WEBVTT - Surveillance: Citi's Hollenhorst Weighs 2020 Risks

0:00:02.640 --> 0:00:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Ye. Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.560
<v Speaker 1>Jay Lee. We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance, investment,

0:00:18.000 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.600 --> 0:00:27.479
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com, and of course on the Bloomberger. Let's

0:00:27.520 --> 0:00:30.760
<v Speaker 1>take a look at the economy, shall we. We have

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the consumer very strong, we had retail sales. Looks like

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 1>the holiday retail sales are gonna come in about three

0:00:35.840 --> 0:00:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent growth year over year. That looks

0:00:39.840 --> 0:00:42.280
<v Speaker 1>very strong for the U S conserner. We've seen that before.

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:44.960
<v Speaker 1>We strong job numbers, strong retail sales. It's got a

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>sense of whether that will continue to push us in

0:00:48.560 --> 0:00:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Andrew Holland Horst, he's the chief US economist for City.

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:54.080
<v Speaker 1>He joins us here on a Bloomberg Interactive broker studio.

0:00:54.320 --> 0:00:56.360
<v Speaker 1>He just did a stint on Bloomberg Television. So we

0:00:56.400 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>are working Andrew hard today. Andrew, thanks so much for

0:00:58.840 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>joining us. What is your thought for I mean, the

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>consumer and the US economy seem to be kind of

0:01:05.319 --> 0:01:07.680
<v Speaker 1>chugging along here. Yeah, I think it still continues to

0:01:07.720 --> 0:01:10.399
<v Speaker 1>power ahead. I mean, we've had this really positive story

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:13.039
<v Speaker 1>around what's going on with jobs, what's going on with wages,

0:01:13.640 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that's supporting incomes and in turn supporting spending. So you know,

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 1>historically low unemployment rate. These are all the kind of

0:01:20.120 --> 0:01:22.280
<v Speaker 1>elements that you need for a strong consumer economy that

0:01:22.560 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>more concerned about what's going on in other places in

0:01:24.520 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the economy. But the consumer, if you just focus on

0:01:26.560 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>that very very strong, what can break the streak. So

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.400
<v Speaker 1>a few things that we were worried about in nineteen

0:01:33.440 --> 0:01:36.360
<v Speaker 1>that you would still think about going into One is

0:01:36.760 --> 0:01:38.920
<v Speaker 1>do you get a big correction in risk assets And

0:01:39.000 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>we don't think that will happen, but if you were

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:42.640
<v Speaker 1>to get a big drop then we saw that at

0:01:42.680 --> 0:01:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the end of eighteen going into twenty nineteen and consumers

0:01:45.840 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>pulled back. So if we get a big drop in

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.800
<v Speaker 1>equity markets, that's something that could slow down consumption. The

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:53.560
<v Speaker 1>other thing that could, of course, always change is the

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 1>positives that we're talking about. If those jobs numbers start

0:01:56.240 --> 0:02:00.280
<v Speaker 1>to slow down, and there was a time in looked

0:02:00.280 --> 0:02:02.920
<v Speaker 1>like maybe they were now as we're going into actually

0:02:02.960 --> 0:02:05.160
<v Speaker 1>looks like they're holding up quite well. Um. But so

0:02:05.320 --> 0:02:08.320
<v Speaker 1>either this kind of pullback and sentiment among consumers that's

0:02:08.320 --> 0:02:10.240
<v Speaker 1>something that we're watching, or do you just get a

0:02:10.240 --> 0:02:12.640
<v Speaker 1>fundamental slowing and job growth. So I listened to you

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.559
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Television earlier today and you said that impeachment

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>wasn't necessarily something that would upend the markets, but that

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the election rhetoric could. And I'm wondering, how does that

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>play into this kind of healthy economy that we're seeing

0:02:26.639 --> 0:02:29.040
<v Speaker 1>right now. Yeah, so these are the things that are

0:02:29.120 --> 0:02:31.839
<v Speaker 1>much harder to kind of forecast or get your hands

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>around as an economist. Um. So, like I was saying,

0:02:35.280 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you have very different visions that are being presented for

0:02:37.800 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Economy. Of Course that's something that investors

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:41.600
<v Speaker 1>have to take into account. Of course that's something that

0:02:41.639 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>economists have to take into account. Um, it still looks

0:02:44.760 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>like the modal outcome, the most likely outcome is that

0:02:48.240 --> 0:02:50.800
<v Speaker 1>while the U. S. Economy kind of continues along on

0:02:50.880 --> 0:02:53.840
<v Speaker 1>its current trajectory, which is this, you know, roughly two

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.280
<v Speaker 1>percent growth. But I I think the point I was

0:02:56.320 --> 0:02:58.520
<v Speaker 1>making and we continue to make, is that this will

0:02:58.560 --> 0:03:02.120
<v Speaker 1>be an important theme in twenty twenty investors watching what's

0:03:02.120 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 1>going on with both the politics between parties and within

0:03:05.440 --> 0:03:07.519
<v Speaker 1>the parties. I'm trying to figure out what this really

0:03:07.520 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>means for the economy. So, Andrew, one of the you

0:03:09.600 --> 0:03:12.880
<v Speaker 1>know that one third of the economy that is manufacturing

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:17.520
<v Speaker 1>business investment that is weak. We've got the manufacturing sector

0:03:17.680 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>contracting now for several months in a row. Do we

0:03:20.440 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>just kind of ignore that and because the consumer is

0:03:22.360 --> 0:03:25.240
<v Speaker 1>still so strong, Yeah, so definitely don't ignore it. I

0:03:25.280 --> 0:03:27.639
<v Speaker 1>think that is the key downside risk that we want

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:31.600
<v Speaker 1>to continue watching. UM some positive stories. They're one is

0:03:31.760 --> 0:03:34.040
<v Speaker 1>it looks like and I think it's too early to

0:03:34.080 --> 0:03:35.880
<v Speaker 1>say anything more than it looks like, but it looks

0:03:35.920 --> 0:03:38.920
<v Speaker 1>like globally, maybe the weak manufacturing story is bottomed a

0:03:38.920 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit. You see globally that data starting to turn over,

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>and if that continues, UM, then that would be a

0:03:43.840 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>positive dynamic for the US. Also, you have these idiosyncratic

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 1>u S specific issues. You had an auto workers strike

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:54.920
<v Speaker 1>and you had the grounding of certain aircraft. If production

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>picks up as we head into twenty twenty around those

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>two store is that could be positive for manufacturing. But

0:04:01.640 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>particularly on the airplane story, that keeps getting pushed further

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:07.640
<v Speaker 1>and further out. So yeah, I don't even know how

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:10.760
<v Speaker 1>we Maybe I guess My question is, how do you

0:04:10.840 --> 0:04:12.760
<v Speaker 1>kind of account for that of economist account for that,

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.960
<v Speaker 1>because I think about the supply chain for Boeing, it

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:17.760
<v Speaker 1>just kind of stretches coast to coast and you know,

0:04:17.800 --> 0:04:20.279
<v Speaker 1>a whole host of industries. Yeah, it's it's definitely a

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:23.920
<v Speaker 1>macroeconomically significant issue. This is not you know, some small

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.240
<v Speaker 1>company's specific issue. It really matters for the US economy

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.360
<v Speaker 1>UM and that supply chain is really important. So when

0:04:30.480 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're talking about a shutdown of production in January, UM,

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.840
<v Speaker 1>but then does the supply chain actually continue to produce?

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>If the supply chain continues producing during that time, then

0:04:42.040 --> 0:04:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not producing final completed aircraft, but you still are

0:04:45.920 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 1>keeping those workers employed in the supply chain. You're producing

0:04:49.760 --> 0:04:53.680
<v Speaker 1>parts that ultimately go into those final aircraft, so that

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:56.359
<v Speaker 1>can kind of support demand while we wait for a

0:04:56.440 --> 0:04:59.040
<v Speaker 1>full restarting of production, which should happen at some point.

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Something we talk a lot of about at this table

0:05:01.440 --> 0:05:05.160
<v Speaker 1>is the impact of automation on jobs. Obviously, the manufacturing

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:07.599
<v Speaker 1>sector has seen a lot of this. It's floating into

0:05:07.640 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other sectors. I cover the banks. We

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>see thousands of job cuts around the world, partially in

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the name of automation. When you're thinking of automation, how

0:05:14.560 --> 0:05:17.719
<v Speaker 1>do you factor this into your longer term outlook on

0:05:18.400 --> 0:05:21.800
<v Speaker 1>what happens with jobs and what happens with growth, And

0:05:21.839 --> 0:05:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so this matters so much, and you have to be

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>careful because there have been many times in history when

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.200
<v Speaker 1>we've looked at technological advances and said, this is the

0:05:31.320 --> 0:05:33.200
<v Speaker 1>end of labor, this is the end of workers. There's

0:05:33.240 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna be no role for humans, um, And they're always

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>has been. But what we need to be very careful

0:05:38.160 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>about with this transition to more automation is that those

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:47.240
<v Speaker 1>opportunities are created for the existing workforce. So we know,

0:05:47.400 --> 0:05:50.600
<v Speaker 1>as you were mentioning, there are certain industries where it's

0:05:50.640 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 1>just not going to make sense for humans to be

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:54.320
<v Speaker 1>doing the jobs that they used to be doing in

0:05:54.360 --> 0:05:58.960
<v Speaker 1>those industries. Um, But are we creating new opportunities? Are

0:05:58.960 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>we creating new engines of growth? So maybe maybe you don't.

0:06:03.200 --> 0:06:05.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not clear yet. It's not clear yet that we are.

0:06:05.279 --> 0:06:06.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think I think that that that is the

0:06:07.360 --> 0:06:10.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, difficulty of navigating this transition. So

0:06:11.200 --> 0:06:13.640
<v Speaker 1>maybe you have less traditional manufacturing jobs, we should have

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.480
<v Speaker 1>more jobs around things like three d printing. Are we

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:19.159
<v Speaker 1>really seeing those jobs come through? Um, that's what we're

0:06:19.160 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>looking for, and that will be an ultimately positive story

0:06:21.320 --> 0:06:23.480
<v Speaker 1>for the economy if we get there. So, Andrew, we've

0:06:24.120 --> 0:06:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, the trade has been such a big, big

0:06:26.160 --> 0:06:29.120
<v Speaker 1>issue for nineteen is kind of faded over the last

0:06:29.160 --> 0:06:30.600
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks a little bit least, you know, in

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>terms of the news flow and the tweet flow. How

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:36.680
<v Speaker 1>do you kind of gauge the trade uncertainty into your

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:42.839
<v Speaker 1>economic forecast? For so any uncertainty, and in particular uncertainty

0:06:42.880 --> 0:06:45.600
<v Speaker 1>around trade is something that's gonna tend to hold back investment.

0:06:45.600 --> 0:06:47.320
<v Speaker 1>People are gonna want to wait, They're gonna want to

0:06:47.320 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 1>see what the actual outcome is. Um. That's true around trade,

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:55.599
<v Speaker 1>It's true around politics, Brexit, everything. Um. It does seem that,

0:06:55.680 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>at least in a short term sense, we've had a

0:06:58.440 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>decrease in uncertainty. So there's still massive uncertainty about where

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>this story goes over the next five years, over the

0:07:04.720 --> 0:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>next ten years. But as you look out over the

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.880
<v Speaker 1>next six months, it seems like there are at least

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:11.760
<v Speaker 1>the contours of a Phase one deal that have been

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 1>agreed to. It looks like these agricultural exports are going

0:07:14.720 --> 0:07:17.440
<v Speaker 1>to be restarted. UM. So all of that is short

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:20.160
<v Speaker 1>term positive and that should helped unleash some of the

0:07:20.240 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>pent up investment that was waiting for some short term

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>resolution of uncertainty. Now, do you have a long term

0:07:26.080 --> 0:07:29.160
<v Speaker 1>resolution resolution of uncertainty where you can think about making

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>plans for the next five years, the next ten years.

0:07:31.560 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a lot less clear. Can I ask

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you also about the Federal Reserve, because I think you

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have a more balanced view than a lot of people

0:07:38.480 --> 0:07:41.560
<v Speaker 1>who believe, yes, this is definitely quey and no, this

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.000
<v Speaker 1>is absolutely not. But can you explain to us how

0:07:45.080 --> 0:07:47.880
<v Speaker 1>much is the is the FED propping up the economy

0:07:47.920 --> 0:07:50.880
<v Speaker 1>more than people realize right now? So there is a

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:53.240
<v Speaker 1>very important sense in which the FED is important the

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>supporting the economy, and that's that's largely through low interest rates.

0:07:58.200 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>And they've achieved low long term interest traits both through

0:08:01.240 --> 0:08:04.560
<v Speaker 1>their bond purchase programs, which I would say, what they're

0:08:04.600 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>doing right now, I would not call it QUI. I

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>think many in the market will see it as qua

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:10.160
<v Speaker 1>when we come back to that in a second. UM.

0:08:10.160 --> 0:08:13.120
<v Speaker 1>But low long term rates, which is partly these que programs,

0:08:13.160 --> 0:08:15.760
<v Speaker 1>but partly just the fact that the Fed is held

0:08:15.840 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 1>rates relatively low. It looks like the top of this

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>interest rate hiking cycle is going to be sub three percent,

0:08:21.280 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 1>and we're thinking about staying around these levels or maybe

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:26.360
<v Speaker 1>in the future going down from these levels. So that's

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>gonna keep rates low. That's going to support the economy.

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:31.000
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the specific program, at the end of

0:08:31.000 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>the day, they're buying T bills that's a three month,

0:08:34.000 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>six month liability of the U. S. Government that pays interest.

0:08:37.800 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>They take those T bills out of supply, and they

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.800
<v Speaker 1>add reserves, which are an overnight interest paying liability of

0:08:42.800 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>the U. S. Government. So it's not clear that that's

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.040
<v Speaker 1>really doing much. Okay, so we're not gonna call it

0:08:46.120 --> 0:08:49.199
<v Speaker 1>QUI at this moment. Andrew Holland Horse, thanks so much

0:08:49.200 --> 0:08:52.920
<v Speaker 1>for joining us. Andrews the chief US economists for City.

0:08:52.920 --> 0:08:55.679
<v Speaker 1>We appreciate them coming here to our Bloomberg Interactive Broker

0:08:55.679 --> 0:08:58.280
<v Speaker 1>studio giving us his thoughts for the economy. Again, as

0:08:58.280 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>we just kind of take a look at the most

0:08:59.640 --> 0:09:02.680
<v Speaker 1>recent data point, call it holiday retail sales pretty strong,

0:09:02.960 --> 0:09:06.480
<v Speaker 1>suggesting once again that the consumer is pretty strong, which

0:09:06.559 --> 0:09:08.640
<v Speaker 1>contends once again that the U S economy reigns on

0:09:08.720 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 1>pretty fair footing. We continue to see really disturbing images

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>coming from Hong Kong that the protests they're just so

0:09:30.280 --> 0:09:33.959
<v Speaker 1>no signs of winding down. The persistence, I think, is

0:09:34.000 --> 0:09:36.160
<v Speaker 1>it really amazing to a lot of us who are

0:09:36.320 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>watching these issues. You get the latest cheer. We welcome

0:09:39.360 --> 0:09:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Karen Lee. She has Bloomberg News, a Greater China Government editor.

0:09:43.320 --> 0:09:46.280
<v Speaker 1>She joins us on the phone. Uh, Karen, thanks so

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>much for joining us. Give us the latest of what

0:09:49.240 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>is happening in Hong Kong right now. Well, there are

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.719
<v Speaker 1>protests scheduled for tonight in an area called Satan, which

0:09:57.720 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>has seen some of the more violent protester but the

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.480
<v Speaker 1>past six months, and then again over the weekend in

0:10:02.520 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>an area near the Chinese border. UM. And this is

0:10:05.360 --> 0:10:07.680
<v Speaker 1>leading up to a major rally that's been planned for

0:10:07.800 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>New Year's Day organized by the Civil Human Rights Plant,

0:10:10.920 --> 0:10:13.560
<v Speaker 1>which is the organization that's home some of the biggest

0:10:13.600 --> 0:10:19.080
<v Speaker 1>peaceful protests since these demonstrations against China's grips began in June.

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:21.439
<v Speaker 1>So we're going to be watching over the next few

0:10:21.480 --> 0:10:24.600
<v Speaker 1>days to see what the turnouts like. UM, how big

0:10:24.640 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the classes between protesters and police, get if there are

0:10:28.000 --> 0:10:30.520
<v Speaker 1>classes at all, and to stands. We can draw a

0:10:30.559 --> 0:10:33.080
<v Speaker 1>new signals from all of this, especially the turnout on

0:10:33.160 --> 0:10:37.280
<v Speaker 1>January first, as to how much momentum this movement sustands

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:41.120
<v Speaker 1>going into So, Karen, just give us a sense an

0:10:41.200 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>updated view of kind of what the protesters are really

0:10:44.440 --> 0:10:48.280
<v Speaker 1>protesting for right now. It's been months and months and months.

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>What kind of change are they really looking for right now? Yeah, Well,

0:10:53.480 --> 0:10:56.200
<v Speaker 1>their demands have shifted a lot over the past six months,

0:10:56.200 --> 0:10:59.640
<v Speaker 1>and this of course began um as blowback against a

0:10:59.720 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>really unpopular extradition law that would have allowed UM transfers

0:11:04.679 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to mainland China, and it morphed pretty quickly into this

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:13.000
<v Speaker 1>wider movement against Beijing script and protesters demands in that time.

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:15.840
<v Speaker 1>It's since that time have changed. Right now, one of

0:11:15.840 --> 0:11:18.400
<v Speaker 1>the biggest demands is not the biggest, is an independent

0:11:18.440 --> 0:11:22.439
<v Speaker 1>inquiry into aggressive behavior by police and their conduct in

0:11:22.559 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>dispersing these protests. Going back to some of those images

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>we were talking about with these big clouds of tear

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 1>gas covering over these areas of Hong Kong where you

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.280
<v Speaker 1>never thought you would see tear gas over the city center,

0:11:33.559 --> 0:11:36.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm going again, even on Christmas Eve, over a popular

0:11:36.400 --> 0:11:39.240
<v Speaker 1>shopping area in front of the Peninsula Hotel, which is

0:11:39.280 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the most generated hotels here. UM. During this

0:11:42.640 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 1>what has been a major shopping season for this economy

0:11:46.320 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>that still runs on tourism and resale. UM. So we're

0:11:49.880 --> 0:11:52.560
<v Speaker 1>going to be looking at the new year really not

0:11:52.640 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>only to see whether this sustains its momentum, but whether

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>the demands shift again. UM, and what they shift to.

0:12:00.000 --> 0:12:02.120
<v Speaker 1>You give us a sense of the tone here, because

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:06.280
<v Speaker 1>over the holiday hundreds were arrested. I'm looking at headlines. Now,

0:12:07.360 --> 0:12:11.800
<v Speaker 1>how much is this really escalating? UM? You know, this

0:12:11.880 --> 0:12:14.240
<v Speaker 1>has really become the new normal in a way for

0:12:14.320 --> 0:12:16.959
<v Speaker 1>this city, at least for parts of it. UM. And

0:12:17.120 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>what we saw on Christmas Eve was not shocking to

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:24.080
<v Speaker 1>those of us who've been watching it for a while. UM.

0:12:24.160 --> 0:12:27.320
<v Speaker 1>We've become quite used to seeing these kind of clashes

0:12:27.360 --> 0:12:32.079
<v Speaker 1>scattered around town, especially in the area where they happened. UM.

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 1>And we've seen more violence than we saw on Christmas Eve.

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:39.520
<v Speaker 1>And we've been seeing occasional live ammunition. UM. We've seen

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:44.200
<v Speaker 1>webberable expired from pretty close range. UM. College campuses turned

0:12:44.240 --> 0:12:47.360
<v Speaker 1>into it looked like battle ground. UM. So really the

0:12:47.400 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 1>context for Christmas Eves importance was more that it happened

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:53.000
<v Speaker 1>on the holiday and that it happened in an area

0:12:53.040 --> 0:12:57.199
<v Speaker 1>that nearest past um would have been full of tourists

0:12:57.240 --> 0:12:59.839
<v Speaker 1>and holiday shoppers. UM. In this year, it was a

0:13:00.080 --> 0:13:01.839
<v Speaker 1>of a different picture, and I think for a lot

0:13:01.880 --> 0:13:04.160
<v Speaker 1>of people that really serve to show what's happened to

0:13:04.240 --> 0:13:06.360
<v Speaker 1>the city over the past year and the kind of

0:13:06.480 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>impact that all of this has had on tourism and

0:13:09.120 --> 0:13:11.959
<v Speaker 1>retail UM, so of which have taken a massive hit.

0:13:12.120 --> 0:13:15.000
<v Speaker 1>So UM, we're going to We're going to see what

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:17.800
<v Speaker 1>happens now on New Year's Day. But really the Sidney

0:13:17.880 --> 0:13:21.520
<v Speaker 1>bracing for a much bigger protests UM in the next

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:23.839
<v Speaker 1>few days. Well, that was what I was gonna ask. Next.

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:28.719
<v Speaker 1>What can we expect on January one? UM, Well, this

0:13:28.840 --> 0:13:31.800
<v Speaker 1>protest is being organized by the Similar Human Rights Front.

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>It is the organization that has brought millions of people

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.280
<v Speaker 1>out onto the street UM at various points throughout all

0:13:38.280 --> 0:13:40.880
<v Speaker 1>of this. They organized the huge marches earlier in the

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 1>summer that really kicked this movement off and got it

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.800
<v Speaker 1>in the global headlines. UM. And they're still waiting for

0:13:45.800 --> 0:13:48.800
<v Speaker 1>a police permit to march UM. They don't have that yet,

0:13:48.880 --> 0:13:51.680
<v Speaker 1>but even if they don't, we think that people will

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:54.560
<v Speaker 1>still probably come out and they'll protest illegally and there

0:13:54.559 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>will be more arrest UM. So we're going to be

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:00.200
<v Speaker 1>looking to see what the turnout is and they they've

0:14:00.360 --> 0:14:04.480
<v Speaker 1>they've generally get much figure furn out UM than other

0:14:04.640 --> 0:14:10.199
<v Speaker 1>protests organized by other UM either opposition groups or or activists.

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:12.240
<v Speaker 1>So UM, and this is going to happen on a

0:14:12.320 --> 0:14:15.960
<v Speaker 1>day when before off here UM people might want to

0:14:16.000 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>send a signal that they do you intend to fight

0:14:18.720 --> 0:14:21.040
<v Speaker 1>into and if they want to do that, this is

0:14:21.080 --> 0:14:22.880
<v Speaker 1>going to be a good day to do it. So

0:14:22.960 --> 0:14:25.720
<v Speaker 1>it really will be UM a signal to us and

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 1>what we might expect going into the new year in

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the first few months of the new year. Hey, Karen,

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:33.000
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We really appreciate that.

0:14:33.080 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>On the spot reporting from Hong Kong, Karen Lye, Bloomberg

0:14:36.120 --> 0:14:51.720
<v Speaker 1>News Greater China Government Editor. Do you get a sense

0:14:51.720 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 1>of kind of what we should be thinking about as

0:14:53.400 --> 0:14:56.640
<v Speaker 1>we think about oil for Welcome Kevin book clear View

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 1>Energy Partner's head of research. Kevin, thanks so much for

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>joining us. So as we take a look at crude

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:05.000
<v Speaker 1>around the world. Is it fair to say this is

0:15:05.040 --> 0:15:08.000
<v Speaker 1>just a clean proxy for what the market thinks is

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.520
<v Speaker 1>going to happen to global trade and trade tensions between

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>US and China. Well, they're surely related. But we're also

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>in a seasonal second half of the year demands peak,

0:15:17.600 --> 0:15:19.840
<v Speaker 1>So when you think about what you're coming up to

0:15:20.040 --> 0:15:23.120
<v Speaker 1>in the first quarter and the second quarter, you're gonna

0:15:23.120 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>have the seasonal troughs. Uh So this is as strong

0:15:26.720 --> 0:15:30.040
<v Speaker 1>really as things could look right now, given those underlying

0:15:30.320 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>seasonal demand pulls on the trade side. You know, the

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>trade war, such as it is with China is far

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:40.280
<v Speaker 1>from over. It's probably about over, and we don't know

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:44.400
<v Speaker 1>how long it's going to stay over. So there's still

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>some looming uncertainty that could camp down industrial demand. That

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 1>industrial demand is in the end crude demand. So we

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.160
<v Speaker 1>may not yet see a rebound into the into the

0:15:54.200 --> 0:15:56.360
<v Speaker 1>first half of next year the same way we've seen

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>it in markets in the equity market so far. Right

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.200
<v Speaker 1>out of our colleagues over at Markets Live believe that

0:16:03.240 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>too much good news has already been priced into the

0:16:05.600 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>oil markets and that that could lead to a significant correction.

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you believe. Well, yeah, we do see

0:16:13.000 --> 0:16:15.560
<v Speaker 1>you know a Brent range in the five handles, probably

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>the fifty five. They're about sixty range for next year,

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>which is below where we are now, and it's based

0:16:24.000 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 1>on a number of things, including significant supply coming on

0:16:26.680 --> 0:16:30.480
<v Speaker 1>stream in the Permian has a very long skid mark.

0:16:30.640 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, when we talk over and over again about

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>shale correcting, it is not synthetic spare capacity. It is

0:16:36.160 --> 0:16:38.000
<v Speaker 1>not like OPEC where they can turn it on and

0:16:38.040 --> 0:16:41.160
<v Speaker 1>turn it off inside of ninety days. We're talking about

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.240
<v Speaker 1>nine months before. Things usually respond to price, and the

0:16:44.240 --> 0:16:48.120
<v Speaker 1>bullishness you're seen in price today is preserving production tomorrow.

0:16:48.440 --> 0:16:50.640
<v Speaker 1>So that sets up some of the weakness we're talking

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>about in tandem with the production outside of the US. So, Kevin,

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:57.440
<v Speaker 1>let's talk a little bit about OPEC or OPEC plus.

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Give us a sense of kind of how you think

0:16:59.640 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>o Heck is behaving right now? Are are people cooperating? Um?

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I think about Russia there, So give us a sense

0:17:06.359 --> 0:17:08.639
<v Speaker 1>of just on the supply side, how is OPEQ and

0:17:08.640 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and OPEC plus kind of performing right now? You know,

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I think the optics still stay ahead of actuals in

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:16.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of ways, the idea that the group is

0:17:16.400 --> 0:17:19.280
<v Speaker 1>still together may be more reassuring to the bulls and

0:17:19.320 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>the markets than the reality of things playing out. In

0:17:23.000 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>excluding Russian condensate from the volume constraints essentially freed up

0:17:27.520 --> 0:17:30.560
<v Speaker 1>barrels that Russia can bring to market, and liquids are

0:17:30.560 --> 0:17:33.880
<v Speaker 1>not perfectly interchangeable. But when we count barrels, we count

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.960
<v Speaker 1>all liquids, and so that doesn't necessarily read is bullish

0:17:38.359 --> 0:17:41.760
<v Speaker 1>as the readout from the medium might have suggested. Going forward,

0:17:42.080 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>the cohesion of the group really reflects the wiliness and

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>ability of the Kingdom to keep doing the heavy lifting

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.439
<v Speaker 1>which they have been doing. But when we look at

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>the neutral zone coming downstream, uh that's you know, somewhere

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.440
<v Speaker 1>between three hundred and five thousand barrels per day coming

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>up in the next six to nine months probably, and

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:01.919
<v Speaker 1>we're going to be looking at that pressuring crew to

0:18:01.960 --> 0:18:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the downside unless the Kingdom does more work. Uh So

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:08.199
<v Speaker 1>what do we expect, Well, Kingdom's got invested interest and

0:18:08.240 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>they're in it to win it right now. But in

0:18:10.720 --> 0:18:12.360
<v Speaker 1>the end, if if it looks like there's too much

0:18:12.359 --> 0:18:15.960
<v Speaker 1>defection from other players, watch out below. The big oil

0:18:16.040 --> 0:18:20.880
<v Speaker 1>story often was obviously a ROMCO right, and nobody would

0:18:20.920 --> 0:18:25.600
<v Speaker 1>stop talking about it from everywhere, from everywhere in the world. Really,

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:28.680
<v Speaker 1>can you touch us a little bit about international demand

0:18:28.880 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>for this i p O. Obviously it was a very

0:18:31.560 --> 0:18:35.320
<v Speaker 1>weak moving forward, but can we expect a little bit

0:18:35.359 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>more love from international investors? That's not really our area

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>of expertise. What we can't say with some some comfort

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:46.280
<v Speaker 1>is that the you know, the circumscribing the the i

0:18:46.400 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>p O to non US nexus markets had it a

0:18:49.600 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>lot more to do not with trying to get a

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>good financial result for the Kingdom or to meet Prince

0:18:55.560 --> 0:18:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Mohammed ben Selmon's two trillion dollar target, had a lot

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to do with the risk of sanctions and pressure here

0:19:01.280 --> 0:19:04.719
<v Speaker 1>in the US under the Justice Against Sponsors of Terrorism

0:19:04.760 --> 0:19:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Act and potentially under a Note Peck bill which would

0:19:08.160 --> 0:19:12.800
<v Speaker 1>allow the sanctions or trade UH sorry Sherman antitrust pressure

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>against the producers group. So UH looking outside the US

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:20.600
<v Speaker 1>created a limited demand in its own way, looking outside

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 1>Western markets for the same reason. Beyond that, you know,

0:19:23.760 --> 0:19:26.600
<v Speaker 1>if they do a further offering, the secondary offering, UH,

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:29.280
<v Speaker 1>they might look broader, but not whilely overhang here in

0:19:29.280 --> 0:19:33.280
<v Speaker 1>the US interdicts their easy access to markets like ours.

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>So Kevin, taking a look at the shale patch in

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>the US, we hear a lot about, really in the

0:19:38.600 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>last year plus about kind of the financial precarious the

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 1>precarious financial position a lot of the operators there are

0:19:46.240 --> 0:19:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we going to see in maybe some of the bigger

0:19:49.280 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>energy players go in there and try to consolidate something

0:19:51.960 --> 0:19:54.960
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing in the permian um or how do

0:19:55.000 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 1>you see that playing out. Consolidation is happening, but it's

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:02.040
<v Speaker 1>not happening with the apidity. I think that might be expected.

0:20:02.400 --> 0:20:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Some of this has to do with, again the lifeline

0:20:04.359 --> 0:20:06.199
<v Speaker 1>that you get from a boost in prices here in

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:08.560
<v Speaker 1>four Q. Some of it also has to do with

0:20:08.600 --> 0:20:11.159
<v Speaker 1>the questions about buyers and the assets. They may not

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 1>want all the assets, and those sellers may not be

0:20:13.760 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>willing to go to the rock bottom that clears the

0:20:16.000 --> 0:20:19.639
<v Speaker 1>market just yet. The infusion of debt capital to to

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.960
<v Speaker 1>the players that needed the most being constrained is a

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:26.960
<v Speaker 1>catalyst for further sales, further consolidation, but at the right price.

0:20:27.600 --> 0:20:29.639
<v Speaker 1>Part of the problem with the vacillation in the market

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that we're seeing up or down does a lot to

0:20:32.359 --> 0:20:34.480
<v Speaker 1>create uncertainty about whether or not there's going to be

0:20:34.520 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>some bottom feeding happening. Speaking of boom bottom feeding, that's

0:20:37.600 --> 0:20:39.560
<v Speaker 1>what I was going to ask, who are the buyers

0:20:39.640 --> 0:20:42.120
<v Speaker 1>for all of these assets? We had Sam's ll here

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>just a couple of months ago saying that he was

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 1>looking at assets himself as the prices start to drop.

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.199
<v Speaker 1>Are there are other Sam's L's in the world that

0:20:51.240 --> 0:20:56.200
<v Speaker 1>are also looking You know, private equity has been pretty constrained. Yeah,

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>so the class of buyer that I think you're going

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:00.480
<v Speaker 1>to get is shifting a little bit in character. It's

0:21:00.480 --> 0:21:02.760
<v Speaker 1>true that you've seen a lot of private private equity

0:21:02.800 --> 0:21:05.760
<v Speaker 1>sponsorship putting that capital for the last five or six years,

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:07.560
<v Speaker 1>and that's done a lot to sustain the boom and

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:09.640
<v Speaker 1>the permian. Now, what I think you're going to get

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:12.000
<v Speaker 1>is capital discipline from the majors that are looking for

0:21:12.040 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity as well as some of the investors who are

0:21:14.640 --> 0:21:16.879
<v Speaker 1>going to have a different set of parameters around the

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:19.640
<v Speaker 1>returns that they want to get. That doesn't necessarily mean

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.040
<v Speaker 1>that when you get an acquisition you get production. You

0:21:22.119 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>might get acquisition consolidation and rationalization, and that flows the

0:21:26.080 --> 0:21:27.680
<v Speaker 1>growth of the permian, which of course, is what the

0:21:27.680 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 1>people who are putting the money into the region are

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.160
<v Speaker 1>hoping for. They want returns on capital because they want

0:21:32.200 --> 0:21:37.120
<v Speaker 1>supply constrained to the highest performing, lowest cost basis assets. Kevin,

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:38.360
<v Speaker 1>let's just take a look at one of the things

0:21:38.400 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I just wanted to chat about real quickly is Venezuela.

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:42.119
<v Speaker 1>We haven't talked about that in a while, but that,

0:21:42.359 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, is a kind of a wild card out there.

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.600
<v Speaker 1>How do you as you think about and supply coming

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:49.640
<v Speaker 1>onto the market? What is how are you discounting what's

0:21:49.680 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>going on in Venezuela from a supply perspective. Well, the

0:21:53.359 --> 0:21:56.040
<v Speaker 1>biggest perturbation of the year from Venezuela was the loss

0:21:56.080 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of heavy supply to the market, and it really did

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a lot to close the light have spread and for

0:22:01.119 --> 0:22:04.040
<v Speaker 1>refiners that were configured for high complexity to make use

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of those cheaper heavy crudes and make bigger margins, that

0:22:07.080 --> 0:22:10.160
<v Speaker 1>was bad news. Finding alternative heavy hasn't gone so well

0:22:10.200 --> 0:22:12.159
<v Speaker 1>because there's other sources of medium and heavy in the

0:22:12.200 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>world similarly constrained. So it's not like the market isn't

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.640
<v Speaker 1>eager for some Venezuelan to crude to come back on

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.239
<v Speaker 1>but the politics of the situation aren't going in that

0:22:22.280 --> 0:22:24.679
<v Speaker 1>direction right now. If you think about the politics of

0:22:24.680 --> 0:22:27.439
<v Speaker 1>the situation, Venezuela is in many ways of proxy for

0:22:27.520 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 1>Cuba in the in the Trump administration. For them, the

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.200
<v Speaker 1>idea that they could could sell Florida on being tough

0:22:33.320 --> 0:22:36.399
<v Speaker 1>on on communism in Cuba by being tough on Venezuela

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:39.399
<v Speaker 1>has been pretty persuasive, and so the the idea that

0:22:39.400 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>there's some sort of workout bargain or there's some sort

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of US brokered way that Venezuelan and Crewde comes back

0:22:44.359 --> 0:22:47.720
<v Speaker 1>to the market doesn't look so strong. The next leg down, though,

0:22:47.760 --> 0:22:50.960
<v Speaker 1>seems also less likely because of what not involves is

0:22:51.080 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>essentially going after Russia Rosneft, which is doing the big

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:57.920
<v Speaker 1>marketing and the essentially the bringing to market to the

0:22:57.960 --> 0:23:00.679
<v Speaker 1>Venezuelan crude in place of markets being opened in the

0:23:00.800 --> 0:23:03.879
<v Speaker 1>US and other Western destinations, and that is a mess.

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:06.760
<v Speaker 1>To go after rust is to go after the world,

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:10.360
<v Speaker 1>and that sanction probably doesn't happen anytime soon. Hey, Kevin,

0:23:10.359 --> 0:23:12.400
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. We really appreciate your

0:23:12.440 --> 0:23:16.120
<v Speaker 1>insights on the global energy market. Kevin book is clear

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:18.520
<v Speaker 1>View Energy Partner's head of research giving us his thoughts

0:23:18.600 --> 0:23:36.720
<v Speaker 1>on the global crude market. We are talking big tech

0:23:36.800 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 1>here again. Let's frame twenty nineteen. We came into the

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.080
<v Speaker 1>year thinking, boy, a lot of these big unicorn deals

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:45.840
<v Speaker 1>that we've been reading about, we're gonna come public. Everybody

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.959
<v Speaker 1>was gonna make money. Public shareholders, the private equity folks,

0:23:49.240 --> 0:23:51.560
<v Speaker 1>and the investment bankers. It was gonna be great. Turned

0:23:51.560 --> 0:23:53.200
<v Speaker 1>out to be a little bit different. And I think

0:23:53.200 --> 0:23:55.639
<v Speaker 1>one of the big takeaways for me as we think

0:23:55.680 --> 0:23:58.520
<v Speaker 1>about the ubers and lifts and smile direction we works

0:23:58.600 --> 0:24:04.600
<v Speaker 1>is that mismatch between private market valuations and public market valuations.

0:24:04.640 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>It's greater than I've ever seen it in my career.

0:24:07.280 --> 0:24:08.600
<v Speaker 1>One of the issues I want to and I want

0:24:08.600 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>to get to this with David Kirkpatrick. He's Techomedy CEO

0:24:11.600 --> 0:24:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and founder. He knows everything about technology, about a great

0:24:15.240 --> 0:24:18.679
<v Speaker 1>seminal book on Facebook back in the day. So David,

0:24:18.760 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>my sense is again thinking about that mismatch between the

0:24:21.480 --> 0:24:24.240
<v Speaker 1>private market and the public market. A lot of blames

0:24:24.280 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>going to soft Bank and that, you know, a hundred

0:24:26.560 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 1>billion dollar Vision fund that invested in a lot of

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:33.440
<v Speaker 1>these companies. You think that's a fair criticism of soft Bank. Well,

0:24:33.440 --> 0:24:36.359
<v Speaker 1>thanks Paul Um. Yes, I do, in fact um, but

0:24:36.400 --> 0:24:38.840
<v Speaker 1>it's not just a vision fund. It's SoftBank's own direct

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.119
<v Speaker 1>investing as well as the investment they did through their

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Vision fund. And in many cases they really almost literally

0:24:45.760 --> 0:24:49.280
<v Speaker 1>throw money at companies that they saw as such dramatic

0:24:49.359 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>disruptors that they might alter entire industries. And I think

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>we now can see they clearly didn't do enough analysis

0:24:57.640 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>in many instances before they made those seemingly rash decisions.

0:25:03.280 --> 0:25:05.280
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, you know, the thing that has

0:25:05.320 --> 0:25:08.639
<v Speaker 1>also characterized this recent period and still characterizes it is

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 1>it's hard to get returns in a lot of places

0:25:12.280 --> 0:25:14.359
<v Speaker 1>where people used to expect them all. You know, stock

0:25:14.400 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>markets have gone up great, but people like to have

0:25:17.240 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>other ways of making money. And you know, one of

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the reasons why the whole Unicorn phenomenon and the SoftBank

0:25:24.640 --> 0:25:28.440
<v Speaker 1>phenomenon phenomenon emerged the way they did is that large

0:25:28.480 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>institutional investors have been looking for more dramatic ways to

0:25:34.080 --> 0:25:38.080
<v Speaker 1>leverage large amounts of money, and that's a global phenomenon

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:41.440
<v Speaker 1>and SoftBank took advantage of that in a very canny way.

0:25:41.480 --> 0:25:45.919
<v Speaker 1>But I think in retrospect they blundered. So something interesting

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.280
<v Speaker 1>about the soft bank investment and we work still is that,

0:25:49.520 --> 0:25:53.479
<v Speaker 1>if I'm not mistaken, SCIFIOUS has not yet approved it.

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the Committee of Foreign Investment in the United States

0:25:56.240 --> 0:25:58.800
<v Speaker 1>that is supposed to be keeping out for these kinds

0:25:58.800 --> 0:26:03.520
<v Speaker 1>of things. Wow. Well, you know, Ciffius, You've done a

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:05.679
<v Speaker 1>lot of reporting on this, Tonali, so you're an expert.

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:11.160
<v Speaker 1>But I I've been impressed actually by Scipius's role in

0:26:11.320 --> 0:26:15.680
<v Speaker 1>general during the Trump presidency. It has gotten much more

0:26:16.119 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>actively engaged with this question of what is and is good,

0:26:20.359 --> 0:26:24.000
<v Speaker 1>what is it is not good for the U s economy, UM.

0:26:24.119 --> 0:26:27.080
<v Speaker 1>When it comes to a lot of these consumer tech companies.

0:26:27.119 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, CIFIUS generally has not spent tons of time

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:32.880
<v Speaker 1>on that. But yes, maybe maybe they will get involved

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:36.480
<v Speaker 1>retroactively in some of these deals. But in reality where

0:26:36.520 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 1>they're really getting superactive is around Huawei and other kinds

0:26:41.000 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>of Chinese American deals UM and Russian investments in US

0:26:47.040 --> 0:26:49.840
<v Speaker 1>companies UM. And they're going to be more and more involved.

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:51.280
<v Speaker 1>One of the things I think is going to be

0:26:51.320 --> 0:26:55.320
<v Speaker 1>a trend for twenty in fact, is government in the

0:26:55.400 --> 0:26:59.480
<v Speaker 1>US and globally is just getting more savvy about tech

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 1>fine league, and I think that's going to change the

0:27:02.320 --> 0:27:04.360
<v Speaker 1>way markets behave. I think it's going to change how

0:27:04.400 --> 0:27:06.399
<v Speaker 1>investors behave, and it's going to change the way we

0:27:06.440 --> 0:27:09.199
<v Speaker 1>think about tech. David, That's exactly where I wanted to go.

0:27:09.240 --> 0:27:11.199
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to get your perspective on this, given that

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:14.240
<v Speaker 1>you followed technology in the valley for such a long time.

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:17.600
<v Speaker 1>I think really historically, from my experience, the U S

0:27:17.640 --> 0:27:22.160
<v Speaker 1>regulators have taken a generally a light touch to technology regulation.

0:27:22.720 --> 0:27:25.199
<v Speaker 1>Was of course, we've seen the European regulators, you know,

0:27:25.240 --> 0:27:27.080
<v Speaker 1>going back to the Microsoft days, you know, taking a

0:27:27.200 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>much heavier touch. But that seems to be changing. I'm

0:27:30.880 --> 0:27:33.440
<v Speaker 1>not sure. We've seen a bunch of texts hauled in

0:27:33.520 --> 0:27:35.160
<v Speaker 1>front of Congress this year. Do you think that's a

0:27:35.200 --> 0:27:38.920
<v Speaker 1>blip or is that a trend that's emerging. Oh, totally

0:27:39.160 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>a massive trend that began very clearly in twenty nineteen

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and will continue. Because one of the other great great

0:27:45.960 --> 0:27:49.919
<v Speaker 1>gigantic trends of not good necessarily, but gigantic trends of

0:27:50.560 --> 0:27:54.720
<v Speaker 1>nineteen was the suspicions we all developed about giant tech

0:27:54.760 --> 0:27:58.600
<v Speaker 1>platforms went to a whole new level of great gravity

0:27:58.680 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>and concern on a global basis, and governments all over

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the world are really much more involved in scrutinizing particularly

0:28:06.640 --> 0:28:09.600
<v Speaker 1>the largest global tech companies, all of which are American

0:28:10.240 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 1>um and and those companies for the most part have

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:17.360
<v Speaker 1>not really responded sufficiently to the concerns that the public

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:20.879
<v Speaker 1>and government have, so those concerns are only going to grow.

0:28:21.560 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 1>So another thing about big tech. You know, Scott Galloway

0:28:25.200 --> 0:28:28.960
<v Speaker 1>was really looking at Facebook, really critical of how big

0:28:29.000 --> 0:28:32.280
<v Speaker 1>it's grown and its responsibility in terms of data and

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:37.480
<v Speaker 1>privacy and y you, Professor Scott Galloway, And now he's

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:41.360
<v Speaker 1>turned his sights to Twitter and whether CEO Jack Dorsey

0:28:41.400 --> 0:28:44.560
<v Speaker 1>should be at CEO. David, I'm really curious about your

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>opinion here. Yeah, I'm I'm a I'm a fan of

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:49.880
<v Speaker 1>Scott Galloway in general, and I think he's done a

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:54.400
<v Speaker 1>really important service in the very close scrutiny he's given

0:28:54.440 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>to the tech giants, even for the last three or

0:28:57.320 --> 0:29:00.000
<v Speaker 1>four years. But I don't agree with him about Twitter.

0:29:00.320 --> 0:29:03.560
<v Speaker 1>Twitter is a whole different kind of company really than

0:29:04.000 --> 0:29:06.880
<v Speaker 1>than Facebook in particular, which it's compared to so often.

0:29:06.920 --> 0:29:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It's it's really tiny in comparison, and it really it's

0:29:10.480 --> 0:29:14.400
<v Speaker 1>it's significance is very very different. I also think Jack

0:29:14.440 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Dorsey is a very different kind of leader than Mark Suckerberg,

0:29:18.440 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 1>far more thoughtful, far more responsible in many ways. And

0:29:22.440 --> 0:29:25.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't really think that there's any reason

0:29:25.440 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 1>why Jack Dorsey shouldn't be remain a CEO of Twitter

0:29:29.320 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>if he wants to interesting the one I guess on

0:29:33.320 --> 0:29:37.920
<v Speaker 1>the extreme, David, as we think about the growing regulatory overhang,

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>if you will, of big U S Tech, And again

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, that was a big, big theme

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:45.280
<v Speaker 1>emerging in twenty nine. On the far extreme, we've even

0:29:45.320 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>heard caused to break up big Tech. Do you think

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.920
<v Speaker 1>that's even on the menu at any point in the

0:29:52.280 --> 0:29:55.040
<v Speaker 1>foreseeable future. Yeah, I think it is on the menu.

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I I have my reservations about it, both from a

0:29:58.040 --> 0:30:00.520
<v Speaker 1>practical point of view and and even whether it's a

0:30:00.520 --> 0:30:02.720
<v Speaker 1>good idea. And I kind of go back and forth

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:07.080
<v Speaker 1>on that. It's certainly a massive trend. You know, President Canada,

0:30:07.120 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>presidential candidate Elizabeth Warren, and even plenty of people inside

0:30:10.560 --> 0:30:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the Trump administration and the President himself have occasionally made

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>noises about that. So you know, I honestly think that

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the companies are really scared about it, and you when

0:30:20.160 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you look at their behavior visa v government, you should

0:30:24.000 --> 0:30:27.080
<v Speaker 1>ask yourself, are they doing whatever they're doing because they

0:30:27.120 --> 0:30:29.480
<v Speaker 1>don't want to be broken up? And I think many

0:30:29.480 --> 0:30:32.959
<v Speaker 1>things they've done recently are explained that way. So it's

0:30:33.000 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>a it's a You know, when Elizabeth Warren talks about it,

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>she talks about things like going back and peeling double

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>click out of Google. You know that happens fifteen years ago.

0:30:41.560 --> 0:30:45.840
<v Speaker 1>So I don't think that's pragmatic or or likely. But

0:30:45.840 --> 0:30:48.800
<v Speaker 1>but the concerns about these platforms are so huge. You

0:30:48.840 --> 0:30:50.640
<v Speaker 1>mentioned I wrote a book about Facebook and it was

0:30:50.680 --> 0:30:53.880
<v Speaker 1>generally positive quite a few years ago. The perceptions that

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:56.720
<v Speaker 1>I have the world has about what Facebook is doing

0:30:56.760 --> 0:30:59.720
<v Speaker 1>and how it behaves and effectives has on society has

0:30:59.800 --> 0:31:03.080
<v Speaker 1>changed so completely. You know, we have real cause to

0:31:03.120 --> 0:31:05.880
<v Speaker 1>be worried about the power that a small number of

0:31:05.920 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 1>companies that are basically making non transparent decisions about our

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>lives are That that phenomenon is really worrisome and we're

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:19.000
<v Speaker 1>going to see reactions against it continually going forward. Let's

0:31:19.040 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>be honest, though, even with all these concerns that big

0:31:22.320 --> 0:31:25.640
<v Speaker 1>keep getting bigger. Google looking to buy fit Bit. Are

0:31:25.680 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>we going to see more deals in among the big

0:31:28.440 --> 0:31:30.920
<v Speaker 1>tech companies, even in light of some of this um

0:31:31.040 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 1>rhetoric from Elizabeth Warren and others. I do think we will.

0:31:34.360 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean partly because these companies are just so wealthy

0:31:37.560 --> 0:31:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and they have so much cash um that you know,

0:31:40.760 --> 0:31:43.920
<v Speaker 1>they they feel the mandate to grow. Look. Wall Street

0:31:43.960 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>is telling these companies keep growing. Their stocks are doing

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:50.920
<v Speaker 1>great almost without exception these giant companies in the last

0:31:51.160 --> 0:31:56.280
<v Speaker 1>few months. So uh, that is what their fundamental priority remains.

0:31:56.960 --> 0:31:59.600
<v Speaker 1>But they have to be super careful about their moves,

0:31:59.600 --> 0:32:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think when they make acquisitions internally, they're going

0:32:02.920 --> 0:32:06.280
<v Speaker 1>to evaluate them much more carefully for the perception that

0:32:06.360 --> 0:32:09.960
<v Speaker 1>they will create. UM. Google buying Fitbit, I think is

0:32:10.280 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, relatively innocuous from the standpoint of its policy implications.

0:32:15.280 --> 0:32:17.200
<v Speaker 1>All these companies really want to get into the health

0:32:17.200 --> 0:32:20.320
<v Speaker 1>care area, so that's one place you will see acquisitions,

0:32:20.320 --> 0:32:23.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think health technology is actually going to be

0:32:23.160 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>one of the great trends of the whole decade that

0:32:25.160 --> 0:32:28.080
<v Speaker 1>we're entering into. David, thanks so much for joining us.

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 1>I got a million other questions. I have for you,

0:32:30.560 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>but we'll catch up with you soon. David Kirkpatrick, tech

0:32:33.120 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Commy CEO and founder, talking to us about all things tech.

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe and

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:46.520
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:32:46.560 --> 0:32:50.800
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keane before

0:32:50.840 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:55.040
<v Speaker 1>Radio