WEBVTT - March Q&A (3/8/2017)

0:00:02.040 --> 0:00:06.880
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the solid verbal. I'm that for me. I'm

0:00:06.920 --> 0:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a man, I'm forty. I've heard so many players say, well,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:11.639
<v Speaker 1>I want to be happy. You want to be happy

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:16.120
<v Speaker 1>for day Edith State? Is that? Whoo whoom? And then

0:00:16.360 --> 0:00:20.919
<v Speaker 1>and tie, Welcome back to the solid verbal boys. A

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.960
<v Speaker 1>girl's my name is ty Hildebrand. I am over here

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in beautiful Allantown, Pennsylvania, joined as always by my colleague

0:00:28.240 --> 0:00:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and co host and friend of many years. Way over there,

0:00:32.560 --> 0:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>over yonder in beautiful New York City. Sir, how are you?

0:00:35.600 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 2>I'm not gonna lie, Tye. The microphone, what is it called?

0:00:38.960 --> 0:00:42.120
<v Speaker 2>It's the foam piece in front of it, the pop

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:44.680
<v Speaker 2>not a pop filter. The wind screen, the wind screen,

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:47.640
<v Speaker 2>thank you. It smells a bit like you're in really

0:00:48.000 --> 0:00:50.320
<v Speaker 2>and I try to speak close to it so that

0:00:50.360 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 2>everybody can hear my nonsense in the clearest possible way.

0:00:54.040 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 2>And it's getting a little bit weird. It's not great.

0:00:57.680 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 2>Is this your foam piece or is this a foam

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.400
<v Speaker 2>This is the Box Media studio windscreen. They just got

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:06.040
<v Speaker 2>a new office for you. They should be able to

0:01:06.040 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>get new You would think so, Ty, You would think so.

0:01:09.160 --> 0:01:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Also in preparation for this Q and A show. One,

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.280
<v Speaker 2>I looked up because we're doing a Q and A show.

0:01:14.319 --> 0:01:16.039
<v Speaker 1>Hey everybody. One.

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 2>I did some research into the a's for the cues

0:01:18.920 --> 0:01:22.360
<v Speaker 2>that were submitted. Oh and two. In looking for any

0:01:22.400 --> 0:01:25.760
<v Speaker 2>sort of news to talk about ty, I looked at

0:01:25.880 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 2>the daily email I get from Jason Kirk and Espianation.

0:01:29.880 --> 0:01:32.600
<v Speaker 2>They do a very good jobs letter, the Espianation College

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 2>Football Newsletter that comes into my mailbox every day that

0:01:35.440 --> 0:01:37.200
<v Speaker 2>has all sorts of news that you should know.

0:01:39.280 --> 0:01:39.840
<v Speaker 1>There is.

0:01:39.920 --> 0:01:41.960
<v Speaker 2>It's called the read option. By the way, yes, there

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 2>is nothing happening there. It's just all like Leonard Fournette

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:49.760
<v Speaker 2>can jump twenty eight and a half inches and that's

0:01:49.840 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 2>not a lot to go on for a college football podcast.

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>What's funny about that is that you put together our

0:01:55.920 --> 0:01:58.200
<v Speaker 1>little runsheet here of all the questions that came in

0:01:58.280 --> 0:02:01.360
<v Speaker 1>via email and Twitter and Facebook, where wherever, And at

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:04.720
<v Speaker 1>the very top you've got in bold in all caps

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:08.160
<v Speaker 1>news and then two bullet points. I looked at those

0:02:08.160 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 1>two bullet points and I was like, is there anything else?

0:02:10.919 --> 0:02:12.160
<v Speaker 1>Is that news at all?

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.280
<v Speaker 2>This was nine o'clock am. This is what came in

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.600
<v Speaker 2>for yesterday's college football news. It was combine stuff, which

0:02:17.639 --> 0:02:21.240
<v Speaker 2>is you know, it's it's tangential, it's relevant to our interests.

0:02:22.680 --> 0:02:25.519
<v Speaker 2>We've got a piece on whether Oregon's mascot is actually

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 2>named Puddles or just the duck. It's a Nike attempt

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:33.640
<v Speaker 2>to brand. Bill c who is already previewing teams previews

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:34.679
<v Speaker 2>North Texas.

0:02:34.720 --> 0:02:36.160
<v Speaker 1>He's encouraged.

0:02:37.280 --> 0:02:40.119
<v Speaker 2>It's time for junior days recruiting wise high school kids

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.440
<v Speaker 2>visiting schools. Andy Staples wrote about a six foot nine,

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:46.720
<v Speaker 2>four hundred pound dude from Australia who's never played football

0:02:46.760 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 2>and has offers from major colleges to play offensive line,

0:02:50.240 --> 0:02:52.760
<v Speaker 2>never played a single down of college of football of

0:02:52.840 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 2>organized football, minor Ohio State players transferring, a bunch of

0:02:58.639 --> 0:03:03.880
<v Speaker 2>Georgia Tech players transfer and celebration penalties in the NFL.

0:03:05.000 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 2>It's not a ton to go on. So I guarantee

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 2>you this scant we will make our best attempt to

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 2>talk about bank robberies and trail mix and some hypothetical.

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>College football sto. I'm so excited for this. Yeah, I

0:03:18.160 --> 0:03:20.919
<v Speaker 1>am so excited for this. So thank you for listening

0:03:20.960 --> 0:03:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to the show. We're at iTunes dot com. Slash soliverbal

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>as well as soliverbal dot com. We are on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Snapchat,

0:03:28.440 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>all the usual social media stops that you might have.

0:03:31.960 --> 0:03:34.239
<v Speaker 1>You can also email us at soliverble at gmail dot

0:03:34.240 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 1>com and let us know how we're doing. We continue

0:03:37.120 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to record and podcasts all throughout the off season. Once

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:43.600
<v Speaker 1>we get a little close to the season, we'll go

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>two times a week. If you're not familiar with our

0:03:46.840 --> 0:03:50.200
<v Speaker 1>rhymes and rhythms. But in the meantime, we tend to

0:03:50.200 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>do these Q and A shows and when we get

0:03:52.600 --> 0:03:56.560
<v Speaker 1>into like the slow news downturns of college football offseason.

0:03:56.640 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>Right it's currently one of those, but before long we'll

0:03:59.800 --> 0:04:03.440
<v Speaker 1>get to spring football. We'll talk about the NFL Draft,

0:04:03.520 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 1>because that's something that a lot of college football fans

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:08.880
<v Speaker 1>are into. We'll talk about it from a college football perspective,

0:04:09.400 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 1>and we've already started lining up a bunch of big

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.160
<v Speaker 1>name college football head coaches. Yes. One of the cool

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>things that I like about that is when we can

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of look back after the year and say, oh,

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>we got this guy, Oh we got that guy, like

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.159
<v Speaker 1>we've had Tom Herman the last two years. Tom Herman

0:04:26.200 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>has been very relevant in college football. Over the last

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>three seasons, Yeah, without question, would say last year was

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:36.279
<v Speaker 1>one of our strongest portfolios yet as it relates to

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>college football head coaching interviews. The way that it is

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:44.039
<v Speaker 1>presently shaping up looks like it will by far be

0:04:45.080 --> 0:04:47.440
<v Speaker 1>our biggest and best yet. So I'm really excited about that.

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.000
<v Speaker 1>That's probably coming up in the next couple months as well. Yeah.

0:04:50.080 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 2>Not too many people know this, but when Bobby Patrino

0:04:52.160 --> 0:04:54.720
<v Speaker 2>crashed his motorcycle, he was actually on the phone with

0:04:54.839 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 2>Tye answering what was job one for the twenty twelve season.

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 2>Many people know that, and so we apologize. Obviously that's

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.080
<v Speaker 2>on us. That is on us. Also relevant question to

0:05:07.120 --> 0:05:10.160
<v Speaker 2>things you were just mentioning, would it be possible for

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.880
<v Speaker 2>you to tell everybody that we are We're over nine

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:17.359
<v Speaker 2>hundred reviews on iTunes? Yes, I believe Bud told me

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.720
<v Speaker 2>that Bud Elliott is on top of these things.

0:05:19.760 --> 0:05:22.800
<v Speaker 1>I have not so checked recently, but that would sound

0:05:22.839 --> 0:05:23.240
<v Speaker 1>about right.

0:05:23.320 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I don't think we've eclipsed a thousand, So if

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:27.880
<v Speaker 2>you could go to iTunes if you haven't yet. I

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:30.080
<v Speaker 2>know this is like everybody says this on every single

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 2>podcast you listen to.

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I get it.

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:33.600
<v Speaker 2>We're nearing a thousand. It would mean a whole lot

0:05:33.600 --> 0:05:36.040
<v Speaker 2>to us if you went on iTunes and threw us

0:05:36.240 --> 0:05:38.760
<v Speaker 2>a review. If you like the show, throw us some stars.

0:05:38.760 --> 0:05:41.480
<v Speaker 2>Maybe five, five stars would be wonderful. So let's close in.

0:05:41.680 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Stars on iTunes, stars on Facebook, stars anywhere you can.

0:05:46.040 --> 0:05:48.599
<v Speaker 1>I think should be the motto for this offseason. But yes,

0:05:48.640 --> 0:05:51.839
<v Speaker 1>absolutely that helps. If you listen an overcast, recommend the

0:05:51.880 --> 0:05:55.560
<v Speaker 1>show through your podcast app of choice. All that stuff

0:05:55.600 --> 0:05:59.919
<v Speaker 1>helps us out. But before we get into all the

0:06:00.000 --> 0:06:02.599
<v Speaker 1>college football nitty gritty that awaits us in the coming

0:06:02.640 --> 0:06:04.919
<v Speaker 1>weeks and months, we do need to do our Q

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:07.000
<v Speaker 1>and A. And then we've got an exciting announcement about

0:06:07.000 --> 0:06:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a show we're going to be doing next week and

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:10.600
<v Speaker 1>then the week after. We'll get to that a little

0:06:10.600 --> 0:06:11.279
<v Speaker 1>bit later on.

0:06:11.440 --> 0:06:15.039
<v Speaker 2>But you mentioned that, you know, it's a longer off

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>season and there's not as many topics. I look at

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.920
<v Speaker 2>it like as a barbecue thing tip. Yeah, oh yeah,

0:06:19.960 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 2>the low and slow burn that gets to the season brisket.

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:25.680
<v Speaker 1>It's the crock potting before the great feast.

0:06:25.800 --> 0:06:28.719
<v Speaker 2>Right, so right now we're just we're slat were Actually

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a big slathering of a brisket guy, I

0:06:30.600 --> 0:06:31.520
<v Speaker 2>don't want a marinade.

0:06:31.839 --> 0:06:34.000
<v Speaker 1>We're seasoning it. We're gently seasoning it with some salt

0:06:34.040 --> 0:06:36.640
<v Speaker 1>and pepper. Maybe a little bit of garlic and brown sugar,

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>but salt and pepper is plenty, So we're just we're

0:06:39.200 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>salting and peppering that off season brisket. Where do we

0:06:41.640 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 1>want to start?

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>Do you have thoughts about the combine before we get started,

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 2>because that's the closest thing to news.

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>I love when I see that someone like Miles Garrett

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:57.919
<v Speaker 1>had thirty three reps on the bench press at like

0:06:57.960 --> 0:07:01.280
<v Speaker 1>two twenty five. Yeah. I like seeing that John Ross

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:05.560
<v Speaker 1>ran a four to two to two before hurting his leg. Yeah.

0:07:05.600 --> 0:07:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Like I like seeing the eye popping stats. I don't

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:12.600
<v Speaker 1>really put much stock in it beyond that.

0:07:13.760 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 2>I like seeing you completely overlook the Temple owl and

0:07:19.080 --> 0:07:23.440
<v Speaker 2>Hassan Reddick Riddick Reddick jumping like eleven feet in the

0:07:23.440 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 2>broad jump, just stomping your disrespect of the owls.

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>I love that. I find that my interest level has

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>gone down with age in the combine.

0:07:33.040 --> 0:07:36.120
<v Speaker 2>Oh yeah, it's tough, but I think the clear best

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:40.480
<v Speaker 2>part is to see just how athletic and nimble and

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 2>you know, the burst and the change of direction of

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 2>the huge dudes where you think to yourself, well, sure

0:07:46.680 --> 0:07:49.080
<v Speaker 2>he's three hundred and twenty five pounds, but there's no

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.520
<v Speaker 2>way he's actually athla oh my god. Yeah yeah, Like

0:07:52.600 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 2>he's just pushing a dude in front of him. It's

0:07:54.720 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 2>college football, and the guy's not an NFL player, and

0:07:57.640 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 2>so he's easier to push around if you're this three

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 2>hundred and twenty Nope, nope. These are just enormous athletes

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:04.640
<v Speaker 2>that are impressive at everything they do.

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I also look forward to Bruce Feldman's annual Draft combines

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Freaks Free columns, you know, where he talks about the

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.320
<v Speaker 1>most athletic guys. Otherwise, though, no, not a whole lot

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:19.840
<v Speaker 1>of interest. It's a cool little mini game that goes

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.360
<v Speaker 1>on within the game, and I'm excited to talk draft

0:08:23.400 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 1>at some point, probably next month with a draft knick

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or two.

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:29.440
<v Speaker 2>A totally underrated part of the combine in the draft

0:08:29.480 --> 0:08:34.400
<v Speaker 2>itself is seeing a school that wasn't necessarily successful at,

0:08:34.600 --> 0:08:36.680
<v Speaker 2>you know, winning college football games.

0:08:36.679 --> 0:08:39.920
<v Speaker 1>I would have like seven draft picks the old like

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>ron Zook Illinois, like Corey Legit, Winnie Merciless. Where are

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:44.200
<v Speaker 1>all these guys coming?

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.480
<v Speaker 2>From and we knew that they were good in college,

0:08:46.600 --> 0:08:48.319
<v Speaker 2>but then the NFL is like, no, these this is

0:08:48.360 --> 0:08:50.680
<v Speaker 2>a team legitimately stocked with NFL players and they go

0:08:50.720 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 2>three and nine.

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>It somehow does more to undermine the credibility of their

0:08:55.400 --> 0:08:56.920
<v Speaker 1>college coach. Right.

0:08:56.960 --> 0:08:59.040
<v Speaker 2>It's sort of an al grow special as well. I

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 2>would argue, what Virginia players, what else is going on?

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.480
<v Speaker 2>Not too much else, But I saw somewhere when I

0:09:04.520 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 2>was scanning things that you know, a big story coming

0:09:07.200 --> 0:09:09.400
<v Speaker 2>for this season. I'm just going to ask this question myself,

0:09:09.480 --> 0:09:11.560
<v Speaker 2>because nobody we have a bunch of questions. I had

0:09:11.559 --> 0:09:13.160
<v Speaker 2>to pair abound a bunch of questions. We got a

0:09:13.160 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 2>bunch through email and Facebook and whatever. But one of

0:09:16.480 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 2>the things that I always enjoy, and somebody asked this

0:09:18.760 --> 0:09:20.560
<v Speaker 2>just on a Twitter Q and A, is what I'm

0:09:20.600 --> 0:09:22.520
<v Speaker 2>looking forward to other than Oregon and what they do

0:09:22.559 --> 0:09:25.000
<v Speaker 2>in twenty seventeen, just in college football in general. And

0:09:25.040 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 2>my answer is generally the same thing, and that's just

0:09:26.960 --> 0:09:30.200
<v Speaker 2>emerging quarterbacks. Quarterback is such a hard position to play,

0:09:30.320 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 2>especially now with so much talent playing on defense, and

0:09:34.080 --> 0:09:36.520
<v Speaker 2>it's just more and more difficult with guys transferring year

0:09:36.559 --> 0:09:37.960
<v Speaker 2>in and year out, we don't get to see them

0:09:37.960 --> 0:09:41.240
<v Speaker 2>get a ton of experience within the same program. So

0:09:41.320 --> 0:09:44.160
<v Speaker 2>which emerge of these four emerging quarterbacks if you had

0:09:44.200 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 2>to rank these guys, and they're specifically emerging because they

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.280
<v Speaker 2>are merging from other teams and going to new teams,

0:09:50.880 --> 0:09:55.319
<v Speaker 2>which of these four people will we say in December? Well,

0:09:55.400 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 2>he's the clear standout of this group. Okay, are you ready?

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 2>Because this is a good year for quarterback transfer. So

0:10:00.520 --> 0:10:04.720
<v Speaker 2>we've got Will Greer starting at West Virginia Jinia. Yeah,

0:10:05.120 --> 0:10:08.959
<v Speaker 2>after a very promising start at Florida and then leaving

0:10:09.000 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 2>under some unfortunate pharmaceutical circumstances.

0:10:13.400 --> 0:10:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Some would say yeah, yeah, some would say sure.

0:10:16.080 --> 0:10:17.880
<v Speaker 2>Kyle Allen moving on from Texas A and M he

0:10:17.920 --> 0:10:19.560
<v Speaker 2>sat out last year. He's going to be playing at

0:10:19.600 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Houston this year.

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:10:20.559 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I thought he'd be playing for Tom Herman, but in

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:24.880
<v Speaker 2>fact it'll be major Apple White, Blake Barnett moving on

0:10:24.880 --> 0:10:28.200
<v Speaker 2>from Alabama and becoming immediately eligible at Arizona State. And

0:10:28.280 --> 0:10:33.000
<v Speaker 2>Jared Stidham taking a year off after the fiasco just

0:10:33.200 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 2>life fiasco at Baylor and emerging at Auburn. So of

0:10:37.480 --> 0:10:39.120
<v Speaker 2>those four quarterbacks, I don't know if you want to

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:41.040
<v Speaker 2>rank them one through four. But right now, as it

0:10:41.080 --> 0:10:44.720
<v Speaker 2>stands in early March, and nobody has really played any

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 2>sort of significant time in the spring, let alone the fall,

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:50.200
<v Speaker 2>who would you take from that group?

0:10:50.840 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>From that group, I think I'd take Jared Stidham. Okay,

0:10:54.000 --> 0:10:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I would take Jared Sidham. Now I'm not crazy about

0:10:57.240 --> 0:10:59.320
<v Speaker 1>the offense he's going to find himself in. I'm not

0:10:59.440 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>quite sure how that's gonna work. But in his short

0:11:03.480 --> 0:11:06.080
<v Speaker 1>time at Baylor, he showed a ton of promise. We

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>simply haven't seen a whole lot out of Blake Barnett.

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:11.560
<v Speaker 1>We saw flashes from Kyle Allen, but that was up

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and down. And Will Greer showed a lot of promise

0:11:14.480 --> 0:11:18.480
<v Speaker 1>before going to the Pine at Florida. So I feel

0:11:18.520 --> 0:11:20.920
<v Speaker 1>like of all the people that we saw, Stidham, to me,

0:11:21.080 --> 0:11:22.680
<v Speaker 1>felt like he had the most upside. So I would

0:11:22.679 --> 0:11:27.000
<v Speaker 1>put him one. I'm gonna put Will Greer too, because

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:28.520
<v Speaker 1>when he came in and I.

0:11:28.440 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 2>Think these are all five star high school guys, I

0:11:30.440 --> 0:11:32.520
<v Speaker 2>believe Yeah, I mean he's on some services.

0:11:32.559 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>You probably can't go wrong talent wise with any of

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:36.400
<v Speaker 1>these guys. But if we're gonna pick a second one,

0:11:36.440 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll go Will Greer. He's going into a system where

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:41.240
<v Speaker 1>you know he's going to air it out, and in

0:11:41.280 --> 0:11:43.760
<v Speaker 1>a short time at Florida he showed I thought a

0:11:43.760 --> 0:11:46.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of promise. People at Florida were excited about Will

0:11:46.200 --> 0:11:49.600
<v Speaker 1>grew before that went south. Then that leaves me between

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.720
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Allen and Blake Barnett. I will put Blake Barnett

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:58.920
<v Speaker 1>at three, knowing full well we hadn't seen anything from him,

0:11:59.160 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>we saw minimum from him. He'll have plenty of opportunities

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:05.880
<v Speaker 1>to show his show his stuff, and I'll put Kyle

0:12:05.920 --> 0:12:10.160
<v Speaker 1>Allen forth. I don't know what Houston's gonna look like

0:12:10.240 --> 0:12:14.239
<v Speaker 1>post Tom Herman. I don't think it's like a situation

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>where it falls off the cliff, but it's certainly not

0:12:17.720 --> 0:12:21.040
<v Speaker 1>the same setup as it was. And Kyle Allen left

0:12:21.080 --> 0:12:23.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot to be desired at Texas A and m

0:12:23.120 --> 0:12:26.360
<v Speaker 1>granted probably wasn't all his fault, but I sort of

0:12:26.440 --> 0:12:28.760
<v Speaker 1>expected a lot more. I feel like we've seen a

0:12:28.760 --> 0:12:31.719
<v Speaker 1>lot from him that left me feeling disappointed, so he

0:12:31.720 --> 0:12:32.680
<v Speaker 1>would be my number four.

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>So I have Will Greer atop the list, just because

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:40.120
<v Speaker 2>I think he looked good enough with the least around him.

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 2>The running game wasn't spectacularly good at Florida, and the

0:12:43.640 --> 0:12:45.440
<v Speaker 2>fact that he's moving on to a system will have

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 2>Justin Crawford in the backfield at West Virginia. If you remember

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 2>Justin Crawford of the Wow, Look what Justin Crawford is

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 2>doing against Oklahoma?

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:53.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah? Yeah.

0:12:53.840 --> 0:12:56.960
<v Speaker 2>And the development of West Virginia receivers seems to be

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.680
<v Speaker 2>a year and in year out things. It's a you know,

0:12:58.720 --> 0:13:00.880
<v Speaker 2>Shelton Gibson has gone Kevin White the year before, A

0:13:00.920 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 2>year after year, they just keep replacing the speed successfully.

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 2>I think whenever it is that Will Grier gets on

0:13:07.559 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 2>the field, he will be put in the best position.

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:14.280
<v Speaker 2>Given West Virginia's defense taking steps forward year in and year out,

0:13:14.720 --> 0:13:16.520
<v Speaker 2>I think he's in the best position to make the

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 2>biggest impact this fall. I have Jared's did him second,

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:21.600
<v Speaker 2>even with the question mark of you know, r At

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Lashley leaving for Yukon, Chip Lindsay coming in from ASU,

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 2>which then welcomes Blake Barnett. So we don't really know

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:30.920
<v Speaker 2>what the offense of Auburn is going to look like

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:33.560
<v Speaker 2>with Chip Lindsay. I imagine it will be heavy maus

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.000
<v Speaker 2>On influence but maybe it's time to sort of weave

0:13:36.000 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 2>in new ideas. I have Kyle Allen third, just because

0:13:40.160 --> 0:13:42.840
<v Speaker 2>I think his ceiling as a thrower is higher than

0:13:42.880 --> 0:13:44.480
<v Speaker 2>Blake Barnett's, even though we haven't seen a lot of

0:13:44.520 --> 0:13:46.960
<v Speaker 2>Blake Barnett and Kyle Allen struggled somemit Tech's A and M.

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.480
<v Speaker 2>I think he will have, you know, going going against

0:13:50.520 --> 0:13:54.160
<v Speaker 2>easier defenses first of all, playing at Houston, and I

0:13:54.200 --> 0:13:57.120
<v Speaker 2>have Blake Barnett, even though I really like the weapons

0:13:57.160 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 2>that Blake Barnett has in Nikhil Harry and Kaylin Blage.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I like those guys a lot, so three and four

0:14:03.520 --> 0:14:07.160
<v Speaker 2>could go either way. I like the general talent level

0:14:07.240 --> 0:14:11.200
<v Speaker 2>of Kyle Allen against AAC defenses and his throng ability

0:14:11.200 --> 0:14:12.559
<v Speaker 2>a little bit more than Barnett's.

0:14:13.000 --> 0:14:15.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, shall we get to our questions. Let's do it.

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:20.480
<v Speaker 1>Congratulations Skippy, you've got mail. You've got mail. On the

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:24.520
<v Speaker 1>solid verbal As often as we can, and quite frequently

0:14:24.520 --> 0:14:26.000
<v Speaker 1>in the off season, we do our best to pay

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>homage to those of you who write in solverble at

0:14:29.400 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>gmail dot com, to our Twitter, to our Facebook. We

0:14:32.800 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>did a Q and A about three weeks ago we

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>will do many more throughout the course of the long

0:14:37.000 --> 0:14:41.800
<v Speaker 1>college football doldrums the off season. We've got some questions

0:14:41.840 --> 0:14:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in here that we're in here previously that we didn't

0:14:45.080 --> 0:14:46.800
<v Speaker 1>get a chance to get to the first time around.

0:14:46.840 --> 0:14:49.440
<v Speaker 2>We've also got a bunch of new ones, Dan, Yes,

0:14:50.480 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 2>and so do we have old ones in here? I

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 2>don't even remember old any old one. I added an

0:14:54.120 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 2>old one here.

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>Please surprise me. Let's start out here. Okay, mm hmm,

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>He says, I got a dilemma. Might make for a

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>good offseason conversation. Okay, you sir, are correct. I work

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.840
<v Speaker 1>for a fabulous nonprofit that does a lot of good

0:15:07.880 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>work in our community. We're about to hold an annual

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>fundraiser gala where we expect to raise hundreds of thousands

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:17.840
<v Speaker 1>of dollars. Sounds great. My dilemma is this. I've just

0:15:17.880 --> 0:15:20.200
<v Speaker 1>been told that Vince Young will be at the event.

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:24.880
<v Speaker 1>I may be expected to hobnob with him, take photos,

0:15:25.520 --> 0:15:29.800
<v Speaker 1>video of people with him, etc. Etc. But I'm a

0:15:29.920 --> 0:15:33.520
<v Speaker 1>usc grad. I have no desire to do any of this.

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>But I also know that this event will help raise

0:15:36.680 --> 0:15:39.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of money for our organization. I'm wondering to

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:43.000
<v Speaker 1>what level, can I appropriately snub or throw a shade

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.920
<v Speaker 1>at Vince Vy, as it were, without gumming up the

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:51.560
<v Speaker 1>fundraising by alienating potential donors who like him, or by

0:15:51.560 --> 0:15:54.520
<v Speaker 1>pissing off my employer. So this is this is a

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:57.680
<v Speaker 1>deep question here, Dan, This is a deep question that

0:15:57.720 --> 0:15:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I've got a shallow answer. But yeah, it could be.

0:16:00.160 --> 0:16:03.360
<v Speaker 1>It sort of harkens back to your roots as a

0:16:03.400 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>college football fan slash alum versus your new mature self

0:16:08.440 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>as a career oriented gentleman working for a solid non problem.

0:16:12.880 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 2>So if Vince Young is there as a positive force

0:16:15.960 --> 0:16:18.960
<v Speaker 2>to do positive things. And I don't know Vince Young,

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:21.760
<v Speaker 2>I haven't been around Vince Young, but I would imagine

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 2>he is somebody who really enjoys reveling in that huge

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 2>game that USC Texas National championship, one of our great

0:16:29.720 --> 0:16:30.960
<v Speaker 2>modern games in our sports.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely, yeah, absolutely.

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:34.400
<v Speaker 2>It would be fair to say he wouldn't be uncomfortable

0:16:34.400 --> 0:16:36.480
<v Speaker 2>if you brought up that game. No, not at all

0:16:36.560 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 2>as a USC fan, as a as a UMass fan,

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.640
<v Speaker 2>whatever whatever team you root for. I say, lean into

0:16:42.640 --> 0:16:44.840
<v Speaker 2>the fact that you were heartbroken. That will make him

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:47.720
<v Speaker 2>feel great. I will say, you know, if I'm a

0:16:47.800 --> 0:16:50.480
<v Speaker 2>USC fan. I'm saying something like it was brutal watching

0:16:50.480 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 2>the Tings try to tackle you, the Ting brothers. It

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 2>was like it was heartbreaking. And that way you sort

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.200
<v Speaker 2>of endear yourself as somebody that has a sense of

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 2>humor about yourself and you don't take things too seriously.

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 2>But at the same time, you establish yourself as a

0:17:03.280 --> 0:17:06.240
<v Speaker 2>college football fan, and you know what, maybe he gives

0:17:06.280 --> 0:17:08.400
<v Speaker 2>you a little nugget about that game that you never

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:10.920
<v Speaker 2>knew and you just sort of like him a little

0:17:10.920 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 2>bit more as a human. And I say steer into

0:17:13.800 --> 0:17:16.399
<v Speaker 2>it because like I've interviewed a bunch of college players

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:18.080
<v Speaker 2>that have gone on to be NFL players at the

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 2>NFL rookie thing we used to do, and we'd come

0:17:20.080 --> 0:17:23.240
<v Speaker 2>across Washington players and you know, that was the point

0:17:23.280 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 2>when Oregon was still beating Washington. But it was still

0:17:26.080 --> 0:17:28.600
<v Speaker 2>fun to talk about that games in a non sort

0:17:28.640 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 2>of trash talky way because you just you find out

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 2>nuggets and that I'm in the nugget business. Tie call

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:37.920
<v Speaker 2>me Dave Thomas. I am a nugget guy. So sort

0:17:37.920 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 2>of introducing yourself as a USC fan, but a good natured,

0:17:41.160 --> 0:17:44.120
<v Speaker 2>good humored one should endear you and you collect those

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:48.280
<v Speaker 2>nuggets because you have no leg to stand on trash

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.640
<v Speaker 2>talking for a team that you literally ran over. See,

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:53.240
<v Speaker 2>I don't think you can throw a shade. You've got

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.000
<v Speaker 2>no leverage. Or you go up to him and you

0:17:55.080 --> 0:17:58.800
<v Speaker 2>say I'm sorry. I'm a huge fan. I have to ask,

0:18:00.640 --> 0:18:07.280
<v Speaker 2>are you Cole McCoy? Can I get a shot? All right,

0:18:07.320 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 2>we'll do that.

0:18:07.760 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Where are we going next?

0:18:09.280 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Let's start with Rob rob Ass. If you could switch

0:18:12.600 --> 0:18:15.199
<v Speaker 2>any two teams conference affiliates to improve alignment.

0:18:18.359 --> 0:18:21.919
<v Speaker 1>I have a problem with conference alignment. And I'm not

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>talking about it from the financial standpoint. You know, I'm

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:26.199
<v Speaker 1>not like, I'm not out there on the internet. I'm

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 1>not examining the economics like Frank the Tank and some

0:18:29.840 --> 0:18:32.680
<v Speaker 1>others that exists in the twitter sphere. I'm looking at

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 1>this purely from a geographic standpoint. So of course, of

0:18:36.320 --> 0:18:39.159
<v Speaker 1>course the answer could be like, switch Notre Dame in

0:18:39.240 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>Rutgers because Notre Dame makes more sense than the Big Ten,

0:18:41.920 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 1>perhaps than Rutgers does, and so on and so forth.

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 1>But one thing that's bothered me for a long time.

0:18:48.640 --> 0:18:51.959
<v Speaker 1>It's it's been after this whole SEC realignment, when they

0:18:52.000 --> 0:18:55.639
<v Speaker 1>added Missouri and Texas A and M. M hmm. Do

0:18:55.720 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>you know where Columbia Missouri is? Guve speaking, Dan, I

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>do know where it is. Can you tell me how

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:09.640
<v Speaker 1>many teams in the SEC West are actually farther east

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:10.920
<v Speaker 1>than Columbia Missouri.

0:19:12.320 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 2>How many teams are farther east in the SEC West?

0:19:15.320 --> 0:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm talking SEC West teams that are actually farther east

0:19:19.000 --> 0:19:22.360
<v Speaker 1>than Columbia Missouri. Is it all of them other than

0:19:22.359 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>Texas A and M. All of them other than Texas

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:27.359
<v Speaker 1>A and M is a correct answer, Dan, Okay, unless

0:19:27.400 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>you're drawing a diagonal line of sixty degrees across the southeast,

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:39.240
<v Speaker 1>there is no way a reasonable minded cartographer could ever

0:19:39.280 --> 0:19:41.880
<v Speaker 1>come to the conclusion that this is a logical way

0:19:42.000 --> 0:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to break down your divisions. I prefer to go by

0:19:45.280 --> 0:19:49.240
<v Speaker 1>longitude and not by any kind of sixty degree diagonal

0:19:49.640 --> 0:19:53.200
<v Speaker 1>across the sun belt of the United States in order

0:19:53.240 --> 0:19:56.679
<v Speaker 1>to form by conferences. So therefore, I feel like, if

0:19:56.720 --> 0:19:58.480
<v Speaker 1>you're going to try and do it and do it right,

0:19:58.960 --> 0:20:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you need to do something in the SEC You need

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:03.960
<v Speaker 1>to better align based on west and east.

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 2>So you want to you want to screw around with

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:07.760
<v Speaker 2>who's in the west and who's in the East. You're

0:20:07.760 --> 0:20:12.000
<v Speaker 2>not switching conferences. You're almost doing division realignment, not conference realignment. Sure,

0:20:12.200 --> 0:20:15.919
<v Speaker 2>I'm booking within a conference. I'm getting more specific, hyper

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:17.040
<v Speaker 2>local with this, Dan.

0:20:17.119 --> 0:20:19.320
<v Speaker 1>Hell yeah. And by the way, this would work out

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 1>better for the SEC East because the SEC East has

0:20:21.640 --> 0:20:24.160
<v Speaker 1>been a bit of a gumpster fire over the last

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>couple of years now. I'm not sure how well they'd

0:20:26.040 --> 0:20:30.800
<v Speaker 1>take to maybe bringing Alabama over Auburn over Nobody wants

0:20:30.840 --> 0:20:33.680
<v Speaker 1>that if you're in the East, but purely in terms

0:20:33.680 --> 0:20:39.160
<v Speaker 1>of geographics and within the SEC conference. Dan, again, hyper local,

0:20:39.920 --> 0:20:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that Columbia, Missouri too far west to be

0:20:42.880 --> 0:20:45.840
<v Speaker 1>in the SEC East. All right, Can I answer Rob's question? Then? Yes?

0:20:45.880 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Please conference affiliation. I'm gonna ad text A and M

0:20:50.600 --> 0:20:54.000
<v Speaker 2>and Nebraska to the Big twelve. That would make things

0:20:54.000 --> 0:20:57.040
<v Speaker 2>better for the Big Twelve. There are two teams that

0:20:57.600 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 2>up the quality to huge name brands. They are geographically

0:21:03.320 --> 0:21:08.560
<v Speaker 2>convenient enough, and text A and M is finding itself

0:21:09.040 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 2>sort of strictly in the middle class at best. Of

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 2>the SEC West, Nebraska is sort of a forgotten power

0:21:16.320 --> 0:21:18.120
<v Speaker 2>right and the Big Ten, it feels like with the

0:21:18.119 --> 0:21:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Michigan Ohio State, Penn State, and recently Michigan State attention.

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.160
<v Speaker 1>Getting they got better though this year. I still think

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:25.480
<v Speaker 1>it's a good cultural fit.

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:31.120
<v Speaker 2>Uh, it's well enough, But I'm going to go with

0:21:31.880 --> 0:21:34.920
<v Speaker 2>those teams being more Big twelve than nine. I understand

0:21:34.920 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 2>the pull of their new conferences, and I understand, Yes,

0:21:37.200 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 2>you know, it's it's East Texas, it's you know, a

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.440
<v Speaker 2>lot in common with the SEC. It's a good cultural

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:45.119
<v Speaker 2>fit for Texas, A and M and Southeastern Conference. But

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.879
<v Speaker 2>in terms of the general health of college football, I

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:51.400
<v Speaker 2>don't think either the Big ten or SEC is affected

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:54.200
<v Speaker 2>by the loss of those two teams, and the Big.

0:21:53.960 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Twelve is greatly improved. Yes, I would agree with that.

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.480
<v Speaker 1>You were also previously in the Big twelve.

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 2>No, I know this is true as well. That was

0:22:03.080 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 2>sort of the sort of unspoken So you're.

0:22:05.480 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>Taking the safe way out with this question. There is

0:22:08.640 --> 0:22:11.040
<v Speaker 1>a long, storied history of those teams being in the

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Big Course. Yeah, I'm fine going back in time. Did

0:22:15.280 --> 0:22:17.959
<v Speaker 1>I not answer question? Maybe I didn't answer it directly.

0:22:18.000 --> 0:22:21.720
<v Speaker 2>You said conference affiliation and he you went with divisions.

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Well, I appreciate this question, even if I didn't answer

0:22:24.960 --> 0:22:27.240
<v Speaker 1>it directly, because it gave me the opportunity to get

0:22:27.240 --> 0:22:30.240
<v Speaker 1>something off my chest. I've never actually articulated that point

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:31.160
<v Speaker 1>here on the podcast.

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 2>So thank you Rob, Thank you Ty. Who is this

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.880
<v Speaker 2>year's Penn State? The answer is Dak Prescott.

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott, Yeah, this year's Penn State.

0:22:41.520 --> 0:22:45.400
<v Speaker 2>Yes, So I don't that's a broad question. So I'm

0:22:45.400 --> 0:22:47.879
<v Speaker 2>interpreting this question as a team that is in the

0:22:47.960 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 2>range of five hundred in their conference one year, and

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 2>through a new starting quarterback and perhaps a new staff

0:22:55.320 --> 0:23:00.040
<v Speaker 2>or overhauled staff, makes a leap, and also having a

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 2>head coach that's on the hot seat going into the

0:23:01.720 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 2>year perhaps makes a leap to save everybody and get

0:23:04.520 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 2>everybody encouraged.

0:23:05.840 --> 0:23:08.800
<v Speaker 1>There's no like one for one here. This is a

0:23:08.800 --> 0:23:12.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit like our goof from many months ago about

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>who is going to be twenty sixteen's Iowa. So there's

0:23:17.400 --> 0:23:21.560
<v Speaker 1>no like congruence here between Penn State and another team

0:23:21.840 --> 0:23:25.199
<v Speaker 1>that exists in twenty seventeen college football, at least not

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>on my radar. I could pick a team like a

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Miami because they've got a starting quarterback and maybe not

0:23:31.720 --> 0:23:34.160
<v Speaker 1>a five hundred team, and twenty sixteen they went nine

0:23:34.160 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>and four, But there are gonna be some questions there.

0:23:36.960 --> 0:23:40.679
<v Speaker 1>I could see them bubbling up under Mark Richt. TCU

0:23:40.920 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>is interesting, maybe not a new starting quarterback, but six

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:46.480
<v Speaker 1>and seven was a disappointing season. I think they've got

0:23:46.520 --> 0:23:48.840
<v Speaker 1>room to grow. I was probably a year early on them.

0:23:49.400 --> 0:23:52.840
<v Speaker 1>What about Texas? Does Texas fall into that category?

0:23:53.440 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, that's certainly an overhauled coaching staff. Right, Texas

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:58.439
<v Speaker 2>went three and six in the Big Twelve, five and

0:23:58.480 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 2>seven overall. Penn State went seven and in six, four

0:24:00.800 --> 0:24:04.639
<v Speaker 2>and four two years ago. I believe, Yeah, who do

0:24:04.680 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 2>you have in mind? So I have two teams here.

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:08.720
<v Speaker 2>I have TCU, who went four and five in the

0:24:08.720 --> 0:24:11.360
<v Speaker 2>Big Twelve. They returned the same quarterback in Kenny Hill.

0:24:11.520 --> 0:24:13.679
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I assume it'll be some sort of open competition,

0:24:14.200 --> 0:24:16.520
<v Speaker 2>but a little bit of a shake up offensively. Doug

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.920
<v Speaker 2>Meachum goes to Kansas and a'ssall sunny Comby's offense now

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.360
<v Speaker 2>and a team that's more talented than four and five

0:24:23.400 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 2>in conference, just like Penn State was more talented than

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:29.000
<v Speaker 2>four and four in the Big Ten. So I'm going

0:24:29.040 --> 0:24:32.359
<v Speaker 2>to go TCU as one of the teams. I have

0:24:32.400 --> 0:24:36.040
<v Speaker 2>another team that could mirror it in more ways than one,

0:24:36.359 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 2>in more ways, in like three different ways. Hear me

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.560
<v Speaker 2>out the Tennessee volunteers.

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:42.720
<v Speaker 1>No, God, here we go.

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:48.080
<v Speaker 2>This is why one Bob Shoop factory got Bob Shoop right.

0:24:48.240 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>So there's that.

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 2>There's a common thread. Yeah, ok, there is that common

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:55.239
<v Speaker 2>thread too. They almost completely overhauled the staff. Okay, you

0:24:55.280 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 2>have Brady Hoake's involvements, very big ten of Tennessee. And

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I think the main thread is so they it's a

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 2>new offensive staff by and large, and it is a

0:25:06.920 --> 0:25:09.680
<v Speaker 2>completely new starting quarterback. It looks like it's going to

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 2>be Jarrett Guarantano. I know it's sort of up for

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:17.119
<v Speaker 2>grabs the starting job. I really like him. Jared Garantano

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 2>to me, I know he grew up. I think in

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:20.520
<v Speaker 2>New Jersey it's maybe not the highest level of high

0:25:20.520 --> 0:25:24.560
<v Speaker 2>school competition. But I recently watched his tape as I

0:25:24.600 --> 0:25:26.760
<v Speaker 2>was just like reading random things about random teams, and

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 2>I watched his high school tape. Doesn't mean a lot,

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:33.480
<v Speaker 2>but reminds me of a little bit a similar game

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.000
<v Speaker 2>to Mariota. Not anywhere near him, but like the similar

0:25:36.119 --> 0:25:38.879
<v Speaker 2>high school tape to Marcus Mariota, And I think he

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:42.880
<v Speaker 2>has the ability to come in and immediately affect change.

0:25:43.119 --> 0:25:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I don't know what. The offensive line was pretty atrocious

0:25:45.800 --> 0:25:48.119
<v Speaker 2>last year. Defensively, there's still talent, but a lot of

0:25:48.119 --> 0:25:51.600
<v Speaker 2>big losses. I know Josh Malone specifically said he turned

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:53.720
<v Speaker 2>pro because Josh Dobbs is turning pro and he didn't

0:25:53.720 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 2>want to play with like a red shirt freshman, sophomore

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:56.120
<v Speaker 2>or whatever.

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:56.520
<v Speaker 1>QB.

0:25:57.080 --> 0:26:00.120
<v Speaker 2>I understand that. I still think there's enough talent there

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:05.560
<v Speaker 2>that if Jarrett Quarantano was really good, immediately Tennessee could

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:06.879
<v Speaker 2>be Penn State esque.

0:26:06.920 --> 0:26:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm excited to just call him Justin Guarini all year. Yeah,

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:11.840
<v Speaker 1>I know, I figured that would be the case. All right,

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>where are we going next? All right?

0:26:13.720 --> 0:26:17.760
<v Speaker 2>Next question? Let's stay with that, though, Ryan, Why does

0:26:17.840 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 2>I think Penn State will take a step back this year?

0:26:20.080 --> 0:26:22.520
<v Speaker 2>I got such a big Chris Godwin fan, such a

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:23.360
<v Speaker 2>Chris Godwin.

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:25.280
<v Speaker 1>I got called out for this on the Twitter on

0:26:25.320 --> 0:26:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter machine. Let me clarify the statement. I'm not

0:26:29.560 --> 0:26:34.040
<v Speaker 1>saying for sure that I think Penn State will absolutely

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>take a step back this year. I don't think that's likely,

0:26:37.720 --> 0:26:40.560
<v Speaker 1>but I think it's possible. I was never sold on

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:43.919
<v Speaker 1>trace mcsoorly, and that, to my dying day will haunt me.

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.960
<v Speaker 1>He had an incredible season last year. He enters twenty

0:26:48.000 --> 0:26:51.080
<v Speaker 1>seventeen as a potential dark horse Heisman contender.

0:26:51.680 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 2>He had a dark horse. He's just like in the conversation.

0:26:54.000 --> 0:26:56.359
<v Speaker 2>He's in the conversation. Sure he might not be top five,

0:26:56.440 --> 0:26:57.840
<v Speaker 2>but he's probably top ten.

0:26:58.720 --> 0:27:01.320
<v Speaker 1>So that's on me. I was wrong. He had a

0:27:01.359 --> 0:27:06.000
<v Speaker 1>great year. I'm still not totally sold on him, And

0:27:06.800 --> 0:27:10.640
<v Speaker 1>without Chris Godwin, I think that hurts the vertical passing

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:15.760
<v Speaker 1>game a little Bitseki's back, right, Gaseeki is back, that's right.

0:27:16.720 --> 0:27:22.119
<v Speaker 1>I am curious to see how their linebacking core forms

0:27:22.200 --> 0:27:24.640
<v Speaker 1>up now that Brandon Bell isn't with the team. And

0:27:24.119 --> 0:27:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we saw when Bell got hurt last year huge to

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:31.680
<v Speaker 1>that they had a little bit of difficulty getting things

0:27:31.760 --> 0:27:34.520
<v Speaker 1>set up in that second tier. The defense. Now they

0:27:34.560 --> 0:27:37.040
<v Speaker 1>had more injuries than just Brandon Bell wasn't all on him,

0:27:37.400 --> 0:27:40.360
<v Speaker 1>but without him they were a much different defense. When

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:42.960
<v Speaker 1>he came back, he obviously made a pretty positive impact

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:44.480
<v Speaker 1>and that was a big part of the reason why

0:27:44.520 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>they were successful. So again I'm not saying it's a

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:54.160
<v Speaker 1>likely scenario, but it's mostly rooted in my irrational distrust

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.119
<v Speaker 1>of trace McSorley at this point. But I am excited

0:27:57.119 --> 0:27:59.240
<v Speaker 1>to see what they do and I hope that I

0:27:59.280 --> 0:28:00.320
<v Speaker 1>hope that does not have happened.

0:28:02.000 --> 0:28:04.679
<v Speaker 2>Next question, this is from Khalil, Am I going to

0:28:04.680 --> 0:28:10.399
<v Speaker 2>be cursed slash blessed. I like that that terminology. He

0:28:10.480 --> 0:28:12.159
<v Speaker 2>did not, but we can. Am I going to be

0:28:12.200 --> 0:28:14.760
<v Speaker 2>curse slash hashtag blessed with Mike Leach until he retires.

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 2>I assume Khalil is a Washington State fan. I feel

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 2>our program can't snag the big name coaches due to

0:28:19.640 --> 0:28:22.200
<v Speaker 2>a multiple of reasons, and Leech is just good enough

0:28:22.200 --> 0:28:24.800
<v Speaker 2>to keep himself from getting fired. I'm so tired of

0:28:24.960 --> 0:28:31.480
<v Speaker 2>bubble scream ty, how would you evaluate the ceiling of

0:28:31.560 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 2>both Washington State as a program, coach it higher wise,

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:39.200
<v Speaker 2>and what they can do in the standings with the

0:28:39.240 --> 0:28:43.000
<v Speaker 2>way the PAC twelve is currently constituted, especially in the North.

0:28:42.880 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>Tough tough going in the PAC twelve right absolutely, especially

0:28:46.640 --> 0:28:48.880
<v Speaker 1>up north, especially up north, does not strike me as

0:28:48.880 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>a conference that's like just there for the taking. It's

0:28:51.720 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>not going to fall off the back of a truck.

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>So he's got his work cut out for him. I

0:28:58.080 --> 0:29:01.160
<v Speaker 1>like Mike Leach. I think he's innovative. I also feel

0:29:01.160 --> 0:29:03.280
<v Speaker 1>like we all know his shtick at this point. He's

0:29:03.280 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 1>gonna say funny stuff. He's gonna run the air raid

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>offense that he's always run, and I think because of that,

0:29:09.760 --> 0:29:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it'll bring some consistency to Washington State. We've seen them

0:29:12.880 --> 0:29:16.880
<v Speaker 1>take gradual steps forward, but I don't know how far

0:29:16.960 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>we are from the ceiling. Like we we could already

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>be there and maybe just not know it. I don't

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:25.920
<v Speaker 1>know how much it advances beyond what we've seen the

0:29:26.000 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>last year and a half in Pullman. Does that make sense?

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:34.160
<v Speaker 2>Here's something important to remember. Washington State will in all

0:29:34.240 --> 0:29:38.000
<v Speaker 2>likelihood never be a player for a major coach unless

0:29:39.240 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 2>Ryan Leaf becomes a major coach, you know, unless a

0:29:42.200 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 2>Washington State guy really really wants to get back to

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.280
<v Speaker 2>Pullman and build some glory. That's just I mean. Washington

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:53.200
<v Speaker 2>State again, I believe is the farthest Power five school

0:29:53.200 --> 0:29:56.040
<v Speaker 2>from an interstate. I think that's the stat maybe it's

0:29:56.120 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't know, but in all likelihood, Washington State should

0:29:58.640 --> 0:30:01.000
<v Speaker 2>have won nine games this year. They should have beaten

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:02.800
<v Speaker 2>at Eastern, They should have want to shoot out against

0:30:02.800 --> 0:30:03.720
<v Speaker 2>Eastern and start the season.

0:30:03.720 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing wrong with losing the Boise.

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 2>And then they lose to two top ten teams to

0:30:07.080 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 2>close out the year in Colorado and Washington. So they

0:30:08.880 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 2>win eighth straight, including a win a big win at Stanford,

0:30:11.920 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 2>who was top fifteen at the time. Nine wins is

0:30:15.440 --> 0:30:18.120
<v Speaker 2>probably the ceiling you have. I mean, Mike Leach really

0:30:18.320 --> 0:30:21.440
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't even be at Wazoo, right, I mean he should

0:30:21.440 --> 0:30:23.800
<v Speaker 2>be at Texas Tech or a job that Texas Tech

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:25.640
<v Speaker 2>propelled him to because of what he was able to

0:30:25.680 --> 0:30:29.920
<v Speaker 2>do on the field. It's just so difficult, and I

0:30:29.960 --> 0:30:33.800
<v Speaker 2>think the case study is look at Oregon. Oregon is

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 2>coming off of, however many great seasons, you know, being

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 2>a huge national program, and when they finally have a

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:42.920
<v Speaker 2>down year and fire a coach and go to the

0:30:42.960 --> 0:30:47.120
<v Speaker 2>open market, they get like, at best their third or

0:30:47.160 --> 0:30:51.600
<v Speaker 2>fourth choice. So Matt Rule allegedly turns them down. I

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.479
<v Speaker 2>think they pursued Tom Herman pretty aggressively, and obviously that

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:57.880
<v Speaker 2>didn't work out. And I'm very bullish on Willie Taggart,

0:30:57.880 --> 0:31:00.960
<v Speaker 2>but if we're talking about Washington State in the open market,

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:03.280
<v Speaker 2>I don't think there's any way they do better.

0:31:03.280 --> 0:31:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Than Mike Leach.

0:31:04.480 --> 0:31:08.040
<v Speaker 2>And I think he's doing exactly what a school like

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 2>Washington State on the West Coast, having certain geographic disadvantages

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 2>needs to do, and that's play with a definitive scheme.

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:16.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean they could run the triple option or something

0:31:16.840 --> 0:31:20.480
<v Speaker 2>like that, have a definitive identity, Identify assistant coaches that

0:31:20.520 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 2>you know you're probably going to lose when they become

0:31:22.560 --> 0:31:24.959
<v Speaker 2>bigger names, like they did to Oregon Joe with Joe

0:31:25.040 --> 0:31:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Salavea their defensive line coach, They're going to have a

0:31:27.600 --> 0:31:32.320
<v Speaker 2>lot of attrition and they just happened into this coach.

0:31:32.440 --> 0:31:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I think you're stuck with Mike Leach.

0:31:33.800 --> 0:31:35.680
<v Speaker 2>The fact is though the offense is a little bit

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 2>more balance, they're running the ball a little bit more.

0:31:38.560 --> 0:31:40.320
<v Speaker 2>I think they're moving in in a really good direction.

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.600
<v Speaker 2>The defense went from an atrocious embarrassment to pretty good.

0:31:43.640 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>They got better.

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.320
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, they went to pretty That's a huge leap in

0:31:47.360 --> 0:31:50.520
<v Speaker 2>college football, atrocious embarrassment to pretty good at a place

0:31:50.600 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 2>nowhere near top talent.

0:31:52.440 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 1>That's impressive. And by the way, I think you're stuck.

0:31:55.360 --> 0:31:57.600
<v Speaker 1>One of our big talking points down the stretch was

0:31:57.640 --> 0:32:00.920
<v Speaker 1>how big the Apple Cup was gonna be. Yeah, Washington

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and Washington State. Keep in mind, this is a program

0:32:03.720 --> 0:32:07.440
<v Speaker 1>that was pretty much irrelevant right for many years, and

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:09.920
<v Speaker 1>then Mike Leach came along and he has made them better.

0:32:10.560 --> 0:32:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I do understand his frustration here because he sees that

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.640
<v Speaker 1>there might be a ceiling, and I feel that ceiling too.

0:32:17.680 --> 0:32:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I just I think you're right tough to do well

0:32:19.760 --> 0:32:21.640
<v Speaker 1>when you're kind of located in the middle of nowhere,

0:32:22.000 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and especially when you're in a really tough conference.

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:27.240
<v Speaker 2>And here's the alternative. Would do you want Bo Baldwin?

0:32:27.680 --> 0:32:29.400
<v Speaker 2>Do you want a really good Eastern coach? And you've

0:32:29.400 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 2>already had experience that with Paul Wolfe. I believe he

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:35.320
<v Speaker 2>was at Eastern before. And Bo Baldwin is running Mike

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:38.920
<v Speaker 2>Leach's offense and isn't Mike Leach or running an offense

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.560
<v Speaker 2>in the same universe and has never really recruited on

0:32:42.640 --> 0:32:45.360
<v Speaker 2>a big level regionally like Mike Leach has. That's I mean,

0:32:45.600 --> 0:32:47.760
<v Speaker 2>if that's what you'd rather have, I think that's okay.

0:32:47.880 --> 0:32:50.880
<v Speaker 1>One question I've always wanted to ask Mike Leach, and

0:32:50.920 --> 0:32:52.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe if you have him on the show next time,

0:32:52.560 --> 0:32:54.720
<v Speaker 1>I can ask him. I really would like to know

0:32:54.760 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>what he loves most about shaving with Harry's. Dan because Harry's,

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:03.160
<v Speaker 1>as you know, started by two guys named Jeff and Andy,

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>not Mike. But they were fed up being overcharged for razors.

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:09.640
<v Speaker 1>They decided they're going to start their own company. Give

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>guys everywhere what they deserve, a great shave at a

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.800
<v Speaker 1>fair price. I gotta tell a personal story here. This

0:33:15.880 --> 0:33:18.200
<v Speaker 1>is God's honest truth. Hand to God here, I'm ready.

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I was shaving with Harry's for a while and then

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.680
<v Speaker 1>I saw a deal on Amazon. I bought an electric razor.

0:33:25.880 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>Now I know you have partaken in the miracle of

0:33:31.040 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>modern science that is electric razors, right I do.

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 2>I have a beard trimmer that keeps things, that keeps

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:39.160
<v Speaker 2>things adequately trimmed. But I got neck to take care

0:33:39.200 --> 0:33:41.600
<v Speaker 2>of tye and keep clean. See I have a problem

0:33:41.680 --> 0:33:44.320
<v Speaker 2>with the neck. Yeah, And when I started using the

0:33:44.360 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 2>electric razor, I was getting a.

0:33:45.680 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>Beard of bees mm hm. So I made the decision

0:33:48.960 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 1>that I was going to switch back to Harry's. I'm

0:33:52.040 --> 0:33:55.280
<v Speaker 1>not having I'm not having the neck issues anymore. Yeah,

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you're not having the more swave of the two of us.

0:33:58.600 --> 0:34:03.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree. Harry's razors they include everything that you need

0:34:03.440 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>for a close, comfortable shave, even on the neck. Five

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>German Engineer blades with a lubricating strip, a flex inch

0:34:10.760 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>for a comfortable glide, a trimmer blade for hard to

0:34:13.640 --> 0:34:17.040
<v Speaker 1>reach places, and a weighted ergonomic handle. All this for

0:34:17.120 --> 0:34:19.879
<v Speaker 1>two bucks a blade. Compare that with four or more,

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:23.000
<v Speaker 1>which is what you'll pay at the drug store. This

0:34:23.320 --> 0:34:25.000
<v Speaker 1>is the time to act if you're like me, if

0:34:25.000 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for a close, comfortable shave. Harry's is so

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:31.640
<v Speaker 1>confident in the quality of their blades they want you

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>to try their most popular trial set for free. Hear

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.600
<v Speaker 1>me Free fr'mar comes with a razor handle of your choice,

0:34:39.640 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>a five blade cartridge, and shaving gel free when you

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 1>sign up. You just got to pay a small fee

0:34:46.600 --> 0:34:48.480
<v Speaker 1>for shipping. If you want to get in on the

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:52.120
<v Speaker 1>free trial, go to Harry's h A R R y

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>s dot com slash solid solid right now Harry's dot

0:34:57.120 --> 0:35:00.600
<v Speaker 1>com slash solid. That's the God's on a truth man.

0:35:01.200 --> 0:35:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I had issues a couple months ago, decided, you know what,

0:35:04.640 --> 0:35:07.279
<v Speaker 1>who am I kidding? Who am I kidding? Trying to

0:35:07.320 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>be all sciency. Let's just go back to what works.

0:35:10.200 --> 0:35:12.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's go back to Harry, So harrys dot Com slash

0:35:12.239 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>solid get in on it too. Yeah, you're head to toe.

0:35:15.080 --> 0:35:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Harry's taking care of you. Where are we going next?

0:35:18.160 --> 0:35:23.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to this question over under on fired coaches.

0:35:23.200 --> 0:35:25.240
<v Speaker 2>We can do is really quickly the pack twelve South,

0:35:25.320 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 2>so we'll stay out West after twenty seventeen. Over under

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 2>is two and a half. Which are you going? Pack

0:35:30.000 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 2>twelve South coaches looking for new jobs after this year?

0:35:32.560 --> 0:35:36.320
<v Speaker 2>The operative phrase here is fired. Operative verb I should

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 2>say is fired. Sure, he is not saying leaving on

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.880
<v Speaker 2>their own volition? Correct, Mike Mcatyre is not going to

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:46.280
<v Speaker 2>get fired. Mike Mcatyre just won ten games of Colorado.

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:47.840
<v Speaker 2>He can stay there as long as he wants.

0:35:48.160 --> 0:35:50.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that's came under a little bit of fire

0:35:50.920 --> 0:35:53.879
<v Speaker 1>this past offseason, rightfully, So he's not getting fired. Right.

0:35:54.800 --> 0:35:57.560
<v Speaker 1>Clay Helton at USC not getting fired unless things really

0:35:57.600 --> 0:35:59.879
<v Speaker 1>go south, and I guess he can't ever fully count

0:35:59.880 --> 0:36:04.360
<v Speaker 1>it out at USC. Correct, Probably not getting fired. Yeah,

0:36:04.400 --> 0:36:07.480
<v Speaker 1>that leaves you with four. My hunch is that Utah

0:36:07.680 --> 0:36:10.320
<v Speaker 1>probably can't do a whole lot better than Kyle Whittingham.

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:13.080
<v Speaker 1>He is a really good football coach. There have been

0:36:13.200 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>rumors of like strife between him and the athletic department.

0:36:16.520 --> 0:36:17.959
<v Speaker 1>It's really old. I think they're in a good place.

0:36:18.000 --> 0:36:19.759
<v Speaker 1>But I think they're in an okay place, and I'm

0:36:19.800 --> 0:36:23.719
<v Speaker 1>confident in saying that Utah again, with nine wins under Whittingham,

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:27.000
<v Speaker 1>they've got no real reason to fire him. That leaves

0:36:27.000 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 1>you with Arizona Schools, Arizona Schools and UCLA. Mm hmm.

0:36:32.800 --> 0:36:34.879
<v Speaker 1>You would need all three of those coaches to get

0:36:34.880 --> 0:36:37.919
<v Speaker 1>fired Dan. So I'm gonna say the under just by

0:36:37.960 --> 0:36:42.040
<v Speaker 1>deductive reasoning. I'm taking the under as well. Gotta go under.

0:36:42.120 --> 0:36:44.919
<v Speaker 2>It'd be surprising if Jim Morrow was back, just given

0:36:44.960 --> 0:36:46.880
<v Speaker 2>the trajectory right now. But I think one of the

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:49.720
<v Speaker 2>two Arizona guys is at least their next year. Okay,

0:36:51.760 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 2>let's go non college football for a little bit.

0:36:53.680 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, Uh, it is.

0:36:54.719 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 2>From Mark which candy is the most overrated among the

0:36:56.880 --> 0:36:59.560
<v Speaker 2>general public? I have an easy answer. That answer is Skittles.

0:36:59.640 --> 0:37:02.400
<v Speaker 2>Skittle is not good. They're just not that good compared

0:37:02.400 --> 0:37:05.600
<v Speaker 2>to the competition. Ty, where do you stand Reese's pieces?

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Really? That's my number one No, how do you not

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.400
<v Speaker 1>like Reese's pieces? I've never eaten a Reese's pieces and

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:16.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted a second I will get an RP every single

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:18.000
<v Speaker 1>time I go to the airport if I'm in the

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>mood for something. So I don't want to make enemies

0:37:19.640 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 1>here with big peanut butter. But I'm just saying that

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I've never had a Reese's pieces and then wanted a

0:37:25.520 --> 0:37:28.719
<v Speaker 1>second one. Maybe do you like? The only exception might

0:37:28.760 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>be those little iddy bitty ones that come individually wrapped.

0:37:32.800 --> 0:37:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes those you need Yearney for a little bit more.

0:37:35.160 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>They make the smaller ones now, they're not all like

0:37:37.080 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>real big one. I don't think you know what a

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Reese's pieces is. I know what a piece. What is

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:41.680
<v Speaker 1>a Reese's piece?

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:46.399
<v Speaker 2>The Reese's pieces are smaller, smaller. What smaller peanut butter

0:37:46.480 --> 0:37:51.000
<v Speaker 2>cuffs tie a Reese's pieces is like an M and M. Ah,

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:53.799
<v Speaker 2>it's a candy. No no, no, no's ty you are

0:37:54.120 --> 0:37:55.359
<v Speaker 2>you are out of line, sir.

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>I have a.

0:37:56.040 --> 0:38:00.719
<v Speaker 2>Problem with the peanut butter candies. Okay, So the pieces

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:02.480
<v Speaker 2>is it looks like an M and M. But I

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:06.279
<v Speaker 2>believe they're just orange yellow and maybe brown. But like

0:38:06.680 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 2>visually aesthetically they look like Eminem's.

0:38:08.920 --> 0:38:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Can I let's just say anything in the like genus

0:38:11.560 --> 0:38:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of the Reese's family.

0:38:13.120 --> 0:38:15.719
<v Speaker 2>All right, that's fair, but you just outed yourself as

0:38:15.800 --> 0:38:22.000
<v Speaker 2>Reese's ignorant. That's an I for one. I for one

0:38:22.400 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 2>thought this show was above that.

0:38:24.200 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It isn't get used to it. You're talking about the

0:38:28.880 --> 0:38:32.319
<v Speaker 1>butter cups, the smaller peanut butter cups, anything they make.

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:36.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm okay overrated, But can we just agree that you

0:38:36.520 --> 0:38:38.240
<v Speaker 2>are not specifically be smirching the piece.

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 1>No, no, okay, just making sure I I am not discriminating.

0:38:43.440 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm throwing them all under the bus man the whole What.

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:48.719
<v Speaker 2>Will you eat like an M and M peanut butter

0:38:48.840 --> 0:38:50.439
<v Speaker 2>or that's out to anything with peanut butter?

0:38:50.480 --> 0:38:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I would eat that.

0:38:51.120 --> 0:38:53.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you just said anything with peanut butter is in

0:38:53.080 --> 0:38:57.879
<v Speaker 2>the genus, the phylum of Obserd, the Reeses, the Reeses genus, Well,

0:38:57.880 --> 0:38:58.359
<v Speaker 2>all the all.

0:38:58.280 --> 0:38:59.680
<v Speaker 1>The M and M peanut butter thing is. It's a

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>bigger version peanut butter, M and M. My head's about

0:39:03.600 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>to X book time. This is unbelieve. Let's move on.

0:39:06.080 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>This is gonna We're gonna get tweets about this more

0:39:08.800 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 1>so than any college football thought. I'm gonna get you

0:39:11.560 --> 0:39:13.799
<v Speaker 1>note et. I've seen et.

0:39:14.000 --> 0:39:16.080
<v Speaker 2>I love those are pieces, Those are re pieces. Those

0:39:16.280 --> 0:39:19.920
<v Speaker 2>were little cups. It wasn't a trail of cups. Just

0:39:19.960 --> 0:39:22.240
<v Speaker 2>not a fan, not a fan of pieces, not a fan.

0:39:22.080 --> 0:39:22.719
<v Speaker 1>Of any of them.

0:39:23.040 --> 0:39:24.760
<v Speaker 2>I will say this, though, you can now get cups

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 2>with pieces inside if you really wanted to be haunted.

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:29.880
<v Speaker 1>See they're all sort of cross pollinating at this point.

0:39:30.120 --> 0:39:31.280
<v Speaker 1>How many keep them all straight?

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.880
<v Speaker 2>How many mustards are in your kitchen? Emmett wants to know,

0:39:35.600 --> 0:39:37.160
<v Speaker 2>He said, an over under of two and a half

0:39:37.160 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 2>for you and three for me. How many mustards two.

0:39:40.320 --> 0:39:43.480
<v Speaker 1>And a half. I will count Deli yellow, any sort

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.040
<v Speaker 1>of brown, stone ground or milled mustard I will count,

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>like a spicy Chinese a gray poupon I've got, I've

0:39:50.560 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>got yellow, and I've got the brown spicy, which I

0:39:54.200 --> 0:39:57.439
<v Speaker 1>believe I talked about at nauseum at some point last year.

0:39:57.480 --> 0:39:59.480
<v Speaker 1>How brown spicy mustard has changed my life.

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:02.799
<v Speaker 2>If you're growing some sausages up, it's nothing better. So yeah,

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm under I think I have two. I think I

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:07.880
<v Speaker 2>have the straight yellow and like a Dijon type for

0:40:07.960 --> 0:40:10.840
<v Speaker 2>when I make like a spicy your honeymustard dressing. Okay,

0:40:11.040 --> 0:40:14.480
<v Speaker 2>so we're both under Yeah, We're under best album. Kenneth

0:40:14.520 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 2>wants to know of the nineteen ninety nine triumvirate of

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 2>emo American football, Clarity or something to write home about?

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:23.320
<v Speaker 1>I had two more to this. You have stronger opinions

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:24.640
<v Speaker 1>on this than I do, so go ahead.

0:40:26.880 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 2>I will probably in terms of staying the test of time,

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:31.520
<v Speaker 2>I might go something to write home about. I will

0:40:31.560 --> 0:40:33.440
<v Speaker 2>listen to that more than Clarity, although I think Clarity

0:40:33.520 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 2>is wonderful. But that was also the same year as

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:38.920
<v Speaker 2>nothing gold can stay from newfound glory and through being cool,

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:41.800
<v Speaker 2>and I think I will have through being cool above everything.

0:40:42.200 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, saves the day? Sounds good? Okay, do not have

0:40:45.640 --> 0:40:47.320
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on this. I don't have strong path I was

0:40:47.360 --> 0:40:50.720
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of Clarity, but okay, yeah, fair enough.

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:53.719
<v Speaker 2>Here is a wonderful question actually, before we go into

0:40:53.760 --> 0:40:56.359
<v Speaker 2>this wonderful question that we're probably gonna sort of dive

0:40:56.400 --> 0:40:59.240
<v Speaker 2>down a rabbit hole with quickly. Who has more wins

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.120
<v Speaker 2>this year is from Ben Jomen, Tom Herman at Texas,

0:41:01.200 --> 0:41:04.640
<v Speaker 2>Charlie Strong at USF. Have you look at USF schedule

0:41:05.280 --> 0:41:08.839
<v Speaker 2>their tough road game this year out of conference? Is

0:41:08.920 --> 0:41:10.840
<v Speaker 2>the fighting a lion eye of Illinois.

0:41:10.920 --> 0:41:12.799
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go us. Oh excuse me, they play

0:41:12.840 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that game at home.

0:41:14.400 --> 0:41:19.919
<v Speaker 2>Let's go usf Okay, agree, agree, Finally, yeah, Zach, If

0:41:19.960 --> 0:41:22.600
<v Speaker 2>you guys were going to pull off an elaborate crime, oh,

0:41:23.080 --> 0:41:27.600
<v Speaker 2>like a really big bank robbery, r theft, how would

0:41:27.600 --> 0:41:27.960
<v Speaker 2>you do it?

0:41:28.000 --> 0:41:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh?

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:31.920
<v Speaker 2>How would Okay, let's clarify something off the top. I

0:41:32.000 --> 0:41:35.640
<v Speaker 2>thought about this independent of you, because he said if

0:41:35.640 --> 0:41:39.319
<v Speaker 2>you guys like we were doing it together. I don't

0:41:39.320 --> 0:41:41.359
<v Speaker 2>know if it was together or individual. I thought about

0:41:41.360 --> 0:41:44.759
<v Speaker 2>it solo, individual, like my own strategy if I were

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:48.400
<v Speaker 2>heading up a plan to rob a bank or like

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:50.200
<v Speaker 2>a really nice museum or gallery.

0:41:50.360 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I thought about it independent of you. Okay, good, same page,

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Independent of you. I feel like the first and most

0:41:57.960 --> 0:42:02.120
<v Speaker 1>important step in planning an elaborate crime. Not that I'm

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.560
<v Speaker 1>advertising anyone do this, but I feel like you need

0:42:05.560 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 1>to establish your alibi, okay, first and foremost, Like if

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:12.239
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna if you're gonna be in deep trying to

0:42:12.280 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 1>steal like money in a bank, highest store art, you

0:42:16.640 --> 0:42:20.400
<v Speaker 1>need to somehow establish an alibi by like, you know,

0:42:20.480 --> 0:42:25.439
<v Speaker 1>not driving a GPS enabled vehicle. There, right, don't take

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 1>your cell phone with you just go dark, as they

0:42:28.200 --> 0:42:31.239
<v Speaker 1>say on on the shows. That's the first thing I

0:42:31.239 --> 0:42:34.440
<v Speaker 1>think is most important. I also think i'd do it

0:42:34.480 --> 0:42:37.600
<v Speaker 1>in broad daylight. Why. I feel like there are probably

0:42:37.640 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>more booby traps at night, There are more things that

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.160
<v Speaker 1>could go wrong at night because of the darkness.

0:42:44.680 --> 0:42:44.960
<v Speaker 2>M h.

0:42:45.840 --> 0:42:49.120
<v Speaker 1>I think my strategy is probably to do it in

0:42:49.120 --> 0:42:52.279
<v Speaker 1>broad daylight, some sort of mask. It needs to be

0:42:52.360 --> 0:42:54.200
<v Speaker 1>a mask, some sort of a tire to make them

0:42:54.239 --> 0:42:56.480
<v Speaker 1>know that I'm serious and a little bit crazy like me.

0:42:57.040 --> 0:43:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Where like a Florida State jersey. Okay, I think I'd

0:43:00.880 --> 0:43:04.279
<v Speaker 1>go with the bank note approach. Okay, I go in

0:43:04.320 --> 0:43:07.840
<v Speaker 1>there broad daylight, with the mask, with some sort of

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:11.880
<v Speaker 1>jersey to give me credibility. I'd slide a note across,

0:43:11.920 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>but it would have to be one of those notes

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:17.440
<v Speaker 1>that was comprised of several cut up letters from a magazine,

0:43:17.600 --> 0:43:19.640
<v Speaker 1>just to add the creepy and crazy factor to it.

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:23.600
<v Speaker 1>I would then do my best to get off into

0:43:24.400 --> 0:43:27.440
<v Speaker 1>some sort of panel van, an unmarked van, no plates,

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and then what I've always wanted to do is sort

0:43:29.520 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 1>of light that vehicle on fire at some point, so

0:43:32.280 --> 0:43:35.080
<v Speaker 1>you're faking your own death, maybe faking my own death,

0:43:35.120 --> 0:43:39.400
<v Speaker 1>but at least eliminating the getaway vehicle and like some

0:43:39.520 --> 0:43:42.920
<v Speaker 1>back alley somewhere in a cornfield, light the van on

0:43:43.000 --> 0:43:46.000
<v Speaker 1>fire so that no one can really get any forensics

0:43:46.040 --> 0:43:46.919
<v Speaker 1>from it. That's the plan.

0:43:47.000 --> 0:43:49.000
<v Speaker 2>That's the rough draft at this point. All right, So

0:43:49.040 --> 0:43:52.040
<v Speaker 2>I'm going long con. So I'm doing some research ahead

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:54.719
<v Speaker 2>of time, and I'm figuring out who's working at this bank,

0:43:54.760 --> 0:43:57.480
<v Speaker 2>who's working at this gallery, who's working at this museum,

0:43:58.000 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 2>And I'm trying to figure out an in romantically ty

0:44:01.000 --> 0:44:05.080
<v Speaker 2>Oh okay, I'm trying to find that in romantically, you know,

0:44:05.200 --> 0:44:07.040
<v Speaker 2>if it's a bank, let's say bank, let's stay on

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:10.160
<v Speaker 2>the same page. I'm finding out tellers. I'm doing research,

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:12.560
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing some Listen. At this point, I'm a bank robber,

0:44:12.600 --> 0:44:15.960
<v Speaker 2>so stalking is within my realm of awfulness, right, So

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:17.000
<v Speaker 2>you're trying to you're.

0:44:16.840 --> 0:44:18.720
<v Speaker 1>Trying to develop an unwitting asset.

0:44:19.120 --> 0:44:21.680
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely, I'm absolutely doing it because I do not have

0:44:21.760 --> 0:44:25.320
<v Speaker 2>the ability to guns blaze into a bank.

0:44:25.360 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I just that's not the humanity of that is.

0:44:28.200 --> 0:44:30.120
<v Speaker 2>I don't have it. I just don't orly inhumanity, I

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:31.960
<v Speaker 2>don't have it. It's just not in my DNA but

0:44:32.960 --> 0:44:37.440
<v Speaker 2>to be an awful person one on one. Sure, So

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:39.640
<v Speaker 2>I don't think I don't think it's like a James

0:44:39.640 --> 0:44:42.440
<v Speaker 2>Bond type seduction, but you know, it's flirtation.

0:44:42.560 --> 0:44:42.919
<v Speaker 1>It's you.

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:44.960
<v Speaker 2>You sort of figure out a way into this person's life,

0:44:45.440 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 2>and then you can cox some sort of sob story

0:44:47.960 --> 0:44:52.359
<v Speaker 2>about needing money, and you exhaust every you figure out

0:44:52.400 --> 0:44:55.440
<v Speaker 2>a reason why you can't do everything that's on the level.

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh, I can't sell this. I can't. I don't have

0:44:57.920 --> 0:44:59.800
<v Speaker 1>any assets. I just need money.

0:44:59.800 --> 0:45:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Like, what if we because you were in the bank,

0:45:03.120 --> 0:45:07.280
<v Speaker 2>let's call her Audrey, what if we? I mean, nobody

0:45:07.280 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 2>would ever know if we just did like a little

0:45:09.040 --> 0:45:11.680
<v Speaker 2>bit of a time like that kind of thing, and

0:45:11.719 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 2>it was just like a little bit, a little bit,

0:45:13.400 --> 0:45:13.960
<v Speaker 2>a little bit.

0:45:14.320 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>And here's the thing what I would do next? So

0:45:15.920 --> 0:45:19.719
<v Speaker 1>you're going office space like a couple cents at a time.

0:45:19.760 --> 0:45:22.279
<v Speaker 2>Well that's not a couple cents at a time. That

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 2>was a computer sort of heist, right. They were doing

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:28.400
<v Speaker 2>it through the Y two K exchange whatever. It was

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:32.200
<v Speaker 2>some sort of software thing. I'm doing maybe some kind

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 2>of you know, there's cash on hand, there's petty cash

0:45:34.239 --> 0:45:36.160
<v Speaker 2>on hand, and I know they counted at the end

0:45:36.160 --> 0:45:38.400
<v Speaker 2>of the day whatever. But maybe at a certain point

0:45:38.880 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 2>when she knows that there's like a rotation a transfer

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:46.120
<v Speaker 2>of the cash coming in or going out, that we

0:45:46.239 --> 0:45:49.080
<v Speaker 2>figure out a way to sort of circumvent the process.

0:45:49.680 --> 0:45:51.759
<v Speaker 2>We get away with the money and people aren't going

0:45:51.800 --> 0:45:54.880
<v Speaker 2>to know for what a day. No, I'm very fortunate

0:45:54.920 --> 0:45:59.360
<v Speaker 2>because my middle brother is a pilot, Okay, so I

0:45:59.400 --> 0:46:06.240
<v Speaker 2>feel like we can possibly circumvent the sort of passports visa.

0:46:06.680 --> 0:46:08.799
<v Speaker 2>We can get on a plane to somewhere foreign. I

0:46:08.840 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 2>would think.

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:12.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna be on some sort of travel list after this.

0:46:12.000 --> 0:46:14.359
<v Speaker 2>This is me and address. By the way, I don't

0:46:14.360 --> 0:46:16.799
<v Speaker 2>think I know a single person named Audrey. No, but

0:46:17.719 --> 0:46:21.640
<v Speaker 2>that's my plan right there. It's and but the problem

0:46:21.719 --> 0:46:23.960
<v Speaker 2>is Audrey is going to think we're doing this for

0:46:24.000 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 2>a noble reason, so I'm gonna have to figure out

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:28.600
<v Speaker 2>some way to ditch her in a non violent way.

0:46:29.239 --> 0:46:32.640
<v Speaker 2>So it's a it's a long con sort of lost Sawyer.

0:46:32.760 --> 0:46:35.919
<v Speaker 2>Did you watch the show Lost? Yeah, that kind of thing.

0:46:36.040 --> 0:46:37.799
<v Speaker 1>See, I'm just I don't like the fact that you're

0:46:37.800 --> 0:46:40.439
<v Speaker 1>taking Audrey with you. I'm weapon No, that's what I'm saying.

0:46:40.440 --> 0:46:43.720
<v Speaker 2>I have to I'm including her in the initial heist,

0:46:43.960 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 2>but then I'm ditching her, So I'm weaponizing my charm,

0:46:47.560 --> 0:46:51.880
<v Speaker 2>tie weaponizing your charm and her emotions to get absolutely Yeah.

0:46:52.080 --> 0:46:53.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean that's the only thing I can think of,

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:55.440
<v Speaker 2>because I just am not a killer, ty, I am

0:46:55.440 --> 0:46:56.600
<v Speaker 2>not a stone cold killer.

0:46:56.840 --> 0:46:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. I wouldn't want to go in there and do

0:46:58.280 --> 0:47:00.759
<v Speaker 1>bodily harm. I also wouldn't want to do anything that

0:47:00.840 --> 0:47:03.840
<v Speaker 1>requires me to dangle from the ceiling like Tom Cruise

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:07.520
<v Speaker 1>in Mission Impossible. I don't feel like that's a successful

0:47:07.560 --> 0:47:09.719
<v Speaker 1>means of acquiring any kind of a lout.

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 2>And you've got to get to a non extraditing country,

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:13.480
<v Speaker 2>or you got to get somewhere where you can definitely

0:47:13.560 --> 0:47:13.960
<v Speaker 2>lay low.

0:47:14.400 --> 0:47:17.160
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, go in there with the mask, scare

0:47:17.200 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 1>the be Jesus out of someone fifteen minutes in out

0:47:20.280 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 1>unmarked panel van on fire, make your getaway into a

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:25.240
<v Speaker 1>non extradition country.

0:47:25.400 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 2>So you're gonna have to do some research, and you're

0:47:26.880 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna have to go to a bank that doesn't have

0:47:28.200 --> 0:47:30.920
<v Speaker 2>like the bulletproof glass because you're not a threat. If

0:47:30.920 --> 0:47:33.319
<v Speaker 2>you slide a note under bulletproof glure, there's definitely going

0:47:33.400 --> 0:47:34.960
<v Speaker 2>to need to be some research into this plan.

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Daan right. I'm not advocating don't do your research. Definitely

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>do your research, but go in there brute force, make

0:47:42.960 --> 0:47:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it happen. Get out right? Okay, fair enough.

0:47:46.840 --> 0:47:48.840
<v Speaker 2>Although, now that I'm saying all this out loud and

0:47:48.880 --> 0:47:52.440
<v Speaker 2>realizing that my fiance works in finance, very fishy. It

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 2>sounds very fishy, And I assure you I am deeply

0:47:56.640 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 2>in love with her and would never do that, although

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:00.520
<v Speaker 2>I guess that's what I will say.

0:48:00.360 --> 0:48:03.880
<v Speaker 1>If I were. I actually read a great bank robber

0:48:04.040 --> 0:48:08.040
<v Speaker 1>tail in a fine publication on texture, Dan.

0:48:08.480 --> 0:48:10.960
<v Speaker 2>Oh nice, I've read a couple of those myself. In

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:12.480
<v Speaker 2>long form magazine features.

0:48:12.520 --> 0:48:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You're a big fan of dB Cooper always like jumping

0:48:15.400 --> 0:48:17.440
<v Speaker 1>out of planes? Where to go? They still don't know?

0:48:17.920 --> 0:48:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Love it? Texture can fill you in on all the details.

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:29.440
<v Speaker 1>dB Cooper and more define service. Over two hundred plus

0:48:29.440 --> 0:48:33.400
<v Speaker 1>magazines are available. They offer access to in depth interviews

0:48:33.480 --> 0:48:37.160
<v Speaker 1>articles from the convenience of your phone or tablet. Dan

0:48:37.400 --> 0:48:41.560
<v Speaker 1>It is basically the Netflix for magazines. Yeah, for publications.

0:48:42.400 --> 0:48:46.400
<v Speaker 1>They give you daily recommendations and exclusive interactive features that

0:48:46.440 --> 0:48:49.239
<v Speaker 1>you can't get in the print edition of your favorite publications.

0:48:49.600 --> 0:48:52.880
<v Speaker 1>They make it easy to enjoy the articles you want

0:48:52.880 --> 0:48:57.120
<v Speaker 1>to read. Plus it's searchable, which is sort of cliche

0:48:57.200 --> 0:48:59.839
<v Speaker 1>at this point in twenty seventeen. Everything the world the search,

0:49:00.800 --> 0:49:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but not so much your magazines. And when you got

0:49:03.600 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 1>them all at your fingertips and you can search for

0:49:06.560 --> 0:49:09.520
<v Speaker 1>what kind of stuff you're into, I think that's sort

0:49:09.520 --> 0:49:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of a differentiator. Plus you get bonus video content. Absolutely.

0:49:13.920 --> 0:49:17.240
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, so get everything from Sports Illustrated to Esquire

0:49:17.280 --> 0:49:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to Forbes, Forbes. Excuse me. They're all available way less

0:49:22.320 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>money than you'd pay if you've got a subscription or

0:49:24.640 --> 0:49:28.400
<v Speaker 1>even bought them all individually. Get it through. Texture was

0:49:28.400 --> 0:49:33.160
<v Speaker 1>selected as one of Apple's top twenty sixteen iPad apps.

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Normally this service is not ninety nine a month, but

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:41.160
<v Speaker 1>if you sign up right now at texture dot com

0:49:41.200 --> 0:49:43.640
<v Speaker 1>t e X t u r e dot com slash Solid,

0:49:44.120 --> 0:49:48.040
<v Speaker 1>you will get a fourteen day free free trial. Nice

0:49:48.520 --> 0:49:51.080
<v Speaker 1>fourteen days try texture for free when you go to

0:49:51.120 --> 0:49:54.279
<v Speaker 1>texture dot com slash Solid one more time. That is

0:49:54.360 --> 0:50:00.279
<v Speaker 1>Texture dot com slash Solid ty what nonsports podcast listen

0:50:00.360 --> 0:50:02.440
<v Speaker 1>to Jake wants to know my brother? My brother and me.

0:50:02.880 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Oh yes, it's my favorite.

0:50:06.960 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 2>How you've only recently started listening, right, Well, I've I've No,

0:50:10.400 --> 0:50:13.560
<v Speaker 2>that's not true. I've been a long time my Big

0:50:13.600 --> 0:50:15.000
<v Speaker 2>Bam listener Solid Wife Kate.

0:50:15.640 --> 0:50:18.600
<v Speaker 1>But right, I didn't listen for a while. Then I

0:50:18.600 --> 0:50:22.759
<v Speaker 1>picked it back up at your prodding because I know

0:50:22.800 --> 0:50:25.319
<v Speaker 1>you're a fan as well. I got Solid Wife Kate

0:50:25.400 --> 0:50:28.080
<v Speaker 1>into it. She now has a longer commute than she

0:50:28.160 --> 0:50:30.960
<v Speaker 1>has at any point in her Oh yeah, adult life.

0:50:31.280 --> 0:50:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Is she gonna go tangential mackelroythe shows? See she I

0:50:35.400 --> 0:50:38.600
<v Speaker 1>think she's started dipping her toes in the water. Okay,

0:50:38.760 --> 0:50:41.760
<v Speaker 1>listen to a little bit of Rose Buddies, Adventure Zone whatnot.

0:50:42.960 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm still sticking with the flagship My Big Bam, but

0:50:46.200 --> 0:50:48.879
<v Speaker 1>I have, I have dabbled with the TV show. I'm

0:50:48.960 --> 0:50:50.840
<v Speaker 1>very excited with what they're doing right now.

0:50:51.160 --> 0:50:53.160
<v Speaker 2>And as background, my brother, my brother and me for

0:50:53.200 --> 0:50:56.680
<v Speaker 2>anybody that is not familiar, three brothers give advice and

0:50:56.760 --> 0:50:59.080
<v Speaker 2>it gets weird, and they also answer question They give

0:50:59.120 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 2>advice people right in with questions. They give funny advice

0:51:03.200 --> 0:51:05.719
<v Speaker 2>and then they also answer questions from Yahoo answers y

0:51:05.719 --> 0:51:08.400
<v Speaker 2>which is all just ridiculous and you should listen. And

0:51:08.440 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 2>two of the three brothers are Vox Media employees that

0:51:10.600 --> 0:51:14.640
<v Speaker 2>were for Polygon. It's an unbelievably popular show. Hilarious, go listen.

0:51:15.000 --> 0:51:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, so that would be my obvious answer. Give

0:51:17.760 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>me an un obvious.

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Let me pull up the old the old text mission here.

0:51:23.120 --> 0:51:24.680
<v Speaker 2>While you do that, I will tell you I started

0:51:24.719 --> 0:51:27.759
<v Speaker 2>listening to one last night. It is about as unsports.

0:51:27.880 --> 0:51:30.480
<v Speaker 2>It's a little bit sports, ye, if you consider fitness sports.

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Missing Richard Simmons.

0:51:36.160 --> 0:51:37.439
<v Speaker 1>Have you heard of this? Yes?

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:41.120
<v Speaker 2>I have, Okay, Missing Richard Simmons. Richard Simmons, of course,

0:51:41.200 --> 0:51:46.319
<v Speaker 2>the very famous fitness teacher or whatever entertainment figure for

0:51:46.360 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 2>the last two years. It's like basically disappeared and like

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:51.560
<v Speaker 2>won't leave his house and it's like a big mystery.

0:51:51.680 --> 0:51:54.160
<v Speaker 2>And his friends, who are I think, one of whom

0:51:54.200 --> 0:51:55.879
<v Speaker 2>is like a movie producer of some kind of la

0:51:56.480 --> 0:51:59.799
<v Speaker 2>started this podcast and it's just them investigating what the

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:03.320
<v Speaker 2>hell happened to Richard Simmons. It sounds sort of strange

0:52:03.360 --> 0:52:08.200
<v Speaker 2>and esoteric. I assure you it's pretty captivating. Really, it's great.

0:52:08.200 --> 0:52:11.319
<v Speaker 2>They're like twenty five thirty minute episodes, so it's really quick.

0:52:11.360 --> 0:52:13.080
<v Speaker 2>I think there's only been three or four that have

0:52:13.120 --> 0:52:16.600
<v Speaker 2>been released. I'm telling you it's wonderful.

0:52:16.760 --> 0:52:21.879
<v Speaker 1>Other shows, I'd call out Dan Carlin's Hardcore History, Oh right, right, right,

0:52:22.000 --> 0:52:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a personal favorite. It's like an audio book. He does

0:52:24.200 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>an outstanding job. I will also throw a shout out

0:52:27.239 --> 0:52:31.480
<v Speaker 1>to my good friends who do the Last Row Podcast

0:52:31.560 --> 0:52:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Movie podcast, Oh right, all right? Have been a guest

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:37.239
<v Speaker 1>on the show What movie did you do? Examining some

0:52:37.280 --> 0:52:39.480
<v Speaker 1>of the movies that you forgot your loved? You know,

0:52:39.520 --> 0:52:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't even remember, think'bout have done Ghostbusters? Nice? A

0:52:43.160 --> 0:52:46.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a Ghostbuster's historian. But okay, yeah, I

0:52:46.960 --> 0:52:48.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Are there any other ones.

0:52:49.680 --> 0:52:52.000
<v Speaker 2>That I listened to consistently? Not really, it's a bunch

0:52:52.000 --> 0:52:53.719
<v Speaker 2>of sports ones. I really like listening to a bunch

0:52:53.760 --> 0:52:57.520
<v Speaker 2>of NBA ones. You know, Espianation has great podcasts and

0:52:57.560 --> 0:52:59.040
<v Speaker 2>you should listen to all of them. I really like

0:52:59.120 --> 0:53:03.080
<v Speaker 2>Limited Upside, non Espianation, NBA one. The True Hoop podcast

0:53:03.080 --> 0:53:04.799
<v Speaker 2>at ESPN puts out is to do a good job.

0:53:04.880 --> 0:53:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, really that one a lot? Okay?

0:53:07.080 --> 0:53:12.279
<v Speaker 2>Next question, ty Yeah, Amber combines two things I'm loving here,

0:53:12.320 --> 0:53:14.600
<v Speaker 2>football and food. When watching football, is it better to

0:53:14.640 --> 0:53:16.440
<v Speaker 2>have solid meals or lots of snacks?

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:19.560
<v Speaker 1>All day long. Gotta go solid meals. I'm gonna go

0:53:19.600 --> 0:53:22.000
<v Speaker 1>solid meals as well. Gotta go solid meals. I have

0:53:22.040 --> 0:53:25.759
<v Speaker 1>a problem. And maybe this is a little TMI, but

0:53:26.440 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're a monster, yeah, that's right. If you go

0:53:28.600 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 1>snacks all day long, it tends to upset the balance

0:53:31.800 --> 0:53:37.920
<v Speaker 1>of the digestive process, right, and therefore you get odd results.

0:53:38.360 --> 0:53:40.799
<v Speaker 1>Let's stick with what got you here, Dan, Yeah, and

0:53:40.920 --> 0:53:43.879
<v Speaker 1>just go solid meals. Stick to a regular schedule. It's

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:46.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be a long day. Do your best to

0:53:46.680 --> 0:53:50.319
<v Speaker 1>try and go solid meals at predictable times. You can

0:53:50.360 --> 0:53:52.560
<v Speaker 1>say whatever you'd like about this show, if you don't

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>like this show, if you love this show, but you

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:57.480
<v Speaker 1>will never accuse us of not caring about your poops.

0:53:58.680 --> 0:54:00.480
<v Speaker 1>We are all about poop health on the solid from

0:54:00.920 --> 0:54:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and Ty just showed that to everybody right here, and

0:54:03.719 --> 0:54:05.279
<v Speaker 1>I applaud you, Ty. Yeah.

0:54:05.280 --> 0:54:07.239
<v Speaker 2>I think I'm going to go solid meals here, just

0:54:07.239 --> 0:54:09.279
<v Speaker 2>because I look forward to the variety of things I

0:54:09.280 --> 0:54:11.359
<v Speaker 2>don't get to eat out all that often, even though

0:54:11.400 --> 0:54:13.439
<v Speaker 2>I live in New York, and sort of thinking about

0:54:13.520 --> 0:54:15.560
<v Speaker 2>things to make for lunch when people come over for

0:54:15.640 --> 0:54:18.120
<v Speaker 2>games on the weekend, or ordering for dinner stuff like that.

0:54:18.400 --> 0:54:19.719
<v Speaker 2>I think it's a little bit more fun, and you

0:54:19.760 --> 0:54:21.680
<v Speaker 2>can include snacks with that. You can say I'm going

0:54:21.719 --> 0:54:24.040
<v Speaker 2>to make let's make tacos, and we'll make some nachos

0:54:24.080 --> 0:54:26.000
<v Speaker 2>for everybody to share. I think you can do both

0:54:26.040 --> 0:54:28.200
<v Speaker 2>on a certain level. But yeah, it becomes a little

0:54:28.200 --> 0:54:30.319
<v Speaker 2>bit dangerous your snacking all day. I don't know about that.

0:54:30.800 --> 0:54:32.839
<v Speaker 1>All right, we will close out with this final question here,

0:54:32.920 --> 0:54:34.640
<v Speaker 1>Dan hit me, I'm ready. Matt wants to know what

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:37.400
<v Speaker 1>are the mandatory songs for a wedding reception?

0:54:37.760 --> 0:54:39.520
<v Speaker 2>I love this question. I was at a wedding this

0:54:39.560 --> 0:54:42.239
<v Speaker 2>past weekend and it helped me. Hone my opinion about this,

0:54:42.960 --> 0:54:47.400
<v Speaker 2>how are you putting together your wedding playlist? Okay, so

0:54:47.440 --> 0:54:49.319
<v Speaker 2>we've already met with the band. We're having a band,

0:54:49.360 --> 0:54:54.319
<v Speaker 2>not a DJ. And I feel very strongly about one

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 2>very specific thing, and that is it's a dance floor.

0:55:00.000 --> 0:55:03.680
<v Speaker 2>There should be dance music, okay, and so that eliminates

0:55:03.760 --> 0:55:06.520
<v Speaker 2>like all eighties rock for me, because you're not really

0:55:06.560 --> 0:55:09.520
<v Speaker 2>dancing that. Like if you're you can shout along to

0:55:09.600 --> 0:55:15.680
<v Speaker 2>bon Jovi, you know you can, You're not dancing to that.

0:55:15.760 --> 0:55:17.360
<v Speaker 2>You're just sort of like maybe your fist is in

0:55:17.400 --> 0:55:18.880
<v Speaker 2>the air, like that's not fun. I don't want to

0:55:18.880 --> 0:55:21.759
<v Speaker 2>do that. No, I want to move, I want I

0:55:21.760 --> 0:55:23.520
<v Speaker 2>want rhythm, I want a baseline, I want to beat.

0:55:23.560 --> 0:55:25.239
<v Speaker 2>That's what I want. It's a dance floor, not a

0:55:25.320 --> 0:55:28.880
<v Speaker 2>stand floor. All right, So mandatory songs to me, everybody

0:55:28.960 --> 0:55:31.160
<v Speaker 2>hit feels differently. Do your thing, and like this past

0:55:31.160 --> 0:55:34.239
<v Speaker 2>weekend there was a good it was a good intro

0:55:34.320 --> 0:55:37.120
<v Speaker 2>of dance music and then it went like heavy eighties

0:55:37.440 --> 0:55:40.719
<v Speaker 2>pop rock that wasn't really danceable and people abandoned the

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:41.320
<v Speaker 2>dance floor.

0:55:41.719 --> 0:55:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Okay, And I think the couple likes that kind of

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:44.520
<v Speaker 1>music and that's cool.

0:55:45.000 --> 0:55:48.759
<v Speaker 2>But so like I'm thinking, like pyt a lot of them,

0:55:48.880 --> 0:55:51.520
<v Speaker 2>like I go heavy, Michael Jackson from the eighties, like

0:55:51.560 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 2>Thriller era Michael Jackson, whatever, bad, whatever, I want to

0:55:55.239 --> 0:55:58.080
<v Speaker 2>dance with somebody, Whitney Houston, Poison from Bell BIV Devou

0:55:58.800 --> 0:56:03.040
<v Speaker 2>can't stop the feeling. Just Timberlake, great dance song, You

0:56:03.080 --> 0:56:06.480
<v Speaker 2>make My dreams. Hollan Oates like I would love some shout,

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:09.600
<v Speaker 2>get some Moldies in there, get everybody involved, Valerie the

0:56:09.600 --> 0:56:12.120
<v Speaker 2>newer song It's Mark Ronson and Amy Winehouse that's that's

0:56:12.120 --> 0:56:13.400
<v Speaker 2>a great little dance number.

0:56:13.680 --> 0:56:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I love that.

0:56:14.280 --> 0:56:16.040
<v Speaker 2>I know I just sounded a thousand years old by

0:56:16.040 --> 0:56:18.960
<v Speaker 2>calling it a dance number, right, yeah, But I will

0:56:19.000 --> 0:56:21.800
<v Speaker 2>insist that those types of songs you want people dancing.

0:56:22.000 --> 0:56:24.240
<v Speaker 2>They had people at this wedding dancing when the band

0:56:24.280 --> 0:56:26.440
<v Speaker 2>took a break and they just started playing I want

0:56:26.440 --> 0:56:29.200
<v Speaker 2>to Dance with somebody, Like over the pa people hit

0:56:29.239 --> 0:56:32.320
<v Speaker 2>the dance floor and mass just because they wanted to dance.

0:56:32.520 --> 0:56:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Will you be launching into the treasure trove of mid

0:56:38.520 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 1>to late nineties boy bands? No, probably not. You're not

0:56:43.239 --> 0:56:44.200
<v Speaker 1>going to do any in sync.

0:56:44.560 --> 0:56:47.560
<v Speaker 2>So I think those specifically because of like the sort

0:56:47.600 --> 0:56:50.799
<v Speaker 2>of harmonic the harmonies that the guys have together, it's

0:56:50.840 --> 0:56:53.960
<v Speaker 2>hard to replicate in a in a fun way with

0:56:54.040 --> 0:56:54.480
<v Speaker 2>a band.

0:56:54.520 --> 0:56:57.799
<v Speaker 1>I think, see, here's the thing, give me, here's the acific song.

0:56:58.360 --> 0:57:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Here's why you're wrong about that. It does doesn't even

0:57:00.400 --> 0:57:04.600
<v Speaker 1>matter how good the performance is, right all right, it's

0:57:04.680 --> 0:57:06.400
<v Speaker 1>just the fact that they're playing it that will get

0:57:06.440 --> 0:57:06.840
<v Speaker 1>people up.

0:57:06.880 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 2>Do you want people dancing or singing along? I want both? Okay,

0:57:10.719 --> 0:57:14.680
<v Speaker 2>I want both. I'm fine with either. Let's why which

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:15.640
<v Speaker 2>is it is too late for me?

0:57:15.680 --> 0:57:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. I'm fine with Journey. I'm fine with Living

0:57:21.200 --> 0:57:25.040
<v Speaker 1>on a prayer. See those two. Those two lose me.

0:57:26.000 --> 0:57:29.520
<v Speaker 1>I want people leaving my wedding sweaty, don't stop believing.

0:57:29.560 --> 0:57:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Living on a prayer are two mandatory songs. I totally disagree.

0:57:34.040 --> 0:57:35.320
<v Speaker 1>Mandatory songs in my.

0:57:35.440 --> 0:57:39.080
<v Speaker 2>We in meeting with the band are do not. Playlist

0:57:39.640 --> 0:57:43.560
<v Speaker 2>was all eighties rock. That's fine, that's fine. I am

0:57:43.600 --> 0:57:45.600
<v Speaker 2>discouraged by the fact that you're not gonna go and sink.

0:57:45.800 --> 0:57:47.959
<v Speaker 2>I feel like that's a staple. Give me a song,

0:57:48.280 --> 0:57:50.880
<v Speaker 2>any of them, I would, okay, But like, what is

0:57:50.920 --> 0:57:55.040
<v Speaker 2>the most danceable in sync song. It doesn't think danable,

0:57:55.080 --> 0:57:57.040
<v Speaker 2>That's my point. I think it's probably it's gonna be me.

0:57:57.280 --> 0:58:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Gonna be gonna be my boom could go bye bye bye. Yeah,

0:58:03.520 --> 0:58:06.640
<v Speaker 1>that's fine. I've got all sorts of options there. I'm

0:58:06.680 --> 0:58:08.680
<v Speaker 1>not saying I'm the biggest fan in the world, but

0:58:08.760 --> 0:58:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you, at a at a regal event such

0:58:11.400 --> 0:58:13.360
<v Speaker 1>as a wedding where you're gonna have a bunch of

0:58:13.440 --> 0:58:17.360
<v Speaker 1>early thirty somethings, that kind of stuff plays. It doesn't

0:58:17.400 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 1>matter how good the band performs it.

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 2>Don't don't give me a false equivalence of Backstreet Boys

0:58:22.080 --> 0:58:23.920
<v Speaker 2>being like in sync and sinc is far superior.

0:58:23.960 --> 0:58:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Everybody knows this.

0:58:24.720 --> 0:58:27.560
<v Speaker 2>Agreed, agreed, Okay, I know what we're gonna close on, Tye.

0:58:27.800 --> 0:58:34.760
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, slow dance if you play that in

0:58:34.840 --> 0:58:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the old time your wedding.

0:58:36.600 --> 0:58:40.120
<v Speaker 1>I am hopping on the flight home asap, and we're

0:58:40.200 --> 0:58:41.600
<v Speaker 1>never doing this show again.

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:45.680
<v Speaker 2>We're gonna show highlights of the Gipper on a big screen.

0:58:46.120 --> 0:58:50.600
<v Speaker 2>Don't even think about it, New Rockney. Yeah, I feel

0:58:50.600 --> 0:58:54.680
<v Speaker 2>strong like people should be sweating. That's that's how I feel.

0:58:54.720 --> 0:58:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Tie. Will these be recognizable songs though? Oh yeah, don't

0:58:59.280 --> 0:59:02.080
<v Speaker 1>get super indie hipster on me. Make sure there's songs

0:59:02.080 --> 0:59:02.480
<v Speaker 1>that we know.

0:59:02.880 --> 0:59:06.720
<v Speaker 2>There's nothing indie hipster, there's nothing. It'll be like eighties, nineties,

0:59:06.760 --> 0:59:09.400
<v Speaker 2>some current stuff. Will we play some burno mars?

0:59:09.440 --> 0:59:12.439
<v Speaker 1>Absolutely? All right? Absolutely? All right? See now now we're

0:59:12.680 --> 0:59:15.360
<v Speaker 1>now we're speaking the same language here. Sure, I'm just

0:59:15.360 --> 0:59:19.280
<v Speaker 1>saying you can dance to that. Absolutely. I'm excited for

0:59:19.320 --> 0:59:21.200
<v Speaker 1>your weddings. You know I'm coming, right, I told you.

0:59:21.200 --> 0:59:23.640
<v Speaker 2>I believe that I knew that you were coming. We're

0:59:23.640 --> 0:59:25.720
<v Speaker 2>in Let's see how long do we have Now we're

0:59:25.760 --> 0:59:29.960
<v Speaker 2>under three months. Yeah, about two almost two and three

0:59:30.000 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 2>quarters a month, something like that.

0:59:31.280 --> 0:59:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Two and a half ish. All right, I'll be there.

0:59:34.360 --> 0:59:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm exciting. I'm exciting. One great and we're on we're

0:59:38.640 --> 0:59:41.040
<v Speaker 1>on schedule. Tie. Everything is going well. Did you get

0:59:41.080 --> 0:59:43.360
<v Speaker 1>your suit yet? Have not gotten my suit yet? You

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:45.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta get on that dog. I will, I will. I'm

0:59:45.760 --> 0:59:46.160
<v Speaker 1>not worried.

0:59:46.800 --> 0:59:49.960
<v Speaker 2>All right, well, I'm excited. No, everything is good. We

0:59:50.120 --> 0:59:52.360
<v Speaker 2>know how we're going to plan bank heists.

0:59:52.600 --> 0:59:52.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:59:52.880 --> 0:59:55.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, we're going to get to Matt's question the next

0:59:55.080 --> 0:59:57.320
<v Speaker 2>time we do a Q and A about his Michigan State

0:59:57.360 --> 1:00:01.720
<v Speaker 2>fandom and his wife's Nebraska fandom or flip flop that. Yeah,

1:00:02.080 --> 1:00:04.760
<v Speaker 2>we got to snacks, we got to Tom Herman, we

1:00:04.800 --> 1:00:06.280
<v Speaker 2>got a lot of Penn State talk, we got some

1:00:06.320 --> 1:00:09.240
<v Speaker 2>new quarterback talk in uh oh, quickly. I will answer

1:00:09.240 --> 1:00:11.160
<v Speaker 2>this question because you can't contribute it all to this

1:00:11.280 --> 1:00:15.160
<v Speaker 2>beyond confirming something. Michael wants to know the best food

1:00:15.160 --> 1:00:17.560
<v Speaker 2>truck in Los Angeles. It's an actual assignment he has

1:00:17.600 --> 1:00:20.840
<v Speaker 2>in college, which, holy crap, Wow, what a class, What

1:00:20.960 --> 1:00:26.560
<v Speaker 2>a great college? Marisco? Salisco is unbelievably good. It might

1:00:26.600 --> 1:00:28.520
<v Speaker 2>be my favorite. It's the best shrimp taco in America,

1:00:28.560 --> 1:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>and they have other really good Mexican seafood that's downtown,

1:00:31.240 --> 1:00:33.360
<v Speaker 2>the Kogie Barbecue truck, which Tie has been to.

1:00:33.680 --> 1:00:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, really really good tacos.

1:00:35.640 --> 1:00:37.920
<v Speaker 2>And a bunch of other Mexican with Crean influenced kind

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:41.080
<v Speaker 2>of stuff. Ricky's best fish taco to America. To me,

1:00:41.560 --> 1:00:45.000
<v Speaker 2>it's that's on East Hollywood. Leo's couple locations, very very

1:00:45.160 --> 1:00:49.440
<v Speaker 2>very good. Alpastor tacos. Gorilla taco is more avant garde,

1:00:49.440 --> 1:00:51.080
<v Speaker 2>a little more gourmet, but it's from a truck and

1:00:51.120 --> 1:00:54.720
<v Speaker 2>it's great. And carnetas El Momo, which I think is

1:00:54.760 --> 1:00:57.280
<v Speaker 2>only open on the weekends, but superior carneitas.

1:00:57.720 --> 1:01:00.760
<v Speaker 1>Those are my answers. All right, So here is the deal.

1:01:01.560 --> 1:01:04.960
<v Speaker 1>As you know, the college basketball bracket is from March

1:01:04.960 --> 1:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Madness get released on Sunday. Yes, we've always had a bracket.

1:01:11.800 --> 1:01:14.280
<v Speaker 1>We'll put that bracket out there so anyone can sign up.

1:01:14.640 --> 1:01:16.640
<v Speaker 1>We'll do it through ESPN dot com as we have

1:01:16.720 --> 1:01:19.600
<v Speaker 1>each and every year. Sign up, do a funny name.

1:01:19.680 --> 1:01:21.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll shout out the winner of that. We will not

1:01:21.920 --> 1:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>be providing any actual analysis for that basketball tournament. I

1:01:26.280 --> 1:01:28.760
<v Speaker 1>haven't watched a single minute of college basketball all year,

1:01:28.840 --> 1:01:32.760
<v Speaker 1>really single minute. Oregon's really good. It might be a

1:01:32.800 --> 1:01:34.880
<v Speaker 1>one seat so that gets me watching. I haven't watched

1:01:34.880 --> 1:01:37.760
<v Speaker 1>a single minute. But we will be having a pick

1:01:37.800 --> 1:01:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and pool, so do get in on that. Next week,

1:01:41.360 --> 1:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>we're going to do our secret garbage bracket. Are we not?

1:01:44.160 --> 1:01:46.840
<v Speaker 1>We are and we need your help. We need your help,

1:01:46.880 --> 1:01:50.480
<v Speaker 1>so write in soliverbot gmail dot com, send us your lists,

1:01:50.560 --> 1:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>share out your Google docs, tweet us, Facebook us, what

1:01:54.400 --> 1:01:57.840
<v Speaker 1>have you. We are looking for things that people are

1:01:57.880 --> 1:02:01.920
<v Speaker 1>into but are secretly garbage. People like blank, but it's

1:02:01.920 --> 1:02:04.960
<v Speaker 1>secretly garbage. We have not yet figured out the format

1:02:05.040 --> 1:02:09.120
<v Speaker 1>for this show. How we'll organize the brackets. Literally everything

1:02:09.160 --> 1:02:11.080
<v Speaker 1>about it remains up in the air. So if you

1:02:11.120 --> 1:02:13.600
<v Speaker 1>have any hot takes, please let us know. Yes, and

1:02:13.640 --> 1:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>I will say right now, the solid verbal is already

1:02:15.880 --> 1:02:18.080
<v Speaker 1>on there. Solid verbal is already on solid verbal is

1:02:18.080 --> 1:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>already on there, So you don't need to submit that.

1:02:19.600 --> 1:02:21.680
<v Speaker 1>We understand how you feel, but you still are with

1:02:21.760 --> 1:02:24.479
<v Speaker 1>us and we're eternally grateful. So yes, Like I would

1:02:24.520 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>say skittles, people like skittles, I think skittles are garbage.

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:30.200
<v Speaker 2>And I would say the Reese's family. You would say

1:02:30.200 --> 1:02:33.640
<v Speaker 2>the Reese's family. So we will Can we concoct a

1:02:33.680 --> 1:02:35.640
<v Speaker 2>Google form? Are you an advanced enough computer?

1:02:35.720 --> 1:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I am an advanced Google Forms user.

1:02:37.880 --> 1:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>Yes, okay, so, and that'll be very easy. You just

1:02:40.000 --> 1:02:42.640
<v Speaker 2>enter what your name and things that you think are

1:02:42.640 --> 1:02:45.400
<v Speaker 2>garbage that people like I would add ketchup to.

1:02:45.400 --> 1:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>That ketchup will be in the bracket. We're gonna have

1:02:48.120 --> 1:02:50.080
<v Speaker 1>to discuss this. This is gonna get this is gonna

1:02:50.120 --> 1:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>this could be the schism between us, it ends the show. Yep,

1:02:53.760 --> 1:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I imagine that's going to be the case. So stay

1:02:56.400 --> 1:02:58.600
<v Speaker 1>tuned next week and then the week after will actually

1:02:58.600 --> 1:03:02.880
<v Speaker 1>be the verbies. So a bunch of interactive elements now

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>coming to a head. We are finalizing the Verbi's bracket.

1:03:06.680 --> 1:03:08.920
<v Speaker 1>You can vote on your favorites. We'll do the award

1:03:08.960 --> 1:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>show in two weeks. We'll do the garbage bracket next week,

1:03:12.080 --> 1:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>and then we've got a bunch of fun stuff coming

1:03:13.880 --> 1:03:14.360
<v Speaker 1>up after that.

1:03:14.880 --> 1:03:16.840
<v Speaker 2>I will also say this ty, and then we can

1:03:16.840 --> 1:03:20.920
<v Speaker 2>close it out. I just wanted a quick message out there, Audrey.

1:03:21.920 --> 1:03:25.000
<v Speaker 2>I am so sorry. I never meant to hurt you.

1:03:25.480 --> 1:03:27.400
<v Speaker 2>I got in over my head. I didn't know what

1:03:27.440 --> 1:03:29.800
<v Speaker 2>to do. I never planned on falling in love with you.

1:03:30.760 --> 1:03:35.760
<v Speaker 2>That was never part of the plan. And it's not

1:03:35.880 --> 1:03:40.320
<v Speaker 2>who I am, it's who I was. And I hope

1:03:40.320 --> 1:03:42.120
<v Speaker 2>you can forgive me someday.

1:03:41.880 --> 1:03:45.760
<v Speaker 1>For that guy over there, Dan Rubensy for myself, Ty Hildebrand,

1:03:45.800 --> 1:03:48.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks again for tuning into the show. Hit us up

1:03:48.440 --> 1:03:53.920
<v Speaker 1>at iub dot com, slash cliverbleslibble dot com, Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Snapchat.

1:03:54.120 --> 1:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>We will catch you all in a week. Based off

1:03:57.480 --> 1:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>peacea