WEBVTT - John Carreyrou on Breaking Open the Theranos Scandal

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:06.439
<v Speaker 1>This is Master's in Business with Barry Ridholts on Bloomberg

0:00:06.519 --> 0:00:11.039
<v Speaker 1>Radio this weekend. On the podcast, I have an extra

0:00:11.080 --> 0:00:13.920
<v Speaker 1>special guest. His name is John Carrie Row. He is

0:00:14.040 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 1>a two time Pulitzer Prize winning investigative reporter for The

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:21.279
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal and author of the book Bad Blood,

0:00:21.440 --> 0:00:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup. I could

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have spoken to John for another nine hours. I found

0:00:28.160 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 1>the book absolutely fascinating. I plowed through it on Labor

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Day weekend and really really enjoyed it, not just because

0:00:35.680 --> 0:00:38.519
<v Speaker 1>of how revealing it is of what turned out to

0:00:38.560 --> 0:00:43.199
<v Speaker 1>be a giant pick pick the metaphor and Ron Bertie

0:00:43.200 --> 0:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>made off whatever, a giant fraud, but it reads like

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:50.319
<v Speaker 1>a thriller. It's a real page turner. There are some

0:00:51.159 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>giant surprises throughout the book. Lots of people see their

0:00:55.040 --> 0:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>reputation damaged and destroyed. It's amazing, and as somebody who

0:01:00.640 --> 0:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>is also an investor, I can't help but notice how

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.200
<v Speaker 1>many times there's red flag after red flag after red

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:14.760
<v Speaker 1>flag that are excused, rationalized, ignored, somehow put shunted aside,

0:01:14.840 --> 0:01:17.679
<v Speaker 1>instead of hey, that's a big, big red flag. Maybe

0:01:17.680 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>we shouldn't put a billion dollars into this nonsensical company

0:01:22.720 --> 0:01:25.120
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't do any of the things it promises it

0:01:25.200 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>can do. Anyway, I highly recommend the book. Whether you've

0:01:29.400 --> 0:01:33.119
<v Speaker 1>read the book or not, you're gonna find this conversation fascinating. So,

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 1>with no further ado, my conversation with John carry Rout.

0:01:41.920 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>My extra special guest this week is John Carrrew. He

0:01:45.959 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>began his career in journalism in after he graduated from Duke,

0:01:52.040 --> 0:01:56.080
<v Speaker 1>he joined the Dow Jones Newswires. Shortly after, he moved

0:01:56.080 --> 0:01:59.160
<v Speaker 1>to European version of the Wall Street Journal in Brussels,

0:01:59.560 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>event a sually going to Paris to cover French business, terrorism,

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and everything in between. He was appointed deputy Bureau chief

0:02:07.680 --> 0:02:11.120
<v Speaker 1>for Southern Europe and OH three. Eventually he became the

0:02:11.120 --> 0:02:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journals Health and Science Bureau chief in New York.

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>He has won numerous awards in journalism, including the Pulitzer

0:02:20.040 --> 0:02:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Prize twice. If this sounds like the perfect background for

0:02:23.800 --> 0:02:28.680
<v Speaker 1>any writer curious about the blood testing start up, there no, nos, Well,

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:32.239
<v Speaker 1>it turned out that is exactly right. Uh. The Unicorn

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.880
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be a fraud, which was broken by

0:02:34.960 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Carrirew in the pages of the Wall Street Journal. He

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>has written a best selling book, Bad Blood, Secrets and

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Lies in Silicon Valley about the entire Elizabeth Holmes and

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:50.640
<v Speaker 1>thearaph O saga. John Carrirew, Welcome to Bloomberg. Thank you

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:53.320
<v Speaker 1>for having me my pleasure. I have to start out

0:02:53.320 --> 0:02:55.639
<v Speaker 1>by saying I love the book. It was on my

0:02:55.760 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>list of ten to read this summer and I just

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>plowed through it over Labor Day week. Again, there's so

0:03:01.440 --> 0:03:05.720
<v Speaker 1>much material to cover. It's such a fascinating story. Let's

0:03:05.760 --> 0:03:09.160
<v Speaker 1>just go back to the beginning. How does Sara nos

0:03:09.240 --> 0:03:13.240
<v Speaker 1>and Elizabeth Holmes out in Silicon Valley first come on

0:03:13.360 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 1>your radar? It was mid December two thousand fourteen, and

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>I was on the subway UH commuting back from UH

0:03:24.800 --> 0:03:27.359
<v Speaker 1>my office in Midtown Manhattan to Brooklyn where I live,

0:03:27.480 --> 0:03:31.280
<v Speaker 1>reading the New Yorker magazine, and in that issue was

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 1>a long profile of Elizabeth Holmes by Ken all Letta

0:03:35.200 --> 0:03:39.720
<v Speaker 1>and um, it was a color glowing It was mostly

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>mostly glowing, with some, I have to say, with some

0:03:42.840 --> 0:03:47.880
<v Speaker 1>skeptical passages that I immediately picked up on, and UM,

0:03:47.920 --> 0:03:49.920
<v Speaker 1>you know that it was. It was an entertaining read

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and interesting that there were, as I just said some

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>some things that struck me as odd in that story. UM.

0:03:58.320 --> 0:04:01.680
<v Speaker 1>One of the ways she she described, you know, how

0:04:01.800 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>her blood testing technology work, or how she worked, how

0:04:05.200 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 1>she summed it up, UH, sounded to me like a

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:12.200
<v Speaker 1>high school chemistry student as opposed to sophisticated you know

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:17.040
<v Speaker 1>lab scientists slash inventor um. But more than any particular thing,

0:04:17.080 --> 0:04:21.360
<v Speaker 1>it was this notion that a college dropout, someone who

0:04:21.400 --> 0:04:25.599
<v Speaker 1>had had two semesters of chemical engineering, had dropped out

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and then gone on and invented groundbreaking new science that

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was going to revolutionize you know, lab testing. So let

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>me jump in right here. So she goes to Stanford, finishes,

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.560
<v Speaker 1>drops out after her freshman year. She's got no medical training,

0:04:41.640 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>she's got no organic chemistry, biology, um, blood chemistry, none

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:49.839
<v Speaker 1>of the things one would normally think would go into

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:55.839
<v Speaker 1>complex medical device manufacturing. This isn't a software startup where

0:04:55.880 --> 0:04:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you could just hey, anybody could code, and whether you

0:04:58.480 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>have the academic credentials or not as irrelevant. This is

0:05:01.720 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>a serious science, isn't it right. She she had zero qualifications.

0:05:06.640 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean she had had literally had two undergraduate UH

0:05:12.120 --> 0:05:15.640
<v Speaker 1>courses with the same professor Channing Robertson, who ended up

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.239
<v Speaker 1>being you know, her first enabler. Uh, that's an interesting

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:23.000
<v Speaker 1>choice of words. Why did you select enabler? Well, so

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>he was for those listening who aren't familiar with him,

0:05:26.120 --> 0:05:29.960
<v Speaker 1>Channing Robertson was a star, rock star star of this

0:05:30.240 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>of the Stanford Engineering School faculty. Had been an expert

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.560
<v Speaker 1>witness in the late nineties for the state of Minnesota

0:05:37.600 --> 0:05:42.120
<v Speaker 1>and its tobacco litigation, and um, you know, also was

0:05:42.200 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 1>really popular with students. He had a way with students,

0:05:44.720 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>he connected with them, and um, she had taken to

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.239
<v Speaker 1>two courses with him, and then you know, came back

0:05:51.279 --> 0:05:56.800
<v Speaker 1>with this cockamami patent in UM after her her summer

0:05:56.839 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>in Singapore working at a lab in Singapore. Uh. So

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.000
<v Speaker 1>we're now in in the fall of two thousand three,

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.479
<v Speaker 1>and the patent was for this device that she envisioned,

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:10.679
<v Speaker 1>which was essentially a wrist band that would have micro

0:06:10.800 --> 0:06:14.719
<v Speaker 1>needles that would come out and insert themselves into your

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>wrist and draw micro amounts of blood and and then

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:25.839
<v Speaker 1>uh diagnosed whatever ailed you and cure you simultaneously. Um.

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 1>And it was clear, I mean, this was science fiction

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:32.919
<v Speaker 1>to anyone involved an engineer or a lab scientist clear

0:06:32.960 --> 0:06:36.440
<v Speaker 1>that it was not feasible and probably ever feasible, at

0:06:36.480 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>least not for for decades. And uh you know, he

0:06:40.279 --> 0:06:45.080
<v Speaker 1>he chose to um go along with it and and

0:06:45.640 --> 0:06:48.240
<v Speaker 1>encouraged her to drop out, or at least didn't discourage

0:06:48.240 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 1>her to drop out, and then accompanied her on pitches

0:06:51.920 --> 0:06:54.360
<v Speaker 1>to vcs and so he gave her credibility. At that point,

0:06:54.400 --> 0:06:57.400
<v Speaker 1>she's nineteen years old, um, and he's the star of

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the Stanford faculty. And then he joins the board and

0:07:00.640 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>he stays on there with her, accompanies her for the

0:07:03.560 --> 0:07:06.760
<v Speaker 1>next twelve years. Uh you know, he is for sure

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>her her original enabler. So one of the questions I

0:07:10.080 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>was going to ask you, but you kind of hinted

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 1>at the answer. Ready, you know, when did you first

0:07:15.520 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>start to smell that something was amiss? But it's pretty

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.080
<v Speaker 1>clear you're you're saying right from the beginning, Well, this

0:07:22.120 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>struck you as a little off, Yes, But to be honest,

0:07:27.120 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>I probably would not have done anything with my intuition

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.360
<v Speaker 1>had I not gotten approached by his source, who was

0:07:35.600 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a pathologist in the Midwest who had gotten to know

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 1>the year before he moonlighted as the writer of this

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>obscure blog called Pathology Blog, which he spelled b L

0:07:46.280 --> 0:07:49.440
<v Speaker 1>A w G. And I had gotten him a year

0:07:49.560 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 1>prior to explain to me some of the complexities of

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.280
<v Speaker 1>lab billing for a series on Medicare Medicare fraud had

0:07:55.280 --> 0:07:57.800
<v Speaker 1>been doing at the time. And he had read the

0:07:57.800 --> 0:08:02.000
<v Speaker 1>New Yorker story about Elizabeth Holmes too, and had immediately

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:05.480
<v Speaker 1>been dubious even more than me. Uh in that you know,

0:08:05.560 --> 0:08:08.440
<v Speaker 1>he was much more familiar with with the intricacies of

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>lab science than I was. And he wrote a skeptical

0:08:13.960 --> 0:08:18.880
<v Speaker 1>item on his block. And uh, this guy named Richard Fuse,

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>who's a pretty big character in my book, by the way,

0:08:23.640 --> 0:08:27.040
<v Speaker 1>had been a childhood neighbor of Elizabeth and her parents

0:08:27.600 --> 0:08:31.480
<v Speaker 1>immediately got in touch with the Pathology blogger and told him,

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>you're on the right track. I think the areness as

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 1>a scam. You should keep digging into this. And Fuse

0:08:38.160 --> 0:08:42.360
<v Speaker 1>had been involved in litigation with Elizabeth Holmes. He had

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:47.280
<v Speaker 1>patented a part of her vision that had caused her

0:08:47.400 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>to sue him, and she had steamrolled him with David Boys.

0:08:52.520 --> 0:08:55.840
<v Speaker 1>David Boys had become her attorney and thereness attorney, and

0:08:55.840 --> 0:08:59.160
<v Speaker 1>and they really steamrolled Fuse in this litigation, and during

0:08:59.160 --> 0:09:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the course of the lime atient, Fuse had become convinced,

0:09:02.200 --> 0:09:06.240
<v Speaker 1>as a actually trained doctor and medical inventor that thereon

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>us was a scam. Hold that thought, we're gonna come

0:09:08.559 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>back to that. Let's talk about some of those secrets

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:17.120
<v Speaker 1>and lies. The question that I still haven't come to

0:09:17.480 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a solid answer was simply this with was this a

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:26.240
<v Speaker 1>scam from day one or did this eventually morph into

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:29.679
<v Speaker 1>a scam? What it was the latter it wasn't a

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.480
<v Speaker 1>scam from day one, and that she didn't drop out

0:09:32.480 --> 0:09:37.360
<v Speaker 1>of Stanford at nineteen and late two thousand three premeditating

0:09:37.559 --> 0:09:41.720
<v Speaker 1>a long con that would defraud investors and eventually put

0:09:41.800 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>patients in harm's way. That that was not in her

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:48.440
<v Speaker 1>thoughts back then. Even though she's never spoken to me, um,

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I know that she dropped out wanting to become a

0:09:52.400 --> 0:09:56.120
<v Speaker 1>successful Silicon Valley entrepreneur. Her idol was Steve Jobs. She

0:09:56.240 --> 0:10:00.920
<v Speaker 1>worshiped Apple and she wanted to follow in his footsteps.

0:10:01.440 --> 0:10:04.480
<v Speaker 1>And she also had this, you know, this notion that

0:10:04.520 --> 0:10:08.240
<v Speaker 1>she should do good for society because her her father

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 1>had worked at the State Department and various other government

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:16.280
<v Speaker 1>agencies and and uh provided um, you know, help and

0:10:16.280 --> 0:10:19.160
<v Speaker 1>and disaster torn areas, and there were photos of him

0:10:19.200 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and and he had raised her, uh with this notion

0:10:22.080 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>that she should live a life of purpose and and

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>that she should make her mark and not just by

0:10:28.760 --> 0:10:32.840
<v Speaker 1>getting rich. And so biotechnology, in her mind, was was

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>the gateway to achieving both becoming rich like her ancestors,

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the Fleishman's had once been, and also doing good. And

0:10:40.440 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>so that's the way in which she was different from

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Steve's jobs. She wanted a product that would that would

0:10:45.160 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>do good for society. Um. And uh, you know, so

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't it wasn't a fraud. From the beginning she

0:10:52.480 --> 0:10:56.800
<v Speaker 1>had she had good intentions. It became a fraud with

0:10:56.920 --> 0:11:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the years as she confronted uh, you know, failures and difficulties.

0:11:03.320 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Because science is hard. Medicine is hard. Science is hard.

0:11:06.600 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 1>So let let me ask you about that. A number

0:11:09.720 --> 0:11:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of people that you write about in the book point

0:11:12.080 --> 0:11:15.760
<v Speaker 1>out that the reason we do venus drawing, the reason

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.160
<v Speaker 1>we take blood from your arm and fill three big

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:21.960
<v Speaker 1>vials is that's a clean sample of blood. When you

0:11:22.000 --> 0:11:25.200
<v Speaker 1>do a pin prick, you're damaging tissue. Even if you

0:11:25.280 --> 0:11:28.880
<v Speaker 1>clean the surface of the skin. It's not as clean

0:11:28.920 --> 0:11:32.280
<v Speaker 1>a sample of of blood. So it makes makes me

0:11:32.400 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>raise the question, isn't it kind of reckless to say, oh,

0:11:35.320 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I could you know, I could run into medicine and

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>figure this out despite lacking a background. I mean, it's

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>hubris and arrogance. It's incredibly naive to think that people

0:11:47.640 --> 0:11:52.040
<v Speaker 1>hadn't tried capillary blood draws. They had, and and one

0:11:52.080 --> 0:11:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of the problems with them, The biggest problem is is

0:11:55.000 --> 0:11:57.960
<v Speaker 1>what you say, which is that the risk UH that

0:11:58.440 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>basically capillary drop capillary blood is not as pure as

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:07.679
<v Speaker 1>venus blood. It's polluted by tissue from cells and and

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 1>from skin, and UH that that stuff interferes with the

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>blood tests and so UH one of the biggest problems

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.560
<v Speaker 1>when you try to do a blood test. UH, the

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>biggest problem is the potassium blood test, because what happens

0:12:23.600 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>is when you milk blood from the finger, you cause

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:32.959
<v Speaker 1>the red blood cells in the blood to burst, and

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>the bursting UH causes a release of potassium, and so

0:12:36.600 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 1>it increases the concentration of potassium in your sample. And

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:45.560
<v Speaker 1>and the concentration of potassium becomes artificially high, and that

0:12:45.600 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>little blood sample and In fact, that is one of

0:12:48.640 --> 0:12:52.000
<v Speaker 1>the problems that UH the ants ran into when it

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:54.880
<v Speaker 1>started going live with its blood tests and Walgreen stores

0:12:54.920 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>in late two thou thirteen, was this hemolysis problem. And

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:01.720
<v Speaker 1>this is in hindsight bias that was well known for decades.

0:13:01.800 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>This is not a new discovery, right, I mean, the

0:13:06.000 --> 0:13:09.680
<v Speaker 1>problems with capillary blood draws were well known among lab

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:13.320
<v Speaker 1>scientists for sure. And then there's another problem that you

0:13:13.320 --> 0:13:15.680
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about, which doesn't have to do necessarily with

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the fact that it was blood pricked from the finger

0:13:18.440 --> 0:13:21.720
<v Speaker 1>that her vision revolved around. It's it's the how small

0:13:21.760 --> 0:13:24.760
<v Speaker 1>the sample was. She she wanted, you know, to be

0:13:24.800 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>able to do hundreds of tests from a drop or

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>two of blood, and no one had figured out how

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>to do that many tests from that small sample. The

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 1>basic reason is that there are about half half a

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>dozen big classes of blood tests, and each one of

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>these classes blood tests requires completely different laboratory techniques and

0:13:46.360 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>laboratory instruments. And so once you've done a couple of

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:54.200
<v Speaker 1>blood tests that are saying immuno assays, and you try

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:58.280
<v Speaker 1>to do blood tests from a different category, such as

0:13:58.520 --> 0:14:01.520
<v Speaker 1>general assays or hematasergy tests. You no longer have any

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.480
<v Speaker 1>blood left because you've used your small sample to do

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the test, and then you need more blood because the

0:14:09.240 --> 0:14:12.480
<v Speaker 1>other tests required completely different methods and completely different instruments.

0:14:12.559 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>And so no one had been able to crack that nut.

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>They've been trying to do so for more than two

0:14:17.040 --> 0:14:21.840
<v Speaker 1>decades an industry and uh in universities, and she came

0:14:21.880 --> 0:14:24.200
<v Speaker 1>along and claimed that she had solved all these problems,

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 1>even though she hadn't solved a single one of these problems.

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>She just stated her intention to solve them, and money

0:14:30.160 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>flowed in. Is that is that a fair? Well? She not,

0:14:33.800 --> 0:14:35.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean it's not quite. I mean that that would

0:14:36.000 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that would be more accurate than what she did. Had

0:14:38.760 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>had she stated her intention to solve them, she asserted

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:46.400
<v Speaker 1>that she had solved them. She said, I have solved

0:14:46.920 --> 0:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>this nut that no one on earth has solved until now.

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:54.640
<v Speaker 1>I have cracked it. And it was it was completely untrue.

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.920
<v Speaker 1>So back to the question about not a fraud From

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:03.120
<v Speaker 1>the beginning, when did it become clear that none of

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:09.120
<v Speaker 1>their products worked? And they started lying to partners, potential investors,

0:15:09.440 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>even employees that hey, we we got a dead parrot

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:16.240
<v Speaker 1>on our hands here right, So the lying actually started

0:15:16.320 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>very early on. I mean the book opens the prologue

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is a scene that takes place in late two thousand

0:15:22.160 --> 0:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and six, and it's the CFO, the chief financial officer

0:15:25.720 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>if there on us at the time, learning that these

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:32.200
<v Speaker 1>demos that he's bringing, he's been bringing perspective investors around

0:15:32.360 --> 0:15:37.800
<v Speaker 1>four for about eight months, are not really real. There's

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 1>a fake machine, it spits out a fake piece of paper. Right.

0:15:40.600 --> 0:15:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Part of the demo is real, the micro fluid ix

0:15:42.800 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>part of the demo is real, but then the result

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.320
<v Speaker 1>at the end as a prerecorded results, so it's essentially

0:15:47.360 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>not the result from the blood that you see flowing

0:15:49.560 --> 0:15:51.680
<v Speaker 1>through the cartridge. And so he goes to her and

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:53.640
<v Speaker 1>he says, you know, we can't keep doing this. The

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>investors I'm bringing around are under the impression that this

0:15:56.600 --> 0:15:59.440
<v Speaker 1>is totally real, and it's not. It's half fake. So

0:16:00.120 --> 0:16:02.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, that's essentially securities fraud. That's lying to investors.

0:16:02.840 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>We have to stop. And she turns ice cold and

0:16:05.840 --> 0:16:08.560
<v Speaker 1>says to him, you know you're not a team player.

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 1>I think you should leave right now. And it's very

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.400
<v Speaker 1>clear from her demeanor and from her tone of voice

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:16.640
<v Speaker 1>that she doesn't just mean leave leave her office, she

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:19.960
<v Speaker 1>means leave the company. And he's just been fired, and

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 1>and so the the the unethical behavior, and the line

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.640
<v Speaker 1>goes back as far as easily two thousand six, meaning

0:16:28.400 --> 0:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, less than two years into the life of

0:16:30.080 --> 0:16:33.320
<v Speaker 1>the company. And just to to elaborate a little bit

0:16:33.560 --> 0:16:37.000
<v Speaker 1>the technology, there were three iterations of the technology. There

0:16:37.040 --> 0:16:40.080
<v Speaker 1>was a real attempt at micro using micro fluid ix,

0:16:40.640 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>which is uh the repurposing of the micro fabrication techniques

0:16:44.680 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>that the computer computer chip industry pioneered. Lab scientists realized

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.320
<v Speaker 1>they could use those microfabrication techniques to create tiny channels

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 1>through which you could put minute amounts of liquids. She

0:16:56.640 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>she made a real effort in the early years of

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:02.320
<v Speaker 1>her company at doing a my micro fluidic device and

0:17:02.480 --> 0:17:05.000
<v Speaker 1>hit a wall. They just needed many more years, and

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>she didn't have the patients, and she was probably under

0:17:07.119 --> 0:17:11.160
<v Speaker 1>pressure from investors, and so they stopped that effort about

0:17:11.200 --> 0:17:13.760
<v Speaker 1>a year after that scene where she fires the CFO

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and pivoted to the second iteration of the technology, which

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>was a converted glue dispensing robot. It was it was

0:17:21.080 --> 0:17:23.960
<v Speaker 1>a glue dispensing robot that a Theranos engineer had had

0:17:24.000 --> 0:17:26.479
<v Speaker 1>purchased from a company called piston Or in New Jersey

0:17:26.880 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and essentially repurposed to be a blood testing machine. He

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:33.960
<v Speaker 1>affixed a pipette to the robotic arm which had three

0:17:33.960 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>degrees of motion, and then he reprogrammed it to to

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:41.080
<v Speaker 1>mimic what a lab scientist would do to test blood

0:17:41.080 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>at the bench. And she disguised it with the sleek

0:17:44.800 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>black and white case that she got a well known

0:17:48.320 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>industrial engineer to design, and that was called She called

0:17:51.520 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 1>it the Edison, named it after Thomas Edison, and um

0:17:55.640 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>the instrumentation basically the techniques of the editor and were

0:18:00.760 --> 0:18:03.760
<v Speaker 1>there was nothing new. It was something you know, uh

0:18:04.080 --> 0:18:09.200
<v Speaker 1>kemmy Luminescent immuno essays was a lab testing technique that

0:18:09.240 --> 0:18:11.359
<v Speaker 1>had been pioneered in the early eighties and that was

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:15.439
<v Speaker 1>what the Edison did. And the third generation so the

0:18:15.560 --> 0:18:17.719
<v Speaker 1>Edison could only do immuno essays, which are this one

0:18:17.760 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>class of blood test. And of course, you know, she

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 1>wanted something because she was beginning to claim that she

0:18:23.480 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>had something that could do all the blood tests, so

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:27.959
<v Speaker 1>she needed a machine that could do more than just

0:18:28.000 --> 0:18:30.439
<v Speaker 1>one class of blood tests. So the work on what

0:18:30.600 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 1>she called the Mini Lab, began in late two thousand ten,

0:18:33.840 --> 0:18:37.880
<v Speaker 1>and that work, you know, continued until recently. Um and

0:18:38.080 --> 0:18:40.479
<v Speaker 1>they've never gotten the mini lab to work. It's it's

0:18:40.520 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>a bigger machine than the Edison, and it's an attempt

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>to miniaturize all these laboratory instruments that are used to

0:18:46.800 --> 0:18:49.760
<v Speaker 1>do these different classes of blood tests. And they've not

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:52.800
<v Speaker 1>never gotten it to work. What about the commercial stuff?

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>They were buying the commercial machines and then deluding the

0:18:56.200 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 1>full blood samp And so that became necessary because think

0:19:00.320 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>normal people if they haven't gotten their device to work

0:19:04.560 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>yet or will wait until they get it to work

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to commercialize it. Right when you agree that that most

0:19:10.720 --> 0:19:13.760
<v Speaker 1>most people would do that, especially especially in the realm

0:19:13.760 --> 0:19:16.400
<v Speaker 1>of medicine where where your product actually you know, has

0:19:16.440 --> 0:19:19.040
<v Speaker 1>an impact on people's lives. Well, she didn't do that.

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 1>She went live with her vaunted fingerstick blood tests in

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the fall of two thirteen in Walgreen stores in northern

0:19:28.040 --> 0:19:31.359
<v Speaker 1>California and Arizona. And because the mini Lab was just

0:19:31.400 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a prototype that didn't work at the time, what she did,

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.000
<v Speaker 1>what she and her boyfriend ordered Thereness employees to do,

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:45.080
<v Speaker 1>was her boyfriend, her number two executives. They ordered people

0:19:45.119 --> 0:19:48.280
<v Speaker 1>in the lab to to hack machines made by the

0:19:48.320 --> 0:19:52.800
<v Speaker 1>German company siemens Um and UH to adapt them to

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.399
<v Speaker 1>small fingerstick samples. And one of the steps that was

0:19:56.480 --> 0:19:59.800
<v Speaker 1>needed to to do this hacking was to dilute the

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.080
<v Speaker 1>tiny fingerstick samples to create more volume in the cup.

0:20:03.600 --> 0:20:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Because these regular machines from from good old Seamans could

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:12.119
<v Speaker 1>only test a normal sized sample of blood, and so

0:20:12.160 --> 0:20:15.040
<v Speaker 1>you need a lot more sample for the machine to work.

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 1>And so they diluted the fingerstick blood to create more volume,

0:20:19.400 --> 0:20:23.199
<v Speaker 1>which itself caused all sorts of problems. Let's talk a

0:20:23.240 --> 0:20:26.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the process that it took to get

0:20:26.400 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>people to speak to you, and the threats of litigation

0:20:29.200 --> 0:20:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and everything against the journal. Um. How challenging was it

0:20:34.119 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to bring this story to light and ultimately to get

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it in print at the Wall Street Journal? By far

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the toughest story that I've ever done in twenty years,

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:48.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty plus years of reporting. Um that the challenge was twofold.

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:52.240
<v Speaker 1>It was getting sources to trust me and to talk

0:20:52.280 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>to me, Um, which was was very hard because uh,

0:20:57.119 --> 0:21:01.040
<v Speaker 1>uh Elizabeth Holmes. Uh, they knew that Elizabeth Holmes and

0:21:01.040 --> 0:21:03.840
<v Speaker 1>her company were very litigious, and they knew that the

0:21:04.119 --> 0:21:09.040
<v Speaker 1>company's outside council was was David Boys, America's premier litigated.

0:21:09.560 --> 0:21:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And and when you say litigious, not just you know,

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>everybody knows people who litigious. These people were seemed to

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 1>be extremely aggressive and used all sorts of questionable approaches. Right.

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.680
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth Holmes had sued former employees early on in two

0:21:26.880 --> 0:21:30.000
<v Speaker 1>as far back as two thousand seven for supposedly stealing

0:21:30.040 --> 0:21:34.159
<v Speaker 1>trade secrets. And then she had sued her childhood neighbor,

0:21:34.560 --> 0:21:38.119
<v Speaker 1>Richard Fuse, who had patented a part of her vision

0:21:38.800 --> 0:21:41.639
<v Speaker 1>um that and that infuriated her, so she came up

0:21:41.720 --> 0:21:44.840
<v Speaker 1>with a story that he and his son had had

0:21:44.840 --> 0:21:49.960
<v Speaker 1>basically colluded to steal proprietary thereinos patent information from a

0:21:50.040 --> 0:21:53.600
<v Speaker 1>law firm where where the Sun was working. But there

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.959
<v Speaker 1>was never any proof whatsoever uh that that that ever happened.

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.440
<v Speaker 1>And and personally, based on all my report, I believe

0:22:00.480 --> 0:22:03.240
<v Speaker 1>that it never did happen and that those were false accusations.

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:07.440
<v Speaker 1>When you mentioned trade secrets, what trade secrets that they

0:22:07.440 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>had nothing? No, technically was what were there any trade secrets?

0:22:10.840 --> 0:22:13.760
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I'm relying primarily on your book.

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>When I say I don't see any trade secrets here,

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>am I rong? No? There were There weren't really any

0:22:20.280 --> 0:22:24.560
<v Speaker 1>trade trade secrets. Was is a technical definition of that

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 1>is it was basically a way to to say, you know, a,

0:22:29.080 --> 0:22:31.679
<v Speaker 1>we can't tell you what we have because if we

0:22:31.760 --> 0:22:35.040
<v Speaker 1>tell you about it, our big competitors, Quest and lap

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:39.680
<v Speaker 1>Corps are going to copy us um and and be uh,

0:22:39.760 --> 0:22:42.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, you all of your reporting. You have to

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>either destroy it or or return it to us. Uh,

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, because it's sensitive and it could do us

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.280
<v Speaker 1>great harm. These were the arguments that that Saronis and

0:22:52.359 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>David Boys used to try to get us to kill

0:22:55.720 --> 0:22:58.840
<v Speaker 1>my reporting and to not publish the story. Well, they

0:22:58.840 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>were right, it was sense of and it could do

0:23:01.040 --> 0:23:05.159
<v Speaker 1>them great harm. However, there were no It doesn't seem

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:08.439
<v Speaker 1>like there was anything other than the bad behavior and

0:23:08.600 --> 0:23:12.200
<v Speaker 1>fraud in the company that you revealed, right, And so

0:23:12.240 --> 0:23:15.640
<v Speaker 1>it gave rise to a surreal five hour showdown at

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:18.720
<v Speaker 1>one point in in June of two fifteen at the

0:23:18.800 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>journal's offices in a conference room, uh pitting me and

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:25.919
<v Speaker 1>my editor of mix A Canolfi and and our lawyer

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Jake Conty on one side of the table, and David

0:23:28.800 --> 0:23:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Boys and two of his associates, and and his former

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>boys Schiller partner Heather King, who had become the General

0:23:34.640 --> 0:23:38.520
<v Speaker 1>council of Theonis, And we went around in circles for

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:41.520
<v Speaker 1>hours because um, you know, I had sent them a

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>list of questions ahead of time, and I was trying

0:23:43.320 --> 0:23:45.720
<v Speaker 1>to get answers to these questions, and they would say, well,

0:23:46.160 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we can't answer that question because it's a trade secret,

0:23:48.960 --> 0:23:53.639
<v Speaker 1>covers trade secrets, and and of course, uh, my questions

0:23:54.160 --> 0:23:57.480
<v Speaker 1>went to the essence of weather THEONIS really had technology

0:23:57.480 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>and really was using proprietary technology to do it's blood

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:04.240
<v Speaker 1>tests based on my sources, my confidential sources, it wasn't.

0:24:04.440 --> 0:24:07.439
<v Speaker 1>So I would ask things like, how many of the

0:24:08.520 --> 0:24:12.480
<v Speaker 1>blood tests on your menu are you doing right now

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:16.800
<v Speaker 1>with para nos proprietary technology? And they would say, we

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.080
<v Speaker 1>can't answer that. That's a trade secret. And I said, well,

0:24:20.119 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>are you and using any third party machines by the

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.679
<v Speaker 1>likes of Semens to do any of these tests? We

0:24:26.680 --> 0:24:29.080
<v Speaker 1>can't answer that, that's a trade secret. And it got

0:24:29.119 --> 0:24:32.679
<v Speaker 1>to a point where I said, well, you know, how

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:36.120
<v Speaker 1>can how can you using a third party machine made

0:24:36.160 --> 0:24:40.520
<v Speaker 1>by another company? And modifying it be a trade secret.

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>That's not inventing anything, that's not doing anything new. And again,

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, we'd go around in circles. I described the

0:24:47.680 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>scene in the book, and I think it's chapter twenty one,

0:24:50.800 --> 0:24:53.159
<v Speaker 1>and I felt like I was watching a performance of

0:24:53.200 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the theater of the absurd um And and towards the

0:24:56.840 --> 0:24:59.400
<v Speaker 1>end of that meeting, Boys let us know that that

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>he'll he would be sending us correspondence written correspondence. Oh,

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I've gotten written a correspondence from him. Let me share

0:25:05.480 --> 0:25:08.080
<v Speaker 1>a quick story. So I write a review of the book,

0:25:08.119 --> 0:25:11.040
<v Speaker 1>and I talked about all the red flags for investors,

0:25:11.920 --> 0:25:18.119
<v Speaker 1>not really concerned so much about um the details of

0:25:18.119 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the litigation. Now, I do say that some people's reputation shafferd.

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.720
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned George Schultz, I mentioned David Boyce. We get

0:25:25.720 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>a nasty graham from Boys and his legal um firm.

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>And I have to tell you, I was genuinely shocked

0:25:34.320 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>that my opinion column based on your book, uh, generated

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:44.600
<v Speaker 1>this intellectually disingenuous thing full of like you made all

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that stuff up. I had to go through your book

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>page by page. This is page to seventy eight. This

0:25:49.320 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 1>is page to sixty three is a page. It was

0:25:52.040 --> 0:25:56.040
<v Speaker 1>a very bizarre experience. What was the rest of your experiences?

0:25:56.160 --> 0:26:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Like fighting boys. He's got a reputation as literally the

0:26:01.200 --> 0:26:05.000
<v Speaker 1>premier litigator in the country, right. And so after that

0:26:05.320 --> 0:26:09.000
<v Speaker 1>five hours showdown, we got a first letter that hinted

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:13.640
<v Speaker 1>at litigation threats if we didn't immediately return or destroy

0:26:13.840 --> 0:26:17.280
<v Speaker 1>the supposed trade secrets that I had obtained through my reporting.

0:26:17.680 --> 0:26:20.959
<v Speaker 1>And then a few days later a I believe it

0:26:21.000 --> 0:26:27.240
<v Speaker 1>was a twenty six page letter that was just this

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:31.520
<v Speaker 1>this assault on my journalistic integrity and this attempt to

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:35.840
<v Speaker 1>portray me as a rogue reporter, that that the journal

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>should disown and um. And at the end of that letter,

0:26:39.720 --> 0:26:42.920
<v Speaker 1>it was very explicit that if we continued to proceed

0:26:42.960 --> 0:26:46.840
<v Speaker 1>with my reporting that the journal would be sued. And

0:26:47.240 --> 0:26:53.000
<v Speaker 1>even as these increasingly threatening letters land, um, some of

0:26:53.000 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>my sources start either going dark or calling me petrified

0:26:58.119 --> 0:27:01.560
<v Speaker 1>because they tell me they're being followed um and they're

0:27:01.600 --> 0:27:04.680
<v Speaker 1>being threatened as well. One of my sources, it has

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:08.720
<v Speaker 1>since emerged, was Tyler Schultz, a young man who was

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:12.120
<v Speaker 1>the grandson of the former Secretary of State George Schultz,

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.560
<v Speaker 1>who was a member of the theraness board. Tyler is

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>essentially the hero of He's a hero. I wouldn't say

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.200
<v Speaker 1>he's the only hero, Okay, I would I would say

0:27:20.400 --> 0:27:23.639
<v Speaker 1>another guy whom I referred to as Alan Beam in

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:27.000
<v Speaker 1>the book, who's the ex lab director. That's a pseudonym.

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:30.679
<v Speaker 1>I would say he's arguably the bigger hero because he

0:27:30.720 --> 0:27:32.359
<v Speaker 1>was the first to to talk to me and to

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and to launch my investigation. But Tyler is absolutely a

0:27:35.800 --> 0:27:39.679
<v Speaker 1>hero in this. And Tyler had worked at the company

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for eight months, become convinced during his stint there, based

0:27:43.240 --> 0:27:45.959
<v Speaker 1>on what he saw, seen and heard, that the company

0:27:46.000 --> 0:27:49.359
<v Speaker 1>was a fraud, tried to alert his grandfather, tried to

0:27:49.359 --> 0:27:51.840
<v Speaker 1>talk sense into him, hadn't been able to and then

0:27:51.880 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 1>had had had to keep that all bottled up for

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a year until I came along and made contact with him,

0:27:57.200 --> 0:28:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and then he became croberating source. And after that five

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.960
<v Speaker 1>hour meeting um or in fact it was, it was

0:28:03.960 --> 0:28:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a little bit before even but unbeknownst to me, uh,

0:28:07.960 --> 0:28:13.080
<v Speaker 1>two boys Schiller attorneys ambushed Tyler at his grandfather, George's

0:28:13.119 --> 0:28:16.760
<v Speaker 1>house off the Stanford campus and tried to get him

0:28:16.760 --> 0:28:21.399
<v Speaker 1>to sign documents. Essentially, uh, you know, acknowledging that he

0:28:21.400 --> 0:28:25.240
<v Speaker 1>had been a source for the journal and naming other

0:28:25.480 --> 0:28:29.560
<v Speaker 1>journal sources. And at that point began a a three

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:34.359
<v Speaker 1>or four month campaign of threats and intimidation against Tyler Um.

0:28:34.560 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 1>He had to hire his own counsel up him. They

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:43.160
<v Speaker 1>at one point, a a lawyer for boys Schiller named

0:28:43.200 --> 0:28:49.440
<v Speaker 1>Mike Brill, threatened to uh bankrupt Tyler Schultz's entire family

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.959
<v Speaker 1>if he didn't sign the documents that Sarons wanted him

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to sign. And the documents were an affidavit where he

0:28:56.720 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 1>basically acknowledged having talked to me and and and said

0:29:01.080 --> 0:29:04.400
<v Speaker 1>it was an essentially essentially a recanting of everything he

0:29:04.480 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 1>told me. And then they also wanted him to to

0:29:06.960 --> 0:29:09.840
<v Speaker 1>name my sources. And and Tyler never signed any of

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:15.240
<v Speaker 1>these documents despite these these outrageous threats uh that were made,

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, stood firm and in large part

0:29:17.960 --> 0:29:19.640
<v Speaker 1>thanks to him, I was able to go to print

0:29:19.720 --> 0:29:22.480
<v Speaker 1>months later with my first story which broke the scandal

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>open that Yet, let's continue discussing the fall. So you

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.520
<v Speaker 1>have a couple of people who were insiders, Um, George

0:29:32.520 --> 0:29:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Schultz's grandson Tyler. There was a woman who worked with

0:29:36.240 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>him who worked in the lab. Chung who who apparently

0:29:39.960 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>was scared out of her mind? Right, what what happened

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:45.479
<v Speaker 1>with her? What did she do? What was she sharing

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:49.480
<v Speaker 1>with you? And what happened? Why? What were the intimidation attempts?

0:29:49.680 --> 0:29:54.080
<v Speaker 1>So boys and his henchmen came to the Journal's offices.

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I think I believe it was on Tuesday in late June,

0:29:57.160 --> 0:30:00.959
<v Speaker 1>and that Friday, three days later, h Erica was working

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:03.360
<v Speaker 1>at her new employer. She had left the as she

0:30:03.400 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>had left Aaroness in fact, the day after Tyler had

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:07.680
<v Speaker 1>left Theariness a year prior, and she was now working

0:30:07.760 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>at a new company. So it's a year after she quit, right,

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>and she's working late at this new company, and I

0:30:13.520 --> 0:30:16.360
<v Speaker 1>think it was Sunny Veil, California, and one of her

0:30:16.400 --> 0:30:18.840
<v Speaker 1>colleagues taps around the shoulder and says, you know, there's

0:30:18.880 --> 0:30:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a man who's been waiting outside for a long time,

0:30:21.840 --> 0:30:24.360
<v Speaker 1>saying he wants to talk to you. And so her

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:27.040
<v Speaker 1>sort of alarm bell start ringing in her head because

0:30:27.080 --> 0:30:31.720
<v Speaker 1>the the head of human resources at UH, Saraonis Uh,

0:30:31.760 --> 0:30:35.400
<v Speaker 1>this woman Mona, who was uh you know, part of

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the inner circle UH with with Elizabeth Holmes and Sunny

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:43.400
<v Speaker 1>Bowani had been trying to reach her and leaving increasingly

0:30:43.440 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 1>frantic messages that day, and so immediately Erica was on

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>her guards, and so she asked the colleague who had

0:30:50.640 --> 0:30:52.880
<v Speaker 1>tapped her on the shoulder, to accompany her to her

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>car as she left the office, which the colleague did,

0:30:56.560 --> 0:30:59.600
<v Speaker 1>and when they walked out of the building, a young

0:30:59.720 --> 0:31:02.760
<v Speaker 1>man came out of a black suv and made a

0:31:02.800 --> 0:31:07.720
<v Speaker 1>beeline toward them and handed to Erica an envelope uh

0:31:07.720 --> 0:31:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and the envelope contained a letter, very aggressive letter assigned

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>by David Boys, threatening to sue her for disclosing trade

0:31:15.440 --> 0:31:18.280
<v Speaker 1>secrets and giving her an ultimatum, which is that she

0:31:18.320 --> 0:31:21.840
<v Speaker 1>had to meet with him and his boy scheller associates

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:24.080
<v Speaker 1>by a certain day and a certain time or she

0:31:24.080 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 1>would be sued. But before she even got to the letter,

0:31:27.000 --> 0:31:29.640
<v Speaker 1>what freaked her out the most was that the envelope

0:31:29.920 --> 0:31:35.040
<v Speaker 1>had her name and an addressed typed on it, and

0:31:35.080 --> 0:31:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the address was a house in East Palo Alto of

0:31:39.880 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>a colleague at her new company that she had been

0:31:43.200 --> 0:31:46.360
<v Speaker 1>staying at for less than two weeks. Because Erica had

0:31:46.360 --> 0:31:49.360
<v Speaker 1>planned on moving to China and so she had given

0:31:49.440 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 1>up the lease on her place in Oakland just a

0:31:53.240 --> 0:31:56.200
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks prior, and started staying with a colleague,

0:31:56.240 --> 0:31:59.880
<v Speaker 1>basically shocking at a colleague's house. UH and niece Palo Alto,

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>and no one knew she was staying there except for

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>the colleague. Her mother didn't even know she was staying there,

0:32:06.400 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>so there was absolutely no way to have known this

0:32:09.760 --> 0:32:13.280
<v Speaker 1>were this was her new address without having followed her.

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And so so she goes home that that evening Friday

0:32:17.040 --> 0:32:20.880
<v Speaker 1>evening petrified and stays inside this this house in East

0:32:20.880 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Palo Alta with the blind closed all weekend, doesn't dare

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>go out. And then first thing on Monday morning, she

0:32:25.960 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 1>calls me and she's terrified, and she tells me what

0:32:29.160 --> 0:32:32.600
<v Speaker 1>has happened, And UM, I'm in my car at that point,

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.240
<v Speaker 1>double parked on a street in Brooklyn, waiting for the

0:32:36.280 --> 0:32:39.400
<v Speaker 1>street sweeping truck to go by. That's one of the

0:32:39.440 --> 0:32:44.840
<v Speaker 1>better aspects of UH living in New York City. Uh,

0:32:44.920 --> 0:32:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm being ironic. Um, And uh so I answered the

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.320
<v Speaker 1>phone and it's her and we talk and I realized

0:32:51.360 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>that she's right. There's no way. I try to run

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.600
<v Speaker 1>through the scenarios and the permutations, there's no way anyone

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.800
<v Speaker 1>could have known that was her address without having her followed.

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>How many people in the book felt like they were

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>being followed? How many participants in the book or that

0:33:05.400 --> 0:33:09.560
<v Speaker 1>you didn't might not have printed? At least three? Alan Beam,

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 1>the ex lab director Again that's a pseudonym. Uh, Tyler,

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Schultz and Erica all either got word that they were

0:33:16.800 --> 0:33:19.840
<v Speaker 1>being followed or strongly suspected they were being followed, or

0:33:19.880 --> 0:33:22.160
<v Speaker 1>had evidence or had reason to believe that they were

0:33:22.160 --> 0:33:24.560
<v Speaker 1>being followed. And what about the fuses did was there

0:33:24.520 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>any any suspicions? Right? The Fuses had been had come

0:33:28.280 --> 0:33:31.040
<v Speaker 1>to the conclusion that they were being followed by p

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I s. But that was several years prior, during the

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:38.920
<v Speaker 1>patent litigation that had pitted them against their nos. So

0:33:39.640 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>something interesting that was brought up from that boys won

0:33:43.240 --> 0:33:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the patent litigation and was paid not in cash but

0:33:47.880 --> 0:33:50.520
<v Speaker 1>in pharan no stock. I was very surprised by that.

0:33:50.680 --> 0:33:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Is that common in legal circles or Silicon I know

0:33:54.800 --> 0:33:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley it's not unusual, but in patent litigation

0:33:59.080 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>how how common or common is that? I mean, I

0:34:01.920 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's very common. Um and uh for me

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:09.160
<v Speaker 1>when I learned about it. I learned about it. I

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.600
<v Speaker 1>think it was in the in the winter of two

0:34:12.600 --> 0:34:15.440
<v Speaker 1>thousand sixteen, a couple of months after my first story

0:34:15.560 --> 0:34:17.960
<v Speaker 1>was published. I thought it was a huge conflict of

0:34:17.960 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>interest because here you had a lawyer and his law

0:34:21.680 --> 0:34:26.400
<v Speaker 1>firm that owned almost five million shares, you know, a

0:34:26.520 --> 0:34:31.520
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars worth of shares UM, and so he

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:35.960
<v Speaker 1>was no longer just the legal advocate of Pharaos. He

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>also um had skin in the game financially, and I

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:44.360
<v Speaker 1>felt self interest, not mere advocacy on behalf of client,

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.799
<v Speaker 1>and and uh, you know, I I strongly felt that

0:34:47.800 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>that was a conflict of interest. And I wonder if

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:53.799
<v Speaker 1>that I wonder if that clouds a lawyer's judgment in

0:34:53.960 --> 0:34:57.160
<v Speaker 1>some of the things you described, if people do that

0:34:57.200 --> 0:35:00.000
<v Speaker 1>when they're representing clients as opposed to I don't see.

0:35:00.520 --> 0:35:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't see how can they can say that it

0:35:01.960 --> 0:35:04.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't And I don't see how it doesn't it it

0:35:04.920 --> 0:35:09.759
<v Speaker 1>has to. I mean, you're you're protecting a pile of

0:35:09.880 --> 0:35:13.239
<v Speaker 1>five million dollars that, by the way, you accepted in

0:35:13.320 --> 0:35:16.680
<v Speaker 1>lieu of of regular compensation because you expected that pile

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:18.960
<v Speaker 1>to grow as the stock and the evaluation of the

0:35:19.000 --> 0:35:22.319
<v Speaker 1>company grew to to hear them if they come out

0:35:22.360 --> 0:35:26.399
<v Speaker 1>and say so, um, you know, say that that this

0:35:26.440 --> 0:35:30.000
<v Speaker 1>didn't influence how they behaved and and and how they

0:35:30.040 --> 0:35:33.360
<v Speaker 1>worked for Thearonis, I think I would maintain as hawkwash.

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:36.279
<v Speaker 1>So here let's talk to put some flesh on on

0:35:36.320 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>the bones about the dollar value of Tharonis and what

0:35:40.800 --> 0:35:43.239
<v Speaker 1>people why people thought it could go to the moon?

0:35:43.880 --> 0:35:46.640
<v Speaker 1>Um at its peak, what was the most of the

0:35:46.680 --> 0:35:49.920
<v Speaker 1>company was worth ten billion dollars? And how much money

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:53.720
<v Speaker 1>had investors put into it. So if you count the

0:35:53.719 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 1>the money that was loaned by the private equity firm

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:01.720
<v Speaker 1>Fortress Investment Group eight last year to keep their US afloat,

0:36:01.800 --> 0:36:05.280
<v Speaker 1>that was million dollars. If you count that cash injection,

0:36:06.080 --> 0:36:10.040
<v Speaker 1>almost a billion dollars. And so that's a you immediately

0:36:10.200 --> 0:36:13.359
<v Speaker 1>you're talking about a ten x return if it if

0:36:13.400 --> 0:36:17.399
<v Speaker 1>it keeps going. The thing that keeps coming up as

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I was working my way through the book was there's

0:36:20.320 --> 0:36:23.480
<v Speaker 1>no there there there's there's really there was this initial

0:36:23.560 --> 0:36:27.080
<v Speaker 1>idea and then there was no new science developed, There

0:36:27.120 --> 0:36:32.560
<v Speaker 1>was no new technology developed. It was shocking. At what

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 1>point did the outside world before your columns start to think, hey,

0:36:38.680 --> 0:36:41.560
<v Speaker 1>there's a fraud here. Where where did the red flags

0:36:41.600 --> 0:36:47.279
<v Speaker 1>start appearing outside of the John Carrrews, No, there were

0:36:47.320 --> 0:36:53.080
<v Speaker 1>grumblings among people in the laboratory science profession. In fact,

0:36:53.239 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>one of the early voices was a guy at Stanford

0:36:58.320 --> 0:37:06.080
<v Speaker 1>UM UH John Ionitus UH Laboratory UH Medicine UM professor

0:37:06.120 --> 0:37:08.880
<v Speaker 1>at at Stanford. And in fact, he and I recently

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.719
<v Speaker 1>had a test the exchange by email because he was

0:37:11.800 --> 0:37:15.080
<v Speaker 1>angry that I hadn't mentioned him in my book um

0:37:15.200 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>and and I told him that that I apologize for

0:37:18.200 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 1>the omission, but I said, at the same time, you

0:37:20.920 --> 0:37:24.040
<v Speaker 1>know he he had essentially written an opinion piece in

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:30.800
<v Speaker 1>the journal of the Association for the American Medicine Medical

0:37:30.840 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 1>Association JAMMA UM and I believe it was in February

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:38.319
<v Speaker 1>or March of two thousand fifteen. Um and I had

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.880
<v Speaker 1>become aware of it about a month into my reporting

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>on the company. And really what he does in this

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.319
<v Speaker 1>piece is is UH he raises the question of whether

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:50.200
<v Speaker 1>theariness should be allowed to do what he termed stealth

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 1>research UH and and UH and he posed hard questions

0:37:55.360 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>about UH this trend toward companies in Silicon Valley Uh,

0:38:00.840 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>bypassing the traditional system of peer reviewed publication, which was

0:38:06.480 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 1>totally valid. And and you know, he put his finger

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on something. But what I did respond to him was,

0:38:13.000 --> 0:38:15.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's one thing to raise some of these questions,

0:38:15.360 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>another thing to prove that the company was a fraud.

0:38:18.040 --> 0:38:21.279
<v Speaker 1>And I think he he could agree that. Um that

0:38:21.400 --> 0:38:23.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I did the heavy lifting to to to

0:38:23.440 --> 0:38:26.279
<v Speaker 1>prove that. The two biggest red flags that leapt out

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>to me from the book the initial board of directors

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:34.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody from medicine, blood sciences lab. It's all, it's two

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of States, it's people from the defense. But it's

0:38:38.000 --> 0:38:42.560
<v Speaker 1>like a run of crazy things. Nobody from medicine, right, Um.

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.520
<v Speaker 1>And eventually they had somebody years later. But there were

0:38:45.560 --> 0:38:48.200
<v Speaker 1>there were two out of I think twelve old men,

0:38:48.920 --> 0:38:51.879
<v Speaker 1>old white men on the board. Uh. There were two

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>had some connection to medicine. One was Bill Frist, who

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 1>had once been a transplant surgeon before becoming a politician.

0:38:59.040 --> 0:39:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Not from the beginning, right, wasn't he a later addition? No? No, no,

0:39:01.880 --> 0:39:04.680
<v Speaker 1>he was there from the beginning. Not from the beginning.

0:39:04.680 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>But the board changed over the years, and the last

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:10.600
<v Speaker 1>iteration of the board essentially dated back to uh two

0:39:10.640 --> 0:39:14.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand eleven, two thousand twelve, so almost a decade after

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>they started. It's like she she acquired this new board

0:39:19.920 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 1>UM because she felt that it would help her. It

0:39:23.880 --> 0:39:27.000
<v Speaker 1>was sort of an exercise and reputational laundering, you know.

0:39:27.040 --> 0:39:30.520
<v Speaker 1>She attracted these larger than life figures with fantastic resumes.

0:39:30.640 --> 0:39:32.560
<v Speaker 1>And then the other thing that was a giant red

0:39:32.560 --> 0:39:37.720
<v Speaker 1>flag was all of the healthcare, medical sciences, medical device

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.880
<v Speaker 1>venture capitalists. Every one of them took a pass. Not

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a one put any money in this right because either

0:39:43.560 --> 0:39:46.880
<v Speaker 1>because either she wouldn't meet with them or when she

0:39:46.960 --> 0:39:50.080
<v Speaker 1>did accept meetings, and and some of these people started

0:39:50.120 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>asking hard questions. UM, her interest in continuing to meet uh,

0:39:56.200 --> 0:40:00.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, waned and and basically evaporated. We're speaking to

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>John Carrirew. He is the author of Bad Blood, Secrets

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:07.320
<v Speaker 1>and Lies in a Silicon Valley Startup. If you enjoy

0:40:07.440 --> 0:40:09.799
<v Speaker 1>this conversation, well be sure and come back for the

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>podcast Astras, where we keep the tape rolling and continue

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:18.400
<v Speaker 1>to discuss all things fraudulent at saranos. You can find

0:40:18.440 --> 0:40:23.200
<v Speaker 1>that wherever your final podcasts are sold Apple, iTunes, Stitcher, Overcast,

0:40:23.320 --> 0:40:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and of course Bloomberg dot com. Be sure and check

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>out my daily column. You can find that on Bloomberg

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:31.799
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Follow me on Twitter at Rich Halts. I'm

0:40:31.840 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Barry Rihults. You're listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.

0:40:49.600 --> 0:40:51.799
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the podcast, John, Thank you so much for

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:55.560
<v Speaker 1>doing this. I have to tell you I really enjoyed

0:40:55.719 --> 0:40:59.000
<v Speaker 1>reading the book. It retreats like a thriller as you're

0:40:59.040 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>going through it. It's just what that that's just astounding.

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:07.640
<v Speaker 1>It's mind blowing. Um. I'll come back to some of

0:41:07.680 --> 0:41:10.080
<v Speaker 1>the red flags. I have a ton of other questions,

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:12.719
<v Speaker 1>but I have to ask you how much fun was

0:41:12.760 --> 0:41:16.080
<v Speaker 1>this to write? You know, it was a lot of fun.

0:41:16.520 --> 0:41:19.000
<v Speaker 1>It was the most fulfilling thing I've ever done in

0:41:19.040 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>my life, uh, professionally or or probably otherwise. Um, it

0:41:24.239 --> 0:41:28.319
<v Speaker 1>was nerve racking at the very beginning because you know,

0:41:28.360 --> 0:41:32.239
<v Speaker 1>I had a book deal and a movie deal to wait.

0:41:32.280 --> 0:41:35.320
<v Speaker 1>When did the movie deal before the book was written? Right?

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Because the I reached my deal with Knopp to do

0:41:38.400 --> 0:41:41.319
<v Speaker 1>the book, I think it was in March, uh late

0:41:41.400 --> 0:41:43.640
<v Speaker 1>March of two thousand sixteen, and then the movie deal

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 1>came less than three months later, and I only went

0:41:46.600 --> 0:41:48.760
<v Speaker 1>on book leave and started writing the book and around

0:41:48.800 --> 0:41:52.200
<v Speaker 1>October of two thousand sixteen. So I had this pressure

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>from these two deals and from the fact that I

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:58.200
<v Speaker 1>had never written a book before. And uh, you know

0:41:58.239 --> 0:42:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that's easy. You just keep going. You've had a column,

0:42:00.560 --> 0:42:03.439
<v Speaker 1>but you don't stop till you got a hundred words. Yeah.

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:07.319
<v Speaker 1>So anyways, it wasn't easy staring at a blank word

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>document at first. But once I got a couple of

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>chapters in UM and I got the I felt like

0:42:12.160 --> 0:42:14.839
<v Speaker 1>I was in a rhythm and I was immersed. Uh.

0:42:14.880 --> 0:42:16.360
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I was continuing to do a

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:18.840
<v Speaker 1>lot of reporting, because the first three quarters of the

0:42:18.920 --> 0:42:21.440
<v Speaker 1>book are told in the third person and or the

0:42:22.080 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 1>what happens at the company until I come along, and

0:42:24.280 --> 0:42:27.400
<v Speaker 1>I had to re report a lot of that. Uh.

0:42:27.640 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Tons of new material came out of that reporting process.

0:42:30.680 --> 0:42:32.960
<v Speaker 1>So I was really reporting and writing at the same time.

0:42:33.520 --> 0:42:39.040
<v Speaker 1>And it was just uh so fun and fulfilling. And

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:41.239
<v Speaker 1>and I'm glad that to hear you say that it

0:42:41.280 --> 0:42:43.600
<v Speaker 1>read like a thriller, because I tried to to make

0:42:43.640 --> 0:42:47.359
<v Speaker 1>it read, uh like a page turner. I'm I'm a

0:42:47.360 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 1>big fan of Agatha Christie and UM Uh you know,

0:42:52.719 --> 0:42:56.400
<v Speaker 1>I I also uh read people like Michael Crichton and

0:42:56.600 --> 0:43:00.399
<v Speaker 1>and Dan Brown, um, and uh you know, I've picked

0:43:00.480 --> 0:43:03.200
<v Speaker 1>up on some of their some of their techniques to

0:43:03.400 --> 0:43:05.920
<v Speaker 1>to to keep the reader interested, and I channeled some

0:43:06.000 --> 0:43:07.879
<v Speaker 1>of that as I was writing this book, no doubt

0:43:07.920 --> 0:43:10.960
<v Speaker 1>about it. The um I got more questions I want

0:43:10.960 --> 0:43:14.719
<v Speaker 1>to circle back to, but I have to get into

0:43:15.400 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 1>the whole back and forth with the Wall Street Journals

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:22.240
<v Speaker 1>editors and the threats of litigation and then the last

0:43:22.239 --> 0:43:26.040
<v Speaker 1>minute hail Mary Elizabeth Holmes polled with Rupert Murdoch of

0:43:26.080 --> 0:43:29.040
<v Speaker 1>all of old people, who who owns the Wall Street Journal.

0:43:29.120 --> 0:43:32.520
<v Speaker 1>So so let's talk a little about that. Your editors

0:43:32.760 --> 0:43:36.400
<v Speaker 1>sound like they're great. They seemed really stand up and

0:43:36.440 --> 0:43:39.040
<v Speaker 1>there was never any Carrie, what the hell are you

0:43:39.040 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>doing to us? You're gonna get a suit? Come on,

0:43:41.160 --> 0:43:44.000
<v Speaker 1>this is crazy. Tell us what the process was like

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.799
<v Speaker 1>in the newsroom. Right. So my editor is a guy

0:43:47.880 --> 0:43:51.680
<v Speaker 1>named Mike Sikonolfi, who who's been old school, right, Yeah,

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:53.359
<v Speaker 1>he's been at the Wall Street Journal since I think

0:43:53.400 --> 0:43:57.840
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen hundreds. I'm kidding, I didn't start till the

0:43:58.960 --> 0:44:01.239
<v Speaker 1>can't tease him a lot about how long he's been

0:44:01.280 --> 0:44:02.960
<v Speaker 1>at the journal. I think he actually joined the Wall

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:06.560
<v Speaker 1>stret Journal in nur UM. But he's a legend at

0:44:06.600 --> 0:44:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the journal, and he is loved and admired UM. And

0:44:10.640 --> 0:44:16.000
<v Speaker 1>it's for good reason. He's a real journalist. UH loves

0:44:16.040 --> 0:44:20.440
<v Speaker 1>to do hard hitting stories and to back reporters who

0:44:20.520 --> 0:44:24.080
<v Speaker 1>are onto hard hitting stories. UM. And he's also great

0:44:24.120 --> 0:44:28.000
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that he knows, uh to to let

0:44:28.040 --> 0:44:31.000
<v Speaker 1>you have a long leash and to follow your knows.

0:44:31.080 --> 0:44:35.600
<v Speaker 1>He doesn't try to micromanage you. And UH, early in

0:44:35.680 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 1>two thousand fifteen, I think it was February one or

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>second week, I had gotten the tip from the pathology

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:44.480
<v Speaker 1>blogger UH, coming on top of the New Yorker story

0:44:44.719 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>that had raised questions in my mind. I went to

0:44:46.719 --> 0:44:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Mike and I said, I think potentially there's a story here,

0:44:50.080 --> 0:44:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and I think potentially it could be a really sexy,

0:44:52.480 --> 0:44:56.760
<v Speaker 1>big story. And he sort of listened to me summarize, UM,

0:44:56.840 --> 0:45:00.400
<v Speaker 1>what I thought the story might be, and he was like, ahead,

0:45:00.520 --> 0:45:02.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, try it for a couple of weeks, and

0:45:02.480 --> 0:45:04.280
<v Speaker 1>then just give me an update in a couple of weeks.

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And and and that's how the process started. And and UH,

0:45:07.760 --> 0:45:09.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, When I gave him the next update, it

0:45:09.440 --> 0:45:11.279
<v Speaker 1>was probably two or three weeks later, and I hadn't

0:45:11.320 --> 0:45:14.200
<v Speaker 1>made uh some headway, and so then he was like,

0:45:14.239 --> 0:45:17.200
<v Speaker 1>well keep going, and uh yeah, so he's a great

0:45:17.280 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 1>editor for sure. What what about when the nasty graham

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:22.799
<v Speaker 1>start to show up? I have to tell you when

0:45:22.880 --> 0:45:25.839
<v Speaker 1>I got mine, and it's nothing like what you're my.

0:45:26.040 --> 0:45:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a book review. Someone didn't like my book review.

0:45:28.640 --> 0:45:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I got a h three page letter. But my immediate

0:45:32.560 --> 0:45:35.359
<v Speaker 1>reaction is, oh my god, I totally screwed up. What

0:45:35.360 --> 0:45:36.960
<v Speaker 1>did I do? And then I started reading through and

0:45:37.000 --> 0:45:39.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, wait, wait a second, that that's not that's

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:43.320
<v Speaker 1>not true. Everything I wrote in there, you said henchman,

0:45:43.440 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I used the word thug, But more or less everything

0:45:46.960 --> 0:45:49.919
<v Speaker 1>in there in my review came right for your book.

0:45:49.920 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>In fact, normally I don't do that. When I do,

0:45:52.680 --> 0:45:54.440
<v Speaker 1>might hear the ten books I'm gonna read this summer

0:45:54.520 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 1>or this winter. And I read a book and I'm like, oh,

0:45:56.800 --> 0:45:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that's interesting, and I put it aside, but I so

0:46:00.040 --> 0:46:03.640
<v Speaker 1>totally enjoyed the story. I'm like, there are red flags everywhere,

0:46:03.680 --> 0:46:07.000
<v Speaker 1>there are lessons for investors. I'm gonna write something like that.

0:46:07.440 --> 0:46:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Not my usual approach, and I wrote it never in

0:46:10.680 --> 0:46:13.160
<v Speaker 1>a million years expecting we're going to get a letter.

0:46:13.440 --> 0:46:17.400
<v Speaker 1>But you get the email and it shakes you. You're like,

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:20.760
<v Speaker 1>holy cow, what did I do? And for a micro second,

0:46:20.800 --> 0:46:23.640
<v Speaker 1>it's I really I screwed the pooch. I really did

0:46:23.680 --> 0:46:27.040
<v Speaker 1>something terrible here. And then it took about ten seconds

0:46:27.080 --> 0:46:31.360
<v Speaker 1>before wait no, I literally shut the book and started

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:34.040
<v Speaker 1>dictating on my iPhone because I was on the beach

0:46:34.080 --> 0:46:37.200
<v Speaker 1>and the Hampton's got home, wrote it up that night,

0:46:37.320 --> 0:46:39.839
<v Speaker 1>polished it the next morning. Off it went. It was

0:46:40.000 --> 0:46:42.799
<v Speaker 1>literally the book could not have been more fresh in

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:47.600
<v Speaker 1>my mind before that, before that column. And so after

0:46:47.719 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 1>the letter came after I finally like took a deep breath,

0:46:53.280 --> 0:46:57.600
<v Speaker 1>figured out all the page citations that were being complained about.

0:46:57.719 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>You made the stuff up? No, I didn't. It's right

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:02.359
<v Speaker 1>from the book. Look, I stopped and I said, what

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:06.800
<v Speaker 1>was it like when carry my nothing little book review.

0:47:07.600 --> 0:47:12.399
<v Speaker 1>You're breaking major news stories. You're breaking stories that ultimately

0:47:12.960 --> 0:47:16.440
<v Speaker 1>leads to the revealing of fraud. So we have we

0:47:16.480 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 1>haven't even talked about the SEC and the other litigation

0:47:18.960 --> 0:47:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that's going on, but you basically brought down a company

0:47:22.120 --> 0:47:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that A was a fraud. B was putting people's life

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and safety at risk. If you get a false positive,

0:47:29.719 --> 0:47:31.839
<v Speaker 1>well you it scares the hell to you. But there's

0:47:31.880 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 1>no danger if you get a false negative. If they

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:38.000
<v Speaker 1>miss something because say this thing doesn't work, people die.

0:47:38.640 --> 0:47:42.440
<v Speaker 1>So what was it like when these letters started coming in,

0:47:42.480 --> 0:47:45.920
<v Speaker 1>these nasty graham start coming in. I can't imagine the

0:47:45.960 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 1>process you went through, right, It was stressful. I mean,

0:47:50.120 --> 0:47:52.319
<v Speaker 1>some of your colleagues have interviewed me about the Book

0:47:52.360 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>of asked whether there was any moment where I felt

0:47:55.560 --> 0:47:58.320
<v Speaker 1>in physical danger. And I don't think there was any

0:47:58.360 --> 0:48:00.560
<v Speaker 1>moment that I felt in physical ange. I mean there

0:48:00.560 --> 0:48:03.720
<v Speaker 1>were moments when I'd come out of my apartment building

0:48:03.719 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 1>in Brooklyn and I'd look left and right to see

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 1>if I could spot anyone UH following me. Do you

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:12.200
<v Speaker 1>think you would follow? I don't know. I don't. I

0:48:12.239 --> 0:48:15.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know the assumption as they do a full online

0:48:15.640 --> 0:48:18.799
<v Speaker 1>search if they have, if they had someone following me,

0:48:18.840 --> 0:48:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and that comes out, I will not be surprised. But

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:24.120
<v Speaker 1>I can't say one way or another whether they did

0:48:24.200 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 1>or not. I just don't know. I didn't I didn't

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:31.319
<v Speaker 1>feel physically threatened. My biggest source of stress was that

0:48:31.440 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>this scorched earth campaign to intimidate my sources and turn

0:48:36.120 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 1>them and to also intimidate the paper that it would

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:43.160
<v Speaker 1>be fruitful and that they would succeed in destroying the

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:46.240
<v Speaker 1>scaffolding of reporting upon which I had built this story,

0:48:46.719 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 1>and that ultimately, uh, you know, the story wouldn't come out.

0:48:50.280 --> 0:48:52.920
<v Speaker 1>That was for me, that was the big source of stress.

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And I finally, you know, breathed a sigh of relief

0:48:56.120 --> 0:48:58.000
<v Speaker 1>when the story was in the paper. I think it

0:48:58.040 --> 0:49:03.040
<v Speaker 1>was October, uh, two thousand fifteen, and then I didn't

0:49:03.040 --> 0:49:05.600
<v Speaker 1>really have time to basket it very long because then

0:49:05.640 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 1>I immediately you know, on to the next one. I

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:10.439
<v Speaker 1>was on to the to the to the first follow

0:49:10.520 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>up story, which we published that very night. Um, and uh,

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, from there it was months and months of

0:49:18.320 --> 0:49:22.400
<v Speaker 1>more follow up reporting, and I think, uh, with each

0:49:22.480 --> 0:49:25.880
<v Speaker 1>week that passed and with each regulatory inspection and finding,

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:29.799
<v Speaker 1>we were vindicated more and more until recently, you know,

0:49:29.840 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>the criminal charges that were filed by the Justice Department,

0:49:34.320 --> 0:49:37.120
<v Speaker 1>the wire fraud fraud charges filed against Elizabeth Holmes and

0:49:37.120 --> 0:49:40.000
<v Speaker 1>Sunny Baliwani by the Justice Department. Really, you know, we're

0:49:40.000 --> 0:49:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate of vindication that my reporting was correct and

0:49:44.160 --> 0:49:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I had been right all along. What about the state

0:49:46.000 --> 0:49:50.799
<v Speaker 1>of California. Did they do any criminal investigations and it

0:49:50.840 --> 0:49:54.799
<v Speaker 1>all took place primarily in California? Are they getting a

0:49:54.880 --> 0:49:58.440
<v Speaker 1>pass by the state. Well, if you depends. If you

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 1>count the the U. S. Attorney's Office in San Francisco

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:05.839
<v Speaker 1>as a federal it's not stage okay. So then if

0:50:05.880 --> 0:50:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you don't count them, California did nothing, that's shocking. I mean,

0:50:11.640 --> 0:50:14.680
<v Speaker 1>this is a serious fraud. It's a billion dollars and

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>investor money, not counting um, not counting the Fortress stuff

0:50:19.040 --> 0:50:22.319
<v Speaker 1>after the fact. So it's almost a billion dollars and

0:50:23.560 --> 0:50:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the risk to individuals. You know, one of in the

0:50:28.000 --> 0:50:31.160
<v Speaker 1>book you describe the Paraos people and I don't remember.

0:50:31.160 --> 0:50:34.520
<v Speaker 1>I was the lawyers or others intimidating some of the

0:50:34.600 --> 0:50:37.040
<v Speaker 1>doctors who had had used that. That was Sunny Bow.

0:50:37.320 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>That was the number two executive the company, the president

0:50:40.360 --> 0:50:43.400
<v Speaker 1>of the company, who was the boyfriend of the founder,

0:50:43.680 --> 0:50:46.320
<v Speaker 1>secret boyfriend of the secret boyfriend of the founder. She

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>was hiding it from everyone, including her own board, flewed

0:50:49.200 --> 0:50:53.399
<v Speaker 1>out to Phoenix and proceeded to intimidate and threaten all

0:50:53.480 --> 0:50:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the doctors who had spoken to me on the record,

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And how did they know the names of those doctors

0:50:57.440 --> 0:51:01.200
<v Speaker 1>because they had asked that we a of them information

0:51:02.080 --> 0:51:04.840
<v Speaker 1>about the doctors and patients and their blood test results

0:51:04.840 --> 0:51:07.279
<v Speaker 1>so that they could rebut them and respond to them,

0:51:07.360 --> 0:51:09.080
<v Speaker 1>which is natural. I mean we you know, you have

0:51:09.160 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 1>you have to have the the party that you're investigating

0:51:11.719 --> 0:51:13.880
<v Speaker 1>and writing about has to have the opportunity to respond.

0:51:13.920 --> 0:51:15.680
<v Speaker 1>And so we did that. And what did they do?

0:51:16.280 --> 0:51:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Rather than responding, they went and they used the information

0:51:19.000 --> 0:51:21.080
<v Speaker 1>to find the people and threaten them, and didn't one

0:51:21.080 --> 0:51:23.040
<v Speaker 1>of the doctors pretty much tell them to go jump.

0:51:23.080 --> 0:51:25.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought one of the doctors was real stand up.

0:51:25.120 --> 0:51:26.920
<v Speaker 1>In the book, there were a couple of doctors who

0:51:27.560 --> 0:51:31.720
<v Speaker 1>either refused to meet with them or or told him, uh,

0:51:31.800 --> 0:51:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you know one and one comes to mind Dr Adrian Stewart,

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:39.520
<v Speaker 1>who who too had two colleagues who had buckled under

0:51:39.560 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 1>pressure and signed these uh statements essentially recanting what they

0:51:43.640 --> 0:51:47.000
<v Speaker 1>told me. Uh. She wasn't there when her two Stewarts,

0:51:47.239 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 1>when her two colleagues uh were presented with those statements

0:51:51.320 --> 0:51:54.359
<v Speaker 1>and chickened out, And she came back a week later

0:51:54.480 --> 0:51:56.759
<v Speaker 1>by which time I hadn't managed to reach her, and

0:51:56.800 --> 0:52:00.759
<v Speaker 1>so she was prepared to be say, which she was

0:52:00.840 --> 0:52:03.520
<v Speaker 1>as soon as she got back by Sunny Bowani, and

0:52:03.560 --> 0:52:07.239
<v Speaker 1>she stood, you know. She she refused to sign the

0:52:07.600 --> 0:52:09.920
<v Speaker 1>document that he put to her, even though he told her,

0:52:10.360 --> 0:52:14.000
<v Speaker 1>if your name appears saying anything about the Ainos in

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:17.200
<v Speaker 1>a Wall Street Journal story, we will drag your reputation

0:52:17.280 --> 0:52:20.839
<v Speaker 1>through the mud. Nice guy. Good for her. She she's

0:52:20.880 --> 0:52:24.719
<v Speaker 1>another one of the heroes in the book. So I

0:52:24.800 --> 0:52:28.160
<v Speaker 1>have to bring up the hail Mary that Elizabeth Holmes

0:52:28.560 --> 0:52:32.520
<v Speaker 1>pulled with Rupert Murdoch, who owner of Fox News, of

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:35.680
<v Speaker 1>which Wall Street Journal was part of all the one

0:52:35.719 --> 0:52:38.120
<v Speaker 1>way I have to correct you now it's been split

0:52:38.440 --> 0:52:40.680
<v Speaker 1>blah blah. Webster Journals part of News Corps, which is

0:52:40.719 --> 0:52:44.239
<v Speaker 1>a separate company. Fox is part of Century Fix. Right,

0:52:44.280 --> 0:52:47.320
<v Speaker 1>So this is at the time it was a single entity.

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:50.760
<v Speaker 1>This is pre split, right, this was post split split

0:52:50.840 --> 0:52:56.440
<v Speaker 1>was really alright? So part of news Corp, an investor

0:52:56.680 --> 0:53:02.840
<v Speaker 1>in Paraos. And the day before are publication was it October?

0:53:05.040 --> 0:53:08.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's two weeks before publication. She and she had

0:53:08.400 --> 0:53:11.640
<v Speaker 1>already done this once a month or two prior, when

0:53:11.840 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 1>she had invited Murdoch to come to Theonos offices in Paloazza,

0:53:15.640 --> 0:53:18.319
<v Speaker 1>and she'd raised my story with him and told him

0:53:18.360 --> 0:53:22.799
<v Speaker 1>I had gathered all this information that was false, uh, misleading,

0:53:22.880 --> 0:53:25.040
<v Speaker 1>and that would do great damage to the company if

0:53:25.040 --> 0:53:27.480
<v Speaker 1>it was published. And she had read about that the

0:53:27.640 --> 0:53:30.400
<v Speaker 1>last one, the latter she invited him to kill it,

0:53:30.440 --> 0:53:33.759
<v Speaker 1>and he the mirrored, told her that, you know, he

0:53:33.760 --> 0:53:36.840
<v Speaker 1>trusted the journal's editors to do the right thing. I

0:53:36.880 --> 0:53:39.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't want to involve himself. And then she came again

0:53:40.960 --> 0:53:44.760
<v Speaker 1>late September, I think it was September, two weeks before

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:46.880
<v Speaker 1>my first story was published. She met with him in

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:51.320
<v Speaker 1>his eighth floor office in News Corp Building on fifth floor,

0:53:51.480 --> 0:53:54.399
<v Speaker 1>so three floors, three floors above me. She was there,

0:53:54.520 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>meeting with him one on one, raising my story with

0:53:57.280 --> 0:54:01.799
<v Speaker 1>him urgently, again hoping that he would volunteer to kill it,

0:54:02.480 --> 0:54:06.319
<v Speaker 1>and uh, he did no such thing, despite having a

0:54:06.360 --> 0:54:10.240
<v Speaker 1>hundred twenty five million reasons to do. Soon dollar investment

0:54:10.239 --> 0:54:14.840
<v Speaker 1>in the Eventually Murdoch to his credit, so the story

0:54:15.200 --> 0:54:19.640
<v Speaker 1>publishes some years later. Murdoch sells his interest back to

0:54:19.640 --> 0:54:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the company for a dollar, so he gets the tax

0:54:22.719 --> 0:54:27.640
<v Speaker 1>right off a year and a half later, approximately sells

0:54:28.280 --> 0:54:30.560
<v Speaker 1>his stake back in the company to the to the

0:54:30.560 --> 0:54:33.839
<v Speaker 1>company for a symbolic dollar, so that he can use

0:54:33.920 --> 0:54:38.560
<v Speaker 1>that huge loss to write off taxes on other earnings.

0:54:38.560 --> 0:54:42.200
<v Speaker 1>But um, there wasn't addendum to that buyback deal, which

0:54:42.239 --> 0:54:47.920
<v Speaker 1>was that if Fairness settled any litigation with Huh, an

0:54:47.960 --> 0:54:50.120
<v Speaker 1>investor who felt they had been defrauded for more than

0:54:50.120 --> 0:54:53.240
<v Speaker 1>forty million dollars, then Murdoch would be entitled to another

0:54:53.320 --> 0:54:56.360
<v Speaker 1>payment of four million dollars. And so that that he

0:54:56.440 --> 0:54:59.160
<v Speaker 1>did get that additional four million dollars later because there

0:54:59.200 --> 0:55:02.239
<v Speaker 1>no settled with the San Francisco Hedge Fund partner fund

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:05.440
<v Speaker 1>that had invested a hundred million uh Sarrens settled with

0:55:05.520 --> 0:55:08.640
<v Speaker 1>them for forty three million in the in the spring

0:55:08.680 --> 0:55:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of two thousand seventeen, and so that entitled Murdoch to

0:55:11.160 --> 0:55:13.720
<v Speaker 1>another four million. So he got four million plus one dollar.

0:55:14.440 --> 0:55:19.520
<v Speaker 1>He's still in other words, he's still lost one million dollars. Amazing. Um,

0:55:19.840 --> 0:55:21.799
<v Speaker 1>there's a couple of other selmans. I wanted to ask

0:55:22.120 --> 0:55:25.880
<v Speaker 1>this safe way in Walgreens, these companies had such a

0:55:26.000 --> 0:55:29.440
<v Speaker 1>bad case of Foamo. They spent a ton of money

0:55:29.840 --> 0:55:33.319
<v Speaker 1>because they were afraid their competitors would get in over

0:55:33.400 --> 0:55:38.319
<v Speaker 1>them despite never seeing the machine, never getting the technology

0:55:38.320 --> 0:55:40.799
<v Speaker 1>of the science. Well, they saw the machine, but she

0:55:40.840 --> 0:55:43.520
<v Speaker 1>would do these these fake demos again. So the real

0:55:43.600 --> 0:55:45.960
<v Speaker 1>machine they saw, no, they saw, they saw the real machine.

0:55:46.000 --> 0:55:48.280
<v Speaker 1>But there was a what they called this secret demo

0:55:48.360 --> 0:55:52.680
<v Speaker 1>protocol where the Walgreens or the safe Way representative, or

0:55:52.680 --> 0:55:56.040
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the board member or even the journalist came and

0:55:56.080 --> 0:55:59.319
<v Speaker 1>had you know, saw the mini lab which was this

0:55:59.360 --> 0:56:04.759
<v Speaker 1>big black box with a digital UH interface, and they'd

0:56:04.840 --> 0:56:08.160
<v Speaker 1>have their finger pricked and the small fingerstick sample would

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:10.600
<v Speaker 1>be put in this cartridge which itself would be slotted

0:56:10.640 --> 0:56:14.160
<v Speaker 1>into the mini lab machine. The Mini lab machine would

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:17.440
<v Speaker 1>be turned on and the testing what you'd hear the

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:19.680
<v Speaker 1>worrying of the machine. And so you think the testing

0:56:19.719 --> 0:56:22.080
<v Speaker 1>has started, and they'd say this is gonna take a while.

0:56:22.080 --> 0:56:24.719
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you go out for lunch or visit the

0:56:24.719 --> 0:56:27.879
<v Speaker 1>rest of the building, or meet with Elizabeth in her

0:56:27.920 --> 0:56:31.440
<v Speaker 1>office and then we'll get you your test result. And

0:56:31.520 --> 0:56:35.560
<v Speaker 1>so the person Walgreen, Safeway or board member would leave

0:56:35.760 --> 0:56:38.600
<v Speaker 1>the room and then when they were out of sight,

0:56:39.200 --> 0:56:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a THEONIS employee would stop the Theoronis Mini Lab UH

0:56:44.360 --> 0:56:46.840
<v Speaker 1>take the cartridge out, take the blood sample out of

0:56:46.880 --> 0:56:50.040
<v Speaker 1>the cartridge, and bring it to the Theonis lab where

0:56:50.040 --> 0:56:53.880
<v Speaker 1>they would either test it manually at the bench or

0:56:54.080 --> 0:56:57.000
<v Speaker 1>run it on one of the hacked Semens analyzers. So

0:56:57.040 --> 0:56:59.520
<v Speaker 1>if someone says, no, I'm fine, I got my phone,

0:56:59.520 --> 0:57:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna just day busy, I just want to watch

0:57:01.440 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 1>this machine work, nothing would have happened. Well, they yeah,

0:57:06.080 --> 0:57:08.960
<v Speaker 1>you would have been pretty much without saying so, calling

0:57:09.000 --> 0:57:11.879
<v Speaker 1>their bluff, and I'm sure they would have come up with,

0:57:12.520 --> 0:57:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, some um excuse to get you out of

0:57:16.320 --> 0:57:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the room at some point so that they could pull

0:57:18.440 --> 0:57:20.920
<v Speaker 1>off their sliders cans. So this is this has been

0:57:21.600 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a deep fraud from let's call it oh six oh seven.

0:57:25.520 --> 0:57:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Is that about right? Yeah? I mean you you could

0:57:27.920 --> 0:57:31.480
<v Speaker 1>argue that the fraud didn't matter as much until two

0:57:31.360 --> 0:57:33.800
<v Speaker 1>thirteen as long as the company remained in R and

0:57:33.880 --> 0:57:37.960
<v Speaker 1>D mode and never went live with the technology. Right.

0:57:38.000 --> 0:57:41.400
<v Speaker 1>But the second you commercialize the technology and you start

0:57:41.440 --> 0:57:43.880
<v Speaker 1>offering it to the public, which is what started happening

0:57:43.960 --> 0:57:46.400
<v Speaker 1>in the fall two thirteen, then it becomes a gigantic

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:50.000
<v Speaker 1>fraud because it's not just investors who are being defrauded,

0:57:50.040 --> 0:57:53.680
<v Speaker 1>but it's the public that's being put in harm's away

0:57:53.720 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and that and that's really you know, I think that's

0:57:56.040 --> 0:57:59.600
<v Speaker 1>what elevates this scandal, uh and puts it in in

0:58:00.040 --> 0:58:04.360
<v Speaker 1>antheon of of you know, modern financial scandals. Let's let's

0:58:04.400 --> 0:58:08.000
<v Speaker 1>talk about the army and Lieutenant Colonel Shoemaker, a no

0:58:08.000 --> 0:58:11.680
<v Speaker 1>nonsense guy with a medical background, was to approve all

0:58:11.760 --> 0:58:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of these um experimental R and D s. Holmes but

0:58:18.680 --> 0:58:21.840
<v Speaker 1>or whoever it was bumps into him when trying to

0:58:21.840 --> 0:58:24.520
<v Speaker 1>get this approved for the army. And this guy doesn't

0:58:24.560 --> 0:58:29.680
<v Speaker 1>take any bs, sees right through it practically from the beginning, well,

0:58:29.720 --> 0:58:33.880
<v Speaker 1>he didn't. He didn't necessarily think that the technology didn't work.

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:37.320
<v Speaker 1>He didn't know whether it worked or not. Um, But

0:58:37.520 --> 0:58:42.320
<v Speaker 1>what he felt strongly about was that this device needed

0:58:42.360 --> 0:58:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to be approved by the FDA. It's a medical device

0:58:45.320 --> 0:58:48.640
<v Speaker 1>for testing blood. How couldn't it be right? And and

0:58:48.640 --> 0:58:52.160
<v Speaker 1>and the f d A approves all laboratory testing equipment

0:58:52.200 --> 0:58:55.440
<v Speaker 1>that laughs by and so he felt that the Thermis

0:58:55.520 --> 0:58:58.240
<v Speaker 1>device was no exception. And so what he really had

0:58:58.280 --> 0:59:01.400
<v Speaker 1>a problem with was this regular to strategy that Elizabeth

0:59:01.400 --> 0:59:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Holmes head um, you know, presented him with in in

0:59:05.560 --> 0:59:08.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eleven, a couple of months after she had

0:59:08.240 --> 0:59:11.320
<v Speaker 1>met Maddis and wrapped Manis around her finger and gotten

0:59:11.320 --> 0:59:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Maddis to back this notion that the Themis technology would

0:59:14.800 --> 0:59:17.240
<v Speaker 1>be used in the field in Afghanistan. And for that

0:59:17.280 --> 0:59:20.560
<v Speaker 1>to happen, it had to go through Lieutenant Colonel Shoemaker

0:59:20.560 --> 0:59:24.080
<v Speaker 1>at Fort Detrick UH in Maryland because he was the

0:59:24.080 --> 0:59:27.680
<v Speaker 1>guy who had to approve such experiments. So this lieutenant

0:59:27.680 --> 0:59:30.800
<v Speaker 1>colonel gets a phone call from a four star general,

0:59:30.880 --> 0:59:33.800
<v Speaker 1>Is that right? Right? And so yeah, later, you know,

0:59:33.840 --> 0:59:37.480
<v Speaker 1>he had has these these clash diplomatic clashes with Elizabeth

0:59:37.600 --> 0:59:41.160
<v Speaker 1>and it becomes clear, uh to her that she's not

0:59:41.200 --> 0:59:44.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna be able to steamroll him. And but so she

0:59:44.200 --> 0:59:48.240
<v Speaker 1>appeals to to Maddis and she emails him and at

0:59:48.280 --> 0:59:50.680
<v Speaker 1>that point he's actually in the war theater in Afghanistan

0:59:51.280 --> 0:59:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh she uh because what what's happened by then

0:59:54.840 --> 0:59:58.840
<v Speaker 1>is that Shoemaker has not only resisted what she wants

0:59:58.880 --> 1:00:03.080
<v Speaker 1>to do, he has passed on what's he what he's

1:00:03.160 --> 1:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>learned about the Theoranis regulatory approach to the f d

1:00:05.720 --> 1:00:09.080
<v Speaker 1>A and two CMS, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services,

1:00:09.120 --> 1:00:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and CMS has dispatched an inspector to do a surprise visit.

1:00:13.600 --> 1:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>And Elizabeth is furious about this, and so she writes Madis,

1:00:17.200 --> 1:00:21.040
<v Speaker 1>who's an Afghanistan, and Mannis gets her email. He's furious.

1:00:21.080 --> 1:00:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And so in August of two thousand twelve, Shoemaker has

1:00:25.280 --> 1:00:29.520
<v Speaker 1>to fly down with an FDA official to Tampa, Florida,

1:00:30.480 --> 1:00:32.680
<v Speaker 1>which is, you know, the headquarters of the Central Command,

1:00:32.720 --> 1:00:34.800
<v Speaker 1>because Maddis at that point was the head of the

1:00:34.840 --> 1:00:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Central Command. And he has to meet with Mannis and

1:00:37.920 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>explain to this legendary journal general, I'm sorry, uh that

1:00:44.400 --> 1:00:47.440
<v Speaker 1>uh you know that that he can't say yes to

1:00:47.640 --> 1:00:51.640
<v Speaker 1>what this uh general wants uh and and here's why.

1:00:51.800 --> 1:00:54.920
<v Speaker 1>And so he and this um FDA official named Alberto

1:00:54.960 --> 1:00:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Gutierrez go in brief Maddis um and they reach a compromise,

1:00:59.560 --> 1:01:03.720
<v Speaker 1>which is that Theoronis can the Thearoness experiment can proceed

1:01:03.800 --> 1:01:09.280
<v Speaker 1>only if it's using after the fact, left over de

1:01:09.480 --> 1:01:13.880
<v Speaker 1>identified samples from wounded soldiers wounded or healthy for that matter,

1:01:14.400 --> 1:01:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and um and so that they could feed it into

1:01:16.960 --> 1:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>it if they want a big sample of blood to

1:01:19.240 --> 1:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>run tests. But nobody in the field is relying on

1:01:22.120 --> 1:01:25.320
<v Speaker 1>this for medical exactly exactly and so, but that you know,

1:01:25.440 --> 1:01:28.360
<v Speaker 1>that opens a window for for Theoroness to do this,

1:01:28.480 --> 1:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and inexplicably, over the ensuing months, Theonis can never seem

1:01:32.880 --> 1:01:36.640
<v Speaker 1>to get its act together to to get the study

1:01:36.680 --> 1:01:41.680
<v Speaker 1>protocol written and ready, um and and and then you know,

1:01:41.720 --> 1:01:46.640
<v Speaker 1>everyone retires, Mannis retires, his uh aid de camp retires,

1:01:47.040 --> 1:01:51.720
<v Speaker 1>Shoemaker ends up retiring mid two thirteen. Um. The live

1:01:51.800 --> 1:01:54.520
<v Speaker 1>experiment in the field in Afghanistan, and that Elizabeth wanted

1:01:55.120 --> 1:01:57.720
<v Speaker 1>never ends up happening. And then wait, wait, wait, wait

1:01:57.720 --> 1:02:01.200
<v Speaker 1>wait why would she want to live? Is she still

1:02:01.240 --> 1:02:04.919
<v Speaker 1>under the illusion this damn thing works? Like how delusional

1:02:05.480 --> 1:02:09.560
<v Speaker 1>is she? She thinks that it's sort of works. And

1:02:09.600 --> 1:02:12.520
<v Speaker 1>then in the end, just a few tweaks right that

1:02:12.600 --> 1:02:17.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, will iterate and uh and and basically what

1:02:17.840 --> 1:02:20.480
<v Speaker 1>she has her eyes on is two things. She has

1:02:20.520 --> 1:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>her eyes on the potentially huge new revenue stream that

1:02:25.800 --> 1:02:29.320
<v Speaker 1>a contract with the Pentagon, of course would bring. And

1:02:29.440 --> 1:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>she has her eyes on the validation of fairness that

1:02:33.480 --> 1:02:38.240
<v Speaker 1>she would get by by virtue of being a supplier

1:02:38.560 --> 1:02:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of this technology to the Pentagon. And what year is this?

1:02:41.520 --> 1:02:45.200
<v Speaker 1>This is two thoen So when did the Safe Way

1:02:45.320 --> 1:02:49.280
<v Speaker 1>and the Walgreens deals fall apart. So the Walgreens deal

1:02:49.400 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>only fell apart after my revelations, and it took not

1:02:54.520 --> 1:02:58.280
<v Speaker 1>even two sixteen. Really, I mean it fell apart in steps.

1:02:58.920 --> 1:03:01.520
<v Speaker 1>But they really, uh you know, ended the whole thing

1:03:01.560 --> 1:03:03.600
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand sixty. And I think it was the

1:03:03.600 --> 1:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>summer of two thousands, just a big three hundred million

1:03:05.800 --> 1:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>dollar right off or whatever it was. It was a

1:03:07.960 --> 1:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>d forty million that Walreens put in therapis. But I mean,

1:03:10.840 --> 1:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>but what about the renovator who did the big renovation

1:03:14.040 --> 1:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>was safe Way safe Weight loaned there, no thirty million,

1:03:16.800 --> 1:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>but on on the side, in addition to that loaned

1:03:19.360 --> 1:03:24.920
<v Speaker 1>it renovated, uh, these these clinics inside its supermarkets and

1:03:24.920 --> 1:03:28.600
<v Speaker 1>and about eight hundred of its supermarkets, Uh, in anticipation

1:03:28.880 --> 1:03:32.880
<v Speaker 1>of you know, having the Theonis technology offered there. And

1:03:32.960 --> 1:03:37.440
<v Speaker 1>that renovation cost three million dollars. So at least they

1:03:37.440 --> 1:03:42.000
<v Speaker 1>got new painting carpet is amazing. Um. The other two

1:03:42.280 --> 1:03:44.600
<v Speaker 1>before I get to my standard questions, the other two

1:03:45.320 --> 1:03:49.439
<v Speaker 1>um sort of frauds that that stood out that was surprising.

1:03:50.240 --> 1:03:55.960
<v Speaker 1>One was the Johns Hopkins letter the right explain the

1:03:56.440 --> 1:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>faux endorsement. Right, So uh, she goes to uh, Walgreen's

1:04:03.520 --> 1:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>has hired Johns Hopkins as sort of a consultant as

1:04:08.280 --> 1:04:12.400
<v Speaker 1>it's beginning to set up this partnership with Sanis and

1:04:12.480 --> 1:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>so in I believe it's May of two thousand ten,

1:04:16.480 --> 1:04:20.160
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth and her boyfriend's Sonny go to the Johns Hopkins

1:04:20.200 --> 1:04:24.520
<v Speaker 1>campus to meet with several Hopkins officials, among them laboratory scientists.

1:04:25.280 --> 1:04:27.640
<v Speaker 1>And they come with what is then the Edison, the

1:04:27.640 --> 1:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>black and white device, and they come with binders full

1:04:31.960 --> 1:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>of data, um, and they explain, you know, what the

1:04:35.520 --> 1:04:39.960
<v Speaker 1>device does, and they show these binders with these graphs

1:04:40.120 --> 1:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>that show, you know, it's basically a diagonal line that

1:04:43.360 --> 1:04:47.680
<v Speaker 1>shows a very tight correlation between the data from the

1:04:47.680 --> 1:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>Tharanis tests and regular technology with you know, regular Venus draws.

1:04:52.200 --> 1:04:54.280
<v Speaker 1>And that was a scam also, And that was a scam.

1:04:54.360 --> 1:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Those were fake, fake graphs and fake data. Um. But

1:04:58.000 --> 1:05:00.600
<v Speaker 1>they meant for a couple of hours, and you know,

1:05:00.640 --> 1:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the meeting, at theirness's request, gave rise to a two

1:05:04.600 --> 1:05:06.960
<v Speaker 1>page letter, not even two pages, a page and a half,

1:05:07.320 --> 1:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>which was essentially a summary of the meeting, minutes from

1:05:09.680 --> 1:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the meeting, saying this meeting happened, and you know what

1:05:13.160 --> 1:05:16.439
<v Speaker 1>the airiness has described sounds interesting. And by the way,

1:05:16.440 --> 1:05:19.680
<v Speaker 1>there's like small boilerplate uh at the end of the

1:05:19.760 --> 1:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>second letter saying you know, this is in no way

1:05:21.920 --> 1:05:27.200
<v Speaker 1>an endorsement by Johns Hopkins of any uh Thereness technology.

1:05:27.240 --> 1:05:29.760
<v Speaker 1>And she then uses this over the ensuing two or

1:05:29.800 --> 1:05:35.360
<v Speaker 1>three years to claim that UH tharoness Is technology has

1:05:35.480 --> 1:05:40.720
<v Speaker 1>been independently verified and validated by the Johns Hopkins School

1:05:40.720 --> 1:05:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of Medicine, and everyone falls for it. Nobody calls up

1:05:44.240 --> 1:05:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Johns Hopkins and says it seems that this is a

1:05:46.920 --> 1:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>stunning thing. Right time and time and time again, there

1:05:49.600 --> 1:05:53.720
<v Speaker 1>are these statements made, these claims made. Nobody does due diligence.

1:05:53.880 --> 1:05:57.880
<v Speaker 1>Nobody sees the technology, nobody sees the actual Well, open

1:05:57.960 --> 1:06:00.960
<v Speaker 1>up the machine. I can't like I would. It's one

1:06:00.960 --> 1:06:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of your Why the vcs walked because you have to

1:06:03.600 --> 1:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>show us this and we can't give you money. This

1:06:05.200 --> 1:06:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is not this isn't a negotiating tactic. It's it's show

1:06:09.720 --> 1:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>it us or we're out, because that's how we run. Yeah.

1:06:13.200 --> 1:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>That the one of the Hopkins Lab scientists who attended

1:06:15.960 --> 1:06:18.080
<v Speaker 1>that this meeting back in the spring of two thousand

1:06:18.040 --> 1:06:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and ten at the end of the meeting, said to Elizabeth,

1:06:20.720 --> 1:06:23.520
<v Speaker 1>you know this is all well and good, but you know,

1:06:23.600 --> 1:06:26.960
<v Speaker 1>for us to really do a rigorous verification, you would

1:06:27.080 --> 1:06:30.000
<v Speaker 1>need to send us one of your devices. Either you

1:06:30.040 --> 1:06:32.320
<v Speaker 1>could leave this one or ship another one of them

1:06:32.400 --> 1:06:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to us. And then I'll want to have it in

1:06:34.640 --> 1:06:37.560
<v Speaker 1>my lab for several months and put it, you know,

1:06:39.120 --> 1:06:42.200
<v Speaker 1>pointed through its paces and compare it with the diagnostic

1:06:42.200 --> 1:06:44.840
<v Speaker 1>equipment that I have in my lab. And so he

1:06:44.920 --> 1:06:46.760
<v Speaker 1>encouraged her to do that, and she said she would.

1:06:46.920 --> 1:06:49.040
<v Speaker 1>And of course she promised a lot of stuff. It

1:06:49.120 --> 1:06:52.600
<v Speaker 1>never happened, never never happened. She promised data, she never delivered.

1:06:52.640 --> 1:06:56.560
<v Speaker 1>She promised documentation, never delivered. But we know why because

1:06:56.680 --> 1:07:00.440
<v Speaker 1>this thing was a fraud for years and years before.

1:07:02.200 --> 1:07:04.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you live like that? How does somebody not

1:07:04.920 --> 1:07:08.320
<v Speaker 1>expect to get caught? You know? Again, in her mind

1:07:08.360 --> 1:07:11.440
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the way that she channeled the traditional

1:07:11.480 --> 1:07:13.920
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, and again that what I think it was.

1:07:14.000 --> 1:07:17.479
<v Speaker 1>The traditional Silicon Valley is the industry that grew out

1:07:17.480 --> 1:07:20.200
<v Speaker 1>of the computer chip industry, then became you know, the

1:07:20.600 --> 1:07:23.520
<v Speaker 1>personal computer revolution, and then the Internet boom, and now

1:07:23.600 --> 1:07:27.360
<v Speaker 1>it's the smartphone that's the traditional Silicon Valley. It's based

1:07:27.400 --> 1:07:30.760
<v Speaker 1>on coding, computer programming. And it's true that there's been

1:07:30.800 --> 1:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of faking it until you make it. There's

1:07:33.720 --> 1:07:38.080
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of exaggerating, making exaggerated vae vaporware to

1:07:38.160 --> 1:07:40.720
<v Speaker 1>get the funding that you need to to make the

1:07:40.760 --> 1:07:44.760
<v Speaker 1>product happen. And she I think because she modeled herself

1:07:44.800 --> 1:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>after jobs and to a lesser extent, Larry Ellison, she thought,

1:07:48.200 --> 1:07:51.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, this is the rule book that everyone goes

1:07:51.360 --> 1:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>by in Silicon Valley, Like, it's not a big deal

1:07:54.120 --> 1:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>if I go by it too. So, last question on

1:07:57.680 --> 1:08:01.280
<v Speaker 1>her prepping for this. I watched a couple of videos.

1:08:02.240 --> 1:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>She always seems to speak like this in all of

1:08:04.600 --> 1:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>our videos. It's this sort of weird baritone. And I

1:08:08.640 --> 1:08:12.640
<v Speaker 1>read a number of other articles that suggest that she

1:08:12.840 --> 1:08:18.240
<v Speaker 1>faked this deep voice for reasons known apparently only to herself.

1:08:18.840 --> 1:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>What is the story with that? Is that her real

1:08:21.000 --> 1:08:23.519
<v Speaker 1>voice is that fake? Is this trying to be a

1:08:23.560 --> 1:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>woman in a man's world? Like, what is what is

1:08:26.400 --> 1:08:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the deal with that it's not her real voice? Um?

1:08:29.080 --> 1:08:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And how do we know that for sure? So I'll

1:08:31.880 --> 1:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>give you at least four data points. One is an

1:08:34.600 --> 1:08:37.519
<v Speaker 1>anecdote that I tell in the book. I think it's

1:08:37.560 --> 1:08:41.479
<v Speaker 1>in chapter eight of the book where an employee who

1:08:41.479 --> 1:08:44.040
<v Speaker 1>has just been hired to as an injury to work

1:08:44.040 --> 1:08:47.160
<v Speaker 1>as an engineer on the mini lab meets with her

1:08:47.280 --> 1:08:49.960
<v Speaker 1>in early two thousand eleven, and the meeting is at

1:08:49.960 --> 1:08:52.400
<v Speaker 1>the end of a long day. She's excited that he's

1:08:52.439 --> 1:08:55.559
<v Speaker 1>there and they're making progress on building this machine. And

1:08:55.880 --> 1:08:58.759
<v Speaker 1>she closes the meeting by getting up and and taking

1:08:58.760 --> 1:09:01.639
<v Speaker 1>her coat off her chair, and as she goes towards,

1:09:01.680 --> 1:09:04.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, to open the door of her office to

1:09:04.880 --> 1:09:08.519
<v Speaker 1>see him out, she lapses out of her baritone. She

1:09:08.520 --> 1:09:11.439
<v Speaker 1>forgets to put on the baritone and lapses into a

1:09:11.600 --> 1:09:15.759
<v Speaker 1>much more natural sounding young woman's voice. And he's totally

1:09:15.760 --> 1:09:18.599
<v Speaker 1>startled at this point because he's only heard her with

1:09:18.640 --> 1:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the baritone, and he he realizes at that point that

1:09:21.640 --> 1:09:24.360
<v Speaker 1>the voice is fake. He kind of turns it in

1:09:24.439 --> 1:09:26.800
<v Speaker 1>his head over the next couple of days and realizes,

1:09:27.360 --> 1:09:31.639
<v Speaker 1>you know, she must have decided this was necessary because, uh,

1:09:31.920 --> 1:09:35.519
<v Speaker 1>Silicon valleys a man's world, and she dropped out as

1:09:35.560 --> 1:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>this young woman and that was so unusual. She must

1:09:38.280 --> 1:09:40.400
<v Speaker 1>have felt along the way that it was necessary to

1:09:40.439 --> 1:09:43.559
<v Speaker 1>get people's attention. Now, the other data points I have

1:09:43.800 --> 1:09:46.880
<v Speaker 1>are one is that um, as the book makes clear,

1:09:47.360 --> 1:09:50.599
<v Speaker 1>one of my sources for the book was Elizabeth's best

1:09:50.600 --> 1:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>friend at Stanford, a young woman by the name of

1:09:53.200 --> 1:09:57.479
<v Speaker 1>Chelsea Burquette UM. And Chelsea says that Elizabeth's voice was

1:09:57.520 --> 1:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>nothing like that at Stanford or even after Stanford. UM.

1:10:02.120 --> 1:10:06.200
<v Speaker 1>And so Chelsea herself believes that the voice is fake. UM.

1:10:06.240 --> 1:10:11.160
<v Speaker 1>A family member UM uh cooperated as well for the book.

1:10:11.200 --> 1:10:13.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not going to say this person's name, but

1:10:14.320 --> 1:10:18.040
<v Speaker 1>that person believes and and uh professes that he knows

1:10:18.080 --> 1:10:21.200
<v Speaker 1>for a fact that the voice is fake. And then

1:10:21.840 --> 1:10:24.840
<v Speaker 1>there's probably the most conclusive proof is that there's an

1:10:24.880 --> 1:10:28.680
<v Speaker 1>interview that she gave to the show Biotech Nation in

1:10:29.000 --> 1:10:32.600
<v Speaker 1>May of two thousand five. It's an NPR show. UM

1:10:32.640 --> 1:10:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and I have a recording of it. And at that point,

1:10:34.760 --> 1:10:37.240
<v Speaker 1>she's eighteen months out of Stanford. She's like twenty or

1:10:37.240 --> 1:10:40.320
<v Speaker 1>twenty one years old. Uh. She gives this interview to

1:10:40.400 --> 1:10:45.799
<v Speaker 1>Morrow Gunn and um Uh she sounds nothing like uh

1:10:45.840 --> 1:10:51.759
<v Speaker 1>the Elizabeth Holmes of later years. She sounds like this, uh,

1:10:51.800 --> 1:10:56.479
<v Speaker 1>this this kid almost who's speaking very fast, uh, in

1:10:56.560 --> 1:11:00.680
<v Speaker 1>a much more natural sounding young woman's voice, that's a

1:11:00.680 --> 1:11:05.479
<v Speaker 1>couple of pitches higher and uh, and you realize listening

1:11:05.520 --> 1:11:10.160
<v Speaker 1>to that audio recording that she basically at a certain

1:11:10.200 --> 1:11:14.000
<v Speaker 1>point after that decided to create a whole new persona

1:11:14.040 --> 1:11:16.760
<v Speaker 1>for herself, and and that changing her voice was part

1:11:16.800 --> 1:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>of that new persona fashion. I always thought when you

1:11:19.680 --> 1:11:22.639
<v Speaker 1>close your b around, your voice changes, and that that

1:11:22.720 --> 1:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>could have something to do with it. But you're saying

1:11:24.920 --> 1:11:28.719
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with that whatsoever. It was for sure

1:11:28.960 --> 1:11:33.320
<v Speaker 1>a very part of a very contrived attempt to project

1:11:34.080 --> 1:11:39.479
<v Speaker 1>this uh you know, female Steve jobs Aura, which which

1:11:40.000 --> 1:11:46.559
<v Speaker 1>other than the other than the the black turtleneck. There

1:11:46.680 --> 1:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>was just nothing in common whatsoever. But um, hey, what

1:11:51.280 --> 1:11:54.880
<v Speaker 1>are you gonna do that? That's was That was um

1:11:54.920 --> 1:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>attempt and uh, just just astonishing. So I only have

1:11:59.680 --> 1:12:01.599
<v Speaker 1>you for a couple of more minutes. Let me jump

1:12:01.640 --> 1:12:05.599
<v Speaker 1>to my favorite questions that I ask all my guests.

1:12:05.960 --> 1:12:07.519
<v Speaker 1>Before I do that, I just have to say, we

1:12:07.600 --> 1:12:10.920
<v Speaker 1>covered a ton of stuff. Anything you want to bring up,

1:12:10.920 --> 1:12:14.840
<v Speaker 1>anything I might have missed you think is noteworthy. A

1:12:14.960 --> 1:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>funny moment in this saga, which is uh, forty eight

1:12:19.080 --> 1:12:24.200
<v Speaker 1>hours after my first story is published in October two fifteen, Um,

1:12:24.200 --> 1:12:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Elizabeth and Sonny lead this all employee meeting. You have

1:12:28.400 --> 1:12:31.559
<v Speaker 1>that in the book, and that's it's amazing that people

1:12:31.920 --> 1:12:34.920
<v Speaker 1>just go along with that. Yeah. And I was told that,

1:12:35.080 --> 1:12:37.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, at least half of the employees in the audience,

1:12:38.120 --> 1:12:41.880
<v Speaker 1>uh didn't go along with it. And and uh, I

1:12:41.880 --> 1:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>couldn't believe that this was actually happening. But then you

1:12:45.760 --> 1:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you did have some employees, many employees, who did go

1:12:48.200 --> 1:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>along with it. And I think it speaks to the

1:12:50.960 --> 1:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>culture of hubris arrogance. Uh. You know, us versus them,

1:12:57.960 --> 1:13:01.799
<v Speaker 1>we're above everything, Uh, even though we haven't really invented

1:13:01.800 --> 1:13:05.639
<v Speaker 1>anything new. Um. And and you know that that's it

1:13:05.680 --> 1:13:08.840
<v Speaker 1>really speaks to how broken the culture of that company was.

1:13:09.160 --> 1:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>F you, Carrie row is what Bawani and Holmes lead

1:13:15.120 --> 1:13:18.080
<v Speaker 1>them on chanting? And how long does this go on?

1:13:18.439 --> 1:13:20.640
<v Speaker 1>And I think people told you about it was it

1:13:20.680 --> 1:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>was just a couple of times, two or three chants, um.

1:13:25.000 --> 1:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>And it had been preceded. There had been a precedent

1:13:28.240 --> 1:13:33.040
<v Speaker 1>three months prior after Aaroness had received FDA approval for

1:13:33.200 --> 1:13:36.240
<v Speaker 1>one of its fingerstick tests. One turned out the only

1:13:36.280 --> 1:13:39.160
<v Speaker 1>fingerstick tests that ever got approval for was a test

1:13:39.200 --> 1:13:42.599
<v Speaker 1>to detect HERPS, which is actually a pretty easy test

1:13:42.640 --> 1:13:44.559
<v Speaker 1>to do because it's just a test that says yes

1:13:44.640 --> 1:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>or no, do you have the disease um. So those

1:13:47.160 --> 1:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>tests are much much easier than than most lab tests,

1:13:50.160 --> 1:13:54.080
<v Speaker 1>which are quantitative tests. Anyways, Aarons had gotten this approval

1:13:54.120 --> 1:13:56.599
<v Speaker 1>from the f d A and was very very proud,

1:13:57.600 --> 1:14:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and Sonny had led employees in the Uteria in a

1:14:02.080 --> 1:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>chant which I actually have on tape because I have

1:14:04.640 --> 1:14:07.840
<v Speaker 1>footage of that meeting, and he yeah, he had the

1:14:07.840 --> 1:14:11.200
<v Speaker 1>whole company yelling, and at that point the chant was

1:14:11.920 --> 1:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>directed at Aronos's rivals Quest and Lab Corps, where the

1:14:16.240 --> 1:14:19.280
<v Speaker 1>two nine pound guerrillas in the in the lab never

1:14:19.360 --> 1:14:22.400
<v Speaker 1>for a second thought this little pissent company with a

1:14:22.479 --> 1:14:26.280
<v Speaker 1>fake technology was That's the most amazing thing is they

1:14:26.360 --> 1:14:30.120
<v Speaker 1>think these are their rivals. And these two companies couldn't

1:14:30.160 --> 1:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>possibly care less about that. Well, I mean, by the

1:14:32.840 --> 1:14:36.920
<v Speaker 1>time she became famous, they certainly knew who she was.

1:14:37.080 --> 1:14:40.559
<v Speaker 1>And I think it, uh, it didn't escape them that

1:14:40.960 --> 1:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>the valuation of Paris first disclosed and Fortune magazine in

1:14:45.400 --> 1:14:48.840
<v Speaker 1>June two fourteen was nine billion, which was essentially the

1:14:49.120 --> 1:14:53.639
<v Speaker 1>same you know, market capitalization that Quest and Labcorp had

1:14:54.040 --> 1:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>so um that had to get their their attention, and

1:14:56.720 --> 1:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>I know it did. But yeah, the the the amount

1:15:01.320 --> 1:15:05.080
<v Speaker 1>that the degree to which Elizabeth and Sonny were obsessed

1:15:05.200 --> 1:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>with Quest and Lab Corp uh is uh exponentially greater

1:15:11.479 --> 1:15:14.439
<v Speaker 1>than uh, you know, than how concerned Question and lap

1:15:14.479 --> 1:15:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Court were with Paras. But anyways, that first chant was

1:15:19.439 --> 1:15:22.519
<v Speaker 1>directed at Quest and Lab Corps. And then three months later,

1:15:22.520 --> 1:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>when my story came out, at the end of this

1:15:25.080 --> 1:15:28.000
<v Speaker 1>meeting in which Elizabeth and Sonny had both been very

1:15:28.040 --> 1:15:32.000
<v Speaker 1>defiant about how my reporting was false and about how

1:15:32.040 --> 1:15:34.840
<v Speaker 1>they would take the fight to the journal and to

1:15:35.080 --> 1:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>the journalist, a senior software engineer asked Sonny if he

1:15:41.920 --> 1:15:45.120
<v Speaker 1>would lead them in a chant, and Uh, no, one

1:15:45.520 --> 1:15:48.599
<v Speaker 1>you know had to ask what the chant was. Everyone

1:15:48.680 --> 1:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>knew based on what had happened three months prior, and

1:15:51.160 --> 1:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>so Sonny was of course very happy to oblige and

1:15:56.439 --> 1:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>lead the company for a second time in a chant. Uh.

1:16:00.320 --> 1:16:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And this time added my name after the F you,

1:16:03.439 --> 1:16:07.559
<v Speaker 1>which was convenient because it rhymed amazing, John carry row

1:16:07.880 --> 1:16:12.360
<v Speaker 1>your fake news. Let's um that's what he should have said. Um,

1:16:12.920 --> 1:16:14.800
<v Speaker 1>I think the book is not fake news, and it's

1:16:14.840 --> 1:16:19.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely fascinating. Let's let's jump to to our favorite questions,

1:16:19.240 --> 1:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm I'm going to skip around a little bit

1:16:21.320 --> 1:16:24.040
<v Speaker 1>because I know we're tied on time. Tell us about

1:16:24.120 --> 1:16:30.080
<v Speaker 1>some of your early mentors, so, uh, I would cite

1:16:30.120 --> 1:16:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a few people. One of them would be uh my

1:16:33.400 --> 1:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>investigative team colleague Mark Merrimont. He's still at the Wall

1:16:37.800 --> 1:16:41.040
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal to this day and still does great work

1:16:41.080 --> 1:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>for the Wall Street Journal. Um was he on one

1:16:43.360 --> 1:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of the Pulitzer Prize winning teams that you uh yeah,

1:16:46.920 --> 1:16:50.559
<v Speaker 1>he was actually uh he he uh lead wrote one

1:16:50.600 --> 1:16:53.879
<v Speaker 1>of the stories that was in a package on corporate

1:16:53.920 --> 1:16:57.559
<v Speaker 1>scandals in two thousand two that won the Pulitzer Prize

1:16:57.600 --> 1:17:02.479
<v Speaker 1>for Explanatory Reporting, and I lead wrote another one of

1:17:02.479 --> 1:17:05.759
<v Speaker 1>those stories. Um, but he he had been a mentor,

1:17:06.080 --> 1:17:11.240
<v Speaker 1>uh several years prior on my first ever uh investigative work,

1:17:11.280 --> 1:17:16.639
<v Speaker 1>which was unmasking a Belgian a speech recognition software company

1:17:16.680 --> 1:17:19.400
<v Speaker 1>called learn out in Hospital, which was the pride of

1:17:19.479 --> 1:17:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Flanders back then. And I was based in Brussels, and

1:17:22.080 --> 1:17:25.919
<v Speaker 1>and Mark and another journal colleague named uh jesse Eisener

1:17:26.120 --> 1:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>had um uh smelled a rat and and started writing

1:17:31.120 --> 1:17:33.559
<v Speaker 1>about this company and they needed help from a reporter

1:17:33.560 --> 1:17:36.200
<v Speaker 1>on the ground in Belgium and sought out my help

1:17:36.240 --> 1:17:39.360
<v Speaker 1>and then we we ended up, you know, spending close

1:17:39.400 --> 1:17:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to a year unraveling the fraud of this company. And

1:17:42.640 --> 1:17:44.919
<v Speaker 1>I learned a ton from those twho's got two guys,

1:17:45.040 --> 1:17:49.360
<v Speaker 1>especially from Mark Merrimont and uh so he was a mentor.

1:17:49.400 --> 1:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>And then, UM, I'm gonna name check another former colleague,

1:17:53.400 --> 1:17:58.599
<v Speaker 1>Mike Williams, who's now the UH investigative editor at UM

1:17:58.640 --> 1:18:02.599
<v Speaker 1>at UH Reuters and who's a long time Wall Street

1:18:02.640 --> 1:18:06.040
<v Speaker 1>Journal reporter and editor. He was my bureau chief in

1:18:06.120 --> 1:18:09.160
<v Speaker 1>Paris for several years and he was later the Page

1:18:09.160 --> 1:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>one editor of the journal. And then of course Mike Sikonolfie,

1:18:12.400 --> 1:18:15.599
<v Speaker 1>who was my current editor on the Investor investigative team.

1:18:15.760 --> 1:18:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I would mention that Eisener went on to win the

1:18:18.920 --> 1:18:23.240
<v Speaker 1>first online Pulitzer for his work at a pro public

1:18:23.360 --> 1:18:27.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right. So um, a lot lots of Pulitzer Prize

1:18:27.320 --> 1:18:30.360
<v Speaker 1>UH winning journalists came out of out of his shop.

1:18:30.720 --> 1:18:33.800
<v Speaker 1>So who, um, let's talk about your favorite books. Bad

1:18:33.840 --> 1:18:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Blood is your first book? What do you read? Who

1:18:36.800 --> 1:18:43.320
<v Speaker 1>do you really enjoy? Fiction? Nonfiction? Right Blood related or not? So? Um,

1:18:43.479 --> 1:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I love nonfiction and I love UH page turning nonfiction.

1:18:50.640 --> 1:18:52.640
<v Speaker 1>One of my favorite books of all time is a

1:18:52.760 --> 1:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Civil Action, which I read in the in the late nineties. UH.

1:18:58.439 --> 1:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>I think it's uh. The name of the author is

1:19:00.160 --> 1:19:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Harror. I think he worked on that book for

1:19:02.160 --> 1:19:08.439
<v Speaker 1>seven years. UM. Another deeply reported book that I love

1:19:08.560 --> 1:19:12.560
<v Speaker 1>is Black Hawk Down by Mark Bowden. Uh an amazing

1:19:12.680 --> 1:19:18.920
<v Speaker 1>feat of reporting uh reconstructing uh what those soldiers went

1:19:18.960 --> 1:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>through in Somalia. Uh. Just an unbelievable book. UM. I

1:19:24.360 --> 1:19:30.280
<v Speaker 1>I loved the the sort of definitive UH nonfiction book

1:19:30.320 --> 1:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>about Wall Street and the eighties Barbarians at the Gate,

1:19:34.920 --> 1:19:39.040
<v Speaker 1>which was written by UH guys who at the time

1:19:39.080 --> 1:19:41.920
<v Speaker 1>worked for the Wall Street Journal, Brian Burrow and John Helliar.

1:19:42.240 --> 1:19:48.599
<v Speaker 1>They've long since moved on. UM. I am a big

1:19:48.640 --> 1:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>fan of the former Wall Street Journal reporter and now

1:19:54.040 --> 1:19:58.240
<v Speaker 1>best selling author Eric Larson. UM. Among his books H

1:19:58.439 --> 1:20:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Devil in the White City were um. Uh. The latest

1:20:03.880 --> 1:20:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that I lead that I read by him is about

1:20:06.920 --> 1:20:11.479
<v Speaker 1>the Lusitania. UM. He's just a terrific writer. UM. And

1:20:11.520 --> 1:20:15.000
<v Speaker 1>I would say, UH an influence in terms of writing

1:20:15.800 --> 1:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>UH non nonfiction probably my my biggest influence. So what

1:20:20.880 --> 1:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>has changed since you became a journalist twenty years ago.

1:20:24.080 --> 1:20:26.439
<v Speaker 1>How do you how do you see the we know,

1:20:26.560 --> 1:20:29.600
<v Speaker 1>the industry, the business of journalisms have changed. What do

1:20:29.640 --> 1:20:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you see as different in the actual reporting? Well, the

1:20:34.320 --> 1:20:40.680
<v Speaker 1>one obvious thing is the rise of social media. Um uh,

1:20:40.720 --> 1:20:45.479
<v Speaker 1>it's it's there everywhere you turn, you know. Uh. Um.

1:20:45.680 --> 1:20:49.400
<v Speaker 1>People you investigate are on social media or use social media.

1:20:49.560 --> 1:20:54.040
<v Speaker 1>I used LinkedIn to make contact with ex Theoris employees,

1:20:54.160 --> 1:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>one of them Tyler Schultz. Um and uh yeah, I

1:20:59.479 --> 1:21:02.360
<v Speaker 1>think that it's it's it's both a reporting tool, but

1:21:02.400 --> 1:21:06.760
<v Speaker 1>it's also a disinformation tool, as we see hint, hint

1:21:07.280 --> 1:21:12.240
<v Speaker 1>with the current administration, it's sort of a propaganda tool. Um.

1:21:12.280 --> 1:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Thinking of Twitter in particular, um uh and uh it's

1:21:17.920 --> 1:21:23.559
<v Speaker 1>got other sort of um effects on our craft, uh,

1:21:24.280 --> 1:21:26.240
<v Speaker 1>which some of which aren't so great, which is that

1:21:26.320 --> 1:21:28.400
<v Speaker 1>journalists spend a lot of time on Twitter, probably too

1:21:28.479 --> 1:21:34.519
<v Speaker 1>much time on Twitter instead of actually doing work. Um right,

1:21:34.600 --> 1:21:38.160
<v Speaker 1>and sometimes they appine on Twitter in a way that

1:21:38.160 --> 1:21:44.320
<v Speaker 1>that compromises their objectivity or person objectivity. Um. So yeah,

1:21:44.320 --> 1:21:46.880
<v Speaker 1>social media has been a game changer, I think for

1:21:46.880 --> 1:21:49.400
<v Speaker 1>for our profession. If I had to point to something,

1:21:50.160 --> 1:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>so tell us about a time you failed and what

1:21:52.320 --> 1:21:55.920
<v Speaker 1>you learned from the experience. So when I was a

1:21:55.920 --> 1:21:59.720
<v Speaker 1>brand new reporter at the Wall Street Journal Europe and

1:22:00.040 --> 1:22:04.559
<v Speaker 1>uscles back in I think it was UM and the

1:22:04.600 --> 1:22:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Wall Street Journal Europe back then was separate from the

1:22:07.000 --> 1:22:10.360
<v Speaker 1>mother ship. UM. We had these these European and Asian

1:22:10.479 --> 1:22:13.200
<v Speaker 1>editions that were run separately. So I wasn't a full

1:22:13.240 --> 1:22:15.360
<v Speaker 1>fledged Wall Street Journal reporter. I was a Wall Street

1:22:15.400 --> 1:22:20.240
<v Speaker 1>Journal Europe reporter. And uh, with respect to this incident,

1:22:20.280 --> 1:22:23.240
<v Speaker 1>it was a good thing. I M a colleague and

1:22:23.280 --> 1:22:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I wrote a story about a business deal that we thought, um,

1:22:30.200 --> 1:22:33.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, we had learned about that that was basically

1:22:33.360 --> 1:22:36.360
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be complete fiction. Uh. And it was

1:22:36.439 --> 1:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>like a comedy of errors. It was a a merger

1:22:41.680 --> 1:22:45.439
<v Speaker 1>or so we thought, between several post offices in Europe,

1:22:46.320 --> 1:22:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and um, you know, we had these sources who were

1:22:50.280 --> 1:22:53.360
<v Speaker 1>who were just you know, these pseudios, sources who were

1:22:53.400 --> 1:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>several times removed from actual information, but who uh you know,

1:22:57.720 --> 1:23:01.799
<v Speaker 1>told us that they thought they knew what they couldn't

1:23:01.800 --> 1:23:04.600
<v Speaker 1>have known because it wasn't true. And so we we

1:23:04.680 --> 1:23:08.879
<v Speaker 1>wrote this this completely absurd story that was completely wrong

1:23:09.000 --> 1:23:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and erroneous. What was the take um was that what

1:23:13.320 --> 1:23:16.800
<v Speaker 1>was your takeaway? No, my takeaway was that, um, you

1:23:16.840 --> 1:23:20.479
<v Speaker 1>know you can't you you got to verify. I'm reading

1:23:20.479 --> 1:23:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Cy Hirsch's um Um autobiography right now, and he has

1:23:25.960 --> 1:23:28.479
<v Speaker 1>an expression for it that he learned at City News

1:23:28.479 --> 1:23:32.360
<v Speaker 1>in Chicago, where he started out his career, uh, which

1:23:32.439 --> 1:23:35.679
<v Speaker 1>is uh check it out. You know, he check it out.

1:23:36.360 --> 1:23:38.599
<v Speaker 1>And we didn't do any checking. We just went with

1:23:39.640 --> 1:23:41.880
<v Speaker 1>what you know, the first person we got on the

1:23:41.880 --> 1:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>phone told us and the story was completely wrong. It

1:23:44.240 --> 1:23:46.599
<v Speaker 1>was embarrassing, and frankly, I just I still don't understand

1:23:46.600 --> 1:23:49.200
<v Speaker 1>why I wasn't fired for it. And what is it

1:23:49.240 --> 1:23:52.920
<v Speaker 1>that you know about investigative reporting today that you wish

1:23:52.960 --> 1:23:57.919
<v Speaker 1>you knew twenty years ago? I mean, I think earlier

1:23:57.920 --> 1:24:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in my career, I think that I thought investigative reporting

1:24:03.200 --> 1:24:09.240
<v Speaker 1>was a glamorous craft. You know this may sound um corny,

1:24:09.360 --> 1:24:12.760
<v Speaker 1>but um. One of the things that contributed to inspiring

1:24:12.800 --> 1:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>me to become a newspaper reporter was reading All the

1:24:15.479 --> 1:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>President's Men after college graduated in ninety four, and that

1:24:19.160 --> 1:24:21.919
<v Speaker 1>was one of the first books I read after college,

1:24:22.720 --> 1:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and uh, you know, I think it made uh investigative

1:24:26.600 --> 1:24:30.560
<v Speaker 1>journalism and reporting seemed glamorous to me. And what I

1:24:30.600 --> 1:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>would caution you know, young people getting into this line

1:24:34.000 --> 1:24:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of work is that uh of the time, it's not glamorous.

1:24:39.520 --> 1:24:43.559
<v Speaker 1>It's digging. Uh you know, behind the scenes and the

1:24:43.720 --> 1:24:49.040
<v Speaker 1>dark in semi or complete obscurity. And um, you know,

1:24:50.160 --> 1:24:53.360
<v Speaker 1>hopefully you you you published some some good stories, but

1:24:53.680 --> 1:24:57.559
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes the stories won't have as much impact as you

1:24:58.280 --> 1:25:02.000
<v Speaker 1>would hope they would have. And you know, it can

1:25:02.040 --> 1:25:05.040
<v Speaker 1>be thankless work, and um, I would argue that it's

1:25:05.040 --> 1:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>also also can be very rewarding work, but you gotta

1:25:09.320 --> 1:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>stick with it, and it's uh work that requires persistence

1:25:13.560 --> 1:25:17.559
<v Speaker 1>and perseverance. UM. I don't know if I necessarily knew

1:25:17.600 --> 1:25:20.560
<v Speaker 1>all those things when it started out, just just fascinating.

1:25:20.800 --> 1:25:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Thank you, John for being so generous with your time.

1:25:23.400 --> 1:25:28.000
<v Speaker 1>We have been speaking with John Carrirew, author of Bad Blood,

1:25:28.280 --> 1:25:31.280
<v Speaker 1>Secrets and Lies in a Silicon Valley start up. If

1:25:31.320 --> 1:25:33.880
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed this conversation, well then look up and intro

1:25:33.960 --> 1:25:38.360
<v Speaker 1>down an intro on Apple, iTunes, Overcast, Stitcher, or wherever

1:25:38.400 --> 1:25:40.840
<v Speaker 1>your final podcasts are sold, and you can see any

1:25:40.960 --> 1:25:45.800
<v Speaker 1>of our prior two hundred plus conversations. We love your

1:25:45.840 --> 1:25:49.840
<v Speaker 1>comments feedback and suggestions right to us at m IB

1:25:50.000 --> 1:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>podcast at Bloomberg dot net. I would be remiss if

1:25:53.120 --> 1:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I did not thank my crack staff that helps to

1:25:55.800 --> 1:25:59.680
<v Speaker 1>put together this conversation each week. Medina Parwana is our

1:26:00.040 --> 1:26:04.120
<v Speaker 1>you engineer slash producer, Taylor Riggs is our booker and producer,

1:26:04.160 --> 1:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and Michael Batnick is our head of research. I'm Barry Retolts.

1:26:08.360 --> 1:26:11.679
<v Speaker 1>You've been listening to Masters in Business on Bloomberg Radio.