Speaker 1: All right, thanks Scott chan An hour two Sean Hannity's
Speaker 1: show Toll Free on numbers eight hundred and nine four one, Sean,
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program.
Speaker 1: So many issues to get to with former Speaker of
Speaker 1: the House, New King Rich who is with us, mister Speaker.
Speaker 1: Great to have you back. How are you, sir?
Speaker 2: I'm doing great and I've always delighted a chance to
Speaker 2: chat with you.
Speaker 1: I love you say that, but you really don't mean it.
Speaker 1: I know that, per fact. I have a chart in
Speaker 1: front of me. I've shown it on TV before, I'll
Speaker 1: show it on TV again tonight, and it shows all
Speaker 1: the different capitals around the world, from Uruguay to Baghdad,
Speaker 1: to Nigeria, Panama City, Panama, Brazil, Costa Rica, Colombia, Mexico,
Speaker 1: Mexico City, you know, Lima, Peru, Ethiopia. So it also
Speaker 1: heads with it the homicide rate. The top capital homicide
Speaker 1: rate by far is Washington, d C. With forty one
Speaker 1: per hundred thousand, and the next highest is Uruguay sixteen
Speaker 1: point one per one hundred thousand. The next high is
Speaker 1: his Bagdad fifteen point two, and it goes all the
Speaker 1: way down to Istanbul Turkey at one point eight per
Speaker 1: one hundred thousand and so. President Trump announced this morning
Speaker 1: that he's going to federalize DC police and deployed National
Speaker 1: Guard troops in an effort to keep people alive in
Speaker 1: our nation's capital and fix what has not been dealt
Speaker 1: with by local officials. People like Al Sharpton are calling
Speaker 1: President Trump's crackdown on DC crime dangerous and disgusting. I
Speaker 1: actually think keeping innocent people alive is a good thing
Speaker 1: to do, a healthy thing to do, and the fact
Speaker 1: that the President cares, and what is the alternative. They've
Speaker 1: had every chance in the world to fix this on
Speaker 1: their own, They've decided not to do it. They don't
Speaker 1: care defundismantal nobail laws, you know, rules the Democratic Party today.
Speaker 2: Look, first of all, Washington is the national capital, and
Speaker 2: every American should be able to visit Washington safely, and
Speaker 2: it should be non negotiable, and it's ultimately a federal responsibility. Unfortunately,
Speaker 2: like many city governments, the DC government, but through corruption
Speaker 2: and competence and ignorance, is unable to solve these problems.
Speaker 2: And I think the President was doing exactly the right thing.
Speaker 2: When I was Speaker of the House, working with people
Speaker 2: at Congressman Tom Davis, we profoundly overhauled the city of Washington.
Speaker 2: We changed his tax code, we changed its education system.
Speaker 2: We've we had an audit and overhauled. We strengthened this
Speaker 2: police force, and we launched what became a boom in
Speaker 2: terms of people moving into the city, businesses move, the
Speaker 2: end of the city which lasted until the decay of
Speaker 2: DC city government. The level of corruption which is endemic
Speaker 2: to a lot of these big cities. When you look
Speaker 2: at New York, you look at Chicago, these are cities
Speaker 2: that just playing corrupt and the result is they're dominated
Speaker 2: by big government socialists who have radical values, who favor
Speaker 2: the criminal over the innocent. They favor basically organized crime
Speaker 2: over the police. And somehow, and this is where people
Speaker 2: are like Sharpton just frankly mystify me saving innocent people
Speaker 2: from being killed, saving innocent people from being raped or mugged.
Speaker 2: It strikes me the bias ought to be in favor
Speaker 2: of the innocent, not the criminal. And yet you find
Speaker 2: some of these people who just can't help themselves in
Speaker 2: their commitment to weaken in society. You have people like Mundami,
Speaker 2: the big government socialists in New York running from mayor
Speaker 2: saying basically he would replace the police with pacification people
Speaker 2: who would come by and would be helpful. They be
Speaker 2: helpful in a positive, friendly way. Well, you start dealing
Speaker 2: with these criminals, passification people are going to get killed.
Speaker 2: They're not going to pacify anybody. And you have rule
Speaker 2: things like no bond laws which allow people to go
Speaker 2: right back on the street, where this which is really
Speaker 2: a reversion to the world that made Clint Eastwood in
Speaker 2: the nineteen seventies, where you know, it would take you
Speaker 2: longer to fill out the paperwork than they'd actually be
Speaker 2: in jail. And I think that this whole model on
Speaker 2: the left has been extraordinarily destructive and what the President's
Speaker 2: doing is exactly right.
Speaker 1: Well, I got to tell you something. I agree. The
Speaker 1: pushback is bewildering to me because the idea is to
Speaker 1: keep people alive. It's not about power, it's about safety.
Speaker 1: It's about security, and honestly, you w I think you
Speaker 1: would welcome more of a police presence, especially from the
Speaker 1: party that you know is so against violence and insurrection,
Speaker 1: although they did vote for a vice president that when
Speaker 1: we had five hundred and seventy four riots that killed
Speaker 1: two dozen Americans, injured thousands of cops, and caused billions
Speaker 1: of property damage. Did go on with Stephen Colbert and
Speaker 1: say the rioters won't stop, shouldn't stop, and we're not
Speaker 1: going to stop supporting them. Let me ask you on
Speaker 1: the issue, because now all of these blue state you
Speaker 1: know leaders or if you want to call them leaders,
Speaker 1: you have Katy hulkeel and and JB. Pritzker and Gavin
Speaker 1: Newsom and others. You know, they're they're up in arms
Speaker 1: over the issue of Texas and redrawing their their their
Speaker 1: congressional districts. The only problem is in every one of
Speaker 1: these states we find that jerry mandering has been mastered
Speaker 1: by the Democratic Party. Now Republicans are just doing what
Speaker 1: Democrats have successfully done. The model that they have they mastered,
Speaker 1: and now they're all up in arms and they say
Speaker 1: they're going to fight fire with firing her. There's no
Speaker 1: more gerry mandering left to do. I don't think they
Speaker 1: can do much.
Speaker 2: Look, I loved the governor of Massachusetts because apparently nobody
Speaker 2: had told her that there are no Republicans you can jerrymander.
Speaker 2: I mean, as you point out there are literally no
Speaker 2: Republicans in the House, so they're in Massachusetts. So she
Speaker 2: can't fight fire with fire. She is the fire. I mean,
Speaker 2: they've already cheated. And ironically, as you probably know, the
Speaker 2: term gerrymander occurred in eighteen twelve in Massachusetts when the Federalists,
Speaker 2: who are desperately trying to survive and a only failed
Speaker 2: the Jefferson The Rise of the Jeffersonians. The Federalists of
Speaker 2: Massachusetts wrote this map and one district the guy said, gee,
Speaker 2: that looks like a salamander, and another guy said, no, no,
Speaker 2: that's a jerrymander, because it was Eldridge Jerry who'd drawn
Speaker 2: the map. So jerrymanders go all the way back to
Speaker 2: Massachusetts in eighteen twelve. And I think, as ironic as
Speaker 2: you point out, Illinois is probably the worst defender, and
Speaker 2: California is bad, Massachusetts is bad, New York is bad.
Speaker 2: All of these states have worked over time to rig
Speaker 2: the game. And the fact is that this is a
Speaker 2: fight that is important. I mean, I'm not quite sure
Speaker 2: how the Texas is. They do have to get the
Speaker 2: Democrats back to have a quorum, so I'm not quite
Speaker 2: sure how they're going to pull that off. But what
Speaker 2: the governor is trying to do in Texas, for one thing,
Speaker 2: probably almost guarantees that the Republicans will retain control of
Speaker 2: the House in twenty twenty six.
Speaker 1: Well, I hope so, because I think otherwise we're going
Speaker 1: to face nothing but two years of never ending, NonStop impeachment, impeachment, impeachment,
Speaker 1: and all progress for the country is going to come
Speaker 1: to a screeching halt. All right, quick break, right act,
Speaker 1: We'll continue more with former Speaker of the House New Gingrid.
Speaker 1: So then we'll get to your calls coming up eight
Speaker 1: hundred and nine four one Sean. If you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, Look, there are evil
Speaker 1: people in the world. You need a personal safety security
Speaker 1: plan for you, your family, and sometimes you may not
Speaker 1: need the lethal option. Maybe there's a threat but it's
Speaker 1: not an immediate death threat, and in that case you
Speaker 1: want the alternative of non lethal force, and that's the
Speaker 1: technology of Berner BYRNA dot com. I think everybody needs.
Speaker 1: Berner is part of their personal safety security strategies. Now
Speaker 1: you should look at their videos online when you go
Speaker 1: to BYRNA dot com and you'll find out why. Over
Speaker 1: five hundred government agencies, why police departments, private security firms
Speaker 1: are now adopting this technology. Berner has powerful deterns like
Speaker 1: tear gas, pepper spray, kinetic rounds. You can hit a
Speaker 1: target fifty sixty feet away. I own them mysels, and
Speaker 1: I give them away his presents all the time. You
Speaker 1: don't need a background check. It's perfect. It's legal in
Speaker 1: all fifty states, and they now even came out with
Speaker 1: their newest and smallest launcher to date, the Compact Launcher
Speaker 1: their cl It's four inches long, two smartphones thick. You
Speaker 1: can easily concealed carry on your body, you won't attract
Speaker 1: unnecessary attention, and ladies, you can put it in your
Speaker 1: first Guys, you can easily put it in a holster anyway.
Speaker 1: Check it out when you go to b y r
Speaker 1: NA dot com. Look at the technology yourself and decide
Speaker 1: if you think this is worthwhile for you and your
Speaker 1: family to keep you and your family safe and secure.
Speaker 1: You can also check them out a select Sportsman warehouse locations.
Speaker 1: It's by r NA dot com today. He's not a
Speaker 1: great golfer, he's a mediocre tennis player, but he's pretty
Speaker 1: good on the radio. Sean Hannity is on right now.
Speaker 1: All right, folks, let's talk about the time shared nightmare. Now.
Speaker 1: If you are stuck paying endless maintenance fees and assessments,
Speaker 1: you need to call my friends at lone Star Transferred today.
Speaker 3: Now.
Speaker 1: They've been shaping the time share exit industry now for
Speaker 1: over a decade. They're still leading the way with their
Speaker 1: exclusive solutions and our friends a lone Star Transfer, they
Speaker 1: may getting out of your time share faster and easier
Speaker 1: than ever before with a guarantee in writing. Lone Star
Speaker 1: Transfer is a family owned company. They have helped tens
Speaker 1: and tens of thousands of owners break free from their
Speaker 1: time shares over the last fifteen years. They have earned
Speaker 1: an eight plus rating with a Better Business Bureau. I
Speaker 1: have endorsed lone Star Transfer for almost ten years now
Speaker 1: because I know they are the only company that I
Speaker 1: would ever trust that will deliver results for you, my listeners.
Speaker 1: Now they'll give you a free now obligation consultation. Call
Speaker 1: now eight three three five nine four zero zero seven
Speaker 1: five eight three three five nine fours zero zero seven
Speaker 1: to five. On the web, it's one word lone Star
Speaker 1: transferre dot com. All right, let's continue now, with former
Speaker 1: Speaker of the House New King Rich. Then we'll hit
Speaker 1: the phones eight hundred and nine to four one, Shawn.
Speaker 1: So I will be headed later this week to the
Speaker 1: great state of Alaska. Interestingly, for me, the only state
Speaker 1: I've never been to, and I'm obsessed with Alaska. The
Speaker 1: fact that i haven't been there is unconscionable. But I'm
Speaker 1: just obsessed with the rugged individualism. I'm obsessed with Life
Speaker 1: Below Zero, the TV show and Deadliest Catch, another TV
Speaker 1: show about about crabbing in the Bearing Sea. So I'm
Speaker 1: kind of excited to go there. But there's a bigger
Speaker 1: issue in play here, and that is the Trump Putin Summit.
Speaker 1: I would put the odds at about twenty five percent
Speaker 1: that Trump is going to have to pull a Reagan
Speaker 1: and say yet and walk away from the table because
Speaker 1: Putin has shown no willingness to show any compromise. And
Speaker 1: the sad thing is, this is Joe Biden. This is
Speaker 1: to me, is Biden's This happened on his watch. Biden
Speaker 1: watched the troops and the military equipment being moved to
Speaker 1: the Ukrainian border and when asked about it, said well,
Speaker 1: what are you going to do? And he said well,
Speaker 1: it depends if it's a minor incursion or not. And
Speaker 1: I thought that was a horrible answer. So Putin was
Speaker 1: able to build up his military. It was obvious he
Speaker 1: was going in by me. It was annexed under Obama
Speaker 1: and Biden. So and right now, I mean, let's be
Speaker 1: very frank about it, Europe has not stepped up now.
Speaker 1: Trump is selling weapons to the Ukrainians. They have fought valiantly.
Speaker 1: I do believe Plutin's a murdering dictator thug, but there
Speaker 1: really is no good answer for Ukraine at this point
Speaker 1: that I see.
Speaker 2: Well, thoughts, I don't know. I mean, first of all,
Speaker 2: I think the eyes of Trump not getting a deal
Speaker 2: this week are probably more like seventy to eighty percent.
Speaker 2: Putin still is not convinced that he can't win, and
Speaker 2: he thinks he can hang toughly to Trump and you
Speaker 2: to try to fight. He tried. He's trying to offer
Speaker 2: a totally one sided truce in terms of very aerial power,
Speaker 2: which tells me that the Ukrainian long range use of
Speaker 2: drones is being to really impact the Russian defense system.
Speaker 3: Uh.
Speaker 2: And I actually think that the combination of American capabilities
Speaker 2: and European capabilities. Uh, we are very likely to wear
Speaker 2: down the Russians, and not not to force them into
Speaker 2: a decisive defeat, which would which would be very dangerous
Speaker 2: because they do have six thousand nuclear weapons, but to
Speaker 2: force them into recognition that they can't they can't claim territory.
Speaker 2: I mean, the real question here is going to be, Uh,
Speaker 2: does prudent get to claim a victory by keeping land
Speaker 2: while not allowing the Ukrainians to keep the land they've
Speaker 2: occupied because Ukrainians deliberately set out to occupy a piece
Speaker 2: of Russia to have a bargaining ship. Well, I mean,
Speaker 2: if we agree to a totally one sided deal where
Speaker 2: Putin gets to keep what he stole, but Zolensky has
Speaker 2: to give back the area of the day've occupied. First
Speaker 2: of all, I don't think Zolenski will agree. I think
Speaker 2: he and the Europeans will say to have.
Speaker 1: The problem is, I don't see a scenario where Zolensky
Speaker 1: can win this war. I don't think Europe has the
Speaker 1: commitment to back them. They have proven me to be
Speaker 1: right here toofore, And I like the President Trump's now
Speaker 1: putting sanctions on them. I like the fact that he's
Speaker 1: selling weaponrys so they can continue to fight valiantly. I
Speaker 1: concede up front that Putin's a murdering dictator thug. I
Speaker 1: just don't see a deal that would emerge that's not
Speaker 1: going to include land handed over the issue for Ukraine.
Speaker 1: To me, what the negotiation, negotiated settlement has to be
Speaker 1: about is security and long term security.
Speaker 2: Sure, but but since Russia also will not allow European
Speaker 2: troops to be on the on the border, you have
Speaker 2: to ask yourself how do you get security?
Speaker 1: I mean, well, well, first of all, Bill Clinton, that
Speaker 1: took away Ukraine's nuclear weapons. That was stupid on their part.
Speaker 1: Looking back through the prism of history. Now, the question
Speaker 1: is can they build up enough military might that if
Speaker 1: another invasion occurs, that they have enough of a deterrent
Speaker 1: to stop them.
Speaker 2: And well, I think that's largely a function of our
Speaker 2: willingness to give them advanced weapons and in or to
Speaker 2: sell them advances. I mean, look, you and I probably
Speaker 2: disagree in that. I think if the United States wanted to,
Speaker 2: we could supply Ukraine with enough very advanced weapons that
Speaker 2: they would cost the Russians an enormous amount. And if
Speaker 2: you combine that with Trump's proposed sanctions. You really can
Speaker 2: begin to put advice in Putin and I guess some
Speaker 2: part of what mean. And I'll be curious to see
Speaker 2: how Trump deals with this, because I believe you never
Speaker 2: go into a negotiation from a position of fear.
Speaker 1: Oh well, Donald Trump doesn't have fears, so that's not
Speaker 1: going to be a problem.
Speaker 3: Right.
Speaker 2: Well, my point is, see you walk in and Putin
Speaker 2: says something outrageous, you comfortably get up and walk out,
Speaker 2: which is what he did, remember to Kim Jong un in.
Speaker 1: I think I can absolutely see that unfolding on Friday, right.
Speaker 2: And just say, now, call on you're serious. And I
Speaker 2: think when I think second, he should Trump should not
Speaker 2: accept any agreement Friday this weekend, even if he should
Speaker 2: say that, if it is a decent offer, he should
Speaker 2: say that's a very useful. Ever, let's meet next week
Speaker 2: and gets Zolensky in and that's the three of us
Speaker 2: talk it through. But I think it's very important. Look,
Speaker 2: Ukrainians have for four years been the victims of a vicious,
Speaker 2: deliberate campaign which targeted civilians, killed innocent people, killed children,
Speaker 2: and I don't think we should impose on them. I
Speaker 2: think we have to say, you know, Putin has made
Speaker 2: an interesting proposal. Let's get the three of us together.
Speaker 2: Let's talk it.
Speaker 1: Through count Recording to jd Vance, I mean Zelenski may
Speaker 1: actually be in Alaska. We'll find out.
Speaker 2: Well, I though, I think they will be very cool.
Speaker 2: If Trump said, oh, by the way, I brought my
Speaker 2: good friend here walked in the room, we'll see at
Speaker 2: that point if Putin would get up and walk out.
Speaker 1: Well, listen, I'm with you. The country does not have
Speaker 1: an appetite for a forever war or proxy war, which
Speaker 1: is the situation that Joe Biden created. I mean, we
Speaker 1: were providing all the weaponry, hundreds of and hundreds of
Speaker 1: billions of dollars, and we can't be in that position either.
Speaker 1: It's I mean, it's very nuanced, very very difficult, and
Speaker 1: with threading a needle. And however, peace in Europe would
Speaker 1: be a good thing and the effort is certainly worth it.
Speaker 1: But you know, we'll find out what happens. Uh, mister speaker.
Speaker 1: We wish you were going to be there be a
Speaker 1: lot of fun to see you. Thank you for being
Speaker 1: with us, and I think you should call the president
Speaker 1: and tell them I know you're good. Friends with him
Speaker 1: eight hundred nine four one, Sewan, if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. You know the media
Speaker 1: scene is getting like crazy. I don't pay that much
Speaker 1: attention to it. I've never heard of this star Jennifer
Speaker 1: Welch from Bravo. Did you ever hear of this person? Ethan?
Speaker 1: It's Linda's birthday today, by the way, Linda is off.
Speaker 1: I have never heard of this person. No, Okay, so
Speaker 1: she's had it with Donald Trump supporters who have had
Speaker 1: the nerve and audacity to dine at foreign themed restaurants
Speaker 1: featuring Indian, Chinese, Mexican food, or people that go to
Speaker 1: a gay hairdresser if they truly believe the president's aim
Speaker 1: to rid the country of illegal immigrants.
Speaker 4: Instead, she wants us to discriminate. She wants people to discriminate.
Speaker 1: No, it's even worse than that. She wants to get
Speaker 1: your for all of us to get our fat asses
Speaker 1: over to cracker barrow, which is not a bad idea,
Speaker 1: because I love cracker barrow. Cracker barrel is awesome. When
Speaker 1: I used to eat pancakes because they real maple syrup,
Speaker 1: I loved it. The other thing I used to love
Speaker 1: is their meat. Love. It was delicious, amazing. So the
Speaker 1: problem is is like everybody else that thinks they know conservatives,
Speaker 1: they don't they or if they think, you know, they're
Speaker 1: so wrapped up in the Trump arrangement syndrome. Donald Trump
Speaker 1: is against Let me define this very clearly, illegal immigration.
Speaker 1: I am for legal immigration, and I don't really care
Speaker 1: where you come from. Just do it legally. Part of
Speaker 1: the legal process should include a background check to make
Speaker 1: sure you don't have radical associations. Post pandemic, we probably
Speaker 1: should have a health check, I would be smart. And
Speaker 1: issue number three is we've got thirty seven thirty eight
Speaker 1: trillion dollars in debt and you can't be a financial
Speaker 1: burden on the American people. So you have to show
Speaker 1: that you're going to be able to financially bend for yourself.
Speaker 1: I don't think that's a big big deal. I don't
Speaker 1: mind be an ordered to go to Grakoboro NewsBusters put out.
Speaker 1: You know, I don't pay attention to all these other
Speaker 1: news outlets because neither does anyone else. To be very honest,
Speaker 1: but when you find out what they're saying, I mean
Speaker 1: I knew that they were talking about, you know, alligator Alcatraz,
Speaker 1: which is basically a prison, and it's a temporary prison
Speaker 1: before you deport people that didn't respect our laws or
Speaker 1: borders or sovereignty. But again, if you go through that
Speaker 1: three criteria that I laid out, and you come through
Speaker 1: the country, and you come into the country illegally, I'd
Speaker 1: even be in favor of expediting the process and make
Speaker 1: it making it easier for people. However, you should have
Speaker 1: to pay for your own process fees like every other country.
Speaker 1: But you know, liberals just say these are concentration camps
Speaker 1: or interment camps. At MSDNC, I don't know who this
Speaker 1: person has, Tiffany Cross asserting that the government is disappearing
Speaker 1: people and transporting them to concentration camps. Conspiracy theorist Madow
Speaker 1: telling her viewers Trump is consolidating dictatorship in our country.
Speaker 1: Over at CBS, Seth MacFarland, whoever he is, admitted that
Speaker 1: he's more scared of Trump's supporters than the shooter that
Speaker 1: tried to kill the president. For those of us, there
Speaker 1: was such a horror because you saw an emerging America.
Speaker 1: I got put on trauma leave, not because of the shooting,
Speaker 1: but because of the reaction of the people. Well, I'm
Speaker 1: trying to you have PTSD, you're now taking leave from
Speaker 1: work and you weren't even shot at It was the
Speaker 1: president that got shot.
Speaker 5: You know.
Speaker 1: Then on MSDNC, same thing. We're normalizing the disappearing of
Speaker 1: people and sending them the concentration camps. How does NBC
Speaker 1: allow this to go over the air? How joyly read
Speaker 1: MAGA wouldn't even consider itself an insult to be called fascist? Well,
Speaker 1: it's it would be an insult to anybody if it
Speaker 1: had any real meaning. I mean, they throw this Nazi,
Speaker 1: fascist hitler, Mussolini stalin nonsense around every day that it's
Speaker 1: lost any impact. You know, where's Trump on the scale
Speaker 1: of one to Mussolini? You got over at MSDNC some
Speaker 1: weekend hosts that they have over there, Republicans lost their souls.
Speaker 1: New York Times staff writer Susan Glaser on PBS's Washington
Speaker 1: Week with the Atlantic. Thank god, we're not funding that
Speaker 1: any of them anymore. Jennifer Rubin, GOP has turned into
Speaker 1: the fascist party, cult of a great leader that's attacking
Speaker 1: our democracy. You know, we've now gone through this for
Speaker 1: ten years. Their whole closing argument and the twenty four
Speaker 1: election was racist, fascist, Nazi Hitler, Stalin Mussolini, you know,
Speaker 1: Chuck Todd. Trump administration has turned CBS into state TV.
Speaker 1: We don't even know what their programming is, but they
Speaker 1: just continue. They go on and on and on. Jimmy,
Speaker 1: I'm most sobbing over the repulsive liberals driving away the
Speaker 1: Democratic Party. Now he's talking to Sarah Silverman and on
Speaker 1: her podcast another Trump Peter, and they criticize those who
Speaker 1: continue to shun Trump voters who are now expressing regret
Speaker 1: for supporting the president. And they mentioned Joe Rogan in particular.
Speaker 1: I'm not so sure that Rogan is that anti Trump,
Speaker 1: But anyway, we know Kimmel has driven his show into
Speaker 1: the ground. There's no way that show's making money. And
Speaker 1: if you lose audience to the extent, I mean, there's
Speaker 1: an even plode of rating seasons for everybody in television.
Speaker 1: I've done this now thirty years, know all about it.
Speaker 1: And that's why you don't get too high, you don't
Speaker 1: get too low. You constantly making adjustments to anybody's show.
Speaker 1: But the reality is these late night comedy shows, as
Speaker 1: Jay Leno rightly put it, they've alienated right out of
Speaker 1: the box half the country. Because it's not humor, it's
Speaker 1: not funny, they stop being funny. And when you stop,
Speaker 1: like John Stewart can be funny, Bill Maher is funny,
Speaker 1: they're more honest. They'll take on their party. Rose o'donald
Speaker 1: predicts ABC will cancel the view if fake news. CNN
Speaker 1: wants a perfect example why nobody watches them. Dana Bash was,
Speaker 1: you know, had an interview with Bernie Sanders over the
Speaker 1: weekend and just you know, telling him how how much
Speaker 1: she admired his vigor and intensity when asking about a
Speaker 1: twenty twenty eight run. And I'll say this about Sanders
Speaker 1: one thing you can say about him, unlike Joe Biden.
Speaker 1: I mean, he's as sharp as he was ten twelve
Speaker 1: years ago, but he's like eighty years old.
Speaker 6: Something that sure you have seen a gallupole? Did you
Speaker 6: see this gallupole? And what the gallupole found was that
Speaker 6: you are one of the most widely admired Americans, And
Speaker 6: I believe you're only second to the pope.
Speaker 3: I want me to declare my candidacy.
Speaker 6: For culpri I don't think. I don't think that you're
Speaker 6: eligible for a lot of reasons. I watched you tonight.
Speaker 6: I've watched you for a very very long time. You're
Speaker 6: obviously still full of a bigger and intensity for the
Speaker 6: things that you're passionate about and have been for decades.
Speaker 6: Is there another presidential run in you?
Speaker 3: Oh God, let's not worry about that. I am going
Speaker 3: to be eighty four years of age next month as
Speaker 3: a matter of fact, so I think that speaks for itself.
Speaker 1: Grandpa Bernie is not running. I found this an interesting
Speaker 1: question msdn C host interviewing other MSDNC host Jen Saki
Speaker 1: if she ever worries that President Trumper's administration is coming
Speaker 1: after you? Ethan, how many times during the last administration
Speaker 1: did my personal private text messages show up and get
Speaker 1: talked about for hour after hour after hour on MSDNC
Speaker 1: or Fake New CNN and every other news source.
Speaker 4: Your text went viral a few times because they released them,
Speaker 4: and it was really funny because it was genuinely you,
Speaker 4: and everyone was shocked that you literally text and say
Speaker 4: things privately that you say on air because all of
Speaker 4: the rest of them are fake.
Speaker 1: Well, I mean, this is the point. Nobody on any
Speaker 1: of these channels cared at all that my personal private
Speaker 1: text messages in any way were made public. I mean,
Speaker 1: they all get to comment on them. I don't get
Speaker 1: to see and nor what I want to see their
Speaker 1: personal private text messages, nor what I want to see
Speaker 1: the government weaponized against any liberal commentator, or they're not journalists.
Speaker 1: They claim to be journalists, they're not a journalists. And
Speaker 1: the double standard is breathtaking to me. And it also implies,
Speaker 1: oh my gosh, it sounds just like his monologues. He
Speaker 1: must really believe this stuff. I'm like, does that mean?
Speaker 1: Is that predicated on the idea that you don't believe
Speaker 1: what you say?
Speaker 5: Right?
Speaker 1: Quick break, we'll get right back to our phones toll free.
Speaker 1: It is eight hundred ninety four one, Sean. If you
Speaker 1: want to be a part of the program as we continue,
Speaker 1: get back to our busy phones eight hundred nine one, Shawn,
Speaker 1: our number, the Mike in Colorado. What's up, Mike? How
Speaker 1: are you glad you called?
Speaker 5: Thank you? You know, when it comes to the conspiracy
Speaker 5: to link Trump to Russian collusion, the quote rational Analysis says,
Speaker 5: don't expect charges against anyone involved, for you know, there's
Speaker 5: two major reasons. Presidential immunity and statute limitations. Both are
Speaker 5: good arguments for how things are now. But you know, however,
Speaker 5: how did they go after Trump? On Egene Carroll, They
Speaker 5: wrote a brand new law. It was somewhat generically written,
Speaker 5: but it was actually specifically written for one purpose to
Speaker 5: allow them to bypass the Statute of limitations and go
Speaker 5: after Trump. How do they go after them on.
Speaker 1: The checkis but they did the same thing, the whole
Speaker 1: issue of you know, the non disclosure agreement, and then
Speaker 1: they came up with that novel legal theory turning what
Speaker 1: is in New York a misdemeanor into a thirty four
Speaker 1: federal count indictment in the most liberal jurisdiction in the
Speaker 1: country was insane, and not one person cared at all,
Speaker 1: because you know, both Letitia James and Alvin Bragg ran
Speaker 1: on a get Trump platform.
Speaker 5: Raised that another way, they erroneously tied the payment to
Speaker 5: finance campaign finance laws so they could go after him
Speaker 5: in a way that was not previously legally available. All
Speaker 5: I'm saying is the precedent is made. The let's been
Speaker 5: pulling this craft for so long they now think it's
Speaker 5: their right. They're bullies. The only thing a bully understands
Speaker 5: is the proverbial punch in the face. You ever see
Speaker 5: those Equalizer movies with Denzel You know there's this one
Speaker 5: scene where he's on a train.
Speaker 1: Oh well, he's a great actor. I like him a lot.
Speaker 5: He tells the guy there are two types of pain
Speaker 5: in this world, the kind that hurts and the kind
Speaker 5: that alters. The left needs to feel the kind of
Speaker 5: pain that forces them to alter course or this will
Speaker 5: never stop. It'll only pus.
Speaker 1: If they if they're not held accountable for their wrongdoing,
Speaker 1: which I believe the evidence will show.
Speaker 6: JD.
Speaker 1: Van said this weekend he thinks there will be indictments.
Speaker 1: I don't want to tell you that because I don't
Speaker 1: want to overpromise an underdeliver. In my view, there's enough evidence.
Speaker 1: There's a Prime of Phacia case against a lot of people,
Speaker 1: and I think they should all be held accountable. Now,
Speaker 1: remember statute of limitations applied to yeah, some of this,
Speaker 1: but if there's if there is a grand conspiracy investigation,
Speaker 1: then that would that would circumvent the statute of limitations
Speaker 1: because it's a much broader investigation.
Speaker 5: I and that'd be great, But if that doesn't work,
Speaker 5: find another way. There's they can find ways to get
Speaker 5: to go after us. We can find ways to go
Speaker 5: after them, you know, as.
Speaker 1: Long as we don't do what they did and just
Speaker 1: make it up whole cloth. I mean, that's what that's
Speaker 1: the opposite.
Speaker 5: We are.
Speaker 1: We believe in our constitution and we've got to return
Speaker 1: to constitutional order. However, we should apply the law equally
Speaker 1: in this country, and if there's evidence of wrongdoing, which
Speaker 1: I believe is emerging, then I believe with all of
Speaker 1: my heart that they should be prosecuted. I do. We'll
Speaker 1: see what happens though. Anyway, Thanks my friend. Eight hundred
Speaker 1: and ninety four one, Sean, if you want to be
Speaker 1: a part of the program. Lynn is in Indiana. Hey Lynn,
Speaker 1: how are you glad you called?
Speaker 2: Hey?
Speaker 1: Sean?
Speaker 2: How you doing today?
Speaker 5: Hey?
Speaker 1: I just want good man, what's up?
Speaker 5: I just want to call and tease you a little bit.
Speaker 6: On Friday, you had that guy on there that said
Speaker 6: he was a Marine and you didn't know any sensitive Marines.
Speaker 1: And I just got one name for you.
Speaker 5: It's Carville.
Speaker 1: Was Carville and the Marines? Is he a yeah? Marine?
Speaker 5: He always wears that Marie shirt, but I think he
Speaker 5: was in Marines.
Speaker 1: He's usually wearing an LSU baseball cap and an LSU shirt.
Speaker 1: He's a huge LSU fan. And I know because I've
Speaker 1: been on the road with him. Yeah, we'll tell you
Speaker 1: some fun times I had was debating Carvell with Tim
Speaker 1: Rushert moderating. We had good times together. We did, and
Speaker 1: we never agreed. I just, you know, kind of rolled
Speaker 1: my eyes at what he said and wouldn't wouldn't take
Speaker 1: debate or pay attention. He'd make his points. I'd make
Speaker 1: my points. Russia was a great interviewer. He knew the
Speaker 1: he would, he would keep the crowd engaged. He was
Speaker 1: really great at his job.
Speaker 5: Yeah, well, I just think, uh, he's got Trump derangement syndrome.
Speaker 5: He's going so wokey, but he's pretty sensitive.
Speaker 1: Now, I mean, Carvell's lost his mind. I mean now
Speaker 1: I'm calling him crazy Carvill, the guy that I knew
Speaker 1: back in the day that worked for Clinton. I don't know,
Speaker 1: he's he's gone, you know now he's he's he's talking
Speaker 1: about all sorts of crazy stuff. We're going to pack
Speaker 1: the courts. So he was saying last week and DC
Speaker 1: and Porto Riec go statehood if we get power back.
Speaker 1: I mean, now it's like crazy car Fall I don't
Speaker 1: know what happened to the guy that you know was
Speaker 1: working for them, for a president that said the era
Speaker 1: big government is over, the end of welfare as we
Speaker 1: know it. He's gone to the crazy side still.
Speaker 5: I just it was funny and Katie needs a raise,
Speaker 5: So there you go.
Speaker 1: H Why are you sucking up to Katie? Why does
Speaker 1: everyone suck up to Katie? I know why? Because you
Speaker 1: think it's going to get you on the air. Wark
Speaker 1: That's why.
Speaker 6: She's very nice on the phone.
Speaker 1: She's very nice, all right. I can't really argue with
Speaker 1: that part.