WEBVTT - Sunset Boulevard

0:00:01.000 --> 0:00:03.960
<v Speaker 1>On the Bechdel Cast, the questions asked if movies have

0:00:04.120 --> 0:00:07.960
<v Speaker 1>women in them, are all their discussions just boyfriends and husbands,

0:00:08.039 --> 0:00:11.879
<v Speaker 1>or do they have individualism? It's the patriarchy. Zephy and

0:00:12.119 --> 0:00:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Beast start changing it with the Bechdel Cast.

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Mister Jamie, I'm ready for my close up.

0:00:20.440 --> 0:00:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Bad news. You're under arrest. No nor acab includes particularly

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:32.400
<v Speaker 1>the cops that arrested Norma Desmond. She did nothing wrong.

0:00:33.880 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>All she did was have a dream.

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:39.560
<v Speaker 2>Murdering a male screenwriter is not against the law.

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Brutal, brutal. I feel like the movie does feel that

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>way a little bit, but maybe I'm just prigeting. Welcome

0:00:48.479 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 1>to the Bechdel Cast. We are washed up podcast stars.

0:00:55.920 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>They're oh god, you know, really, is it like the

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.480
<v Speaker 1>second you turned thirty that you're like, oh, Norma does

0:01:01.560 --> 0:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but you know, bushy wrong.

0:01:03.040 --> 0:01:07.760
<v Speaker 2>She's got some interesting ID you know, maybe she's onto something.

0:01:07.880 --> 0:01:10.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I should live with a little chimpanzee at my

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 1>house and would that be so bad? Oh?

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:17.280
<v Speaker 2>I felt so bad for that really weird looking chimp.

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what the prop department was doing, but.

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.039
<v Speaker 1>It was like, what, Okay, I'm not even gonna say it,

0:01:24.040 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 1>there's something Nope, never mind, Okay, Yeah, I'm washed Up

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Podcast star Jamie Loftus.

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:31.920
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Washed Up Podcast star Caitlin Dernte And this

0:01:32.000 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>is our washed Up podcast. Hell yeah, where we examine

0:01:38.160 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 2>movies through an intersectional feminist lens, using the Bechdel Test

0:01:43.040 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 2>as a jumping off point.

0:01:45.360 --> 0:01:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh, this movie has a fun pass there. Yeah, what

0:01:51.080 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>just happened to my brain? Holy shit? Happy New Year? Yes,

0:01:53.960 --> 0:01:57.400
<v Speaker 1>and here's what the Bechdel test. We're too washed up

0:01:57.440 --> 0:02:00.760
<v Speaker 1>to even talk. Oh my god, so sorry. Our brains

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are just so old and decaying that we don't even know.

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 1>We think we're on the set of soloam or whatever?

0:02:07.200 --> 0:02:08.920
<v Speaker 1>Can you keeps spacing out in the middle of this

0:02:08.960 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>recording and being like solo where what? Anyways? Sorry, our

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.920
<v Speaker 1>feeble little brains aren't working. The Bechdel Test is a

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>media metric originally created by queer cartoonist Alison Bechdel with

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>her friend Liz Wallace, which is why it's often called

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>the Bechdel Wallace Test. It was originally created just as

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>a one off joke in her excellent comic Dikes to

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Watch Out For, as a way of drawing attention to

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>how little queer representation there was and how infrequently women

0:02:39.320 --> 0:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>spoke to each other. Lots of versions of the test.

0:02:41.800 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>Our version is this, we require that a character of

0:02:46.320 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>a marginalized gender with a name speak to another character

0:02:50.639 --> 0:02:53.400
<v Speaker 1>of a marginalized gender with a name about something other

0:02:53.440 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>than a man, for two lines of dialogue. Most movies

0:02:57.600 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>don't do it. Past present, and I'll say it future.

0:03:01.200 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we moved the needle very much, but

0:03:04.040 --> 0:03:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that's okay. And today we are discussing a movie that

0:03:08.440 --> 0:03:12.760
<v Speaker 1>has been on our request list forever and one that

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>just felt like it would be fun because it features

0:03:15.040 --> 0:03:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the most depressing New Year's Party ever committed to film, truly,

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:21.760
<v Speaker 1>And we just hit the New Year, and so it's

0:03:21.840 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 1>high time we cover Sunset Bulevard nineteen fifty directed by

0:03:25.800 --> 0:03:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Billy wild At. That's so true. Who is German not Australian? Yeah? Wait,

0:03:34.160 --> 0:03:38.080
<v Speaker 1>huge news. Caitlin and I were talking to an Australian

0:03:38.080 --> 0:03:39.960
<v Speaker 1>guy the other night at a New Year's party that

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>was not depressing. It was very fun. It was very fun,

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and he complimented your Australian accent.

0:03:45.320 --> 0:03:49.040
<v Speaker 2>He did and did. I felt so honored.

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:51.720
<v Speaker 1>It was truly like, in the seven years we've been

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.119
<v Speaker 1>doing this, the first time we've received active encouragement from

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>an authority and it felt really good. Yeah, so thank

0:03:59.120 --> 0:04:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you Trint for for the compliments that did not pass

0:04:05.320 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 1>the Bechdel test. So hope you're taking notes, Hope you're

0:04:07.800 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>keeping up correct.

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 2>You know what is going to pass the Bechdel test though,

0:04:13.080 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 2>is when we take a little detour to plug the

0:04:16.000 --> 0:04:18.520
<v Speaker 2>tour that we have coming up.

0:04:19.040 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Yes, it will totally pass the Bechdel test because a

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>tour is famously genderless.

0:04:23.839 --> 0:04:26.880
<v Speaker 2>And it's about Barbie, the Barbie Movie.

0:04:26.960 --> 0:04:30.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited. I just don't have a bone of

0:04:30.440 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>hate in my body for the Barbie Movie, except for

0:04:32.240 --> 0:04:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the few that we'll talk about at the show. Yeah,

0:04:34.080 --> 0:04:37.200
<v Speaker 1>we were touring five cities coming up at the beginning

0:04:37.240 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>of February. We are covering the Barbie Movie in every city.

0:04:41.160 --> 0:04:45.039
<v Speaker 1>February first, we'll be at SF Sketch Fest in San Francisco.

0:04:45.520 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>February second will be going over to Sacramento. Oh, Greta

0:04:49.120 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Gerwig vibes much everything about that Lady Bird. Our Barbie

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.720
<v Speaker 1>show there is sold out, but we still have tickets

0:04:55.720 --> 0:04:58.640
<v Speaker 1>available to our second show, which is about the Wolf

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of Wall Street, which is like basically the same movie

0:05:02.240 --> 0:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>on same experience. You'll be fine, too much. Bring the luds, yes, yeah.

0:05:06.720 --> 0:05:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Then after that we are heading to Texas and doing

0:05:09.720 --> 0:05:13.279
<v Speaker 2>a show in Dallas on February third, a show in

0:05:13.440 --> 0:05:18.320
<v Speaker 2>Austin on February fifth, and then we are circling back

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.680
<v Speaker 2>around to southern California and doing a show in San

0:05:21.720 --> 0:05:26.640
<v Speaker 2>Diego on February tenth, recovering Barbie at all of those shows,

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.400
<v Speaker 2>and tickets are still available, although they're going fast, so yes,

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.320
<v Speaker 2>make sure you grab your tickets, which you can do

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.600
<v Speaker 2>at Link Tree Slash Bechtel Cast. And you're gonna want

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:42.320
<v Speaker 2>to see us live because here's the thing we put

0:05:42.360 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 2>on a show. It's a spectacle. Okay. We are ready

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 2>for our close up at these live shows, you know

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.240
<v Speaker 2>we are. Certainly we wear outfits, we do slide shows

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:56.600
<v Speaker 2>if we have time, we do audience Q and.

0:05:56.600 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>A sound really exciting. We wear close and there's we

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:04.920
<v Speaker 1>played games, we've sung, we've danced. We really put on.

0:06:04.920 --> 0:06:07.600
<v Speaker 2>The eat sometimes on stage.

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 1>We do didn't have to be fed. It's kind of like,

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:13.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, a crossover between like a fetish video and

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>a sexy college lecture, so so coming down and then

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.279
<v Speaker 1>we always we have tour exclusive merch and then we

0:06:20.320 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>do meet in greats afterwards. So yeah, it's it's always

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a fun time and we hope to see you there. Indeed,

0:06:26.920 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>don't believe we could have a fun time talking about

0:06:29.760 --> 0:06:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a movie. Well, listen to this, Caitlyn, what's your experience

0:06:34.920 --> 0:06:36.520
<v Speaker 1>with the movie Sunset Boulevard.

0:06:37.600 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 2>So I saw it for the first time either late

0:06:41.040 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 2>in high school or early college. I would have been

0:06:44.040 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 2>like seventeen eighteen something like that. I knew that it

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 2>was a very culturally significant movie, you know, one of

0:06:52.320 --> 0:06:57.839
<v Speaker 2>the greats from the classic Hollywood era. So it's been

0:06:57.880 --> 0:07:01.120
<v Speaker 2>on my radar for a very long time. And yeah,

0:07:01.200 --> 0:07:07.320
<v Speaker 2>I watched it once then probably once again for like

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:11.480
<v Speaker 2>a film school assignment, and then maybe even a second

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.960
<v Speaker 2>time for a film school assignment when I did go

0:07:14.360 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 2>and get my master's degree in screenwriting at Boston University,

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 2>a fact that I never mention, and you know who

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 2>probably doesn't have a master's in screenwriting from Boston University

0:07:26.160 --> 0:07:27.800
<v Speaker 2>is Joe Gillis.

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:32.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I was like, whoa, why are we yelling at me? Yeah,

0:07:32.920 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>it's true, it's true, and that's why he's such a

0:07:35.760 --> 0:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>failure exactly, and maybe that's why he died. It makes

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:43.960
<v Speaker 1>you think, Yeah, I have a similar experience with this movie.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I hadn't seen it in a bit, but I would

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:48.440
<v Speaker 1>consider it in sort of my top tier of movies.

0:07:48.480 --> 0:07:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it many times. I saw it for the

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>first time, I think in college first just for fun

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>or like the film program, like we've discussed like, oh,

0:08:00.000 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>I have to watch this movie because like this movie

0:08:02.240 --> 0:08:05.720
<v Speaker 1>is I think, like fantastic, and it's also heavily assigned.

0:08:06.160 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I've like a lot of people watch this movie for school,

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 1>and maybe more people should watch it for fun because

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:14.119
<v Speaker 1>it's fun to watch. But yeah, I think I've mentioned

0:08:14.120 --> 0:08:16.160
<v Speaker 1>this in the show in past years. I took this

0:08:16.240 --> 0:08:21.280
<v Speaker 1>class in college that not only aged tremendously poorly, but

0:08:21.400 --> 0:08:24.200
<v Speaker 1>at the time students were like what the fuck. I

0:08:24.240 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>had a class called Wilder, Allan and Kaufman, and I

0:08:28.120 --> 0:08:32.000
<v Speaker 1>took heavy objection to it exactly one of those directors.

0:08:32.040 --> 0:08:33.520
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want to. I wanted to study the other

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:36.440
<v Speaker 1>two and not the middle one. Blah blah blah. It

0:08:36.520 --> 0:08:41.480
<v Speaker 1>was like twenty thirteen, and they were like, shut up. Anyways,

0:08:41.800 --> 0:08:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I quite enjoyed the Wilder portions of that class, in

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the Kaffman portions, but for the sake of this conversation,

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 1>I sort of became a proper Billy Wilder fan through

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:57.439
<v Speaker 1>taking that class. I think he's a really fascinating person, complicated,

0:08:57.880 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly imperfect, but like I really like his work. And

0:09:01.640 --> 0:09:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think this is my favorite Billy Wilder movie.

0:09:05.520 --> 0:09:08.080
<v Speaker 1>But I mean it is like kind of not to

0:09:08.200 --> 0:09:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like start the episode out by like handing it to

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a man, but I really really like, I mean, the

0:09:13.559 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>amount of incredibly influential movies that he turned out in

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:20.440
<v Speaker 1>this course of his career is absolutely I'll say it

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:21.560
<v Speaker 1>is Wilder. Wow.

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:24.640
<v Speaker 2>I mean, You've got Double Indemnity, which we have covered

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 2>a couple of years ago on the show with Anita Sarkisian.

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 2>We have not covered, but other very notable movies of

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 2>his include The Seven Year Itch, The Apartment, and Some

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 2>Like It Hot, which is probably my favorite Wilder movie.

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, like it's almost like a three way time

0:09:42.080 --> 0:09:45.360
<v Speaker 1>between ugh, because we were also talking about covering The

0:09:45.360 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>Apartment this week, because it's also like a holiday time movie.

0:09:49.360 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 1>It might be a tie between the Sunset Boulevard and

0:09:51.559 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 1>The Apartment for me, but some like it Hot is

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>also so great. See he also directed Sabrina like he

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 1>did a lot of great work. And I was trying

0:10:02.280 --> 0:10:05.439
<v Speaker 1>to read where I know that he had contentious relationships

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>with actors and actresses. It seemed like but I think

0:10:08.600 --> 0:10:12.840
<v Speaker 1>he's been through several rounds of film buff discourse of

0:10:13.679 --> 0:10:16.120
<v Speaker 1>is his work pro women, is his work anti women?

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the answer, as with most people, is like

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.040
<v Speaker 1>somewhere in the middle, and it depends from text to text,

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>and it depends on the years coming out all this stuff.

0:10:25.920 --> 0:10:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I love Sunset Boulevard. I love the performances in it,

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.320
<v Speaker 1>and I really I mean, I hadn't watched it, I

0:10:32.360 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>want to say, for maybe like three or four years,

0:10:35.440 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 1>and there's so much to talk about. But I think

0:10:37.240 --> 0:10:43.200
<v Speaker 1>as it's probably my favorite movie about movies. It's a

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.880
<v Speaker 1>good one. Yeah, And I feel like it still has

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:48.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot to say in a way that feels like

0:10:49.040 --> 0:10:53.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of depressingly not dated. This movie is over seventy

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.200
<v Speaker 1>years old, and it still feels like what it's saying

0:10:57.320 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is still very relevant to how the movie and just works,

0:11:00.440 --> 0:11:02.880
<v Speaker 1>but also very specific to the silent era and like,

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited to talk about the context of this

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:10.320
<v Speaker 1>movie because Norma Dusmond is such a complex character that

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you can view a million ways, some

0:11:12.200 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>of which are we'll talk about all one million. I

0:11:16.080 --> 0:11:18.880
<v Speaker 1>just have like such, I can't imagine being Glorious Swanson

0:11:19.520 --> 0:11:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and having like this experience and then being like, here's

0:11:24.000 --> 0:11:27.600
<v Speaker 1>the character, and then not just being like, Okay, I

0:11:27.640 --> 0:11:32.360
<v Speaker 1>can compartmentalize my entire life and career and play this

0:11:32.679 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 1>caricature of an actor and while watching my movies that

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:39.079
<v Speaker 1>were directed by.

0:11:39.720 --> 0:11:43.280
<v Speaker 2>Marriage and whatever, yeah, and.

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>That movie was directed by him, and like compartmentalize it

0:11:46.280 --> 0:11:48.679
<v Speaker 1>and not just be able to compartmentalize it, but like

0:11:48.800 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>deliver such an iconic performance that like is so stripped

0:11:54.480 --> 0:11:58.800
<v Speaker 1>of artifice, and like it's just and I have issues

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 1>with that in some but I just like, I don't know,

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:05.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't watch this movie and not be like, oh

0:12:05.040 --> 0:12:08.760
<v Speaker 1>my god, I don't know if I could even consider

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.520
<v Speaker 1>doing something that would require compartmentalizing your ego to that extent.

0:12:12.600 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 2>It's unbelievable, I know, right Well, shall we get into

0:12:19.000 --> 0:12:20.280
<v Speaker 2>it with the recap.

0:12:20.760 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's do it.

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.440
<v Speaker 2>Let's take a quick break first, and then we'll come back.

0:12:37.200 --> 0:12:38.400
<v Speaker 1>And where we're back.

0:12:39.920 --> 0:12:43.800
<v Speaker 2>All right, So here's the recap of Sunset Boulevard. But

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 2>before that'll place a content warning for suicide as well

0:12:49.960 --> 0:12:54.640
<v Speaker 2>as emotional abuse in a partnership.

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.800
<v Speaker 1>If you're triggered by a character named hog Eye. Hog Eye,

0:12:59.080 --> 0:13:02.200
<v Speaker 1>I have so many questions about Haguy? What was going on?

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:06.199
<v Speaker 1>How Guy? There are a few lines in this movie

0:13:06.200 --> 0:13:08.440
<v Speaker 1>that are obviously, like, very famous, whether you've seen the

0:13:08.440 --> 0:13:12.600
<v Speaker 1>movie or not. But hello, haw Guy. You're like, whoa,

0:13:12.920 --> 0:13:15.559
<v Speaker 1>that's the greatest line rate I've ever heard.

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 2>Because it's also not clear because he identifies himself if

0:13:20.200 --> 0:13:22.840
<v Speaker 2>she remembers so yeah, he says, Hey, it's me, how Guy,

0:13:23.160 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 2>and then she responds hello guy, but it's we don't

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:30.000
<v Speaker 2>know if she recognizes him and knows him or if

0:13:30.000 --> 0:13:31.280
<v Speaker 2>she's just like being like.

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna guess she does, so I'm gonna guess she's

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.160
<v Speaker 1>actively listening. But just like the way she greets ha

0:13:37.280 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>guy and he's so thrilled iconic, Oh my god, yeallo

0:13:45.000 --> 0:13:46.400
<v Speaker 1>all right EPISP.

0:13:48.200 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>The movie opens on Sunset Boulevard in Los Angeles, California.

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:54.400
<v Speaker 1>I've ever heard of it? Oh, I can see it

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>from my freaking house. Oh my gosh, I can't wait

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>to die in a pool. Okay, So the police are

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.600
<v Speaker 1>heading to a huge mansion on Sunset Boulevard to investigate

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>a homicide because the body of a man was found

0:14:12.720 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>floating in the pool of a movie star. Yes, I

0:14:16.640 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>feel like you know, narration is so often like overused

0:14:20.640 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>or like as a lazy tool, but it rocks in

0:14:22.920 --> 0:14:25.200
<v Speaker 1>this movie. And there's also that sort of moment where

0:14:25.200 --> 0:14:29.760
<v Speaker 1>like Joe the William Holton character, as like, this isn't

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:31.360
<v Speaker 1>a famous thing to say yet, but he's like, you're

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>kind of wondering how I got here. Huh, well, it's

0:14:34.960 --> 0:14:35.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of a weird story.

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 2>We go take it back, like, let's flash back to

0:14:40.000 --> 0:14:44.200
<v Speaker 2>six months earlier where we meet and we get voiceover

0:14:44.400 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 2>narration from a struggling screenwriter who, again I can only

0:14:49.280 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 2>assume is struggling because he doesn't have a master's degree

0:14:52.400 --> 0:14:53.240
<v Speaker 2>in screenwriting.

0:14:53.880 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>It's so yeah watching this, I mean, just like individually,

0:14:57.160 --> 0:14:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you're just like, wow, I don't like that I can

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>relate with Joe and Norman No Bad and Betty like,

0:15:06.880 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>oh I know, it's almost like it's a really good movie.

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Wow, Okay, So This screenwriter is Joe Gillis played

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 2>by William Holden, and some men show up at his

0:15:19.160 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 2>apartment to try to repossess his car because he's several

0:15:22.960 --> 0:15:27.640
<v Speaker 2>months behind on payments. He needs some quick cash. He

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 2>mentions two hundred and ninety dollars, which is nearly four

0:15:31.040 --> 0:15:35.200
<v Speaker 2>thousand dollars in today's money. Bad and that situation, yes,

0:15:35.280 --> 0:15:38.120
<v Speaker 2>So he's trying to go around town and borrow money

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 2>from friends.

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:40.560
<v Speaker 1>No luck.

0:15:40.840 --> 0:15:44.440
<v Speaker 2>He also goes to Paramount to pitch a story idea,

0:15:44.520 --> 0:15:47.520
<v Speaker 2>hoping that he can sell a script, but the producer

0:15:47.640 --> 0:15:52.240
<v Speaker 2>isn't interested because a script reader named Betty played by

0:15:52.320 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 2>Nancy Olsen is like, yeah, I read that script and

0:15:55.880 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 2>it sucked.

0:15:56.680 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>So I honestly it's like, you have such Betty, I

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:03.120
<v Speaker 1>kept writing down Caitlyn vibes when he's like, what do

0:16:03.160 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>you think?

0:16:04.200 --> 0:16:06.760
<v Speaker 2>She would just be like nu, it's a trite and boring.

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. And then they meet up again later and you're like, oh,

0:16:09.840 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>she's good, but she's just as hard. She's just like, no,

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>it's bad. I still don't like it.

0:16:14.880 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 2>But then she's also like, but I've heard your talented

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 2>and I can see your potential, so let's collaborate and.

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, which is like at least grounded in the fact

0:16:23.000 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 1>that she's seen work of his that she liked, but

0:16:25.440 --> 0:16:27.120
<v Speaker 1>like none of the work of his that she liked

0:16:27.120 --> 0:16:30.160
<v Speaker 1>has ever been produced, which does feel true to far. Yeah,

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I really like that exchange between them where she's like,

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I heard you had talent and he's like, not this year.

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to work this year. I'm like, damn me too,

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 1>me too.

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Man relatable. Yeah, Okay. So Joe leaves and while he's

0:16:43.600 --> 0:16:46.720
<v Speaker 2>driving down Sunset Boulevard, he spots the guys who are

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 2>trying to repoe his car, so he speeds away and

0:16:49.840 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 2>ends up in the driveway of what appears to be

0:16:53.440 --> 0:16:57.000
<v Speaker 2>an abandoned mansion, and he hides his car in the

0:16:57.040 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 2>empty garage. His plan is basically to skip town, take

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.000
<v Speaker 2>a bus back to Ohio, and kind of just like

0:17:04.080 --> 0:17:08.200
<v Speaker 2>give up on the Hollywood life. But as he's there

0:17:08.359 --> 0:17:11.679
<v Speaker 2>examining this mansion, he hears a woman's voice and it

0:17:11.720 --> 0:17:16.080
<v Speaker 2>turns out the house has not been abandoned. Then a

0:17:16.119 --> 0:17:22.080
<v Speaker 2>butler named Max played by Eric von Stroheim, who, if

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:25.280
<v Speaker 2>you don't know, is a prominent Silent film era director

0:17:25.480 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 2>who directed a movie starring Gloria Swanson, and.

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't worry they show a clip of it. Don't screen

0:17:32.160 --> 0:17:34.280
<v Speaker 1>it this god.

0:17:35.200 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So anyway, Max the butler shows Joe inside and

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:45.359
<v Speaker 2>the woman whose voice we heard had mistaken Joe for

0:17:45.480 --> 0:17:48.679
<v Speaker 2>being an undertaker who's there to remove the body of

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:49.840
<v Speaker 2>a dead chin.

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Pansy monkey undertaker. Yeah what, and the chimpanzee has been dead.

0:17:55.720 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I dare I say for a while, it seems like

0:17:59.280 --> 0:18:05.919
<v Speaker 1>so it looks dry, uh huh, yucky, it's nasty. Anyway,

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>it's real meet cute. At the top, they kind of

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:14.720
<v Speaker 1>do like start vibing immediately, like you know, it's fundamentally

0:18:14.720 --> 0:18:17.880
<v Speaker 1>an abusive relationship with this first encounter, I'm like, are

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>they vibing right now over the whole dead monkey situation?

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:23.840
<v Speaker 2>But in a very it's like a very neggy Yeah

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:30.200
<v Speaker 2>both ways with these two way nagging street they're weirdos,

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 2>they're sick. So anyway, Joe is like, you got the

0:18:34.520 --> 0:18:38.160
<v Speaker 2>wrong guy, But wait a minute, I recognize you because

0:18:38.200 --> 0:18:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the woman is Norma Desmond played by Gloria Swanson, a

0:18:43.440 --> 0:18:47.840
<v Speaker 2>silent movie star who used to be very famous but

0:18:48.200 --> 0:18:53.760
<v Speaker 2>hasn't worked as an actor since talkies became popular, which

0:18:53.800 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 2>is something that we learn she deeply resents that you know,

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.199
<v Speaker 2>she's not working anymore, and.

0:19:00.800 --> 0:19:05.080
<v Speaker 1>That she hasn't completely accepted that she is no longer

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.240
<v Speaker 1>a big current start, and also that she struggles to

0:19:08.320 --> 0:19:11.560
<v Speaker 1>accept the fact that she's aging and accept her own

0:19:11.960 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>mortality because of how older women are treated in Hollywood,

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.400
<v Speaker 1>which I feel like this is one of the few

0:19:17.400 --> 0:19:20.040
<v Speaker 1>movies of this era that like, well, we'll get into it,

0:19:20.040 --> 0:19:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but like it's at least suggested and clear that there

0:19:25.600 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>is a systemic reason that she's trained to see herself.

0:19:29.920 --> 0:19:32.119
<v Speaker 1>It's all over the place, but like, I feel like

0:19:32.119 --> 0:19:34.480
<v Speaker 1>it's clearer than you know, normally you see a woman

0:19:34.600 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>over forty much less fifty that the call is coming

0:19:40.080 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 1>from inside the house, and this is just something that

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:47.360
<v Speaker 1>happens at least this movie, I think. Does a lot

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:50.959
<v Speaker 1>of current movies do to contextualize it. Yeah, true, but

0:19:51.000 --> 0:19:53.159
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't free her from you know, the troupes, all

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:56.080
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. It's so we're covering well, yeah, I guess

0:19:56.080 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>this will come out in sequential order. We're covering May

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>December coming up next week, and I know it's just

0:20:02.600 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>because we've been sort of preparing for these episodes beside

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>each other. But there are these like interesting parallels between

0:20:10.520 --> 0:20:13.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, just like an older woman and by old,

0:20:13.520 --> 0:20:16.280
<v Speaker 1>you know a woman over fifty, right, yeah, whose whole

0:20:16.960 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>life has been constructed to protect her from reality, amongst

0:20:22.800 --> 0:20:25.080
<v Speaker 1>other things. But it was just interesting watching those movies

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>side by side and being like, oh, obviously I know

0:20:27.680 --> 0:20:29.800
<v Speaker 1>that Todd Haynes has seen Sunset Boulevard, but there is

0:20:29.800 --> 0:20:32.880
<v Speaker 1>like just the haunted house feel to it for sure. Yeah.

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was also getting some misery parallels. Sure, yeah,

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 2>a movie we covered some time years ago. Yeah, And

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:46.879
<v Speaker 2>I was like, wow, I bet Stephen King watched.

0:20:48.680 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. It's like, oh, I love having the genius thought

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that maybe a famous director has seen one of the

0:20:53.320 --> 0:20:59.120
<v Speaker 1>most famous movies ever, Like could it be? Are you anyway?

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 2>So Joe recognizes Norma Desmond and she's like, oh, wait

0:21:06.160 --> 0:21:10.040
<v Speaker 2>a minute, you're a writer. Well, I wrote a story

0:21:10.200 --> 0:21:14.920
<v Speaker 2>about Slome that I want Cecil B. Demill to direct,

0:21:15.480 --> 0:21:22.120
<v Speaker 2>and she wants Joe to read her very long, handwritten script.

0:21:22.400 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>It's got Santi University vibes. I was like, wow, literally,

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:30.159
<v Speaker 1>Norma Desmond wrote her Santi University. And also she's like,

0:21:30.160 --> 0:21:32.440
<v Speaker 1>and no one will produce it.

0:21:31.200 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 2>It's six hundred pages.

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Yep. She won't take.

0:21:36.240 --> 0:21:40.119
<v Speaker 2>Notes, certainly not, And so Joe starts reading it and

0:21:40.160 --> 0:21:44.480
<v Speaker 2>it turns out to be like poorly written, melodramatic drivel.

0:21:45.080 --> 0:21:47.879
<v Speaker 2>But Joe realizes that he can try to squeeze some

0:21:48.040 --> 0:21:54.640
<v Speaker 2>money out of Norma if he offers to rewrite the script. Yeah,

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.760
<v Speaker 2>and she's like, well, you're Sagittarius, so I can trust

0:21:58.800 --> 0:21:59.680
<v Speaker 2>you again.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:06.439
<v Speaker 1>It's like, no, No, that's the worst reasoning I've ever heard.

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:11.840
<v Speaker 2>There's another scene later on where she's talking about, like

0:22:11.960 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 2>today is the exact right day to drop off the

0:22:14.680 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 2>script to Cecil b de Mill because of like the

0:22:18.200 --> 0:22:21.080
<v Speaker 2>alignments of the planets and how she's a blah blah

0:22:21.119 --> 0:22:22.879
<v Speaker 2>blah and he's a leah or whatever.

0:22:22.960 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Like she's like, la women are going to LA women.

0:22:25.520 --> 0:22:29.000
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't matter what decade it is, exactly the position

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.639
<v Speaker 1>of the stars is what is going to make or

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:37.159
<v Speaker 1>break their flopping career, you know, sure, yeah yeah, And

0:22:37.200 --> 0:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>also like we don't even need to ascribe a gender

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.439
<v Speaker 1>to it. That's just simply what it's like out here

0:22:41.880 --> 0:22:44.840
<v Speaker 1>in general. It's true. And if you live in La

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>and you think you're immune to it, you just haven't

0:22:47.160 --> 0:22:48.680
<v Speaker 1>lived here long enough. I don't think.

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:53.959
<v Speaker 2>I quite recently was like, okay, fine, I'll finally figure

0:22:54.000 --> 0:22:59.320
<v Speaker 2>out what my like rising and moon signs are.

0:22:59.720 --> 0:23:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh gosh, wait, you should get a chart reading from

0:23:03.320 --> 0:23:08.160
<v Speaker 1>my friend Cameron. Shout out Cameron Farmer's chart. My boyfriend

0:23:08.200 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>just got his chart read by them, because he also

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:16.560
<v Speaker 1>was like, okay, you win, La, you win. I will

0:23:16.600 --> 0:23:18.159
<v Speaker 1>find out about the start I know.

0:23:18.240 --> 0:23:21.080
<v Speaker 2>And then also a few years ago, I bought crystals.

0:23:21.119 --> 0:23:23.399
<v Speaker 2>I went to House of Intuition, I remember, and I

0:23:23.400 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 2>bought crystals because I was like, these are gonna change

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 2>my life and did they certainly not.

0:23:29.160 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>But they're pretty A bunch of people just threw their

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.720
<v Speaker 1>phone in across the They're just like god, damn it.

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 1>They're all like this. It's kind of true, but like,

0:23:37.760 --> 0:23:40.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, victimist crime unless you get into like a

0:23:40.119 --> 0:23:42.160
<v Speaker 1>wellness called don't do it. Don't do that, just don't

0:23:42.160 --> 0:23:46.920
<v Speaker 1>do that, just don't Yeah exactly. Anyways, Norma Desmond not immune.

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I was just it was funny to be like, oh wow,

0:23:49.080 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifty and yeah, yeah, it's just always been like that.

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:56.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I didn't realize it, but it's true. Good for

0:23:56.440 --> 0:24:01.040
<v Speaker 2>her Okay, So Norma has Joe read the rest of

0:24:01.040 --> 0:24:03.600
<v Speaker 2>her script. She makes him stay the night to finish

0:24:03.640 --> 0:24:06.399
<v Speaker 2>reading it because she won't let the script leave her house.

0:24:07.160 --> 0:24:10.439
<v Speaker 2>She sets up a room for him and he's like, Okay,

0:24:10.440 --> 0:24:13.639
<v Speaker 2>this is fucking weird, but whatever, I need money.

0:24:14.040 --> 0:24:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:24:14.760 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 2>Then he wakes up to discover that Norma had her butler, Max,

0:24:20.000 --> 0:24:24.280
<v Speaker 2>bring all of Joe's stuff to her home. Basically, she

0:24:24.359 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 2>wants him to move in while he's working on her script,

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.800
<v Speaker 2>and he's upset and freaked out, but he decides to

0:24:33.920 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 2>get to work and get it over with as quickly

0:24:36.080 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 2>as possible. But Norma is like hovering over him. She's

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:45.600
<v Speaker 2>being very controlling, and it's also clear, like you previously

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:50.760
<v Speaker 2>mentioned Jamie, that she's like she's been very sheltered. She's

0:24:51.160 --> 0:24:55.120
<v Speaker 2>perhaps delusional. She's also very egotistical.

0:24:55.960 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 1>And there's a big twist that like triple validates this

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:01.800
<v Speaker 1>late in the moon, but like, it still feels very

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.960
<v Speaker 1>like Max is like her protector. It's how I think

0:25:06.000 --> 0:25:11.520
<v Speaker 1>of my eldest cat, Flee. Flee has Max vibes where

0:25:11.560 --> 0:25:14.400
<v Speaker 1>he's like, don't disturb her, she's working.

0:25:16.400 --> 0:25:19.840
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, she she's very like self absorbed She's always

0:25:19.880 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 2>responding to fan mail from her adoring fans. She always

0:25:24.560 --> 0:25:28.720
<v Speaker 2>insists on watching her own movies, things like that the.

0:25:28.760 --> 0:25:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Fan mail thing was another May December overlap for me,

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:36.280
<v Speaker 1>where the Juliete more character like it's the same three

0:25:36.320 --> 0:25:41.160
<v Speaker 1>neighbors keeping her bakery in business to appease her, and like, yeah,

0:25:41.240 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>just sort of this like privileged but contextually upsetting and

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 1>like fundamental, like just the bubble that you're stuck in. Granted,

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:53.159
<v Speaker 1>I have far more empathy for Norma, and you know

0:25:53.200 --> 0:25:54.240
<v Speaker 1>she knew what she had to do.

0:25:55.119 --> 0:26:01.879
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So more time passes and a dynamic starts to

0:26:02.000 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 2>emerge between Norma and Joe, where basically she becomes his

0:26:08.320 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 2>sugar mama.

0:26:09.720 --> 0:26:11.879
<v Speaker 1>Whoa, I said, I don't think I've ever heard you

0:26:11.920 --> 0:26:13.080
<v Speaker 1>say that phrase out loud.

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:16.879
<v Speaker 2>It felt so weird coming out of my mouth. I'm

0:26:16.920 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 2>not gonna lie. Someone clipped that, is that even the

0:26:19.880 --> 0:26:20.959
<v Speaker 2>term sugar mama?

0:26:21.680 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Is that any So sugar mommy, sugar mommy? I don't know.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I think sugar mommy, sugar daddy. Yeah,

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.120
<v Speaker 1>but then sugar mama is a character on the Proud Family,

0:26:33.359 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And so how do we square that we don't know.

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 2>The bottom line is Joe is her sugar baby.

0:26:42.000 --> 0:26:45.960
<v Speaker 1>That's definitely true. That's okay, okay, and we're back.

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 2>And we're back, and Norma seems to be into him,

0:26:49.840 --> 0:26:53.719
<v Speaker 2>but he at present is not into her.

0:26:54.560 --> 0:26:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:26:54.840 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 2>We also around this time find out that Max the

0:26:58.280 --> 0:27:01.119
<v Speaker 2>Butler is the one who is sending all of the

0:27:01.160 --> 0:27:06.280
<v Speaker 2>fan mail to Norma, and so Joe is like, yikes, okay.

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:10.959
<v Speaker 2>Then he attends Norma's New Year's Eve party, except that

0:27:11.280 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 2>Joe is the only one who Norma invited and because

0:27:16.440 --> 0:27:17.560
<v Speaker 2>she's in love with him.

0:27:17.880 --> 0:27:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and she's like being actively predatory, creepy yeah, And

0:27:23.320 --> 0:27:26.320
<v Speaker 1>so he's creeped out and he leaves and goes to

0:27:26.520 --> 0:27:31.240
<v Speaker 1>his friends New Year's Eve party hosted by Artie, who

0:27:31.359 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 1>says that Joe can stay with him for a few

0:27:33.720 --> 0:27:36.200
<v Speaker 1>weeks because Joe's trying to get the hell out of there.

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:38.359
<v Speaker 1>Artie really gets the short end of the stick of it.

0:27:38.440 --> 0:27:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I guess Joe dies, so that doesn't end

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.000
<v Speaker 1>very well for him, but there is like a poor

0:27:43.119 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 1>Arty later on. I'm like, already did nothing wrong except

0:27:45.800 --> 0:27:48.360
<v Speaker 1>ask someone to come to Arizona, which is like generally

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:52.399
<v Speaker 1>do that, No offense to all of our treasure. We

0:27:52.560 --> 0:27:58.960
<v Speaker 1>just got so many subscriber Oh you la, people think

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>you're better than Aaron Zona. And here's why the stars

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 1>are on my side. Just kidding, I don't know what

0:28:05.240 --> 0:28:05.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking about.

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Let's get Yeah, don't listen to us anyway. Artie's girlfriend

0:28:11.200 --> 0:28:14.960
<v Speaker 2>is Betty, the script reader from earlier, who mentions to

0:28:15.040 --> 0:28:18.400
<v Speaker 2>Joe that she has read another one of his scripts

0:28:18.840 --> 0:28:22.840
<v Speaker 2>and she's like, it does suck for the most part,

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.760
<v Speaker 2>but there's this flashback with a teacher character that has

0:28:26.800 --> 0:28:30.560
<v Speaker 2>a lot of potential. Yeah, so they're talking about that.

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Betty's good at her job, like she's direct, but she's

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:40.160
<v Speaker 1>also constructed, like the lady knows what she's doing exactly,

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:41.959
<v Speaker 1>and she's only twenty two. She's got a future in

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:45.960
<v Speaker 1>this town. Tell me about it. Well, we'll get there.

0:28:46.240 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>But it's just like, God, I mean, I guess you

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:50.719
<v Speaker 1>already know that Joe dies. I'm just like, you know,

0:28:51.080 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>he really would have been dead weight and her life

0:28:53.560 --> 0:28:57.920
<v Speaker 1>so sorry, sorry, But also like, what she gonna do

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.080
<v Speaker 1>move to Arizona? I sure hope not. I hope she

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:02.640
<v Speaker 1>was like, Hey, I just need to be single for

0:29:02.720 --> 0:29:06.280
<v Speaker 1>a while. I think that that's that's why she does

0:29:06.560 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>do that.

0:29:07.200 --> 0:29:12.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, but before then she and Joe are flirting a

0:29:12.200 --> 0:29:15.160
<v Speaker 2>little bit, even though Artie is in the next room,

0:29:16.200 --> 0:29:17.440
<v Speaker 2>and so.

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>That's not very that's not very nice. And then also

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, well, she's twenty two or whatever. Yeah.

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:29.160
<v Speaker 2>So then Joe discovers that Norma is horribly distraught and

0:29:29.240 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 2>that she attempted suicide after he left her New Year's

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:37.600
<v Speaker 2>Eve party, so he hurries back to her house to

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:41.760
<v Speaker 2>comfort her, and then they kiss, and then it fades

0:29:41.840 --> 0:29:46.120
<v Speaker 2>to black, which I feel implies they have sex.

0:29:47.080 --> 0:29:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm on board with.

0:29:48.520 --> 0:29:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, yes, So now Norma and Joe are like together.

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>I love what it says on scholarly journal Wikipedia that

0:29:57.000 --> 0:30:01.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe laughed. Joe returns to Norma and there relationship becomes

0:30:01.480 --> 0:30:10.880
<v Speaker 1>non platonic. Oh they fuck, They fuck? Yeah hard. I mean,

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, we don't know, we don't know.

0:30:14.920 --> 0:30:17.400
<v Speaker 2>The production code wouldn't show it.

0:30:17.880 --> 0:30:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm like, the writers new, the writers do it.

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe Billy Wilder knew how Norma fucks, but we

0:30:24.280 --> 0:30:25.720
<v Speaker 1>just weren't privy to that information.

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so Joe and Norma are together now. But also

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Joe bumps into Betty again, and she is urging him

0:30:36.160 --> 0:30:39.120
<v Speaker 2>to work with her on this script idea, and he's like,

0:30:39.440 --> 0:30:44.480
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, we'll see. Then the script of Norma's

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 2>that Joe has been rewriting is finished and it gets

0:30:49.560 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 2>dropped off at Paramount Studios. And then a few days later,

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:57.040
<v Speaker 2>Norma and Joe go to Paramount to see cecil B

0:30:57.160 --> 0:31:01.120
<v Speaker 2>de Mille, and Norma thinks that he wants to direct

0:31:01.160 --> 0:31:05.080
<v Speaker 2>her movie. But it's clear to us, though not clear

0:31:05.120 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 2>to Norma, that Demil thinks she's a nuisance and he

0:31:09.600 --> 0:31:10.800
<v Speaker 2>wants nothing to do with her.

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:15.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to talk about this scene. It's a devastating scene.

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, yeah, it's brutal, really is. And this is

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:21.800
<v Speaker 1>also where our friend Hagye shows up, so we have

0:31:21.880 --> 0:31:23.800
<v Speaker 1>to get hello, hai guy.

0:31:24.920 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 2>He spins a spotlight around and shines it on her,

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:31.000
<v Speaker 2>and she's like, yes, this is where I meant to be.

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And you know, Hagy got an earfull from all the mail.

0:31:37.760 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Probably got fired for that. God. I hope not. I

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 1>hope not. He's worked there for years. Katelie's I mean

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:50.160
<v Speaker 1>the silent era, you can't fire Hog. I let him

0:31:50.200 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 1>off of the warning.

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 2>I seriously, I know. Anyway, So, thinking that she is

0:31:56.400 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 2>going to star in a movie soon and make the

0:32:00.360 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 2>triumphant return to the screen, Norma starts getting all kinds

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:10.200
<v Speaker 2>of facials and massages and beauty treatments. She starts counting

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:11.920
<v Speaker 2>calories things like that.

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Meanwhile, women are still encouraged to do today well and

0:32:16.360 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>also any actor.

0:32:17.360 --> 0:32:21.920
<v Speaker 2>But right, yes, yeah, but especially the pressure because women

0:32:21.960 --> 0:32:25.080
<v Speaker 2>are so highly valued for their appearance and their youth,

0:32:25.680 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 2>that pressure is especially placed on women and fans. Yes, okay. Meanwhile,

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 2>Joe has been sneaking out every night to meet up

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.200
<v Speaker 2>with Betty so that they can write this script about

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:43.120
<v Speaker 2>the teachers together. And also they're vibing even though she

0:32:43.240 --> 0:32:47.240
<v Speaker 2>is now engaged to Artie, who is I think working

0:32:47.280 --> 0:32:52.120
<v Speaker 2>on a film in Arizona. Anyway, One night, Max catches

0:32:52.200 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 2>Joe as he's returning from sneaking out, and Joe is like, Max,

0:32:57.280 --> 0:33:00.440
<v Speaker 2>we have to put an end to this charade. What

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 2>happens when she finds out that there is no Demill

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:07.360
<v Speaker 2>movie and Max is like, she'll never find out. I

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 2>was the one who made her a star and I'll

0:33:10.160 --> 0:33:12.840
<v Speaker 2>keep her that way. And then this is where Max

0:33:12.880 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 2>reveals that he directed all of her early movies, and

0:33:17.480 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 2>that he was Norma's first husband.

0:33:21.480 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Why wild That twist never ceases to be, like, so

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:30.440
<v Speaker 1>you're doing what right?

0:33:30.480 --> 0:33:32.920
<v Speaker 2>And I think, let me know if I have this right.

0:33:33.040 --> 0:33:37.320
<v Speaker 2>But it seems as though they were together and then

0:33:37.960 --> 0:33:43.120
<v Speaker 2>she rose to stardom and then left him and he

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:46.000
<v Speaker 2>couldn't handle it and he came crawling back, and then

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:47.920
<v Speaker 2>she made him her servant.

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Is that what happened? It seems like I would say

0:33:52.960 --> 0:33:56.480
<v Speaker 1>he certainly is still in love with her, yeah, and

0:33:56.760 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>also has this sort of paternalistic control over her life too,

0:34:01.400 --> 0:34:06.640
<v Speaker 1>because it's like I hadn't ever really like thought past, like, well,

0:34:06.640 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what would Norma's life look like if Max wasn't there?

0:34:09.880 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And I think that like he clearly thinks that she

0:34:12.680 --> 0:34:16.440
<v Speaker 1>would be actively suffering without him, preserving this delusion and

0:34:16.520 --> 0:34:18.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of keeping her trapped in this house to an

0:34:18.600 --> 0:34:21.480
<v Speaker 1>extent by taking you know, making sure all of her

0:34:21.520 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>needs are met. But I you know, it's like possibly

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>not like you will never know because you know she's

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:30.279
<v Speaker 1>been preserved in this place. I don't know, Yeah, Like

0:34:30.280 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>the push and pull of like Norma is absolutely an

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:40.399
<v Speaker 1>emotionally abusive person and like extremely manipulative sort of by

0:34:40.400 --> 0:34:44.640
<v Speaker 1>any means necessary, while having serious mental illness problems, will also,

0:34:44.680 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 1>by any means necessary, keep the people she wants around

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:51.359
<v Speaker 1>around her to preserve these delusions of grandeur that she has.

0:34:51.520 --> 0:34:55.600
<v Speaker 1>But it's also like there is so much patriarchy that

0:34:55.640 --> 0:34:57.759
<v Speaker 1>surrounds her, right, and like.

0:34:58.040 --> 0:35:03.280
<v Speaker 2>She has this enabler who is like playing into this delusion.

0:35:03.360 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 2>So it's fair.

0:35:04.400 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it's a I mean, it's it's such a good movie, yeah,

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:09.440
<v Speaker 1>because it's just like, yeah, the cycle of abuse is

0:35:09.480 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>present in every single character, and like you can argue

0:35:15.120 --> 0:35:19.960
<v Speaker 1>that the you know, Joe being straightforward with her is

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 1>a gift in a way, but it also is like

0:35:22.719 --> 0:35:25.759
<v Speaker 1>it's what gets him killed. It's it's good that this

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:29.400
<v Speaker 1>will be demil sequence that leads into Max revealing that

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>like she's Grew, I'm Kevin, and you're just like, huh,

0:35:35.280 --> 0:35:39.080
<v Speaker 1>got it. It is kind of a Grew Kevin situation.

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:42.200
<v Speaker 1>If there was like three hundred Maxes, it would be

0:35:43.320 --> 0:35:43.960
<v Speaker 1>think about.

0:35:43.719 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 2>That, right, So Max is the Kevin le Mignon in

0:35:47.920 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 2>this scenario.

0:35:48.880 --> 0:35:52.920
<v Speaker 1>Dominions, He's all of the minions in one guy. If

0:35:53.000 --> 0:35:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Drew had married one of the ominions. Anyways, it doesn't

0:35:55.600 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>quite work in any case, we make.

0:36:02.480 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 2>This work, Okay. So we get all these like intense

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:15.040
<v Speaker 2>reveals and we're like, oh my gosh. Meanwhile, Betty is

0:36:15.080 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 2>talking to Joe and she's like, I'm not in love

0:36:18.160 --> 0:36:23.200
<v Speaker 2>with my fiance Alretie and my fiance yes anymore. I'm

0:36:23.200 --> 0:36:26.880
<v Speaker 2>in love with you, Joe. And then they smooch on

0:36:26.960 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 2>the lips. And so now Joe is trying to figure

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 2>out a way to leave Norma. But oh no, Norma,

0:36:34.960 --> 0:36:38.160
<v Speaker 2>unbeknownst to Joe, has found the script that he's been

0:36:38.200 --> 0:36:41.959
<v Speaker 2>working on with Betty. So Norma calls Betty to tell

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:46.360
<v Speaker 2>her like what this situation actually is with Joe, like

0:36:46.480 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 2>who he lives with, how he lives, who's bankrolling his

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:55.520
<v Speaker 2>life basically, and then Betty goes over to Norma's house

0:36:55.719 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 2>to see for herself what's going on. Also, Norma has

0:37:01.560 --> 0:37:07.680
<v Speaker 2>bought a revolver, and we're like, okay, checkof's gun alert.

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Literally, I think that that scene with Betty is

0:37:12.520 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>so I mean, like Joe, it makes sense what Joe's doing,

0:37:16.000 --> 0:37:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and I think that he is so overcome by like

0:37:20.360 --> 0:37:23.880
<v Speaker 1>shame and frustration and at least I mean one of

0:37:23.920 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the few men in movie history baby that can correctly

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>identify when he's no good for a woman and she's

0:37:32.280 --> 0:37:34.880
<v Speaker 1>out of his league, and he is like, and I

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:37.799
<v Speaker 1>will move to Ohio, and you're like, wow, more men

0:37:37.840 --> 0:37:42.600
<v Speaker 1>should do that. So like he understands that, like, even

0:37:42.600 --> 0:37:46.920
<v Speaker 1>though he would like this relationship with Betty actively in

0:37:46.960 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 1>a way that I think kind of plays on movie

0:37:49.480 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 1>tropes where it's like, you know, usually if you have

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the like, no we can't, they will by the end.

0:37:54.960 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 1>But like he at least has the presence of mind

0:37:57.080 --> 0:38:01.160
<v Speaker 1>to be like, this relationship with Norma is too fucked up, yeah,

0:38:01.160 --> 0:38:04.080
<v Speaker 1>and it like speaks to like what is Norma really

0:38:04.080 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>a symbol of? But like, by extracting himself from that relationship,

0:38:07.600 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>he's also extracting himself from like the Hollywood machine, right,

0:38:12.160 --> 0:38:13.959
<v Speaker 1>and everything fucked up about it.

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:20.200
<v Speaker 2>And extracting himself from this cycle of abuse because he

0:38:20.280 --> 0:38:24.200
<v Speaker 2>has been lying to Betty and withholding all this information

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 2>from her, and that's so much of what's been happening

0:38:29.160 --> 0:38:32.840
<v Speaker 2>between like Norma and Max, and I think, right, Joe

0:38:32.840 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 2>realizes that he is like perpetuating that same cycle onto

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Betty in a different way, but totally he's still very

0:38:41.080 --> 0:38:43.480
<v Speaker 2>much like withholding information from her. So he's like, I

0:38:43.480 --> 0:38:45.480
<v Speaker 2>don't I can't keep doing this. I don't want to

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.040
<v Speaker 2>be a part of this period.

0:38:47.680 --> 0:38:50.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think it's really interesting and like speaks

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:55.799
<v Speaker 1>to her naivete as like a younger character that like

0:38:55.920 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>he brings her in, tells her exactly like this is

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 1>the way I've been lying to you. It is tempting

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:05.279
<v Speaker 1>for me to stay for these very cynical reasons, and

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:07.680
<v Speaker 1>she you know, I think again it's like a little

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:09.719
<v Speaker 1>bit of a play on what we expect where she

0:39:10.000 --> 0:39:12.879
<v Speaker 1>offers him forgiveness. You know, I could see that going

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 1>either way, like she's horrified by it but offers him

0:39:16.480 --> 0:39:20.319
<v Speaker 1>a fresh start essentially, but again he rejects it. He's like, no,

0:39:20.360 --> 0:39:22.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't you know, because yeah, I think you're totally right,

0:39:22.600 --> 0:39:27.120
<v Speaker 1>like him, staying with Betty first of all, will absolutely

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>make her life worse and also will keep him in

0:39:31.080 --> 0:39:34.200
<v Speaker 1>this Hollywood cycle of abuse. And it's like, I feel

0:39:34.239 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>like we're led to believe weirdly that like Betty is

0:39:38.880 --> 0:39:41.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's not even you know, fast forward thirty years,

0:39:42.600 --> 0:39:45.759
<v Speaker 1>Betty is likely extremely jaded as well, because that's just

0:39:45.760 --> 0:39:49.160
<v Speaker 1>what happens yeah, but that like it seems like she

0:39:50.080 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>for reasons that it's like you know, aligning like youth

0:39:54.360 --> 0:39:57.399
<v Speaker 1>and beauty with like they'll be fine. But I think

0:39:57.440 --> 0:39:59.720
<v Speaker 1>that it's like set up that she is better suited

0:39:59.760 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 1>to this life because she's like it's a generational thing

0:40:03.920 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 1>with her family and she's had this experience with acting

0:40:07.520 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and leaving acting, and like she has the healthiest attitude

0:40:10.920 --> 0:40:13.439
<v Speaker 1>about Hollywood out of anyone, And I think it's because

0:40:13.480 --> 0:40:17.120
<v Speaker 1>she's from there and like her parents do behind the

0:40:17.160 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>scenes work, so it's like the less ego driven positions

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>that are are sort of better suited to understand this

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is just how it goes if you work in this shitty,

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>garbage industry. So I don't know, I sort of went

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>into this viewing being like, uh, how do I feel

0:40:34.040 --> 0:40:36.640
<v Speaker 1>about Betty? Is she an underwritten character? But like, I

0:40:36.640 --> 0:40:38.439
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Coming out of it, I was like, I'm

0:40:38.440 --> 0:40:41.200
<v Speaker 1>never going to argue with more, but I feel like

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:46.200
<v Speaker 1>it's really clear where she's coming from, and like not

0:40:46.280 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>that she is like higher functioning in this industry and

0:40:50.280 --> 0:40:52.839
<v Speaker 1>like and it has a healthier attitude and avoid like

0:40:52.880 --> 0:40:56.719
<v Speaker 1>it does make sense to me why she's kind of

0:40:57.040 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 1>letting things roll off her shoulders but still works hard

0:40:59.440 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of vibe.

0:41:00.600 --> 0:41:03.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, And I'm excited to talk about her more

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 2>just because of her attitude toward the film industry and

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 2>just kind of how that informs different things about her character.

0:41:14.560 --> 0:41:19.920
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, it's all very fascinating anyway. So Okay, Betty

0:41:20.320 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 2>is there at the house. Now. She's trying to encourage

0:41:23.320 --> 0:41:25.800
<v Speaker 2>Joe to like run away with her and like escape

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:31.839
<v Speaker 2>this scenario and leave, and he's like, no, I've got

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:36.319
<v Speaker 2>a decent setup here. So Betty runs off heartbroken, but

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:39.200
<v Speaker 2>Joe decides it is time for him to leave and

0:41:39.280 --> 0:41:43.040
<v Speaker 2>actually like go through with moving back to Ohio and

0:41:43.320 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 2>just getting out of Hollywood in general. So he starts

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:51.000
<v Speaker 2>packing his belongings and Norma's like, what are you doing?

0:41:51.320 --> 0:41:54.320
<v Speaker 2>Why are you leaving me? And he's like, wake up, Norma,

0:41:54.840 --> 0:41:58.520
<v Speaker 2>there is no Demil movie. The fan mail you get

0:41:58.960 --> 0:42:03.080
<v Speaker 2>is fake and you're not a star anymore. And that's okay,

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:06.399
<v Speaker 2>but you gotta face Fax. And then he goes to leave,

0:42:07.000 --> 0:42:12.480
<v Speaker 2>but Norma shoots him and he collapses in the pool dead.

0:42:13.480 --> 0:42:17.399
<v Speaker 1>Great gas by vibes good for him, yes, So.

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:21.279
<v Speaker 2>Then after this, Norma goes into a kind of like

0:42:21.680 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 2>fugue state where she completely disassociates and she's ignoring the

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:31.640
<v Speaker 2>cops and the press who are there interrogating her until

0:42:32.000 --> 0:42:39.120
<v Speaker 2>the newsreel guys show up with cameras and she's like, cameras, well, okay,

0:42:39.360 --> 0:42:42.200
<v Speaker 2>And then she slowly heads down the stairs, thinking that

0:42:42.239 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 2>she's like in the middle of a scene, that she's

0:42:46.040 --> 0:42:48.200
<v Speaker 2>like back at the studio, that she has made her

0:42:48.239 --> 0:42:51.360
<v Speaker 2>triumphant return. And this is where we get the famous

0:42:51.400 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 2>line from the movie, one of the famous lines from

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:58.319
<v Speaker 2>the movie, often misquoted, mister demil, I'm ready for my

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:02.239
<v Speaker 2>close up. And that's how the movie ends. So let's

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:05.560
<v Speaker 2>take a quick break and we will come back to discuss,

0:43:17.840 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 2>and we're back.

0:43:18.560 --> 0:43:21.440
<v Speaker 1>We're back. Yeah. Part of what I find fascinating about

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:24.400
<v Speaker 1>the ending of that movie, just like reckoning back to

0:43:25.280 --> 0:43:28.200
<v Speaker 1>other movies we've covered and like that takes place in

0:43:28.239 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of span of years, is that the

0:43:31.239 --> 0:43:35.800
<v Speaker 1>ghost of Joe who's telling us this story, clearly thinks

0:43:35.800 --> 0:43:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that Norma's life is you know, He's like, well, I

0:43:38.640 --> 0:43:40.239
<v Speaker 1>don't know what happens to her. She probably won't serve

0:43:40.280 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>a lot of prison time because she's so famous but like,

0:43:42.680 --> 0:43:45.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially his ghost is like she's fucked. But I'm like

0:43:46.520 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of worked out for the ladies in Chicago who

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:53.920
<v Speaker 1>were trying to pivot from Vaudeville into being Moidera's So

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:56.839
<v Speaker 1>I feel like, baby, she's got another act in her

0:43:57.640 --> 0:44:02.319
<v Speaker 1>could be ded. He just named Richard Gear to be

0:44:02.480 --> 0:44:06.360
<v Speaker 1>your lawyer, and you can really make things work. That's

0:44:06.800 --> 0:44:10.520
<v Speaker 1>how I feel. I wouldn't count Norma out, I wouldn't

0:44:10.560 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 1>counter out. Oh yeah, is that a good thing? I

0:44:13.160 --> 0:44:18.839
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Okay, where shall we begin? Oh boy, let's see.

0:44:18.840 --> 0:44:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I want to do a little context for

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:24.040
<v Speaker 1>this movie, because it is like the context of it

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is very important. Yeah, so this is, you know, as

0:44:28.520 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 1>we've already talked about a Billy Wilds a movie. He

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:36.640
<v Speaker 1>was born in nineteen oh six. He's a Jewish director.

0:44:37.040 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>He was born in Austria, Hungary, which either way, yeah,

0:44:40.320 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>he ultimately moved to America and began working in films.

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I believe that he did do some work in the

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:54.600
<v Speaker 1>silent era, but mostly worked in the talkies, which exists

0:44:54.640 --> 0:45:00.080
<v Speaker 1>to this day. What in any case, this movie, it

0:45:00.320 --> 0:45:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was extremely polarizing and sort of disliked in Hollywood. Communities.

0:45:06.080 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 1>When it came out, it prompted Louis Bymyriage to say

0:45:09.719 --> 0:45:14.800
<v Speaker 1>something very xenophobic to Billy Wilder. He said, you've disgraced

0:45:14.840 --> 0:45:16.920
<v Speaker 1>the industry that made and fed you. You should be

0:45:17.000 --> 0:45:19.600
<v Speaker 1>tarred and feathered and run out of Hollywood. And he

0:45:19.719 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 1>kept going, oh, he like said get out of the country,

0:45:24.040 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>essentially implied that he should go back to Germany, which

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:30.360
<v Speaker 1>to say that to a Jewish director in nineteen fifty

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is unfucking believable, and like Louis by mahor notorious monster,

0:45:35.280 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>but also speaks to like uh. Billy Wilder was a

0:45:38.600 --> 0:45:42.040
<v Speaker 1>very successful director within the studio system and within the

0:45:42.080 --> 0:45:45.080
<v Speaker 1>star system, and this was viewed as like, how dare

0:45:45.200 --> 0:45:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you bite the hand that feeds you or criticize the

0:45:47.880 --> 0:45:50.840
<v Speaker 1>hand that feeds you, right, which is like fuck you,

0:45:50.960 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>which is exactly when Billy Wilder walked up to Louisimhor

0:45:53.680 --> 0:45:59.280
<v Speaker 1>and said, he said, go fuck yourself girl. He was right. Okay.

0:46:00.080 --> 0:46:02.920
<v Speaker 1>The other thing that is, like we've already referenced, is

0:46:03.520 --> 0:46:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the fact that so many people, because this came out

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen fifty, this was the time that like silent

0:46:10.960 --> 0:46:15.480
<v Speaker 1>film stars that did not make the crossover into sound

0:46:15.719 --> 0:46:19.799
<v Speaker 1>pictures were getting older and hadn't worked in a while.

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:24.080
<v Speaker 1>This was Gloria Swanson's first movie in like nine years

0:46:24.160 --> 0:46:26.480
<v Speaker 1>at the time that she had kind of switched to do.

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an interesting point in history, and like

0:46:29.440 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>the fact that this movie is as like brutal as

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>it is, it's really interesting because it's we were seeing

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:39.080
<v Speaker 1>around this time and like would continue even for like

0:46:39.120 --> 0:46:43.640
<v Speaker 1>old Hollywood stars that did crossover into talking movies, people

0:46:43.680 --> 0:46:46.439
<v Speaker 1>like Betty Davis, at people like Joan Crawford, like they

0:46:46.480 --> 0:46:51.719
<v Speaker 1>would be pushed into television back on stage or if

0:46:51.719 --> 0:46:54.200
<v Speaker 1>they stated movies would often be cast you know, the

0:46:54.200 --> 0:46:56.880
<v Speaker 1>only way to really get a leading role would be

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to do older woman bodyhorn, which you see, you know,

0:47:01.960 --> 0:47:03.880
<v Speaker 1>as the years go on. Like I think whatever Happened

0:47:03.920 --> 0:47:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to Baby Jane is a huge example of that, where

0:47:07.120 --> 0:47:10.840
<v Speaker 1>it's like, well, if you are a woman over fifty

0:47:11.200 --> 0:47:15.000
<v Speaker 1>working at Hollywood and you want to work outside of

0:47:15.040 --> 0:47:18.840
<v Speaker 1>like the kindly mother role, what are your options? And

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it is sort of like Norma Desmond is like the

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:25.960
<v Speaker 1>best role available because at least it's self aware. But

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.800
<v Speaker 1>like in most cases, there's a whole subgenre that still

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:32.720
<v Speaker 1>exists in certain ways. There's a great video essay about

0:47:32.760 --> 0:47:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it from be kind Rewind that talks about whatever happened

0:47:36.520 --> 0:47:39.400
<v Speaker 1>to Baby Jane specifically, but basically it is like a

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:43.919
<v Speaker 1>whole subgenre called hag horror that you know, just capitalizes

0:47:44.000 --> 0:47:48.040
<v Speaker 1>on the star power of incredible actresses when they were

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:51.360
<v Speaker 1>younger and you know, allows them to be in movies

0:47:51.400 --> 0:47:54.879
<v Speaker 1>with the contingency that they are perpetuating the idea that

0:47:55.200 --> 0:47:57.840
<v Speaker 1>being an aging woman is horrific.

0:47:58.320 --> 0:47:58.520
<v Speaker 2>Right.

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:03.800
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting because, like we've talked about, like Gloria Swanson,

0:48:04.680 --> 0:48:07.839
<v Speaker 1>this is her lived experience. We are seeing, not Norma

0:48:07.920 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 1>Desmond story, but like she, you know, was a silent

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:16.400
<v Speaker 1>film star who never quite broke out as a talking

0:48:16.480 --> 0:48:20.000
<v Speaker 1>film actress. Before Sunset Boulevard, she went back on stage.

0:48:20.000 --> 0:48:22.200
<v Speaker 1>She was still working. She worked, she did stuff on TV,

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:24.840
<v Speaker 1>she worked on stage. You know, she wasn't rotting in

0:48:24.880 --> 0:48:27.880
<v Speaker 1>a house, which I think is pretty fucking insulting. Yeah,

0:48:28.320 --> 0:48:31.360
<v Speaker 1>but her career, I think we still see this with

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>women and fems today. The types of roles she was

0:48:34.719 --> 0:48:39.880
<v Speaker 1>offered changed, the types of mediums she was welcomed and changed.

0:48:40.520 --> 0:48:43.320
<v Speaker 1>And then you know, Max is played by a silent

0:48:43.360 --> 0:48:46.520
<v Speaker 1>film director. It's Buster Keaton is in this movie.

0:48:46.520 --> 0:48:51.479
<v Speaker 2>Right, Demill plays himself, and Demill is often credited as

0:48:51.600 --> 0:48:56.320
<v Speaker 2>the director who kind of made Gloria Swanson a star.

0:48:56.920 --> 0:49:02.400
<v Speaker 2>So there's all these really interesting parallel between Glorious Swanson

0:49:02.640 --> 0:49:05.880
<v Speaker 2>and the character she plays. Again, to our knowledge, Glorious

0:49:05.920 --> 0:49:11.319
<v Speaker 2>Swanson wasn't, you know, didn't have a very warped view

0:49:11.360 --> 0:49:14.320
<v Speaker 2>of reality and wasn't like living in this kind of delusion.

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:16.800
<v Speaker 1>But no, she was like living in New York acting

0:49:16.840 --> 0:49:20.239
<v Speaker 1>on Broadway like she was. Okay, right, But it's still like,

0:49:20.480 --> 0:49:24.959
<v Speaker 1>I honestly haven't studied Demil as a person very much.

0:49:25.080 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 1>I know that he was a notorious conservative. I know

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:32.280
<v Speaker 1>that he was, you know, obviously deeply complicit in many

0:49:32.440 --> 0:49:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of the sins of early Hollywood, but it is I

0:49:35.920 --> 0:49:39.479
<v Speaker 1>think it's really kind of admirable that he was even

0:49:39.560 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 1>willing to be in this movie as himself, kind of

0:49:42.280 --> 0:49:45.800
<v Speaker 1>acknowledging the system that he was still complicit within, because

0:49:46.080 --> 0:49:49.320
<v Speaker 1>like that de Mill scene was shot on the set

0:49:49.400 --> 0:49:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of a huge movie he was directing, Like it was

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:56.360
<v Speaker 1>exaggerated versions of the actual reality, where it's like he

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:59.319
<v Speaker 1>still hadn't even directed, you know, the time, he hadn't

0:49:59.320 --> 0:50:02.439
<v Speaker 1>even directed in his is hit yet when this came out,

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:06.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, as far as Glorious Swanson's career goes, that,

0:50:06.920 --> 0:50:10.640
<v Speaker 1>like Sunset Boulevard is a huge success for her, She's

0:50:10.800 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 1>nominated for an Oscar. It's an unbelievable performance. But it's

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>like the question is at what cost? Like you know,

0:50:16.360 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Cecil b de mill is not asked to make these

0:50:20.440 --> 0:50:25.040
<v Speaker 1>huge ego compromises in order to continue working in an

0:50:25.040 --> 0:50:28.960
<v Speaker 1>interesting way, And yeah, that scene is like just so

0:50:30.160 --> 0:50:32.600
<v Speaker 1>brutal and like the way that he comes off, I

0:50:32.600 --> 0:50:35.799
<v Speaker 1>thought like it worked where it's like he clearly has

0:50:36.920 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 1>sympathy for her, but not empathy and not enough to

0:50:40.600 --> 0:50:41.600
<v Speaker 1>do anything about it.

0:50:41.560 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 2>Where be direct about like I actually didn't like your script,

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:49.080
<v Speaker 2>and he just sort of like lets her believe what

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:51.600
<v Speaker 2>she wants to believe, and he's too much of a

0:50:51.640 --> 0:50:55.920
<v Speaker 2>coward to like be clear about what's gonna happen, and

0:50:56.000 --> 0:50:59.400
<v Speaker 2>instead he's like get Gordon Cole on the phone and

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:01.120
<v Speaker 2>tell him just because the reason.

0:51:00.920 --> 0:51:03.439
<v Speaker 1>That right, he's like, someone else take care of this.

0:51:03.600 --> 0:51:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to take care of this, right, yes, yes,

0:51:06.760 --> 0:51:09.359
<v Speaker 1>But then also like I think he doesn't come off

0:51:09.480 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 1>as a complete monster. And I thought that was an

0:51:12.120 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>interesting choice too. I mean, I guess that kind of

0:51:15.239 --> 0:51:17.840
<v Speaker 1>makes sense where it's like that's where like it's particularly gross,

0:51:17.840 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 1>where he has sympathy for her, he understands her predicament,

0:51:20.520 --> 0:51:22.560
<v Speaker 1>but he doesn't want to deal with it because he

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 1>does sort of defend her before she comes in the room,

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.279
<v Speaker 1>where they're like, oh, wasn't she a fucking nightmare to

0:51:28.320 --> 0:51:30.640
<v Speaker 1>work with? And he was like not really, Like she

0:51:30.719 --> 0:51:32.720
<v Speaker 1>was great to work with at the beginning of her career,

0:51:32.800 --> 0:51:34.839
<v Speaker 1>she was really smart. And then you know, the more

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:37.960
<v Speaker 1>famous she got, the more difficult she became to work with,

0:51:38.040 --> 0:51:43.920
<v Speaker 1>which also plays into stereotypes around actors, especially women, especially

0:51:43.920 --> 0:51:46.839
<v Speaker 1>the further back in history you go of, like being

0:51:46.920 --> 0:51:52.839
<v Speaker 1>characterized as being difficult could mean just being assertive and not.

0:51:52.920 --> 0:51:54.840
<v Speaker 2>Rolling out advocating for yourself.

0:51:54.960 --> 0:51:57.919
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly. And so we don't really know, we don't

0:51:57.920 --> 0:52:01.239
<v Speaker 1>know enough about the period between you know, Norma as

0:52:01.280 --> 0:52:04.000
<v Speaker 1>a young woman into a woman in her fifties. But

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:06.960
<v Speaker 1>he has that really good line a dozen press agents

0:52:07.000 --> 0:52:08.960
<v Speaker 1>working over time can do a terrible thing to the

0:52:09.040 --> 0:52:13.160
<v Speaker 1>human spirit, Yes, which is a great line and also

0:52:13.360 --> 0:52:16.920
<v Speaker 1>is like it makes set, like who but him would

0:52:16.960 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>fully understand what is happening to her, and he does

0:52:21.520 --> 0:52:24.439
<v Speaker 1>have the power to do something about it, as does

0:52:24.480 --> 0:52:28.680
<v Speaker 1>any highly influential director. You know, does her script suck?

0:52:28.880 --> 0:52:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Certainly seems like it like offer her a part that

0:52:32.360 --> 0:52:34.319
<v Speaker 1>is not in this you know, it's I feel like,

0:52:35.000 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>because Norma's whole world is designed to protect her from

0:52:39.560 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 1>rejection or change, there are all these missed opportunities for

0:52:43.560 --> 0:52:48.439
<v Speaker 1>potential compromise, right to get her back out into into

0:52:48.480 --> 0:52:51.840
<v Speaker 1>the world. And so it does feel like these paternalistic

0:52:52.600 --> 0:52:56.279
<v Speaker 1>men who want to appease her but don't actually want

0:52:56.320 --> 0:53:01.480
<v Speaker 1>to help her in any way, Like she's completely doomed.

0:53:02.280 --> 0:53:03.320
<v Speaker 1>Our girl is doing.

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:09.360
<v Speaker 2>And there's so many layers because like they're feeding into

0:53:10.120 --> 0:53:17.160
<v Speaker 2>this ego of hers that is almost bound to form

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:20.400
<v Speaker 2>in a scenario like this where you're so doted on

0:53:20.800 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 2>and you have all these adoring fans, and especially when

0:53:23.760 --> 0:53:25.880
<v Speaker 2>you get famous super young, like she did. I think, yes,

0:53:26.160 --> 0:53:29.040
<v Speaker 2>it's mentioned that she was discovered when she was sixteen,

0:53:29.280 --> 0:53:32.040
<v Speaker 2>so you know, she's a very young person when she

0:53:32.160 --> 0:53:33.320
<v Speaker 2>becomes a star.

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:37.320
<v Speaker 1>Just like my theory. By theory holds that you become

0:53:37.400 --> 0:53:41.600
<v Speaker 1>frozen in maturity at the moment you become famous. Yeah,

0:53:41.640 --> 0:53:44.719
<v Speaker 1>and so she's still acting like a kid like and

0:53:45.239 --> 0:53:47.080
<v Speaker 1>it is like they don't shy away from the fact

0:53:47.080 --> 0:53:49.279
<v Speaker 1>that her I mean, it's it's like funny the way

0:53:49.320 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 1>that she It's sad, but it is funny how she

0:53:51.560 --> 0:53:54.719
<v Speaker 1>talks to Demil where she's like, all right, I don't

0:53:54.800 --> 0:53:58.040
<v Speaker 1>care about budget, you figure that out, and I won't

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:01.720
<v Speaker 1>work more than six hours a day, just like Norma.

0:54:01.960 --> 0:54:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Come on, we got it, okay, But like that level

0:54:05.360 --> 0:54:10.239
<v Speaker 1>of entitlement, Like I don't know, I kind of like

0:54:10.280 --> 0:54:14.319
<v Speaker 1>that the movie doesn't make her tragic in the way

0:54:14.320 --> 0:54:16.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's like and she's not even asking for much

0:54:16.600 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>like she is asking for a lot. She's a diva.

0:54:19.040 --> 0:54:21.960
<v Speaker 1>She's not being reasonable. Yeah, she is a diva, but

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't justify the way that she's treated, and it

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:28.480
<v Speaker 1>also doesn't justify the way she treats people like. It's

0:54:28.640 --> 0:54:33.160
<v Speaker 1>just extremely messy. I think what I've seen talked about

0:54:33.160 --> 0:54:36.000
<v Speaker 1>with Norma a lot over the years, which I do

0:54:36.080 --> 0:54:41.120
<v Speaker 1>agree with, but it's like, because it's such a complicated movie,

0:54:41.320 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that there's any like simple way to

0:54:43.880 --> 0:54:47.239
<v Speaker 1>be prescriptive about her. But there are like we've sort

0:54:47.239 --> 0:54:49.880
<v Speaker 1>of been hinting at there is the tropes around older

0:54:49.920 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 1>women are fully present. We see characters like this all

0:54:55.239 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the time, even now. The idea of like this is

0:54:58.000 --> 0:55:01.560
<v Speaker 1>a woman who has not accept did that she's aging.

0:55:02.600 --> 0:55:05.640
<v Speaker 1>And what I think this movie does well, even though

0:55:05.680 --> 0:55:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it is way over the top and like

0:55:08.560 --> 0:55:13.200
<v Speaker 1>the Norma character is more a symbol of how a

0:55:13.280 --> 0:55:17.920
<v Speaker 1>whole generation of actresses were treated and discarded, as opposed

0:55:17.960 --> 0:55:21.279
<v Speaker 1>to like an actual experience that happened to anyone. My

0:55:21.640 --> 0:55:26.560
<v Speaker 1>favorite quote about this was from a former Silent actor

0:55:26.680 --> 0:55:29.560
<v Speaker 1>named May Murray who saw the movie and said, none

0:55:29.600 --> 0:55:33.399
<v Speaker 1>of us floozies. Was that nuts? Just a very old

0:55:33.440 --> 0:55:37.279
<v Speaker 1>Hollywood way to say that. But so obviously it's not

0:55:37.960 --> 0:55:42.240
<v Speaker 1>even reflective of Glorious Swanson's experience. It's an exaggerated version

0:55:42.360 --> 0:55:46.120
<v Speaker 1>of how women are discarded. And I think that what

0:55:46.400 --> 0:55:50.480
<v Speaker 1>works about Normous Character is that you get the full context.

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:54.759
<v Speaker 1>I think with other older women, it's just presented that

0:55:55.000 --> 0:55:58.040
<v Speaker 1>this is how older women are, not this is how

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:01.600
<v Speaker 1>the world treats older one right, right.

0:56:01.680 --> 0:56:04.839
<v Speaker 2>That's the thing with this movie that I think makes

0:56:04.880 --> 0:56:10.640
<v Speaker 2>it so great, which is that a lesser movie would say, yeah,

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 2>this is just how older women behave Why doesn't matter

0:56:16.239 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 2>the way that you know, women are conditioned to feel

0:56:20.160 --> 0:56:21.880
<v Speaker 2>about themselves as they age.

0:56:22.440 --> 0:56:24.560
<v Speaker 1>What's that? Never heard of it? You know not?

0:56:25.200 --> 0:56:28.759
<v Speaker 2>But this movie Okay, so it presents a woman who

0:56:28.840 --> 0:56:33.480
<v Speaker 2>is quote unquote past her prime and who is characterized

0:56:33.560 --> 0:56:40.400
<v Speaker 2>as being delusional. She's controlling, she's very conceited and self obsessed.

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:44.440
<v Speaker 2>But there's also this component of, like we said, she

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:49.520
<v Speaker 2>came out of this like system where like which is

0:56:49.560 --> 0:56:55.680
<v Speaker 2>fundamentally abusive, super abusive, so focused on image, and so

0:56:56.320 --> 0:57:01.759
<v Speaker 2>heavily values youth in a special women it does tend

0:57:01.800 --> 0:57:05.680
<v Speaker 2>to chew people up and spit them out, and again,

0:57:05.800 --> 0:57:10.319
<v Speaker 2>especially women as they age. This is clearly what had

0:57:10.360 --> 0:57:14.799
<v Speaker 2>happened to Norma. And again, like we mentioned, there's the

0:57:14.920 --> 0:57:19.160
<v Speaker 2>component of she became a star when she was super young.

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:21.920
<v Speaker 2>She like you know, came into all this money. It

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:27.920
<v Speaker 2>seems like she invested in oil boo and real estate.

0:57:27.800 --> 0:57:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Oil boo, which is like, I mean, that's some rich

0:57:31.480 --> 0:57:33.840
<v Speaker 1>lady shit like. And I also think that it is

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:40.960
<v Speaker 1>a good choice that she still has money because it's like, yeah,

0:57:41.040 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 1>that it's not like she's down on her luck in

0:57:44.600 --> 0:57:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the financial sense, But it's like all of the loneliness

0:57:48.200 --> 0:57:51.600
<v Speaker 1>and like isolation in her life is fueled by feeling

0:57:51.680 --> 0:57:55.960
<v Speaker 1>discarded and and it feels like whatever underlying mental health

0:57:56.000 --> 0:57:58.840
<v Speaker 1>issues she may have had when she was very famous

0:57:59.080 --> 0:58:03.400
<v Speaker 1>are so exacerbated by the predicament that she's in. And

0:58:03.440 --> 0:58:06.680
<v Speaker 1>also I think, yeah, like you were saying enabled, however

0:58:06.840 --> 0:58:09.160
<v Speaker 1>well intentioned, you know, you could debate all day, but

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:13.360
<v Speaker 1>by people like Max who are like actively preventing her

0:58:13.520 --> 0:58:15.880
<v Speaker 1>from trying to live life a different way because of

0:58:15.920 --> 0:58:19.960
<v Speaker 1>how he is enabling her current lifestyle that is killing her.

0:58:20.200 --> 0:58:25.600
<v Speaker 1>It's like, I it's upsetting to hear the repeated attempts

0:58:25.600 --> 0:58:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to take her own life and that like this has

0:58:27.960 --> 0:58:32.880
<v Speaker 1>happened before, but there are no changes made to her life.

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>And certainly so it's like Max is a really difficult

0:58:37.360 --> 0:58:40.040
<v Speaker 1>character for me because I like he doesn't have her

0:58:40.080 --> 0:58:43.920
<v Speaker 1>best interests at heart, at least in a long term sense.

0:58:44.040 --> 0:58:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe in the short term it's more comfortable for

0:58:46.560 --> 0:58:49.680
<v Speaker 1>her to believe these things, but it's clear that like

0:58:50.520 --> 0:58:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, and it's painful to see Norma seeking

0:58:54.760 --> 0:58:59.680
<v Speaker 1>out this validation from people where it's you know, I

0:58:59.720 --> 0:59:04.480
<v Speaker 1>don't believe that she loves Joe. Really, they think that

0:59:04.520 --> 0:59:09.120
<v Speaker 1>she has I think that he and maybe I, you know,

0:59:09.400 --> 0:59:12.200
<v Speaker 1>feel free to roast be in the common. I don't

0:59:12.240 --> 0:59:13.880
<v Speaker 1>think that she loves him. I think that he is

0:59:13.920 --> 0:59:17.960
<v Speaker 1>someone that comes along when she is extremely lonely, who

0:59:18.040 --> 0:59:21.600
<v Speaker 1>has a skill that she needs. It's a mutually beneficial

0:59:21.680 --> 0:59:26.280
<v Speaker 1>relationship and that like, ultimately, I don't think she kills

0:59:26.360 --> 0:59:30.640
<v Speaker 1>him in anything but like anger and jealousy, which are

0:59:30.680 --> 0:59:32.040
<v Speaker 1>not love. Right.

0:59:32.200 --> 0:59:37.280
<v Speaker 2>Yes, he's one of the first people to reject her

0:59:37.720 --> 0:59:42.840
<v Speaker 2>in a way that she actually is able to interpret

0:59:42.920 --> 0:59:48.000
<v Speaker 2>it as rejection because she's so surrounded by this like sheltered,

0:59:48.840 --> 0:59:53.800
<v Speaker 2>enabled life where you know, he's the first person who

0:59:53.800 --> 0:59:56.520
<v Speaker 2>comes along. And I really like his line towards the

0:59:56.600 --> 1:00:00.440
<v Speaker 2>end where he says, you know, Norma, you're a woman

1:00:00.520 --> 1:00:04.320
<v Speaker 2>of fifty, grow up and there's nothing tragic about being fifty,

1:00:05.080 --> 1:00:08.240
<v Speaker 2>not unless you're trying to be twenty five, which is

1:00:08.400 --> 1:00:10.680
<v Speaker 2>what Norma is trying to do.

1:00:11.200 --> 1:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>But I also like that line. It's another amazing line

1:00:14.160 --> 1:00:16.760
<v Speaker 1>that is so loaded because it's coming from a man,

1:00:16.880 --> 1:00:20.280
<v Speaker 1>because it's like he is like on paper in a

1:00:20.360 --> 1:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>perfect world, he's right, but it's like he doesn't I

1:00:24.800 --> 1:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>feel like, even though he understands that the world has

1:00:29.200 --> 1:00:33.480
<v Speaker 1>done Norma this injustice and not in a way that

1:00:33.480 --> 1:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>feels underwritten in a way that I think is kind

1:00:35.640 --> 1:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of genuine to a lot of people who don't have

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that experience of just being like, well, why don't you

1:00:41.720 --> 1:00:44.200
<v Speaker 1>just snap out of it? And it's like, well, you know,

1:00:44.320 --> 1:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>it's presenting like, well, what are her options? Certainly what

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:53.480
<v Speaker 1>she's doing is not working for anyone, especially her, but

1:00:53.680 --> 1:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>like it feels like the alternative that she's being presented

1:00:57.080 --> 1:01:02.920
<v Speaker 1>with is disappear gracefully, and that is like what women are,

1:01:03.600 --> 1:01:06.200
<v Speaker 1>especially you know, women, the further back you go. And

1:01:06.240 --> 1:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>it's like she is operating at the highest privileged level.

1:01:09.320 --> 1:01:13.080
<v Speaker 1>She's a rich white woman, and she's still nonetheless being asked,

1:01:13.200 --> 1:01:16.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, can't you just gracefully disappear? Like why can't

1:01:16.800 --> 1:01:19.440
<v Speaker 1>you do that? And I think that this movie, like

1:01:19.880 --> 1:01:22.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, I think in this movie, maybe it

1:01:22.520 --> 1:01:24.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't make an overt suggestion of like what is the

1:01:24.920 --> 1:01:28.400
<v Speaker 1>alternative because I don't think there is an alternative for

1:01:28.920 --> 1:01:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Norma at this time. I mean, if we're being pragmatic,

1:01:31.520 --> 1:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>the alternative is go to TV, go to the stage.

1:01:35.120 --> 1:01:38.720
<v Speaker 1>But like, I don't know, it's Norma is an ego

1:01:38.840 --> 1:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>monster in a way that a lot of actors are

1:01:41.600 --> 1:01:44.360
<v Speaker 1>ego monsters. I don't think that it's like a you know,

1:01:44.440 --> 1:01:47.680
<v Speaker 1>a gendered gender thing. I think that the way that

1:01:47.960 --> 1:01:50.920
<v Speaker 1>people with big egos are treated is in a gendered way.

1:01:51.120 --> 1:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, for sure, no one's calling a man a diva.

1:01:54.040 --> 1:01:56.200
<v Speaker 1>They're like, he knows what he wants and he doesn't

1:01:56.200 --> 1:01:58.240
<v Speaker 1>take shit from anyone, and like he's.

1:01:58.120 --> 1:02:00.440
<v Speaker 2>Just going method and blah blah blah.

1:02:00.480 --> 1:02:03.920
<v Speaker 1>God. Yeah, but you know when women do the same thing,

1:02:03.920 --> 1:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>they're difficult to work with whatever. But she is an

1:02:06.880 --> 1:02:09.840
<v Speaker 1>ego monster, nonetheless, yes, but yeah, it's like what are

1:02:09.840 --> 1:02:12.720
<v Speaker 1>her alternatives? And it seems like Joe's like, why don't

1:02:12.760 --> 1:02:15.800
<v Speaker 1>you just quietly like, you know, can't you just be normal?

1:02:15.880 --> 1:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>And you're like, she kind of can't. Like not that

1:02:18.640 --> 1:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>that makes it, that justifies any of her actions, but

1:02:20.920 --> 1:02:22.880
<v Speaker 1>her whole life has been constructed in a way that

1:02:22.920 --> 1:02:24.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like, what does normal look like?

1:02:25.400 --> 1:02:28.800
<v Speaker 2>What does normal normal look like?

1:02:29.680 --> 1:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, fact, what does normal look like? Garfield?

1:02:32.240 --> 1:02:34.920
<v Speaker 2>Wow, I just love a cat named normal because I

1:02:35.000 --> 1:02:36.440
<v Speaker 2>used to love Garfield so much.

1:02:36.720 --> 1:02:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, he was a really good cat shout out normal. Yes,

1:02:42.720 --> 1:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>like she is.

1:02:44.280 --> 1:02:48.600
<v Speaker 2>An ego monster, but she's a product of this environment

1:02:48.680 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 2>that turns people into ego monsters. And Joe, Yes, it's

1:02:54.760 --> 1:02:59.280
<v Speaker 2>He's right when he says, grow up, you're behaving like

1:02:59.280 --> 1:03:02.560
<v Speaker 2>a child based and there's nothing tragic about being fifty

1:03:02.720 --> 1:03:07.400
<v Speaker 2>unless you're trying to like desperately cling on to youth,

1:03:07.520 --> 1:03:10.720
<v Speaker 2>which again she is doing because she is a product

1:03:10.720 --> 1:03:15.040
<v Speaker 2>of this you know, nasty Hollywood machine. Yeah, but he's

1:03:15.080 --> 1:03:18.280
<v Speaker 2>also complicit in this in the sense that he is

1:03:18.320 --> 1:03:22.800
<v Speaker 2>a writer actively working in Hollywood, and his just complicit

1:03:22.880 --> 1:03:27.640
<v Speaker 2>in this system that does value youth and beauty in

1:03:27.920 --> 1:03:30.840
<v Speaker 2>women and that like choose them up and spits them out.

1:03:31.400 --> 1:03:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So and it like makes sense that he's finally comfortable

1:03:35.120 --> 1:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>saying this when he I feel like I've had I mean,

1:03:37.720 --> 1:03:39.600
<v Speaker 1>obviously not to this extent, but like you know what,

1:03:39.640 --> 1:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>like your friend is like I'm leaving La, I'm fucking done.

1:03:43.160 --> 1:03:45.880
<v Speaker 1>And then and then you just start saying shit, and

1:03:45.920 --> 1:03:48.840
<v Speaker 1>like this is his his moment for that where it's like,

1:03:49.080 --> 1:03:52.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's done with this industry. He doesn't need

1:03:52.320 --> 1:03:55.640
<v Speaker 1>to preserve any bridges. He's done, and so he can

1:03:55.680 --> 1:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>finally just be like this is fucked, Like I'm your fuck.

1:04:00.800 --> 1:04:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This is bad. Pops the bubble because he decides he

1:04:04.520 --> 1:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>doesn't want to benefit from it. I don't know, I

1:04:06.520 --> 1:04:09.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't remember, Like it's a small detail, but I was like,

1:04:09.160 --> 1:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>he better not take that stuff. He does it, he

1:04:12.320 --> 1:04:14.840
<v Speaker 1>leaves the stuff. He's just like, fuck it, I'm gonna

1:04:14.840 --> 1:04:17.440
<v Speaker 1>go work at this job in Ohio. And you know,

1:04:17.720 --> 1:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>at that point in the movie, I wanted that for him.

1:04:20.160 --> 1:04:23.160
<v Speaker 1>It's it's too bad that he gets killed two minutes later.

1:04:23.480 --> 1:04:26.280
<v Speaker 2>There's something to be said though, for like, look at

1:04:26.280 --> 1:04:30.480
<v Speaker 2>this man who is able to accept that he didn't

1:04:30.520 --> 1:04:33.280
<v Speaker 2>make it in Hollywood, and so he's gonna go back

1:04:33.320 --> 1:04:37.560
<v Speaker 2>to his you know, humble beginnings and do whatever it

1:04:37.600 --> 1:04:42.320
<v Speaker 2>takes for him to survive. But he's accepting that the

1:04:42.360 --> 1:04:46.040
<v Speaker 2>Hollywood thing didn't work out for him, whereas.

1:04:45.640 --> 1:04:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Well, I mean, but I guess where I would contest

1:04:48.160 --> 1:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>that a little bit is like because.

1:04:50.800 --> 1:04:52.920
<v Speaker 2>He's like half I mean, I think the Betty character

1:04:53.320 --> 1:04:54.600
<v Speaker 2>helps to balance that out.

1:04:55.200 --> 1:04:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and also that like Norma has such a wildly

1:04:57.880 --> 1:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>different experience of Hollywood. He hasn't even been successful, so

1:05:01.720 --> 1:05:03.440
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of like, well, Yeah, it's kind of a

1:05:03.520 --> 1:05:06.040
<v Speaker 1>lot like you can't be doing much worse than you're doing.

1:05:06.160 --> 1:05:10.439
<v Speaker 1>You're like kind of a prisoner, you know. So it's

1:05:10.480 --> 1:05:12.840
<v Speaker 1>not like I didn't feel gendered to me that it

1:05:12.880 --> 1:05:14.680
<v Speaker 1>was easier for him to leave because there was nothing

1:05:14.680 --> 1:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>for him there anymore, and then like it seemed like

1:05:17.440 --> 1:05:20.360
<v Speaker 1>his only way to stay there is to be in

1:05:20.400 --> 1:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>this horrific I don't even know if you can call

1:05:24.200 --> 1:05:26.720
<v Speaker 1>it a relationship, this like cycle of abuse that he

1:05:27.400 --> 1:05:30.120
<v Speaker 1>is a part of, but it is also very much

1:05:30.120 --> 1:05:31.960
<v Speaker 1>a victim of, and I don't think that that is

1:05:32.320 --> 1:05:34.840
<v Speaker 1>something to shy away from. I think that again, if

1:05:34.840 --> 1:05:38.400
<v Speaker 1>we're going back to like movie criticism of the mid

1:05:38.480 --> 1:05:41.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty tens, which is where we came out of and

1:05:41.200 --> 1:05:45.680
<v Speaker 1>then we you know, grew up like Norma can't, but

1:05:45.720 --> 1:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>that like there is a hero and villain of this story,

1:05:47.840 --> 1:05:51.600
<v Speaker 1>there's not Like Norma is tremendously abusive and manipulative at times.

1:05:52.080 --> 1:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>Joe is like lies and manipulates people as well. Betty's

1:05:55.920 --> 1:05:59.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of the only person who's chilling and like, give

1:05:59.240 --> 1:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>her time too. She's twenty two. She'll probably you know,

1:06:01.600 --> 1:06:04.320
<v Speaker 1>become a monster if she hangs out in Hollywood long

1:06:04.400 --> 1:06:07.680
<v Speaker 1>enough's inevitable. But I liked going back to your point

1:06:07.720 --> 1:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>about like the writer being complicit in this system too.

1:06:10.760 --> 1:06:12.640
<v Speaker 1>It felt like this movie also had like a pretty

1:06:12.720 --> 1:06:16.160
<v Speaker 1>layered approach to that because it's true, but it's also

1:06:16.320 --> 1:06:22.000
<v Speaker 1>like demonstrated how the way that the system is encourages

1:06:22.080 --> 1:06:24.959
<v Speaker 1>that where it's suggested and it's like we don't really

1:06:25.000 --> 1:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>get a clear idea on like what Joe would be

1:06:30.400 --> 1:06:34.880
<v Speaker 1>writing in a perfect world, so like is he brilliant?

1:06:35.080 --> 1:06:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, but like he's trying to sell this shitty,

1:06:38.720 --> 1:06:41.840
<v Speaker 1>bullshit idea that almost sounds like someone pitching a Netflix

1:06:41.880 --> 1:06:45.160
<v Speaker 1>movie right, like they're like, I don't know someone famous,

1:06:45.200 --> 1:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't it baseball something? Is this anything? But how it's

1:06:49.400 --> 1:06:53.120
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like recently suggested that like this is not

1:06:53.280 --> 1:06:54.760
<v Speaker 1>the kind of work he wants to be doing. He

1:06:54.800 --> 1:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>would rather be doing something creative and different, but that's

1:07:00.600 --> 1:07:02.280
<v Speaker 1>not the sort of thing that's going to allow him

1:07:02.320 --> 1:07:05.840
<v Speaker 1>to make a living. So that's also like drawn attention

1:07:05.920 --> 1:07:08.880
<v Speaker 1>to God. Yeah that the line about being like, yeah, yeah,

1:07:09.920 --> 1:07:11.960
<v Speaker 1>I know you've heard a head of talent, but I

1:07:11.960 --> 1:07:16.320
<v Speaker 1>want to work this year, like vibe that, I get it,

1:07:16.400 --> 1:07:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I get it. I get it.

1:07:18.000 --> 1:07:21.320
<v Speaker 2>Yes, yeah, there's that. And then but I also just

1:07:21.840 --> 1:07:26.920
<v Speaker 2>I mean representation of a woman telling a male artist

1:07:27.120 --> 1:07:30.360
<v Speaker 2>that his art is bad and try it.

1:07:31.200 --> 1:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Loves it no matter like if they're flirting or not,

1:07:35.240 --> 1:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Like she's just like I cannot tell a lie.

1:07:37.520 --> 1:07:39.320
<v Speaker 2>At that point, they're not flirting because that's like their

1:07:39.360 --> 1:07:42.200
<v Speaker 2>first meeting and she's at work and she's just like

1:07:42.400 --> 1:07:46.000
<v Speaker 2>giving her honest, professional opinion and she's like, oh, yeah,

1:07:46.640 --> 1:07:52.120
<v Speaker 2>I covered that script and I passed on it because

1:07:52.200 --> 1:07:55.360
<v Speaker 2>it was trite, and I was like, hell yeah, dude.

1:07:55.400 --> 1:08:01.160
<v Speaker 2>And then also later Demil calls Norma's script awful, but

1:08:01.360 --> 1:08:05.920
<v Speaker 2>presumably he read the version that Joe rewrote and like

1:08:06.000 --> 1:08:08.920
<v Speaker 2>punched up and it's apparently still very bad. So I

1:08:08.960 --> 1:08:12.640
<v Speaker 2>think Joe is a flop. He's not a good writer.

1:08:12.880 --> 1:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>See again, I'm gonna come to Joe's defense here as

1:08:15.600 --> 1:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>someone who's done punch up work. Some things are unsavable

1:08:19.080 --> 1:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes fair. And it also sounds like if she's

1:08:22.080 --> 1:08:24.320
<v Speaker 1>hovering over his shoulder being like, no, you can't take

1:08:24.320 --> 1:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>that seat out, it's like, well, how much work did

1:08:26.000 --> 1:08:29.439
<v Speaker 1>he even really get to do? True? I say Joe

1:08:29.439 --> 1:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>innocent in that instance. I do sort of wonder why

1:08:34.400 --> 1:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>because there are multiple times in the movie where Joe

1:08:39.439 --> 1:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>is like, hey, Betty, like you can have this, I

1:08:41.960 --> 1:08:43.639
<v Speaker 1>don't really want to do it. I'm like, why doesn't

1:08:43.720 --> 1:08:46.599
<v Speaker 1>she just do it? He's given her permission multiple times.

1:08:46.600 --> 1:08:48.680
<v Speaker 1>Why doesn't she just do it? But maybe that's a

1:08:48.680 --> 1:08:51.280
<v Speaker 1>good I don't know as far as Norma goes to

1:08:51.439 --> 1:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of wrap up that discussion, Yes, to really fully

1:08:54.880 --> 1:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>explore her, we would have to talk moment to moment

1:08:58.520 --> 1:09:04.080
<v Speaker 1>how she's behaved. I think that there are many tropes

1:09:04.439 --> 1:09:09.360
<v Speaker 1>present in her character, undoubtedly. I think that her character

1:09:09.680 --> 1:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>uses these tropes to really exaggerate the point it seems

1:09:13.240 --> 1:09:17.360
<v Speaker 1>like Billy Wilder is trying to make about how Hollywood

1:09:17.640 --> 1:09:21.320
<v Speaker 1>choose actresses up and spits them out. And I think

1:09:21.360 --> 1:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>that in that exaggeration, there are moments that are like

1:09:25.680 --> 1:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>feel almost like I felt bad that Gloria Swanson had

1:09:31.040 --> 1:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>to act them out because it's suggesting that this could

1:09:34.040 --> 1:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>be her own experience when she was a person, and like,

1:09:39.600 --> 1:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it was really interesting reading about her process of becoming

1:09:43.080 --> 1:09:47.280
<v Speaker 1>involved with this movie because she was a huge star

1:09:47.400 --> 1:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>at Paramount and there is like a degree of truth

1:09:50.080 --> 1:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>to that like line that Norma says when she goes

1:09:52.800 --> 1:09:55.280
<v Speaker 1>into the Paramount lot of like, you know, why should

1:09:55.280 --> 1:09:57.439
<v Speaker 1>I have to check in? I'm the reason this place exists.

1:09:57.439 --> 1:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And Gloria Swanson was such a huge early Paramount star

1:10:00.040 --> 1:10:02.479
<v Speaker 1>that there is like some tongue in cheekness to that

1:10:02.840 --> 1:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>she didn't want to have to audition for this part.

1:10:05.040 --> 1:10:06.679
<v Speaker 1>She's like, why the funk would I have to audition?

1:10:06.880 --> 1:10:11.200
<v Speaker 1>That's silly, And George Qcoor, who is like another big

1:10:11.200 --> 1:10:14.800
<v Speaker 1>old Hollywood director, was like, just do it, like you'll

1:10:14.800 --> 1:10:18.240
<v Speaker 1>regret not doing it. But she had to make ego

1:10:18.280 --> 1:10:23.240
<v Speaker 1>compromises in order to play this ego monster, and I

1:10:23.320 --> 1:10:26.559
<v Speaker 1>just like, that is not the fault of Billy Wilder,

1:10:26.920 --> 1:10:29.400
<v Speaker 1>but it is just an example of, like, even to

1:10:29.560 --> 1:10:33.679
<v Speaker 1>make this movie that is hyper critical of Hollywood practices,

1:10:34.200 --> 1:10:36.960
<v Speaker 1>those practices still had to be in play in order

1:10:36.960 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 1>for it to even happen. And there were a lot

1:10:39.200 --> 1:10:42.320
<v Speaker 1>of silent film star actresses who were like, fuck you,

1:10:42.360 --> 1:10:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not doing this. Mary Pickford said no, May West

1:10:45.840 --> 1:10:48.040
<v Speaker 1>said no, I think And you can't fault them at

1:10:48.120 --> 1:10:50.680
<v Speaker 1>all to be like, well, and I don't think I

1:10:50.720 --> 1:10:53.000
<v Speaker 1>would be able to do They're like, hey, do you

1:10:53.040 --> 1:10:55.479
<v Speaker 1>want to play like a podcaster who's like a huge

1:10:55.520 --> 1:10:59.920
<v Speaker 1>fucking loser. I would be like, I'd rather not. I

1:11:00.080 --> 1:11:03.240
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I'd rather not. I was like, is there, Yeah,

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:05.479
<v Speaker 1>it's not even like hard, No, it's just like, is

1:11:05.479 --> 1:11:08.920
<v Speaker 1>that really my only option is there? Which it seems

1:11:08.920 --> 1:11:11.240
<v Speaker 1>like for Glorious wantson to get back into a major movie,

1:11:11.439 --> 1:11:16.320
<v Speaker 1>this was the option and like that fucking sucks.

1:11:16.000 --> 1:11:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Yes, but that okay. So this is interesting where the

1:11:19.960 --> 1:11:23.720
<v Speaker 2>reason that a lot of stars who were considered or

1:11:23.800 --> 1:11:28.160
<v Speaker 2>offered the role of Norma Desmond, the reason they turned

1:11:28.200 --> 1:11:32.719
<v Speaker 2>it down informs something which I'll talk about in a second.

1:11:32.720 --> 1:11:36.320
<v Speaker 2>But so like may West, who portrayed herself as a

1:11:36.320 --> 1:11:42.519
<v Speaker 2>sex symbol even into her forties fifties beyond, she was

1:11:42.560 --> 1:11:45.600
<v Speaker 2>offended that she would be asked to play you know

1:11:45.720 --> 1:11:48.479
<v Speaker 2>a quote unquote Hollywood has been because she's like, I'm

1:11:48.479 --> 1:11:51.200
<v Speaker 2>still fucking hot, Like that's not the image I want

1:11:51.240 --> 1:11:52.120
<v Speaker 2>to portray.

1:11:52.200 --> 1:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>The May West rejection's the best one. Yeah.

1:11:54.920 --> 1:12:00.519
<v Speaker 2>Then you've got an actor named Clara Bowes. She was yeah,

1:12:00.640 --> 1:12:05.760
<v Speaker 2>famous member her Silent Movie era star. She declined the role,

1:12:05.920 --> 1:12:09.240
<v Speaker 2>saying that she didn't want to engage in the film

1:12:09.280 --> 1:12:12.599
<v Speaker 2>industry again because of how hard it was for her

1:12:12.720 --> 1:12:16.760
<v Speaker 2>to transition during like sound films, and I think it

1:12:16.880 --> 1:12:18.599
<v Speaker 2>just like rung too close to home.

1:12:19.120 --> 1:12:19.599
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

1:12:19.760 --> 1:12:23.439
<v Speaker 2>Norma Shearer also rejected the role due to, like I think,

1:12:23.479 --> 1:12:27.320
<v Speaker 2>similar reasons. She retired and she just had a distaste

1:12:27.479 --> 1:12:30.400
<v Speaker 2>for the script. She just didn't feel like the characters

1:12:30.560 --> 1:12:34.600
<v Speaker 2>someone she wanted to portray. But that brings me to

1:12:35.680 --> 1:12:41.680
<v Speaker 2>this movie and how it does acknowledge the effect of

1:12:41.920 --> 1:12:46.000
<v Speaker 2>societal expectations that are placed on women as far as like,

1:12:46.200 --> 1:12:49.760
<v Speaker 2>you know, you always have to be young forever. If

1:12:49.800 --> 1:12:55.360
<v Speaker 2>you age, you are rendered irrelevant. There's this strong pressure

1:12:55.439 --> 1:12:58.920
<v Speaker 2>to stay young and beautiful and all of this stuff,

1:12:58.960 --> 1:13:02.639
<v Speaker 2>which is this is sidal pressure, but also like very

1:13:02.760 --> 1:13:06.759
<v Speaker 2>very prevalent in Hollywood, which is so image based. Yes,

1:13:07.479 --> 1:13:12.760
<v Speaker 2>this movie also again acknowledges what probably led her to

1:13:12.800 --> 1:13:17.880
<v Speaker 2>become such an egotistical person. Do I think that there

1:13:17.920 --> 1:13:21.440
<v Speaker 2>could have been a few more explicit lines of dialogue

1:13:21.439 --> 1:13:25.679
<v Speaker 2>that address this a little bit more explicitly? Maybe maybe

1:13:25.680 --> 1:13:28.760
<v Speaker 2>they would have been too on the nose, but I

1:13:28.800 --> 1:13:31.280
<v Speaker 2>feel like there are ways that the script could have

1:13:31.840 --> 1:13:37.479
<v Speaker 2>addressed and acknowledged those things a little bit more. Sure, thoroughly.

1:13:38.280 --> 1:13:40.840
<v Speaker 2>But the movie for the most part, does acknowledge all

1:13:40.840 --> 1:13:43.519
<v Speaker 2>of these things. And even though there are tropes present

1:13:44.439 --> 1:13:46.679
<v Speaker 2>as far as like, well, yes, of course an older

1:13:46.800 --> 1:13:50.240
<v Speaker 2>woman is going to be delusional and she's going to

1:13:50.240 --> 1:13:53.880
<v Speaker 2>be jealous of the younger woman, because there's that part

1:13:53.920 --> 1:13:59.360
<v Speaker 2>where Norma calls Betty, who becomes Joe's new love interest,

1:13:59.520 --> 1:14:03.280
<v Speaker 2>and she's like, well, you don't even know what's happening.

1:14:03.400 --> 1:14:07.000
<v Speaker 2>He's actually with me, and things like that. But these

1:14:07.280 --> 1:14:13.240
<v Speaker 2>tropes are you know, tropes often come from some grain

1:14:13.680 --> 1:14:17.400
<v Speaker 2>of something that's true, which we see from the reasons

1:14:17.439 --> 1:14:22.320
<v Speaker 2>that those other actors rejected that role. So like, it's

1:14:22.320 --> 1:14:25.320
<v Speaker 2>all very interesting and it's just handled and I think

1:14:25.360 --> 1:14:30.840
<v Speaker 2>of a more nuanced way than a lesser movie would

1:14:30.840 --> 1:14:31.479
<v Speaker 2>have done.

1:14:32.200 --> 1:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I mean, I really really love this movie.

1:14:35.000 --> 1:14:37.719
<v Speaker 1>I just I also, like, I can't fault any actor

1:14:37.760 --> 1:14:40.599
<v Speaker 1>for not wanting to play that role, because I mean

1:14:40.680 --> 1:14:44.439
<v Speaker 1>it's so you know, reflective of what's happening within the movie.

1:14:44.479 --> 1:14:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Of like, this is Norma's big comeback, and this was

1:14:49.160 --> 1:14:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Glorious Swanson's quote unquote big comeback into film that yeah,

1:14:54.040 --> 1:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>required a level of ego compartmentalization that we don't ask

1:14:58.160 --> 1:15:01.559
<v Speaker 1>of male actors, is all I was sort of getting at.

1:15:01.560 --> 1:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's still, like, I think, one of the best

1:15:06.720 --> 1:15:10.479
<v Speaker 1>performances I've ever because it's like it's like sad and

1:15:10.520 --> 1:15:14.479
<v Speaker 1>it's also goofy and scary what she's doing with her eyes.

1:15:14.800 --> 1:15:16.080
<v Speaker 1>It's still am big.

1:15:16.560 --> 1:15:18.599
<v Speaker 2>It's the pictures that got small.

1:15:19.320 --> 1:15:22.320
<v Speaker 1>Oh she's just iconic. I love things were queer, but

1:15:22.360 --> 1:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>they were about to get queer. Always true with this performance.

1:15:26.560 --> 1:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>She Oh god, there's moments where she goes like she

1:15:29.720 --> 1:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>does this little gremlin voice that I love, where she's like,

1:15:33.240 --> 1:15:35.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I'm not afraid to die and you're like,

1:15:35.160 --> 1:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, Hello, she can go big in that way,

1:15:40.400 --> 1:15:43.240
<v Speaker 1>but also have these moments of like complete devastit. It's

1:15:43.320 --> 1:15:47.639
<v Speaker 1>just so fucking good. She's so good. But yeah, Norma,

1:15:47.680 --> 1:15:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I think that what you just said is a great

1:15:49.479 --> 1:15:54.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of bow on the Norma conversation. Oh thanks, but

1:15:54.160 --> 1:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we've got a Betty. We've got a Betty here, we

1:15:57.120 --> 1:16:01.200
<v Speaker 1>sure do. We've got miss Betty. I like Betty. I

1:16:01.320 --> 1:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>like her. I thought she's got a good head on

1:16:03.880 --> 1:16:06.880
<v Speaker 1>her shoulders. I like you said before, I like that

1:16:06.920 --> 1:16:10.439
<v Speaker 1>she is. And again I think it is just an

1:16:10.439 --> 1:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>element of because I just think of like people I

1:16:13.760 --> 1:16:17.360
<v Speaker 1>know and work with who grew up here tend to

1:16:17.400 --> 1:16:22.760
<v Speaker 1>have a healthier attitude towards the sort of bullshit that

1:16:22.800 --> 1:16:26.479
<v Speaker 1>takes place, because it's just like you're brought up knowing

1:16:26.560 --> 1:16:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's bullshit. Right, It seems like that is sort of

1:16:30.280 --> 1:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>where Betty's coming from. Where she's referenced that she's like

1:16:32.840 --> 1:16:37.360
<v Speaker 1>a third generation Hollywood worker, not a Hollywood star, and

1:16:37.360 --> 1:16:40.360
<v Speaker 1>then we haven't even talked about her experience as an actor,

1:16:40.360 --> 1:16:44.479
<v Speaker 1>which I thought was a really really interesting narrative decision

1:16:44.560 --> 1:16:47.280
<v Speaker 1>to just add that, because it's like in like the

1:16:47.320 --> 1:16:52.320
<v Speaker 1>space of a scene completely helps you understand where she's

1:16:52.560 --> 1:16:54.960
<v Speaker 1>coming from and why her attitude, Like it was almost

1:16:54.960 --> 1:17:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like she was spared this potential norma future, right, right.

1:17:01.200 --> 1:17:03.799
<v Speaker 2>So her backstory is that, like you said, she comes

1:17:03.880 --> 1:17:08.599
<v Speaker 2>from a Hollywood family in the sense that her parents

1:17:08.600 --> 1:17:14.479
<v Speaker 2>and grandparents worked in Hollywood, but were never in those

1:17:14.760 --> 1:17:18.920
<v Speaker 2>huge roles either as performers or like directors.

1:17:19.160 --> 1:17:22.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, like lighting, costuming dn't work, yeah, stuff like that.

1:17:23.000 --> 1:17:25.640
<v Speaker 2>So like she's a Hollywood the real she comes from

1:17:25.680 --> 1:17:29.280
<v Speaker 2>a Hollywood family, but it's not like nepotism necessarily it's

1:17:29.280 --> 1:17:33.280
<v Speaker 2>not like all that ego is not present in her

1:17:33.479 --> 1:17:36.400
<v Speaker 2>character and her kind of line of work. Then you

1:17:36.520 --> 1:17:40.120
<v Speaker 2>learn that she because she came from this, you know,

1:17:40.200 --> 1:17:44.839
<v Speaker 2>like working class Hollywood family, it would maybe be expected

1:17:44.840 --> 1:17:48.280
<v Speaker 2>that she would also work and oh, let's try to

1:17:48.280 --> 1:17:50.280
<v Speaker 2>make her an actor. So her parents had her take

1:17:50.400 --> 1:17:54.040
<v Speaker 2>like acting classes and all this stuff, and then when

1:17:54.040 --> 1:17:56.920
<v Speaker 2>she went to do auditions and screen tests and things

1:17:57.000 --> 1:18:01.519
<v Speaker 2>like that, it's mentioned that they didn't like her nose,

1:18:02.320 --> 1:18:08.320
<v Speaker 2>so she had cosmetic surgery it seems to quote unquote

1:18:08.360 --> 1:18:11.840
<v Speaker 2>fix her nose or you know, have surgery performed on it,

1:18:12.560 --> 1:18:16.160
<v Speaker 2>and then you know, the casting people liked her nose now,

1:18:16.280 --> 1:18:18.280
<v Speaker 2>but then they didn't like her acting, so she never

1:18:18.320 --> 1:18:21.000
<v Speaker 2>made it as an actor. And it seems like this

1:18:21.080 --> 1:18:26.400
<v Speaker 2>is something that she accepted and went to work as

1:18:26.680 --> 1:18:31.519
<v Speaker 2>a script reader. But as she tells Joe, she's like,

1:18:31.600 --> 1:18:34.320
<v Speaker 2>I don't want to do this forever. I'd like to

1:18:34.600 --> 1:18:37.040
<v Speaker 2>advance in my career. And that's one of the main

1:18:37.120 --> 1:18:42.280
<v Speaker 2>reasons she tries to like strike a professional relationship with him,

1:18:42.280 --> 1:18:45.200
<v Speaker 2>because he says something like he's like, thanks for your

1:18:45.240 --> 1:18:48.360
<v Speaker 2>interest in my career, and she's like, no, it's not

1:18:48.600 --> 1:18:51.479
<v Speaker 2>your career I'm interested in, and it's mine, Like I

1:18:51.560 --> 1:18:53.960
<v Speaker 2>was hoping to get in on this, make some kind

1:18:53.960 --> 1:18:56.479
<v Speaker 2>of deal because I don't want to be a reader

1:18:56.600 --> 1:18:58.800
<v Speaker 2>all my life. It seems like she wants to be

1:18:59.000 --> 1:19:00.479
<v Speaker 2>a screenwriter.

1:19:00.560 --> 1:19:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Right, and it actually like is if she's quote unquote

1:19:04.240 --> 1:19:06.439
<v Speaker 1>just a reader at this time, it makes a lot

1:19:06.439 --> 1:19:08.479
<v Speaker 1>of sense that she would try to find a writing

1:19:08.520 --> 1:19:11.760
<v Speaker 1>partner who has at least had some work produced to

1:19:11.800 --> 1:19:14.120
<v Speaker 1>get her first screen credit and then, you know, like,

1:19:14.200 --> 1:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>if she's smart, kind of ditch Joe and start doing

1:19:17.320 --> 1:19:20.480
<v Speaker 1>her own thing. Right now, what she's doing makes complete

1:19:21.000 --> 1:19:26.200
<v Speaker 1>logical sense. I love the story about her almost becoming

1:19:26.240 --> 1:19:29.360
<v Speaker 1>an actor and then having that taken away. But like she,

1:19:29.760 --> 1:19:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I think because she has a more grounded view of

1:19:32.800 --> 1:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>how brutal the industry is, because she's grown up around it.

1:19:37.280 --> 1:19:41.720
<v Speaker 1>It's not this devastating ego blow. Like she's she's adaptable

1:19:41.800 --> 1:19:46.320
<v Speaker 1>and that's why she survives and because of And again

1:19:46.360 --> 1:19:48.519
<v Speaker 1>it's like I think that there would have been a

1:19:48.520 --> 1:19:52.640
<v Speaker 1>time where I would have watched Norma and Betty and

1:19:52.720 --> 1:19:56.040
<v Speaker 1>thought that it's like suggested that one is adaptable and

1:19:56.080 --> 1:19:57.920
<v Speaker 1>one isn't, And like there's a good kind of woman

1:19:57.920 --> 1:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and a bad kind of woman. But you still have

1:20:00.000 --> 1:20:02.640
<v Speaker 1>all the information you need as to why Norma was

1:20:02.680 --> 1:20:05.400
<v Speaker 1>not adaptable. She never got an opportunity to be adaptable.

1:20:05.560 --> 1:20:07.479
<v Speaker 1>She became really famous when she was a kid. It's

1:20:07.479 --> 1:20:10.599
<v Speaker 1>all she knows. Are there people who become really famous

1:20:10.600 --> 1:20:14.559
<v Speaker 1>as kids who are adaptable people? Certainly? And like it's

1:20:14.600 --> 1:20:16.760
<v Speaker 1>always going to be a person to person thing. I

1:20:16.800 --> 1:20:21.879
<v Speaker 1>think what is generally true is people who become famous

1:20:22.000 --> 1:20:26.200
<v Speaker 1>very young and then are fairly well adjusted as adults

1:20:26.400 --> 1:20:29.240
<v Speaker 1>tend to have a good support system around them, which

1:20:29.280 --> 1:20:32.599
<v Speaker 1>Norma very much does not. It is not so as

1:20:32.800 --> 1:20:35.599
<v Speaker 1>exaggerated as her fate is. I do feel like you're

1:20:35.640 --> 1:20:38.559
<v Speaker 1>given all of the information as to why Betty is

1:20:38.800 --> 1:20:42.080
<v Speaker 1>comparatively well adjusted. I don't think it is a like

1:20:42.360 --> 1:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>youth equals good old equals bad situation. Then they add

1:20:48.160 --> 1:20:53.000
<v Speaker 1>in this love story, which is just like, I don't know.

1:20:53.080 --> 1:20:57.679
<v Speaker 1>I think that this it undercuts like we've been saying

1:20:57.680 --> 1:21:00.920
<v Speaker 1>for seven years. Adding a love story is not an

1:21:00.960 --> 1:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>inherently bad thing. It's just like, well, what is it

1:21:03.520 --> 1:21:06.240
<v Speaker 1>adding to the story. I think that like, you don't

1:21:06.280 --> 1:21:10.960
<v Speaker 1>lose anything in this story if it is like a

1:21:11.040 --> 1:21:18.200
<v Speaker 1>professional relationship dissolving and not a romantic one developing. Completely agree,

1:21:18.280 --> 1:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>And that is like as close as I feel like

1:21:20.760 --> 1:21:24.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to just a trope, be a trup.

1:21:25.120 --> 1:21:30.160
<v Speaker 2>I agree because like, the two main female characters in

1:21:30.200 --> 1:21:34.439
<v Speaker 2>this movie both fall in love with Joe, and I'm like,

1:21:34.600 --> 1:21:39.479
<v Speaker 2>first of all, why although I understand why Norma and

1:21:39.520 --> 1:21:42.120
<v Speaker 2>we already talked about this, whereas like, does she actually

1:21:42.280 --> 1:21:43.519
<v Speaker 2>love him or.

1:21:43.439 --> 1:21:46.360
<v Speaker 1>He is useful? You know what's going on there? Exactly?

1:21:46.439 --> 1:21:51.960
<v Speaker 2>Like she probably you know, thinks she loves him, but

1:21:52.280 --> 1:21:55.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure she has a pretty warped perception of what

1:21:56.080 --> 1:21:58.720
<v Speaker 2>romantic love, like healthy romantic love is.

1:21:59.120 --> 1:22:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so she kinda like she LOOKI had no problem

1:22:02.360 --> 1:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>killing him. He that is to be what indicates that,

1:22:06.760 --> 1:22:11.439
<v Speaker 1>you know, I mean, obviously taking into account the mental

1:22:11.479 --> 1:22:14.920
<v Speaker 1>health cliff that she is falling off of the entire movie,

1:22:15.120 --> 1:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that that it like demonstrates that this was

1:22:17.680 --> 1:22:20.920
<v Speaker 1>not love. It was like, I want someone around me

1:22:20.960 --> 1:22:24.559
<v Speaker 1>who will help preserve this reality that I live in,

1:22:24.760 --> 1:22:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and once he doesn't do that, she kills him. Exactly.

1:22:27.200 --> 1:22:32.679
<v Speaker 2>That's not yeah, it's that it's she's deeply lonely, it seems,

1:22:32.920 --> 1:22:36.759
<v Speaker 2>and he's a young good looking guy who comes.

1:22:36.560 --> 1:22:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Along and has also William Holten like he I mean

1:22:39.560 --> 1:22:40.160
<v Speaker 1>he's hot.

1:22:41.000 --> 1:22:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so yeah, it stands to reason why she would

1:22:46.760 --> 1:22:51.200
<v Speaker 2>be drawn to him. Yeah, But why Betty is drawn

1:22:51.280 --> 1:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>to Joe I don't quite get in a romantic way.

1:22:55.280 --> 1:22:58.360
<v Speaker 2>I can understand why she's like, oh, like, this is

1:22:58.400 --> 1:23:02.680
<v Speaker 2>someone who can potentially help me in my career, and

1:23:02.720 --> 1:23:05.679
<v Speaker 2>she's not going about it in any sort of manipulative way,

1:23:05.760 --> 1:23:09.519
<v Speaker 2>like this is how just networking happens in Hollywood, where

1:23:09.520 --> 1:23:12.120
<v Speaker 2>you're just like, oh, this is someone.

1:23:12.320 --> 1:23:14.840
<v Speaker 1>No, And that's like she's not pretending that she's doing

1:23:14.880 --> 1:23:17.519
<v Speaker 1>something she isn't. She's very honest about right. I mean

1:23:17.600 --> 1:23:19.439
<v Speaker 1>in the same way where it's like it would be

1:23:19.560 --> 1:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>very easy for her to bullshit him and be like, oh, yeah,

1:23:22.960 --> 1:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm interested in your career, but she's honest about it.

1:23:25.240 --> 1:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>She's like, no, this is like a mutually beneficial thing.

1:23:27.600 --> 1:23:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And they're collaborating in a way that felt like progressive

1:23:31.200 --> 1:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>of like you don't see women professionals acting that way

1:23:34.920 --> 1:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>in movies of this time very much, and so like

1:23:38.400 --> 1:23:41.519
<v Speaker 1>it's cool, And then I don't know, Yeah, I guess

1:23:41.520 --> 1:23:43.360
<v Speaker 1>it's like the only thing I can chalk it up

1:23:43.360 --> 1:23:47.680
<v Speaker 1>to is like being twenty two, like I you know,

1:23:47.800 --> 1:23:51.400
<v Speaker 1>certainly like in speaking for personal experience, not out of

1:23:51.400 --> 1:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the realm of possibility that a twenty two year old

1:23:55.000 --> 1:23:58.280
<v Speaker 1>can become infatuated with someone just because they're like older

1:23:58.320 --> 1:24:00.120
<v Speaker 1>and kind of doing something they want to do and

1:24:00.160 --> 1:24:05.600
<v Speaker 1>are nearby. But I don't think it serves the story.

1:24:05.760 --> 1:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it serves her story. I think it

1:24:07.479 --> 1:24:10.880
<v Speaker 1>serves his true in a kind of male centric writer

1:24:11.000 --> 1:24:12.960
<v Speaker 1>way where it's like, oh, well, he has to make

1:24:13.000 --> 1:24:15.920
<v Speaker 1>the choice between two women, and it has to be

1:24:15.960 --> 1:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a romantic choice, where it doesn't. I think that this

1:24:19.479 --> 1:24:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the choice that he's making is ultimately a professional choice anyways,

1:24:24.320 --> 1:24:28.559
<v Speaker 1>because he's only with Norma for his career, and like

1:24:28.720 --> 1:24:31.360
<v Speaker 1>Betty is offering him a different version of that career,

1:24:31.439 --> 1:24:34.439
<v Speaker 1>I think the choice is still like adding the romantic

1:24:34.439 --> 1:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>element is just like not necessary. I mean, it didn't

1:24:38.040 --> 1:24:41.800
<v Speaker 1>take up so much of the plot that it derailed

1:24:41.840 --> 1:24:45.479
<v Speaker 1>the movie. For me. It just felt like thrown in suddenly,

1:24:45.520 --> 1:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and I know that they were like flirting and vibing

1:24:47.360 --> 1:24:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the whole movie. I wouldn't have minded if it was

1:24:50.280 --> 1:24:52.280
<v Speaker 1>just kind of left there where it's like they have

1:24:52.439 --> 1:24:55.800
<v Speaker 1>this like horny. I don't know. I just hope she

1:24:55.840 --> 1:24:58.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't go to Arizona. And I also kind of felt

1:24:58.280 --> 1:25:00.519
<v Speaker 1>bad for her boyfriend. I was like, that was yeah.

1:25:00.560 --> 1:25:02.479
<v Speaker 1>He was so nice to Joe. He's like, yeah, you

1:25:02.479 --> 1:25:04.960
<v Speaker 1>can live at my house. I'll do whatever. You're my bud.

1:25:05.080 --> 1:25:08.479
<v Speaker 1>And then he's like, all right, time to hit on

1:25:08.520 --> 1:25:13.439
<v Speaker 1>your girlfriend. You're like, come on, men get better at

1:25:13.479 --> 1:25:16.479
<v Speaker 1>being friends. Anyways. Yeah, I think that the romantic element

1:25:16.600 --> 1:25:20.559
<v Speaker 1>like did the least for me of any relationship in

1:25:20.600 --> 1:25:21.880
<v Speaker 1>the movie. Yeah.

1:25:21.960 --> 1:25:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean Hollywood has been wedging in hetero romances for decades.

1:25:29.960 --> 1:25:33.360
<v Speaker 2>I know we see it here and it still happens

1:25:33.520 --> 1:25:34.240
<v Speaker 2>to this day.

1:25:34.560 --> 1:25:36.760
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if that was like an original part because

1:25:37.240 --> 1:25:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Billy Wilder's so funny and interesting, and I just I

1:25:43.479 --> 1:25:47.479
<v Speaker 1>really admire him, and I know that probably there's something horrible.

1:25:47.479 --> 1:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know about I really admired me, but I

1:25:51.800 --> 1:25:54.479
<v Speaker 1>really love him and I like hearing about just like

1:25:54.840 --> 1:25:57.799
<v Speaker 1>he was just a little rascal, where like he would

1:25:57.840 --> 1:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>submit the pages for this script to get approved a

1:26:01.479 --> 1:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>couple of pages at a time. You just sort of

1:26:03.840 --> 1:26:06.320
<v Speaker 1>trick people. And then he said he was adapting this

1:26:06.479 --> 1:26:09.720
<v Speaker 1>from a text called A Can of Beans, and they

1:26:09.720 --> 1:26:12.720
<v Speaker 1>were like, okay, like he'd led people to believe that.

1:26:12.760 --> 1:26:14.800
<v Speaker 1>He's like, oh, yeah, it's based on this book I

1:26:14.840 --> 1:26:17.599
<v Speaker 1>read called A Can of Beans, which is so funny.

1:26:17.720 --> 1:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>You're just like, wow, you really can just don't ask

1:26:20.200 --> 1:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>people who we've here to read a book if you

1:26:21.800 --> 1:26:23.960
<v Speaker 1>just tell them the book exists. They're like, yeah, totally

1:26:24.240 --> 1:26:28.479
<v Speaker 1>a can of Beans. I heard about that. I just

1:26:28.520 --> 1:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>thought that mus really funny. Yeah, do you have any

1:26:32.960 --> 1:26:34.479
<v Speaker 1>they asked you what to touch on for this movie?

1:26:35.560 --> 1:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Not really.

1:26:37.680 --> 1:26:45.000
<v Speaker 2>I just Norma engages in like as she's I guess

1:26:45.160 --> 1:26:49.400
<v Speaker 2>seducing Joe or like what however you want to define

1:26:49.400 --> 1:26:54.600
<v Speaker 2>that or what predatory? Yes, she is engaging in predatory

1:26:54.800 --> 1:26:59.400
<v Speaker 2>behavior because there's that like line of voiceover narration from

1:26:59.479 --> 1:27:02.760
<v Speaker 2>Joe where you know she would be showing him one

1:27:02.760 --> 1:27:08.479
<v Speaker 2>of her silent films and he says something like you

1:27:08.520 --> 1:27:14.400
<v Speaker 2>know sometimes she'd clutch my arm forgetting she was my employer. Yeah,

1:27:14.400 --> 1:27:19.439
<v Speaker 2>and then you know that escalates, which I feel like

1:27:19.600 --> 1:27:24.759
<v Speaker 2>you could argue is leaning into a trope about older

1:27:24.800 --> 1:27:30.200
<v Speaker 2>women that sure they are inherently predatory because no one

1:27:30.280 --> 1:27:35.479
<v Speaker 2>sees them as romantically viable people. Anymore, so of course

1:27:35.520 --> 1:27:40.400
<v Speaker 2>they're going to engage in, you know, sexually predatory behavior.

1:27:40.880 --> 1:27:44.439
<v Speaker 1>You're like, now, listen, I don't know how to what

1:27:44.520 --> 1:27:46.880
<v Speaker 1>exactly to make of it, but I think that it

1:27:47.000 --> 1:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>is I like, I am inclined to agree with you,

1:27:50.080 --> 1:27:53.799
<v Speaker 1>and also like, yeah, like that older women will prey

1:27:54.240 --> 1:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>on younger women and that's like one of the few

1:27:57.880 --> 1:28:00.040
<v Speaker 1>kinds of older women that you see, or just like

1:28:00.080 --> 1:28:02.519
<v Speaker 1>an older woman who is single, there has to be

1:28:02.600 --> 1:28:06.760
<v Speaker 1>this air of inherently like she's desperate, right, and it

1:28:06.800 --> 1:28:09.040
<v Speaker 1>can't be like, I don't know, like you could even

1:28:09.040 --> 1:28:11.680
<v Speaker 1>be an older woman and be lonely and have it

1:28:11.800 --> 1:28:15.280
<v Speaker 1>not translate to that behavior. But I mean, I guess

1:28:15.280 --> 1:28:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the only thing and I'm obviously not trying to justify

1:28:18.439 --> 1:28:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the behavior. I think to contextualize the behavior. I feel

1:28:21.120 --> 1:28:25.760
<v Speaker 1>like that behavior is somewhat in line with Norma's entitlement

1:28:26.240 --> 1:28:30.120
<v Speaker 1>right to how she treats people. So it didn't feel

1:28:30.160 --> 1:28:32.880
<v Speaker 1>like out of step with the character. But then that

1:28:32.920 --> 1:28:37.839
<v Speaker 1>speaks to like, well, who is the character. It's Norma Desmond.

1:28:38.240 --> 1:28:42.240
<v Speaker 1>She's a menace, but also she's wounded and she has

1:28:42.280 --> 1:28:49.679
<v Speaker 1>a product of her environment hurt people, hurt people, Damn, damn. Wow,

1:28:49.920 --> 1:28:52.800
<v Speaker 1>someone tell Billy Wilder that. I think that's all I

1:28:52.800 --> 1:28:55.320
<v Speaker 1>have to I just I love this movie. I love

1:28:55.520 --> 1:29:00.440
<v Speaker 1>how challenging it still is, and I love how it

1:29:00.439 --> 1:29:03.799
<v Speaker 1>interacts directly, not even like just with like the history

1:29:03.920 --> 1:29:07.679
<v Speaker 1>of Hollywood up until this point in a really brilliant

1:29:07.760 --> 1:29:10.960
<v Speaker 1>and smart way. Also Edith Head costumes just shouting that out.

1:29:11.439 --> 1:29:14.559
<v Speaker 1>Oh that's that's always a good detail. But does it

1:29:14.600 --> 1:29:18.479
<v Speaker 1>pass the Bechtels test? Wow, like low Kia does. Like,

1:29:18.560 --> 1:29:20.760
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm giving it the edge. I think you

1:29:20.800 --> 1:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>could make the argument that you know, the grand context

1:29:25.800 --> 1:29:30.479
<v Speaker 1>is Joe. But there is a brief phone conversation there's

1:29:30.960 --> 1:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it passes like once kind of back to back with

1:29:34.120 --> 1:29:36.439
<v Speaker 1>like Betty and her friend who we do get a name? Oh,

1:29:36.520 --> 1:29:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we learn her name at some point.

1:29:38.280 --> 1:29:41.880
<v Speaker 2>Her roommate right, who like drives her to Norma's house.

1:29:42.360 --> 1:29:46.360
<v Speaker 1>Yes, she is weirdly given a name in the car

1:29:47.120 --> 1:29:49.920
<v Speaker 1>when she's driving her. Either way, we do get her name.

1:29:50.880 --> 1:29:54.240
<v Speaker 1>We could argue she's sort of like someone's on the phone.

1:29:54.360 --> 1:29:57.559
<v Speaker 1>That's important because it's Norma. Yeah. And then it also

1:29:57.680 --> 1:29:59.720
<v Speaker 1>there's like two lines of dialogue at the beginning of

1:29:59.720 --> 1:30:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that phone call. The pass between Norma and Betty before

1:30:02.920 --> 1:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Joe inevitably comes.

1:30:04.040 --> 1:30:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Up right, So it's a it's a loose, soft pass.

1:30:11.240 --> 1:30:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give it, but only because I just like

1:30:13.960 --> 1:30:15.760
<v Speaker 1>this movie.

1:30:16.320 --> 1:30:22.320
<v Speaker 2>But it does demonstrate how little women interact in the movie.

1:30:22.479 --> 1:30:26.000
<v Speaker 2>But that's not what this movie is about. If Norma

1:30:26.160 --> 1:30:31.080
<v Speaker 2>had more female friends, yeah, maybe she wouldn't be in.

1:30:31.080 --> 1:30:33.800
<v Speaker 1>This I think she'd be a better shape. I think

1:30:33.920 --> 1:30:35.160
<v Speaker 1>her life would be in better shape.

1:30:35.240 --> 1:30:40.559
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, But society, you know, conditions women to, as we've

1:30:40.560 --> 1:30:43.639
<v Speaker 2>talked about many times, be in competition with each other

1:30:43.720 --> 1:30:47.880
<v Speaker 2>and not have you know, support and camaraderie. So Norma

1:30:47.920 --> 1:30:51.400
<v Speaker 2>probably was just like although I think there are those

1:30:51.520 --> 1:30:55.200
<v Speaker 2>scenes where she like invites other Silent Film era stars,

1:30:55.240 --> 1:30:58.759
<v Speaker 2>including Buster Keaton playing himself, and a few other people

1:30:58.800 --> 1:31:02.120
<v Speaker 2>that I didn't recognize who they were, but they were

1:31:02.120 --> 1:31:04.840
<v Speaker 2>real Silent film stars, yes, yes, and a couple of

1:31:04.840 --> 1:31:08.000
<v Speaker 2>them are women. So she does seem to have some

1:31:08.800 --> 1:31:11.560
<v Speaker 2>friends who she plays bridge.

1:31:11.280 --> 1:31:13.360
<v Speaker 1>With, so it doesn't seem like, say, Tice. I think

1:31:13.360 --> 1:31:15.519
<v Speaker 1>that that's like part of what makes that seem sad.

1:31:15.600 --> 1:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>It's like they're all together, but they're all kind of

1:31:18.360 --> 1:31:22.719
<v Speaker 1>like again, makes me totally understand why silent film stars

1:31:22.720 --> 1:31:25.559
<v Speaker 1>would be like fuck you, Billy Wilder, because it does

1:31:25.600 --> 1:31:28.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of present the entire silent film actor generation is

1:31:28.960 --> 1:31:32.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of like checked out and zongked and just like

1:31:32.360 --> 1:31:36.080
<v Speaker 1>drinking shuffling their thumbs around, you know. And I also

1:31:36.160 --> 1:31:38.439
<v Speaker 1>understand why it's like, oh, well, that's a fun part

1:31:38.439 --> 1:31:41.439
<v Speaker 1>for Buster Keaton to take because he survived that era,

1:31:41.640 --> 1:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>so it's like, well, you know, he's fine. So again

1:31:44.320 --> 1:31:48.280
<v Speaker 1>I get why it's a challenging, annoying thing.

1:31:48.880 --> 1:31:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Yes, in any case, our nipple scale.

1:31:52.439 --> 1:31:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Our nipple scale, no one talks about that.

1:31:55.800 --> 1:31:59.959
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, how come the nipple scale isn't the most famous

1:32:00.040 --> 1:32:02.400
<v Speaker 2>media metric of all time, which of course is our

1:32:03.200 --> 1:32:08.759
<v Speaker 2>scale where we rate movies zero two five nipples based

1:32:08.800 --> 1:32:14.799
<v Speaker 2>on examining the movie through an intersectional feminist lens, keeping

1:32:14.840 --> 1:32:20.960
<v Speaker 2>in mind that this is a movie exclusively about white

1:32:21.000 --> 1:32:27.479
<v Speaker 2>people and this white woman and her white privilege, which

1:32:27.640 --> 1:32:32.040
<v Speaker 2>is in step with Hollywood at the time. Yes, there

1:32:32.120 --> 1:32:34.800
<v Speaker 2>was very, very very little space for anyone who was

1:32:34.880 --> 1:32:39.720
<v Speaker 2>not white to achieve any kind of stardom in Hollywood

1:32:39.840 --> 1:32:44.280
<v Speaker 2>in this era. But the fact remains that this is

1:32:44.320 --> 1:32:49.759
<v Speaker 2>an entirely white movie about this very privileged white woman.

1:32:50.680 --> 1:32:56.760
<v Speaker 2>In any case, the movie presents this very nuanced examination

1:32:57.120 --> 1:33:02.679
<v Speaker 2>of what an industry like Hollywood Wood does two people,

1:33:02.880 --> 1:33:08.840
<v Speaker 2>and particularly two women who are getting older, and it

1:33:08.880 --> 1:33:15.320
<v Speaker 2>acknowledges the various context that kind of creates this kind

1:33:15.320 --> 1:33:21.800
<v Speaker 2>of ego maniac character in Norma. And again, I do

1:33:21.880 --> 1:33:25.480
<v Speaker 2>think there could have been maybe a few more moments

1:33:25.479 --> 1:33:33.040
<v Speaker 2>of more explicit examinations of that. The movie presents it

1:33:33.200 --> 1:33:37.920
<v Speaker 2>visually without being too explicit about it. But again, you know,

1:33:37.960 --> 1:33:40.120
<v Speaker 2>there's always the like, you know, you don't want your

1:33:40.160 --> 1:33:43.800
<v Speaker 2>dialogue to be too on the nose and too preachy.

1:33:43.920 --> 1:33:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, And I think that also like part of the

1:33:46.040 --> 1:33:49.160
<v Speaker 1>reason it may have been more obvious to audiences at

1:33:49.200 --> 1:33:52.599
<v Speaker 1>the time as well. Sure, right, yeah, because this movie

1:33:52.680 --> 1:33:55.320
<v Speaker 1>is all as shit, it is very quite old.

1:33:55.920 --> 1:33:59.360
<v Speaker 2>But even so, the movie you know, presents these things.

1:33:59.439 --> 1:34:04.040
<v Speaker 2>And whether or not it how much judgment it is

1:34:04.120 --> 1:34:10.000
<v Speaker 2>passing on Norma is not super clear to me.

1:34:11.920 --> 1:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>That also is still like kind of eye of the beholdery,

1:34:14.880 --> 1:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>like I don't know.

1:34:17.120 --> 1:34:21.360
<v Speaker 2>Right, because it's like she doesn't come up is very

1:34:21.479 --> 1:34:24.439
<v Speaker 2>you know, sympathetic or empathetic by the end on account

1:34:24.439 --> 1:34:29.560
<v Speaker 2>of her murdering someone and then being like completely dissociating

1:34:30.439 --> 1:34:30.960
<v Speaker 2>about it.

1:34:31.040 --> 1:34:35.720
<v Speaker 1>But also she's so iconic. I know so, but it's

1:34:35.760 --> 1:34:38.439
<v Speaker 1>also not like a I don't know, I think like

1:34:38.520 --> 1:34:41.640
<v Speaker 1>a trope. I'm getting burn dataup right now in contemporary

1:34:41.640 --> 1:34:44.080
<v Speaker 1>movies is like just a kind of like good for

1:34:44.160 --> 1:34:46.720
<v Speaker 1>her ending to a movie of like and then she

1:34:46.960 --> 1:34:50.240
<v Speaker 1>killed him, good for her, and that is well, we'll

1:34:50.240 --> 1:34:52.400
<v Speaker 1>cover it eventually, but that was like the end of

1:34:52.439 --> 1:34:54.320
<v Speaker 1>poor things for me, whereas like it's another you know,

1:34:54.880 --> 1:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>good for her movie that I think, like whatever whatever,

1:34:57.880 --> 1:35:00.320
<v Speaker 1>different discussion, but like, yes, whether you're like or not,

1:35:00.800 --> 1:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not good for her at the end of this movie.

1:35:03.000 --> 1:35:04.280
<v Speaker 1>It's actually quite bad for her.

1:35:04.400 --> 1:35:07.320
<v Speaker 2>It is not great for her. But yeah, yeah, I

1:35:07.360 --> 1:35:10.000
<v Speaker 2>don't know. I wish there was just and maybe this

1:35:10.120 --> 1:35:13.240
<v Speaker 2>is just like you know, us examining the movie in

1:35:13.439 --> 1:35:15.840
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty four, a movie.

1:35:15.600 --> 1:35:19.240
<v Speaker 1>From nine seventy five years later, Oh my goodness, yikes.

1:35:19.400 --> 1:35:22.639
<v Speaker 2>But I think if this movie not that it needs

1:35:22.680 --> 1:35:26.160
<v Speaker 2>to be remade at all, but if there was a more.

1:35:26.080 --> 1:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Modern future adaptations, there's like ben Broadway adaptations. I think

1:35:30.720 --> 1:35:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Glenn Close wanted Tony for playing Norman Desmond, which I

1:35:33.280 --> 1:35:36.519
<v Speaker 1>wish to god, I could see. Yeah.

1:35:36.560 --> 1:35:40.400
<v Speaker 2>Anyways, if there was a more modern retelling of this

1:35:40.479 --> 1:35:43.240
<v Speaker 2>story or a similar story, I think that it would

1:35:43.320 --> 1:35:47.920
<v Speaker 2>be more explicit about examining like gender bias and all

1:35:47.960 --> 1:35:51.160
<v Speaker 2>these things that the movie isn't super explicit about.

1:35:51.360 --> 1:35:53.920
<v Speaker 1>But it's like also, I think, like fundamentally hard to

1:35:54.120 --> 1:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>extract this movie from this time because of how even

1:35:58.240 --> 1:36:02.639
<v Speaker 1>though it's like you can up in history the things

1:36:02.680 --> 1:36:05.240
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about where it's like, well, what there's the

1:36:05.640 --> 1:36:08.519
<v Speaker 1>you know, silent film stars. You know, someone who is

1:36:08.520 --> 1:36:11.599
<v Speaker 1>famous thirty years ago, you'd be like, oh, easy one

1:36:11.680 --> 1:36:14.160
<v Speaker 1>to one is like a ninety sitcom actor that is

1:36:14.200 --> 1:36:16.439
<v Speaker 1>considered washed up now and trying to adapt with the times.

1:36:16.439 --> 1:36:19.360
<v Speaker 1>But it's also so specific to like, I don't know,

1:36:19.400 --> 1:36:21.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that that's why they're so like there was

1:36:21.080 --> 1:36:24.599
<v Speaker 1>just an attempt to comment on this in Babylon last year,

1:36:24.680 --> 1:36:27.439
<v Speaker 1>where like the jump from silent pictures to talk like

1:36:27.479 --> 1:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just so metaphorically works so well.

1:36:31.760 --> 1:36:35.559
<v Speaker 2>Right, And it just reminds me that we still need

1:36:35.600 --> 1:36:38.080
<v Speaker 2>to cover Singing in the Rain because that is also

1:36:38.120 --> 1:36:41.760
<v Speaker 2>a movie about the transition from silent era movies to

1:36:42.080 --> 1:36:46.639
<v Speaker 2>talkies and how a lot of actors struggle to make

1:36:46.680 --> 1:36:50.920
<v Speaker 2>that transition and are discarded along the way. Anyway, Sorry,

1:36:50.920 --> 1:36:52.599
<v Speaker 2>really quick, So Sunset Flo.

1:36:52.840 --> 1:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>I did know this because I was recently I don't

1:36:54.880 --> 1:36:58.200
<v Speaker 1>know why, like bi annually I have to like watch

1:36:58.280 --> 1:37:01.240
<v Speaker 1>every video that exists of Glenn Close. I just love

1:37:01.320 --> 1:37:04.760
<v Speaker 1>glennon Close. I mean, and you're right to do that.

1:37:05.479 --> 1:37:08.080
<v Speaker 1>Over the holiday break, I was just like, the time

1:37:08.120 --> 1:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>has come, I need to once again watch five hundred

1:37:10.120 --> 1:37:12.280
<v Speaker 1>video essays about Glenn Close. So I knew that she

1:37:12.720 --> 1:37:16.240
<v Speaker 1>had played Norma in an Andrew Lloyd Weber musical adaptation

1:37:16.320 --> 1:37:19.280
<v Speaker 1>from the early nineties Whoa, and then so she played

1:37:19.320 --> 1:37:20.960
<v Speaker 1>the part in ninety three and ninety four, and then

1:37:21.000 --> 1:37:24.400
<v Speaker 1>again in twenty sixteen seventeen Iconic. But do you know

1:37:24.439 --> 1:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>who's currently playing Norma Desmond on the West End is

1:37:29.040 --> 1:37:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Nicole Scherzinger of the Pussycat Dolls. And I just think that,

1:37:34.000 --> 1:37:39.280
<v Speaker 1>who oh, I would go see that. I kind of

1:37:39.320 --> 1:37:43.120
<v Speaker 1>baffling to me. But also, yeah, I'm in, I'm in.

1:37:43.360 --> 1:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>I want to I want to see Pussycat Dolls Boulevard

1:37:46.280 --> 1:37:46.680
<v Speaker 1>bring in.

1:37:47.000 --> 1:37:50.440
<v Speaker 2>Loosen up my buttons, Baby.

1:37:50.800 --> 1:37:51.919
<v Speaker 1>Loosen up my buttons.

1:37:52.160 --> 1:37:59.000
<v Speaker 2>Joe Gillis, Yes, well I will finally say what my

1:37:59.080 --> 1:38:05.280
<v Speaker 2>nipple rating? Oh yeah, after so much preamble, hmm, I

1:38:05.360 --> 1:38:11.120
<v Speaker 2>want to give it three point five. Okay, it's a

1:38:11.240 --> 1:38:16.759
<v Speaker 2>very white movie, but it is handling this subject matter

1:38:17.080 --> 1:38:22.639
<v Speaker 2>with more nuanced than movies from fifty or more years

1:38:22.720 --> 1:38:29.599
<v Speaker 2>later handled this subject. So it's cool and interesting in

1:38:29.680 --> 1:38:33.680
<v Speaker 2>that way. So three and a half nipples, and I

1:38:33.760 --> 1:38:40.120
<v Speaker 2>will split them between Gloria Swanson, the actor who plays Betty,

1:38:40.280 --> 1:38:48.360
<v Speaker 2>which is Nancy Olsen, and I'll give Billy Wilder, who

1:38:49.040 --> 1:38:54.280
<v Speaker 2>hopefully was not problematic the way that basically everyone from

1:38:54.280 --> 1:38:56.599
<v Speaker 2>that era was by default.

1:38:57.560 --> 1:39:00.240
<v Speaker 1>I did a light scared he he said some kind

1:39:00.240 --> 1:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>of insulting things to Marilyn Monroe's intelligence that people feel

1:39:04.200 --> 1:39:07.519
<v Speaker 1>one way or another about. And also, you know he

1:39:07.680 --> 1:39:11.960
<v Speaker 1>was the seven year itch director that did the famous

1:39:11.960 --> 1:39:15.840
<v Speaker 1>skirt up shot. You know, right, He's not without sin.

1:39:16.000 --> 1:39:21.800
<v Speaker 1>But I, unfortunately am a big old fan. I want

1:39:21.840 --> 1:39:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to give this movie for it that feels too high

1:39:24.120 --> 1:39:28.400
<v Speaker 1>because of how cartoonish Norma is. But I also don't

1:39:28.400 --> 1:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>want to go much. I'm gonna go three point seven

1:39:30.000 --> 1:39:34.040
<v Speaker 1>five because it's just vibe space. I think this movie

1:39:34.200 --> 1:39:39.120
<v Speaker 1>is fantastic. I think that there are elements of it

1:39:39.200 --> 1:39:43.120
<v Speaker 1>that feel studio notes thee I hope, like adding in

1:39:43.520 --> 1:39:46.719
<v Speaker 1>a love story between Betty and Joe felt unnecessary, especially

1:39:46.720 --> 1:39:48.639
<v Speaker 1>because as I was watching it, I was like, Betty

1:39:48.680 --> 1:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>could easily be a male character. Yeah, and I don't

1:39:54.439 --> 1:39:57.360
<v Speaker 1>wish that, but just because of like, I just felt

1:39:57.360 --> 1:39:59.879
<v Speaker 1>like the layering on of the love story was not necessary.

1:40:00.120 --> 1:40:01.679
<v Speaker 1>One of the few things I really don't like about

1:40:01.720 --> 1:40:05.680
<v Speaker 1>this spoofee. But Norma is iconic again for all of

1:40:05.720 --> 1:40:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the complicated reasons we've talked about that also have to

1:40:08.439 --> 1:40:10.760
<v Speaker 1>do with the production and the time. You know, is

1:40:10.800 --> 1:40:14.000
<v Speaker 1>it reasonable that this is the best possible, you know,

1:40:14.120 --> 1:40:18.120
<v Speaker 1>prestige part available to a woman over fifty at this time. No,

1:40:18.200 --> 1:40:22.120
<v Speaker 1>I think that's incredibly fucked up. But it's an incredible part,

1:40:22.200 --> 1:40:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's like I feel like you for the most part.

1:40:25.000 --> 1:40:27.160
<v Speaker 1>And I know we've had discussions of the shades of gray,

1:40:27.960 --> 1:40:29.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, sort of within that, but like you are

1:40:29.920 --> 1:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>given context for the ways in which Norma is a

1:40:33.920 --> 1:40:37.280
<v Speaker 1>product of her environment, and it is not empathetic to

1:40:37.400 --> 1:40:40.479
<v Speaker 1>her environment to the point where this movie actively makes

1:40:40.520 --> 1:40:44.559
<v Speaker 1>a famous director look bad, which is amazing. I mean, like,

1:40:44.600 --> 1:40:47.559
<v Speaker 1>I can't really think of a contemporary example of that

1:40:47.720 --> 1:40:51.040
<v Speaker 1>happening in such an explicit way, like it's a you know,

1:40:51.080 --> 1:40:54.200
<v Speaker 1>big old cautionary tale about why it's a heap of

1:40:54.240 --> 1:40:58.000
<v Speaker 1>garbage to work in the entertainment industry, and you know,

1:40:58.439 --> 1:41:04.080
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, I mean, not wrong, not untrue. And I

1:41:04.120 --> 1:41:06.439
<v Speaker 1>also I mean, I think I know that Billy Wilder

1:41:06.520 --> 1:41:09.360
<v Speaker 1>is kind of known or was known for a long

1:41:09.360 --> 1:41:12.760
<v Speaker 1>time of being somewhat cynical in his outlook of the world,

1:41:12.840 --> 1:41:15.439
<v Speaker 1>where it's like there's no suggestion on how to improve

1:41:15.920 --> 1:41:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the entertainment industry. But I don't think that that's the

1:41:18.200 --> 1:41:21.400
<v Speaker 1>job of the movie, you know. I think that it

1:41:21.439 --> 1:41:25.720
<v Speaker 1>really paints a bleak picture of the Hollywood system at

1:41:25.760 --> 1:41:29.400
<v Speaker 1>this time, and like it works, and I think the

1:41:29.400 --> 1:41:32.040
<v Speaker 1>fact that it is age this well speaks to how

1:41:32.479 --> 1:41:37.120
<v Speaker 1>little has actually changed. True. So I yeah, I just

1:41:37.200 --> 1:41:41.160
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a wonderful movie. Three and zero

1:41:41.160 --> 1:41:43.599
<v Speaker 1>point seventy five nipples still got a lot to say.

1:41:43.640 --> 1:41:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give one to Norma. She did what

1:41:46.160 --> 1:41:48.360
<v Speaker 1>she had to do. I'm going to give one to Betty.

1:41:48.880 --> 1:41:51.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to give one two hmmm.

1:41:52.479 --> 1:41:56.679
<v Speaker 2>I give one to Hoguy, of course, Hogg guy.

1:41:56.800 --> 1:42:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Where's my hog? Eye spin off. Now that we're we're

1:42:00.240 --> 1:42:03.360
<v Speaker 1>scraping the bottom of the barrel of ip, Like, ha, guy,

1:42:04.080 --> 1:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>what about that guy?

1:42:06.280 --> 1:42:08.800
<v Speaker 2>Let's give him six seasons in a movie. I'm gonna

1:42:08.800 --> 1:42:11.320
<v Speaker 2>take back everything and give my three and a half

1:42:11.400 --> 1:42:13.880
<v Speaker 2>nipples to the dead chimpanzee.

1:42:14.400 --> 1:42:18.599
<v Speaker 1>Oh bless, they're hard. We didn't, we didn't, we don't know.

1:42:19.400 --> 1:42:24.439
<v Speaker 1>And then I'll give my point seventy five cute Billy

1:42:24.479 --> 1:42:27.559
<v Speaker 1>Wilder because God damn, I love him. I can't wait

1:42:27.600 --> 1:42:29.080
<v Speaker 1>to cover the apartment. I can't wait to cover some

1:42:29.240 --> 1:42:34.040
<v Speaker 1>like it hot and that Sunset Boulevard, Baby, I'm gonna

1:42:34.040 --> 1:42:40.479
<v Speaker 1>celebrate by walking down Sunset Boulevard and buying one diet coke. Yay,

1:42:40.840 --> 1:42:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that's my Sunset Boulevard. Walking down the street and getting

1:42:43.400 --> 1:42:47.720
<v Speaker 1>a diet coke four times a day? Why because I

1:42:47.720 --> 1:42:50.120
<v Speaker 1>can't have more than one soda at my house? Why

1:42:50.600 --> 1:42:52.960
<v Speaker 1>obsessive compulsive disorder? Fair.

1:42:53.439 --> 1:42:58.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna walk down Sunset Boulevard and Nerd Mount used

1:42:58.680 --> 1:42:59.960
<v Speaker 2>to be on Sunset Boulevard.

1:43:00.680 --> 1:43:05.680
<v Speaker 1>RP, Folks, It's a long street. It's many miles. I

1:43:05.720 --> 1:43:08.519
<v Speaker 1>was like, also, the Sunset Boulevard normous living on is

1:43:08.680 --> 1:43:13.439
<v Speaker 1>not the Sunset no, we live on the PP side

1:43:13.560 --> 1:43:16.280
<v Speaker 1>of Sunset Boulevard. Yeah, but I love it.

1:43:16.400 --> 1:43:20.960
<v Speaker 2>I imagine she lives in like the Beverly Hills.

1:43:21.120 --> 1:43:25.519
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, would you know all that? If you take the two,

1:43:25.680 --> 1:43:27.920
<v Speaker 1>if you're a buzzhead like myself, you take the two

1:43:27.960 --> 1:43:31.080
<v Speaker 1>far enough you'll get to normal zone. But yeah, we're

1:43:31.080 --> 1:43:35.200
<v Speaker 1>we're closer to downtown. Anyways, you didn't ask. Uh. This

1:43:35.240 --> 1:43:37.720
<v Speaker 1>is a great movie. I would highly recommend. And also

1:43:37.880 --> 1:43:40.360
<v Speaker 1>it's streaming for free on the Internet Archive. If you

1:43:40.360 --> 1:43:42.120
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen it before, you can watch it for free

1:43:42.200 --> 1:43:48.040
<v Speaker 1>right now. Mm hm. Anyways, that's our show year. You

1:43:48.160 --> 1:43:51.840
<v Speaker 1>got a Shrek, you got a Sunset Boulevard, and next week, spoiler,

1:43:52.160 --> 1:43:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you got May Decemba. We're casting a wide net this year,

1:43:56.000 --> 1:43:59.360
<v Speaker 1>so enjoy. Indeed, you can follow us on all the

1:43:59.400 --> 1:44:01.479
<v Speaker 1>normal stuff. You can follow us on Instagram, you can

1:44:01.520 --> 1:44:04.439
<v Speaker 1>follow us on x and you can also subscribe to

1:44:04.479 --> 1:44:07.960
<v Speaker 1>our Patreon aka Matreon. Great way to start the year

1:44:08.560 --> 1:44:11.800
<v Speaker 1>five bucks a month at yourself. Treat yourself. It's five

1:44:11.800 --> 1:44:14.360
<v Speaker 1>bucks a month. It gets you access to two bonus

1:44:14.400 --> 1:44:17.040
<v Speaker 1>episodes a month with Caitlin and myself, and you also

1:44:17.479 --> 1:44:20.160
<v Speaker 1>get access to our back catalog of over I think

1:44:20.200 --> 1:44:24.320
<v Speaker 1>officially over one hundred and fifty bonus episodes, so you'll

1:44:24.360 --> 1:44:28.120
<v Speaker 1>be delighted and infuriated for days on end.

1:44:29.040 --> 1:44:33.120
<v Speaker 2>So check that out and go to our link tree

1:44:33.520 --> 1:44:36.160
<v Speaker 2>link tree slash Bechdall Cast to grab those tickets for

1:44:36.360 --> 1:44:43.280
<v Speaker 2>our upcoming tour once again. It's San Francisco, Sacramento, Dallas, Austin,

1:44:43.520 --> 1:44:47.880
<v Speaker 2>and San Diego. Will be in those cities in early February,

1:44:48.000 --> 1:44:51.000
<v Speaker 2>so check our link tree to look at all the

1:44:51.040 --> 1:44:54.439
<v Speaker 2>ticket links and the dates and the details. So we

1:44:54.520 --> 1:44:57.160
<v Speaker 2>hope to see you there. Yes, and you can also

1:44:57.240 --> 1:45:00.160
<v Speaker 2>go to teapublic dot com slash the Bechdel Cast to

1:45:00.200 --> 1:45:02.559
<v Speaker 2>grab some merch. So what you're gonna want to do?

1:45:03.439 --> 1:45:08.080
<v Speaker 2>Grab some merch, wear it to the live shows and

1:45:08.120 --> 1:45:11.280
<v Speaker 2>then we'll take pictures together and it'll be so cute.

1:45:11.640 --> 1:45:15.679
<v Speaker 1>Exactly. In conclusion, we love you, Happy New Year, Happy

1:45:15.680 --> 1:45:18.439
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four. It's gonna be such a regular year.

1:45:18.479 --> 1:45:23.200
<v Speaker 1>We can feel it. So normal, so norma, so norma,

1:45:23.360 --> 1:45:31.080
<v Speaker 1>so normal. Goodbye, bye bye.

1:45:31.120 --> 1:45:34.400
<v Speaker 2>The Bechdel Cast is a production of iHeartMedia, hosted by

1:45:34.479 --> 1:45:38.360
<v Speaker 2>Caitlin Derante and Jamie loftis produced by Sophie Lichterman, edited

1:45:38.439 --> 1:45:41.639
<v Speaker 2>by Mola Board. Our theme song was composed by Mike

1:45:41.760 --> 1:45:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Kaplan with vocals by Catherine Vosskrosenski. Our logo in Merch

1:45:46.280 --> 1:45:49.240
<v Speaker 2>is designed by Jamie Loftis and a special thanks to

1:45:49.240 --> 1:45:53.679
<v Speaker 2>Aristotle Acevedo. For more information about the podcast, please visit

1:45:53.720 --> 1:45:55.680
<v Speaker 2>link Tree Slash Bechdel Cast