WEBVTT - Single Best Idea with Tom Keene: Sophia Drossos & Mark Lehmann

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news, Single Best Idea. Thank

0:00:15.640 --> 0:00:19.319
<v Speaker 1>you for the comments and Ed YARDNNY yesterday. Yesterday we

0:00:19.360 --> 0:00:23.239
<v Speaker 1>spent our entire Single Best Idea with Yardanny, who's looking

0:00:23.280 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 1>at the Roaring twenties and has some huge numbers. But

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to I want to make this clear because people are like, OMG,

0:00:30.520 --> 0:00:35.479
<v Speaker 1>Dow fifty thousand, Dow sixty thousand, SPX eight thousand, and

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.839
<v Speaker 1>Ed brought this up, but it got buried in the conversation.

0:00:39.800 --> 0:00:43.440
<v Speaker 1>If you extrapolate the trend line to get you to

0:00:43.520 --> 0:00:47.680
<v Speaker 1>those targets on a per year basis, it's not all

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>that much of a lift. I want to make clear

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>that in the Yard Denny Roaring twenties, he's looking at

0:00:54.640 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>seven or eight percent per year return. It may happen sooner,

0:01:00.440 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>may happen later, but these are not outlandish numbers across

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the X axis. I think we'll leave it at that.

0:01:07.440 --> 0:01:09.960
<v Speaker 1>The Roaring twenties out there got a note from UBS today.

0:01:10.000 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>Will will effort at Ubs as they use the phrase

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Roaring twenties. We used it with Sofia Drosis. She's the

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>point seven to two. This is Steve Cohen Shop and

0:01:20.400 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>she has the privilege. You're working with Dean Mackie. Sofia Drosis,

0:01:25.120 --> 0:01:28.200
<v Speaker 1>a nominal GDP and the Roaring twenties.

0:01:28.360 --> 0:01:31.160
<v Speaker 2>I don't know about Roaring twenties exactly, but I'll tell

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 2>you a little bit about my forecast. I'm looking for

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.240
<v Speaker 2>nominal GDP five five and a half percent this year,

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.319
<v Speaker 2>and that's pretty strong, and that it sort of entails

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:42.960
<v Speaker 2>that corporate profits will remain strong. So we are seeing

0:01:43.000 --> 0:01:46.520
<v Speaker 2>the consumer remain strong, and I think maybe that there

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:50.360
<v Speaker 2>are some misconceptions about the relative strength of the consumer,

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 2>maybe some concerns about the fact that goods prices are slowing,

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.720
<v Speaker 2>and so maybe that's restraining some of the things we're

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:01.680
<v Speaker 2>seeing in retail sales. But recently the consumers also spending

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 2>on services, and so when I look at consumption overall,

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:09.280
<v Speaker 2>it remains at a trend pace, which again makes it

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:10.399
<v Speaker 2>hard to see a recession.

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Sophia Drosis there informed comments the optimism that she has.

0:02:14.800 --> 0:02:18.960
<v Speaker 1>She's again at point seven to two. We love to

0:02:19.000 --> 0:02:21.600
<v Speaker 1>get outside three zip codes. I'm as guilty of this

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:26.520
<v Speaker 1>as anyone. Look far west to sixth Avenue. We all

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:28.400
<v Speaker 1>want to do that. We want to go across this nation,

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and it's really important when people fly in from the

0:02:31.680 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>left coast from San Francisco, and he is iconic. Mark

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Lehmann is with JMP, not JPMGP Morgan, j MP, which

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:45.720
<v Speaker 1>is the aggregate of San Francisco technology history. You go

0:02:45.800 --> 0:02:51.400
<v Speaker 1>back to Montgomery Securities, Thomas Weisel, Robertson Stevens, the rest

0:02:51.440 --> 0:02:54.080
<v Speaker 1>of it. Well, there's the technology that's always been in

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco. He had wonderful comments his optimism on the

0:02:57.440 --> 0:03:01.679
<v Speaker 1>resurrection of San Francisco. But here's Mark Lehman of JMP

0:03:02.320 --> 0:03:04.000
<v Speaker 1>on the new tech age.

0:03:04.160 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 3>I think a lot has to do with Back then,

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 3>the hype was just show up, have a meeting, get

0:03:11.960 --> 0:03:12.520
<v Speaker 3>your capital.

0:03:12.639 --> 0:03:12.799
<v Speaker 1>Yep.

0:03:12.880 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 3>Now it's a much more discipline discussion. I think there's

0:03:17.520 --> 0:03:21.440
<v Speaker 3>way fewer of these kind of larks, if you will,

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:25.520
<v Speaker 3>that are being created. And I think the big firms

0:03:25.639 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 3>are collaborating. So it's not just the venture capital it's

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:31.840
<v Speaker 3>but the big install tech companies. We mentioned Google. Obviously

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 3>Microsoft's got a big stake, but I think the dynamism

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 3>of the investment is way different than it was years ago,

0:03:38.480 --> 0:03:39.040
<v Speaker 3>way different.

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Mark Leman of JMP. As we go into Google's announcements

0:03:42.480 --> 0:03:45.480
<v Speaker 1>this afternoon, and on to August first, Amazon and other

0:03:45.560 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>worthies of this tech era that we're living in did

0:03:48.760 --> 0:03:51.520
<v Speaker 1>an experiment today. We tied Zach Cohen and David Gurr

0:03:51.600 --> 0:03:54.240
<v Speaker 1>at the same time. On the politics. I really want

0:03:54.280 --> 0:03:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to say, I've had all sorts of anecdotal evidence people

0:03:57.880 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>coming up at lunch or whatever thanking us for a

0:04:01.160 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>political coverage. We're sort of in a mailstream mirror where

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.480
<v Speaker 1>we're just trying to survive and get through the day

0:04:06.480 --> 0:04:09.040
<v Speaker 1>and stay up with the zeitgeist. And the news flow

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>is reported by our wonderful news bureau led by Margaret Collins.

0:04:13.320 --> 0:04:16.080
<v Speaker 1>But I'm really taken by the comments of how we're

0:04:16.120 --> 0:04:19.839
<v Speaker 1>trying to stay away from the punditry and talk about

0:04:19.880 --> 0:04:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the more granularity. What a successful effort today was Zach

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Cohen and David Gurrow. We'll try to do that again.

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>We're on YouTube. Subscribe to Bloomberg podcast That's all I

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:33.960
<v Speaker 1>can say. I sound like everybody else on YouTube. That's

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>how it works. Subscribe to Bloomberg Podcasts and we're there

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>for you each morning seven am. Wall Street Time on

0:04:41.400 --> 0:04:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Apple car Play on Android Auto, both with new platforms

0:04:44.720 --> 0:04:48.919
<v Speaker 1>coming out, and of course this on Apple Podcast single

0:04:49.040 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>best idea