WEBVTT - SoftBank Invests in Intel as US Government Eyes 10% Stake

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.520 --> 0:00:17.319
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Carolline Hide in New York

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and Edmavelow in San Francisco.

0:00:22.040 --> 0:00:25.200
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech coming up. Intel gets two billion

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 2>dollars from soft Bank as the US government confirms discussions

0:00:28.200 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>to take a steak in the chip maker. Plus Palo

0:00:30.800 --> 0:00:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Alto Networks gives a strong forecast for the cybersecurity giant

0:00:34.240 --> 0:00:38.520
<v Speaker 2>our conversation with the CEO Nikesha Rura, and Apple expands

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 2>its iPhone production in India as it seeks to lessen

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 2>its reliance on China. But first I shinelight what's happening

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.839
<v Speaker 2>with arm as well, because the news was that SoftBank

0:00:47.920 --> 0:00:50.600
<v Speaker 2>is taking well two billion dollars in inequity state. They're

0:00:50.640 --> 0:00:52.479
<v Speaker 2>going to be selling new shells. Soft Bank is going

0:00:52.520 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 2>to be having them. Remember SoftBank, of course, in many

0:00:55.040 --> 0:00:58.680
<v Speaker 2>ways controls on the chip designer. We're thinking also about

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 2>the US government, which doesn't indeed confirm that they are

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 2>eyeing a stake for the business. We're wondering just how much.

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:06.680
<v Speaker 2>And I'm pretiused to say that we can dive into

0:01:06.720 --> 0:01:09.880
<v Speaker 2>this with Michael Shepherd, of course, Blomberg's executive editor on

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 2>all things to do with technology and Washington, and boy

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:16.000
<v Speaker 2>is Washington playing a bigger and bigger role at the moment.

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>COMMAS Secretary Lutnik saying, yes, we're involved in talks, but

0:01:20.000 --> 0:01:21.360
<v Speaker 2>how much equity MIC.

0:01:22.520 --> 0:01:23.479
<v Speaker 3>Well, it's a great question.

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.680
<v Speaker 4>He stopped short of saying that it would be the

0:01:25.840 --> 0:01:31.280
<v Speaker 4>ten percent stake that our colleagues scooped and reported yesterday,

0:01:31.440 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 4>and it gave a size and scope to what we

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.200
<v Speaker 4>had broken earlier over last week, and that is that

0:01:38.240 --> 0:01:42.399
<v Speaker 4>the government had been weighing this investment in the company.

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:44.760
<v Speaker 4>And the idea is to take some of the Chips

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.680
<v Speaker 4>Act money and those are funds and subsidies CARA that

0:01:47.720 --> 0:01:50.600
<v Speaker 4>we have talked about on these airwaves so much.

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Over the past year and a half.

0:01:52.240 --> 0:01:54.280
<v Speaker 4>But they would take that money and turn it into

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 4>equity handstock over to the government, and that would make

0:01:58.160 --> 0:02:01.280
<v Speaker 4>the federal government the largest holder in Intel, which would

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.920
<v Speaker 4>be an extraordinary step, especially in the tech space, and

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 4>it would also provide something of a lifeline to this

0:02:08.400 --> 0:02:11.560
<v Speaker 4>company as the new CEO, Lip Bhutan, tries to turn

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:15.720
<v Speaker 4>it around after inheriting from Pat Gelsinger's predecessor, a company

0:02:15.760 --> 0:02:18.320
<v Speaker 4>that was really at a crossroads.

0:02:17.800 --> 0:02:21.280
<v Speaker 2>Really at a crossroads. Lip Bhutan now has to almost

0:02:21.320 --> 0:02:24.720
<v Speaker 2>try and weave a narrative that's got pretty confusing for

0:02:24.800 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 2>the government. They care about manufacturing in the United States,

0:02:28.560 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 2>they care about Ohio an awful lot, They care about innovation,

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 2>and that almost felt like something that Boutan was pulling

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.040
<v Speaker 2>away from, and certainly in terms of the latest and

0:02:37.080 --> 0:02:42.079
<v Speaker 2>greatest innovation with fourteen eight processes, but they couldn't find

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:42.720
<v Speaker 2>demand for it.

0:02:44.040 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 4>Well, Caro, you hit the nail on the head right there.

0:02:46.840 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 4>There is such tension between what lip Bhutan was going

0:02:49.680 --> 0:02:52.440
<v Speaker 4>to have to do with the turnaround, with the goals

0:02:52.480 --> 0:02:55.239
<v Speaker 4>of the administration, which, as you said, is to try

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 4>to stoke warm domestic manufacturing, especially in the advanced technology

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.040
<v Speaker 4>space and semiconductor space, and that factory in Ohio we've

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 4>talked so much about has now been pushed back to

0:03:05.639 --> 0:03:08.760
<v Speaker 4>the twenty thirties, and that's not a timeline that the

0:03:08.800 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 4>Trump administration would accept. The rub though, is that Intel

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:15.120
<v Speaker 4>just doesn't yet have the customers to be able to

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:20.560
<v Speaker 4>sustain the factory build out there, which is so costly

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:24.960
<v Speaker 4>and would involve such continued investment by the company. It

0:03:25.040 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 4>needs a guaranteed revenue stream from those buyers of chips.

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:30.480
<v Speaker 3>To be able to make that work.

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 4>Now, one of the questions is would the government try

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:38.280
<v Speaker 4>to cajole some other tech companies into buying chips from

0:03:38.400 --> 0:03:42.000
<v Speaker 4>Intel to help it find that customer base as it

0:03:42.000 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 4>seeks to move forward. We heard from Treasury Secretary Treasury,

0:03:47.960 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 4>the secret Treasury Secretary Scott Vestn't this morning saying that no,

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:53.920
<v Speaker 4>the federal government would not get involved in trying to

0:03:54.000 --> 0:03:55.400
<v Speaker 4>find those customers.

0:03:55.600 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 3>But we'll wait and see.

0:03:57.400 --> 0:04:00.640
<v Speaker 4>The President is very much interested in trying to see

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:01.520
<v Speaker 4>Intel succeed.

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 3>He had a very positive meeting with.

0:04:03.560 --> 0:04:06.920
<v Speaker 4>Bhutan about ten days ago, and this was just days

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.480
<v Speaker 4>after suggesting that the CEO might have to leave over

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 4>his prior ties and engagement with China.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 3>China.

0:04:13.960 --> 0:04:16.279
<v Speaker 4>So we are seeing a bit of a turn of

0:04:16.360 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 4>fortune between not only the company and the government, but

0:04:20.040 --> 0:04:23.600
<v Speaker 4>really the company and CEO with the president himself.

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:27.200
<v Speaker 2>I mean, Link Secretary Strategies might call this monumental the

0:04:27.279 --> 0:04:30.479
<v Speaker 2>last couple of days in their view for Intel. What

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 2>I think is really interesting though, is not aside from

0:04:33.040 --> 0:04:36.440
<v Speaker 2>already the investment, they're managing to push from SoftBank, for example,

0:04:36.720 --> 0:04:41.320
<v Speaker 2>into Intel. But whether other companies that have taken Chipsack

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.640
<v Speaker 2>money might see that turn into an equity investment too.

0:04:44.680 --> 0:04:46.240
<v Speaker 2>That seemed to be what I was reading between the

0:04:46.279 --> 0:04:49.160
<v Speaker 2>lines of our reporting. Well, Micron's taken money, but how

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.680
<v Speaker 2>could that possibly work for TSMC Samsung?

0:04:53.200 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 4>We are seeing in between the lines of those reporting

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.359
<v Speaker 4>a sense among some White House officials that they would

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 4>like to perhaps take it a step further with those

0:05:02.080 --> 0:05:05.360
<v Speaker 4>other companies, perhaps including the ones that you mentioned now,

0:05:05.360 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 4>with a venture like Micron, perhaps because it's US flagged

0:05:10.000 --> 0:05:10.920
<v Speaker 4>and US based.

0:05:11.240 --> 0:05:12.679
<v Speaker 3>Sure, maybe that could work.

0:05:12.880 --> 0:05:18.640
<v Speaker 4>But then Taiwan and TSMC, how does Taiwan semiconductor manufacturing

0:05:18.680 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 4>company and the Taiwanese government leadership accept something like that?

0:05:24.120 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 4>And Samsung and the government in South Korea there lies

0:05:28.360 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 4>some greater sensitivities. Even as those governments have come to

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:36.600
<v Speaker 4>embrace the need to diversify the location of their manufacturing

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:40.400
<v Speaker 4>and to also curry favor with Donald Trump by investing

0:05:40.520 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 4>in the US, there may be a certain line when

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:44.839
<v Speaker 4>it comes to the equity stakes, Carol, So we'll have

0:05:44.839 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 4>to see how that plays out.

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.360
<v Speaker 2>A Max Michael Shepherd and the Inside Track of what's

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:51.559
<v Speaker 2>happening in Washington. We thank you. Let's turn to well

0:05:51.720 --> 0:05:54.440
<v Speaker 2>they analysis on the street now for Intel and the

0:05:54.480 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 2>read across to the sector. Gailuria's with US head of

0:05:56.800 --> 0:05:59.159
<v Speaker 2>Tech research at DA Davison. Is this a good thing

0:05:59.360 --> 0:05:59.839
<v Speaker 2>for Intel?

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:05.599
<v Speaker 5>It's a lightsaver. They were on an unclear path before

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 5>the government decided to renegotiate its deal. Let's not forget

0:06:09.680 --> 0:06:12.680
<v Speaker 5>the US government already had a deal with Intel. It's

0:06:13.000 --> 0:06:15.680
<v Speaker 5>we're going to give you six billion dollars and we're

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:18.880
<v Speaker 5>going to get a colored profit shared down the line.

0:06:20.000 --> 0:06:22.800
<v Speaker 5>What this administration is doing is just renegotiating the deal.

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 5>It's saying that's not good enough. We want to take

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 5>an equity state. And by the way, Intel is different

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.760
<v Speaker 5>because part of this deal is a big Department of

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 5>Defense component. Let's not forget. We're going to want Intel

0:06:36.080 --> 0:06:39.080
<v Speaker 5>to manufacture chips for our F thirty fives and other

0:06:39.120 --> 0:06:42.800
<v Speaker 5>important weapons systems. So the government has a different type

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 5>of relationship, for instance, than it does with TMSMC, where

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:50.560
<v Speaker 5>we're just talking about making chips for data centers. So

0:06:50.800 --> 0:06:54.400
<v Speaker 5>the government renegotiated the deal, and now when it's done that,

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 5>it's not a coincidence that Libu time can go to

0:06:57.839 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 5>his friend Masa San and say, okay, this is the

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:04.799
<v Speaker 5>time for SoftBank to invest as well and maybe line

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 5>up some armed demand for those fourteen eight chips down

0:07:08.800 --> 0:07:09.200
<v Speaker 5>the line.

0:07:09.360 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 2>I'm so interested in the arm architecture side of this.

0:07:12.600 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 2>How do you see these working hand in hand going forward?

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.320
<v Speaker 2>How more cemented could a relationship become?

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, clearly it could be part of the deal. And

0:07:23.840 --> 0:07:26.600
<v Speaker 5>more importantly for Intel, as of a week ago, they

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.320
<v Speaker 5>had no customers for the fourteen A architecture and they

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:34.680
<v Speaker 5>said they may not even proceed with it. Now they

0:07:34.840 --> 0:07:37.880
<v Speaker 5>might have one lined up. Let's not forget the Department

0:07:37.880 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 5>of Defense is a customer that's now more likely to

0:07:41.320 --> 0:07:43.800
<v Speaker 5>be lined up for that, And then they can go

0:07:43.880 --> 0:07:46.960
<v Speaker 5>and talk to the other companies. And even if the

0:07:47.000 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 5>government doesn't have it, doesn't go ahead and twist some arms.

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 5>Let's not forget. And Nvidia's committed half a trillion dollars

0:07:54.600 --> 0:07:58.160
<v Speaker 5>of investment in the US, so can the government now?

0:07:58.400 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 5>Can President Trump called Jensen Wang and say, hey, this

0:08:02.200 --> 0:08:04.080
<v Speaker 5>is part of how I want to see the investment

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:06.800
<v Speaker 5>play out. I need for you to be a customer

0:08:06.840 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 5>of fourteen A that's not inconceivable at this point. And again,

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:14.280
<v Speaker 5>remember this is national security, So the rules of the

0:08:14.320 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 5>games change once we say this is national security.

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Rules of the game are often blurred by frenemy lines.

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Gil And what's so interesting is Massa has had a

0:08:23.920 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 2>long term relationship with the CEO of Invidia, of course,

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 2>Jensen Wang, but also in some ways wants to build

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.600
<v Speaker 2>a competing architecture in some ways, what's to take on

0:08:34.200 --> 0:08:36.600
<v Speaker 2>in Vidio in terms of AI chips? Could he do

0:08:36.720 --> 0:08:38.840
<v Speaker 2>that with Intel's help.

0:08:41.040 --> 0:08:43.720
<v Speaker 5>It's one way for him to participate in an even

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 5>more broad fashion in the growth of AI, which he's

0:08:47.800 --> 0:08:51.120
<v Speaker 5>doing now. He regrets selling in video when he did.

0:08:51.120 --> 0:08:53.720
<v Speaker 5>He's buying some of it back, but he's also making

0:08:53.720 --> 0:08:58.200
<v Speaker 5>a set of other investments in AI infrastructure. Let's not

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:02.600
<v Speaker 5>forget Stargate is probably the flag bearer of his effort,

0:09:02.679 --> 0:09:06.160
<v Speaker 5>combining with open Ai and Oracle to build again at

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:09.360
<v Speaker 5>least one hundred billion dollars worth of data center capacity.

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:13.040
<v Speaker 5>And for that it would make sense to diversify and

0:09:13.080 --> 0:09:16.560
<v Speaker 5>not only buy Nvidia chips. Now, that's going to take

0:09:16.600 --> 0:09:19.280
<v Speaker 5>a while, and Nvidia not only has a lead but

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 5>continues to extend its lead every year, but it does

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:27.960
<v Speaker 5>make sense for him and for other companies to try

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:29.840
<v Speaker 5>to diversify away from Nvidia.

0:09:30.440 --> 0:09:33.920
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is how a Lutnik Ecomo sextuary had said, look,

0:09:33.960 --> 0:09:36.680
<v Speaker 2>we will be we confirm that we're looking at taking

0:09:36.679 --> 0:09:39.320
<v Speaker 2>an equity stake. Didn't say how much, but it wouldn't

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.640
<v Speaker 2>be with a governance role. Now, well, broadly, how are

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 2>you starting to analyze companies that are getting closer and

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.840
<v Speaker 2>closer to the US government and how much Well is

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 2>it interference or is it positive help that is being

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:55.959
<v Speaker 2>led by a US government here.

0:09:57.400 --> 0:10:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Well, the US government has an ability to to give

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:05.559
<v Speaker 5>proferential treatment to some of these companies to change the

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.840
<v Speaker 5>rules of the road, and it wants equity participation when

0:10:09.840 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 5>it does that. And again, it's not doing it broadly.

0:10:12.400 --> 0:10:14.880
<v Speaker 5>It's doing when it's a matter of national security. Let's

0:10:14.920 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 5>not forget it's already very involved with Nvidia. It's limiting

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.760
<v Speaker 5>their chip sales to China. It's already very involved with

0:10:21.840 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 5>open Ai. This may be quiet, but it's pretty safe

0:10:25.480 --> 0:10:28.400
<v Speaker 5>to assume the Department of Defense gets briefs from open

0:10:28.440 --> 0:10:31.760
<v Speaker 5>Ai very frequently about where the models are. So the

0:10:31.800 --> 0:10:36.200
<v Speaker 5>government is involved because it's national security. In Intel's case,

0:10:36.600 --> 0:10:41.200
<v Speaker 5>it's a matter of if this is this century's nuclear arsenal,

0:10:41.679 --> 0:10:45.079
<v Speaker 5>we need somebody to make the shellcasings domestically. We can't

0:10:45.080 --> 0:10:47.800
<v Speaker 5>have a Taiwanese company in a Korean company make our

0:10:47.840 --> 0:10:53.000
<v Speaker 5>shellcasings for our nuclear arsenal. So in Intel's case, it's

0:10:53.000 --> 0:10:56.880
<v Speaker 5>a much deeper involvement, and I wouldn't be surprised if

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 5>there are if there is input into where the investments go,

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 5>what the governance is, even if it's not explicit.

0:11:06.000 --> 0:11:09.199
<v Speaker 2>Something that Blomberg will seek comment on Da Davidson's Guilduria,

0:11:09.600 --> 0:11:12.640
<v Speaker 2>like so much be analysis today we are coming up.

0:11:12.760 --> 0:11:15.480
<v Speaker 2>We have from Palo Alto Network CEO Niickesha Arora is

0:11:15.520 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 2>the company sees it a stronger than expected twenty twenty six.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:31.800
<v Speaker 2>This is Blue Medtech Shares a Palo alter Networks rising

0:11:31.800 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>in fact best days since April. It's not apposting a

0:11:34.320 --> 0:11:37.560
<v Speaker 2>stronger than expected forecast for twenty twenty six. We caught

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:39.840
<v Speaker 2>up with the CEO, Niickesha Rara earlier. That's what we

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:40.960
<v Speaker 2>had to say about the growth.

0:11:41.960 --> 0:11:44.880
<v Speaker 6>The industry has got too many fragmented players where the

0:11:44.880 --> 0:11:47.920
<v Speaker 6>customers are left to do the stitching on cybersecurity themselves,

0:11:48.040 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 6>and now the base at which attacks are happening, the

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:52.760
<v Speaker 6>base at which the bad actor is able to get

0:11:52.800 --> 0:11:56.000
<v Speaker 6>in and excellent straight data has shrunk to twenty five minutes.

0:11:56.200 --> 0:11:58.440
<v Speaker 3>You can't solve that problem with the humans. You have

0:11:58.480 --> 0:12:01.080
<v Speaker 3>to apply technology. You have to apply automation, you have

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:01.800
<v Speaker 3>to apply.

0:12:01.600 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, and that's why that's where platformization comes in.

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:07.439
<v Speaker 2>You talk about the pervasive attacks, I mean you apply

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:11.240
<v Speaker 2>GENI to tackle ultimately attacks coming from JENI. I think

0:12:11.240 --> 0:12:14.439
<v Speaker 2>you had phenomenal statistics in the call, eight hundred and

0:12:14.520 --> 0:12:18.960
<v Speaker 2>ninety percent increase in GENAI traffic in twenty twenty four.

0:12:19.360 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 2>Can you just talk to us about how you can

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:23.839
<v Speaker 2>combat that, what sort of things you need in place

0:12:23.880 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 2>to be able to take on the GENI impact.

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.520
<v Speaker 6>Well, look, as we're noticing everywhere as AI is getting deployed,

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:33.840
<v Speaker 6>the fundamental problem that every company is facing and deploying

0:12:34.000 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 6>LLLMS or AI effectively is they don't have good data.

0:12:37.040 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 6>You need good data on drug discovery, you need good

0:12:39.679 --> 0:12:42.360
<v Speaker 6>data on self driving cars to understand where every tree is,

0:12:42.360 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 6>where we plant is, So you need good data to

0:12:45.160 --> 0:12:47.719
<v Speaker 6>solve the problem. If you want to use AI and

0:12:47.920 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 6>What we have done at our end is we have

0:12:50.000 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 6>basically built a platform that ingests so collects all the

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.080
<v Speaker 6>data from the enterprise and makes sense of it as

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:56.959
<v Speaker 6>fast as.

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:59.160
<v Speaker 3>The bad actors can. Now, that can't be done in humans.

0:12:59.160 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 6>For example, in an instance of ourselves, Leaven just one

0:13:02.520 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 6>hundred and fifty terabytes a day. That's a lot of data,

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 6>and that's just for ourselves. And imagine doing that across

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:11.400
<v Speaker 6>four hundred customers. We're ingesting data and petabytes, analyzing it

0:13:11.440 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 6>on the fly and trying to stop an attack made stream.

0:13:14.600 --> 0:13:18.600
<v Speaker 6>That requires tons of technology, tons of AI expertise because

0:13:18.800 --> 0:13:22.559
<v Speaker 6>the consequences are disastrous. Right, the bad actors are doing that,

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:24.199
<v Speaker 6>but they're trying to get it right once. We have

0:13:24.280 --> 0:13:25.839
<v Speaker 6>to get it right one hundred percent of the time.

0:13:26.400 --> 0:13:29.760
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so you're on the expertise that you need. You've

0:13:29.800 --> 0:13:33.240
<v Speaker 2>had organically, but also some inorganic expertise coming on. When

0:13:33.240 --> 0:13:35.360
<v Speaker 2>I think about the identity focus you've now put on

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:36.920
<v Speaker 2>with cyber arg it's a deal that of course will

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:38.200
<v Speaker 2>be folded in in the longer term.

0:13:38.320 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. You guys like to call it in organic.

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.600
<v Speaker 6>When you hire great people, that's possibly call it in organic,

0:13:43.640 --> 0:13:46.040
<v Speaker 6>isn't it like, Well, Meta goes and hires AI researchers

0:13:46.080 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 6>and people hire people. That's innerwirement. Guess we have to

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 6>get great people from elsewhere because we don't have, you know,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 6>the prerogative of having best people on all of the time.

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 3>So yes, we buy great teams who are doing great works.

0:13:56.600 --> 0:13:58.800
<v Speaker 2>It's twenty five billion, This is a twenty five billion

0:13:58.880 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 2>dollar Aquahi.

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:02.439
<v Speaker 6>Well, we can't get there the way we got here,

0:14:02.480 --> 0:14:03.760
<v Speaker 6>so we're going to have to make sure that we

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.560
<v Speaker 6>go ahead. And it's not just acquhire. It's amazing technology.

0:14:06.559 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 6>It's a great bunch of people. And honestly, I think

0:14:09.040 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 6>the way to frame it, Caroline, is if you listen

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.680
<v Speaker 6>to all the narratives I here in Bloomberg and around

0:14:14.760 --> 0:14:17.000
<v Speaker 6>in media, we're all worried about agents.

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:18.719
<v Speaker 3>We all believe that agents are going to take over

0:14:18.760 --> 0:14:19.000
<v Speaker 3>the world.

0:14:19.080 --> 0:14:21.200
<v Speaker 6>We believe they're going to be more agents in companies

0:14:21.200 --> 0:14:23.560
<v Speaker 6>and they're going to be humans. Now, well, somebody's got

0:14:23.600 --> 0:14:25.440
<v Speaker 6>to make sense of these agents. Somebody's got to make

0:14:25.440 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 6>sure these agents have credentials, they're managed, they're understood, they

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:31.800
<v Speaker 6>don't run rogue, they have guardrails. That whole world of

0:14:31.800 --> 0:14:35.880
<v Speaker 6>agentic AI needs a whole cloak or framework of identity

0:14:35.920 --> 0:14:38.680
<v Speaker 6>management around them, and cyber Arc is the world leader

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 6>in this topic. So partnering with them, making them put

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:44.280
<v Speaker 6>the networks allows us to see ahead and say two

0:14:44.320 --> 0:14:46.240
<v Speaker 6>years from now, three years from now, when the world

0:14:46.280 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 6>is talking about how to manage all these things, how

0:14:48.240 --> 0:14:50.640
<v Speaker 6>does podel to get ready and be at the forefront

0:14:50.680 --> 0:14:53.640
<v Speaker 6>so our customers can solve their problems on deploying AI

0:14:53.760 --> 0:14:55.560
<v Speaker 6>while we help them a security What.

0:14:55.440 --> 0:14:57.760
<v Speaker 2>Sales synergies do you see in that two to three years?

0:14:57.840 --> 0:14:59.480
<v Speaker 2>How do you ensure that you don't get a hit

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 2>to that margin that some award about.

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.440
<v Speaker 6>We are as the first at scale cybersecurity company. We

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 6>crossed a ten billion dollar revenue rundrate never been done

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 6>in cybersecurity. That allows us to leverage scale economics. We

0:15:14.280 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 6>run a thirty percent operating margin, We run close to

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 6>forty percent free.

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:18.600
<v Speaker 3>Cash flow margins.

0:15:18.680 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 6>Were a robust, profitable company. Any company that isn't a

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.600
<v Speaker 6>billion two billion dollar ur business, which a cyber Arc is,

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:27.400
<v Speaker 6>we think we can vastly improve their operations as part

0:15:27.400 --> 0:15:29.600
<v Speaker 6>of Polo Alto because the scale economics that we bring

0:15:29.840 --> 0:15:31.720
<v Speaker 6>both on the go to market side, we have ten

0:15:31.800 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 6>times of sellers they have, and on the operating side,

0:15:34.360 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 6>and we run large scale systems for sixteen thousand employees.

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:41.320
<v Speaker 6>Adding six thousand employees doesn't take a lot, but it

0:15:41.360 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 6>does improve the margins the underlying business of Tagic, So

0:15:43.880 --> 0:15:46.760
<v Speaker 6>we believe that the acquisition will be a creative over time.

0:15:46.880 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 6>The billion f FI twenty eight we can collectively achieve

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 6>a forty percent free cash flow margin, which again is

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:55.200
<v Speaker 6>gold standard in our industry, let alone our industry and software.

0:15:55.200 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Hello Alto Networks Cee Nikesh Aurora. The AI industry's massive

0:16:06.080 --> 0:16:08.960
<v Speaker 2>funding needs are being seen as an opportunity by private

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 2>credit firms. For example, firms competed for months till Ard

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 2>Meta twenty nine million dollars for its AI data center

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 2>project in Louisiana. Now Pinco and blue Out Capital eventually

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:22.240
<v Speaker 2>selected there. Bloomberg's Laura Benitez joins us. She covers asset management,

0:16:22.240 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 2>and we're reporting on this a lot, and just remind

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.800
<v Speaker 2>us why private credit is really salivating at the opportunity here.

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:33.360
<v Speaker 7>There's a huge opportunity within AI, you know, unline private equity,

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.360
<v Speaker 7>which we're seeing, you know, some kind of logjam with exits.

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:40.800
<v Speaker 7>You know, there's big opportunity with infrastructure and digital infrastructure.

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 7>The margins can be quite high, the coupons can be

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:46.840
<v Speaker 7>very lucrative. So yes, it's a piece of the private

0:16:46.880 --> 0:16:48.440
<v Speaker 7>everyone's trying to get in on right now.

0:16:49.040 --> 0:16:51.720
<v Speaker 2>They get in our meta, there's opportunities to come. I

0:16:51.800 --> 0:16:53.720
<v Speaker 2>was just looking at a note put out by UBS,

0:16:53.720 --> 0:16:57.160
<v Speaker 2>So they almost worry that perhaps this is getting too much.

0:16:57.280 --> 0:16:59.800
<v Speaker 2>The froth starts to appear, the risks start to appear.

0:17:00.040 --> 0:17:02.480
<v Speaker 2>That something you're hearing, Laura, that's right.

0:17:02.520 --> 0:17:04.520
<v Speaker 7>There are some concerns that, you know, there's too much

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.879
<v Speaker 7>money chasing this opportunity now, and that it might be

0:17:07.960 --> 0:17:11.600
<v Speaker 7>overblown and demand you know, seem to be you know,

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:14.840
<v Speaker 7>apparently soaring. But we I think kind of a bit

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.720
<v Speaker 7>skeptical on that in the long term. But you're right.

0:17:17.720 --> 0:17:19.840
<v Speaker 7>Morgan Stanley have said, for instance, that there's you know,

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 7>trillions of capital expenditure needs for AI in the next

0:17:23.040 --> 0:17:25.680
<v Speaker 7>few years, and that could translate to hundreds of billions

0:17:25.680 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 7>of bond issuance coming into the bond market.

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 8>So again huge numbers here.

0:17:29.440 --> 0:17:32.640
<v Speaker 2>Three trillion in the next three years is the number

0:17:32.640 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 2>that morgus Standing was estimating. It is eyewatering. A lot

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:37.879
<v Speaker 2>of it is US denominated. Just tell us where on

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 2>the respectrum actually this lies. Is this what would be

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.400
<v Speaker 2>deemed investment grade debt? More broadly, because these companies are

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:47.520
<v Speaker 2>i mean washed with cash and very betterable against the

0:17:47.640 --> 0:17:50.400
<v Speaker 2>many see the demand is there for these AI data centers.

0:17:51.119 --> 0:17:51.879
<v Speaker 2>It's a good question.

0:17:52.000 --> 0:17:54.200
<v Speaker 7>The vast majority of what we're seeing could translate into

0:17:54.280 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 7>investment grade issuance, primarily because of the tenor so the

0:17:57.920 --> 0:18:00.280
<v Speaker 7>maturities of these debt instruments are very very low long

0:18:00.680 --> 0:18:03.639
<v Speaker 7>that allows companies and issuers to get an investment grade rating.

0:18:03.960 --> 0:18:06.440
<v Speaker 7>And also they're back to against card assets, so you've

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:07.639
<v Speaker 7>got more collateral there.

0:18:07.920 --> 0:18:09.120
<v Speaker 8>Should things go wrong.

0:18:08.880 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 7>You've got more security to negotiate with.

0:18:13.200 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 2>Banks, cut out private credit swoops in Pimco A big

0:18:16.640 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 2>winner here, Bluemos, Laura Benitez, it has been great speaking

0:18:19.040 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 2>to you, thank you. But elsewhere in AI, let's talk

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.560
<v Speaker 2>about regulation. Last year, California Governor Gavin Newsom, remember he

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.800
<v Speaker 2>vetoed an AI safety bill. The lawmakers actually pleased to

0:18:28.840 --> 0:18:32.040
<v Speaker 2>take another swing at the regulation. Here's State Senator Scott

0:18:32.040 --> 0:18:33.679
<v Speaker 2>Wiener speaking with us after the.

0:18:33.720 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 9>Vetop California as the heartland of tech and.

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 8>AI innovation, has a responsibility to lead on AI safety.

0:18:43.080 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 2>Titus Wu. He covers California politics for Bluembag Industry Group,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 2>and you're joining us now because there are multiple AI

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:52.600
<v Speaker 2>in tech related bills in front of lawmakers and Sacramento.

0:18:52.880 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 2>But I thought, this is exactly what the administration doesn't want,

0:18:55.800 --> 0:19:00.440
<v Speaker 2>a patchwork effect, a state by state AI regulation future.

0:19:02.520 --> 0:19:05.119
<v Speaker 10>I would say for thanks for having me on, but

0:19:05.119 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 10>I would say that you know, Governor news doesn't necessarily

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 10>say that he didn't want, you know, any air regulation

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 10>whatsoever here in California. If anything, you know, in recent months,

0:19:15.760 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 10>you know, given that you know, on the fairal level,

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:22.560
<v Speaker 10>we saw them try to implement a ten year moratorium

0:19:22.600 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 10>on state IO laws. That you know, Newsom has tod

0:19:24.760 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 10>that he's felt that California has to lead on AI regulation.

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:34.919
<v Speaker 10>The question is what is Newsome's preferred approach of regulating it,

0:19:34.960 --> 0:19:37.600
<v Speaker 10>because clearly, you know last year was SP ten forty seven,

0:19:37.920 --> 0:19:41.239
<v Speaker 10>that was not how he wanted to see it. And

0:19:41.359 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 10>right now, you know, lawmakers they're trying again, and they're

0:19:44.000 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 10>trying to suss out and read the teenies on us

0:19:46.440 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 10>to what the governor wants what kind of regulation. What's

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 10>the mill line in which the governor would say, okay,

0:19:52.600 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 10>this supports innovation but also advances some sensible regulation.

0:19:57.240 --> 0:20:00.760
<v Speaker 2>So they're thinking about AI developers testing the tools against bias,

0:20:00.760 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 2>for example, that's in the AB ten eighteen. This isn't

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.879
<v Speaker 2>just the only era of regulation that my OVERSEAI, right,

0:20:07.920 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 2>we're also thinking about how big tech, in many ways

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.800
<v Speaker 2>is lobbying against what's SB fifty three. Can you took

0:20:13.840 --> 0:20:15.120
<v Speaker 2>us through that one, Titus?

0:20:15.440 --> 0:20:18.480
<v Speaker 10>Yes? So SB fifty three is basically center and Winner's

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 10>kind of second attempt after his teen forty seven got vitailed.

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 10>It's definitely a lot less i'd say, restrictive than ten

0:20:27.760 --> 0:20:32.080
<v Speaker 10>forty seven. It focuses mostly on kind of disclosing safety

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:34.840
<v Speaker 10>and security prodcasts for AA developers. There's s a blow

0:20:34.880 --> 0:20:38.639
<v Speaker 10>of protections the third party audits. You have to report

0:20:38.640 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 10>a kind of safety instance to the state ag. So

0:20:42.080 --> 0:20:44.680
<v Speaker 10>it's it's it's nothing not as intrusive as last years

0:20:44.680 --> 0:20:46.640
<v Speaker 10>ten forty seven, and it's trying to pick up on

0:20:47.240 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 10>some of the recommendations from this working group formed by

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:53.679
<v Speaker 10>this group of experts that the governor formed after his

0:20:53.800 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 10>vetol last year.

0:20:55.040 --> 0:20:59.680
<v Speaker 2>And very briefly worker rights against automated tools. That seems

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:00.399
<v Speaker 2>to we canes.

0:21:01.760 --> 0:21:05.360
<v Speaker 10>Yes, definitely. You know, labor forces in California, the really

0:21:05.400 --> 0:21:08.760
<v Speaker 10>powerful political force, uh you know this year they're they're

0:21:08.760 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 10>getting more in the weeds into trying to put in

0:21:11.280 --> 0:21:16.920
<v Speaker 10>comprehensive rules around AI in the workplace SB seven. It's

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:20.639
<v Speaker 10>very very intense bill where you know, labor and in

0:21:20.720 --> 0:21:23.920
<v Speaker 10>tech they're fighting with each other and the capital over it. Basically,

0:21:23.960 --> 0:21:28.840
<v Speaker 10>that bill would, uh, that bill would give workers rights

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:31.960
<v Speaker 10>to kind of you know, opt out, potentially refuse you know,

0:21:32.040 --> 0:21:35.199
<v Speaker 10>decisions by employers when they use AI, for instance, to

0:21:35.240 --> 0:21:39.280
<v Speaker 10>make termination decisions, disciplinary decisions, and it had a big

0:21:39.320 --> 0:21:41.240
<v Speaker 10>consequence of employers across the California.

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Titus Wio, California correspondent for Bluemag Industry Group. Great to

0:21:44.520 --> 0:21:53.040
<v Speaker 2>get your insights. Thank you, welcome back to blombag Tech.

0:21:53.080 --> 0:21:55.639
<v Speaker 2>We're all thinking about what the US government means for

0:21:55.720 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 2>Intel ownership, how much they confirm that they are indeed

0:21:58.760 --> 0:22:01.080
<v Speaker 2>looking at taking a stake, what size of steak is

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:04.240
<v Speaker 2>still under question, how we see a change of grants,

0:22:04.320 --> 0:22:07.119
<v Speaker 2>money lent in the chip sat into equity, and what

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:09.320
<v Speaker 2>soft Bank's now getting in on the game. For we're

0:22:09.400 --> 0:22:11.359
<v Speaker 2>up seven and a half percent. Let's get over to

0:22:11.400 --> 0:22:14.000
<v Speaker 2>London where Peter Elstrom is with US executive editor who

0:22:14.040 --> 0:22:16.200
<v Speaker 2>used to oversee. Of course, you're looking at the technology

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 2>news for US more broadly and big expertise in Asia.

0:22:19.600 --> 0:22:21.240
<v Speaker 2>So I go to Asia first. I ask you why

0:22:21.359 --> 0:22:24.720
<v Speaker 2>SoftBank is taking that two billion dollar steak. Why are

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 2>they getting Intel to sell more equity to them.

0:22:28.480 --> 0:22:30.679
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, there's a lot going on here with Intel, but

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.280
<v Speaker 11>on the software. On the soft Bank front in particular,

0:22:34.640 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 11>the founder Mosio Shechssan has had ambitions in the chip

0:22:37.840 --> 0:22:40.679
<v Speaker 11>area for a long time. He bought armholdings of course,

0:22:41.280 --> 0:22:45.440
<v Speaker 11>the chip designers that's commonplace and all sorts of smartphones,

0:22:45.640 --> 0:22:48.239
<v Speaker 11>and he has ambitions to be able to compete in

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:51.719
<v Speaker 11>AI chips against Nvidia. In particular. They think that they

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.520
<v Speaker 11>can use some of those designs from ARM to make

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:58.800
<v Speaker 11>a much more efficient, energy efficient chip that could compete

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:01.920
<v Speaker 11>with Invidious chips, particularly for running some of these AI

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:05.399
<v Speaker 11>services like chat, GPT in particular. So the idea that

0:23:05.400 --> 0:23:08.720
<v Speaker 11>SoftBank would put two billion dollars into Intel gives them

0:23:08.720 --> 0:23:10.919
<v Speaker 11>a stake in the company that could be important, perhaps

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.879
<v Speaker 11>as an investment, but also if Intel is able to

0:23:14.440 --> 0:23:17.480
<v Speaker 11>develop its foundry business, that is, making custom chips for

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:20.360
<v Speaker 11>other kinds of companies. You could imagine a day when

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:24.160
<v Speaker 11>Intel makes AI chips for soft Bank and is able

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:26.119
<v Speaker 11>to sell those, and both companies would be able to

0:23:26.160 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 11>benefit from taking some of that demand away from Nvidia

0:23:30.000 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 11>as this AI boom really explodes.

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:33.720
<v Speaker 2>And when we think about the foundry business, when we

0:23:33.720 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 2>think about manufacturing, that's where the US government wants to

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 2>lean in. They want domestically made manufactured chips that ultimately

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:43.800
<v Speaker 2>gives them control of the supply chain. But we're hearing

0:23:43.800 --> 0:23:46.119
<v Speaker 2>from Howard Lutnink that he doesn't want control over Intel

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.160
<v Speaker 2>in any way. They don't want a governance role here.

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:53.840
<v Speaker 11>Right right, Yeah, you make a good point. The US

0:23:54.000 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 11>government has wanted to rebuild the domestic semiconductor and industry

0:23:57.880 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 11>for a number of different reasons. Partly because it's a

0:23:59.800 --> 0:24:02.440
<v Speaker 11>great business. It could mean some jobs and some profits

0:24:02.480 --> 0:24:04.080
<v Speaker 11>for them, but also they don't want to have the

0:24:04.119 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 11>strategic risk of having all the advanced semiconductor and manufacturing

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 11>in the world in East Asia and Taiwan and South

0:24:11.080 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 11>Korea in particular. They want to be able to bring

0:24:13.440 --> 0:24:16.359
<v Speaker 11>that into the United States, And Howard Lutnik eluded this

0:24:16.480 --> 0:24:18.639
<v Speaker 11>today when he confirmed the nice group that we had

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 11>yesterday about how the US government is looking at taking

0:24:21.200 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 11>this ten percent stake in Intel. Intel, of course, is

0:24:24.240 --> 0:24:27.800
<v Speaker 11>really the last major US chip maker standing that has

0:24:27.840 --> 0:24:30.040
<v Speaker 11>a shot at being able to make those most advanced

0:24:30.119 --> 0:24:32.159
<v Speaker 11>chips to be able to compete with the likes of

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:35.600
<v Speaker 11>TSMC and Samsung in particular. So Lutnik is saying, hey,

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.120
<v Speaker 11>we may use this chipsack money to convert into equity

0:24:39.200 --> 0:24:42.399
<v Speaker 11>and then take this ten percent steak within Intel. And

0:24:42.440 --> 0:24:44.439
<v Speaker 11>he's also suggesting that they may do that with some

0:24:44.480 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 11>of the other companies that are supposed to be recipients

0:24:47.400 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 11>of the chipsacked.

0:24:48.200 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 2>Money, one of them being Micron for example. You want

0:24:51.359 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 2>to on Earth that would sink in with a TSMC

0:24:53.640 --> 0:24:57.440
<v Speaker 2>and Samsung they've also taken chipsacked money. Peter. But what's

0:24:57.480 --> 0:24:59.800
<v Speaker 2>really interesting is weather this gets you. The end of

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 2>the reason that we could pull back from fourteen A

0:25:03.640 --> 0:25:05.640
<v Speaker 2>in many ways was because it was like, I don't

0:25:05.680 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 2>want to be that person who just builds it in

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:08.359
<v Speaker 2>hopes that they come.

0:25:09.800 --> 0:25:12.159
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, this isn't free money, to be clear, under the

0:25:12.160 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 11>Biden administration, they allocated these Chips Act awards. Those were

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:17.680
<v Speaker 11>supposed to be grants. This was supposed to be money

0:25:17.680 --> 0:25:20.040
<v Speaker 11>that was coming in anyway. There was no talk about

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 11>these companies giving up equity to be able to get

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:25.240
<v Speaker 11>those billions of dollars. So the Trump administration is trying

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:28.200
<v Speaker 11>to change the calculus here where they still will give

0:25:28.240 --> 0:25:30.280
<v Speaker 11>you the amount of money that you were supposed to

0:25:30.280 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 11>get from the Chips Act, but in place you're going

0:25:33.000 --> 0:25:34.679
<v Speaker 11>to have to give them some equity in the company.

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 11>So it's not free money. And maybe a little bit

0:25:36.920 --> 0:25:40.800
<v Speaker 11>accelerated from what the original vision was for the Chips Act.

0:25:41.119 --> 0:25:43.439
<v Speaker 11>Intel for example, may be able to get that ten

0:25:43.480 --> 0:25:45.440
<v Speaker 11>point nine billion dollars that they were supposed to get

0:25:45.440 --> 0:25:47.960
<v Speaker 11>a bit sooner, but still it's not you know, it's

0:25:47.960 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 11>not free money. They still have to go out there.

0:25:50.080 --> 0:25:52.359
<v Speaker 11>They have to prove that they can succeed in the

0:25:52.359 --> 0:25:54.639
<v Speaker 11>foundry business. And to your point, then they need to

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:56.760
<v Speaker 11>go out and get customers. The US government can do

0:25:56.800 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 11>a lot, but it can't get Intel customers for that

0:25:58.960 --> 0:25:59.719
<v Speaker 11>boundary business.

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:03.440
<v Speaker 2>To Alstrom also to articulate and like me, just then

0:26:03.560 --> 0:26:06.640
<v Speaker 2>we thank you. Let's bring in Swiss COT senior analyst

0:26:06.640 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 2>ipek Oskodeshka for more. Who I ask you whether there's

0:26:10.480 --> 0:26:14.080
<v Speaker 2>changing up of the calculus is actually what global investors

0:26:14.080 --> 0:26:16.359
<v Speaker 2>want to see. How difficult is it to calculate what

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:17.920
<v Speaker 2>the US government's going to do next?

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 12>Well, it's very difficult, indeed, because the speed at which

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 12>things are coming some news are usual, some news are unusual.

0:26:26.320 --> 0:26:29.679
<v Speaker 12>So the speed at which things are coming to investors'

0:26:29.680 --> 0:26:33.359
<v Speaker 12>attention is just went out of control. And some of

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:37.399
<v Speaker 12>the news do have positive implications for companies.

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:39.840
<v Speaker 2>But there is still the risk that the US.

0:26:39.760 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 12>Government's goals are not going to be always aligned with

0:26:43.720 --> 0:26:49.160
<v Speaker 12>business objective objectives and the company's primary goal of maximizing

0:26:49.240 --> 0:26:50.159
<v Speaker 12>investor value.

0:26:50.200 --> 0:26:53.639
<v Speaker 2>So the risks are building, risk of building. Does it

0:26:53.680 --> 0:26:57.320
<v Speaker 2>put you off the generator of AI tailwinds? More broadly

0:26:57.359 --> 0:27:00.040
<v Speaker 2>though that we've seen, Let's go back to previous weeks

0:27:00.080 --> 0:27:03.639
<v Speaker 2>with Nvideo and AMD becoming in the eye of the

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.200
<v Speaker 2>political storm and having to pay fifteen percent if they're

0:27:06.200 --> 0:27:07.640
<v Speaker 2>going to sell it to China, for example.

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 12>So that's very interesting because if you look at AMD

0:27:11.320 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 12>and Nvidia today, they are in a better place than

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:17.040
<v Speaker 12>they were a month or two months ago where they

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:18.080
<v Speaker 12>weren't able.

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 3>To sell their hips to China.

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.360
<v Speaker 12>Today all of a sudden, they can if they pay

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:23.920
<v Speaker 12>fifteen percent cut of their Chinese sales.

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:25.840
<v Speaker 3>So this looks like it is good.

0:27:25.640 --> 0:27:28.520
<v Speaker 12>News, but in the short run is going to give

0:27:28.680 --> 0:27:31.000
<v Speaker 12>these companies more revenue. But in the long run, in

0:27:31.040 --> 0:27:33.359
<v Speaker 12>the midium to long run, we don't know how the

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:36.440
<v Speaker 12>news and the US government interference is going to change,

0:27:36.560 --> 0:27:39.000
<v Speaker 12>whether the changes are going to be positive or negative.

0:27:39.040 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 12>So that means that the votility is higher and the

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.720
<v Speaker 12>risks are building up. It doesn't mean that the companies

0:27:44.760 --> 0:27:47.679
<v Speaker 12>will not benefit from the US government support, but it

0:27:47.760 --> 0:27:50.359
<v Speaker 12>means that the US government will not pursue the same

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 12>goals that they do all the time. So that I

0:27:53.320 --> 0:27:56.119
<v Speaker 12>think is a risk, and that is there's something that

0:27:56.160 --> 0:27:57.680
<v Speaker 12>we become quite concious.

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Even though over the last let's call it two years,

0:28:01.359 --> 0:28:04.520
<v Speaker 2>basically seven names have made up nearly all of the

0:28:04.520 --> 0:28:09.560
<v Speaker 2>equity benchromarks gains. So how does an investor basically hedge

0:28:09.600 --> 0:28:13.800
<v Speaker 2>against that volatility? Do they stay exposed but start diversifying impact?

0:28:14.320 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 12>Well, diversific diversification is one of the rules that we're

0:28:19.280 --> 0:28:22.880
<v Speaker 12>just like recommending obviously because diversifying away from the US

0:28:22.920 --> 0:28:26.560
<v Speaker 12>equities that have quite high valuations right now towards sectors

0:28:26.560 --> 0:28:30.080
<v Speaker 12>that do have opportunity to follow up is interesting. Then

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:33.760
<v Speaker 12>other clients are looking to byput options for example, that

0:28:34.119 --> 0:28:37.840
<v Speaker 12>are interesting in case there is a sell off in

0:28:37.840 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 12>the market and we start seeing valuations come down, and

0:28:40.760 --> 0:28:42.800
<v Speaker 12>there are many things to do, but at the end

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 12>of the day, what we see is that.

0:28:44.200 --> 0:28:45.200
<v Speaker 2>AI is growing.

0:28:45.320 --> 0:28:47.880
<v Speaker 12>It is not the AIK that's going to be smaller,

0:28:47.880 --> 0:28:50.120
<v Speaker 12>but it is how the AIK is going to be

0:28:50.440 --> 0:28:53.000
<v Speaker 12>pieced together that's going to be important. And we think

0:28:53.040 --> 0:28:56.480
<v Speaker 12>that international companies are also going for a piece of

0:28:56.960 --> 0:29:00.640
<v Speaker 12>a piece for themselves and that is actually giving way

0:29:00.720 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 12>to opportunities in the international market. Is now that the

0:29:04.520 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 12>US technology companies are value to perfection.

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:10.280
<v Speaker 2>It's been interesting. You just mentioned how perhaps you use

0:29:10.320 --> 0:29:14.320
<v Speaker 2>options to be able to well hedge oneself. What many

0:29:14.360 --> 0:29:16.560
<v Speaker 2>would say is what occurred with Intel, as many were

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:18.800
<v Speaker 2>using it as a hedge, betting against it to be

0:29:18.800 --> 0:29:20.640
<v Speaker 2>able to protect the upside that they've been getting from

0:29:20.920 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 2>in video and other areas of chips market. Was that

0:29:22.840 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 2>something you saw at play and where else had basically

0:29:26.120 --> 0:29:30.200
<v Speaker 2>investors looked to bet against to protect other winnings that

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:31.280
<v Speaker 2>they'd seen in the sector.

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:35.120
<v Speaker 12>Well, you don't really want to go against MVDA NAMS,

0:29:35.160 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 12>you don't. You cannot really go against this machine. The

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 12>only thing that you're willing to do is to protect

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:43.200
<v Speaker 12>any potential sell off or any potential drug down. So

0:29:43.240 --> 0:29:45.880
<v Speaker 12>in this sense, we think that it is always very

0:29:45.960 --> 0:29:49.920
<v Speaker 12>important to stay long and just diversific Diversification of the

0:29:49.920 --> 0:29:52.880
<v Speaker 12>portfolios looks like the way to go for US. We

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:57.040
<v Speaker 12>do not really expect to see a sector meltdown or

0:29:57.320 --> 0:30:00.840
<v Speaker 12>very very big change in the dominance of the US.

0:30:01.040 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 2>What we're trying to do.

0:30:02.120 --> 0:30:04.560
<v Speaker 12>Is just to diversify a little bit in order to

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 12>tame the downside US for investors who are looking to

0:30:07.040 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 12>have some international exposure to broader AI play.

0:30:09.680 --> 0:30:12.840
<v Speaker 2>And is that Europe? I mean I think of ASML, SAP,

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:16.200
<v Speaker 2>but not many other AI names leap to the forefram

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 2>when it comes to publicly traded equities. Is it more

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 2>of an Asia game as well? Is it thinking elsewhere

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.640
<v Speaker 2>in the asset pool, not just equity, but maybe death?

0:30:24.560 --> 0:30:27.000
<v Speaker 12>No, you're right, I mean for Europe, we are specifically

0:30:27.040 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 12>looking into defense related technology plays and we think that

0:30:31.400 --> 0:30:35.000
<v Speaker 12>the defense spending is somehow going to boost the technology

0:30:35.080 --> 0:30:38.400
<v Speaker 12>spending in Europe as well, So we are mostly looking

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 12>into military in defense technologies within the European context.

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.560
<v Speaker 2>For China, we are looking at the AI plays.

0:30:44.600 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 12>We are looking at the funderies and the chip makers

0:30:47.760 --> 0:30:50.760
<v Speaker 12>like SMIs for example. Same thing for South Korea.

0:30:50.880 --> 0:30:52.040
<v Speaker 8>We are watching.

0:30:51.800 --> 0:30:55.040
<v Speaker 12>Very closely some some what especially ska Heinex. So there

0:30:55.080 --> 0:30:57.560
<v Speaker 12>are some champions around the world that are willing to

0:30:57.600 --> 0:30:59.800
<v Speaker 12>take a piece of that cake and that are looking

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 12>in resting and that how not seen enough exposure so

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:05.680
<v Speaker 12>far because they have remained will stay under the cloud

0:31:05.720 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 12>of the US big technology giants. And we think that

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 12>there's still opportunity there and there's still a reason to

0:31:12.000 --> 0:31:13.680
<v Speaker 12>think about diverse buying there.

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.640
<v Speaker 2>Ibecshta Geshkaya, We thank you so much for Swiss quid

0:31:23.120 --> 0:31:26.480
<v Speaker 2>open Ai. But it's launching a new subscription tier exclusively

0:31:26.480 --> 0:31:29.920
<v Speaker 2>in India called chatchipt Go and the plan will use

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:32.560
<v Speaker 2>its latest GPT five model at just five dollars a

0:31:32.560 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 2>month now. The plan would allow users to generate more

0:31:35.640 --> 0:31:38.960
<v Speaker 2>images and interact with the chatbot more frequently compared to

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the free version. The latest tier will be in addition

0:31:41.800 --> 0:31:45.560
<v Speaker 2>to its other paid plan offerings, including Chatchipt Plus, which

0:31:45.600 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 2>course costs twenty dollars a month. Now, sticking with India,

0:31:49.640 --> 0:31:53.280
<v Speaker 2>Apple is expanding iPhone production at five factories in the country. Look,

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.840
<v Speaker 2>it's a move aimed at lessening the company's reliance on

0:31:55.920 --> 0:31:59.320
<v Speaker 2>China for US bound models. Let's bring in Marabell Lopez,

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 2>Founa and play for analyst at Lopez Research and Marravell.

0:32:03.880 --> 0:32:06.320
<v Speaker 2>What was so interesting is this brought the ire of

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.360
<v Speaker 2>President Trump, who was frustrated that Apple was doing more

0:32:09.360 --> 0:32:12.240
<v Speaker 2>of its manufacturing in India, shifting from China. He wanted

0:32:12.240 --> 0:32:14.200
<v Speaker 2>it in the US. But has Tim Cook done enough

0:32:14.280 --> 0:32:17.120
<v Speaker 2>therefore in the United States to offset this.

0:32:18.840 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 9>I think Tim Cook eventually will do enough on the

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.480
<v Speaker 9>United States to upset it. But today the answer to

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:26.760
<v Speaker 9>that is now. And it's unexpected that they move this

0:32:26.840 --> 0:32:30.680
<v Speaker 9>to India. They've been working with India since roughly twenty seventeen.

0:32:31.000 --> 0:32:33.280
<v Speaker 9>So it takes a long time to build manufacturing. So

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.040
<v Speaker 9>you just don't go in, no matter who you are,

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 9>a president or not, and say you're going to build tomorrow.

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:40.440
<v Speaker 8>It takes time to build factors.

0:32:40.440 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 2>Takes time. So how much do you think ultimately will

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 2>be sourced from India into the United States. Is it

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 2>only going to be iPhones in other accessories, Well.

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.160
<v Speaker 9>I think we're starting to see other plants come online

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:56.880
<v Speaker 9>in the US. For example in Houston, when we look

0:32:56.880 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 9>at what they want to do with Apple Intelligence and

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 9>Servers for they are building that and that's coming online

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 9>in twenty twenty six. So that's an example of some

0:33:04.360 --> 0:33:06.480
<v Speaker 9>of the products that will be built here. But the

0:33:06.520 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 9>iPhone manufacturing, I expect that it will take several years

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:14.160
<v Speaker 9>to get up and running any major significant US presence,

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 9>And this is part of the reason why there's roughly

0:33:17.080 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 9>six hundred billion earmarked towards creating manufacturing in the US,

0:33:22.720 --> 0:33:24.720
<v Speaker 9>and that comes in many different forms. Part of that

0:33:24.760 --> 0:33:26.880
<v Speaker 9>will be for servers, but you have to envision that

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:28.800
<v Speaker 9>part of that will also be for iPhones.

0:33:29.400 --> 0:33:31.959
<v Speaker 2>Let's talk about what's happening here in the United States,

0:33:32.000 --> 0:33:35.840
<v Speaker 2>because today we understand that Apple is unfolding its academy.

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 2>This is all about training here in the United States.

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:42.120
<v Speaker 2>Who exactly is it for and what production do that

0:33:42.200 --> 0:33:44.120
<v Speaker 2>ultimately lead to here.

0:33:45.560 --> 0:33:46.959
<v Speaker 9>So one of the things that we have happening right

0:33:46.960 --> 0:33:50.040
<v Speaker 9>now is AI is very complicated and businesses actually don't

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:53.400
<v Speaker 9>know where to get started. So the concept behind the

0:33:53.480 --> 0:33:58.280
<v Speaker 9>Apple Academy is for small medium businesses to understand effectively

0:33:58.320 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 9>what they need to know to build next.

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:03.520
<v Speaker 8>Gen manufacturing, which would be highly AI driven. So that

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:04.200
<v Speaker 8>is going to.

0:34:04.200 --> 0:34:07.720
<v Speaker 9>Be a multi day program that small and medium businesses

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:10.440
<v Speaker 9>sign up for. They currently have a wait list at

0:34:10.440 --> 0:34:13.359
<v Speaker 9>this point for the next wave of that. They will

0:34:13.360 --> 0:34:15.960
<v Speaker 9>be running those courses throughout the year, and then once

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:19.120
<v Speaker 9>you've gone through the course, there's an opportunity to discuss

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:22.840
<v Speaker 9>more detailed discussions about what kind of products and services

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 9>we need. With Apple engineers, it can help you do

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 9>something that's more specific to your organization.

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 8>This is to fill a skills gap.

0:34:29.640 --> 0:34:32.440
<v Speaker 9>You know, we have a plenty of education programs in

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:35.520
<v Speaker 9>high school and above to try to bring in new employees,

0:34:35.560 --> 0:34:38.200
<v Speaker 9>but if you're actually a business running today, especially at

0:34:38.200 --> 0:34:41.200
<v Speaker 9>small medium business, there's very few options for you. So

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:45.240
<v Speaker 9>this is both an opportunity to educate these small businesses

0:34:45.280 --> 0:34:47.560
<v Speaker 9>but then also put them in the pipeline to buy

0:34:47.600 --> 0:34:49.480
<v Speaker 9>Apple products and services moving forward.

0:34:50.000 --> 0:34:52.080
<v Speaker 2>Really interesting you talk about this is the skills gap.

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:54.239
<v Speaker 2>Prior to this, of course, President Trump has talked a

0:34:54.239 --> 0:34:56.759
<v Speaker 2>lot about the production gap and where he wants to

0:34:56.760 --> 0:34:58.360
<v Speaker 2>see that rectivid. Just take a listen to what he

0:34:58.360 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 2>said in August six.

0:35:00.920 --> 0:35:03.960
<v Speaker 13>We're doing these things now in the United States instead

0:35:03.960 --> 0:35:06.800
<v Speaker 13>of other countries, far away countries.

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:08.200
<v Speaker 2>This is a.

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:11.960
<v Speaker 13>Significant step toward the ultimate goal of ensuring that iPhone

0:35:12.120 --> 0:35:14.799
<v Speaker 13>sold in the United States of America also are made

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.840
<v Speaker 13>in America with the mass infusion of capitalists. Announcing today,

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:22.320
<v Speaker 13>Apple will also build a two hundred and fifty thousand

0:35:22.320 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 13>square foot server manufacturing facility in Houston and avest billions

0:35:27.160 --> 0:35:30.359
<v Speaker 13>of dollars to construct data centers across the country from

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.480
<v Speaker 13>North Carolina to Iowa to Oregon.

0:35:34.880 --> 0:35:38.400
<v Speaker 2>Marvell, you so thoughtfully put us right on the medium

0:35:38.600 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 2>sized businesses. They really have nowhere to go when it

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:44.279
<v Speaker 2>comes to upskilling and being able to facilitate production. What

0:35:44.480 --> 0:35:48.279
<v Speaker 2>is it that Apple brings by training? Because really the

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.920
<v Speaker 2>anxiety for Tim Cook has been they haven't got the

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:53.480
<v Speaker 2>tooling engineers in the United States that they have in

0:35:53.600 --> 0:35:55.880
<v Speaker 2>China that they have in India. Is that what is

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:57.320
<v Speaker 2>going after longer term?

0:35:58.800 --> 0:36:01.879
<v Speaker 9>So I think yeah is the short answer, but it's

0:36:01.920 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 9>actually a very broad field when you think about what

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:05.840
<v Speaker 9>we're moving into moving forward, There's been a lot of

0:36:05.840 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 9>discussion of physical AI and robotics, and a lot of

0:36:09.160 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 9>that will be in manufacturing. It could be for iPhones,

0:36:11.719 --> 0:36:14.680
<v Speaker 9>it could be for automotive. The reason that they've picked

0:36:14.719 --> 0:36:18.200
<v Speaker 9>Detroit is not lost. It's a manufacturing culture. There are

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:22.600
<v Speaker 9>companies there, but we are running into this gap where

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:26.440
<v Speaker 9>these organizations don't have data scientists. They don't understand machine learning,

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:29.960
<v Speaker 9>as an example, so we're starting with things that is

0:36:30.520 --> 0:36:33.440
<v Speaker 9>on the AI side, machine learning, which is a basic

0:36:33.480 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 9>way to start, and then moving that forward. So these

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.920
<v Speaker 9>are short courses. The Apple engineers that are there are

0:36:40.960 --> 0:36:44.920
<v Speaker 9>actually basically doing rotations to spend some time helping the

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.680
<v Speaker 9>small medium businesses, but they're also still doing their day job.

0:36:47.880 --> 0:36:50.520
<v Speaker 9>So there wasn't a net new investment in terms of employees,

0:36:50.719 --> 0:36:52.799
<v Speaker 9>but there is a net new investment in terms of

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 9>getting organizations to understand what is required for them to

0:36:57.680 --> 0:36:59.960
<v Speaker 9>participate in the next generation economy.

0:37:00.040 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 8>That's stage one.

0:37:01.480 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 2>Well alongside that stage is what companies are listening to

0:37:06.160 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 2>in terms of what's needed in terms of manufacturing here

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:10.719
<v Speaker 2>in the US on the most sophisticated chips. I turn

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 2>our attention to what's happening with Intel at the moment.

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:14.360
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we just heard from President Trump on all

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:17.200
<v Speaker 2>the sixth what he wants of Apple. How do you

0:37:17.200 --> 0:37:18.960
<v Speaker 2>make of the state that they might take in Intel.

0:37:20.680 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 9>I think we really were in this situation where the

0:37:23.640 --> 0:37:28.759
<v Speaker 9>concept of a US chip manufacturer was almost going to

0:37:28.840 --> 0:37:32.759
<v Speaker 9>go away. There was just so many discussions about what

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.399
<v Speaker 9>would happen Intel, and I think the US governments thing

0:37:35.400 --> 0:37:36.040
<v Speaker 9>we're going to step in.

0:37:36.080 --> 0:37:37.359
<v Speaker 8>We're going to take an equity stake.

0:37:37.640 --> 0:37:39.600
<v Speaker 9>Some of that chip backed money that we had talked

0:37:39.600 --> 0:37:42.799
<v Speaker 9>about in the Biden administration that was actually going to

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:44.239
<v Speaker 9>go away, it's actually.

0:37:43.880 --> 0:37:44.800
<v Speaker 8>Now coming back.

0:37:45.160 --> 0:37:48.480
<v Speaker 9>And the context of how that comes back, if you

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:52.719
<v Speaker 9>look at it as an investment and equity stake, it

0:37:52.800 --> 0:37:55.799
<v Speaker 9>is really to try to create confidence in Intel as

0:37:55.800 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 9>a long standing player, to take away that risk. Buyers

0:37:59.120 --> 0:38:01.759
<v Speaker 9>do not want to invest in a chip company where

0:38:01.760 --> 0:38:04.319
<v Speaker 9>they think that could be risk. These are multi year

0:38:04.400 --> 0:38:07.520
<v Speaker 9>deals that we're talking about, plans that I talked to

0:38:07.560 --> 0:38:09.600
<v Speaker 9>you today about something I want to have come online

0:38:09.600 --> 0:38:11.040
<v Speaker 9>in three years. If I don't think you're going to

0:38:11.080 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 9>be there in three years, I'm not calling you. And

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:15.680
<v Speaker 9>so part of this strategy is to take away some

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 9>of that risk, to give Intel a foundation where they

0:38:18.640 --> 0:38:20.799
<v Speaker 9>think they can execute on the strategy that they need

0:38:20.800 --> 0:38:23.719
<v Speaker 9>to execute on without all being at the whim of

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:25.400
<v Speaker 9>how does the market feel about you?

0:38:26.160 --> 0:38:30.400
<v Speaker 2>Marabell Lopez, founder and principal analyst of Lopez Research, fascinating

0:38:30.440 --> 0:38:38.120
<v Speaker 2>to catch up with you. Let's get back to Intel,

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the government confirming that it is in talks with the

0:38:40.920 --> 0:38:43.160
<v Speaker 2>company to acquire a stake in the chip maker. That's,

0:38:43.239 --> 0:38:45.760
<v Speaker 2>of course, after SoftBank makes a two billion dollar investment

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:49.440
<v Speaker 2>Blue Bang Intelligence Senior semiconductor analyst Kunja Savani joins us

0:38:49.480 --> 0:38:52.600
<v Speaker 2>now and Qunjin. You put out a react note along

0:38:52.640 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 2>with colleagues, really talking about how this would offer support

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:59.040
<v Speaker 2>this potential stake, but it wouldn't close the gap with TSMC.

0:38:59.280 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Just talk us through your.

0:39:01.520 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, there's like positives of this stake one near term

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.000
<v Speaker 14>that it can help, but we don't think it's really

0:39:07.040 --> 0:39:09.640
<v Speaker 14>positive long term for stakeholders. In terms of the new

0:39:09.680 --> 0:39:13.319
<v Speaker 14>term positives they get the ten billion infusion, they get

0:39:13.320 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 14>as signaling that the government is behind this, behind Intel,

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:19.680
<v Speaker 14>and so it might not fail as people have risks.

0:39:19.760 --> 0:39:22.400
<v Speaker 14>And the third important point is we think given the

0:39:22.440 --> 0:39:24.880
<v Speaker 14>looming risk of the semi conductor terriffs up till three

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:29.120
<v Speaker 14>hundred percent that's coming. The government could incentivize US fabulous

0:39:29.120 --> 0:39:33.279
<v Speaker 14>semiconductors to bring business to Intel manufacturing, which could aid

0:39:33.560 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 14>the company in lieu of getting exemptions for terraffs. So

0:39:36.880 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 14>some positives near term, but long term, we don't think

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:43.040
<v Speaker 14>this is ideal for shareholders. First, you have the delusion. Second,

0:39:43.440 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 14>most of this money would have come to Intel until

0:39:46.120 --> 0:39:48.680
<v Speaker 14>last week almost in the shape of grants which they

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:50.440
<v Speaker 14>don't have to pay back. But now you have to

0:39:50.480 --> 0:39:53.280
<v Speaker 14>give up about ten percent stake for receiving the same money.

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:57.560
<v Speaker 14>So not great outcome for share shareholders. And finally, like

0:39:57.800 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 14>we say, this does not aid anything change structurally anything

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:03.000
<v Speaker 14>from Intel to catching up to TSMC.

0:40:03.320 --> 0:40:06.320
<v Speaker 2>Isn't it interesting that the share price has been going

0:40:06.560 --> 0:40:09.319
<v Speaker 2>up into the right in reaction to basically money they

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:11.000
<v Speaker 2>were getting anyway, but maybe it was more of a

0:40:11.000 --> 0:40:13.400
<v Speaker 2>profit share in the future. Tell us a little bit

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:15.239
<v Speaker 2>though about where they really need to close the gap

0:40:15.239 --> 0:40:17.600
<v Speaker 2>from an innovation perspective. Is this really going to get

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:19.600
<v Speaker 2>them out there with a fourteen A.

0:40:20.560 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 3>It does not do anything.

0:40:21.640 --> 0:40:24.560
<v Speaker 14>I mean, look, they ten billion is not going to

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:26.440
<v Speaker 14>make or break them getting out in the fourteen eight

0:40:26.520 --> 0:40:29.040
<v Speaker 14>right so that is an execution challenge that only the

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:33.200
<v Speaker 14>company can fix. This could depends on what the you know,

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 14>what are the things attached to this deal. This could

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:39.160
<v Speaker 14>even slow it down because now you have government on

0:40:39.200 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 14>the decision making, seat driving some kind of decisions in

0:40:44.040 --> 0:40:46.480
<v Speaker 14>that direction. So this does not do anything to close

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:48.399
<v Speaker 14>that gap when it comes to leading edge.

0:40:48.480 --> 0:40:50.400
<v Speaker 2>I mean must be said how it lukmank Commers sexually

0:40:50.480 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 2>was saying, we're not going to take a governance role here,

0:40:52.400 --> 0:40:56.839
<v Speaker 2>but you can potentially you're saying, estimate, Maybe there's more

0:40:57.719 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 2>thoughts that the executives have to think through. So we're

0:41:00.440 --> 0:41:01.680
<v Speaker 2>p only in the here and now. What do you

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:03.760
<v Speaker 2>want to hear from the CEO, lit butan what's next?

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 14>Yeah, I think we want to see the same reassurance

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:11.080
<v Speaker 14>that the focus is going to be on eighteen A

0:41:11.200 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 14>and fourteen A and how like I said, the possibilities

0:41:16.200 --> 0:41:19.560
<v Speaker 14>of those positives. Hopefully we hear that and that encourages

0:41:19.840 --> 0:41:22.560
<v Speaker 14>investors that they'll deal will be positive in the near term.

0:41:22.800 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 14>A is getting more business from US fabulous companies in

0:41:26.160 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 14>order to get those exemptions from the tariffs.

0:41:28.640 --> 0:41:32.319
<v Speaker 2>We still await those tariffs. Con Josvanni Bloomberg Intelligence. We

0:41:32.400 --> 0:41:34.560
<v Speaker 2>thank you for the analysis. Meanwhile, that does it the

0:41:34.680 --> 0:41:36.879
<v Speaker 2>this edition of Blomberg Tech. Do not forget to check

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 2>out our podcast. You find it on the terminal as

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:41.799
<v Speaker 2>well as online on Apple, Spotify, and iHeart so much

0:41:41.840 --> 0:41:44.960
<v Speaker 2>more Intel news to digest ap currently the highest since April.

0:41:45.360 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 2>It's a Bloomberg Tech