1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:02,679
Speaker 1: Well, now it's time for our daily Bloomberg Law Brief,

2
00:00:02,800 --> 00:00:06,080
Speaker 1: exploring legal issues in the news and Today, Bloomberg Law

3
00:00:06,120 --> 00:00:09,760
Speaker 1: host Greg Store speaks with Kimberly Robinson, a Supreme Court

4
00:00:09,800 --> 00:00:13,240
Speaker 1: reporter for Bloomberg b NA, and Rebecca Green, a professor

5
00:00:13,280 --> 00:00:16,160
Speaker 1: at William and Mary Law School, to discuss how allegations

6
00:00:16,440 --> 00:00:22,080
Speaker 1: of voter fraud and redistricting shape the historical U. S election. Kimberly,

7
00:00:22,239 --> 00:00:25,200
Speaker 1: arguably the biggest court ruling of the year came in

8
00:00:25,200 --> 00:00:29,720
Speaker 1: a case involving North Carolina's voting restrictions. Give us a

9
00:00:29,880 --> 00:00:32,400
Speaker 1: quick synopsis of that place. Well, this is really an

10
00:00:32,400 --> 00:00:34,920
Speaker 1: extraordinary decision. I think the important thing to keep in

11
00:00:34,960 --> 00:00:36,760
Speaker 1: the back of your mind when I'm talking about this

12
00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:41,000
Speaker 1: case is the fact that race and voting are very

13
00:00:41,040 --> 00:00:43,519
Speaker 1: much correlated in the South, especially in North Carolina. So

14
00:00:43,560 --> 00:00:46,760
Speaker 1: it turns out that most minorities tend to vote democratically.

15
00:00:47,400 --> 00:00:50,920
Speaker 1: A court here struck down UH North Carolina's voter I

16
00:00:51,000 --> 00:00:54,720
Speaker 1: D laws and some other restrictions that it said has

17
00:00:55,400 --> 00:00:59,480
Speaker 1: had surgically UH singled out African Americans, and it was

18
00:00:59,520 --> 00:01:02,040
Speaker 1: extored area. Because there are really two ways that a

19
00:01:02,120 --> 00:01:05,199
Speaker 1: court can strike down UH. Some of these voting restrictions.

20
00:01:05,200 --> 00:01:08,440
Speaker 1: One is if the effect has a discriminatory purpose. Um.

21
00:01:08,520 --> 00:01:11,640
Speaker 1: That the other is the intent of the legislature is

22
00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:15,000
Speaker 1: to discriminate against minorities. And that final one is what

23
00:01:15,120 --> 00:01:18,199
Speaker 1: the court here said that you know, the legislature really

24
00:01:18,200 --> 00:01:22,399
Speaker 1: intended to disenfranchise minority voters. Rebecca, let me ask you

25
00:01:22,560 --> 00:01:25,600
Speaker 1: just a broader question as you look back on what

26
00:01:25,640 --> 00:01:27,520
Speaker 1: do you think is that the big message of the

27
00:01:27,640 --> 00:01:33,360
Speaker 1: big takeaway from this this year in election law? Yeah?

28
00:01:33,480 --> 00:01:35,679
Speaker 1: So um. For me, as I sort of look back

29
00:01:35,680 --> 00:01:38,160
Speaker 1: at it all, I think what is clear is the

30
00:01:38,280 --> 00:01:42,560
Speaker 1: fragility of public confidence in our elections. You know, elections

31
00:01:42,600 --> 00:01:45,920
Speaker 1: only work if the public has confidence in the outcome. Um.

32
00:01:45,959 --> 00:01:49,760
Speaker 1: And that confidence was under explicit attack in two thousands sixteen.

33
00:01:49,920 --> 00:01:51,960
Speaker 1: We have a long history, of course of the losing

34
00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:56,040
Speaker 1: side alleging fraud in elections, but this year felt very different. Right.

35
00:01:56,080 --> 00:01:58,400
Speaker 1: We had the integrity of the election being called into

36
00:01:58,440 --> 00:02:03,320
Speaker 1: the question before uh election day. Uh. That said. What's

37
00:02:03,360 --> 00:02:07,080
Speaker 1: extraordinary extraordinary also about two thousand sixteen is how smoothly

38
00:02:07,120 --> 00:02:12,160
Speaker 1: the election actually went. Before the election, voting rates advocates

39
00:02:12,200 --> 00:02:14,960
Speaker 1: were bracing for widespread problems at the polls. But as

40
00:02:15,000 --> 00:02:18,240
Speaker 1: it happened, UM, with few a few exceptions, UH, the

41
00:02:18,280 --> 00:02:23,080
Speaker 1: election proceeded without major incident. So I think the challenge

42
00:02:23,080 --> 00:02:25,680
Speaker 1: going forward is figuring out how to shore up public

43
00:02:25,680 --> 00:02:28,440
Speaker 1: confidence in our elections. Some think the way to do

44
00:02:28,520 --> 00:02:31,880
Speaker 1: this is to tighten election rules UM. Others see this

45
00:02:31,960 --> 00:02:34,320
Speaker 1: tightening as a pretext a way to restrict certain people

46
00:02:34,360 --> 00:02:36,880
Speaker 1: from accessing the ballot. So figuring out how to navigate

47
00:02:36,919 --> 00:02:39,800
Speaker 1: between those two perspectives seems to be the difficult task

48
00:02:39,840 --> 00:02:44,000
Speaker 1: ahead that Skimberly Robinson, a Supreme Court reporter for a

49
00:02:44,040 --> 00:02:47,360
Speaker 1: Bloomberg b NA, and Rebecca Green, a professor at William

50
00:02:47,360 --> 00:02:50,160
Speaker 1: and Mary Law School, speaking with the Bloomberg's Gregg Store

51
00:02:50,320 --> 00:02:52,639
Speaker 1: even us in a Bloomberg Law weekdays at one pm

52
00:02:52,639 --> 00:02:55,560
Speaker 1: Wall Street Time here on Bloomberg Radio Now among the

53
00:02:55,880 --> 00:02:58,880
Speaker 1: legal stories from Bloomberg Law. Dylan Roof has again been

54
00:02:58,919 --> 00:03:02,000
Speaker 1: found competent to stand trial in last year's massacre at

55
00:03:02,000 --> 00:03:04,519
Speaker 1: a church in South Carolina. They left nine parishioners dead

56
00:03:04,680 --> 00:03:07,240
Speaker 1: at a Bible study. After a second hearing over his

57
00:03:07,280 --> 00:03:09,560
Speaker 1: mental capacity, a judge ruled not only that Roof can

58
00:03:09,600 --> 00:03:12,520
Speaker 1: be sentenced for his crimes, but can represent himself in

59
00:03:12,560 --> 00:03:15,359
Speaker 1: those proceedings. The same jury the last month took less

60
00:03:15,360 --> 00:03:17,680
Speaker 1: than two hours to find Roof guilty of hate crimes,

61
00:03:17,840 --> 00:03:20,920
Speaker 1: obstruction of religion and other accounts. Returns to court tomorrow

62
00:03:20,960 --> 00:03:24,160
Speaker 1: to be to begin to consider his sentence. Thus his

63
00:03:24,280 --> 00:03:26,600
Speaker 1: morning's Bloomberg Lab Brrie. If you can find more illegal

64
00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:29,880
Speaker 1: news at Bloomberg law dot com and Bloomberg DNA dot com.

65
00:03:29,960 --> 00:03:33,280
Speaker 1: Attorneys will find exceptional legal research and business development tools

66
00:03:33,360 --> 00:03:36,680
Speaker 1: there as well. Visit Bloomberg Law dot com and Bloomberg

67
00:03:36,760 --> 00:03:39,080
Speaker 1: DNA dot com for more information