WEBVTT - The Housing Slowdown Could Become a Global Meltdown

0:00:07.600 --> 0:00:09.920
<v Speaker 1>Hello, and welcome to Stephanomics, the podcast that brings the

0:00:09.920 --> 0:00:12.920
<v Speaker 1>global economy to you. And in this last episode of

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:16.239
<v Speaker 1>the series, we have to talk about housing. Where we

0:00:16.320 --> 0:00:18.599
<v Speaker 1>live is often a big part of who we are.

0:00:18.920 --> 0:00:21.440
<v Speaker 1>If we're lucky, it's also our main source of wealth,

0:00:21.600 --> 0:00:25.960
<v Speaker 1>quite possibly our retirement plan. But for many many others,

0:00:26.280 --> 0:00:29.160
<v Speaker 1>finding and keeping a home it's what keeps them living

0:00:29.200 --> 0:00:32.600
<v Speaker 1>on the edge, a constant financial burden and source of stress.

0:00:33.280 --> 0:00:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And because it does play such a big role in

0:00:35.920 --> 0:00:40.600
<v Speaker 1>all our lives, property as also historically played an outsized

0:00:40.680 --> 0:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>role in the ups and downs of the economy. In

0:00:42.960 --> 0:00:44.839
<v Speaker 1>a little while, I'll be taking a quick tour of

0:00:44.880 --> 0:00:48.120
<v Speaker 1>the world's property markets with Bloomberg economist near Our Shah,

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:52.880
<v Speaker 1>warming up for an expansive, even philosophical conversation with Bloomberg

0:00:53.000 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Star columnist John Authors, asking why it is that real

0:00:56.920 --> 0:01:00.280
<v Speaker 1>estate causes us so much trouble and which of theollowing

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:02.960
<v Speaker 1>are most likely to blow up the global economy, this

0:01:03.000 --> 0:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>time around bankrupt property developers in New York or China.

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:12.600
<v Speaker 1>But first, US economy reporter Maria Paula Micharris Doris has

0:01:12.680 --> 0:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>this ground level view of the increasingly cutthroat market for

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:21.759
<v Speaker 1>US rentals, where suppliers tight and costs for even long

0:01:21.840 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 1>time renters are soaring despite whether the rents go up

0:01:37.200 --> 0:01:41.319
<v Speaker 1>or not. I can't afford anything until I get some

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.960
<v Speaker 1>help from the government with disability from solving secured so

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that the story is, yes, we have higher rent and

0:01:47.440 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>now the higher rents are now backering in my ability

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:55.600
<v Speaker 1>to rent an apartment in my busical condition because the

0:01:55.680 --> 0:01:58.920
<v Speaker 1>rents are higher. Deny Keiner had a plan to deal

0:01:59.040 --> 0:02:01.640
<v Speaker 1>with the big increase in the monthly rent for his

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>as big as apartment to spring. You figure he would

0:02:05.080 --> 0:02:08.720
<v Speaker 1>just take extra ships at his pretending job on the strip.

0:02:09.600 --> 0:02:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Then life intervened a diagnosis of pancreatic cancer and made

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:17.800
<v Speaker 1>it hard for him to move, let alone work, and

0:02:17.880 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>he lost his job. Now he's facing eviction. I don't

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:27.160
<v Speaker 1>have enough strength. I'm physically able to walk around like

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a regular person. I can walk maybe a quarter mile

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and then I'm done physically. So the question at some

0:02:34.880 --> 0:02:38.000
<v Speaker 1>point in my life, this terminal disease will kick in

0:02:38.760 --> 0:02:42.520
<v Speaker 1>to where I can't do anything like even work from

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a laptop. Cannery is among the eight point four million

0:02:47.120 --> 0:02:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Americans who are laid on rent payments as prices continue

0:02:50.600 --> 0:02:53.200
<v Speaker 1>to increase. According to data by the U S and

0:02:53.240 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>SIS Bureau, that is of o U S renters. As

0:02:59.360 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>rental cut sore across the country, Americans are struggling to

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:07.600
<v Speaker 1>keep up. Single family rents grows by a record of

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 1>fourteen percent nationally over the past year, according to core Logic,

0:03:12.760 --> 0:03:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a real state data firm, But the increases were even

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 1>more dramatic in cities that became popular living destinations during

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.880
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic, including a four one percent increase in Miami,

0:03:24.720 --> 0:03:28.280
<v Speaker 1>a twenties six percent rise in Orlando, and an eighteen

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>percent jump in Phoenix. Some tenants are seeing their mostly

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:36.160
<v Speaker 1>rent bills rise by several hundred dollars even after years

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:40.240
<v Speaker 1>of living in the same apartment. The government block landlords

0:03:40.400 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 1>from a big tim many people during the pandemic, but

0:03:43.560 --> 0:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>those moratoriums are ending, so too are many emergency rental

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>assistance programs. Now there's a very real chance many Americans

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 1>could be forced out of their homes. It's pretty much

0:03:56.520 --> 0:04:00.880
<v Speaker 1>the perfect storm for renters right now. That was Kate Reynolds,

0:04:01.040 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>principal policy associated at the Washington based Urban Institute. So

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:08.840
<v Speaker 1>emergency rental release was authorized as a response to the

0:04:08.840 --> 0:04:12.360
<v Speaker 1>pandemic a total of forty seven billion dollars. And these

0:04:12.400 --> 0:04:16.640
<v Speaker 1>were authorized back at the beginning of What we're seeing

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>now is that a lot of that funding has been

0:04:18.800 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 1>spent down and those renters and and their landlords are

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:24.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, don't have a place to turn if they're

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 1>unable to pay the rent. She says that for the

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:30.560
<v Speaker 1>first time since the pandemic began, an increasing number of

0:04:30.600 --> 0:04:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Americans are on their own to COVID strowing housing costs

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:40.400
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic. Combination of national, state and local moratoriums

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.320
<v Speaker 1>you have a lifeline to millions of Americans thrown out

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:46.799
<v Speaker 1>of work or forced to stay home to care for children.

0:04:48.040 --> 0:04:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Starting in March, the Federal Cares Act put in the

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:56.440
<v Speaker 1>initial one d twenty day ban on evictions that covered

0:04:56.800 --> 0:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>as many as forty five percent of U S renters

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:04.760
<v Speaker 1>according to Urban Insitute estimates. That was followed up by

0:05:04.760 --> 0:05:09.200
<v Speaker 1>a sweeping moratorium imposed by the Federal Centers for the

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:14.240
<v Speaker 1>c Control and Prevention, which covered millions more American throughout

0:05:14.279 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>parts of However, by August of last year, the US

0:05:21.120 --> 0:05:24.320
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court struck down the federal moratorium and in art

0:05:24.360 --> 0:05:29.560
<v Speaker 1>evictions to RACEUME. So for the first time ever UM

0:05:29.640 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>in June, we saw median rant prices go above two

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:38.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand dollars a month, and you have inflation on essentials

0:05:38.680 --> 0:05:42.159
<v Speaker 1>like gas, food and groceries as well as energy costs.

0:05:42.400 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 1>And then on top of all of that, eviction moratoria

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 1>were also extended during the pandemic, both by Congress and

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:55.840
<v Speaker 1>by UM. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and

0:05:56.400 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>some local places also had policies and eas. All of

0:06:01.360 --> 0:06:06.040
<v Speaker 1>those have expired. There's a few local exceptions. But what

0:06:06.200 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>we did see is that UM, during the time that

0:06:09.080 --> 0:06:13.360
<v Speaker 1>those eviction moratory were in place, that eviction filings really

0:06:13.440 --> 0:06:17.160
<v Speaker 1>did stay below average levels. And so all of these

0:06:17.240 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>things are sort of happening at the same time, which

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>is really difficult for a lot of friends or households.

0:06:25.920 --> 0:06:30.560
<v Speaker 1>There is a great research study out of California that

0:06:30.960 --> 0:06:35.440
<v Speaker 1>came out, you know, mid in mid crisis UM, that

0:06:35.560 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>basically showed that a lot of renter households had what

0:06:38.640 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>we call shadow debts UM, so renters were taking on

0:06:43.960 --> 0:06:46.000
<v Speaker 1>debt in order to pay their rent because you know,

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:50.800
<v Speaker 1>folks worry about UM, you know, in eviction filing or

0:06:50.880 --> 0:06:53.160
<v Speaker 1>losing their housing and so a lot of times we've

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.320
<v Speaker 1>seen that. UM. What we say sometimes is that the

0:06:56.400 --> 0:07:01.160
<v Speaker 1>rent eats first, UM. And what that means is that folks, uh,

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, put money their money towards rents, even if

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it means that they can't, you know, buy groceries, even

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:12.239
<v Speaker 1>when someone isn't facing eviction. A shortage of available housing

0:07:12.400 --> 0:07:15.160
<v Speaker 1>and a search of people moving to warmer climates has

0:07:15.240 --> 0:07:19.600
<v Speaker 1>given landlords an advantage over their tenants. In many cases,

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>then there's are boosting rents by hundreds of dollars and

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:27.760
<v Speaker 1>renters have those choice but to pay for it. Last Yanuary,

0:07:28.040 --> 0:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Carlia Kelly was unable to renew the lease of the

0:07:30.840 --> 0:07:33.920
<v Speaker 1>two bedroom apartment where she has lived since the thousand

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>nine in the Atlanta suburb of Duluth, Georgia. People from

0:07:38.120 --> 0:07:42.320
<v Speaker 1>the northeastern California were higher than here. They think george

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>is less expensive and where people can work remotely from

0:07:46.200 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 1>a number of jobs. Now they don't necessarily have to

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.080
<v Speaker 1>be where their company is headquartered. So we do have

0:07:52.200 --> 0:07:55.800
<v Speaker 1>a big influx of people from the Northeast and from

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.360
<v Speaker 1>California moving to Georgia. So there was that thing shortage

0:07:59.400 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>of a part the company that owned the building decided

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.440
<v Speaker 1>to the renovations that could accommodate new residents who moved

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 1>from more expensive cities and are willing to pay more

0:08:09.080 --> 0:08:12.320
<v Speaker 1>for rent. The landlord offered her a space in another

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>of its buildings, bosting her rent by almost six hundred

0:08:15.880 --> 0:08:18.280
<v Speaker 1>dollars a month. And the night I got the keys,

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.680
<v Speaker 1>there were cockroaches running all around the apartment. That was like,

0:08:22.920 --> 0:08:27.240
<v Speaker 1>pictures were rusted. Light coaches didn't work. Carpeting in the

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:31.560
<v Speaker 1>bedrooms was old, um thoughts that didn't work. I mean,

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>there was just a whole list of stuff. The parments

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:38.240
<v Speaker 1>builder hadn't been changed. Um, it was just it was horrible.

0:08:40.200 --> 0:08:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Back in Las Vegas, Keener's rent went from seven hundred

0:08:43.520 --> 0:08:46.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty to one thousand dollars for our one bedroom, one

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:51.320
<v Speaker 1>bathroom apartment. That might sound cheap for New Yorkers and Californians,

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>but very expensive for people in Las Vegas. Unable to

0:08:55.760 --> 0:08:59.960
<v Speaker 1>work and facing possible eviction. He's hoping to win financial

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:04.040
<v Speaker 1>assistance from a government program that helps low income Americans

0:09:04.080 --> 0:09:08.920
<v Speaker 1>with housing costs. However, his application has been tied up

0:09:09.000 --> 0:09:12.920
<v Speaker 1>for months. The money is they opened the federal government

0:09:13.320 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and needs to corps, to these very i agencies. But

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.360
<v Speaker 1>there's so many people applying for this, but they've called

0:09:19.559 --> 0:09:22.240
<v Speaker 1>created a weights so I can even apply for the

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.200
<v Speaker 1>month with the help of a lawyer. He's doing an

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 1>eviction appeal to buy more time before he has nowhere

0:09:28.120 --> 0:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>else to go. As we speak, he's backing his belongings

0:09:32.320 --> 0:09:35.240
<v Speaker 1>into storage to be pretty moved to a homeless shelter

0:09:35.880 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>whenever he gets evicted. For Bloomberg News, this is Mariab Stories.

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.600
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to start with that piece because conversations about

0:09:49.640 --> 0:09:52.240
<v Speaker 1>property so often revolve around what's going to happen to

0:09:52.320 --> 0:09:55.599
<v Speaker 1>house prices and mortgage rates. We talked less about the

0:09:55.640 --> 0:09:58.240
<v Speaker 1>consequences of those things for a renter just looking for

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:02.000
<v Speaker 1>somewhere affordable to live. But super low mortgage rates are

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:05.200
<v Speaker 1>one reason why property prices and rents have been going

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>up and up around the world in recent years, and

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 1>especially if you live in the US or the UK.

0:10:11.120 --> 0:10:13.760
<v Speaker 1>You'll know that the property boom didn't let up during

0:10:13.800 --> 0:10:18.520
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. If anything, it accelerated. So now mortgage rates

0:10:18.600 --> 0:10:21.160
<v Speaker 1>are finally heading up in many countries. You have to

0:10:21.240 --> 0:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>wonder which property market will pop first, and what the

0:10:25.320 --> 0:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>collateral damage will be our UK economists. Near Our Shah

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>has been looking at a series of indicators for nineteen

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.680
<v Speaker 1>property markets around the world. Has some answers to that question.

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:37.559
<v Speaker 1>Near Ash, thank you very much for doing this, Thank

0:10:37.640 --> 0:10:39.800
<v Speaker 1>you for having me on, Stephanie. So we should cut

0:10:39.840 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to the chase. Everyone wants to know whether they're sitting

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:43.960
<v Speaker 1>in a place that's about to blow up. So which

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:48.160
<v Speaker 1>countries came top in our in our rankings as places

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to watch? So New Zealand camp top, but Australian Cannedy

0:10:51.960 --> 0:10:54.439
<v Speaker 1>were up there as well, and all of those countries

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.960
<v Speaker 1>are showing now signs of cooling. The more striking thing

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>is Toronto, where as you've seen quite dramatic price falls,

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>and so that's something to watch out having had big

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>house price rises for a long indeed exactly exactly. But

0:11:08.840 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the other places a Czech Republic is well up there

0:11:12.480 --> 0:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>from the European Union, but also Portugal within the UR Area.

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:18.959
<v Speaker 1>Now both those are not actually sharing signs of cooling

0:11:19.120 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>as yet, and so but something to want to look

0:11:21.400 --> 0:11:25.679
<v Speaker 1>out for, especially as the ECB starts raising rates from

0:11:25.800 --> 0:11:28.640
<v Speaker 1>this month and possibly by fifty basis points in September.

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting because a lot of the countries that we mentioned,

0:11:32.120 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>certainly Australia and Canada, are actually countries that kind of

0:11:35.200 --> 0:11:39.120
<v Speaker 1>didn't have a housing market crash in the global financial crisis.

0:11:39.200 --> 0:11:41.160
<v Speaker 1>They sort of dodged that bullet. But it also meant

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:43.160
<v Speaker 1>that prizes were able to just keep going up and

0:11:43.280 --> 0:11:46.480
<v Speaker 1>up and up and up, and they get even less affordable.

0:11:46.960 --> 0:11:49.360
<v Speaker 1>There is a lot of focus on America, given that

0:11:49.520 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>it was the U s sub prime market that played

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:53.960
<v Speaker 1>such a big role in triggering that global financial crisis

0:11:54.000 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight. Actually, there was a fascinating

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.439
<v Speaker 1>statistic that the Deputy Governor of the Bank of England

0:11:59.480 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>then broad been calculated at the time. I remember he

0:12:02.400 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>calculated that UK banks had lost a lot more money

0:12:05.600 --> 0:12:10.680
<v Speaker 1>on US subprime assets going into that crisis than they

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>ever did on the UK housing market. So people are

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>looking again at the US and saying, could this now

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:21.240
<v Speaker 1>cause another global problem? Is it in a stronger position

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:23.360
<v Speaker 1>now than it was then? Well, you absolutely right to

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:26.400
<v Speaker 1>focus on the US. It is actually up there within

0:12:26.559 --> 0:12:29.120
<v Speaker 1>what the country to look out for, um, But it

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>is actually in a much stronger position than in two

0:12:32.080 --> 0:12:35.199
<v Speaker 1>thousand and eight, and I think it's not only just

0:12:35.520 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>tight lending standards than they were during the subprime crisis,

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>it's also the quality of buyer and what I mean

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:46.480
<v Speaker 1>by that the last cycle, anyone could practically by get

0:12:46.559 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 1>a mortgage. This time, it's been quite difficult for those

0:12:49.880 --> 0:12:52.280
<v Speaker 1>on more wonderable incomes and so on to get a mortgage.

0:12:52.520 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>So we already on a stronger platform in that sense.

0:12:55.320 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Sean Donald, who is often on this program, he had

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:01.000
<v Speaker 1>done some fascinating analysis of nicely that point. On the

0:13:01.080 --> 0:13:03.480
<v Speaker 1>other from the other direction, that actually that it was

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.880
<v Speaker 1>many African American households who weren't particularly poor we're being

0:13:06.960 --> 0:13:08.880
<v Speaker 1>shut out of the lending boom and the sort of

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.079
<v Speaker 1>mortgages that you've seen over the last few years in

0:13:11.080 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the US. I mean more broadly, households do seem to

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:17.280
<v Speaker 1>be in stronger shape. You know, we talk about the

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:20.520
<v Speaker 1>cash that's built up in different countries in the US

0:13:20.600 --> 0:13:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and the UK from the COVID crisis. People still have

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 1>a bit of extra cash in their bank accounts. Um

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.120
<v Speaker 1>in most cases you also have a fixed rate mortgage.

0:13:30.240 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>So when the European Central Bank or the Bank of

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.319
<v Speaker 1>England raises interest rates or the FED, that doesn't immediately

0:13:36.400 --> 0:13:41.559
<v Speaker 1>affect your the cost of your of your mortgage right then, absolutely.

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.240
<v Speaker 1>But when you talk about fixed rates, and the US

0:13:44.280 --> 0:13:46.520
<v Speaker 1>has always been one of those countries where you used

0:13:46.520 --> 0:13:48.880
<v Speaker 1>to have ten thirty years do make the average the

0:13:48.960 --> 0:13:50.839
<v Speaker 1>normal to get a thirty year fixed rate, which I

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:53.040
<v Speaker 1>thought was incredible when I lived at the stakes, But

0:13:53.160 --> 0:13:56.079
<v Speaker 1>globally now that has been going and so the UK

0:13:56.679 --> 0:14:00.079
<v Speaker 1>you have eight actually over eighty percent of people on

0:14:00.200 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>fixed rates, and significant of those are not going to

0:14:03.440 --> 0:14:06.160
<v Speaker 1>be renewing them until two years time in the line,

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>so they've got that breathing space to adjust and doubt

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:10.559
<v Speaker 1>you point out, and in the piece that you've written,

0:14:10.559 --> 0:14:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you point out the house prices are record high globally.

0:14:13.679 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>There's an International Monetary Fund Global House Price Index which

0:14:17.000 --> 0:14:19.080
<v Speaker 1>is higher now even than it was before the last

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the last crash. And we know in the US and

0:14:23.560 --> 0:14:26.760
<v Speaker 1>in UK and Europe it's a constant source of discussion

0:14:26.840 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 1>how difficult it is for young people to get on

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:33.720
<v Speaker 1>the housing ladder to buy houses. Um. Yet you know,

0:14:33.840 --> 0:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>when government's tried to address this, the last thing that

0:14:37.040 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>they would appeal to is the idea of actually a

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:41.560
<v Speaker 1>fall in house prices that would be the most direct

0:14:41.680 --> 0:14:45.040
<v Speaker 1>way of making houses more affordable um and instead they

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>have ways to coax people into buying houses and having

0:14:48.800 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>less and needing less and less money to buy a house.

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:54.840
<v Speaker 1>We won't go into our respective ages, but you will

0:14:54.880 --> 0:14:57.720
<v Speaker 1>have I'm sure lots of friends who have faced this issue,

0:14:57.760 --> 0:15:00.640
<v Speaker 1>even with quite well paid jobs in in the UK

0:15:00.840 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>and in London. Is it just that the people who

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.040
<v Speaker 1>have all the houses sit on now all this housing

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:09.960
<v Speaker 1>value and vote a lot more regularly than the young

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.280
<v Speaker 1>people that are struggling to get at home. It's quite

0:15:13.280 --> 0:15:15.520
<v Speaker 1>an interesting thing, isn't it, Where the people who are

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>on the housing ladder and so on are the ones

0:15:17.520 --> 0:15:20.960
<v Speaker 1>who tend to vote the most. And the other sort

0:15:20.960 --> 0:15:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of interesting thing on this is going back to how

0:15:24.880 --> 0:15:28.360
<v Speaker 1>most the first time the UK in many decades, you've

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:32.640
<v Speaker 1>got more people who own their home outright then have mortgages.

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>The government is quite aware of all this so sort

0:15:36.880 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>of gives these trinkets of little things that we're doing

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>something to get to you on the ladder. But home

0:15:40.920 --> 0:15:45.320
<v Speaker 1>ownership has gone significantly down for those on the lowest

0:15:45.880 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>income groups and young age people. Basically it's halved of

0:15:50.760 --> 0:15:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the last I think fifteen years. And that's you know,

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>that's quite a shocking really with you and your friends

0:15:57.200 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of you know, more or less starting out in

0:15:59.480 --> 0:16:02.160
<v Speaker 1>the in the working force, or quite early in your careers.

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>If you opened, if you if you turn on the

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 1>TV tonight and they said house prices early on a

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.040
<v Speaker 1>four by ten percent or trying to strip out the

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>fact that you're an economist, and you would worry about

0:16:12.080 --> 0:16:14.160
<v Speaker 1>all the consequences. But just among your friends, I think

0:16:14.160 --> 0:16:16.120
<v Speaker 1>they would think it was good news. I can definitely

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:17.480
<v Speaker 1>match for a few of my friends, they would be

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.120
<v Speaker 1>absolutely celebrating. They do wish there's their house and crash.

0:16:21.240 --> 0:16:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I s this is about time, and they do resent

0:16:25.360 --> 0:16:28.720
<v Speaker 1>all the enormous blenks that governments try and go to

0:16:28.880 --> 0:16:31.960
<v Speaker 1>to prevent one. But again, this is the thing governments.

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>If if there is a housing crash, there would be

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:38.240
<v Speaker 1>financial stability would be quite profound. You could have a

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:40.400
<v Speaker 1>far deeper recession and so on. So would actould be

0:16:40.440 --> 0:16:43.040
<v Speaker 1>worsel for everyone. Sure that's what you say to your

0:16:43.080 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>friends when they say, what a great thing it would be.

0:16:46.720 --> 0:16:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Thank you very much, thank you very much. I'm delighted

0:16:57.000 --> 0:17:00.440
<v Speaker 1>now to be drawing all the strands together with one

0:17:00.480 --> 0:17:03.760
<v Speaker 1>of the stars in the world of financial journalism, John Authors,

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>for many, many years one of the most read columnists

0:17:06.520 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>for the Financial Times. In fact, we overlapped a little

0:17:08.800 --> 0:17:12.680
<v Speaker 1>bit at the Ft and now definitely the most read

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>columnists on finance and markets for Bloomberg. And John thank

0:17:16.560 --> 0:17:18.840
<v Speaker 1>you so much for taking time to be part of

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:22.040
<v Speaker 1>our season finale. Well, thank you very much for that

0:17:22.280 --> 0:17:26.760
<v Speaker 1>very kind introduction. Yes, it's good to be working together again,

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>and appropriately given what we're going to talk about, your

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:32.000
<v Speaker 1>sitting and you're talking to us from from New York,

0:17:32.480 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted to focus on property in this episode,

0:17:35.080 --> 0:17:38.080
<v Speaker 1>not only because the cost of housing affects all of

0:17:38.200 --> 0:17:40.520
<v Speaker 1>us in one way or another, or because the ups

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and downs in the value of real estate has historically

0:17:43.840 --> 0:17:46.919
<v Speaker 1>played such a role in amplifying the booms and busts

0:17:47.440 --> 0:17:50.920
<v Speaker 1>in the broader economy, but also it occurred to me

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in a slightly more philosophical way that it seemed to

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:58.440
<v Speaker 1>embody the tensions the contradictions we're seeing playing out in

0:17:58.680 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>this chapter of global capitalism. When you look at any

0:18:02.280 --> 0:18:06.359
<v Speaker 1>given country where governments and those who have prospered in

0:18:06.440 --> 0:18:08.959
<v Speaker 1>these years of rising asset prices they're all doing all

0:18:09.040 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>they can to prop up property markets, But then you

0:18:12.760 --> 0:18:15.399
<v Speaker 1>have a big chunk of the population, including lower income

0:18:15.480 --> 0:18:17.720
<v Speaker 1>households and young people. We heard some of them at

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:20.520
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of the show who'd like nothing better than

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>to see house prices fall and for housing finally to

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>become more affordable. So, before we get into some of

0:18:26.000 --> 0:18:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the sort of market dynamics, where you stand on this

0:18:28.560 --> 0:18:32.280
<v Speaker 1>particular issue very much depends on where you live or

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:37.719
<v Speaker 1>don't live, doesn't it. Well, certainly where I live in Manhattan,

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the issue of affordability is about as acute as it's

0:18:42.040 --> 0:18:45.800
<v Speaker 1>possible to imagine. One of the critical problems you always

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>faced with their property is that even though people treated

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:54.600
<v Speaker 1>as an investment, it's something you truly need. Shelter is

0:18:54.600 --> 0:18:59.320
<v Speaker 1>a very basic human need. You could argue it's almost

0:18:59.320 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>an urged it's it's um goes back to John Locke

0:19:05.440 --> 0:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>and the whole idea of property rights, that you cannot

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:13.359
<v Speaker 1>really be a full fledged citizen or a full fledged

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 1>participants in the economy without some property. So yes, it's

0:19:18.840 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this is always more difficult for governments and more dangerous

0:19:24.240 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>for the economy than stocks. You could, let you know,

0:19:29.119 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in two thousands, um the dot com boom blew up,

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:36.720
<v Speaker 1>and there was a mild procession thereafter. In two thousand

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and seven, the housing bubble blew up and all hell

0:19:40.240 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>broke loose, And there's a there's a reason for that.

0:19:42.080 --> 0:19:45.840
<v Speaker 1>You people can bear the notion of losing money on

0:19:46.000 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>other assets. Losing money on property is a fundamentally different proposition.

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I would say you should always in

0:19:57.480 --> 0:20:01.840
<v Speaker 1>any kind of financial you know, tour of the horizon,

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:04.920
<v Speaker 1>you should always be on the lookout for whether real

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:09.120
<v Speaker 1>estate is in danger. That's what can tip a financial

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.520
<v Speaker 1>event into something more serious. There's a lot of economic

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 1>evidence now that when you look back and you say, well,

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 1>why wasn't you know, for example, the you know, the

0:20:20.960 --> 0:20:26.320
<v Speaker 1>market crash of barely remembered now, and indeed the stock

0:20:26.359 --> 0:20:28.520
<v Speaker 1>market was more or less back where it was by

0:20:28.560 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the end of that year. They didn't have that knock

0:20:31.040 --> 0:20:33.520
<v Speaker 1>on effect for the broader economy that you did see

0:20:33.720 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>for example before the global financial crisis when the U s.

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:38.760
<v Speaker 1>US housing obviously triggered all these things. So it definitely

0:20:38.800 --> 0:20:40.399
<v Speaker 1>does seem to make the difference between the sort of

0:20:40.480 --> 0:20:44.280
<v Speaker 1>minor market correction and a broader economic recession. So I

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.639
<v Speaker 1>guess that the big question we have to ask is

0:20:46.720 --> 0:20:49.800
<v Speaker 1>do you see that transition happening today? Do you see

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 1>enough problems in the housing market that what we've seen

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in the financial markets in the last few months possibly

0:20:54.640 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a bear market now that's going to turn into something

0:20:59.080 --> 0:21:03.760
<v Speaker 1>much worse. I do see the real possibility of that.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I wouldn't say it was yet an inevitability.

0:21:07.720 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>If you start with the States, then yes, house prices

0:21:11.119 --> 0:21:13.480
<v Speaker 1>are now even in real terms, higher than they were

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.960
<v Speaker 1>at the top in two thousand and six. Uh. And

0:21:17.640 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>demand has been very aggressive and there is now clear

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:26.719
<v Speaker 1>sign of a turn. You've seen new house sales falling

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.399
<v Speaker 1>from a high level each month for several months now.

0:21:30.640 --> 0:21:35.280
<v Speaker 1>Measures of housing sentiments have got very much weaker. Uh.

0:21:35.680 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>And that's also you've got to throw in the very

0:21:40.920 --> 0:21:45.320
<v Speaker 1>serious displacements caused by the pandemic. Lots of areas are

0:21:45.400 --> 0:21:48.280
<v Speaker 1>much more appealing than they were three years ago, very suddenly,

0:21:48.880 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and others are much less appealing. It's those sudden breaks

0:21:52.720 --> 0:21:58.560
<v Speaker 1>that markets can have a difficulty dealing with across the world. Um,

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:03.400
<v Speaker 1>the UK has long had I don't need to tell

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you that's a bad habit of when in doubt inflates

0:22:08.720 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>the stock market, and that leads to always the risk

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of in Britain, of that a housing market can bring

0:22:19.880 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the economy down. It's a it's a

0:22:22.040 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 1>very housing sensitive economy. Um. The great imponderable UH is China.

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:35.720
<v Speaker 1>We know for years now that the Chinese authorities are

0:22:36.080 --> 0:22:39.560
<v Speaker 1>scared of a Minsky moment or a Lehman moment. You

0:22:39.640 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>know Minsky for those uninitiated, is the idea is that

0:22:44.320 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the economist who came up with the idea that at

0:22:46.960 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>a certain point confidence in debt can be lost, and

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.280
<v Speaker 1>that's when you have a crisis. For scale of what's

0:22:54.280 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>happened after Lehman Brothers in twoth has and eight um,

0:22:58.800 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>there is an an imaginably large amount of money that

0:23:02.160 --> 0:23:06.199
<v Speaker 1>has been borrowed for the state in China. There are

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>many property developers in very serious trouble UM and the

0:23:13.400 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>investment is falling there even as fixed assets in other

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>fictity investment is improving. It's plainly very much of an

0:23:21.880 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>Achilles heel for the Chinese property sector. For sorry, for

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the Chinese economy. My best guess is that China is

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:34.120
<v Speaker 1>still in enough control that it can manage a very

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:40.280
<v Speaker 1>slow period of growth, possibly even a recession without a

0:23:40.359 --> 0:23:44.080
<v Speaker 1>blow up, without a major crisis for the rest of

0:23:44.119 --> 0:23:47.960
<v Speaker 1>the world having become as dependent as we have on

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Chinese growth, that's still quite an alarming prospect. I mean,

0:23:52.119 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 1>there's probably a few things so that we should pick

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:55.720
<v Speaker 1>up on. But just going back to going back to

0:23:55.760 --> 0:23:57.960
<v Speaker 1>the US, I mean, and it came up earlier in

0:23:58.000 --> 0:23:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the program as well, that you know, we had the

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>economy go south during COVID in a kind of dramatic way,

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 1>and then we've had the sort of interesting mixed up

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:08.960
<v Speaker 1>pattern of the recovery, a different kind of recovery than

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:11.480
<v Speaker 1>we've had before UM and that has caused its own

0:24:11.480 --> 0:24:13.680
<v Speaker 1>problems with supply chains and everything else that we've talked

0:24:13.720 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot about in stephonomics. But actually house prices had

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:20.960
<v Speaker 1>just carried on defying gravity for quite for most of

0:24:21.040 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>that period. Talk us through you know a little bit

0:24:23.800 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 1>of you know why that happened, where you think there's

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 1>most vulnerability with all real estates. Critical thing about real

0:24:31.560 --> 0:24:34.320
<v Speaker 1>estate is that it's leveraged, which is another reason why

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:36.080
<v Speaker 1>we should really care about it from the point of

0:24:36.119 --> 0:24:41.480
<v Speaker 1>view of financial crises. So it's based based on borrow money. Yes,

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>exactly if if if if rich people use their money

0:24:44.880 --> 0:24:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to to bet on stocks that go up and then

0:24:47.000 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>come down again. Yeah, there are some wealth effects. But

0:24:50.960 --> 0:24:56.120
<v Speaker 1>so what if lots of people borrow money and their

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.240
<v Speaker 1>house price goes down and they can't support repay the loan.

0:24:59.400 --> 0:25:03.239
<v Speaker 1>That's very e series. That's a different question altogether. UM,

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.639
<v Speaker 1>you do still see prices is rising very sharply in

0:25:08.080 --> 0:25:12.080
<v Speaker 1>the US. That's partly because supply was actually somewhat limited

0:25:12.600 --> 0:25:18.400
<v Speaker 1>during the earlier stages of COVID, and because UM finance

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:23.040
<v Speaker 1>became exceptionally cheap thanks to the thanks to the Fed's

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:28.160
<v Speaker 1>monetary policy, which I think everybody now agrees stayed too

0:25:28.880 --> 0:25:32.440
<v Speaker 1>easy for too long with the benefit of hindsight, and

0:25:33.119 --> 0:25:36.439
<v Speaker 1>that did mean that a lot of people started looking

0:25:36.520 --> 0:25:40.920
<v Speaker 1>for for housing. The fact that the supply was relatively limited,

0:25:41.200 --> 0:25:44.520
<v Speaker 1>and that there was also the desire of some who

0:25:44.600 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 1>were living in cities to find somewhere else to move

0:25:48.160 --> 0:25:52.320
<v Speaker 1>meant that you really did have a perfect positive storm

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>from the point of view people who wanted to sell houses. UM.

0:25:57.720 --> 0:25:59.919
<v Speaker 1>You could make the argument in terms of how day

0:26:00.000 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>injurious that is now UM mortgage rates are you know,

0:26:06.200 --> 0:26:11.280
<v Speaker 1>have have had probably the biggest upward shock they've ever had,

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.440
<v Speaker 1>bearing in mind how low they started. Yes, it's true.

0:26:15.720 --> 0:26:21.159
<v Speaker 1>Americans tend to have long term fixed mortgages. Many of

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.200
<v Speaker 1>them were hoping to use their house as an a

0:26:24.320 --> 0:26:27.560
<v Speaker 1>t M, however, which isn't going to happen for a

0:26:27.640 --> 0:26:31.639
<v Speaker 1>long time at this point. And many were probably hoping

0:26:31.720 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to refinance lower, which isn't going to happen. So there

0:26:36.320 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>are still very great concerns there. And actually we should

0:26:40.600 --> 0:26:42.400
<v Speaker 1>just say, I mean roughly how much. I mean they're

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>now back thirty year rates back to what around six

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:50.160
<v Speaker 1>percent or something, So the change at the start from

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>the start of the year is pretty dramatic. Its Fortunately,

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know that the actual interest rates cost you need

0:26:58.440 --> 0:27:01.440
<v Speaker 1>to pay now compared taking out a mortgage six months

0:27:01.480 --> 0:27:05.800
<v Speaker 1>ago has multiplied several times over, so for people who

0:27:05.840 --> 0:27:08.240
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about their kind of monthly costs, even though

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.200
<v Speaker 1>even though the sort of six percent doesn't seem that

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.879
<v Speaker 1>much historically, it's a huge difference in your monthly payment

0:27:14.920 --> 0:27:18.399
<v Speaker 1>if you were rather over extending yourself potentially, yes, and

0:27:18.560 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>and and if a year ago you were doing the

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.520
<v Speaker 1>math and thought that you were going to be paying two.

0:27:24.480 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Then the whole proposition is transformed. And that is a

0:27:30.240 --> 0:27:34.720
<v Speaker 1>bigger shock, um than you know, there was ever he

0:27:34.800 --> 0:27:37.320
<v Speaker 1>suffered at any point during the seventies that kind of

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:41.480
<v Speaker 1>speed of increase in in debt debt costs from a

0:27:41.520 --> 0:27:44.920
<v Speaker 1>low base. I mean. Moving on to commercial property, I

0:27:45.000 --> 0:27:48.960
<v Speaker 1>think that's where there is the really great concern because

0:27:49.680 --> 0:27:57.000
<v Speaker 1>two things. One supply is extreme. Um. I don't know

0:27:57.040 --> 0:27:59.000
<v Speaker 1>when you were started in Manhattan, but there are now

0:27:59.119 --> 0:28:02.600
<v Speaker 1>something like half a dozen buildings taller than the Empire State.

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:09.280
<v Speaker 1>There's forests of new skyscrapers going up. Very beautiful views

0:28:09.320 --> 0:28:13.200
<v Speaker 1>from the higher floors of the Bloomberg Building. UM, very

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:18.399
<v Speaker 1>hard to imagine. It strike me as optimistic even before

0:28:18.520 --> 0:28:22.119
<v Speaker 1>the pandemic. At this point, you know, I go to

0:28:22.280 --> 0:28:24.760
<v Speaker 1>work in the morning and I actually sit down in

0:28:24.840 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the subway because so many fewer people are actually going

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 1>to work in an office, which is which, which is nice,

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:35.800
<v Speaker 1>but you know, the and I then move into you know,

0:28:35.880 --> 0:28:39.120
<v Speaker 1>a central business district with vastly more capacity than had

0:28:39.160 --> 0:28:43.360
<v Speaker 1>before that that is really terrifying. Putting those things together.

0:28:43.520 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 1>The you know, your average real estate developer in this city.

0:28:48.920 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>These are guys who probably don't have thirty year financing.

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:56.280
<v Speaker 1>They're probably they probably are trying to to borrow over

0:28:56.360 --> 0:29:01.320
<v Speaker 1>shorter terms and needing to roll over um. So the

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>one positive, the one reason we're not needn't be too

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.040
<v Speaker 1>concerned about it, is that a lot of the money

0:29:08.480 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for these guys ultimately comes from pension funds and endowments

0:29:12.400 --> 0:29:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and the kind of people who can afford to wait

0:29:15.640 --> 0:29:20.280
<v Speaker 1>out a storm that they've got a long term time horizon.

0:29:21.120 --> 0:29:23.640
<v Speaker 1>But not all of it does. And you know, we'd

0:29:23.760 --> 0:29:27.800
<v Speaker 1>rather not all of us sacrifice a bit of our

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>pension to deal with real estate. So cook from for

0:29:32.120 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>my money, commercial real estate is probably the single greatest

0:29:36.960 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 1>cause for concern. What I'm taking from from what you're

0:29:40.160 --> 0:29:44.080
<v Speaker 1>saying is that if we do see property triggering something

0:29:44.200 --> 0:29:49.080
<v Speaker 1>really significant for the economy, it's going to look and

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:52.360
<v Speaker 1>feel very different from what we saw before the global

0:29:52.400 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>financial crisis, which was very much tied up into what

0:29:54.960 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>had happened to those to the to the lower end

0:29:58.200 --> 0:30:02.160
<v Speaker 1>housing market, with the assets attached to that sort of

0:30:02.200 --> 0:30:06.840
<v Speaker 1>subprime market having somehow infiltrated not just the US financial

0:30:06.920 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>system but the global financial system. This seems like the

0:30:09.720 --> 0:30:12.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of the complete opposite that you've got. It's actually

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it's the it's a bit of real estate that probably

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:18.080
<v Speaker 1>affects people least in their day to day um and

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that's potentially the biggest trigger point. And indeed it could

0:30:22.240 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>be the other side of the world's property market that

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this time is going to affect us. So let's just

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe come back to what you said about China. You know,

0:30:30.840 --> 0:30:35.960
<v Speaker 1>famously US subprime kind of set off this global sort

0:30:36.000 --> 0:30:41.480
<v Speaker 1>of financial explosion in the two thousand and seven eight?

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:45.720
<v Speaker 1>Are we about to see China's property market now do

0:30:45.880 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>the same to the rest of the world. I mean,

0:30:47.560 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>how how serious do you see that threat? I do

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>see it as serious? Um uh. I mean, as ever,

0:30:54.640 --> 0:30:57.080
<v Speaker 1>when you're making comparisons to two thousands and seven, it's

0:30:57.120 --> 0:30:59.880
<v Speaker 1>like making comparisons to Hitler when you're talking about politics.

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Um do I am I predicting that it's going to

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:07.640
<v Speaker 1>be as bad as that? No, not necessarily. Is it

0:31:07.680 --> 0:31:12.360
<v Speaker 1>conceptually something similar that could be very bad? Yes, you

0:31:12.520 --> 0:31:15.400
<v Speaker 1>do have which you didn't have in the States. You

0:31:15.520 --> 0:31:20.800
<v Speaker 1>have had several years of the Chinese authorities trying to

0:31:22.000 --> 0:31:25.520
<v Speaker 1>deal with the issue. The reason the big property developers

0:31:25.600 --> 0:31:29.240
<v Speaker 1>got into trouble last year is because China was trying

0:31:29.360 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>to rain them in um. But yes, that that has

0:31:35.320 --> 0:31:38.120
<v Speaker 1>been an important engine of China's growth. In China's growth

0:31:38.160 --> 0:31:42.080
<v Speaker 1>has been vital to the rest of the world. So

0:31:42.360 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a difference, it's it's rooted in the same

0:31:46.400 --> 0:31:51.880
<v Speaker 1>ultimate problem that everybody needs property, that it tends to

0:31:51.960 --> 0:31:55.640
<v Speaker 1>be a leveraged investment, and that when it goes, when

0:31:55.720 --> 0:32:00.520
<v Speaker 1>things go wrong, it's a really serious issue. But you're right, then,

0:32:00.880 --> 0:32:02.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't think they're going to make the same mistakes

0:32:03.040 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>as the US. Did you know seven? The US hasn't

0:32:05.600 --> 0:32:07.480
<v Speaker 1>made the same mistakes as in No. Seven or eight.

0:32:08.440 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>They have at least made new mistakes. But the theories

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>whether how big, how serious the new mistake will be,

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And as we heard earlier, actually it's not been it's

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.760
<v Speaker 1>been the lower income people that have actually been locked

0:32:19.800 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>out of many of the new mortgages. But that also

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:24.720
<v Speaker 1>suggests that maybe there's a bit more tolerance in the

0:32:24.920 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>property market, the sort of residential property market, because it's

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>not people who are right on living hand to mouth

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:33.560
<v Speaker 1>who are who are dealing with these higher rates. You

0:32:33.640 --> 0:32:35.480
<v Speaker 1>and I, who have spent so long looking at the

0:32:35.520 --> 0:32:38.360
<v Speaker 1>global economy and the global nacial system in various ways.

0:32:38.840 --> 0:32:41.840
<v Speaker 1>You look at property and it just seems of all

0:32:41.920 --> 0:32:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the assets that we have uniquely divisive between generations, between

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:52.560
<v Speaker 1>lower and higher income, that it sets up these problems

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:54.440
<v Speaker 1>for young people not being able to afford to get

0:32:54.480 --> 0:32:57.040
<v Speaker 1>in the housing ladder. It's very lumpy as an asset,

0:32:57.120 --> 0:33:01.160
<v Speaker 1>it's extremely passy to buy and sell, how very prone

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.960
<v Speaker 1>to booms and bust, and it's not a productive place

0:33:05.240 --> 0:33:07.840
<v Speaker 1>to invest when you think about the broader economy. Much

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:11.760
<v Speaker 1>better to have money invested in a in in creating

0:33:11.920 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 1>jobs and a going concern a company, rather than just

0:33:15.320 --> 0:33:18.680
<v Speaker 1>tied up in a in a lump of bricks and mortar.

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>So why have we ended up having so much of

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the world's wealth tied up in such a bad place.

0:33:25.000 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>It's very good, very profound question. I would say partly

0:33:31.360 --> 0:33:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's because you can borrow easily to do it, and

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:39.320
<v Speaker 1>people will always that you've if you've got a house

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>as security for a loan, you can borrow much more

0:33:42.040 --> 0:33:43.800
<v Speaker 1>easily and much more cheaply than in many other ways.

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:48.240
<v Speaker 1>So that's a big part of it. I think you're

0:33:48.320 --> 0:33:51.400
<v Speaker 1>right that the sense of status that comes with it

0:33:51.920 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>the sense that's not necessarily economically rational that you want

0:33:56.880 --> 0:33:59.280
<v Speaker 1>to have a house, that you want to have your

0:33:59.360 --> 0:34:03.040
<v Speaker 1>parts on housing ladder. That's a phrase that the British

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:09.400
<v Speaker 1>use all the time. Is very is very central. UM.

0:34:10.800 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>What worries me most in terms of what you were

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:15.560
<v Speaker 1>just saying, is that there is a there is indeed

0:34:15.640 --> 0:34:22.520
<v Speaker 1>a very serious generational issue to this. UM. Younger people

0:34:23.239 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 1>like in their twenties and early thirties, in my experience,

0:34:26.680 --> 0:34:31.719
<v Speaker 1>really wants to own real estate because in part they

0:34:31.880 --> 0:34:36.200
<v Speaker 1>can't and they feel they're missing out, and you know

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.120
<v Speaker 1>they are. I've got plenty of friends in their early

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:44.320
<v Speaker 1>thirties starting families still renting UM, and that doesn't that

0:34:44.520 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>feels at a psychological level, that doesn't feel comfortable. UM.

0:34:49.560 --> 0:34:54.080
<v Speaker 1>The way the housing market has developed, certainly the two

0:34:54.120 --> 0:34:56.400
<v Speaker 1>countries I know best, the UK and the US, there

0:34:56.560 --> 0:35:04.960
<v Speaker 1>is really a very nasty, sharp generational evidem which intensifies

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.440
<v Speaker 1>the sense of inequality, of the sense of injustice that

0:35:08.719 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>we all know is poisoning much of the developed West

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:18.800
<v Speaker 1>at present. UM. So I suppose, coming back to your question,

0:35:18.880 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that's that's how I would answered it. Partly, it's what

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>we can all borrow for and it's always easier to

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:29.000
<v Speaker 1>buy something if you can borrow, but it's also that

0:35:29.200 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>you do need it, and that it comes with this

0:35:32.400 --> 0:35:38.520
<v Speaker 1>immense psychologically important sense of status. And it matters to

0:35:38.640 --> 0:35:41.520
<v Speaker 1>people that if you if you, if you are renting

0:35:41.560 --> 0:35:47.320
<v Speaker 1>in your thirties, you feel somewhat more of a of

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.799
<v Speaker 1>a rootless person, less of a stake somehow or other

0:35:51.000 --> 0:35:55.319
<v Speaker 1>than if you've already got a house and a mortgage. UM.

0:35:55.840 --> 0:36:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Whether that's sensible, whether that's economically rational, is probably a

0:36:02.880 --> 0:36:06.520
<v Speaker 1>topic you could spend another entire podcast on, But there's

0:36:06.560 --> 0:36:12.880
<v Speaker 1>no question people feel uncomfortable not having having property by

0:36:12.960 --> 0:36:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a certain age, and in the current situation where they

0:36:16.480 --> 0:36:21.799
<v Speaker 1>can't UM that leads to very serious tensions. And whether

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 1>or not we see a big boom and bust in

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.800
<v Speaker 1>the property market in the next year or so, it

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:29.800
<v Speaker 1>certainly feels like something we're setting up problems for the future.

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:42.719
<v Speaker 1>John Author's thank you very much, thank you. Well, that's

0:36:42.760 --> 0:36:44.840
<v Speaker 1>it for this episode of Stephonomics. We'll be back in

0:36:44.920 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>the autumn. They look out for bonus episodes if I

0:36:47.800 --> 0:36:50.440
<v Speaker 1>meet anyone exciting on my travels, and do be sure

0:36:50.480 --> 0:36:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to check out the Bloomberg news website Bloomberg UK in Britain.

0:36:54.160 --> 0:36:56.840
<v Speaker 1>For more economic news and views on the global economy,

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.120
<v Speaker 1>you should also follow at economics on Twitter. So This

0:37:01.239 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 1>episode was produced by Magnus Hendrickson and Sammer Sadi. Special

0:37:05.280 --> 0:37:09.040
<v Speaker 1>thanks also to Maria Paulo, Michelis Dorris, John Lle Marte,

0:37:09.800 --> 0:37:14.080
<v Speaker 1>Gilda de Carli Blake, Maple's, John Author's and Nera Sharp.

0:37:14.640 --> 0:37:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike Sasso is the executive producer of Stephanomics. M