1 00:00:16,311 --> 00:00:16,711 Speaker 1: Pushkin. 2 00:00:23,751 --> 00:00:26,911 Speaker 2: You can't predict these things. You have to make your 3 00:00:26,951 --> 00:00:30,351 Speaker 2: decision on the best available knowledge. You know, once you 4 00:00:30,391 --> 00:00:35,150 Speaker 2: get into retroactive clairvoyance, is nobody left of anything. 5 00:00:35,431 --> 00:00:39,311 Speaker 3: You had all of these different people calling from Florida 6 00:00:39,391 --> 00:00:43,271 Speaker 3: and leaving messages saying do something. Why don't you do something? 7 00:00:47,711 --> 00:00:51,191 Speaker 1: Hello, Fiasco listeners, it's Leon Vok. This is the fourth 8 00:00:51,231 --> 00:00:53,751 Speaker 1: in a series of bonus episodes we're dropping in this feed. 9 00:00:54,511 --> 00:00:56,671 Speaker 1: The goal is to showcase some of the best interviews 10 00:00:56,671 --> 00:00:59,191 Speaker 1: we did for Bush v. Gore, in which we covered 11 00:00:59,191 --> 00:01:01,551 Speaker 1: the ins and outs of the two thousand Florida recount. 12 00:01:02,191 --> 00:01:05,271 Speaker 1: In today's episode, we're looking at the two thousand campaign 13 00:01:05,831 --> 00:01:08,671 Speaker 1: as in the campaign itself, the thing that happened in 14 00:01:08,711 --> 00:01:11,071 Speaker 1: the months leading up to the recount, for all the 15 00:01:11,151 --> 00:01:14,431 Speaker 1: what ifs packed into the thirty days that followed election Day. 16 00:01:14,911 --> 00:01:18,071 Speaker 1: The campaign that preceded it was full of tiny turning 17 00:01:18,111 --> 00:01:20,911 Speaker 1: points that could have changed the outcome one way or another. 18 00:01:21,751 --> 00:01:23,591 Speaker 1: As you heard me say on the first episode of 19 00:01:23,591 --> 00:01:27,071 Speaker 1: the show, the Elian Gonzales saga and the environmental activism 20 00:01:27,111 --> 00:01:29,951 Speaker 1: around the Homestead Air Force Base were just two factors 21 00:01:29,991 --> 00:01:32,791 Speaker 1: that might have changed the razor thin margin on election day. 22 00:01:33,711 --> 00:01:36,671 Speaker 1: So today we have two interviews taking a deeper dive 23 00:01:36,711 --> 00:01:39,951 Speaker 1: into the what ifs that might have prevented or recount altogether. 24 00:01:46,631 --> 00:01:50,671 Speaker 1: First up, Ralph Nader. Nader has been America's most famous 25 00:01:50,711 --> 00:01:54,391 Speaker 1: consumer advocate since nineteen sixty five, when he published a 26 00:01:54,391 --> 00:01:59,031 Speaker 1: groundbreaking expose about the auto industry. Nader trained an entire 27 00:01:59,111 --> 00:02:03,151 Speaker 1: generation of activists. They called themselves Nator's Raiders, and he 28 00:02:03,191 --> 00:02:07,471 Speaker 1: deputized them to investigate all kinds of injustice, inefficiency, and corruption. 29 00:02:08,631 --> 00:02:11,911 Speaker 1: By two thousand was an icon, and he ran for 30 00:02:11,951 --> 00:02:15,071 Speaker 1: president as the Green Party candidate, railing against the two 31 00:02:15,111 --> 00:02:17,511 Speaker 1: party system and sold out arenas. 32 00:02:17,031 --> 00:02:19,751 Speaker 4: What about poverty in the Land of the Free, Home 33 00:02:19,791 --> 00:02:22,911 Speaker 4: of the brave, booming economy. On the one hand, twenty 34 00:02:22,951 --> 00:02:26,471 Speaker 4: percent child poverty in the USA, richest country in the world. 35 00:02:26,711 --> 00:02:29,631 Speaker 4: There are countries in Western Europe that have abolished poverty. 36 00:02:29,791 --> 00:02:30,191 Speaker 4: They did it. 37 00:02:30,391 --> 00:02:32,631 Speaker 1: We interviewed Nator for the first episode of the season 38 00:02:32,791 --> 00:02:35,711 Speaker 1: because his candidacy is so often blamed for Gore's defeat 39 00:02:36,111 --> 00:02:38,751 Speaker 1: and we wanted to hear his perspective on it. Nator 40 00:02:38,831 --> 00:02:41,311 Speaker 1: mapped out why he thought he was a necessary alternative 41 00:02:41,431 --> 00:02:43,991 Speaker 1: and why he thought Gore struggled as a candidate. 42 00:02:43,991 --> 00:02:46,591 Speaker 2: Because he was the front runner, he was too cautious, 43 00:02:46,991 --> 00:02:51,911 Speaker 2: and because he was too cautious, he didn't take pioneering stands. 44 00:02:51,991 --> 00:02:54,031 Speaker 2: He thought he could just say to the public, Look, 45 00:02:54,351 --> 00:02:57,311 Speaker 2: I had eight years of experience in Washington's vice president, 46 00:02:57,391 --> 00:03:00,111 Speaker 2: I was senator, I was representative. I was a journalist 47 00:03:00,191 --> 00:03:05,591 Speaker 2: in Vietnam. And who's this guy, this bumbling governor from 48 00:03:05,671 --> 00:03:08,631 Speaker 2: Texas who couldn't put four sentences together and had a 49 00:03:08,671 --> 00:03:13,231 Speaker 2: horrible record on children's poverty to a corporate pollution. 50 00:03:13,791 --> 00:03:15,831 Speaker 1: And when you when you looked at him and Bush 51 00:03:15,871 --> 00:03:17,791 Speaker 1: side by side on the campaign trail, and I realized, 52 00:03:17,791 --> 00:03:19,631 Speaker 1: you know, you're making distinction between the old al Gore 53 00:03:19,711 --> 00:03:21,550 Speaker 1: and the al Gore who was running for president. When 54 00:03:21,551 --> 00:03:23,511 Speaker 1: you looked at them side by side, what did you see? 55 00:03:23,991 --> 00:03:26,551 Speaker 2: Bush was horrible? I mean, one of the reasons I 56 00:03:26,671 --> 00:03:31,191 Speaker 2: ran was to push the Democrats into a more comprehensive 57 00:03:31,311 --> 00:03:36,151 Speaker 2: assault on Bush's record, because they weren't doing it, and 58 00:03:36,191 --> 00:03:38,351 Speaker 2: so I was saying to myself, well, you know, I 59 00:03:38,391 --> 00:03:41,151 Speaker 2: got to show them how to do it. Unfortunately, in 60 00:03:41,231 --> 00:03:44,591 Speaker 2: the two party duopoly, the press doesn't pay attention to 61 00:03:44,671 --> 00:03:47,191 Speaker 2: third party agendas. By and large. 62 00:03:48,431 --> 00:03:49,991 Speaker 1: When you were on the trail, I know that you 63 00:03:50,591 --> 00:03:53,271 Speaker 1: sort of had a recurring argument that you would make 64 00:03:53,271 --> 00:03:55,631 Speaker 1: that these two guys are in many ways the same, 65 00:03:55,751 --> 00:03:58,151 Speaker 1: or that they were that they you could make distinctions 66 00:03:58,151 --> 00:04:00,711 Speaker 1: on certain policy areas, but that you saw them in 67 00:04:00,751 --> 00:04:02,991 Speaker 1: some ways as fundamentally the same. Can you elaborate on 68 00:04:03,031 --> 00:04:03,831 Speaker 1: that or explain it? 69 00:04:04,071 --> 00:04:07,711 Speaker 2: Yeah, on certain social safety nets, obviously, they're very different. 70 00:04:08,191 --> 00:04:12,631 Speaker 2: On things like child health, health and childcare and medicare 71 00:04:12,751 --> 00:04:18,231 Speaker 2: preservation and some of the more basic civil liberty, civil rights, 72 00:04:18,791 --> 00:04:22,951 Speaker 2: housing issues. The Democrats were of course better, I mean 73 00:04:23,151 --> 00:04:26,231 Speaker 2: nowhere near enough, but they were very distinctly better than 74 00:04:26,271 --> 00:04:30,150 Speaker 2: the Republicans. But on the biggest issue of AWE, which 75 00:04:30,191 --> 00:04:37,431 Speaker 2: is the corporate state, crony capitalism, corporate welfare, militarism, they 76 00:04:37,471 --> 00:04:39,510 Speaker 2: were increasingly alike. 77 00:04:40,151 --> 00:04:43,751 Speaker 1: Did that carry over into a sense among the electorate 78 00:04:43,871 --> 00:04:47,190 Speaker 1: that this election wasn't that important? Did you detect an 79 00:04:47,311 --> 00:04:51,391 Speaker 1: unusual level of disengagement due to these these pacific candidates. 80 00:04:51,911 --> 00:04:54,271 Speaker 2: Let's put it this way, it was not an exciting election. 81 00:04:54,471 --> 00:04:57,591 Speaker 2: You had boring candidates. Al Gore is very boring candidate. 82 00:04:57,631 --> 00:05:01,190 Speaker 2: George W. Bush was a boring candidate. They agreed with 83 00:05:01,271 --> 00:05:04,991 Speaker 2: each other incredible number of times on the debate. Somebody 84 00:05:05,031 --> 00:05:08,511 Speaker 2: counted once that Bush and Gore agreed with each other 85 00:05:08,631 --> 00:05:12,551 Speaker 2: over twenty times in one residential debate. And so the 86 00:05:12,591 --> 00:05:16,671 Speaker 2: attention of the activists was they would paint George W. 87 00:05:16,791 --> 00:05:20,911 Speaker 2: Bush as bad on the environment, which is true. But 88 00:05:21,031 --> 00:05:24,911 Speaker 2: then Gore, he allowed Bill Clinton to shut him down 89 00:05:24,991 --> 00:05:32,190 Speaker 2: on regulating auto pollution, fuel efficiency standards, and generally were 90 00:05:32,671 --> 00:05:36,071 Speaker 2: very unexciting in the area of environment, which is his 91 00:05:36,191 --> 00:05:40,871 Speaker 2: principal claim to fame. People saw that he wasn't authentic 92 00:05:40,991 --> 00:05:43,871 Speaker 2: when he said I'm for power for the people, not 93 00:05:44,071 --> 00:05:48,031 Speaker 2: the corporations. I'm not for the insured companies, I'm not 94 00:05:48,231 --> 00:05:53,711 Speaker 2: for the oil companies. People really didn't believe them. It 95 00:05:53,791 --> 00:05:57,911 Speaker 2: was too little, too light, and not specific enough. He 96 00:05:57,951 --> 00:06:01,111 Speaker 2: could have done a lot, but he was coasting because 97 00:06:01,351 --> 00:06:02,671 Speaker 2: he thought he had it in a bag. 98 00:06:03,591 --> 00:06:06,071 Speaker 1: It's interesting to hear you say that he was cautious 99 00:06:06,071 --> 00:06:08,070 Speaker 1: because he thought he had it in the bag. I 100 00:06:08,071 --> 00:06:11,111 Speaker 1: feel like there's a competing narrative, or at least one 101 00:06:11,151 --> 00:06:14,391 Speaker 1: I've absorbed somehow that he was cautious because he didn't 102 00:06:14,391 --> 00:06:14,991 Speaker 1: know who he was. 103 00:06:16,431 --> 00:06:18,911 Speaker 2: Well, when I say he was cautious because he thought 104 00:06:18,911 --> 00:06:20,751 Speaker 2: he had it in a bag. That wasn't the only 105 00:06:20,791 --> 00:06:25,190 Speaker 2: reason he was cautious. He's a cautious politician to begin 106 00:06:25,271 --> 00:06:29,871 Speaker 2: with in his prior races, very very cautious. Finger to 107 00:06:29,951 --> 00:06:32,791 Speaker 2: the wind of the powers that be? That's Al Gore 108 00:06:33,071 --> 00:06:35,551 Speaker 2: fingers to the wind of the powers that be. 109 00:06:36,991 --> 00:06:39,871 Speaker 1: Do you agree that there's this phrase that he didn't 110 00:06:39,911 --> 00:06:42,591 Speaker 1: know who he was? Is that something that you subscribe to? 111 00:06:42,831 --> 00:06:42,951 Speaker 5: Oh? 112 00:06:42,991 --> 00:06:45,911 Speaker 2: Yeah, definitely. If you look at the way he came 113 00:06:45,951 --> 00:06:48,351 Speaker 2: out for each debate, he was a different Al Gore. 114 00:06:49,351 --> 00:06:53,591 Speaker 2: One time he was aggressive, another time he was aloof 115 00:06:54,231 --> 00:06:57,431 Speaker 2: a third time he was like a boxer in a clinch. 116 00:06:58,031 --> 00:07:04,111 Speaker 2: I agree with Governor Bush. You know, over twenty times. 117 00:07:04,191 --> 00:07:08,031 Speaker 1: In one debate you said you didn't do much campaigning 118 00:07:08,031 --> 00:07:09,711 Speaker 1: in Florida, that you'd just gone down for I think 119 00:07:09,751 --> 00:07:12,351 Speaker 1: you said two and a half days. Was that because 120 00:07:12,391 --> 00:07:14,431 Speaker 1: you didn't want to draw votes from Gore in a 121 00:07:14,471 --> 00:07:16,191 Speaker 1: battleground state as close as Florida. 122 00:07:16,991 --> 00:07:22,511 Speaker 2: No, it was not the best management of my schedule. 123 00:07:23,191 --> 00:07:26,151 Speaker 2: I mean, I wasn't pulling that high in Florida. I 124 00:07:26,231 --> 00:07:31,311 Speaker 2: was pulling much higher in places like Massachusetts, California, Oregon, 125 00:07:31,511 --> 00:07:35,711 Speaker 2: Washington State, Illinois, and that's where I wanted to spend 126 00:07:36,151 --> 00:07:39,071 Speaker 2: a lot of time because I was looking for the 127 00:07:39,151 --> 00:07:43,031 Speaker 2: aggregate vote. I wasn't in the running for electoral college votes. 128 00:07:43,071 --> 00:07:46,111 Speaker 2: I was looking try to get five percent of the 129 00:07:46,231 --> 00:07:50,951 Speaker 2: total popular vote so we could qualify four years hence 130 00:07:51,391 --> 00:07:52,471 Speaker 2: for federal funds. 131 00:07:53,151 --> 00:07:56,271 Speaker 1: Were there gore people or people from the DNC who 132 00:07:56,471 --> 00:07:59,831 Speaker 1: begged you to not campaign in battleground states. 133 00:08:00,231 --> 00:08:03,111 Speaker 2: Well, in the last few weeks, they didn't beg me. 134 00:08:03,151 --> 00:08:07,311 Speaker 2: They opposed me. They literally took people like Lauria Steinem 135 00:08:07,351 --> 00:08:11,031 Speaker 2: and so on on a tour to turn again against 136 00:08:11,031 --> 00:08:15,151 Speaker 2: my candidacy. Some of them took out ads attacking me. 137 00:08:16,031 --> 00:08:17,911 Speaker 1: Were there any backchannel efforts to get you to not 138 00:08:18,031 --> 00:08:21,511 Speaker 1: go to those states like ay other Buchanan, for example, 139 00:08:21,751 --> 00:08:24,191 Speaker 1: like very deliberately did not go to battleground states. You 140 00:08:24,271 --> 00:08:26,231 Speaker 1: only can't because he was only also going for five percent. 141 00:08:27,431 --> 00:08:30,271 Speaker 1: He campaigned only in safe states that were safe for Bush. 142 00:08:30,431 --> 00:08:33,831 Speaker 2: Yeah. I just thought of principle, I wouldn't listen to 143 00:08:33,871 --> 00:08:35,910 Speaker 2: that sort of thing because you have to respect the 144 00:08:36,030 --> 00:08:38,670 Speaker 2: voters in every state. You can't say I'm not going 145 00:08:38,751 --> 00:08:41,831 Speaker 2: to go to a state because it's a battleground state. 146 00:08:42,310 --> 00:08:46,910 Speaker 2: That's disrespecting potential voters and the interest of all voters 147 00:08:46,910 --> 00:08:50,111 Speaker 2: to have more voices and choices. That's why I rigorously 148 00:08:50,550 --> 00:08:54,430 Speaker 2: campaigned in every fifty states. No other candidate did that, 149 00:08:54,631 --> 00:08:58,311 Speaker 2: small candidate or major party candidate, because it was a 150 00:08:58,310 --> 00:08:59,511 Speaker 2: matter of principle with me. 151 00:09:00,471 --> 00:09:04,351 Speaker 1: Do you remember the emergence of the Nators raiders for Gore? 152 00:09:05,550 --> 00:09:10,991 Speaker 2: Yeah, very much. I was campaigning in Minnesota and got 153 00:09:11,751 --> 00:09:15,550 Speaker 2: their one or two days press. But you know, they 154 00:09:15,550 --> 00:09:19,151 Speaker 2: weren't in a position to adopt the principle I had. 155 00:09:19,190 --> 00:09:22,670 Speaker 2: They weren't running, Therefore, they didn't want to be obliged 156 00:09:22,710 --> 00:09:26,391 Speaker 2: to respect the voters. They just saw the winner take 157 00:09:26,430 --> 00:09:30,991 Speaker 2: all electoral college duopoly, culled the sac and had to 158 00:09:31,030 --> 00:09:31,790 Speaker 2: adjust to it. 159 00:09:33,391 --> 00:09:35,950 Speaker 1: Did you feel betrayed by them at all, that these 160 00:09:35,950 --> 00:09:38,551 Speaker 1: were your supporters who were going against this principle of 161 00:09:38,590 --> 00:09:41,950 Speaker 1: yours about respecting the voters. That it feel like, I like, 162 00:09:42,231 --> 00:09:43,711 Speaker 1: these guys don't really understand you. 163 00:09:43,950 --> 00:09:46,231 Speaker 2: Well, they were more numerous in two thousand and four. 164 00:09:47,190 --> 00:09:53,231 Speaker 2: Almost the entire progressive lineup of well known progressives dropped 165 00:09:53,271 --> 00:09:55,111 Speaker 2: their supported me in two thousand and four. 166 00:09:56,710 --> 00:09:59,111 Speaker 1: Is that because they just felt so sad about the 167 00:09:59,111 --> 00:10:02,910 Speaker 1: fact that your votes in Florida could have been Gore votes, 168 00:10:02,950 --> 00:10:04,431 Speaker 1: and thus Gore could have been present. 169 00:10:05,231 --> 00:10:08,631 Speaker 2: It's like all smart people they were fact deprived and 170 00:10:08,710 --> 00:10:13,910 Speaker 2: they didn't realize that there were tens sena quantons, any 171 00:10:13,950 --> 00:10:17,190 Speaker 2: one of which, if change, would have won for Gore 172 00:10:18,070 --> 00:10:24,190 Speaker 2: and electoral college and three hundred thousand Democrat voters going 173 00:10:24,231 --> 00:10:29,151 Speaker 2: for Borsch's Supreme Court loss of Tennessee. They bought into 174 00:10:29,190 --> 00:10:33,830 Speaker 2: blaming the Greens and me for every other sena quantone, 175 00:10:34,511 --> 00:10:39,151 Speaker 2: giving us delusions of grandeur. It's amazing. It's almost a 176 00:10:39,351 --> 00:10:42,511 Speaker 2: intellectual tick. It doesn't matter how smart they are, how 177 00:10:42,590 --> 00:10:45,271 Speaker 2: savvy they are. All they look at is the difference 178 00:10:45,790 --> 00:10:49,350 Speaker 2: between the two major candidates and how many votes I got. 179 00:10:50,231 --> 00:10:53,591 Speaker 2: Every third party candidate in Florida got more than five 180 00:10:53,670 --> 00:10:57,190 Speaker 2: hundred and thirty five votes, by the way, But the 181 00:10:57,550 --> 00:11:00,431 Speaker 2: one thing you can look back on is that a 182 00:11:00,471 --> 00:11:06,230 Speaker 2: winner take all system electoral college determination is full of mischief, 183 00:11:11,151 --> 00:11:11,551 Speaker 2: all right. 184 00:11:11,631 --> 00:11:14,471 Speaker 1: That was Ralph Nader, the Green Party presidential candidate in 185 00:11:14,511 --> 00:11:22,351 Speaker 1: two thousand. For many frustrated Gore supporters, Ralph Nader's candidacy 186 00:11:22,430 --> 00:11:24,991 Speaker 1: is one of the most enduring what ifs of the election. 187 00:11:25,790 --> 00:11:28,711 Speaker 1: But there's another election day question mark, one that received 188 00:11:28,830 --> 00:11:32,470 Speaker 1: much less attention during the recount that's coming up after 189 00:11:32,511 --> 00:11:32,910 Speaker 1: the break. 190 00:11:38,670 --> 00:11:40,990 Speaker 3: Some people said that they went down and they were 191 00:11:40,991 --> 00:11:43,951 Speaker 3: told they weren't on the registration rolls, and they couldn't 192 00:11:44,030 --> 00:11:46,310 Speaker 3: understand why they weren't on the roles because they'd been 193 00:11:46,391 --> 00:11:47,070 Speaker 3: voting before. 194 00:11:47,590 --> 00:11:50,830 Speaker 1: This is Mary Francis Berry, a professor at the University 195 00:11:50,830 --> 00:11:54,271 Speaker 1: of Pennsylvania. She's referring to a population of largely African 196 00:11:54,310 --> 00:11:57,030 Speaker 1: American and Latino voters who said they were turned away 197 00:11:57,030 --> 00:12:00,310 Speaker 1: from the polls on election Day. In two thousand, Barry 198 00:12:00,391 --> 00:12:02,791 Speaker 1: was the chair of the US Commission on Civil Rights, 199 00:12:03,030 --> 00:12:06,670 Speaker 1: which was tasked with investigating complaints of disenfranchisement around the country. 200 00:12:06,950 --> 00:12:09,151 Speaker 3: We had to set up a hot land before the 201 00:12:09,231 --> 00:12:12,950 Speaker 3: election so that if there were any complaints, we would 202 00:12:12,950 --> 00:12:15,030 Speaker 3: have a number out there that people could call. We 203 00:12:15,070 --> 00:12:18,070 Speaker 3: had done that in other elections, but in this one 204 00:12:18,151 --> 00:12:22,030 Speaker 3: you had all of these different people calling from Florida 205 00:12:22,070 --> 00:12:26,030 Speaker 3: and leaving messages saying do something, Why don't you do something? 206 00:12:26,590 --> 00:12:29,151 Speaker 1: And so this was like an unusual volume of complaints 207 00:12:29,310 --> 00:12:31,391 Speaker 1: and they were specifically concentrated in Florida. 208 00:12:31,430 --> 00:12:35,351 Speaker 3: Absolutely, they were a volume higher than any I had 209 00:12:35,391 --> 00:12:37,590 Speaker 3: seen and all the time I'd been on the Commission, 210 00:12:37,590 --> 00:12:41,190 Speaker 3: and I was first appointed to the Commission in nineteen eighty. 211 00:12:41,910 --> 00:12:44,471 Speaker 1: In early two thousand and one, the Commission on Civil 212 00:12:44,550 --> 00:12:47,391 Speaker 1: Rights investigated the large number of Florida voters who had 213 00:12:47,430 --> 00:12:50,191 Speaker 1: reported problems at polling sites that prevented them from voting. 214 00:12:50,751 --> 00:12:53,631 Speaker 1: Over the course of their investigation, Barry and her colleagues 215 00:12:53,670 --> 00:12:56,991 Speaker 1: her testimony from dozens of Florida voters and officials, including 216 00:12:57,030 --> 00:12:58,870 Speaker 1: Governor Jeb bush I. 217 00:12:58,830 --> 00:13:03,470 Speaker 5: Asked for a briefing on the alleged concern that felons 218 00:13:04,111 --> 00:13:08,310 Speaker 5: were voting and that non felons were not allowed to 219 00:13:08,391 --> 00:13:11,231 Speaker 5: vote because they were allegedly felons. 220 00:13:12,271 --> 00:13:14,910 Speaker 1: One of the priorities of the investigation was to get 221 00:13:14,950 --> 00:13:19,030 Speaker 1: to the bottom of what's now known as Florida's felon purge. 222 00:13:19,070 --> 00:13:21,431 Speaker 1: In two thousand, it was illegal for anyone with a 223 00:13:21,430 --> 00:13:24,830 Speaker 1: felony conviction to vote in Florida, even after they had 224 00:13:24,871 --> 00:13:28,351 Speaker 1: served their time. So in two thousand, the state of 225 00:13:28,351 --> 00:13:31,710 Speaker 1: Florida commissioned a contractor to create a list of felons 226 00:13:31,751 --> 00:13:34,910 Speaker 1: living in the state and to ensure that they weren't 227 00:13:34,991 --> 00:13:39,271 Speaker 1: registered to vote. The list was deeply flawed and resulted 228 00:13:39,310 --> 00:13:41,990 Speaker 1: in more than a thousand legal voters being turned away 229 00:13:42,070 --> 00:13:45,111 Speaker 1: at the polls. The state office in charge of this 230 00:13:45,190 --> 00:13:47,670 Speaker 1: operation was one that you might be familiar with at 231 00:13:47,670 --> 00:13:48,111 Speaker 1: this point. 232 00:13:49,030 --> 00:13:52,990 Speaker 3: Catherine Harris, as Secretary of State, had direct responsibility under 233 00:13:52,991 --> 00:13:57,271 Speaker 3: the law for the elections, and she testified. I recall 234 00:13:57,310 --> 00:13:59,831 Speaker 3: her saying something like she was in a hurry and 235 00:13:59,871 --> 00:14:02,151 Speaker 3: didn't have much time because she was going to New 236 00:14:02,231 --> 00:14:05,551 Speaker 3: York on a shopping trip or some thing like that, 237 00:14:05,631 --> 00:14:08,190 Speaker 3: which I didn't understand why she told us that, but anyway, 238 00:14:09,111 --> 00:14:14,550 Speaker 3: she said that she had handed it over to her subordinates, 239 00:14:14,790 --> 00:14:19,230 Speaker 3: and we in particular asked her we had testimony from 240 00:14:19,271 --> 00:14:23,671 Speaker 3: a firm that her office had hired to purge clean 241 00:14:23,751 --> 00:14:26,351 Speaker 3: up the voting roles, to make sure that there were 242 00:14:26,391 --> 00:14:29,791 Speaker 3: in no extraneous names and it was all clear, and 243 00:14:31,151 --> 00:14:35,791 Speaker 3: to do it scientifically. And the head of this company, 244 00:14:35,991 --> 00:14:40,191 Speaker 3: which had many contracts with the government, testified that under 245 00:14:40,231 --> 00:14:44,431 Speaker 3: oath that they told her office that if they did 246 00:14:44,511 --> 00:14:47,071 Speaker 3: the procedure the way they had asked them to do it, 247 00:14:47,671 --> 00:14:51,711 Speaker 3: they would get a lot of false positives of people 248 00:14:51,751 --> 00:14:54,830 Speaker 3: who were actually registered, and asked if they should change 249 00:14:54,830 --> 00:14:58,711 Speaker 3: the procedure, and that Harris's office and her staff told 250 00:14:58,751 --> 00:15:00,431 Speaker 3: them to go ahead and do it the way they 251 00:15:00,471 --> 00:15:03,470 Speaker 3: had told them to do it, which they did, and 252 00:15:03,511 --> 00:15:07,791 Speaker 3: so the result was that there were people whose names 253 00:15:07,830 --> 00:15:11,271 Speaker 3: were confused with other people's names, people who had told 254 00:15:11,311 --> 00:15:15,871 Speaker 3: they weren't registered when they were. And one black minister 255 00:15:16,031 --> 00:15:19,351 Speaker 3: testified that when he went to vote and took his 256 00:15:19,351 --> 00:15:21,631 Speaker 3: family with him, he liked his kids to watch when 257 00:15:21,631 --> 00:15:25,511 Speaker 3: he went to vote, to get the experience of seeing 258 00:15:25,551 --> 00:15:27,951 Speaker 3: the polling place and all that. And he went in 259 00:15:28,031 --> 00:15:30,471 Speaker 3: and he'd voted before, and they told him in a 260 00:15:30,551 --> 00:15:34,031 Speaker 3: very loud voice where everyone could hear, that he was 261 00:15:34,071 --> 00:15:38,710 Speaker 3: a convicted felon. And he was outraged because he said, 262 00:15:38,951 --> 00:15:42,471 Speaker 3: not only aim, I'm not ever convicted of anything. I've 263 00:15:42,551 --> 00:15:46,031 Speaker 3: even been charged with anything, and the only time I've 264 00:15:46,071 --> 00:15:48,391 Speaker 3: been to the courthouse is when I served on a jury, 265 00:15:48,551 --> 00:15:52,231 Speaker 3: So I don't understand how I could be a convicted felon. 266 00:15:52,311 --> 00:15:55,111 Speaker 3: Could you call up somebody and find out, you know, 267 00:15:55,191 --> 00:15:57,431 Speaker 3: this is a mistake. And then they said they couldn't 268 00:15:57,471 --> 00:16:00,551 Speaker 3: get through to the office where they would check this, 269 00:16:00,710 --> 00:16:02,791 Speaker 3: so he ended up having to slink out of the 270 00:16:03,111 --> 00:16:07,351 Speaker 3: room with everybody looking at him as this convicted felon, 271 00:16:08,111 --> 00:16:10,431 Speaker 3: when in fact his name was on the roll and 272 00:16:10,471 --> 00:16:12,511 Speaker 3: he had been on the rolls. He said he felt 273 00:16:12,551 --> 00:16:15,830 Speaker 3: slingshotted back to slavery when they told him that he 274 00:16:15,871 --> 00:16:18,711 Speaker 3: was just and he was so disconsolate even by the 275 00:16:18,791 --> 00:16:21,031 Speaker 3: time he came to the hero and so it was 276 00:16:21,111 --> 00:16:24,911 Speaker 3: really sort of an outrageous sort of thing that happened. 277 00:16:25,231 --> 00:16:28,470 Speaker 6: Was it your sense at that point that the fellon 278 00:16:28,551 --> 00:16:31,591 Speaker 6: purge list was the primary driver of the problems you 279 00:16:31,590 --> 00:16:33,791 Speaker 6: were getting reports on election day? 280 00:16:34,071 --> 00:16:36,791 Speaker 3: Yeah, it was our understanding, or it seemed to me 281 00:16:37,391 --> 00:16:43,151 Speaker 3: that that list, that process was a major problem, that 282 00:16:43,191 --> 00:16:47,391 Speaker 3: there were any number of people who were not on 283 00:16:47,431 --> 00:16:51,951 Speaker 3: the rolls. The other major problem that compounded it was 284 00:16:52,231 --> 00:16:57,351 Speaker 3: that we found out in one county that the election 285 00:16:58,391 --> 00:17:02,231 Speaker 3: office state election office made sure that there were cell 286 00:17:02,271 --> 00:17:07,591 Speaker 3: phones given to some of the precincts, but there weren't 287 00:17:07,631 --> 00:17:10,671 Speaker 3: any given to the precincts where there were Latino voters 288 00:17:10,791 --> 00:17:11,391 Speaker 3: or whether they were. 289 00:17:11,351 --> 00:17:14,791 Speaker 6: Black voters, so that cell phones they could use to 290 00:17:15,150 --> 00:17:15,670 Speaker 6: the election. 291 00:17:15,830 --> 00:17:18,831 Speaker 3: That the volunteers who were there or who were hired 292 00:17:19,110 --> 00:17:21,511 Speaker 3: to conduct the election, the people who sit there at 293 00:17:21,551 --> 00:17:24,150 Speaker 3: the tables, you know, during election checking the rolls and 294 00:17:24,191 --> 00:17:26,871 Speaker 3: so on could call up if they had some problem, 295 00:17:27,390 --> 00:17:30,831 Speaker 3: and they didn't give cell phones. In some district. They 296 00:17:30,870 --> 00:17:34,270 Speaker 3: were very particular about who had a cell phone and 297 00:17:34,311 --> 00:17:36,230 Speaker 3: who could call up and who could not. And it 298 00:17:36,390 --> 00:17:39,231 Speaker 3: just turned out that the ones who couldn't call up 299 00:17:39,311 --> 00:17:41,231 Speaker 3: were the district where there were the problems. 300 00:17:41,511 --> 00:17:41,751 Speaker 4: Right. 301 00:17:42,311 --> 00:17:46,471 Speaker 6: Can you describe the reaction to your report and how 302 00:17:46,511 --> 00:17:48,791 Speaker 6: it worked politically, what its impact was politically. 303 00:17:49,390 --> 00:17:56,511 Speaker 3: Sometimes when you do reports in government agencies like the 304 00:17:56,551 --> 00:18:01,670 Speaker 3: Commission that are investigative and informative, the reports sort of 305 00:18:01,711 --> 00:18:04,191 Speaker 3: collect dust. You know, there might be a one day 306 00:18:04,231 --> 00:18:08,110 Speaker 3: half story about you did a report, but then after 307 00:18:08,150 --> 00:18:11,031 Speaker 3: that you know it served its purpose. It has been 308 00:18:11,071 --> 00:18:13,511 Speaker 3: a safety valve for people who want to talk about it, 309 00:18:13,590 --> 00:18:16,870 Speaker 3: to complain or do whatever, and you make your recommendations. 310 00:18:17,471 --> 00:18:19,551 Speaker 3: But I was determined when I was chair of the 311 00:18:19,551 --> 00:18:23,031 Speaker 3: Commission that we would only do reports that were important 312 00:18:23,071 --> 00:18:26,431 Speaker 3: and substantive, and that we would make sure that our 313 00:18:26,471 --> 00:18:30,911 Speaker 3: recommendations had some kind of teeth and were in conformity 314 00:18:30,951 --> 00:18:35,630 Speaker 3: with what we found, and that we would look toward 315 00:18:35,791 --> 00:18:38,670 Speaker 3: trying to get some kind of legislation help the Congress 316 00:18:39,590 --> 00:18:41,471 Speaker 3: and the President is trying to get some kind of 317 00:18:41,630 --> 00:18:45,390 Speaker 3: legislation to remedy whatever problems we found. Okay, so the 318 00:18:45,431 --> 00:18:50,150 Speaker 3: report came out, and it did not just gathered us 319 00:18:50,951 --> 00:18:55,791 Speaker 3: the Senate, thank Senator Dodd from Connecticut. Chris Dodd was 320 00:18:55,911 --> 00:18:58,430 Speaker 3: chair of the committee over there that considered it. I 321 00:18:58,511 --> 00:19:02,950 Speaker 3: remember Diane Feinstein was on the committee, a leading member 322 00:19:02,951 --> 00:19:06,750 Speaker 3: of it. That committee and its staff held hearings on 323 00:19:06,830 --> 00:19:12,630 Speaker 3: the report. We recommended that the federal government pass a 324 00:19:12,791 --> 00:19:17,631 Speaker 3: law which set up some kind of election commission and 325 00:19:17,751 --> 00:19:21,110 Speaker 3: in fact required the states to change and clean up 326 00:19:21,150 --> 00:19:24,910 Speaker 3: their procedures so that we wouldn't have this kind of 327 00:19:24,951 --> 00:19:28,510 Speaker 3: purge that took place from this company that ended up 328 00:19:28,551 --> 00:19:31,711 Speaker 3: calling people felons who weren't felons and all that sort 329 00:19:31,791 --> 00:19:34,910 Speaker 3: of stuff. And that the states looked to see that 330 00:19:35,630 --> 00:19:41,470 Speaker 3: polling places are accessible, and that the Congress and also 331 00:19:41,711 --> 00:19:46,150 Speaker 3: that discouraged the states from having police officers patrolling up 332 00:19:46,231 --> 00:19:48,990 Speaker 3: and down a highway patrolment on the roads leading to 333 00:19:49,031 --> 00:19:53,910 Speaker 3: the polling places, which sometimes intimidated people who wanted to 334 00:19:53,991 --> 00:19:58,111 Speaker 3: vote and didn't know what was happening. And that all 335 00:19:58,150 --> 00:20:01,710 Speaker 3: of these different problems ought to be addressed by legislation. 336 00:20:02,031 --> 00:20:06,830 Speaker 3: And I was pleased to see. The Congress passed some 337 00:20:06,991 --> 00:20:10,910 Speaker 3: legislation called Help America Vote Act up and the Election 338 00:20:11,031 --> 00:20:15,390 Speaker 3: Assistance Commission and appropriated a bunch of money. Sometimes Congress 339 00:20:15,511 --> 00:20:19,151 Speaker 3: authorizes things, but they don't appropriate any money to give 340 00:20:19,231 --> 00:20:23,190 Speaker 3: to the states in order for them to fix some 341 00:20:23,390 --> 00:20:24,511 Speaker 3: of these problems. 342 00:20:25,431 --> 00:20:29,431 Speaker 6: How effective was that legislation and the formation of that organization? 343 00:20:29,751 --> 00:20:33,390 Speaker 3: Well after the law passed and the money came and 344 00:20:33,471 --> 00:20:40,350 Speaker 3: people's attention went elsewhere. The Election Assistance Commission had no teeth. 345 00:20:40,630 --> 00:20:43,751 Speaker 3: I knew that to begin with, because the Constitution in 346 00:20:43,870 --> 00:20:47,830 Speaker 3: Article one leaves the way elections are conducted to the 347 00:20:47,870 --> 00:20:53,630 Speaker 3: states unless there is discrimination under the fourteenth Amendment, and 348 00:20:53,671 --> 00:20:56,110 Speaker 3: then you can file a civil rights complaint, which is 349 00:20:56,150 --> 00:21:00,351 Speaker 3: what we had been looking at. But the normal election process, 350 00:21:00,551 --> 00:21:04,071 Speaker 3: that is, how do they handle the roles and where 351 00:21:04,110 --> 00:21:07,351 Speaker 3: the polling play. All that stuff is under the control 352 00:21:07,390 --> 00:21:11,351 Speaker 3: of the states. So the Election Assistance Commission was not 353 00:21:11,431 --> 00:21:15,231 Speaker 3: given the authority to force the states to do anything, 354 00:21:15,390 --> 00:21:18,150 Speaker 3: because Congress couldn't give them the authority to do that. 355 00:21:18,590 --> 00:21:20,590 Speaker 3: But they thought that if they gave them the money 356 00:21:21,951 --> 00:21:25,151 Speaker 3: and then monitored how they spent the money, then indeed 357 00:21:25,231 --> 00:21:27,830 Speaker 3: they might change some of these procedures, and some of 358 00:21:27,870 --> 00:21:30,071 Speaker 3: the states did a lot of them did. They used 359 00:21:30,110 --> 00:21:33,830 Speaker 3: the money to buy new equipment and so you wouldn't 360 00:21:33,870 --> 00:21:38,031 Speaker 3: have all those chad things again and to use paper ballots, 361 00:21:38,071 --> 00:21:43,430 Speaker 3: and they some of them put out policies where they 362 00:21:43,471 --> 00:21:51,271 Speaker 3: wouldn't have an overriding police presidence around the roads to elections. 363 00:21:51,311 --> 00:21:55,071 Speaker 3: I mean, there were some things actually that actually got 364 00:21:55,150 --> 00:21:56,350 Speaker 3: changed as a result. 365 00:21:57,471 --> 00:21:59,231 Speaker 1: You sort of got up this with the answer you 366 00:21:59,271 --> 00:22:03,031 Speaker 1: just gave. But do you think there's the fact that 367 00:22:03,511 --> 00:22:06,950 Speaker 1: a federal national election is administered by the states in 368 00:22:06,951 --> 00:22:10,430 Speaker 1: the federal system that we have is inherently flawed. Do 369 00:22:10,471 --> 00:22:12,670 Speaker 1: you think it's possible for a national election to be 370 00:22:13,630 --> 00:22:17,031 Speaker 1: fair and fairly administered and equally administered across the country 371 00:22:17,271 --> 00:22:19,390 Speaker 1: when each state is in charge of their own operation. 372 00:22:20,350 --> 00:22:23,271 Speaker 3: Well, one answer to that question is that we've had 373 00:22:23,311 --> 00:22:30,311 Speaker 3: federal elections in which federal officials have involved in corrupt behavior. 374 00:22:30,671 --> 00:22:35,190 Speaker 3: So it doesn't necessarily mean that because they're state officials. 375 00:22:35,390 --> 00:22:40,951 Speaker 3: So that's one answer. Okay, I think that it's okay 376 00:22:41,271 --> 00:22:45,391 Speaker 3: to unless we amend the constitution, which is hard to do, 377 00:22:46,390 --> 00:22:51,311 Speaker 3: you can't change that procedure. I do think the answer 378 00:22:51,511 --> 00:22:57,710 Speaker 3: is for now for the Congress to give more powers 379 00:22:57,751 --> 00:23:02,870 Speaker 3: to the Election Assistance Commission to hold hearings which it 380 00:23:02,911 --> 00:23:07,870 Speaker 3: doesn't have, to call people in to monitor them, to 381 00:23:07,951 --> 00:23:12,391 Speaker 3: staff them, to show that some people weren't serious about it. 382 00:23:12,511 --> 00:23:14,991 Speaker 3: They didn't give their much staff to the commission that 383 00:23:15,191 --> 00:23:18,751 Speaker 3: commissioned it, didn't hardly had anybody to do anything. So 384 00:23:19,711 --> 00:23:23,311 Speaker 3: just putting some sunlight on what people were doing and 385 00:23:23,350 --> 00:23:26,671 Speaker 3: having enough staff to do that, I think would help 386 00:23:26,711 --> 00:23:30,110 Speaker 3: the process. 387 00:23:31,711 --> 00:23:34,991 Speaker 1: In twenty eighteen, Florida voters passed an amendment to the 388 00:23:34,991 --> 00:23:39,751 Speaker 1: state constitution restoring voting rights to approximately one million Floridians 389 00:23:39,751 --> 00:23:44,230 Speaker 1: with felonies on their records. The following year, Republican legislators 390 00:23:44,271 --> 00:23:47,551 Speaker 1: passed a law stating that people with felonies cannot cast 391 00:23:47,590 --> 00:23:50,751 Speaker 1: a ballot until they've paid off their outstanding fines and 392 00:23:50,791 --> 00:23:54,271 Speaker 1: court fees. As a result, most of the one million 393 00:23:54,271 --> 00:23:56,431 Speaker 1: people who regained the right to vote back in twenty 394 00:23:56,471 --> 00:24:08,031 Speaker 1: eighteen still can't actually do it. Fiasco BUSHVII Gore is 395 00:24:08,071 --> 00:24:11,350 Speaker 1: produced by Prolog Projects and district bed by Pushkin Industries. 396 00:24:11,870 --> 00:24:15,071 Speaker 1: The show is produced by Madeline kaplan Ulla Culpa, Andrew 397 00:24:15,110 --> 00:24:19,071 Speaker 1: Parsons and me Leon nafak We. Had additional editorial support 398 00:24:19,110 --> 00:24:22,670 Speaker 1: from Lisa Chase and Daniel Riley. Thanks for listening, We'll 399 00:24:22,671 --> 00:24:23,350 Speaker 1: see you next week.