WEBVTT - Chips in Focus and Epic Games' Mobile Storefront

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:04.880
<v Speaker 1>From markhard where Innovation, Money and Power co line in

0:00:05.000 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, NBN. This is Bloomberg Technology with Caroline Hyde

0:00:09.960 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and Ed.

0:00:10.400 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 2>Loved Love.

0:00:24.560 --> 0:00:26.880
<v Speaker 3>Live from New York and San Francisco. This is Bloomberg

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Technology coming up. Chips in focus as equipment maker of

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 3>prime materials. It does the points on its forecast, while

0:00:33.320 --> 0:00:36.840
<v Speaker 3>Texas Instruments scores cash from the Chips act Plus.

0:00:36.840 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 2>Epic Games launches a new mobile storefront. After years of

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 2>legal wrangling with Apple and Google and.

0:00:43.159 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 3>Seagrammare Edgar Brundman Junior as close to making a rival

0:00:47.159 --> 0:00:51.360
<v Speaker 3>offer for Paramount is a bidding war brewing. First. I

0:00:51.440 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 3>was checking on these markets because it is a good week.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:54.720
<v Speaker 4>Ed.

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:56.680
<v Speaker 3>If you are along these markets, then that's that one

0:00:56.760 --> 0:01:00.000
<v Speaker 3>hundred having its best week in the year since November.

0:01:00.080 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 3>We're almost five percent. That is a call one point

0:01:02.560 --> 0:01:05.560
<v Speaker 3>three trillion dollars being added to the overall benchmark. And

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:09.520
<v Speaker 3>it is a significant well sigh of relief post volatility

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.560
<v Speaker 3>of the last couple of weeks. Once again, we've got

0:01:11.560 --> 0:01:13.880
<v Speaker 3>some consumer data just showing sentiment is on the up

0:01:13.920 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 3>to date. It counts counteracts some of that weakness, and

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 3>the housing data on the day. No, we're just done

0:01:18.120 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 3>a little bit on the day, but it is a

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:22.319
<v Speaker 3>strong week. What are you looking at on the microad I'm.

0:01:22.200 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 2>Going to go straight to Applied Materials and a company

0:01:25.440 --> 0:01:27.920
<v Speaker 2>that makes the machines that make the chips. It's down

0:01:27.959 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 2>three percent, be in the courter gone, but there were

0:01:31.319 --> 0:01:35.360
<v Speaker 2>really high expectations in its forecast for the current period.

0:01:35.400 --> 0:01:38.160
<v Speaker 2>Where the market wants to see that all this investment

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 2>around AI in particular is translating into more equipment or

0:01:42.920 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 2>chip manufacturing equipment investment. We'll get to that in just

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:49.560
<v Speaker 2>a moment. The other top story in the semiconductor space,

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 2>Texas Instruments set to receive one point six billion dollars

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 2>in Chip ACT grants and three billion dollars in loans

0:01:56.480 --> 0:02:00.160
<v Speaker 2>the Buying Administration announced today marks the latest major award

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:05.240
<v Speaker 2>from the program that's designed to boost American semiconductor manufacturing.

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.400
<v Speaker 2>We're joined by Bloomozi and King here on set in

0:02:07.400 --> 0:02:10.400
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco. A lot of the money's been allocated Texas

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Instruments makes all kinds of more basic chips. Just the

0:02:13.880 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 2>terms that they've agreed with the administration here.

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean, the way to look at this is

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 5>nothing is set. A lot of money has been promised,

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.920
<v Speaker 5>But from a taxpayer's perspective, it's like, Okay, you have

0:02:25.000 --> 0:02:27.079
<v Speaker 5>to do this, you have to go into production, actually

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.280
<v Speaker 5>build this, and then we'll give you the money. So

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 5>that's the way to look at it from a general perspective.

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:34.760
<v Speaker 5>The flip side of it, Wall Street is like, this

0:02:34.800 --> 0:02:38.680
<v Speaker 5>is how many dollars, how many cents on the EPs

0:02:38.720 --> 0:02:41.320
<v Speaker 5>that they'll be gaining, how much less CAPEX will be spending.

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:45.079
<v Speaker 3>Still, they are spending a lot, and it is all

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:47.280
<v Speaker 3>about the focus on chips at the moment and the

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:49.679
<v Speaker 3>focus on AI. Just take us back to applying materials

0:02:50.200 --> 0:02:53.640
<v Speaker 3>moment in because look, the numbers were good, but the

0:02:53.639 --> 0:02:56.240
<v Speaker 3>forecast perhaps just not living up to the AI euphoria.

0:02:57.520 --> 0:02:59.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean there are two things going on here.

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 5>Anything that's to do with high end logic, which is

0:03:03.280 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 5>for data centers and by extension, AI is doing really well.

0:03:07.280 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of demand for that. On the flip side,

0:03:09.760 --> 0:03:13.080
<v Speaker 5>some of the types of chips that say, are for

0:03:13.280 --> 0:03:17.000
<v Speaker 5>automakers or for industrial equipment, there's not a lot of

0:03:17.400 --> 0:03:20.680
<v Speaker 5>strong demand growth there at the moment, So perhaps machinery

0:03:20.760 --> 0:03:22.960
<v Speaker 5>orders for that particular sector are a little bit weaker.

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:25.880
<v Speaker 5>There's kind of a balance of factors going on there.

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 2>That automotive parts kind of consistent with NXP that we've

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 2>heard it on an ongoing basis. Just real quick, what's

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:35.000
<v Speaker 2>the difference between applied materials and ASML. You know, if

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:37.920
<v Speaker 2>you think about what those machines are actually used for.

0:03:38.120 --> 0:03:41.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I mean think about applied Materials as much more generalists.

0:03:41.520 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 5>They make a whole range of different pieces of equipment.

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:49.520
<v Speaker 5>ASML is very specific. It's making lithography. They're essentially the

0:03:49.600 --> 0:03:52.320
<v Speaker 5>lasers that are burning the holes to make the pattern

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.240
<v Speaker 5>on the chips. Applyed Materials is putting materials on those

0:03:55.440 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 5>silicon wafers.

0:03:57.040 --> 0:03:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Bloombergsy and King, thank you very much. Let's take a

0:03:59.600 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 2>closer look at chips globally. Japan is applying foreign trade

0:04:03.840 --> 0:04:07.040
<v Speaker 2>regulations to chip making equipment as part of its effort

0:04:07.160 --> 0:04:10.720
<v Speaker 2>to secure stable supply chains, The Ministry of Finance said

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:14.120
<v Speaker 2>earlier today, foreign investors are now required to give prior

0:04:14.240 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 2>notice when conducting direct investment in equipment tieds chip making.

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:21.599
<v Speaker 2>This in an effort to address the risk of key

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:24.640
<v Speaker 2>technology leaks and interesting global story carrac and so.

0:04:24.640 --> 0:04:26.720
<v Speaker 3>Much going on with ships. In fact, overall they are

0:04:26.720 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 3>weighing on the overall benchmarks today because of that apply

0:04:29.600 --> 0:04:32.159
<v Speaker 3>materials number. Just get broad a look at the tech

0:04:32.160 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 3>market right now. Janet Mumors with us RBC Brewint, head

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 3>of market Analysis, and Janet, we've had an extraordinary few weeks.

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.960
<v Speaker 3>To put it bluntly, what are you making of AI

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:46.440
<v Speaker 3>euphoria reality and what it means for the tech benchmarks

0:04:46.520 --> 0:04:46.920
<v Speaker 3>right now?

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:50.799
<v Speaker 6>Hi, good one night, Caroline, Thanks for having I think

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:53.920
<v Speaker 6>one thing is that the evaluations are some of these

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:58.560
<v Speaker 6>megacap starks and AI exposed starks have come down. I

0:04:58.600 --> 0:05:00.800
<v Speaker 6>think that is good news for in sirs who are

0:05:00.800 --> 0:05:03.359
<v Speaker 6>not invested yet. They can actually get in with a

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 6>better valuation into companies that still have great long term prospects.

0:05:08.680 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 6>And I also think that the rebounds, the very quick

0:05:11.080 --> 0:05:14.719
<v Speaker 6>rebound that we've seen suggests that, you know, if the

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.240
<v Speaker 6>data is okay, continues to suggest that the US economy

0:05:18.279 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 6>is still growing.

0:05:19.200 --> 0:05:21.320
<v Speaker 7>You know, there's still a lot of demand for these

0:05:21.360 --> 0:05:22.360
<v Speaker 7>high quality sauce.

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 6>And I will say our position would be to keep

0:05:27.080 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 6>being focused on high quality growth companies, which a lot

0:05:30.320 --> 0:05:32.800
<v Speaker 6>of these AIS old starts are. And I think some

0:05:32.839 --> 0:05:37.240
<v Speaker 6>of the observations from companies' guidance, from the big tech

0:05:37.240 --> 0:05:39.839
<v Speaker 6>companies for example, is that they prefer to actually spend

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:42.640
<v Speaker 6>more on AI instead of being left behind. So I

0:05:42.680 --> 0:05:46.640
<v Speaker 6>think that this is still very much a very important trade.

0:05:47.120 --> 0:05:52.160
<v Speaker 3>Why then, was everyone suddenly so nervous around it, Janet?

0:05:52.320 --> 0:05:55.719
<v Speaker 3>Why do you think that, Yeah, we're still twelve percent

0:05:55.720 --> 0:05:57.360
<v Speaker 3>of of our highs on the socks and next, But

0:05:57.440 --> 0:06:00.479
<v Speaker 3>why haven't we managed to rebound to the extent that

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:01.640
<v Speaker 3>has your level of conviction?

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:05.279
<v Speaker 7>Yes? I think so.

0:06:05.680 --> 0:06:09.040
<v Speaker 6>Generally speaking, a lot of focus is still placed on

0:06:09.160 --> 0:06:10.799
<v Speaker 6>the economic data.

0:06:11.720 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 7>We got some relief I think in.

0:06:13.080 --> 0:06:15.400
<v Speaker 6>The past week or so with solid economic data and

0:06:15.440 --> 0:06:18.400
<v Speaker 6>slower inflation, but I think there are still uncertainty surrounding that.

0:06:18.600 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 6>I think particularly for cheap companies. I think the politics

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 6>of that still played a pretty important part.

0:06:24.160 --> 0:06:27.800
<v Speaker 7>I remember when esmlt.

0:06:26.720 --> 0:06:31.320
<v Speaker 6>UH and then there is this suggestion that Donald Trump

0:06:31.400 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 6>is going to uh, you know, make a stricter for

0:06:34.160 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 6>US companies to export high tech equipment and things like that,

0:06:40.680 --> 0:06:43.920
<v Speaker 6>and also of course the Biden administration tightening the stands.

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 7>I think these are still ongoing concerns.

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:47.599
<v Speaker 6>So I think that is the reason why the cheap

0:06:47.640 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 6>makers are not bouncing bad as much as the other

0:06:50.240 --> 0:06:50.920
<v Speaker 6>wider stocks.

0:06:52.200 --> 0:06:54.600
<v Speaker 2>Janet Hired zed in San Francisco. I've been reading your

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 2>research and you've been thinking about reads real estate investment trusts.

0:06:58.720 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 2>So have I, and I've been writing about how you

0:07:01.279 --> 0:07:04.159
<v Speaker 2>can look at their pipeline in the context of data

0:07:04.200 --> 0:07:07.400
<v Speaker 2>center investments. I didn't realize it was such a focus

0:07:07.400 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 2>of opportunity for some of the reads out there. Is

0:07:10.560 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 2>that an area that you look for for data sets

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 2>to kind of work out how long this investment cycle

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 2>has to run.

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 6>Yes, I think in terms of reads, I think data

0:07:20.040 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 6>center is one of the more resilient areas actually throughout

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:26.280
<v Speaker 6>the previous sell off, and I think that that is

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:29.240
<v Speaker 6>still a very valid investment point. But what we're looking

0:07:29.280 --> 0:07:32.520
<v Speaker 6>at in terms of reads is basically broadening out of

0:07:32.600 --> 0:07:36.160
<v Speaker 6>the other reeds area because simply the valuation has gone

0:07:36.360 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 6>much more attractive. And I think particularly right now, we're

0:07:40.600 --> 0:07:42.240
<v Speaker 6>at the stage where the fan is going to cut

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.560
<v Speaker 6>interest rates, and you know, expectation is building that they

0:07:45.600 --> 0:07:48.559
<v Speaker 6>will be you know, further cuts well into twenty twenty

0:07:48.600 --> 0:07:50.800
<v Speaker 6>five and beyond, so I think, you know, being a

0:07:50.880 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 6>very interest rate sensitive sector is likely to benefit from

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 6>this monetary policy development, and I think the valuation is

0:07:58.080 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 6>just adding to that attractive Jesus.

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 2>Earlier in the show, Caroline was looking at the NASA

0:08:03.880 --> 0:08:06.960
<v Speaker 2>one hundred on the weekly basis. We've had a lot

0:08:06.960 --> 0:08:10.640
<v Speaker 2>of conflicting economic data. What has the data all told

0:08:10.680 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 2>by Friday Afternoon told you about the state of the

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 2>global economy.

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.440
<v Speaker 7>I think everything is still fine.

0:08:19.480 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 6>I think the labor market is obviously is lowing down,

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 6>but it is actually as expected, and in fact, it

0:08:27.040 --> 0:08:29.320
<v Speaker 6>is a trend that the Fatter Reserve would like to see.

0:08:29.400 --> 0:08:33.160
<v Speaker 6>If you look at the job opening unemployed person is

0:08:33.920 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 6>going down, but it is basically what I would describe

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.439
<v Speaker 6>at a normalization back to where it's pre COVID.

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:41.440
<v Speaker 7>So I think this is all positive development.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:45.920
<v Speaker 6>I think we're saying a slowdown in consumer because the

0:08:46.040 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 6>savings are being depleted, but I think the key thing

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 6>is that real wage book is very much positive. I

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 6>think that that is a very fundamental supportive factor out there.

0:08:56.760 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 6>So overall speaking, the economy is still fine, slowing but

0:09:01.240 --> 0:09:04.000
<v Speaker 6>as expected, and we're not seeing the economy falling off

0:09:04.040 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 6>a cliff, and soft lending is still very much in

0:09:06.280 --> 0:09:06.840
<v Speaker 6>play here.

0:09:07.559 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 3>Janet what is then the most important piece of data

0:09:11.280 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 3>in the next few weeks. Is it fed Macro? Is

0:09:14.960 --> 0:09:18.520
<v Speaker 3>it August twenty eighth in video results.

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Nabidia is It's definitely a very important corporate earnings

0:09:22.800 --> 0:09:26.440
<v Speaker 6>I think yeah, that would be a very important point

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 6>for us to watch. Basically we know the volatility around

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.199
<v Speaker 6>that event and the ability to actually spill over to

0:09:33.240 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 6>the rest of the megacap industry. And also investors will

0:09:36.800 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 6>be seeking validation on whether that AI orders is still

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 6>very strong. And of course I think any data that

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.000
<v Speaker 6>relates to the labor market will be a big focus.

0:09:47.040 --> 0:09:49.760
<v Speaker 6>I think inflation side of things, we got more confirmation

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 6>that is okay and unlikely to see a volatility around inflation,

0:09:54.360 --> 0:09:56.280
<v Speaker 6>So I think labor market data for sure.

0:09:57.800 --> 0:10:00.280
<v Speaker 2>Such such a good question by Caroline though August twenty

0:10:00.280 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 2>eight from Video and Macro level event. Maybe Janet Mouie,

0:10:04.200 --> 0:10:06.720
<v Speaker 2>RBC Brewing, head of Market Analysis. Great to have you

0:10:06.760 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 2>back on the show. Thank you very much. Now, coming up,

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:10.679
<v Speaker 2>we're going to be joined by Josh Chapman, who is

0:10:10.720 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 2>a managing partner at Convoy, a firm focused on the

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.400
<v Speaker 2>video games industry, and we're going to discuss epic Games's

0:10:16.679 --> 0:10:19.439
<v Speaker 2>new mobile storefront, which is out today. By the way,

0:10:19.480 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 2>heading to break, we're looking at shares of Rivian. I

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.160
<v Speaker 2>broke this story overnight with Kyle Porter that they've had

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.559
<v Speaker 2>to pause the line that makes the delivery vans for

0:10:27.600 --> 0:10:31.080
<v Speaker 2>Amazon due to a part shortage. The stock declines are

0:10:31.080 --> 0:10:34.199
<v Speaker 2>really accelerated in the session, almost three percent. It won't

0:10:34.240 --> 0:10:37.960
<v Speaker 2>affect long term their production targets. They'll make that up.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.319
<v Speaker 2>They're not changing guidance, and all the workers will We've paid,

0:10:41.360 --> 0:10:43.920
<v Speaker 2>et cetera. But it's interesting that this continues to be

0:10:43.960 --> 0:10:46.280
<v Speaker 2>an issue in the supply chain for Rivian, such a

0:10:46.280 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 2>closely watched ev name. Keep tuned, Stay tuned. This is

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:51.679
<v Speaker 2>Blombow Technology.

0:11:00.960 --> 0:11:04.680
<v Speaker 3>Epic debut for Epic Games, A Fortnite maker is launching

0:11:04.720 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 3>a new mobile storefront after four years of legal wrangling

0:11:07.800 --> 0:11:11.079
<v Speaker 3>with Apple and Google over their app store practices, now

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:13.640
<v Speaker 3>the Epic CEO saying it may have lost up to

0:11:13.720 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 3>one billion dollars in revenue after Fortnite was removed from

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 3>Apple's App store Whennipek tried to circumvent that fee with

0:11:20.080 --> 0:11:23.280
<v Speaker 3>its own storefront back in twenty twenty, joining us now

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:27.120
<v Speaker 3>Josh Chapman managing partner of Convoy and look, it's returning

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:31.360
<v Speaker 3>to iPhones in Europe, to Android devices worldwide? Can people

0:11:31.360 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 3>get it? Access it? What's the pickup?

0:11:34.200 --> 0:11:34.600
<v Speaker 2>Right now?

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:37.720
<v Speaker 8>You can only access the Epic Games Store in the

0:11:37.760 --> 0:11:40.440
<v Speaker 8>EU if you're on the iOS, and globally on Android.

0:11:40.440 --> 0:11:43.640
<v Speaker 8>As you mentioned, it is an absolute pain to download

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.640
<v Speaker 8>on both stores. So Apple and Google are fighting this

0:11:46.760 --> 0:11:49.120
<v Speaker 8>tooth and nail that I just watched some videos that

0:11:49.200 --> 0:11:50.760
<v Speaker 8>came out this morning. We're going to be trying it

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:54.199
<v Speaker 8>all day today. Is this is requiring anywhere from ten

0:11:54.240 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 8>to twenty steps. There's lots of flags and alerts on

0:11:57.400 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 8>both phone devices saying hey are you sure? Are you

0:12:01.040 --> 0:12:03.880
<v Speaker 8>sure you want to download this? So these stores are

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 8>going to fight this tooth and nail.

0:12:06.400 --> 0:12:09.720
<v Speaker 2>An Apple spokesperson clarified to Bloomberg that it is a

0:12:09.760 --> 0:12:14.199
<v Speaker 2>five step process in Europe at least, not fifteen. I'm

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:15.160
<v Speaker 2>glad to have you on the show.

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 6>Right.

0:12:15.400 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 2>You're a firm that invests in video games startups that

0:12:18.240 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 2>want to disrupt the industry. That's what Sam Sweeny's trying

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.640
<v Speaker 2>to do. The argument that if you have more stores,

0:12:23.679 --> 0:12:26.160
<v Speaker 2>you have a more competitive market. One hundred and eighty

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:28.880
<v Speaker 2>billion dollar video games market, half of which is mobile.

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 2>Is he right about that argument?

0:12:31.880 --> 0:12:34.000
<v Speaker 8>He is right that there is It is better for

0:12:34.040 --> 0:12:36.800
<v Speaker 8>the games industry if there are more stores, more options,

0:12:36.800 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 8>and more competitive pricing. That said, I think what he's

0:12:40.160 --> 0:12:42.960
<v Speaker 8>fighting for is fantastic and will be positive in this

0:12:43.240 --> 0:12:47.000
<v Speaker 8>development today is positive for the games industry. That said,

0:12:47.040 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 8>Apple is well within their right having the platform they've built,

0:12:50.440 --> 0:12:52.560
<v Speaker 8>to defend it as much as they can, and so

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:55.160
<v Speaker 8>the courts of the US have decided that yes, they're

0:12:55.240 --> 0:12:57.719
<v Speaker 8>not a monopoly. They but they have to allow for

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.560
<v Speaker 8>third party payments to be processed. Essentially, the way I

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:03.080
<v Speaker 8>read that and the way we read that as a

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:06.520
<v Speaker 8>firm here at Convoys that that's kind of a meet

0:13:06.559 --> 0:13:09.560
<v Speaker 8>in the middle. Right, let's let them do off platform payments.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:12.280
<v Speaker 8>But you're not a monopoly, and you got to let

0:13:12.280 --> 0:13:14.120
<v Speaker 8>Epic Games launch a store on your app store.

0:13:14.240 --> 0:13:16.800
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the reason that this is happening for iOS

0:13:16.800 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 3>in Europe and not here is because the Digital Markets

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 3>Act and the fact that Europe's decided that Apple is

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 3>acting as a gatekeeper in some way Google too with

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 3>these app stores, and they've got to change. But often

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 3>what happens in Europe ends up happening here in the US.

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 3>So when if you're saying they're pushing and fighting tooth

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:36.840
<v Speaker 3>and nail, will we ever see it occurring here in

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.960
<v Speaker 3>the US unless there's our own antitrust issues that are

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:40.719
<v Speaker 3>set to bear here.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:43.679
<v Speaker 8>So it took about four years to get to this

0:13:43.760 --> 0:13:46.360
<v Speaker 8>point just in the EU. So I think that we're

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.439
<v Speaker 8>looking at another just a prediction three to five years

0:13:49.440 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 8>before we see this really happen in the United States

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 8>unless a huge ruling comes down from the Supreme Court

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.080
<v Speaker 8>in the United States, if they decide to take this

0:13:57.200 --> 0:14:00.000
<v Speaker 8>court and take the appeal, which they rejected I believe

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:02.560
<v Speaker 8>earlier this year last year. And so I think we're

0:14:02.600 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 8>looking at a very long drawn out battle. And in

0:14:04.800 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 8>the meantime, Apple is making billions and billions a week

0:14:09.160 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 8>off of the app store. In about sixty to seventy

0:14:11.640 --> 0:14:15.040
<v Speaker 8>percent of all revenue on Google's App Store and on

0:14:15.559 --> 0:14:19.040
<v Speaker 8>Apple's App Store comes from the video gaming space alone.

0:14:19.120 --> 0:14:22.000
<v Speaker 8>And so the reason why they were fighting, yeah, well.

0:14:21.960 --> 0:14:23.640
<v Speaker 2>Let me just jump in and Carra, I'm sorry us

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 2>we're talking about that Apple side of the story. Let's

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 2>be under no illusions. Epic want to make money from

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.400
<v Speaker 2>this arrangement, right, they have the target of one hundred

0:14:33.440 --> 0:14:38.720
<v Speaker 2>million downloads by a certain period of time. Ambitious. Will

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:40.600
<v Speaker 2>they be successful is the question.

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 8>I think Epic Games is going to make a lot

0:14:44.600 --> 0:14:46.880
<v Speaker 8>of money off of this move today. I think they'll

0:14:46.880 --> 0:14:49.920
<v Speaker 8>make it primarily through Android globally, and then I think

0:14:49.960 --> 0:14:52.440
<v Speaker 8>they'll secondarily make it on iOS. I think it'll be

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:55.400
<v Speaker 8>in that order of magnitude. But Epic Games as a

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 8>private company that owns Fortnite and Rocket League and Fall guys.

0:15:00.160 --> 0:15:03.440
<v Speaker 8>They have now recently launched uefn, which is basically their

0:15:03.520 --> 0:15:06.800
<v Speaker 8>Roadblocks competitor. They watched Roadblocks have success, so they're launching

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 8>their own sort of user generated content platform. This is

0:15:10.680 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 8>a continued effort for Epic Games to increase their margin.

0:15:13.400 --> 0:15:16.000
<v Speaker 8>Profile Mobile is a perfect way to do that, and

0:15:16.040 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 8>whether that's an acquisition or an IPO in the future,

0:15:18.800 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 8>Epic Games is playing their hand very well and this

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 8>will work out in their favor for sure.

0:15:23.400 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 3>I think the data showed that some thirty five million

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 3>people played Fortnite for more than six hundred million hours

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.600
<v Speaker 3>in July on Xbox in PlayStation. Just give us the

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:37.000
<v Speaker 3>context of how popular Fortnite is compared to the rest

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 3>of the gaming landscape.

0:15:39.160 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 8>Before Fortnite was kicked off the app Store, we as

0:15:41.440 --> 0:15:45.880
<v Speaker 8>a firm did an estimate that Fortnite was responsible alone

0:15:45.920 --> 0:15:49.520
<v Speaker 8>for almost one percent of all revenue on the Apple

0:15:49.520 --> 0:15:51.760
<v Speaker 8>App Store before it was kicked off. That was sort

0:15:51.800 --> 0:15:55.600
<v Speaker 8>of an estimate that we kind of did internally. The

0:15:55.640 --> 0:15:58.680
<v Speaker 8>significance that Fortnite is is a title on console, which

0:15:58.680 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 8>you just mentioned is absolutely massive, and on mobile, which

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:08.320
<v Speaker 8>is more accessible globally around the emerging market countries especially,

0:16:08.480 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 8>which is why Android's important. Fortnite is, you know, one

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 8>of the top five forever titles we call them forever

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.840
<v Speaker 8>titles in the game and industry in the world right

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 8>alongside that as things like Call of Duty and Grand

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:21.200
<v Speaker 8>Theft Auto and many others.

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:27.440
<v Speaker 2>Josh Chapman, managing partner at Convoy, a particularly great voice

0:16:27.440 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 2>to have on a daylight today, Thank you very much.

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 2>There's another big story in the world of entertainment. We're

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 2>looking at Paramount seagramat Edgar Brontham Junior is close to

0:16:36.920 --> 0:16:40.240
<v Speaker 2>making an offer four Paramount Global, setting off a potential

0:16:40.320 --> 0:16:42.880
<v Speaker 2>bidding war for the film and TV company that owns

0:16:42.920 --> 0:16:45.680
<v Speaker 2>CBS in MTV. That's because the Bloomberg's Hannah Miller and

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Hannah I will say the same thing to you I

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 2>said several weeks ago, I'm confused and I have deja vu.

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 2>So that there's a new bidder and then another bidding war.

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:56.440
<v Speaker 2>Good morning, yes, good morning.

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.960
<v Speaker 9>So yeah, we know Bronklin has been interested in Paramount

0:17:01.000 --> 0:17:04.119
<v Speaker 9>for a while and things have shifted since then. You know,

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 9>obviously there's this Skydance deal that has been agreed to,

0:17:07.800 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 9>and that there's this forty five day go shop period.

0:17:10.280 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 9>So it looks like Bronfman is going to put in

0:17:12.359 --> 0:17:15.560
<v Speaker 9>a bid, But unlike his earlier interests, he's no longer

0:17:15.600 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 9>working with Bain Capital on this and has been discussions

0:17:19.200 --> 0:17:24.360
<v Speaker 9>with a couple of different entities, including Roku Fortress and

0:17:24.400 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 9>the film producer Stephen Paul.

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:33.080
<v Speaker 3>So I'm sat here as a B class shareholder, not voting,

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 3>trying to work out what ultimately is going to be

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:40.040
<v Speaker 3>better for me. How does he push away from what

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:42.280
<v Speaker 3>David Ellison is going to offer in terms of technology,

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:43.959
<v Speaker 3>in terms of studios, How is he going to make

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:45.360
<v Speaker 3>a different kind of appeal.

0:17:46.960 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so you know, Brockman is coming in with years

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:52.600
<v Speaker 9>of experience in the Badia industry. He's arguing that this

0:17:52.800 --> 0:17:57.199
<v Speaker 9>is a better deal for shareholders. You know, he is

0:17:57.440 --> 0:17:59.800
<v Speaker 9>saying that he can take this company to the next level.

0:17:59.800 --> 0:18:03.600
<v Speaker 9>And we were putting this potential bin together. But it'll

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:06.240
<v Speaker 9>be interesting to see what happens. Ultimately, it's up to

0:18:06.280 --> 0:18:10.600
<v Speaker 9>Sherry Redstone, her holding company, National Amusements, think is the

0:18:10.600 --> 0:18:13.960
<v Speaker 9>biggest shareholder in Paramount, and what she says, what she

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.640
<v Speaker 9>says goes. If she prefers guidance, that's what's going to be.

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.840
<v Speaker 3>Anna Milla telling it straight. We thank you so much.

0:18:27.640 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 3>Let's talk politics and creators because as the election campaign

0:18:30.920 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 3>picks up, the creator economy has been on the administration's mind.

0:18:34.680 --> 0:18:37.679
<v Speaker 3>Two hundred content creators will be credentialed to cover the

0:18:37.680 --> 0:18:41.000
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty four DNC in Chicago next week. This follows

0:18:41.040 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 3>actually the White House itself hosting the Creator Economy Conference,

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:47.400
<v Speaker 3>where it convene a group of digital creators and professionals

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.680
<v Speaker 3>to discuss the industry's most pressing issues. Let's talk about

0:18:50.680 --> 0:18:53.880
<v Speaker 3>it with LTK co founder president Ama Ven's Box who

0:18:54.200 --> 0:18:57.040
<v Speaker 3>you weren't there yourself, but a lot of the influencers

0:18:57.080 --> 0:19:01.200
<v Speaker 3>that you represent that you help monetize were there. Why

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 3>is it important? Why why are we seeing such political

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.000
<v Speaker 3>interest in the influencer economy right now?

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.520
<v Speaker 4>Well, our LTK team was on the ground, they were there,

0:19:11.720 --> 0:19:15.000
<v Speaker 4>And you know, when I think about creators and politics,

0:19:15.359 --> 0:19:17.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't know of any better marketing machine than the

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:20.760
<v Speaker 4>RNC and the DNC. And what we're seeing is that

0:19:21.080 --> 0:19:23.600
<v Speaker 4>even government is realizing that in order to reach people,

0:19:23.640 --> 0:19:25.280
<v Speaker 4>you need to be where they are. They're spending six

0:19:25.320 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 4>and a half hours a day on their phones, they're

0:19:27.200 --> 0:19:30.199
<v Speaker 4>in these aggregated content channels. The content that they're viewing

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:33.959
<v Speaker 4>is created by creators themselves. The new media has arrived,

0:19:33.960 --> 0:19:37.320
<v Speaker 4>it's here, and it was hugely validating for the Creator

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:39.719
<v Speaker 4>Economy Conference to be held at the White House. This

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 4>is an industry that we started thirteen years ago. The

0:19:42.720 --> 0:19:46.280
<v Speaker 4>word influencer was only added to the dictionary five years ago,

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 4>so we've come a long way. This was a really

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:49.680
<v Speaker 4>big moment for our entire industry.

0:19:50.640 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 3>And what can I get political with you for a moment.

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.440
<v Speaker 3>I don't want anyone to take sides, but just from

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 3>a perspective of a creator, an influencer who's doing it

0:19:59.359 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 3>better at the moment, who's managing to reach the US

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 3>voter base via influencers most efficiently. Is it DNC Democrats?

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:09.719
<v Speaker 3>Is that are and see Republicans?

0:20:11.560 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 4>You know, both are using these tactics, and they both

0:20:13.600 --> 0:20:16.120
<v Speaker 4>used them for the last several elections, and we've seen

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:20.080
<v Speaker 4>it across all of the different platforms. That said, I think,

0:20:20.280 --> 0:20:22.919
<v Speaker 4>really this is important for the entire industry. Whether you

0:20:22.920 --> 0:20:26.119
<v Speaker 4>are someone who as a creator that is following politics,

0:20:26.119 --> 0:20:29.200
<v Speaker 4>who is reporting on politics, this is it. It's a

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 4>validating moment. And for some creators they don't want to

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:33.960
<v Speaker 4>touch the elections at all, But I think what this

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 4>points to in this moment is that they are looking

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 4>to see that this industry is important and that they

0:20:38.880 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 4>need to be thinking about the things they're thinking about.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:42.159
<v Speaker 4>And there are definitely a handful of things the air

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:44.080
<v Speaker 4>Top of Mind that we showed up in Washington to

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 4>talk about what.

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Are the protections here for voters that creators, as we

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:54.439
<v Speaker 2>are calling them, get it right, that it's accurate, that

0:20:54.520 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 2>it's not false or fake information.

0:20:59.400 --> 0:21:02.359
<v Speaker 4>Well so for our creators. Joe Biden stood up and

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 4>he said, you know you are the new media. You're

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.439
<v Speaker 4>the new way that people are being reached. We know

0:21:07.520 --> 0:21:09.760
<v Speaker 4>that people are not just listening and thinking about sentiment

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 4>that they're actually acting on the things that their influencers

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:14.919
<v Speaker 4>that they follow are telling them. We're seeing that, you know,

0:21:16.000 --> 0:21:18.399
<v Speaker 4>consumers are buying five billion dollars with the products from

0:21:18.440 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 4>these creators every year, so they're voting with their wallet

0:21:20.760 --> 0:21:22.440
<v Speaker 4>and not just with their mind.

0:21:22.480 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 2>So there's a huge responsibility.

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 4>That comes from being a creator and the acknowledgement that

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 4>this is the new media is one of the most

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:32.000
<v Speaker 4>important things as a creator. There are really key, three

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:34.399
<v Speaker 4>key things that are our top of mind when it

0:21:34.400 --> 0:21:36.160
<v Speaker 4>comes to politics. I'd love to share that you guys

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:37.040
<v Speaker 4>are interested.

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Just fifteen seconds, just got wonderful.

0:21:41.200 --> 0:21:44.359
<v Speaker 4>Well, we're thinking about the content that's taken and monetized

0:21:44.400 --> 0:21:47.639
<v Speaker 4>directly and indirectly and without a license, without permission or

0:21:47.640 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 4>benefit to that creator. We're thinking about the implications of

0:21:50.400 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 4>creator content being taken to train AI again without the license,

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.840
<v Speaker 4>permission or benefit to the creator. And then I think, finally,

0:21:56.880 --> 0:22:00.680
<v Speaker 4>it's really important that this industry was built on innovation.

0:22:00.960 --> 0:22:04.399
<v Speaker 4>How are we protecting the innovators who are creating it?

0:22:04.440 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 4>And that's really in the court system through legislation. Thank

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 4>you so much.

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, lta HO founder and President Ambven's box. Sorry we

0:22:11.600 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 2>ran out of time, but thank you for coming on

0:22:13.480 --> 0:22:17.440
<v Speaker 2>the show.

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.520
<v Speaker 3>Welcome back to Bluemotechnology and Caroline.

0:22:23.240 --> 0:22:25.840
<v Speaker 2>Hide in New York and I'm Ed Lovelow in San Francisco.

0:22:25.880 --> 0:22:27.080
<v Speaker 2>I want to go back to the chart you showed

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.040
<v Speaker 2>at the top of the show, and that's that one hundred.

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 2>But on a five day basis, we're actually on track

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.320
<v Speaker 2>for a second consecutive week of weekly gains. But five

0:22:35.359 --> 0:22:38.320
<v Speaker 2>percent over five days is actually the biggest weekly gain

0:22:38.400 --> 0:22:41.720
<v Speaker 2>on that index since November of twenty twenty three. And

0:22:41.760 --> 0:22:44.479
<v Speaker 2>it's amazing how the narrative changes. It was just two

0:22:44.520 --> 0:22:47.040
<v Speaker 2>weeks ago that we'd had four straight weeks of declines

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.680
<v Speaker 2>and we were perilously close to a fifth straight week

0:22:49.680 --> 0:22:53.520
<v Speaker 2>of declines, going back the worst run since twenty twenty two.

0:22:53.600 --> 0:22:57.439
<v Speaker 2>Economic data is really whipsawing us about and as you

0:22:57.480 --> 0:23:00.479
<v Speaker 2>point out, August twenty eighth and Nvidia earned is this

0:23:00.560 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 2>macro level event. There's a really big story out there.

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 2>In a specific mover, Autodesk continue to use a controversial

0:23:06.520 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 2>sales strategy after promising investors it would stop, and then

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:14.440
<v Speaker 2>ignored internal warnings about the risks of doing so. According

0:23:14.520 --> 0:23:19.080
<v Speaker 2>to previously unreported internal documents. The reporter with those documents

0:23:19.119 --> 0:23:23.520
<v Speaker 2>Bloomberg's Brody Ford, this is so interesting. So basically management

0:23:23.560 --> 0:23:26.520
<v Speaker 2>have been said told don't use this, there are risks.

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:29.479
<v Speaker 2>They carried on using it, and you found out about it.

0:23:29.600 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 2>Take us from there.

0:23:31.359 --> 0:23:34.840
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, taking a step back and April, Autodesk said, Yo,

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.439
<v Speaker 10>we cannot file our financial disclosures. We'll come back to you,

0:23:38.920 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 10>and the whole market said, oh my god, what's going

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:43.480
<v Speaker 10>on here. This is unheard of for the size of

0:23:43.480 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 10>a publicly traded company. Eventually they said that yeah, we

0:23:48.040 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 10>had some problems with these deals, but it was still

0:23:50.680 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 10>somewhat vague. And so what we found out through these

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:58.000
<v Speaker 10>documents is that Autodesk pledged to stop doing a specific

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 10>kind of deal that essentially frow loads the cash flow.

0:24:01.200 --> 0:24:03.639
<v Speaker 10>I'm not going to board with the details. But they

0:24:03.760 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 10>kept doing it quietly. And the reason they kept doing

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 10>it is because they were reliance on these deals to

0:24:09.240 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 10>meet free cash flow targets. Right. We see in these

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 10>documents that employees warned executives, hey, this might hurt our

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 10>long term revenue. This increases the chances of us making

0:24:20.960 --> 0:24:23.399
<v Speaker 10>a serious mistake, maybe like the one we saw earlier

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 10>this year. But they pledged on because you know, you

0:24:26.720 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 10>gotta meet those financial targets.

0:24:28.680 --> 0:24:33.200
<v Speaker 3>But this had big ramifications. The accounting probe finished in May,

0:24:33.640 --> 0:24:37.360
<v Speaker 3>the board decided to remove the clifford Is CFO. I mean,

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:41.160
<v Speaker 3>what more could they do to make everyone take this seriously.

0:24:42.520 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 7>Correct?

0:24:43.000 --> 0:24:46.000
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, they removed the CFO. The board decided that a

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:50.119
<v Speaker 10>little bit earlier this year, and since then activists investors

0:24:50.160 --> 0:24:53.760
<v Speaker 10>Starboard has entered the stocks, saying, in part the handling

0:24:53.840 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 10>of this probe was not good enough that investors didn't

0:24:56.680 --> 0:25:00.480
<v Speaker 10>get enough accountability. They didn't really know what happened. How

0:25:00.520 --> 0:25:03.080
<v Speaker 10>wide was the pool of knowledge here? And again what

0:25:03.160 --> 0:25:05.840
<v Speaker 10>these documents show is that the pool of knowledge was

0:25:05.920 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 10>quite wide. I mean we see executives signing off on

0:25:08.640 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 10>these deals saying that, hey, we got to meet these targets.

0:25:12.200 --> 0:25:13.760
<v Speaker 10>You know, let's pursue them.

0:25:15.000 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 7>In terms of.

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 10>Ramifications, Starboard is requesting things like considering whether the current

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.640
<v Speaker 10>CEO is still the right guy for the job, as

0:25:23.640 --> 0:25:26.679
<v Speaker 10>well as the kind of traditional activist stuff like let's

0:25:26.880 --> 0:25:29.600
<v Speaker 10>raise margins and you know all that kind of thing.

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.360
<v Speaker 2>Brady, real quickly, forgive me this one. Just the basics

0:25:33.359 --> 0:25:36.160
<v Speaker 2>of what Autodesk is and does and why people might

0:25:36.280 --> 0:25:36.720
<v Speaker 2>or might not.

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:41.000
<v Speaker 10>Know it totally. Autodesk is like Adobe for the physical world.

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:44.680
<v Speaker 10>That bridge behind you, probably Autodesk was used in some

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:47.760
<v Speaker 10>capacity to design it, right, most buildings you see their

0:25:47.800 --> 0:25:51.520
<v Speaker 10>software was designed for. They have a very interesting vertical

0:25:51.560 --> 0:25:54.080
<v Speaker 10>that they really own. It's one of those kind of

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 10>large software markets you almost don't think about because they

0:25:57.119 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 10>are so entrenched in their market. It's a very interesting

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 10>set of very.

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:05.840
<v Speaker 2>Offer Bloomberg's Brady Ford with another top piece of reporting Carrot.

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, absolutely on it. Meanwhile, just switch gears ed. We're

0:26:10.240 --> 0:26:12.359
<v Speaker 3>going to look at fintech for a moment because Revolute

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:15.280
<v Speaker 3>said that a secondary share sale that allowed it basically

0:26:15.280 --> 0:26:17.879
<v Speaker 3>to give employees some liquidity for their stakes value. The

0:26:17.920 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 3>company at get this forty five billion dollars the new

0:26:20.480 --> 0:26:23.199
<v Speaker 3>valuation for the UK unicorn. It's up from thirty three

0:26:23.240 --> 0:26:25.840
<v Speaker 3>billion price tag that it received back in twenty twenty one.

0:26:25.880 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 3>And actually that's the interesting point here, And like many

0:26:28.480 --> 0:26:31.200
<v Speaker 3>of its rivals in fintech, Revelue hasn't had to raise

0:26:31.240 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 3>money since then in recent years, and it's allowed it

0:26:33.440 --> 0:26:36.359
<v Speaker 3>to basically avoid those sharp declines of valuation that many

0:26:36.480 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 3>peers have suffered. But at the same time, let's go

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.399
<v Speaker 3>to another peer. Let's go to a European fintech that's

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:44.480
<v Speaker 3>saking liquidity, and it's Klana, and it is inching ever

0:26:44.560 --> 0:26:47.439
<v Speaker 3>closer to its USIPO next year, with sources saying that

0:26:47.480 --> 0:26:49.879
<v Speaker 3>the company is seeking a valuation of around twenty billion

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 3>dollars now. The Klana CEO joined Bloomberg Daybreak Europe earlier

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.320
<v Speaker 3>today to discuss those plans and his outlook for the company.

0:26:56.400 --> 0:26:56.920
<v Speaker 3>Just take a listen.

0:26:58.200 --> 0:27:01.720
<v Speaker 11>People really appreciate mostly about is that two years ago

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.600
<v Speaker 11>this business was you know, very much attractive, growing fast

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:07.760
<v Speaker 11>in the US, but also loss making. And in just

0:27:07.840 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 11>two years we have increased revenue by fifty percent, we

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:13.280
<v Speaker 11>have increased gross profit by one hundred percent, and we

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.240
<v Speaker 11>reduce costs in thirty percent, which means that now we're

0:27:16.240 --> 0:27:18.840
<v Speaker 11>are you know, profitable And I think those kind of

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 11>financial performances obviously do raise the eyeboras a little bit

0:27:21.520 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 11>with investors also, as we have, due to AI, committed

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.880
<v Speaker 11>to continue shrinking the company. We've already gone from four

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 11>to half thousand to three and a half thousand in

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.680
<v Speaker 11>the last year, and we are committed to continuing on

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:37.720
<v Speaker 11>that path, not by layoffs but simply by natural attritionids.

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:42.200
<v Speaker 12>You've been an early mover on Jenai, and you reached

0:27:42.200 --> 0:27:45.240
<v Speaker 12>down to Sam Moltman of chat GBT open ai pretty

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:46.919
<v Speaker 12>pretty early on in all of this. What's been one

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:49.080
<v Speaker 12>of the most surprising things that stood out to you

0:27:49.160 --> 0:27:53.160
<v Speaker 12>as you've embedded some of this genai across the business.

0:27:53.800 --> 0:27:56.760
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that it is to me in a way.

0:27:56.760 --> 0:27:59.080
<v Speaker 11>I would actually partially say that like I was even

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 11>you know, kind of pulled into the hype a year ago.

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:03.720
<v Speaker 11>We're a little bit like we you know again self

0:28:03.800 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 11>driving cars. You know, we used to read about them

0:28:05.840 --> 0:28:07.800
<v Speaker 11>in the press every day and then you would look

0:28:07.840 --> 0:28:09.440
<v Speaker 11>out the window and like, where are they? Where are

0:28:09.440 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 11>they not happening? And now it's actually happening. And I

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.120
<v Speaker 11>think that like to somebody, I was almost like drawn

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:14.800
<v Speaker 11>into the hype.

0:28:14.600 --> 0:28:15.239
<v Speaker 10>A year ago as well.

0:28:15.240 --> 0:28:17.520
<v Speaker 11>It's like, okay, in the year you know, the whole

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 11>thing will already have like totally dramatically change everything, and

0:28:20.280 --> 0:28:22.359
<v Speaker 11>now you almost had the opposite. You hear people say, oh,

0:28:22.440 --> 0:28:24.400
<v Speaker 11>we tried it, and give us the results and so forth.

0:28:24.520 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 2>But in tonally, what I'm seeing to plan is that

0:28:26.440 --> 0:28:27.320
<v Speaker 2>it is working.

0:28:27.480 --> 0:28:29.440
<v Speaker 11>It's just it will take a little bit for other

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:31.520
<v Speaker 11>time before it will have the full implications to us.

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 11>We've already had delivered so fantastic results, but we were

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:34.760
<v Speaker 11>super excited.

0:28:34.840 --> 0:28:35.439
<v Speaker 7>What's coming in the.

0:28:35.400 --> 0:28:38.120
<v Speaker 12>Next twelve months before we let you go? It's about

0:28:38.160 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 12>you Look, what do we win you back? You're going

0:28:39.480 --> 0:28:42.160
<v Speaker 12>to list in the US. That's a suggestion, that's the expectation.

0:28:42.640 --> 0:28:44.960
<v Speaker 12>What does Europe and the UK need to do? Is

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 12>there anything they can do to win this listing?

0:28:49.040 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 11>Well, one thing that I have said to regulators in

0:28:51.440 --> 0:28:53.280
<v Speaker 11>the year, because there's been so much discussion in Brussels

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 11>as well, how do we create a competitive market? And

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:59.000
<v Speaker 11>I have suggested and actually get some positive from some

0:28:59.040 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 11>of the foreign ministers, was invited with all the finance

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 11>binases over you, is that I think that if if

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:08.440
<v Speaker 11>Europe will never you know, will never agree on like

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:11.040
<v Speaker 11>where should listing shuld the big stock market be? Is

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:14.000
<v Speaker 11>in Prairies, is it Frankfurt, is it you know whatever,

0:29:14.040 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 11>European country? So the only way to actually get this

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.400
<v Speaker 11>to work is if if you would mandate all the

0:29:18.400 --> 0:29:21.080
<v Speaker 11>stock sciations in Europe so that any stock that is

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:23.800
<v Speaker 11>listed in one is automatically trading in another. I think

0:29:23.840 --> 0:29:26.280
<v Speaker 11>that could reach the critical mass to create an investor

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:28.520
<v Speaker 11>base that is, you know, similar size that one we

0:29:28.600 --> 0:29:30.000
<v Speaker 11>see in the US, because that's really one of the

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 11>biggest challenges when you make US comparisons. If the company

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:36.760
<v Speaker 11>like ours is already mostly US business from revenue size,

0:29:37.040 --> 0:29:39.200
<v Speaker 11>it will have to be a you know, a similar

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.200
<v Speaker 11>size of investment base and stock market size to make

0:29:42.240 --> 0:29:43.920
<v Speaker 11>it a relevant listening point.

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 2>That was clan A CEO Sebastian shimi at Kowski. Coming

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.480
<v Speaker 2>up on the program, We're going to be joined by

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Hibba Amva from the Ericsson Immigration Group to discuss the

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 2>impact of the election on H one B visas and

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 2>in turn the world of technology.

0:30:01.680 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 3>Caro, I just want to go back to that question

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 3>of dual listings and what certain nations and territories have

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 3>to do to woo over other companies, because get this

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:13.560
<v Speaker 3>av point. It's a new Jersey based company software company

0:30:13.640 --> 0:30:17.200
<v Speaker 3>it's considering actually second listing outside of the US and Singapore.

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:19.080
<v Speaker 3>People with knowledge of the matter have been saying it

0:30:19.080 --> 0:30:21.360
<v Speaker 3>would be a deal that basically bring US infrastructure software

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:24.040
<v Speaker 3>firm a step closer to some of its big backers.

0:30:24.080 --> 0:30:26.080
<v Speaker 3>Remember they had a big chunk of change from Temasek.

0:30:26.520 --> 0:30:27.600
<v Speaker 3>This is blue big technology.

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 13>The H one and by visa policy is really critical

0:30:40.760 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 13>for the tech industry, and Trump does not have a

0:30:44.040 --> 0:30:48.040
<v Speaker 13>positive track record there. So I think having a president

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:51.160
<v Speaker 13>who understands the importance of immigration in this country is

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:51.960
<v Speaker 13>really critical.

0:30:52.840 --> 0:30:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Venture capitalist Shrewdi Shah one of the signatories of VC's

0:30:56.120 --> 0:30:59.280
<v Speaker 3>for Kamala group supporting the campaign of Kamala Harris. And

0:30:59.320 --> 0:31:01.680
<v Speaker 3>as we look ahead to the DNC that' starts next

0:31:01.680 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 3>week H one B visas, I think it'll be a

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 3>topic that's type of mind, certainly off of the tech industry.

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 3>That's bring in our next guest to discuss him. Advert

0:31:09.240 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 3>partner with the ericson Immigration group, And I ask you there, Hibbert,

0:31:13.720 --> 0:31:16.720
<v Speaker 3>will we get much clarity? Do you need more clarity

0:31:16.800 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 3>from the position of the immigration from the Democratic ticket?

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.560
<v Speaker 14>So I think that the companies that operate in the

0:31:23.560 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 14>tech industry, as well as the AI industry, semiconductor, basically

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:30.200
<v Speaker 14>any industry in which the United States wants to be

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:34.440
<v Speaker 14>a global leader and continue to dominate, they're definitely looking

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.080
<v Speaker 14>for a lot more clarity when it comes to what

0:31:37.280 --> 0:31:39.800
<v Speaker 14>the next president's policy is going to be with respect

0:31:39.840 --> 0:31:42.400
<v Speaker 14>to high skilled immigration. And the reason that this is

0:31:42.440 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 14>so important for companies, particularly in the tech sector, is

0:31:45.440 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 14>because there is a heavy reliance on visas like the

0:31:48.320 --> 0:31:51.280
<v Speaker 14>H one B visa, because when it comes to employees

0:31:51.320 --> 0:31:54.480
<v Speaker 14>who have the necessary STEM skills that these companies are

0:31:54.520 --> 0:31:58.520
<v Speaker 14>looking for, demands still very much outweighs supply, and so

0:31:58.960 --> 0:32:01.240
<v Speaker 14>whoever the next present cident is going to be, it's

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:03.960
<v Speaker 14>really really important to point out that what we really

0:32:04.000 --> 0:32:06.400
<v Speaker 14>need for the success of the tech industry and other

0:32:06.440 --> 0:32:10.360
<v Speaker 14>industries is an immigration policy that actually reflects a twenty

0:32:10.400 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 14>first century economy.

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:16.360
<v Speaker 2>Hebert. Former President Trump actually gave some detail on how

0:32:16.400 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 2>he'd approach visas, particularly those originating from students of US universities,

0:32:21.880 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 2>on the All In podcasts, and then he discussed it

0:32:24.040 --> 0:32:28.680
<v Speaker 2>with Bloomberg in July as well. Have you had any

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:32.080
<v Speaker 2>detail or sense from the Harris ticket on a specific

0:32:32.160 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 2>approach to technology relevant visas?

0:32:35.960 --> 0:32:38.720
<v Speaker 14>So what we know about Vice President Harris is that

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:42.640
<v Speaker 14>she definitely has close ties to the tech industry. There

0:32:42.680 --> 0:32:45.800
<v Speaker 14>were two hundred tech leaders who came out and endorsed

0:32:45.840 --> 0:32:48.520
<v Speaker 14>her publicly. Now, as you mentioned, the DNC is right

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:50.360
<v Speaker 14>around the corner. So we're definitely going to learn a

0:32:50.400 --> 0:32:55.320
<v Speaker 14>lot more here in the next few days. But what

0:32:55.560 --> 0:32:58.400
<v Speaker 14>most people are expecting of Vice President Harris is that

0:32:58.440 --> 0:33:02.800
<v Speaker 14>she's going to continue President Biden's approach to high skilled immigration,

0:33:03.240 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 14>and President Biden's approach has been in large part walking

0:33:06.560 --> 0:33:07.960
<v Speaker 14>back Trump era policy.

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if we could sort of take a bipartisan

0:33:11.800 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 2>look at the mechanics of getting a visa in the

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.880
<v Speaker 2>federal administration of visas. I got my first visa in

0:33:17.920 --> 0:33:21.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty eighteen under the Trump administration and had to renew

0:33:21.840 --> 0:33:26.720
<v Speaker 2>it in the chaos of COVID. But how easy procedurally

0:33:26.880 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 2>is it now in this day state, right this moment

0:33:30.640 --> 0:33:31.760
<v Speaker 2>to get an H one B.

0:33:33.320 --> 0:33:37.520
<v Speaker 14>So it's not necessarily as difficult as it was during

0:33:37.520 --> 0:33:40.880
<v Speaker 14>the Trump administration. The experience that a lot of immigration

0:33:40.960 --> 0:33:44.240
<v Speaker 14>practitioners had during the Trump administration was that the process

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:48.280
<v Speaker 14>was a lot longer and it felt somewhat inefficient. I

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:50.800
<v Speaker 14>think that that's why it's really important to watch what

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 14>the results of this election are going to be because

0:33:54.480 --> 0:33:57.120
<v Speaker 14>some of the concerns that the companies have experiences, whether

0:33:57.200 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 14>or not policy pertaining to H one B visas and

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:03.160
<v Speaker 14>policies surrounding high skilled immigration are actually going to act

0:34:03.200 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 14>as a deterrent and discourage high skill talent from coming

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 14>to the United States and making the United States their home.

0:34:09.400 --> 0:34:11.560
<v Speaker 14>And if that happens, then companies are going to run

0:34:11.600 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 14>into issues in terms of whether they can remain competitive

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 14>because they may not necessarily be able to hire the

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:17.640
<v Speaker 14>best and brighters from around the world.

0:34:18.080 --> 0:34:22.120
<v Speaker 3>And perhaps we see what occurred back in previous administration

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:25.600
<v Speaker 3>where Canada suddenly got a lot of high skill perhaps

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:29.480
<v Speaker 3>versus the United States. What about other types of visas?

0:34:29.520 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 3>We all focus in so much on an H one B,

0:34:31.640 --> 0:34:33.399
<v Speaker 3>but I came in twenty eighteen on an L one.

0:34:33.480 --> 0:34:36.160
<v Speaker 3>I mean, how many other routes are there to be

0:34:36.680 --> 0:34:39.480
<v Speaker 3>and contribute to the US economy.

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.319
<v Speaker 14>I think that there are several other routes, but the

0:34:43.400 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 14>eligibility standards are a little bit more controlled and restricted.

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:50.040
<v Speaker 14>And that's why the H one D visa is so important.

0:34:50.520 --> 0:34:52.800
<v Speaker 14>It's the type of visa that a lot more people

0:34:52.800 --> 0:34:56.439
<v Speaker 14>could potentially be eligible for, and as a result, it's

0:34:56.520 --> 0:35:01.560
<v Speaker 14>the most frequently leveraged employer sponsored visa by several industries,

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:05.440
<v Speaker 14>including the tech industry. And so with respect to policy,

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 14>when it comes to high skilled immigration. You know, WOLS

0:35:08.480 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 14>policy surrounding H and B visas is definitely going to

0:35:11.280 --> 0:35:16.640
<v Speaker 14>be top of mind. It's really important to continue to

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 14>have immigration policy that actually encourages talent to come to

0:35:20.520 --> 0:35:23.680
<v Speaker 14>the United States and innovate, because the next time somebody

0:35:23.840 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 14>you know, founds the next Google or the next Tesla,

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:28.440
<v Speaker 14>we still want that to be an American company.

0:35:30.400 --> 0:35:33.399
<v Speaker 2>Cuba and the ericson Immigration Group, thank you very much.

0:35:33.440 --> 0:35:35.080
<v Speaker 2>There are other news headlines out there in the world

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:36.520
<v Speaker 2>of tech. Carry yeah, it's.

0:35:36.360 --> 0:35:38.440
<v Speaker 3>Time for talking tech. First up, we're going to discuss

0:35:38.480 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 3>SpaceX announcing it will launch a me faned satellite to

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:45.520
<v Speaker 3>track super bolluters. Now, Carbon Mapper is a nonprofit behind

0:35:45.560 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 3>the satellite, and it will be the second methane detecting

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:51.359
<v Speaker 3>satellite launched in the past six months. This reflects basically

0:35:51.400 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 3>growing scrutiny around the greenhouse gas and the satellite's low

0:35:54.680 --> 0:36:00.080
<v Speaker 3>cost to atmospheric monitoring. Meanwhile, you tariffs, they're slowing the

0:36:00.120 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 3>influx of Chinese made evs. In July now, according to

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:07.440
<v Speaker 3>research from Data Force, the number of new electric vehicles

0:36:07.480 --> 0:36:10.600
<v Speaker 3>from Chinese manufacturers registered in the EU found forty five

0:36:10.640 --> 0:36:13.440
<v Speaker 3>percent in June. Look, that's his carmakers actually rushed to

0:36:13.440 --> 0:36:15.880
<v Speaker 3>get their products to dealers before the towers took effect

0:36:16.080 --> 0:36:20.360
<v Speaker 3>on July fifth, and Jack Mars backing of course and Groove,

0:36:20.600 --> 0:36:23.240
<v Speaker 3>and it's said to be in discussions to acquire Chinese

0:36:23.280 --> 0:36:27.560
<v Speaker 3>healthcare platform howds dot com. That's acording to sources now

0:36:27.600 --> 0:36:30.640
<v Speaker 3>a group is seeing and looking to integrate its tech

0:36:30.760 --> 0:36:33.200
<v Speaker 3>within the website and an effort to basically beef up

0:36:33.200 --> 0:36:34.880
<v Speaker 3>its AI services in healthcare.

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:47.520
<v Speaker 1>The ORB before you is made by a startup called

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Tools for Humanity. If it looks all too dramatic, that's

0:36:51.360 --> 0:36:54.799
<v Speaker 1>sort of the point. The backers of the company, which

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:58.560
<v Speaker 1>include Sam Altman, the CEO of OpenAI, have put two

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:02.799
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty million this venture and want folks to

0:37:02.800 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 1>take notice of their ORB. This is because they want

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>to use it to scan the irises of as many

0:37:08.400 --> 0:37:12.000
<v Speaker 1>people around the world as possible, all as part of

0:37:12.040 --> 0:37:16.320
<v Speaker 1>their main project known as world Coin. If you allow

0:37:16.360 --> 0:37:19.640
<v Speaker 1>world Cooin to scan your iris, two things happen. You

0:37:19.680 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 1>get a small chunk of the world Coin cryptocurrency, and

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:27.080
<v Speaker 1>you're certified as a real, living human, which the company

0:37:27.120 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>hopes will lead to a reduction in fraud on the

0:37:29.520 --> 0:37:35.080
<v Speaker 1>Internet and provide better access to banking and social services. Critics, however,

0:37:35.200 --> 0:37:38.759
<v Speaker 1>are wary about the ethics of biometric collection and the

0:37:38.800 --> 0:37:42.040
<v Speaker 1>possible exploitation of users from developing countries.

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 2>You can check out the full episode of that Bloomberg

0:37:48.480 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 2>original's piece on Bloomberg dot com and joining us now

0:37:52.160 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 2>is the co founder of worldcoin himself, Alex Blania Alex,

0:37:56.360 --> 0:38:00.279
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Bloomberg Technology. In Ashley Vance's Very Deep Tell

0:38:00.360 --> 0:38:04.400
<v Speaker 2>BusinessWeek's story, he talks about how when you describe worldcoin

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:08.279
<v Speaker 2>to someone the project, it can sound nuts, and you

0:38:08.360 --> 0:38:11.680
<v Speaker 2>were cited as saying that you think there's just a

0:38:11.800 --> 0:38:16.600
<v Speaker 2>five percent probability five that you'll succeed. How do you

0:38:16.680 --> 0:38:17.560
<v Speaker 2>arrive at that number?

0:38:19.400 --> 0:38:22.960
<v Speaker 15>I think it's just a very ambitious project. And Ashley

0:38:22.960 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 15>and I talked about massive success, like a large percentage

0:38:26.719 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 15>of the kind of people in the world actually signing

0:38:29.480 --> 0:38:33.319
<v Speaker 15>up and verifying with our services. I think that's just

0:38:33.800 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 15>a lo perability. I think we will we will increase

0:38:35.920 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 15>the probertly over time and do our best to succeed.

0:38:39.080 --> 0:38:42.520
<v Speaker 15>But I think with very kind of very ambitious technology company,

0:38:43.600 --> 0:38:45.799
<v Speaker 15>that's that's probably what you're looking at and just try

0:38:45.840 --> 0:38:46.799
<v Speaker 15>to be realistic about that.

0:38:47.040 --> 0:38:51.319
<v Speaker 3>Give us the elevator pitch of what success looks like, Alex, Well,

0:38:51.600 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 3>the problem is that you will solve.

0:38:54.560 --> 0:38:58.800
<v Speaker 15>So Semini started working on this company four and a

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:02.279
<v Speaker 15>half years ago and one of the one of the

0:39:02.320 --> 0:39:06.160
<v Speaker 15>main ideas was, of course that AGI and kind of

0:39:06.480 --> 0:39:11.560
<v Speaker 15>general AI progress will continue, and so we started a

0:39:11.600 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 15>company called Tools for Humanity with the simple goal of

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:17.879
<v Speaker 15>building tools for humanity scale that we think will turn

0:39:17.920 --> 0:39:20.160
<v Speaker 15>out to be very very important in a world in

0:39:20.200 --> 0:39:24.160
<v Speaker 15>which AI will become increasingly powerful. And one of the

0:39:24.200 --> 0:39:28.160
<v Speaker 15>problems that are very easy to understand is that on

0:39:28.920 --> 0:39:32.799
<v Speaker 15>social media X for example, it will be really really

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:36.520
<v Speaker 15>hard to distinguish if you're interacting with a real human

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:41.720
<v Speaker 15>or if you're interacting with an AI. And we believe

0:39:42.040 --> 0:39:44.359
<v Speaker 15>that this will turn out to be a very very

0:39:44.400 --> 0:39:48.320
<v Speaker 15>critical problem for our democracy for many really things, for

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:51.040
<v Speaker 15>many things that we care about, to protect many of

0:39:51.080 --> 0:39:56.279
<v Speaker 15>us services against influenced by AI, and really make sure

0:39:56.280 --> 0:40:00.800
<v Speaker 15>we only interface with humans. And so basically for years back,

0:40:01.000 --> 0:40:04.000
<v Speaker 15>we thought about how that would work and what technology

0:40:04.000 --> 0:40:07.000
<v Speaker 15>would need to build, and so that's what we did.

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 7>We built about biometric.

0:40:08.520 --> 0:40:10.480
<v Speaker 15>Device that we distribute all of the world, and we

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 15>allow everyone.

0:40:12.239 --> 0:40:16.400
<v Speaker 3>To verify in everyone being so far six million unique humans.

0:40:16.400 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 3>I think it is in growing verified by the ORB.

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:22.720
<v Speaker 3>But the issue here is how many of those humans

0:40:22.800 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 3>actually understand what it is that they're giving you and

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:26.879
<v Speaker 3>why they're giving it. There is an argument that people

0:40:26.920 --> 0:40:30.160
<v Speaker 3>are standing in line in Ecuador and in developing nations

0:40:30.360 --> 0:40:31.919
<v Speaker 3>thinking they're just going to get reward with a little

0:40:31.920 --> 0:40:33.960
<v Speaker 3>bit of money and giving over a lot of data

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.280
<v Speaker 3>that they don't really understand. How you counteract that.

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:39.800
<v Speaker 15>Well, they don't. In fact, they don't give us anything.

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:42.400
<v Speaker 15>We don't store any data that the network does to

0:40:42.400 --> 0:40:44.840
<v Speaker 15>storing data. It's implemented in a self custodial way, and

0:40:44.840 --> 0:40:47.920
<v Speaker 15>it uses what's called zero knowledge proofs to give you

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:52.200
<v Speaker 15>truly fundamental privacy guarantees. That's one, and then second, I

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:54.440
<v Speaker 15>would argue that you don't understand most of the technologies

0:40:54.480 --> 0:40:56.400
<v Speaker 15>you're using. That's also not the point. I think you

0:40:56.480 --> 0:41:00.279
<v Speaker 15>understand why you're doing it and what comes up for you,

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:02.399
<v Speaker 15>but I don't think you have to understand every detail

0:41:02.440 --> 0:41:04.120
<v Speaker 15>about technology, And that would be my.

0:41:04.080 --> 0:41:06.919
<v Speaker 2>Response, Alex, You've spent a lot of time flying around

0:41:06.960 --> 0:41:10.240
<v Speaker 2>the world with Sam Autman to countries trying to convince

0:41:10.239 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 2>them if they've placed a ban on the technology, to

0:41:12.480 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 2>overturn it. You've had success in South career in Kenya.

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:18.719
<v Speaker 2>There are other countries where it stands. What is the

0:41:18.800 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 2>concern that you hear most consistently from them?

0:41:22.520 --> 0:41:24.960
<v Speaker 15>So we only actually hit one band and that is

0:41:25.840 --> 0:41:31.280
<v Speaker 15>that is Hong Kong. We paused another in other countries

0:41:31.480 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 15>to work with regulators, but that is what we expected.

0:41:34.600 --> 0:41:37.120
<v Speaker 15>This is a very new technology and there's many questions

0:41:37.200 --> 0:41:38.200
<v Speaker 15>to we ask for regulators.

0:41:38.200 --> 0:41:38.879
<v Speaker 7>That is their job.

0:41:39.480 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 15>So we we really work with regulators and respond to

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 15>the questions and their main concerns. Our main questions is

0:41:46.280 --> 0:41:49.239
<v Speaker 15>nothing that I think would really surprise you. It is

0:41:50.040 --> 0:41:52.719
<v Speaker 15>what happens to the data, how does technology work? And

0:41:53.080 --> 0:41:56.439
<v Speaker 15>all of that of course an increasing detail, but we're

0:41:56.440 --> 0:41:59.439
<v Speaker 15>really happy to answer to these questions and regulators around

0:41:59.440 --> 0:41:59.759
<v Speaker 15>the world.

0:42:00.760 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 2>Alex, we've just got a minute or so left. What

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 2>is the benefit to humanity that you want to provide

0:42:05.200 --> 0:42:07.080
<v Speaker 2>with this technology?

0:42:08.000 --> 0:42:10.799
<v Speaker 15>Well, I think I think it will turn out to

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:15.160
<v Speaker 15>be truly critical. I think services like x social media,

0:42:15.239 --> 0:42:18.640
<v Speaker 15>many things that we care about, will otherwise be really

0:42:18.640 --> 0:42:21.160
<v Speaker 15>hard to use or are very easy to influence, and

0:42:21.200 --> 0:42:24.759
<v Speaker 15>so I think for our democracy, for things that we

0:42:24.800 --> 0:42:27.080
<v Speaker 15>care about, we will need such technology and I hope

0:42:27.080 --> 0:42:28.120
<v Speaker 15>we can contribute with that.

0:42:29.160 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 3>Thanks Plannia, come back on as you continue to build

0:42:32.200 --> 0:42:34.880
<v Speaker 3>the amount of people using it. Of course, co founder

0:42:35.000 --> 0:42:38.920
<v Speaker 3>of world Coin and also humanity, we appreciate it. Meanwhile,

0:42:39.160 --> 0:42:41.000
<v Speaker 3>that does it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology.

0:42:41.080 --> 0:42:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Yep, another week of earnings, economic data and innovation recap

0:42:45.239 --> 0:42:46.839
<v Speaker 2>it on the podcast. You know where to find it

0:42:46.960 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 2>on the terminal, Apple, Spotify, and iHeart big thanks to

0:42:49.880 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 2>the team in New York City with Caro and out

0:42:52.239 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 2>with a crew here in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology.