1
00:00:00,160 --> 00:00:10,440
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. This is the Bloomberg

2
00:00:10,520 --> 00:00:13,720
Speaker 1: Daybreak Aisia podcast. I'm Doug Krisner. You can join Brian

3
00:00:13,800 --> 00:00:16,640
Speaker 1: Curtis and myself for the stories, making news and moving

4
00:00:16,680 --> 00:00:19,560
Speaker 1: markets in the APAC region. You can subscribe to the

5
00:00:19,600 --> 00:00:23,080
Speaker 1: show anywhere you get your podcast and always on Bloomberg Radio,

6
00:00:23,320 --> 00:00:26,080
Speaker 1: the Bloomberg Terminal, and the Bloomberg Business App.

7
00:00:27,240 --> 00:00:30,440
Speaker 2: Well, Disney shareholders have handed CEO Bob Iger a big

8
00:00:30,520 --> 00:00:33,640
Speaker 2: vote of confidence. They elected all of Disney's choices for

9
00:00:33,720 --> 00:00:37,320
Speaker 2: the company's board at a proxy vote, and shareholders rejected

10
00:00:37,440 --> 00:00:41,640
Speaker 2: dissident investor Nelson Peltz's bid for board seats. Beltz's ally,

11
00:00:41,720 --> 00:00:45,879
Speaker 2: former Disney finance chief Jay Russulu, was also rejected. The

12
00:00:45,960 --> 00:00:48,319
Speaker 2: result is a clear cut victory for Iger, who has

13
00:00:48,360 --> 00:00:51,159
Speaker 2: fought to keep Peltz off the board since returning to

14
00:00:51,240 --> 00:00:55,160
Speaker 2: CEO in twenty twenty two. Jamie Lumley, senior analyst at

15
00:00:55,200 --> 00:00:59,920
Speaker 2: Third Bridge, outlines what's next for Iiger after winning the vote.

16
00:01:00,080 --> 00:01:02,520
Speaker 3: Thing that I think investors will really be looking at

17
00:01:02,680 --> 00:01:07,399
Speaker 3: is streaming profitability. The company's planning on finally driving profits

18
00:01:07,480 --> 00:01:10,360
Speaker 3: in fiscal year twenty twenty four. This is coming after

19
00:01:10,800 --> 00:01:13,800
Speaker 3: so many quarters and years of billions and losses in

20
00:01:13,840 --> 00:01:16,240
Speaker 3: this segment, and we've heard Bob Bayer talk about how

21
00:01:16,240 --> 00:01:19,399
Speaker 3: important this streaming transition is for the business. Really making

22
00:01:19,400 --> 00:01:21,640
Speaker 3: sure that they're hitting their mark and achieving their goals.

23
00:01:21,760 --> 00:01:24,160
Speaker 3: That's definitely priority number one as they move beyond this

24
00:01:24,240 --> 00:01:24,840
Speaker 3: proxy fight.

25
00:01:25,720 --> 00:01:29,560
Speaker 2: Jamie Lumley at Third Bridge. Disney has reinstated its dividend

26
00:01:29,640 --> 00:01:32,720
Speaker 2: and has announced plans to invest sixty billion dollars in

27
00:01:32,760 --> 00:01:35,720
Speaker 2: its parks and resorts over the next ten years. It

28
00:01:35,760 --> 00:01:38,880
Speaker 2: also deepened its involvement in the video game business via

29
00:01:38,959 --> 00:01:42,640
Speaker 2: a one point five billion dollar investment in Epic Games.

30
00:01:43,280 --> 00:01:46,160
Speaker 2: Joining US now to discuss this is Bloomberg Intelligence US

31
00:01:46,280 --> 00:01:49,880
Speaker 2: media analyst Gita Rong and Athan Geeta. Can we say

32
00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:52,880
Speaker 2: that this is a victory for both Bob Byer and

33
00:01:53,160 --> 00:01:56,800
Speaker 2: Nelson Pelts. I mean, the former is obvious, the latter,

34
00:01:56,920 --> 00:02:01,120
Speaker 2: Pelts is a billion dollars richer now, and he's also

35
00:02:01,200 --> 00:02:04,920
Speaker 2: made a point. I guess you could say, hater's gonna hate, Well,

36
00:02:04,960 --> 00:02:07,080
Speaker 2: this is billionaire's gonna billion.

37
00:02:10,240 --> 00:02:11,840
Speaker 4: That's a perfect way to put it. And I think

38
00:02:11,919 --> 00:02:14,800
Speaker 4: Nlson Pels is definitely kind of spinning this as a

39
00:02:14,880 --> 00:02:18,600
Speaker 4: win for himself, for his fun triad, and of course

40
00:02:18,639 --> 00:02:21,160
Speaker 4: for Disney shareholders at large. I mean, the stock is

41
00:02:21,160 --> 00:02:24,640
Speaker 4: definitely up fifty percent, and I think in many ways

42
00:02:24,680 --> 00:02:27,160
Speaker 4: he's right. I mean, he is claiming that he has

43
00:02:27,480 --> 00:02:33,239
Speaker 4: been the instrumental catalyst for kind of accelerating this transformation

44
00:02:33,320 --> 00:02:37,160
Speaker 4: at Disney, and I think to largest tent, that's definitely true.

45
00:02:37,840 --> 00:02:40,440
Speaker 1: Gay to take us inside the drama of this story,

46
00:02:40,480 --> 00:02:42,400
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the second time in two years

47
00:02:42,720 --> 00:02:45,920
Speaker 1: that Pelts was trying to get board seats. And the

48
00:02:45,960 --> 00:02:49,400
Speaker 1: other character that's part of the story is Ike pearl Mutter,

49
00:02:49,560 --> 00:02:53,360
Speaker 1: the former chairman of Marvel Entertainment. Disney purchased Marvel for

50
00:02:53,400 --> 00:02:55,840
Speaker 1: a round four billion, and pearl Mutter was able to

51
00:02:55,919 --> 00:02:59,760
Speaker 1: join the leadership team. He was tossed out last year.

52
00:03:00,040 --> 00:03:02,200
Speaker 1: And I'm wondering whether a part of the story had

53
00:03:02,200 --> 00:03:04,799
Speaker 1: to do with a bit of revenge that failed ultimately.

54
00:03:05,040 --> 00:03:05,560
Speaker 1: Is that fair?

55
00:03:06,600 --> 00:03:08,960
Speaker 4: I think that's definitely fair. I mean, we've seen kind

56
00:03:09,000 --> 00:03:12,880
Speaker 4: of Bob Eiger even chronicle this in his autobiography The

57
00:03:13,200 --> 00:03:14,960
Speaker 4: Right of a Lifetime, you know, kind of dealing with

58
00:03:15,000 --> 00:03:19,200
Speaker 4: a very difficult personality like Ike Perlmutter. They always had

59
00:03:19,320 --> 00:03:23,160
Speaker 4: kind of their creative differences. Bob was was forced to

60
00:03:23,240 --> 00:03:25,920
Speaker 4: keep him on after the Marvel acquisition. That turned out

61
00:03:25,960 --> 00:03:28,400
Speaker 4: to be a huge, huge win for of course, for

62
00:03:28,480 --> 00:03:31,520
Speaker 4: Iiger and for Disney. You know, the Marvel movies bringing

63
00:03:31,520 --> 00:03:33,919
Speaker 4: in billions and billions of dollars at the box office,

64
00:03:34,400 --> 00:03:38,000
Speaker 4: but he had to constantly kind of contend with you know,

65
00:03:38,120 --> 00:03:41,600
Speaker 4: Pearl Mutter's temper tantrums. Remember, Perlmutter wanted to get rid

66
00:03:41,640 --> 00:03:44,040
Speaker 4: of Kevin Feige, and Kevin Feigi has kind of been

67
00:03:44,040 --> 00:03:47,920
Speaker 4: the whole creative genius behind Marvel and so many of

68
00:03:47,960 --> 00:03:50,880
Speaker 4: the Disney movies. So it's been a very rough and

69
00:03:51,000 --> 00:03:54,640
Speaker 4: rocky road, you know, between the Disney management team as

70
00:03:54,680 --> 00:03:56,840
Speaker 4: well as Ike pul Mutter. Of course, he was forced out,

71
00:03:57,760 --> 00:04:01,400
Speaker 4: and you know, the way that Eiger and kind of

72
00:04:01,400 --> 00:04:03,720
Speaker 4: the Disney team have fun at is this has been

73
00:04:03,800 --> 00:04:08,160
Speaker 4: kind of this vendetta against Disney by Eike Pelmas. I

74
00:04:08,160 --> 00:04:09,480
Speaker 4: think there's definitely a ring.

75
00:04:09,360 --> 00:04:10,040
Speaker 5: Of truth to that.

76
00:04:11,360 --> 00:04:14,000
Speaker 2: No matter how we got here, the company has been

77
00:04:14,040 --> 00:04:17,560
Speaker 2: benefiting from some of what was suggested by Tryan, and

78
00:04:18,120 --> 00:04:20,719
Speaker 2: you know, we've seen the stock price advance. You mentioned

79
00:04:20,720 --> 00:04:23,400
Speaker 2: that I'm not sure about the succession planning that's still

80
00:04:23,720 --> 00:04:26,520
Speaker 2: out there, and at least just with the streaming strategy

81
00:04:26,600 --> 00:04:29,279
Speaker 2: is something that we probably should discuss. How might the

82
00:04:29,400 --> 00:04:33,239
Speaker 2: streaming strategy change from here and how might it improve?

83
00:04:34,720 --> 00:04:38,440
Speaker 4: Yes, I don't necessarily think that Tryan or pelse offered

84
00:04:38,480 --> 00:04:42,039
Speaker 4: any constructive advice when it came to any strategic visions

85
00:04:42,040 --> 00:04:44,960
Speaker 4: around Disney. Yes, they're absolutely right that the succession plan

86
00:04:45,000 --> 00:04:48,520
Speaker 4: has been botched and botched multiple times, and that is

87
00:04:48,560 --> 00:04:50,760
Speaker 4: something that I think, you know, they're obviously going to

88
00:04:50,839 --> 00:04:52,880
Speaker 4: try and fix and do a good job. They have

89
00:04:52,920 --> 00:04:55,840
Speaker 4: a whole committee just looking into succession right now. James

90
00:04:55,880 --> 00:04:58,480
Speaker 4: Gorman from Morgan Stanley is kind of leading those efforts.

91
00:04:59,240 --> 00:05:02,800
Speaker 4: So I think they definitely do their best there from

92
00:05:02,839 --> 00:05:06,080
Speaker 4: a same perspective. You know, profitability, of course, is the

93
00:05:06,120 --> 00:05:10,080
Speaker 4: big metric. Now it's no longer subscribers. They have multiple levers.

94
00:05:10,120 --> 00:05:13,520
Speaker 4: I think in place to drive streaming profits, they're going

95
00:05:13,560 --> 00:05:16,560
Speaker 4: to increase prices. They're going to make sure that they

96
00:05:16,600 --> 00:05:19,240
Speaker 4: have the best content. They're not going to spend money

97
00:05:19,279 --> 00:05:21,479
Speaker 4: like how they were spending. You know, everybody was spending

98
00:05:21,480 --> 00:05:25,960
Speaker 4: money like drunken sailors. Everybody's now rationalizing output. They're rationalizing costs,

99
00:05:26,200 --> 00:05:28,480
Speaker 4: and they're having many other different initiatives. You know, they

100
00:05:28,480 --> 00:05:31,839
Speaker 4: have a new ad tier, they're integrating Hulu and Disney

101
00:05:31,839 --> 00:05:33,640
Speaker 4: Plus and that's going to save them a whole bunch

102
00:05:33,640 --> 00:05:36,080
Speaker 4: of costs. And then remember they are going to crack

103
00:05:36,160 --> 00:05:39,440
Speaker 4: down on passwords sharing Alla Netflix. So all of this

104
00:05:39,720 --> 00:05:41,800
Speaker 4: is going to you know, add to that bottom.

105
00:05:41,440 --> 00:05:43,640
Speaker 1: Line gata in a moment. I want to get your

106
00:05:43,680 --> 00:05:47,719
Speaker 1: take on this Paramount Global deal with Sherry Redstone and

107
00:05:47,760 --> 00:05:50,640
Speaker 1: sky Dance. We can talk about that in a moment. Obviously,

108
00:05:50,680 --> 00:05:54,039
Speaker 1: Paramount is a company with legacy assets like CBS and

109
00:05:54,160 --> 00:05:57,560
Speaker 1: MTV and to get back to Disney, Disney is still

110
00:05:57,600 --> 00:06:00,080
Speaker 1: holding on to ABC. Do you have a sense of

111
00:06:00,120 --> 00:06:01,920
Speaker 1: what Disney is going to do with the network?

112
00:06:03,120 --> 00:06:05,159
Speaker 4: I think Disney, you know, so there's been a lot

113
00:06:05,160 --> 00:06:07,920
Speaker 4: of on again off against speculation about what they want

114
00:06:07,960 --> 00:06:09,279
Speaker 4: to do with their TV networks.

115
00:06:09,320 --> 00:06:09,520
Speaker 6: You know.

116
00:06:09,720 --> 00:06:13,120
Speaker 4: The Eiger famously last year said that, you know, everything

117
00:06:13,160 --> 00:06:15,040
Speaker 4: is on the table. You know, maybe we don't really

118
00:06:15,080 --> 00:06:16,720
Speaker 4: want to hold on to our TV ass and then

119
00:06:16,760 --> 00:06:18,760
Speaker 4: he kind of walked it back and I think he

120
00:06:18,839 --> 00:06:21,240
Speaker 4: realized that, you know, yes, the TV ascids are in

121
00:06:21,279 --> 00:06:23,800
Speaker 4: secular decline, but at the same token. I mean, they

122
00:06:23,800 --> 00:06:25,880
Speaker 4: do bring in a fair amount of cash and they

123
00:06:25,880 --> 00:06:28,240
Speaker 4: all respond and you know they're going to be instrumental

124
00:06:28,279 --> 00:06:31,440
Speaker 4: for him kind of crafting a digital strategy as well,

125
00:06:31,480 --> 00:06:34,480
Speaker 4: which is exactly what he's doing with ESPN. Remember, he's

126
00:06:34,520 --> 00:06:36,920
Speaker 4: again putting a lot of the linear TV networks into

127
00:06:36,920 --> 00:06:40,720
Speaker 4: this new sports app that they're creating, and ABC is

128
00:06:40,720 --> 00:06:42,920
Speaker 4: going to be part of that as well, comes out

129
00:06:42,920 --> 00:06:46,840
Speaker 4: a little bit later this year along with Warner Brothers, Discovery,

130
00:06:46,839 --> 00:06:49,719
Speaker 4: and Foxy. So they have that in the works. You know,

131
00:06:49,720 --> 00:06:52,560
Speaker 4: they have the new ESPN digital strategy in the works.

132
00:06:52,800 --> 00:06:55,920
Speaker 4: So I think they're really kind of trying to orchestrate

133
00:06:56,000 --> 00:06:59,560
Speaker 4: this transition from linear to digital in as painless and

134
00:06:59,560 --> 00:07:01,000
Speaker 4: as smooth way as possible.

135
00:07:02,240 --> 00:07:05,000
Speaker 2: And just that one other area that we had raised

136
00:07:05,040 --> 00:07:08,200
Speaker 2: a few moments ago, succession. What's the latest there.

137
00:07:09,360 --> 00:07:11,800
Speaker 4: So they do have their four internal candidates who are

138
00:07:11,800 --> 00:07:15,400
Speaker 4: all seen as possible successors. Again, remember each of these candidates,

139
00:07:15,400 --> 00:07:18,320
Speaker 4: whether you know it's from Parks or from the film division,

140
00:07:18,440 --> 00:07:21,120
Speaker 4: or the TV division or even ESPN, they all have

141
00:07:21,200 --> 00:07:25,000
Speaker 4: specialized expertise. The problem for you know, the Disney succession

142
00:07:25,120 --> 00:07:27,000
Speaker 4: plan is that you need somebody who has not just

143
00:07:27,040 --> 00:07:30,840
Speaker 4: specialized expertise, but also broad expertise. And that's really going

144
00:07:30,920 --> 00:07:32,880
Speaker 4: to be the challenge here. So I think they're going

145
00:07:32,960 --> 00:07:36,160
Speaker 4: to have to have multiple successors kind of groom them

146
00:07:36,160 --> 00:07:39,680
Speaker 4: and see who really kind of is up for the challenge.

147
00:07:39,800 --> 00:07:41,920
Speaker 1: So let's get to Paramount Global, because we had some

148
00:07:42,000 --> 00:07:45,720
Speaker 1: breaking news later in New York today Sherry Redstone apparently

149
00:07:46,040 --> 00:07:49,080
Speaker 1: with a tentative deal to sell her stake in Paramount Global.

150
00:07:49,760 --> 00:07:53,560
Speaker 1: She is the controlling interest in National Amusements. In National

151
00:07:53,640 --> 00:07:56,960
Speaker 1: has about seventy seven percent of voting shares for Paramount.

152
00:07:57,360 --> 00:08:00,680
Speaker 1: Skydance Media looks to be the buyer take on this.

153
00:08:02,000 --> 00:08:04,800
Speaker 4: I mean again, this has been going on now for

154
00:08:04,840 --> 00:08:08,680
Speaker 4: almost four or five months. Uh so they've been engaged

155
00:08:08,760 --> 00:08:11,920
Speaker 4: in some kind of discussions with really all different types

156
00:08:11,960 --> 00:08:13,920
Speaker 4: of buyers. Of course, sky Dance has been the one

157
00:08:14,000 --> 00:08:17,400
Speaker 4: that's been there from the very beginning. Remember Skydance Media

158
00:08:17,720 --> 00:08:21,080
Speaker 4: is this film studio that is controlled by David Ellison,

159
00:08:21,120 --> 00:08:25,160
Speaker 4: who is the son of Larry Ellison, and sky Dancer

160
00:08:25,200 --> 00:08:28,600
Speaker 4: has had a lot of you know, collaboration with par

161
00:08:28,640 --> 00:08:31,040
Speaker 4: around in the past. They almost have this ten year relationship.

162
00:08:31,560 --> 00:08:35,120
Speaker 4: They worked on movies together like you know, top Gun Maverick.

163
00:08:36,280 --> 00:08:38,240
Speaker 4: So so there has been you know, a lot of

164
00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:41,800
Speaker 4: exchange from on both sides, and so they feel like,

165
00:08:41,840 --> 00:08:43,199
Speaker 4: you know, it would be it would be kind of

166
00:08:43,240 --> 00:08:45,760
Speaker 4: the perfect fit. And I think in many ways Sharry

167
00:08:45,800 --> 00:08:48,480
Speaker 4: Redstone wants to deal with sky Dance because again this is,

168
00:08:49,040 --> 00:08:51,120
Speaker 4: you know, a known devil better than an unknown angel

169
00:08:51,200 --> 00:08:51,640
Speaker 4: kind of thing.

170
00:08:53,120 --> 00:08:56,920
Speaker 2: So does this does this sort of signal uh, the

171
00:08:57,000 --> 00:08:59,000
Speaker 2: exit of Sherry Redstone.

172
00:08:59,200 --> 00:09:03,720
Speaker 4: Ultimately, it's still going to be very, very complex and

173
00:09:03,840 --> 00:09:06,720
Speaker 4: very messy. She does have, as you pointed out, a

174
00:09:06,840 --> 00:09:10,720
Speaker 4: close to eighty percent voting interest, about a ten percent

175
00:09:10,840 --> 00:09:15,760
Speaker 4: economic interest. We're not yet clear exactly what Skydance has

176
00:09:15,840 --> 00:09:21,160
Speaker 4: offered her for both her economic stake as well as

177
00:09:21,200 --> 00:09:24,440
Speaker 4: her controlling voting stake in the company. So all of

178
00:09:24,480 --> 00:09:26,760
Speaker 4: that has to be worked out. And then at the

179
00:09:26,840 --> 00:09:30,120
Speaker 4: end of all of this, the ultimate goal is that

180
00:09:30,200 --> 00:09:34,000
Speaker 4: sky Dance has not just to control National Amusements, but

181
00:09:34,040 --> 00:09:36,840
Speaker 4: then has to somehow get complete control of paramounts. It's

182
00:09:36,880 --> 00:09:39,800
Speaker 4: kind of this very very messy, complex two step process.

183
00:09:39,920 --> 00:09:43,120
Speaker 2: Gita, thanks so much for joining us as Bloomberg Intelligence

184
00:09:43,240 --> 00:09:44,800
Speaker 2: is Gita, Rang and hast.

185
00:09:51,440 --> 00:09:53,400
Speaker 1: Let's take a closer look at what's going on in

186
00:09:53,440 --> 00:09:56,320
Speaker 1: markets at the moment with our own Mark Cranfield is

187
00:09:56,320 --> 00:09:59,600
Speaker 1: Bloomberg's m Live strategist. He joins us from our studios

188
00:09:59,600 --> 00:10:02,440
Speaker 1: and singer hard to believe. At the end of last year,

189
00:10:02,480 --> 00:10:04,880
Speaker 1: the market was looking at one hundred and fifty basis

190
00:10:04,880 --> 00:10:08,360
Speaker 1: points in cuts from the Fed in calendar twenty four.

191
00:10:08,559 --> 00:10:11,280
Speaker 1: I mean that was super aggressive, well beyond double in

192
00:10:11,360 --> 00:10:14,079
Speaker 1: fact what the Fed was predicting. And here we are

193
00:10:14,160 --> 00:10:17,280
Speaker 1: now wondering whether we're going to get one rate cut.

194
00:10:17,720 --> 00:10:19,000
Speaker 1: What the heck is going on here?

195
00:10:19,040 --> 00:10:23,320
Speaker 7: Mark, Well, what you can really see here is a

196
00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:28,520
Speaker 7: disconnect between Jerme Power and the rest of the Federal

197
00:10:28,559 --> 00:10:34,560
Speaker 7: Reserve to some extent. So back in late November early December,

198
00:10:34,640 --> 00:10:41,080
Speaker 7: Drone Power appeared to be really optimistic that the FED

199
00:10:41,200 --> 00:10:43,040
Speaker 7: was on the path, that the inflation was going to

200
00:10:43,080 --> 00:10:45,560
Speaker 7: hear his targets, everything was going to go right, and

201
00:10:45,600 --> 00:10:49,280
Speaker 7: there'll be early rate cuts. And then the data came

202
00:10:49,320 --> 00:10:53,040
Speaker 7: in and set everybody back. And you've heard a whole

203
00:10:53,120 --> 00:10:57,520
Speaker 7: variety of Federal Reserve speakers who pushed back against the

204
00:10:57,559 --> 00:11:01,120
Speaker 7: idea that not only three intra rate cuts is too many,

205
00:11:01,160 --> 00:11:03,840
Speaker 7: but maybe we only need one this year, As you

206
00:11:03,840 --> 00:11:06,640
Speaker 7: were saying, mister Bostic is the clear front runner in

207
00:11:06,679 --> 00:11:07,880
Speaker 7: the In the one case.

208
00:11:08,840 --> 00:11:10,880
Speaker 2: I don't really worry too much about this kind of

209
00:11:10,920 --> 00:11:15,560
Speaker 2: stuff because to me, the economy is leading. Really the FED,

210
00:11:15,679 --> 00:11:20,520
Speaker 2: you know, it was talking about possibly doing more rate cuts,

211
00:11:20,520 --> 00:11:24,240
Speaker 2: but it's stipulated three in the coming year. And no

212
00:11:24,280 --> 00:11:27,520
Speaker 2: matter what they're saying, they're they're they're saying that they

213
00:11:27,559 --> 00:11:31,120
Speaker 2: will follow the economy. They will be waiting on the data.

214
00:11:31,640 --> 00:11:34,520
Speaker 2: And if you think about it, normally we think of

215
00:11:34,559 --> 00:11:37,679
Speaker 2: the FED leading, but the Fed is really following, and

216
00:11:37,720 --> 00:11:40,559
Speaker 2: the market's not really leading either. The market is also

217
00:11:40,640 --> 00:11:43,679
Speaker 2: following the economy. The economy is surprising all of us.

218
00:11:44,280 --> 00:11:49,200
Speaker 7: Well, they've said before that their data dependent finally looks

219
00:11:49,200 --> 00:11:52,800
Speaker 7: as though investors are believing it, having having lost money

220
00:11:52,840 --> 00:11:55,600
Speaker 7: by being too aggressive on the rate cuts in the

221
00:11:55,600 --> 00:11:58,440
Speaker 7: first place, that they finally can conclude you that, okay,

222
00:11:58,679 --> 00:12:02,160
Speaker 7: maybe we really should watch the data and react accordingly

223
00:12:03,240 --> 00:12:06,959
Speaker 7: to that. But obviously different asset classes are viewing this

224
00:12:07,480 --> 00:12:10,679
Speaker 7: in different ways. So the bond market is getting used

225
00:12:10,720 --> 00:12:12,120
Speaker 7: to the idea that it's in a bit of a

226
00:12:12,160 --> 00:12:15,880
Speaker 7: trading range, not really going anywhere for the time being.

227
00:12:16,240 --> 00:12:18,319
Speaker 7: And yet the equity market is in a much stronger

228
00:12:18,360 --> 00:12:22,959
Speaker 7: position where it knows that interest rate cuts are coming eventually,

229
00:12:23,520 --> 00:12:26,160
Speaker 7: it's very confident that interest rates won't go up again,

230
00:12:26,559 --> 00:12:29,600
Speaker 7: so that's much more important. And earnings are in a

231
00:12:29,600 --> 00:12:33,520
Speaker 7: good situation. The underlying economy is doing very well, so

232
00:12:33,679 --> 00:12:37,000
Speaker 7: all of that is favorable for the US cor and

233
00:12:37,080 --> 00:12:40,600
Speaker 7: the US dollars fairly firm as well, which again helps

234
00:12:40,600 --> 00:12:44,800
Speaker 7: as well. So different asset classes will respond in different ways,

235
00:12:44,840 --> 00:12:48,040
Speaker 7: But the bond market for now is going to have

236
00:12:48,080 --> 00:12:51,080
Speaker 7: to get used to probably sideways trading for quite a while.

237
00:12:51,160 --> 00:12:53,480
Speaker 1: Yet you were talking about the dollar there. Year we

238
00:12:53,520 --> 00:12:55,320
Speaker 1: pulled back a little bit in New York trading, we

239
00:12:55,320 --> 00:12:58,280
Speaker 1: weakened against the majors. But I think that to the

240
00:12:58,360 --> 00:13:00,640
Speaker 1: tune that we were singing at the end of last

241
00:13:00,720 --> 00:13:04,319
Speaker 1: year with much lower interest rates, I think guys in

242
00:13:04,360 --> 00:13:07,040
Speaker 1: the foreign exchange really had to reverse their bets that

243
00:13:07,080 --> 00:13:09,240
Speaker 1: we're going to see a great deal of dollar weakness.

244
00:13:09,679 --> 00:13:12,040
Speaker 1: That hasn't happened so far this year. But when you

245
00:13:12,040 --> 00:13:14,320
Speaker 1: look at some of the important crosses, and I'm thinking

246
00:13:14,360 --> 00:13:18,600
Speaker 1: particularly dollar yen. Brian was referencing a commentary from a

247
00:13:18,600 --> 00:13:21,800
Speaker 1: former member of the boj board talking about the fact

248
00:13:21,800 --> 00:13:23,840
Speaker 1: that now the heavy lifting has been done at the

249
00:13:23,840 --> 00:13:27,559
Speaker 1: March meeting, where we've moved away from the massive stimulus

250
00:13:27,679 --> 00:13:30,000
Speaker 1: program on the part of what the Bank of Japan

251
00:13:30,040 --> 00:13:33,240
Speaker 1: had been doing, maybe there's no longer an urgent need

252
00:13:33,640 --> 00:13:36,360
Speaker 1: to adjust further. Would you say that's a fair statement,

253
00:13:36,400 --> 00:13:38,880
Speaker 1: and you know we're going to see maybe stasis from

254
00:13:38,920 --> 00:13:39,680
Speaker 1: the Bank of Japan.

255
00:13:40,920 --> 00:13:44,120
Speaker 7: I suspect they have more interest rate hikes to come

256
00:13:44,160 --> 00:13:46,120
Speaker 7: this year from the Bank of Japan. But in terms

257
00:13:46,160 --> 00:13:49,200
Speaker 7: of the US dollar, next week is probably going to

258
00:13:49,240 --> 00:13:53,160
Speaker 7: be a pretty big moment for the dollar. If we

259
00:13:53,200 --> 00:13:55,880
Speaker 7: get past non farm payrolls at the end of this

260
00:13:55,960 --> 00:13:59,600
Speaker 7: week and DOLLI yen still hasn't risen above one hundred

261
00:13:59,600 --> 00:14:02,400
Speaker 7: and fifty two, it may well be that they will

262
00:14:02,520 --> 00:14:04,640
Speaker 7: just start the beginning of a down trend for the

263
00:14:04,679 --> 00:14:08,120
Speaker 7: dollar because people will lose patients. There are very very

264
00:14:08,120 --> 00:14:12,319
Speaker 7: big short positions against the yen, which have also prompted

265
00:14:12,559 --> 00:14:18,160
Speaker 7: strong dollar positions elsewhere. If people don't see satisfaction quickly

266
00:14:18,760 --> 00:14:21,760
Speaker 7: in achieving what they want in a strong dollar, will

267
00:14:21,880 --> 00:14:23,640
Speaker 7: they will go the other way. They will start cutting

268
00:14:23,680 --> 00:14:27,760
Speaker 7: those positions and they'll look for the next trend. It's

269
00:14:27,760 --> 00:14:29,560
Speaker 7: a very big time coming up for the dollar.

270
00:14:30,000 --> 00:14:32,120
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think a lot of investors would look forward

271
00:14:32,160 --> 00:14:35,600
Speaker 2: to that dollar weekening a little. Another currency besides the

272
00:14:35,760 --> 00:14:38,000
Speaker 2: en that's been weak against the greenback is the Chinese

273
00:14:38,040 --> 00:14:42,160
Speaker 2: you want, So let's switch the discussion to China briefly.

274
00:14:42,280 --> 00:14:44,240
Speaker 2: Doug sent me a story which is quite interesting. Ray

275
00:14:44,320 --> 00:14:48,320
Speaker 2: Dalio says he's sticking with China. What do you think, Mark,

276
00:14:48,760 --> 00:14:51,640
Speaker 2: Is that a political call or is that a smart

277
00:14:51,880 --> 00:14:53,480
Speaker 2: business and finance call.

278
00:14:54,120 --> 00:14:56,600
Speaker 7: I think if you're a good equity picker and you're

279
00:14:56,640 --> 00:14:59,840
Speaker 7: looking at China, I'm sure your bounds will be able

280
00:14:59,880 --> 00:15:03,080
Speaker 7: to find ways to invest and to make decent returns

281
00:15:03,440 --> 00:15:06,640
Speaker 7: because the Chinese government is all the measures it's doing

282
00:15:06,800 --> 00:15:11,440
Speaker 7: art to support Chinese based companies to improve the Chinese economy.

283
00:15:11,520 --> 00:15:15,120
Speaker 7: So most likely there will be decent returns to be

284
00:15:15,200 --> 00:15:19,160
Speaker 7: found among good companies in China itself. The tricky part

285
00:15:19,400 --> 00:15:21,920
Speaker 7: for a lot of investors is the Hong Kong side

286
00:15:21,920 --> 00:15:23,640
Speaker 7: of it, because a lot of people like to use

287
00:15:23,680 --> 00:15:26,400
Speaker 7: Hong Kong as a way to play China. That might

288
00:15:26,440 --> 00:15:29,840
Speaker 7: be much more complicated because of the way in which

289
00:15:30,280 --> 00:15:34,360
Speaker 7: the hate shares are very cheap compared to the on

290
00:15:34,440 --> 00:15:36,640
Speaker 7: shore and they may stay that way for a long time.

291
00:15:37,080 --> 00:15:40,200
Speaker 1: Yeah, the big numbers in the week ahead for China

292
00:15:40,240 --> 00:15:42,440
Speaker 1: will be the inflation numbers. And one of the things

293
00:15:42,480 --> 00:15:44,480
Speaker 1: I think for the market right now is whether or

294
00:15:44,480 --> 00:15:47,320
Speaker 1: not we're going to see a prolonged period of deflation

295
00:15:47,640 --> 00:15:51,000
Speaker 1: in the mainland economy. Market. It's always a pleasure. Thanks

296
00:15:51,000 --> 00:15:53,360
Speaker 1: for making time to chat with us from the Lion City.

297
00:15:53,360 --> 00:15:56,160
Speaker 1: It's Mark Cranfield, Bloomberg m Live Strategistic.

298
00:16:03,640 --> 00:16:06,040
Speaker 2: Well, let's take a look at markets now with Belita own,

299
00:16:06,200 --> 00:16:09,840
Speaker 2: chairman at Dalton Investments. Blita, thanks very much for joining you.

300
00:16:09,880 --> 00:16:11,880
Speaker 2: I want to start with Jay Powell and I want

301
00:16:11,920 --> 00:16:14,680
Speaker 2: to play a clip from his speech a little bit

302
00:16:14,680 --> 00:16:18,040
Speaker 2: earlier and then get your response to it. Powell did

303
00:16:18,160 --> 00:16:22,440
Speaker 2: note the pickup in jobs and inflation, but he reaffirmed

304
00:16:22,440 --> 00:16:25,880
Speaker 2: that the Fed wants to stay patient and watch the data, and,

305
00:16:25,920 --> 00:16:29,760
Speaker 2: while perhaps not intending to pal laid out the bulls

306
00:16:29,800 --> 00:16:30,440
Speaker 2: base case.

307
00:16:31,120 --> 00:16:34,400
Speaker 8: But these recent data do not, however, materially change the

308
00:16:34,480 --> 00:16:37,920
Speaker 8: overall picture, which continues to be one of solid growth,

309
00:16:38,120 --> 00:16:41,480
Speaker 8: a strong but rebalancing labor market, and inflation moving down

310
00:16:41,520 --> 00:16:44,880
Speaker 8: toward two percent on a sometimes bumpy path.

311
00:16:45,720 --> 00:16:48,200
Speaker 2: So the point is that he makes the point sort

312
00:16:48,240 --> 00:16:51,440
Speaker 2: of the bulls point, which is, look, don't overthink this.

313
00:16:51,600 --> 00:16:55,080
Speaker 2: Things are pretty good. The economy is doing well, profits

314
00:16:55,240 --> 00:17:00,360
Speaker 2: have been increasing, and inflation is coming down, while agnolaging

315
00:17:00,440 --> 00:17:02,440
Speaker 2: that it did pop up a little bit in January

316
00:17:02,480 --> 00:17:04,840
Speaker 2: and Febry. Do you support that view or do you

317
00:17:04,840 --> 00:17:05,800
Speaker 2: think he's all wet?

318
00:17:07,560 --> 00:17:08,960
Speaker 9: I think pal is right on track.

319
00:17:09,160 --> 00:17:12,800
Speaker 5: It's very much the case that the US economy is

320
00:17:12,800 --> 00:17:17,840
Speaker 5: strong and that we have seen substantial improvement in the

321
00:17:17,880 --> 00:17:22,120
Speaker 5: inflation numbers. My only caution is that I believe it's

322
00:17:22,200 --> 00:17:25,200
Speaker 5: much harder to get it much further down than where

323
00:17:25,200 --> 00:17:28,200
Speaker 5: it is currently, because we live in a world where

324
00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:33,240
Speaker 5: there are hot wars going on and unforeseen events of

325
00:17:33,320 --> 00:17:36,280
Speaker 5: the unforeseen events that could disrupt supply chains.

326
00:17:36,520 --> 00:17:38,440
Speaker 9: So you've got that to worry.

327
00:17:38,160 --> 00:17:40,400
Speaker 6: About, and that's you know, in recent memory, and even

328
00:17:40,440 --> 00:17:42,440
Speaker 6: further back from that, in recent memory, we've already seen

329
00:17:42,480 --> 00:17:45,320
Speaker 6: the disruption of the Red Sea, and then we've also seen,

330
00:17:46,800 --> 00:17:49,080
Speaker 6: you know, the impact going further back two years or

331
00:17:49,119 --> 00:17:53,480
Speaker 6: so of Russia's invasion on the grain market. So with

332
00:17:53,720 --> 00:17:57,639
Speaker 6: these tensions running so high, it's difficult to be truly

333
00:17:57,680 --> 00:18:01,600
Speaker 6: confident that the US and the numbers are insulated from

334
00:18:02,000 --> 00:18:05,560
Speaker 6: you know, adverse surprises. But the points that he makes,

335
00:18:05,560 --> 00:18:07,840
Speaker 6: I think is that the economy is strong, and so

336
00:18:08,000 --> 00:18:10,840
Speaker 6: there seems to be, know, Harry, whatsoever to ease at

337
00:18:10,840 --> 00:18:14,280
Speaker 6: this point. Why stoke an economy that's already strong and

338
00:18:15,119 --> 00:18:17,200
Speaker 6: increase the odds that inflation will research?

339
00:18:17,760 --> 00:18:19,560
Speaker 1: You know, I'm listening to you, and I'm wondering whether

340
00:18:19,680 --> 00:18:21,480
Speaker 1: or not there are people around the globe that feel

341
00:18:21,520 --> 00:18:24,200
Speaker 1: the same way. And that's one reason to favor the US.

342
00:18:24,800 --> 00:18:26,800
Speaker 1: Brian has been talking a lot about how well the

343
00:18:26,800 --> 00:18:29,760
Speaker 1: market's been holding up as being kind of a response

344
00:18:29,920 --> 00:18:33,159
Speaker 1: to the performance of the overall American economy. I get that.

345
00:18:33,200 --> 00:18:36,480
Speaker 1: I don't disagree, but I'm wondering, given everything that you

346
00:18:36,600 --> 00:18:41,240
Speaker 1: just laid out in terms of uncertainty and risk, whether

347
00:18:41,280 --> 00:18:44,879
Speaker 1: you want to kind of be defensive and put you know,

348
00:18:45,320 --> 00:18:48,080
Speaker 1: risk assets to work only in the United States. Maybe

349
00:18:48,200 --> 00:18:51,240
Speaker 1: the expense of other markets. Is that a fair statement?

350
00:18:51,680 --> 00:18:53,919
Speaker 1: Maybe Japan? You would include Japan in that.

351
00:18:55,240 --> 00:18:56,440
Speaker 9: I would definitely include Japan.

352
00:18:56,480 --> 00:19:00,199
Speaker 6: Japan is cheap, and Japan is at a point in

353
00:19:00,240 --> 00:19:02,520
Speaker 6: time where many things are going right and it looks

354
00:19:02,520 --> 00:19:04,800
Speaker 6: like it's about to take off. So Japan spent the

355
00:19:04,880 --> 00:19:08,480
Speaker 6: last nine years working on corporate governance reform. We're finally

356
00:19:08,520 --> 00:19:14,120
Speaker 6: seeing the results of that through companies giving back returns

357
00:19:14,160 --> 00:19:18,800
Speaker 6: to shareholders, either through dividends or share buybacks. Also, we're

358
00:19:18,840 --> 00:19:23,199
Speaker 6: seeing an increase in unsolicited bids for companies, which is

359
00:19:23,400 --> 00:19:25,639
Speaker 6: very unusual in Japan, and I can't remember when the

360
00:19:25,640 --> 00:19:27,119
Speaker 6: first one was, but it was just no more than

361
00:19:27,160 --> 00:19:30,320
Speaker 6: to say, two three years ago. And the pressure from

362
00:19:30,320 --> 00:19:34,880
Speaker 6: the TSE is quite heavy on managements to respond response

363
00:19:35,040 --> 00:19:38,040
Speaker 6: responsibly to these take up of bids. In the past,

364
00:19:38,040 --> 00:19:42,080
Speaker 6: it wasn't uncommon to just simply ignore them. But now

365
00:19:42,320 --> 00:19:45,520
Speaker 6: there is a list, if you like, of companies that

366
00:19:45,560 --> 00:19:49,040
Speaker 6: are doing the right thing according to TSSE reforms, and

367
00:19:49,280 --> 00:19:54,240
Speaker 6: that includes being responsible in terms of taking seriously bids

368
00:19:54,280 --> 00:19:58,040
Speaker 6: from you know, investors or other companies to buy a

369
00:19:58,080 --> 00:20:02,440
Speaker 6: company at a much higher price. These events and the

370
00:20:02,520 --> 00:20:07,399
Speaker 6: encouragement of the TSE is really propelling valuations upwards. So

371
00:20:07,480 --> 00:20:10,720
Speaker 6: even though we've just seen finally a new high in

372
00:20:10,800 --> 00:20:13,520
Speaker 6: Japan after the nineteen eighty nine you know peak and

373
00:20:13,560 --> 00:20:17,600
Speaker 6: then collapse TACON thirty what is it, thirty four years?

374
00:20:17,680 --> 00:20:20,480
Speaker 6: Is it to get back there, and we've just passed

375
00:20:20,520 --> 00:20:23,800
Speaker 6: forty thousand on the nick A, and I think even

376
00:20:23,800 --> 00:20:24,880
Speaker 6: betadtes are ahead.

377
00:20:26,359 --> 00:20:30,520
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's great to be diversified, and Japan's offering US investors,

378
00:20:30,520 --> 00:20:33,960
Speaker 2: for instance, great opportunities. Europe has done pretty well too.

379
00:20:34,320 --> 00:20:38,320
Speaker 2: The AI companies involved in that have rallied a lot,

380
00:20:38,400 --> 00:20:40,880
Speaker 2: and just here in the last say three or four months,

381
00:20:40,920 --> 00:20:44,600
Speaker 2: we've seen a lot of ketchup being done by cyclical

382
00:20:44,760 --> 00:20:49,280
Speaker 2: oriented companies, and so industrials and materials and financials have

383
00:20:49,440 --> 00:20:51,879
Speaker 2: rallied pretty well. And the other thing that's kind of

384
00:20:51,880 --> 00:20:54,919
Speaker 2: great about the environment is that you can make some

385
00:20:55,040 --> 00:20:59,080
Speaker 2: bets on equities, which are obviously more risky assets, all

386
00:20:59,119 --> 00:21:01,600
Speaker 2: the while collecting five percent coupon and the bonds that

387
00:21:01,680 --> 00:21:04,200
Speaker 2: you hold. No, that wasn't always the case. You were

388
00:21:04,200 --> 00:21:06,879
Speaker 2: forced into the equity market because you're getting nothing on

389
00:21:06,920 --> 00:21:09,560
Speaker 2: bond deals one percent or so. And that remains the

390
00:21:09,600 --> 00:21:12,919
Speaker 2: case in Japan. So you know, yeah, I'm curious how

391
00:21:13,000 --> 00:21:19,480
Speaker 2: you are sort of diversified big picture, So we are, frankly.

392
00:21:19,200 --> 00:21:22,200
Speaker 6: We're not particularly bullish about the US simply because the

393
00:21:22,280 --> 00:21:25,479
Speaker 6: valuations are so high. Being value investors, we invest one

394
00:21:25,560 --> 00:21:29,040
Speaker 6: company at a time and you know, for US, it's

395
00:21:29,119 --> 00:21:31,720
Speaker 6: easier to focus on companies in Asia because they are

396
00:21:31,760 --> 00:21:34,080
Speaker 6: a lot cheaper, so they provide you a margin of safety.

397
00:21:34,320 --> 00:21:36,159
Speaker 6: So in addition to Japan, there are other parts of

398
00:21:36,200 --> 00:21:37,840
Speaker 6: Asia that we think are quite attractive.

399
00:21:37,920 --> 00:21:39,720
Speaker 9: One of them, you know, clearly.

400
00:21:39,400 --> 00:21:43,199
Speaker 6: Being India, and Indian valuations are not cheap even by

401
00:21:43,359 --> 00:21:47,800
Speaker 6: US standards, but the growth of earnings among Indian companies

402
00:21:47,920 --> 00:21:50,200
Speaker 6: is extremely high. I was looking at a recent table

403
00:21:50,240 --> 00:21:53,080
Speaker 6: that showed that the earnings growth is something like two

404
00:21:53,119 --> 00:21:56,080
Speaker 6: and a half times that in the US. So that's

405
00:21:56,080 --> 00:21:59,600
Speaker 6: the case, surely you would want to accord a higher multiple.

406
00:21:59,480 --> 00:22:01,080
Speaker 9: To that growth in earnings.

407
00:22:02,200 --> 00:22:06,040
Speaker 6: And then also if you look at some other countries

408
00:22:06,760 --> 00:22:10,640
Speaker 6: like Korea for instance, where you have fantastic companies, and

409
00:22:11,160 --> 00:22:14,360
Speaker 6: the problem with Korea, what's been called the Korean discount,

410
00:22:14,880 --> 00:22:18,520
Speaker 6: is one of governance. They've been so poor in terms

411
00:22:18,520 --> 00:22:21,400
Speaker 6: of treating minority shareholders.

412
00:22:21,560 --> 00:22:25,040
Speaker 9: You know fairly that we've come to a point where.

413
00:22:24,880 --> 00:22:28,120
Speaker 6: The Korean government sees what's happened in Japan that's successful

414
00:22:28,280 --> 00:22:30,760
Speaker 6: this long period of corporate governance reform, and they want

415
00:22:30,760 --> 00:22:32,239
Speaker 6: to do the same thing in Korea because they have

416
00:22:32,240 --> 00:22:35,199
Speaker 6: the same exact problems which is an Asian population, and

417
00:22:35,240 --> 00:22:38,320
Speaker 6: not enough returns on their stock market. So I think

418
00:22:38,480 --> 00:22:42,440
Speaker 6: there are you know, good opportunities in Korea as well.

419
00:22:42,560 --> 00:22:45,359
Speaker 1: Believed to before we let you go thirty seconds on China,

420
00:22:45,480 --> 00:22:45,960
Speaker 1: yes or no.

421
00:22:48,160 --> 00:22:48,760
Speaker 9: Not for us.

422
00:22:49,720 --> 00:22:52,760
Speaker 6: China's cheap, but it's a difficult place for us because

423
00:22:53,080 --> 00:22:56,080
Speaker 6: we don't see entrepreneurs taking care of minority shareholders.

424
00:22:57,200 --> 00:23:00,159
Speaker 2: All right, Belita, thanks very much for your insights. To

425
00:23:00,200 --> 00:23:02,480
Speaker 2: own chairman of Dalton Investments.

426
00:23:04,880 --> 00:23:07,800
Speaker 1: This has been the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast, bringing you

427
00:23:07,880 --> 00:23:11,000
Speaker 1: the stories making news and moving markets in the Asia Pacific.

428
00:23:11,480 --> 00:23:14,600
Speaker 1: Visit the Bloomberg Podcast channel on YouTube to get more

429
00:23:14,640 --> 00:23:18,240
Speaker 1: episodes of this and other shows from Bloomberg. Subscribe to

430
00:23:18,280 --> 00:23:22,080
Speaker 1: the podcast on Apple, Spotify, or anywhere else you listen

431
00:23:22,160 --> 00:23:25,280
Speaker 1: and always on Bloomberg Radio, the Bloomberg Terminal, and the

432
00:23:25,280 --> 00:23:26,360
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Business App.