Speaker 1: All right, clad you with us busy newsday today as
Speaker 1: we have a lot going on eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: for one. Shaun as our toll free telephone number three
Speaker 1: speech summit going on at the White House President Executive
Speaker 1: Order on the census question, well, what is wrong with
Speaker 1: asking a question that you know has been asked so many,
Speaker 1: so many times in the past. What is wrong with
Speaker 1: knowing how many people in this country have come into
Speaker 1: this country and are here illegally that didn't respect our borders,
Speaker 1: our laws, our sovereignty and having that number as a baseline.
Speaker 1: I mean, I know people throw out numbers all the time,
Speaker 1: but eleven million, thirty million, seven million, eight million, nobody knows.
Speaker 1: So it would be an opportunity for America to get
Speaker 1: to know. There's no better opportunity. We've done it in
Speaker 1: past census, and the President wants to do it now.
Speaker 1: I think it's the right thing to do. And the
Speaker 1: fact that everybody wants to turn this into some type
Speaker 1: of race issue has nothing to do with race. You
Speaker 1: know the president, everyone forgets that he wants to build
Speaker 1: a wall. But what else did he say with a
Speaker 1: big door in it? Okay, a big door means that
Speaker 1: he supports legal immigration, not illegal immigration, and every listen,
Speaker 1: I don't care where you come from, I really don't.
Speaker 1: I think, for example, having people I like the idea
Speaker 1: of merit based immigration, especially for certain sectors, certain fields
Speaker 1: of endeavor. If, for example, we need more computer programmers,
Speaker 1: or we need more doctors, or we need more surgeons,
Speaker 1: or we need more engineers, or whatever it happens to be,
Speaker 1: whatever the field of endeavor happens to be. Or maybe
Speaker 1: we need more laborers to work in different construction jobs
Speaker 1: or in farms around in America. Okay, we have opportunities.
Speaker 1: We can't fill these positions absolutely. I'm only asking for
Speaker 1: two things. Number one, that we check you out and
Speaker 1: make sure you that you are who you say you are,
Speaker 1: and that you have no intention, no background, no red flags,
Speaker 1: no indication that you support ideas that are contrary too
Speaker 1: and contradict our American constitutional system. In other words, that
Speaker 1: you're here because you want a better life. Okay, once
Speaker 1: we check you out, we determine you're the person you
Speaker 1: say you are. There are jobs available for people right now.
Speaker 1: We learned from the FED that there seven and a
Speaker 1: half million unfilled jobs in America today. That's a huge
Speaker 1: amount of jobs that we've got to fill, and we're
Speaker 1: virtually at full employment in this country. So if we
Speaker 1: need laborers, or maybe we need doctors, or maybe we
Speaker 1: need mechanical engineers, or maybe we need computer programmers, Okay,
Speaker 1: you can make the application. We can expedite the process
Speaker 1: which has been burdensome and takes way too long. You
Speaker 1: should pay for your own vetting. If you want to
Speaker 1: be a citizen, you should pay to be vetted. And
Speaker 1: by vetting, we do a security background check on whoever
Speaker 1: you happen to be. And the other requirement I would
Speaker 1: have is that you've got to be able and prove
Speaker 1: that you will be able to take care of yourself
Speaker 1: and not rely on the American taxpayers for education, health care,
Speaker 1: or any other housing, clothing, whatever you might need. I
Speaker 1: think that's fair because we only have a limited number
Speaker 1: of available slots at any given time, sometimes more we
Speaker 1: have more slots than others, and it's highly coveted, and
Speaker 1: I think it should be given to people that respect
Speaker 1: our laws, our constitution, our sovereignty, and our border. I
Speaker 1: don't think it should be given to people that just
Speaker 1: decide they want to come to America. The hell with
Speaker 1: our laws, the hell with our borders, the hell with
Speaker 1: our sovereignty. It's really that simple knowing who is here illegally,
Speaker 1: you know. I mean, if we did what Mexico has
Speaker 1: done up to really recently, Mexico, if you're an illegal immigrant,
Speaker 1: they would throw you out immediately, or even worse, they
Speaker 1: would throw you in jail for a significant period of time. Now,
Speaker 1: one of the things that's happened on the border recently
Speaker 1: is there is a dramatic slow down in terms of
Speaker 1: let's see an eighty five decrease in border apprehensions, the
Speaker 1: lowest level since March. Now, why did that happen? Because
Speaker 1: finally the President put his foot down, even though some
Speaker 1: Republicans no spine, no backbone, he said, okay, if you
Speaker 1: don't stop at Mexico, because you're allowing it to happen.
Speaker 1: Those people coming from El Salvador and Nicaraugua, Central America
Speaker 1: are creating migrant caravans, and they're marching straight through your
Speaker 1: country and you're not doing anything. And you're supposed to
Speaker 1: be our friend and neighbor. Normally your practice has been
Speaker 1: to return people, but you've decided to let people just
Speaker 1: walk right on through Mexico right up to the Mexican
Speaker 1: border with America. And now we've got a potential crisis
Speaker 1: going on. Okay, that has to stop. And if it
Speaker 1: doesn't stop, we're going to slap a tariff on you.
Speaker 1: And that's what the President has done. And so we'll see.
Speaker 1: So anyway, the President is going to move forward with
Speaker 1: the citizenship question. The other thing this freedom of speech
Speaker 1: form on these big tech companies. You gotta understand something here.
Speaker 1: If we don't do that. Think of the Project Veritas
Speaker 1: video and James O'Keefe what was it last week or
Speaker 1: the week before, two weeks ago, and an undercover video
Speaker 1: showing the people at Google in a very sophisticated fashion,
Speaker 1: are programming algorithms. Now we're leaving my area of expert.
Speaker 1: He's here, so you know, bear with me a little bit.
Speaker 1: But what they're doing is controlling content. In other words,
Speaker 1: they want to control the news that people see when
Speaker 1: they google a particular topic. Now, in the one case,
Speaker 1: what James O'Keefe did very cleverly, I think, is he said,
Speaker 1: all right, let's google Hillary Clinton and emails. Well, of
Speaker 1: course we expect email server. The violation of the Espionage
Speaker 1: Act and top secret classified information on the secret server,
Speaker 1: and of course the obstruction of subpoena, emails deleted and
Speaker 1: bleach bit and the hammers anyway, but it's buried in Google.
Speaker 1: But you get Donald Trump pops right up. Now that
Speaker 1: would be well, frankly, it's propaganda. It's not honest. It's
Speaker 1: a false representation of what the truth is on the topic.
Speaker 1: And I you'd think Google would want to inform people
Speaker 1: with the truth. But it's also a camp donation. When
Speaker 1: you were dealing with Google and the numbers of people
Speaker 1: that we have that tap into Google every single solitary
Speaker 1: day to look up information, and you're controlling the free
Speaker 1: flow of that information. But you're now talking about the
Speaker 1: ability probably to impact the outcome of a presidential race,
Speaker 1: a national election. That's a problem because that's the biggest
Speaker 1: in kind donation ever. Or the same would go for
Speaker 1: Facebook or Twitter or any of these high tech companies.
Speaker 1: If they're controlling data, if they're shadow banning people, if
Speaker 1: for example, they set up algorithms that reduced conservative content
Speaker 1: but spread virally liberal content, well that's what there's high
Speaker 1: Tech Summit's about a lot going on in the way House,
Speaker 1: they got the summit. Then on top of that, then
Speaker 1: they've got the issue of the president now moving forward
Speaker 1: with an executive order. As it relates to the census question,
Speaker 1: how many people are on at any given day or hour.
Speaker 1: Let me look that up for you. I believe you
Speaker 1: could find that information on Hannity dot com. You tell
Speaker 1: me that every time, so I assume you have it
Speaker 1: at you're ready. Do you know how many? I do? Actually,
Speaker 1: it's sixty sixty three thousand searches per second? Sixty three thousand?
Speaker 1: How many in that twenty four hour day? I'm sorry?
Speaker 1: Do I do? I look like some kind of savant.
Speaker 1: I thought you said you had it in front of you.
Speaker 1: Listen by I know one statistic? By what what's one
Speaker 1: sixty three thousand three per second? That's the one you
Speaker 1: keep asking me. Yeah, well that's I didn't know how
Speaker 1: it's coming to Jeopardy today. Hold on, Oh my gosh, exactly.
Speaker 1: Just slow down the show because you're not paying attention.
Speaker 1: You're in there talking to Blarney. First of all, do
Speaker 1: you know what I was just doing for you? What
Speaker 1: were you doing? Tell you what? I was just printing out?
Speaker 1: The project Veritas highlights from that video so I could
Speaker 1: bring it into you so you didn't have to try to,
Speaker 1: you know, scram through your you know that cobb memory
Speaker 1: all a brain, you know the cobweb. Wow, getting a
Speaker 1: little odd under the collar in here today. Exactly right.
Speaker 1: So what number I was talking whole night, what's the number?
Speaker 1: Three point five three point five billion a day searches
Speaker 1: a day. All right, Now, you're going to control the
Speaker 1: content of that three point five billion a day. And
Speaker 1: if you're controlling the content to advance a political agenda
Speaker 1: not another, well, that gives a massive influential competitive advantage
Speaker 1: to one person, one side of the debate. We don't
Speaker 1: want that. All right, we'll get back to that as
Speaker 1: the day on. Folks. Now, this is getting really interesting
Speaker 1: because behind the scenes yesterday Speaker of the House and
Speaker 1: name only Nancy Pelosi, Well, it turns out she's telling
Speaker 1: people like Alexandria Cacio Ortez Cortez that if you have
Speaker 1: a criticism of me, tell me to my face, not
Speaker 1: on Twitter. Well, every time she calls out the real speaker,
Speaker 1: the one that is controlling the agenda, well, Alexandria Cassio
Speaker 1: Cortez or AOC as she is better known just gives
Speaker 1: her more of a taste of her own medicine. Anyway,
Speaker 1: So we thought the spat was bad yesterday, and it
Speaker 1: got a lot nastier last night after the so called speaker.
Speaker 1: Pelosi spoke out and said literally suggesting the speakers singling
Speaker 1: out her and her colleagues, and then AOC said telling
Speaker 1: the Washington posted an interview that the persistent singling out
Speaker 1: of newly elected women of color by the speaker maybe
Speaker 1: more than outright disrespectful. What is she saying? Is she racist?
Speaker 1: Is that the implication here, by the way, interesting in
Speaker 1: light of the fact that Nancy Pelosi herself played the
Speaker 1: race card on the census question just what two days earlier,
Speaker 1: and AOC court did not rule in their favorite because
Speaker 1: they said the administration did not give sufficient evidence as
Speaker 1: to why the census citizenship questions should be there. So
Speaker 1: they kick the can. And then the administration said, okay,
Speaker 1: we won't put it on there, and then the President
Speaker 1: injected himself into this. But this is about keeping you know,
Speaker 1: make America, you know this hat make America white again.
Speaker 1: They want to make sure that people, certain people are counted.
Speaker 1: It's really disgraceful and it's not what our founders had
Speaker 1: in mind. It's not certain people, it's every person in
Speaker 1: the country is going to get counted, including those that
Speaker 1: might be here that we know. We're here illegally, you know,
Speaker 1: if you have look, I think I speak for most people.
Speaker 1: I want America, yeah, to be the land of opportunity.
Speaker 1: We just can't take the world's population. And I know
Speaker 1: there are countries in the world we have to be
Speaker 1: build walls to keep them where they are. By the way,
Speaker 1: I'm looking at this, Oh my gosh, this is Google Live.
Speaker 1: You see the numbers. Over four billion Google searches today,
Speaker 1: four billion, one hundred and seventy wait, four billion, one
Speaker 1: hundred and seventy four million searches so far today. Wow.
Speaker 1: Internet users in the world four billion, two hundred and
Speaker 1: seventy seven million people as of today. Over three million,
Speaker 1: almost four million blog posts today. Twitter tweets today, you
Speaker 1: have four hundred and seventy two million tweets today. Now,
Speaker 1: these are powerful companies. Emails today one hundred and sixty
Speaker 1: one billion. Now, I bet those mega data storage centers
Speaker 1: in Utah they're pretty busy every day. If they're capturing
Speaker 1: all of this stuff, is well has been suggested on
Speaker 1: this program. So anyways to watch now Casio Cortez being
Speaker 1: so defiant, and I love those people in the media
Speaker 1: saying Hannity is pushing a conspiracy theory again. He's saying
Speaker 1: that Nancy Pelosi's not the real speaker, that there was
Speaker 1: somehow a change in power, but we don't know it
Speaker 1: because they're hiding it from us. Okay for you stupid
Speaker 1: people in the medium, mop when I say speaker in
Speaker 1: name only, I'm saying exactly what happened yesterday, and that
Speaker 1: is Nancy Pelosi tells the Casio Cortez you got something
Speaker 1: to say to me, say it to my face, not publicly,
Speaker 1: not on social media. And what happens. Casio Cortez does
Speaker 1: what she's done every other time. She goes out, doubles
Speaker 1: down and challenges Nancy's quote gavel, She's the real speaker
Speaker 1: of the House, Nanci Pelosi, speaker in name only. That's
Speaker 1: it she's and by the way, think about it, speaker
Speaker 1: in name only. Well, this kind of proves the point
Speaker 1: is that if Acasio Cortes does not care one wit
Speaker 1: about what Nancy Pelosi says, that's my point. And who
Speaker 1: are all the twenty twenty Democratic presidential candidates listening to
Speaker 1: because they've all adopted some version of the New Green Deal. Well,
Speaker 1: they'd be listening to Acasio Cortez because it's not like
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi actually has any agenda whatsoever. I tell you this,
Speaker 1: I give a Coasio Cortez high marks for one thing.
Speaker 1: She's pretty courageous. I love what she's I love this.
Speaker 1: By the way, we'll she'd be courageous enough to ever
Speaker 1: do their show. All right, glad you others twenty five
Speaker 1: till the top of the hour, eight hundred and nine
Speaker 1: four one Sean, you want to be a part of
Speaker 1: the program. I guess they printed out all of the
Speaker 1: citizenship sens this stuff without the question. Now it's a
Speaker 1: question of the president executive order to add like another
Speaker 1: page or another sheet. And it's not looking good, which
Speaker 1: I think should be. Well, I don't see anything wrong
Speaker 1: with asking the question and knowing who Actley is in
Speaker 1: this country. I don't know why that's even deemed controversial.
Speaker 1: I don't think I think every American knows fundamentally and instinctively.
Speaker 1: It is in our character, It's in our bloodstream, it's
Speaker 1: in our soul. It's in our solar plexus in that
Speaker 1: we are a nation of immigrants. We have people from
Speaker 1: over the entire globe coming to this country. Nobody has
Speaker 1: said that, I have heard they want to end all immigration.
Speaker 1: I have not heard anybody say that. I've not heard
Speaker 1: anybody or would suggest, wow, we're only going to take
Speaker 1: people from here, but not here, and not heard that.
Speaker 1: What people are saying, though, is what we're asking because look,
Speaker 1: if we opened up our doors tomorrow, probably half the
Speaker 1: world's population would want to come right over. We don't
Speaker 1: have the capacity to take in everybody that wants to
Speaker 1: be here. We're just asking that you respect our laws,
Speaker 1: our constitution, our borders, and our sovereignty, and that you
Speaker 1: follow the legal process, which, by the way, I would
Speaker 1: be in favor of expediting that process. I'd make a
Speaker 1: few suggestions. I would say, I do like the idea
Speaker 1: of merit based citizenship or merit based immigration. It's the
Speaker 1: same system that Australia has. New Zealand has very difficult
Speaker 1: to get into those countries, and by the way, their
Speaker 1: their prime ministers have been very firm on the issue
Speaker 1: of assimilation. You come to Australia, you're going to be
Speaker 1: an Australian. You're not going to tell us how we
Speaker 1: ought to change our way of life and their view
Speaker 1: of civil society and how they run things. So they've
Speaker 1: been pretty clear about that. And as far as illegal immigration, well,
Speaker 1: if you're going by boat, say to Australian and they
Speaker 1: will meet you in the waters, and they're gonna give
Speaker 1: you food, and they'll give you water, and they're gonna
Speaker 1: give you If you needed medical attention, they won't take
Speaker 1: you to the mainland. If you need real medical attention,
Speaker 1: they're gonna take care of you. Then they're gonna send
Speaker 1: you back in the boat. And then said tell you
Speaker 1: to go back to where you came from. They don't
Speaker 1: accept the illegal immigration. Mexico of all countries. I mean,
Speaker 1: it infuriated me because they had some of the most
Speaker 1: draconian treatment of the illegal immigrants. They'd throw you in
Speaker 1: jail for however long they wanted, indefinitely at times, or
Speaker 1: they just throw you back, send you back immediately, you know,
Speaker 1: do not pass go You're going back, no questions asked.
Speaker 1: And since the president did his things anyway, I get it.
Speaker 1: We'll see what happens in the end here. But the
Speaker 1: illegal immigrant population, you know, according to some surveys, is
Speaker 1: going to be ten percent. We don't have the ability
Speaker 1: to absorb that anyway. Eight hundred and nine for one
Speaker 1: Sean is a toe free telephone number. You want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. I want to take
Speaker 1: a quick break here for a second, in the sense
Speaker 1: that we have now the southeastern United States all the
Speaker 1: way from say, Houston through Florida. Now we have a
Speaker 1: forecast that looks pretty ominous and may even turn into
Speaker 1: I guess the season's first hurricane. We at WeatherBell dot com.
Speaker 1: The official meteorologist of the Sean Hannity Show, Joe, but
Speaker 1: starting standing by what are the biggest what's happening? When
Speaker 1: is it going to happen? New Orleans, I guess, is
Speaker 1: in jeopardy of at least tropical storm winds, maybe even
Speaker 1: twelve inches of rain or more. Who's in jeopardy here? Well,
Speaker 1: New Orleans is the target that I'm most nervous about.
Speaker 1: And we have a situation that actually has been evolving
Speaker 1: for three or four months. The extremely cold winter in
Speaker 1: the northern plains, the record snow cover, the late snow melt,
Speaker 1: combined with the enhanced precipitation in the plains means that
Speaker 1: the Mississippi River is uncommonly high around New Orleans. Now,
Speaker 1: if that situation did not occur, this is not that
Speaker 1: big a deal for New Orleans. They're going to get
Speaker 1: sixty to seventy mile an hour wind gusts they think,
Speaker 1: and four to eight inches of rain. That's not that
Speaker 1: big a problem for New Orleans. They've had storms like
Speaker 1: that before. But because the Mississippi is so high, and
Speaker 1: because the fetch off the ocean, and you folks to
Speaker 1: the northeast know about what we call fetch, where there
Speaker 1: is days of east winds coming in, they pile the
Speaker 1: tide up. And what happens is that you're going to
Speaker 1: get winds strong from the east late tonight tomorrow, into
Speaker 1: the southeast on Saturday, in south on Sunday. That's going
Speaker 1: to push water, try to push water up the Mississippi
Speaker 1: as it's raining very heavily and with the rest of
Speaker 1: the Mississippi flowing down toward it. So the potential here
Speaker 1: is that out of a run of the mill tropical storms,
Speaker 1: because of preexistent conditions, that New Orleans could have a
Speaker 1: bad flood. Now right now, they are forecasting it to
Speaker 1: be to not breach the levies. One foot below is
Speaker 1: what they've got yesterday they were a little bit higher.
Speaker 1: But I'm very concerned, especially looking at the US hurricane models,
Speaker 1: which are you know, are emblematic of the problem we
Speaker 1: have in forecasting that they're trying to blow the storm
Speaker 1: up and take it right over New Orleans. So there's
Speaker 1: a lot of uncertainty here. And what we are doing
Speaker 1: is the same thing we've been doing all week is
Speaker 1: telling people that we believe this is going to come
Speaker 1: inland and it is a threat for New Orleans, Houston.
Speaker 1: I don't think you have to worry about much at all.
Speaker 1: So that's that's a positive that this is not coming
Speaker 1: all the way back to Houston. Well, when I'm trying
Speaker 1: to impact and absorb what you're saying about New Orleans,
Speaker 1: because I know, I mean, we went through Hurricane Katrina.
Speaker 1: Now you're talking about what rising tide because of the rainfall.
Speaker 1: Let's say it's twelve to eighteen inches that then breach
Speaker 1: the levies and that means it gets studded. If they
Speaker 1: get twelve eighteen inches of rain over New Orleans with
Speaker 1: the southerly winds, southeast south winds blowing for two two
Speaker 1: three days, even with the storm going west of them,
Speaker 1: that is going to be a huge problem. But there's
Speaker 1: so much variance here, and you know, Sean, in our
Speaker 1: preseason forecast we issued in April, we said, this is
Speaker 1: precisely the kind of storm to look for this year.
Speaker 1: May not be a lot coming off Africa, but the
Speaker 1: ones that pop in your backyard. You may see something
Speaker 1: pop in our backyard or relatively close before this season's over.
Speaker 1: That's the kind of year it is. So you know,
Speaker 1: we've sort of been waiting for this to start showing up.
Speaker 1: This kind of system. This didn't originate over tropics. It
Speaker 1: came down out of the northwest Alicia by the way,
Speaker 1: for you folks in Texas in nineteen eighty three, that
Speaker 1: was a Category three hurricane originated the same way. It
Speaker 1: was a land system that came down over the Gulf
Speaker 1: and turned west. So what we're telling people is this
Speaker 1: that there is a lot of potential in New Orleans
Speaker 1: for some real bad things to happen. I'm not going
Speaker 1: to sugarcoat that in the best case scenario. I think
Speaker 1: the best case is being outlined now now in that
Speaker 1: it will stay below the levees, and they're going to
Speaker 1: have a tropical storm. The hurricane part of this, because
Speaker 1: we do believe it will become a hurricane, will head
Speaker 1: off to Vermillion Bay and up over Lafayette to the
Speaker 1: west over there. But you've been down there before. You
Speaker 1: know how low lying that land is, how susceptible it
Speaker 1: is to flooding. So it is a headache. Well you
Speaker 1: just you know, I just in my own mind, would
Speaker 1: think after everything that New Orleans has been through, that
Speaker 1: they would have built the levees a little higher. Now
Speaker 1: they got listen. I gotta tell you something. After Katrina
Speaker 1: hit I wrote a paper called you know about why
Speaker 1: no matter what they do in New Orleans, the wrong
Speaker 1: storm is going to flood them. There's a storm in
Speaker 1: nineteen forty seven shown that came in from the east southeast.
Speaker 1: It hit West Palm as a category four or five,
Speaker 1: was only a one or two when it came back
Speaker 1: to New Orleans. I look at that track, that track
Speaker 1: back where it makes landfall just north of the mouth
Speaker 1: of the Mississippi and push is all the water back
Speaker 1: into Lake Bourne and Lake ponta train. If you had
Speaker 1: a storm as strong as Katrina take that path into
Speaker 1: New Orleans. I think a Bill Levy's twenty five thirty feet.
Speaker 1: It's not going to stop it. Remember Katrina, the storm
Speaker 1: surge was only nine to thirteen feet back into Ponta
Speaker 1: Train and it's not like It's not like a kind
Speaker 1: of storm surge that they had in Biloxi in East Gulfport.
Speaker 1: The biggest problem here though, is caused by the Mississippi
Speaker 1: being so high and relative to averages in the summer season,
Speaker 1: it's not usually this high, and that particular aspect was
Speaker 1: set up two thirty four months ago. And in addition,
Speaker 1: it's exactly opposite of what was being pushed in the
Speaker 1: climate change of agenda that we were going to start
Speaker 1: seeing droughts all over the place. And so it's amazing
Speaker 1: because you're seeing people come out of the woodwork high here.
Speaker 1: It is climate change. This is a run of the
Speaker 1: mill development in the northern Gulf of me to go.
Speaker 1: Compounded by the fact that instead of being so darned
Speaker 1: warm in the spring, it was wickedly cold in the plains.
Speaker 1: That's set up the battle for heavy precipitation. You had
Speaker 1: late melting snow and you know it's dangerously close to
Speaker 1: causing a big problem. Well with this, tomorrow is happening.
Speaker 1: The official meteorologist of the Sean Hannity Shows WeatherBell dot Com,
Speaker 1: Joe Bastardi. You've got an encyclopedic knowledge of every storm
Speaker 1: every year that goes back to the sixteen hundreds. Anyway
Speaker 1: about all I can do? Though, No, you can lift
Speaker 1: weights pretty well. Joe's a big weightlifter and bodybuilder. All right,
Speaker 1: Joe BISTARTI thank you, my friend. Eight hundred nine point
Speaker 1: one shunk. All right, So you got this. We've got
Speaker 1: three separate civil wars breaking out. You got the deep
Speaker 1: State all turning on each other, and by that, I
Speaker 1: mean you got Struck and Page they're turning. Well, they
Speaker 1: might be turning on each other interestingly, but certainly they
Speaker 1: have unitated and pointing the finger at the Attorney General
Speaker 1: Loretta Lynch at the time. Then you've got Comy. Comey's
Speaker 1: at war with Brennan and Clapper and there at war
Speaker 1: with him. Then Comey's battling McCabe, and then Baker's battling
Speaker 1: all of them. And I think the net result of
Speaker 1: it is people are starting to talk, and we're now
Speaker 1: getting finally to the deep dive part and the truth,
Speaker 1: which is going to be very interesting. Those that are
Speaker 1: held accountable for this abuse of power and corruption. Then
Speaker 1: you've got the Acasio Cortez I mean she accused Pelosi
Speaker 1: literally persistently singling out women of color. It's outright disrespectful
Speaker 1: coming on the heels of Nancy Pelosi playing the race
Speaker 1: card against the President and Republicans on the census question. Now,
Speaker 1: there is something that is happening with the twenty twenty
Speaker 1: leftist socialist DEFF. They all agree pretty much on some
Speaker 1: version of the New Green Deal. They all agree that
Speaker 1: they want illegal immigrants to get free healthcare. They all
Speaker 1: look agree that borders are immoral. They all agree on
Speaker 1: pretty much. They all want to raise taxes. They all
Speaker 1: want to raise taxes on businesses. Does anyone know the
Speaker 1: corporations pass the increase in taxes onto consumers or if
Speaker 1: you go to a ninety percent corporate marginal income tax rate,
Speaker 1: They're gonna leave the country. And if you have any
Speaker 1: doubt of what I'm saying is true, ask yourself. Why
Speaker 1: is New York, New Jersey, Illinois, California the highest tax
Speaker 1: states in the country. Why are they losing population to
Speaker 1: all the low tax states like Florida, Texas, Tennessee, the
Speaker 1: Carolinas wherever. Why because of burdensome taxation and regulation. Tax
Speaker 1: the rich, tax, the rich, tax the rich. We did now,
Speaker 1: God forbid the rich leave. They're leaving two point three
Speaker 1: billion dollars shortfall in New York. By the way, Andrew
Speaker 1: Cuomo can get out of any financial difficulty in thirty seconds.
Speaker 1: Just sign off on fracking and upstate New York. The
Speaker 1: best thing you ever did for the state. I don't
Speaker 1: think he's gonna do it anyway. So now we've got
Speaker 1: so the leading pack in the field just certainly emerged.
Speaker 1: It still remains sleepy, creepy, crazy Uncle Joe. Then you've
Speaker 1: got the worst mayor. Well, he's given Comrade de Blasio
Speaker 1: run for his money. But you know, you got Buddha
Speaker 1: Judge mayor Pete, who has the worst track record of
Speaker 1: a small town mayor. I've ever heard not that South Bend,
Speaker 1: Indiana small, But it is small, and it's a nice town.
Speaker 1: It's a home of Notre Dame. I mean it's great.
Speaker 1: And you got Kamala Harris who scored big points beating
Speaker 1: down Joe. But then pulling away. Remember, Harris says, there's
Speaker 1: going to be no private insurance. We're all going to
Speaker 1: be under medicare for all. Bernie Sanders bragging that he
Speaker 1: now has brought the entire Democratic Party over to his
Speaker 1: positions that are a mainstream, the socialist mainstreamer. And then
Speaker 1: of course Elizabeth Warren. You know, combined they raised one
Speaker 1: hundred million dollars in the past three months and they
Speaker 1: share the majority of the public support. Anyway, so now
Speaker 1: you got Biden says, all right, let me change the topic.
Speaker 1: He's talking about foreign policy. The same guy that gave
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty billion to mullahs that chant death
Speaker 1: to America, death to Israel. You got Buddha Judge proposing
Speaker 1: a broad plan to counter what he's calling racial inequality
Speaker 1: and establish a ten billion dollar fund for black entrepreneurs
Speaker 1: over five years, twenty five billion in historic for historically
Speaker 1: black colleges, legalized marijuana, expunge pass drug convictions, reduced the
Speaker 1: prison population by half, and pass a new voting rights
Speaker 1: act to empower etc. Etc. Anyway, and comparing it to
Speaker 1: a Marshall plan, and which is the equivalent about one
Speaker 1: hundred billion dollars at current value. Then you got Kamala Harris.
Speaker 1: She decided to team up with Alexandria Acasio Cortez on
Speaker 1: a housing legislation, and we don't have a price to
Speaker 1: ticket on that. Then we have the Blasio saying I'm
Speaker 1: gonna pay all pay female athletes equally if elected president. Well, okay,
Speaker 1: but I didn't know the government paid athletes, so I
Speaker 1: thought teams paid athletes. I guess they'll determine that too.
Speaker 1: And by the way, New York is proposing building brand
Speaker 1: new jails with a more welcoming experience that will replace
Speaker 1: Rikers Island. I'll have jails with natural sunlight, space for
Speaker 1: programming and a children's play area for the prisoners. And
Speaker 1: that's what they're proposing. And I'm not making this up.
Speaker 1: Somehow something to do it before two thousand and eight.
Speaker 1: As if my opponents want to believe, I served from
Speaker 1: nineteen seventy two to two thousand and eight and then
Speaker 1: took hiatus the next eight years. They don't want to
Speaker 1: talk much about my time as vice president. Nine states.
Speaker 1: It was the honor of my lifetime to serve with
Speaker 1: the man who I believe is a great president, historic figure,
Speaker 1: and most important to me a close friend. I was vetted.
Speaker 1: I was bettered by he and ten serious lawyers he
Speaker 1: appointed to go back and to look at every single
Speaker 1: thing in my background, from finances to anything. I had
Speaker 1: done everything, and he selected me. I'll take his judgment
Speaker 1: about my record, my character, my ability to handle a job,
Speaker 1: over anyone else's. I know there many I want this
Speaker 1: campaign to me by my past, my past, my past.
Speaker 1: I get it, that's the game. But this isn't a game.
Speaker 1: Every one of you, no matter who you're for, no
Speaker 1: in your bones, this election is different, not because I'm running.
Speaker 1: This election is different. Here we are in Nashville. I
Speaker 1: know this from my home state of Texas, those places
Speaker 1: that formed the Confederacy, that this country was founded on
Speaker 1: white supremacy, and every single institution and structure that we
Speaker 1: have in our country still reflects the legacy of slavery
Speaker 1: and segregation in Jim Crow and suppression even in our democracy,
Speaker 1: ability to vote and participate in our elections. All right.
Speaker 1: That was Robert Francis Beto Bozo O'Rourke, glad you're with us,
Speaker 1: eight hundred and nine for one sean. Before that, it
Speaker 1: was sleepy, creepy, crazy uncle Joe, now, by the way,
Speaker 1: finally got his footing. It took him three weeks after
Speaker 1: the Kamala Harris beat down. But now he's come up
Speaker 1: with the line and he's delivering it with such passion. Anyway,
Speaker 1: got a lot to get to a couple of things.
Speaker 1: You gotta know here, Oh, I forgot to mention, you know,
Speaker 1: Nancy Pelosi is giving illegal immigrants tips on how to
Speaker 1: evade ice agents. It's just kind of a new low.
Speaker 1: But sanctuary cities and states kind of do the same
Speaker 1: thing as you're aiding and abetting in criminal activity. But anyway,
Speaker 1: in a press conference earlier today, after the real speaker,
Speaker 1: she's speaker in name only, Acasio Cortez ripped her for
Speaker 1: pretty much being racist and going after only women of color. Anyway,
Speaker 1: press conference earlier today, Pelosi actually told the illegal immigrants
Speaker 1: they don't need to answer the door if ice comes knocking,
Speaker 1: because a deportation warrant is not the same as a
Speaker 1: search warrant. I mean, these are supposed to be lawmakers.
Speaker 1: If you don't like the law, if you don't like
Speaker 1: the constitution, it just can't make it up as you go.
Speaker 1: That's not how a civil society a constitutional republic actually works.
Speaker 1: But I'm sure that that's just new news to her.
Speaker 1: She probably doesn't even know anyway. So we do have
Speaker 1: other sort of on the sidelines. We have some other
Speaker 1: data that has come in for crazy creepy Uncle Joe.
Speaker 1: Remember Biden and Obama left, and we had thirteen million
Speaker 1: more Americans on food stamps, eight million more in poverty,
Speaker 1: the worst recovery since the forties, lowest labor participation rates
Speaker 1: since the seventies, more debt than all forty three presidents
Speaker 1: and vice presidents before them combined. Okay, and they dropped
Speaker 1: one hundred and fifty billion dollars, these geniuses known as
Speaker 1: Biden Obama the one hundred and fifty billion dollars in
Speaker 1: cash and other currencies on the tarmac of Tehron for
Speaker 1: Muller's that chant death to America. You know, could the
Speaker 1: convert or die leaders of Iran that have been sewing
Speaker 1: proxy wars terrorism, funding terrorism for all these years. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's brilliant move on the part of creepy, sleepy, crazy
Speaker 1: Uncle Joe and Obama. By the way, military poll out
Speaker 1: by the Military Time shows ve Yeah, they overwhelmingly approve
Speaker 1: of the president. That's not an appeaser. Wow, and by
Speaker 1: the way, a near record in that particular poll. And
Speaker 1: on top of it, yeah, what is helping the people
Speaker 1: that are doing the best? Heritage Foundation puts out a
Speaker 1: study and with the new unemployment numbers that came out
Speaker 1: two hundred and twenty four thousand jobs created in June, unexpected,
Speaker 1: of course like every other month. Now that we're headed
Speaker 1: towards seven million new jobs under Donald Trump and seven
Speaker 1: million fewer people on food stamps on the unemployment lines.
Speaker 1: And of course now we know too from the census
Speaker 1: that in fact there's seven point five million jobs unfilled
Speaker 1: right now in the country. But just pointing it out
Speaker 1: that the people that benefited the most out of this
Speaker 1: climb and the economy of Donald Trump, when you actually
Speaker 1: look for it, it is quote the US economy offers
Speaker 1: new opportunities to people who have historically been left behind.
Speaker 1: The left continues to push their radic agenda against American values.
Speaker 1: The good news is there is a solution. Average wages
Speaker 1: have grown above three percent now for ten straight months,
Speaker 1: twice as fast as inflation since the tax cuts the
Speaker 1: largest in history by Donald Trump. In twenty seventeen. Wage
Speaker 1: growth for the poorest twenty five percent of Americans has
Speaker 1: now reached a post recession high of four point four percent.
Speaker 1: Don't forget ten percent of American taxpayers pay seventy percent
Speaker 1: of the income tax bill, twenty percent over ninety percent.
Speaker 1: The bottom fifty percent of wage earners pay no federal
Speaker 1: income taxes, none, nothing, not a penny. So we have
Speaker 1: full and complete redistribution. Now the question is as the
Speaker 1: Democrats now begin to lay out their policies without specifics
Speaker 1: and without costs, and all of them support illegal immigrants. Yeah, healthcare,
Speaker 1: you're paying for it and everything in between. Now they're
Speaker 1: aiding and abetting in sanctuary cities, states and everything else.
Speaker 1: And you got creepy Uncle Joe now given a foreign
Speaker 1: policy speech. He's the guy that helped the Mullahs in Iran.
Speaker 1: And you got Buddha Judge proposing one hundred billion dollars
Speaker 1: in a plan to counter racial inequality. And you got
Speaker 1: Kamala Harris who says we're all going to be under
Speaker 1: Medicare for all and no private insurance. How did Obamacare
Speaker 1: keep your doctor plan and save money work out? It didn't.
Speaker 1: And de Blasio Comrade Deblasio's pledging to pay female athletes
Speaker 1: equally two men. I didn't know that the city's mayor
Speaker 1: of New York was responsible for paying athletes for professional teams.
Speaker 1: I actually thought the free market determined what a team
Speaker 1: chooses to pay or not pay somebody. Anyway, here to
Speaker 1: look at the latest polls. Where we are in this
Speaker 1: twenty twenty election. John McLaughlin, Matt Towery are with us.
Speaker 1: Welcome back both of you. And you're doing a great
Speaker 1: job in retirement. Matt, as I can tell as you're.
Speaker 1: You come on every time we ask you, and you
Speaker 1: always have some good recent data to share. But you're
Speaker 1: not working. We'll just pretend you're telling the truth on that.
Speaker 1: But at least I'm in Atlanta today, Sean, all right, well,
Speaker 1: good for you. All right. So here's here's the main question.
Speaker 1: If you couple the New Green Deal, if you add
Speaker 1: that to legal immigrants, healthcare being paid for, and everything
Speaker 1: in between, versus the Trump economy, do these polls even
Speaker 1: mean a single thing to you? To me, absolutely not.
Speaker 1: I think right now we're in this time period where
Speaker 1: tolling these various horse races between the billious Democratic candidates,
Speaker 1: or even between the Democrats and the president are relatively meaningless.
Speaker 1: I mean, we saw how quickly being shifted just from
Speaker 1: the debate where Kamala Harris managed to land that blow
Speaker 1: to Bide, and everything moved very quickly because of course
Speaker 1: the media moved in that direction. Now we're seeing some
Speaker 1: of a little bit of a drifting that Biden's up
Speaker 1: by eleven points on average and real politics, none of
Speaker 1: this really matters right now. But what does matter, Sean,
Speaker 1: and I think it's very important, is that the overall
Speaker 1: drift of the Democratic Party to the left, which is
Speaker 1: very obvious from that debate and all the fall out,
Speaker 1: I think that's assisting the president even more in his
Speaker 1: approval ratings. Did you recall about three weeks ago when
Speaker 1: we were on the airs, I said I felt like
Speaker 1: in my gut that the president turned the corner and
Speaker 1: that his approval ratings were moving up. And we've seen
Speaker 1: that happen really accelerate after that test or that speat.
Speaker 1: Do you see do you see anybody in your review?
Speaker 1: John McLaughlin and I had this conversation when I was
Speaker 1: on vacation last week with a number of people. Do
Speaker 1: you see Donald Trump losing any of the vote from
Speaker 1: twenty sixteen and do you think with record low unemployment
Speaker 1: for the demographics such as African Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans,
Speaker 1: women in the youth workforce, and youth unemployment, do you
Speaker 1: see that he has the POTENTI until of gaining new voters. Absolutely?
Speaker 1: I mean, I mean our strategy back in twenty sixteen,
Speaker 1: when when ben Donald Trump the candidate, asked me how
Speaker 1: are we going to win? I said, we were going
Speaker 1: to excite new voters, and we brought out nine million
Speaker 1: new voters. Then they had for a record historic turnout
Speaker 1: of a hundred thirty nine million, and we were able
Speaker 1: to defy the polls because we brought out new voters.
Speaker 1: You're going to have the same effect now. And we
Speaker 1: had sixty three million voters come out and support them
Speaker 1: for president back in twenty sixteen. The strategy this time
Speaker 1: is very clear that we've been, as mad As pointed out,
Speaker 1: we've been grinding up moving up the president's job approval.
Speaker 1: So even these biased polls, like if you go on
Speaker 1: the Real Clear Politics average, you'll see all these polls
Speaker 1: and they'll have his average at forty five for job
Speaker 1: approval and if and the Liberals are freaking out because
Speaker 1: you'll have the Washington Post saying we've got forty seven
Speaker 1: percent job approval and these other ones. But they're registered voters.
Speaker 1: So that's a universe of two arm forty million people
Speaker 1: you'll have. Instead of one hundred and thirty nine million
Speaker 1: people like we had twenty sixteen, you'll have one hundred
Speaker 1: over one hundred forty maybe arrom fifty million people come out.
Speaker 1: So the president is actually broadening his base as well
Speaker 1: as do you see him losing all the people that
Speaker 1: voted for him in twenty sixteen. Let's focus on three
Speaker 1: states in particular, because I think it'll make all the difference. Pennsylvania, Wisconsin,
Speaker 1: and Michigan. Of course, North Carolina, Ohio, Florida, they always matter,
Speaker 1: But in those three states, you see anybody that can
Speaker 1: take those states back for the Democrats gotten this group
Speaker 1: because his met said, and you've pointed out they're going left.
Speaker 1: I mean, the best thing we had was that the
Speaker 1: last series of Democrat debates, I mean the Trump campaign,
Speaker 1: I wanted to run them as an infomercial and just
Speaker 1: keep looping them and letting people play. I mean that
Speaker 1: the one question where the moderator asked the Democrats, would
Speaker 1: you you know, do you support free healthcare for illegal immigrants?
Speaker 1: And they all raise their hands. I mean there's people
Speaker 1: out there in those states of years ago, in Pennsylvania
Speaker 1: and Michigan, Wisconsin, they can't afford their own healthcare, and
Speaker 1: now you wanted to tax them to pay for somebody
Speaker 1: who's here illegally. I mean, the Democratic Party is really
Speaker 1: going that's the second part of our strategies. Let them
Speaker 1: go off to on the edge. Now let them I
Speaker 1: don't know when they're digging a big hole, let them
Speaker 1: dig it. I do think that they're now locked into
Speaker 1: these positions that are so out of the mainstream. Matt Towery,
Speaker 1: how big an impact? Well, I think it's a huge impact.
Speaker 1: And to John's point, I mean, and I say, the presidents,
Speaker 1: what could you have someone like John at Boston? Because
Speaker 1: he gets it. This has to do with John. Why
Speaker 1: are you sucking up to John? Don't don't who you're
Speaker 1: I don't have to suck up to John anymore. I've
Speaker 1: just happened, I know, because you're retired, just like I'm retired.
Speaker 1: Keep going right, So anyway he would like it to have,
Speaker 1: but but that haven't been said. It's about turnouts and
Speaker 1: I think what's going to happen, Sean, and they've been
Speaker 1: we talked about this before. I think that not only
Speaker 1: are you going to see an increase in intensity and
Speaker 1: turn out for the president, I think you're going to
Speaker 1: see as they drifts further to the left. And I
Speaker 1: think that's inevitable with this Democratic Party this time. You're
Speaker 1: going to see states that John and I are not
Speaker 1: even talking about right now that will drift more towards
Speaker 1: President Trump. I think again, this is a Nixon the
Speaker 1: govern type election scenario. I will put one little caveat there.
Speaker 1: The only states that I'm concerned about are the demographically
Speaker 1: challenged states, of which one of which I'm at today,
Speaker 1: which is Georgia, because a state like this has seen
Speaker 1: a shift in tur and just based on how people
Speaker 1: vote demographically historically, Cobb County, which of course in our
Speaker 1: old days, Sean, when you and I were doing the
Speaker 1: New Ingrid Stain, Cobb was seventy percent Republicans. That would
Speaker 1: vote sixty five to seventy percent Republican. It is likely
Speaker 1: to be a Democratic county this next go around, which
Speaker 1: gives you some idea of the change, and that is
Speaker 1: a dramatic shift and I was there. I was there
Speaker 1: when the state of Georgia went blue to red. So
Speaker 1: I mean you saw the whole thing. So now most
Speaker 1: people expect, well, the majority of the legislative delegation, which
Speaker 1: I was a part of years ago as a Republican,
Speaker 1: is now Democrat in Cobb County. Yeah, all right, I
Speaker 1: gotta I gotta take a break more with Matt Towery
Speaker 1: and John McLaughlin, our posters. All right, let's we roll
Speaker 1: along Sean Hannity show our posters taking the polls every
Speaker 1: couple of weeks or so. Matt Towery, John McLaughlin, all right,
Speaker 1: if you had the guests now today, John McLaughlin, what's
Speaker 1: the Democratic ticket? I think right now he's going to
Speaker 1: see a battle between Harrison Warren for the nomination. A lot.
Speaker 1: There's a lot of things that can happen between now
Speaker 1: and then. But in the past, remember we talked about Biden.
Speaker 1: Biden has collapsed from May ninth, from forty one percent
Speaker 1: in the peak of the Real Clear Politics average fourteen points,
Speaker 1: where he's down to twenty seven percent on the average,
Speaker 1: and he's gonna collapse even more because they're really picking
Speaker 1: on him, and there's been a secondary collapse. Sanders has
Speaker 1: gone from twenty four percent back in March down to
Speaker 1: fifteen percent now. And you've got Harrison's fifteen to Warren
Speaker 1: and fourteen six ten Democrat prior voters happened to be women,
Speaker 1: and a good number of them happened to be African
Speaker 1: American women. So you're about to see this, all right,
Speaker 1: fight coming up? Matt, What do you think we got
Speaker 1: about forty five seconds? Okay? I said two months ago, Harris,
Speaker 1: I'm sticking with Harris. I think she'll probably be the nominee.
Speaker 1: The running they would be. I would agree that Warren
Speaker 1: would be right up there close though, because she's a fighter,
Speaker 1: and I do think it'll be a woman who's a
Speaker 1: nominated I'm going to agree right now advantage Kamala Harris,
Speaker 1: but I think her extreme positions when exposs are going
Speaker 1: to prevent her from ever winning the presidency. I agreed.
Speaker 1: I agreed, um, and watch out disagree, Watch out for
Speaker 1: Buddha judge. What you who disagrees gon bo Buddha judge
Speaker 1: is ant going anywhere? No, I absolutely, I can't disagree.
Speaker 1: And you know what, in the end, the winner is
Speaker 1: going to be Donald Trump. I've been saying this for
Speaker 1: a while, and you've been saying it, Matt's been saying it,
Speaker 1: and now you're seeing it come about. And uh, we've
Speaker 1: got a long ways to go, but the environment here,
Speaker 1: quick break, we'll come back. We'll continue your calls coming
Speaker 1: up twenty five now to the top of the hour.
Speaker 1: Eight nine one Seawan is our toll free telephone number.
Speaker 1: I'd like it. What has been going on most of
Speaker 1: the day here? Today they add the free speech summit
Speaker 1: at the White House, which is all that you're referring
Speaker 1: to us and our hard work. Sorry, okay, you're doing
Speaker 1: a great job. And now why is this free speech summit?
Speaker 1: If if these big massive tech companies, let's let's take
Speaker 1: Project Veritas and Google and the tape of James O'Keefe,
Speaker 1: if they have the ability to control the content of
Speaker 1: what they put up as news on their sites, and
Speaker 1: they suppress other news, and they they literally set algorithms. Again,
Speaker 1: this is outside of my area of expertise. I can
Speaker 1: barely download an app, but I get it done somehow.
Speaker 1: Lendah my kids. Somebody helped me download an app. Um.
Speaker 1: But if they get this is the biggest in kind
Speaker 1: donation ever when you're talking about how many was it
Speaker 1: every second? Six million plus people on Google? Stan, boy,
Speaker 1: let me get the boy. Are we waiting for the
Speaker 1: New Yorker to google it up? Go to Google first
Speaker 1: of all dot com. I'll be looking on handy dot
Speaker 1: dot dot com. Yeah, we've been to put the statistics
Speaker 1: up there. Welcome. But every single time, every second of
Speaker 1: every minute of every hour of every day, if they're
Speaker 1: controlling the content, well, and they're doing it to favor
Speaker 1: one political party, one ideology over another, that is an
Speaker 1: in kind contribution, a massive one because of the numb
Speaker 1: right here. And is he you're ready? I'm ready. I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: it's walking. Go ahead. Google receives over sixty three thousand
Speaker 1: searches per second on any give and day. Say that again.
Speaker 1: Google receives over sixty three thousand searches per second on
Speaker 1: any given day. Wow, that's a lot of searches. So
Speaker 1: the algorithm. This is why that Project Veritas tape was
Speaker 1: so good. It exposed their agenda. It all looks strewed
Speaker 1: over twenty sixteen. Again, it wasn't like people got stewed over.
Speaker 1: The news got strewed over, like everybody got stewed over,
Speaker 1: so they were robbing the Jingini is the head of
Speaker 1: Responsible Innovation at Google Global Affairs. She determines policy and
Speaker 1: ethics for machine learning or artificial intelligence. What we've learned
Speaker 1: is that AI is increasingly what Google search is all about.
Speaker 1: But the reason the entree tells me the people are
Speaker 1: not putting that line in the saying who were like, well,
Speaker 1: we are who are going to say it as a
Speaker 1: bias that the story marginalized maybees who are maybe these
Speaker 1: who are in power. Our definition of fairness one of
Speaker 1: those things that we thought would mean like obvious and
Speaker 1: everybody would agree to the same. People's voting for the
Speaker 1: current president do not agree with their national harness. Fairness
Speaker 1: is a dog whistle. It does not mean what you
Speaker 1: think that it means, and you have to apply double
Speaker 1: think in order to understand what they're really saying. What
Speaker 1: they're really saying about fairness is that they have to
Speaker 1: manipulate their search results so it gives them their political
Speaker 1: agenda that they want, and so they have to rebias
Speaker 1: their algorithms so that they can they can get their
Speaker 1: agenda across, you know, unpack everything that she's saying saying
Speaker 1: that she wants to be she wants the algorithm to
Speaker 1: be fair to a handpicked representative of that community. Means
Speaker 1: that what she's trying to do is she's trying to
Speaker 1: sell your product that is not objectionable. It's what she's
Speaker 1: trying to do is she's trying to sell a product
Speaker 1: that's not objective, that doesn't represent the will of its users,
Speaker 1: but instead represents the will of a group of people
Speaker 1: making decisions behind the shadows. So what did you find
Speaker 1: inside Google that was related to this idea of fairness?
Speaker 1: What I found at Google related to fairness was a
Speaker 1: machine learning algorithm called a MEL fairness a NOL standing
Speaker 1: for machine learning and fairness, meaning whatever it is that
Speaker 1: they wanted to define as fair. You could actually think
Speaker 1: of fairness as unfair because it's taking as input the
Speaker 1: clicks that people are making and then figuring out what
Speaker 1: signals are being generated from the clicks and which signals
Speaker 1: wants to amplify and then also, Project Veritas also received
Speaker 1: a trope of confidential documents from within Google. This document
Speaker 1: is about algorithmic unfairness. It reads quote for example, imagine
Speaker 1: that a Google image query for CEOs shows predominantly men,
Speaker 1: even if it were a factually accurate representation of the world,
Speaker 1: it would be algorithmic unfairness unquote. Gorov Guite, a Google
Speaker 1: software engineer, independently verified the thesis of this Documents and
Speaker 1: fairness teams. Yeah, you need to be Yeah, time modify
Speaker 1: the substyle. It's kind of balances out. This is a
Speaker 1: confidential document, correct, Yes, which is not a document that
Speaker 1: Google has come out and admitted that this is their process.
Speaker 1: That's correct, And in this document it says I'm going
Speaker 1: to read from it. In fact, in fact, if you
Speaker 1: brought this up, I thought the document, they would say
Speaker 1: that this is a conspiracy theory. Wow, So they wouldn't
Speaker 1: admit this publicly. Who would never admit this publicly? In
Speaker 1: this document, it says in some cases, it may be
Speaker 1: appropriate to take no action if the system accurately affects
Speaker 1: current reality, while in other cases it may be desirable
Speaker 1: to consider how he might help society reach a more
Speaker 1: fair and equitable state via product intervention. What do they
Speaker 1: mean by that? So what they want to do is
Speaker 1: they want to act as gatekeepers between the user and
Speaker 1: the content that they're trying to access. And so they're
Speaker 1: going to come in, They're going to filter the content,
Speaker 1: and they're going to say, actually, we don't want to
Speaker 1: give the user access to that information because it's going
Speaker 1: to create an outcome that's undesirable to us. Does Google
Speaker 1: have an editorial agenda? Does the company make news decisions?
Speaker 1: Is that what I'm seeing in this document? Yes? Um,
Speaker 1: this is describing what's happening within the Google News. Would
Speaker 1: Google have a problem if people saw this document? I
Speaker 1: think so? Why wouldn't Google want people to see this document?
Speaker 1: The reason why is because um, right here, Um, in
Speaker 1: some of these boxes, they're applying editorial, their their editorial
Speaker 1: agenda onto the news sources. And if you were to
Speaker 1: expand that, you would see that there's a machine learning
Speaker 1: fairness within these algorithmic checks. And they state right here
Speaker 1: that it's for callability and extractability, but in reality, it's
Speaker 1: it's it's doesn't fall in line with their um, with
Speaker 1: their agenda, and if it does, it it pops the top,
Speaker 1: and if it doesn't, then it gets buried. Google's really
Speaker 1: thinking and they won't say in public, but she just said,
Speaker 1: you know what a lot of us see and know
Speaker 1: to be true, and you guys just got her and
Speaker 1: she was just she said the truth. They're not an
Speaker 1: objective piece, They're not an objective source of information. They
Speaker 1: are a highly biased political machine UM that is bent
Speaker 1: on never letting somebody like Donald Trump come to power again.
Speaker 1: Twenty certainty, on top of my old organization, on top
Speaker 1: of mind, they've been working on it since twenty sixteen
Speaker 1: to make sure the game we have there pretty unbelievable.
Speaker 1: All right, eight hundred and nine four one Sean, If
Speaker 1: you want to be a part of the program, actually,
Speaker 1: you know what before we do that, Oh boy, I
Speaker 1: think that we should know this is a good thing.
Speaker 1: I think we should remind the audience of what James
Speaker 1: O'Keefe discovered, you know, just a little bit, not like
Speaker 1: a lot. I'm not going to take away from the
Speaker 1: coalism saying say something, you're you you're It gets thicker,
Speaker 1: It doesn't get better, it gets thicker. Should I talk
Speaker 1: like you golf? Say golf, Say golf the way you
Speaker 1: say I say golf. And I want to have a
Speaker 1: gulf off wolf walk. I'm calling it a golf off.
Speaker 1: Is that what you call it in sports? Well off? No,
Speaker 1: there's no such thing as a gulf off, no such
Speaker 1: thing as like wolf off. But isn't there a thing
Speaker 1: in sports how dance off? Oh you know what, that
Speaker 1: is what I'm thinking of. Ethan's right, I love dancing.
Speaker 1: Let's see that, Sean, Let's sayut dance each other. No, bo,
Speaker 1: he's I've already been I I've already been humiliated. Actually,
Speaker 1: out with you at the Redneck River, you weren't humiliated.
Speaker 1: You were revered. They were like, oh my god, Sean
Speaker 1: actually has a friend that can shake it. Oh thank you. No,
Speaker 1: that's not what it was at all. So we're there
Speaker 1: with our entire crew and what was the audience knows
Speaker 1: a story and they're on my side. Okay, we're there for.
Speaker 1: We were there for everybody was there for a very
Speaker 1: Psalmber sang, Oh that's right. Remember okay, So did you
Speaker 1: want me to finish you? Okay, now please take it
Speaker 1: by all means. I don't want it at all. Why
Speaker 1: would I love being interrupted? Go ahead interrupt me. So anyhow,
Speaker 1: we were out there for a very somber event, which
Speaker 1: was the one year anniversary of the deadly shooting in
Speaker 1: Las Vegas for all of those folks that went to
Speaker 1: the country music festival, and John Rich came out there
Speaker 1: big and Rich, and we had this amazing sort of
Speaker 1: like charity event. It was like a tribute and it
Speaker 1: was really beautiful. But afterwards, John Rich has a redneck
Speaker 1: Riviera whiskey bar on strip, so him and Kenny got
Speaker 1: up and they actually did a very impromptu set. It
Speaker 1: was fantastic. Sounds is in there spot on and so
Speaker 1: you know, I decided to take where the rhythm moved me,
Speaker 1: which was the dance floor with many other people. The
Speaker 1: only difference was all of you and the rest of
Speaker 1: your staff were too stiff and too incapable to join me,
Speaker 1: So I had to dance with strangers, which was fine, Okay,
Speaker 1: it was a little weird. And Lair and I saw
Speaker 1: this and we're like looking and Stanger was there, and
Speaker 1: sweet Baby James was there and everybody's looking like she's
Speaker 1: dancing on the dance floor by herself. Yeah. And then
Speaker 1: Finland I dance too, Remember I remember that. And I
Speaker 1: remember Lair saw me in Finland. He didn't see me
Speaker 1: in Vegas, but John Rich saw me in Vegas, and
Speaker 1: John Rich gave me a big old thumbs up. Well
Speaker 1: you think he was on the stage playing with Big Kenny,
Speaker 1: And I don't think he saw you in the crowd.
Speaker 1: I got a major shout out from the stage. He
Speaker 1: was like Linda from Hannity in the house, what what? Yeah,
Speaker 1: okay whatever, And that happened. I remember me sad, sweet
Speaker 1: baby James and everybody else like, oh my god, this
Speaker 1: is gonna hold up the wall. I can't do it
Speaker 1: on its own. That's exactly That's what I'm doing. All right, right,
Speaker 1: let me get to the phones. We'll say hi to
Speaker 1: Jerry and Missouri. How are you, Missolie. I'm just kidding.
Speaker 1: How are you, Jerry? What's going on? Oh? Pretty? Something
Speaker 1: fun when you're not working. I'll make this asked. I
Speaker 1: am so tired of the double standards that both sides
Speaker 1: are practice in regard to the Epstein matter. If Secretary
Speaker 1: Acosta is going to face consequences, and maybe he should,
Speaker 1: then so should the Clintons, because they were even Clinton
Speaker 1: was there well, I mean twenty six times on the
Speaker 1: Lolita Express, and by all accounts, on most of those trips,
Speaker 1: you have these young girls. You know, I was talking
Speaker 1: to somebody I forget who yesterday and and I don't
Speaker 1: know what was going on, but I'm like, I'm sorry,
Speaker 1: there's too much smoke here and I have sirens blaring
Speaker 1: all over my mind about all of this. But you know,
Speaker 1: one of the things that Alexander a Costa said, and
Speaker 1: I didn't really think about this last night, Pam Bondi
Speaker 1: was on and she made the observation that she has
Speaker 1: tried a lot of these sex crime cases there. I mean,
Speaker 1: these these are there are these predator pedophiles out there,
Speaker 1: and remember remember to catch a criminal. Remember that show
Speaker 1: that went on they would catch all the pedophiles and
Speaker 1: it was actually catch a predator, all right, So I
Speaker 1: would watch these things. I mean, it's so disgusting what
Speaker 1: they do and how they literally they're predators. They're out
Speaker 1: there and they are trying to lure teenage kids to
Speaker 1: have sex with them. In other words, they are the
Speaker 1: embodiment of evil. You know, look at the hierarchy in prison.
Speaker 1: You could be the worst murderer and you'll you'll get
Speaker 1: along with the prison population. If you're a predator pedophile,
Speaker 1: they don't want They even have a line that you
Speaker 1: don't cross. And I'm talking about the worst criminals. But
Speaker 1: what Pam was saying, and what a Costa was revealing
Speaker 1: and saying, is that the lenient deal happened because a
Speaker 1: lot of the accusers were refusing. And by the way,
Speaker 1: I'm not judging the accusers. If you come out and
Speaker 1: you make an allegation and you got to be cross
Speaker 1: examined and you're fourteen years old with braces, as the
Speaker 1: Daily Mail article pointed out in one case, and those
Speaker 1: defense attorneys are going right at you. I don't know that.
Speaker 1: I mean, now you have to relive the trauma again
Speaker 1: and again and again. I don't know. If a kid
Speaker 1: doesn't want to do that, you can't blame them. And
Speaker 1: I all but two apparently refused to testify. According to
Speaker 1: former prosecutor Solomon Weisberg, he was on Fox News last
Speaker 1: night with Laura and based on allegations from two of
Speaker 1: the accusers, it was not a slam dunk, especially since
Speaker 1: according to reports that you know, there were people willing
Speaker 1: to testify that, oh, he was actually a great guy.
Speaker 1: I don't know. I mean, it's it's a little more complicated,
Speaker 1: but I'll tell you this, my gut, my siren, my
Speaker 1: instinct is it's reeling in my head