Speaker 1: Welcome to the solid verbal. I'm that for me. I'm
Speaker 1: a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,
Speaker 1: I want to be happy. You want to be happy
Speaker 1: for day Edith State? Is that? Whoo whoom? And then
Speaker 1: and tie, Welcome back to the solid verbal boys. A
Speaker 1: girl's my name is ty Hildebrand. I am over here
Speaker 1: in beautiful Allantown, Pennsylvania, joined as always by my colleague
Speaker 1: and co host and friend of many years. Way over there,
Speaker 1: over yonder in beautiful New York City. Sir, how are you?
Speaker 2: I'm not gonna lie, Tye. The microphone, what is it called?
Speaker 2: It's the foam piece in front of it, the pop
Speaker 2: not a pop filter. The wind screen, the wind screen,
Speaker 2: thank you. It smells a bit like you're in really
Speaker 2: and I try to speak close to it so that
Speaker 2: everybody can hear my nonsense in the clearest possible way.
Speaker 2: And it's getting a little bit weird. It's not great.
Speaker 2: Is this your foam piece or is this a foam
Speaker 2: This is the Box Media studio windscreen. They just got
Speaker 2: a new office for you. They should be able to
Speaker 2: get new You would think so, Ty, You would think so.
Speaker 2: Also in preparation for this Q and A show. One,
Speaker 2: I looked up because we're doing a Q and A show.
Speaker 1: Hey everybody. One.
Speaker 2: I did some research into the a's for the cues
Speaker 2: that were submitted. Oh and two. In looking for any
Speaker 2: sort of news to talk about ty, I looked at
Speaker 2: the daily email I get from Jason Kirk and Espianation.
Speaker 2: They do a very good jobs letter, the Espianation College
Speaker 2: Football Newsletter that comes into my mailbox every day that
Speaker 2: has all sorts of news that you should know.
Speaker 1: There is.
Speaker 2: It's called the read option. By the way, yes, there
Speaker 2: is nothing happening there. It's just all like Leonard Fournette
Speaker 2: can jump twenty eight and a half inches and that's
Speaker 2: not a lot to go on for a college football podcast.
Speaker 1: What's funny about that is that you put together our
Speaker 1: little runsheet here of all the questions that came in
Speaker 1: via email and Twitter and Facebook, where wherever, And at
Speaker 1: the very top you've got in bold in all caps
Speaker 1: news and then two bullet points. I looked at those
Speaker 1: two bullet points and I was like, is there anything else?
Speaker 1: Is that news at all?
Speaker 2: This was nine o'clock am. This is what came in
Speaker 2: for yesterday's college football news. It was combine stuff, which
Speaker 2: is you know, it's it's tangential, it's relevant to our interests.
Speaker 2: We've got a piece on whether Oregon's mascot is actually
Speaker 2: named Puddles or just the duck. It's a Nike attempt
Speaker 2: to brand. Bill c who is already previewing teams previews
Speaker 2: North Texas.
Speaker 1: He's encouraged.
Speaker 2: It's time for junior days recruiting wise high school kids
Speaker 2: visiting schools. Andy Staples wrote about a six foot nine,
Speaker 2: four hundred pound dude from Australia who's never played football
Speaker 2: and has offers from major colleges to play offensive line,
Speaker 2: never played a single down of college of football of
Speaker 2: organized football, minor Ohio State players transferring, a bunch of
Speaker 2: Georgia Tech players transfer and celebration penalties in the NFL.
Speaker 2: It's not a ton to go on. So I guarantee
Speaker 2: you this scant we will make our best attempt to
Speaker 2: talk about bank robberies and trail mix and some hypothetical.
Speaker 1: College football sto. I'm so excited for this. Yeah, I
Speaker 1: am so excited for this. So thank you for listening
Speaker 1: to the show. We're at iTunes dot com. Slash soliverbal
Speaker 1: as well as soliverbal dot com. We are on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat,
Speaker 1: all the usual social media stops that you might have.
Speaker 1: You can also email us at soliverble at gmail dot
Speaker 1: com and let us know how we're doing. We continue
Speaker 1: to record and podcasts all throughout the off season. Once
Speaker 1: we get a little close to the season, we'll go
Speaker 1: two times a week. If you're not familiar with our
Speaker 1: rhymes and rhythms. But in the meantime, we tend to
Speaker 1: do these Q and A shows and when we get
Speaker 1: into like the slow news downturns of college football offseason.
Speaker 1: Right it's currently one of those, but before long we'll
Speaker 1: get to spring football. We'll talk about the NFL Draft,
Speaker 1: because that's something that a lot of college football fans
Speaker 1: are into. We'll talk about it from a college football perspective,
Speaker 1: and we've already started lining up a bunch of big
Speaker 1: name college football head coaches. Yes. One of the cool
Speaker 1: things that I like about that is when we can
Speaker 1: sort of look back after the year and say, oh,
Speaker 1: we got this guy, Oh we got that guy, like
Speaker 1: we've had Tom Herman the last two years. Tom Herman
Speaker 1: has been very relevant in college football. Over the last
Speaker 1: three seasons, Yeah, without question, would say last year was
Speaker 1: one of our strongest portfolios yet as it relates to
Speaker 1: college football head coaching interviews. The way that it is
Speaker 1: presently shaping up looks like it will by far be
Speaker 1: our biggest and best yet. So I'm really excited about that.
Speaker 1: That's probably coming up in the next couple months as well. Yeah.
Speaker 2: Not too many people know this, but when Bobby Patrino
Speaker 2: crashed his motorcycle, he was actually on the phone with
Speaker 2: Tye answering what was job one for the twenty twelve season.
Speaker 2: Many people know that, and so we apologize. Obviously that's
Speaker 2: on us. That is on us. Also relevant question to
Speaker 2: things you were just mentioning, would it be possible for
Speaker 2: you to tell everybody that we are We're over nine
Speaker 2: hundred reviews on iTunes? Yes, I believe Bud told me
Speaker 2: that Bud Elliott is on top of these things.
Speaker 1: I have not so checked recently, but that would sound
Speaker 1: about right.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I don't think we've eclipsed a thousand, So if
Speaker 2: you could go to iTunes if you haven't yet. I
Speaker 2: know this is like everybody says this on every single
Speaker 2: podcast you listen to.
Speaker 1: I get it.
Speaker 2: We're nearing a thousand. It would mean a whole lot
Speaker 2: to us if you went on iTunes and threw us
Speaker 2: a review. If you like the show, throw us some stars.
Speaker 2: Maybe five, five stars would be wonderful. So let's close in.
Speaker 1: Stars on iTunes, stars on Facebook, stars anywhere you can.
Speaker 1: I think should be the motto for this offseason. But yes,
Speaker 1: absolutely that helps. If you listen an overcast, recommend the
Speaker 1: show through your podcast app of choice. All that stuff
Speaker 1: helps us out. But before we get into all the
Speaker 1: college football nitty gritty that awaits us in the coming
Speaker 1: weeks and months, we do need to do our Q
Speaker 1: and A. And then we've got an exciting announcement about
Speaker 1: a show we're going to be doing next week and
Speaker 1: then the week after. We'll get to that a little
Speaker 1: bit later on.
Speaker 2: But you mentioned that, you know, it's a longer off
Speaker 2: season and there's not as many topics. I look at
Speaker 2: it like as a barbecue thing tip. Yeah, oh yeah,
Speaker 2: the low and slow burn that gets to the season brisket.
Speaker 1: It's the crock potting before the great feast.
Speaker 2: Right, so right now we're just we're slat were Actually
Speaker 2: I'm not a big slathering of a brisket guy, I
Speaker 2: don't want a marinade.
Speaker 1: We're seasoning it. We're gently seasoning it with some salt
Speaker 1: and pepper. Maybe a little bit of garlic and brown sugar,
Speaker 1: but salt and pepper is plenty, So we're just we're
Speaker 1: salting and peppering that off season brisket. Where do we
Speaker 1: want to start?
Speaker 2: Do you have thoughts about the combine before we get started,
Speaker 2: because that's the closest thing to news.
Speaker 1: I love when I see that someone like Miles Garrett
Speaker 1: had thirty three reps on the bench press at like
Speaker 1: two twenty five. Yeah. I like seeing that John Ross
Speaker 1: ran a four to two to two before hurting his leg. Yeah.
Speaker 1: Like I like seeing the eye popping stats. I don't
Speaker 1: really put much stock in it beyond that.
Speaker 2: I like seeing you completely overlook the Temple owl and
Speaker 2: Hassan Reddick Riddick Reddick jumping like eleven feet in the
Speaker 2: broad jump, just stomping your disrespect of the owls.
Speaker 1: I love that. I find that my interest level has
Speaker 1: gone down with age in the combine.
Speaker 2: Oh yeah, it's tough, but I think the clear best
Speaker 2: part is to see just how athletic and nimble and
Speaker 2: you know, the burst and the change of direction of
Speaker 2: the huge dudes where you think to yourself, well, sure
Speaker 2: he's three hundred and twenty five pounds, but there's no
Speaker 2: way he's actually athla oh my god. Yeah yeah, Like
Speaker 2: he's just pushing a dude in front of him. It's
Speaker 2: college football, and the guy's not an NFL player, and
Speaker 2: so he's easier to push around if you're this three
Speaker 2: hundred and twenty Nope, nope. These are just enormous athletes
Speaker 2: that are impressive at everything they do.
Speaker 1: I also look forward to Bruce Feldman's annual Draft combines
Speaker 1: Freaks Free columns, you know, where he talks about the
Speaker 1: most athletic guys. Otherwise, though, no, not a whole lot
Speaker 1: of interest. It's a cool little mini game that goes
Speaker 1: on within the game, and I'm excited to talk draft
Speaker 1: at some point, probably next month with a draft knick
Speaker 1: or two.
Speaker 2: A totally underrated part of the combine in the draft
Speaker 2: itself is seeing a school that wasn't necessarily successful at,
Speaker 2: you know, winning college football games.
Speaker 1: I would have like seven draft picks the old like
Speaker 1: ron Zook Illinois, like Corey Legit, Winnie Merciless. Where are
Speaker 1: all these guys coming?
Speaker 2: From and we knew that they were good in college,
Speaker 2: but then the NFL is like, no, these this is
Speaker 2: a team legitimately stocked with NFL players and they go
Speaker 2: three and nine.
Speaker 1: It somehow does more to undermine the credibility of their
Speaker 1: college coach. Right.
Speaker 2: It's sort of an al grow special as well. I
Speaker 2: would argue, what Virginia players, what else is going on?
Speaker 2: Not too much else, But I saw somewhere when I
Speaker 2: was scanning things that you know, a big story coming
Speaker 2: for this season. I'm just going to ask this question myself,
Speaker 2: because nobody we have a bunch of questions. I had
Speaker 2: to pair abound a bunch of questions. We got a
Speaker 2: bunch through email and Facebook and whatever. But one of
Speaker 2: the things that I always enjoy, and somebody asked this
Speaker 2: just on a Twitter Q and A, is what I'm
Speaker 2: looking forward to other than Oregon and what they do
Speaker 2: in twenty seventeen, just in college football in general. And
Speaker 2: my answer is generally the same thing, and that's just
Speaker 2: emerging quarterbacks. Quarterback is such a hard position to play,
Speaker 2: especially now with so much talent playing on defense, and
Speaker 2: it's just more and more difficult with guys transferring year
Speaker 2: in and year out, we don't get to see them
Speaker 2: get a ton of experience within the same program. So
Speaker 2: which emerge of these four emerging quarterbacks if you had
Speaker 2: to rank these guys, and they're specifically emerging because they
Speaker 2: are merging from other teams and going to new teams,
Speaker 2: which of these four people will we say in December? Well,
Speaker 2: he's the clear standout of this group. Okay, are you ready?
Speaker 2: Because this is a good year for quarterback transfer. So
Speaker 2: we've got Will Greer starting at West Virginia Jinia. Yeah,
Speaker 2: after a very promising start at Florida and then leaving
Speaker 2: under some unfortunate pharmaceutical circumstances.
Speaker 1: Some would say yeah, yeah, some would say sure.
Speaker 2: Kyle Allen moving on from Texas A and M he
Speaker 2: sat out last year. He's going to be playing at
Speaker 2: Houston this year.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: I thought he'd be playing for Tom Herman, but in
Speaker 2: fact it'll be major Apple White, Blake Barnett moving on
Speaker 2: from Alabama and becoming immediately eligible at Arizona State. And
Speaker 2: Jared Stidham taking a year off after the fiasco just
Speaker 2: life fiasco at Baylor and emerging at Auburn. So of
Speaker 2: those four quarterbacks, I don't know if you want to
Speaker 2: rank them one through four. But right now, as it
Speaker 2: stands in early March, and nobody has really played any
Speaker 2: sort of significant time in the spring, let alone the fall,
Speaker 2: who would you take from that group?
Speaker 1: From that group, I think I'd take Jared Stidham. Okay,
Speaker 1: I would take Jared Sidham. Now I'm not crazy about
Speaker 1: the offense he's going to find himself in. I'm not
Speaker 1: quite sure how that's gonna work. But in his short
Speaker 1: time at Baylor, he showed a ton of promise. We
Speaker 1: simply haven't seen a whole lot out of Blake Barnett.
Speaker 1: We saw flashes from Kyle Allen, but that was up
Speaker 1: and down. And Will Greer showed a lot of promise
Speaker 1: before going to the Pine at Florida. So I feel
Speaker 1: like of all the people that we saw, Stidham, to me,
Speaker 1: felt like he had the most upside. So I would
Speaker 1: put him one. I'm gonna put Will Greer too, because
Speaker 1: when he came in and I.
Speaker 2: Think these are all five star high school guys, I
Speaker 2: believe Yeah, I mean he's on some services.
Speaker 1: You probably can't go wrong talent wise with any of
Speaker 1: these guys. But if we're gonna pick a second one,
Speaker 1: I'll go Will Greer. He's going into a system where
Speaker 1: you know he's going to air it out, and in
Speaker 1: a short time at Florida he showed I thought a
Speaker 1: lot of promise. People at Florida were excited about Will
Speaker 1: grew before that went south. Then that leaves me between
Speaker 1: Kyle Allen and Blake Barnett. I will put Blake Barnett
Speaker 1: at three, knowing full well we hadn't seen anything from him,
Speaker 1: we saw minimum from him. He'll have plenty of opportunities
Speaker 1: to show his show his stuff, and I'll put Kyle
Speaker 1: Allen forth. I don't know what Houston's gonna look like
Speaker 1: post Tom Herman. I don't think it's like a situation
Speaker 1: where it falls off the cliff, but it's certainly not
Speaker 1: the same setup as it was. And Kyle Allen left
Speaker 1: a lot to be desired at Texas A and m
Speaker 1: granted probably wasn't all his fault, but I sort of
Speaker 1: expected a lot more. I feel like we've seen a
Speaker 1: lot from him that left me feeling disappointed, so he
Speaker 1: would be my number four.
Speaker 2: So I have Will Greer atop the list, just because
Speaker 2: I think he looked good enough with the least around him.
Speaker 2: The running game wasn't spectacularly good at Florida, and the
Speaker 2: fact that he's moving on to a system will have
Speaker 2: Justin Crawford in the backfield at West Virginia. If you remember
Speaker 2: Justin Crawford of the Wow, Look what Justin Crawford is
Speaker 2: doing against Oklahoma?
Speaker 1: Yeah? Yeah.
Speaker 2: And the development of West Virginia receivers seems to be
Speaker 2: a year and in year out things. It's a you know,
Speaker 2: Shelton Gibson has gone Kevin White the year before, A
Speaker 2: year after year, they just keep replacing the speed successfully.
Speaker 2: I think whenever it is that Will Grier gets on
Speaker 2: the field, he will be put in the best position.
Speaker 2: Given West Virginia's defense taking steps forward year in and year out,
Speaker 2: I think he's in the best position to make the
Speaker 2: biggest impact this fall. I have Jared's did him second,
Speaker 2: even with the question mark of you know, r At
Speaker 2: Lashley leaving for Yukon, Chip Lindsay coming in from ASU,
Speaker 2: which then welcomes Blake Barnett. So we don't really know
Speaker 2: what the offense of Auburn is going to look like
Speaker 2: with Chip Lindsay. I imagine it will be heavy maus
Speaker 2: On influence but maybe it's time to sort of weave
Speaker 2: in new ideas. I have Kyle Allen third, just because
Speaker 2: I think his ceiling as a thrower is higher than
Speaker 2: Blake Barnett's, even though we haven't seen a lot of
Speaker 2: Blake Barnett and Kyle Allen struggled somemit Tech's A and M.
Speaker 2: I think he will have, you know, going going against
Speaker 2: easier defenses first of all, playing at Houston, and I
Speaker 2: have Blake Barnett, even though I really like the weapons
Speaker 2: that Blake Barnett has in Nikhil Harry and Kaylin Blage.
Speaker 2: I like those guys a lot, so three and four
Speaker 2: could go either way. I like the general talent level
Speaker 2: of Kyle Allen against AAC defenses and his throng ability
Speaker 2: a little bit more than Barnett's.
Speaker 1: All right, shall we get to our questions. Let's do it.
Speaker 1: Congratulations Skippy, you've got mail. You've got mail. On the
Speaker 1: solid verbal As often as we can, and quite frequently
Speaker 1: in the off season, we do our best to pay
Speaker 1: homage to those of you who write in solverble at
Speaker 1: gmail dot com, to our Twitter, to our Facebook. We
Speaker 1: did a Q and A about three weeks ago we
Speaker 1: will do many more throughout the course of the long
Speaker 1: college football doldrums the off season. We've got some questions
Speaker 1: in here that we're in here previously that we didn't
Speaker 1: get a chance to get to the first time around.
Speaker 2: We've also got a bunch of new ones, Dan, Yes,
Speaker 2: and so do we have old ones in here? I
Speaker 2: don't even remember old any old one. I added an
Speaker 2: old one here.
Speaker 1: Please surprise me. Let's start out here. Okay, mm hmm,
Speaker 1: He says, I got a dilemma. Might make for a
Speaker 1: good offseason conversation. Okay, you sir, are correct. I work
Speaker 1: for a fabulous nonprofit that does a lot of good
Speaker 1: work in our community. We're about to hold an annual
Speaker 1: fundraiser gala where we expect to raise hundreds of thousands
Speaker 1: of dollars. Sounds great. My dilemma is this. I've just
Speaker 1: been told that Vince Young will be at the event.
Speaker 1: I may be expected to hobnob with him, take photos,
Speaker 1: video of people with him, etc. Etc. But I'm a
Speaker 1: usc grad. I have no desire to do any of this.
Speaker 1: But I also know that this event will help raise
Speaker 1: a lot of money for our organization. I'm wondering to
Speaker 1: what level, can I appropriately snub or throw a shade
Speaker 1: at Vince Vy, as it were, without gumming up the
Speaker 1: fundraising by alienating potential donors who like him, or by
Speaker 1: pissing off my employer. So this is this is a
Speaker 1: deep question here, Dan, This is a deep question that
Speaker 1: I've got a shallow answer. But yeah, it could be.
Speaker 1: It sort of harkens back to your roots as a
Speaker 1: college football fan slash alum versus your new mature self
Speaker 1: as a career oriented gentleman working for a solid non problem.
Speaker 2: So if Vince Young is there as a positive force
Speaker 2: to do positive things. And I don't know Vince Young,
Speaker 2: I haven't been around Vince Young, but I would imagine
Speaker 2: he is somebody who really enjoys reveling in that huge
Speaker 2: game that USC Texas National championship, one of our great
Speaker 2: modern games in our sports.
Speaker 1: Absolutely, yeah, absolutely.
Speaker 2: It would be fair to say he wouldn't be uncomfortable
Speaker 2: if you brought up that game. No, not at all
Speaker 2: as a USC fan, as a as a UMass fan,
Speaker 2: whatever whatever team you root for. I say, lean into
Speaker 2: the fact that you were heartbroken. That will make him
Speaker 2: feel great. I will say, you know, if I'm a
Speaker 2: USC fan. I'm saying something like it was brutal watching
Speaker 2: the Tings try to tackle you, the Ting brothers. It
Speaker 2: was like it was heartbreaking. And that way you sort
Speaker 2: of endear yourself as somebody that has a sense of
Speaker 2: humor about yourself and you don't take things too seriously.
Speaker 2: But at the same time, you establish yourself as a
Speaker 2: college football fan, and you know what, maybe he gives
Speaker 2: you a little nugget about that game that you never
Speaker 2: knew and you just sort of like him a little
Speaker 2: bit more as a human. And I say steer into
Speaker 2: it because like I've interviewed a bunch of college players
Speaker 2: that have gone on to be NFL players at the
Speaker 2: NFL rookie thing we used to do, and we'd come
Speaker 2: across Washington players and you know, that was the point
Speaker 2: when Oregon was still beating Washington. But it was still
Speaker 2: fun to talk about that games in a non sort
Speaker 2: of trash talky way because you just you find out
Speaker 2: nuggets and that I'm in the nugget business. Tie call
Speaker 2: me Dave Thomas. I am a nugget guy. So sort
Speaker 2: of introducing yourself as a USC fan, but a good natured,
Speaker 2: good humored one should endear you and you collect those
Speaker 2: nuggets because you have no leg to stand on trash
Speaker 2: talking for a team that you literally ran over. See,
Speaker 2: I don't think you can throw a shade. You've got
Speaker 2: no leverage. Or you go up to him and you
Speaker 2: say I'm sorry. I'm a huge fan. I have to ask,
Speaker 2: are you Cole McCoy? Can I get a shot? All right,
Speaker 2: we'll do that.
Speaker 1: Where are we going next?
Speaker 2: Let's start with Rob rob Ass. If you could switch
Speaker 2: any two teams conference affiliates to improve alignment.
Speaker 1: I have a problem with conference alignment. And I'm not
Speaker 1: talking about it from the financial standpoint. You know, I'm
Speaker 1: not like, I'm not out there on the internet. I'm
Speaker 1: not examining the economics like Frank the Tank and some
Speaker 1: others that exists in the twitter sphere. I'm looking at
Speaker 1: this purely from a geographic standpoint. So of course, of
Speaker 1: course the answer could be like, switch Notre Dame in
Speaker 1: Rutgers because Notre Dame makes more sense than the Big Ten,
Speaker 1: perhaps than Rutgers does, and so on and so forth.
Speaker 1: But one thing that's bothered me for a long time.
Speaker 1: It's it's been after this whole SEC realignment, when they
Speaker 1: added Missouri and Texas A and M. M hmm. Do
Speaker 1: you know where Columbia Missouri is? Guve speaking, Dan, I
Speaker 1: do know where it is. Can you tell me how
Speaker 1: many teams in the SEC West are actually farther east
Speaker 1: than Columbia Missouri.
Speaker 2: How many teams are farther east in the SEC West?
Speaker 1: I'm talking SEC West teams that are actually farther east
Speaker 1: than Columbia Missouri. Is it all of them other than
Speaker 1: Texas A and M. All of them other than Texas
Speaker 1: A and M is a correct answer, Dan, Okay, unless
Speaker 1: you're drawing a diagonal line of sixty degrees across the southeast,
Speaker 1: there is no way a reasonable minded cartographer could ever
Speaker 1: come to the conclusion that this is a logical way
Speaker 1: to break down your divisions. I prefer to go by
Speaker 1: longitude and not by any kind of sixty degree diagonal
Speaker 1: across the sun belt of the United States in order
Speaker 1: to form by conferences. So therefore, I feel like, if
Speaker 1: you're going to try and do it and do it right,
Speaker 1: you need to do something in the SEC You need
Speaker 1: to better align based on west and east.
Speaker 2: So you want to you want to screw around with
Speaker 2: who's in the west and who's in the East. You're
Speaker 2: not switching conferences. You're almost doing division realignment, not conference realignment. Sure,
Speaker 2: I'm booking within a conference. I'm getting more specific, hyper
Speaker 2: local with this, Dan.
Speaker 1: Hell yeah. And by the way, this would work out
Speaker 1: better for the SEC East because the SEC East has
Speaker 1: been a bit of a gumpster fire over the last
Speaker 1: couple of years now. I'm not sure how well they'd
Speaker 1: take to maybe bringing Alabama over Auburn over Nobody wants
Speaker 1: that if you're in the East, but purely in terms
Speaker 1: of geographics and within the SEC conference. Dan, again, hyper local,
Speaker 1: I'm saying that Columbia, Missouri too far west to be
Speaker 1: in the SEC East. All right, Can I answer Rob's question? Then? Yes?
Speaker 2: Please conference affiliation. I'm gonna ad text A and M
Speaker 2: and Nebraska to the Big twelve. That would make things
Speaker 2: better for the Big Twelve. There are two teams that
Speaker 2: up the quality to huge name brands. They are geographically
Speaker 2: convenient enough, and text A and M is finding itself
Speaker 2: sort of strictly in the middle class at best. Of
Speaker 2: the SEC West, Nebraska is sort of a forgotten power
Speaker 2: right and the Big Ten, it feels like with the
Speaker 2: Michigan Ohio State, Penn State, and recently Michigan State attention.
Speaker 1: Getting they got better though this year. I still think
Speaker 1: it's a good cultural fit.
Speaker 2: Uh, it's well enough, But I'm going to go with
Speaker 2: those teams being more Big twelve than nine. I understand
Speaker 2: the pull of their new conferences, and I understand, Yes,
Speaker 2: you know, it's it's East Texas, it's you know, a
Speaker 2: lot in common with the SEC. It's a good cultural
Speaker 2: fit for Texas, A and M and Southeastern Conference. But
Speaker 2: in terms of the general health of college football, I
Speaker 2: don't think either the Big ten or SEC is affected
Speaker 2: by the loss of those two teams, and the Big.
Speaker 1: Twelve is greatly improved. Yes, I would agree with that.
Speaker 1: You were also previously in the Big twelve.
Speaker 2: No, I know this is true as well. That was
Speaker 2: sort of the sort of unspoken So you're.
Speaker 1: Taking the safe way out with this question. There is
Speaker 1: a long, storied history of those teams being in the
Speaker 1: Big Course. Yeah, I'm fine going back in time. Did
Speaker 1: I not answer question? Maybe I didn't answer it directly.
Speaker 2: You said conference affiliation and he you went with divisions.
Speaker 1: Well, I appreciate this question, even if I didn't answer
Speaker 1: it directly, because it gave me the opportunity to get
Speaker 1: something off my chest. I've never actually articulated that point
Speaker 1: here on the podcast.
Speaker 2: So thank you Rob, Thank you Ty. Who is this
Speaker 2: year's Penn State? The answer is Dak Prescott.
Speaker 1: Dak Prescott, Yeah, this year's Penn State.
Speaker 2: Yes, So I don't that's a broad question. So I'm
Speaker 2: interpreting this question as a team that is in the
Speaker 2: range of five hundred in their conference one year, and
Speaker 2: through a new starting quarterback and perhaps a new staff
Speaker 2: or overhauled staff, makes a leap, and also having a
Speaker 2: head coach that's on the hot seat going into the
Speaker 2: year perhaps makes a leap to save everybody and get
Speaker 2: everybody encouraged.
Speaker 1: There's no like one for one here. This is a
Speaker 1: little bit like our goof from many months ago about
Speaker 1: who is going to be twenty sixteen's Iowa. So there's
Speaker 1: no like congruence here between Penn State and another team
Speaker 1: that exists in twenty seventeen college football, at least not
Speaker 1: on my radar. I could pick a team like a
Speaker 1: Miami because they've got a starting quarterback and maybe not
Speaker 1: a five hundred team, and twenty sixteen they went nine
Speaker 1: and four, But there are gonna be some questions there.
Speaker 1: I could see them bubbling up under Mark Richt. TCU
Speaker 1: is interesting, maybe not a new starting quarterback, but six
Speaker 1: and seven was a disappointing season. I think they've got
Speaker 1: room to grow. I was probably a year early on them.
Speaker 1: What about Texas? Does Texas fall into that category?
Speaker 2: I mean, that's certainly an overhauled coaching staff. Right, Texas
Speaker 2: went three and six in the Big Twelve, five and
Speaker 2: seven overall. Penn State went seven and in six, four
Speaker 2: and four two years ago. I believe, Yeah, who do
Speaker 2: you have in mind? So I have two teams here.
Speaker 2: I have TCU, who went four and five in the
Speaker 2: Big Twelve. They returned the same quarterback in Kenny Hill.
Speaker 2: I mean, I assume it'll be some sort of open competition,
Speaker 2: but a little bit of a shake up offensively. Doug
Speaker 2: Meachum goes to Kansas and a'ssall sunny Comby's offense now
Speaker 2: and a team that's more talented than four and five
Speaker 2: in conference, just like Penn State was more talented than
Speaker 2: four and four in the Big Ten. So I'm going
Speaker 2: to go TCU as one of the teams. I have
Speaker 2: another team that could mirror it in more ways than one,
Speaker 2: in more ways, in like three different ways. Hear me
Speaker 2: out the Tennessee volunteers.
Speaker 1: No, God, here we go.
Speaker 2: This is why one Bob Shoop factory got Bob Shoop right.
Speaker 1: So there's that.
Speaker 2: There's a common thread. Yeah, ok, there is that common
Speaker 2: thread too. They almost completely overhauled the staff. Okay, you
Speaker 2: have Brady Hoake's involvements, very big ten of Tennessee. And
Speaker 2: I think the main thread is so they it's a
Speaker 2: new offensive staff by and large, and it is a
Speaker 2: completely new starting quarterback. It looks like it's going to
Speaker 2: be Jarrett Guarantano. I know it's sort of up for
Speaker 2: grabs the starting job. I really like him. Jared Garantano
Speaker 2: to me, I know he grew up. I think in
Speaker 2: New Jersey it's maybe not the highest level of high
Speaker 2: school competition. But I recently watched his tape as I
Speaker 2: was just like reading random things about random teams, and
Speaker 2: I watched his high school tape. Doesn't mean a lot,
Speaker 2: but reminds me of a little bit a similar game
Speaker 2: to Mariota. Not anywhere near him, but like the similar
Speaker 2: high school tape to Marcus Mariota, And I think he
Speaker 2: has the ability to come in and immediately affect change.
Speaker 2: I don't know what. The offensive line was pretty atrocious
Speaker 2: last year. Defensively, there's still talent, but a lot of
Speaker 2: big losses. I know Josh Malone specifically said he turned
Speaker 2: pro because Josh Dobbs is turning pro and he didn't
Speaker 2: want to play with like a red shirt freshman, sophomore
Speaker 2: or whatever.
Speaker 1: QB.
Speaker 2: I understand that. I still think there's enough talent there
Speaker 2: that if Jarrett Quarantano was really good, immediately Tennessee could
Speaker 2: be Penn State esque.
Speaker 1: I'm excited to just call him Justin Guarini all year. Yeah,
Speaker 1: I know, I figured that would be the case. All right,
Speaker 1: where are we going next? All right?
Speaker 2: Next question? Let's stay with that, though, Ryan, Why does
Speaker 2: I think Penn State will take a step back this year?
Speaker 2: I got such a big Chris Godwin fan, such a
Speaker 2: Chris Godwin.
Speaker 1: I got called out for this on the Twitter on
Speaker 1: the Twitter machine. Let me clarify the statement. I'm not
Speaker 1: saying for sure that I think Penn State will absolutely
Speaker 1: take a step back this year. I don't think that's likely,
Speaker 1: but I think it's possible. I was never sold on
Speaker 1: trace mcsoorly, and that, to my dying day will haunt me.
Speaker 1: He had an incredible season last year. He enters twenty
Speaker 1: seventeen as a potential dark horse Heisman contender.
Speaker 2: He had a dark horse. He's just like in the conversation.
Speaker 2: He's in the conversation. Sure he might not be top five,
Speaker 2: but he's probably top ten.
Speaker 1: So that's on me. I was wrong. He had a
Speaker 1: great year. I'm still not totally sold on him, And
Speaker 1: without Chris Godwin, I think that hurts the vertical passing
Speaker 1: game a little Bitseki's back, right, Gaseeki is back, that's right.
Speaker 1: I am curious to see how their linebacking core forms
Speaker 1: up now that Brandon Bell isn't with the team. And
Speaker 1: we saw when Bell got hurt last year huge to
Speaker 1: that they had a little bit of difficulty getting things
Speaker 1: set up in that second tier. The defense. Now they
Speaker 1: had more injuries than just Brandon Bell wasn't all on him,
Speaker 1: but without him they were a much different defense. When
Speaker 1: he came back, he obviously made a pretty positive impact
Speaker 1: and that was a big part of the reason why
Speaker 1: they were successful. So again I'm not saying it's a
Speaker 1: likely scenario, but it's mostly rooted in my irrational distrust
Speaker 1: of trace McSorley at this point. But I am excited
Speaker 1: to see what they do and I hope that I
Speaker 1: hope that does not have happened.
Speaker 2: Next question, this is from Khalil, Am I going to
Speaker 2: be cursed slash blessed. I like that that terminology. He
Speaker 2: did not, but we can. Am I going to be
Speaker 2: curse slash hashtag blessed with Mike Leach until he retires.
Speaker 2: I assume Khalil is a Washington State fan. I feel
Speaker 2: our program can't snag the big name coaches due to
Speaker 2: a multiple of reasons, and Leech is just good enough
Speaker 2: to keep himself from getting fired. I'm so tired of
Speaker 2: bubble scream ty, how would you evaluate the ceiling of
Speaker 2: both Washington State as a program, coach it higher wise,
Speaker 2: and what they can do in the standings with the
Speaker 2: way the PAC twelve is currently constituted, especially in the North.
Speaker 1: Tough tough going in the PAC twelve right absolutely, especially
Speaker 1: up north, especially up north, does not strike me as
Speaker 1: a conference that's like just there for the taking. It's
Speaker 1: not going to fall off the back of a truck.
Speaker 1: So he's got his work cut out for him. I
Speaker 1: like Mike Leach. I think he's innovative. I also feel
Speaker 1: like we all know his shtick at this point. He's
Speaker 1: gonna say funny stuff. He's gonna run the air raid
Speaker 1: offense that he's always run, and I think because of that,
Speaker 1: it'll bring some consistency to Washington State. We've seen them
Speaker 1: take gradual steps forward, but I don't know how far
Speaker 1: we are from the ceiling. Like we we could already
Speaker 1: be there and maybe just not know it. I don't
Speaker 1: know how much it advances beyond what we've seen the
Speaker 1: last year and a half in Pullman. Does that make sense?
Speaker 2: Here's something important to remember. Washington State will in all
Speaker 2: likelihood never be a player for a major coach unless
Speaker 2: Ryan Leaf becomes a major coach, you know, unless a
Speaker 2: Washington State guy really really wants to get back to
Speaker 2: Pullman and build some glory. That's just I mean. Washington
Speaker 2: State again, I believe is the farthest Power five school
Speaker 2: from an interstate. I think that's the stat maybe it's
Speaker 2: I don't know, but in all likelihood, Washington State should
Speaker 2: have won nine games this year. They should have beaten
Speaker 2: at Eastern, They should have want to shoot out against
Speaker 2: Eastern and start the season.
Speaker 1: There's nothing wrong with losing the Boise.
Speaker 2: And then they lose to two top ten teams to
Speaker 2: close out the year in Colorado and Washington. So they
Speaker 2: win eighth straight, including a win a big win at Stanford,
Speaker 2: who was top fifteen at the time. Nine wins is
Speaker 2: probably the ceiling you have. I mean, Mike Leach really
Speaker 2: shouldn't even be at Wazoo, right, I mean he should
Speaker 2: be at Texas Tech or a job that Texas Tech
Speaker 2: propelled him to because of what he was able to
Speaker 2: do on the field. It's just so difficult, and I
Speaker 2: think the case study is look at Oregon. Oregon is
Speaker 2: coming off of, however many great seasons, you know, being
Speaker 2: a huge national program, and when they finally have a
Speaker 2: down year and fire a coach and go to the
Speaker 2: open market, they get like, at best their third or
Speaker 2: fourth choice. So Matt Rule allegedly turns them down. I
Speaker 2: think they pursued Tom Herman pretty aggressively, and obviously that
Speaker 2: didn't work out. And I'm very bullish on Willie Taggart,
Speaker 2: but if we're talking about Washington State in the open market,
Speaker 2: I don't think there's any way they do better.
Speaker 1: Than Mike Leach.
Speaker 2: And I think he's doing exactly what a school like
Speaker 2: Washington State on the West Coast, having certain geographic disadvantages
Speaker 2: needs to do, and that's play with a definitive scheme.
Speaker 2: I mean they could run the triple option or something
Speaker 2: like that, have a definitive identity, Identify assistant coaches that
Speaker 2: you know you're probably going to lose when they become
Speaker 2: bigger names, like they did to Oregon Joe with Joe
Speaker 2: Salavea their defensive line coach, They're going to have a
Speaker 2: lot of attrition and they just happened into this coach.
Speaker 1: I think you're stuck with Mike Leach.
Speaker 2: The fact is though the offense is a little bit
Speaker 2: more balance, they're running the ball a little bit more.
Speaker 2: I think they're moving in in a really good direction.
Speaker 2: The defense went from an atrocious embarrassment to pretty good.
Speaker 1: They got better.
Speaker 2: Yeah, they went to pretty That's a huge leap in
Speaker 2: college football, atrocious embarrassment to pretty good at a place
Speaker 2: nowhere near top talent.
Speaker 1: That's impressive. And by the way, I think you're stuck.
Speaker 1: One of our big talking points down the stretch was
Speaker 1: how big the Apple Cup was gonna be. Yeah, Washington
Speaker 1: and Washington State. Keep in mind, this is a program
Speaker 1: that was pretty much irrelevant right for many years, and
Speaker 1: then Mike Leach came along and he has made them better.
Speaker 1: I do understand his frustration here because he sees that
Speaker 1: there might be a ceiling, and I feel that ceiling too.
Speaker 1: I just I think you're right tough to do well
Speaker 1: when you're kind of located in the middle of nowhere,
Speaker 1: and especially when you're in a really tough conference.
Speaker 2: And here's the alternative. Would do you want Bo Baldwin?
Speaker 2: Do you want a really good Eastern coach? And you've
Speaker 2: already had experience that with Paul Wolfe. I believe he
Speaker 2: was at Eastern before. And Bo Baldwin is running Mike
Speaker 2: Leach's offense and isn't Mike Leach or running an offense
Speaker 2: in the same universe and has never really recruited on
Speaker 2: a big level regionally like Mike Leach has. That's I mean,
Speaker 2: if that's what you'd rather have, I think that's okay.
Speaker 1: One question I've always wanted to ask Mike Leach, and
Speaker 1: maybe if you have him on the show next time,
Speaker 1: I can ask him. I really would like to know
Speaker 1: what he loves most about shaving with Harry's. Dan because Harry's,
Speaker 1: as you know, started by two guys named Jeff and Andy,
Speaker 1: not Mike. But they were fed up being overcharged for razors.
Speaker 1: They decided they're going to start their own company. Give
Speaker 1: guys everywhere what they deserve, a great shave at a
Speaker 1: fair price. I gotta tell a personal story here. This
Speaker 1: is God's honest truth. Hand to God here, I'm ready.
Speaker 1: I was shaving with Harry's for a while and then
Speaker 1: I saw a deal on Amazon. I bought an electric razor.
Speaker 1: Now I know you have partaken in the miracle of
Speaker 1: modern science that is electric razors, right I do.
Speaker 2: I have a beard trimmer that keeps things, that keeps
Speaker 2: things adequately trimmed. But I got neck to take care
Speaker 2: of tye and keep clean. See I have a problem
Speaker 2: with the neck. Yeah, And when I started using the
Speaker 2: electric razor, I was getting a.
Speaker 1: Beard of bees mm hm. So I made the decision
Speaker 1: that I was going to switch back to Harry's. I'm
Speaker 1: not having I'm not having the neck issues anymore. Yeah,
Speaker 1: you're not having the more swave of the two of us.
Speaker 1: I agree. Harry's razors they include everything that you need
Speaker 1: for a close, comfortable shave, even on the neck. Five
Speaker 1: German Engineer blades with a lubricating strip, a flex inch
Speaker 1: for a comfortable glide, a trimmer blade for hard to
Speaker 1: reach places, and a weighted ergonomic handle. All this for
Speaker 1: two bucks a blade. Compare that with four or more,
Speaker 1: which is what you'll pay at the drug store. This
Speaker 1: is the time to act if you're like me, if
Speaker 1: you're looking for a close, comfortable shave. Harry's is so
Speaker 1: confident in the quality of their blades they want you
Speaker 1: to try their most popular trial set for free. Hear
Speaker 1: me Free fr'mar comes with a razor handle of your choice,
Speaker 1: a five blade cartridge, and shaving gel free when you
Speaker 1: sign up. You just got to pay a small fee
Speaker 1: for shipping. If you want to get in on the
Speaker 1: free trial, go to Harry's h A R R y
Speaker 1: s dot com slash solid solid right now Harry's dot
Speaker 1: com slash solid. That's the God's on a truth man.
Speaker 1: I had issues a couple months ago, decided, you know what,
Speaker 1: who am I kidding? Who am I kidding? Trying to
Speaker 1: be all sciency. Let's just go back to what works.
Speaker 1: Let's go back to Harry, So harrys dot Com slash
Speaker 1: solid get in on it too. Yeah, you're head to toe.
Speaker 1: Harry's taking care of you. Where are we going next?
Speaker 1: Let's go to this question over under on fired coaches.
Speaker 2: We can do is really quickly the pack twelve South,
Speaker 2: so we'll stay out West after twenty seventeen. Over under
Speaker 2: is two and a half. Which are you going? Pack
Speaker 2: twelve South coaches looking for new jobs after this year?
Speaker 2: The operative phrase here is fired. Operative verb I should
Speaker 2: say is fired. Sure, he is not saying leaving on
Speaker 2: their own volition? Correct, Mike Mcatyre is not going to
Speaker 2: get fired. Mike Mcatyre just won ten games of Colorado.
Speaker 2: He can stay there as long as he wants.
Speaker 1: I think that's came under a little bit of fire
Speaker 1: this past offseason, rightfully, So he's not getting fired. Right.
Speaker 1: Clay Helton at USC not getting fired unless things really
Speaker 1: go south, and I guess he can't ever fully count
Speaker 1: it out at USC. Correct, Probably not getting fired. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that leaves you with four. My hunch is that Utah
Speaker 1: probably can't do a whole lot better than Kyle Whittingham.
Speaker 1: He is a really good football coach. There have been
Speaker 1: rumors of like strife between him and the athletic department.
Speaker 1: It's really old. I think they're in a good place.
Speaker 1: But I think they're in an okay place, and I'm
Speaker 1: confident in saying that Utah again, with nine wins under Whittingham,
Speaker 1: they've got no real reason to fire him. That leaves
Speaker 1: you with Arizona Schools, Arizona Schools and UCLA. Mm hmm.
Speaker 1: You would need all three of those coaches to get
Speaker 1: fired Dan. So I'm gonna say the under just by
Speaker 1: deductive reasoning. I'm taking the under as well. Gotta go under.
Speaker 2: It'd be surprising if Jim Morrow was back, just given
Speaker 2: the trajectory right now. But I think one of the
Speaker 2: two Arizona guys is at least their next year. Okay,
Speaker 2: let's go non college football for a little bit.
Speaker 1: Okay, Uh, it is.
Speaker 2: From Mark which candy is the most overrated among the
Speaker 2: general public? I have an easy answer. That answer is Skittles.
Speaker 2: Skittle is not good. They're just not that good compared
Speaker 2: to the competition. Ty, where do you stand Reese's pieces?
Speaker 1: Really? That's my number one No, how do you not
Speaker 1: like Reese's pieces? I've never eaten a Reese's pieces and
Speaker 1: wanted a second I will get an RP every single
Speaker 1: time I go to the airport if I'm in the
Speaker 1: mood for something. So I don't want to make enemies
Speaker 1: here with big peanut butter. But I'm just saying that
Speaker 1: I've never had a Reese's pieces and then wanted a
Speaker 1: second one. Maybe do you like? The only exception might
Speaker 1: be those little iddy bitty ones that come individually wrapped.
Speaker 1: Sometimes those you need Yearney for a little bit more.
Speaker 1: They make the smaller ones now, they're not all like
Speaker 1: real big one. I don't think you know what a
Speaker 1: Reese's pieces is. I know what a piece. What is
Speaker 1: a Reese's piece?
Speaker 2: The Reese's pieces are smaller, smaller. What smaller peanut butter
Speaker 2: cuffs tie a Reese's pieces is like an M and M. Ah,
Speaker 2: it's a candy. No no, no, no's ty you are
Speaker 2: you are out of line, sir.
Speaker 1: I have a.
Speaker 2: Problem with the peanut butter candies. Okay, So the pieces
Speaker 2: is it looks like an M and M. But I
Speaker 2: believe they're just orange yellow and maybe brown. But like
Speaker 2: visually aesthetically they look like Eminem's.
Speaker 1: Can I let's just say anything in the like genus
Speaker 1: of the Reese's family.
Speaker 2: All right, that's fair, but you just outed yourself as
Speaker 2: Reese's ignorant. That's an I for one. I for one
Speaker 2: thought this show was above that.
Speaker 1: It isn't get used to it. You're talking about the
Speaker 1: butter cups, the smaller peanut butter cups, anything they make.
Speaker 2: I'm okay overrated, But can we just agree that you
Speaker 2: are not specifically be smirching the piece.
Speaker 1: No, no, okay, just making sure I I am not discriminating.
Speaker 1: I'm throwing them all under the bus man the whole What.
Speaker 2: Will you eat like an M and M peanut butter
Speaker 2: or that's out to anything with peanut butter?
Speaker 1: I would eat that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, you just said anything with peanut butter is in
Speaker 2: the genus, the phylum of Obserd, the Reeses, the Reeses genus, Well,
Speaker 2: all the all.
Speaker 1: The M and M peanut butter thing is. It's a
Speaker 1: bigger version peanut butter, M and M. My head's about
Speaker 1: to X book time. This is unbelieve. Let's move on.
Speaker 1: This is gonna We're gonna get tweets about this more
Speaker 1: so than any college football thought. I'm gonna get you
Speaker 1: note et. I've seen et.
Speaker 2: I love those are pieces, Those are re pieces. Those
Speaker 2: were little cups. It wasn't a trail of cups. Just
Speaker 2: not a fan, not a fan of pieces, not a fan.
Speaker 1: Of any of them.
Speaker 2: I will say this, though, you can now get cups
Speaker 2: with pieces inside if you really wanted to be haunted.
Speaker 1: See they're all sort of cross pollinating at this point.
Speaker 1: How many keep them all straight?
Speaker 2: How many mustards are in your kitchen? Emmett wants to know,
Speaker 2: He said, an over under of two and a half
Speaker 2: for you and three for me. How many mustards two.
Speaker 1: And a half. I will count Deli yellow, any sort
Speaker 1: of brown, stone ground or milled mustard I will count,
Speaker 1: like a spicy Chinese a gray poupon I've got, I've
Speaker 1: got yellow, and I've got the brown spicy, which I
Speaker 1: believe I talked about at nauseum at some point last year.
Speaker 1: How brown spicy mustard has changed my life.
Speaker 2: If you're growing some sausages up, it's nothing better. So yeah,
Speaker 2: I'm under I think I have two. I think I
Speaker 2: have the straight yellow and like a Dijon type for
Speaker 2: when I make like a spicy your honeymustard dressing. Okay,
Speaker 2: so we're both under Yeah, We're under best album. Kenneth
Speaker 2: wants to know of the nineteen ninety nine triumvirate of
Speaker 2: emo American football, Clarity or something to write home about?
Speaker 1: I had two more to this. You have stronger opinions
Speaker 1: on this than I do, so go ahead.
Speaker 2: I will probably in terms of staying the test of time,
Speaker 2: I might go something to write home about. I will
Speaker 2: listen to that more than Clarity, although I think Clarity
Speaker 2: is wonderful. But that was also the same year as
Speaker 2: nothing gold can stay from newfound glory and through being cool,
Speaker 2: and I think I will have through being cool above everything.
Speaker 1: Okay, saves the day? Sounds good? Okay, do not have
Speaker 1: thoughts on this. I don't have strong path I was
Speaker 1: a big fan of Clarity, but okay, yeah, fair enough.
Speaker 2: Here is a wonderful question actually, before we go into
Speaker 2: this wonderful question that we're probably gonna sort of dive
Speaker 2: down a rabbit hole with quickly. Who has more wins
Speaker 2: this year is from Ben Jomen, Tom Herman at Texas,
Speaker 2: Charlie Strong at USF. Have you look at USF schedule
Speaker 2: their tough road game this year out of conference? Is
Speaker 2: the fighting a lion eye of Illinois.
Speaker 1: All right, let's go us. Oh excuse me, they play
Speaker 1: that game at home.
Speaker 2: Let's go usf Okay, agree, agree, Finally, yeah, Zach, If
Speaker 2: you guys were going to pull off an elaborate crime, oh,
Speaker 2: like a really big bank robbery, r theft, how would
Speaker 2: you do it?
Speaker 1: Oh?
Speaker 2: How would Okay, let's clarify something off the top. I
Speaker 2: thought about this independent of you, because he said if
Speaker 2: you guys like we were doing it together. I don't
Speaker 2: know if it was together or individual. I thought about
Speaker 2: it solo, individual, like my own strategy if I were
Speaker 2: heading up a plan to rob a bank or like
Speaker 2: a really nice museum or gallery.
Speaker 1: I thought about it independent of you. Okay, good, same page,
Speaker 1: Independent of you. I feel like the first and most
Speaker 1: important step in planning an elaborate crime. Not that I'm
Speaker 1: advertising anyone do this, but I feel like you need
Speaker 1: to establish your alibi, okay, first and foremost, Like if
Speaker 1: you're gonna if you're gonna be in deep trying to
Speaker 1: steal like money in a bank, highest store art, you
Speaker 1: need to somehow establish an alibi by like, you know,
Speaker 1: not driving a GPS enabled vehicle. There, right, don't take
Speaker 1: your cell phone with you just go dark, as they
Speaker 1: say on on the shows. That's the first thing I
Speaker 1: think is most important. I also think i'd do it
Speaker 1: in broad daylight. Why. I feel like there are probably
Speaker 1: more booby traps at night, There are more things that
Speaker 1: could go wrong at night because of the darkness.
Speaker 2: M h.
Speaker 1: I think my strategy is probably to do it in
Speaker 1: broad daylight, some sort of mask. It needs to be
Speaker 1: a mask, some sort of a tire to make them
Speaker 1: know that I'm serious and a little bit crazy like me.
Speaker 1: Where like a Florida State jersey. Okay, I think I'd
Speaker 1: go with the bank note approach. Okay, I go in
Speaker 1: there broad daylight, with the mask, with some sort of
Speaker 1: jersey to give me credibility. I'd slide a note across,
Speaker 1: but it would have to be one of those notes
Speaker 1: that was comprised of several cut up letters from a magazine,
Speaker 1: just to add the creepy and crazy factor to it.
Speaker 1: I would then do my best to get off into
Speaker 1: some sort of panel van, an unmarked van, no plates,
Speaker 1: and then what I've always wanted to do is sort
Speaker 1: of light that vehicle on fire at some point, so
Speaker 1: you're faking your own death, maybe faking my own death,
Speaker 1: but at least eliminating the getaway vehicle and like some
Speaker 1: back alley somewhere in a cornfield, light the van on
Speaker 1: fire so that no one can really get any forensics
Speaker 1: from it. That's the plan.
Speaker 2: That's the rough draft at this point. All right, So
Speaker 2: I'm going long con. So I'm doing some research ahead
Speaker 2: of time, and I'm figuring out who's working at this bank,
Speaker 2: who's working at this gallery, who's working at this museum,
Speaker 2: And I'm trying to figure out an in romantically ty
Speaker 2: Oh okay, I'm trying to find that in romantically, you know,
Speaker 2: if it's a bank, let's say bank, let's stay on
Speaker 2: the same page. I'm finding out tellers. I'm doing research,
Speaker 2: I'm doing some Listen. At this point, I'm a bank robber,
Speaker 2: so stalking is within my realm of awfulness, right, So
Speaker 2: you're trying to you're.
Speaker 1: Trying to develop an unwitting asset.
Speaker 2: Absolutely, I'm absolutely doing it because I do not have
Speaker 2: the ability to guns blaze into a bank.
Speaker 1: I just that's not the humanity of that is.
Speaker 2: I don't have it. I just don't orly inhumanity, I
Speaker 2: don't have it. It's just not in my DNA but
Speaker 2: to be an awful person one on one. Sure, So
Speaker 2: I don't think I don't think it's like a James
Speaker 2: Bond type seduction, but you know, it's flirtation.
Speaker 1: It's you.
Speaker 2: You sort of figure out a way into this person's life,
Speaker 2: and then you can cox some sort of sob story
Speaker 2: about needing money, and you exhaust every you figure out
Speaker 2: a reason why you can't do everything that's on the level.
Speaker 1: Oh, I can't sell this. I can't. I don't have
Speaker 1: any assets. I just need money.
Speaker 2: Like, what if we because you were in the bank,
Speaker 2: let's call her Audrey, what if we? I mean, nobody
Speaker 2: would ever know if we just did like a little
Speaker 2: bit of a time like that kind of thing, and
Speaker 2: it was just like a little bit, a little bit,
Speaker 2: a little bit.
Speaker 1: And here's the thing what I would do next? So
Speaker 1: you're going office space like a couple cents at a time.
Speaker 2: Well that's not a couple cents at a time. That
Speaker 2: was a computer sort of heist, right. They were doing
Speaker 2: it through the Y two K exchange whatever. It was
Speaker 2: some sort of software thing. I'm doing maybe some kind
Speaker 2: of you know, there's cash on hand, there's petty cash
Speaker 2: on hand, and I know they counted at the end
Speaker 2: of the day whatever. But maybe at a certain point
Speaker 2: when she knows that there's like a rotation a transfer
Speaker 2: of the cash coming in or going out, that we
Speaker 2: figure out a way to sort of circumvent the process.
Speaker 2: We get away with the money and people aren't going
Speaker 2: to know for what a day. No, I'm very fortunate
Speaker 2: because my middle brother is a pilot, Okay, so I
Speaker 2: feel like we can possibly circumvent the sort of passports visa.
Speaker 2: We can get on a plane to somewhere foreign. I
Speaker 2: would think.
Speaker 1: We're gonna be on some sort of travel list after this.
Speaker 2: This is me and address. By the way, I don't
Speaker 2: think I know a single person named Audrey. No, but
Speaker 2: that's my plan right there. It's and but the problem
Speaker 2: is Audrey is going to think we're doing this for
Speaker 2: a noble reason, so I'm gonna have to figure out
Speaker 2: some way to ditch her in a non violent way.
Speaker 2: So it's a it's a long con sort of lost Sawyer.
Speaker 2: Did you watch the show Lost? Yeah, that kind of thing.
Speaker 1: See, I'm just I don't like the fact that you're
Speaker 1: taking Audrey with you. I'm weapon No, that's what I'm saying.
Speaker 2: I have to I'm including her in the initial heist,
Speaker 2: but then I'm ditching her, So I'm weaponizing my charm,
Speaker 2: tie weaponizing your charm and her emotions to get absolutely Yeah.
Speaker 2: I mean that's the only thing I can think of,
Speaker 2: because I just am not a killer, ty, I am
Speaker 2: not a stone cold killer.
Speaker 1: Yeah. I wouldn't want to go in there and do
Speaker 1: bodily harm. I also wouldn't want to do anything that
Speaker 1: requires me to dangle from the ceiling like Tom Cruise
Speaker 1: in Mission Impossible. I don't feel like that's a successful
Speaker 1: means of acquiring any kind of a lout.
Speaker 2: And you've got to get to a non extraditing country,
Speaker 2: or you got to get somewhere where you can definitely
Speaker 2: lay low.
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, go in there with the mask, scare
Speaker 1: the be Jesus out of someone fifteen minutes in out
Speaker 1: unmarked panel van on fire, make your getaway into a
Speaker 1: non extradition country.
Speaker 2: So you're gonna have to do some research, and you're
Speaker 2: gonna have to go to a bank that doesn't have
Speaker 2: like the bulletproof glass because you're not a threat. If
Speaker 2: you slide a note under bulletproof glure, there's definitely going
Speaker 2: to need to be some research into this plan.
Speaker 1: Daan right. I'm not advocating don't do your research. Definitely
Speaker 1: do your research, but go in there brute force, make
Speaker 1: it happen. Get out right? Okay, fair enough.
Speaker 2: Although, now that I'm saying all this out loud and
Speaker 2: realizing that my fiance works in finance, very fishy. It
Speaker 2: sounds very fishy, And I assure you I am deeply
Speaker 2: in love with her and would never do that, although
Speaker 2: I guess that's what I will say.
Speaker 1: If I were. I actually read a great bank robber
Speaker 1: tail in a fine publication on texture, Dan.
Speaker 2: Oh nice, I've read a couple of those myself. In
Speaker 2: long form magazine features.
Speaker 1: You're a big fan of dB Cooper always like jumping
Speaker 1: out of planes? Where to go? They still don't know?
Speaker 1: Love it? Texture can fill you in on all the details.
Speaker 1: dB Cooper and more define service. Over two hundred plus
Speaker 1: magazines are available. They offer access to in depth interviews
Speaker 1: articles from the convenience of your phone or tablet. Dan
Speaker 1: It is basically the Netflix for magazines. Yeah, for publications.
Speaker 1: They give you daily recommendations and exclusive interactive features that
Speaker 1: you can't get in the print edition of your favorite publications.
Speaker 1: They make it easy to enjoy the articles you want
Speaker 1: to read. Plus it's searchable, which is sort of cliche
Speaker 1: at this point in twenty seventeen. Everything the world the search,
Speaker 1: but not so much your magazines. And when you got
Speaker 1: them all at your fingertips and you can search for
Speaker 1: what kind of stuff you're into, I think that's sort
Speaker 1: of a differentiator. Plus you get bonus video content. Absolutely.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, so get everything from Sports Illustrated to Esquire
Speaker 1: to Forbes, Forbes. Excuse me. They're all available way less
Speaker 1: money than you'd pay if you've got a subscription or
Speaker 1: even bought them all individually. Get it through. Texture was
Speaker 1: selected as one of Apple's top twenty sixteen iPad apps.
Speaker 1: Normally this service is not ninety nine a month, but
Speaker 1: if you sign up right now at texture dot com
Speaker 1: t e X t u r e dot com slash Solid,
Speaker 1: you will get a fourteen day free free trial. Nice
Speaker 1: fourteen days try texture for free when you go to
Speaker 1: texture dot com slash Solid one more time. That is
Speaker 1: Texture dot com slash Solid ty what nonsports podcast listen
Speaker 1: to Jake wants to know my brother? My brother and me.
Speaker 1: Oh yes, it's my favorite.
Speaker 2: How you've only recently started listening, right, Well, I've I've No,
Speaker 2: that's not true. I've been a long time my Big
Speaker 2: Bam listener Solid Wife Kate.
Speaker 1: But right, I didn't listen for a while. Then I
Speaker 1: picked it back up at your prodding because I know
Speaker 1: you're a fan as well. I got Solid Wife Kate
Speaker 1: into it. She now has a longer commute than she
Speaker 1: has at any point in her Oh yeah, adult life.
Speaker 1: Is she gonna go tangential mackelroythe shows? See she I
Speaker 1: think she's started dipping her toes in the water. Okay,
Speaker 1: listen to a little bit of Rose Buddies, Adventure Zone whatnot.
Speaker 1: I'm still sticking with the flagship My Big Bam, but
Speaker 1: I have, I have dabbled with the TV show. I'm
Speaker 1: very excited with what they're doing right now.
Speaker 2: And as background, my brother, my brother and me for
Speaker 2: anybody that is not familiar, three brothers give advice and
Speaker 2: it gets weird, and they also answer question They give
Speaker 2: advice people right in with questions. They give funny advice
Speaker 2: and then they also answer questions from Yahoo answers y
Speaker 2: which is all just ridiculous and you should listen. And
Speaker 2: two of the three brothers are Vox Media employees that
Speaker 2: were for Polygon. It's an unbelievably popular show. Hilarious, go listen.
Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah, so that would be my obvious answer. Give
Speaker 1: me an un obvious.
Speaker 2: Let me pull up the old the old text mission here.
Speaker 2: While you do that, I will tell you I started
Speaker 2: listening to one last night. It is about as unsports.
Speaker 2: It's a little bit sports, ye, if you consider fitness sports.
Speaker 2: Missing Richard Simmons.
Speaker 1: Have you heard of this? Yes?
Speaker 2: I have, Okay, Missing Richard Simmons. Richard Simmons, of course,
Speaker 2: the very famous fitness teacher or whatever entertainment figure for
Speaker 2: the last two years. It's like basically disappeared and like
Speaker 2: won't leave his house and it's like a big mystery.
Speaker 2: And his friends, who are I think, one of whom
Speaker 2: is like a movie producer of some kind of la
Speaker 2: started this podcast and it's just them investigating what the
Speaker 2: hell happened to Richard Simmons. It sounds sort of strange
Speaker 2: and esoteric. I assure you it's pretty captivating. Really, it's great.
Speaker 2: They're like twenty five thirty minute episodes, so it's really quick.
Speaker 2: I think there's only been three or four that have
Speaker 2: been released. I'm telling you it's wonderful.
Speaker 1: Other shows, I'd call out Dan Carlin's Hardcore History, Oh right, right, right,
Speaker 1: a personal favorite. It's like an audio book. He does
Speaker 1: an outstanding job. I will also throw a shout out
Speaker 1: to my good friends who do the Last Row Podcast
Speaker 1: Movie podcast, Oh right, all right? Have been a guest
Speaker 1: on the show What movie did you do? Examining some
Speaker 1: of the movies that you forgot your loved? You know,
Speaker 1: I don't even remember, think'bout have done Ghostbusters? Nice? A
Speaker 1: little bit of a Ghostbuster's historian. But okay, yeah, I
Speaker 1: don't know. Are there any other ones.
Speaker 2: That I listened to consistently? Not really, it's a bunch
Speaker 2: of sports ones. I really like listening to a bunch
Speaker 2: of NBA ones. You know, Espianation has great podcasts and
Speaker 2: you should listen to all of them. I really like
Speaker 2: Limited Upside, non Espianation, NBA one. The True Hoop podcast
Speaker 2: at ESPN puts out is to do a good job.
Speaker 1: Yeah, really that one a lot? Okay?
Speaker 2: Next question, ty Yeah, Amber combines two things I'm loving here,
Speaker 2: football and food. When watching football, is it better to
Speaker 2: have solid meals or lots of snacks?
Speaker 1: All day long. Gotta go solid meals. I'm gonna go
Speaker 1: solid meals as well. Gotta go solid meals. I have
Speaker 1: a problem. And maybe this is a little TMI, but
Speaker 1: if you're a monster, yeah, that's right. If you go
Speaker 1: snacks all day long, it tends to upset the balance
Speaker 1: of the digestive process, right, and therefore you get odd results.
Speaker 1: Let's stick with what got you here, Dan, Yeah, and
Speaker 1: just go solid meals. Stick to a regular schedule. It's
Speaker 1: going to be a long day. Do your best to
Speaker 1: try and go solid meals at predictable times. You can
Speaker 1: say whatever you'd like about this show, if you don't
Speaker 1: like this show, if you love this show, but you
Speaker 1: will never accuse us of not caring about your poops.
Speaker 1: We are all about poop health on the solid from
Speaker 1: and Ty just showed that to everybody right here, and
Speaker 1: I applaud you, Ty. Yeah.
Speaker 2: I think I'm going to go solid meals here, just
Speaker 2: because I look forward to the variety of things I
Speaker 2: don't get to eat out all that often, even though
Speaker 2: I live in New York, and sort of thinking about
Speaker 2: things to make for lunch when people come over for
Speaker 2: games on the weekend, or ordering for dinner stuff like that.
Speaker 2: I think it's a little bit more fun, and you
Speaker 2: can include snacks with that. You can say I'm going
Speaker 2: to make let's make tacos, and we'll make some nachos
Speaker 2: for everybody to share. I think you can do both
Speaker 2: on a certain level. But yeah, it becomes a little
Speaker 2: bit dangerous your snacking all day. I don't know about that.
Speaker 1: All right, we will close out with this final question here,
Speaker 1: Dan hit me, I'm ready. Matt wants to know what
Speaker 1: are the mandatory songs for a wedding reception?
Speaker 2: I love this question. I was at a wedding this
Speaker 2: past weekend and it helped me. Hone my opinion about this,
Speaker 2: how are you putting together your wedding playlist? Okay, so
Speaker 2: we've already met with the band. We're having a band,
Speaker 2: not a DJ. And I feel very strongly about one
Speaker 2: very specific thing, and that is it's a dance floor.
Speaker 2: There should be dance music, okay, and so that eliminates
Speaker 2: like all eighties rock for me, because you're not really
Speaker 2: dancing that. Like if you're you can shout along to
Speaker 2: bon Jovi, you know you can, You're not dancing to that.
Speaker 2: You're just sort of like maybe your fist is in
Speaker 2: the air, like that's not fun. I don't want to
Speaker 2: do that. No, I want to move, I want I
Speaker 2: want rhythm, I want a baseline, I want to beat.
Speaker 2: That's what I want. It's a dance floor, not a
Speaker 2: stand floor. All right, So mandatory songs to me, everybody
Speaker 2: hit feels differently. Do your thing, and like this past
Speaker 2: weekend there was a good it was a good intro
Speaker 2: of dance music and then it went like heavy eighties
Speaker 2: pop rock that wasn't really danceable and people abandoned the
Speaker 2: dance floor.
Speaker 1: Okay, And I think the couple likes that kind of
Speaker 1: music and that's cool.
Speaker 2: But so like I'm thinking, like pyt a lot of them,
Speaker 2: like I go heavy, Michael Jackson from the eighties, like
Speaker 2: Thriller era Michael Jackson, whatever, bad, whatever, I want to
Speaker 2: dance with somebody, Whitney Houston, Poison from Bell BIV Devou
Speaker 2: can't stop the feeling. Just Timberlake, great dance song, You
Speaker 2: make My dreams. Hollan Oates like I would love some shout,
Speaker 2: get some Moldies in there, get everybody involved, Valerie the
Speaker 2: newer song It's Mark Ronson and Amy Winehouse that's that's
Speaker 2: a great little dance number.
Speaker 1: I love that.
Speaker 2: I know I just sounded a thousand years old by
Speaker 2: calling it a dance number, right, yeah, But I will
Speaker 2: insist that those types of songs you want people dancing.
Speaker 2: They had people at this wedding dancing when the band
Speaker 2: took a break and they just started playing I want
Speaker 2: to Dance with somebody, Like over the pa people hit
Speaker 2: the dance floor and mass just because they wanted to dance.
Speaker 1: Will you be launching into the treasure trove of mid
Speaker 1: to late nineties boy bands? No, probably not. You're not
Speaker 1: going to do any in sync.
Speaker 2: So I think those specifically because of like the sort
Speaker 2: of harmonic the harmonies that the guys have together, it's
Speaker 2: hard to replicate in a in a fun way with
Speaker 2: a band.
Speaker 1: I think, see, here's the thing, give me, here's the acific song.
Speaker 1: Here's why you're wrong about that. It does doesn't even
Speaker 1: matter how good the performance is, right all right, it's
Speaker 1: just the fact that they're playing it that will get
Speaker 1: people up.
Speaker 2: Do you want people dancing or singing along? I want both? Okay,
Speaker 2: I want both. I'm fine with either. Let's why which
Speaker 2: is it is too late for me?
Speaker 1: Thank you. I'm fine with Journey. I'm fine with Living
Speaker 1: on a prayer. See those two. Those two lose me.
Speaker 1: I want people leaving my wedding sweaty, don't stop believing.
Speaker 1: Living on a prayer are two mandatory songs. I totally disagree.
Speaker 1: Mandatory songs in my.
Speaker 2: We in meeting with the band are do not. Playlist
Speaker 2: was all eighties rock. That's fine, that's fine. I am
Speaker 2: discouraged by the fact that you're not gonna go and sink.
Speaker 2: I feel like that's a staple. Give me a song,
Speaker 2: any of them, I would, okay, But like, what is
Speaker 2: the most danceable in sync song. It doesn't think danable,
Speaker 2: That's my point. I think it's probably it's gonna be me.
Speaker 1: Gonna be gonna be my boom could go bye bye bye. Yeah,
Speaker 1: that's fine. I've got all sorts of options there. I'm
Speaker 1: not saying I'm the biggest fan in the world, but
Speaker 1: I'm telling you, at a at a regal event such
Speaker 1: as a wedding where you're gonna have a bunch of
Speaker 1: early thirty somethings, that kind of stuff plays. It doesn't
Speaker 1: matter how good the band performs it.
Speaker 2: Don't don't give me a false equivalence of Backstreet Boys
Speaker 2: being like in sync and sinc is far superior.
Speaker 1: Everybody knows this.
Speaker 2: Agreed, agreed, Okay, I know what we're gonna close on, Tye.
Speaker 2: All right, well, slow dance if you play that in
Speaker 2: the old time your wedding.
Speaker 1: I am hopping on the flight home asap, and we're
Speaker 1: never doing this show again.
Speaker 2: We're gonna show highlights of the Gipper on a big screen.
Speaker 2: Don't even think about it, New Rockney. Yeah, I feel
Speaker 2: strong like people should be sweating. That's that's how I feel.
Speaker 1: Tie. Will these be recognizable songs though? Oh yeah, don't
Speaker 1: get super indie hipster on me. Make sure there's songs
Speaker 1: that we know.
Speaker 2: There's nothing indie hipster, there's nothing. It'll be like eighties, nineties,
Speaker 2: some current stuff. Will we play some burno mars?
Speaker 1: Absolutely? All right? Absolutely? All right? See now now we're
Speaker 1: now we're speaking the same language here. Sure, I'm just
Speaker 1: saying you can dance to that. Absolutely. I'm excited for
Speaker 1: your weddings. You know I'm coming, right, I told you.
Speaker 2: I believe that I knew that you were coming. We're
Speaker 2: in Let's see how long do we have Now we're
Speaker 2: under three months. Yeah, about two almost two and three
Speaker 2: quarters a month, something like that.
Speaker 1: Two and a half ish. All right, I'll be there.
Speaker 1: I'm exciting. I'm exciting. One great and we're on we're
Speaker 1: on schedule. Tie. Everything is going well. Did you get
Speaker 1: your suit yet? Have not gotten my suit yet? You
Speaker 1: gotta get on that dog. I will, I will. I'm
Speaker 1: not worried.
Speaker 2: All right, well, I'm excited. No, everything is good. We
Speaker 2: know how we're going to plan bank heists.
Speaker 1: Yeah.
Speaker 2: Yeah, we're going to get to Matt's question the next
Speaker 2: time we do a Q and A about his Michigan State
Speaker 2: fandom and his wife's Nebraska fandom or flip flop that. Yeah,
Speaker 2: we got to snacks, we got to Tom Herman, we
Speaker 2: got a lot of Penn State talk, we got some
Speaker 2: new quarterback talk in uh oh, quickly. I will answer
Speaker 2: this question because you can't contribute it all to this
Speaker 2: beyond confirming something. Michael wants to know the best food
Speaker 2: truck in Los Angeles. It's an actual assignment he has
Speaker 2: in college, which, holy crap, Wow, what a class, What
Speaker 2: a great college? Marisco? Salisco is unbelievably good. It might
Speaker 2: be my favorite. It's the best shrimp taco in America,
Speaker 2: and they have other really good Mexican seafood that's downtown,
Speaker 2: the Kogie Barbecue truck, which Tie has been to.
Speaker 1: Yeah, really really good tacos.
Speaker 2: And a bunch of other Mexican with Crean influenced kind
Speaker 2: of stuff. Ricky's best fish taco to America. To me,
Speaker 2: it's that's on East Hollywood. Leo's couple locations, very very
Speaker 2: very good. Alpastor tacos. Gorilla taco is more avant garde,
Speaker 2: a little more gourmet, but it's from a truck and
Speaker 2: it's great. And carnetas El Momo, which I think is
Speaker 2: only open on the weekends, but superior carneitas.
Speaker 1: Those are my answers. All right, So here is the deal.
Speaker 1: As you know, the college basketball bracket is from March
Speaker 1: Madness get released on Sunday. Yes, we've always had a bracket.
Speaker 1: We'll put that bracket out there so anyone can sign up.
Speaker 1: We'll do it through ESPN dot com as we have
Speaker 1: each and every year. Sign up, do a funny name.
Speaker 1: We'll shout out the winner of that. We will not
Speaker 1: be providing any actual analysis for that basketball tournament. I
Speaker 1: haven't watched a single minute of college basketball all year,
Speaker 1: really single minute. Oregon's really good. It might be a
Speaker 1: one seat so that gets me watching. I haven't watched
Speaker 1: a single minute. But we will be having a pick
Speaker 1: and pool, so do get in on that. Next week,
Speaker 1: we're going to do our secret garbage bracket. Are we not?
Speaker 1: We are and we need your help. We need your help,
Speaker 1: so write in soliverbot gmail dot com, send us your lists,
Speaker 1: share out your Google docs, tweet us, Facebook us, what
Speaker 1: have you. We are looking for things that people are
Speaker 1: into but are secretly garbage. People like blank, but it's
Speaker 1: secretly garbage. We have not yet figured out the format
Speaker 1: for this show. How we'll organize the brackets. Literally everything
Speaker 1: about it remains up in the air. So if you
Speaker 1: have any hot takes, please let us know. Yes, and
Speaker 1: I will say right now, the solid verbal is already
Speaker 1: on there. Solid verbal is already on solid verbal is
Speaker 1: already on there, So you don't need to submit that.
Speaker 1: We understand how you feel, but you still are with
Speaker 1: us and we're eternally grateful. So yes, Like I would
Speaker 1: say skittles, people like skittles, I think skittles are garbage.
Speaker 2: And I would say the Reese's family. You would say
Speaker 2: the Reese's family. So we will Can we concoct a
Speaker 2: Google form? Are you an advanced enough computer?
Speaker 1: I am an advanced Google Forms user.
Speaker 2: Yes, okay, so, and that'll be very easy. You just
Speaker 2: enter what your name and things that you think are
Speaker 2: garbage that people like I would add ketchup to.
Speaker 1: That ketchup will be in the bracket. We're gonna have
Speaker 1: to discuss this. This is gonna get this is gonna
Speaker 1: this could be the schism between us, it ends the show. Yep,
Speaker 1: I imagine that's going to be the case. So stay
Speaker 1: tuned next week and then the week after will actually
Speaker 1: be the verbies. So a bunch of interactive elements now
Speaker 1: coming to a head. We are finalizing the Verbi's bracket.
Speaker 1: You can vote on your favorites. We'll do the award
Speaker 1: show in two weeks. We'll do the garbage bracket next week,
Speaker 1: and then we've got a bunch of fun stuff coming
Speaker 1: up after that.
Speaker 2: I will also say this ty, and then we can
Speaker 2: close it out. I just wanted a quick message out there, Audrey.
Speaker 2: I am so sorry. I never meant to hurt you.
Speaker 2: I got in over my head. I didn't know what
Speaker 2: to do. I never planned on falling in love with you.
Speaker 2: That was never part of the plan. And it's not
Speaker 2: who I am, it's who I was. And I hope
Speaker 2: you can forgive me someday.
Speaker 1: For that guy over there, Dan Rubensy for myself, Ty Hildebrand,
Speaker 1: thanks again for tuning into the show. Hit us up
Speaker 1: at iub dot com, slash cliverbleslibble dot com, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat.
Speaker 1: We will catch you all in a week. Based off
Speaker 1: peacea