WEBVTT - Existential Zones, Pt. 2 — It Ends

0:00:00.180 --> 0:00:02.810
<v Speaker 1>The Next Picture Show is presented by Regal Unlimited, the

0:00:02.880 --> 0:00:05.690
<v Speaker 1>all-you-can-watch movie subscription pass that pays for itself in just

0:00:05.730 --> 0:00:09.590
<v Speaker 1>two visits. See any standard 2D movie, anytime, with no

0:00:09.630 --> 0:00:12.410
<v Speaker 1>blackout dates or restrictions. Sign up now on the Regal

0:00:12.510 --> 0:00:15.130
<v Speaker 1>app or at the link in this episode's description and

0:00:15.260 --> 0:00:22.800
<v Speaker 1>use code NEXTPICK26 to receive 15% off. It's very difficult

0:00:22.820 --> 0:00:25.259
<v Speaker 1>to keep the line between the past and the present.

0:00:25.280 --> 0:00:28.670
<v Speaker 2>Do you believe that someone out of the past can change?

0:00:29.260 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 3>Enter and take possession of a living being.

0:00:31.980 --> 0:00:34.100
<v Speaker 1>We may be through with the past, but the past

0:00:34.180 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>is not through with us! Welcome back to The Next

0:00:40.659 --> 0:00:42.900
<v Speaker 1>Picture Show, a Movie of the Week podcast devoted to

0:00:42.920 --> 0:00:44.760
<v Speaker 1>a classic film and the way it's shaped our thoughts

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.820
<v Speaker 1>on a recent release. I'm Tasha Robinson, here again with.

0:00:48.200 --> 0:00:48.659
<v Speaker 2>Keith Phipps.

0:00:49.180 --> 0:00:49.820
<v Speaker 3>Scott Tobias.

0:00:50.420 --> 0:00:53.239
<v Speaker 1>Our absent co-host Genevieve Kosky said something about going off

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:55.620
<v Speaker 1>to conquer the cosmos and prove that she does so

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:57.730
<v Speaker 1>know what to do with other worlds, and we haven't

0:00:57.740 --> 0:01:00.040
<v Speaker 1>seen her since. We wish her all the best in

0:01:00.100 --> 0:01:02.860
<v Speaker 1>pushing back the frontiers of man's limitations and hope she

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:06.360
<v Speaker 1>brings us all souvenirs. In our last episode, we discussed

0:01:06.540 --> 0:01:11.750
<v Speaker 1>Andrei Tartovsky's 1972 adaptation of Stanislaw Lem's novel Solaris. We'll

0:01:11.790 --> 0:01:13.690
<v Speaker 1>return to that movie after we spend a little time

0:01:13.730 --> 0:01:17.709
<v Speaker 1>with its newer equivalent, Alexander Ullum's feature debut, It Ends.

0:01:18.330 --> 0:01:21.970
<v Speaker 1>This little 89-minute indie movie, made for just $ 80, 000, had

0:01:22.010 --> 0:01:25.190
<v Speaker 1>an interesting path to the screen. Ullum spent six years

0:01:25.280 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>and several rounds of reshoots on making, revising, and recutting it.

0:01:29.090 --> 0:01:32.330
<v Speaker 1>It debuted at South by Southwest in 2025, but like

0:01:32.390 --> 0:01:34.830
<v Speaker 1>so many smaller movies playing at festivals over the past

0:01:34.870 --> 0:01:37.570
<v Speaker 1>few years, it wasn't picked up for release. Ulam was

0:01:37.730 --> 0:01:40.330
<v Speaker 1>on the lot at Universal Studios, having the film turned

0:01:40.410 --> 0:01:43.230
<v Speaker 1>down for distribution again, when he noticed a crowd of

0:01:43.310 --> 0:01:47.150
<v Speaker 1>influencers nearby for a Jurassic World Rebirth event. As Ulam

0:01:47.170 --> 0:01:50.530
<v Speaker 1>told Variety, he jumped a fence, lied his way through security,

0:01:50.810 --> 0:01:53.500
<v Speaker 1>and crashed the event, where he ran into filmmaker Nick

0:01:53.590 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Curcio and talked up his movie. Curcio wound up posting

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:58.910
<v Speaker 1>about it in ends for his audience, which led to

0:01:58.950 --> 0:02:02.310
<v Speaker 1>an online debut as part of Letterboxd's new streaming store.

0:02:02.970 --> 0:02:05.830
<v Speaker 1>That brought the film to the attention of boutique distributor Neon,

0:02:05.950 --> 0:02:07.790
<v Speaker 1>which picked up the movie and brought it to theaters,

0:02:07.910 --> 0:02:11.200
<v Speaker 1>where it premiered to rave reviews. And in the process,

0:02:11.260 --> 0:02:13.500
<v Speaker 1>Olam picked up a contract for his next movie, which

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>he just finished shooting. Ed Ends is a daring little

0:02:16.740 --> 0:02:19.980
<v Speaker 1>piece of micro-budget drama centering on four friends all at

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>transition points in their lives. James, Day, and Fisher have

0:02:24.120 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>just graduated from college and are moving out of the dorms.

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:29.310
<v Speaker 1>Their friend Tyler, who joined the military and has been

0:02:29.320 --> 0:02:31.690
<v Speaker 1>away for a year, is back from training to help

0:02:31.730 --> 0:02:34.669
<v Speaker 1>them move. But after packing everything into a rental truck

0:02:34.690 --> 0:02:37.050
<v Speaker 1>and leaving it to the movers, the four friends wind

0:02:37.130 --> 0:02:39.790
<v Speaker 1>up on a forest-lined road with no turns or exits.

0:02:40.450 --> 0:02:43.220
<v Speaker 1>Whenever they stop, screaming people charge out of the woods

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.620
<v Speaker 1>and assault their jeep, seemingly trying to steal it. After

0:02:46.660 --> 0:02:48.260
<v Speaker 1>a full day on the road, they realize the car

0:02:48.360 --> 0:02:51.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't burning gas. None of them are tired or thirsty.

0:02:51.620 --> 0:02:54.730
<v Speaker 1>They can't sleep. Are they in purgatory? Is this a

0:02:54.770 --> 0:02:57.660
<v Speaker 1>test of some kind? They all have different theories and

0:02:57.720 --> 0:03:00.940
<v Speaker 1>different responses. And as the movie unfolds, they each reveal

0:03:00.980 --> 0:03:03.960
<v Speaker 1>things about themselves, both consciously as a way to pass

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.919
<v Speaker 1>the time or try to end the experience they're having,

0:03:07.380 --> 0:03:11.220
<v Speaker 1>and unconsciously in their responses to the situation. Is this

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:14.890
<v Speaker 1>a film about despair? About the afterlife? About the condition

0:03:14.930 --> 0:03:18.450
<v Speaker 1>of being human? About the difficulties of growing up? We'll

0:03:18.470 --> 0:03:19.730
<v Speaker 1>get into that in just a moment.

0:03:20.630 --> 0:03:23.830
<v Speaker 2>How long do y'all think we can do this? Just

0:03:23.889 --> 0:03:25.650
<v Speaker 2>sitting in here, driving.

0:03:26.940 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a forest full of people James has been

0:03:28.860 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>a dick to.

0:03:29.600 --> 0:03:31.940
<v Speaker 2>Maybe it's a forest full of people I've given dick to.

0:03:31.980 --> 0:03:33.019
<v Speaker 1>Empty fucking forest.

0:03:33.080 --> 0:03:33.880
<v Speaker 3>I definitely want.

0:03:33.760 --> 0:03:36.660
<v Speaker 1>To be here. James, there is no test!

0:03:38.060 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 3>So just this? Forever?

0:03:42.570 --> 0:03:44.090
<v Speaker 1>What if we're supposed to suffer here?

0:03:44.210 --> 0:03:47.130
<v Speaker 2>Happy birthday!

0:03:47.250 --> 0:03:48.330
<v Speaker 1>What if that's the point?

0:03:48.510 --> 0:03:50.810
<v Speaker 2>I'll do it.

0:03:51.510 --> 0:03:52.310
<v Speaker 3>For him.

0:03:52.410 --> 0:03:52.710
<v Speaker 2>It's time.

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:02.280
<v Speaker 3>This is not real life anymore.

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:06.380
<v Speaker 2>Help me!

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:07.460
<v Speaker 3>Help me!

0:04:08.780 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>So it ends. We could start with a lot of things,

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:13.520
<v Speaker 1>but where I really want to start is Ulm describes

0:04:13.580 --> 0:04:16.900
<v Speaker 1>this movie as Richard Linklater made a horror movie. He's

0:04:17.560 --> 0:04:20.180
<v Speaker 1>used that as kind of the tagline, his calling card

0:04:20.220 --> 0:04:22.029
<v Speaker 1>and trying to sell it. And he's used it in

0:04:22.050 --> 0:04:24.910
<v Speaker 1>various interviews. Do you think that's accurate?

0:04:25.290 --> 0:04:27.550
<v Speaker 2>It's a good calling card. I don't know if it

0:04:27.589 --> 0:04:31.090
<v Speaker 2>describes the movie. We talked about doing Slacker as a pairing.

0:04:31.250 --> 0:04:34.410
<v Speaker 2>And I think we're going to find more connections with Solaris.

0:04:34.710 --> 0:04:36.050
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. What do you think, Scott?

0:04:36.529 --> 0:04:39.589
<v Speaker 3>I think it's fair if you're talking about the tone

0:04:39.630 --> 0:04:42.589
<v Speaker 3>of the movie. I mean, the fact is, as a

0:04:42.670 --> 0:04:45.070
<v Speaker 3>horror film, what's fascinating about it is that it starts

0:04:45.170 --> 0:04:49.630
<v Speaker 3>off as something familiar as a horror film. And is

0:04:49.930 --> 0:04:54.650
<v Speaker 3>shot quite effectively. When you get that first sequence. When

0:04:55.190 --> 0:04:57.750
<v Speaker 3>they drive back to where they entered the road. And

0:04:57.890 --> 0:05:00.910
<v Speaker 3>it is now shut off by the forest. And they're

0:05:01.029 --> 0:05:05.130
<v Speaker 3>attacked by all of these people. Being sort of running

0:05:05.310 --> 0:05:09.270
<v Speaker 3>out of the woods. That has a real impact. That

0:05:09.350 --> 0:05:13.029
<v Speaker 3>feels like a conventional horror film. But then when the

0:05:13.050 --> 0:05:15.570
<v Speaker 3>film becomes what it becomes. And it's much more of

0:05:15.610 --> 0:05:19.410
<v Speaker 3>a situation. Those attacks continue. have no horror effect at

0:05:19.470 --> 0:05:22.710
<v Speaker 3>all because they can anticipate them, they can time them out,

0:05:22.830 --> 0:05:26.370
<v Speaker 3>and eventually any kind of threat that you would experience

0:05:26.390 --> 0:05:29.609
<v Speaker 3>in a conventional horror film completely disappears. It's a horror

0:05:29.650 --> 0:05:34.180
<v Speaker 3>film only in a philosophical sense, not in a visceral sense,

0:05:34.420 --> 0:05:38.420
<v Speaker 3>which is, I think, a hugely audacious and fascinating thing,

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:40.480
<v Speaker 3>one of the many things I love about this movie.

0:05:40.880 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 3>So then what is it? And I think then you

0:05:43.020 --> 0:05:45.400
<v Speaker 3>can kind of shift into this idea that it is

0:05:46.010 --> 0:05:49.610
<v Speaker 3>you know, link letter, like in the mode of slacker

0:05:49.790 --> 0:05:51.710
<v Speaker 3>or waking life or a movie like that, where it's

0:05:51.750 --> 0:05:55.410
<v Speaker 3>just like, okay, now we're just in philosophical terrain. And

0:05:55.670 --> 0:05:57.750
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the things that makes it link

0:05:57.830 --> 0:06:01.150
<v Speaker 3>lettery and is that all of them has a really

0:06:01.190 --> 0:06:05.039
<v Speaker 3>good sense of dialogue and how, you know, young people

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:08.540
<v Speaker 3>talk and philosophize and joke and relate to each other.

0:06:08.560 --> 0:06:10.940
<v Speaker 3>There's a, there's kind of a, you know, a loose, fun,

0:06:11.660 --> 0:06:15.280
<v Speaker 3>quality to it that's also married to, I think, a

0:06:15.320 --> 0:06:19.880
<v Speaker 3>pretty interesting, I guess, existential drama that sort of plays

0:06:19.940 --> 0:06:21.260
<v Speaker 3>out in this scenario.

0:06:21.850 --> 0:06:24.510
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I don't want to get too far into spoilers yet,

0:06:24.670 --> 0:06:27.270
<v Speaker 1>although we are definitely going to talk about where the

0:06:27.290 --> 0:06:30.030
<v Speaker 1>movie goes and where the movie ends. But before we

0:06:30.070 --> 0:06:32.810
<v Speaker 1>get to that, yeah, I didn't process this all that

0:06:32.870 --> 0:06:35.839
<v Speaker 1>much as a horror film past, I want to say,

0:06:35.880 --> 0:06:40.060
<v Speaker 1>maybe the first 25 minutes or so. It almost seems

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:44.570
<v Speaker 1>like It's got a horror-ish setup in a very A24

0:06:44.610 --> 0:06:46.669
<v Speaker 1>get butts in seats kind of way. You know, you

0:06:47.050 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>can advertise this with a few carefully selected shots and

0:06:51.220 --> 0:06:54.000
<v Speaker 1>framing as a horror movie, but it kind of lures

0:06:54.020 --> 0:06:56.940
<v Speaker 1>you in with that and then goes somewhere else. And similarly,

0:06:56.980 --> 0:06:59.180
<v Speaker 1>there was a point of maybe a little later in

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the movie where the characters are kind of trying to

0:07:02.580 --> 0:07:06.040
<v Speaker 1>decode the situation they're in and find the magic button

0:07:06.060 --> 0:07:08.770
<v Speaker 1>that'll let them escape. where I realize it kind of

0:07:08.810 --> 0:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>picks up a lot of the framework of a repeating

0:07:11.500 --> 0:07:15.390
<v Speaker 1>day movie. You know, your Groundhog Days and the many,

0:07:15.470 --> 0:07:19.420
<v Speaker 1>many copycats of that where they kind of do the,

0:07:20.310 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is all a punishment because one of

0:07:23.040 --> 0:07:26.980
<v Speaker 1>us did X. Like, let's do confessionals. Let's see if

0:07:27.020 --> 0:07:29.940
<v Speaker 1>we can find the thing that we're missing or that

0:07:29.960 --> 0:07:32.900
<v Speaker 1>we did or whatever and fix that. And that also

0:07:32.960 --> 0:07:36.260
<v Speaker 1>proves to not be particularly relevant and is something that

0:07:36.300 --> 0:07:39.800
<v Speaker 1>the movie can address and then dismiss. And all of

0:07:39.860 --> 0:07:43.880
<v Speaker 1>this to me just feels very... Genre savvy, in a way,

0:07:43.890 --> 0:07:46.380
<v Speaker 1>I'm just seeing more and more and more with young

0:07:46.440 --> 0:07:49.820
<v Speaker 1>filmmakers in particular, people who've just absorbed a lot of

0:07:49.900 --> 0:07:53.700
<v Speaker 1>cinema and kind of know this maybe hit me first

0:07:53.760 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>and hardest with Smile, the horror movie. There's just a

0:07:57.280 --> 0:08:01.820
<v Speaker 1>lot of young filmmakers, particularly working in genre, that are

0:08:01.880 --> 0:08:05.890
<v Speaker 1>kind of coming from a perspective of You know cinema.

0:08:06.250 --> 0:08:10.350
<v Speaker 1>And when X happens, you're expecting Y. So let's make

0:08:10.370 --> 0:08:14.110
<v Speaker 1>a point of mentioning Y before we veer to kind

0:08:14.170 --> 0:08:16.910
<v Speaker 1>of do a Leonardo DiCaprio pointing meme at you and

0:08:17.330 --> 0:08:19.470
<v Speaker 1>acknowledge that you're smart before we move on and do

0:08:19.490 --> 0:08:21.850
<v Speaker 1>the next thing. And I felt a lot of that here.

0:08:22.150 --> 0:08:25.770
<v Speaker 1>You know, I felt a lot of the filmmaker kind

0:08:25.810 --> 0:08:28.230
<v Speaker 1>of knows what we're thinking and is going to like

0:08:28.330 --> 0:08:30.810
<v Speaker 1>take us just far enough down that road that we

0:08:30.860 --> 0:08:34.310
<v Speaker 1>can feel smart. and then veer off in another direction

0:08:34.410 --> 0:08:36.770
<v Speaker 1>so we can feel intrigued by where is this film

0:08:36.809 --> 0:08:37.370
<v Speaker 1>going next.

0:08:37.710 --> 0:08:40.920
<v Speaker 3>To what you were saying, Tasha, about young filmmakers and horror,

0:08:40.980 --> 0:08:44.620
<v Speaker 3>I mean, what a year. I know, right? I mean,

0:08:44.660 --> 0:08:46.940
<v Speaker 3>obviously the timing on this is a little wonky because

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 3>of when it was made and when it was finally,

0:08:49.420 --> 0:08:50.939
<v Speaker 3>how it was put on the letterbox and then it

0:08:51.000 --> 0:08:54.059
<v Speaker 3>was released theatrically. So, you know, it doesn't always align,

0:08:54.100 --> 0:08:57.640
<v Speaker 3>but we are experiencing these movies as like obsession and

0:08:57.700 --> 0:08:59.900
<v Speaker 3>back rooms in this film. And it just, it kind

0:08:59.960 --> 0:09:03.020
<v Speaker 3>of is a reminder of like, horror being now this

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:08.590
<v Speaker 3>space of exploration and theme and innovation that is kind

0:09:08.650 --> 0:09:11.709
<v Speaker 3>of leaving a lot of the other genres behind at

0:09:11.730 --> 0:09:14.690
<v Speaker 3>the current moment, just because I think they've discovered that

0:09:15.170 --> 0:09:18.460
<v Speaker 3>there's a thirst for it, for original horror, that it's

0:09:18.500 --> 0:09:21.100
<v Speaker 3>something you can gamble not a lot of money on

0:09:21.340 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 3>and have these incredible moments like this film, which was

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:29.450
<v Speaker 3>made for 80 grand or back rooms, which is obviously

0:09:29.490 --> 0:09:32.929
<v Speaker 3>not the most expensive production, and come up with something

0:09:33.170 --> 0:09:36.390
<v Speaker 3>pretty original, I would say. Quite an experience. So it

0:09:36.429 --> 0:09:39.050
<v Speaker 3>has been kind of invigorating to see this. Though I

0:09:39.050 --> 0:09:41.989
<v Speaker 3>think Keith was somewhat more guarded in his praise of

0:09:42.030 --> 0:09:45.250
<v Speaker 3>this film, so I'm curious to hear his take on it.

0:09:45.530 --> 0:09:47.810
<v Speaker 2>No, I like the movie. To be clear, I saw

0:09:47.830 --> 0:09:51.990
<v Speaker 2>this at the Overlook Film Festival last year, and it

0:09:52.030 --> 0:09:54.550
<v Speaker 2>is a horror festival. So it did fit right in there,

0:09:54.590 --> 0:09:58.260
<v Speaker 2>but you're right, it does lose the horror fairly early on.

0:09:58.420 --> 0:10:01.500
<v Speaker 2>I just thought it was good. I thought the ideas

0:10:01.520 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 2>were maybe stronger, not stronger than the execution, which I

0:10:03.800 --> 0:10:06.140
<v Speaker 2>think is quite good, but I felt like I lost

0:10:06.200 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 2>a little patience with it as it went on, which

0:10:08.580 --> 0:10:10.420
<v Speaker 2>I understand is kind of part of the point. But

0:10:10.460 --> 0:10:12.420
<v Speaker 2>for an 89 minutes, you know, it does make 89

0:10:12.420 --> 0:10:16.100
<v Speaker 2>minutes feels kind of long for this in some ways. But,

0:10:16.200 --> 0:10:18.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, the movie came out again. It got all

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:22.120
<v Speaker 2>kinds of rapturous response, including from you, Scott. And I'm like,

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:24.300
<v Speaker 2>I'm probably just, you know, going to have a much

0:10:24.340 --> 0:10:26.579
<v Speaker 2>stronger response to it this time. And when I saw

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:30.209
<v Speaker 2>it again, I was like, Oh, that's good. I like it.

0:10:30.570 --> 0:10:32.309
<v Speaker 2>I did not. I was not over the moon for it,

0:10:32.309 --> 0:10:34.679
<v Speaker 2>but I do like it. I think it's really savvy

0:10:34.800 --> 0:10:38.630
<v Speaker 2>to release this film. in the wake of Obsession and Backrooms.

0:10:38.870 --> 0:10:40.550
<v Speaker 2>I kind of wish the movie Undertone had come out

0:10:40.570 --> 0:10:42.190
<v Speaker 2>a little after those movies, too, because I think that

0:10:42.230 --> 0:10:44.569
<v Speaker 2>could have ridden that wave. This movie I liked quite

0:10:44.610 --> 0:10:48.010
<v Speaker 2>a bit. It's doing something neat with horror that I

0:10:48.050 --> 0:10:50.750
<v Speaker 2>think maybe got a little lost earlier this year, so

0:10:50.870 --> 0:10:53.610
<v Speaker 2>call that a little recommendation. But yeah, I'm sure we're

0:10:53.630 --> 0:10:54.630
<v Speaker 2>going to get into it some more. I think there's

0:10:54.650 --> 0:10:57.250
<v Speaker 2>a lot going on in this film, and I do

0:10:57.290 --> 0:10:59.439
<v Speaker 2>like it, but I was not blown away.

0:10:59.780 --> 0:11:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Let's start in unpacking this. Again, I don't want to

0:11:02.460 --> 0:11:04.700
<v Speaker 1>get too deep into the what's going on because I

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:09.030
<v Speaker 1>want to, I strongly suspect just based on how far

0:11:09.070 --> 0:11:12.510
<v Speaker 1>the movie has come from theaters already, like how many

0:11:12.530 --> 0:11:16.329
<v Speaker 1>theaters it left literally as of today when we're recording this.

0:11:16.770 --> 0:11:19.050
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if by the time when this episode comes

0:11:19.150 --> 0:11:21.910
<v Speaker 1>out two weeks from now as we're recording it, I'm

0:11:21.970 --> 0:11:23.449
<v Speaker 1>wondering if people are going to have an option to

0:11:23.490 --> 0:11:25.229
<v Speaker 1>watch it at all. So this may be more of

0:11:25.350 --> 0:11:29.439
<v Speaker 1>a put it on your watch when it hits streaming again.

0:11:29.460 --> 0:11:31.260
<v Speaker 1>I kind of wonder if it'll come back to the

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:35.559
<v Speaker 1>letterbox to store in addition to wherever else Neon puts it.

0:11:36.160 --> 0:11:38.020
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to get too far into the

0:11:38.080 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>spoiler section yet. So with that caveat, though, we've got

0:11:42.500 --> 0:11:46.290
<v Speaker 1>four characters here who are very different from each other.

0:11:46.309 --> 0:11:49.130
<v Speaker 1>It's so different, in fact, that in the early going

0:11:49.170 --> 0:11:50.709
<v Speaker 1>of the movie, I had kind of one of those,

0:11:51.330 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 1>why are these people friends? And Really, are they friends

0:11:54.880 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>given how they speak to each other and treat each

0:11:57.179 --> 0:12:00.500
<v Speaker 1>other kind of responses? But I think it is pretty

0:12:00.600 --> 0:12:06.050
<v Speaker 1>easy in college, particularly to fall in with people who are,

0:12:06.530 --> 0:12:09.309
<v Speaker 1>you know, in your classes or in your dorms or

0:12:09.490 --> 0:12:11.679
<v Speaker 1>in your social circles who you might not be friends

0:12:11.720 --> 0:12:14.930
<v Speaker 1>with five years later. So I'll give that a pass.

0:12:15.090 --> 0:12:18.589
<v Speaker 1>But again, very different people. Curious if any of them

0:12:18.809 --> 0:12:21.910
<v Speaker 1>especially stood out for you, or I guess to ask

0:12:21.960 --> 0:12:24.380
<v Speaker 1>the question I asked in the last part of the episode,

0:12:24.740 --> 0:12:27.550
<v Speaker 1>if you identified with or connected with any of them particularly.

0:12:28.059 --> 0:12:33.099
<v Speaker 2>I'm so old. I don't know that I do anymore. No,

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:33.740
<v Speaker 2>that's being flipped.

0:12:34.020 --> 0:12:36.980
<v Speaker 3>I would say, I mean, the standout character for me

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:40.780
<v Speaker 3>is James, played by Phineas Yoon, because I think that

0:12:40.940 --> 0:12:44.840
<v Speaker 3>your initial impression of him is someone who is very

0:12:44.980 --> 0:12:51.290
<v Speaker 3>cool and hyper-rational and not really emotionally driven. He kind

0:12:51.330 --> 0:12:55.209
<v Speaker 3>of surprises you because he ends up being the person

0:12:55.690 --> 0:13:00.750
<v Speaker 3>who is most hopeful, most curious, most willing to withstand

0:13:00.770 --> 0:13:05.850
<v Speaker 3>the sort of psychological pressure challenge of the situation as

0:13:05.910 --> 0:13:08.310
<v Speaker 3>it goes on and on and on and on uh

0:13:08.390 --> 0:13:10.189
<v Speaker 3>trying to be vague here but boy tasha we should

0:13:10.210 --> 0:13:12.740
<v Speaker 3>probably but we should really just like have this be

0:13:13.080 --> 0:13:15.719
<v Speaker 3>a spoiler podcast at this point but i guess vaguely

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 3>speaking i i think that his need to understand what's

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.719
<v Speaker 3>going on his need to understand what it means you

0:13:22.240 --> 0:13:25.179
<v Speaker 3>know it really drives that character makes him the most

0:13:25.210 --> 0:13:26.670
<v Speaker 3>compelling of the four for me but i kind of

0:13:26.710 --> 0:13:29.750
<v Speaker 3>like i like that the film really delineates these characters

0:13:29.929 --> 0:13:31.809
<v Speaker 3>quite well i mean it's a really nice piece of

0:13:31.830 --> 0:13:34.730
<v Speaker 3>characterization good acting in the movie And I think to

0:13:34.770 --> 0:13:39.230
<v Speaker 3>speak to your assertion about how these four could be friends,

0:13:39.370 --> 0:13:41.570
<v Speaker 3>I think the one character who kind of stands apart

0:13:41.590 --> 0:13:44.630
<v Speaker 3>from them is the driver. And I think he ends

0:13:44.670 --> 0:13:47.870
<v Speaker 3>up standing apart because he has gone on a different

0:13:48.010 --> 0:13:50.949
<v Speaker 3>journey than them. He's that classic person that you left

0:13:51.010 --> 0:13:53.610
<v Speaker 3>behind that was an old buddy of yours and now

0:13:53.630 --> 0:13:56.970
<v Speaker 3>you've gone off to college and he's gone off to, what,

0:13:57.010 --> 0:14:02.790
<v Speaker 3>the military? And they just don't quite click. the same way.

0:14:02.840 --> 0:14:05.700
<v Speaker 3>Their experiences are not the same. And there's a kind

0:14:05.740 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 3>of a built-in awkwardness to that relationship. And again, it's

0:14:10.200 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 3>all in a fruitful way. And one of the things

0:14:12.820 --> 0:14:16.030
<v Speaker 3>that I think really works in the film's favor throughout,

0:14:16.070 --> 0:14:18.790
<v Speaker 3>I think, is it's really funny. Just on a script

0:14:18.830 --> 0:14:23.390
<v Speaker 3>writing level, it's really promising beyond what it does on

0:14:23.430 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 3>a conceptual level.

0:14:24.730 --> 0:14:28.030
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the guy who you identify as the driver, the

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.620
<v Speaker 1>guy who went off and joined the military, Tyler, played

0:14:30.660 --> 0:14:33.860
<v Speaker 1>by Mitchell Cole. This is a very multi-culti group, you know,

0:14:34.240 --> 0:14:37.500
<v Speaker 1>a Black woman, an Asian guy, a white guy. And

0:14:37.540 --> 0:14:39.750
<v Speaker 1>then Tyler is also a white guy, but with a

0:14:39.890 --> 0:14:42.950
<v Speaker 1>very distinctive Southern accent and what I think of as

0:14:42.990 --> 0:14:47.750
<v Speaker 1>kind of a Southern military family personality. He comes across

0:14:47.770 --> 0:14:51.170
<v Speaker 1>as a little bit curt, not very interested in talking

0:14:51.190 --> 0:14:55.390
<v Speaker 1>about emotions, but also possibly kind of deeper and more

0:14:55.630 --> 0:14:59.890
<v Speaker 1>life experience than the other people in the car. And

0:14:59.930 --> 0:15:02.670
<v Speaker 1>he does feel like he's moved beyond them just a

0:15:02.710 --> 0:15:06.900
<v Speaker 1>little bit. And, you know, that he's certainly dealing with

0:15:06.940 --> 0:15:10.700
<v Speaker 1>a deeper well of emotion than he would be comfortable expressing.

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.940
<v Speaker 1>And I found him very interesting. All of them, I think,

0:15:14.060 --> 0:15:17.860
<v Speaker 1>I agree, they're pretty well delineated in kind of interesting ways.

0:15:18.240 --> 0:15:20.300
<v Speaker 1>Fisher kind of feels like he might have been the

0:15:20.580 --> 0:15:23.640
<v Speaker 1>class clown and Day has a little more of a

0:15:23.740 --> 0:15:29.370
<v Speaker 1>caretaker vibe. But yeah, James, who Alex Olam has been

0:15:29.400 --> 0:15:32.350
<v Speaker 1>very clear is like kind of a self-insertion character for

0:15:32.390 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>him and how he would take the situation. It's both very,

0:15:36.060 --> 0:15:40.470
<v Speaker 1>very frustrating in a pretty deliberate way, and for me,

0:15:40.970 --> 0:15:45.190
<v Speaker 1>just the most understandable character there. The way he tries

0:15:45.230 --> 0:15:49.990
<v Speaker 1>to intellectualize everything that he's dealing with, the way he...

0:15:51.210 --> 0:15:53.390
<v Speaker 1>wants to talk about things nobody else wants to talk

0:15:53.450 --> 0:15:56.270
<v Speaker 1>about in terms of what might be going on and

0:15:56.590 --> 0:15:59.350
<v Speaker 1>doesn't take emotional cues from the rest of them when

0:15:59.370 --> 0:16:01.190
<v Speaker 1>they try to shut him down. And the fact that

0:16:01.230 --> 0:16:05.230
<v Speaker 1>he pushes on when other people make other decisions, all

0:16:05.270 --> 0:16:09.270
<v Speaker 1>of which makes him, I think, both frustrating and unlikable

0:16:09.450 --> 0:16:12.890
<v Speaker 1>and just the most interesting character and just, to me,

0:16:12.960 --> 0:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>maybe the most relatable character in the story.

0:16:22.610 --> 0:16:25.770
<v Speaker 3>One more thing that connects it to Linklater is that

0:16:25.860 --> 0:16:29.920
<v Speaker 3>one of its themes is Linklater's favorite theme, which is time.

0:16:30.340 --> 0:16:33.200
<v Speaker 3>Though I don't know how much, you know, it's felt.

0:16:33.240 --> 0:16:34.840
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I guess maybe you all felt it was

0:16:34.880 --> 0:16:38.450
<v Speaker 3>kind of a long feeling 89 minute movie. So maybe

0:16:39.110 --> 0:16:40.090
<v Speaker 3>you thought it moved pretty fast.

0:16:40.370 --> 0:16:42.850
<v Speaker 1>If this movie was two hours long, I probably would

0:16:42.870 --> 0:16:45.690
<v Speaker 1>have gotten pretty itchy, but it felt pretty perfect to

0:16:45.730 --> 0:16:46.650
<v Speaker 1>me at 89 minutes.

0:16:47.210 --> 0:16:47.430
<v Speaker 2>Okay.

0:16:47.750 --> 0:16:50.110
<v Speaker 3>But it is in any case, you know, something that

0:16:50.390 --> 0:16:53.100
<v Speaker 3>we know these characters are having to contend with. And

0:16:53.120 --> 0:16:57.340
<v Speaker 3>I think that the film does an effective enough job

0:16:57.800 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 3>of dramatizing the kind of wear and tear that you

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:07.320
<v Speaker 3>would experience logging that many miles and hours and days

0:17:07.380 --> 0:17:10.000
<v Speaker 3>and weeks or whatever, you know, driving on this road

0:17:10.040 --> 0:17:13.330
<v Speaker 3>with no end and never getting tired, never getting hungry,

0:17:13.810 --> 0:17:18.389
<v Speaker 3>having to, you know, basically exhaust every conversational nugget you

0:17:18.410 --> 0:17:21.619
<v Speaker 3>might have in your head. All that is interesting. I mean,

0:17:21.640 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a little, it's almost a little unrealistic

0:17:23.540 --> 0:17:25.780
<v Speaker 3>in the fact that to the degree that like when we,

0:17:26.560 --> 0:17:28.440
<v Speaker 3>we need sleep for a reason, we sleep, we sleep

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:31.899
<v Speaker 3>because we would go completely mad. If we were to

0:17:31.920 --> 0:17:35.060
<v Speaker 3>stay awake for such a long time. And so I

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 3>think the degree to which these characters would actually kind

0:17:38.800 --> 0:17:41.060
<v Speaker 3>of fall to pieces would be a lot faster, I think,

0:17:41.100 --> 0:17:43.899
<v Speaker 3>than what happens in the scope of time that is

0:17:43.920 --> 0:17:44.920
<v Speaker 3>suggested by the movie.

0:17:45.420 --> 0:17:48.409
<v Speaker 2>But nevertheless. But bodily needs are no longer required. They

0:17:48.430 --> 0:17:51.710
<v Speaker 2>don't need to eat either and presumably use the bathroom

0:17:52.070 --> 0:17:55.570
<v Speaker 2>or shave. I guess shave does grow some facial hair.

0:17:55.970 --> 0:17:57.189
<v Speaker 2>over the course of the film, doesn't he?

0:17:57.250 --> 0:17:58.830
<v Speaker 1>Well, he heals, too.

0:17:59.290 --> 0:18:01.609
<v Speaker 3>One of them gets injured and then heals up.

0:18:02.050 --> 0:18:02.629
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:18:02.830 --> 0:18:06.900
<v Speaker 1>But there is no sign that they're shaving, that they're

0:18:06.920 --> 0:18:10.500
<v Speaker 1>growing bodily hair. I wondered about their fingernails. Or getting stinky.

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:12.980
<v Speaker 2>I always wonder about, I find myself thinking about smells

0:18:13.240 --> 0:18:15.679
<v Speaker 2>in films more than I think most people, but I

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:20.090
<v Speaker 2>just wonder what it smelled like inside of there. But

0:18:20.109 --> 0:18:21.510
<v Speaker 2>I think they would have run out of things to

0:18:21.570 --> 0:18:23.470
<v Speaker 2>talk about sooner than they do.

0:18:24.010 --> 0:18:27.010
<v Speaker 3>There's a game that they play that involves really going

0:18:27.070 --> 0:18:31.389
<v Speaker 3>through item after item after item that would seem like

0:18:31.410 --> 0:18:33.369
<v Speaker 3>that would take a while to, to try to.

0:18:33.410 --> 0:18:34.450
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's true.

0:18:34.470 --> 0:18:37.090
<v Speaker 1>And it kind of feels like, you know, that's the

0:18:37.130 --> 0:18:40.630
<v Speaker 1>point both within the universe of the movie where they're

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:45.020
<v Speaker 1>inventing games to make conversation still seem relevant after so

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>much time. And outside of the movie where we're seeing

0:18:48.660 --> 0:18:51.629
<v Speaker 1>the passage of time and, and how the, They've been

0:18:51.670 --> 0:18:55.010
<v Speaker 1>on the road so long that discussing their emotional responses

0:18:55.070 --> 0:18:59.670
<v Speaker 1>towards windshield wipers is potentially interesting. Yeah, the passage of

0:18:59.730 --> 0:19:04.100
<v Speaker 1>time and the way it's conveyed in sometimes very humorous ways.

0:19:04.119 --> 0:19:06.560
<v Speaker 1>At one point, there's just a giant title card that says,

0:19:06.980 --> 0:19:12.450
<v Speaker 1>way later. You know, this movie has a sharp sense

0:19:12.490 --> 0:19:16.180
<v Speaker 1>of humor for... something that is in many ways kind

0:19:16.220 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>of grim and certainly existential. So the way it plays

0:19:20.640 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>around with time and particularly the lapses of time is fun.

0:19:25.119 --> 0:19:27.350
<v Speaker 1>Before we get into anything spoilery, we should just sort

0:19:27.380 --> 0:19:30.649
<v Speaker 1>of talk about the filmmaking, you know, the cinematography, and

0:19:31.130 --> 0:19:35.490
<v Speaker 1>particularly I think the use of montage to show time passing,

0:19:35.609 --> 0:19:38.590
<v Speaker 1>to show kind of the weight of time on these

0:19:38.630 --> 0:19:42.800
<v Speaker 1>people is very interesting. This is more or less a

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:46.660
<v Speaker 1>single set movie that takes place outdoors.

0:19:47.869 --> 0:19:49.109
<v Speaker 2>It's a mobile set. Yeah.

0:19:49.369 --> 0:19:56.820
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. traversing a very large amount of imaginary landscape. I

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:59.720
<v Speaker 1>think that's innovative. I think the camera use is kind

0:19:59.780 --> 0:20:04.720
<v Speaker 1>of fun and exploratory. We have a little classic spinning

0:20:04.780 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>upside down to make you dizzy and make the... Skies

0:20:09.180 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>seem like the ground. We get in real, real close

0:20:11.880 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>and wander far away from our characters. I think there's

0:20:14.900 --> 0:20:17.619
<v Speaker 1>a lot of conscious thought to, like, how can we

0:20:17.700 --> 0:20:23.310
<v Speaker 1>visually vary a situation that is event-wise kind of unvarying

0:20:23.470 --> 0:20:26.550
<v Speaker 1>and make it still seem like fresh and interesting for

0:20:26.570 --> 0:20:26.970
<v Speaker 1>our audience?

0:20:27.320 --> 0:20:31.300
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, the landscape is, by design, unchanging. But I also

0:20:31.320 --> 0:20:34.159
<v Speaker 2>feel like we never see the same particular stretch of

0:20:34.200 --> 0:20:37.900
<v Speaker 2>road more than once, too. It's very clever that way.

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:40.649
<v Speaker 1>I watched a pretty funny interview, a short interview with Ulum,

0:20:40.670 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>where he talks about how he... He filmed this in

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 1>Florida on a very long road, but he's been asked

0:20:48.980 --> 0:20:51.879
<v Speaker 1>by the national park that it's in to stop identifying

0:20:51.900 --> 0:20:55.260
<v Speaker 1>where it is because people, having seen the film, have

0:20:55.300 --> 0:20:58.390
<v Speaker 1>started showing up there to drag race along this long road.

0:20:58.950 --> 0:21:01.369
<v Speaker 1>So now he can't talk about where he shot it anymore.

0:21:01.730 --> 0:21:03.910
<v Speaker 2>That's funny. Should we get into spoilers at this point?

0:21:04.290 --> 0:21:05.990
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, let's get into spoilers.

0:21:06.010 --> 0:21:08.550
<v Speaker 2>Before you, I think there's a conversation that happens early

0:21:08.609 --> 0:21:11.660
<v Speaker 2>on that's kind of key to this movie where James

0:21:11.700 --> 0:21:15.030
<v Speaker 2>is going on about envisioning the rest of his life,

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.310
<v Speaker 2>like what's going to happen next. And his vision of

0:21:18.410 --> 0:21:21.189
<v Speaker 2>it is funny, but it's also kind of like, this

0:21:21.250 --> 0:21:23.129
<v Speaker 2>is going to happen then, this is going to happen next.

0:21:23.510 --> 0:21:24.990
<v Speaker 2>And it's like this vision of his life is being

0:21:25.030 --> 0:21:28.889
<v Speaker 2>like on rails. Like once he chooses his direction, he

0:21:28.910 --> 0:21:30.889
<v Speaker 2>can only keep going in that direction. To me, I

0:21:30.910 --> 0:21:33.330
<v Speaker 2>feel like that is kind of a key to unlocking

0:21:33.350 --> 0:21:35.250
<v Speaker 2>what this film is about. These are characters at a

0:21:35.270 --> 0:21:37.810
<v Speaker 2>particular point in their lives where, I mean, think about

0:21:37.850 --> 0:21:40.650
<v Speaker 2>where you were out of college and like things that

0:21:40.690 --> 0:21:44.179
<v Speaker 2>didn't seem like momentous choices in that ended up affecting

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:47.340
<v Speaker 2>the rest of your life. And I think this film's

0:21:47.380 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 2>very good at kind of capturing, turning that feeling into

0:21:50.540 --> 0:21:52.200
<v Speaker 2>a feature-length experience in some ways.

0:21:52.700 --> 0:21:55.570
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that little bit of dialogue where James kind of

0:21:55.609 --> 0:22:00.230
<v Speaker 1>lays out the pitilessness of the life that he sees

0:22:00.270 --> 0:22:04.110
<v Speaker 1>ahead of him. And he's just very derogatory about marrying

0:22:04.150 --> 0:22:07.780
<v Speaker 1>somebody and having kids and getting this tedious job where

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>he does the same thing forever and ever. And I

0:22:10.240 --> 0:22:12.300
<v Speaker 1>think it's Day that calls him out on, you know,

0:22:12.580 --> 0:22:18.020
<v Speaker 1>your most depressive version of your life involves having a

0:22:18.140 --> 0:22:21.180
<v Speaker 1>family and a home and a job and a purpose.

0:22:21.260 --> 0:22:24.700
<v Speaker 1>And she's kind of like laughing at him because he's

0:22:24.900 --> 0:22:27.900
<v Speaker 1>depicting all of that as just kind of like soul

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:32.369
<v Speaker 1>crushing and horrible. But what he's describing is a sense

0:22:32.430 --> 0:22:36.129
<v Speaker 1>that he doesn't have any control, you know, that society

0:22:36.190 --> 0:22:39.390
<v Speaker 1>has kind of laid out the one path that you're

0:22:39.430 --> 0:22:42.850
<v Speaker 1>allowed to take and he sees himself as stuck on it.

0:22:43.260 --> 0:22:45.600
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, that does seem like a metaphor for what's

0:22:45.619 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 1>going on in the movie.

0:22:46.800 --> 0:22:50.540
<v Speaker 3>I think one of the important things about this movie

0:22:50.820 --> 0:22:54.620
<v Speaker 3>and sort of the really profound thing to me about

0:22:54.640 --> 0:22:58.940
<v Speaker 3>this movie is how much it, you know, addresses what

0:22:58.980 --> 0:23:01.210
<v Speaker 3>it is that we actually do, you know, what our

0:23:01.430 --> 0:23:03.689
<v Speaker 3>lives are about, what composes our lives, what do we

0:23:03.770 --> 0:23:06.910
<v Speaker 3>talk about, how do we actually pass the time, right?

0:23:07.380 --> 0:23:10.879
<v Speaker 3>because we do a lot of, our interactions with each

0:23:11.000 --> 0:23:14.889
<v Speaker 3>other are often banal and silly. And you get to

0:23:14.910 --> 0:23:18.810
<v Speaker 3>this point in this movie where the conversation has no

0:23:18.869 --> 0:23:21.030
<v Speaker 3>substance to it at all. It's just, how do we

0:23:21.070 --> 0:23:24.240
<v Speaker 3>pass the time? We have to fill the air with something.

0:23:24.660 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 3>And it all comes back around to that framing device

0:23:27.980 --> 0:23:31.140
<v Speaker 3>with the scenario of the 10,000 rats and the five

0:23:31.180 --> 0:23:34.580
<v Speaker 3>gorillas and the human with the gun and the 50 Hawks.

0:23:34.660 --> 0:23:36.620
<v Speaker 3>And in that, that scenario, it's just, it's a kind

0:23:36.640 --> 0:23:39.679
<v Speaker 3>of a nonsense kind of game that you get, that

0:23:39.700 --> 0:23:42.240
<v Speaker 3>you play with each other that really has no actual meaning.

0:23:42.820 --> 0:23:46.500
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, it's, it's, I just find that interesting, you know,

0:23:47.000 --> 0:23:49.770
<v Speaker 3>you'll philosophically just about like what, what this film actually

0:23:50.310 --> 0:23:52.609
<v Speaker 3>is sort of getting at or suggesting about, you know,

0:23:52.810 --> 0:23:54.710
<v Speaker 3>the ways, ways in which we talk to each other,

0:23:54.750 --> 0:23:56.790
<v Speaker 3>the way, you know, in the way that we spend

0:23:56.810 --> 0:23:58.790
<v Speaker 3>our time on earth and, Which is not to say

0:23:58.810 --> 0:24:01.130
<v Speaker 3>it's being judgmental about it, but I think it's well observed.

0:24:01.450 --> 0:24:04.470
<v Speaker 1>I want to get into a little bit of what

0:24:04.510 --> 0:24:07.459
<v Speaker 1>that talking to each other looks like, because it heavily

0:24:07.500 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>affects what happens in the rest of the film. And effectively,

0:24:11.680 --> 0:24:15.640
<v Speaker 1>what happens is Tyler dips pretty early. He decides fairly early,

0:24:15.760 --> 0:24:18.379
<v Speaker 1>once they realize that the people attacking them from the

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.369
<v Speaker 1>woods want the car and don't care about them as

0:24:21.470 --> 0:24:25.879
<v Speaker 1>individuals and won't come after them, he suggests that If

0:24:25.980 --> 0:24:30.540
<v Speaker 1>he himself joins the Woods people, he's probably just going

0:24:30.560 --> 0:24:34.570
<v Speaker 1>to fall quietly into oblivion when cars are not passing.

0:24:35.150 --> 0:24:36.510
<v Speaker 1>And he just gets out of the car and won't

0:24:36.550 --> 0:24:39.550
<v Speaker 1>get back in, which feels to me a lot like

0:24:39.690 --> 0:24:43.100
<v Speaker 1>moments in Stephen King's The Long Walk book and movie

0:24:43.490 --> 0:24:46.280
<v Speaker 1>where people just realize they can't walk anymore and they

0:24:46.300 --> 0:24:51.320
<v Speaker 1>just stop. The movie does make reference to suicide. Day

0:24:51.340 --> 0:24:54.379
<v Speaker 1>has apparently attempted it at one point and wonders if

0:24:54.520 --> 0:24:58.500
<v Speaker 1>others have. To me, Tyler's stepping aside from the situation

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:04.300
<v Speaker 1>and choosing oblivion rather than continuation feels like a metaphor

0:25:04.340 --> 0:25:08.370
<v Speaker 1>for suicide. But what we see after that is some

0:25:08.590 --> 0:25:12.459
<v Speaker 1>unknown period of time way later. where Day, Fisher, and

0:25:12.500 --> 0:25:16.300
<v Speaker 1>James have all kind of developed a pattern for their lives,

0:25:16.420 --> 0:25:20.660
<v Speaker 1>a literal schedule from day to day where they have

0:25:20.800 --> 0:25:23.399
<v Speaker 1>the time during which they tell each other stories and

0:25:23.420 --> 0:25:26.270
<v Speaker 1>the time during which they play a particular road game

0:25:26.670 --> 0:25:29.910
<v Speaker 1>and the time during which they air their grievances about

0:25:29.930 --> 0:25:33.010
<v Speaker 1>each other to clear the air. which they've developed kind

0:25:33.030 --> 0:25:35.710
<v Speaker 1>of a patterned way to do. And as you say,

0:25:35.770 --> 0:25:38.690
<v Speaker 1>all of this seems kind of meaningless in a way,

0:25:38.790 --> 0:25:41.310
<v Speaker 1>but it also seems very creative. And I don't just

0:25:41.350 --> 0:25:45.930
<v Speaker 1>mean creative in terms of the filmmakers. I mean, these

0:25:45.970 --> 0:25:50.490
<v Speaker 1>people have found ways to both pattern their lives to

0:25:50.530 --> 0:25:54.669
<v Speaker 1>give them meaning and like exploratory ways to keep themselves

0:25:54.780 --> 0:25:57.320
<v Speaker 1>fresh to each other. And I find that kind of

0:25:57.420 --> 0:26:00.560
<v Speaker 1>buoyant in the middle of so much existential despair about

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:04.050
<v Speaker 1>what is life and what's it for. You know, human

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:07.970
<v Speaker 1>creativity will still find a way, even if it looks

0:26:08.050 --> 0:26:11.889
<v Speaker 1>banal from the outside. It's still people trying to communicate

0:26:12.010 --> 0:26:14.169
<v Speaker 1>and connect. I found that pretty touching.

0:26:14.810 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 2>When you say Tyler bails relatively early. And it is

0:26:19.560 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 2>relatively early, but I believe the mile marker is at

0:26:22.550 --> 0:26:26.869
<v Speaker 2>like 52,000 miles at that point, which is more miles

0:26:26.890 --> 0:26:30.890
<v Speaker 2>than I have on my six-year-old car at this point. So,

0:26:31.190 --> 0:26:34.210
<v Speaker 2>you know, he's been there for a while before he decided.

0:26:34.770 --> 0:26:38.919
<v Speaker 2>Compared to how long everybody else lasts, especially James, it's

0:26:38.960 --> 0:26:41.780
<v Speaker 2>relatively early. But he doesn't give up right away.

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:42.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh, true.

0:26:42.800 --> 0:26:46.530
<v Speaker 3>And he's not there for the exciting moments. Changes that

0:26:46.550 --> 0:26:50.790
<v Speaker 3>happen later on, like coming across some abandoned cars on

0:26:50.830 --> 0:26:53.630
<v Speaker 3>the road and getting to a point where, you know,

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:56.480
<v Speaker 3>no one's coming out of the woods to attack them

0:26:56.619 --> 0:26:59.620
<v Speaker 3>or few people are anyway. And so he's missing, he's

0:26:59.640 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 3>missing out on these signs of hope or signs that there,

0:27:02.240 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 3>there is some potential danger. And to, it ends, I mean,

0:27:05.820 --> 0:27:08.040
<v Speaker 3>you know, it's already in the title. It ends eventually, but.

0:27:09.080 --> 0:27:11.770
<v Speaker 2>He totally misses them finding a marker. What a development

0:27:11.810 --> 0:27:13.629
<v Speaker 2>that is. They can draw on the car at that point.

0:27:13.750 --> 0:27:16.030
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, a magic marker, not a mile marker.

0:27:16.650 --> 0:27:19.550
<v Speaker 3>I guess in those situations, you look for those green shoots,

0:27:19.890 --> 0:27:21.550
<v Speaker 3>I guess you would call them, but they're pretty bad

0:27:21.750 --> 0:27:24.430
<v Speaker 3>even for, as green shoots go, not that hopeful, but

0:27:25.580 --> 0:27:27.700
<v Speaker 3>enough to cling to it. And I do find it

0:27:27.980 --> 0:27:31.340
<v Speaker 3>an interesting kind of running theme. idea of them wondering

0:27:31.380 --> 0:27:34.139
<v Speaker 3>if they are in purgatory, how they got there, do

0:27:34.180 --> 0:27:35.740
<v Speaker 3>they deserve to be there, what do they need to

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.020
<v Speaker 3>do to go out, how much of the suffering are

0:27:39.060 --> 0:27:42.699
<v Speaker 3>they being asked by some being they don't know, how

0:27:42.720 --> 0:27:45.530
<v Speaker 3>much are they being asked to withstand to be delivered

0:27:45.550 --> 0:27:48.010
<v Speaker 3>to wherever they're supposed to go. That's all, you know,

0:27:48.050 --> 0:27:51.310
<v Speaker 3>creates kind of an interesting spiritual dilemma that, you know,

0:27:51.650 --> 0:27:53.690
<v Speaker 3>at least one of them is up for, even if

0:27:53.730 --> 0:27:57.250
<v Speaker 3>the end result is, you know, not what he had

0:27:57.290 --> 0:27:57.609
<v Speaker 3>hoped for.

0:27:58.180 --> 0:28:00.959
<v Speaker 1>Well, we know we could continue down the road that

0:28:01.010 --> 0:28:04.470
<v Speaker 1>we're currently on, which feels a little narrow and directed.

0:28:04.530 --> 0:28:06.530
<v Speaker 1>And like we should go into what happens with Dan

0:28:06.570 --> 0:28:08.670
<v Speaker 1>Fisher and then what happens with James and what happens

0:28:08.690 --> 0:28:10.870
<v Speaker 1>with the ending. But I'm going to take a left

0:28:11.030 --> 0:28:14.260
<v Speaker 1>turn here. Normally by this time we've transitioned into connections.

0:28:14.359 --> 0:28:17.460
<v Speaker 1>And I think what the next steps are in this

0:28:17.520 --> 0:28:22.380
<v Speaker 1>story do connect to Solaris in a pretty literal way.

0:28:22.780 --> 0:28:26.300
<v Speaker 1>So I'm going to say rather than continuing to discuss

0:28:26.320 --> 0:28:28.190
<v Speaker 1>kind of the spoiler section, We're going to go ahead

0:28:28.250 --> 0:28:34.340
<v Speaker 1>and take the off ramp and get into connections. The

0:28:34.380 --> 0:28:37.280
<v Speaker 1>next picture show is presented by Regal Unlimited, the all-you-can-watch

0:28:37.340 --> 0:28:40.140
<v Speaker 1>movie subscription pass that pays for itself in just two visits.

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:42.940
<v Speaker 1>By the time you hear this, it'll be September and

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.850
<v Speaker 1>we'll be headed into a season of theatrical revivals and

0:28:45.950 --> 0:28:50.250
<v Speaker 1>anniversary screenings. The week I'm recording this, Pixar's Cars, the

0:28:50.290 --> 0:28:53.490
<v Speaker 1>Hunger Games movies, and the anime classic Akira are all

0:28:53.530 --> 0:28:56.830
<v Speaker 1>back in theaters. Cars for its 20th anniversary, The Hunger

0:28:56.870 --> 0:28:59.650
<v Speaker 1>Games movies ahead of the new prequel Sunrise on the Reaping,

0:28:59.990 --> 0:29:03.650
<v Speaker 1>and Akira in a new 4K edition. Transformers the movie

0:29:03.690 --> 0:29:06.990
<v Speaker 1>will return to theaters for its 40th anniversary on September 17th,

0:29:07.410 --> 0:29:09.750
<v Speaker 1>The Lego Batman movie will be in theaters on the 18th,

0:29:10.130 --> 0:29:13.510
<v Speaker 1>Avengers Endgame is coming back on September 25th, and Hayao

0:29:13.530 --> 0:29:17.630
<v Speaker 1>Miyazaki's Princess Mononoke will hit theaters on the 26th. Look,

0:29:17.650 --> 0:29:19.330
<v Speaker 1>you could watch all of these movies at home for

0:29:19.350 --> 0:29:21.410
<v Speaker 1>a few bucks each, but if you're the type of

0:29:21.450 --> 0:29:23.930
<v Speaker 1>person who listens to this podcast... you're probably going to

0:29:24.010 --> 0:29:26.170
<v Speaker 1>enjoy them more in a premium theater, on a great

0:29:26.190 --> 0:29:30.180
<v Speaker 1>big screen, with flawless audio, surrounded by other fans. But

0:29:30.260 --> 0:29:32.800
<v Speaker 1>revisiting this many old favorites in theaters while trying to

0:29:32.820 --> 0:29:35.870
<v Speaker 1>keep up with new releases gets expensive fast. You don't

0:29:35.890 --> 0:29:37.990
<v Speaker 1>want to let your budget make the difference between whether

0:29:38.030 --> 0:29:39.970
<v Speaker 1>you see an older movie or a newer one. You

0:29:40.000 --> 0:29:42.540
<v Speaker 1>want to see however many movies you want without emptying

0:29:42.580 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 1>your bank account. So if you're seeing more than one

0:29:45.180 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>movie a month, Regal Unlimited will save you money. And

0:29:48.140 --> 0:29:50.250
<v Speaker 1>if you're heading to theaters weekly to catch up with

0:29:50.290 --> 0:29:52.290
<v Speaker 1>old and new favorites, it's going to save you a

0:29:52.390 --> 0:29:55.630
<v Speaker 1>lot of money. With Regal Unlimited, you pay one monthly

0:29:55.670 --> 0:29:58.290
<v Speaker 1>fee to see as many standard 2D movies as you want,

0:29:58.650 --> 0:30:01.550
<v Speaker 1>with no blackout dates and no restrictions. And we have

0:30:01.570 --> 0:30:03.650
<v Speaker 1>a discount code to make the cost of watching all

0:30:03.670 --> 0:30:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the movies you want to see even cheaper. When you

0:30:06.130 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>sign up for Regal Unlimited using the Next Picture Show

0:30:08.560 --> 0:30:13.360
<v Speaker 1>code NEXTPICK26, you'll get 15% off on an all-you-can-watch movie pass,

0:30:13.700 --> 0:30:16.860
<v Speaker 1>with no blackout dates or restrictions, plus 10% off all

0:30:16.960 --> 0:30:20.800
<v Speaker 1>non-alcoholic concessions. Just open the Regal app or follow the

0:30:20.860 --> 0:30:24.730
<v Speaker 1>link in this episode's description and use NEXTPICK26 to receive

0:30:24.750 --> 0:30:34.110
<v Speaker 1>your discount. That code is NEXTPICK26. P-I-C 26. Now it's

0:30:34.130 --> 0:30:36.390
<v Speaker 1>time for connections when we bring these two films together

0:30:36.450 --> 0:30:38.990
<v Speaker 1>and talk about all the things they have in common. Keith,

0:30:39.010 --> 0:30:41.030
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to kick directly to you. I told you

0:30:41.070 --> 0:30:43.690
<v Speaker 1>I was going to bring up your point about no

0:30:43.710 --> 0:30:46.410
<v Speaker 1>matter where you go, you take your baggage. which you

0:30:46.430 --> 0:30:48.790
<v Speaker 1>brought up in connection with Solaris in the first half.

0:30:48.890 --> 0:30:51.850
<v Speaker 1>And I immediately thought, wow, that certainly does describe the

0:30:51.890 --> 0:30:54.210
<v Speaker 1>four people in a car in It Ends. How do

0:30:54.250 --> 0:30:55.950
<v Speaker 1>you see that connection working?

0:30:56.230 --> 0:31:00.070
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that's fair to say. Although I think ultimately, well,

0:31:00.090 --> 0:31:02.550
<v Speaker 2>I guess we don't really learn that much about our

0:31:02.570 --> 0:31:05.990
<v Speaker 2>characters in Solaris either, but we don't learn that much

0:31:06.360 --> 0:31:10.320
<v Speaker 2>about the various characters in It Ends, enough that they

0:31:10.360 --> 0:31:14.140
<v Speaker 2>feel like real characters and they have some key details

0:31:14.180 --> 0:31:18.540
<v Speaker 2>about their They're very distinct and well-drawn, but in terms

0:31:18.580 --> 0:31:23.530
<v Speaker 2>of their actual histories, presumably they all know each other's

0:31:23.570 --> 0:31:26.190
<v Speaker 2>histories to the point it doesn't bear repeating, but we

0:31:26.230 --> 0:31:29.200
<v Speaker 2>don't learn that much. We do learn the day attempted suicide.

0:31:30.810 --> 0:31:33.950
<v Speaker 2>And Tyler, you know, would not drive to a pumpkin patch.

0:31:34.610 --> 0:31:36.970
<v Speaker 2>I realized his relationship had reached an impasse because he

0:31:36.990 --> 0:31:39.470
<v Speaker 2>was not willing to drive to a pumpkin patch for

0:31:39.490 --> 0:31:41.930
<v Speaker 2>a date. But I don't know that much about James

0:31:42.210 --> 0:31:46.240
<v Speaker 2>or Fisher. Beyond that, I don't mean to say I don't.

0:31:46.580 --> 0:31:48.400
<v Speaker 2>I think I get this into who they are as characters,

0:31:48.420 --> 0:31:50.260
<v Speaker 2>but not necessarily the details of their lives.

0:31:50.940 --> 0:31:53.980
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we don't know very basic things like what they

0:31:54.000 --> 0:31:57.080
<v Speaker 1>majored in, where everybody who is not James in the

0:31:57.120 --> 0:32:00.760
<v Speaker 1>car wants to end up. Why Tyler joined the military,

0:32:00.980 --> 0:32:04.900
<v Speaker 1>you know, his accent and his persona could very easily

0:32:05.000 --> 0:32:08.620
<v Speaker 1>suggest somebody who, you know, has a family connection or

0:32:08.720 --> 0:32:11.640
<v Speaker 1>felt a drive to serve or somebody who, you know,

0:32:11.660 --> 0:32:15.330
<v Speaker 1>given that they all went to college and they don't

0:32:15.480 --> 0:32:17.950
<v Speaker 1>say much about him in college, you know, possibly he

0:32:17.990 --> 0:32:20.450
<v Speaker 1>came from poverty and that's why he joined the military.

0:32:20.570 --> 0:32:22.530
<v Speaker 1>You can fill in a lot of blanks for yourself,

0:32:22.950 --> 0:32:25.350
<v Speaker 1>but you don't get those blanks filled in. And that

0:32:25.410 --> 0:32:28.170
<v Speaker 1>is a result of this movie being kind of minimalist.

0:32:28.550 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>which I think makes an interesting contrast with Solaris, which

0:32:32.620 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 1>is kind of maximalist. One of these movies being 89

0:32:35.320 --> 0:32:39.700
<v Speaker 1>minutes long and the other being 166 minutes long is

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:42.580
<v Speaker 1>pretty funny to me, given that I feel like we

0:32:42.620 --> 0:32:45.620
<v Speaker 1>end up knowing about the same amount about the characters

0:32:45.680 --> 0:32:46.060
<v Speaker 1>in the end.

0:32:46.620 --> 0:32:49.350
<v Speaker 3>One connection I thought of, because I think I had

0:32:50.030 --> 0:32:53.170
<v Speaker 3>suggested this as the pairing, so it was on me

0:32:53.190 --> 0:32:54.770
<v Speaker 3>a little bit. It was just trying to figure out

0:32:55.480 --> 0:32:58.230
<v Speaker 3>you know, what It Ends even reminds me of, because

0:32:58.450 --> 0:33:02.450
<v Speaker 3>I think we did feel like the link ladder connection

0:33:02.530 --> 0:33:05.750
<v Speaker 3>that the director had brought up wasn't quite sufficient enough

0:33:05.770 --> 0:33:08.540
<v Speaker 3>for us to do like a slacker pairing, say. And

0:33:08.560 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 3>I think what I ultimately came to was that both

0:33:11.420 --> 0:33:15.260
<v Speaker 3>of these films, what Solaris does is, and what It

0:33:15.340 --> 0:33:18.510
<v Speaker 3>Ends does, that it takes a few characters to and

0:33:18.570 --> 0:33:22.570
<v Speaker 3>puts them in a situation and uses what is a

0:33:22.690 --> 0:33:26.340
<v Speaker 3>genre premise in both films to do a type of

0:33:26.410 --> 0:33:32.080
<v Speaker 3>story that isn't what we expect from those genres. Solaris

0:33:32.100 --> 0:33:35.100
<v Speaker 3>is not a conventional science fiction film. It Ends is

0:33:35.140 --> 0:33:39.400
<v Speaker 3>not a conventional horror film, certainly, but these two are

0:33:39.500 --> 0:33:45.380
<v Speaker 3>similar in terms of placing these characters in this extreme,

0:33:45.840 --> 0:33:51.230
<v Speaker 3>strange situation that causes them to turn inward. They're forced

0:33:51.270 --> 0:33:54.910
<v Speaker 3>to be reflective. They're forced to kind of assess this

0:33:54.990 --> 0:33:58.590
<v Speaker 3>situation that they can't really unpack and that the film

0:33:58.630 --> 0:34:00.930
<v Speaker 3>doesn't really even give them any clues as to how

0:34:00.970 --> 0:34:02.930
<v Speaker 3>to unpack. They try. They try to figure it out.

0:34:02.950 --> 0:34:06.240
<v Speaker 3>They don't figure it out. They act on it. But

0:34:06.300 --> 0:34:10.420
<v Speaker 3>mostly the situation acts on them and reveals stuff about

0:34:10.500 --> 0:34:14.430
<v Speaker 3>them and thus becomes these sort of existential problems. journeys

0:34:14.469 --> 0:34:16.650
<v Speaker 3>of a kind so so that was kind of why

0:34:16.730 --> 0:34:19.450
<v Speaker 3>i thought these two films meshed well together and you

0:34:19.469 --> 0:34:22.950
<v Speaker 3>know even though who knows if you know alexander had

0:34:22.989 --> 0:34:26.590
<v Speaker 3>not was surprised to hear his movie compared to uh

0:34:27.150 --> 0:34:29.930
<v Speaker 3>to sartre and and maybe he'd be surprised to hear

0:34:30.090 --> 0:34:32.770
<v Speaker 3>compared to tarkovsky as well but but it definitely came

0:34:32.810 --> 0:34:34.230
<v Speaker 3>to mind yeah it.

0:34:34.290 --> 0:34:36.069
<v Speaker 1>Seems from the interviews i read with him he was

0:34:36.090 --> 0:34:42.299
<v Speaker 1>very much kind of exploring his own existential questions about

0:34:42.340 --> 0:34:44.170
<v Speaker 1>who he was and where he wanted to go. And

0:34:44.230 --> 0:34:46.710
<v Speaker 1>he seems to have been a little surprised to find

0:34:46.770 --> 0:34:50.210
<v Speaker 1>out that people before him in various ages and in

0:34:50.250 --> 0:34:53.710
<v Speaker 1>various ways were asking the same questions. It does not

0:34:53.750 --> 0:34:56.150
<v Speaker 1>seem like he came to this from a Like I

0:34:56.190 --> 0:34:58.690
<v Speaker 1>have read a bunch of philosophy and here's my, my

0:34:58.730 --> 0:35:00.450
<v Speaker 1>take on it kind of way so much as he

0:35:00.489 --> 0:35:02.799
<v Speaker 1>was looking at, you know, the path ahead of his

0:35:02.840 --> 0:35:05.359
<v Speaker 1>own life and saying, is, is that all there is?

0:35:05.680 --> 0:35:08.799
<v Speaker 1>And he turned it into a big central metaphor, which

0:35:08.840 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>is something else I see as, as connecting these two movies.

0:35:12.620 --> 0:35:15.580
<v Speaker 1>In the one hand, you've got this sort of limbo-like

0:35:15.700 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>place where death does not mean anything. In the other,

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:21.540
<v Speaker 1>you've got a sort of limbo-like place where life does

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:26.359
<v Speaker 1>not mean anything. And exactly what the symbolism is, what

0:35:26.400 --> 0:35:29.899
<v Speaker 1>it's a metaphor for, is kind of Rorschach blobby enough

0:35:29.920 --> 0:35:32.890
<v Speaker 1>that you can interpret it in different ways. But the

0:35:32.950 --> 0:35:36.100
<v Speaker 1>end result in both cases is that you're kind of examining,

0:35:36.780 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, that age-old science fiction question, what does it

0:35:39.180 --> 0:35:41.259
<v Speaker 1>mean to be human? And specifically, what does it mean

0:35:41.300 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>to be human when a lot of the kind of

0:35:44.900 --> 0:35:49.770
<v Speaker 1>things that we associate with being human, like reacting to

0:35:49.790 --> 0:35:53.430
<v Speaker 1>the passage of time in certain ways, having bodily needs,

0:35:54.050 --> 0:35:56.190
<v Speaker 1>death being the end like when those things are stripped

0:35:56.230 --> 0:35:59.210
<v Speaker 1>away then who are we and what do we become

0:35:59.469 --> 0:36:01.390
<v Speaker 1>so i i found both of these movies to be

0:36:02.090 --> 0:36:06.839
<v Speaker 1>highly metaphorical in kind of like pleasing ways without hitting

0:36:06.880 --> 0:36:08.760
<v Speaker 1>us over the head about exactly what they mean.

0:36:09.060 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 2>I feel like it ends is i'm not sure that

0:36:13.360 --> 0:36:16.180
<v Speaker 2>the endless drive is a necessarily a metaphor that works

0:36:16.239 --> 0:36:19.779
<v Speaker 2>in any other country But it is very much an

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:25.169
<v Speaker 2>American version of an existential prison, I guess, in a way.

0:36:25.190 --> 0:36:27.890
<v Speaker 3>Now I'm thinking about what other countries' versions of that

0:36:27.930 --> 0:36:31.489
<v Speaker 3>might be, if it's the American road. I don't know.

0:36:31.710 --> 0:36:33.500
<v Speaker 1>I'll tell you. I mean, one of the movies this

0:36:33.719 --> 0:36:36.580
<v Speaker 1>most reminded me of was Exit 8, which came out

0:36:36.719 --> 0:36:39.879
<v Speaker 1>earlier this year and which we talked about, I think,

0:36:39.940 --> 0:36:43.290
<v Speaker 1>as a Your Next Picture show. rather than a main focus.

0:36:43.330 --> 0:36:46.790
<v Speaker 1>But in that case, the main character is caught in

0:36:46.830 --> 0:36:51.880
<v Speaker 1>an endless, it's a Japanese movie based on a video game,

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:55.279
<v Speaker 1>and it's a character caught in an endless series of

0:36:55.360 --> 0:36:59.890
<v Speaker 1>Japanese subway tunnels. But, Scott, my mind also goes to

0:36:59.969 --> 0:37:03.190
<v Speaker 1>The Death of Mr. Lazaresco. Is that the title of

0:37:03.210 --> 0:37:04.290
<v Speaker 1>that movie that you love so much?

0:37:04.310 --> 0:37:04.450
<v Speaker 3>Sure.

0:37:05.010 --> 0:37:08.950
<v Speaker 1>And kind of the endless limbo of being stuck in

0:37:09.070 --> 0:37:12.110
<v Speaker 1>a dysfunctional medical industrial complex.

0:37:12.390 --> 0:37:15.770
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I think tonally it's not that far off either because,

0:37:16.310 --> 0:37:19.540
<v Speaker 3>I mean, Death of Mr. Lazaresco is a comedy. I mean,

0:37:19.620 --> 0:37:21.240
<v Speaker 3>it's incredibly dry.

0:37:21.260 --> 0:37:22.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a very dark comedy.

0:37:22.560 --> 0:37:26.759
<v Speaker 3>But it is absurdist in this situation of this poor

0:37:27.620 --> 0:37:32.660
<v Speaker 3>man who's getting passed around in this cold, thoughtless bureaucracy

0:37:32.680 --> 0:37:35.460
<v Speaker 3>until he finally kicks the bucket. I mean, it's about

0:37:35.500 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 3>as bleakly funny a premise as you can get, but

0:37:38.300 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 3>I think it's a pretty good one for our purposes.

0:37:40.360 --> 0:37:42.660
<v Speaker 3>And I think you mentioned also the Groundhog Day thing

0:37:42.700 --> 0:37:45.069
<v Speaker 3>is definitely present here too, just what happens when you

0:37:45.110 --> 0:37:50.850
<v Speaker 3>live every day. The days are homogenous and repeating, but

0:37:51.330 --> 0:37:53.950
<v Speaker 3>though I would say with all of the difference between

0:37:53.989 --> 0:37:57.960
<v Speaker 3>it ends and the other, the Groundhog Day type movies

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.500
<v Speaker 3>is that i is that there's always that promise i

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:03.020
<v Speaker 3>think and i think at least the audience feels like

0:38:03.120 --> 0:38:06.200
<v Speaker 3>okay there's there's like a cosmic lesson that has to

0:38:06.239 --> 0:38:09.719
<v Speaker 3>be learned in order for this basic spell to be

0:38:09.840 --> 0:38:13.320
<v Speaker 3>broken and maybe the characters in it ends are searching

0:38:13.380 --> 0:38:16.740
<v Speaker 3>for that that lesson that way out but the film

0:38:16.760 --> 0:38:18.910
<v Speaker 3>is harsher about it and thus it takes on a

0:38:18.950 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 3>different tone i mean you really have to really grapple

0:38:21.890 --> 0:38:24.450
<v Speaker 3>with hopelessness in a way that you don't in those

0:38:24.510 --> 0:38:25.190
<v Speaker 3>other movies.

0:38:25.560 --> 0:38:29.520
<v Speaker 2>I think that's another connection, too, because they, at least

0:38:29.739 --> 0:38:31.879
<v Speaker 2>up to a point, think there's a way out of this.

0:38:32.080 --> 0:38:33.560
<v Speaker 2>If they can just crack it, if they can figure

0:38:33.600 --> 0:38:37.160
<v Speaker 2>out why they're there, or maybe something on the road

0:38:37.200 --> 0:38:42.009
<v Speaker 2>itself will present itself. And in Solaris, Kelvin is presented

0:38:42.030 --> 0:38:45.450
<v Speaker 2>with this visitor in the form of his wife who's

0:38:45.489 --> 0:38:48.270
<v Speaker 2>killed herself. And it's almost like, you know, if I can...

0:38:49.170 --> 0:38:51.549
<v Speaker 2>It's a second chance. I can fix this. My life

0:38:51.590 --> 0:38:55.189
<v Speaker 2>has been ruined by this loss and now is my second.

0:38:55.210 --> 0:38:58.669
<v Speaker 2>But it's not that at all. There's things that maybe

0:38:58.710 --> 0:39:01.960
<v Speaker 2>look like solutions that just aren't in both these films.

0:39:02.600 --> 0:39:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And one of the solutions they reach for is kind

0:39:05.500 --> 0:39:08.779
<v Speaker 1>of appeal to the divine, which I found interesting as

0:39:08.820 --> 0:39:13.480
<v Speaker 1>a connection. Tarkovsky kind of famously says, The censors in

0:39:13.540 --> 0:39:17.080
<v Speaker 1>Russia wanted him to remove mentions of God from the movie,

0:39:17.440 --> 0:39:20.509
<v Speaker 1>and he kind of pushed back and did the MPAA

0:39:20.510 --> 0:39:23.140
<v Speaker 1>thing that people in America do, where he kind of

0:39:23.140 --> 0:39:26.649
<v Speaker 1>twiddled with the film but didn't actually remove anything and

0:39:26.650 --> 0:39:29.600
<v Speaker 1>eventually got away with it. And it's not necessarily a

0:39:29.620 --> 0:39:33.160
<v Speaker 1>religious movie, but it is a movie where people are

0:39:33.200 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of debating humanity's place in the universe and debating,

0:39:38.100 --> 0:39:41.510
<v Speaker 1>of course, whether the ocean itself is God or is

0:39:42.410 --> 0:39:48.170
<v Speaker 1>effectively God given its power and its position. In It Ends,

0:39:48.430 --> 0:39:51.469
<v Speaker 1>that connection, I think, becomes a lot more literal at

0:39:51.510 --> 0:39:55.489
<v Speaker 1>the point where Fisher and Day give up hope and

0:39:55.550 --> 0:39:57.980
<v Speaker 1>try to force James to give up hope as well

0:39:58.120 --> 0:40:01.000
<v Speaker 1>by turning the car off and taking away the keys forcibly.

0:40:01.800 --> 0:40:04.219
<v Speaker 1>To me, this is the one evil act that takes

0:40:04.280 --> 0:40:07.339
<v Speaker 1>place in It Ends because they try to take his

0:40:07.380 --> 0:40:09.740
<v Speaker 1>choice away from him and they tell him it's for

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:13.450
<v Speaker 1>his own good, that they're trying to rob him of hope.

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Like how bleak and despairing is that?

0:40:16.540 --> 0:40:19.570
<v Speaker 2>From two relatively upbeat characters to?

0:40:20.170 --> 0:40:22.870
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, two characters that you think have reached a point

0:40:22.910 --> 0:40:26.290
<v Speaker 1>where they're balanced and they're supporting each other. And instead

0:40:26.330 --> 0:40:30.950
<v Speaker 1>they're conniving with each other against James. And it feels

0:40:30.989 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 1>like a shift into like a movie that doesn't have

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:35.020
<v Speaker 1>a villain. To me in that moment kind of has

0:40:35.040 --> 0:40:37.480
<v Speaker 1>a couple of villains. But James gets back into the

0:40:37.500 --> 0:40:40.560
<v Speaker 1>car and tries to restart it. And when it won't restart,

0:40:40.800 --> 0:40:44.100
<v Speaker 1>he works himself up into an emotional frenzy until he

0:40:44.140 --> 0:40:46.509
<v Speaker 1>finally starts calling on a higher power, just kind of

0:40:46.550 --> 0:40:52.590
<v Speaker 1>trying to bargain with something, anything, kind of finding prayer

0:40:52.930 --> 0:40:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in a moment. And that's what makes the car restart. And,

0:40:56.380 --> 0:40:59.870
<v Speaker 1>you know, as he goes on, When something else happens

0:41:00.410 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that is anomalous, he immediately starts, again, praying in an

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:09.800
<v Speaker 1>albeit kind of awkward, inexperienced kind of way. He's talking

0:41:09.840 --> 0:41:12.340
<v Speaker 1>to something outside of himself. So both of these movies

0:41:12.380 --> 0:41:18.540
<v Speaker 1>have kind of like fumbling, quasi-philosophical relationships to God or

0:41:18.600 --> 0:41:21.259
<v Speaker 1>the divine or the idea that there might be such

0:41:21.300 --> 0:41:24.370
<v Speaker 1>a thing. Neither one of them, I think, in the end–

0:41:24.770 --> 0:41:29.070
<v Speaker 1>has something strong or, you know, or positive or specific

0:41:29.110 --> 0:41:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to say about it, but in two situations where it

0:41:31.920 --> 0:41:34.680
<v Speaker 1>feels like there's something all powerful there that might or

0:41:34.719 --> 0:41:37.529
<v Speaker 1>might not be observing and judging you. I think it's

0:41:37.550 --> 0:41:40.270
<v Speaker 1>a very natural topic for the characters to bring up.

0:41:40.630 --> 0:41:43.469
<v Speaker 1>And maybe more interesting that none of them really have

0:41:43.610 --> 0:41:48.240
<v Speaker 1>any basis for or understanding of religion to start with

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.040
<v Speaker 1>as a kind of a building block for that exploration.

0:41:51.460 --> 0:41:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's really interesting, Tasha, because I did kind of

0:41:54.200 --> 0:41:58.900
<v Speaker 3>think about that. I mean, it ends that moment you

0:41:58.920 --> 0:42:03.010
<v Speaker 3>discuss of him saying, You know, desperately trying to start

0:42:03.030 --> 0:42:06.710
<v Speaker 3>the car and the car is improbably starting, which would

0:42:06.730 --> 0:42:10.030
<v Speaker 3>seem to confirm that there is some kind of force

0:42:10.070 --> 0:42:12.290
<v Speaker 3>or there's some sort of presence that is acting in

0:42:12.330 --> 0:42:15.710
<v Speaker 3>that moment that is responding to something like prayer when

0:42:15.750 --> 0:42:20.640
<v Speaker 3>I think there's been no evidence that such a presence exists.

0:42:20.700 --> 0:42:23.700
<v Speaker 3>And there's almost not that much evidence there. Later on,

0:42:23.760 --> 0:42:26.160
<v Speaker 3>I think it rains, I guess. So there's something in

0:42:26.200 --> 0:42:30.030
<v Speaker 3>the road and the road does eventually, you know, spoiler alert,

0:42:31.050 --> 0:42:33.470
<v Speaker 3>it does come to an end. But even when it

0:42:33.510 --> 0:42:36.130
<v Speaker 3>comes to that end, it's like, is that all there is?

0:42:36.150 --> 0:42:37.890
<v Speaker 3>It's sort of the response is like, where are we?

0:42:37.930 --> 0:42:38.469
<v Speaker 2>What is this?

0:42:38.770 --> 0:42:41.930
<v Speaker 3>What do we do now? So it becomes quite bleak.

0:42:41.969 --> 0:42:44.840
<v Speaker 3>But the acknowledgement that there is this. That there is

0:42:44.900 --> 0:42:49.069
<v Speaker 3>some kind of presence that does something miraculous or responsive

0:42:49.489 --> 0:42:52.450
<v Speaker 3>to James in that moment is, you know, notable, I

0:42:52.469 --> 0:42:52.810
<v Speaker 3>would say.

0:42:53.230 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 2>It's really possible to start thinking about some of the

0:42:57.260 --> 0:43:00.120
<v Speaker 2>other passages along this road from that final scene, too.

0:43:00.140 --> 0:43:01.759
<v Speaker 2>Because there's a couple, I think there's like an old

0:43:01.820 --> 0:43:04.779
<v Speaker 2>Packard in there, too. So this road may have existed before.

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 2>for a long time. But I think it's also kind

0:43:09.900 --> 0:43:12.219
<v Speaker 2>of like Solaris in that way. There's things we see

0:43:12.239 --> 0:43:16.020
<v Speaker 2>on the station that are obviously the results of some

0:43:16.140 --> 0:43:20.240
<v Speaker 2>fairly dramatic events that we'll never know what the story

0:43:20.340 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 2>is behind them. We'll never know what happened to that

0:43:24.000 --> 0:43:27.740
<v Speaker 2>car that clearly had reached the end, had had it back,

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:30.839
<v Speaker 2>it's a dollar, it reached a million, and then did

0:43:30.860 --> 0:43:33.770
<v Speaker 2>they give up on the way back? I mean, it's... Yeah,

0:43:34.370 --> 0:43:36.730
<v Speaker 2>I like the way that in both these films, we

0:43:36.770 --> 0:43:39.620
<v Speaker 2>kind of get hints of stories that we'll never really know.

0:43:40.020 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you very strongly there. And one of

0:43:42.300 --> 0:43:44.540
<v Speaker 1>the aspects of that that I found kind of interesting

0:43:45.100 --> 0:43:48.660
<v Speaker 1>is both of these films kind of present a dichotomy

0:43:48.719 --> 0:43:53.020
<v Speaker 1>between the newbies in the situation and the veterans in

0:43:53.060 --> 0:43:57.300
<v Speaker 1>the situation, with the implication that the veterans have absolutely

0:43:57.440 --> 0:44:01.950
<v Speaker 1>lost their minds and that the newbies are progressing toward that.

0:44:02.550 --> 0:44:06.790
<v Speaker 1>In Solaris, you know, you have these two very cynical

0:44:06.890 --> 0:44:09.690
<v Speaker 1>men who don't really want to discuss the situation, but

0:44:09.710 --> 0:44:12.500
<v Speaker 1>do want to kind of discuss the high-minded philosophy behind it.

0:44:13.070 --> 0:44:16.339
<v Speaker 1>They don't have the courtesy to talk to Kelvin and

0:44:16.660 --> 0:44:20.299
<v Speaker 1>explain anything about what the situation might be, what they've

0:44:20.340 --> 0:44:23.020
<v Speaker 1>gone through, who they are, what he might go through.

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>You know, they don't set him up in any way

0:44:25.739 --> 0:44:28.580
<v Speaker 1>for it. And he is there literally to determine whether

0:44:28.719 --> 0:44:33.700
<v Speaker 1>they're both psychotic. In It Ends, we get the kind

0:44:33.719 --> 0:44:36.180
<v Speaker 1>of the suggestion that the people in the woods are

0:44:36.200 --> 0:44:39.060
<v Speaker 1>all people who were also on the road and whose

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:44.360
<v Speaker 1>cars broke down and who disintegrated into some sort of

0:44:44.840 --> 0:44:49.330
<v Speaker 1>madness that eventually gives way to just a catalepsy, basically.

0:44:49.810 --> 0:44:53.230
<v Speaker 1>And the horror of the situation in both cases is

0:44:53.270 --> 0:44:55.969
<v Speaker 1>that we kind of see our protagonists moving in that

0:44:55.989 --> 0:44:59.950
<v Speaker 1>direction and seeing it in front of them as evidence

0:45:00.030 --> 0:45:03.509
<v Speaker 1>of what they might become as they're subjected to this

0:45:04.190 --> 0:45:06.310
<v Speaker 1>experience outside of the reality that they know.

0:45:06.890 --> 0:45:09.390
<v Speaker 2>I think another thing, too, is to circle back to

0:45:09.410 --> 0:45:11.870
<v Speaker 2>one of the very first things we talked about with

0:45:12.010 --> 0:45:16.250
<v Speaker 2>Solaris is that, you know, Kelvin is there kind of

0:45:16.469 --> 0:45:21.469
<v Speaker 2>haunted by his memories of home, sort of, you know, ultimately,

0:45:21.910 --> 0:45:25.780
<v Speaker 2>which ultimately manifests themselves in the final scene in the movie.

0:45:26.140 --> 0:45:29.440
<v Speaker 2>We get a little bit of that here as well.

0:45:29.660 --> 0:45:33.730
<v Speaker 2>I think it's Fisher who plays the voicemails from his mother.

0:45:33.750 --> 0:45:37.729
<v Speaker 2>There's sort of this kind of talk about what they've

0:45:37.750 --> 0:45:40.670
<v Speaker 2>left behind. I think kind of curiously, though, apart from,

0:45:40.730 --> 0:45:43.170
<v Speaker 2>I think, the very beginning of the trip, no one

0:45:43.650 --> 0:45:47.020
<v Speaker 2>talks about wondering, you know, what the people they've left

0:45:47.060 --> 0:45:50.860
<v Speaker 2>behind will think about their disappearances as well. But nonetheless,

0:45:50.880 --> 0:45:56.680
<v Speaker 2>there's still, like, even in this strange space that the

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:00.700
<v Speaker 2>characters find themselves in both films, there's a pull of

0:46:00.760 --> 0:46:03.589
<v Speaker 2>the life they left behind that feels like it's kind

0:46:03.610 --> 0:46:05.330
<v Speaker 2>of tugging on their psyches at the same time.

0:46:05.890 --> 0:46:08.390
<v Speaker 1>I mean, inevitably, I think to go back to your

0:46:08.510 --> 0:46:11.750
<v Speaker 1>first point, wherever you go, you take your baggage. That's

0:46:11.770 --> 0:46:14.410
<v Speaker 1>because your baggage is from home. Your baggage is from

0:46:14.610 --> 0:46:19.380
<v Speaker 1>your past, your history, your experiences. And seeing these two

0:46:19.530 --> 0:46:23.440
<v Speaker 1>different approaches to, in many ways, kind of conceptually or

0:46:23.540 --> 0:46:28.580
<v Speaker 1>metaphorically different stories. Here's the 89-minute version. Here's the 166-minute version.

0:46:29.360 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 1>One of the big differences there is that 44 minutes

0:46:32.120 --> 0:46:35.160
<v Speaker 1>that we spend at home with Kelvin seeing his life

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:39.290
<v Speaker 1>and his relatives and what normal looks like for him

0:46:39.830 --> 0:46:43.230
<v Speaker 1>and having none of that sense from the others. It

0:46:43.290 --> 0:46:46.330
<v Speaker 1>does feel like in It Ends, one of the reasons

0:46:46.370 --> 0:46:48.990
<v Speaker 1>we don't spend more time with that is that very

0:46:49.110 --> 0:46:52.670
<v Speaker 1>early on, they kind of tag into not having any

0:46:52.770 --> 0:46:56.150
<v Speaker 1>idea what they might have left behind in terms of,

0:46:56.820 --> 0:46:59.359
<v Speaker 1>did they die? Are there corpses at home? Or did

0:46:59.400 --> 0:47:03.940
<v Speaker 1>they just magically disappear? Is any of this real in

0:47:04.040 --> 0:47:08.440
<v Speaker 1>any meaningful way? So not knowing what their families might

0:47:08.460 --> 0:47:11.950
<v Speaker 1>be experiencing seems to be a solid reason for not

0:47:11.989 --> 0:47:14.930
<v Speaker 1>discussing it. And at the same time, given how young

0:47:14.969 --> 0:47:17.370
<v Speaker 1>they are, it does seem a little bit surprising that

0:47:17.590 --> 0:47:20.270
<v Speaker 1>none of them really kind of goes into my relationship

0:47:20.310 --> 0:47:24.420
<v Speaker 1>with my brother and how much he needs me and

0:47:24.460 --> 0:47:26.739
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to be there for him, or at

0:47:26.820 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>least I'm out from under my dad's thumb or anything

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.140
<v Speaker 1>like that. We just don't get that sense of who

0:47:32.180 --> 0:47:33.180
<v Speaker 1>they are or where they're from.

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:37.150
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that's kind of a funny thing that I literally

0:47:37.170 --> 0:47:40.690
<v Speaker 3>am only just thinking about now that you mentioned it, Tasha,

0:47:40.870 --> 0:47:42.750
<v Speaker 3>and I almost feel like it's part of the film's

0:47:43.510 --> 0:47:46.610
<v Speaker 3>design in a way, and maybe that also aligns it

0:47:46.670 --> 0:47:49.989
<v Speaker 3>with Solaris because it's such a, you know, not even

0:47:50.010 --> 0:47:53.049
<v Speaker 3>aligns with Solaris, it's something like, I feel like It

0:47:53.150 --> 0:47:57.720
<v Speaker 3>Ends is really about these characters learning very fundamental things

0:47:57.820 --> 0:48:02.770
<v Speaker 3>about themselves as individuals apart from Whatever baggage they bring

0:48:02.810 --> 0:48:06.360
<v Speaker 3>with them, you know, who are they? You know, what

0:48:06.580 --> 0:48:09.480
<v Speaker 3>can they withstand? You know, what do they believe spiritually?

0:48:09.500 --> 0:48:12.379
<v Speaker 3>You know, I mean, that's what movies, that's what stories do.

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:16.190
<v Speaker 3>That's what situations do that we're put in extreme circumstances.

0:48:16.730 --> 0:48:20.390
<v Speaker 3>How we react to those circumstances tells us something about ourselves.

0:48:20.610 --> 0:48:22.430
<v Speaker 3>And I think that's kind of what happens at Ends.

0:48:22.870 --> 0:48:25.610
<v Speaker 3>And it ends up happening without a lot of pieces

0:48:25.690 --> 0:48:28.680
<v Speaker 3>of these characters' lives that maybe we would expect to

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 3>know in terms of who they're leaving behind by being

0:48:31.980 --> 0:48:36.980
<v Speaker 3>on this road. Whereas, obviously, Solaris, this very personal, important

0:48:37.000 --> 0:48:40.779
<v Speaker 3>piece to Kelvin's life is very present and something he's

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:42.940
<v Speaker 3>going to have to contend with. It's like this grief

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:46.150
<v Speaker 3>that has followed him and then manifests itself in a

0:48:46.570 --> 0:48:50.290
<v Speaker 3>three-dimensional way in space. It's a much different situation.

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:53.779
<v Speaker 1>I think to address part of what you're talking about,

0:48:53.800 --> 0:48:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I think we should talk about the endings of these

0:48:55.960 --> 0:49:00.850
<v Speaker 1>two movies. But rather than do that and then wrap

0:49:00.950 --> 0:49:05.150
<v Speaker 1>up with just sort of a piddlier rundown of a

0:49:05.150 --> 0:49:06.870
<v Speaker 1>bunch of the other connections, I'm going to do the

0:49:06.910 --> 0:49:09.630
<v Speaker 1>piddly part first so we can go out on a

0:49:09.650 --> 0:49:12.810
<v Speaker 1>bang discussing the endings. In terms of just small connections,

0:49:13.350 --> 0:49:16.490
<v Speaker 1>both of these films feature sudden rainstorms that are very

0:49:16.630 --> 0:49:22.930
<v Speaker 1>emotionally important and narratively important to our protagonists. Both of them,

0:49:23.830 --> 0:49:26.670
<v Speaker 1>we kind of talked a bit about the passage of

0:49:26.750 --> 0:49:31.680
<v Speaker 1>time via cuts in It Ends. Solaris also does some

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:36.259
<v Speaker 1>similarly dreamy things with time. particularly when Kelvin has a

0:49:36.380 --> 0:49:41.080
<v Speaker 1>fever and kind of just like lets a pretty important

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:45.550
<v Speaker 1>chunk of the story go unexperienced in a dreamy kind

0:49:45.590 --> 0:49:48.750
<v Speaker 1>of way. Both of these movies are about regret. Both

0:49:48.770 --> 0:49:52.089
<v Speaker 1>of these movies kind of address things that people have

0:49:52.110 --> 0:49:55.350
<v Speaker 1>done that they're sorry for and how they feel about

0:49:55.390 --> 0:49:58.859
<v Speaker 1>them and to what degree any of that really makes

0:49:58.910 --> 0:50:02.620
<v Speaker 1>a difference on like a cosmic level. in terms of

0:50:02.800 --> 0:50:06.240
<v Speaker 1>the experience of humanity. Both of them, there's the man

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:10.020
<v Speaker 1>needs man line in Solaris, and you see that kind

0:50:10.060 --> 0:50:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of like played out in the action in It Ends

0:50:15.260 --> 0:50:17.910
<v Speaker 1>as the characters depend on each other, but you also

0:50:17.950 --> 0:50:21.030
<v Speaker 1>kind of see it refuted when Day and Fisher betray James.

0:50:21.850 --> 0:50:27.169
<v Speaker 1>I guess finally for me, Tarkovsky talking about how what

0:50:27.290 --> 0:50:31.330
<v Speaker 1>interests him is the dogged character that moves forward no

0:50:31.390 --> 0:50:33.870
<v Speaker 1>matter what and gets to the end of the road

0:50:33.930 --> 0:50:37.049
<v Speaker 1>that all of the people around him don't get to

0:50:37.090 --> 0:50:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the end of. I mean, that just describes it ends very,

0:50:40.219 --> 0:50:41.540
<v Speaker 1>very literally, doesn't it?

0:50:41.960 --> 0:50:44.030
<v Speaker 2>Yes. And speaking of the ending, we should talk about it.

0:50:44.280 --> 0:50:44.660
<v Speaker 1>Go for it.

0:50:44.980 --> 0:50:46.140
<v Speaker 2>Oh, me?

0:50:48.780 --> 0:50:51.819
<v Speaker 1>I just talked for– let's check the timer. I'm pretty

0:50:51.860 --> 0:50:54.049
<v Speaker 1>sure it's in double-digit minutes. Oh, wait, no, it was

0:50:54.070 --> 0:50:56.830
<v Speaker 1>only like four minutes, but still. Yeah, go ahead and

0:50:56.870 --> 0:50:57.830
<v Speaker 1>lead us off on this one, Keith.

0:50:57.950 --> 0:51:00.110
<v Speaker 3>I like how we're throwing back. We know people that

0:51:00.210 --> 0:51:03.219
<v Speaker 3>listened to the first episode, so they got that joke.

0:51:03.840 --> 0:51:06.580
<v Speaker 2>All right, so we have on our discussion sheet here,

0:51:06.600 --> 0:51:10.240
<v Speaker 2>elliptical yet definitive endings. But I have a little question

0:51:10.260 --> 0:51:14.220
<v Speaker 2>of the definitive with it ends, because as we discussed,

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:17.380
<v Speaker 2>James gets to the end, the sign that says road ends,

0:51:17.500 --> 0:51:19.350
<v Speaker 2>he heads back. So, you know, the cycle kind of

0:51:19.370 --> 0:51:23.400
<v Speaker 2>begins there. begins anew, whereas Calvin ends up at home,

0:51:24.560 --> 0:51:27.980
<v Speaker 2>but not his home. It's a not-quite-perfect simulation of his

0:51:28.000 --> 0:51:32.239
<v Speaker 2>home to which he seems to have a complicated emotional response.

0:51:32.380 --> 0:51:35.790
<v Speaker 2>But I guess in both cases, though, we have characters

0:51:36.070 --> 0:51:38.290
<v Speaker 2>that are beginning a new phase of a journey we'll

0:51:38.330 --> 0:51:39.830
<v Speaker 2>never see the end of, but I think it may

0:51:39.850 --> 0:51:42.469
<v Speaker 2>not matter. It's a journey to this point that might

0:51:42.489 --> 0:51:44.750
<v Speaker 2>have mattered for these characters and for us watching them.

0:51:45.050 --> 0:51:48.009
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, when I wrote elliptical but definitive endings, what I

0:51:48.050 --> 0:51:52.330
<v Speaker 1>kind of meant was We end on pregnant pauses, I think,

0:51:52.630 --> 0:51:55.250
<v Speaker 1>as kind of a new phase of their lives begin.

0:51:55.850 --> 0:51:58.770
<v Speaker 1>But to me, while the story may be open-ended, what

0:51:58.890 --> 0:52:02.810
<v Speaker 1>happens next may be open-ended, it feels like both characters

0:52:02.830 --> 0:52:06.390
<v Speaker 1>have crossed a Rubicon. Both characters have come somewhere that

0:52:06.430 --> 0:52:09.330
<v Speaker 1>they want to be. It's a little uncertain to me

0:52:09.370 --> 0:52:13.780
<v Speaker 1>whether Kelvin... chose not to leave the planet or thought

0:52:13.820 --> 0:52:15.880
<v Speaker 1>he left the planet and then discovered that he didn't.

0:52:16.280 --> 0:52:18.740
<v Speaker 1>But either way, the way he falls on his knees

0:52:18.800 --> 0:52:21.759
<v Speaker 1>before this avatar of his father, you know, to me

0:52:21.800 --> 0:52:24.480
<v Speaker 1>says he's where he wants to be. With It Ends,

0:52:24.580 --> 0:52:27.870
<v Speaker 1>I found that ending very rousing and very touching because

0:52:27.910 --> 0:52:30.670
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me that what James has determined is

0:52:30.730 --> 0:52:36.049
<v Speaker 1>that he can do more by connecting with others and

0:52:36.110 --> 0:52:39.300
<v Speaker 1>helping with others than he can by going on solo.

0:52:39.989 --> 0:52:43.410
<v Speaker 1>And if that brings him to contact with new people,

0:52:43.430 --> 0:52:45.950
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's one of the big ways I get

0:52:45.989 --> 0:52:49.089
<v Speaker 1>through the tedium of life is reaching out to new

0:52:49.110 --> 0:52:52.890
<v Speaker 1>people and making new connections. So I connected a lot

0:52:52.989 --> 0:52:56.120
<v Speaker 1>with that ending. And whether it's meant to be like

0:52:56.739 --> 0:53:00.480
<v Speaker 1>a permanent step, whether he's just rescuing this one person

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:05.280
<v Speaker 1>or he's beginning a career of bringing people back from despair,

0:53:05.500 --> 0:53:08.549
<v Speaker 1>we don't know. But to me, making that choice to

0:53:08.850 --> 0:53:11.450
<v Speaker 1>stop pushing forward and instead turn back and help other

0:53:11.469 --> 0:53:12.890
<v Speaker 1>people felt really definitive.

0:53:13.130 --> 0:53:15.009
<v Speaker 2>I think the car only seats five, though, Tasha. There's

0:53:15.030 --> 0:53:16.650
<v Speaker 2>sort of a limit to how many people he can

0:53:16.690 --> 0:53:16.950
<v Speaker 2>bring back.

0:53:16.969 --> 0:53:20.370
<v Speaker 3>That's pretty funny. I guess I didn't interpret the ending

0:53:20.790 --> 0:53:22.009
<v Speaker 3>like you did, Tasha.

0:53:22.030 --> 0:53:23.810
<v Speaker 2>I like the thought.

0:53:23.870 --> 0:53:29.000
<v Speaker 3>It's more optimistic than what I saw. Because I think

0:53:29.060 --> 0:53:32.100
<v Speaker 3>it's now when you kind of close that loop and

0:53:32.120 --> 0:53:37.080
<v Speaker 3>you're back to asking this silly hypothetical question that was

0:53:37.219 --> 0:53:41.700
<v Speaker 3>asked at the beginning. You're starting this cycle all over again,

0:53:41.739 --> 0:53:45.730
<v Speaker 3>and you're starting it with someone whose processing speed, at

0:53:45.770 --> 0:53:50.129
<v Speaker 3>least at this point, is really low. I always find

0:53:50.150 --> 0:53:54.310
<v Speaker 3>it kind of a funny sort of comedic button to

0:53:54.330 --> 0:53:55.470
<v Speaker 3>the movie more than anything.

0:53:56.090 --> 0:53:58.980
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's a moment where we see that people

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:02.700
<v Speaker 1>can be brought back from that catatonic state. The road

0:54:02.739 --> 0:54:06.460
<v Speaker 1>may not lead anywhere, but the end state does not

0:54:06.540 --> 0:54:09.580
<v Speaker 1>have to be the same for all people. And, you know,

0:54:09.940 --> 0:54:13.180
<v Speaker 1>the fact that the strangers in the woods are so

0:54:13.280 --> 0:54:16.980
<v Speaker 1>desperate and, you know, screaming and clawing for access to

0:54:17.020 --> 0:54:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the car and the ability to move forward and the

0:54:19.900 --> 0:54:23.220
<v Speaker 1>characters are terrified of them, you know, but they're screaming

0:54:23.260 --> 0:54:26.960
<v Speaker 1>for help. And the response to people screaming for help

0:54:27.180 --> 0:54:30.570
<v Speaker 1>is to flee them and to avoid being pulled down

0:54:30.610 --> 0:54:35.069
<v Speaker 1>with them. Like, like, physically in a dangerous painful kind

0:54:35.110 --> 0:54:39.180
<v Speaker 1>of way I think that's a very common response to

0:54:39.739 --> 0:54:43.140
<v Speaker 1>the degree to which we could all drown in the

0:54:43.360 --> 0:54:46.239
<v Speaker 1>number of other people out there needing our help and

0:54:46.560 --> 0:54:50.500
<v Speaker 1>James making the choice to like actively seek out one

0:54:50.560 --> 0:54:54.009
<v Speaker 1>person he can help to me feels like you know

0:54:54.070 --> 0:54:56.170
<v Speaker 1>he may have infinity this may be a drop in

0:54:56.190 --> 0:54:58.130
<v Speaker 1>the bucket but it's the first drop in the bucket

0:54:58.250 --> 0:55:00.090
<v Speaker 1>so yeah I did see that as a very positive

0:55:00.130 --> 0:55:03.230
<v Speaker 1>ending And given the guy he picks comes back from

0:55:03.330 --> 0:55:08.690
<v Speaker 1>complete limp catatonia, the fact that he's willing to respond

0:55:08.910 --> 0:55:11.330
<v Speaker 1>at all is a step forward. I don't think he's

0:55:11.350 --> 0:55:14.310
<v Speaker 1>going to be that way forever any more than I

0:55:14.370 --> 0:55:17.009
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to. They're going to just continue to

0:55:17.150 --> 0:55:21.730
<v Speaker 1>talk about hawks versus gorillas for the rest of their existence.

0:55:21.750 --> 0:55:23.700
<v Speaker 3>I like it, Tasha.

0:55:24.270 --> 0:55:26.469
<v Speaker 1>Well, you know how much I love ending on a

0:55:26.510 --> 0:55:29.410
<v Speaker 1>place where Scott Tobias actually agrees with me about something,

0:55:29.590 --> 0:55:33.310
<v Speaker 1>or at least says that he's willing to enjoy something

0:55:33.330 --> 0:55:37.310
<v Speaker 1>that I've said. Solaris is available on streaming services, including

0:55:37.450 --> 0:55:40.630
<v Speaker 1>HBO Max and the Criterion channel. It's on Criterion DVD

0:55:40.750 --> 0:55:43.760
<v Speaker 1>and Blu-ray. As we're recording this, it ends, it's pretty

0:55:43.780 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>close to ending its run in theaters. So it's possible

0:55:46.200 --> 0:55:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you might not be able to see it immediately by

0:55:48.180 --> 0:55:50.500
<v Speaker 1>the time this episode airs, but it should have a

0:55:50.560 --> 0:55:53.980
<v Speaker 1>second or possibly third life in digital release soon. We'll

0:55:54.000 --> 0:56:03.100
<v Speaker 1>be right back with your next picture show. Finally, it's

0:56:03.140 --> 0:56:05.780
<v Speaker 1>time to recommend a film or film-related item that complements

0:56:05.820 --> 0:56:08.350
<v Speaker 1>this set of episodes. We call it your next picture show,

0:56:08.510 --> 0:56:10.830
<v Speaker 1>with hopes that it will put some interesting choices on

0:56:10.870 --> 0:56:13.880
<v Speaker 1>your radar. All right, Keith, let's hear it.

0:56:13.890 --> 0:56:17.730
<v Speaker 2>Okay, well, briefly, I sat down to see it in

0:56:17.770 --> 0:56:19.969
<v Speaker 2>for a second time, and I thought, You know what?

0:56:20.010 --> 0:56:22.670
<v Speaker 2>We should have done Tulane Blacktop, which is one of

0:56:22.690 --> 0:56:25.210
<v Speaker 2>my favorite films, but I'm sure we'll get to it eventually.

0:56:25.230 --> 0:56:27.600
<v Speaker 2>And actually, now that we've done it, I think the

0:56:27.660 --> 0:56:29.759
<v Speaker 2>Solaris has been good. But if you want to keep

0:56:29.800 --> 0:56:33.780
<v Speaker 2>the Solaris vibe going, you can watch the 2002 remake

0:56:33.800 --> 0:56:39.110
<v Speaker 2>by Steven Soderbergh, which is not widely liked, not widely remembered,

0:56:39.150 --> 0:56:42.930
<v Speaker 2>best I can tell. It was when Soderbergh was in

0:56:42.969 --> 0:56:46.470
<v Speaker 2>his super productive phase in the early 2000s, unlike now

0:56:46.530 --> 0:56:50.290
<v Speaker 2>when he's merely in the extremely productive phase of his career.

0:56:51.180 --> 0:56:54.520
<v Speaker 2>But it's a remake that stars George Clooney in the

0:56:54.580 --> 0:56:58.799
<v Speaker 2>Kelvin role and Jeremy Davies, Viola Davis, and Ulrich Tukor

0:56:58.960 --> 0:57:03.239
<v Speaker 2>as the astronauts on the space station. And the plot

0:57:03.320 --> 0:57:07.000
<v Speaker 2>is really roughly the same, just as it's roughly the

0:57:07.040 --> 0:57:13.080
<v Speaker 2>same as the novel. Natasha Mechelone plays His wife, who,

0:57:13.560 --> 0:57:17.480
<v Speaker 2>like the wife in the original film, has killed herself.

0:57:17.840 --> 0:57:22.450
<v Speaker 2>But it is much more emotional. I think this is really,

0:57:22.630 --> 0:57:28.189
<v Speaker 2>you know, everything that Lim... objected to about the Tarkovsky film,

0:57:28.210 --> 0:57:32.710
<v Speaker 2>which he seems not to actually have seen, is heightened

0:57:32.750 --> 0:57:35.770
<v Speaker 2>in this version, which Lim lived long enough to disapprove

0:57:35.870 --> 0:57:40.180
<v Speaker 2>of without seeing this film too, which is kind of nice.

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:42.860
<v Speaker 2>But I think Clooney, it's one of his best performances.

0:57:42.900 --> 0:57:45.670
<v Speaker 2>I think McClellan's really good. I think there's some, some

0:57:45.750 --> 0:57:49.140
<v Speaker 2>really scary moments early on before it becomes a sort

0:57:49.160 --> 0:57:53.940
<v Speaker 2>of this fairly highly emotional kind of romantic film. It's

0:57:53.960 --> 0:57:57.350
<v Speaker 2>also lean. I mean, Soderbergh was an editor before he

0:57:57.370 --> 0:58:01.080
<v Speaker 2>was a director and, and, He also did a, at

0:58:01.180 --> 0:58:03.200
<v Speaker 2>one point, I've never seen it, but he offered a

0:58:03.820 --> 0:58:08.200
<v Speaker 2>more fleet cut of 2001 A Space Odyssey by re-editing

0:58:08.220 --> 0:58:10.080
<v Speaker 2>the film himself. I think he kind of cut this

0:58:10.220 --> 0:58:13.040
<v Speaker 2>one down to a very lean running time, but I

0:58:13.060 --> 0:58:15.680
<v Speaker 2>think it works as sort of like, I don't know,

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:21.850
<v Speaker 2>sort of like the chamber music version to Tarkovsky's big

0:58:22.450 --> 0:58:25.410
<v Speaker 2>symphonic version of Solaris. I like them both a lot.

0:58:25.610 --> 0:58:30.070
<v Speaker 2>I think Solaris is The Tarkovsky version is probably, no,

0:58:30.090 --> 0:58:32.630
<v Speaker 2>it's definitely more of an artistic accomplishment, but I think

0:58:32.650 --> 0:58:35.050
<v Speaker 2>the Soderbergh version is quite strong. Also has one of

0:58:35.110 --> 0:58:38.700
<v Speaker 2>my favorite scores of the century. Cliff Martinez does the

0:58:38.720 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 2>score that I still listen to when I write sometimes.

0:58:42.080 --> 0:58:46.320
<v Speaker 2>So check it out. It is available for rental most

0:58:46.360 --> 0:58:50.280
<v Speaker 2>places and the usual places. And I don't think it

0:58:50.300 --> 0:58:52.640
<v Speaker 2>ever even came out on Blu-ray, but it's out there.

0:58:52.740 --> 0:58:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Check it out.

0:58:53.120 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:58:53.610 --> 0:58:57.100
<v Speaker 1>Keith, does Soderbergh at any point zoom way, way, way

0:58:57.300 --> 0:58:58.700
<v Speaker 1>into George Clooney's ear?

0:58:58.720 --> 0:59:02.160
<v Speaker 2>It's been a while since I've seen the film. I

0:59:02.200 --> 0:59:04.820
<v Speaker 2>rewatched it for defense. I bought it on the reveal.

0:59:05.000 --> 0:59:06.630
<v Speaker 2>You can find it there if you look for it.

0:59:07.160 --> 0:59:10.570
<v Speaker 2>I do not recall that shot. Sorry.

0:59:10.590 --> 0:59:15.300
<v Speaker 1>All right. Well, if you take Keith's advice and watch

0:59:15.360 --> 0:59:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the Soderbergh Solaris, either to revisit it or for the

0:59:18.940 --> 0:59:21.320
<v Speaker 1>first time, please write in and let us know if

0:59:21.360 --> 0:59:25.860
<v Speaker 1>there are any deep dive earshots. But in the meantime, Keith,

0:59:25.940 --> 0:59:28.220
<v Speaker 1>thank you. I have not seen it myself, and I

0:59:28.320 --> 0:59:31.920
<v Speaker 1>certainly am curious after watching the Tartofsky version, not for

0:59:31.940 --> 0:59:35.320
<v Speaker 1>the first time, but definitely for the first time while

0:59:35.340 --> 0:59:43.310
<v Speaker 1>being awake the entire time, shall we say. That's it

0:59:43.350 --> 0:59:45.570
<v Speaker 1>for this edition of The Next Picture Show. Scott, can

0:59:45.590 --> 0:59:47.090
<v Speaker 1>you tell us about our next pairing?

0:59:47.110 --> 0:59:50.310
<v Speaker 3>In the new independent drama The Wait, Ethan Hawke stars

0:59:50.370 --> 0:59:53.800
<v Speaker 3>as a convict in 1930s Oregon and who's desperate for

0:59:53.820 --> 0:59:56.560
<v Speaker 3>the opportunity to end his prison sentence so he can

0:59:56.580 --> 1:00:00.340
<v Speaker 3>be reunited with his daughter. Such an opportunity arises when

1:00:00.360 --> 1:00:03.510
<v Speaker 3>the warden, played by Russell Crowe, offers him the chance

1:00:03.570 --> 1:00:05.950
<v Speaker 3>for an early release if he leads a crew on

1:00:05.990 --> 1:00:09.990
<v Speaker 3>a dangerous mission to smuggle gold through the wilderness. This

1:00:10.090 --> 1:00:14.930
<v Speaker 3>high-stakes proposition calls to mind William Friedkin's Sorcerer, a 1977

1:00:14.930 --> 1:00:18.390
<v Speaker 3>remake of the French classic The Wages of Fear, about

1:00:18.470 --> 1:00:21.860
<v Speaker 3>desperate men who agree to drive trucks filled with unstable

1:00:21.910 --> 1:00:27.140
<v Speaker 3>nitroglycerin to an oil well 200 bumpy miles away. Though

1:00:27.180 --> 1:00:29.970
<v Speaker 3>Friedkin's film was a flop at the time, in part

1:00:30.010 --> 1:00:32.630
<v Speaker 3>because it opened against a little film called Star Wars,

1:00:33.350 --> 1:00:36.430
<v Speaker 3>it's since become a cult favorite. Please join us next

1:00:36.490 --> 1:00:40.070
<v Speaker 3>time as we compare these compelling takes on a white-knuckle thriller.

1:00:40.430 --> 1:00:43.050
<v Speaker 1>For now, we welcome your feedback on Solaris, It Ends,

1:00:43.250 --> 1:00:46.070
<v Speaker 1>and anything else film-related you'd like to talk about. Email

1:00:46.110 --> 1:00:49.130
<v Speaker 1>us at comments at nextpictureshow.net or leave us a voicemail

1:00:49.190 --> 1:00:56.410
<v Speaker 1>at 773- Before we close out this week's episode, you know,

1:00:56.550 --> 1:00:58.430
<v Speaker 1>you guys know where to find me these days. Pretty

1:00:58.450 --> 1:01:01.270
<v Speaker 1>much just on Vulture and a little more on Blue

1:01:01.310 --> 1:01:05.030
<v Speaker 1>Sky at Tasha Robinson, but mostly Land Back. And we

1:01:05.070 --> 1:01:07.350
<v Speaker 1>can find you guys mostly in the same place. So

1:01:08.050 --> 1:01:10.730
<v Speaker 1>who wants to kick off by telling us about the reveal?

1:01:11.070 --> 1:01:11.290
<v Speaker 2>Wow.

1:01:11.350 --> 1:01:14.090
<v Speaker 3>Okay. You bring it forward. I don't know what to do.

1:01:14.620 --> 1:01:18.150
<v Speaker 3>Let me start, I suppose. You can find me, Scott Tobias,

1:01:18.530 --> 1:01:21.590
<v Speaker 3>on Blue Sky at Scott Tobias, and you can find

1:01:21.630 --> 1:01:24.290
<v Speaker 3>my work at The Reveal. I certainly do a tremendous

1:01:24.310 --> 1:01:26.870
<v Speaker 3>amount of work at The Reveal, the newsletter I edit

1:01:27.490 --> 1:01:31.230
<v Speaker 3>and write with QFIPs. It's thereveal.film. And you can also

1:01:31.250 --> 1:01:34.670
<v Speaker 3>find my work in The New York Times, Guardian, Vulture,

1:01:34.690 --> 1:01:36.310
<v Speaker 3>and other fine publications. Keith?

1:01:36.690 --> 1:01:38.990
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. I mean, you can find me at KFIP3000,

1:01:39.670 --> 1:01:41.790
<v Speaker 2>mostly at Blue Sky. You can find my work at

1:01:41.810 --> 1:01:45.550
<v Speaker 2>places like Vulture and TV Guide, but also The Reveal, TheReveal.film,

1:01:45.590 --> 1:01:48.270
<v Speaker 2>with Scott Tobias. And if you like this podcast, you'll

1:01:48.290 --> 1:01:51.540
<v Speaker 2>probably enjoy that newsletter. And I do have another podcast

1:01:51.640 --> 1:01:54.280
<v Speaker 2>that I co-host with my friend Mike Ryan. It's called

1:01:54.360 --> 1:01:56.880
<v Speaker 2>Ford Focus, a Harrison Ford podcast. You can probably piece

1:01:56.900 --> 1:01:59.460
<v Speaker 2>together what that podcast is about.

1:02:00.080 --> 1:02:04.100
<v Speaker 1>Our absent co-host, Genevieve Kosky, is the TV editor at Vulture.

1:02:04.400 --> 1:02:07.860
<v Speaker 1>And you can also find her mostly not blue-skying on

1:02:07.910 --> 1:02:11.140
<v Speaker 1>Blue Sky at Genevieve Kosky. Stay updated on The Next

1:02:11.180 --> 1:02:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Picture Show at nextpictureshow.net and on Blue Sky at The

1:02:14.660 --> 1:02:17.460
<v Speaker 1>Next Picture Show. Get bonus content and open discussion at

1:02:17.500 --> 1:02:21.940
<v Speaker 1>patreon.com slash nextpictureshow. And as always, we appreciate your rating

1:02:21.960 --> 1:02:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and reviews on Apple Podcasts or Spotify or wherever you

1:02:25.160 --> 1:02:27.420
<v Speaker 1>listen to the show. Thanks to Dan the Baked Jakes

1:02:27.460 --> 1:02:30.280
<v Speaker 1>for his assistance in producing this podcast. The Next Picture

1:02:30.300 --> 1:02:32.510
<v Speaker 1>Show is proud to be part of the FilmSpotting family

1:02:32.530 --> 1:02:34.490
<v Speaker 1>of podcasts. Please tune in next time.

1:02:46.650 --> 1:02:47.490
<v Speaker 3>That was a good movie.

1:02:47.780 --> 1:02:49.340
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, seen here before once.