seeing all

0:20:13.640 --> 0:20:18.000
<v Speaker 1>of these look no fee UH funds or offerings, there

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:20.119
<v Speaker 1>are fees for somebody. Is someone going to bear the

0:20:20.119 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 1>brunt of this, either through inefficiencies or extra cars costs elsewhere. Yeah,

0:20:25.080 --> 0:20:27.080
<v Speaker 1>I think that's the big case here. You have with

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>UH you know this idea of selling order flow, which

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you know your own money. But again, I don't look.

0:20:33.119 --> 0:20:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I know there's a lot of ways to look at this.

0:20:35.359 --> 0:20:37.800
<v Speaker 1>And what's the catch, right, That's that's what Vanguard that

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:41.160
<v Speaker 1>their reaction to Fidelity going to zero fee. But in

0:20:41.200 --> 0:20:44.399
<v Speaker 1>this case, if you're a disciplined person, it's sort of

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:46.240
<v Speaker 1>like your credit card. You know, my wife and I

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:49.560
<v Speaker 1>use it a lot, but we pay it back like clockwork.

0:20:49.560 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>It's more my wife, I'm a little easier, but we

0:20:51.720 --> 0:20:55.119
<v Speaker 1>pay it back like clock was. Yeah, it's all her.

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I get to give her credit. If you can really

0:20:57.720 --> 0:21:01.440
<v Speaker 1>discipline yourself and and not and resist temptation, I think

0:21:01.480 --> 0:21:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you can really get basically free exposure and all of

0:21:04.480 --> 0:21:07.760
<v Speaker 1>your investments and finances for almost nothing. I think they're

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 1>it's the people who can't control themselves. Maybe you trade

0:21:11.240 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot and you get more involved in they're in

0:21:13.080 --> 0:21:15.840
<v Speaker 1>there sort of like universe than they upsell you. You

0:21:15.880 --> 0:21:18.560
<v Speaker 1>start using options. Next thing you know, they're making a

0:21:18.600 --> 0:21:20.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of money off you. So I think this is

0:21:20.320 --> 0:21:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sort of the same situation here. But discipline will help

0:21:24.280 --> 0:21:28.640
<v Speaker 1>investors who are looking to enter these free situations. Um,

0:21:28.680 --> 0:21:30.720
<v Speaker 1>and that's important. Yeah, It's sort of like free drinks

0:21:30.760 --> 0:21:33.160
<v Speaker 1>in Las Vegas. Right. It's fine for people who are disciplined,

0:21:33.200 --> 0:21:36.320
<v Speaker 1>but for those heavy gamblers might be tougher. Eric Felt,

0:21:36.880 --> 0:21:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Senior et F analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence, always with insightful

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>comments today on the race to zero throughout the financial industry.

0:22:00.080 --> 0:22:04.919
<v Speaker 1>President Trump is disappointed in Jerome Powell. He said in

0:22:05.000 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>comments to a number of different outlets that he thought

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.760
<v Speaker 1>that his FED chair was going to be a cheap

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:15.320
<v Speaker 1>money FED chairman, and he is disappointed that he's been

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:17.560
<v Speaker 1>raising interest rates. Joining us now to talk about that

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is Mark Spintel, founder and chief investment officer at Potomac

0:22:20.880 --> 0:22:24.080
<v Speaker 1>River Capital, as well as Craig Torres Federal Reserve, and

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:27.720
<v Speaker 1>you as economy reporter for Bloomberg News. Thank you both

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:32.000
<v Speaker 1>for joining me here from Washington, d C. Craig I

0:22:32.000 --> 0:22:33.920
<v Speaker 1>want to start with you and just get a sense

0:22:34.080 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of what President Trump said and how out of the

0:22:36.680 --> 0:22:41.920
<v Speaker 1>ordinary it is. Uh. It was uh not that dissimilar

0:22:42.000 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>to previous remarks he made, which I think is why

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 1>people are kind of people are investors in particular paying attention,

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>but not really saying this is something new. He's been complaining,

0:22:56.119 --> 0:23:00.959
<v Speaker 1>it's on everybody's radar. Uh. The question is you know,

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>what does it do? Um? How does it shape the

0:23:03.800 --> 0:23:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve? So among the comments was a comment to

0:23:08.160 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>Reuters where he said, we're President Trump said during this

0:23:10.800 --> 0:23:12.880
<v Speaker 1>period of time, I should be given some help by

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:17.080
<v Speaker 1>the Fed. The other countries are accommodated. Mark, come on

0:23:17.200 --> 0:23:19.760
<v Speaker 1>in here. I guess that there is a big existential

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.800
<v Speaker 1>question that this raises about the independence of the Photo Reserve.

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Jeroan Powell cannot be firement President Trump. Does this matter

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>at all from an independence angle? I think it does.

0:23:29.880 --> 0:23:33.240
<v Speaker 1>And uh, and thank you for for the invitation to talk.

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>I I would first point out that, uh, though extreme

0:23:37.160 --> 0:23:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Powell could be fired by Trump, though the parameters and

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:45.600
<v Speaker 1>the reasons are are sort of very narrow. Um, but

0:23:45.720 --> 0:23:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he could so called Trump up some charges to find

0:23:49.600 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>cause in Powell's actions. Um, I think I would echo

0:23:53.880 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Gregg's point that this is not necessarily unusual presidents going

0:23:58.840 --> 0:24:04.480
<v Speaker 1>back forty or fifty years, most spectacularly Nixon criticizing his

0:24:04.560 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 1>appointed FED chair Arthur Burns. But I think most presidents

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 1>have been upset with with FED chairs who are tightening

0:24:12.800 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>the reins on credit. What makes this somewhat unique is

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that monetary policy is, by the FED zone measures quite

0:24:20.040 --> 0:24:22.960
<v Speaker 1>loose accommodative. They talk about that in their statements. So

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he's unhappy with loose monetary policy and

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that he's criticizing his hand picked FED chair is a

0:24:29.600 --> 0:24:32.439
<v Speaker 1>bit unusual. This this early into the game. Mark, you

0:24:32.480 --> 0:24:35.080
<v Speaker 1>co authored a book, The Myth of Independence, How Congress

0:24:35.119 --> 0:24:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Governs the Federal Reserve. Uh So, clearly your skeptical of

0:24:38.920 --> 0:24:41.679
<v Speaker 1>FED Federal Reserve independence to begin with. But I'm wondering

0:24:41.760 --> 0:24:45.920
<v Speaker 1>does this type of rhetoric push the FED further into

0:24:45.920 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the domain of politics rather than policy. Indeed, and I

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:54.639
<v Speaker 1>think you're talking about a century old institution that sits

0:24:55.040 --> 0:24:57.199
<v Speaker 1>right here in our town and is very much in

0:24:57.240 --> 0:25:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the political sphere. And the book that Sarah Binder and

0:25:00.160 --> 0:25:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I co author talked a lot about the FEDS relationship

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.920
<v Speaker 1>with Congress. But I think the way presidents in particular

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Trump this go around, are putting pressure on on the

0:25:11.520 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve and on Chair Powell Powell directly will potentially

0:25:15.960 --> 0:25:19.600
<v Speaker 1>shape some of the contours and outlooks for interest rates. Again,

0:25:19.640 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>we're we're in a tightening cycle. The Fed is still

0:25:21.960 --> 0:25:25.920
<v Speaker 1>quite accommodative, but they're moving very gradually, uh, and as

0:25:25.960 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 1>they get closer to their own definition of neutral, I

0:25:29.640 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to be very interesting to see if

0:25:31.680 --> 0:25:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they continue that gradual pace, which may be interpreted as

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:39.760
<v Speaker 1>just uh, sort of bending a little bit to the

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.960
<v Speaker 1>White House's demands. Greg come in here, because we're just

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.320
<v Speaker 1>weeks away from the September meeting, where the Federal Reserve

0:25:45.359 --> 0:25:49.200
<v Speaker 1>is widely expected to hike interest rates yet again this year.

0:25:49.640 --> 0:25:51.959
<v Speaker 1>There is a question of how many more times they

0:25:51.960 --> 0:25:54.359
<v Speaker 1>would hike. What data points are they looking at, especially

0:25:54.400 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 1>given the fact that the U. S economy by some measures,

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.280
<v Speaker 1>just growing at the fastest pace since two thive Well,

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>they'll be looking at that, but also that the jobs

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:08.400
<v Speaker 1>market continues to be very robust, and perhaps most importantly,

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:12.919
<v Speaker 1>that inflation is around their target slightly above actually so

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Fed is letting the economy run, but

0:26:16.440 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>to keep inflation expectations nailed down, Uh, they need to

0:26:20.440 --> 0:26:24.240
<v Speaker 1>gradually raise interest rates. However, I would I would agree

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.360
<v Speaker 1>with Mark that here's an interesting fact. Yes, I think

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the debate about QUEI during the financial crisis, nobody thought

0:26:33.240 --> 0:26:35.720
<v Speaker 1>about the politics of it at the time. But if

0:26:35.760 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you stand back now, you know and look at it.

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>I think even Bernanke would say there were constraints on

0:26:42.359 --> 0:26:47.760
<v Speaker 1>doing more than more than they actually did at the time,

0:26:47.920 --> 0:26:50.879
<v Speaker 1>and those constraints were political. So it's not like the

0:26:50.920 --> 0:26:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Fed responds to political pressure, but it does feel constrained

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:57.680
<v Speaker 1>by it in terms of what they can do well.

0:26:57.720 --> 0:26:59.359
<v Speaker 1>And Mark, then I want to turn that back to

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:01.840
<v Speaker 1>you because, I mean you could say, in the larger

0:27:01.920 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>scheme of things that Congress ultimately holds the strings when

0:27:05.800 --> 0:27:07.879
<v Speaker 1>it comes to the Federal Reserve with confirmation and a

0:27:07.920 --> 0:27:10.360
<v Speaker 1>number of other measures and sort of controls that it has.

0:27:10.440 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 1>But for all intents and purposes, it's not like J.

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 1>Powell and other committee members are going to go to

0:27:15.000 --> 0:27:17.280
<v Speaker 1>Congress people and say, what do you guys think do

0:27:17.280 --> 0:27:18.800
<v Speaker 1>you think we should raise interest rates? I mean, there

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is a modicum of independence, and that's not going away correct.

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And I think the term that Sarah and I adopted

0:27:25.080 --> 0:27:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in the book was interdependence. And you know, to your point, Lisa,

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:32.480
<v Speaker 1>they're operating in this political sphere. I think the legislative

0:27:32.520 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>threat is probably a bit far even for President Trump

0:27:37.160 --> 0:27:41.280
<v Speaker 1>at this point. Um. There there probably isn't indeed in

0:27:41.320 --> 0:27:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the House as we speak, the Republican Conference is probably

0:27:44.200 --> 0:27:47.480
<v Speaker 1>more hawkish, uh, certainly more hawkish than the president. So

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they would cow tow to the President's

0:27:51.040 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 1>demands for cheaper money. Um. But that could change in November.

0:27:55.880 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 1>We could see a Democratic conference in the House. We

0:27:58.200 --> 0:28:00.359
<v Speaker 1>could see Max Swheet, Maxine waters as ahead of the

0:28:00.359 --> 0:28:04.720
<v Speaker 1>House Financial Services Committee. But there's very unlikely to be

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sixty votes in the Senate to reopen the Act. Uh.

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>Not to mention, what would they do? And that goes back,

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Lisa to your point that I think some threats. He

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.840
<v Speaker 1>could increase the heat on Powell himself. He could threaten

0:28:16.920 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>to fire the FED chair. He could stack some more

0:28:19.960 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>seats on the committee on the board with more Delvish members, um.

0:28:25.000 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think the context in the environment is important.

0:28:28.720 --> 0:28:32.680
<v Speaker 1>We are growing quite quickly. UH. Inflation has ticked above

0:28:32.720 --> 0:28:35.560
<v Speaker 1>their target and UH and might continue to rise. The

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:39.560
<v Speaker 1>capital markets, equities in particular, are very strong. Unemployment is

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>as low as it's been in a generation. And again,

0:28:42.320 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy is still loose, and the president's upset with

0:28:46.880 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>with money that isn't cheap enough, Soraig. Given given that backdrop,

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I was interested in what Atlanta Fed Raphael Bostic said

0:28:54.360 --> 0:28:56.960
<v Speaker 1>earlier this week or a couple of days ago, anyway

0:28:57.400 --> 0:28:59.480
<v Speaker 1>where he was speaking. He said, you know, he didn't

0:28:59.480 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>want to raise interest rates to a point where he

0:29:02.200 --> 0:29:04.680
<v Speaker 1>inverts the yield curve. Seems like that's very much on

0:29:05.360 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>Federal Reserve members minds. What do you expect how that

0:29:09.200 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>influence what they do? Not very much? All right? Then there.

0:29:15.960 --> 0:29:18.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the board staff has looked at this and

0:29:18.840 --> 0:29:22.280
<v Speaker 1>somewhat dismissed it. And I would add this, if Rafael

0:29:22.320 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>Bostic is so concerned about the yield curve, then he

0:29:25.360 --> 0:29:29.120
<v Speaker 1>should be arguing that they shorten the maturity of their

0:29:29.160 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 1>portfolio and sell those assets a little bit faster. That's

0:29:34.160 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>really interesting. That's a fascinating point. Other words, step in

0:29:36.280 --> 0:29:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve another way, don't just stop hiking interest

0:29:38.480 --> 0:29:41.800
<v Speaker 1>rates on the short end. Thank you both. Fascinating conversation.

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Mark Spindel, founder and Chief investment officer of Potomac River Capital,

0:29:46.120 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>also the co author of the book The Myth of Independence,

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>How Congress Governs the Federal Reserve, And of course my

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>thanks to Craig Torah's Federal Reserve and US Economy reporter

0:29:55.160 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg News who always has fantastic stories. I recommend

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:04.800
<v Speaker 1>to read them. Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P

0:30:04.920 --> 0:30:07.880
<v Speaker 1>and L podcast. You can subscribe and listen to interviews

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:30:12.360 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm

0:30:15.960 --> 0:30:19.280
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at Lisa Abramo. It's one before the podcast.

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:21.920
<v Speaker 1>You can always catch us worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.